research article the pressure relief system design for...
TRANSCRIPT
Hindawi Publishing CorporationJournal of Industrial EngineeringVolume 2013 Article ID 453509 14 pageshttpdxdoiorg1011552013453509
Research ArticleThe Pressure Relief System Design for Industrial Reactors
Iztok Hace
University of California 1111 Franklin St Oakland CA 94607 USA
Correspondence should be addressed to Iztok Hace iztokhacegmailcom
Received 29 November 2012 Revised 4 June 2013 Accepted 11 September 2013
Academic Editor Eleonora Bottani
Copyright copy 2013 Iztok Hace This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License whichpermits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited
A quick and simple approach for reactormdashemergency relief system designmdashfor runaway chemical reactions is presented Acookbook for system sizing with all main characteristic dimensions and parameters is shown on one realistic example from processindustry System design was done based on existing theories standards and correlations obtained from the literature which wereimplemented for presented case A simple and effective method for emergency relief system is shown which may serve as anexample for similar systems design Obtained results may contribute to better understanding of blow down system frequentlyused in industrial plants for increasing safety decreasing explosion damage and alleviating the ecological problems together withenvironmental pollution in case of industrial accidents
1 Introduction
In process industry raw materials are converted into var-ious commercial products using different techniques Onefrequently used method is their conversion by exothermicchemical reactions which can lead to a reactor thermalrunaway if the heat generation rate exceeds the heat removalrate during process [1] Pressure build-up during the runawayis caused by an increasing vapor pressure of liquid compo-nents and by the production of noncondensable gases Apartfrom the loss of reactor inventory due to an uncontrolledconversion process a runaway reaction may lead to severelydamaged equipment or even a physical explosion if pressurebuild-up inside the reactor exceeds the design pressureThe emergency relief system is composed of vent areavent rupture membrane safety relief valve vent pipes blowdown tank horizontal condenser scrubber with absorberand vertical condenser outflow chimney correspondingpumps fan pipes fitting and supply system with electricitycooling water and neutralizationmedium In case of reactionrunaway the vent rupture disc opens and the reactor mixtureblows out into the vent pipes and flows into blow downtank Due to short residence time of reactor mixture inthe blow down tank the volume changes and the pressuredecreases at isothermal conditions which results in thecondensation of reaction mixtures Remained two phases
flow instantaneously blows into horizontal condenser whereit cools down condensates and flows into absorber withvertical condenser where it is neutralized [2ndash4]
In present study a detailed design of emergency reliefsystem is shown based on Design Method for EmergencyRelief Systems (DIERSs) It incorporates the state-of-the-art knowledge obtained from mechanical electrical andprocess engineering based on a long year experiences inthe process industries all over the world All componentswere designed based on API RP 520 and API STD 526standards [5 6] In case of problems reaction runaway mayappear due to loss of cooling water in the reactor over-or miss-charged reactant external fire and loss of agitationor wrong reaction temperature in reactor Such cases aredifficult to predict almost not possible to control and canlead to explosion Therefore a proper and correct sizedemergency relief system is appropriate method to preventfatal accidences and environmental pollutions
The purpose of present study is to
(i) show the main mechanical electrical and processfundamentals for this system
(ii) design emergency relief system with correspond-ing scrubber absorption column and correspondingconnections
2 Journal of Industrial Engineering
Blow down scrubber ATEX zone
From plant
Water inlet
Water outlet
Blow down tank 60m3
Drain Drain
Condenser 54m2
horizontal
Abso
rptio
n co
lum
nO
utflo
w ch
imne
y
Liquid levelScrubber
45m3
PC
Verticalcooler5m2
Scrubber filling
Centrifugalpump
Ventilator fan
Vent to ATM
DN 400
DN400
DN400
DN 100 DN 400 DN 100
DN 500
DN 80 DN 80
DN 300
DN 300
DN500
DN 150
DN 150
DN1500
DN400
DN 50
DN 150
DN 125
DN 125
DN 200
DN 200
To electric boards located outside ATEX zone
DN
200
DN
200
13∘C26∘C
Figure 1 Emergency relief system
Designed emergency relief system is presented inFigure 1 A real industrial example from process industrycomposed from twelve equal 30m3 batch reactors equippedwith pressure and temperature sensors cooling and heatingmechanism and rupture discs was taken In reactors anexothermic phenol formaldehyde reaction takes place Forreactor cooling towers with capacity of 700m3sdothminus1 of coolingwater at 13∘C26∘C cooling temperature regime was used
Based on the reaction runaway the emergency reliefsystem design was made in stages from plant vent systemblow down tank and scrubber with corresponding heatexchangers and absorption column
2 Pressure Relief Devices
Pressure relief devices design was made according to APIRP 520 standard [5] Detailed pressure relief system on thereactor is presented in Figure 3 and is composed of safetyrelief valve (SVR) and rupture disc (RD) with dimensionspresented in Table 1The pressure at which SVR piston opensdepends on the physicochemical characteristics of reactionsystem In present study it is designed so that SVR openswhen the reaction medium pressure is above 70 sdot 103 Pa Incase of runaway the outflow medium from reactor blows
into vent pipes connected to blow down tank Very high tipvelocities cause a phenomenon known as blow-off where theflame front is lifted and could eventually turn into a blow-out Therefore determination of the right pipe diameter isimportant as far as operation of the system is concernedThevent size is a crucial step at emergency relief system designIn this study an approach proposed by Fauske [1] and Leunget al [3] was used For pressure temperature relation Antoineequation was used to calculate the vapor pressure at reactionrunaway as follows
119875 = exp(1578 minus 8798
119879
) (1)
The two phase discharge flow rate per unit area was evaluatedaccording to the homogeneous equilibrium model whichcan be approximated in the low quality region by relationproposed by Leung [2] as follows
119866vent = 09 sdot 144 sdot119889119875
119889119879
sdot (
322
77816
sdot
119879
119888
119901vent)
12
(2)
where 119889119875119889119879was replaced by differential form of (1) and thetwo phase discharged flow per unit area was evaluated
Journal of Industrial Engineering 3
Table 1 Calculated system dimensions and characteristics for vent area horizontal and vertical heat exchanger blow down and scrubbertank absorption column and outflow chimney
(a)
Parameter Unit ValueCooling water data119879
119888in∘C 13 Designed
119879
119888out∘C 26 Designed
119879
119888out∘C 24 Designed
119876 m3sdothminus1 700 Designed
Power supply119868 A 130 Designed119881 V 380 Designed119882 kW 50 DesignedMaterial flow from reactor119902
119888W 894 sdot 10
6 Calculated from (8)119902
ℎW 23 sdot 10
6 Calculated from (8)
(b)
Energy released data Set condition Peak condition
119875 Pa 207 sdot 10
5221 sdot 10
5 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119879 K 3946 3967 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
(
119889119879
119889119905
)
119898
(119889119879119889119905
)
119904
Ksdotminminus1 15 20 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119888
119901Jsdotkgminus1sdotKminus1 29308 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)
[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119879
119898
∘C 1243 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119879
119904
∘C 1212 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
(c)
Parameter Unit Value
119862
119901cold Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1 4183 Obtained from literature Perry andGreen (2007) [7]
119862
119901hot Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1 29281 Obtained from literature Perry andGreen (2007) [7]
Blow down tank119881
119900m3 30 Designed
119881bd m3 60 Calculated from (6)119875sat Pa 1 sdot 10
5 Calculated from (1)119866in kgsdotsminus1 346 Calculated from (2)
119875Pa 207 sdot 10
5 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119875
1Pa 1 sdot 10
5 Pa Calculated from (7)119903
119888 024 Calculated from (34)
119866HZT kgsdotsminus1 82 Calculated from (35)119882
m 25 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 25 sdot 10
5 Designed
4 Journal of Industrial Engineering
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
Safety relief valveDN m 065 Designed119875safety Pa 70 sdot 10
4 DesignedVent area119902vent Jsdotkgminus1 846 Calculated from (6)119866vent kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 2124 Calculated from (2)119860vent m2 0326 Calculated from (3)119863vent m 065 Calculated from (5)Calculated data horizontal heatexchanger119871
mm 5000 Designed
ℎDirtIN = ℎDirtOUT Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 698 lt ℎ lt 9987
Obtained from literature Perry andGreen (2007) [7]
120582
119908Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1 162 Obtained from literature Perry and
Green (2007) [7]
119876hot W 585711 Calculated from (8)
119876cold W 366125 Calculated from (8)119879
ℎout∘C 80 Calculated from (8)
LMTD ∘C 7616 Calculated from (9)
119877
119905 683 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119878 00594 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119865
119905 096 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]119879
119898
∘C 7311 Calculated from (10)119860
m2 54 Calculated from (11)119873
119905 85 Calculated from (13)
Pipe dimensions for horizontal heatexchanger119889out mm 508
BWG 16 Perry and Green (2007) [7]INOX AISI316
119889in mm 46732Wall thickness mm 2034119901
119905mm 635 Calculated from (14)
119863
119887mm 6891 Calculated from (15)
BDC mm 93 Obtained from diagrams Richardsonet al (2009) [10]
119863
119904mm 782 Calculated from (16)
119861
119904mm 313 Calculated from (17)
119860
119904m2 004895 Calculated from (18)
119866shell kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2 1986 Calculated from (19)119889
119890mm 3607 Calculated from (20)
Reshell 65127 Calculated from (21)Prshell 748 Calculated from (22)Nushell 323 Calculated from (23)ℎshell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 5490 Calculated from (23) and (25)119897
119887mm 875 Calculated from (26)
Δ119875shell Pa 53800 Calculated from (25)119873tpp 85 Calculated from (27)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 5
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
119866tube kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 7971 Calculated from (28)Vtube msdotsminus1 2596 Calculated from (29)Retube 30390 Calculated from (21)Prtube 0575 Calculated from (22)ℎtube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0044 Calculated from (30)119880tube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0022 Calculated from (32)119880shell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 1957 Calculated from (31)Δ119875tube Pa 91500 Calculated from (33)Calculated data vertical heat exchangerRecycle hminus1 2222 Calculated from (40)Total heat vertical kW 23553 Calculated from (36)Heat per recycle kW 1454 Calculated from (38)119879
ℎinvert∘C 80 Calculated from (8)
119860m2 5 Calculated from (11)
119879
ℎoutvert∘C 40 Calculated from (8)
119879
119888invert∘C 15 Calculated from (8)
119879
119888outvert∘C 24 Calculated from (8)
Pipe dimensions for vertical heatexchanger119871
mm 2500119889out mm 508
BWG 16 Perry and Green (2007) [7]
119889in mm 46732Wall thickness mm 2034119901
119905mm 635 Calculated from (14)
119863
119887mm 2867 Calculated from (15)
BDC mm 88 Obtained from diagrams Richardsonet al (2009) [10]
119863
119904mm 388 Calculated from (16)
119861
119904mm 1552 Calculated from (17)
119860
119904m2 0012043 Calculated from (18)
119866
119904kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2 8072 Calculated from (19)
119889
119890mm 3607 Calculated from (20)
Reshell 264718 Calculated from (21)Prshell 748 Calculated from (22)Nushell 2547 Calculated from (23)ℎshell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 43435 Calculated from (23) and (24)119897
119887mm 4375 Calculated from (26)
Δ119875shell Pa 82000 Calculated from (25)119873tpp 13 Calculated from (27)119866tube kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 6196 Calculated from (28)Vtube msdotsminus1 2018 Calculated from (29)Retube 23545 Calculated from (21)Prtube 0575 Calculated from (22)Δ119875tube Pa 128000 Calculated from (33)ℎtube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0036 Calculated from (30)119880tube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 001867 Calculated from (32)119880shell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 5617 Calculated from (31)
6 Journal of Industrial Engineering
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
LMTD ∘C 3844 Calculated from (9)
119877
119905 444 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119878 01385 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119865
119905 096 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]DT119898
∘C 367 Calculated from (10)119860
m2 5 Calculated from (11)119873
119905 13 Calculated from (13)
Absorber and scrubberScrubber
119871NaOH kgsdotsminus1 4221 Calculated from reactionstoichiometry
Recycle hminus1 2222 Calculated from (40)119881scrubber tank m3 45 Calculated from (40)119908
m 10 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 15 sdot 10
5 DesignedAbsorber(119871119866) sdot (120588
119892120588
119871)
12
0023 Calculated ratio119866
lowast2sdot 119865 sdot 120583
01
322 sdot 120588
119892sdot (120588
119892minus 120588
119871)
18 Obtained from correlations proposedin literature Seader et al (2010) [11]
119866
lowast kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 49 Calculated from obtained factor119860abs m2 168 Calculated from (41)119863abs m 146 Calculated from (42)
Δ119875abs m 03048 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
No foaming factor 119865nf 1 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119865IMTP 12 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
IMTP packing mm 889 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119873
119871 166 Obtained from literature Seader et al
(2010) [11]
HETP m 183 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119867abs m 3 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119865IMTP 12 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119871operation m3hsdotm2 599 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119908m 10 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 10 sdot 10
5 DesignedNeutralization reaction in absorber andin scrubber
Δ119867react kJsdotmolminus1 2232 Calculated from literature data Perryand Green (2007) [7]
119876reaction kW 71 Calculated from (37)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 7
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit ValueCentrifugal pump119871NaOH m3
sdothminus1 100 Calculated from reaction stochiometryΔ119875pump Pa 400000 DesignedVentilator fan designΔ119875Fan Pa 500 Calculated from (43)0
119881Fan m3sdothminus1 72000 Calculated from (44) and (45)
119907
119903msdotsminus1 230 Calculated from (47)
120599Fan RPM 2920 Calculated from (44) and (45)119875Fanmotor kW 34 Calculated from (46)119889Fan mm 1460 Calculated from (44) and (45)Chimney design
ℎchimney mm 6000 Obtained from literature diagramsBleier (1987) [12]
119889chimney mm 500 Obtained from literature diagramsBleier (1987) [12]
Pipe sizingPipes from blow down tank viahorizontal heat exchanger to absorberDNpipes
Blow down tank-horizontal heatexchanger mm 400 Calculated from (48)
Horizontal heat exchanger-absorber mm 400 Calculated from (48)Pipes from scrubber via pump andvertical heat exchanger to absorberDNpipes
Pipes from scrubber via pump mm 125 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
Cooling water pipesDNpipes
Main cooling water pipes mm 300 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
Cooling water pipes after crossing mm 200 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
The analytical vent sizing equation for homogeneousvessel venting is [2ndash4]
119860vent = 119898
119900sdot 119902vent
times (119866vent sdot [(119881
119898
119900
sdot
144
77816
sdot 119879 sdot
119889119875
119889119879
)
12
+(119888
119901vent sdot Δ119879vent)12
])
minus1
(3)
whereΔ119879vent = 119879119898 minus 119879119904
119863 =
radic
4 sdot 119860vent120587
119902vent =1
2
sdot 119888
119901vent sdot [(119889119879
119889119905
)
119904
+ (
119889119879
119889119905
)
119898
]
(4)
and all necessary physical and chemical data are presented asfollows
Physical-chemical parameters use for blow down systemdesign
120588liq [mol sdot dmminus3] = 13798
031598
(1+(1minus(11987969425))032768)
119888
119901liq [J sdot Kmolminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 101720 + 31761 sdot 119879
119888
119901119892[J sdot Kmolminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0434 sdot 10
5+ 2445 sdot 10
5
sdot [
1152119879
sinh [1152119879]]
2
+ 1512 sdot 10
5sdot [
507119879
cosh [507119879]]
2
8 Journal of Industrial Engineering
120578liq [Pa sdot s] = exp(minus43335 + 38817
119879
+
43983
ln (119879)+ 30548 sdot 10
24sdot 119879
minus10)
120578vap [Pa sdot s] =10094 sdot 10
minus7sdot 119879
0799
1 + 1031119879
120582vap [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0038846 sdot 119879
02392
1 + 98581119879 + 93717119879
2
120582liq [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 018837 minus 00001 sdot 119879
Δ119867evap [J sdot Kmolminus1] = 7306 sdot 107 sdot (1 minus 119879
69425
)
04246
119875vapour [Pa] = exp (95444 minus 1013
119879
minus 1009 sdot ln (119879)
+67603 sdot 10
minus18sdot 119879
6)
(5)
Formation enthalpies (Perry and Green (2007) [7])
Δ119867
119891
NaOH = minus46915 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
PhOH = minus1650 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
H2O= minus28583 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
NaPhO = minus326 kJ sdotmolminus1
120588
50wt NaOH = 1529 kg sdot Lminus1
Reaction chemistry at runaway is very complex and dependson the type of used catalyst and other process conditions [1ndash4] In present study a ldquoworst-case scenariordquo was used for thethermal runaway of reaction Design bases of (119889119879119889119905)
119898and
(119889119879119889119905)
119904were obtained from the literature [2ndash4 8] and are
presented in Table 1 Calculated vent area was compared tothe nomogram method from study by Fauske [9] and yield avent area of 0326m2 or 065m vent area pipe diameter whichis in good agreement with the calculated results Pressurerelief devices designs were made according to API RP 526standard [5] Detailed presentation of pressure relief devicesare presented in Figure 3 with main dimensions shown inTable 1 In present design it was suggested that RD is locatedbetween reactor and SRV RD protects SRV piston fromvapors and opens when tank pressure is above allowablereactor pressure Maximal pressure which appears at reactionrunaway was not known and was obtained from the literaturereported data [9] A design pressure of 221 sdot 105 Pa was usedfor system design with 20 safety factor In present study avent membrane had a pressure relief from minus075 bar to 075bar At pressures higher than 075 bar the rupture disc openedand the material was discharged into the blow down tank
3 Blow Down Tank Design
Thepurpose of the blowdown tank is to capture the twophasematerial flow from reactor and to decrease the pressure of
outflow material [9] Blow down tank design was done basedon API RP 520 standard [5] Blow down tank volume wascalculated from the reactor volume as
119881bd = 2 sdot 119881119900 (6)
and is reported in Table 1 A factor 2 in (6) was used as engi-neering safety coefficient which decreases the pressure fromreaction runaway by half It may also be called additionalsafety margin The pressure decrease in a blow down tankwas calculated by applying the ideal gas behavior at constanttemperatures as follows
119875
1sdot 119881
1
119879
1
=
119875
2sdot 119881
2
119879
2
(7)
and was 1 sdot 105 Pa The maximal allowable working pressure(MAWP) for blow down tank was calculated according toAPI RP 520 standard [5] and was 25 sdot 105 Pa MAWP washigher than peak pressure at 221 sdot 105 Pa Due to volumechange the MAWP in blow down tank will not be reachedduring reaction runaway In blow down tank a solid part oftwo phase runaway material is captured
4 Horizontal and Vertical HeatExchanger Design
Various procedures for heat exchanger design may be foundin the available literature [9 10 13] Only brief calculationprocedure is presented [5 7 10]
(i) Assume pipe diameter length inside and outsidefouling factor
(ii) For the pipe construction an INOX AISI 316 wasused with corresponding characteristics presented inTable 1
(iii) Corresponding energetic balances for horizontal andvertical heat exchanger were written as
119876 =
119876hot =
119876cold = 119888 sdot 119888119901119888 sdot (119879119888out minus 119879119888in)
=
ℎsdot 119888
119901ℎsdot (119879
ℎout minus 119879ℎin) (8)
Equation (8) enables calculation of heat duty 119902 andthe hot medium outflow temperatures and results arepresented in Table 1
(iv) The Log Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD) forcountercurrent flow was calculated by
LMTD =
(119879
ℎin minus 119879119888out) minus (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in)
ln ((119879ℎin minus 119879119888out) (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in))
(9)
(v) Based on the experiences and literature data dividedflow shell and even tube passes were assumed forboth condensers Following the procedure proposedby Richardson et al [10] parameters119877
119905 119878 and119865
119905were
obtained from the corresponding diagrams Obtainedparameters enabled calculation of mean temperaturedifference
119863119879
119898= 119865
119905sdot LMTD (10)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 9
(vi) Overall heat transfer coefficients were assumed fromthe data reported in the literature [10] within theirminimum and maximum values and were between700Wsdotm2sdotK and 1000Wsdotm2sdotK Predicted heat trans-fer coefficients enabled calculation of minimum andmaximum provisional area which were taken as aver-age for heat exchanger design
119860 =
1
2
sdot (119860min + 119860max) (11)
Nextmain parameters used for heat exchanger designwere calculated using (12)ndash(18) Pressure drops andthe heat transfer coefficients for heat exchanger werecalculated using (19)ndash(25) for the shell and tube siterespectively
Equations used for horizontal and vertical heatexchanger design are as follows
119860 =
119902
119880 sdot 119863119879
119898
(12)
119873
119905=
119860
120587 sdot 119889out sdot 119871 (13)
119901
119905= 125 sdot 119889
119900 (14)
119863
119887= 119889
119900sdot (
119873
119905
119870
1
)
11198991
(15)
119863
119878= 119863
119887+ BDC (16)
119861
119878= 04 sdot 119863
119878 (17)
119860
119878=
(119901
119905minus 119889out) sdot 119863119878 sdot 119861119878
119901
119905
(18)
119866shell =shell side flow rate
119860
119904
(19)
119889
119890=
110
119889outsdot (119901
2
119905minus 0917 sdot 119889
2
out) (20)
Re =119889
119890sdot 120583 sdot 120588
120578
(21)
Pr =120583 sdot 119888
119901
120582
(22)
Nu =ℎshell sdot 119889119890
119896
119891
(23)
Nu = 119895ℎsdot Re sdotPr13 sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
014
(24)
Δ119875shell = 8 sdot 119895119891 sdot (119863
119904
119889
119890
) sdot (
119871
119897
119861
) sdot (
120588 sdot 119906
2
119904
2
) sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus014
(25)
119897
119861=
07 sdot 119871
4
(26)
119873tpp =119873
119905
number of passes (27)
119866tube =119866in
119873tpp sdot (120587 sdot 1198892
in4) (28)
]tube =119866tube120588
119894
(29)
(vii) The heat transfer coefficient ℎtube for turbulent flowwas calculated by using next correlation
ℎtube = 0023 sdot119865
119903
119889insdot Re08 sdot Pr033 sdot (1 + 119889in
119871
) (30)
(viii) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquooutside pipes flowrdquo
119880shell = 1 times (
1
ℎshell+
1
ℎdirtout+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(31)
(ix) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquoinside pipes flowrdquo
119880tube = 1 times (
1
ℎtube+
1
ℎdirtin+
119889in119889out sdot ℎdirtout
+
119889in119889out sdot ℎshell
+
119889in sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(32)
(x) The tube-side pressure drop was calculated
Δ119875tube = (15 + 119873119905 sdot [25 +8 sdot 119895
119891sdot 119871
119889in+ (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus119898
]) sdot
120588
119894 sdot V2
2
(33)
Calculated parameters for horizontal and vertical condenserdesign are reported in Table 1
5 Vertical Heat Exchanger Design
For the vertical heat exchanger design exactly the sameprocedure as proposed for the horizontal heat exchanger wasused Firstly the amount of condensed vapor was calculatedfrom the ratio of vapor pressures at reactor release in the blowdown tank and after the volumetric expansion
119903
119888=
119901
1199041
119901
1199042
(34)
where 1199011199041
and 119901
1199042were the saturated pressures calculated
from (1) Obtained 119903
119888was used for calculation of gas flow
10 Journal of Industrial Engineering
which needs to be neutralized and cooled down in verticalheat exchanger
119866HZT = 119903
119888sdot 119866vent (35)
where 119866HZT and 119866vent are the reactor runaway flow and flowthrough horizontal condenser reported in Table 1 Calculated119866HZT flow was used for vertical condenser design at the exactsame procedure as for horizontal condenser In the next step119866HZT flow needed to be cooled down and neutralized inabsorption column using sodium hydroxide solution beforeit was left in the surrounding 119866HZT flows from blow downreactor with temperature which is equal to the temperature ofrunaway flow due to short residence time Similar predictionswere obtained at design of other blowdownprocesses [3 8 9]
All calculated parameters are presented in Table 1 During119866HZT neutralization reaction heat was formed The heatwhich needs to be cooled down was calculated as the sumof vapor gas heat and the heat produced by neutralizationreaction
119876total =
119876hot gas +
119876reaction (36)
where
119876react was calculated using reaction enthalpy as follows
119876reaction = Δ119867reaction sdot 119866HZT (37)
and the heat pro recycles using
119876recycle =
119876totalRecycle
(38)
6 Scrubber Design
Since the reaction enthalpy for the neutralization reactionof phenol acid with sodium hydroxide cannot be foundin the available literature it was calculated from formationenthalpies and was 2232 kJmol [10] Since the compositionof the blow down gas is not known exactly it was assumedthat it is composed from phenolic acid [8]The neutralizationreaction of phenolic acid with sodium hydroxide was writtenas
PhCOOH +NaOH 997888rarr PhCONa +H2O (39)
Neutralization reaction gives the stoichiometric ratio ofphenolic acid versus sodium hydroxide and enables the cal-culation of the amount of neutralization medium needed forneutralization The necessary 50wt neutralization liquidflow rate was calculated from the reaction and was 423 kgsTo decrease the necessary volume of used sodium hydroxideits recycling was assumed The recycle flow was calculatedusing
Recycle = 119866HZT119881scrubber tank
(40)
The recycle ratio gives scrubber volume of 45m3 and enablesthe calculation of the liquid and the gas flow rates used forabsorption column design Scrubber design was performedaccording to API RP 520 standard All main scrubberdimensions are presented in Table 1 MAWP of scrubber wasdesigned to be 15 sdot 105 Pa
7 Absorption Column Design
Before outflow gas from blow down system was left intosurrounding air it was neutralized by sodium hydroxidein counterflow absorption column A lot of literature forabsorption column design can be found in available literature[11 14] Due to high flow of gas and neutralization fluid thechemical reaction was the limiting step of this process Ageneralized approach proposed in the literature was used forcolumn design [7 11 14] Firstly (119871119866) sdot (120588
119866120588
119871)
12 factor wascalculated Pump characteristics limited the pressure drop inabsorption column to 110158401015840 water column per feet of packingBased on existing correlations factor (119866lowast2 sdot119865 sdot12058301)(322 sdot120588
119892sdot
(120588
119892minus 120588
119871)) was obtained to be 18 and enabled to calculate the
gas flux119866lowast A ceramic IMTP packing number 70was taken aspacking material with main parameters presented in Table 1Calculated parameters enabled to design an absorption col-umn area and diameter from the following equation
119866 = 119860 sdot 119866
lowast (41)
119860 =
120587 sdot 119863
2
4
(42)
Large absorption column diameter is a consequence of largegas flow at reaction runaway which was designed to be up to595m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 which is lower than allowed maximal liquidflow rate of 122m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 for IMTO packing number 70Next absorption column height was designed based on theprocedure proposed by Seader et al [11] and was obtained tobe 3000mm All other column parameters are presented inTable 1 and enabled to design the absorption column pressuredrop which was 30 sdot 103 Pa
8 Ventilator Fan Design
The vapor gas coming out from absorption column is mainlycomposed of different phenolic vapors which are heavierthan air therefore a ventilator fan needs to be inserted intooutflow chimney The role of the fan is to suck the vaporgas coming out from absorption column and to blow it outvia chimney into surrounding air Equations used for the fandesign are presented as follows [12]
Design equations for ventilator fan design in outflowchimney
Pressure of ventilator
Δ119875Fan = 120588 sdot 119892 sdot ℎchimney +120588 sdot V2
2
(43)
Gas vapor velocity
0
119881 Fan = 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan sdot 119860Fan (44)
where
119860Fan =120587sdot119889Fan
2
4
(45)
Ventilator motor power
119875Fan motor = 0 119881 Fan sdot Δ119875Fan (46)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 11
95
96
1 3 5
2 4 6
F5
F4F3 F2 F1
F6
Frompressuresensor
PC
CCC
M
3
M3 55 kW M3 34kW
F3 F1
1 3 5
2 4 6
C C C
M
3
Pump motor Fan motor
L1L2L3N
0
20A F20
120A
P
Figure 2 Electrical connections for pump and fan motor
Safety relief valve
Connection to pressurerelief system
Rupture disc
Connectionto reactor
Figure 3 Rupture disc and safety relief valve connection to reactor
Axial fan velocity
V119903= 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan (47)
The fan pressure and the fan capacity were designed basedon capacity of 823 kg sdot sminus1 of outcoming gas by (43)ndash(47)Radial velocity of ventilator fan speed V
119903was calculated from
(47) and clearly indicates that an axial ventilator must beapplied All main designed technical characteristics of theventilator fan are shown in Table 1 A 34 kW ventilator fanmotor with corresponding ATEX protection with II 2G EExde II B T4 code and motor thermal protection should beused since the motor is located in Ex cone According toATEX directive the electric board with all main connectionsshould be located outside Ex cone which is presented in
Figure 2 Chimney height was obtained from standards andwas approximately 6000mm All other chimney dimensionsare presented in Table 1 [4 15]
9 Blow Down and Cooling Water Pipes Design
Blow down equipment is connected using thick wall pipesmade of INOX AISI 316 due to highly corrosive mediumhigh fluid velocities and large pressures at reaction runawayFor the vent size pipes diameter design at reaction runawayfrequently used technique proposed by Bleier [12] was used
119863119873pipe = (119866
119891pipe)
12
sdot (
120588
119875
)
14
(48)
where all parameters are explained in the Nomenclature Thepipe system with 400mm pipe diameter was proposed asconnection between horizontal heat exchanger and absorp-tion column at given conditions All other data are presentedin Table 1 and Figure 2 Connection pipe system betweenreactors and blow down tank should be as short as possiblestraight with no elbows no reductions to decrease theamount of condensing flow and to prevent the appearance ofplugs which may lead to fatal accidents Additionally suchsystem configuration ensures easy maintain and fast pipecleaning In parallel the pipe pressure drops were calculatedby method proposed by Crane [16] to ensure smooth andeasy flow The pipe length was designed to be as short aspossible with minimal pressure drop which will result inlow amount of condensed fluid High fluid velocities lowfriction factors and minimal pressure drops are expectedwhich agrees with results obtained from the literature [16]For the cooling water pipes diameter and sodium hydroxidepipe diameter design a method proposed byMays [17] which
12 Journal of Industrial Engineering
is based on the steady state incompressible energy equationutilizing Hazel Williams friction loses and continuity equa-tion was used The results are presented in Table 1 and inFigure 2
10 Pump Design
Neutralization process characteristics demand 100m3sdothminus1 of50wt sodium hydroxide For this a corresponding pumpwith 55 kW electrical motor and capacity of 120m3sdothminus1 atapproximately 4sdot105 Pa is proposed A corresponding electricschema with all relevant parts is presented in Figure 2 Sincethe pump is situated in Ex cone a correct motor withmotor II 2G EEx de II B T4 code and correct connectionaccording toATEX standardmust be used [18] Electric boardwith necessary connections should be located outside theEx cone A pressure sensor (PC) is proposed on the pipefrom vertical heat exchanger to absorption column PC hastwo tasks to ensure that neutralization medium is pumpedall the time from scrubber tank on the absorption columnand to prevent the centrifugal pump running dry which canresult in pump failure and in the worst case in pump rotordamage
