response surface method

Upload: adiraju07

Post on 16-Oct-2015

75 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Response Surface Method

TRANSCRIPT

  • Response Surface Methodology

  • Contents Conclusion Further Study Basic Concept, Definition, & History of RSM Introduction ; Motivation DOE (Design Of Experiments) Experiments (Numerical) & Databases Construction of RSM (Response Surface Model) Optimization Using RS Model (Meta Model) Examples Efficient RS Modeling Using MLSM and Sensitivity Design Optimization Using RSM and Sensitivity

  • 1.1 Concept of Response Surface MethodOriginal SystemRSM : Response Surface Method : Response Surface Model

  • 1.2 Definition of Response Surface MethodA simple function, such as linear or quadratic polynomial, fitted to the data obtained from the experiments is called a response surface, and the approach is called the response surface method.Response surface method is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques useful for developing, improving, and optimizing processes.Response surface method is a method for constructing global approximations to system behavior based on results calculated at various points in the design space.Box G.E.P. and Draper N.R.,1987Myers R.H., 1995Roux W.J.,1998

  • 1.3 History of Response Surface Method1951 Box and Wilson - CCD1959 Kiefer - Start of D-optimal Design1960 Box and Behnken - Box-Behnken deign 1971 Box and Draper - D-optimal Design1972 Fedorov - exchange algorithm 1974 Mitchell - D-optimal Design1996 Burgee - design HSCT 1997 Ragon and Haftka - optimization of large wing structure 1998 Koch, Mavris, and Mistree - multi-level approximation1999 Choi / Mavris Robut, Reliablity-Based DesignResearch of DOEApplication in OptimizationApp in Optimization & Reduce the Approximation Error

  • 1.4 Introduction - Motivation of RSMHeavy Computation Problem ApproximationWhen Sensitivity is NOT AvailableGlobal BehaviorReal / Numerical ExperimentWhen the Batch Run is ImpossibleFor Any System Which has Inputs and ResponsesEasy to ImplementPart of MDO, Concurrent EngineeringProbabilistic ConceptNoisy Responses or EnvironmentsApproximation ErrorSize of the Approx. Domain is Very DominantAdvantagesDisadvantages

  • Part I(Classical RSM)

  • DOE (Design Of Experiments) Experiments (Numerical) & DatabasesOptimization Using RS Model (Meta Model)Construction of RSM (Response Surface Model)

  • 2.1 DOE 1 Factorial Design- 2 / 3 level Factorial Design- Full / Fractional Factorial Design2 level Full Factorial DesignFractional Factorial DesignClassifications

  • 2.1 DOE 2 Central Composite Design(CCD)Factorial PointsAxial PointsCenter Pointsx1x2-1 0 1103 DV2 DVQuadratic RS ModelEffective than Full-Factorial DesignRotatabilityCharacteristics

  • Quadratic RS ModelEffective 3 Level DesignBalanced Incomplete Block DesignCharacteristicsBlock1Block2Block3Center Point2.1 DOE 3 Box-Behnken Design

  • Good fittingThe Most Popular DOEArbitrary Number of Experiment PointsPossible to Add PointsSpecified Functional Form of the ResponseCharacteristicsApproximation Function(RSM)Coefficients of RSMVariance of Coefficients2.1 DOE 4 D-Optimal Design

  • 2.1 DOE 5 Latin-Hypercube DesignArbitrary Number of Experiment PointsNo Priori Knowledge of the Functional Form of the ResponseCharacteristics1. No. of Levels = No. of Experiments2. Experiment points in the design space are distributed as regular as possible.No. of Variables : kNo. of Experiments : nInitial InformationMain Principles

  • DOE (Design Of Experiments) Experiments (Numerical) & DatabasesOptimization Using RS Model (Meta Model)Construction of RSM (Response Surface Model)

  • 2.2 Experiments (Numerical) & DatabasesBlack BoxedSystem(FE Model)InputResponse*.bdf*.cdb*.f06 , *.pch*.rstNASTRANANSYSRewrite Input FilesRead Output Files

  • DOE (Design Of Experiments) Experiments (Numerical) & DatabasesOptimization Using RS Model (Meta Model)Construction of RSM (Response Surface Model)

  • 2.3 Construction of RSM Least Squares MethodInputResponse- Global Approximation 1 RS Function at all pts Constant Coefficients

  • - 1. Approximation Function(RSM)- 2. Least Squares Function- 4. The coefficients of the RS model - 3. Minimize Least Squares Function2.3 Construction of RSM Least Squares Method()DOE

  • 2.3 Example Construction Of RSMSoftwareJMP, SAS, SPSSMATLAB Statistics ToolboxVisual-DOCIn-House CodesNumber of Design Variable = 2Number of Experiment(FFD) = 9RS Model = Quadratic ModelOriginal FunctionRSM Function

    6math-2dv-table_analysis

    NoXlXu

    NOreal_x[1]real_x[2]output(1)-510NOreal_x1real_x2output(1)

