resource pack for teachers global citizenship mini ... · global citizenship mini challenge ks4...
TRANSCRIPT
The National Assembly for Wales is made up of 60 Assembly Members from across Wales. They are elected by the people of Wales to represent them and their communities, make laws for Wales, agree Welsh taxes and to make sure the Welsh Government is doing its job properly.
©National Assembly for Wales Commission Copyright 2016The text of this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading or derogatory context. The material must be acknowledged as copyright of the National Assembly for Wales Commission and the title of the document specified.
Global Citizenship Mini Challenge KS4-
‘Sugary Drinks – a challenge for government or
us?’
Introduction
The National Assembly for Wales is made up of 60 Assembly Members from across Wales. They are
elected by the people of Wales to represent them and their communities, make laws for Wales and to
ensure the Welsh Government is doing its job properly.
The Assembly’s Education and Youth Engagement Service provides free tailored education
programmes for schools, colleges and youth groups. Our aim is to involve young people in the work of
the Assembly and encourage them to get involved in the democratic process.
We think it’s important that children and young people develop an understanding of issues that affect
their lives so that they can make informed and responsible decisions as citizens. Our learning
programmes offer activities and opportunities to discuss political issues, either at the Assembly’s
centre for learning, Siambr Hywel, or at a school, college, university or youth organisation.
The debates in Siambr Hywel will contribute to the Critical Thinking and Problem Solving aspects, for
example by allowing students to ‘be able to justify decisions’; ‘identify and develop arguments’ and
‘critically assess the strength of options and arguments, take into account opposing views or
alternative ideas, validity and reliability’.
This mini challenge, under the theme ‘nutrition,’ is designed to develop skills in preparation for the
assessed Challenge Brief.
This teacher’s guide will assist the completion of the Student Resource Pack. The student resource
pack contains the necessary information needed for learners to complete the mini challenge. To
accompany the Student Resource Pack is an Information Resource Pack for additional information.
After the completion of this mini challenge, you can book a visit with the National Assembly for Wales’
Education Service to see how the Assembly deals with nutrition and other topical issues in Wales.
Contact us on 0300 200 6565 to book your visit.
Activity Overview
Activity Description Outcomes Developed
01. Understanding Nutrition.
Looking at diets around the world.
Pupils to understand differences in diets
around the globe, in particular the
consumption of sugar and sweeteners.
PowerPoint slides: 5, 6, 7 and 8.
Student resource numbers: 1, 2 and 3.
02. Is sugar damaging our health?
Pupils to consider the issue of sugar in
our diets, using a PESTLE frame.
Pupils understand the PESTLE frame as a
tool for analysis.
PowerPoint slides: 9.
Student resource pack: PESTLE grid.
03. Facts and opinions about sugar. Develop critical literacy skills through
considering different written, visual and
numerical sources
PowerPoint slides: 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Student resource numbers: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and
9.
4. The sugar tax debate in Wales and the
UK.
Consider different viewpoints on one
solution.
Pupils to consider alternative opinions, views
and arguments.
PowerPoint slides: 15, 16 and 17.
Student resource numbers: 10 and 11.
Student resource pack: For and against
table.
5. Groups prepare a SWOT analysis of a
solution.
Pupils assess decision using a SWOT tool.
Pupils evaluate concepts and reflect on
problem solving.
PowerPoint slides: 18.
Student resource pack: Two SWOT tables.
6. Personal Standpoint.
Through class discussion or debate in the
Assembly’s Young Person’s Debating
Chamber- Siambr Hywel- students decide
their personal standpoint and vote.
Topic for debate:
‘Sugary Drinks – a challenge for
government or us?’
‘A sugar tax-could it work?’
Pupils understand problem solving and
decision making techniques.
Students develop a detailed understanding
of the issue.
PowerPoint slides: 19.
Student resource pack: Area for notes.
Raising Awareness. Generate appropriate and realistic ideas for
raising awareness.
PowerPoint slides: 20.
Student resource pack: Area for notes.
Reflection. Pupils reflect on critical thinking and the
problem solving process.
PowerPoint slides: 21.
Student resource pack: Personal reflection
grid.
Activity 1: Understanding Nutrition
A class discussion introducing the term Nutrition.
Use slide numbers 5 to 9 to discuss the differences in diets across the world.
Video is from Buzzfeed using YouTube, and summarises which countries have the highest sugar
consumption. Key facts from the video are included on a table on slide 7.
Questions to consider:
Which countries consume the most sugar?
Are you surprised/not surprised by which countries consume the most sugar?
A list of questions about the Buzzfeed video are included on slide 7.
Student resource pack:
Definitions of nutrition from the PowerPoint.
Table of countries from Buzzfeed video.
Facts about sugar from PowerPoint.
The questions included on slide 7 on the Buzzfeed video.