It needs to be mentioned that reaction mixture whichappears at reaction runaway is very viscous which mayresult in appearance of plug in designed pipes equipmentand huge pressure drops This problem will be avoided bydecreasing the connection pipe length without reductionsand low pipe elbow number Horizontal heat exchangerwhich is located above the blow down tank decreases thefluid temperature which results in fluid condensation thatis why lower amount of gas need to be neutralized inabsorption column Less required gas for neutralizationresults in lower NaOH consumption which decreases oper-ational costs of designed system Additionally horizontalheat exchanger produces huge pressure drop which results inlower gas velocities and higher gasliquid mass transfer coef-ficients which increases the efficiency of absorption columns[14]
11 Conclusions
Designed results of this study demonstrate that proposedmethod can be used for emergency relief system designBased on calculated data the following conclusions weremade
Emergency relief system for exothermic reaction forreactor volume up to 30m3 was designed A 60m3 blowdown tank with 700m3sdothminus1 of 13∘C26∘C cooling water andtwo condensersmdashhorizontal and verticalmdashwith cooling areaof 54m2 and 5m2 are proposed An absorber column withdiameter of 15m and 30m height 45m3 scrubber tankand corresponding outflow chimney were designed All othersystem parameters are presented in Table 1 It is hoped thatthe presented procedure will serve as an engineering tool foremergency relief system design in various process industriesall over the world
Nomenclature
119871 Length (m)120582
119908 Thermal conductivity
(Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1)119862
119901cold Specific heat of cold medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119862
119901hot Specific heat of hot medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
Cooling water Specific heat of cooling water(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119876 Heat transfer (W)119879hin Temperature of hot medium
(∘C)119898
119900 Reactor charge (kg)
119860 Area (m2)119881 Reactor volume (m3)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119902
119888 Heat release per unit mass cold
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119902
ℎ Heat release per unit mass hot
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119866 Discharge mass flow rate per
unit area (kgsdotm2sdotsminus1)119875 Pressure (Pa)119879 Temperature (K)119889119879119889119905 Self heat rate in runaway
reactions (Ksdotmin1)119902 Energy release rate (Jsdotkgminus1)
119876hot Heat of hot medium (W)
119876cold Heat of cold medium (W)119879
ℎout Temperature of hot medium(∘C)
LMTD Log mean temperaturedifference (∘C)
119877
119905 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119878 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119865
119905 Temperature correction factor
119879
119898 Mean temperature difference
(∘C)119880 Overall heat transfer coefficient
(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)119860 Average provisional area (m2)119873
119905 Number of tubes
119889 Pipe diameter (mm)119903 Ration Mass flow (kgsdots1)119865
119905 Friction factor
Δ119875shell Pressure drop on the shell side(Pa)
Δ119875tube Pressure drop on the tube side(Pa)
BDC Bundle diameter clearance(mm)
119908 Wall thickness (mm)119901
119905 Tube pitch (mm)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 13
119863
119887 Bundle diameter (mm)
119863
119904 Shell diameter (mm)
119861
119904 Baffle spacing (mm)
119860
119904 Area for cross-flow (m2)
119866shell Shell-side mass velocity(kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2)
119889
119890 Shell equivalent diameter (mm)
Re Reynolds numberPr Prandtl numberNu Nusselt numberℎshell Shell-side heat transfer
coefficient (Wsdotmminus2sdotK1)119895
ℎat 45 of baffle cut Shell-side heat transfer factor
119897
119887 Baffle spacing (mm)
119873tpp Number of tubes per pass119866tube Tube-side mass velocity
(kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1)119881tube Tube-side velocity (msdotsminus1)Retube Inside tube Reynolds numberPrtube Inside tube Prandtl numberNutube Inside tube Nusselt number119895
119891at 45 of baffle cut Shell side friction factor
ℎtubeside Inside heat transfer coefficient(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880i Overall heat transfer factor forinside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880o Overall heat transfer factor foroutside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880 Average heat transfer factor(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119865IMTP IMTP packing factor119871NaOH NaOH flow (m3sdoth1)Recycle Recycle of NaOH in absorber
(hminus1)119881scrubbertank Volume of scrubber tank (m3)119860abs Absorber area (m2)119863abs Absorber diameter (m)Δ119875abs Pressure drop on absorber tray
(Pa)119865IMTP IMTP packing factorIMTP packing Mark of absorber fill119873
119871 Number of theoretical plates or
traysHETP Height equivalent to the
theoretical plate (m)119867abs Height of absorption column
(m)119881bd Blow down volume (m3)119881max Maximal tank volume (m3)119902vent Heat release per unit mass at
reaction runaway (Wsdotsminus1)119888
119901 Specific heat of material
(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)(119889119879119889119905)
119898 Self heat rate at temperature
turn around or maximal overpressure defined by API RP 520during run away (Ksdotsminus1)
(119889119879119889119905)
119904 Self heat rate at set pressure of
pressure relief devices (Ksdotsminus1)
119879
119898 Temperature of reactant
correlates to the temperatureturn around or maximum overpressure defined by API RP520 during runaway (K)
119879
119904 Temperature of reactant
correlates to set pressure ofpressure relief devices (K)
Δ119879 Temperature difference (K)119905 Time (s)120578 Viscosity (Pasdots)120583 Kinematic viscosity (m2sdotsminus1)119881 Volume (m3)119863 diameter (m)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119865 Flow reduction factor119881 Voltage (V)119868 Current (A)119882 Power supply (W)GF Gas rate (m3sdothminus1)LF Liquid rate (m3sdothminus1)119888Li Liquid concentration (molsdotm3)119888gi Gas concentration (molsdotm3)119877 liquid rate to tank volume
(hminus1)0
119881Fan Ventilator fan flow (m3sdothminus1)V119903 Axial fan velocity (msdotsminus1)
Δ119875Fan Ventilator fan pressure (Pa)119875Fanmotor Ventilator motor power (W)0
119881Fan Rotational velocity ofventilator fan (RPM)
119860Fan Ventilator area (m2)119889Fan Fan diameter (mm)ℎchimney Height of outflow chimney
(mm)119892 Gravity acceleration (m2sdotsminus1)Vvapor Outflow vapor gas velocity
(msdots1)119891pipe Flow reduction factorΔ119867react Reaction enthalpy (Jsdotmol1)119866
lowast Gas flux (kgsdots1sdotm2)DN Inner diameter (m)bd Blow down119898 Pressure turnaround meanmax Maximal value119904 Relief set conditions shell119900 Initial conditionscin Cold incout Cold outabs Absorbervent VentBWG BirminghamWire Gaugedirt indirt out Coatings of dirt on the in and
out site of pipe119908 Walltube Tube sideshell Shell side119894 119895 Refers to tube and shell side119901 Specific heat
14 Journal of Industrial Engineering
1 2 3 Refers to positionS1 S2 Saturated pressure at position 1
and 2HZT Horizontalhin Hot inhout Hot outout Out sitesdot Unit in time119890 EquivalentIMTP IMTP packing type119888 Coldℎ Hot119905 Pitch119887 Bundleℎ Heat119891 Friction119894 Inside119900 Outsideabs Absorber119871 Theoretical120587 314119904 Set pointPE Electrically groundedU1 U2 Electro phasesV1 V2 Electro phasesW1 W2 Electro phasesTK Electro phasesL1 L2 L3 Electro phases119873 Neutral phaseS1 Switch 10 1 2 3 4 Position in switch and
correctionF1 Fusion 1AC3 Analog currentX1X2 ContactorM Motor3 sim ΛΔ Three phase electro motorMAWP Maximal allowed working
pressure
References
[1] H K Fauske ldquoEmergency relief system design for reactive andnon-reactive systems extension of the DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 7 no 3 pp 153ndash158 1988
[2] J C Leung ldquoSimplified vent sizing equations for emergencyrelief requirements in reactors and storage vesselsrdquo AIChEJournal vol 32 no 10 pp 1622ndash1634 1986
[3] J C Leung H K Fauske and H G Fisher ldquoThermal runawayreactions in a low thermal inertia apparatusrdquo ThermochimicaActa vol 104 pp 13ndash29 1986
[4] R C Rosaler Standard Handbook of Plant EngineeringMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 3rd edition 2002
[5] API RP 520 Sizing Selection and Installation of Pressure Reliev-ing Devices in Refineries American Petroleum Institution 2000
[6] API STD 526 Flanged Steel Pressure Relief Valves AmericanPetroleum Institution 6th edition 2012
[7] R H Perry and D W Green Perryrsquos Chemical EngineersrsquoHandbook McGraw-Hill New York NY USA 2007
[8] J L Gustin J Fillion G Treand and K E Biyaali ldquoThe phenol+ formaldehyde runaway reaction Vent sizing for reactorprotectionrdquo Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industriesvol 6 no 2 pp 103ndash113 1993
[9] H K Fauske ldquoGeneralized vent sizing monogram for runawaychemical reactionsrdquo PlantOperations Progress vol 3 no 4 pp213ndash215 1984
[10] J F Richardson J H Harker and J R Backhurst Coulson andRichardsonrsquos Chemical Engineering Butterworth-HeinemannBoston Mass USA 2009
[11] J D Seader E J Henley and D K Roter Separation ProcessPrinciples John Wiley amp Sons New York NY USA 2010
[12] F Bleier Fan Handbook Selection Application and DesignMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 1987
[13] S A Kudchadker A P Kudchadker R C Wilhoit and B JZwolinski ldquoIdeal gas thermodynamic properties of phenol andcresolsrdquo Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data vol 7no 2 pp 417ndash423 1978
[14] I Hace ldquoComparison of concentration profiles for boundarylayers in absorption with chemical reaction processesrdquo Chemi-cal Engineering and Technology vol 29 no 5 pp 574ndash582 2006
[15] J C Leung and H K Fauske ldquoRunaway system charac-terization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 6 no 2 pp 77ndash83 1987
[16] Crane Technical Paper ldquoA Process Design Engineerrsquos Perspec-tive on Using Equivalent Lengths of Valves and Fittings inPipeline Pressure Drop Calculations 410(TP-410)rdquo 2009
[17] L W Mays Hydraulic Design Handbook McGraw-Hill NewYork NY USA 1999
[18] ldquolsquoATEXDirective 949ECrsquo on equipment and protective systemsintended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX)rdquohttpeceuropaeuenterprisesectorsmechanicaldocumentslegislationatex
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of
2 Journal of Industrial Engineering
Blow down scrubber ATEX zone
From plant
Water inlet
Water outlet
Blow down tank 60m3
Drain Drain
Condenser 54m2
horizontal
Abso
rptio
n co
lum
nO
utflo
w ch
imne
y
Liquid levelScrubber
45m3
PC
Verticalcooler5m2
Scrubber filling
Centrifugalpump
Ventilator fan
Vent to ATM
DN 400
DN400
DN400
DN 100 DN 400 DN 100
DN 500
DN 80 DN 80
DN 300
DN 300
DN500
DN 150
DN 150
DN1500
DN400
DN 50
DN 150
DN 125
DN 125
DN 200
DN 200
To electric boards located outside ATEX zone
DN
200
DN
200
13∘C26∘C
Figure 1 Emergency relief system
Designed emergency relief system is presented inFigure 1 A real industrial example from process industrycomposed from twelve equal 30m3 batch reactors equippedwith pressure and temperature sensors cooling and heatingmechanism and rupture discs was taken In reactors anexothermic phenol formaldehyde reaction takes place Forreactor cooling towers with capacity of 700m3sdothminus1 of coolingwater at 13∘C26∘C cooling temperature regime was used
Based on the reaction runaway the emergency reliefsystem design was made in stages from plant vent systemblow down tank and scrubber with corresponding heatexchangers and absorption column
2 Pressure Relief Devices
Pressure relief devices design was made according to APIRP 520 standard [5] Detailed pressure relief system on thereactor is presented in Figure 3 and is composed of safetyrelief valve (SVR) and rupture disc (RD) with dimensionspresented in Table 1The pressure at which SVR piston opensdepends on the physicochemical characteristics of reactionsystem In present study it is designed so that SVR openswhen the reaction medium pressure is above 70 sdot 103 Pa Incase of runaway the outflow medium from reactor blows
into vent pipes connected to blow down tank Very high tipvelocities cause a phenomenon known as blow-off where theflame front is lifted and could eventually turn into a blow-out Therefore determination of the right pipe diameter isimportant as far as operation of the system is concernedThevent size is a crucial step at emergency relief system designIn this study an approach proposed by Fauske [1] and Leunget al [3] was used For pressure temperature relation Antoineequation was used to calculate the vapor pressure at reactionrunaway as follows
119875 = exp(1578 minus 8798
119879
) (1)
The two phase discharge flow rate per unit area was evaluatedaccording to the homogeneous equilibrium model whichcan be approximated in the low quality region by relationproposed by Leung [2] as follows
119866vent = 09 sdot 144 sdot119889119875
119889119879
sdot (
322
77816
sdot
119879
119888
119901vent)
12
(2)
where 119889119875119889119879was replaced by differential form of (1) and thetwo phase discharged flow per unit area was evaluated
Journal of Industrial Engineering 3
Table 1 Calculated system dimensions and characteristics for vent area horizontal and vertical heat exchanger blow down and scrubbertank absorption column and outflow chimney
(a)
Parameter Unit ValueCooling water data119879
119888in∘C 13 Designed
119879
119888out∘C 26 Designed
119879
119888out∘C 24 Designed
119876 m3sdothminus1 700 Designed
Power supply119868 A 130 Designed119881 V 380 Designed119882 kW 50 DesignedMaterial flow from reactor119902
119888W 894 sdot 10
6 Calculated from (8)119902
ℎW 23 sdot 10
6 Calculated from (8)
(b)
Energy released data Set condition Peak condition
119875 Pa 207 sdot 10
5221 sdot 10
5 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119879 K 3946 3967 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
(
119889119879
119889119905
)
119898
(119889119879119889119905
)
119904
Ksdotminminus1 15 20 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119888
119901Jsdotkgminus1sdotKminus1 29308 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)
[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119879
119898
∘C 1243 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119879
119904
∘C 1212 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
(c)
Parameter Unit Value
119862
119901cold Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1 4183 Obtained from literature Perry andGreen (2007) [7]
119862
119901hot Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1 29281 Obtained from literature Perry andGreen (2007) [7]
Blow down tank119881
119900m3 30 Designed
119881bd m3 60 Calculated from (6)119875sat Pa 1 sdot 10
5 Calculated from (1)119866in kgsdotsminus1 346 Calculated from (2)
119875Pa 207 sdot 10
5 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119875
1Pa 1 sdot 10
5 Pa Calculated from (7)119903
119888 024 Calculated from (34)
119866HZT kgsdotsminus1 82 Calculated from (35)119882
m 25 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 25 sdot 10
5 Designed
4 Journal of Industrial Engineering
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
Safety relief valveDN m 065 Designed119875safety Pa 70 sdot 10
4 DesignedVent area119902vent Jsdotkgminus1 846 Calculated from (6)119866vent kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 2124 Calculated from (2)119860vent m2 0326 Calculated from (3)119863vent m 065 Calculated from (5)Calculated data horizontal heatexchanger119871
mm 5000 Designed
ℎDirtIN = ℎDirtOUT Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 698 lt ℎ lt 9987
Obtained from literature Perry andGreen (2007) [7]
120582
119908Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1 162 Obtained from literature Perry and
Green (2007) [7]
119876hot W 585711 Calculated from (8)
119876cold W 366125 Calculated from (8)119879
ℎout∘C 80 Calculated from (8)
LMTD ∘C 7616 Calculated from (9)
119877
119905 683 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119878 00594 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119865
119905 096 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]119879
119898
∘C 7311 Calculated from (10)119860
m2 54 Calculated from (11)119873
119905 85 Calculated from (13)
Pipe dimensions for horizontal heatexchanger119889out mm 508
BWG 16 Perry and Green (2007) [7]INOX AISI316
119889in mm 46732Wall thickness mm 2034119901
119905mm 635 Calculated from (14)
119863
119887mm 6891 Calculated from (15)
BDC mm 93 Obtained from diagrams Richardsonet al (2009) [10]
119863
119904mm 782 Calculated from (16)
119861
119904mm 313 Calculated from (17)
119860
119904m2 004895 Calculated from (18)
119866shell kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2 1986 Calculated from (19)119889
119890mm 3607 Calculated from (20)
Reshell 65127 Calculated from (21)Prshell 748 Calculated from (22)Nushell 323 Calculated from (23)ℎshell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 5490 Calculated from (23) and (25)119897
119887mm 875 Calculated from (26)
Δ119875shell Pa 53800 Calculated from (25)119873tpp 85 Calculated from (27)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 5
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
119866tube kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 7971 Calculated from (28)Vtube msdotsminus1 2596 Calculated from (29)Retube 30390 Calculated from (21)Prtube 0575 Calculated from (22)ℎtube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0044 Calculated from (30)119880tube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0022 Calculated from (32)119880shell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 1957 Calculated from (31)Δ119875tube Pa 91500 Calculated from (33)Calculated data vertical heat exchangerRecycle hminus1 2222 Calculated from (40)Total heat vertical kW 23553 Calculated from (36)Heat per recycle kW 1454 Calculated from (38)119879
ℎinvert∘C 80 Calculated from (8)
119860m2 5 Calculated from (11)
119879
ℎoutvert∘C 40 Calculated from (8)
119879
119888invert∘C 15 Calculated from (8)
119879
119888outvert∘C 24 Calculated from (8)
Pipe dimensions for vertical heatexchanger119871
mm 2500119889out mm 508
BWG 16 Perry and Green (2007) [7]
119889in mm 46732Wall thickness mm 2034119901
119905mm 635 Calculated from (14)
119863
119887mm 2867 Calculated from (15)
BDC mm 88 Obtained from diagrams Richardsonet al (2009) [10]
119863
119904mm 388 Calculated from (16)
119861
119904mm 1552 Calculated from (17)
119860
119904m2 0012043 Calculated from (18)
119866
119904kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2 8072 Calculated from (19)
119889
119890mm 3607 Calculated from (20)
Reshell 264718 Calculated from (21)Prshell 748 Calculated from (22)Nushell 2547 Calculated from (23)ℎshell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 43435 Calculated from (23) and (24)119897
119887mm 4375 Calculated from (26)
Δ119875shell Pa 82000 Calculated from (25)119873tpp 13 Calculated from (27)119866tube kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 6196 Calculated from (28)Vtube msdotsminus1 2018 Calculated from (29)Retube 23545 Calculated from (21)Prtube 0575 Calculated from (22)Δ119875tube Pa 128000 Calculated from (33)ℎtube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0036 Calculated from (30)119880tube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 001867 Calculated from (32)119880shell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 5617 Calculated from (31)
6 Journal of Industrial Engineering
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
LMTD ∘C 3844 Calculated from (9)
119877
119905 444 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119878 01385 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119865
119905 096 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]DT119898
∘C 367 Calculated from (10)119860
m2 5 Calculated from (11)119873
119905 13 Calculated from (13)
Absorber and scrubberScrubber
119871NaOH kgsdotsminus1 4221 Calculated from reactionstoichiometry
Recycle hminus1 2222 Calculated from (40)119881scrubber tank m3 45 Calculated from (40)119908
m 10 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 15 sdot 10
5 DesignedAbsorber(119871119866) sdot (120588
119892120588
119871)
12
0023 Calculated ratio119866
lowast2sdot 119865 sdot 120583
01
322 sdot 120588
119892sdot (120588
119892minus 120588
119871)
18 Obtained from correlations proposedin literature Seader et al (2010) [11]
119866
lowast kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 49 Calculated from obtained factor119860abs m2 168 Calculated from (41)119863abs m 146 Calculated from (42)
Δ119875abs m 03048 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
No foaming factor 119865nf 1 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119865IMTP 12 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
IMTP packing mm 889 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119873
119871 166 Obtained from literature Seader et al
(2010) [11]
HETP m 183 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119867abs m 3 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119865IMTP 12 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119871operation m3hsdotm2 599 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119908m 10 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 10 sdot 10
5 DesignedNeutralization reaction in absorber andin scrubber
Δ119867react kJsdotmolminus1 2232 Calculated from literature data Perryand Green (2007) [7]
119876reaction kW 71 Calculated from (37)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 7
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit ValueCentrifugal pump119871NaOH m3
sdothminus1 100 Calculated from reaction stochiometryΔ119875pump Pa 400000 DesignedVentilator fan designΔ119875Fan Pa 500 Calculated from (43)0
119881Fan m3sdothminus1 72000 Calculated from (44) and (45)
119907
119903msdotsminus1 230 Calculated from (47)
120599Fan RPM 2920 Calculated from (44) and (45)119875Fanmotor kW 34 Calculated from (46)119889Fan mm 1460 Calculated from (44) and (45)Chimney design
ℎchimney mm 6000 Obtained from literature diagramsBleier (1987) [12]
119889chimney mm 500 Obtained from literature diagramsBleier (1987) [12]
Pipe sizingPipes from blow down tank viahorizontal heat exchanger to absorberDNpipes
Blow down tank-horizontal heatexchanger mm 400 Calculated from (48)
Horizontal heat exchanger-absorber mm 400 Calculated from (48)Pipes from scrubber via pump andvertical heat exchanger to absorberDNpipes
Pipes from scrubber via pump mm 125 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
Cooling water pipesDNpipes
Main cooling water pipes mm 300 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
Cooling water pipes after crossing mm 200 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
The analytical vent sizing equation for homogeneousvessel venting is [2ndash4]
119860vent = 119898
119900sdot 119902vent
times (119866vent sdot [(119881
119898
119900
sdot
144
77816
sdot 119879 sdot
119889119875
119889119879
)
12
+(119888
119901vent sdot Δ119879vent)12
])
minus1
(3)
whereΔ119879vent = 119879119898 minus 119879119904
119863 =
radic
4 sdot 119860vent120587
119902vent =1
2
sdot 119888
119901vent sdot [(119889119879
119889119905
)
119904
+ (
119889119879
119889119905
)
119898
]
(4)
and all necessary physical and chemical data are presented asfollows
Physical-chemical parameters use for blow down systemdesign
120588liq [mol sdot dmminus3] = 13798
031598
(1+(1minus(11987969425))032768)
119888
119901liq [J sdot Kmolminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 101720 + 31761 sdot 119879
119888
119901119892[J sdot Kmolminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0434 sdot 10
5+ 2445 sdot 10
5
sdot [
1152119879
sinh [1152119879]]
2
+ 1512 sdot 10
5sdot [
507119879
cosh [507119879]]
2
8 Journal of Industrial Engineering
120578liq [Pa sdot s] = exp(minus43335 + 38817
119879
+
43983
ln (119879)+ 30548 sdot 10
24sdot 119879
minus10)
120578vap [Pa sdot s] =10094 sdot 10
minus7sdot 119879
0799
1 + 1031119879
120582vap [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0038846 sdot 119879
02392
1 + 98581119879 + 93717119879
2
120582liq [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 018837 minus 00001 sdot 119879
Δ119867evap [J sdot Kmolminus1] = 7306 sdot 107 sdot (1 minus 119879
69425
)
04246
119875vapour [Pa] = exp (95444 minus 1013
119879
minus 1009 sdot ln (119879)
+67603 sdot 10
minus18sdot 119879
6)
(5)
Formation enthalpies (Perry and Green (2007) [7])
Δ119867
119891
NaOH = minus46915 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
PhOH = minus1650 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
H2O= minus28583 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
NaPhO = minus326 kJ sdotmolminus1
120588
50wt NaOH = 1529 kg sdot Lminus1
Reaction chemistry at runaway is very complex and dependson the type of used catalyst and other process conditions [1ndash4] In present study a ldquoworst-case scenariordquo was used for thethermal runaway of reaction Design bases of (119889119879119889119905)
119898and
(119889119879119889119905)
119904were obtained from the literature [2ndash4 8] and are
presented in Table 1 Calculated vent area was compared tothe nomogram method from study by Fauske [9] and yield avent area of 0326m2 or 065m vent area pipe diameter whichis in good agreement with the calculated results Pressurerelief devices designs were made according to API RP 526standard [5] Detailed presentation of pressure relief devicesare presented in Figure 3 with main dimensions shown inTable 1 In present design it was suggested that RD is locatedbetween reactor and SRV RD protects SRV piston fromvapors and opens when tank pressure is above allowablereactor pressure Maximal pressure which appears at reactionrunaway was not known and was obtained from the literaturereported data [9] A design pressure of 221 sdot 105 Pa was usedfor system design with 20 safety factor In present study avent membrane had a pressure relief from minus075 bar to 075bar At pressures higher than 075 bar the rupture disc openedand the material was discharged into the blow down tank
3 Blow Down Tank Design
Thepurpose of the blowdown tank is to capture the twophasematerial flow from reactor and to decrease the pressure of
outflow material [9] Blow down tank design was done basedon API RP 520 standard [5] Blow down tank volume wascalculated from the reactor volume as
119881bd = 2 sdot 119881119900 (6)
and is reported in Table 1 A factor 2 in (6) was used as engi-neering safety coefficient which decreases the pressure fromreaction runaway by half It may also be called additionalsafety margin The pressure decrease in a blow down tankwas calculated by applying the ideal gas behavior at constanttemperatures as follows
119875
1sdot 119881
1
119879
1
=
119875
2sdot 119881
2
119879
2
(7)
and was 1 sdot 105 Pa The maximal allowable working pressure(MAWP) for blow down tank was calculated according toAPI RP 520 standard [5] and was 25 sdot 105 Pa MAWP washigher than peak pressure at 221 sdot 105 Pa Due to volumechange the MAWP in blow down tank will not be reachedduring reaction runaway In blow down tank a solid part oftwo phase runaway material is captured
4 Horizontal and Vertical HeatExchanger Design
Various procedures for heat exchanger design may be foundin the available literature [9 10 13] Only brief calculationprocedure is presented [5 7 10]
(i) Assume pipe diameter length inside and outsidefouling factor
(ii) For the pipe construction an INOX AISI 316 wasused with corresponding characteristics presented inTable 1
(iii) Corresponding energetic balances for horizontal andvertical heat exchanger were written as
119876 =
119876hot =
119876cold = 119888 sdot 119888119901119888 sdot (119879119888out minus 119879119888in)
=
ℎsdot 119888
119901ℎsdot (119879
ℎout minus 119879ℎin) (8)
Equation (8) enables calculation of heat duty 119902 andthe hot medium outflow temperatures and results arepresented in Table 1
(iv) The Log Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD) forcountercurrent flow was calculated by
LMTD =
(119879
ℎin minus 119879119888out) minus (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in)
ln ((119879ℎin minus 119879119888out) (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in))
(9)
(v) Based on the experiences and literature data dividedflow shell and even tube passes were assumed forboth condensers Following the procedure proposedby Richardson et al [10] parameters119877
119905 119878 and119865
119905were
obtained from the corresponding diagrams Obtainedparameters enabled calculation of mean temperaturedifference
119863119879
119898= 119865
119905sdot LMTD (10)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 9
(vi) Overall heat transfer coefficients were assumed fromthe data reported in the literature [10] within theirminimum and maximum values and were between700Wsdotm2sdotK and 1000Wsdotm2sdotK Predicted heat trans-fer coefficients enabled calculation of minimum andmaximum provisional area which were taken as aver-age for heat exchanger design
119860 =
1
2
sdot (119860min + 119860max) (11)
Nextmain parameters used for heat exchanger designwere calculated using (12)ndash(18) Pressure drops andthe heat transfer coefficients for heat exchanger werecalculated using (19)ndash(25) for the shell and tube siterespectively
Equations used for horizontal and vertical heatexchanger design are as follows
119860 =
119902
119880 sdot 119863119879
119898
(12)
119873
119905=
119860
120587 sdot 119889out sdot 119871 (13)
119901
119905= 125 sdot 119889
119900 (14)
119863
119887= 119889
119900sdot (
119873
119905
119870
1
)
11198991
(15)
119863
119878= 119863
119887+ BDC (16)
119861
119878= 04 sdot 119863
119878 (17)
119860
119878=
(119901
119905minus 119889out) sdot 119863119878 sdot 119861119878
119901
119905
(18)
119866shell =shell side flow rate
119860
119904
(19)
119889
119890=
110
119889outsdot (119901
2
119905minus 0917 sdot 119889
2
out) (20)
Re =119889
119890sdot 120583 sdot 120588
120578
(21)
Pr =120583 sdot 119888
119901
120582
(22)
Nu =ℎshell sdot 119889119890
119896
119891
(23)
Nu = 119895ℎsdot Re sdotPr13 sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
014
(24)
Δ119875shell = 8 sdot 119895119891 sdot (119863
119904
119889
119890
) sdot (
119871
119897
119861
) sdot (
120588 sdot 119906
2
119904
2
) sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus014
(25)
119897
119861=
07 sdot 119871
4
(26)
119873tpp =119873
119905
number of passes (27)
119866tube =119866in
119873tpp sdot (120587 sdot 1198892
in4) (28)
]tube =119866tube120588
119894
(29)
(vii) The heat transfer coefficient ℎtube for turbulent flowwas calculated by using next correlation
ℎtube = 0023 sdot119865
119903
119889insdot Re08 sdot Pr033 sdot (1 + 119889in
119871
) (30)
(viii) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquooutside pipes flowrdquo
119880shell = 1 times (
1
ℎshell+
1
ℎdirtout+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(31)
(ix) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquoinside pipes flowrdquo
119880tube = 1 times (
1
ℎtube+
1
ℎdirtin+
119889in119889out sdot ℎdirtout
+
119889in119889out sdot ℎshell
+
119889in sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(32)
(x) The tube-side pressure drop was calculated
Δ119875tube = (15 + 119873119905 sdot [25 +8 sdot 119895
119891sdot 119871
119889in+ (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus119898
]) sdot
120588
119894 sdot V2
2
(33)
Calculated parameters for horizontal and vertical condenserdesign are reported in Table 1
5 Vertical Heat Exchanger Design
For the vertical heat exchanger design exactly the sameprocedure as proposed for the horizontal heat exchanger wasused Firstly the amount of condensed vapor was calculatedfrom the ratio of vapor pressures at reactor release in the blowdown tank and after the volumetric expansion
119903
119888=
119901
1199041
119901
1199042
(34)
where 1199011199041
and 119901
1199042were the saturated pressures calculated
from (1) Obtained 119903
119888was used for calculation of gas flow
10 Journal of Industrial Engineering
which needs to be neutralized and cooled down in verticalheat exchanger
119866HZT = 119903
119888sdot 119866vent (35)
where 119866HZT and 119866vent are the reactor runaway flow and flowthrough horizontal condenser reported in Table 1 Calculated119866HZT flow was used for vertical condenser design at the exactsame procedure as for horizontal condenser In the next step119866HZT flow needed to be cooled down and neutralized inabsorption column using sodium hydroxide solution beforeit was left in the surrounding 119866HZT flows from blow downreactor with temperature which is equal to the temperature ofrunaway flow due to short residence time Similar predictionswere obtained at design of other blowdownprocesses [3 8 9]
All calculated parameters are presented in Table 1 During119866HZT neutralization reaction heat was formed The heatwhich needs to be cooled down was calculated as the sumof vapor gas heat and the heat produced by neutralizationreaction
119876total =
119876hot gas +
119876reaction (36)
where
119876react was calculated using reaction enthalpy as follows
119876reaction = Δ119867reaction sdot 119866HZT (37)
and the heat pro recycles using
119876recycle =
119876totalRecycle
(38)
6 Scrubber Design
Since the reaction enthalpy for the neutralization reactionof phenol acid with sodium hydroxide cannot be foundin the available literature it was calculated from formationenthalpies and was 2232 kJmol [10] Since the compositionof the blow down gas is not known exactly it was assumedthat it is composed from phenolic acid [8]The neutralizationreaction of phenolic acid with sodium hydroxide was writtenas
PhCOOH +NaOH 997888rarr PhCONa +H2O (39)
Neutralization reaction gives the stoichiometric ratio ofphenolic acid versus sodium hydroxide and enables the cal-culation of the amount of neutralization medium needed forneutralization The necessary 50wt neutralization liquidflow rate was calculated from the reaction and was 423 kgsTo decrease the necessary volume of used sodium hydroxideits recycling was assumed The recycle flow was calculatedusing
Recycle = 119866HZT119881scrubber tank
(40)
The recycle ratio gives scrubber volume of 45m3 and enablesthe calculation of the liquid and the gas flow rates used forabsorption column design Scrubber design was performedaccording to API RP 520 standard All main scrubberdimensions are presented in Table 1 MAWP of scrubber wasdesigned to be 15 sdot 105 Pa
7 Absorption Column Design
Before outflow gas from blow down system was left intosurrounding air it was neutralized by sodium hydroxidein counterflow absorption column A lot of literature forabsorption column design can be found in available literature[11 14] Due to high flow of gas and neutralization fluid thechemical reaction was the limiting step of this process Ageneralized approach proposed in the literature was used forcolumn design [7 11 14] Firstly (119871119866) sdot (120588
