research proposal 7-10-2013
TRANSCRIPT
2013
Sarah DeCloux
Webster University
7/10/2013
Research Proposal: Rising Cost of Health Care.
Has the Government Contributed to Rising Cost?
1
Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................................2
Relevance.......................................................................................................................................3
Research Question ..........................................................................................................................3
Structure of Research Proposal ........................................................................................................4
Literature Review ...........................................................................................................................4
Hypothesis and Methodology ..........................................................................................................7
Data ...............................................................................................................................................9
Expected Outcome ........................................................................................................................ 10
Bibliography................................................................................................................................. 12
2
Introduction
On March 21, 2010 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as ACA or
Obamacare, was passed. This legislation will provide all Americans with health insurance by
2014, regardless of health or age, employed or unemployed status; dissolving the issues of not
being able to obtain treatment. The bill provides for a government insurance option in order to
keep private insurances honest and it also offers insurance to those who cannot afford it.
In the United States, people around the country are becoming aware and concerned about the
intense increase in health care costs, namely the dramatic increases in health insurance
premiums. Americans were promised a decrease of close to $2,500 per family for health
insurance as a result of health care reform, but instead are facing a $3,000 increase of their health
insurance costs.1 In a recent article from the Huffington Post, health insurance premiums are
predicted to increase from 25 to 116% across the country for some people.2 Although these are
only predictions we have already seen that Ohio has reported an increase of 88% of health
insurance premiums from 2013 – 2014.3 This is only one example of the states that are
experiencing this sharp acceleration of cost. This phenomenon has caused wide speculation as to
1 Merrill Matthews and Mark E. Litow, "ObamaCare's Health-Insurance Sticker Shock," The Wall Street
Journal, January 13, 2013,
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323936804578227890968100984.html.
2 Jeffrey Young, "Health Insurance Premium Increases Vowed By Companies For 2014," The Huffington
Post, March 22, 2013, accessed June 19, 2013, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/22/health-
insurance-premium-increases_n_2932704.html.
3 Avik Roy, "Ohio Dept. Of Insurance: Obamacare To Increase Individual-Market Health Premiums By
88 Percent," Forbes, June 10, 2013, accessed June 19, 2013,
http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/06/10/ohio-dept-of-insurance-obamacare-to-increase-
individual-market-health-premiums-by-88-percent/.
3
what has prompted the rise in cost. Premiums have continued to rise at a more significant rate
than in the 80s and 90s, and even the early 2000s, which makes one wonder, why?
Relevance
My research question is based on observations and articles I have read as I have followed health
care reform through the different stages of implementation. The purpose of this project is to
determine if government involvement has had a substantial impact on increasing health care
costs. If a correlation between the rise in health care costs and the government’s prized ACA bill
can be made, it will show that the government’s reform is ultimately responsible for putting an
additional burden of unnecessary health costs on Americans and that the United States has failed
to meet the standard of what other western democratic health systems already offer.
Research Question
My research question is: Has the US government played a role in the rising cost of health care in
the United States? By stating the question in this way it leaves the answer open ended. My
question is not a statement that the government is to blame, but is worded as such, to suggest a
different line of thinking from what has been pressed upon in the past. For the purpose of this
project, the US government’s role will be defined as the key driver of the Affordable Care Act,
and the rising cost of health care will be viewed as increasing annual health insurance premiums.
To further clarify, let us make the distinction between health care expenditures, which refer to
the dollar amount attached to health services provided; and health insurance premium, which is
the dollar amount that citizens must pay out of pocket, which is simultaneously, the cost that will
be referred to throughout this proposal.
4
Structure of Research Proposal
This research proposal will show which studies and information are currently available on this
topic, how this project was planned, how the research will be conducted, what data will be used,
possible complications with the research, and what the expected results are. Each section will
address the role it will play in this research project and how the research design is setup.
Literature Review
The content of this Literature Review will encompass several different approaches which try to
explain increasing health care costs, as well as, views regarding the correlation between rising
health care costs and the Affordable Care Act.