    1-5.0-5.0-194.2RSM11-5.0-5.0-194.2RSM1

    22.5-5.0-98.81-30.16RSM1x1x2obj2-5.02.5-102.91-30.16

    310.0-5.0-228.7x17.89Xopt2.002674.649950.583453-5.010.0-128.4x17.89

    4-5.02.5-102.9x29.82True opt25642.5-5.0-98.8x29.82

    52.52.5-4.9x1*x1-2.00Error(%)0.134-7.001-90.27652.52.5-4.9x1*x1-2.00

    610.02.5-131.8x1*x20.03XlXu62.510.0-30.3x1*x20.03

    7-5.010.0-128.4x2*x2-1.06x1-510710.0-5.0-228.7x2*x2-1.06

    82.510.0-30.3x2-510810.02.5-131.8

    910.010.0-157.0910.010.0-157.0

    1-1.01.6-33.845590

    22.01.6-5.560000RSM2

    35.01.6-33.8455901-36.9533784593

    4-1.04.6-15.985860x110.9315140741RSM2x1x2obj

    52.04.65.840000x213.3437499259Xopt1.99855.18.01582

    65.04.6-15.985860x1*x1-2.7328785185True opt256

    7-1.07.6-24.436270x2*x2-1.307782963Error(%)-0.075233.597

    82.07.6-0.760000XlXu

    95.07.6-24.436270x1-15

    x21.67.6

    10.83.9-2.620000

    22.03.94.790000RSM3

    33.23.9-2.5800001-94.7374309609Xopt

  • 2.3 Construction of RSM Test CriteriaThe model was fitted well. F-Test (ANOVA)

  • The coefficient of determination t-TestAdjusted R2 Where Cjj diagonal term in (XX)-1 corresponding to bj xj is a dominant term of RS model 1.01.0Prediction Test2.3 Construction of RSM Test Criteria (Continued)

  • 2.3 Construction of RSM Variable SelectionAll Possible Regression Stepwise Regression Original SystemRS ModelConcept Forward regression Backward regression Stepwise regression (Backward + Forward )MinimizeUnnecessary Term

  • DOE (Design Of Experiments) Experiments (Numerical) & DatabasesOptimization Using RS Model (Meta Model)Construction of RSM (Response Surface Model)

  • 2.4 Optimization Using RSM - Whole SequencesApproximation DomainDOE & ExperimentsConstruct RSMOptimization Using RSMEstimated Opt ResponseFinal Optimal SolutionOptimization ProblemVariable Selection

  • 2.5 Example 1 System / Problem SetupInitial variablesMin : weights.t : Problem SetupSystem(FE Model)

  • 2.5 Example 1 Optimization Using RSM

  • 2.5 Example 2 - Induction Motor FE Model UpdateModel : WM0F3A-S Induction motor Upper HousingRotorStatorLower HousingReal SystemFE Model (NASTRAN)LMS CADA-XReliable FE Model ?? (close to Real Model )

  • 2.5 Example 2 - Modal Analysis(1/2)Rotor12Lower Housing12Upper Housing21Stator21

    42-4dvdot_results

    DVPhysicalXLXUX_OptexperiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)

    x1E of shaft1.50E+112.30E+112.251087E+11f19739851.23973.01-0.56978.46680.56

    x2E of mass around the shaft2.00E+101.50E+112.748357E+10f23305371112.283305.33-1.143343.4171.16

    x3density of shaft5.50E+031.02E+049.103201E+03

    x4density of mass5.50E+031.02E+045.728883E+03

    RSMf1f2

    1946.573506.15

    X197.29334.41

    X224.98194.90

    X3-116.17-505.70

    X4-31.67-34.08

    X1*X1-4.58-14.65

    X2*X14.9437.91

    X2*X2-13.52-105.41

    X3*X1-11.60-45.47

    X3*X2-3.25-30.68

    X3*X326.16110.51

    X4*X1-3.45-6.72

    X4*X20.054.38

    X4*X3-1.451.23

    X4*X48.376.08

    table_analysis2

    ============< EXPERIMENT RESULTS>===========

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nonorm_x(1)norm_x(2)norm_x(3)norm_x(4)norm_x(5)output(1)output(2)output(3)output(4)output(5)output(6)

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    11.00000-1.000001.00000-1.00000-1.00000534.77170725.75910750.93360788.439801559.255001553.62100RSMf1f2f3f4f5f6

    2-1.000001.000001.000001.00000-1.00000479.76860645.12040654.03290702.097701328.839001323.767001548.0439743.2894772.9851834.60161504.37491495.6679

    31.00000-1.000001.000001.000001.00000518.39940692.32230725.75910787.576801456.457001446.40800X188.9624112.0083121.9068132.3060279.0827276.2355

    4-0.483561.00000-1.000001.00000-1.00000617.51400843.59510877.17900943.010201674.687001666.22800X254.441276.985980.124784.2272149.4518148.9536

    5-1.00000-0.41306-1.000001.000001.00000454.71750672.16830700.37220749.328401179.787001174.04000X3-41.2243-68.3565-76.6626-84.0448-86.8328-85.5759

    6-0.512971.00000-1.00000-1.000001.00000573.36260834.87080872.77910936.409101503.949001495.76500X40.6236-1.8266-1.87180.30812.17041.7945

    71.00000-1.00000-1.00000-1.000000.20087614.59280843.43440888.86860963.682401684.116001671.69000X5-13.4569-8.1772-3.68360.0015-63.4594-64.2435

    81.00000-0.10189-0.03064-1.000001.00000616.26260838.07030882.47330957.018801699.889001687.51100X1*X1-2.9050-1.44552.0571-1.8728-3.4211-2.9685

    90.000380.009110.01237-1.00000-0.20345550.70090741.45690773.45880834.014401516.832001508.26800X2*X18.233110.040911.682312.039726.277026.1001

    101.00000-1.00000-1.000001.00000-1.00000634.90690847.91830888.86980964.580601783.788001771.48100X2*X2-2.7138-6.1382-5.6414-4.7563-7.0117-7.1538

