research for pr and advocacy

23
Research for Public Relations and Advocacy NRCCUA Research Summit March 3, 2009 © Lipman Hearne 2009. This material cannot be copied or reproduced without permission

Upload: lipman-hearne-inc

Post on 11-May-2015

591 views

Category:

Education


3 download

DESCRIPTION

These three principles of research will help your institution command attention and trust in the media marketplace.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Research For PR And Advocacy

Research forPublic Relations and Advocacy

NRCCUA Research SummitMarch 3, 2009

© Lipman Hearne 2009. This material cannot be copied or reproduced without permission

Page 2: Research For PR And Advocacy

2

Today’s focus:• Accountability

• Transparency

• Authenticity

Page 3: Research For PR And Advocacy

3

Today’s focus:• Accountability

• Transparency

• Authenticity

Why?• Growing skepticism due to misuse, overuse and

conflicting research results

• Necessity to cut through “noise” to command attention and trust

Page 4: Research For PR And Advocacy

4

Critical questions to ask before conducting research:• Who’s going to use it? Who will see/read/hear it? What

insights do you seek?

• What decisions need to be made? What action needs to be taken?

• Who do you need to hear from?

• How will you get the information from them?

• How will you use the results?

Page 5: Research For PR And Advocacy

5

Accountability• Responsible, truthful

Page 6: Research For PR And Advocacy

6

Accountability• Responsible, truthful

Who do we need to be accountable to?• The press? Our clients? Policymakers? Our

partners? Our donors? Our staff?

“Facts are stubborn, but statistics are more pliable.”Mark Twain

Page 7: Research For PR And Advocacy

7

For the press, be able to provide technical detail, such as:

• Exact language used in the instrument

• Total number of people contacted

• Number of people not reached

• Number of people who refused to answer

• Number of terminations

• Number of ineligibles

• Number of completed interviews

Accountability

Page 8: Research For PR And Advocacy

8

Provide an explanation of your methodWhat kind of polls can be problematic?• Internet polls

• Problem: nonprobability samples

• Interactive voice response polls• Problem: anyone can answer the phone and respond

• Partisan or privately sponsored polls• Problem: Democratic and Republican pollsters, in

particular

Accountability

Page 9: Research For PR And Advocacy

9

Go to great lengths to explain:• The organization’s point of view

• The author’s affiliations

• Conflicting data – avoid the “I hope they won’t notice” strategy

Accountability

Page 10: Research For PR And Advocacy

10

Transparency = Full disclosureAccepted practices• Release the full questionnaire, results, methodology

• Identify research sponsor and fieldwork provider

• Disclose margin of error

“You can tell whether a man is clever by his answers. You can tell whether a man is wise by his questions.”Naguib Mahfouz

Transparency

Page 11: Research For PR And Advocacy

11

Ask yourself: Would I feel comfortable answering this question?

If you find yourself answering “Yes, but” or “No, except” – then don’t ask the question.

Transparency

Page 12: Research For PR And Advocacy

12

Words matterSingle words that mean the same thing can convey different ideas.

• Taxes . . . Revenues

• MX Missile . . . Peacekeeper

• Pro-choice . . . Pro-abortion

• Welfare . . . Public assistance

Transparency

Page 13: Research For PR And Advocacy

13

Consider presenting the data in person:• Invite someone with a different point of view to

share conflicting data

• Answer all questions

• Distribute the entire data set

Transparency

Page 14: Research For PR And Advocacy

14

Research designed for media attention is usually inauthentic.

9 out of 10 of you agree with us.

Authenticity

Page 15: Research For PR And Advocacy

15

Research designed for media attention is usually inauthentic.

9 out of 10 of you agree with us.

Research that is based on sound methodology, described articulately, is authentic.

76.2% of Americans are “generally” or “strongly” in favor of a change in the direction of X.

Authenticity

Page 16: Research For PR And Advocacy

16

Authenticity• Validity: accuracy/correctness

• Are you measuring what you think you’re measuring?

Authenticity

Page 17: Research For PR And Advocacy

17

Authenticity• Validity: accuracy/correctness

• Are you measuring what you think you’re measuring?

Achieving validity• Accurately reflect the concept (idea)

• Of particular importance in polling: content and construct validity

Authenticity

Page 18: Research For PR And Advocacy

18

Responses can vary dramatically depending upon whether the question is closed- or open-ended(choices or no choices)

Authenticity

Page 19: Research For PR And Advocacy

19

Responses can vary dramatically depending upon whether the question is closed- or open-ended(choices or no choices)

Ex: Respondents were asked what is the most important thing for children to learn to prepare them for life

• When given a choice of five options, 62 percent chose “to think for themselves”

• When asked in an open-ended format, 5 percent identified that notion

Authenticity

Page 20: Research For PR And Advocacy

20

Polls do not typically measure how intensely respondents feel about issues, too.

Authenticity

Page 21: Research For PR And Advocacy

21

Polls do not typically measure how intensely respondents feel about issues, too.

The beliefs of those who care little are often publicized as much as those who care a great deal.

Authenticity

Page 22: Research For PR And Advocacy

22

What makes findings credible?• There is other research on the topic

• There is corroboration from multiple studies

Authenticity

Page 23: Research For PR And Advocacy

23

• Donna Van De Water• [email protected]

• Rodney Ferguson• [email protected]