119866120588
119871)
12 factor wascalculated Pump characteristics limited the pressure drop inabsorption column to 110158401015840 water column per feet of packingBased on existing correlations factor (119866lowast2 sdot119865 sdot12058301)(322 sdot120588
119892sdot
(120588
119892minus 120588
119871)) was obtained to be 18 and enabled to calculate the
gas flux119866lowast A ceramic IMTP packing number 70was taken aspacking material with main parameters presented in Table 1Calculated parameters enabled to design an absorption col-umn area and diameter from the following equation
119866 = 119860 sdot 119866
lowast (41)
119860 =
120587 sdot 119863
2
4
(42)
Large absorption column diameter is a consequence of largegas flow at reaction runaway which was designed to be up to595m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 which is lower than allowed maximal liquidflow rate of 122m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 for IMTO packing number 70Next absorption column height was designed based on theprocedure proposed by Seader et al [11] and was obtained tobe 3000mm All other column parameters are presented inTable 1 and enabled to design the absorption column pressuredrop which was 30 sdot 103 Pa
8 Ventilator Fan Design
The vapor gas coming out from absorption column is mainlycomposed of different phenolic vapors which are heavierthan air therefore a ventilator fan needs to be inserted intooutflow chimney The role of the fan is to suck the vaporgas coming out from absorption column and to blow it outvia chimney into surrounding air Equations used for the fandesign are presented as follows [12]
Design equations for ventilator fan design in outflowchimney
Pressure of ventilator
Δ119875Fan = 120588 sdot 119892 sdot ℎchimney +120588 sdot V2
2
(43)
Gas vapor velocity
0
119881 Fan = 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan sdot 119860Fan (44)
where
119860Fan =120587sdot119889Fan
2
4
(45)
Ventilator motor power
119875Fan motor = 0 119881 Fan sdot Δ119875Fan (46)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 11
95
96
1 3 5
2 4 6
F5
F4F3 F2 F1
F6
Frompressuresensor
PC
CCC
M
3
M3 55 kW M3 34kW
F3 F1
1 3 5
2 4 6
C C C
M
3
Pump motor Fan motor
L1L2L3N
0
20A F20
120A
P
Figure 2 Electrical connections for pump and fan motor
Safety relief valve
Connection to pressurerelief system
Rupture disc
Connectionto reactor
Figure 3 Rupture disc and safety relief valve connection to reactor
Axial fan velocity
V119903= 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan (47)
The fan pressure and the fan capacity were designed basedon capacity of 823 kg sdot sminus1 of outcoming gas by (43)ndash(47)Radial velocity of ventilator fan speed V
119903was calculated from
(47) and clearly indicates that an axial ventilator must beapplied All main designed technical characteristics of theventilator fan are shown in Table 1 A 34 kW ventilator fanmotor with corresponding ATEX protection with II 2G EExde II B T4 code and motor thermal protection should beused since the motor is located in Ex cone According toATEX directive the electric board with all main connectionsshould be located outside Ex cone which is presented in
Figure 2 Chimney height was obtained from standards andwas approximately 6000mm All other chimney dimensionsare presented in Table 1 [4 15]
9 Blow Down and Cooling Water Pipes Design
Blow down equipment is connected using thick wall pipesmade of INOX AISI 316 due to highly corrosive mediumhigh fluid velocities and large pressures at reaction runawayFor the vent size pipes diameter design at reaction runawayfrequently used technique proposed by Bleier [12] was used
119863119873pipe = (119866
119891pipe)
12
sdot (
120588
119875
)
14
(48)
where all parameters are explained in the Nomenclature Thepipe system with 400mm pipe diameter was proposed asconnection between horizontal heat exchanger and absorp-tion column at given conditions All other data are presentedin Table 1 and Figure 2 Connection pipe system betweenreactors and blow down tank should be as short as possiblestraight with no elbows no reductions to decrease theamount of condensing flow and to prevent the appearance ofplugs which may lead to fatal accidents Additionally suchsystem configuration ensures easy maintain and fast pipecleaning In parallel the pipe pressure drops were calculatedby method proposed by Crane [16] to ensure smooth andeasy flow The pipe length was designed to be as short aspossible with minimal pressure drop which will result inlow amount of condensed fluid High fluid velocities lowfriction factors and minimal pressure drops are expectedwhich agrees with results obtained from the literature [16]For the cooling water pipes diameter and sodium hydroxidepipe diameter design a method proposed byMays [17] which
12 Journal of Industrial Engineering
is based on the steady state incompressible energy equationutilizing Hazel Williams friction loses and continuity equa-tion was used The results are presented in Table 1 and inFigure 2
10 Pump Design
Neutralization process characteristics demand 100m3sdothminus1 of50wt sodium hydroxide For this a corresponding pumpwith 55 kW electrical motor and capacity of 120m3sdothminus1 atapproximately 4sdot105 Pa is proposed A corresponding electricschema with all relevant parts is presented in Figure 2 Sincethe pump is situated in Ex cone a correct motor withmotor II 2G EEx de II B T4 code and correct connectionaccording toATEX standardmust be used [18] Electric boardwith necessary connections should be located outside theEx cone A pressure sensor (PC) is proposed on the pipefrom vertical heat exchanger to absorption column PC hastwo tasks to ensure that neutralization medium is pumpedall the time from scrubber tank on the absorption columnand to prevent the centrifugal pump running dry which canresult in pump failure and in the worst case in pump rotordamage
It needs to be mentioned that reaction mixture whichappears at reaction runaway is very viscous which mayresult in appearance of plug in designed pipes equipmentand huge pressure drops This problem will be avoided bydecreasing the connection pipe length without reductionsand low pipe elbow number Horizontal heat exchangerwhich is located above the blow down tank decreases thefluid temperature which results in fluid condensation thatis why lower amount of gas need to be neutralized inabsorption column Less required gas for neutralizationresults in lower NaOH consumption which decreases oper-ational costs of designed system Additionally horizontalheat exchanger produces huge pressure drop which results inlower gas velocities and higher gasliquid mass transfer coef-ficients which increases the efficiency of absorption columns[14]
11 Conclusions
Designed results of this study demonstrate that proposedmethod can be used for emergency relief system designBased on calculated data the following conclusions weremade
Emergency relief system for exothermic reaction forreactor volume up to 30m3 was designed A 60m3 blowdown tank with 700m3sdothminus1 of 13∘C26∘C cooling water andtwo condensersmdashhorizontal and verticalmdashwith cooling areaof 54m2 and 5m2 are proposed An absorber column withdiameter of 15m and 30m height 45m3 scrubber tankand corresponding outflow chimney were designed All othersystem parameters are presented in Table 1 It is hoped thatthe presented procedure will serve as an engineering tool foremergency relief system design in various process industriesall over the world
Nomenclature
119871 Length (m)120582
119908 Thermal conductivity
(Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1)119862
119901cold Specific heat of cold medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119862
119901hot Specific heat of hot medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
Cooling water Specific heat of cooling water(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119876 Heat transfer (W)119879hin Temperature of hot medium
(∘C)119898
119900 Reactor charge (kg)
119860 Area (m2)119881 Reactor volume (m3)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119902
119888 Heat release per unit mass cold
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119902
ℎ Heat release per unit mass hot
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119866 Discharge mass flow rate per
unit area (kgsdotm2sdotsminus1)119875 Pressure (Pa)119879 Temperature (K)119889119879119889119905 Self heat rate in runaway
reactions (Ksdotmin1)119902 Energy release rate (Jsdotkgminus1)
119876hot Heat of hot medium (W)
119876cold Heat of cold medium (W)119879
ℎout Temperature of hot medium(∘C)
LMTD Log mean temperaturedifference (∘C)
119877
119905 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119878 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119865
119905 Temperature correction factor
119879
119898 Mean temperature difference
(∘C)119880 Overall heat transfer coefficient
(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)119860 Average provisional area (m2)119873
119905 Number of tubes
119889 Pipe diameter (mm)119903 Ration Mass flow (kgsdots1)119865
119905 Friction factor
Δ119875shell Pressure drop on the shell side(Pa)
Δ119875tube Pressure drop on the tube side(Pa)
BDC Bundle diameter clearance(mm)
119908 Wall thickness (mm)119901
119905 Tube pitch (mm)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 13
119863
119887 Bundle diameter (mm)
119863
119904 Shell diameter (mm)
119861
119904 Baffle spacing (mm)
119860
119904 Area for cross-flow (m2)
119866shell Shell-side mass velocity(kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2)
119889
119890 Shell equivalent diameter (mm)
Re Reynolds numberPr Prandtl numberNu Nusselt numberℎshell Shell-side heat transfer
coefficient (Wsdotmminus2sdotK1)119895
ℎat 45 of baffle cut Shell-side heat transfer factor
119897
119887 Baffle spacing (mm)
119873tpp Number of tubes per pass119866tube Tube-side mass velocity
(kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1)119881tube Tube-side velocity (msdotsminus1)Retube Inside tube Reynolds numberPrtube Inside tube Prandtl numberNutube Inside tube Nusselt number119895
119891at 45 of baffle cut Shell side friction factor
ℎtubeside Inside heat transfer coefficient(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880i Overall heat transfer factor forinside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880o Overall heat transfer factor foroutside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880 Average heat transfer factor(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119865IMTP IMTP packing factor119871NaOH NaOH flow (m3sdoth1)Recycle Recycle of NaOH in absorber
(hminus1)119881scrubbertank Volume of scrubber tank (m3)119860abs Absorber area (m2)119863abs Absorber diameter (m)Δ119875abs Pressure drop on absorber tray
(Pa)119865IMTP IMTP packing factorIMTP packing Mark of absorber fill119873
119871 Number of theoretical plates or
traysHETP Height equivalent to the
theoretical plate (m)119867abs Height of absorption column
(m)119881bd Blow down volume (m3)119881max Maximal tank volume (m3)119902vent Heat release per unit mass at
reaction runaway (Wsdotsminus1)119888
119901 Specific heat of material
(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)(119889119879119889119905)
119898 Self heat rate at temperature
turn around or maximal overpressure defined by API RP 520during run away (Ksdotsminus1)
(119889119879119889119905)
119904 Self heat rate at set pressure of
pressure relief devices (Ksdotsminus1)
119879
119898 Temperature of reactant
correlates to the temperatureturn around or maximum overpressure defined by API RP520 during runaway (K)
119879
119904 Temperature of reactant
correlates to set pressure ofpressure relief devices (K)
Δ119879 Temperature difference (K)119905 Time (s)120578 Viscosity (Pasdots)120583 Kinematic viscosity (m2sdotsminus1)119881 Volume (m3)119863 diameter (m)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119865 Flow reduction factor119881 Voltage (V)119868 Current (A)119882 Power supply (W)GF Gas rate (m3sdothminus1)LF Liquid rate (m3sdothminus1)119888Li Liquid concentration (molsdotm3)119888gi Gas concentration (molsdotm3)119877 liquid rate to tank volume
(hminus1)0
119881Fan Ventilator fan flow (m3sdothminus1)V119903 Axial fan velocity (msdotsminus1)
Δ119875Fan Ventilator fan pressure (Pa)119875Fanmotor Ventilator motor power (W)0
119881Fan Rotational velocity ofventilator fan (RPM)
119860Fan Ventilator area (m2)119889Fan Fan diameter (mm)ℎchimney Height of outflow chimney
(mm)119892 Gravity acceleration (m2sdotsminus1)Vvapor Outflow vapor gas velocity
(msdots1)119891pipe Flow reduction factorΔ119867react Reaction enthalpy (Jsdotmol1)119866
lowast Gas flux (kgsdots1sdotm2)DN Inner diameter (m)bd Blow down119898 Pressure turnaround meanmax Maximal value119904 Relief set conditions shell119900 Initial conditionscin Cold incout Cold outabs Absorbervent VentBWG BirminghamWire Gaugedirt indirt out Coatings of dirt on the in and
out site of pipe119908 Walltube Tube sideshell Shell side119894 119895 Refers to tube and shell side119901 Specific heat
14 Journal of Industrial Engineering
1 2 3 Refers to positionS1 S2 Saturated pressure at position 1
and 2HZT Horizontalhin Hot inhout Hot outout Out sitesdot Unit in time119890 EquivalentIMTP IMTP packing type119888 Coldℎ Hot119905 Pitch119887 Bundleℎ Heat119891 Friction119894 Inside119900 Outsideabs Absorber119871 Theoretical120587 314119904 Set pointPE Electrically groundedU1 U2 Electro phasesV1 V2 Electro phasesW1 W2 Electro phasesTK Electro phasesL1 L2 L3 Electro phases119873 Neutral phaseS1 Switch 10 1 2 3 4 Position in switch and
correctionF1 Fusion 1AC3 Analog currentX1X2 ContactorM Motor3 sim ΛΔ Three phase electro motorMAWP Maximal allowed working
pressure
References
[1] H K Fauske ldquoEmergency relief system design for reactive andnon-reactive systems extension of the DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 7 no 3 pp 153ndash158 1988
[2] J C Leung ldquoSimplified vent sizing equations for emergencyrelief requirements in reactors and storage vesselsrdquo AIChEJournal vol 32 no 10 pp 1622ndash1634 1986
[3] J C Leung H K Fauske and H G Fisher ldquoThermal runawayreactions in a low thermal inertia apparatusrdquo ThermochimicaActa vol 104 pp 13ndash29 1986
[4] R C Rosaler Standard Handbook of Plant EngineeringMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 3rd edition 2002
[5] API RP 520 Sizing Selection and Installation of Pressure Reliev-ing Devices in Refineries American Petroleum Institution 2000
[6] API STD 526 Flanged Steel Pressure Relief Valves AmericanPetroleum Institution 6th edition 2012
[7] R H Perry and D W Green Perryrsquos Chemical EngineersrsquoHandbook McGraw-Hill New York NY USA 2007
[8] J L Gustin J Fillion G Treand and K E Biyaali ldquoThe phenol+ formaldehyde runaway reaction Vent sizing for reactorprotectionrdquo Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industriesvol 6 no 2 pp 103ndash113 1993
[9] H K Fauske ldquoGeneralized vent sizing monogram for runawaychemical reactionsrdquo PlantOperations Progress vol 3 no 4 pp213ndash215 1984
[10] J F Richardson J H Harker and J R Backhurst Coulson andRichardsonrsquos Chemical Engineering Butterworth-HeinemannBoston Mass USA 2009
[11] J D Seader E J Henley and D K Roter Separation ProcessPrinciples John Wiley amp Sons New York NY USA 2010
[12] F Bleier Fan Handbook Selection Application and DesignMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 1987
[13] S A Kudchadker A P Kudchadker R C Wilhoit and B JZwolinski ldquoIdeal gas thermodynamic properties of phenol andcresolsrdquo Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data vol 7no 2 pp 417ndash423 1978
[14] I Hace ldquoComparison of concentration profiles for boundarylayers in absorption with chemical reaction processesrdquo Chemi-cal Engineering and Technology vol 29 no 5 pp 574ndash582 2006
[15] J C Leung and H K Fauske ldquoRunaway system charac-terization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 6 no 2 pp 77ndash83 1987
[16] Crane Technical Paper ldquoA Process Design Engineerrsquos Perspec-tive on Using Equivalent Lengths of Valves and Fittings inPipeline Pressure Drop Calculations 410(TP-410)rdquo 2009
[17] L W Mays Hydraulic Design Handbook McGraw-Hill NewYork NY USA 1999
[18] ldquolsquoATEXDirective 949ECrsquo on equipment and protective systemsintended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX)rdquohttpeceuropaeuenterprisesectorsmechanicaldocumentslegislationatex
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of
Journal of Industrial Engineering 3
Table 1 Calculated system dimensions and characteristics for vent area horizontal and vertical heat exchanger blow down and scrubbertank absorption column and outflow chimney
(a)
Parameter Unit ValueCooling water data119879
119888in∘C 13 Designed
119879
119888out∘C 26 Designed
119879
119888out∘C 24 Designed
119876 m3sdothminus1 700 Designed
Power supply119868 A 130 Designed119881 V 380 Designed119882 kW 50 DesignedMaterial flow from reactor119902
119888W 894 sdot 10
6 Calculated from (8)119902
ℎW 23 sdot 10
6 Calculated from (8)
(b)
Energy released data Set condition Peak condition
119875 Pa 207 sdot 10
5221 sdot 10
5 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119879 K 3946 3967 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
(
119889119879
119889119905
)
119898
(119889119879119889119905
)
119904
Ksdotminminus1 15 20 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119888
119901Jsdotkgminus1sdotKminus1 29308 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)
[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119879
119898
∘C 1243 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119879
119904
∘C 1212 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
(c)
Parameter Unit Value
119862
119901cold Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1 4183 Obtained from literature Perry andGreen (2007) [7]
119862
119901hot Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1 29281 Obtained from literature Perry andGreen (2007) [7]
Blow down tank119881
119900m3 30 Designed
119881bd m3 60 Calculated from (6)119875sat Pa 1 sdot 10
5 Calculated from (1)119866in kgsdotsminus1 346 Calculated from (2)
119875Pa 207 sdot 10
5 Obtained from literature Fauske (1988)[1] Leung (1986) [2]
119875
1Pa 1 sdot 10
5 Pa Calculated from (7)119903
119888 024 Calculated from (34)
119866HZT kgsdotsminus1 82 Calculated from (35)119882
m 25 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 25 sdot 10
5 Designed
4 Journal of Industrial Engineering
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
Safety relief valveDN m 065 Designed119875safety Pa 70 sdot 10
4 DesignedVent area119902vent Jsdotkgminus1 846 Calculated from (6)119866vent kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 2124 Calculated from (2)119860vent m2 0326 Calculated from (3)119863vent m 065 Calculated from (5)Calculated data horizontal heatexchanger119871
mm 5000 Designed
ℎDirtIN = ℎDirtOUT Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 698 lt ℎ lt 9987
Obtained from literature Perry andGreen (2007) [7]
120582
119908Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1 162 Obtained from literature Perry and
Green (2007) [7]
119876hot W 585711 Calculated from (8)
119876cold W 366125 Calculated from (8)119879
ℎout∘C 80 Calculated from (8)
LMTD ∘C 7616 Calculated from (9)
119877
119905 683 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119878 00594 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119865
119905 096 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]119879
119898
∘C 7311 Calculated from (10)119860
m2 54 Calculated from (11)119873
119905 85 Calculated from (13)
Pipe dimensions for horizontal heatexchanger119889out mm 508
BWG 16 Perry and Green (2007) [7]INOX AISI316
119889in mm 46732Wall thickness mm 2034119901
119905mm 635 Calculated from (14)
119863
119887mm 6891 Calculated from (15)
BDC mm 93 Obtained from diagrams Richardsonet al (2009) [10]
119863
119904mm 782 Calculated from (16)
119861
119904mm 313 Calculated from (17)
119860
119904m2 004895 Calculated from (18)
119866shell kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2 1986 Calculated from (19)119889
119890mm 3607 Calculated from (20)
Reshell 65127 Calculated from (21)Prshell 748 Calculated from (22)Nushell 323 Calculated from (23)ℎshell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 5490 Calculated from (23) and (25)119897
119887mm 875 Calculated from (26)
Δ119875shell Pa 53800 Calculated from (25)119873tpp 85 Calculated from (27)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 5
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
119866tube kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 7971 Calculated from (28)Vtube msdotsminus1 2596 Calculated from (29)Retube 30390 Calculated from (21)Prtube 0575 Calculated from (22)ℎtube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0044 Calculated from (30)119880tube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0022 Calculated from (32)119880shell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 1957 Calculated from (31)Δ119875tube Pa 91500 Calculated from (33)Calculated data vertical heat exchangerRecycle hminus1 2222 Calculated from (40)Total heat vertical kW 23553 Calculated from (36)Heat per recycle kW 1454 Calculated from (38)119879
ℎinvert∘C 80 Calculated from (8)
119860m2 5 Calculated from (11)
119879
ℎoutvert∘C 40 Calculated from (8)
119879
119888invert∘C 15 Calculated from (8)
119879
119888outvert∘C 24 Calculated from (8)
Pipe dimensions for vertical heatexchanger119871
mm 2500119889out mm 508
BWG 16 Perry and Green (2007) [7]
119889in mm 46732Wall thickness mm 2034119901
119905mm 635 Calculated from (14)
119863
119887mm 2867 Calculated from (15)
BDC mm 88 Obtained from diagrams Richardsonet al (2009) [10]
119863
119904mm 388 Calculated from (16)
119861
119904mm 1552 Calculated from (17)
119860
119904m2 0012043 Calculated from (18)
119866
119904kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2 8072 Calculated from (19)
119889
119890mm 3607 Calculated from (20)
Reshell 264718 Calculated from (21)Prshell 748 Calculated from (22)Nushell 2547 Calculated from (23)ℎshell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 43435 Calculated from (23) and (24)119897
119887mm 4375 Calculated from (26)
Δ119875shell Pa 82000 Calculated from (25)119873tpp 13 Calculated from (27)119866tube kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 6196 Calculated from (28)Vtube msdotsminus1 2018 Calculated from (29)Retube 23545 Calculated from (21)Prtube 0575 Calculated from (22)Δ119875tube Pa 128000 Calculated from (33)ℎtube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0036 Calculated from (30)119880tube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 001867 Calculated from (32)119880shell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 5617 Calculated from (31)
6 Journal of Industrial Engineering
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
LMTD ∘C 3844 Calculated from (9)
119877
119905 444 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119878 01385 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119865
119905 096 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]DT119898
∘C 367 Calculated from (10)119860
m2 5 Calculated from (11)119873
119905 13 Calculated from (13)
Absorber and scrubberScrubber
119871NaOH kgsdotsminus1 4221 Calculated from reactionstoichiometry
Recycle hminus1 2222 Calculated from (40)119881scrubber tank m3 45 Calculated from (40)119908
m 10 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 15 sdot 10
5 DesignedAbsorber(119871119866) sdot (120588
119892120588
119871)
12
0023 Calculated ratio119866
lowast2sdot 119865 sdot 120583
01
322 sdot 120588
119892sdot (120588
119892minus 120588
119871)
18 Obtained from correlations proposedin literature Seader et al (2010) [11]
119866
lowast kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 49 Calculated from obtained factor119860abs m2 168 Calculated from (41)119863abs m 146 Calculated from (42)
Δ119875abs m 03048 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
No foaming factor 119865nf 1 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119865IMTP 12 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
IMTP packing mm 889 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119873
119871 166 Obtained from literature Seader et al
(2010) [11]
HETP m 183 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119867abs m 3 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119865IMTP 12 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119871operation m3hsdotm2 599 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119908m 10 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 10 sdot 10
5 DesignedNeutralization reaction in absorber andin scrubber
Δ119867react kJsdotmolminus1 2232 Calculated from literature data Perryand Green (2007) [7]
119876reaction kW 71 Calculated from (37)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 7
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit ValueCentrifugal pump119871NaOH m3
sdothminus1 100 Calculated from reaction stochiometryΔ119875pump Pa 400000 DesignedVentilator fan designΔ119875Fan Pa 500 Calculated from (43)0
119881Fan m3sdothminus1 72000 Calculated from (44) and (45)
119907
119903msdotsminus1 230 Calculated from (47)
120599Fan RPM 2920 Calculated from (44) and (45)119875Fanmotor kW 34 Calculated from (46)119889Fan mm 1460 Calculated from (44) and (45)Chimney design
ℎchimney mm 6000 Obtained from literature diagramsBleier (1987) [12]
119889chimney mm 500 Obtained from literature diagramsBleier (1987) [12]
Pipe sizingPipes from blow down tank viahorizontal heat exchanger to absorberDNpipes
Blow down tank-horizontal heatexchanger mm 400 Calculated from (48)
Horizontal heat exchanger-absorber mm 400 Calculated from (48)Pipes from scrubber via pump andvertical heat exchanger to absorberDNpipes
Pipes from scrubber via pump mm 125 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
Cooling water pipesDNpipes
Main cooling water pipes mm 300 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
Cooling water pipes after crossing mm 200 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
The analytical vent sizing equation for homogeneousvessel venting is [2ndash4]
119860vent = 119898
119900sdot 119902vent
times (119866vent sdot [(119881
119898
119900
sdot
144
77816
sdot 119879 sdot
119889119875
119889119879
)
12
+(119888
119901vent sdot Δ119879vent)12
])
minus1
(3)
whereΔ119879vent = 119879119898 minus 119879119904
119863 =
radic
4 sdot 119860vent120587
119902vent =1
2
sdot 119888
119901vent sdot [(119889119879
119889119905
)
119904
+ (
119889119879
119889119905
)
119898
]
(4)
and all necessary physical and chemical data are presented asfollows
Physical-chemical parameters use for blow down systemdesign
120588liq [mol sdot dmminus3] = 13798
031598
(1+(1minus(11987969425))032768)
119888
119901liq [J sdot Kmolminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 101720 + 31761 sdot 119879
119888
119901119892[J sdot Kmolminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0434 sdot 10
5+ 2445 sdot 10
5
sdot [
1152119879
sinh [1152119879]]
2
+ 1512 sdot 10
5sdot [
507119879
cosh [507119879]]
2
8 Journal of Industrial Engineering
120578liq [Pa sdot s] = exp(minus43335 + 38817
119879
+
43983
ln (119879)+ 30548 sdot 10
24sdot 119879
minus10)
120578vap [Pa sdot s] =10094 sdot 10
minus7sdot 119879
0799
1 + 1031119879
120582vap [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0038846 sdot 119879
02392
1 + 98581119879 + 93717119879
2
120582liq [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 018837 minus 00001 sdot 119879
Δ119867evap [J sdot Kmolminus1] = 7306 sdot 107 sdot (1 minus 119879
69425
)
04246
119875vapour [Pa] = exp (95444 minus 1013
119879
minus 1009 sdot ln (119879)
+67603 sdot 10
minus18sdot 119879
6)
(5)
Formation enthalpies (Perry and Green (2007) [7])
Δ119867
119891
NaOH = minus46915 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
PhOH = minus1650 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
H2O= minus28583 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
NaPhO = minus326 kJ sdotmolminus1
120588
50wt NaOH = 1529 kg sdot Lminus1
Reaction chemistry at runaway is very complex and dependson the type of used catalyst and other process conditions [1ndash4] In present study a ldquoworst-case scenariordquo was used for thethermal runaway of reaction Design bases of (119889119879119889119905)
119898and
(119889119879119889119905)
119904were obtained from the literature [2ndash4 8] and are
presented in Table 1 Calculated vent area was compared tothe nomogram method from study by Fauske [9] and yield avent area of 0326m2 or 065m vent area pipe diameter whichis in good agreement with the calculated results Pressurerelief devices designs were made according to API RP 526standard [5] Detailed presentation of pressure relief devicesare presented in Figure 3 with main dimensions shown inTable 1 In present design it was suggested that RD is locatedbetween reactor and SRV RD protects SRV piston fromvapors and opens when tank pressure is above allowablereactor pressure Maximal pressure which appears at reactionrunaway was not known and was obtained from the literaturereported data [9] A design pressure of 221 sdot 105 Pa was usedfor system design with 20 safety factor In present study avent membrane had a pressure relief from minus075 bar to 075bar At pressures higher than 075 bar the rupture disc openedand the material was discharged into the blow down tank
3 Blow Down Tank Design
Thepurpose of the blowdown tank is to capture the twophasematerial flow from reactor and to decrease the pressure of
outflow material [9] Blow down tank design was done basedon API RP 520 standard [5] Blow down tank volume wascalculated from the reactor volume as
119881bd = 2 sdot 119881119900 (6)
and is reported in Table 1 A factor 2 in (6) was used as engi-neering safety coefficient which decreases the pressure fromreaction runaway by half It may also be called additionalsafety margin The pressure decrease in a blow down tankwas calculated by applying the ideal gas behavior at constanttemperatures as follows
119875
1sdot 119881
1
119879
1
=
119875
2sdot 119881
2
119879
2
(7)
and was 1 sdot 105 Pa The maximal allowable working pressure(MAWP) for blow down tank was calculated according toAPI RP 520 standard [5] and was 25 sdot 105 Pa MAWP washigher than peak pressure at 221 sdot 105 Pa Due to volumechange the MAWP in blow down tank will not be reachedduring reaction runaway In blow down tank a solid part oftwo phase runaway material is captured
4 Horizontal and Vertical HeatExchanger Design
Various procedures for heat exchanger design may be foundin the available literature [9 10 13] Only brief calculationprocedure is presented [5 7 10]
(i) Assume pipe diameter length inside and outsidefouling factor
(ii) For the pipe construction an INOX AISI 316 wasused with corresponding characteristics presented inTable 1
(iii) Corresponding energetic balances for horizontal andvertical heat exchanger were written as
119876 =
119876hot =
119876cold = 119888 sdot 119888119901119888 sdot (119879119888out minus 119879119888in)
=
ℎsdot 119888
119901ℎsdot (119879
ℎout minus 119879ℎin) (8)
Equation (8) enables calculation of heat duty 119902 andthe hot medium outflow temperatures and results arepresented in Table 1
(iv) The Log Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD) forcountercurrent flow was calculated by
LMTD =
(119879
ℎin minus 119879119888out) minus (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in)
ln ((119879ℎin minus 119879119888out) (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in))
(9)
(v) Based on the experiences and literature data dividedflow shell and even tube passes were assumed forboth condensers Following the procedure proposedby Richardson et al [10] parameters119877
119905 119878 and119865
119905were
obtained from the corresponding diagrams Obtainedparameters enabled calculation of mean temperaturedifference
119863119879
119898= 119865
119905sdot LMTD (10)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 9
(vi) Overall heat transfer coefficients were assumed fromthe data reported in the literature [10] within theirminimum and maximum values and were between700Wsdotm2sdotK and 1000Wsdotm2sdotK Predicted heat trans-fer coefficients enabled calculation of minimum andmaximum provisional area which were taken as aver-age for heat exchanger design
119860 =
1
2
sdot (119860min + 119860max) (11)
Nextmain parameters used for heat exchanger designwere calculated using (12)ndash(18) Pressure drops andthe heat transfer coefficients for heat exchanger werecalculated using (19)ndash(25) for the shell and tube siterespectively
Equations used for horizontal and vertical heatexchanger design are as follows
119860 =
119902
119880 sdot 119863119879
119898
(12)
119873
119905=
119860
120587 sdot 119889out sdot 119871 (13)
119901
119905= 125 sdot 119889
119900 (14)
119863
119887= 119889
119900sdot (
119873
119905
119870
1
)
11198991
(15)
119863
119878= 119863
119887+ BDC (16)
119861
119878= 04 sdot 119863
119878 (17)
119860
119878=
(119901
119905minus 119889out) sdot 119863119878 sdot 119861119878
119901
119905
(18)
119866shell =shell side flow rate
119860
119904
(19)
119889
119890=
110
119889outsdot (119901
2
119905minus 0917 sdot 119889
2
out) (20)
Re =119889
119890sdot 120583 sdot 120588
120578
(21)
Pr =120583 sdot 119888
119901
120582
(22)
Nu =ℎshell sdot 119889119890
119896
119891
(23)
Nu = 119895ℎsdot Re sdotPr13 sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
014
(24)
Δ119875shell = 8 sdot 119895119891 sdot (119863
119904
119889
119890
) sdot (
119871
119897
119861
) sdot (
120588 sdot 119906
2
119904
2
) sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus014
(25)
119897
119861=
07 sdot 119871
4
(26)
119873tpp =119873
119905
number of passes (27)
119866tube =119866in
119873tpp sdot (120587 sdot 1198892
in4) (28)
]tube =119866tube120588
119894
(29)
(vii) The heat transfer coefficient ℎtube for turbulent flowwas calculated by using next correlation
ℎtube = 0023 sdot119865
119903
119889insdot Re08 sdot Pr033 sdot (1 + 119889in
119871
) (30)
(viii) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquooutside pipes flowrdquo
119880shell = 1 times (
1
ℎshell+
1
ℎdirtout+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(31)
(ix) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquoinside pipes flowrdquo
119880tube = 1 times (
1
ℎtube+
1
ℎdirtin+
119889in119889out sdot ℎdirtout
+
119889in119889out sdot ℎshell
+
119889in sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(32)
