resonant witness
TRANSCRIPT
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 1/18
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 2/18
The Calvin Institute of Christian Worship Liturgical Studies
Series, edited by John D. Witvliet, is designed to promote reflection on the his-
tory, theology, and practice of Christian worship and to stimulate worship re-
newal in Christian congregations. Contributions include writings by pastoral
worship leaders from a wide range of communities and scholars from a wide
range of disciplines. The ultimate goal of these contributions is to nurtureworship practices that are spiritually vital and theologically rooted.
Published
The Pastor as Minor Poet
M. Craig Barnes
Touching the Altar: The Old Testament and Christian Worship
Carol M. Bechtel, EditorResonant Witness: Conversations between Music and Theology
Jeremy S. Begbie and Steven R. Guthrie, Editors
God Against Religion: Rethinking Christian Theology through Worship
Matthew Myer Boulton
Inclusive yet Discerning: Navigating Worship Artfully
Frank Burch Brown
What Language Shall I Borrow? The Bible and Christian WorshipRonald P. Byars
A Primer on Worship
William Dyrness
Christian Worship Worldwide: Expanding Horizons, Deepening Practices
Charles E. Farhadian
Gather into One: Praying and Singing Globally
C. Michael HawnThe Substance of Things Seen: Art, Faith, and the Christian Community
Robin M. Jensen
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 3/18
Our Worship
Abraham Kuyper, Edited by Harry Boonstra
Wonderful Words of Life:Hymns in American Protestant History and Theology
Richard J. Mouw and Mark A. Noll, Editors
Discerning the Spirits:
A Guide to Thinking about Christian Worship Today
Cornelius Plantinga Jr. and Sue A. Rozeboom
Voicing God’s Psalms
Calvin Seerveld
My Only Comfort: Death, Deliverance, and Discipleship
in the Music of Bach
Calvin R. Stapert
A New Song for an Old World: Musical Thought in the Early Church
Calvin R. Stapert
An Architecture of Immanence: Architecture for Worship and Ministry Today
Mark A. Torgerson
A More Profound Alleluia: Theology and Worship in Harmony Leanne Van Dyk, Editor
Christian Worship in Reformed Churches Past and Present
Lukas Vischer, Editor
The Biblical Psalms in Christian Worship:
A Brief Introduction and Guide to Resources
John D. Witvliet
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 4/18
Resonant Witness
Conversations between Music and Theology
Edited by
Jeremy S. Begbie & Steven R. Guthrie
William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company
Grand Rapids, Michigan / Cambridge, U.K.
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 5/18
© 2011 Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.All rights reserved
Published 2011 by
Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
2140 Oak Industrial Drive N.E., Grand Rapids, Michigan 49505 /
P.O. Box 163, Cambridge CB3 9PU U.K.
Printed in the United States of America
17 16 15 14 13 12 11 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Resonant witness: conversations between music and theology /
edited by Jeremy S. Begbie & Steven R. Guthrie.
p. cm. — (The Calvin Institute of Christian Worship liturgical studies)
Includes index.
