resistance htn & acei vs arb
DESCRIPTION
Resistance Hypertension (HTN) ManagementTRANSCRIPT
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
• Blood pressure remaining above goal in spite of concurrent use of 3 antihypertensive agents of different classes.
• Ideally, 1 of the 3 agents should be a diuretic & all agents should be prescribed at optimal dose amounts.
What is Resistant Hypertension
BP not on target
Three drugs used
One is a diuretic
At optimal dosage
In Compliant Patient
On life style change
Definition Highlights
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
• Use of diuretic recommended but not required before diagnosing resistant hypertension.
• Doses should be optimal but not necessarily maximal before diagnosing resistant hypertension.
• Controlled resistant hypertension: high blood pressure controlled but with use of 4 of more agents should be considered resistant.
Definition Highlights
Resistant HT: Introduction (Contd)
• This definition does not apply to patients who have been recently diagnosed with HT
• Moreover, resistant HT is not synonymous with uncontrolled HT
• Uncontrolled HT includes all hypertensive patients who lack BP control under treatment, namely, – those receiving an inadequate treatment regimen,
those with poor adherence, and those with undetected secondary HT, as well as those with true treatment resistance
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1749–57
Resistant HT: Introduction (Contd)
• Patients with resistant HT may achieve BP control with full doses of– 4 or more antihypertensive
medications
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1749–57
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
Prevalence• Prevalence is unknown, but observational and clinical trials
suggest it is a common clinical problem.
• In a recent analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants being treated for hypertension, only 53% were controlled to <140/90 mm Hg. 1
• Of NHANES participants with CKD, only 37% were controlled to <130/80 mm Hg2 and only 25% of diabetic participants were controlled to <130/85 mm Hg.1
• In the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) after approximately 5 years of follow-up, 27% of participants were on 3 or more medications.3
1Hajjar I, Kotchen TA. JAMA 2003; 2Peralta CA et al. Hypertension 2005; 3Cushman WC et al. Clin Hypertens.
Drug-relatedcauses58%
Nonadherence16%
Unknown6%
Officeresistance
6%
Psychologicalcauses
9%
SecondaryHTN5%
Interferingsubstances
1%
Am J Hypertens 2003;16:925-930
Cause of resistance found in 133/141 – 94% (83/91 – 91%)
cases
Resistant HT: Primary Cause
Pseudo-resistance
• Lack of BP control with appropriate treatment in a patient who does not have resistant hypertension
• Factors include– Suboptimal BP measurement
technique; – The white-coat effect; and – Poor adherence to prescribed therapy
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1749–57
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
Causes of Resistance to Hypertension Treatment
• Poor adherence with prescribed medications • Inaccurate blood pressure measurement
• White coat hypertension
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
• Non-Narcotic Analgesics - Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents including aspirin - Selective COX-2 inhibitors
• Sympathomimetic agents- decongestants- diet pills- cocaine
• Stimulants -methylphenidate-dexmethylphenidate,-dextroamphetamine- amphetamine, methamphetamine-modafinil
Substances that Can Interfere with Blood Pressure Control
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
Substances that Can Interfere with Blood Pressure Control
• Alcohol
• Oral contraceptives
• Cyclosporine
• Erythropoietin
• Natural licorice
• Herbal compounds -ephedra - ma huang
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
Common
• Obstructive sleep apnea
• Renal parenchymal disease
• Primary aldosteronism
• Renal artery stenosis
Secondary Causes of Resistant Hypertension
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
Secondary Causes of Resistant Hypertension
Uncommon
• Pheochromocytoma
• Cushing’s disease
• Hyperparathyroidism
• Aortic coarctation
• Intracranial tumor
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of Resistant Hypertension
• Confirm appropriate treatment
• Identify causes- Secondary?
• Document target organ damage
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
Resistant Hypertension: Diagnostic and Treatment Recommendations
Confirm Treatment Resistance
• Office blood pressure >140/90 or 130/80 mm Hg in patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease
and• Patient prescribed 3 or more antihypertensive medications
at optimal doses, including if possible a diuretic or
• Office blood pressure at goal but patient requiring 4 or more antihypertensive medications
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
Exclude Pseudoresistance
• Is patient adherent with prescribed regimen?
