1

Course Syllabus

Research in European and Global Governance and integration

Global Governance1

Daniel Large larged@spp.ceu.edu

Term: Spring 2020 Prerequisites: None Teaching Format: Seminar Office and Office Hours: October 6 u. 7, 2nd floor, Office 241; TBC Background and overall aim of the course:

This course focuses on two closely related areas of research that are important to students of contemporary public policy: European and global governance. Whereas European integration implies the emergence of the world’s most intertwined system of multi-level governance, addressing key policy challenges with the help of global governance arrangements has been an inherent feature of public policy-making for long. Yet, since the end of the Cold War, both, expectations towards and contestations of European and global governance mechanisms have become more extreme. On the one hand, European Union supranationalism and its democratisation, as well as global multilateralism and multipolarity have been identified as the only ways to guarantee peace and economic prosperity in a globalized world. On the other hand, the nature and future of global governance is increasingly being brought into question, and so is the European ambition to create an ‘ever closer union’. These diverging expectations surrounding European and global governance necessitate new forms of research and policy engagement. This course features the European and global dimensions next to each other. Students learn to identify commonalities and differences between research perspectives and key topics in these two domains. This course aims to provide an intensive and critical orientation to European and global governance as a field of scholarly inquiry and applied policy engagement. Reference is made to key conceptual themes and historical background. Students examine theoretical and methodological approaches to, and problems in, European and global governance. Employing a global perspective, the course will draw on a range of analytical perspectives, including those labelled ‘non-Western’, and encourage reflection on research methods and epistemology together with more substantive analytical questions. Employing a European perspective the course shows how scholarship on policy and governance is routed in particular theories of integration and this sub-field of inquiry is informed by different

1 This syllabus covers the Global Governance part of this course. Please see the separate European syllabus.

2

disciplinary traditions. The course discusses whether the European Union is one aspect of wider, evolving shifts in global governance and politics more generally. The class features different teaching formats such as classic seminar discussion of core themes and research literature, or study reviews of major standalone research contributions. Please note: the class features two major themes – global governance (Theme 1) and EU governance and integration (Theme 2) – which are delivered in parallel by the two course directors, each of them taking the lead on of these themes as illustrated in the table below:

Course objectives

This class aims at preparing students for independent and advanced-level research in the field of research into European integration and global governance. The course provides access to core debates in European integration studies and global governance by critically reviewing existing research in the light of new empirical findings. The course pays particular attention to the challenges of combining the theoretical frameworks and methodological tools of different disciplines in EU and global governance studies. The class aims at helping students to identify key issues and policy problems and to advance their own conceptual and empirical research frameworks as well as to situate themselves and their respective research projects in the wider disciplines of European integration studies and the global governance literature.

The course develops core analytical and theoretical skills and specifically aims at preparing students for a career in academia and/or in leadership positions in policy-making related to European affairs and within global governance. The course is based on an interactive teaching methodology targeted at a small group seminar. Students obtain responsibility for acting as lead speakers on specific topics and practice peer review. To this end the course applies a number of formats that are characteristic of the future academic and/or professional environment of students such as panel discussion, presenter/discussant model, short lecture format, policy briefings and round table discussions. This Global Governance part of the course seeks to provide an intensive orientation into select key themes concerning research into global governance. On the one hand, it is concerned with critically engaging a limited selection of topics in the field of global governance, exploring different historical, theoretical (epistemological and ontological issues) and research challenges that have potentially transferable uses. On the other hand, it also seeks to highlight the value of learning processes. Emphasizing active participation, rotation of roles in class and final presentations, it will seek to combine practice of transferable skills along with knowledge. Learning outcomes

By the end of this course, students will have the ability to critically apply core theories and research perspectives in European integration theory and the global governance literature to different empirical contexts in an innovative manner, thus contributing both to empirical and theoretical innovation. They will have developed an understanding of core conceptual, methodological as well as empirical challenges with regard to researching a range of different issues in contemporary research concerning EU integration and global governance. Moreover, students will be able to apply a number of core academic practices and will have developed oral and written presentation skills which are required for communicating the results of complex and advanced-level studies to different audiences (academic, professional expert setting, interested public).

This course will contribute to the development of a new generation of researchers with a strong analytical potential, thus helping innovation in the field of European integration and global governance studies, both in research and teaching. Those students aiming for a career

3

in EU or global policy practice will be able to both produce and make use of complex theoretical and empirical studies in applied and practical contexts.