ISBN 978-0-8028-6277-8 (pbk.: alk. paper)
1. Music — Religious aspects. I. Begbie, Jeremy. II. Guthrie, Steven R., 1967-
ML3921.R47 2011
261.5¢78 — dc22
2010027779
www.eerdmans.com
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 6/18
Contents
acknowledgments viii
Introduction 1
Jeremy S. Begbie and Steven R. Guthrie
Part One: Music and Cosmos
1. Augustine and the Art of Music 27
Carol Harrison
2. Material: Philip the Chancellor
and the Reception of Aristotle’s Physics 46
Nancy van Deusen
3. “So Faith Comes from What Is Heard”:
The Relationship between Music and God’s Word
in the First Two Centuries of German Lutheranism 65
Joyce Irwin
4. Created Beauty: The Witness of J. S. Bach 83
Jeremy S. Begbie
v
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 7/18
5. On Music, Mathematics, and Theology:
Pythagoras, the Mind, and Human Agency 109
John Paul Ito
Part Two: Music and Culture
6. Music as the Mouthpiece of Theology 137
Daniel K. L. Chua
7. The Shock of the Positive: Olivier Messiaen,
St. Francis, and Redemption through Modernity 162Robert Sholl
8. Quasi Una Sonata: Modernism, Postmodernism,
Religion, and Music 190
Catherine Pickstock
Part Three: Music and Theology
9. The Integration of Music and Theology
in the Vocal Compositions of J. S. Bach 215
Richard J. Plantinga
10. “Parables” and “Polyphony”: The Resonance
of Music as Witness in the Theology of
Karl Barth and Dietrich Bonhoeffer 240
David J. R. S. Moseley
11. Musical Time and Eschatology 271
Alastair Borthwick, Trevor Hart, and Anthony Monti
12. Improvising Texts, Improvising Communities:
Jazz, Interpretation, Heterophony, and the Ekkl 3 sia 295
Bruce Ellis Benson
vi
contents
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 8/18
Part Four: Music and Worship
13. Faithful Feelings: Music and Emotion in Worship 323
Jeremy S. Begbie
14. Music for the Love Feast: Hildegard of Bingen
and the Song of Songs 355
Margot Fassler
15. The Wisdom of Song 382
Steven R. Guthrie
16. The Truth Shall Set You Free: Song, Struggle,
and Solidarity in South Africa 408
C. Michael Hawn
17. The Singing of Jesus 434
Michael O’Connor
Afterword 454
John D. Witvliet
contributors 464
glossary of musical terms 471
index 481
vii
Contents
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 9/18
Acknowledgments
The editors and authors are profoundly grateful for the sponsorship of the
Calvin Institute of Christian Worship at Calvin College, Michigan — with-
out their support, this project would never have seen the light of day. In par-
ticular, we owe a debt of thanks to its director, Dr. John Witvliet, for his en-
couragement and his Afterword to the volume. Our thanks also go to DonaMcCullagh for her meticulous attention to the numerous tasks that have
come her way in the production of this volume: editing, proofreading, per-
missions, and the production of the glossary. We are all very much in her
debt.
“Created Beauty: The Witness of J. S. Bach,” by Jeremy Begbie is adapted
from The Beauty of God, edited by Daniel J. Treier, Mark Husbands and
Roger Lundin. © 2007 by Daniel J. Treier, Mark Husbands and Roger
Lundin. Used with permission of InterVarsity Press, PO Box 1400, Downers
Grove, IL 60515. ivpress.com.
“Music for the Love Feast: Hildegard of Bingen and the Song of Songs”
by Margot Fassler was originally published in Women’s Voices Across Musical
Worlds, edited by Jane A. Bernstein (Boston: Northeastern University Press,
2004). © University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. Reprinted with
permission.
viii
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 10/18
Introduction
Jeremy S. Begbie and Steven R. Guthrie
“It is better to get a headache from exercises in canons, fugues and
counterpoint than from confuting the Kantian confutation of the
evidence for the existence of God. Enough of your theological spin-
sterhood!”1
So the music teacher, Wendell Kretschmar, attempts to lure Adrian
Leverkühn away from theology into the study of music. For Leverkühn, the
main character of Thomas Mann’s Doctor Faustus, it seems these two cannot
be pursued side by side. He writes to Kretschmar: “you consider [me] as
‘gifted’ for music and summon me to you and to its service, instead of leav-
ing me humbly to tarry with God and theology.”2 To study the things of God
is to refuse the study of music; to pursue music is to abandon theology. In-
deed, Adrian’s tuition in music will mean not only leaving seminary, but ul-
timately entering the realm of the demonic.3
1
1. Thomas Mann, Dr. Faustus: The life of the German composer Adrian Leverkühn as told
by a friend, trans. H. T. Lowe-Porter (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948), p. 135.