    11-0.08905-1.00000-0.069540.115201.00000472.94490657.50590687.35150740.084701273.567001266.16900X3*X1-8.2340-8.0816-9.7955-12.3413-18.5078-17.9511

    12-1.000001.00000-0.06239-0.085730.16044499.60630695.72540720.96730772.731001333.066001327.20000X3*X2-3.4086-6.8931-10.0031-7.7431-6.5885-6.9472

    13-0.318631.000001.000001.000001.00000519.23240706.82120735.89190791.873401413.817001406.35600X3*X34.038614.549514.405313.08966.40986.7105

    14-1.00000-1.00000-1.00000-1.000001.00000424.53500627.69020654.02940699.745701101.463001096.09900X4*X10.4942-0.6353-1.81050.76501.60981.2187

    151.000001.000001.00000-1.000000.68970637.84310854.58180888.86890964.737201799.815001787.70700X4*X20.6120-0.24791.30990.73410.73290.7866

    161.000001.00000-0.106261.000000.00507701.17350936.32150984.222201067.977001965.080001951.40100X4*X3-0.82920.83632.0438-0.7567-1.8627-1.4214

    17-1.00000-0.71783-1.00000-0.98631-1.00000472.23090653.38680676.70670725.424501264.415001258.90900X4*X40.0736-3.8829-5.3938-1.19710.6660-0.0535

    19-1.00000-1.000001.000001.00000-1.00000391.77350526.94090534.01570573.260801085.255001081.11300X5*X11.3416-3.3939-5.31431.4236-3.8684-4.9619

    200.08853-0.31342-0.051140.05249-1.00000553.68380744.58720763.20000823.844901552.609001544.23400X5*X2-0.9562-1.1874-0.94530.6149-5.1926-5.4441

    211.000000.386941.000000.21867-1.00000620.58900842.23540871.37160914.975801809.421001802.87400X5*X33.2141-3.8777-0.8033-0.85439.12459.0700

    22-0.26917-1.000001.00000-0.153480.12740435.91310582.53520605.70320652.324301205.054001198.88600X5*X4-0.33191.40291.7532-0.0788-1.2220-0.9251

    23-1.00000-0.182631.00000-1.000001.00000408.92570565.84500586.04080628.231101094.878001090.11200X5*X5-0.02685.71234.44870.52423.24793.9552

    241.000000.56748-1.000000.296431.00000709.19790993.304701048.665001136.249001918.790001904.38900

    250.03894-0.13044-0.024950.11185-0.10011546.74130737.79880770.10830830.521901503.750001495.11200

    26-0.514791.000001.00000-1.00000-1.00000524.16660711.01910712.62540766.975801471.670001465.37100

    27-0.01132-0.08150-1.000000.02262-0.07203588.93910818.85550856.65240922.779101586.984001577.57100

    28-1.000000.15386-0.033060.086420.00098464.44350643.20930666.22360714.166901242.913001237.49100

    290.19101-0.071631.000001.00000-0.12982523.42620704.79840721.37420779.163001471.012001462.92200

    f1~f5

    opt ptgoodDVPhysicalXLXUX_Opt

    x1thickness1.00E-031.40E-031.15E-03

    x2E1(body)8.00E+101.20E+119.12E+10

    x3density12.40E+033.60E+032.40E+03

    x4E2(solid)1.60E+112.40E+112.28E+11

    x5density26.29E+039.43E+038.75E+03

    at opt ptexperiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)

    f1567548-3.35533.15640.35531.29922-6.30

    f27167413.49754.1939-0.46757.67895.82

    f3790773-2.15785.656-0.87792.54790.32

    f4904834-7.74852.83870.11851.9276-5.76

    f51339150312.251414.3050.331409.7025.28

    f6144614953.391404.909-0.201407.674-2.65

    f1~f6bad

    opt ptthicknessE1(body)density1E2(solid)density2

    x1x2x3x4x5

    1.12E-031.01E+112.56E+032.00E+118.90E+03

    at opt ptexperiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)

    f1567548-3.3509700176535.328-7.4163366251578.211.9770723104

    f27167413.4916201117759.821-6.4110017614811.8713.3896648045

    f3790773-2.1518987342793.457-6.7157704155850.587.6683544304

    f4904834-7.7433628319853.5425-6.8490123322916.31.360619469

    f51339150312.24794622851420.99231-8.35352705391550.51515.7964899178

    f6144614953.38865836791412.9608-8.25334985211540.0686.5053941909

    12table_doe-normalized

    Nonorm_x[1]norm_x[2]norm_x[3]norm_x[4]output(1)output(2)output(3)output(4)

    1111-1861.37991119.88201262.22002127.5100

    2-11-11593.9438772.7447876.77491455.3170

    310.063-1-1692.2947886.3386932.30091581.0520

    411-11594.4263772.7935886.57991475.9830

    51-0.057811664.2859847.9056899.98641508.0560

    61-1-11533.0735647.6674658.67111097.1680RSMf1f2f3f4

    710.01540.0017-1756.4104967.29331013.34301719.39801675.136238866.561642903.5014471519.143373