Learning activities and teaching methods

Emphasizing active learning, this course will feature a variety of teaching formats. Students are required to participate actively during classes, during which skills as well as knowledge will be highlighted.

Requirements

Class participation is mandatory for this class. Students missing more than two sessions per class might not receive a passing grade for this course. The successful completion of the course requires active participation in the class sessions. As this is a research class the emphasis is on interactive class discussions, the review of research approaches, the preparation of larger texts and regularly scheduled student presentations. Use of laptops or phones is not permitted during class, unless by special need.

Assessment2 • Attendance and active class-room participation: 10% • Final Presentation: 10% • Final research essay or book review paper: 50%

Students will need to complete either a research essay or a book review paper (3,000 word maximum including references and footnotes) at the end of the course. The review paper engages with a particular study and critically discusses it. Papers can be related to the topic of one of the own in-class presentations but do not have to. Full requirements are on the Moodle course site.

Background Reading Those wishing to get a basic overview before the start of the course, please consult:

• Mazower, Mark. 2012. Governing the World. The History of an Idea. New York: Penguin.

• Weiss, Thomas G. and Rorden Wilkinson eds. 2014. International Organization and Global Governance. London: Routledge.

• Murphy, Craig. 1994. International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance since 1850. New York: Oxford University Press.

Please note: The seminar schedule below is accurate at the time of publication. Amendments may be made prior to the start, and during the course of the term. You will be notified via Moodle about any amendments. The Moodle site also contains up to date information about each session; this syllabus is a guide only.

2 NB: this concerns only this part of the course. Please consult the other syllabus for this course and remaining assessment criteria.

4

Course Programme

Course content structure: Overview 1. Introduction 2. Global Governance: Theory and Practice 3. Can the Study of Global Governance be Decentered? 4. Global Histories, Knowledge and Power 5. Global Governance: Advent to Eclipse? 6. Global Governors 7. Domestic-Global Connections 8. Where are the Women? 9. Emerging Powers 10 & 11. Policy Fields in Global Governance: Case Study Presentations 12. Conclusions Weekly Sessions 1. Introduction This will introduce the content and approach of the course, and seek to understand your backgrounds and interests in more depth. Recommended Reading

• Weiss, Thomas G., and Wilkinson, R. 2014. ‘Rethinking global governance? Complexity, authority, power, change.’ International Studies Quarterly, 58 (1): 207-215.

• Fehl, Caroline, and Johannes Thimm. 2019. ‘Dispensing With the Indispensable Nation?: Multilateralism minus One in the Trump Era.’ Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 25 (1): 23-46.

Supplementary

• Martin Wolf, ‘Bretton Woods at 75: global cooperation under threat’, FT July 10, 2019.

• Ana Palacio, ‘The Twilight of the Global Order’, Project Syndicate September 2, 2019.

• Beeson, Mark. Rethinking Global Governance (Macmillan International Higher Education, 2019).

• Thomas Weiss and Rorden Wilkinson, Rethinking Global Governance (Polity 2019). • Wendt, Alexander. 2003. Why a World State is Inevitable’. European Journal of

International Relations 9: 491–542. • Zhao Tingyang, ‘Can this ancient Chinese philosophy save us from global chaos?’,

The Washington Post February 7, 2018.

5

2. Global Governance: Theory and Practice This will set the scene with a foundational overview class aiming to provide general orientation to the subject. How has global governance been approached to date, as a scholarly field and a field of practice? Required Reading

• Dingwerth, Klaus and Philipp Pattberg. 2009. ‘Actors, arenas and issues in global governance’, in Jim Whitman ed., Palgrave Advances in Global Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 41-65.

• Coleman, William D. 2012. ‘Governance and Global Public Policy’. In David Levi-Faur ed., The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 673-685.

• Miles Kahler, ‘Global Governance: Three Futures’, International Studies Review 20 (2018): 239-246.

Supplementary

• Coen, D. and Tom Pegram. 2015. ‘Wanted: A Third Generation of Global Governance Research.’ Governance, 28: 417–420.

• Reinicke, W. H. 1998. Global Public Policy: Governing Without Government? Washington DC: Brookings. pp. 52-74.

• Stone, Diane. 2008. ‘Global public policy, transnational policy communities, and their networks’, Policy Studies Journal 36: 19-38.