2. Mann, Dr. Faustus, p. 134.
3. Mann would later write: “It is a grave error on the part of legend and story not to
connect Faust with music. He should have been musical, he should have been a musician.
Music is a demonic realm; Kierkegaard, a great Christian, proved that most convincingly in
his painfully enthusiastic essay on Mozart’s Don Juan. Music is Christian art with a negative
prefix. Music is calculated order and chaos-breeding irrationality at once, rich in conjuring,
incantatory gestures, in magic of numbers, the most unrealistic and yet the most impas-
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 11/18
Or might it be that these two areas of study are not so fully set against
one another? At one point Leverkühn concedes that his native “Lutheran-
ism” even “sees in theology and music neighbouring spheres and close of
kin.”4
Certainly, in Western culture the dialogue between music and theology
has often been lively and intense — a fact to which Mann’s novel bears dra-
matic witness. Not only has music been ubiquitous, it also has had a persis-
tent and virtually irrepressible place in the Christian church, pre-eminently
in worship. To this day the vast majority of Christians sing or play instru -
ments as part of their corporate encounter with God. This has provoked
many, including some of the finest Christian thinkers in history, to explore
how music might relate to Christianity’s central convictions, to the shapeand substance of the faith of Israel which climaxes in the person of Jesus
Christ. The longest-lasting and most developed stream of thought in this re-
gard stretches from Augustine and Boethius to the late Middle Ages, situat-
ing musical sounds amid a grand and highly distinctive vision of a divinely
permeated cosmos. The emergence of modernity occasioned several fresh
efforts to interweave theology and music — Leverkühn has already drawn
our attention to the Lutherans, who offered a variety of ways of coming to
terms with music theologically. A number of Enlightenment philosophersincorporated musical phenomena into the theological worldviews they be-
lieved appropriate to scientific discoveries.5 Similarly, some of the
nineteenth-century Romantics offered extended panegyrics of instrumental
music, in effect, re-working and re-forming the grand medieval vision.6
For the last hundred years, however, the theological landscape has more
closely reflected the pessimism of Leverkühn and Kretschmar. While no seri-
ous theologian to our knowledge has advocated a necessary connection be-
tween music and the demonic, relatively few have attempted any thorough
2
jer emy s. begbie and steven r . guthr ie
sioned of arts, mystical and abstract. If Faust is to be the representative of the German soul,
he would have to be musical, for the relation of the German to the world is abstract and
mystical, that is, musical – the relation of a professor with a touch of demonism.” Thomas
Mann, “Germany and the Germans,” The Yale Review 35, no. 2 (1946): 227. As cited in Carroll
E. Reed, “Thomas Mann and the Faust Tradition,” The Journal of English and Germanic Phi-
lology 51, no. 1 (Jan. 1952): 20.
4. Mann, Dr. Faustus, p. 131.
5. Paul Henry Lang, “The Enlightenment and Music,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 1, no.
1 (Autumn 1967): 93-108.
6. Daniel K. L. Chua, Absolute Music and the Construction of Meaning (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1999), chs. 20-22.
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 12/18
integration of the theological and the musical.7 Although we have witnessed
a recent renewal of interest in theology and the arts in Europe and North
America, the lion’s share of attention has been given to the visual and liter-
ary arts. There are various reasons for this, among them the difficulty of us-
ing words to speak about something that so quickly eludes language (“In the
face of music, the wonders of language are also its frustrations” [George
Steiner]8). There are also acute problems that arise from recognizing that
“representation” and “reference” do not seem intrinsic to the way music op-
erates — how can music be “meaningful” when it is so abstract, so semanti-
cally fluid?
Nevertheless, recent signs of fresh activity at the music-theology inter-
face suggest that the difficulties are not insuperable,9 and we hope that this
3
Introduction
7. As far as major figures are concerned, the most obvious exceptions are the Congrega-
tionalist theologian P. T. Forsyth, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Karl Barth, and Joseph Ratzinger.