(x) The tube-side pressure drop was calculated
Δ119875tube = (15 + 119873119905 sdot [25 +8 sdot 119895
119891sdot 119871
119889in+ (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus119898
]) sdot
120588
119894 sdot V2
2
(33)
Calculated parameters for horizontal and vertical condenserdesign are reported in Table 1
5 Vertical Heat Exchanger Design
For the vertical heat exchanger design exactly the sameprocedure as proposed for the horizontal heat exchanger wasused Firstly the amount of condensed vapor was calculatedfrom the ratio of vapor pressures at reactor release in the blowdown tank and after the volumetric expansion
119903
119888=
119901
1199041
119901
1199042
(34)
where 1199011199041
and 119901
1199042were the saturated pressures calculated
from (1) Obtained 119903
119888was used for calculation of gas flow
10 Journal of Industrial Engineering
which needs to be neutralized and cooled down in verticalheat exchanger
119866HZT = 119903
119888sdot 119866vent (35)
where 119866HZT and 119866vent are the reactor runaway flow and flowthrough horizontal condenser reported in Table 1 Calculated119866HZT flow was used for vertical condenser design at the exactsame procedure as for horizontal condenser In the next step119866HZT flow needed to be cooled down and neutralized inabsorption column using sodium hydroxide solution beforeit was left in the surrounding 119866HZT flows from blow downreactor with temperature which is equal to the temperature ofrunaway flow due to short residence time Similar predictionswere obtained at design of other blowdownprocesses [3 8 9]
All calculated parameters are presented in Table 1 During119866HZT neutralization reaction heat was formed The heatwhich needs to be cooled down was calculated as the sumof vapor gas heat and the heat produced by neutralizationreaction
119876total =
119876hot gas +
119876reaction (36)
where
119876react was calculated using reaction enthalpy as follows
119876reaction = Δ119867reaction sdot 119866HZT (37)
and the heat pro recycles using
119876recycle =
119876totalRecycle
(38)
6 Scrubber Design
Since the reaction enthalpy for the neutralization reactionof phenol acid with sodium hydroxide cannot be foundin the available literature it was calculated from formationenthalpies and was 2232 kJmol [10] Since the compositionof the blow down gas is not known exactly it was assumedthat it is composed from phenolic acid [8]The neutralizationreaction of phenolic acid with sodium hydroxide was writtenas
PhCOOH +NaOH 997888rarr PhCONa +H2O (39)
Neutralization reaction gives the stoichiometric ratio ofphenolic acid versus sodium hydroxide and enables the cal-culation of the amount of neutralization medium needed forneutralization The necessary 50wt neutralization liquidflow rate was calculated from the reaction and was 423 kgsTo decrease the necessary volume of used sodium hydroxideits recycling was assumed The recycle flow was calculatedusing
Recycle = 119866HZT119881scrubber tank
(40)
The recycle ratio gives scrubber volume of 45m3 and enablesthe calculation of the liquid and the gas flow rates used forabsorption column design Scrubber design was performedaccording to API RP 520 standard All main scrubberdimensions are presented in Table 1 MAWP of scrubber wasdesigned to be 15 sdot 105 Pa
7 Absorption Column Design
Before outflow gas from blow down system was left intosurrounding air it was neutralized by sodium hydroxidein counterflow absorption column A lot of literature forabsorption column design can be found in available literature[11 14] Due to high flow of gas and neutralization fluid thechemical reaction was the limiting step of this process Ageneralized approach proposed in the literature was used forcolumn design [7 11 14] Firstly (119871119866) sdot (120588
119866120588
119871)
12 factor wascalculated Pump characteristics limited the pressure drop inabsorption column to 110158401015840 water column per feet of packingBased on existing correlations factor (119866lowast2 sdot119865 sdot12058301)(322 sdot120588
119892sdot
(120588
119892minus 120588
119871)) was obtained to be 18 and enabled to calculate the
gas flux119866lowast A ceramic IMTP packing number 70was taken aspacking material with main parameters presented in Table 1Calculated parameters enabled to design an absorption col-umn area and diameter from the following equation
119866 = 119860 sdot 119866
lowast (41)
119860 =
120587 sdot 119863
2
4
(42)
Large absorption column diameter is a consequence of largegas flow at reaction runaway which was designed to be up to595m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 which is lower than allowed maximal liquidflow rate of 122m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 for IMTO packing number 70Next absorption column height was designed based on theprocedure proposed by Seader et al [11] and was obtained tobe 3000mm All other column parameters are presented inTable 1 and enabled to design the absorption column pressuredrop which was 30 sdot 103 Pa
8 Ventilator Fan Design
The vapor gas coming out from absorption column is mainlycomposed of different phenolic vapors which are heavierthan air therefore a ventilator fan needs to be inserted intooutflow chimney The role of the fan is to suck the vaporgas coming out from absorption column and to blow it outvia chimney into surrounding air Equations used for the fandesign are presented as follows [12]
Design equations for ventilator fan design in outflowchimney
Pressure of ventilator
Δ119875Fan = 120588 sdot 119892 sdot ℎchimney +120588 sdot V2
2
(43)
Gas vapor velocity
0
119881 Fan = 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan sdot 119860Fan (44)
where
119860Fan =120587sdot119889Fan
2
4
(45)
Ventilator motor power
119875Fan motor = 0 119881 Fan sdot Δ119875Fan (46)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 11
95
96
1 3 5
2 4 6
F5
F4F3 F2 F1
F6
Frompressuresensor
PC
CCC
M
3
M3 55 kW M3 34kW
F3 F1
1 3 5
2 4 6
C C C
M
3
Pump motor Fan motor
L1L2L3N
0
20A F20
120A
P
Figure 2 Electrical connections for pump and fan motor
Safety relief valve
Connection to pressurerelief system
Rupture disc
Connectionto reactor
Figure 3 Rupture disc and safety relief valve connection to reactor
Axial fan velocity
V119903= 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan (47)
The fan pressure and the fan capacity were designed basedon capacity of 823 kg sdot sminus1 of outcoming gas by (43)ndash(47)Radial velocity of ventilator fan speed V
119903was calculated from
(47) and clearly indicates that an axial ventilator must beapplied All main designed technical characteristics of theventilator fan are shown in Table 1 A 34 kW ventilator fanmotor with corresponding ATEX protection with II 2G EExde II B T4 code and motor thermal protection should beused since the motor is located in Ex cone According toATEX directive the electric board with all main connectionsshould be located outside Ex cone which is presented in
Figure 2 Chimney height was obtained from standards andwas approximately 6000mm All other chimney dimensionsare presented in Table 1 [4 15]
9 Blow Down and Cooling Water Pipes Design
Blow down equipment is connected using thick wall pipesmade of INOX AISI 316 due to highly corrosive mediumhigh fluid velocities and large pressures at reaction runawayFor the vent size pipes diameter design at reaction runawayfrequently used technique proposed by Bleier [12] was used
119863119873pipe = (119866
119891pipe)
12
sdot (
120588
119875
)
14
(48)
where all parameters are explained in the Nomenclature Thepipe system with 400mm pipe diameter was proposed asconnection between horizontal heat exchanger and absorp-tion column at given conditions All other data are presentedin Table 1 and Figure 2 Connection pipe system betweenreactors and blow down tank should be as short as possiblestraight with no elbows no reductions to decrease theamount of condensing flow and to prevent the appearance ofplugs which may lead to fatal accidents Additionally suchsystem configuration ensures easy maintain and fast pipecleaning In parallel the pipe pressure drops were calculatedby method proposed by Crane [16] to ensure smooth andeasy flow The pipe length was designed to be as short aspossible with minimal pressure drop which will result inlow amount of condensed fluid High fluid velocities lowfriction factors and minimal pressure drops are expectedwhich agrees with results obtained from the literature [16]For the cooling water pipes diameter and sodium hydroxidepipe diameter design a method proposed byMays [17] which
12 Journal of Industrial Engineering
is based on the steady state incompressible energy equationutilizing Hazel Williams friction loses and continuity equa-tion was used The results are presented in Table 1 and inFigure 2
10 Pump Design
Neutralization process characteristics demand 100m3sdothminus1 of50wt sodium hydroxide For this a corresponding pumpwith 55 kW electrical motor and capacity of 120m3sdothminus1 atapproximately 4sdot105 Pa is proposed A corresponding electricschema with all relevant parts is presented in Figure 2 Sincethe pump is situated in Ex cone a correct motor withmotor II 2G EEx de II B T4 code and correct connectionaccording toATEX standardmust be used [18] Electric boardwith necessary connections should be located outside theEx cone A pressure sensor (PC) is proposed on the pipefrom vertical heat exchanger to absorption column PC hastwo tasks to ensure that neutralization medium is pumpedall the time from scrubber tank on the absorption columnand to prevent the centrifugal pump running dry which canresult in pump failure and in the worst case in pump rotordamage
It needs to be mentioned that reaction mixture whichappears at reaction runaway is very viscous which mayresult in appearance of plug in designed pipes equipmentand huge pressure drops This problem will be avoided bydecreasing the connection pipe length without reductionsand low pipe elbow number Horizontal heat exchangerwhich is located above the blow down tank decreases thefluid temperature which results in fluid condensation thatis why lower amount of gas need to be neutralized inabsorption column Less required gas for neutralizationresults in lower NaOH consumption which decreases oper-ational costs of designed system Additionally horizontalheat exchanger produces huge pressure drop which results inlower gas velocities and higher gasliquid mass transfer coef-ficients which increases the efficiency of absorption columns[14]
11 Conclusions
Designed results of this study demonstrate that proposedmethod can be used for emergency relief system designBased on calculated data the following conclusions weremade
Emergency relief system for exothermic reaction forreactor volume up to 30m3 was designed A 60m3 blowdown tank with 700m3sdothminus1 of 13∘C26∘C cooling water andtwo condensersmdashhorizontal and verticalmdashwith cooling areaof 54m2 and 5m2 are proposed An absorber column withdiameter of 15m and 30m height 45m3 scrubber tankand corresponding outflow chimney were designed All othersystem parameters are presented in Table 1 It is hoped thatthe presented procedure will serve as an engineering tool foremergency relief system design in various process industriesall over the world
Nomenclature
119871 Length (m)120582
119908 Thermal conductivity
(Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1)119862
119901cold Specific heat of cold medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119862
119901hot Specific heat of hot medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
Cooling water Specific heat of cooling water(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119876 Heat transfer (W)119879hin Temperature of hot medium
(∘C)119898
119900 Reactor charge (kg)
119860 Area (m2)119881 Reactor volume (m3)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119902
119888 Heat release per unit mass cold
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119902
ℎ Heat release per unit mass hot
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119866 Discharge mass flow rate per
unit area (kgsdotm2sdotsminus1)119875 Pressure (Pa)119879 Temperature (K)119889119879119889119905 Self heat rate in runaway
reactions (Ksdotmin1)119902 Energy release rate (Jsdotkgminus1)
119876hot Heat of hot medium (W)
119876cold Heat of cold medium (W)119879
ℎout Temperature of hot medium(∘C)
LMTD Log mean temperaturedifference (∘C)
119877
119905 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119878 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119865
119905 Temperature correction factor
119879
119898 Mean temperature difference
(∘C)119880 Overall heat transfer coefficient
(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)119860 Average provisional area (m2)119873
119905 Number of tubes
119889 Pipe diameter (mm)119903 Ration Mass flow (kgsdots1)119865
119905 Friction factor
Δ119875shell Pressure drop on the shell side(Pa)
Δ119875tube Pressure drop on the tube side(Pa)
BDC Bundle diameter clearance(mm)
119908 Wall thickness (mm)119901
119905 Tube pitch (mm)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 13
119863
119887 Bundle diameter (mm)
119863
119904 Shell diameter (mm)
119861
119904 Baffle spacing (mm)
119860
119904 Area for cross-flow (m2)
119866shell Shell-side mass velocity(kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2)
119889
119890 Shell equivalent diameter (mm)
Re Reynolds numberPr Prandtl numberNu Nusselt numberℎshell Shell-side heat transfer
coefficient (Wsdotmminus2sdotK1)119895
ℎat 45 of baffle cut Shell-side heat transfer factor
119897
119887 Baffle spacing (mm)
119873tpp Number of tubes per pass119866tube Tube-side mass velocity
(kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1)119881tube Tube-side velocity (msdotsminus1)Retube Inside tube Reynolds numberPrtube Inside tube Prandtl numberNutube Inside tube Nusselt number119895
119891at 45 of baffle cut Shell side friction factor
ℎtubeside Inside heat transfer coefficient(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880i Overall heat transfer factor forinside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880o Overall heat transfer factor foroutside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880 Average heat transfer factor(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119865IMTP IMTP packing factor119871NaOH NaOH flow (m3sdoth1)Recycle Recycle of NaOH in absorber
(hminus1)119881scrubbertank Volume of scrubber tank (m3)119860abs Absorber area (m2)119863abs Absorber diameter (m)Δ119875abs Pressure drop on absorber tray
(Pa)119865IMTP IMTP packing factorIMTP packing Mark of absorber fill119873
119871 Number of theoretical plates or
traysHETP Height equivalent to the
theoretical plate (m)119867abs Height of absorption column
(m)119881bd Blow down volume (m3)119881max Maximal tank volume (m3)119902vent Heat release per unit mass at
reaction runaway (Wsdotsminus1)119888
119901 Specific heat of material
(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)(119889119879119889119905)
119898 Self heat rate at temperature
turn around or maximal overpressure defined by API RP 520during run away (Ksdotsminus1)
(119889119879119889119905)
119904 Self heat rate at set pressure of
pressure relief devices (Ksdotsminus1)
119879
119898 Temperature of reactant
correlates to the temperatureturn around or maximum overpressure defined by API RP520 during runaway (K)
119879
119904 Temperature of reactant
correlates to set pressure ofpressure relief devices (K)
Δ119879 Temperature difference (K)119905 Time (s)120578 Viscosity (Pasdots)120583 Kinematic viscosity (m2sdotsminus1)119881 Volume (m3)119863 diameter (m)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119865 Flow reduction factor119881 Voltage (V)119868 Current (A)119882 Power supply (W)GF Gas rate (m3sdothminus1)LF Liquid rate (m3sdothminus1)119888Li Liquid concentration (molsdotm3)119888gi Gas concentration (molsdotm3)119877 liquid rate to tank volume
(hminus1)0
119881Fan Ventilator fan flow (m3sdothminus1)V119903 Axial fan velocity (msdotsminus1)
Δ119875Fan Ventilator fan pressure (Pa)119875Fanmotor Ventilator motor power (W)0
119881Fan Rotational velocity ofventilator fan (RPM)
119860Fan Ventilator area (m2)119889Fan Fan diameter (mm)ℎchimney Height of outflow chimney
(mm)119892 Gravity acceleration (m2sdotsminus1)Vvapor Outflow vapor gas velocity
(msdots1)119891pipe Flow reduction factorΔ119867react Reaction enthalpy (Jsdotmol1)119866
lowast Gas flux (kgsdots1sdotm2)DN Inner diameter (m)bd Blow down119898 Pressure turnaround meanmax Maximal value119904 Relief set conditions shell119900 Initial conditionscin Cold incout Cold outabs Absorbervent VentBWG BirminghamWire Gaugedirt indirt out Coatings of dirt on the in and
out site of pipe119908 Walltube Tube sideshell Shell side119894 119895 Refers to tube and shell side119901 Specific heat
14 Journal of Industrial Engineering
1 2 3 Refers to positionS1 S2 Saturated pressure at position 1
and 2HZT Horizontalhin Hot inhout Hot outout Out sitesdot Unit in time119890 EquivalentIMTP IMTP packing type119888 Coldℎ Hot119905 Pitch119887 Bundleℎ Heat119891 Friction119894 Inside119900 Outsideabs Absorber119871 Theoretical120587 314119904 Set pointPE Electrically groundedU1 U2 Electro phasesV1 V2 Electro phasesW1 W2 Electro phasesTK Electro phasesL1 L2 L3 Electro phases119873 Neutral phaseS1 Switch 10 1 2 3 4 Position in switch and
correctionF1 Fusion 1AC3 Analog currentX1X2 ContactorM Motor3 sim ΛΔ Three phase electro motorMAWP Maximal allowed working
pressure
References
[1] H K Fauske ldquoEmergency relief system design for reactive andnon-reactive systems extension of the DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 7 no 3 pp 153ndash158 1988
[2] J C Leung ldquoSimplified vent sizing equations for emergencyrelief requirements in reactors and storage vesselsrdquo AIChEJournal vol 32 no 10 pp 1622ndash1634 1986
[3] J C Leung H K Fauske and H G Fisher ldquoThermal runawayreactions in a low thermal inertia apparatusrdquo ThermochimicaActa vol 104 pp 13ndash29 1986
[4] R C Rosaler Standard Handbook of Plant EngineeringMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 3rd edition 2002
[5] API RP 520 Sizing Selection and Installation of Pressure Reliev-ing Devices in Refineries American Petroleum Institution 2000
[6] API STD 526 Flanged Steel Pressure Relief Valves AmericanPetroleum Institution 6th edition 2012
[7] R H Perry and D W Green Perryrsquos Chemical EngineersrsquoHandbook McGraw-Hill New York NY USA 2007
[8] J L Gustin J Fillion G Treand and K E Biyaali ldquoThe phenol+ formaldehyde runaway reaction Vent sizing for reactorprotectionrdquo Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industriesvol 6 no 2 pp 103ndash113 1993
[9] H K Fauske ldquoGeneralized vent sizing monogram for runawaychemical reactionsrdquo PlantOperations Progress vol 3 no 4 pp213ndash215 1984
[10] J F Richardson J H Harker and J R Backhurst Coulson andRichardsonrsquos Chemical Engineering Butterworth-HeinemannBoston Mass USA 2009
[11] J D Seader E J Henley and D K Roter Separation ProcessPrinciples John Wiley amp Sons New York NY USA 2010
[12] F Bleier Fan Handbook Selection Application and DesignMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 1987
[13] S A Kudchadker A P Kudchadker R C Wilhoit and B JZwolinski ldquoIdeal gas thermodynamic properties of phenol andcresolsrdquo Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data vol 7no 2 pp 417ndash423 1978
[14] I Hace ldquoComparison of concentration profiles for boundarylayers in absorption with chemical reaction processesrdquo Chemi-cal Engineering and Technology vol 29 no 5 pp 574ndash582 2006
[15] J C Leung and H K Fauske ldquoRunaway system charac-terization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 6 no 2 pp 77ndash83 1987
[16] Crane Technical Paper ldquoA Process Design Engineerrsquos Perspec-tive on Using Equivalent Lengths of Valves and Fittings inPipeline Pressure Drop Calculations 410(TP-410)rdquo 2009
[17] L W Mays Hydraulic Design Handbook McGraw-Hill NewYork NY USA 1999
[18] ldquolsquoATEXDirective 949ECrsquo on equipment and protective systemsintended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX)rdquohttpeceuropaeuenterprisesectorsmechanicaldocumentslegislationatex
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of
4 Journal of Industrial Engineering
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
Safety relief valveDN m 065 Designed119875safety Pa 70 sdot 10
4 DesignedVent area119902vent Jsdotkgminus1 846 Calculated from (6)119866vent kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 2124 Calculated from (2)119860vent m2 0326 Calculated from (3)119863vent m 065 Calculated from (5)Calculated data horizontal heatexchanger119871
mm 5000 Designed
ℎDirtIN = ℎDirtOUT Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 698 lt ℎ lt 9987
Obtained from literature Perry andGreen (2007) [7]
120582
119908Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1 162 Obtained from literature Perry and
Green (2007) [7]
119876hot W 585711 Calculated from (8)
119876cold W 366125 Calculated from (8)119879
ℎout∘C 80 Calculated from (8)
LMTD ∘C 7616 Calculated from (9)
119877
119905 683 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119878 00594 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119865
119905 096 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]119879
119898
∘C 7311 Calculated from (10)119860
m2 54 Calculated from (11)119873
119905 85 Calculated from (13)
Pipe dimensions for horizontal heatexchanger119889out mm 508
BWG 16 Perry and Green (2007) [7]INOX AISI316
119889in mm 46732Wall thickness mm 2034119901
119905mm 635 Calculated from (14)
119863
119887mm 6891 Calculated from (15)
BDC mm 93 Obtained from diagrams Richardsonet al (2009) [10]
119863
119904mm 782 Calculated from (16)
119861
119904mm 313 Calculated from (17)
119860
119904m2 004895 Calculated from (18)
119866shell kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2 1986 Calculated from (19)119889
119890mm 3607 Calculated from (20)
Reshell 65127 Calculated from (21)Prshell 748 Calculated from (22)Nushell 323 Calculated from (23)ℎshell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 5490 Calculated from (23) and (25)119897
119887mm 875 Calculated from (26)
Δ119875shell Pa 53800 Calculated from (25)119873tpp 85 Calculated from (27)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 5
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
119866tube kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 7971 Calculated from (28)Vtube msdotsminus1 2596 Calculated from (29)Retube 30390 Calculated from (21)Prtube 0575 Calculated from (22)ℎtube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0044 Calculated from (30)119880tube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0022 Calculated from (32)119880shell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 1957 Calculated from (31)Δ119875tube Pa 91500 Calculated from (33)Calculated data vertical heat exchangerRecycle hminus1 2222 Calculated from (40)Total heat vertical kW 23553 Calculated from (36)Heat per recycle kW 1454 Calculated from (38)119879
ℎinvert∘C 80 Calculated from (8)
119860m2 5 Calculated from (11)
119879
ℎoutvert∘C 40 Calculated from (8)
119879
119888invert∘C 15 Calculated from (8)
119879
119888outvert∘C 24 Calculated from (8)
Pipe dimensions for vertical heatexchanger119871
mm 2500119889out mm 508
BWG 16 Perry and Green (2007) [7]
119889in mm 46732Wall thickness mm 2034119901
119905mm 635 Calculated from (14)
119863
119887mm 2867 Calculated from (15)
BDC mm 88 Obtained from diagrams Richardsonet al (2009) [10]
119863
119904mm 388 Calculated from (16)
119861
119904mm 1552 Calculated from (17)
119860
119904m2 0012043 Calculated from (18)
119866
119904kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2 8072 Calculated from (19)
119889
119890mm 3607 Calculated from (20)
Reshell 264718 Calculated from (21)Prshell 748 Calculated from (22)Nushell 2547 Calculated from (23)ℎshell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 43435 Calculated from (23) and (24)119897
119887mm 4375 Calculated from (26)
Δ119875shell Pa 82000 Calculated from (25)119873tpp 13 Calculated from (27)119866tube kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 6196 Calculated from (28)Vtube msdotsminus1 2018 Calculated from (29)Retube 23545 Calculated from (21)Prtube 0575 Calculated from (22)Δ119875tube Pa 128000 Calculated from (33)ℎtube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0036 Calculated from (30)119880tube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 001867 Calculated from (32)119880shell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 5617 Calculated from (31)
6 Journal of Industrial Engineering
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
LMTD ∘C 3844 Calculated from (9)
119877
119905 444 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119878 01385 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119865
119905 096 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]DT119898
∘C 367 Calculated from (10)119860
m2 5 Calculated from (11)119873
119905 13 Calculated from (13)
Absorber and scrubberScrubber
119871NaOH kgsdotsminus1 4221 Calculated from reactionstoichiometry
Recycle hminus1 2222 Calculated from (40)119881scrubber tank m3 45 Calculated from (40)119908
m 10 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 15 sdot 10
5 DesignedAbsorber(119871119866) sdot (120588
119892120588
119871)
12
0023 Calculated ratio119866
lowast2sdot 119865 sdot 120583
01
322 sdot 120588
119892sdot (120588
119892minus 120588
119871)
18 Obtained from correlations proposedin literature Seader et al (2010) [11]
119866
lowast kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 49 Calculated from obtained factor119860abs m2 168 Calculated from (41)119863abs m 146 Calculated from (42)
Δ119875abs m 03048 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
No foaming factor 119865nf 1 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119865IMTP 12 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
IMTP packing mm 889 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119873
119871 166 Obtained from literature Seader et al
(2010) [11]
HETP m 183 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119867abs m 3 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119865IMTP 12 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119871operation m3hsdotm2 599 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119908m 10 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 10 sdot 10
5 DesignedNeutralization reaction in absorber andin scrubber
Δ119867react kJsdotmolminus1 2232 Calculated from literature data Perryand Green (2007) [7]
119876reaction kW 71 Calculated from (37)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 7
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit ValueCentrifugal pump119871NaOH m3
sdothminus1 100 Calculated from reaction stochiometryΔ119875pump Pa 400000 DesignedVentilator fan designΔ119875Fan Pa 500 Calculated from (43)0
119881Fan m3sdothminus1 72000 Calculated from (44) and (45)
119907
119903msdotsminus1 230 Calculated from (47)
120599Fan RPM 2920 Calculated from (44) and (45)119875Fanmotor kW 34 Calculated from (46)119889Fan mm 1460 Calculated from (44) and (45)Chimney design
ℎchimney mm 6000 Obtained from literature diagramsBleier (1987) [12]
119889chimney mm 500 Obtained from literature diagramsBleier (1987) [12]
Pipe sizingPipes from blow down tank viahorizontal heat exchanger to absorberDNpipes
Blow down tank-horizontal heatexchanger mm 400 Calculated from (48)
Horizontal heat exchanger-absorber mm 400 Calculated from (48)Pipes from scrubber via pump andvertical heat exchanger to absorberDNpipes
Pipes from scrubber via pump mm 125 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
Cooling water pipesDNpipes
Main cooling water pipes mm 300 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
Cooling water pipes after crossing mm 200 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
The analytical vent sizing equation for homogeneousvessel venting is [2ndash4]
119860vent = 119898
119900sdot 119902vent
times (119866vent sdot [(119881
119898
119900
sdot
144
77816
sdot 119879 sdot
119889119875
119889119879
)
12
+(119888
119901vent sdot Δ119879vent)12
])
minus1
(3)
whereΔ119879vent = 119879119898 minus 119879119904
119863 =
radic
4 sdot 119860vent120587
119902vent =1
2
sdot 119888
119901vent sdot [(119889119879
119889119905
)
119904
+ (
119889119879
119889119905
)
119898
]
(4)
and all necessary physical and chemical data are presented asfollows
Physical-chemical parameters use for blow down systemdesign
120588liq [mol sdot dmminus3] = 13798
031598
(1+(1minus(11987969425))032768)
119888
119901liq [J sdot Kmolminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 101720 + 31761 sdot 119879
119888
119901119892[J sdot Kmolminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0434 sdot 10
5+ 2445 sdot 10
5
sdot [
1152119879
sinh [1152119879]]
2
+ 1512 sdot 10
5sdot [
507119879
cosh [507119879]]
2
8 Journal of Industrial Engineering
120578liq [Pa sdot s] = exp(minus43335 + 38817
119879
+
43983
ln (119879)+ 30548 sdot 10
24sdot 119879
minus10)
120578vap [Pa sdot s] =10094 sdot 10
minus7sdot 119879
0799
1 + 1031119879
120582vap [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0038846 sdot 119879
02392
1 + 98581119879 + 93717119879
2
120582liq [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 018837 minus 00001 sdot 119879
Δ119867evap [J sdot Kmolminus1] = 7306 sdot 107 sdot (1 minus 119879
69425
)
04246
119875vapour [Pa] = exp (95444 minus 1013
119879
minus 1009 sdot ln (119879)
+67603 sdot 10
minus18sdot 119879
6)
(5)
Formation enthalpies (Perry and Green (2007) [7])
Δ119867
119891
NaOH = minus46915 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
PhOH = minus1650 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
H2O= minus28583 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
NaPhO = minus326 kJ sdotmolminus1
120588
50wt NaOH = 1529 kg sdot Lminus1
Reaction chemistry at runaway is very complex and dependson the type of used catalyst and other process conditions [1ndash4] In present study a ldquoworst-case scenariordquo was used for thethermal runaway of reaction Design bases of (119889119879119889119905)
119898and
(119889119879119889119905)
119904were obtained from the literature [2ndash4 8] and are
presented in Table 1 Calculated vent area was compared tothe nomogram method from study by Fauske [9] and yield avent area of 0326m2 or 065m vent area pipe diameter whichis in good agreement with the calculated results Pressurerelief devices designs were made according to API RP 526standard [5] Detailed presentation of pressure relief devicesare presented in Figure 3 with main dimensions shown inTable 1 In present design it was suggested that RD is locatedbetween reactor and SRV RD protects SRV piston fromvapors and opens when tank pressure is above allowablereactor pressure Maximal pressure which appears at reactionrunaway was not known and was obtained from the literaturereported data [9] A design pressure of 221 sdot 105 Pa was usedfor system design with 20 safety factor In present study avent membrane had a pressure relief from minus075 bar to 075bar At pressures higher than 075 bar the rupture disc openedand the material was discharged into the blow down tank
3 Blow Down Tank Design
Thepurpose of the blowdown tank is to capture the twophasematerial flow from reactor and to decrease the pressure of
outflow material [9] Blow down tank design was done basedon API RP 520 standard [5] Blow down tank volume wascalculated from the reactor volume as
119881bd = 2 sdot 119881119900 (6)
and is reported in Table 1 A factor 2 in (6) was used as engi-neering safety coefficient which decreases the pressure fromreaction runaway by half It may also be called additionalsafety margin The pressure decrease in a blow down tankwas calculated by applying the ideal gas behavior at constanttemperatures as follows
119875
1sdot 119881
1
119879
1
=
119875
2sdot 119881
2
119879
2
(7)
and was 1 sdot 105 Pa The maximal allowable working pressure(MAWP) for blow down tank was calculated according toAPI RP 520 standard [5] and was 25 sdot 105 Pa MAWP washigher than peak pressure at 221 sdot 105 Pa Due to volumechange the MAWP in blow down tank will not be reachedduring reaction runaway In blow down tank a solid part oftwo phase runaway material is captured
4 Horizontal and Vertical HeatExchanger Design
Various procedures for heat exchanger design may be foundin the available literature [9 10 13] Only brief calculationprocedure is presented [5 7 10]
(i) Assume pipe diameter length inside and outsidefouling factor
(ii) For the pipe construction an INOX AISI 316 wasused with corresponding characteristics presented inTable 1
(iii) Corresponding energetic balances for horizontal andvertical heat exchanger were written as
119876 =
119876hot =
119876cold = 119888 sdot 119888119901119888 sdot (119879119888out minus 119879119888in)
=
ℎsdot 119888
119901ℎsdot (119879
ℎout minus 119879ℎin) (8)
Equation (8) enables calculation of heat duty 119902 andthe hot medium outflow temperatures and results arepresented in Table 1
(iv) The Log Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD) forcountercurrent flow was calculated by
LMTD =
(119879
ℎin minus 119879119888out) minus (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in)
ln ((119879ℎin minus 119879119888out) (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in))
(9)
(v) Based on the experiences and literature data dividedflow shell and even tube passes were assumed forboth condensers Following the procedure proposedby Richardson et al [10] parameters119877
119905 119878 and119865
119905were
obtained from the corresponding diagrams Obtainedparameters enabled calculation of mean temperaturedifference
119863119879
119898= 119865
119905sdot LMTD (10)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 9
(vi) Overall heat transfer coefficients were assumed fromthe data reported in the literature [10] within theirminimum and maximum values and were between700Wsdotm2sdotK and 1000Wsdotm2sdotK Predicted heat trans-fer coefficients enabled calculation of minimum andmaximum provisional area which were taken as aver-age for heat exchanger design
119860 =
1
2
sdot (119860min + 119860max) (11)
Nextmain parameters used for heat exchanger designwere calculated using (12)ndash(18) Pressure drops andthe heat transfer coefficients for heat exchanger werecalculated using (19)ndash(25) for the shell and tube siterespectively
Equations used for horizontal and vertical heatexchanger design are as follows
119860 =
119902
119880 sdot 119863119879
119898
(12)
119873
119905=
119860
120587 sdot 119889out sdot 119871 (13)
119901
119905= 125 sdot 119889
119900 (14)
119863
119887= 119889
119900sdot (
119873