• Cerny, Philip. 2017. ‘The Limits of Global Governance: Transnational Neopluralism in a Complex World.’ In R. Marchetti (eds) Partnerships in International Policy-Making. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 31-47.

3. Can the Study of Global Governance be Decentered? What ‘centre’ in global governance research is there to decentre? What is the power of the global in your research? Required Reading

• Bilgin, Pinar. 2008.‘Thinking past ‘Western’ IR?’ Third World Quarterly 29(1): 5-23. • Hurrell, Andrew. 2017. ‘Can the Study of Global Governance Be Decentred?’ In

Anna Triandafyllidou ed., Global Governance from Regional Perspectives: A Critical View. OUP online.

• Held, David. 2016. ‘Elements of a theory of global governance’, Philosophy & Social Criticism 42 (9): 837-846.

Supplementary Reading

• Kellee S. Tsai. 2013. ‘China’s Political Economy and Political Science’, Perspectives on Politics 11 (3): 860-871.

• Zarakol, Ayse. 2016. ‘Afterword: Creating a Community of Area Studies in a Changing World’. In Edith W. Clowes and Shelly Jarrett Bromberg eds., Area Studies in the Global Age: Community, Place, Identity. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press: 268-276

• Tickner, Arlene. 2003. ‘Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 32 (2): 295-324.

• Darian-Smith, Eve and Philip C. McCart. 2017. The Global Turn: Theories, Research Designs, and Methods for Global Studies. Oakland: University of California Press.

6

4. Global Histories, Knowledge and Power How would you present a history of global governance? The past is a fertile frontier of new research about global governance. This class will firstly consider historical change, and the relevance of global histories to global governance today. Secondly, it will reflect on the politics of knowledge. Required Reading

• Weiss, Thomas G. 2009. ‘What Happened to the Idea of World Government?’, International Studies Quarterly 53: 253-271.

• Eve Darian-Smith, ‘Decolonizing Global Studies’. In Mark Juergensmeyer et al eds., The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 251-273.

• Mishra, Pankaj. 2013. From the Ruins of Empire: The Revolt against the West and the Remaking of Asia. London: Penguin: 1-11; 294-310.

Supplementary Reading • Ruggie, John G. 1992. ‘Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution’,

International Organization 46 (3): 561-598. • Deudney, Daniel. 2016. ‘The Great Descent: ‘Global Governance’ in Historical and

Theoretical Perspective’. In Amitav Acharya (ed.), Why Govern? Rethinking Demand and Progress in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 31-54.

• Sabaratnam, Meera. 2013. ‘Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace,’ Security Dialogue 44 (3): 259–278.

5. Global Governance: ‘Yesterday’s Dream’? This class explores the context of the emergence and development of global governance after the Cold War, taking in arguments for and against. It also traces elements of a more recent backlash against ‘globalism’ and global policy. Required Reading

• Commission on Global Governance. 1995. Our Global Neighbourhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapters 1 & 2.

• Bolton, John R. 2000. ‘Should We Take Global Governance Seriously?’, Chicago Journal of International Law 1 (2): 205-221.

• Michael Zurn. 2018. ‘Contested Global Governance’, Global Policy 9 (1): 138-145. Supplementary Reading

• Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. ‘The End of History?’, The National Interest. • Pisani-Ferry, Jean. 2018. ‘Should we give up on global governance?’, Policy

Contribution Issue 17, October. • Richard Haas, ‘How a World Order Ends and what comes in its wake’,

ForeignAffairs.com Jan/Feb 2019.

7

6. Global Governors Who are the agents of global governance and what is their role? What are the benefits of a practice approach to global governing? Required Reading

• Stone, Diane and Stella Ladi. 2015. ‘Global Public Policy and Transnational Administration’, Public Administration 93 (4): 839-855.

• Pouliot, Vincent and Jean-Philippe Therien. 2018. ‘Global Governance in Practice’, Global Policy 9 (2): 163-172.

• Barnett, Michael. 2018. ‘Human rights, humanitarianism, and the practices of humanity’, International Theory 103: 314-349.

Additional Reading

• Avant, Deborah D., Martha Finnemore, and Susan K. Sell eds. 2010. Who Governs the Globe? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

• Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall, eds., Power in Global Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

• Abbott, Kenneth and Duncan Snidal. 1998. ‘Why States Act through Formal Organizations.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42: 3–32.