    8-11-1-1727.4170946.41381055.03201772.8130X10.4884543.1539654.44446517.71174

    9-1-111629.9476749.6078779.28511255.0930X237.33801284.728206130.236345234.481056

    1011-1-0.1022657.9166855.3408973.55301629.8210X357.33865471.27228578.080769128.985523

    11-0.0661-11-1771.8763907.7280954.45741549.3810X4-69.093909-83.177185-88.319683-150.983724

    12-1-1-11532.4053633.6316658.61611060.8180X1*X10.295007-0.0664531.5242853.100661

    131-1-1-1652.8362776.6903806.70101335.0060X2*X10.087048-4.101323.339613-4.169078

    141-11-1772.4413918.8292954.50151579.4790X2*X20.76397-21.57188415.1659410.717691

    15-0.02361-0.0931-1790.90321028.69501152.26001938.0650X3*X10.030551-0.8720181.4557261.454112

    16-0.0004111703.0032914.35051042.24201731.9390X3*X23.0267967.1939710.49383219.276498

    17-1-1-1-1652.0067759.5267806.63351290.4260X3*X3-2.830685-3.866636-3.94694-6.71652

    18-1110.1231760.5209989.48431115.47501859.8020X4*X1-0.07608-0.825291-0.170855-2.048003

    191-10.15510.1714637.0615768.6475787.17711308.4180X4*X2-3.765359-12.562131-8.445428-23.303408

    200.0346-0.11831-0.0434728.0571928.3646964.56701619.8500X4*X3-5.720911-8.275237-5.949173-12.394537

    21-1-10.106-1720.5182839.2650891.39531425.9700X4*X410.8452611.93175314.28822623.632609

    22-10.22051-1825.26671061.11901112.58301874.6340

    opt ptPhysicalxLXUX Opt

    x1height of stiffener1.00E-031.40E-031.29E-03

    x2thickness of shell1.00E-031.40E-031.37E-03

    x3E of body5.00E+107.00E+105.00E+10

    x4density of body2.40E+033.60E+032.98E+03

    at opt ptexperiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)

    f1628675.5357.57647.149719-0.11647.88643.17

    f2863863.99930.12844.8399660.47840.9149-2.56

    f3919906.6369-1.35938.8532-0.48943.33612.65

    f416361520.64-7.051576.9646-0.051577.774-3.56

    1st RSMb1h1b2h2tE1density1E2density2

    1X1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8X9

    675.5350.0140.070.0870.3837.4454.123-58.8520.003-0.009

    Sheet1

    3statorx_lowerx_upperx_normalizedx_realobjfunc call

    x1(E)1.80E+102.20E+100.9514752.19E+101.79E+0431RSMf1f2

    x2(density)77008020-0.3085227.81E+0311462.22333333331474.2063333333

    x173.210573.8105

    x2-14.874-14.996

    DVPhysicalXLXUX_Optx1*x1-1.8335-1.8485

    x1(E)1.80E+102.20E+102.192E+10x1*x2-0.74525-0.75125

    x2(density)770080207.815E+03x2*x20.2270.229

    experiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)

    f1144014621.531535.09480.001535.0796.60

    f216421474-10.231547.6750.001547.659-5.75

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • 2.5 Example 2 - Model Update Using RSM : Rotor

  • 2.5 Example 2 - Model Update Using RSM: Other Parts

  • 2.5 Example 2 - Model Assemble & Analysis4312Mode ShapeNatural FrequenciesThese good Results are from the good part models Sensitivities of all design variables w.r.t. the each frequencies5 Design Variables are selected

    Sheet1

    1_22

    1D.V.Physical PropertyxLXUX OptexperiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)RSMf1f2f3f4RSMf1f2f3f4f5f6

    x1height of stiffener1.00E-031.40E-031.29E-03f1628675.5357.57647.149719-0.11647.88643.171675.136866.562903.5011519.1431548.044743.289772.985834.6021504.3751495.668

    x2thickness of shell1.00E-031.40E-031.37E-03f2863863.99930.12844.8399660.47840.9149-2.56X10.4883.1544.44417.712X188.962112.008121.907132.306279.083276.236

    x3E of body5.00E+107.00E+105.00E+10f3919906.6369-1.35938.8532-0.48943.33612.65X237.33884.728130.236234.481X254.44176.98680.12584.227149.452148.954

    x4density of body2.40E+033.60E+032.98E+03f416361520.64-7.051576.9646-0.051577.774-3.56X357.33971.27278.081128.986X3-41.224-68.357-76.663-84.045-86.833-85.576

    X4-69.094-83.177-88.320-150.984X40.624-1.827-1.8720.3082.1701.795

    X1*X10.295-0.0661.5243.101X5-13.457-8.177-3.6840.001-63.459-64.243

    2DVPhysical PropertyXLXUX_OptexperiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)X2*X10.087-4.1013.340-4.169X1*X1-2.905-1.4462.057-1.873-3.421-2.969

    x1thickness of Shell1.00E-031.40E-031.1465E-03f1567548-3.35533.15640.35531.29922-6.30X2*X20.764-21.57215.1660.718X2*X18.23310.04111.68212.04026.27726.100

    x2E1(body) of Body8.00E+101.20E+119.1167E+10f27167413.49754.1939-0.46757.67895.82X3*X10.031-0.8721.4561.454X2*X2-2.714-6.138-5.641-4.756-7.012-7.154

    x3density1 of body2.40E+033.60E+032.4000E+03f3790773-2.15785.656-0.87792.54790.32X3*X23.0277.19410.49419.276X3*X1-8.234-8.082-9.795-12.341-18.508-17.951

    x4E2(solid) of bearing1.60E+112.40E+112.2756E+11f4904834-7.74852.83870.11851.9276-5.76X3*X3-2.831-3.867-3.947-6.717X3*X2-3.409-6.893-10.003-7.743-6.589-6.947

    x5density2 of bearing6.29E+039.43E+038.7550E+03f51339150312.251414.3050.331409.7025.28X4*X1-0.076-0.825-0.171-2.048X3*X34.03914.54914.40513.0906.4106.710

    f6144614953.391404.909-0.201407.674-2.65X4*X2-3.765-12.562-8.445-23.303X4*X10.494-0.635-1.8100.7651.6101.219

