reservoir seals - how they work and how to chose a good one
DESCRIPTION
Reservoir Seals - How They Work and How to Chose a Good OneTRANSCRIPT
Reservoir Seals; How Reservoir Seals; How they Work and How they Work and How to Chose a Good Oneto Chose a Good One
Charles Christopher and Charles Christopher and James James IliffeIliffe
BP plcBP plc
Sealing ProcessesSealing Processes
What holds hydrocarbons and CO2 in the subsurface?Three sealing processes…– Capillary Seals– Pressure Seals– Permeability Seals
Buoyancy ForcesBuoyancy ForcesSeals hold back fluid pressure caused by the buoyancy of the fluids. Oil floats on water because it is less denseThe fluid pressure (B) increases by the density difference between the fluid (ρf) and water (ρw) times the height (h) times gravity (g)
hg**)( fwB ρρ −=
hρf
SEAL
ρw
Pressure
Fluid Properties: Density and Fluid Properties: Density and BouyancyBouyancy
Fluid Buoyancy Pressures
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Pressure (MPa)
Dept
h fro
m C
onta
ct (m
) Oil
CO2
Gas
At Same Res. P&TOil Density = 700 Kg/m3
Gas density = 400 Kg/m3
CO2 density = 500 Kg/m3
For 1000 m column Gas exerts the highest pressure, then CO2.Before we can assess how well seal behaves we have to understand the interfacial tension and wettability
Pressure exerted by CO2 is intermediate between oil and gas for an equivalent column.
O CO2 G
Capillary SealsCapillary Seals
rPc
θγ cos*2=
Washburn (1921)Pc = Capillary Pressure (MPa)γ = Interfacial tension (N/m)θ = wetting angle (°)r = pore throat radius
• Capillary entry pressure is directly proportional to the interfacial tension– the greater the IFT between the fluid in the seal pore throat and the fluid trying to enter the pore throat, the greater the seal capacity! Petroleum
Driving Force
Resistive Force
PetroleumCO2
Driving Force
Resistive Force
Driving Force
Resistive Force
Driving Force
Resistive Force
Pore throat
qΘ
Interfacial TensionInterfacial TensionIFT is a vital parameter in the capillary force calculation IFT is a function of fluid type, p and t. After Hildebrand 2003
Oil has an IFT of approximately 25 mN/m)
Pressure, Mpa
CH4
At 1.4 Km depth – a pressure of 14 MPa CO2 water IFT is 25 (mN/m)
Methane Gas has an IFT of 50 (mN/m)
Capillary Pressure, Pore Radius Capillary Pressure, Pore Radius and IFTand IFT
The smaller the pore throat – the higher the capillary Pressure – so the better the seal Seals are between 10 and 100 nm pore throats
NOTE:
LOG-LOG plot
Capillary Pressure and Pore throat radius
0.000000001
0.00000001
0.0000001
0.000001
0.00001
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Capillary Pressure (MPa)
Rad
ius
(m)
OilGas
Reservoirs
Seals
Geological Barriers
mm
um
nm
Combining Buoyancy and IFTCombining Buoyancy and IFT
Fluid Buoyancy Pressures
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Pressure (MPa)D
epth
from
Con
tact
(m)
Oil
CO2
Gas
What is the theoretical pore throat to hold a 1000 m column of each fluid?19 nm – oil14 nm – gas10 nm – CO2
CO2 requires better seals than other fluids for a particular column
IFT and Pore throat radius
0.000000001
0.00000001
0.0000001
1 10 100
Capillary Pressure (MPa)
Rad
ius
(m)
Oil & CO2Gas
3 5 6
Pore size radius: Mercury Pore size radius: Mercury Intrusion DataIntrusion Data
Top sample is a MUDDY SILTSTONE from about 4850 m below mudline, porosity 17%.Dominant pores are 2 – 20 nm. A very good seal.Algeria sample for Krechba– has a dominant pore throat of <10 nm. An excellent sealShallower – we see a sample indicative of a mixedlithology. A weak seal.
BP Algeria KB502, 1520m
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Pore Radius (nm)
Incr
emen
tal/C
umul
ativ
e P
oros
ity
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Pore radius nm
Cum
ulat
ive/
incr
eam
enta
l po
rosi
ty
BP Algeria KB502, 780m
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Pore Radius (nm)
Incr
emen
tal/C
umul
ativ
e P
oros
ity
Kv = 9.5E-21 m2
1 Darcy ~ 1e-12 m210 nanoDarcies ~ 1e-21m2
Capillary Seal SummaryCapillary Seal Summary
Fluid density, pore throat and interfacial tension all play a role in capillary sealsGas fields are good sites for storage, as the seals are proven.IFT effects reduces the column potential for CO2 in a gas fieldOilfields cannot hold as much (column) CO2 as gas fieldsThis is a density and IFT effect.