See also Albert Blackwell, The Sacred in Music (Cambridge: Lutterworth, 1999);
Christopher R. Campling, The Food of Love: Reflections on Music and Faith (London: SCM,
1997); William Edgar, Taking Note of Music (London: SPCK, 1986); Alfred John Pike, A
Theology of Music (Toledo: Gregorian Institute, 1953). A few theological studies of com-
posers have been offered: e.g., Jaroslav J. Pelikan, Bach among the Theologians (Philadel-
phia: Fortress Press, 1986); Hans Küng, Mozart: Traces of Transcendence (London: SCM,1992); Harold M. Best, Music Through the Eyes of Faith (San Francisco: Harper, 1993).
There have been forays into theology by musicologists: e.g., Wilfrid H. Mellers, Bach and
the Dance of God (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981); Beethoven and the Voice of God
(London: Faber, 1983); Eric T. Chafe, Tonal Allegory in the Vocal Music of J. S. Bach (Berke-
ley: University of California Press, 1991); Analyzing Bach Cantatas (Oxford: Oxford Uni-
versity Press, 2000). With regard to the potential of music to enrich theology, see Hans
Urs von Balthasar, Truth Is Symphonic: Aspects of Christian Pluralism (San Francisco:
Ignatius Press, 1987). See also Jon Michael Spencer, Theological Music: Introduction to
Theomusicology (London: Greenwood Press, 1991); Theomusicology (Durham, NC: Duke
University Press, 1994).
8. George Steiner, Errata: An Examined Life (London: Phoenix, 1997), p. 65.
9. See, e.g., Jeremy S. Begbie, Theology, Music and Time (Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-
versity Press, 2000); Resounding Truth: Christian Wisdom in the World of Music (Grand
Rapids, MI: Baker, 2007); Leo Black, Franz Schubert: Music and Belief (Woodbridge, Suffolk:
Boydell Press, 2003); David S. Cunningham, These Three Are One: The Practice of Trinitarian
Theology, Challenges in Contemporary Theology (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1998), pp.
127-64; Mark Hijleh, The Music of Jesus: From Composition to Koinonia (San Jose, New York,
Lincoln, and Shanghai: Writers Club Press, 2001); Heidi Epstein, Melting the Venusberg: A
Feminist Theology of Music (London: Continuum, 2005); Ann Pederson, God, Creation and
All That Jazz: A Process of Composition and Improvisation (St. Louis: Chalice Press, 2001);
A. R. Peacocke and Ann Pederson, The Music of Creation (Minneapolis: Fortress Press,
2006); Don E. Saliers, Music and Theology (Nashville: Abingdon, 2007).
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 13/18
volume will serve to carry forward such initiatives, stimulating fresh and
fruitful interactions. Against the testimony of Adrian Leverkühn, the convic-
tion of the authors and editors of this volume is that the study of theology
and the study of music need not, and should not, be kept apart; that there is
an enormous amount to gain from conversations between those who seek to
explore and articulate the content and shape of Christian truth, and those
who inhabit the world of Beethoven and Bruckner, Corinne Bailey Rae and
Keith Jarrett.
Resonant Witness has arisen out of just such conversations among theo-
logians, musicologists,10 and philosophers with an interest in either or both
fields. In 2002, a “Music and Theology Colloquium” was established as the
result of a collaboration between the research project “Theology Throughthe Arts” at the University of St. Andrews, Scotland, and the Calvin Institute
of Christian Worship at Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan. It was
chaired by Jeremy Begbie, and its participants, drawn largely from the
United Kingdom and the United States, gathered for two residential meet-
ings in Ely, Cambridgeshire. All but four of the essays in this volume arose
directly out of these meetings and were revised through subsequent one-to-
one discussions and email correspondence. This kind of extended exchange
is time-consuming and demanding, but critical, we believe, for the successand fruitfulness of any multidisciplinary enterprise.