    3DVPhysical PropertyXLXUX_OptX4*X3-5.721-8.275-5.949-12.395X4*X20.612-0.2481.3100.7340.7330.787

    x1(E) of Stator1.80E+102.20E+102.1916E+10experiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)X4*X410.84511.93214.28823.633X4*X3-0.8290.8362.044-0.757-1.863-1.421

    x2(density) of Stator770080207.8147E+03f1144014621.531535.09480.001535.0796.60X4*X40.074-3.883-5.394-1.1970.666-0.053

    f216421474-10.231547.6750.001547.659-5.754_2X5*X11.342-3.394-5.3141.424-3.868-4.962

    RSMf1f2X5*X2-0.956-1.187-0.9450.615-5.193-5.444

    4DVPhysical PropertyXLXUX_OptexperiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)1946.5713506.149X5*X33.214-3.878-0.803-0.8549.1259.070

    x1E of shaft1.50E+112.30E+112.2511E+11f19739851.23973.01-0.56978.46680.56X197.292334.412X5*X4-0.3321.4031.753-0.079-1.222-0.925

    x2E of mass around the shaft2.00E+101.50E+112.7484E+10f23305371112.283305.33-1.143343.4171.16X224.977194.899X5*X5-0.0275.7124.4490.5243.2483.955

    x3density of shaft5.50E+031.02E+049.1032E+03X3-116.175-505.701

    x4density of mass5.50E+031.02E+045.7289E+03X4-31.671-34.082

    X1*X1-4.576-14.6463

    experiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)X2*X14.94237.912RSMf1f2

    f1451474.415.19474.410.00474.415.19X2*X2-13.524-105.41211462.2231474.206

    52DVPhysicalDirectionXLXUX_Optf2502492.22-1.95492.220.00492.21-1.95X3*X1-11.604-45.470x173.21173.811

    x1spring k(bearing)z2.00E+033.80E+041.743098E+04f3613609.48-0.57601.680.05601.41-1.89X3*X2-3.247-30.679x2-14.874-14.996

    x2spring k(connection)z2.00E+093.80E+102.030161E+10f4624613.79-1.64613.250.44610.58-2.15X3*X326.162110.512x1*x1-1.833-1.848

    x3spring k(bearing)y/x2.00E+093.80E+102.032543E+10f5763789.073.42771.160.01771.111.06X4*X1-3.455-6.716x1*x2-0.745-0.751

    x4spring k(bearing)y/x1.41E+092.68E+101.433662E+10f611021031.06-6.441031.070.001031.06-6.44X4*X20.0464.380x2*x20.2270.229

    f711101063.21-4.221063.210.001063.21-4.22X4*X3-1.4471.227

    f815381378.92-10.341378.950.001378.92-10.34X4*X48.3736.079

    5_8

    58DVPhysicalXLXUX_OptexperiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)RSMf1f2f3f4f5f6f7f8

    x1Elasticity of shaft1.58E+112.93E+112.461909E+11f1451474.415.19472.22-0.11472.754.821472.249675490.226377584.827227611.073596765.8308151022.6827271050.6131541392.179764

    x2Density of shaft6.37E+031.18E+046.372241E+03f2502492.21-1.95496.740.24495.55-1.28X138.21598441.387634.346765.786113-0.96907995.766765109.63835375.462943

    x3Density of mass on shaft4.01E+037.45E+036.186602E+03f3613601.41-1.89601.460.20600.27-2.08X2-3.412597-4.69781-2.182844-0.928528-3.409813-32.953164-36.426914-108.367014

    x4Elasticity of lower body6.38E+101.19E+119.852380E+10f4624610.58-2.15632.94-0.23634.381.66X3-46.622506-46.592922-4.211997-5.124542-3.081245-79.837016-90.868693-23.791534

    x5Elasticity of upper body3.50E+106.50E+104.437427E+10f5763771.111.06753.622.35736.35-3.49X410.36216715.36587460.90499583.10845620.09743731.68125335.28472682.790203

    f611021031.06-6.441067.40.311064.08-3.44X515.6186188.2781021.1785141.78604156.09910813.5761784.3911821.901104

    f711101063.21-4.221102.431.031091.15-1.70X1*X1-9.249617-10.7555413.7892493.850869-3.114455-7.573029-11.547198-38.483735

    f815381378.92-10.341554.530.991539.360.09X2*X12.8374742.764556-2.560242-2.023085-1.031511-1.2215992.84187120.535164