119905
119870
1
)
11198991
(15)
119863
119878= 119863
119887+ BDC (16)
119861
119878= 04 sdot 119863
119878 (17)
119860
119878=
(119901
119905minus 119889out) sdot 119863119878 sdot 119861119878
119901
119905
(18)
119866shell =shell side flow rate
119860
119904
(19)
119889
119890=
110
119889outsdot (119901
2
119905minus 0917 sdot 119889
2
out) (20)
Re =119889
119890sdot 120583 sdot 120588
120578
(21)
Pr =120583 sdot 119888
119901
120582
(22)
Nu =ℎshell sdot 119889119890
119896
119891
(23)
Nu = 119895ℎsdot Re sdotPr13 sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
014
(24)
Δ119875shell = 8 sdot 119895119891 sdot (119863
119904
119889
119890
) sdot (
119871
119897
119861
) sdot (
120588 sdot 119906
2
119904
2
) sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus014
(25)
119897
119861=
07 sdot 119871
4
(26)
119873tpp =119873
119905
number of passes (27)
119866tube =119866in
119873tpp sdot (120587 sdot 1198892
in4) (28)
]tube =119866tube120588
119894
(29)
(vii) The heat transfer coefficient ℎtube for turbulent flowwas calculated by using next correlation
ℎtube = 0023 sdot119865
119903
119889insdot Re08 sdot Pr033 sdot (1 + 119889in
119871
) (30)
(viii) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquooutside pipes flowrdquo
119880shell = 1 times (
1
ℎshell+
1
ℎdirtout+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(31)
(ix) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquoinside pipes flowrdquo
119880tube = 1 times (
1
ℎtube+
1
ℎdirtin+
119889in119889out sdot ℎdirtout
+
119889in119889out sdot ℎshell
+
119889in sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(32)
(x) The tube-side pressure drop was calculated
Δ119875tube = (15 + 119873119905 sdot [25 +8 sdot 119895
119891sdot 119871
119889in+ (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus119898
]) sdot
120588
119894 sdot V2
2
(33)
Calculated parameters for horizontal and vertical condenserdesign are reported in Table 1
5 Vertical Heat Exchanger Design
For the vertical heat exchanger design exactly the sameprocedure as proposed for the horizontal heat exchanger wasused Firstly the amount of condensed vapor was calculatedfrom the ratio of vapor pressures at reactor release in the blowdown tank and after the volumetric expansion
119903
119888=
119901
1199041
119901
1199042
(34)
where 1199011199041
and 119901
1199042were the saturated pressures calculated
from (1) Obtained 119903
119888was used for calculation of gas flow
10 Journal of Industrial Engineering
which needs to be neutralized and cooled down in verticalheat exchanger
119866HZT = 119903
119888sdot 119866vent (35)
where 119866HZT and 119866vent are the reactor runaway flow and flowthrough horizontal condenser reported in Table 1 Calculated119866HZT flow was used for vertical condenser design at the exactsame procedure as for horizontal condenser In the next step119866HZT flow needed to be cooled down and neutralized inabsorption column using sodium hydroxide solution beforeit was left in the surrounding 119866HZT flows from blow downreactor with temperature which is equal to the temperature ofrunaway flow due to short residence time Similar predictionswere obtained at design of other blowdownprocesses [3 8 9]
All calculated parameters are presented in Table 1 During119866HZT neutralization reaction heat was formed The heatwhich needs to be cooled down was calculated as the sumof vapor gas heat and the heat produced by neutralizationreaction
119876total =
119876hot gas +
119876reaction (36)
where
119876react was calculated using reaction enthalpy as follows
119876reaction = Δ119867reaction sdot 119866HZT (37)
and the heat pro recycles using
119876recycle =
119876totalRecycle
(38)
6 Scrubber Design
Since the reaction enthalpy for the neutralization reactionof phenol acid with sodium hydroxide cannot be foundin the available literature it was calculated from formationenthalpies and was 2232 kJmol [10] Since the compositionof the blow down gas is not known exactly it was assumedthat it is composed from phenolic acid [8]The neutralizationreaction of phenolic acid with sodium hydroxide was writtenas
PhCOOH +NaOH 997888rarr PhCONa +H2O (39)
Neutralization reaction gives the stoichiometric ratio ofphenolic acid versus sodium hydroxide and enables the cal-culation of the amount of neutralization medium needed forneutralization The necessary 50wt neutralization liquidflow rate was calculated from the reaction and was 423 kgsTo decrease the necessary volume of used sodium hydroxideits recycling was assumed The recycle flow was calculatedusing
Recycle = 119866HZT119881scrubber tank
(40)
The recycle ratio gives scrubber volume of 45m3 and enablesthe calculation of the liquid and the gas flow rates used forabsorption column design Scrubber design was performedaccording to API RP 520 standard All main scrubberdimensions are presented in Table 1 MAWP of scrubber wasdesigned to be 15 sdot 105 Pa
7 Absorption Column Design
Before outflow gas from blow down system was left intosurrounding air it was neutralized by sodium hydroxidein counterflow absorption column A lot of literature forabsorption column design can be found in available literature[11 14] Due to high flow of gas and neutralization fluid thechemical reaction was the limiting step of this process Ageneralized approach proposed in the literature was used forcolumn design [7 11 14] Firstly (119871119866) sdot (120588
119866120588
119871)
12 factor wascalculated Pump characteristics limited the pressure drop inabsorption column to 110158401015840 water column per feet of packingBased on existing correlations factor (119866lowast2 sdot119865 sdot12058301)(322 sdot120588
119892sdot
(120588
119892minus 120588
119871)) was obtained to be 18 and enabled to calculate the
gas flux119866lowast A ceramic IMTP packing number 70was taken aspacking material with main parameters presented in Table 1Calculated parameters enabled to design an absorption col-umn area and diameter from the following equation
119866 = 119860 sdot 119866
lowast (41)
119860 =
120587 sdot 119863
2
4
(42)
Large absorption column diameter is a consequence of largegas flow at reaction runaway which was designed to be up to595m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 which is lower than allowed maximal liquidflow rate of 122m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 for IMTO packing number 70Next absorption column height was designed based on theprocedure proposed by Seader et al [11] and was obtained tobe 3000mm All other column parameters are presented inTable 1 and enabled to design the absorption column pressuredrop which was 30 sdot 103 Pa
8 Ventilator Fan Design
The vapor gas coming out from absorption column is mainlycomposed of different phenolic vapors which are heavierthan air therefore a ventilator fan needs to be inserted intooutflow chimney The role of the fan is to suck the vaporgas coming out from absorption column and to blow it outvia chimney into surrounding air Equations used for the fandesign are presented as follows [12]
Design equations for ventilator fan design in outflowchimney
Pressure of ventilator
Δ119875Fan = 120588 sdot 119892 sdot ℎchimney +120588 sdot V2
2
(43)
Gas vapor velocity
0
119881 Fan = 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan sdot 119860Fan (44)
where
119860Fan =120587sdot119889Fan
2
4
(45)
Ventilator motor power
119875Fan motor = 0 119881 Fan sdot Δ119875Fan (46)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 11
95
96
1 3 5
2 4 6
F5
F4F3 F2 F1
F6
Frompressuresensor
PC
CCC
M
3
M3 55 kW M3 34kW
F3 F1
1 3 5
2 4 6
C C C
M
3
Pump motor Fan motor
L1L2L3N
0
20A F20
120A
P
Figure 2 Electrical connections for pump and fan motor
Safety relief valve
Connection to pressurerelief system
Rupture disc
Connectionto reactor
Figure 3 Rupture disc and safety relief valve connection to reactor
Axial fan velocity
V119903= 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan (47)
The fan pressure and the fan capacity were designed basedon capacity of 823 kg sdot sminus1 of outcoming gas by (43)ndash(47)Radial velocity of ventilator fan speed V
119903was calculated from
(47) and clearly indicates that an axial ventilator must beapplied All main designed technical characteristics of theventilator fan are shown in Table 1 A 34 kW ventilator fanmotor with corresponding ATEX protection with II 2G EExde II B T4 code and motor thermal protection should beused since the motor is located in Ex cone According toATEX directive the electric board with all main connectionsshould be located outside Ex cone which is presented in
Figure 2 Chimney height was obtained from standards andwas approximately 6000mm All other chimney dimensionsare presented in Table 1 [4 15]
9 Blow Down and Cooling Water Pipes Design
Blow down equipment is connected using thick wall pipesmade of INOX AISI 316 due to highly corrosive mediumhigh fluid velocities and large pressures at reaction runawayFor the vent size pipes diameter design at reaction runawayfrequently used technique proposed by Bleier [12] was used
119863119873pipe = (119866
119891pipe)
12
sdot (
120588
119875
)
14
(48)
where all parameters are explained in the Nomenclature Thepipe system with 400mm pipe diameter was proposed asconnection between horizontal heat exchanger and absorp-tion column at given conditions All other data are presentedin Table 1 and Figure 2 Connection pipe system betweenreactors and blow down tank should be as short as possiblestraight with no elbows no reductions to decrease theamount of condensing flow and to prevent the appearance ofplugs which may lead to fatal accidents Additionally suchsystem configuration ensures easy maintain and fast pipecleaning In parallel the pipe pressure drops were calculatedby method proposed by Crane [16] to ensure smooth andeasy flow The pipe length was designed to be as short aspossible with minimal pressure drop which will result inlow amount of condensed fluid High fluid velocities lowfriction factors and minimal pressure drops are expectedwhich agrees with results obtained from the literature [16]For the cooling water pipes diameter and sodium hydroxidepipe diameter design a method proposed byMays [17] which
12 Journal of Industrial Engineering
is based on the steady state incompressible energy equationutilizing Hazel Williams friction loses and continuity equa-tion was used The results are presented in Table 1 and inFigure 2
10 Pump Design
Neutralization process characteristics demand 100m3sdothminus1 of50wt sodium hydroxide For this a corresponding pumpwith 55 kW electrical motor and capacity of 120m3sdothminus1 atapproximately 4sdot105 Pa is proposed A corresponding electricschema with all relevant parts is presented in Figure 2 Sincethe pump is situated in Ex cone a correct motor withmotor II 2G EEx de II B T4 code and correct connectionaccording toATEX standardmust be used [18] Electric boardwith necessary connections should be located outside theEx cone A pressure sensor (PC) is proposed on the pipefrom vertical heat exchanger to absorption column PC hastwo tasks to ensure that neutralization medium is pumpedall the time from scrubber tank on the absorption columnand to prevent the centrifugal pump running dry which canresult in pump failure and in the worst case in pump rotordamage
It needs to be mentioned that reaction mixture whichappears at reaction runaway is very viscous which mayresult in appearance of plug in designed pipes equipmentand huge pressure drops This problem will be avoided bydecreasing the connection pipe length without reductionsand low pipe elbow number Horizontal heat exchangerwhich is located above the blow down tank decreases thefluid temperature which results in fluid condensation thatis why lower amount of gas need to be neutralized inabsorption column Less required gas for neutralizationresults in lower NaOH consumption which decreases oper-ational costs of designed system Additionally horizontalheat exchanger produces huge pressure drop which results inlower gas velocities and higher gasliquid mass transfer coef-ficients which increases the efficiency of absorption columns[14]
11 Conclusions
Designed results of this study demonstrate that proposedmethod can be used for emergency relief system designBased on calculated data the following conclusions weremade
Emergency relief system for exothermic reaction forreactor volume up to 30m3 was designed A 60m3 blowdown tank with 700m3sdothminus1 of 13∘C26∘C cooling water andtwo condensersmdashhorizontal and verticalmdashwith cooling areaof 54m2 and 5m2 are proposed An absorber column withdiameter of 15m and 30m height 45m3 scrubber tankand corresponding outflow chimney were designed All othersystem parameters are presented in Table 1 It is hoped thatthe presented procedure will serve as an engineering tool foremergency relief system design in various process industriesall over the world
Nomenclature
119871 Length (m)120582
119908 Thermal conductivity
(Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1)119862
119901cold Specific heat of cold medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119862
119901hot Specific heat of hot medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
Cooling water Specific heat of cooling water(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119876 Heat transfer (W)119879hin Temperature of hot medium
(∘C)119898
119900 Reactor charge (kg)
119860 Area (m2)119881 Reactor volume (m3)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119902
119888 Heat release per unit mass cold
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119902
ℎ Heat release per unit mass hot
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119866 Discharge mass flow rate per
unit area (kgsdotm2sdotsminus1)119875 Pressure (Pa)119879 Temperature (K)119889119879119889119905 Self heat rate in runaway
reactions (Ksdotmin1)119902 Energy release rate (Jsdotkgminus1)
119876hot Heat of hot medium (W)
119876cold Heat of cold medium (W)119879
ℎout Temperature of hot medium(∘C)
LMTD Log mean temperaturedifference (∘C)
119877
119905 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119878 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119865
119905 Temperature correction factor
119879
119898 Mean temperature difference
(∘C)119880 Overall heat transfer coefficient
(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)119860 Average provisional area (m2)119873
119905 Number of tubes
119889 Pipe diameter (mm)119903 Ration Mass flow (kgsdots1)119865
119905 Friction factor
Δ119875shell Pressure drop on the shell side(Pa)
Δ119875tube Pressure drop on the tube side(Pa)
BDC Bundle diameter clearance(mm)
119908 Wall thickness (mm)119901
119905 Tube pitch (mm)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 13
119863
119887 Bundle diameter (mm)
119863
119904 Shell diameter (mm)
119861
119904 Baffle spacing (mm)
119860
119904 Area for cross-flow (m2)
119866shell Shell-side mass velocity(kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2)
119889
119890 Shell equivalent diameter (mm)
Re Reynolds numberPr Prandtl numberNu Nusselt numberℎshell Shell-side heat transfer
coefficient (Wsdotmminus2sdotK1)119895
ℎat 45 of baffle cut Shell-side heat transfer factor
119897
119887 Baffle spacing (mm)
119873tpp Number of tubes per pass119866tube Tube-side mass velocity
(kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1)119881tube Tube-side velocity (msdotsminus1)Retube Inside tube Reynolds numberPrtube Inside tube Prandtl numberNutube Inside tube Nusselt number119895
119891at 45 of baffle cut Shell side friction factor
ℎtubeside Inside heat transfer coefficient(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880i Overall heat transfer factor forinside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880o Overall heat transfer factor foroutside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880 Average heat transfer factor(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119865IMTP IMTP packing factor119871NaOH NaOH flow (m3sdoth1)Recycle Recycle of NaOH in absorber
(hminus1)119881scrubbertank Volume of scrubber tank (m3)119860abs Absorber area (m2)119863abs Absorber diameter (m)Δ119875abs Pressure drop on absorber tray
(Pa)119865IMTP IMTP packing factorIMTP packing Mark of absorber fill119873
119871 Number of theoretical plates or
traysHETP Height equivalent to the
theoretical plate (m)119867abs Height of absorption column
(m)119881bd Blow down volume (m3)119881max Maximal tank volume (m3)119902vent Heat release per unit mass at
reaction runaway (Wsdotsminus1)119888
119901 Specific heat of material
(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)(119889119879119889119905)
119898 Self heat rate at temperature
turn around or maximal overpressure defined by API RP 520during run away (Ksdotsminus1)
(119889119879119889119905)
119904 Self heat rate at set pressure of
pressure relief devices (Ksdotsminus1)
119879
119898 Temperature of reactant
correlates to the temperatureturn around or maximum overpressure defined by API RP520 during runaway (K)
119879
119904 Temperature of reactant
correlates to set pressure ofpressure relief devices (K)
Δ119879 Temperature difference (K)119905 Time (s)120578 Viscosity (Pasdots)120583 Kinematic viscosity (m2sdotsminus1)119881 Volume (m3)119863 diameter (m)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119865 Flow reduction factor119881 Voltage (V)119868 Current (A)119882 Power supply (W)GF Gas rate (m3sdothminus1)LF Liquid rate (m3sdothminus1)119888Li Liquid concentration (molsdotm3)119888gi Gas concentration (molsdotm3)119877 liquid rate to tank volume
(hminus1)0
119881Fan Ventilator fan flow (m3sdothminus1)V119903 Axial fan velocity (msdotsminus1)
Δ119875Fan Ventilator fan pressure (Pa)119875Fanmotor Ventilator motor power (W)0
119881Fan Rotational velocity ofventilator fan (RPM)
119860Fan Ventilator area (m2)119889Fan Fan diameter (mm)ℎchimney Height of outflow chimney
(mm)119892 Gravity acceleration (m2sdotsminus1)Vvapor Outflow vapor gas velocity
(msdots1)119891pipe Flow reduction factorΔ119867react Reaction enthalpy (Jsdotmol1)119866
lowast Gas flux (kgsdots1sdotm2)DN Inner diameter (m)bd Blow down119898 Pressure turnaround meanmax Maximal value119904 Relief set conditions shell119900 Initial conditionscin Cold incout Cold outabs Absorbervent VentBWG BirminghamWire Gaugedirt indirt out Coatings of dirt on the in and
out site of pipe119908 Walltube Tube sideshell Shell side119894 119895 Refers to tube and shell side119901 Specific heat
14 Journal of Industrial Engineering
1 2 3 Refers to positionS1 S2 Saturated pressure at position 1
and 2HZT Horizontalhin Hot inhout Hot outout Out sitesdot Unit in time119890 EquivalentIMTP IMTP packing type119888 Coldℎ Hot119905 Pitch119887 Bundleℎ Heat119891 Friction119894 Inside119900 Outsideabs Absorber119871 Theoretical120587 314119904 Set pointPE Electrically groundedU1 U2 Electro phasesV1 V2 Electro phasesW1 W2 Electro phasesTK Electro phasesL1 L2 L3 Electro phases119873 Neutral phaseS1 Switch 10 1 2 3 4 Position in switch and
correctionF1 Fusion 1AC3 Analog currentX1X2 ContactorM Motor3 sim ΛΔ Three phase electro motorMAWP Maximal allowed working
pressure
References
[1] H K Fauske ldquoEmergency relief system design for reactive andnon-reactive systems extension of the DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 7 no 3 pp 153ndash158 1988
[2] J C Leung ldquoSimplified vent sizing equations for emergencyrelief requirements in reactors and storage vesselsrdquo AIChEJournal vol 32 no 10 pp 1622ndash1634 1986
[3] J C Leung H K Fauske and H G Fisher ldquoThermal runawayreactions in a low thermal inertia apparatusrdquo ThermochimicaActa vol 104 pp 13ndash29 1986
[4] R C Rosaler Standard Handbook of Plant EngineeringMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 3rd edition 2002
[5] API RP 520 Sizing Selection and Installation of Pressure Reliev-ing Devices in Refineries American Petroleum Institution 2000
[6] API STD 526 Flanged Steel Pressure Relief Valves AmericanPetroleum Institution 6th edition 2012
[7] R H Perry and D W Green Perryrsquos Chemical EngineersrsquoHandbook McGraw-Hill New York NY USA 2007
[8] J L Gustin J Fillion G Treand and K E Biyaali ldquoThe phenol+ formaldehyde runaway reaction Vent sizing for reactorprotectionrdquo Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industriesvol 6 no 2 pp 103ndash113 1993
[9] H K Fauske ldquoGeneralized vent sizing monogram for runawaychemical reactionsrdquo PlantOperations Progress vol 3 no 4 pp213ndash215 1984
[10] J F Richardson J H Harker and J R Backhurst Coulson andRichardsonrsquos Chemical Engineering Butterworth-HeinemannBoston Mass USA 2009
[11] J D Seader E J Henley and D K Roter Separation ProcessPrinciples John Wiley amp Sons New York NY USA 2010
[12] F Bleier Fan Handbook Selection Application and DesignMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 1987
[13] S A Kudchadker A P Kudchadker R C Wilhoit and B JZwolinski ldquoIdeal gas thermodynamic properties of phenol andcresolsrdquo Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data vol 7no 2 pp 417ndash423 1978
[14] I Hace ldquoComparison of concentration profiles for boundarylayers in absorption with chemical reaction processesrdquo Chemi-cal Engineering and Technology vol 29 no 5 pp 574ndash582 2006
[15] J C Leung and H K Fauske ldquoRunaway system charac-terization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 6 no 2 pp 77ndash83 1987
[16] Crane Technical Paper ldquoA Process Design Engineerrsquos Perspec-tive on Using Equivalent Lengths of Valves and Fittings inPipeline Pressure Drop Calculations 410(TP-410)rdquo 2009
[17] L W Mays Hydraulic Design Handbook McGraw-Hill NewYork NY USA 1999
[18] ldquolsquoATEXDirective 949ECrsquo on equipment and protective systemsintended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX)rdquohttpeceuropaeuenterprisesectorsmechanicaldocumentslegislationatex
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of
Journal of Industrial Engineering 5
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
119866tube kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 7971 Calculated from (28)Vtube msdotsminus1 2596 Calculated from (29)Retube 30390 Calculated from (21)Prtube 0575 Calculated from (22)ℎtube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0044 Calculated from (30)119880tube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0022 Calculated from (32)119880shell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 1957 Calculated from (31)Δ119875tube Pa 91500 Calculated from (33)Calculated data vertical heat exchangerRecycle hminus1 2222 Calculated from (40)Total heat vertical kW 23553 Calculated from (36)Heat per recycle kW 1454 Calculated from (38)119879
ℎinvert∘C 80 Calculated from (8)
119860m2 5 Calculated from (11)
119879
ℎoutvert∘C 40 Calculated from (8)
119879
119888invert∘C 15 Calculated from (8)
119879
119888outvert∘C 24 Calculated from (8)
Pipe dimensions for vertical heatexchanger119871
mm 2500119889out mm 508
BWG 16 Perry and Green (2007) [7]
119889in mm 46732Wall thickness mm 2034119901
119905mm 635 Calculated from (14)
119863
119887mm 2867 Calculated from (15)
BDC mm 88 Obtained from diagrams Richardsonet al (2009) [10]
119863
119904mm 388 Calculated from (16)
119861
119904mm 1552 Calculated from (17)
119860
119904m2 0012043 Calculated from (18)
119866
119904kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2 8072 Calculated from (19)
119889
119890mm 3607 Calculated from (20)
Reshell 264718 Calculated from (21)Prshell 748 Calculated from (22)Nushell 2547 Calculated from (23)ℎshell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 43435 Calculated from (23) and (24)119897
119887mm 4375 Calculated from (26)
Δ119875shell Pa 82000 Calculated from (25)119873tpp 13 Calculated from (27)119866tube kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 6196 Calculated from (28)Vtube msdotsminus1 2018 Calculated from (29)Retube 23545 Calculated from (21)Prtube 0575 Calculated from (22)Δ119875tube Pa 128000 Calculated from (33)ℎtube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 0036 Calculated from (30)119880tube Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 001867 Calculated from (32)119880shell Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1 5617 Calculated from (31)
6 Journal of Industrial Engineering
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
LMTD ∘C 3844 Calculated from (9)
119877
119905 444 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119878 01385 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119865
119905 096 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]DT119898
∘C 367 Calculated from (10)119860
m2 5 Calculated from (11)119873
119905 13 Calculated from (13)
Absorber and scrubberScrubber
119871NaOH kgsdotsminus1 4221 Calculated from reactionstoichiometry
Recycle hminus1 2222 Calculated from (40)119881scrubber tank m3 45 Calculated from (40)119908
m 10 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 15 sdot 10
5 DesignedAbsorber(119871119866) sdot (120588
119892120588
119871)
12
0023 Calculated ratio119866
lowast2sdot 119865 sdot 120583
01
322 sdot 120588
119892sdot (120588
119892minus 120588
119871)
18 Obtained from correlations proposedin literature Seader et al (2010) [11]
119866
lowast kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 49 Calculated from obtained factor119860abs m2 168 Calculated from (41)119863abs m 146 Calculated from (42)
Δ119875abs m 03048 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
No foaming factor 119865nf 1 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119865IMTP 12 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
IMTP packing mm 889 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119873
119871 166 Obtained from literature Seader et al
(2010) [11]
HETP m 183 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119867abs m 3 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119865IMTP 12 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119871operation m3hsdotm2 599 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119908m 10 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 10 sdot 10
5 DesignedNeutralization reaction in absorber andin scrubber
Δ119867react kJsdotmolminus1 2232 Calculated from literature data Perryand Green (2007) [7]
119876reaction kW 71 Calculated from (37)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 7
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit ValueCentrifugal pump119871NaOH m3
sdothminus1 100 Calculated from reaction stochiometryΔ119875pump Pa 400000 DesignedVentilator fan designΔ119875Fan Pa 500 Calculated from (43)0
119881Fan m3sdothminus1 72000 Calculated from (44) and (45)
119907
119903msdotsminus1 230 Calculated from (47)
120599Fan RPM 2920 Calculated from (44) and (45)119875Fanmotor kW 34 Calculated from (46)119889Fan mm 1460 Calculated from (44) and (45)Chimney design
ℎchimney mm 6000 Obtained from literature diagramsBleier (1987) [12]
119889chimney mm 500 Obtained from literature diagramsBleier (1987) [12]
Pipe sizingPipes from blow down tank viahorizontal heat exchanger to absorberDNpipes
Blow down tank-horizontal heatexchanger mm 400 Calculated from (48)
Horizontal heat exchanger-absorber mm 400 Calculated from (48)Pipes from scrubber via pump andvertical heat exchanger to absorberDNpipes
Pipes from scrubber via pump mm 125 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
Cooling water pipesDNpipes
Main cooling water pipes mm 300 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
Cooling water pipes after crossing mm 200 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
The analytical vent sizing equation for homogeneousvessel venting is [2ndash4]
119860vent = 119898
119900sdot 119902vent
times (119866vent sdot [(119881
119898
119900
sdot
144
77816
sdot 119879 sdot
119889119875
119889119879
)
12
+(119888
119901vent sdot Δ119879vent)12
])
minus1
(3)
whereΔ119879vent = 119879119898 minus 119879119904
119863 =
radic
4 sdot 119860vent120587
119902vent =1
2
sdot 119888
119901vent sdot [(119889119879
119889119905
)
119904
+ (
119889119879
119889119905
)
119898
]
(4)
and all necessary physical and chemical data are presented asfollows
Physical-chemical parameters use for blow down systemdesign
120588liq [mol sdot dmminus3] = 13798
031598
(1+(1minus(11987969425))032768)
119888
119901liq [J sdot Kmolminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 101720 + 31761 sdot 119879
119888
119901119892[J sdot Kmolminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0434 sdot 10
5+ 2445 sdot 10
5
sdot [
1152119879
sinh [1152119879]]
2
+ 1512 sdot 10
5sdot [
507119879
cosh [507119879]]
2
8 Journal of Industrial Engineering
120578liq [Pa sdot s] = exp(minus43335 + 38817
119879
+
43983
ln (119879)+ 30548 sdot 10
24sdot 119879
minus10)
120578vap [Pa sdot s] =10094 sdot 10
minus7sdot 119879
0799
1 + 1031119879
120582vap [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0038846 sdot 119879
02392
1 + 98581119879 + 93717119879
2
120582liq [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 018837 minus 00001 sdot 119879
Δ119867evap [J sdot Kmolminus1] = 7306 sdot 107 sdot (1 minus 119879
69425
)
04246
119875vapour [Pa] = exp (95444 minus 1013
119879
minus 1009 sdot ln (119879)
+67603 sdot 10
minus18sdot 119879
6)
(5)
Formation enthalpies (Perry and Green (2007) [7])
Δ119867
119891
NaOH = minus46915 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
PhOH = minus1650 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
H2O= minus28583 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
NaPhO = minus326 kJ sdotmolminus1
120588
50wt NaOH = 1529 kg sdot Lminus1
Reaction chemistry at runaway is very complex and dependson the type of used catalyst and other process conditions [1ndash4] In present study a ldquoworst-case scenariordquo was used for thethermal runaway of reaction Design bases of (119889119879119889119905)
119898and
(119889119879119889119905)
119904were obtained from the literature [2ndash4 8] and are
presented in Table 1 Calculated vent area was compared tothe nomogram method from study by Fauske [9] and yield avent area of 0326m2 or 065m vent area pipe diameter whichis in good agreement with the calculated results Pressurerelief devices designs were made according to API RP 526standard [5] Detailed presentation of pressure relief devicesare presented in Figure 3 with main dimensions shown inTable 1 In present design it was suggested that RD is locatedbetween reactor and SRV RD protects SRV piston fromvapors and opens when tank pressure is above allowablereactor pressure Maximal pressure which appears at reactionrunaway was not known and was obtained from the literaturereported data [9] A design pressure of 221 sdot 105 Pa was usedfor system design with 20 safety factor In present study avent membrane had a pressure relief from minus075 bar to 075bar At pressures higher than 075 bar the rupture disc openedand the material was discharged into the blow down tank
3 Blow Down Tank Design
Thepurpose of the blowdown tank is to capture the twophasematerial flow from reactor and to decrease the pressure of
outflow material [9] Blow down tank design was done basedon API RP 520 standard [5] Blow down tank volume wascalculated from the reactor volume as
119881bd = 2 sdot 119881119900 (6)
and is reported in Table 1 A factor 2 in (6) was used as engi-neering safety coefficient which decreases the pressure fromreaction runaway by half It may also be called additionalsafety margin The pressure decrease in a blow down tankwas calculated by applying the ideal gas behavior at constanttemperatures as follows
119875
1sdot 119881
1
119879
1
=
119875
2sdot 119881
2
119879
2
(7)
and was 1 sdot 105 Pa The maximal allowable working pressure(MAWP) for blow down tank was calculated according toAPI RP 520 standard [5] and was 25 sdot 105 Pa MAWP washigher than peak pressure at 221 sdot 105 Pa Due to volumechange the MAWP in blow down tank will not be reachedduring reaction runaway In blow down tank a solid part oftwo phase runaway material is captured
4 Horizontal and Vertical HeatExchanger Design
Various procedures for heat exchanger design may be foundin the available literature [9 10 13] Only brief calculationprocedure is presented [5 7 10]
(i) Assume pipe diameter length inside and outsidefouling factor
(ii) For the pipe construction an INOX AISI 316 wasused with corresponding characteristics presented inTable 1
(iii) Corresponding energetic balances for horizontal andvertical heat exchanger were written as
119876 =
119876hot =
119876cold = 119888 sdot 119888119901119888 sdot (119879119888out minus 119879119888in)
=
ℎsdot 119888
119901ℎsdot (119879
ℎout minus 119879ℎin) (8)
Equation (8) enables calculation of heat duty 119902 andthe hot medium outflow temperatures and results arepresented in Table 1
(iv) The Log Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD) forcountercurrent flow was calculated by
LMTD =
(119879
ℎin minus 119879119888out) minus (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in)
ln ((119879ℎin minus 119879119888out) (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in))
(9)
(v) Based on the experiences and literature data dividedflow shell and even tube passes were assumed forboth condensers Following the procedure proposedby Richardson et al [10] parameters119877
119905 119878 and119865
119905were
obtained from the corresponding diagrams Obtainedparameters enabled calculation of mean temperaturedifference
119863119879
119898= 119865
119905sdot LMTD (10)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 9
(vi) Overall heat transfer coefficients were assumed fromthe data reported in the literature [10] within theirminimum and maximum values and were between700Wsdotm2sdotK and 1000Wsdotm2sdotK Predicted heat trans-fer coefficients enabled calculation of minimum andmaximum provisional area which were taken as aver-age for heat exchanger design
119860 =
1
2
sdot (119860min + 119860max) (11)
Nextmain parameters used for heat exchanger designwere calculated using (12)ndash(18) Pressure drops andthe heat transfer coefficients for heat exchanger werecalculated using (19)ndash(25) for the shell and tube siterespectively
Equations used for horizontal and vertical heatexchanger design are as follows
119860 =
119902
119880 sdot 119863119879
119898
(12)
119873
119905=
119860
120587 sdot 119889out sdot 119871 (13)
119901
119905= 125 sdot 119889
119900 (14)
119863
119887= 119889
119900sdot (
119873
119905
119870
1
)
11198991
(15)
119863
119878= 119863
119887+ BDC (16)
119861
119878= 04 sdot 119863
119878 (17)
119860
119878=
(119901
119905minus 119889out) sdot 119863119878 sdot 119861119878
119901
119905
(18)
119866shell =shell side flow rate
119860
119904
(19)
119889
119890=
110
119889outsdot (119901
2
119905minus 0917 sdot 119889
2
out) (20)
Re =119889
119890sdot 120583 sdot 120588
120578
(21)
Pr =120583 sdot 119888
119901