• Obtain home, work, or ambulatory blood pressure readings to exclude white coat effect
Identify and Reverse Contributing Lifestyle Factors
• Obesity
• Physical inactivity
• Excessive alcohol ingestion
• High salt, low-fiber diet
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
• Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents
• Sympathomimetics- Diet pills- Decongestants
• Stimulants
• Oral contraceptives
• Licorice
• Ephedra
Discontinue or Minimize Interfering Substances
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
Screen for Secondary Causes of Hypertension• Obstructive sleep apnea (snoring, witnessed apnea, excessive daytime
sleepiness)
• Primary aldosteronism (elevated aldosterone/renin ratio)
• Chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min)
• Renal artery stenosis (young female, known atherosclerotic disease, worsening renal function)
• Pheochromocytoma (episodic hypertension, palpitations, diaphoresis, headache)
• Cushing’s disease (moon facies, central obesity, abdominal striae, inter-scapular fat deposition)
• Aortic coarctation (differential in brachial or femoral pulses, systolic bruit)
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
Treatment of Resistant HypertensionNon-Pharmacologic Recommendations
• Weight loss
• Regular exercise (at least 30 min most days of the week)
• Low dietary salt ingestion (<100 mEq sodium/24-hr)
• Moderate alcohol ingestion (no more than 2 drinks per day for most men and 1 drink per day for women or lighter weight persons)
• Ingestion of low-fat, high-fiber diet
• Treat obstructive sleep apnea if present
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
Treatment of Resistant Hypertension
Pharmacologic Recommendations
• Withdrawal or down titration of interfering substances as possible
• Use of a long-acting thiazide diuretic, preferably chlorthalidone
• Combine agents with different mechanisms of action
• Recommended triple regimen of -ARB or ACE inhibitor- Calcium channel blocker-Thiazide diuretic
© 2008, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
Treatment of Resistant Hypertension
• Consider addition of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist
• Use of loop diuretic may be necessary in patients with CKD (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min)
Diuretics• Studies indicate that patients with
resistant HT – Frequently have inappropriate
volume expansion contributing to their treatment resistance such that a diuretic is essential to maximize BP control
– In most patients, use of a long-acting thiazide diuretic will be most effective
Circulation. 2008;117:e510-e526
Diuretics (Contd)
• In a blinded comparison of hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg daily, the latter provided greater 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure reduction, with the largest difference occurring overnight
• Given the outcome benefit demonstrated with chlorthalidone and its superior efficacy compared with hydrochlorothiazide, – Chlorthalidone should be preferentially used in
patients with resistant HT
Circulation. 2008;117:e510-e526
Diuretics (Contd)
• In patients with oedema or more advance renal impairment, for example, serum creatinine >200 mmol/l,– Thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics may be
ineffective and a – Loop diuretic (eg furosemide) may be
required, often in higher doses than used conventionally
Journal of Human Hypertension 2004;18:139–185
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists
• Consistent with reports of a high prevalence of primary aldosteronism in patients with resistant HT have been studies demonstrating that
• Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists provide significant antihypertensive benefit when added to existing multidrug regimens
Circulation. 2008;117:e510-e526
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (Contd)
• Spironolactone
– Used for resistant HT with normal aldosterone levels, 12.5-50mg/daily
– Additional benefits: antiproteinuric, improves heart failure survival (RALES)
– 10% gynecomastia
– Not when creatinine > 2.5, K > 5.0
Drug Combinations
• Chlorthalidone 25mg + spironolactone 12.5-50 mg– Excellent diuretic maximization, also vs hypokalemia– Chlorthalidone, can
↓ s. K+ enough to cause cardiac arrest– Aldosterone blockers spironolactone eplerenone can
Protect vulnerable patients and Significantly reduce BP resistant to ≥ 3 drugs,
– A logical way to provide maximal anti-HT efficacy and to prevent hypokalemia might be a
Combination of chlorthalidone and spironolactone 12.5/25.0 mg/d
Hypertension 2009;54;951-953
Drug Combinations (Contd)
– ACEI plus ARB Mostly 4-8 week studies Risk of ARF in animal studies Additional reduction mild: 4/3 mm Hg Best application in proteinuric patients
Direct Vasodilators
•Hydralazine sequence is 25 BID to 50 BID to 100mg BID•Minoxidil sequence is 2.5mg, to 5mg, to 5mg BID, to 10 mg BID, to 20 mg BID•Need a BB and a diuretic on board•Watch for headache and fluid retention
Direct Vasodilators (Contd)
•Minoxidil
– Excellent drug for resistant HT
– Direct vasodilator causing reflex tachycardia and fluid retention
– Need BB on board to prevent myocardial ischemia
– Dosage range 2.5mg to 20 mg BID
– Temporarily discontinue drug with marked edema, than restart with more diuretic
– 90% ST-T change within 2 weeks, later resolve
α1-Adrenergic Receptor Blockers
• Not to be used for monotherapy: ALLHAT (class effect)
• May be used as an add-on for resistant hypertension
