research ethics infrastructure
DESCRIPTION
Research Ethics Infrastructure. Challenges in Establishing an Effective System. 1. Capacity building. Widespread agreement on need for capacity building in research ethics in developing and transition countries CIOMS international ethical guidelines Nuffield Council and NBAC Reports - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Research Ethics InfrastructureChallenges in Establishing an
Effective System
1
Ruth Macklin, PhD
Florencia Luna, PhD
![Page 2: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Capacity building
• Widespread agreement on need for capacity building in research ethics in developing and transition countries– CIOMS international ethical guidelines– Nuffield Council and NBAC Reports– UNAIDS Vaccine Guidance Document– WHO , NIH, and FIC sponsored workshops
• But how to determine when capacity is successfully built?
2
![Page 3: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Settled ethical issues
• An effective research ethics infrastructure must have– Officially recognized regulations or guidelines
governing research with human beings
– A system of well-functioning research ethics committees (RECs)
– Ethics training for researchers and members of RECs
– A system for oversight and monitoring 3
![Page 4: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Challenges
• Which international guidelines to use?
• Who should monitor research, and how?
• How to ensure adequate ethical review of research protocols?
• What sort of ethics training is appropriate and adequate?
• Ongoing problems and controversies
4
![Page 5: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Regulations and guidelines
• Many developing countries lack laws or regulations governing ethics in research
• International guidelines are increasing in number and are not harmonized– Declaration of Helsinki– CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines– ICH GCP– UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and
Human Rights 5
![Page 6: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Regulations and guidelines
• Regulations and guidelines require interpretation– Cannot “deduce” a particular application of a
guideline– Example from Declaration of Helsinki
• At the conclusion of the study, every patient entered into the study should be assured of access to the best proven prophylactic, diagnostic and therapeutic methods identified by the study.
– Para. 306
![Page 7: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Regulations and guidelines
• Guidelines conflict with one another– Multiple and confusing provisions relating to
“standard of care”• For participants in control groups in RCTs• For participants in prevention trials who acquire the target
disease during a clinical trial• For participants in any research who develop a treatable
disease or condition during the trial
– DoH very vague on this point– CIOMS and UNAIDS Guidance disagree
7
![Page 8: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Ensuring adequate ethical review
• RECs should have members with expertise in scientific and methodological aspects of research under review– “Bad science is bad ethics”
• RECs should clearly indicate which regulations or ethical guidelines they use
• RECs must have rules of procedure, keep records of proceedings, be accountable
8
![Page 9: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Ensuring adequate ethical review
• Desirability of central or regional RECs?• Local RECs
– Institutional level (hospital based)– Independent but academic based (universities, academic societies)– Independent (for profit)
• Are for-profit RECs acceptable?– Their “client” is the sponsor of research but their mandate is to
protect human subjects
• Quality of REC review of research proposals– Avoiding rubberstamping – Avoiding inconsistencies
![Page 10: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Facilitating ethical review
• Institutions and governmental agencies should provide financial and administrative support for RECs– Competent secretarial assistance – Photocopying research protocols for distribution to
REC members– Communications with investigators– Complete record of REC decisions, progress
reports, amendments to protocols 10
![Page 11: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Ongoing challenges
• Controversies regarding voluntary vs. professional/paid RECs members
• Difficulties with voluntary system– Affording protected time – Conflicting demands of job requirements– Recognition of REC service in continuing professional
development
• Preventing REC “shopping”• Confidentiality versus transparency
![Page 12: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Ongoing challenges
• Complete follow up of clinical trials and availability of data (publications-bad data)
• National systems: Sisnep (National system of Information on research ethics involving persons) (Brazil) http://portal.saude.gov.br/sisnep/pesquisador/menuusuario.cfm
• Creating a centralized registry of clinical trials– International clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO)
http://www.who.int/ictrp/en
![Page 13: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Ethics training
• Researchers and ERC members should receive ethics training– What sort is adequate or desirable?
• On-line courses and tests• In-person training by experts in research ethics• Distribution of the Declaration of Helsinki and other
pertinent guidelines or regulations• Use of case studies
– Total absence of standards or agreement on this issue
13
![Page 14: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Ongoing challenges
• Is informal training adequate?
• Is there a need for “official” training or standards?
• Is a system of accreditation of RECs needed? – What would be the standards?
![Page 15: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Oversight and monitoring
• Compliance with regulatory authorities for research involving drugs and biotechnology products– European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical
Products (EMEA)– U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)– ICH GCP
• Researchers and RECs must be familiar with these requirements
15
![Page 16: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Oversight and monitoring
• Oversight at national or regional level– Some countries have governmental agencies
with this responsibility• OHRP in U.S.
• Issues FWAs for other countries
– Most developing countries lack any such agency– How to ensure adequacy of REC review and
compliance with regulations or guidelines?
16
![Page 17: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Oversight and monitoring
• RECs responsible for establishing and maintaining a monitoring system– Adverse event reporting and progress reports– “Compliance monitoring” necessary to ensure that
researchers conduct research properly• In compliance with provisions in the protocol
• In compliance with ethical requirements
– Requires a dedicated person knowledgeable about research regulations and ethics
– Is time consuming and labor intensive17
![Page 18: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Ongoing challenges
• Informed consent– IC documents provided by industry are overly
long, use medical jargon, complex language– Process of obtaining informed consent in
conduct of research often flawed, cursory, inadequate understanding by participants
– Individual ERCs often not allowed to make changes in consent forms for multicentric trials
18
![Page 19: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Ongoing challenges
• Involving communities– Numerous international guidelines refer to
“community involvement” or “community participation” in the research enterprise
• Lip service paid to this requirement but little evidence of actual adherence
– What forms of community involvement are desirable?
• Community members on RECs not sufficient
– Are there any good models?
![Page 20: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Ongoing challenges
• What must RECs review?– Social and behavioral research
• Not required in some countries or committees
• Not reviewed even if required
– Quality improvement/quality assurance• How to distinguish from health systems research?
– Public health surveillance or studies in outbreaks• How to distinguish from public health research?
20
![Page 21: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Conflicts of interest
• What constitutes a genuine conflict of interest in the research setting?– Substantial financial interest on part of researchers
or members of RECs– Researchers may not be involved in ethical review
of their own protocols
• Challenges and uncertainties– Members of same academic department,
laboratory, or institution as the researcher?21
![Page 22: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Controversies regarding money
Is it acceptable to pay research subjects for their participation?– Common in some countries, frowned upon in
some, prohibited in others– RECs must determine whether and how much
• “Finders’ fees” for recruitment of subjects
22
![Page 23: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Conclusions
• Laws, guidelines, and regulations abound– But may conflict with one another– Often do not give clear guidance– May be interpreted differently by RECs
• RECs are increasingly established in developing countries– Yet reports exist of lack of competency– Hard to obtain information about functioning– General absence of oversight and monitoring
23
![Page 24: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
The way forward
• Ethical guidelines– No additional ones, please– Can existing ones be harmonized in some way?– Revision and updating needed as things change
• Declaration of Helsinki and CIOMS, yet controversies remain
• UNAIDS Guidance for vaccines a new effort
24
![Page 25: Research Ethics Infrastructure](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062304/568145ea550346895db2ec2d/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
The way forward
• Research ethics training and education– More regional workshops needed
• “Train the trainers” for in-country capacity building
– Educational sessions on research ethics at conferences attended by researchers
• Industrialized and developing countries• Exchange programs and visiting scholars among
researchers and REC members
– Establishing effective and sustainable research ethics networks in developing countries
25