research on the web

28
Using the WWW to Build Community A guide to resources and safe surfing

Upload: rick-mckinnon

Post on 20-Aug-2015

479 views

Category:

Technology


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Research on the Web

Using the WWW to Build Community

A guide to resources and safe surfing

Page 2: Research on the Web

The Tools

• Ways of connecting individuals in such a way that they can share knowledge about the things they care about.

• Disproportionate advantage for people who are away from urban centers -- information becomes accessible through the web.

Page 3: Research on the Web

User-generated Content

• The web allows the creation of knowledge in a bottom-up, rather than top-down direction.

• Experts are not determined by degrees or credentials. Experts are the people who have the knowledge, no matter who or where they are.

Page 4: Research on the Web

Collective Knowledge

• Wikipedia

• Fluther

Page 5: Research on the Web

Bookmark Tools

• Delicious

Page 6: Research on the Web

Event & Scheduling Tools

• Google Calendar

• Doodle

Page 7: Research on the Web

Video Tools

• YouTube

• Google Video

• Blip

• Leak

Page 8: Research on the Web

Photography Tools

• Flickr!

Page 9: Research on the Web

Survey Tools

• Survey Monkey

Page 10: Research on the Web

Writing Tools

• Writely

• Google Docs (Also offers spreadsheet)

Page 11: Research on the Web

Graphical Tools

• Frappr (Mapping Tool)

• Wayfaring (Mapping Tool)

Page 12: Research on the Web

Filtering Tools

• Newstrust

• Digg

Page 13: Research on the Web

Critical Evaluation of Web Content

• Why Evaluate What You Find on the Web?

• Anyone can put up a Web page– about anything

• Many pages not kept up-to-date

• No quality control– most sites not “peer-reviewed”

• less trustworthy than scholarly publications

– no selection guidelines for search engines

Page 14: Research on the Web

Before you click to view the page...

• Look at the URL - personal page or site ? ~ or % or users or members

• Domain name appropriate for the content ? edu, com, org, net, gov, ca.us, uk, etc.

• Published by an entity that makes sense ? • News from its source?

www.nytimes.com

• Advice from valid agency? www.nih.gov/www.nlm.nih.gov/www.nimh.nih.gov/

Page 15: Research on the Web

Scan the perimeter of the page

• Can you tell who wrote it ?• name of page author• organization, institution, agency you recognize• e-mail contact by itself not enough

• Credentials for the subject matter ?– Look for links to:

“About us” “Philosophy” “Background” “Biography”

• Is it recent or current enough ?• Look for “last updated” date - usually at bottom

• If no links or other clues...• truncate back the URL

http://hs.houstonisd.org/hspva/academic/Science/Thinkquest/gail/text/ethics.html

Page 16: Research on the Web

Indicators of quality

• Sources documented• links, footnotes, etc.

– As detailed as you expect in print publications ?

• do the links work ?

• Information retyped or forged• why not a link to published version instead ?

• Links to other resources• biased, slanted ?

Page 17: Research on the Web

What Do Others Say ?

• Search the URL in alexa.com– Who links to the site? Who owns the domain?

– Type or paste the URL into the basic search box

– Traffic for top 100,000 sites

• See what links are in Google’s Similar pages

• Look up the page author in Google

Page 18: Research on the Web

Does it all add up?

• Why was the page put on the Web ? • inform with facts and data? • explain, persuade? • sell, entice?

• share, disclose?• as a parody or satire?

• Is it appropriate for your purpose?

Page 19: Research on the Web

Might it be ironic? Satire or parody?

• Think about the "tone" of the page.• Humorous? Parody? Exaggerated?

Overblown arguments?• Outrageous photographs or

juxtaposition of unlikely images?• Arguing a viewpoint with examples that

suggest that what is argued is ultimately not possible.

Page 20: Research on the Web

Kayak Attack

• GoogleVideo:– Kayak Attack

• Snoops:– The Truth

Page 21: Research on the Web

Try evaluating some sites...1. Search a controversial topic in Google:

– "nuclear armageddon"– prions danger– “stem cells” abortion

2. Scan the first two pages of results

3. Visit one or two sites – try to evaluate their quality and reliability

Page 22: Research on the Web

Citations

• Citations ad credibility to a work (whether on the the web or not).

• They help readers to find source material.

• They indicate original research.

• They protect against any claim of plagiarism.

Page 23: Research on the Web

How to cite web content

Reference List:• Author or Editor. Date. Title of work. Edition.

[Type of medium]: <Protocol/Site/Path/File> Additional: retrieval information [Access date].

or• Author or Editor. Date. Title of work. Edition.

[Type of medium]: Supplier/Database identifier or number/Item name or number [Access date].

Page 24: Research on the Web

Examples

• Crouse, Maurice. 4 August 2006. Citing electronic information in history papers. <http://history.memphis.edu/mcrouse/ elcite.html> [4 August 2006].

• Online Book Initiative [Public-domain electronic texts]. No date. <gopher://ftp.std.com/11/obi> [3 December 1996].

• Kehoe, Brian P. 1992. Zen and the art of the Internet. 2d ed. <ftp://quake.think.com/pub /etext/1992/zen10.txt> [25 March 1995].

Page 25: Research on the Web

MLA: Books

• Lastname, Firstname. Title of Book. Place of Publication: Publisher, Year of Publication.

Page 26: Research on the Web

Examples

• Gleick, James. Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Penguin Books, 1987.

• Henley, Patricia. The Hummingbird House. Denver: MacMurray, 1999.

Page 27: Research on the Web

Periodicals

• Author(s). "Title of Article." Title of Periodical Day Month Year: pages.

Page 28: Research on the Web

Examples

• Poniewozik, James. "TV Makes a Too-Close Call." Time 20 Nov. 2000: 70-71.

• Trembacki, Paul. "Brees Hopes to Win Heisman for Team." Purdue Exponent 5 Dec. 2000: 20.