    X2*X2-1.220529-0.7510141.0052111.4796997.2193083.6225433.34337624.606745

    X3*X10.8322932.633564-5.859659-5.932582-4.753774-31.582848-32.605836-3.010238

    X3*X20.2286281.3308231.3739890.8027880.01053922.96310332.587405-28.675277

    X3*X37.3431757.6770754.3504644.042839-1.10160619.90503218.88109119.123374

    X4*X17.2361189.457747-5.313963-6.804532-2.426263-22.41176-13.093192-16.831496

    X4*X2-2.164786-1.2533221.482595-0.0093030.0634258.0294945.19078223.421585

    X4*X3-5.461929-7.5770333.658897.521769-3.12607926.02382419.09131-1.343106

    X4*X4-2.652697-4.232089-8.332874-4.145229-11.08825210.9248518.591516-27.327853

    X5*X13.4315262.460812-0.11362-4.020144.02793114.27747515.136914-3.991974

    X5*X23.6925444.183426-2.864545-4.451858-0.6697589.60669412.5632082.543733

    X5*X3-2.519702-2.1257850.6987481.726843-0.392715-8.572588-9.436356-17.375372

    X5*X4-0.916958-1.0474031.3190663.54382719.799911-10.837183-10.9395824.281333

    X5*X54.6950384.605444-6.422384-8.499246-12.0468759.02672412.536395-6.587147

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

    Sheet1

    domain3RSM+DOTdomain4RSM+DOT

    obj=34.1obj=30.6

    DVPhysicalXLXUX_OptexperiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)realerror(%)realerror(%)

    x1Elasticityshaft1.58E+112.93E+112.461909E+11f1451474.415.19472.22-0.11472.754.82+471.1594.47469.434.09

    x2Densityshaft6.37E+031.18E+046.372241E+03f2502492.21-1.95496.740.24495.55-1.28497.048-0.99499.31-0.54

    x3Densitymass around shaft4.01E+037.45E+036.186602E+03f3613601.41-1.89601.460.20600.27-2.08+600.532-2.03600.06-2.11

    x4Elasticitylower body6.38E+101.19E+119.852380E+10f4624610.58-2.15632.94-0.23634.381.66+633.9411.59633.371.50

    x5Elasticityupper body3.50E+106.50E+104.437427E+10f5763771.111.06753.622.35736.35-3.49753.059-1.30752.72-1.35

    f611021031.06-6.441067.40.311064.08-3.44+1085.994-1.451080.91-1.91

    f711101063.21-4.221102.431.031091.15-1.70+1091.740-1.651096.86-1.18

    f815381378.92-10.341554.530.991539.360.09+1538.5360.031538.530.03

    206.2667340752sumsq58.927214949334.1405460532

    RSM+DOT

    0experiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)realerror(%)

    f1451474.415.19468.9472-0.79472.674.81471.1594.47

    f2502492.21-1.95496.4845-0.88500.87-0.23497.048-0.99

    f3613601.41-1.89603.2610.61599.61-2.18600.532-2.03

    f4624610.58-2.15634.03820.26632.421.35633.9411.59

    f5763771.111.06749.31882.70729.64-4.37753.059-1.30

    f611021031.06-6.441088.52-0.831097.65-0.391085.994-1.45

    f711101063.21-4.221093.472-1.341108.28-0.161091.740-1.65

    f815381378.92-10.341527.535-0.711538.410.031538.5360.03

    sumsq49.03193233634.1405460532

    -0.5experiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)Finalerror(%)

    f1451474.415.19469.1766-0.61472.074.67471.0234.44

    DVPhysicalReal_xl(i)Real_xu(i)f2502492.21-1.95495.8851-0.45498.14-0.77After497.065-0.98

    x1Elasticityshaft2.00E+113.50E+11f3613601.41-1.89604.10760.53600.95-1.97Gradient600.424-2.05

    x2Densityshaft2.50E+038.00E+03f4624610.58-2.15633.6846-0.10634.351.66Based633.7731.57

    x3Densitymass around shaft6.00E+031.20E+04f5763771.111.06748.35523.06726.16-4.83Method751.891-1.46

    x4Elasticitylower body6.38E+101.19E+11f611021031.06-6.441087.693-0.271090.66-1.031086.141-1.44

    x5Elasticityupper body3.50E+106.50E+10f711101063.21-4.221091.187-1.081103.06-0.621092.040-1.62

    f815381378.92-10.341534.986-0.221538.400.031538.5290.03

    Objective206.26753.78734.149

    objrsmobj obj

    DVPropertyPartReal_xl(i)Real_xu(i)

    x1Elasticityshaft1.00E+113.50E+11

    x2Densityshaft2.50E+031.20E+04

    x3Densitymass around shaft2.50E+031.20E+04

    x4Elasticitylower body6.38E+101.19E+11

    x5Elasticityupper body3.50E+106.50E+10

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • 2.5 Example 2 - Model Update : Whole MotorFinal Results Using Hybrid MethodOptimizationGradient-based OptimizationHybrid(RSM+GRAD) Optimization

    Sheet1

    domain3RSM+DOTdomain4RSM+DOT

    obj=34.1obj=30.6

    DVPhysicalXLXUX_OptexperiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)realerror(%)realerror(%)

    x1Elasticityshaft1.58E+112.93E+112.461909E+11f1451474.415.19472.22-0.11472.754.82+471.1594.47469.434.09

    x2Densityshaft6.37E+031.18E+046.372241E+03f2502492.21-1.95496.740.24495.55-1.28497.048-0.99499.31-0.54

    x3Densitymass around shaft4.01E+037.45E+036.186602E+03f3613601.41-1.89601.460.20600.27-2.08+600.532-2.03600.06-2.11

    x4Elasticitylower body6.38E+101.19E+119.852380E+10f4624610.58-2.15632.94-0.23634.381.66+633.9411.59633.371.50

    x5Elasticityupper body3.50E+106.50E+104.437427E+10f5763771.111.06753.622.35736.35-3.49753.059-1.30752.72-1.35