• Abbott, Kenneth W., Green, Jessica F. and. Keohane, Robert O. 2016. ‘Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance’, International Organization, 70, Spring: 247–277.

• Sending, Ole Jacob and Iver B. Neumann. (2006). ‘Governance to Governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, States, and Power’, International Studies Quarterly 50: 651-672.

• Stephen, Matthew D. 2018. ‘Will international Institutions Fail Again? International Power Shifts and the Future of Global Cooperation’, Finish Institute of International Affairs Briefing Paper, No. 249.

7. Domestic-Global Connections How are domestic politics and policies connected to global governance? Required Reading

• Hameiri, Shahar and Lee Jones. 2016. ‘Global Governance as State Transformation’, Political Studies 64 (4): 793-810.

• Bernstein, S and Cashore. 2012. ‘Complex global governance and domestic policies: four pathways of influence.’ International Affairs 88: 585–604.

Supplementary

• Schirm, Stefan. A. 2016. ‘Domestic ideas, institutions or interests? Explaining governmental preferences towards global economic governance’, International Political Science Review 37 (1): 66–80.

• Tuo, Cai. 2016. ‘Global Governance and State Governance: Two Strategic Considerations in Contemporary China,’ Social Sciences in China 37, (4): 138-151

8

8. Where are the Women in Global Governance? This class will examine the changing position of gender in research on global governance, and why it matters. Required Reading

• True, Jacqui. 2003. ‘Mainstreaming Gender in Global Public Policy’, International Feminist Journal of Politics 5, (3): 368-396.

• Harman, Sophie. 2016. ‘Ebola, Gender and Conspicuously Invisible Women in Global Health Governance’, Third World Quarterly 37, (3): 524-541.

• Medie, Peace A. and Alice J. Kang. 2018. ‘Power, knowledge and the politics of gender in the Global South’, European Journal of Politics and Gender 1, (1-2): 37–54.

Supplementary

• Campbell ML, Kim E. 2018. ‘The (missing) subjects of research on gender and global governance: Toward inquiry into the ruling relations of development.’ Business Ethics: A Eur Rev 27:350–360.

• Marchetti, S. 2018. ‘The Global Governance of Paid Domestic Work: Comparing the Impact of ILO Convention No. 189 in Ecuador and India.’ Critical Sociology, 44 (7–8), 1191–1205.

• True, Jacqui. 2019. ‘Gender Research and the stdy of institutional transfer and norm transmission’. In Sawer M, Baker K eds., Gender Innovation in Political Science. Palgrave Macmillan.

9. ‘Emerging Powers’ in Global Governance What are the implications for global governance of an apparent shift in power from the West and North to the East and South? This class will require you to choose a case study of an ‘emerging power’ in a given policy domain, with a view to critically and comparatively discussion how such powers are shaping global governance. Required Reading

• Stuenkel, Oliver. 2016. ‘The BRICS: Seeking Privileges by Constructing and Running Multilateral Institutions’, Global Summitry 2 (1): 38–53.

• Larson, Deborah Welch. 2018. ‘New Perspectives on Rising Powers and Global Governance: Status and Clubs,’ International Studies Review 20 (2): 247–254,

• Zhao, Suisheng. 2018. ‘A Revisionist Stakeholder: China and the Post-World War II World Order’, Journal of Contemporary China 27, 113: 643-658.

Supplementary

• Acharya, Amitav. 2017. ‘After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order.’ Ethics and International Affairs 31 (3): 271-285.

• Breslin, Shaun. 2018. ‘Global Reordering and China’s Rise: Adoption, Adaptation and Reform’, The International Spectator, 53 (1): 57-75.

• He, Yafei. 2019. ‘China and its participation in global governance in the new era.’ In Huiyao Wan and Lu Mao eds. Handbook on China and Globalization( Edward Elgar 2019).

9

10 & 11. Policy Fields in Global Governance (II): Cases This section of the course requires you to prepare and deliver a presentation concerning a chosen field within global governance, and answer questions arising. Each class member will be assigned the role of a respondent, and required to ask follow up questions. Full instructions will be posted to the Moodle course site. 12. Conclusions Annex: Further Reading Global Governance: theory and practice

• Ikenberry, G. John. 2014. ‘The Quest for Global Governance’, Current History 113, 759: 16-18.