In order to form a basis of different theories, we will first look at existing, potential explanations
for increases in health care cost. Altman and Levitt, both of whom work for Kaiser (one of the
largest health insurance providers in the US), say the reason we are experiencing continuing
increase of medical costs all comes down to greedy American people. Their demand for better
treatment, the latest technology, and consumerism has forced insurance companies to increase
their prices.4 While in some instances this approach may be true, they do not rule out any
additional reasons which raise just as many concerns about increased costs, for example, the
increased need of medical care for the “baby boomer” generation. Furthermore, common citizens
do not control or regulate the prices of medical expenditures which have been known to increase
cost in the past. Therefore, how are they to be held liable for the rules and policies which are
already set in place? Another approach which has been studied in an article by Bates and
4 Drew E. Altman and Larry Levitt, "The Sad History Of Health Care Cost Containment As Told In One
Chart," Health Affairs, February 23, 2002, accessed June 25, 2013, doi:10.1377/hlthaff.w2.83.
5
Rexford provides that the U.S. is affected by a theory called Baumol's cost disease. Ultimately,
their study states that health care costs increase when wages are increased beyond the rate of
productivity and that unbalanced growth is the true determinant factor.5 This theory provides a
reasonable possibility; however, they state in their paper that the result of their research may
possibly change when applied to different industries in health care such as pharmaceuticals or
medical technology. If this is the case, their indicators are not stable enough to produce
consistent results, thus it does not make sense to consider this as a reliable explanation. In yet
another approach, Bodenheimer takes the time to look over all possible explanations for the
rising costs of healthcare. He suggests that the pharmaceutical industries and health
administration are the main causes of this quickly growing cost.6 Yet, he does not continue to ask
why these two sectors have produced the greatest increase in health care costs.
Next we will look at authors, who have identified a correlation between the ACA and rising
health care costs, but are purely speculative and are based on estimations of the future. One
analysis looks at California rates specifically. It is useful to note that the authors provide a
statistical evaluation which confirms that health costs have been directly linked to the ACA.
Their research gives examples of what specific factors have been identified as producing
increased costs and what factors can be disregarded. It is also interesting to note that this report
was paid for by the new California Health Exchange which was established as a result of the
5 Laurie J. Bates and Rexford E. Santerre, "Does the U.S. Health Care Sector Suffer from Baumol's Cost
Disease? Evidence from the 50 States," Journal of Health Economics 32, no. 2 (March 2013), accessed
June 21, 2013, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629612001877.
6 Thomas Bodenheimer, "High and Rising Health Care Costs. Part 1: Seeking an Explanation," Annals of
Internal Medicine 142, no. 10 (May 2005), http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=718406.
6
implementation of the ACA.7 While this paper is consistent with the research I will be
conducting, the scope of the report remains limited to California alone and does not encompass
the entirety of the United States. This will be discussed further in the methodology section of this
proposal. An assessment by Sarah Kliff cites several sources that confirm prices will increase
notably as a result of the ACA. She suggests two factors are responsible for this increase,
namely: additional mandated benefits and the influx of new customers to the insurance market.8
Kliff provides sound reasoning, but is only speculating about what may come in the future.
Matthews and Litow make it explicitly clear, in their article from The Wall Street Journal, that
insurance companies are the prime source of premium increases as a direct result of ACA. They
note three requirements of the Affordable Care Act and note how the insurance companies have
responded. Throughout their explanation they show eight different states that have tried a similar
form of health coverage to the ACA, and how these failed to reduce cost. They also site Mark
Bertolini, the CEO of Aetna (one of the largest health insurance companies in the United States),
who confirms that insurance companies are increasing premiums up to 100% of what they would
normally.9 Even the insurance companies won't deny they are a major contributor to increasing
costs. While this article is aimed directly at the center of my research, it does not assess the
7 Robert Cosway and Barbara Abbott, Factors Affecting Individual Premium Rates in 2014 for
California, report, March 28, 2013,
http://www.healthexchange.ca.gov/Documents/Factors%20Affecting%20Individual%20Premiums%20FI
NAL%203-28-2013.pdf.
8 Sarah Kliff, "How Will Obamacare Hit Premiums? Let’s Break down the Numbers.,"Washington Post,
March 29, 2013, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/03/29/how-will-obamacare-
hit-premiums-lets-break-down-the-numbers/.