120582
(22)
Nu =ℎshell sdot 119889119890
119896
119891
(23)
Nu = 119895ℎsdot Re sdotPr13 sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
014
(24)
Δ119875shell = 8 sdot 119895119891 sdot (119863
119904
119889
119890
) sdot (
119871
119897
119861
) sdot (
120588 sdot 119906
2
119904
2
) sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus014
(25)
119897
119861=
07 sdot 119871
4
(26)
119873tpp =119873
119905
number of passes (27)
119866tube =119866in
119873tpp sdot (120587 sdot 1198892
in4) (28)
]tube =119866tube120588
119894
(29)
(vii) The heat transfer coefficient ℎtube for turbulent flowwas calculated by using next correlation
ℎtube = 0023 sdot119865
119903
119889insdot Re08 sdot Pr033 sdot (1 + 119889in
119871
) (30)
(viii) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquooutside pipes flowrdquo
119880shell = 1 times (
1
ℎshell+
1
ℎdirtout+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(31)
(ix) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquoinside pipes flowrdquo
119880tube = 1 times (
1
ℎtube+
1
ℎdirtin+
119889in119889out sdot ℎdirtout
+
119889in119889out sdot ℎshell
+
119889in sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(32)
(x) The tube-side pressure drop was calculated
Δ119875tube = (15 + 119873119905 sdot [25 +8 sdot 119895
119891sdot 119871
119889in+ (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus119898
]) sdot
120588
119894 sdot V2
2
(33)
Calculated parameters for horizontal and vertical condenserdesign are reported in Table 1
5 Vertical Heat Exchanger Design
For the vertical heat exchanger design exactly the sameprocedure as proposed for the horizontal heat exchanger wasused Firstly the amount of condensed vapor was calculatedfrom the ratio of vapor pressures at reactor release in the blowdown tank and after the volumetric expansion
119903
119888=
119901
1199041
119901
1199042
(34)
where 1199011199041
and 119901
1199042were the saturated pressures calculated
from (1) Obtained 119903
119888was used for calculation of gas flow
10 Journal of Industrial Engineering
which needs to be neutralized and cooled down in verticalheat exchanger
119866HZT = 119903
119888sdot 119866vent (35)
where 119866HZT and 119866vent are the reactor runaway flow and flowthrough horizontal condenser reported in Table 1 Calculated119866HZT flow was used for vertical condenser design at the exactsame procedure as for horizontal condenser In the next step119866HZT flow needed to be cooled down and neutralized inabsorption column using sodium hydroxide solution beforeit was left in the surrounding 119866HZT flows from blow downreactor with temperature which is equal to the temperature ofrunaway flow due to short residence time Similar predictionswere obtained at design of other blowdownprocesses [3 8 9]
All calculated parameters are presented in Table 1 During119866HZT neutralization reaction heat was formed The heatwhich needs to be cooled down was calculated as the sumof vapor gas heat and the heat produced by neutralizationreaction
119876total =
119876hot gas +
119876reaction (36)
where
119876react was calculated using reaction enthalpy as follows
119876reaction = Δ119867reaction sdot 119866HZT (37)
and the heat pro recycles using
119876recycle =
119876totalRecycle
(38)
6 Scrubber Design
Since the reaction enthalpy for the neutralization reactionof phenol acid with sodium hydroxide cannot be foundin the available literature it was calculated from formationenthalpies and was 2232 kJmol [10] Since the compositionof the blow down gas is not known exactly it was assumedthat it is composed from phenolic acid [8]The neutralizationreaction of phenolic acid with sodium hydroxide was writtenas
PhCOOH +NaOH 997888rarr PhCONa +H2O (39)
Neutralization reaction gives the stoichiometric ratio ofphenolic acid versus sodium hydroxide and enables the cal-culation of the amount of neutralization medium needed forneutralization The necessary 50wt neutralization liquidflow rate was calculated from the reaction and was 423 kgsTo decrease the necessary volume of used sodium hydroxideits recycling was assumed The recycle flow was calculatedusing
Recycle = 119866HZT119881scrubber tank
(40)
The recycle ratio gives scrubber volume of 45m3 and enablesthe calculation of the liquid and the gas flow rates used forabsorption column design Scrubber design was performedaccording to API RP 520 standard All main scrubberdimensions are presented in Table 1 MAWP of scrubber wasdesigned to be 15 sdot 105 Pa
7 Absorption Column Design
Before outflow gas from blow down system was left intosurrounding air it was neutralized by sodium hydroxidein counterflow absorption column A lot of literature forabsorption column design can be found in available literature[11 14] Due to high flow of gas and neutralization fluid thechemical reaction was the limiting step of this process Ageneralized approach proposed in the literature was used forcolumn design [7 11 14] Firstly (119871119866) sdot (120588
119866120588
119871)
12 factor wascalculated Pump characteristics limited the pressure drop inabsorption column to 110158401015840 water column per feet of packingBased on existing correlations factor (119866lowast2 sdot119865 sdot12058301)(322 sdot120588
119892sdot
(120588
119892minus 120588
119871)) was obtained to be 18 and enabled to calculate the
gas flux119866lowast A ceramic IMTP packing number 70was taken aspacking material with main parameters presented in Table 1Calculated parameters enabled to design an absorption col-umn area and diameter from the following equation
119866 = 119860 sdot 119866
lowast (41)
119860 =
120587 sdot 119863
2
4
(42)
Large absorption column diameter is a consequence of largegas flow at reaction runaway which was designed to be up to595m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 which is lower than allowed maximal liquidflow rate of 122m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 for IMTO packing number 70Next absorption column height was designed based on theprocedure proposed by Seader et al [11] and was obtained tobe 3000mm All other column parameters are presented inTable 1 and enabled to design the absorption column pressuredrop which was 30 sdot 103 Pa
8 Ventilator Fan Design
The vapor gas coming out from absorption column is mainlycomposed of different phenolic vapors which are heavierthan air therefore a ventilator fan needs to be inserted intooutflow chimney The role of the fan is to suck the vaporgas coming out from absorption column and to blow it outvia chimney into surrounding air Equations used for the fandesign are presented as follows [12]
Design equations for ventilator fan design in outflowchimney
Pressure of ventilator
Δ119875Fan = 120588 sdot 119892 sdot ℎchimney +120588 sdot V2
2
(43)
Gas vapor velocity
0
119881 Fan = 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan sdot 119860Fan (44)
where
119860Fan =120587sdot119889Fan
2
4
(45)
Ventilator motor power
119875Fan motor = 0 119881 Fan sdot Δ119875Fan (46)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 11
95
96
1 3 5
2 4 6
F5
F4F3 F2 F1
F6
Frompressuresensor
PC
CCC
M
3
M3 55 kW M3 34kW
F3 F1
1 3 5
2 4 6
C C C
M
3
Pump motor Fan motor
L1L2L3N
0
20A F20
120A
P
Figure 2 Electrical connections for pump and fan motor
Safety relief valve
Connection to pressurerelief system
Rupture disc
Connectionto reactor
Figure 3 Rupture disc and safety relief valve connection to reactor
Axial fan velocity
V119903= 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan (47)
The fan pressure and the fan capacity were designed basedon capacity of 823 kg sdot sminus1 of outcoming gas by (43)ndash(47)Radial velocity of ventilator fan speed V
119903was calculated from
(47) and clearly indicates that an axial ventilator must beapplied All main designed technical characteristics of theventilator fan are shown in Table 1 A 34 kW ventilator fanmotor with corresponding ATEX protection with II 2G EExde II B T4 code and motor thermal protection should beused since the motor is located in Ex cone According toATEX directive the electric board with all main connectionsshould be located outside Ex cone which is presented in
Figure 2 Chimney height was obtained from standards andwas approximately 6000mm All other chimney dimensionsare presented in Table 1 [4 15]
9 Blow Down and Cooling Water Pipes Design
Blow down equipment is connected using thick wall pipesmade of INOX AISI 316 due to highly corrosive mediumhigh fluid velocities and large pressures at reaction runawayFor the vent size pipes diameter design at reaction runawayfrequently used technique proposed by Bleier [12] was used
119863119873pipe = (119866
119891pipe)
12
sdot (
120588
119875
)
14
(48)
where all parameters are explained in the Nomenclature Thepipe system with 400mm pipe diameter was proposed asconnection between horizontal heat exchanger and absorp-tion column at given conditions All other data are presentedin Table 1 and Figure 2 Connection pipe system betweenreactors and blow down tank should be as short as possiblestraight with no elbows no reductions to decrease theamount of condensing flow and to prevent the appearance ofplugs which may lead to fatal accidents Additionally suchsystem configuration ensures easy maintain and fast pipecleaning In parallel the pipe pressure drops were calculatedby method proposed by Crane [16] to ensure smooth andeasy flow The pipe length was designed to be as short aspossible with minimal pressure drop which will result inlow amount of condensed fluid High fluid velocities lowfriction factors and minimal pressure drops are expectedwhich agrees with results obtained from the literature [16]For the cooling water pipes diameter and sodium hydroxidepipe diameter design a method proposed byMays [17] which
12 Journal of Industrial Engineering
is based on the steady state incompressible energy equationutilizing Hazel Williams friction loses and continuity equa-tion was used The results are presented in Table 1 and inFigure 2
10 Pump Design
Neutralization process characteristics demand 100m3sdothminus1 of50wt sodium hydroxide For this a corresponding pumpwith 55 kW electrical motor and capacity of 120m3sdothminus1 atapproximately 4sdot105 Pa is proposed A corresponding electricschema with all relevant parts is presented in Figure 2 Sincethe pump is situated in Ex cone a correct motor withmotor II 2G EEx de II B T4 code and correct connectionaccording toATEX standardmust be used [18] Electric boardwith necessary connections should be located outside theEx cone A pressure sensor (PC) is proposed on the pipefrom vertical heat exchanger to absorption column PC hastwo tasks to ensure that neutralization medium is pumpedall the time from scrubber tank on the absorption columnand to prevent the centrifugal pump running dry which canresult in pump failure and in the worst case in pump rotordamage
It needs to be mentioned that reaction mixture whichappears at reaction runaway is very viscous which mayresult in appearance of plug in designed pipes equipmentand huge pressure drops This problem will be avoided bydecreasing the connection pipe length without reductionsand low pipe elbow number Horizontal heat exchangerwhich is located above the blow down tank decreases thefluid temperature which results in fluid condensation thatis why lower amount of gas need to be neutralized inabsorption column Less required gas for neutralizationresults in lower NaOH consumption which decreases oper-ational costs of designed system Additionally horizontalheat exchanger produces huge pressure drop which results inlower gas velocities and higher gasliquid mass transfer coef-ficients which increases the efficiency of absorption columns[14]
11 Conclusions
Designed results of this study demonstrate that proposedmethod can be used for emergency relief system designBased on calculated data the following conclusions weremade
Emergency relief system for exothermic reaction forreactor volume up to 30m3 was designed A 60m3 blowdown tank with 700m3sdothminus1 of 13∘C26∘C cooling water andtwo condensersmdashhorizontal and verticalmdashwith cooling areaof 54m2 and 5m2 are proposed An absorber column withdiameter of 15m and 30m height 45m3 scrubber tankand corresponding outflow chimney were designed All othersystem parameters are presented in Table 1 It is hoped thatthe presented procedure will serve as an engineering tool foremergency relief system design in various process industriesall over the world
Nomenclature
119871 Length (m)120582
119908 Thermal conductivity
(Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1)119862
119901cold Specific heat of cold medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119862
119901hot Specific heat of hot medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
Cooling water Specific heat of cooling water(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119876 Heat transfer (W)119879hin Temperature of hot medium
(∘C)119898
119900 Reactor charge (kg)
119860 Area (m2)119881 Reactor volume (m3)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119902
119888 Heat release per unit mass cold
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119902
ℎ Heat release per unit mass hot
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119866 Discharge mass flow rate per
unit area (kgsdotm2sdotsminus1)119875 Pressure (Pa)119879 Temperature (K)119889119879119889119905 Self heat rate in runaway
reactions (Ksdotmin1)119902 Energy release rate (Jsdotkgminus1)
119876hot Heat of hot medium (W)
119876cold Heat of cold medium (W)119879
ℎout Temperature of hot medium(∘C)
LMTD Log mean temperaturedifference (∘C)
119877
119905 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119878 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119865
119905 Temperature correction factor
119879
119898 Mean temperature difference
(∘C)119880 Overall heat transfer coefficient
(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)119860 Average provisional area (m2)119873
119905 Number of tubes
119889 Pipe diameter (mm)119903 Ration Mass flow (kgsdots1)119865
119905 Friction factor
Δ119875shell Pressure drop on the shell side(Pa)
Δ119875tube Pressure drop on the tube side(Pa)
BDC Bundle diameter clearance(mm)
119908 Wall thickness (mm)119901
119905 Tube pitch (mm)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 13
119863
119887 Bundle diameter (mm)
119863
119904 Shell diameter (mm)
119861
119904 Baffle spacing (mm)
119860
119904 Area for cross-flow (m2)
119866shell Shell-side mass velocity(kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2)
119889
119890 Shell equivalent diameter (mm)
Re Reynolds numberPr Prandtl numberNu Nusselt numberℎshell Shell-side heat transfer
coefficient (Wsdotmminus2sdotK1)119895
ℎat 45 of baffle cut Shell-side heat transfer factor
119897
119887 Baffle spacing (mm)
119873tpp Number of tubes per pass119866tube Tube-side mass velocity
(kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1)119881tube Tube-side velocity (msdotsminus1)Retube Inside tube Reynolds numberPrtube Inside tube Prandtl numberNutube Inside tube Nusselt number119895
119891at 45 of baffle cut Shell side friction factor
ℎtubeside Inside heat transfer coefficient(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880i Overall heat transfer factor forinside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880o Overall heat transfer factor foroutside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880 Average heat transfer factor(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119865IMTP IMTP packing factor119871NaOH NaOH flow (m3sdoth1)Recycle Recycle of NaOH in absorber
(hminus1)119881scrubbertank Volume of scrubber tank (m3)119860abs Absorber area (m2)119863abs Absorber diameter (m)Δ119875abs Pressure drop on absorber tray
(Pa)119865IMTP IMTP packing factorIMTP packing Mark of absorber fill119873
119871 Number of theoretical plates or
traysHETP Height equivalent to the
theoretical plate (m)119867abs Height of absorption column
(m)119881bd Blow down volume (m3)119881max Maximal tank volume (m3)119902vent Heat release per unit mass at
reaction runaway (Wsdotsminus1)119888
119901 Specific heat of material
(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)(119889119879119889119905)
119898 Self heat rate at temperature
turn around or maximal overpressure defined by API RP 520during run away (Ksdotsminus1)
(119889119879119889119905)
119904 Self heat rate at set pressure of
pressure relief devices (Ksdotsminus1)
119879
119898 Temperature of reactant
correlates to the temperatureturn around or maximum overpressure defined by API RP520 during runaway (K)
119879
119904 Temperature of reactant
correlates to set pressure ofpressure relief devices (K)
Δ119879 Temperature difference (K)119905 Time (s)120578 Viscosity (Pasdots)120583 Kinematic viscosity (m2sdotsminus1)119881 Volume (m3)119863 diameter (m)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119865 Flow reduction factor119881 Voltage (V)119868 Current (A)119882 Power supply (W)GF Gas rate (m3sdothminus1)LF Liquid rate (m3sdothminus1)119888Li Liquid concentration (molsdotm3)119888gi Gas concentration (molsdotm3)119877 liquid rate to tank volume
(hminus1)0
119881Fan Ventilator fan flow (m3sdothminus1)V119903 Axial fan velocity (msdotsminus1)
Δ119875Fan Ventilator fan pressure (Pa)119875Fanmotor Ventilator motor power (W)0
119881Fan Rotational velocity ofventilator fan (RPM)
119860Fan Ventilator area (m2)119889Fan Fan diameter (mm)ℎchimney Height of outflow chimney
(mm)119892 Gravity acceleration (m2sdotsminus1)Vvapor Outflow vapor gas velocity
(msdots1)119891pipe Flow reduction factorΔ119867react Reaction enthalpy (Jsdotmol1)119866
lowast Gas flux (kgsdots1sdotm2)DN Inner diameter (m)bd Blow down119898 Pressure turnaround meanmax Maximal value119904 Relief set conditions shell119900 Initial conditionscin Cold incout Cold outabs Absorbervent VentBWG BirminghamWire Gaugedirt indirt out Coatings of dirt on the in and
out site of pipe119908 Walltube Tube sideshell Shell side119894 119895 Refers to tube and shell side119901 Specific heat
14 Journal of Industrial Engineering
1 2 3 Refers to positionS1 S2 Saturated pressure at position 1
and 2HZT Horizontalhin Hot inhout Hot outout Out sitesdot Unit in time119890 EquivalentIMTP IMTP packing type119888 Coldℎ Hot119905 Pitch119887 Bundleℎ Heat119891 Friction119894 Inside119900 Outsideabs Absorber119871 Theoretical120587 314119904 Set pointPE Electrically groundedU1 U2 Electro phasesV1 V2 Electro phasesW1 W2 Electro phasesTK Electro phasesL1 L2 L3 Electro phases119873 Neutral phaseS1 Switch 10 1 2 3 4 Position in switch and
correctionF1 Fusion 1AC3 Analog currentX1X2 ContactorM Motor3 sim ΛΔ Three phase electro motorMAWP Maximal allowed working
pressure
References
[1] H K Fauske ldquoEmergency relief system design for reactive andnon-reactive systems extension of the DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 7 no 3 pp 153ndash158 1988
[2] J C Leung ldquoSimplified vent sizing equations for emergencyrelief requirements in reactors and storage vesselsrdquo AIChEJournal vol 32 no 10 pp 1622ndash1634 1986
[3] J C Leung H K Fauske and H G Fisher ldquoThermal runawayreactions in a low thermal inertia apparatusrdquo ThermochimicaActa vol 104 pp 13ndash29 1986
[4] R C Rosaler Standard Handbook of Plant EngineeringMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 3rd edition 2002
[5] API RP 520 Sizing Selection and Installation of Pressure Reliev-ing Devices in Refineries American Petroleum Institution 2000
[6] API STD 526 Flanged Steel Pressure Relief Valves AmericanPetroleum Institution 6th edition 2012
[7] R H Perry and D W Green Perryrsquos Chemical EngineersrsquoHandbook McGraw-Hill New York NY USA 2007
[8] J L Gustin J Fillion G Treand and K E Biyaali ldquoThe phenol+ formaldehyde runaway reaction Vent sizing for reactorprotectionrdquo Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industriesvol 6 no 2 pp 103ndash113 1993
[9] H K Fauske ldquoGeneralized vent sizing monogram for runawaychemical reactionsrdquo PlantOperations Progress vol 3 no 4 pp213ndash215 1984
[10] J F Richardson J H Harker and J R Backhurst Coulson andRichardsonrsquos Chemical Engineering Butterworth-HeinemannBoston Mass USA 2009
[11] J D Seader E J Henley and D K Roter Separation ProcessPrinciples John Wiley amp Sons New York NY USA 2010
[12] F Bleier Fan Handbook Selection Application and DesignMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 1987
[13] S A Kudchadker A P Kudchadker R C Wilhoit and B JZwolinski ldquoIdeal gas thermodynamic properties of phenol andcresolsrdquo Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data vol 7no 2 pp 417ndash423 1978
[14] I Hace ldquoComparison of concentration profiles for boundarylayers in absorption with chemical reaction processesrdquo Chemi-cal Engineering and Technology vol 29 no 5 pp 574ndash582 2006
[15] J C Leung and H K Fauske ldquoRunaway system charac-terization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 6 no 2 pp 77ndash83 1987
[16] Crane Technical Paper ldquoA Process Design Engineerrsquos Perspec-tive on Using Equivalent Lengths of Valves and Fittings inPipeline Pressure Drop Calculations 410(TP-410)rdquo 2009
[17] L W Mays Hydraulic Design Handbook McGraw-Hill NewYork NY USA 1999
[18] ldquolsquoATEXDirective 949ECrsquo on equipment and protective systemsintended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX)rdquohttpeceuropaeuenterprisesectorsmechanicaldocumentslegislationatex
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of
6 Journal of Industrial Engineering
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit Value
LMTD ∘C 3844 Calculated from (9)
119877
119905 444 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119878 01385 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]
119865
119905 096 Obtained from literature Richardson et
al (2009) [10]DT119898
∘C 367 Calculated from (10)119860
m2 5 Calculated from (11)119873
119905 13 Calculated from (13)
Absorber and scrubberScrubber
119871NaOH kgsdotsminus1 4221 Calculated from reactionstoichiometry
Recycle hminus1 2222 Calculated from (40)119881scrubber tank m3 45 Calculated from (40)119908
m 10 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 15 sdot 10
5 DesignedAbsorber(119871119866) sdot (120588
119892120588
119871)
12
0023 Calculated ratio119866
lowast2sdot 119865 sdot 120583
01
322 sdot 120588
119892sdot (120588
119892minus 120588
119871)
18 Obtained from correlations proposedin literature Seader et al (2010) [11]
119866
lowast kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1 49 Calculated from obtained factor119860abs m2 168 Calculated from (41)119863abs m 146 Calculated from (42)
Δ119875abs m 03048 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
No foaming factor 119865nf 1 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119865IMTP 12 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
IMTP packing mm 889 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119873
119871 166 Obtained from literature Seader et al
(2010) [11]
HETP m 183 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119867abs m 3 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119865IMTP 12 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119871operation m3hsdotm2 599 Obtained from literature Seader et al(2010) [11]
119908m 10 sdot 10
minus3 DesignedMAWP Pa 10 sdot 10
5 DesignedNeutralization reaction in absorber andin scrubber
Δ119867react kJsdotmolminus1 2232 Calculated from literature data Perryand Green (2007) [7]
119876reaction kW 71 Calculated from (37)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 7
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit ValueCentrifugal pump119871NaOH m3
sdothminus1 100 Calculated from reaction stochiometryΔ119875pump Pa 400000 DesignedVentilator fan designΔ119875Fan Pa 500 Calculated from (43)0
119881Fan m3sdothminus1 72000 Calculated from (44) and (45)
119907
119903msdotsminus1 230 Calculated from (47)
120599Fan RPM 2920 Calculated from (44) and (45)119875Fanmotor kW 34 Calculated from (46)119889Fan mm 1460 Calculated from (44) and (45)Chimney design
ℎchimney mm 6000 Obtained from literature diagramsBleier (1987) [12]
119889chimney mm 500 Obtained from literature diagramsBleier (1987) [12]
Pipe sizingPipes from blow down tank viahorizontal heat exchanger to absorberDNpipes
Blow down tank-horizontal heatexchanger mm 400 Calculated from (48)
Horizontal heat exchanger-absorber mm 400 Calculated from (48)Pipes from scrubber via pump andvertical heat exchanger to absorberDNpipes
Pipes from scrubber via pump mm 125 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
Cooling water pipesDNpipes
Main cooling water pipes mm 300 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
Cooling water pipes after crossing mm 200 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
The analytical vent sizing equation for homogeneousvessel venting is [2ndash4]
119860vent = 119898
119900sdot 119902vent
times (119866vent sdot [(119881
119898
119900
sdot
144
77816
sdot 119879 sdot
119889119875
119889119879
)
12
+(119888
119901vent sdot Δ119879vent)12
])
minus1
(3)
whereΔ119879vent = 119879119898 minus 119879119904
119863 =
radic
4 sdot 119860vent120587
119902vent =1
2
sdot 119888
119901vent sdot [(119889119879
119889119905
)
119904
+ (
119889119879
119889119905
)
119898
]
(4)
and all necessary physical and chemical data are presented asfollows
Physical-chemical parameters use for blow down systemdesign
120588liq [mol sdot dmminus3] = 13798
031598
(1+(1minus(11987969425))032768)
119888
119901liq [J sdot Kmolminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 101720 + 31761 sdot 119879
119888
119901119892[J sdot Kmolminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0434 sdot 10
5+ 2445 sdot 10
5
sdot [
1152119879
sinh [1152119879]]
2
+ 1512 sdot 10
5sdot [
507119879
cosh [507119879]]
2
8 Journal of Industrial Engineering
120578liq [Pa sdot s] = exp(minus43335 + 38817
119879
+
43983
ln (119879)+ 30548 sdot 10
24sdot 119879
minus10)
120578vap [Pa sdot s] =10094 sdot 10
minus7sdot 119879
0799
1 + 1031119879
120582vap [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0038846 sdot 119879
02392
1 + 98581119879 + 93717119879
2
120582liq [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 018837 minus 00001 sdot 119879
Δ119867evap [J sdot Kmolminus1] = 7306 sdot 107 sdot (1 minus 119879
69425
)
04246
119875vapour [Pa] = exp (95444 minus 1013
119879
minus 1009 sdot ln (119879)
+67603 sdot 10
minus18sdot 119879
6)
(5)
Formation enthalpies (Perry and Green (2007) [7])
Δ119867
119891
NaOH = minus46915 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
PhOH = minus1650 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
H2O= minus28583 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
NaPhO = minus326 kJ sdotmolminus1
120588
50wt NaOH = 1529 kg sdot Lminus1
Reaction chemistry at runaway is very complex and dependson the type of used catalyst and other process conditions [1ndash4] In present study a ldquoworst-case scenariordquo was used for thethermal runaway of reaction Design bases of (119889119879119889119905)
119898and
(119889119879119889119905)
119904were obtained from the literature [2ndash4 8] and are
presented in Table 1 Calculated vent area was compared tothe nomogram method from study by Fauske [9] and yield avent area of 0326m2 or 065m vent area pipe diameter whichis in good agreement with the calculated results Pressurerelief devices designs were made according to API RP 526standard [5] Detailed presentation of pressure relief devicesare presented in Figure 3 with main dimensions shown inTable 1 In present design it was suggested that RD is locatedbetween reactor and SRV RD protects SRV piston fromvapors and opens when tank pressure is above allowablereactor pressure Maximal pressure which appears at reactionrunaway was not known and was obtained from the literaturereported data [9] A design pressure of 221 sdot 105 Pa was usedfor system design with 20 safety factor In present study avent membrane had a pressure relief from minus075 bar to 075bar At pressures higher than 075 bar the rupture disc openedand the material was discharged into the blow down tank
3 Blow Down Tank Design
Thepurpose of the blowdown tank is to capture the twophasematerial flow from reactor and to decrease the pressure of
outflow material [9] Blow down tank design was done basedon API RP 520 standard [5] Blow down tank volume wascalculated from the reactor volume as
119881bd = 2 sdot 119881119900 (6)
and is reported in Table 1 A factor 2 in (6) was used as engi-neering safety coefficient which decreases the pressure fromreaction runaway by half It may also be called additionalsafety margin The pressure decrease in a blow down tankwas calculated by applying the ideal gas behavior at constanttemperatures as follows
119875
1sdot 119881
1
119879
1
=
119875
2sdot 119881
2
119879
2
(7)
and was 1 sdot 105 Pa The maximal allowable working pressure(MAWP) for blow down tank was calculated according toAPI RP 520 standard [5] and was 25 sdot 105 Pa MAWP washigher than peak pressure at 221 sdot 105 Pa Due to volumechange the MAWP in blow down tank will not be reachedduring reaction runaway In blow down tank a solid part oftwo phase runaway material is captured
4 Horizontal and Vertical HeatExchanger Design
Various procedures for heat exchanger design may be foundin the available literature [9 10 13] Only brief calculationprocedure is presented [5 7 10]
(i) Assume pipe diameter length inside and outsidefouling factor
(ii) For the pipe construction an INOX AISI 316 wasused with corresponding characteristics presented inTable 1
(iii) Corresponding energetic balances for horizontal andvertical heat exchanger were written as
119876 =
119876hot =
119876cold = 119888 sdot 119888119901119888 sdot (119879119888out minus 119879119888in)
=
ℎsdot 119888
119901ℎsdot (119879
ℎout minus 119879ℎin) (8)
Equation (8) enables calculation of heat duty 119902 andthe hot medium outflow temperatures and results arepresented in Table 1
(iv) The Log Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD) forcountercurrent flow was calculated by
LMTD =
(119879
ℎin minus 119879119888out) minus (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in)
ln ((119879ℎin minus 119879119888out) (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in))
(9)
(v) Based on the experiences and literature data dividedflow shell and even tube passes were assumed forboth condensers Following the procedure proposedby Richardson et al [10] parameters119877
119905 119878 and119865
119905were
obtained from the corresponding diagrams Obtainedparameters enabled calculation of mean temperaturedifference
119863119879
119898= 119865
119905sdot LMTD (10)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 9
(vi) Overall heat transfer coefficients were assumed fromthe data reported in the literature [10] within theirminimum and maximum values and were between700Wsdotm2sdotK and 1000Wsdotm2sdotK Predicted heat trans-fer coefficients enabled calculation of minimum andmaximum provisional area which were taken as aver-age for heat exchanger design
119860 =
1
2
sdot (119860min + 119860max) (11)
Nextmain parameters used for heat exchanger designwere calculated using (12)ndash(18) Pressure drops andthe heat transfer coefficients for heat exchanger werecalculated using (19)ndash(25) for the shell and tube siterespectively
Equations used for horizontal and vertical heatexchanger design are as follows
119860 =
119902
119880 sdot 119863119879
119898
(12)
119873
119905=
119860
120587 sdot 119889out sdot 119871 (13)
119901
119905= 125 sdot 119889
119900 (14)
119863
119887= 119889
119900sdot (
119873
119905
119870
1
)
11198991
(15)
119863
119878= 119863
119887+ BDC (16)
119861
119878= 04 sdot 119863
119878 (17)
119860
119878=
(119901
119905minus 119889out) sdot 119863119878 sdot 119861119878
119901
119905
(18)
119866shell =shell side flow rate
119860
119904
(19)
119889
119890=
110
119889outsdot (119901
2
119905minus 0917 sdot 119889
2
out) (20)
Re =119889
119890sdot 120583 sdot 120588
120578
(21)
Pr =120583 sdot 119888
119901
120582
(22)
Nu =ℎshell sdot 119889119890
119896
119891
(23)
Nu = 119895ℎsdot Re sdotPr13 sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
014
(24)
Δ119875shell = 8 sdot 119895119891 sdot (119863
119904
119889
119890
) sdot (
119871
119897
119861
) sdot (
120588 sdot 119906
2
119904
2
) sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus014
(25)
119897
119861=
07 sdot 119871
4
(26)
119873tpp =119873
119905
number of passes (27)
119866tube =119866in
119873tpp sdot (120587 sdot 1198892
in4) (28)
]tube =119866tube120588
119894
(29)
(vii) The heat transfer coefficient ℎtube for turbulent flowwas calculated by using next correlation
ℎtube = 0023 sdot119865
119903
119889insdot Re08 sdot Pr033 sdot (1 + 119889in
119871
) (30)
(viii) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquooutside pipes flowrdquo
119880shell = 1 times (
1
ℎshell+
1
ℎdirtout+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(31)
(ix) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquoinside pipes flowrdquo
119880tube = 1 times (
1
ℎtube+
1
ℎdirtin+
119889in119889out sdot ℎdirtout
+
119889in119889out sdot ℎshell
+
119889in sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(32)
(x) The tube-side pressure drop was calculated
Δ119875tube = (15 + 119873119905 sdot [25 +8 sdot 119895
119891sdot 119871
119889in+ (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus119898
]) sdot
120588
119894 sdot V2
2
(33)
Calculated parameters for horizontal and vertical condenserdesign are reported in Table 1
5 Vertical Heat Exchanger Design
For the vertical heat exchanger design exactly the sameprocedure as proposed for the horizontal heat exchanger wasused Firstly the amount of condensed vapor was calculatedfrom the ratio of vapor pressures at reactor release in the blowdown tank and after the volumetric expansion
119903
119888=
119901
1199041
119901
1199042
(34)
where 1199011199041
and 119901
1199042were the saturated pressures calculated
from (1) Obtained 119903
119888was used for calculation of gas flow
10 Journal of Industrial Engineering
which needs to be neutralized and cooled down in verticalheat exchanger
119866HZT = 119903
119888sdot 119866vent (35)
where 119866HZT and 119866vent are the reactor runaway flow and flowthrough horizontal condenser reported in Table 1 Calculated119866HZT flow was used for vertical condenser design at the exactsame procedure as for horizontal condenser In the next step119866HZT flow needed to be cooled down and neutralized inabsorption column using sodium hydroxide solution beforeit was left in the surrounding 119866HZT flows from blow downreactor with temperature which is equal to the temperature ofrunaway flow due to short residence time Similar predictionswere obtained at design of other blowdownprocesses [3 8 9]