The aim of the Colloquium, and this book as a whole, is to demonstrate
the fruitfulness of theology for music, and the fruitfulness of music for theology,
with a view to encouraging sustained engagements between musicians and
theologians in the future. We make no claim to be comprehensive. Many
types of music, many historical periods, many doctrinal and philosophical
issues, and many practical matters concerning music are not addressed. And
there are types of music-theology dialogue not undertaken here, or even
mentioned. The collection sets forth only a range of possibilities, a sample of
different forms of engagement; no more.
4
jer emy s. begbie and steven r . guthr ie
10. In the English-speaking world, the term “musicology” can have different usages,
and its definition is a much-debated issue. It is often used in a fairly narrow sense to refer to
the history of (primarily Western) music. Here we use the term in the much wider sense of
“the scholarly study of music.”
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 14/18
Music in Action
To set the scene, it is worth saying something briefly about the terms “music”
and “theology,” about what shapes and conditions our use of these words in
the essays that follow.
Although the word “music” may appear unproblematic, a moment’s re-
flection reveals it to be highly multivalent. Not only are there are many forms
of “music” worldwide, but even within a single category (such as “modern
Western music”) quite different activities and entities can be distinguished.
In many scholarly circles, it has become a commonplace to urge that music is
best conceived fundamentally in terms of embodied practices (rather than in
terms of objects or theoretical disciplines), the primary practices beingmusic-making and music-hearing. To pick up Christopher Small’s expression,
we should speak more of “musicking” than “music.”11 This seems a wise line
to follow, given that the “products” of music (sound-patterns, pieces, works,
scores) and its second-order disciplines are all dependent on the more basic
practices of making and hearing music. For theology to come to terms with
music, then, first and foremost means coming to terms with these actions or
practices. (It is no accident that most of the contributors to this volume are
keen music practitioners of one sort or another.)“Music-making” we can understand as the intentional production of
temporally organized patterns of pitched sounds, and “music-hearing” as
the perception of temporally organized patterns of pitched sounds as “mu-
sic” (“perception” covering everything from concentrated, attentive listening
to unfocused, tacit awareness). (It may be that a distinct phase of “compos-
ing” precedes music-making, but this is certainly not always so: for most of
human history, composing has been concurrent with music-making, and
besides, many contemporary composers work at an instrument.)
Music-making gives rise to various objects or entities, first and foremost
“temporally organized patterns of pitched sounds”; in other words, musical
sound-patterns. This is the primary “text” of musical activity (“text” being
understood here in the broad sense of the product of music-making, includ-
ing a “form” such as the canon, or the blues). It may be that this text devel-
ops and solidifies into a particular “work,” a “piece of music,” often inscribed
as a written “score,” but this is not always so (works and scores are relatively
recent phenomena in musical history).
5
Introduction
11. Christopher Small, Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening (Hanover:
University Press of New England, 1998).
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 15/18
What emerges, then, is a threefold pattern — music-making/text/
music-hearing12 — a pattern that is met often in cultural studies (trans-
ferred to the persons involved, it works out as author/text/reader, producer/
product/consumer, and so on). When we are dealing with what we call “mu-
sic,” even when concentrating on one of these elements, we need to be alert
to this threefold pattern. Much scholarship has been hampered by ignoring
or over-stressing one or more of the elements at the expense of others.
It is also important to be alert to the fact that these practices are socially
and culturally embedded: the way we make and hear music is shaped by our
relations to others — our social setting, all the way from one-to-one rela-
tionships to very large groupings.13 And because of this, making and hearing
music are shaped by the meaningful patterns and products that we fashionas we relate to others and the natural world — in other words, by “culture”
(social institutions, images, books, customs, etc.).14 Further, musical prac-
tices are politically entrenched: they are inevitably mixed up with the power
relations that are necessary for social organization.