9 Merrill Matthews and Mark E. Litow, "ObamaCare's Health-Insurance Sticker Shock," The Wall Street
Journal, January 13, 2013, section goes here,
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323936804578227890968100984.html.
7
difference between rate increases before and after the Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010
and concentrates mainly on futuristic expectations. In a summary of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act, from the Kaiser Family Foundation, they explain the government's role in
health care and show what is now expected of health insurance companies. This document also
states how the government prescribes to pay for the cost of this new health care. Their
proposition is less than exciting, when the government says that increased taxes will cover a
mere 3% of this cost over ten years.10 In addition, the contents, of the Private Health Insurance
State Oversight of Premium Rates report to congress, address the increasing premium rates
across the country. These increases are provided for in the ACA, stating that rates which increase
by more than ten percent are subject to government review and approval. The report establishes
that these reviews have only been successful 35% of the time. Thus the provision, by the
government, to keep insurance costs down has failed; further solidifying the government’s
ineffective role in controlling health care costs.
Hypothesis and Methodology
My hypothesis states that the greater the involvement of the government in health care, the
greater the rate of increase in health care costs. More simply stated, the greater the involvement
of government; the higher the cost of health care will be. This hypothesis does not provide a list
of possible outcomes. Rather I will find my hypothesis to either be proved right or wrong. In
order to prove or disprove my hypothesis it will be tested through regression analysis.
10 Kaiser Family Foundation, "Focus on Health: Summary of New Health Reform Law," Center for
Personal Assistance Services, April 15, 2011, Coverage and financing,
http://www.pascenter.org/publications/item.php?id=1064.
8
The approach I will use for this research will be an empirical-analytical approach. The method
applied will include an experimental, quantitative study of data through regression analysis. This
form of analysis is usually easy to interpret and also widely used. Therefore, it will allow others
researchers to follow the same model and also, to control my results at the same time. In order to
receive accurate results, I have limited the scope of the research. The time frame of data is set
from 1994 till 2011. This time frame allows us to look at increases or decreases in insurance
premiums over several years using the Affordable Care Act as the main shifting point in time.
Although this topic has the potential to warrant speculation regarding future predictions, I have
limited the time frame to include data up till 2011 in order to remain within the boundaries of the
intended experiment. Currently, since data is not yet available, I am unable to gather present day
resources. Though, if it becomes accessible in the future, it would have a strengthening effect on
the research. This study will focus on the United States specifically, and will include all 50 states
in order to show if this phenomenon occurs nation-wide.
For the purpose of conducting the regression analysis, the dependent variable will be the cost of
health care. More specifically, I will examine the percentage of change in annual insurance
premiums. Accordingly, the independent variable will be the US government’s role in health
care reform [see illustration below]. This method allows me to see if the impact of implementing
health care reform via the ACA, is in fact, a cause of the rapidly rising cost of health insurance
for Americans.
IV DV
Government Cost of Health care
ACA – March 21, 2010
9
Data
From my pre-research I have established that several of my sources have verified the correlation
between increase in health insurance costs and the continual implementation of the ACA.
However, no study has been conducted to look at the difference in insurance premium increases
before and after the ACA was passed. Current opinions on the increasing health care costs look
only at the health expenditures of Americans, the physicians, and hospitals. No approach, I have
found thus far, points to the government or the health insurance companies as an explanation for
these rapid rate increases. Conversely, the approach I have suggested takes both of these into
account and builds a new case. Looking at the governmental impact on health insurance costs is
a unique way to explain this phenomenon. In light of the broad scope of standing approaches, I
have attempted to illuminate the ultimate factor for why health costs have grown so quickly in
the past few years.
The data I will be using will come from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.11 This website
provides governmental data on insurance premiums for the years 1994 - 2011. It allows the
researcher to create the necessary variables in a graph, based on the information they have
collected in their database. The data is easily available in Excel format, thus making it ideal for
conducting regression analysis. I will also be verifying this data with data from “Federal Health
Reform: State Implementation Entities, Reports, and Research.”12 This website provides sound
11 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Home, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, accessed June 25, 2013, http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/.
12 "Federal Health Reform: State Implementation Entities, Reports, and Research," Health Reform: State
Implementation Entities, Reports, and Research, accessed June 21, 2013, http://www.ncsl.org/issues-
research/health/state-implementation-entities-to-implement-the-aca.aspx.