All calculated parameters are presented in Table 1 During119866HZT neutralization reaction heat was formed The heatwhich needs to be cooled down was calculated as the sumof vapor gas heat and the heat produced by neutralizationreaction
119876total =
119876hot gas +
119876reaction (36)
where
119876react was calculated using reaction enthalpy as follows
119876reaction = Δ119867reaction sdot 119866HZT (37)
and the heat pro recycles using
119876recycle =
119876totalRecycle
(38)
6 Scrubber Design
Since the reaction enthalpy for the neutralization reactionof phenol acid with sodium hydroxide cannot be foundin the available literature it was calculated from formationenthalpies and was 2232 kJmol [10] Since the compositionof the blow down gas is not known exactly it was assumedthat it is composed from phenolic acid [8]The neutralizationreaction of phenolic acid with sodium hydroxide was writtenas
PhCOOH +NaOH 997888rarr PhCONa +H2O (39)
Neutralization reaction gives the stoichiometric ratio ofphenolic acid versus sodium hydroxide and enables the cal-culation of the amount of neutralization medium needed forneutralization The necessary 50wt neutralization liquidflow rate was calculated from the reaction and was 423 kgsTo decrease the necessary volume of used sodium hydroxideits recycling was assumed The recycle flow was calculatedusing
Recycle = 119866HZT119881scrubber tank
(40)
The recycle ratio gives scrubber volume of 45m3 and enablesthe calculation of the liquid and the gas flow rates used forabsorption column design Scrubber design was performedaccording to API RP 520 standard All main scrubberdimensions are presented in Table 1 MAWP of scrubber wasdesigned to be 15 sdot 105 Pa
7 Absorption Column Design
Before outflow gas from blow down system was left intosurrounding air it was neutralized by sodium hydroxidein counterflow absorption column A lot of literature forabsorption column design can be found in available literature[11 14] Due to high flow of gas and neutralization fluid thechemical reaction was the limiting step of this process Ageneralized approach proposed in the literature was used forcolumn design [7 11 14] Firstly (119871119866) sdot (120588
119866120588
119871)
12 factor wascalculated Pump characteristics limited the pressure drop inabsorption column to 110158401015840 water column per feet of packingBased on existing correlations factor (119866lowast2 sdot119865 sdot12058301)(322 sdot120588
119892sdot
(120588
119892minus 120588
119871)) was obtained to be 18 and enabled to calculate the
gas flux119866lowast A ceramic IMTP packing number 70was taken aspacking material with main parameters presented in Table 1Calculated parameters enabled to design an absorption col-umn area and diameter from the following equation
119866 = 119860 sdot 119866
lowast (41)
119860 =
120587 sdot 119863
2
4
(42)
Large absorption column diameter is a consequence of largegas flow at reaction runaway which was designed to be up to595m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 which is lower than allowed maximal liquidflow rate of 122m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 for IMTO packing number 70Next absorption column height was designed based on theprocedure proposed by Seader et al [11] and was obtained tobe 3000mm All other column parameters are presented inTable 1 and enabled to design the absorption column pressuredrop which was 30 sdot 103 Pa
8 Ventilator Fan Design
The vapor gas coming out from absorption column is mainlycomposed of different phenolic vapors which are heavierthan air therefore a ventilator fan needs to be inserted intooutflow chimney The role of the fan is to suck the vaporgas coming out from absorption column and to blow it outvia chimney into surrounding air Equations used for the fandesign are presented as follows [12]
Design equations for ventilator fan design in outflowchimney
Pressure of ventilator
Δ119875Fan = 120588 sdot 119892 sdot ℎchimney +120588 sdot V2
2
(43)
Gas vapor velocity
0
119881 Fan = 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan sdot 119860Fan (44)
where
119860Fan =120587sdot119889Fan
2
4
(45)
Ventilator motor power
119875Fan motor = 0 119881 Fan sdot Δ119875Fan (46)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 11
95
96
1 3 5
2 4 6
F5
F4F3 F2 F1
F6
Frompressuresensor
PC
CCC
M
3
M3 55 kW M3 34kW
F3 F1
1 3 5
2 4 6
C C C
M
3
Pump motor Fan motor
L1L2L3N
0
20A F20
120A
P
Figure 2 Electrical connections for pump and fan motor
Safety relief valve
Connection to pressurerelief system
Rupture disc
Connectionto reactor
Figure 3 Rupture disc and safety relief valve connection to reactor
Axial fan velocity
V119903= 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan (47)
The fan pressure and the fan capacity were designed basedon capacity of 823 kg sdot sminus1 of outcoming gas by (43)ndash(47)Radial velocity of ventilator fan speed V
119903was calculated from
(47) and clearly indicates that an axial ventilator must beapplied All main designed technical characteristics of theventilator fan are shown in Table 1 A 34 kW ventilator fanmotor with corresponding ATEX protection with II 2G EExde II B T4 code and motor thermal protection should beused since the motor is located in Ex cone According toATEX directive the electric board with all main connectionsshould be located outside Ex cone which is presented in
Figure 2 Chimney height was obtained from standards andwas approximately 6000mm All other chimney dimensionsare presented in Table 1 [4 15]
9 Blow Down and Cooling Water Pipes Design
Blow down equipment is connected using thick wall pipesmade of INOX AISI 316 due to highly corrosive mediumhigh fluid velocities and large pressures at reaction runawayFor the vent size pipes diameter design at reaction runawayfrequently used technique proposed by Bleier [12] was used
119863119873pipe = (119866
119891pipe)
12
sdot (
120588
119875
)
14
(48)
where all parameters are explained in the Nomenclature Thepipe system with 400mm pipe diameter was proposed asconnection between horizontal heat exchanger and absorp-tion column at given conditions All other data are presentedin Table 1 and Figure 2 Connection pipe system betweenreactors and blow down tank should be as short as possiblestraight with no elbows no reductions to decrease theamount of condensing flow and to prevent the appearance ofplugs which may lead to fatal accidents Additionally suchsystem configuration ensures easy maintain and fast pipecleaning In parallel the pipe pressure drops were calculatedby method proposed by Crane [16] to ensure smooth andeasy flow The pipe length was designed to be as short aspossible with minimal pressure drop which will result inlow amount of condensed fluid High fluid velocities lowfriction factors and minimal pressure drops are expectedwhich agrees with results obtained from the literature [16]For the cooling water pipes diameter and sodium hydroxidepipe diameter design a method proposed byMays [17] which
12 Journal of Industrial Engineering
is based on the steady state incompressible energy equationutilizing Hazel Williams friction loses and continuity equa-tion was used The results are presented in Table 1 and inFigure 2
10 Pump Design
Neutralization process characteristics demand 100m3sdothminus1 of50wt sodium hydroxide For this a corresponding pumpwith 55 kW electrical motor and capacity of 120m3sdothminus1 atapproximately 4sdot105 Pa is proposed A corresponding electricschema with all relevant parts is presented in Figure 2 Sincethe pump is situated in Ex cone a correct motor withmotor II 2G EEx de II B T4 code and correct connectionaccording toATEX standardmust be used [18] Electric boardwith necessary connections should be located outside theEx cone A pressure sensor (PC) is proposed on the pipefrom vertical heat exchanger to absorption column PC hastwo tasks to ensure that neutralization medium is pumpedall the time from scrubber tank on the absorption columnand to prevent the centrifugal pump running dry which canresult in pump failure and in the worst case in pump rotordamage
It needs to be mentioned that reaction mixture whichappears at reaction runaway is very viscous which mayresult in appearance of plug in designed pipes equipmentand huge pressure drops This problem will be avoided bydecreasing the connection pipe length without reductionsand low pipe elbow number Horizontal heat exchangerwhich is located above the blow down tank decreases thefluid temperature which results in fluid condensation thatis why lower amount of gas need to be neutralized inabsorption column Less required gas for neutralizationresults in lower NaOH consumption which decreases oper-ational costs of designed system Additionally horizontalheat exchanger produces huge pressure drop which results inlower gas velocities and higher gasliquid mass transfer coef-ficients which increases the efficiency of absorption columns[14]
11 Conclusions
Designed results of this study demonstrate that proposedmethod can be used for emergency relief system designBased on calculated data the following conclusions weremade
Emergency relief system for exothermic reaction forreactor volume up to 30m3 was designed A 60m3 blowdown tank with 700m3sdothminus1 of 13∘C26∘C cooling water andtwo condensersmdashhorizontal and verticalmdashwith cooling areaof 54m2 and 5m2 are proposed An absorber column withdiameter of 15m and 30m height 45m3 scrubber tankand corresponding outflow chimney were designed All othersystem parameters are presented in Table 1 It is hoped thatthe presented procedure will serve as an engineering tool foremergency relief system design in various process industriesall over the world
Nomenclature
119871 Length (m)120582
119908 Thermal conductivity
(Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1)119862
119901cold Specific heat of cold medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119862
119901hot Specific heat of hot medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
Cooling water Specific heat of cooling water(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119876 Heat transfer (W)119879hin Temperature of hot medium
(∘C)119898
119900 Reactor charge (kg)
119860 Area (m2)119881 Reactor volume (m3)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119902
119888 Heat release per unit mass cold
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119902
ℎ Heat release per unit mass hot
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119866 Discharge mass flow rate per
unit area (kgsdotm2sdotsminus1)119875 Pressure (Pa)119879 Temperature (K)119889119879119889119905 Self heat rate in runaway
reactions (Ksdotmin1)119902 Energy release rate (Jsdotkgminus1)
119876hot Heat of hot medium (W)
119876cold Heat of cold medium (W)119879
ℎout Temperature of hot medium(∘C)
LMTD Log mean temperaturedifference (∘C)
119877
119905 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119878 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119865
119905 Temperature correction factor
119879
119898 Mean temperature difference
(∘C)119880 Overall heat transfer coefficient
(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)119860 Average provisional area (m2)119873
119905 Number of tubes
119889 Pipe diameter (mm)119903 Ration Mass flow (kgsdots1)119865
119905 Friction factor
Δ119875shell Pressure drop on the shell side(Pa)
Δ119875tube Pressure drop on the tube side(Pa)
BDC Bundle diameter clearance(mm)
119908 Wall thickness (mm)119901
119905 Tube pitch (mm)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 13
119863
119887 Bundle diameter (mm)
119863
119904 Shell diameter (mm)
119861
119904 Baffle spacing (mm)
119860
119904 Area for cross-flow (m2)
119866shell Shell-side mass velocity(kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2)
119889
119890 Shell equivalent diameter (mm)
Re Reynolds numberPr Prandtl numberNu Nusselt numberℎshell Shell-side heat transfer
coefficient (Wsdotmminus2sdotK1)119895
ℎat 45 of baffle cut Shell-side heat transfer factor
119897
119887 Baffle spacing (mm)
119873tpp Number of tubes per pass119866tube Tube-side mass velocity
(kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1)119881tube Tube-side velocity (msdotsminus1)Retube Inside tube Reynolds numberPrtube Inside tube Prandtl numberNutube Inside tube Nusselt number119895
119891at 45 of baffle cut Shell side friction factor
ℎtubeside Inside heat transfer coefficient(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880i Overall heat transfer factor forinside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880o Overall heat transfer factor foroutside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880 Average heat transfer factor(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119865IMTP IMTP packing factor119871NaOH NaOH flow (m3sdoth1)Recycle Recycle of NaOH in absorber
(hminus1)119881scrubbertank Volume of scrubber tank (m3)119860abs Absorber area (m2)119863abs Absorber diameter (m)Δ119875abs Pressure drop on absorber tray
(Pa)119865IMTP IMTP packing factorIMTP packing Mark of absorber fill119873
119871 Number of theoretical plates or
traysHETP Height equivalent to the
theoretical plate (m)119867abs Height of absorption column
(m)119881bd Blow down volume (m3)119881max Maximal tank volume (m3)119902vent Heat release per unit mass at
reaction runaway (Wsdotsminus1)119888
119901 Specific heat of material
(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)(119889119879119889119905)
119898 Self heat rate at temperature
turn around or maximal overpressure defined by API RP 520during run away (Ksdotsminus1)
(119889119879119889119905)
119904 Self heat rate at set pressure of
pressure relief devices (Ksdotsminus1)
119879
119898 Temperature of reactant
correlates to the temperatureturn around or maximum overpressure defined by API RP520 during runaway (K)
119879
119904 Temperature of reactant
correlates to set pressure ofpressure relief devices (K)
Δ119879 Temperature difference (K)119905 Time (s)120578 Viscosity (Pasdots)120583 Kinematic viscosity (m2sdotsminus1)119881 Volume (m3)119863 diameter (m)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119865 Flow reduction factor119881 Voltage (V)119868 Current (A)119882 Power supply (W)GF Gas rate (m3sdothminus1)LF Liquid rate (m3sdothminus1)119888Li Liquid concentration (molsdotm3)119888gi Gas concentration (molsdotm3)119877 liquid rate to tank volume
(hminus1)0
119881Fan Ventilator fan flow (m3sdothminus1)V119903 Axial fan velocity (msdotsminus1)
Δ119875Fan Ventilator fan pressure (Pa)119875Fanmotor Ventilator motor power (W)0
119881Fan Rotational velocity ofventilator fan (RPM)
119860Fan Ventilator area (m2)119889Fan Fan diameter (mm)ℎchimney Height of outflow chimney
(mm)119892 Gravity acceleration (m2sdotsminus1)Vvapor Outflow vapor gas velocity
(msdots1)119891pipe Flow reduction factorΔ119867react Reaction enthalpy (Jsdotmol1)119866
lowast Gas flux (kgsdots1sdotm2)DN Inner diameter (m)bd Blow down119898 Pressure turnaround meanmax Maximal value119904 Relief set conditions shell119900 Initial conditionscin Cold incout Cold outabs Absorbervent VentBWG BirminghamWire Gaugedirt indirt out Coatings of dirt on the in and
out site of pipe119908 Walltube Tube sideshell Shell side119894 119895 Refers to tube and shell side119901 Specific heat
14 Journal of Industrial Engineering
1 2 3 Refers to positionS1 S2 Saturated pressure at position 1
and 2HZT Horizontalhin Hot inhout Hot outout Out sitesdot Unit in time119890 EquivalentIMTP IMTP packing type119888 Coldℎ Hot119905 Pitch119887 Bundleℎ Heat119891 Friction119894 Inside119900 Outsideabs Absorber119871 Theoretical120587 314119904 Set pointPE Electrically groundedU1 U2 Electro phasesV1 V2 Electro phasesW1 W2 Electro phasesTK Electro phasesL1 L2 L3 Electro phases119873 Neutral phaseS1 Switch 10 1 2 3 4 Position in switch and
correctionF1 Fusion 1AC3 Analog currentX1X2 ContactorM Motor3 sim ΛΔ Three phase electro motorMAWP Maximal allowed working
pressure
References
[1] H K Fauske ldquoEmergency relief system design for reactive andnon-reactive systems extension of the DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 7 no 3 pp 153ndash158 1988
[2] J C Leung ldquoSimplified vent sizing equations for emergencyrelief requirements in reactors and storage vesselsrdquo AIChEJournal vol 32 no 10 pp 1622ndash1634 1986
[3] J C Leung H K Fauske and H G Fisher ldquoThermal runawayreactions in a low thermal inertia apparatusrdquo ThermochimicaActa vol 104 pp 13ndash29 1986
[4] R C Rosaler Standard Handbook of Plant EngineeringMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 3rd edition 2002
[5] API RP 520 Sizing Selection and Installation of Pressure Reliev-ing Devices in Refineries American Petroleum Institution 2000
[6] API STD 526 Flanged Steel Pressure Relief Valves AmericanPetroleum Institution 6th edition 2012
[7] R H Perry and D W Green Perryrsquos Chemical EngineersrsquoHandbook McGraw-Hill New York NY USA 2007
[8] J L Gustin J Fillion G Treand and K E Biyaali ldquoThe phenol+ formaldehyde runaway reaction Vent sizing for reactorprotectionrdquo Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industriesvol 6 no 2 pp 103ndash113 1993
[9] H K Fauske ldquoGeneralized vent sizing monogram for runawaychemical reactionsrdquo PlantOperations Progress vol 3 no 4 pp213ndash215 1984
[10] J F Richardson J H Harker and J R Backhurst Coulson andRichardsonrsquos Chemical Engineering Butterworth-HeinemannBoston Mass USA 2009
[11] J D Seader E J Henley and D K Roter Separation ProcessPrinciples John Wiley amp Sons New York NY USA 2010
[12] F Bleier Fan Handbook Selection Application and DesignMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 1987
[13] S A Kudchadker A P Kudchadker R C Wilhoit and B JZwolinski ldquoIdeal gas thermodynamic properties of phenol andcresolsrdquo Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data vol 7no 2 pp 417ndash423 1978
[14] I Hace ldquoComparison of concentration profiles for boundarylayers in absorption with chemical reaction processesrdquo Chemi-cal Engineering and Technology vol 29 no 5 pp 574ndash582 2006
[15] J C Leung and H K Fauske ldquoRunaway system charac-terization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 6 no 2 pp 77ndash83 1987
[16] Crane Technical Paper ldquoA Process Design Engineerrsquos Perspec-tive on Using Equivalent Lengths of Valves and Fittings inPipeline Pressure Drop Calculations 410(TP-410)rdquo 2009
[17] L W Mays Hydraulic Design Handbook McGraw-Hill NewYork NY USA 1999
[18] ldquolsquoATEXDirective 949ECrsquo on equipment and protective systemsintended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX)rdquohttpeceuropaeuenterprisesectorsmechanicaldocumentslegislationatex
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of
Journal of Industrial Engineering 7
(c) Continued
Parameter Unit ValueCentrifugal pump119871NaOH m3
sdothminus1 100 Calculated from reaction stochiometryΔ119875pump Pa 400000 DesignedVentilator fan designΔ119875Fan Pa 500 Calculated from (43)0
119881Fan m3sdothminus1 72000 Calculated from (44) and (45)
119907
119903msdotsminus1 230 Calculated from (47)
120599Fan RPM 2920 Calculated from (44) and (45)119875Fanmotor kW 34 Calculated from (46)119889Fan mm 1460 Calculated from (44) and (45)Chimney design
ℎchimney mm 6000 Obtained from literature diagramsBleier (1987) [12]
119889chimney mm 500 Obtained from literature diagramsBleier (1987) [12]
Pipe sizingPipes from blow down tank viahorizontal heat exchanger to absorberDNpipes
Blow down tank-horizontal heatexchanger mm 400 Calculated from (48)
Horizontal heat exchanger-absorber mm 400 Calculated from (48)Pipes from scrubber via pump andvertical heat exchanger to absorberDNpipes
Pipes from scrubber via pump mm 125 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
Cooling water pipesDNpipes
Main cooling water pipes mm 300 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
Cooling water pipes after crossing mm 200 Calculated from literature data Fauske(1986) Richardson et al (2009) [3]
The analytical vent sizing equation for homogeneousvessel venting is [2ndash4]
119860vent = 119898
119900sdot 119902vent
times (119866vent sdot [(119881
119898
119900
sdot
144
77816
sdot 119879 sdot
119889119875
119889119879
)
12
+(119888
119901vent sdot Δ119879vent)12
])
minus1
(3)
whereΔ119879vent = 119879119898 minus 119879119904
119863 =
radic
4 sdot 119860vent120587
119902vent =1
2
sdot 119888
119901vent sdot [(119889119879
119889119905
)
119904
+ (
119889119879
119889119905
)
119898
]
(4)
and all necessary physical and chemical data are presented asfollows
Physical-chemical parameters use for blow down systemdesign
120588liq [mol sdot dmminus3] = 13798
031598
(1+(1minus(11987969425))032768)
119888
119901liq [J sdot Kmolminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 101720 + 31761 sdot 119879
119888
119901119892[J sdot Kmolminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0434 sdot 10
5+ 2445 sdot 10
5
sdot [
1152119879
sinh [1152119879]]
2
+ 1512 sdot 10
5sdot [
507119879
cosh [507119879]]
2
8 Journal of Industrial Engineering
120578liq [Pa sdot s] = exp(minus43335 + 38817
119879
+
43983
ln (119879)+ 30548 sdot 10
24sdot 119879
minus10)
120578vap [Pa sdot s] =10094 sdot 10
minus7sdot 119879
0799
1 + 1031119879
120582vap [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0038846 sdot 119879
02392
1 + 98581119879 + 93717119879
2
120582liq [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 018837 minus 00001 sdot 119879
Δ119867evap [J sdot Kmolminus1] = 7306 sdot 107 sdot (1 minus 119879
69425
)
04246
119875vapour [Pa] = exp (95444 minus 1013
119879
minus 1009 sdot ln (119879)
+67603 sdot 10
minus18sdot 119879
6)
(5)
Formation enthalpies (Perry and Green (2007) [7])
Δ119867
119891
NaOH = minus46915 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
PhOH = minus1650 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
H2O= minus28583 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
NaPhO = minus326 kJ sdotmolminus1
120588
50wt NaOH = 1529 kg sdot Lminus1
Reaction chemistry at runaway is very complex and dependson the type of used catalyst and other process conditions [1ndash4] In present study a ldquoworst-case scenariordquo was used for thethermal runaway of reaction Design bases of (119889119879119889119905)
119898and
(119889119879119889119905)
119904were obtained from the literature [2ndash4 8] and are
presented in Table 1 Calculated vent area was compared tothe nomogram method from study by Fauske [9] and yield avent area of 0326m2 or 065m vent area pipe diameter whichis in good agreement with the calculated results Pressurerelief devices designs were made according to API RP 526standard [5] Detailed presentation of pressure relief devicesare presented in Figure 3 with main dimensions shown inTable 1 In present design it was suggested that RD is locatedbetween reactor and SRV RD protects SRV piston fromvapors and opens when tank pressure is above allowablereactor pressure Maximal pressure which appears at reactionrunaway was not known and was obtained from the literaturereported data [9] A design pressure of 221 sdot 105 Pa was usedfor system design with 20 safety factor In present study avent membrane had a pressure relief from minus075 bar to 075bar At pressures higher than 075 bar the rupture disc openedand the material was discharged into the blow down tank
3 Blow Down Tank Design
Thepurpose of the blowdown tank is to capture the twophasematerial flow from reactor and to decrease the pressure of
outflow material [9] Blow down tank design was done basedon API RP 520 standard [5] Blow down tank volume wascalculated from the reactor volume as
119881bd = 2 sdot 119881119900 (6)
and is reported in Table 1 A factor 2 in (6) was used as engi-neering safety coefficient which decreases the pressure fromreaction runaway by half It may also be called additionalsafety margin The pressure decrease in a blow down tankwas calculated by applying the ideal gas behavior at constanttemperatures as follows
119875
1sdot 119881
1
119879
1
=
119875
2sdot 119881
2
119879
2
(7)
and was 1 sdot 105 Pa The maximal allowable working pressure(MAWP) for blow down tank was calculated according toAPI RP 520 standard [5] and was 25 sdot 105 Pa MAWP washigher than peak pressure at 221 sdot 105 Pa Due to volumechange the MAWP in blow down tank will not be reachedduring reaction runaway In blow down tank a solid part oftwo phase runaway material is captured
4 Horizontal and Vertical HeatExchanger Design
Various procedures for heat exchanger design may be foundin the available literature [9 10 13] Only brief calculationprocedure is presented [5 7 10]
(i) Assume pipe diameter length inside and outsidefouling factor
(ii) For the pipe construction an INOX AISI 316 wasused with corresponding characteristics presented inTable 1
(iii) Corresponding energetic balances for horizontal andvertical heat exchanger were written as
119876 =
119876hot =
119876cold = 119888 sdot 119888119901119888 sdot (119879119888out minus 119879119888in)
=
ℎsdot 119888
119901ℎsdot (119879
ℎout minus 119879ℎin) (8)
Equation (8) enables calculation of heat duty 119902 andthe hot medium outflow temperatures and results arepresented in Table 1
(iv) The Log Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD) forcountercurrent flow was calculated by
LMTD =
(119879
ℎin minus 119879119888out) minus (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in)
ln ((119879ℎin minus 119879119888out) (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in))
(9)
(v) Based on the experiences and literature data dividedflow shell and even tube passes were assumed forboth condensers Following the procedure proposedby Richardson et al [10] parameters119877
119905 119878 and119865
119905were
obtained from the corresponding diagrams Obtainedparameters enabled calculation of mean temperaturedifference
119863119879
119898= 119865
119905sdot LMTD (10)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 9
(vi) Overall heat transfer coefficients were assumed fromthe data reported in the literature [10] within theirminimum and maximum values and were between700Wsdotm2sdotK and 1000Wsdotm2sdotK Predicted heat trans-fer coefficients enabled calculation of minimum andmaximum provisional area which were taken as aver-age for heat exchanger design
119860 =
1
2
sdot (119860min + 119860max) (11)
Nextmain parameters used for heat exchanger designwere calculated using (12)ndash(18) Pressure drops andthe heat transfer coefficients for heat exchanger werecalculated using (19)ndash(25) for the shell and tube siterespectively
Equations used for horizontal and vertical heatexchanger design are as follows
119860 =
119902
119880 sdot 119863119879
119898
(12)
119873
119905=
119860
120587 sdot 119889out sdot 119871 (13)
119901
119905= 125 sdot 119889
119900 (14)
119863
119887= 119889
119900sdot (
119873
119905
119870
1
)
11198991
(15)
119863
119878= 119863
119887+ BDC (16)
119861
119878= 04 sdot 119863
119878 (17)
119860
119878=
(119901
119905minus 119889out) sdot 119863119878 sdot 119861119878
119901
119905
(18)
119866shell =shell side flow rate
119860
119904
(19)
119889
119890=
110
119889outsdot (119901
2
119905minus 0917 sdot 119889
2
out) (20)
Re =119889
119890sdot 120583 sdot 120588
120578
(21)
Pr =120583 sdot 119888
119901
120582
(22)
Nu =ℎshell sdot 119889119890
119896
119891
(23)
Nu = 119895ℎsdot Re sdotPr13 sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
014
(24)
Δ119875shell = 8 sdot 119895119891 sdot (119863
119904
119889
119890
) sdot (
119871
119897
119861
) sdot (
120588 sdot 119906
2
119904
2
) sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus014
(25)
119897
119861=
07 sdot 119871
4
(26)
119873tpp =119873
119905
number of passes (27)
119866tube =119866in
119873tpp sdot (120587 sdot 1198892
in4) (28)
]tube =119866tube120588
119894
(29)
(vii) The heat transfer coefficient ℎtube for turbulent flowwas calculated by using next correlation
ℎtube = 0023 sdot119865
119903
119889insdot Re08 sdot Pr033 sdot (1 + 119889in
119871
) (30)
(viii) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquooutside pipes flowrdquo
119880shell = 1 times (
1
ℎshell+
1
ℎdirtout+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(31)
(ix) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquoinside pipes flowrdquo
119880tube = 1 times (
1
ℎtube+
1
ℎdirtin+
119889in119889out sdot ℎdirtout
+
119889in119889out sdot ℎshell
+
119889in sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(32)
(x) The tube-side pressure drop was calculated
Δ119875tube = (15 + 119873119905 sdot [25 +8 sdot 119895
119891sdot 119871
119889in+ (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus119898
]) sdot
120588
119894 sdot V2
2
(33)
Calculated parameters for horizontal and vertical condenserdesign are reported in Table 1
5 Vertical Heat Exchanger Design
For the vertical heat exchanger design exactly the sameprocedure as proposed for the horizontal heat exchanger wasused Firstly the amount of condensed vapor was calculatedfrom the ratio of vapor pressures at reactor release in the blowdown tank and after the volumetric expansion
119903
119888=
119901
1199041
119901
1199042
(34)
where 1199011199041
and 119901
1199042were the saturated pressures calculated
from (1) Obtained 119903
119888was used for calculation of gas flow
10 Journal of Industrial Engineering
which needs to be neutralized and cooled down in verticalheat exchanger
119866HZT = 119903
119888sdot 119866vent (35)
where 119866HZT and 119866vent are the reactor runaway flow and flowthrough horizontal condenser reported in Table 1 Calculated119866HZT flow was used for vertical condenser design at the exactsame procedure as for horizontal condenser In the next step119866HZT flow needed to be cooled down and neutralized inabsorption column using sodium hydroxide solution beforeit was left in the surrounding 119866HZT flows from blow downreactor with temperature which is equal to the temperature ofrunaway flow due to short residence time Similar predictionswere obtained at design of other blowdownprocesses [3 8 9]
All calculated parameters are presented in Table 1 During119866HZT neutralization reaction heat was formed The heatwhich needs to be cooled down was calculated as the sumof vapor gas heat and the heat produced by neutralizationreaction
119876total =
119876hot gas +
119876reaction (36)
where
119876react was calculated using reaction enthalpy as follows
119876reaction = Δ119867reaction sdot 119866HZT (37)
and the heat pro recycles using
119876recycle =
119876totalRecycle
(38)
6 Scrubber Design
Since the reaction enthalpy for the neutralization reactionof phenol acid with sodium hydroxide cannot be foundin the available literature it was calculated from formationenthalpies and was 2232 kJmol [10] Since the compositionof the blow down gas is not known exactly it was assumedthat it is composed from phenolic acid [8]The neutralizationreaction of phenolic acid with sodium hydroxide was writtenas
PhCOOH +NaOH 997888rarr PhCONa +H2O (39)
Neutralization reaction gives the stoichiometric ratio ofphenolic acid versus sodium hydroxide and enables the cal-culation of the amount of neutralization medium needed forneutralization The necessary 50wt neutralization liquidflow rate was calculated from the reaction and was 423 kgsTo decrease the necessary volume of used sodium hydroxideits recycling was assumed The recycle flow was calculatedusing
Recycle = 119866HZT119881scrubber tank
(40)
The recycle ratio gives scrubber volume of 45m3 and enablesthe calculation of the liquid and the gas flow rates used forabsorption column design Scrubber design was performedaccording to API RP 520 standard All main scrubberdimensions are presented in Table 1 MAWP of scrubber wasdesigned to be 15 sdot 105 Pa
7 Absorption Column Design
Before outflow gas from blow down system was left intosurrounding air it was neutralized by sodium hydroxidein counterflow absorption column A lot of literature forabsorption column design can be found in available literature[11 14] Due to high flow of gas and neutralization fluid thechemical reaction was the limiting step of this process Ageneralized approach proposed in the literature was used forcolumn design [7 11 14] Firstly (119871119866) sdot (120588
119866120588
119871)
12 factor wascalculated Pump characteristics limited the pressure drop inabsorption column to 110158401015840 water column per feet of packingBased on existing correlations factor (119866lowast2 sdot119865 sdot12058301)(322 sdot120588
119892sdot
(120588
119892minus 120588
119871)) was obtained to be 18 and enabled to calculate the
gas flux119866lowast A ceramic IMTP packing number 70was taken aspacking material with main parameters presented in Table 1Calculated parameters enabled to design an absorption col-umn area and diameter from the following equation
119866 = 119860 sdot 119866
lowast (41)
119860 =
120587 sdot 119863
2
4
(42)
Large absorption column diameter is a consequence of largegas flow at reaction runaway which was designed to be up to595m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 which is lower than allowed maximal liquidflow rate of 122m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 for IMTO packing number 70Next absorption column height was designed based on theprocedure proposed by Seader et al [11] and was obtained tobe 3000mm All other column parameters are presented inTable 1 and enabled to design the absorption column pressuredrop which was 30 sdot 103 Pa
8 Ventilator Fan Design
The vapor gas coming out from absorption column is mainlycomposed of different phenolic vapors which are heavierthan air therefore a ventilator fan needs to be inserted intooutflow chimney The role of the fan is to suck the vaporgas coming out from absorption column and to blow it outvia chimney into surrounding air Equations used for the fandesign are presented as follows [12]
Design equations for ventilator fan design in outflowchimney
Pressure of ventilator
Δ119875Fan = 120588 sdot 119892 sdot ℎchimney +120588 sdot V2
2
(43)
Gas vapor velocity
0
119881 Fan = 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan sdot 119860Fan (44)
where
119860Fan =120587sdot119889Fan
2
4
(45)
Ventilator motor power
119875Fan motor = 0 119881 Fan sdot Δ119875Fan (46)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 11
95
96
1 3 5
2 4 6
F5
F4F3 F2 F1
F6
Frompressuresensor
PC
CCC
M
3
M3 55 kW M3 34kW
F3 F1
1 3 5
2 4 6
C C C
M
3
Pump motor Fan motor
L1L2L3N
0
20A F20
120A
P
Figure 2 Electrical connections for pump and fan motor
Safety relief valve
Connection to pressurerelief system
Rupture disc
Connectionto reactor
Figure 3 Rupture disc and safety relief valve connection to reactor
Axial fan velocity
V119903= 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan (47)
The fan pressure and the fan capacity were designed basedon capacity of 823 kg sdot sminus1 of outcoming gas by (43)ndash(47)Radial velocity of ventilator fan speed V