    f611021031.06-6.441067.40.311064.08-3.44+1085.994-1.451080.91-1.91

    f711101063.21-4.221102.431.031091.15-1.70+1091.740-1.651096.86-1.18

    f815381378.92-10.341554.530.991539.360.09+1538.5360.031538.530.03

    206.2667340752sumsq58.927214949334.1405460532

    RSM+DOT

    0experiInitialerror(%)predictedpredic errrealerror(%)realerror(%)

    f1451474.415.19468.9472-0.79472.674.81471.1594.47

    f2502492.21-1.95496.4845-0.88500.87-0.23497.048-0.99

    f3613601.41-1.89603.2610.61599.61-2.18600.532-2.03

    f4624610.58-2.15634.03820.26632.421.35633.9411.59

    f5763771.111.06749.31882.70729.64-4.37753.059-1.30

    f611021031.06-6.441088.52-0.831097.65-0.391085.994-1.45

    f711101063.21-4.221093.472-1.341108.28-0.161091.740-1.65

    f815381378.92-10.341527.535-0.711538.410.031538.5360.03

    sumsq49.03193233634.1405460532

    -0.5ExperiInitialerror(%)Predictedpredic errRealerror(%)Finalerror(%)

    f1451474.415.19469.1766-0.61472.074.67471.0234.44

    DVPhysicalReal_xl(i)Real_xu(i)f2502492.21-1.95495.8851-0.45498.14-0.77After497.065-0.98

    x1Elasticityshaft2.00E+113.50E+11f3613601.41-1.89604.10760.53600.95-1.97Gradient600.424-2.05

    x2Densityshaft2.50E+038.00E+03f4624610.58-2.15633.6846-0.10634.351.66Based633.7731.57

    x3Densitymass around shaft6.00E+031.20E+04f5763771.111.06748.35523.06726.16-4.83Method751.891-1.46

    x4Elasticitylower body6.38E+101.19E+11f611021031.06-6.441087.693-0.271090.66-1.031086.141-1.44

    x5Elasticityupper body3.50E+106.50E+10f711101063.21-4.221091.187-1.081103.06-0.621092.040-1.62

    f815381378.92-10.341534.986-0.221538.400.031538.5290.03

    Objective206.26753.78734.149

    objrsmobj obj

    DVPhysicalReal_xl(i)Real_xu(i)

    x1Elasticityshaft1.00E+113.50E+11

    x2Densityshaft2.50E+031.20E+04

    x3Densitymass around shaft2.50E+031.20E+04

    x4Elasticitylower body6.38E+101.19E+11

    x5Elasticityupper body3.50E+106.50E+10

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • Example by k.k.choi, U. of Iowa, Moving Least Square Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization, WCSMO4, 2001 2.5 Example 3 - AUTOMOTIVE SIDE IMPACT

  • ReferencesNguyen, N. K., and Miller, F. L. A Review of Some Exchange Algorithms for Constructing discrete D-optimal Designs, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 14, 1992, pp.489-49 Myers, R. H., and Montgomery, D. C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. John Wiley & Sons. Inc., New York, 1995 , , , 1998 , , , 1996 , Efficient Response Surface Modeling and Design Optimization Using Sensitivity, , , 2001

  • Part II(Advanced RSM)

  • 3.1 Introduction-MotivationEfficient Construction of RSM using SensitivityOptimization using RSM and Sensitivity-based MethodReduce the Computation Time Effect of Function & SensitivityReduce Approximation Errors Local & Global Approximation (MLSM)RSM Optimization Global Behavior / Large Approximation ErrorSensitivity-based Optimization Accurate & Fast Convergence / local Behavior Function TestInduction Motor FE Model UpdateRestriction-Available Cheap Sensitivity

  • InputResponse- Global Approximation 1 RS Function at all pts Constant Coefficients3.2 Moving Least Squares MethodInputResponse Local Approximation 1 RS Function at 1 pt Various Coefficients

  • 3.2 Numerical Derivation (1/2) Moving Least Squares Method- Response Function- Least Squares Function- The coefficients of the RS model Function of location x

  • 3.2 Numerical Derivation (2/2) MLSM with Sensitivity- New Least Squares Function- The coefficients of the RS model - Gradient Function

  • Rosenbrock Function 3.2 Numerical Examples (Graphical Analysis)Basis Model : QuadraticWeight Function of Resp : 4th order polynomialsWeight Function of Grad : 4th order polynomialsFunction Characteristics Banana Function V-shaped Valley

    Sheet1

    SSE/n

    PbrunSensitivityMLSMX2Bi- X2

    TF316XX2.809E+051.870E-10

    1.837E+061.836E+06

    1.911E+053.391E+04

    X1.57.346E+02X

    1.927E+06

    3.424E+04

    opt1opt11.005E+038.687E+02

    1.655E+051.511E+05

    2.744E+042.712E+04

    Use ofUse ofBasisSSE/n of RespSSE/n of GradSSE/n of Resp

    NoSensitivityMLSMModelfor 16 Experi ptsfor 16 Experi ptsfor 100 Test ptsDataClassical LSMMoving LSMMLSM with Sensitivity

    1XXQuadratic2.809E+051.837E+061.911E+05SSE/n of Resp for 16 Experi pts2.809E+057.346E+021.005E+03

    2Bi-Quadratic1.870E-101.836E+063.391E+04SSE/n of Grad for 16 Experi pts1.837E+061.927E+061.655E+05

    3XOQuadratic7.346E+021.927E+063.424E+04SSE/n of Resp for 100 Test pts1.911E+053.424E+042.744E+04