Activity 2: Is sugar damaging our health?
By using knowledge gathered in activity 1, learners should consider the issue of the growing
consumption of sugar from six different angles:
Political: internal – conflicting opinions and interests of political parties in the National Assembly
for Wales. External – employment laws, tax policies, trade restrictions, environmental regulations,
political stability.
Economic: internal – project viability, cost effective, affordable and within budget. External – tax,
economic growth, jobs, recession, exchange rate, minimum wage, wage rates, unemployment, cost
of living or working hours.
Social: society, family life, lifestyle, health, education, young/old, men/women, disabilities,
cultures, ethnicities.
Technological: what is needed? Does it need to be developed? How expensive and accessible?
Legal: employment or environment laws. Human rights.
Environmental: ecological and environmental aspects. Biodiversity, air, water, soil pollution,
climate change, noise and light pollution, attractiveness of environment.
Note: The following table contains a list of possible answers students could come up with.
Student Resource Pack:
PESTLE grid for completion.
Activity 2: Is sugar damaging our health?
Political Differences between the political parties on solutions to the
consumption of hidden sugars.
Policies to encourage healthy eating.
Should the government intervene? Persuading people to avoid sugary
drinks, or forcing people to stop consuming hidden sugars.
Economic Could cause a decrease in profit for companies producing products the
tax would apply to, leading to reduced investment and potential job
losses.
Increase in spending on the NHS.
Money can be raised through the tax to fund the NHS/education
programmes.
Increase in supermarket price of carbonated drinks.
Social Studies suggest links between high sugar intake and mental health
issues.
Decreased mobility.
Social stigma and media image towards obesity.
Health complications – diseases caused by obesity eg diabetes, heart
disease.
Technological Specialised ambulances developed to carry obese people.
New medicines need to be developed to cure illnesses caused by obesity
eg diabetes.
Legal New laws would need to be passed by the Assembly for the legislation to
cover Wales and fall within the competencies of the National Assembly
for Wales.
Issue could infringe on personal freedoms – could be a taken to court.
Environmental Could reduce the production of fizzy drinks – decreasing the amount of
plastic produced.
Activity 3: Analysis of ‘facts and opinions about
sugar’
Pupils are shown facts about sugar through a variety of resources.
Either individually or in groups pupils to analyse the information.
Information included:
A selection of photographs for students to analyse.
Sources for students to analyse in the resource pack, including a letter from Jamie Oliver to David
Cameron, facts and statistics about sugar consumption, and an information sheet from the
Taxpayers Alliance.
A video of Jamie Oliver giving evidence to the House of Commons Health Committee. This video
should provide students with a knowledge of how evidence is collected by a committee in a
parliamentary body.
Evidence begins at 16:13:45.
First question at 16:14:18.
Sugar tax discussion at 16:17:00.
Student Resource Pack:
Average sugar consumption of children.
Extracts from a letter written by Jamie Oliver to David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United
Kingdom.
The TaxPayers Alliance Sugar Tax Briefing.
National Diet and Nutrition Survey (rolling programme) 2008-2012.
The Telegraph, 20 January 2016, Laura Donnelly, Health Editor.
Quotations from organisations.
Results on a vote on the motion and amendments in the National Assembly for Wales.
Activity 4: The sugar tax debate in Wales and the
UK
Politicians in the UK Parliament and the National Assembly for Wales have debated what should be
done to curb rising levels of obesity. Although most people believe that there is no one solution to
combat this issue, some politicians and campaigners believe that a ‘pop tax’, increasing the price of
soft drinks loaded with added sugar would lower consumption of such drinks, a major source of added
sugar in our diets.
Show a clip from Senedd.tv of Assembly Members debating a sugar tax (09/12/2015: Item 5 – ‘A
sugary drinks levy’) from the PowerPoint.
Start time: 16:20 (item number 5 on the agenda).
Debate begins at 2:50:07 on the video.
Shorter version available on YouTube (link in PowerPoint).
What are the main arguments used during the debate?
Pupils should complete the table ‘Points for and against’ to collate their findings. An example table
is provided (not extensive).
Further research:
“Tax on sugary drinks backed by MPs” – BBC online.
“Sugar reduction: the evidence for action” - Public Health England.
“Childhood Obesity- Brave and Bold Action” - House of Commons Health Select Committee
November 2015.
Debate on Childhood Obesity, National Assembly for Wales, May 2015.
Student Resource Pack:
A ‘for’ and ‘against’ table to fill in individually or in groups.
Quotes from the four main political parties in Wales from the video.
A summary of the transcript from the Record of
Proceedings – a view from all the political parties
in Wales (9 December 2015)
“Let’s recap some of the facts about the consumption of soft drinks and health.
The Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition stated that drinking high-sugar
beverages results in weight gain and increases body mass index in teenagers and
children. An obese child is 80 per cent more likely to be an obese adult. Being
overweight in adolescence is linked to a greater risk of bowel cancer later in life.
Overweight teenagers go on to have twice the risk of bowel cancer. Drinking a can
of Coke a day increases the risk of developing diabetes by 22 per cent. Yet sugary
drinks are taxed at a standard rate of VAT. They attract no extra taxation or duty
that reflects the health risks and costs associated with consumption.”
“So, I urge Members here this afternoon to support the introduction of a pop tax in
Wales, and for us here to lead the way in making this change happen for the benefit
of the health of our nation.”
Elin Jones AM Plaid Cymru
“A Tango tax is not the answer to the public health crisis that is growing here in
Wales. Whilst I have a great deal of sympathy with the calls to address increasing
sugar consumption across the country, I think we have to put things into context.
The reality is that only 3 per cent of the calories consumed here in Wales actually
come from soft drinks—just 3 per cent. So, if we think we’re going to make a huge
difference by simply taxing something like sugary drinks, then we are hugely
mistaken. And I don’t think that we will ever see, as a result of that, the sort of sea
change in the consumption of sugar that Elin Jones, quite rightly, is seeking to
establish here in Wales.”
“Let me tell you that certain fruit juice drinks have higher sugar contents than fizzy
pop. Are you wanting to tax those? Are you wanting to have additional taxes on
sugary milk products? You’re nodding away. So, you want to discourage people
from drinking fruit drinks, fruit juices—yes? You want to discourage people from
consuming something which is proven to have some health benefits and actually
tax an industry that is already making significant inroads into reducing the sugar
content of its drinks. I think this is entirely the wrong approach. If you think
seriously that adding pennies to the cost of a can of pop in Wales is going to
discourage youngsters across this country from buying the occasional Coke or the
occasional Fanta or the occasional Lilt or whatever else they’re buying, I think you
will be very much mistaken indeed.”
Darren Millar AM Conservatives
I think schools are already doing a good job on promoting healthy eating to
children, and the Change4Life sugar swap campaign is promoting tips on how to
lower sugar intake. So, there are other very important things we can do. I do realise
that the causes of childhood obesity are not just down to drinking pop. I think
increasing the cost of sugary drinks would send the right signal to families with
children and teenagers who are forming the habits of a lifetime at this point in their
lives. I think it is very important that we do this, as well as making sure that children
have the best start in life in relation to dentistry as well. I’ll just finally end on this
point about dentistry. When I first came to this Assembly and the children’s
committee looked at the issue with children’s teeth in Wales, it was absolutely
horrific what was happening at that time. I think that this would help with that a lot.
Julie Morgan AM Labour
I would like to see this tax used, as I said, as part of concerted action and a
concerted campaign by this Assembly as a whole and the Welsh Government to
persuade the Westminster Government to take action on marketing and
advertising of high-sugar products, especially to children, as well as looking to put
extra pressure on the food industry to address the sugar content and portion size
of everyday foods, because whilst we see table sugar dropping in sales, actually, our
sugar content is going up because of the hidden sugar in so many products that
people are not aware that they’re consuming.
Kirsty Williams AM Welsh Liberal Democrats
I think it is important—many people have said this afternoon that taxation is only
one of the policy tools open to us to tackle the problem of sugary drinks. We’ve
already got a wide range of measures in place to support and encourage healthy
diets and healthy, more active living. It’s important to just record those again: the
all-Wales obesity pathway, a framework for the services and support provided by
health boards, working with local government and other partners; the work being
taken forward by Public Health Wales in developing its 10-step programme to
address childhood obesity, and that’s focusing on how parents can adopt healthy
habits with their children at an early stage; Let’s Walk Cymru, walking projects
targeted at inactive adults—it’s not just children; the national exercise referral
scheme, targeting clients who are developing or have developed a chronic
condition; Change4Life Wales; and Healthy Working Wales. And, of course, we’ve
talked about education quite a bit this afternoon—the Welsh network of healthy
school schemes are particularly important in encouraging the development of
local healthy schools schemes.
Jane Hutt AM Welsh Government
Teachers’ notes ‘Points for and against’
For Against
In a debate at the Assembly on 09 December
2015, 38 Assembly Members voted in favour
of a tax on drinks containing added sugars
and 10 voted against.
Only 3% of our calories come from soft
drinks. Do you think a tax will make a
difference?
The House of Commons Health Select
Committee is in favour of a tax on sugary
drinks in recommendations made in
November 2015.
Soft-drink manufacturers have already been
making huge inroads into the volumes of
sugar in their drinks in recent years. Some
manufacturers have reduced the content of
sugar in their fizzy drinks by up to 30% or
even 40%, and consumers are still buying
them.
Increasing the price of a can of fizzy drink
could make people opt for an alternative
drink. One can of fizzy drink contains 9
teaspoons of sugar and the recommended
daily intake is 6-7 teaspoons.