• May cause urinary incontinence, especially in females, due to bladder outlet relaxation
Additional Agents/ Devices•Combined alpha- and beta-blockers (labetalol,
carvedilol)
•Reserpine 0.05-0.1 mg
•Isosorbide vs augmentation pressure
•Device-guided slow breathing exercises (Resperate)
•Device-mediated electrical carotid sinus baroreceptor
stimulation
•Thoracic bioimpedance measurements
Resistant HT: Newer approaches
• Under evaluation– Endothelial receptor antagonist– Catheter-based renal sympathetic
denervation
Endothelial receptor antagonist
• Class of agents that may prove useful for resistant HT is endothelin-receptor antagonists (ERAs)
• In patients with mild-to-moderate essential HT, both nonselective and selective (type A receptor) ERAs – Produce BP reductions comparable to those of
common antihypertensive agents, but – Concerns about adverse events precluded their
use as a treatment option for uncomplicated hypertension
Darusentan
• However, a selective ERA recently tested in 115 patients with resistant HT, – Demonstrated a dose-dependent decrease in BP
• The largest reductions (11.5/6.3 mm Hg) were observed after 10 weeks of follow-up with the largest dose, and
• The drug was generally well tolerated • Ongoing phase III clinical trials with such
agents are awaited to provide further information in this interesting field
Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2007;9:760 –9
Darusentan (Contd)
• Lancet 2009 – Randomised, double-blind study was
undertaken in 117 sites in North and South America, Europe, New Zealand, and Australia
Lancet 2009; 374:1423-1431
Darusentan (Contd)
• Results– The mean reductions in clinic
systolic and diastolic blood pressures were
9/5 mm Hg (SD 14/8) with placebo, 17/10 mm Hg (15/9) with darusentan 50
mg, 18/10 mm Hg (16/9) with darusentan 100
mg, 18/11 mm Hg (18/10) with darusentan
300 mg (p<0·0001 for all effects)
Lancet 2009; 374:1423-1431
Darusentan (Contd)
• Results (Contd)
– The main adverse effects were related to fluid accumulation
– Oedema or fluid retention occurred in 67 (27%) patients given darusentan compared with 19 (14%) given placebo
– One patient in the placebo group died (sudden cardiac death), and five patients in the three darusentan dose groups combined had cardiac-related serious adverse events
Lancet 2009; 374:1423-1431
Darusentan (Contd)
• Interpretation– Darusentan provides additional
reduction in blood pressure in patients who have not attained their treatment goals with three or more antihypertensive drugs. As with other vasodilatory drugs, fluid management with effective diuretic therapy might be needed
Lancet 2009; 374:1423-1431
Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation
• Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of-principle cohort study.
• Lancet. 2009;373(9671):1275-1281.
Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (Contd)
• Proof-of-principle study showing that a– Novel catheter-based device produced
renal denervation and a substantial decrease in blood pressure in a select group of 45 patients with resistant HT
Lancet. 2009;373(9671):1275-1281
Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (Contd)
• Systolic and diastolic BP after the procedure (while maintaining patients on their usual antihypertensive medication therapy) were decreased by– 14/10, 21/10, 22/11, 24/11, and 27/17
mm Hg at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively
Lancet. 2009;373(9671):1275-1281
Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (Contd)
• The development of this novel catheter-based technology offers – An opportunity for clinical investigators to
examine the impact of selective renal denervation on resistant HT
• For clinicians learning of this new technology, – Data are too preliminary to rush to judgment
American Journal of Kidney Diseases,54;2009: pp 795-797
Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (Contd)
• Hence, further rigorous investigation is required to – Identify hypertensive patients who
might benefit from catheter-induced renal sympathetic denervation
American Journal of Kidney Diseases,54;2009: pp 795-797
• ■ ACEIs and ARBs are two of the many kinds of Anti Hypertensives
• ■ Both kinds of drugs (ACEIs and ARBs) do a good job of lowering blood pressure.
• ■ ACEIs and ARBs rarely cause serious problems. The main difference in side effects is that ACEIs are more likely than ARBs to cause a dry cough.
• ■ ACEIs and ARBs do not affect cholesterol levels or blood sugar levels.
• ■ Some ACEIs are available as generics, which cost less.
Facts
•How do side effects of ACEIs and ARBs compare?
Both ACEIs and ARBs can cause cough, dizziness, and headache. The chance of dizziness or headache is about the same with ACEIs and ARBs. The main difference is that ACEIs are more likely to cause a dry cough. Sometimes this cough is bad enough that people need to switch drugs. In research studies: •■ 8 out of 100 people taking an ACEI stop taking it because of side effects. •■ 3 out of 100 people taking an ARB stop because of side effects. •Tell your doctor or nurse if you are bothered by one of these side effects. But do not stop taking your medicine on your own.
British Hypertension Society state that
ACE inhibitor intolerance,
Diabetic nephropathy
Hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy,
Heart failure in ACE inhibitor-intolerant patients post-MI
are all 'compelling indications' for the use of ARBs
ARBs as antihypertensive agents
• Angiotensin receptor blockers are a popular first-choice medicine for high blood pressure.
