research to policy: capacity building for conservation through poverty alleviation

16
Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation Research to Policy Workshop September 17-18 2013, Metropole- Kampala, Uganda

Upload: poverty-and-conservation-learning-group-pclg

Post on 18-Jul-2015

104 views

Category:

Environment


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

Research to Policy:Capacity Building for Conservation Through

Poverty Alleviation

Research to Policy WorkshopSeptember 17-18 2013, Metropole-

Kampala, Uganda

Page 2: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

Background information

• Ranger Based Monitoring Program (RBMP)has a good database on ‘where and what’ for illegal activities

• The ‘who and why’ remain unanswered

• Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation (CTPA) project launched the collection of ‘fresh arrest data’ from August 2012 to document and understand the profiles and motivations of Unauthorised Resource Users (URUs)

Page 3: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

Background Information

• Fresh arrests from August 2012 to February 2013 were interviewed (n=12)

• Collected and analyzed the available socioeconomic data from August 2012 to July 2013 (n=39)

• Total number by July 2013 (n=39)

• These are not the only URU but those arrested by UWA rangers

• There are minor differences with records of law enforcement

Page 4: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

Key profile on the location of arrest and residence of fresh arrested individuals

• 62% (n=15) places of illegal activity are places of arrest. This comprised of 69% (n=27) of the arrested

• 38% (n= 9) places of illegal activity were different from arrest areas. This comprised of 31% (n=12) of the arrested

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Samelocation

Differentlocation

Total numberarrested

Page 5: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

Key contd…

• 15% (n=6) are ARUs

• 36% (n=14) of arrests live in Multiple Use Programme (MUP) parishes

• 64% (n=25) of arrests live in non-MUP parishes

Page 6: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

MUP parishes Vs Non-MUP parishes

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1

MUP parishes

Not MUP parishes

Page 7: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

Distance of fresh arrest residence from the park

• Frontier parishes (n=22)

• Non Frontier parishes (n=2)

• DRC (n=13)

• Tourists (n=02)

Page 8: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

Distance of fresh arrest residence from the park

• Arrests from villages far from the park undertake big forest products

• Arrests from frontier parishes undertake minor forest products such as firewood, salt sticks and bean stakes

Page 9: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

Frontier Villages Vs Others

Frontier Villages

Not Frontier-Uganda

Foreigners

Page 10: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

Elevation of fresh arrest data since August 2012

Page 11: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

Fresh arrests by Rangers since August 2012

Page 12: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

Key profiles of fresh arrests contd…

Ethnicity of fresh arrests

• Batwa (n=0)

• Bakiga (n=24)

• Bafumbira (n=0)

• Other locals (n=0)

• Congolese (n=13)

• Foreign tourists (n=2)

Page 13: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

Ethnicity %s

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Batwa Bakiga Bafumbira Other locals Congolese Foreign tourists

Frequency

%

Page 14: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

Other key profile of fresh arrested individuals

Sex

• All the arrested were males

Age

• Youth (n=3)

• Adult (n=36)

Position in society

• Majority (n=9) have no position in society

Page 15: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

Other key profile contd…• All had knowledge on ICD mostly MUP and

crop raiding project.

• All had attended park meetings apart from one

• Farming is the main source of livelihood especially subsistence farming

• Were averagely ranked in ‘somewhat bad’ not ‘worst members’ of the community .So what drives them?

• Majority URUs have big families of either more than one wife or many children

Page 16: Research to Policy: Capacity Building for Conservation Through Poverty Alleviation

• Can we continue this social monitoring of resource use?

• Research to Policy