• Dingwerth, Klaus and Philipp Pattberg. 2009. ‘Actors, arenas and issues in global governance’, in Jim Whitman ed., Palgrave Advances in Global Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 41-65.

• Kaul, Inge ed. 2003. Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization. Oxford Scholarship online.

• Stone, Diane. 2008. ‘Global public policy, transnational policy communities, and their networks’, Policy Studies Journal 36: 19-38.

• Murphy, Craig N. 2000. ‘Global governance: poorly done and poorly understood’, International Affairs 76 (4): 789-803.

• Rosenau, James N. and Ernst-Otto Czempiel eds. 1992. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.

• Avant, Deborah, Miles Kahler, & Jason Pielemeier. 2017. ‘Innovations in Global Governance: How Resilient, How Influential?’ In Deborah Avant et. al. Innovations in Global Governance (Council on Foreign Relations), 1-7.

• Hall, Rodney Bruce and Thomas J. Biersteker, eds. 2004. The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

• Stoker, Gerry. 1998. ‘Governance as Theory: Five Propositions,’ International Social Science Journal, 50 (155): 17-28.

• Castells, Manuel. 2005. ‘Global Governance and Global Politics,’ PS: Political Science and Politics (January): 9-16.

• Grindle, Merilee. 2007. ‘Good Enough Governance Revisited’, Development Policy Review 25(5): 533-574.

• Eagleton-Pierce, M. 2014. ‘The concept of governance in the spirit of capitalism’, Critical Policy Studies, 8 (1): 5–21.

• Hofferberth, Matthias. 2014. ‘Mapping the Meanings of Global Governance: A Conceptual Reconstruction of a Floating Signifier’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43 (2): 598-617.

• Koenig-Archibugi, M. 2011. ‘Is global democracy possible? European Journal of International Relations. 17: 519–542.

Can the Study of Global Governance be Decentered?

• Best, Jacqueline and Alexandra Gheciu eds. 2014. The Return of the Public in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10

• Pegram, Tom and Michele Acuto. 2015. ‘Introduction: Global Governance in the Interregnum’, Millennium, 43 (2): 584-597.

• Harrington, Cameron. 2016. ‘The Ends of the World: International Relations and the Anthropocene’, Millennium 44 (3): 478 – 498.

• Flockhart, Trine. 2016. ‘The coming multi-order world,’ Contemporary Security Policy, 37 (1): 3-30.

• Andrews, Matt. 2010. ‘Good Government Means Different Things in Different Countries,’ Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 23 (1): 7-35.

• Westad, Odd Arne. 2005. The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

• Acharya, Amitav and Barry Buzan. 2017. ‘Why is there no Non-Western International Relations Theory? Ten years on’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 17: 341–370.

• Hobson, John M. 2017. “The Postcolonial Paradox of Eastern Agency.” In Pinar Bilgin and LHM Ling eds., Asia in International Relations: Unlearning Imperial Power Relations. London: Routledge, 109-120.

• Blaney, David and Arlene Tickner, ‘Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 45, 3 (2017): 293-311.

Global Histories, Knowledge and Power

• Mazower, Mark. 2006. ‘An International Civilization? Empire, internationalism and the crisis of the mid-twentieth century’, International Affairs 82 (3): 553-566.

• ‘Special Section: Principles from the Periphery: The Neglected Southern Sources of Global Norms,’ Global Governance 20, 3 (2014): 359–417.

• Hurrell, Andrew. 2013. ‘Power Transitions, Global Justice, and the Virtues of Pluralism’; Ethics & International Affairs 27 (2): 189-205.

• Wӕver, Ole B. and Arlene B. Tickner eds. 2009. International Relations Scholarship Around the World. New York: Routledge.

• Muppidi, Himadeep. 2005. ‘Producing the Global: Colonial and Postcolonial Forms of Governance’, in Barnett, Michael and Raymond Duvall eds. Power in Global Governance.

• Epstein, C., Zarakol, A., Gallagher, J., Shilliam, R., & Jabri, V. 2014. ‘Forum: Interrogating the use of norms in international relations: Postcolonial perspectives.’ International Theory, 6(2): 293-293.

• Capan, Zeynep Gulsah. 2017. ‘Decolonising International Relations?’, Third World Quarterly, 38 (1): 1-15.

• Cooper, Frederick. 2001. ‘What is the Concept of Globalization Good for? An African Historian’s Perspective’, African Affairs 100: 189-213.