Will adding pennies to the cost of a can of
pop in Wales discourage youngsters across
this country from buying the occasionalfizzy
drink?
Jamie Oliver thinks this is the best solution to
curb sugar intake amongst young people.
We need to educate the public about
choices, working with manufacturers to
continue to reduce the sugar content of soft
drinks in particular.
The levy introduced in 2014 has worked in
Mexico, and has seen a 65% drop in
consumption.
What is needed is cheaper healthy foods.
Finland, Hungary and France have all
introduced a tax on all soft drinks containing
added sugar.
We should not penalise healthy people who
like to drink these soft drinks occasionally
Drinking one can a day increases the risk of
cancer.
There was no childhood obesity in the 60s
since children played more often in the
street.
Too much sugar in the diet can lead to Type
2 Diabetes, which can lead to blindness.
What about a levy on all sweets and
chocolate?
The money collected could pay for services
in the NHS in Wales.
What about restricting the advertisement of
food and drinks full of sugar before 9pm?
The problem arises because of over
consumption but nobody would argue now
against taxing alcohol and cigarettes, just
because they are not consumed regularly.
Perhaps best to reduce the amount of added
sugar in food and drinks first?
Commissioned research which models the
effects of a 20p per litre tax found:
Obesity levels would reduce by 8,300.
the number of people who were overweight
would be reduced by 13,300.
consumption of sugary drinks would reduce
by around 15 per cent, leading to a reduction
of diabetes by between 3 per cent and 5 per
cent, with reductions greatest amongst
those on low incomes.
Ischaemic heart disease would decline
between 1 per cent and 3 per cent.
There would be more positive behaviour
from children in schools due to less sugar
consumption. Tooth decay would be
reduced.
£45 million would be raised in tax receipts.
There would be a long-term saving to the
NHS from treating the effects of obesity and
diabetes.
Activity 5: SWOT analysis
As well as tax, some politicians have called for:
A crackdown on price promotions of unhealthy foods.
Tougher controls on marketing, including the use of cartoon characters to promote unhealthy
food.
A ban on advertising unhealthy foods on television before 21:00.
Clearer labelling of products showing sugar content in teaspoons.
A drive to force the industry to reduce sugar in food and drink as has happened with salt.
Pupils to complete a SWOT analysis frame to assess the viability of two of the ideas above.
Student Resource Pack:
SWOT table for completion.
Activity 6: Personal standpoint
Use individual research as a basis to hold a class debate or arrange to debate the issue at the
Assembly’s dedicated Youth debating chamber in Cardiff Bay. This could be held in the style of an
Assembly debate (as viewed in the Senedd.tv video) or informally amongst learners.
For more information, visit www.yourassembly.org, or visit the Assembly and book an educational
visit (0300 200 6565)
Student resource pack:
Area for learners to note.
Suggested topic for debate:
‘A sugar tax-could it work?’
‘Sugary Drinks – a challenge for government or us?’
This is a more challenging topic – it can be swapped onto the PowerPoint.
Activity 7: Raising awareness
Individuals or groups of people, including young people, often start an awareness raising campaign
about an issue they feel passionate about. Such campaigns often gather supporters and elected
representatives will often discuss the issue at either a local authority level or national Assembly and
/or Parliament. Pupils to discuss the following ways they can get their message across:
Student resource pack:
Area for students to note ideas.
E mail an Assembly Member:
You have 5 Assembly Members representing you. Visit the ‘Your Assembly’ website at
www.yourassembly.org and use the interactive map to find your Assembly Members, all their
social media channels and e mail addresses. Think about what you want to achieve and write the e
mail as clearly as possible.
Social Media:
Start following people that might have an interest in your campaign/issue.
Create a short and simple hashtag to use across all social media platforms eg Facebook, Instagram,
and Twitter.
Petition the National Assembly for Wales:
Draft what action you would like to happen and send as an e-petition to the National Assembly for
Wales. Visit the Get Involved tab of the Your Assembly website to find useful information about how
to petition. Read current petitions to give you inspiration.
A petition requires 10 signatures for it to be considered by the Assembly’s Petition Committee. A
petition to the House of Commons needs 10,000 signatures for it to be acknowledged, and
100,000 signatures for it to be considered for debate.
Activity 8: Personal reflection
What have I learnt?
Outcome I have started to develop
this skill
I am confident I have
achieved this outcome
I can use PESTLE to think
about an issue
I can critically assess a
variety of sources
I can consider a variety of
viewpoints about an issue
I can solve problems and
make decisions using
SWOT
I have developed a
personal standpoint about
the issue of sugar in sugary
drinks
I can generate appropriate
and realistic ideas for
raising awareness
Student Resource Pack:
Personal reflection table for completion.