• ARBs particularly recommended for people who are under 55 years.
• Angiotensin receptor blockers can be useful for people who have diabetes or kidney disease as well as high blood pressure. This is because there is some evidence to show that they can protect kidneys.
Development of ARB’s
Losartan1986Valsartan,
Candesartan Irbesartan
1990 Telmisartan1991 Olmesartan1995
Became the first successful Ang II antagonist drug
Valsartan –nonheterocyclic ARBCandesartan – Prodrug have stronger blood pressure lowering effects than and losartan. Irebesartan - longer acting than valsartan & losartan
Telmisartan - longest elimination half-life of the ARBs or about 24 hours
Olmesartan – Newest & Best ARB on the market, marketed in 2002
Guideline
Population
Goal BP(mm Hg)
Initial Drug Treatment Options
JNC 8 ≥60 y <150/90 Non-Black: thiazide, ACEI, ARB, or CCB Black: thiazide or CCB
<60 y <140/90 Non-Black: thiazide, ACEI, ARB, or CCB Black: thiazide or CCB
Diabetes <140/90 Thiazide, ACEI, ARB, or CCB
CKD <140/90 ACEI or ARB
ARB according to Guideline
Guideline Population Goal BP(mm Hg)
Initial Drug Treatment Options
ESH/ESC 2013
General nonelderly
<140/90 β-Blocker, diuretic, CCB, ACEI, or ARB
General elderly <80 y
<150/90 β-Blocker, diuretic, CCB, ACEI, or ARB
General ≥80 y <150/90 β-Blocker, diuretic, CCB, ACEI, or ARB
Diabetes <140/85 ACEI or ARB
CKD no proteinuria
<140/90 ACEI or ARB
CKD + proteinuria
<130/90
Guideline Population Goal BP(mm Hg)
Initial Drug Treatment Options
NICE 2011
General <80 y <140/90 <55 y: ACEI or ARB
General ≥80 y <150/90 ≥55 y or black: CCB
Guideline Population Goal BP(mm Hg)
Initial Drug Treatment Options
ADA 2013
Diabetes <140/80 ACEI or ARB
A range of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) is available, and analyses suggest there are differences between agents in terms of
- antihypertensive efficacy
- 24-hour BP control
Olmesartan: An advancement in BP lowering effect of ARB?
Though ARB is considered a modest antihypertensive agent in terms of BP lowering effect,
Olmesartan, the newest ARB in the market is unique for its strong antihypertensive property due to ……
What is different with Olmesartan?
Longer half life (13-15 hours)
Higher degree of receptor specificity(12500 fold
greater affinity to AT1 than AT2 receptor)
24 hour complete blockade of AT1 receptor due
to its unique chemical structure
AT 1 affinity
1000 fold• Losartan
3000 fold• Telmisartan
8500 fold• Irbesartan
12500 fold• Olmesartan
68
The specific AT1 affinity relates to how specificially attracted the medicine is for the correct receptor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angiotensin_II_receptor_antagonist#AT1_affinity
olmesartan > candesartan > Irbesartan > telmisartan > losartan
* Andrew Whittaker .A Review of Olmesartan Medoxomil -- A New Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker . Br J Cardiol. 2005;12(2):125-129.
In most people BP displays a characteristics diurnal pattern, with a decline during sleep and sharp increase around the time of awakening. It is due to increase level of catecholamine in blood.
The early morning surge in BP is synchronous with an increase in the risk of catastrophic CV events, including
1. Acute MI 2. CV death & 3. Stroke.
The need for truly 24 hours action including the critical early morning hours
Olmesartan significantly reduce BP in the critical early morning hours
compare to other ARB
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst2009; 10; 147 .Aug 3, 2009;
Olmesartan significantly reduce SBP & DBP compared to other ARB’s
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst2009; 10; 147 .Aug 3, 2009;
These 3 benefits can result in strong and sustained binding with AT1 receptor leading to truly 24 hours action compared to other ARBs.
Prompt BP reduction compared to Losartan after 2 weeks of
therapy
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2009; 10; 147 .Aug 3, 2009;
Prevention of Atherosclerosis progression is a striking benefit of Olmesartan over other ARBs beyond powerful BP control
OLIVUS Trial
EUTOPIA Trial
Vascular Anti-inflammatory properties of Olmesartan provides beneficial cardiovascular effects in addition to its BP lowering action
“Olmesartan demonstrates remodeling effects on small resistance blood vessel, offering more complete end-organ protection”
VIOS Trial
“Olmesartan reduces the occurrence of microalbuminuria in patients with type-2 diabetes, even when BP control is excellent”
ROADMAP Trial