• Odoom, Isaac and Nathan Andrews. 2017. ‘What/who is still missing in International Relations scholarship? Situating Africa as an agent in IR theorising’, Third World Quarterly, 38 (1): 42-60.

• Weiss, Thomas G. 2009. ‘What Happened to the Idea of World Government?’, International Studies Quarterly 53: 253-271.

• Buzan, Barry and George Lawson. 2015. The Great Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

• Wilkinson, Rorden. 2018. ‘Past as global trade governance prelude: reconfiguring debate about reform of the multilateral trading system’, Third World Quarterly 39, 3: 418-435.

11

Global Governance: advent to eclipse?

• Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. ‘The End of History?’, The National Interest. • Ruggie, J. G. 1992. ‘Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution.’ International

Organization 46 (3): 561-598. • Mearsheimer, John J. 1995. ‘The False Promise of International Institutions,"

International Security 19 (3): 5-49 • Abbott, Kenneth W. and Duncan Snidal. 1998. "Why States Act through Formal

International Organizations,’ The Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (1): 3-32. • Ruggie, John. 1982. ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded

Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,’ International Organization 36 (2): 379-415. • Ruggie, John Gerard. 2004. ‘Reconstituting the Global Public Domain: Issues,

Actors, and Practices’, European Journal of International Relations 10 (4): 499-531. • Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1997. ‘The Real New World Order’, Foreign Affairs 75 (5):

183-97. • Witte, Jan Martin, Thorsten Benner and Wolfgang Reinicke. 2003. ‘Global Public

Policy Networks: Lessons Learned and Challenges ahead’. Brookings Review. • Sending, Ole Jacob and Iver B. Neumann. (2006). ‘Governance to Governmentality:

Analyzing NGOs, States, and Power’, International Studies Quarterly 50: 651-672. • Rosenau, James N. and Ernst-Otto Czempiel eds. 1992. Governance without

Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

• Bello, Walden Bello. 2008. ‘Civil Society, the World Social Forum, and the Crisis of the Globalist Project—A Commentary”’, Journal of Civil Society 4 (1): 61-69.

• Duffield, Mark. 2001. Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed.

• Vincent Pouliot, Jean-Philippe Thérien. 2017. ‘Global Governance: A Struggle over Universal Values’, International Studies Review 20 (1): 55-73.

• Mishra, Pankaj. 'The Globalization Rage,' Foreign Affairs, November/December 2016.

• Alvaredo, Facundo et al., 2018. World Inequality Report 2018 Executive Summary. • Goldin, I. 2013. Divided Nations: Why Global Governance is Failing and What We

Can Do about It. Oxford: Oxford University Press. • Mani, Rama. 2015. ‘From ‘dystopia’ to ‘Ourtopia’: charting a future for global

governance’, International Affairs 91 (6): 1237-1258. • Patrick, Stewart. 2014. ‘The unruled world: the case for good enough global

governance’, Foreign Affairs 93: 1: 58–73. • Öniş, Ziya. 2017. ‘The Age of Anxiety: The Crisis of Liberal Democracy in a Post-

Hegemonic Global Order’, The International Spectator 52 (3). • Luce, Edward. 2017. The Retreat of Western Liberalism. London: Little Brown. • Acharya, Amitav. 2016. ‘The Future of Global Governance: Fragmentation may be

inevitable and creative’, Global Governance 22: 453-460. • Brands, Hal. 2017. ‘The Unexceptional Superpower: American Grand Strategy in the

Age of Trump’, Survival 59 (6). • Streeck, Wolfgang. 2017. 'Trump and Trumpists’, Inference International Review of

Science 3(1). • Koopmans, R., and Zürn, M. 2019. ‘Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism – How

Globalization Is Reshaping Politics in the Twenty-First Century.’ In P. De Wilde, R. Koopmans, W. Merkel, O. Strijbis, & M. Zürn (eds.), The Struggle Over Borders:

12

Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism (pp. 1-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Global Governors

• Abbott, Kenneth W., Green, Jessica F. and. Keohane, Robert O. 2016. ‘Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance’, International Organization, 70, Spring: 247–277.

• Carpenter, R. Charli. 2010. ‘Governing the global agenda: “gatekeepers” and “issue adoption” in transnational advocacy networks’, in Avant, Deborah D., Martha Finnemore, and Susan K. Sell eds., Who Governs the Globe? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 202-237.