“Reading” Music — Resisting Reductionism
One of the perennial temptations in writing about music is what might be
loosely termed “reductionism.” One may, for instance, attend to only one
type or aspect of musical practice (or musical text) without due regard for
its relation to others. Or one may allow one discipline of inquiry to domi-
nate so strongly that other legitimate modes are ignored, excluded, or per-
haps subsumed under the master discipline.
To cite one example of reductionism, it has become routine in many ac-
ademic music departments to stress that musical practices and products are
socially, culturally, and politically conditioned — against the notion that
6
jer emy s. begbie and steven r . guthr ie
12. See Jean-Jacques Nattiez, Music and Discourse: Toward a Semiology of Music (Prince-
ton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990); Nattiez speaks of the “poietic”and “esthesic” pro-
cesses, and of “producer,” “trace,” and “receiver” (p. 17).
13. See Nicholas Wolterstorff, “The Work of Making a Work of Music,” in What Is Mu-
sic? An Introduction to the Philosophy of Music, ed. P. J. Alperson (University Park: Pennsylva-
nia State University Press, 1987), pp. 109-12 for detailed discussion of the concept of “social
practices,” following Alasdair MacIntyre.
14. For a helpful survey of shifts in musicology toward seeing music chiefly as a human
activity embedded in society and culture, see C. Michael Hawn, Gather into One: Praying
and Singing Globally (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003), pp. 21-30.
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 16/18
music can exist in an a-temporal, “other-worldly” sphere, divorced from the
strong and messy currents of human designs and interests. (This has been
the predominant concern of the so-called “New Musicology,” a largely
Anglo-American movement emerging in the mid-1980s.)15 However, prob-
lems arise if it is suggested that music can be exhaustively accounted for in
these terms. We can lose sight of the fact that the temporally organized
sound-patterns of music have their own distinct integrity and are not infi-
nitely variable in their potential effects. They interact with features of our
bodily make-up that are universally shared. It is one thing to say that music-
making and music-hearing are humanly shaped, socially conditioned activi-
ties, intertwined with matrices of human relations and intentions; it is quite
another to say that their significance for us is explicable solely in such terms.An approach that is both multidisciplinary and multileveled is to be pre-
ferred — a “thick description” — and this volume is a modest contribution
toward this end. An anti-reductionist reading of music will be multi-
disciplinary in that it recognizes that the multifaceted nature of “music” re-
quires a variety of perspectives to do it justice. There are the disciplines of
theoretical reflection that immediately surround music — musicology, in
other words, which includes historical musicology (the history of music),
music theory and analysis (of texts), ethnomusicology (the anthropology of music), performance practice and research, and acoustics (the science of
sound and hearing). These disciplines, all of which are deployed to some ex-
tent in this book, employ their own discourses.16 Further, there will be other,
less proximate disciplines — such as physiology, psychology, sociology, aes-
thetics, semiotics, film studies, cultural studies, and so forth — that may also
prove relevant. In fact, in the last twenty years or so, a wide variety of strate-
gies, tools, and methodologies for the study of music has emerged, together
with a sense that such variety is to be welcomed.17
Closely related to this, a thick description of music will be multileveled.
7
Introduction
15. See, e.g., Joseph Kerman, Contemplating Music: Challenges to Musicology (Cam-
bridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985); L. Kramer, Classical Music and Postmodern
Knowledge (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995); Alastair Williams, Constructing
Musicology (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001); Pieter C. Van den Toorn, Music, Politics, and the
Academy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995).
16. We should perhaps note that the disciplines and discourses, though they reflect on
musical practices, are themselves practices, and have themselves become the object of disci-
plines and discourses.
17. Nicholas Cook and Mark Everest, “Preface,” in Rethinking Music, ed. Nicholas Cook
and Mark Everest (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. xi-xii.