10
state-by-state reports, data, and analysis of the implementation and impact that ACA has on each
individual state. While this data is not available in Excel format, I will be able to confirm that the
raw data used is accurate by using more than one source. All of the data I have found is open to
the public. The data is limited to the United States and the time frame is set from 1994 through
2011. The data I will be collecting is regularly updated and checked for accuracy by the website
sponsors.
In the next section, I will look at some possible challenges related to data collection, namely:
access, reliability, validity, and replication. Firstly, the sources I have listed previously are open
and accessible to any person or institution. Secondly, I have found data from two reliable
sources thus far, and will continue to look for a third source. This is important in order to
triangulate the accuracy of the data. Thirdly, by using the percentage of increase or decrease in
insurance premiums over several years I will be able to show whether the ACA has had an effect
thus providing validity. The percentages measured year-to-year, before and after the bill was
passed will show if any significant change has occurred. As data following 2010 becomes
available and more accurate, this research project will only become stronger; assuring that
replication of this experiment is possible.
Expected Outcome
In conclusion, I expect to find that there is a direct connection between the government and the
rising cost of health care. In effect, the government can be said to have produced this impact
since they are responsible for reforming health care in the United States. The government must
be vigilant in their monitoring of insurance companies to protect the welfare of the American
people and states should fine tune this legislation according to the needs of their individual
populations. Although this research project will offer a good indication as to the role of the
11
government, in order to provide a stronger argument in terms of time after the bill was passed,
further research is needed.
12
Bibliography
Altman, Drew E., and Larry Levitt. "The Sad History Of Health Care Cost Containment As Told In One
Chart." Health Affairs. February 23, 2002. Accessed June 25, 2013. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.w2.83.
Bates, Laurie J., and Rexford E. Santerre. "Does the U.S. Health Care Sector Suffer from Baumol's Cost Disease? Evidence from the 50 States." Journal of Health Economics 32, no. 2 (March 2013): 386-91. Accessed June 21, 2013.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629612001877.
Bodenheimer, Thomas. "High and Rising Health Care Costs. Part 1: Seeking an Explanation." Annals of Internal Medicine 142, no. 10 (May 2005): 847-54. http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=718406.
Cosway, Robert, and Barbara Abbott. Factors Affecting Individual Premium Rates in 2014 for
California. Report. March 28, 2013. http://www.healthexchange.ca.gov/Documents/Factors%20Affecting%20Individual%20Premiums%20FINAL%203-28-2013.pdf.
"Federal Health Reform: State Implementation Entities, Reports, and Research." Health Reform: State
Implementation Entities, Reports, and Research. Accessed June 21, 2013. http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/state- implementation-entities-to- implement-the-aca.aspx.
Kaiser Family Foundation. "Focus on Health: Summary of New Health Reform Law." Center for
Personal Assistance Services. April 15, 2011. http://www.pascenter.org/publications/item.php?id=1064.
Kliff, Sarah. "How Will Obamacare Hit Premiums? Let’s Break down the Numbers." Washington Post, March 29, 2013. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/03/29/how-will-
obamacare-hit-premiums- lets-break-down-the-numbers/. Matthews, Merrill, and Mark E. Litow. "ObamaCare's Health-Insurance Sticker Shock." The Wall Street
Journal. January 13, 2013. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323936804578227890968100984.html.
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Home. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed June 25, 2013.
http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/.
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE State Oversight of Premium Rates. Report. Washington D.C.: GAO: Government Accountability Office, 2011. Accessed June 21, 2013. http://www.gao.gov/assets/330/322333.pdf.
Roy, Avik. "Ohio Dept. Of Insurance: Obamacare To Increase Individual-Market Health Premiums By
88 Percent." Forbes. June 10, 2013. Accessed June 19, 2013.
13
http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/06/10/ohio-dept-of- insurance-obamacare-to-
increase-individual-market-health-premiums-by-88-percent/.
Young, Jeffrey. "Health Insurance Premium Increases Vowed By Companies For 2014." The Huffington
Post. March 22, 2013. Accessed June 19, 2013. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/22/health-insurance-premium-
increases_n_2932704.html.