• Eckhard, Steffen and Jörn Ege. 2016. ‘International bureaucracies and their influence on policy-making: a review of empirical evidence’, Journal of European Public Policy 23 (7).

• Niezen, Ronald, and Maria Sapignoli. 2017. Palaces of Hope: The Anthropology of Global Organizations. Cambridge University Press.

• Buntaine, Mark T. 2015. “Accountability in Global Governance: Civil Society Claims for Environmental Performance at the World Bank,” International Studies Quarterly 59 (1): 99−111.

• Stein, Janice. 2008. “Accountability of Humanitarian Organizations—Why, to Whom, for What, and How?” in Michael Barnett and Thomas G. Weiss, eds., Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press: 124−143.

• Whitman, Jim. 2002. ‘Global Governance as the Friendly Face of Unaccountable Power’, Security Dialogue 33, (1): 46-57.

• Cox, Robert. 1994. ‘The Crisis in World Order and the Challenge to International Organization,’ Cooperation and Conflict, 29 (2): 99-113.

• Toye, John. 2014. ‘Assessing the G77: 50 years after UNCTAD and 40 years after the NIEO’, Third World Quarterly 35 (10): 1759-1774.

• Slaughter, S. 2013. ‘Debating the International Legitimacy of the G20: Global Policymaking and Contemporary International Society.’ Global Policy 4 (1): 43-52.

• Milhorance, Carolina and Folashade Soule-Kohndou. 2017. ‘South-South Cooperation and Change in International Organizations’, Global Governance 23: 461-481.

• Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian. 2019. ‘International authority and the emergency problematique. IO empowerment through crises’. In: International Theory, 11 (2): 182-210.

• Dingwerth, Klaus, Antonia Witt, Ina Lehmann, Ellen Reichel, and Tobias Weise. 2019. International organizations under pressure: legitimating global governance in challenging times. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Domestic-Global Linkages

• Putnam, Robert D. 1988. ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Twolevel Games,’ International Organization 42 (3): 427−460.

• Krasner, S. D. and Risse, T. 2014. ‘External Actors, State-Building, and Service Provision in Areas of Limited Statehood: Introduction.’ Governance, 27: 545–567.

• Krause, Keith and W. Andy Knight, eds. 1995, State, Society, and the UN System: Changing Perspectives on Multilateralism. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

• Foot, Rosemary ed. 2013. China Across the Divide: The Domestic and Global in Politics and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.

• Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for human rights: international law in domestic

13

Politics. Cambridge University Press. • Drezner, D.W. 1999. ‘The Global Governance of the Internet: Bringing the State

Back In.’ Political Science Quarterly 119: 477–498. • Duffy, R. 2006. ‘Non-governmental organisations and governance states: The impact

of transnational environmental management networks in Madagascar.’ Environmental Politics 15: 731–749.

• Adamson, Fiona B. 2016. “Spaces of Global Security: beyond Methodological Nationalism.” Journal of Global Security Studies 1: 1-17.

• Boyle, Michael J. 2016. ‘The Coming Illiberal Order’, Survival: 35-66. • Adebajo, Adekeye. 2016. ‘The Revolt Against the West: intervention and

Sovereignty’, Third World Quarterly 37 (7): 1187-1202. • Stuenkel, Oliver. 2016. Post-Western World: How Emerging Powers are Remaking

Global Order. Cambridge, Polity. • Liu, Xueliana and Yao Lu. 2016. ‘The Implications of State Governance for Effective

Global Governance’, Social Sciences in China 37 (4). • Kahler, Miles. 2017. ‘Domestic Sources of Transnational Climate

Governance,’ International Interactions 43 (1): 156-174. Where are the Women in Global Governance?

• True, Jacqui. 2014. ‘The global governance of gender’. In Anthony Payne and Nicola Philips eds. Handbook of the International Political Economy of Governance. Edward Elgar.

• Suraj Jacob, John A. Scherpereel, Melinda Adams. 2017. ‘Will rising powers undermine global norms? The case of gender-balanced decision-making’, European Journal of International Relations 23 (4): 780–808.

• Haack, Kirsten. 2014. ‘Breaking Barriers? Women’s Representation and Leadership at the United Nations’, Global Governance 20 (1): 37-54.