Pressure SealPressure Seal
A pressure seal is where the buoyant fluid is held back by the wall of water flowing downwards through the pores due to a pressure potential – which can be considered to be an equivalent column of water – or “head”.
Fluid Flow Goes From High HeadFluid Flow Goes From High HeadTo Low HeadTo Low Head
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Pressure (psi)
Dep
th (m
)
Hydrostatic Pressure (psi)Lithostatic Pressure (psi)Pressure (psi)
Flow occurs from high head to low head—this can be vertically upward as well as down or lateral!
HydrostaticLithostatic (Overburden)
Fluid pressure
Overpressure
Lithostatic = combined water/rock pressure
Pressure SealPressure Seal
Capillary pressure alone is not enough to hold back the column of CO2Combined with a downward head of water CO2 is trapped.Capillary
Head
h
p
Capillary
Permeability SealPermeability SealAfter the capillary pressure of a rock has been reached, flow becomes dominated by the relative permeability of the system.Darcys Law shows that flow will always take place – but at different rates depending on:-– Pressure differential– Relative Permeability (and saturation)– Fluid viscosity
EG. In the shale sample above with an intrinsic (rock only) permeability of 9.85e-21m2 (100nd), in a 20m thick bed holding back a pressure of 5MPa will flow at a velocity of <1 m per 1000 years or less. So for millenia storage this rock is a very effective layer. It would take at least 20,000 years for the flow to reach the next bed (20m). A silt with a permeability of 1 e-16 m2 (0.1md) will flow at 10 m/year – so it would take 2 years to get across.
Trap GeometryTrap Geometry
Number seals to define the trap. Identifying the weakest seal relative to the strongest upward force.The sealing process.– Fill or spill –maximum column
Column Height ControlsColumn Height Controls
First Question is …What is controlling my column? or …How do I want to control my column?Is it leaking or spilling?
Spilling
Give a minimum seal effectiveness
Leaking – through caprock
Provides a “true” seal effectivess for the fluid
Know it leaks because we detect hydrocarbons in the mudrocks above
Seal presence and continuity Seal presence and continuity Stratigraphic Trap with 5 seals
Dip-parallel channel pinching out (shale-out) on monocline. How many capillary seals?
5 : top, bottom and three lateral
13
2
+
_
3
4 5
Map (left): sub-crop to, and contours on, base top-seal. Section (right): north-south transect Which is going to be the weakest seal – depends on the lithology
Faults: And their role is…Faults: And their role is…Types of rocks affect faulting.– Soft, fine grained and unconsolidated– Deform easily and are ductile– Likely to smearThe more clay smeared in a fault the more capillary pressure the fault will have to a lateral sand across the fault. Harder, more brittle rocks will not smear as readily and faults likely will be more permeable.Faults may be propped open by pore pressure but even this permeability is unlikely to provide efficient vertical conduits.Volumes and rates will be quite low and on geological scales.
Fault Seal ExampleFault Seal Example
Shale Gauge Ratio and Cross Shale Gauge Ratio and Cross fault flowfault flow
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 16000 17000 18000 19000 20000 21000 22000 23000 24000 25000 26000 27000 280Arbitrary distance (metres)
View: arbitrary (Isometric)
Project: emsealUser: zrgg08
Date: Wed Aug 28 08:18:57 1996
Gouge ratio (average)
Z.119
em25
em25
0.000
25.0
50.0
75.0
100
25 ss HW HWC
25 ss FW HWC
spill point from HW to FW whereself-juxtaposed with low gouge ratio
Gouge Ratio
Shale Gauge Ratio values calculated using the local stratigraphyindicate that the fault-zone is unlikely to prevent the lateral movement of fluid.
Characteristics of a Good Characteristics of a Good SealSeal
Petrophysically has small pore throats without large connected poresHomogenous both vertically and laterallyLaterally continuousThick to reduce the number of pathways Has no “bypass” systems (sand injection features, faults, etc.)Water wet – to increase the capillary effects
Poor SealsPoor Seals
Larger pore throatsLithologically variableDiscontinuous layeringThin bedsFractured and faultedHydrocarbon wet Can be good for stacked reservoir systems to get high CO2 storage density – just as we do for hydrocarbons –provided a shallower super seal exists.
SummarySummaryAll seals have a threshold above which fluids will leakFine grained lithologies are essential for good seals.CO2 is lighter than oil so imparts more buoyancy pressure per unit. CO2 has lower interfacial tension than gas, so leaks easier than gas.The low permeability of fine grained rocks means that flow rates are extremely slow.Fluid flow UP faults may occur but at slow rates and at low volumes, flow ACROSS faults is much more likely.