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 17/18
Musical practices, like any cultural reality, require explanations at different
levels of complexity. When a violinist performs a concerto, we can describe
what happens in terms of neurophysiology, but also in terms of the inten-
tions of the performer, the society she lives in, the cultural values associated
with the style, and so on. We can view this in terms of levels of ever wider ex-
planation, each level drawing upon levels below it and opening up to higher
levels.18
The essayists in this volume assume (and in some cases argue) that the-
ology, with the levels of description it offers, has a legitimate place at the
musicological round table without compromising the integrity of the partic-
ular responsibilities required by its truth-claims. The ultimate purposes and
grounding of musical endeavor can hardly be dismissed as a non-question,nor theology be written off when it attempts to supply the beginnings of an
answer. Indeed, numerous writers have contended that particular features of
music-making and hearing, and the sound-patterns they involve, are able,
even when no such intent is present, to intimate or gesture toward that infi-
nite life which generates, upholds, and redeems all things, the life of the tri-
une God made known in Jesus Christ. In fact, even in the arena of musicol-
ogy, a sense of the “openness” of all levels of explanation to the theological
can emerge quite naturally. Recently, two distinguished musicologists, re-viewing a huge range of writing in their field, observed that in much of it we
can discern the
same underlying concerns: what are we doing when we analyse or contex-
tualise music, and why are we doing it? What kind of truth can analysis or
historical musicology reveal, and how might it relate to other kinds of
truth about music? Should we be speaking of truth at all? Or does the act
of engaging in analysis or the writing of history lock us into a predeter-
mined epistemological stance?19
The status of truth-claims — whether viewed in terms of epistemology
or otherwise — while traditionally an issue of concern among (at least
8
jer emy s. begbie and steven r . guthr ie
18. A much-discussed and highly fruitful way of regarding scientific inquiry is to see it
as involving a conception of (a) reality as “stratified,” as a “universe of levels,” each operating
under the influence of the levels above, and (b) explanation as similarly stratified, each level
“knowing its limits” and opening up to the levels above. See Roy Bhaskar, Scientific Realism
and Human Emancipation (London: Verso Press, 1986), p. 253; Michael Polanyi, The Tacit Di-
mension (New York: Doubleday, 1966), pp. 29-32, 37.
19. Cook and Everest, “Preface,” p. xi.
8/8/2019 Resonant Witness
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resonant-witness 18/18
some) philosophers, is one in which theologians are bound to have an inter-
est and with which they can engage fruitfully, given the Christian commit-
ment to the “givenness” of a material order which precedes all knowing, and
to a Creator who graciously intends interactive relations of knowing with
that order.
Theology in Action
What, then, of theology? In our discussions, we have made no attempt to set-
tle on a definition that would command unanimous agreement. We come
from a wide variety of traditions and viewpoints, and the major Christianfigures discussed in the chapters do not share a single theology. On the other
hand, it is fair to say we adopt as normative the broad perspective of Chris-
tian trinitarian orthodoxy, grounded in Scripture and classically expressed
in the church’s ecumenical creeds. At its heart, this entails being oriented to-
ward, and being invited to share in, the gracious self-communication of the
God of Jesus Christ. It finds its focus in the gospel — the announcement that
in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, the triune Creator, the God of Is-
rael, has acted decisively to reconcile the world to himself. The gospel findsits outworking in a reconciled people gathered by the Holy Spirit to share
God’s life and make known what God has done in Christ, a people of wor-
ship and mission, called to live in and for the sake of the world as a foretaste
of the world to come. This gospel is testified to and mediated first and fore-
most through the Scriptures, writings that are themselves the outcome of
God’s reconciling work. Christian theology can thus be understood as the
disciplined thinking and rethinking of this gospel, and as such, one dimen-
sion of the intellectual participation in the divine life that God has made
possible.
Theology for Music
We seek to demonstrate the fruitfulness of theology for music, and vice
versa. As far as the former is concerned — “what can theology do for mu-
sic?” — all of the chapters in one way or another attempt to show ways in
which the thinking and rethinking of the gospel can enable a richer descrip-tion and deeper understanding of music. Two broad forms of this can be dis-
tinguished. (a) We may take particular instances of music-making, music-
9
Introduction