• Dobson, Hugo. 2012. ‘Where Are the Women in Global Governance? Leaders, Wives and Hegemonic Masculinity in the G8 and G20 Summits’, Global Society 26 (4): 429-449.

• Sisson, Anne and V. Spike Peterson. 2013. Global Gender Issues in the New Millennium. Boulder: Westview Press.

• Rai, Shirin. 2004. ‘Gendering Global Governance’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 6 (4): 579-601.

• Marchand, Marianne H. and Anne Sisson Runyan. 2000. Gender and Global Restructuring: Sightings, Sites and Resistances. Routledge.

• Enloe, Cynthia. 1990. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

• Meyer, Lisa and Elisabeth Prügl, eds. 1999, Gender Politics in Global Governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

• Gülay Cagler, Elisabeth Prügl, and Susanne Zwingel, eds. 2012, Feminist Strategies in International Governance. New York: Routledge.

• Hafner-Burton, Emilie and Mark A. Pollack. 2002. ‘Mainstreaming Gender in Global Governance’, European Journal of International Relations 8 (3): 339–373.

• Bexell, Magdalena. 2012. ‘Global Governance, Gains and Gender’, International Feminist Journal of Politics 14 (3).

• Thompson, L. B. 2017. ‘Gender Equality in International Institutions: Progress and Challenges in Moving Toward Gender Parity.’ Inquiries Journal, 9(2).

• Basu S., Eichler M. 2017. ‘Gender in International Relations: Interdisciplinarity and the Study of Conflict’ In: Yetiv S., James P. (eds) Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan.

14

Emerging Powers in Global Governance

• Zhao, K. 2017. ‘China's Public Diplomacy for International Public Goods,’ Politics and Policy, 45: 706–732.

• Stephen, Mathew D. 2017. ‘Emerging Powers and Emerging Trends in Global Governance’, Global Governance 23: 483-502.

• Hopewell, Kristen. 2017. ‘The BRICS—merely a fable? Emerging power alliances in global trade governance,’ International Affairs 93 (6): 1377–1396.

• Wade, Robert H. 2011. ‘Emerging World Order? From Multipolarity to Multilateralism in the G20, the World Bank, and the IMF’, Politics & Society 39 (3): 347-378.

• Ikenberry, John G. 2009. ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’, Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 71-87.

• Barma, Naazneen, Ely Ratner and Steven Weber. 2007. ‘A World Without the West’, The National Interest 90: 23-30.

• Wang, Hongying and Erik French. 2013. ‘China’s Participation in Global Governance from a Comparative Perspective’, Asia Policy 15: 89-114.

• Narlikar, Amrita. 2017. ‘India’s Role in global governance: a Modi-fication?’ International Affairs 93 (1): 93-111.

• Lesage, Dries and Thijs Van de Graaf eds. 2015. Rising Powers and Multilateral Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan.

• Öniş, Ziya and Mustafa Kutlay. 2017. ‘The dynamics of emerging middle-power influence in regional and global governance: the paradoxical case of Turkey’, Australian Journal of International Affairs 71 (2): 164-83.

• Kahler, M. 2017. ‘Regional Challenges to Global Governance’. Global Policy, 8: 97–100.

• Newman, Edward and Benjamin Zala. 2017. ‘Rising powers and order contestation: disaggregating the normative from the representational,’ Third World Quarterly.

• Pu, Xiaoyu. 2012. ‘Socialisation as a Two-way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 (4): 341-367.

• Biermann, Frank, Philipp Pattberg, Harro van Asselt, and Fariborz Zelli. 2009. ‘The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis’, Global Environmental Politics 9 (4): 14-40.

• Kornegay, Francis A. Jr. and Narnia Bohler-Muller eds. 2013. Laying the BRICS of a New Global Order. Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa.

• Wu Xinbo. 2018. ‘China in search of a liberal partnership international order’, International Affairs 94, 5: 995–1018.

• Gerald Chan, Pak K. Lee and Lai-Ha Chan. 2012. China Engages Global Governance: a new world order in the making? London: Routledge.

• Liu, Mingfu. 2015. The China Dream: Great Power Thinking and Strategic Posture in the Post-American Era. New York: CN Times Books.

• Zhang, Weiwei. 2015. The China Horizon: Glory and Dream of a Civilizational State. Singapore: World Scientific.

• Zeng, Jinghan. 2019. ‘Chinese views of global economic governance.’ Third World Quarterly 40, (3): 578-594.