    4Bi-QuadraticXXX

    5OOQuadratic1.005E+031.655E+052.744E+04Original FunctionClassical LSMMoving LSMMLSM with Sensitivity

    6Bi-Quadratic8.687E+021.511E+052.712E+04

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • 3.2 Numerical Examples (Error Analysis)Global ErrorSSE/n = Sum of Squared Errors / No of Sampling PtsSSE/nt = Sum of Squared Errors / No of Test PtsGrad ErrorResp ErrorError Table

    Sheet1

    SSE/n

    PbrunSensitivityMLSMX2Bi- X2

    TF316XX2.809E+051.870E-10W X

    1.837E+061.836E+06

    1.911E+053.391E+04

    X1.57.346E+02X

    1.927E+06

    3.424E+04

    opt1opt11.005E+038.687E+02

    1.655E+051.511E+05

    2.744E+042.712E+04

    Use ofUse ofBasisSSE/n of RespSSE/n of GradSSE/n of Resp

    NoSensitivityMLSMModelfor 16 Experi ptsfor 16 Experi ptsfor 100 Test ptsDataClassical LSMMoving LSMMLSM with Sensitivity

    1XXQuadratic2.809E+051.837E+061.911E+05SSE/n of Resp at 16 Experi pts2.81E+057.35E+023.47E+03

    2Bi-Quadratic1.870E-101.836E+063.391E+04SSE/n of Grad at 16 Experi pts1.84E+061.93E+063.81E+05

    3XOQuadratic7.346E+021.927E+063.424E+04SSE/nt of Resp at 100 Test pts1.91E+053.42E+042.41E+04

    4Bi-QuadraticXXX

    5OOQuadratic1.005E+031.655E+052.744E+04Original FunctionClassical LSMMoving LSMMLSM with Sensitivity

    6Bi-Quadratic8.687E+021.511E+052.712E+04

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • 3.2 Numerical Examples (Graphical Analysis)2D six-hump camel back function 4 local optimums and 2 global optimums within the bounded regionBasis Model : QuadraticWeight Function of Resp : 4th order polynomialsWeight Function of Grad : Exponential

    Sheet1

    SSE/n

    PbrunSensitivityMLSMX2Bi- X2

    TF316XX2.809E+051.870E-10W X

    1.837E+061.836E+06

    1.911E+053.391E+04

    X1.57.346E+02X

    1.927E+06

    3.424E+04

    opt1opt11.005E+038.687E+02

    1.655E+051.511E+05

    2.744E+042.712E+04

    Use ofUse ofBasisSSE/n of RespSSE/n of GradSSE/n of Resp

    NoSensitivityMLSMModelfor 16 Experi ptsfor 16 Experi ptsfor 100 Test ptsDataClassical LSMMoving LSMMLSM with Sensitivity

    1XXQuadratic2.809E+051.837E+061.911E+05SSE/n of Resp for 16 Experi pts2.809E+057.346E+021.005E+03

    2Bi-Quadratic1.870E-101.836E+063.391E+04SSE/n of Grad for 16 Experi pts1.837E+061.927E+061.655E+05

    3XOQuadratic7.346E+021.927E+063.424E+04SSE/n of Resp for 100 Test pts1.911E+053.424E+042.744E+04

    4Bi-QuadraticXXX

    5OOQuadratic1.005E+031.655E+052.744E+04Original FunctionClassical LSM/Moving LSMMLSM with SensitivityMLSM with Sensitivity

    6Bi-Quadratic8.687E+021.511E+052.712E+04

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • 3.2 Numerical Examples (Error Analysis)Error TableGlobal ErrorGrad ErrorResp ErrorSSE/n = Sum of Squared Errors / No of Sampling PtsSSE/nt = Sum of Squared Errors / No of Test Pts

    Sheet1

    DataClassical LSMMoving LSMMLSM with Sensitivity

    SSE/n of Resp at 16 Experi pts4.23E-164.23E-163.02E-04

    SSE/n of Grad at 16 Experi pts5.80E+015.80E+012.26E-01

    SSE/nt of Resp at 100 Test pts5.79E-015.79E-011.85E-01

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • 3.2 Numerical Examples (Efficiency Test)

  • 3.3 Concept of Hybrid Optimization of RSM & gradient-based optimization Original ResponseRSM ResponseOptimum By RSMTrue Optimum by Gradient-based optimizationHybrid Optimization (Function Plot)Hybrid Optimization (Contour Plot)Using Response Surface Method (Adv) Global Behavior (Dis) Large Approximation ErrorUsing Gradient-Based Method (Adv) Accurate & Fast Convergence (Dis) local Behavior Use the approximated Function instead of the original systemSearch the direction s.t. improve the objectiveUse the original system

  • 3.3 Sequences of the optimization

  • 3.3 Numerical ExampleOptimization Problem

  • 3.4 ConclusionEfficient Construction of RSM using SensitivityLocal & Global Approximation (MLSM) Reduce the Approximation ErrorsEffect of Function & Sensitivity Reduce the Calculation TimeOptimization using RSM and Sensitivity-based MethodRSM Optimization Global BehaviorSensitivity-based Optimization Accurate & Fast ConvergenceFunction Tests Accuracy & Efficiency Function Test & Induction Motor FE Model Update

  • 3.4 Further Study Apply to Real Optimization Problems Using these Methods

    Reliability-Based Design Optimization Using This RSM

    Proper Selection of The Weight Factor of Gradient Error (SWg)

    Use of Design Of Experiments

  • 3.5 Other Approximation MethodsKriging ModelNeural Network