119903was calculated from
(47) and clearly indicates that an axial ventilator must beapplied All main designed technical characteristics of theventilator fan are shown in Table 1 A 34 kW ventilator fanmotor with corresponding ATEX protection with II 2G EExde II B T4 code and motor thermal protection should beused since the motor is located in Ex cone According toATEX directive the electric board with all main connectionsshould be located outside Ex cone which is presented in
Figure 2 Chimney height was obtained from standards andwas approximately 6000mm All other chimney dimensionsare presented in Table 1 [4 15]
9 Blow Down and Cooling Water Pipes Design
Blow down equipment is connected using thick wall pipesmade of INOX AISI 316 due to highly corrosive mediumhigh fluid velocities and large pressures at reaction runawayFor the vent size pipes diameter design at reaction runawayfrequently used technique proposed by Bleier [12] was used
119863119873pipe = (119866
119891pipe)
12
sdot (
120588
119875
)
14
(48)
where all parameters are explained in the Nomenclature Thepipe system with 400mm pipe diameter was proposed asconnection between horizontal heat exchanger and absorp-tion column at given conditions All other data are presentedin Table 1 and Figure 2 Connection pipe system betweenreactors and blow down tank should be as short as possiblestraight with no elbows no reductions to decrease theamount of condensing flow and to prevent the appearance ofplugs which may lead to fatal accidents Additionally suchsystem configuration ensures easy maintain and fast pipecleaning In parallel the pipe pressure drops were calculatedby method proposed by Crane [16] to ensure smooth andeasy flow The pipe length was designed to be as short aspossible with minimal pressure drop which will result inlow amount of condensed fluid High fluid velocities lowfriction factors and minimal pressure drops are expectedwhich agrees with results obtained from the literature [16]For the cooling water pipes diameter and sodium hydroxidepipe diameter design a method proposed byMays [17] which
12 Journal of Industrial Engineering
is based on the steady state incompressible energy equationutilizing Hazel Williams friction loses and continuity equa-tion was used The results are presented in Table 1 and inFigure 2
10 Pump Design
Neutralization process characteristics demand 100m3sdothminus1 of50wt sodium hydroxide For this a corresponding pumpwith 55 kW electrical motor and capacity of 120m3sdothminus1 atapproximately 4sdot105 Pa is proposed A corresponding electricschema with all relevant parts is presented in Figure 2 Sincethe pump is situated in Ex cone a correct motor withmotor II 2G EEx de II B T4 code and correct connectionaccording toATEX standardmust be used [18] Electric boardwith necessary connections should be located outside theEx cone A pressure sensor (PC) is proposed on the pipefrom vertical heat exchanger to absorption column PC hastwo tasks to ensure that neutralization medium is pumpedall the time from scrubber tank on the absorption columnand to prevent the centrifugal pump running dry which canresult in pump failure and in the worst case in pump rotordamage
It needs to be mentioned that reaction mixture whichappears at reaction runaway is very viscous which mayresult in appearance of plug in designed pipes equipmentand huge pressure drops This problem will be avoided bydecreasing the connection pipe length without reductionsand low pipe elbow number Horizontal heat exchangerwhich is located above the blow down tank decreases thefluid temperature which results in fluid condensation thatis why lower amount of gas need to be neutralized inabsorption column Less required gas for neutralizationresults in lower NaOH consumption which decreases oper-ational costs of designed system Additionally horizontalheat exchanger produces huge pressure drop which results inlower gas velocities and higher gasliquid mass transfer coef-ficients which increases the efficiency of absorption columns[14]
11 Conclusions
Designed results of this study demonstrate that proposedmethod can be used for emergency relief system designBased on calculated data the following conclusions weremade
Emergency relief system for exothermic reaction forreactor volume up to 30m3 was designed A 60m3 blowdown tank with 700m3sdothminus1 of 13∘C26∘C cooling water andtwo condensersmdashhorizontal and verticalmdashwith cooling areaof 54m2 and 5m2 are proposed An absorber column withdiameter of 15m and 30m height 45m3 scrubber tankand corresponding outflow chimney were designed All othersystem parameters are presented in Table 1 It is hoped thatthe presented procedure will serve as an engineering tool foremergency relief system design in various process industriesall over the world
Nomenclature
119871 Length (m)120582
119908 Thermal conductivity
(Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1)119862
119901cold Specific heat of cold medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119862
119901hot Specific heat of hot medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
Cooling water Specific heat of cooling water(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119876 Heat transfer (W)119879hin Temperature of hot medium
(∘C)119898
119900 Reactor charge (kg)
119860 Area (m2)119881 Reactor volume (m3)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119902
119888 Heat release per unit mass cold
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119902
ℎ Heat release per unit mass hot
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119866 Discharge mass flow rate per
unit area (kgsdotm2sdotsminus1)119875 Pressure (Pa)119879 Temperature (K)119889119879119889119905 Self heat rate in runaway
reactions (Ksdotmin1)119902 Energy release rate (Jsdotkgminus1)
119876hot Heat of hot medium (W)
119876cold Heat of cold medium (W)119879
ℎout Temperature of hot medium(∘C)
LMTD Log mean temperaturedifference (∘C)
119877
119905 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119878 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119865
119905 Temperature correction factor
119879
119898 Mean temperature difference
(∘C)119880 Overall heat transfer coefficient
(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)119860 Average provisional area (m2)119873
119905 Number of tubes
119889 Pipe diameter (mm)119903 Ration Mass flow (kgsdots1)119865
119905 Friction factor
Δ119875shell Pressure drop on the shell side(Pa)
Δ119875tube Pressure drop on the tube side(Pa)
BDC Bundle diameter clearance(mm)
119908 Wall thickness (mm)119901
119905 Tube pitch (mm)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 13
119863
119887 Bundle diameter (mm)
119863
119904 Shell diameter (mm)
119861
119904 Baffle spacing (mm)
119860
119904 Area for cross-flow (m2)
119866shell Shell-side mass velocity(kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2)
119889
119890 Shell equivalent diameter (mm)
Re Reynolds numberPr Prandtl numberNu Nusselt numberℎshell Shell-side heat transfer
coefficient (Wsdotmminus2sdotK1)119895
ℎat 45 of baffle cut Shell-side heat transfer factor
119897
119887 Baffle spacing (mm)
119873tpp Number of tubes per pass119866tube Tube-side mass velocity
(kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1)119881tube Tube-side velocity (msdotsminus1)Retube Inside tube Reynolds numberPrtube Inside tube Prandtl numberNutube Inside tube Nusselt number119895
119891at 45 of baffle cut Shell side friction factor
ℎtubeside Inside heat transfer coefficient(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880i Overall heat transfer factor forinside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880o Overall heat transfer factor foroutside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880 Average heat transfer factor(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119865IMTP IMTP packing factor119871NaOH NaOH flow (m3sdoth1)Recycle Recycle of NaOH in absorber
(hminus1)119881scrubbertank Volume of scrubber tank (m3)119860abs Absorber area (m2)119863abs Absorber diameter (m)Δ119875abs Pressure drop on absorber tray
(Pa)119865IMTP IMTP packing factorIMTP packing Mark of absorber fill119873
119871 Number of theoretical plates or
traysHETP Height equivalent to the
theoretical plate (m)119867abs Height of absorption column
(m)119881bd Blow down volume (m3)119881max Maximal tank volume (m3)119902vent Heat release per unit mass at
reaction runaway (Wsdotsminus1)119888
119901 Specific heat of material
(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)(119889119879119889119905)
119898 Self heat rate at temperature
turn around or maximal overpressure defined by API RP 520during run away (Ksdotsminus1)
(119889119879119889119905)
119904 Self heat rate at set pressure of
pressure relief devices (Ksdotsminus1)
119879
119898 Temperature of reactant
correlates to the temperatureturn around or maximum overpressure defined by API RP520 during runaway (K)
119879
119904 Temperature of reactant
correlates to set pressure ofpressure relief devices (K)
Δ119879 Temperature difference (K)119905 Time (s)120578 Viscosity (Pasdots)120583 Kinematic viscosity (m2sdotsminus1)119881 Volume (m3)119863 diameter (m)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119865 Flow reduction factor119881 Voltage (V)119868 Current (A)119882 Power supply (W)GF Gas rate (m3sdothminus1)LF Liquid rate (m3sdothminus1)119888Li Liquid concentration (molsdotm3)119888gi Gas concentration (molsdotm3)119877 liquid rate to tank volume
(hminus1)0
119881Fan Ventilator fan flow (m3sdothminus1)V119903 Axial fan velocity (msdotsminus1)
Δ119875Fan Ventilator fan pressure (Pa)119875Fanmotor Ventilator motor power (W)0
119881Fan Rotational velocity ofventilator fan (RPM)
119860Fan Ventilator area (m2)119889Fan Fan diameter (mm)ℎchimney Height of outflow chimney
(mm)119892 Gravity acceleration (m2sdotsminus1)Vvapor Outflow vapor gas velocity
(msdots1)119891pipe Flow reduction factorΔ119867react Reaction enthalpy (Jsdotmol1)119866
lowast Gas flux (kgsdots1sdotm2)DN Inner diameter (m)bd Blow down119898 Pressure turnaround meanmax Maximal value119904 Relief set conditions shell119900 Initial conditionscin Cold incout Cold outabs Absorbervent VentBWG BirminghamWire Gaugedirt indirt out Coatings of dirt on the in and
out site of pipe119908 Walltube Tube sideshell Shell side119894 119895 Refers to tube and shell side119901 Specific heat
14 Journal of Industrial Engineering
1 2 3 Refers to positionS1 S2 Saturated pressure at position 1
and 2HZT Horizontalhin Hot inhout Hot outout Out sitesdot Unit in time119890 EquivalentIMTP IMTP packing type119888 Coldℎ Hot119905 Pitch119887 Bundleℎ Heat119891 Friction119894 Inside119900 Outsideabs Absorber119871 Theoretical120587 314119904 Set pointPE Electrically groundedU1 U2 Electro phasesV1 V2 Electro phasesW1 W2 Electro phasesTK Electro phasesL1 L2 L3 Electro phases119873 Neutral phaseS1 Switch 10 1 2 3 4 Position in switch and
correctionF1 Fusion 1AC3 Analog currentX1X2 ContactorM Motor3 sim ΛΔ Three phase electro motorMAWP Maximal allowed working
pressure
References
[1] H K Fauske ldquoEmergency relief system design for reactive andnon-reactive systems extension of the DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 7 no 3 pp 153ndash158 1988
[2] J C Leung ldquoSimplified vent sizing equations for emergencyrelief requirements in reactors and storage vesselsrdquo AIChEJournal vol 32 no 10 pp 1622ndash1634 1986
[3] J C Leung H K Fauske and H G Fisher ldquoThermal runawayreactions in a low thermal inertia apparatusrdquo ThermochimicaActa vol 104 pp 13ndash29 1986
[4] R C Rosaler Standard Handbook of Plant EngineeringMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 3rd edition 2002
[5] API RP 520 Sizing Selection and Installation of Pressure Reliev-ing Devices in Refineries American Petroleum Institution 2000
[6] API STD 526 Flanged Steel Pressure Relief Valves AmericanPetroleum Institution 6th edition 2012
[7] R H Perry and D W Green Perryrsquos Chemical EngineersrsquoHandbook McGraw-Hill New York NY USA 2007
[8] J L Gustin J Fillion G Treand and K E Biyaali ldquoThe phenol+ formaldehyde runaway reaction Vent sizing for reactorprotectionrdquo Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industriesvol 6 no 2 pp 103ndash113 1993
[9] H K Fauske ldquoGeneralized vent sizing monogram for runawaychemical reactionsrdquo PlantOperations Progress vol 3 no 4 pp213ndash215 1984
[10] J F Richardson J H Harker and J R Backhurst Coulson andRichardsonrsquos Chemical Engineering Butterworth-HeinemannBoston Mass USA 2009
[11] J D Seader E J Henley and D K Roter Separation ProcessPrinciples John Wiley amp Sons New York NY USA 2010
[12] F Bleier Fan Handbook Selection Application and DesignMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 1987
[13] S A Kudchadker A P Kudchadker R C Wilhoit and B JZwolinski ldquoIdeal gas thermodynamic properties of phenol andcresolsrdquo Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data vol 7no 2 pp 417ndash423 1978
[14] I Hace ldquoComparison of concentration profiles for boundarylayers in absorption with chemical reaction processesrdquo Chemi-cal Engineering and Technology vol 29 no 5 pp 574ndash582 2006
[15] J C Leung and H K Fauske ldquoRunaway system charac-terization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 6 no 2 pp 77ndash83 1987
[16] Crane Technical Paper ldquoA Process Design Engineerrsquos Perspec-tive on Using Equivalent Lengths of Valves and Fittings inPipeline Pressure Drop Calculations 410(TP-410)rdquo 2009
[17] L W Mays Hydraulic Design Handbook McGraw-Hill NewYork NY USA 1999
[18] ldquolsquoATEXDirective 949ECrsquo on equipment and protective systemsintended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX)rdquohttpeceuropaeuenterprisesectorsmechanicaldocumentslegislationatex
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of
8 Journal of Industrial Engineering
120578liq [Pa sdot s] = exp(minus43335 + 38817
119879
+
43983
ln (119879)+ 30548 sdot 10
24sdot 119879
minus10)
120578vap [Pa sdot s] =10094 sdot 10
minus7sdot 119879
0799
1 + 1031119879
120582vap [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 0038846 sdot 119879
02392
1 + 98581119879 + 93717119879
2
120582liq [W sdotmminus1 sdot Kminus1] = 018837 minus 00001 sdot 119879
Δ119867evap [J sdot Kmolminus1] = 7306 sdot 107 sdot (1 minus 119879
69425
)
04246
119875vapour [Pa] = exp (95444 minus 1013
119879
minus 1009 sdot ln (119879)
+67603 sdot 10
minus18sdot 119879
6)
(5)
Formation enthalpies (Perry and Green (2007) [7])
Δ119867
119891
NaOH = minus46915 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
PhOH = minus1650 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
H2O= minus28583 kJ sdotmolminus1
Δ119867
119891
NaPhO = minus326 kJ sdotmolminus1
120588
50wt NaOH = 1529 kg sdot Lminus1
Reaction chemistry at runaway is very complex and dependson the type of used catalyst and other process conditions [1ndash4] In present study a ldquoworst-case scenariordquo was used for thethermal runaway of reaction Design bases of (119889119879119889119905)
119898and
(119889119879119889119905)
119904were obtained from the literature [2ndash4 8] and are
presented in Table 1 Calculated vent area was compared tothe nomogram method from study by Fauske [9] and yield avent area of 0326m2 or 065m vent area pipe diameter whichis in good agreement with the calculated results Pressurerelief devices designs were made according to API RP 526standard [5] Detailed presentation of pressure relief devicesare presented in Figure 3 with main dimensions shown inTable 1 In present design it was suggested that RD is locatedbetween reactor and SRV RD protects SRV piston fromvapors and opens when tank pressure is above allowablereactor pressure Maximal pressure which appears at reactionrunaway was not known and was obtained from the literaturereported data [9] A design pressure of 221 sdot 105 Pa was usedfor system design with 20 safety factor In present study avent membrane had a pressure relief from minus075 bar to 075bar At pressures higher than 075 bar the rupture disc openedand the material was discharged into the blow down tank
3 Blow Down Tank Design
Thepurpose of the blowdown tank is to capture the twophasematerial flow from reactor and to decrease the pressure of
outflow material [9] Blow down tank design was done basedon API RP 520 standard [5] Blow down tank volume wascalculated from the reactor volume as
119881bd = 2 sdot 119881119900 (6)
and is reported in Table 1 A factor 2 in (6) was used as engi-neering safety coefficient which decreases the pressure fromreaction runaway by half It may also be called additionalsafety margin The pressure decrease in a blow down tankwas calculated by applying the ideal gas behavior at constanttemperatures as follows
119875
1sdot 119881
1
119879
1
=
119875
2sdot 119881
2
119879
2
(7)
and was 1 sdot 105 Pa The maximal allowable working pressure(MAWP) for blow down tank was calculated according toAPI RP 520 standard [5] and was 25 sdot 105 Pa MAWP washigher than peak pressure at 221 sdot 105 Pa Due to volumechange the MAWP in blow down tank will not be reachedduring reaction runaway In blow down tank a solid part oftwo phase runaway material is captured
4 Horizontal and Vertical HeatExchanger Design
Various procedures for heat exchanger design may be foundin the available literature [9 10 13] Only brief calculationprocedure is presented [5 7 10]
(i) Assume pipe diameter length inside and outsidefouling factor
(ii) For the pipe construction an INOX AISI 316 wasused with corresponding characteristics presented inTable 1
(iii) Corresponding energetic balances for horizontal andvertical heat exchanger were written as
119876 =
119876hot =
119876cold = 119888 sdot 119888119901119888 sdot (119879119888out minus 119879119888in)
=
ℎsdot 119888
119901ℎsdot (119879
ℎout minus 119879ℎin) (8)
Equation (8) enables calculation of heat duty 119902 andthe hot medium outflow temperatures and results arepresented in Table 1
(iv) The Log Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD) forcountercurrent flow was calculated by
LMTD =
(119879
ℎin minus 119879119888out) minus (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in)
ln ((119879ℎin minus 119879119888out) (119879ℎout minus 119879119888in))
(9)
(v) Based on the experiences and literature data dividedflow shell and even tube passes were assumed forboth condensers Following the procedure proposedby Richardson et al [10] parameters119877
119905 119878 and119865
119905were
obtained from the corresponding diagrams Obtainedparameters enabled calculation of mean temperaturedifference
119863119879
119898= 119865
119905sdot LMTD (10)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 9
(vi) Overall heat transfer coefficients were assumed fromthe data reported in the literature [10] within theirminimum and maximum values and were between700Wsdotm2sdotK and 1000Wsdotm2sdotK Predicted heat trans-fer coefficients enabled calculation of minimum andmaximum provisional area which were taken as aver-age for heat exchanger design
119860 =
1
2
sdot (119860min + 119860max) (11)
Nextmain parameters used for heat exchanger designwere calculated using (12)ndash(18) Pressure drops andthe heat transfer coefficients for heat exchanger werecalculated using (19)ndash(25) for the shell and tube siterespectively
Equations used for horizontal and vertical heatexchanger design are as follows
119860 =
119902
119880 sdot 119863119879
119898
(12)
119873
119905=
119860
120587 sdot 119889out sdot 119871 (13)
119901
119905= 125 sdot 119889
119900 (14)
119863
119887= 119889
119900sdot (
119873
119905
119870
1
)
11198991
(15)
119863
119878= 119863
119887+ BDC (16)
119861
119878= 04 sdot 119863
119878 (17)
119860
119878=
(119901
119905minus 119889out) sdot 119863119878 sdot 119861119878
119901
119905
(18)
119866shell =shell side flow rate
119860
119904
(19)
119889
119890=
110
119889outsdot (119901
2
119905minus 0917 sdot 119889
2
out) (20)
Re =119889
119890sdot 120583 sdot 120588
120578
(21)
Pr =120583 sdot 119888
119901
120582
(22)
Nu =ℎshell sdot 119889119890
119896
119891
(23)
Nu = 119895ℎsdot Re sdotPr13 sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
014
(24)
Δ119875shell = 8 sdot 119895119891 sdot (119863
119904
119889
119890
) sdot (
119871
119897
119861
) sdot (
120588 sdot 119906
2
119904
2
) sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus014
(25)
119897
119861=
07 sdot 119871
4
(26)
119873tpp =119873
119905
number of passes (27)
119866tube =119866in
119873tpp sdot (120587 sdot 1198892
in4) (28)
]tube =119866tube120588
119894
(29)
(vii) The heat transfer coefficient ℎtube for turbulent flowwas calculated by using next correlation
ℎtube = 0023 sdot119865
119903
119889insdot Re08 sdot Pr033 sdot (1 + 119889in
119871
) (30)
(viii) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquooutside pipes flowrdquo
119880shell = 1 times (
1
ℎshell+
1
ℎdirtout+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(31)
(ix) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquoinside pipes flowrdquo
119880tube = 1 times (
1
ℎtube+
1
ℎdirtin+
119889in119889out sdot ℎdirtout
+
119889in119889out sdot ℎshell
+
119889in sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(32)
(x) The tube-side pressure drop was calculated
Δ119875tube = (15 + 119873119905 sdot [25 +8 sdot 119895
119891sdot 119871
119889in+ (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus119898
]) sdot
120588
119894 sdot V2
2
(33)
Calculated parameters for horizontal and vertical condenserdesign are reported in Table 1
5 Vertical Heat Exchanger Design
For the vertical heat exchanger design exactly the sameprocedure as proposed for the horizontal heat exchanger wasused Firstly the amount of condensed vapor was calculatedfrom the ratio of vapor pressures at reactor release in the blowdown tank and after the volumetric expansion
119903
119888=
119901
1199041
119901
1199042
(34)
where 1199011199041
and 119901
1199042were the saturated pressures calculated
from (1) Obtained 119903
119888was used for calculation of gas flow
10 Journal of Industrial Engineering
which needs to be neutralized and cooled down in verticalheat exchanger
119866HZT = 119903
119888sdot 119866vent (35)
where 119866HZT and 119866vent are the reactor runaway flow and flowthrough horizontal condenser reported in Table 1 Calculated119866HZT flow was used for vertical condenser design at the exactsame procedure as for horizontal condenser In the next step119866HZT flow needed to be cooled down and neutralized inabsorption column using sodium hydroxide solution beforeit was left in the surrounding 119866HZT flows from blow downreactor with temperature which is equal to the temperature ofrunaway flow due to short residence time Similar predictionswere obtained at design of other blowdownprocesses [3 8 9]
All calculated parameters are presented in Table 1 During119866HZT neutralization reaction heat was formed The heatwhich needs to be cooled down was calculated as the sumof vapor gas heat and the heat produced by neutralizationreaction
119876total =
119876hot gas +
119876reaction (36)
where
119876react was calculated using reaction enthalpy as follows
119876reaction = Δ119867reaction sdot 119866HZT (37)
and the heat pro recycles using
119876recycle =
119876totalRecycle
(38)
6 Scrubber Design
Since the reaction enthalpy for the neutralization reactionof phenol acid with sodium hydroxide cannot be foundin the available literature it was calculated from formationenthalpies and was 2232 kJmol [10] Since the compositionof the blow down gas is not known exactly it was assumedthat it is composed from phenolic acid [8]The neutralizationreaction of phenolic acid with sodium hydroxide was writtenas
PhCOOH +NaOH 997888rarr PhCONa +H2O (39)
Neutralization reaction gives the stoichiometric ratio ofphenolic acid versus sodium hydroxide and enables the cal-culation of the amount of neutralization medium needed forneutralization The necessary 50wt neutralization liquidflow rate was calculated from the reaction and was 423 kgsTo decrease the necessary volume of used sodium hydroxideits recycling was assumed The recycle flow was calculatedusing
Recycle = 119866HZT119881scrubber tank
(40)
The recycle ratio gives scrubber volume of 45m3 and enablesthe calculation of the liquid and the gas flow rates used forabsorption column design Scrubber design was performedaccording to API RP 520 standard All main scrubberdimensions are presented in Table 1 MAWP of scrubber wasdesigned to be 15 sdot 105 Pa
7 Absorption Column Design
Before outflow gas from blow down system was left intosurrounding air it was neutralized by sodium hydroxidein counterflow absorption column A lot of literature forabsorption column design can be found in available literature[11 14] Due to high flow of gas and neutralization fluid thechemical reaction was the limiting step of this process Ageneralized approach proposed in the literature was used forcolumn design [7 11 14] Firstly (119871119866) sdot (120588
119866120588
119871)
12 factor wascalculated Pump characteristics limited the pressure drop inabsorption column to 110158401015840 water column per feet of packingBased on existing correlations factor (119866lowast2 sdot119865 sdot12058301)(322 sdot120588
119892sdot
(120588
119892minus 120588
119871)) was obtained to be 18 and enabled to calculate the
gas flux119866lowast A ceramic IMTP packing number 70was taken aspacking material with main parameters presented in Table 1Calculated parameters enabled to design an absorption col-umn area and diameter from the following equation
119866 = 119860 sdot 119866
lowast (41)
119860 =
120587 sdot 119863
2
4
(42)
Large absorption column diameter is a consequence of largegas flow at reaction runaway which was designed to be up to595m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 which is lower than allowed maximal liquidflow rate of 122m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 for IMTO packing number 70Next absorption column height was designed based on theprocedure proposed by Seader et al [11] and was obtained tobe 3000mm All other column parameters are presented inTable 1 and enabled to design the absorption column pressuredrop which was 30 sdot 103 Pa
8 Ventilator Fan Design
The vapor gas coming out from absorption column is mainlycomposed of different phenolic vapors which are heavierthan air therefore a ventilator fan needs to be inserted intooutflow chimney The role of the fan is to suck the vaporgas coming out from absorption column and to blow it outvia chimney into surrounding air Equations used for the fandesign are presented as follows [12]
Design equations for ventilator fan design in outflowchimney
Pressure of ventilator
Δ119875Fan = 120588 sdot 119892 sdot ℎchimney +120588 sdot V2
2
(43)
Gas vapor velocity
0
119881 Fan = 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan sdot 119860Fan (44)
where
119860Fan =120587sdot119889Fan
2
4
(45)
Ventilator motor power
119875Fan motor = 0 119881 Fan sdot Δ119875Fan (46)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 11
95
96
1 3 5
2 4 6
F5
F4F3 F2 F1
F6
Frompressuresensor
PC
CCC
M
3
M3 55 kW M3 34kW
F3 F1
1 3 5
2 4 6
C C C
M
3
Pump motor Fan motor
L1L2L3N
0
20A F20
120A
P
Figure 2 Electrical connections for pump and fan motor
Safety relief valve
Connection to pressurerelief system
Rupture disc
Connectionto reactor
Figure 3 Rupture disc and safety relief valve connection to reactor
Axial fan velocity
V119903= 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan (47)
The fan pressure and the fan capacity were designed basedon capacity of 823 kg sdot sminus1 of outcoming gas by (43)ndash(47)Radial velocity of ventilator fan speed V
119903was calculated from
(47) and clearly indicates that an axial ventilator must beapplied All main designed technical characteristics of theventilator fan are shown in Table 1 A 34 kW ventilator fanmotor with corresponding ATEX protection with II 2G EExde II B T4 code and motor thermal protection should beused since the motor is located in Ex cone According toATEX directive the electric board with all main connectionsshould be located outside Ex cone which is presented in
Figure 2 Chimney height was obtained from standards andwas approximately 6000mm All other chimney dimensionsare presented in Table 1 [4 15]
9 Blow Down and Cooling Water Pipes Design
Blow down equipment is connected using thick wall pipesmade of INOX AISI 316 due to highly corrosive mediumhigh fluid velocities and large pressures at reaction runawayFor the vent size pipes diameter design at reaction runawayfrequently used technique proposed by Bleier [12] was used
119863119873pipe = (119866
119891pipe)
12
sdot (
120588
119875
)
14
(48)
where all parameters are explained in the Nomenclature Thepipe system with 400mm pipe diameter was proposed asconnection between horizontal heat exchanger and absorp-tion column at given conditions All other data are presentedin Table 1 and Figure 2 Connection pipe system betweenreactors and blow down tank should be as short as possiblestraight with no elbows no reductions to decrease theamount of condensing flow and to prevent the appearance ofplugs which may lead to fatal accidents Additionally suchsystem configuration ensures easy maintain and fast pipecleaning In parallel the pipe pressure drops were calculatedby method proposed by Crane [16] to ensure smooth andeasy flow The pipe length was designed to be as short aspossible with minimal pressure drop which will result inlow amount of condensed fluid High fluid velocities lowfriction factors and minimal pressure drops are expectedwhich agrees with results obtained from the literature [16]For the cooling water pipes diameter and sodium hydroxidepipe diameter design a method proposed byMays [17] which
12 Journal of Industrial Engineering
is based on the steady state incompressible energy equationutilizing Hazel Williams friction loses and continuity equa-tion was used The results are presented in Table 1 and inFigure 2
10 Pump Design
Neutralization process characteristics demand 100m3sdothminus1 of50wt sodium hydroxide For this a corresponding pumpwith 55 kW electrical motor and capacity of 120m3sdothminus1 atapproximately 4sdot105 Pa is proposed A corresponding electricschema with all relevant parts is presented in Figure 2 Sincethe pump is situated in Ex cone a correct motor withmotor II 2G EEx de II B T4 code and correct connectionaccording toATEX standardmust be used [18] Electric boardwith necessary connections should be located outside theEx cone A pressure sensor (PC) is proposed on the pipefrom vertical heat exchanger to absorption column PC hastwo tasks to ensure that neutralization medium is pumpedall the time from scrubber tank on the absorption columnand to prevent the centrifugal pump running dry which canresult in pump failure and in the worst case in pump rotordamage
It needs to be mentioned that reaction mixture whichappears at reaction runaway is very viscous which mayresult in appearance of plug in designed pipes equipmentand huge pressure drops This problem will be avoided bydecreasing the connection pipe length without reductionsand low pipe elbow number Horizontal heat exchangerwhich is located above the blow down tank decreases thefluid temperature which results in fluid condensation thatis why lower amount of gas need to be neutralized inabsorption column Less required gas for neutralizationresults in lower NaOH consumption which decreases oper-ational costs of designed system Additionally horizontalheat exchanger produces huge pressure drop which results inlower gas velocities and higher gasliquid mass transfer coef-ficients which increases the efficiency of absorption columns[14]
11 Conclusions
Designed results of this study demonstrate that proposedmethod can be used for emergency relief system designBased on calculated data the following conclusions weremade
Emergency relief system for exothermic reaction forreactor volume up to 30m3 was designed A 60m3 blowdown tank with 700m3sdothminus1 of 13∘C26∘C cooling water andtwo condensersmdashhorizontal and verticalmdashwith cooling areaof 54m2 and 5m2 are proposed An absorber column withdiameter of 15m and 30m height 45m3 scrubber tankand corresponding outflow chimney were designed All othersystem parameters are presented in Table 1 It is hoped thatthe presented procedure will serve as an engineering tool foremergency relief system design in various process industriesall over the world
Nomenclature
119871 Length (m)120582
119908 Thermal conductivity
(Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1)119862
119901cold Specific heat of cold medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119862
119901hot Specific heat of hot medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
Cooling water Specific heat of cooling water(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119876 Heat transfer (W)119879hin Temperature of hot medium
(∘C)119898
119900 Reactor charge (kg)
119860 Area (m2)119881 Reactor volume (m3)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119902
119888 Heat release per unit mass cold
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119902
ℎ Heat release per unit mass hot
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119866 Discharge mass flow rate per
unit area (kgsdotm2sdotsminus1)119875 Pressure (Pa)119879 Temperature (K)119889119879119889119905 Self heat rate in runaway
reactions (Ksdotmin1)119902 Energy release rate (Jsdotkgminus1)
119876hot Heat of hot medium (W)
119876cold Heat of cold medium (W)119879
ℎout Temperature of hot medium(∘C)
LMTD Log mean temperaturedifference (∘C)
119877
119905 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119878 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119865
119905 Temperature correction factor
119879
119898 Mean temperature difference
(∘C)119880 Overall heat transfer coefficient
(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)119860 Average provisional area (m2)119873
119905 Number of tubes
119889 Pipe diameter (mm)119903 Ration Mass flow (kgsdots1)119865
119905 Friction factor
Δ119875shell Pressure drop on the shell side(Pa)
Δ119875tube Pressure drop on the tube side(Pa)
BDC Bundle diameter clearance(mm)
119908 Wall thickness (mm)119901
119905 Tube pitch (mm)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 13
119863
119887 Bundle diameter (mm)
119863
119904 Shell diameter (mm)
119861
119904 Baffle spacing (mm)
119860
119904 Area for cross-flow (m2)
119866shell Shell-side mass velocity(kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2)
119889
119890 Shell equivalent diameter (mm)
Re Reynolds numberPr Prandtl numberNu Nusselt numberℎshell Shell-side heat transfer
coefficient (Wsdotmminus2sdotK1)119895
ℎat 45 of baffle cut Shell-side heat transfer factor
119897
119887 Baffle spacing (mm)
119873tpp Number of tubes per pass119866tube Tube-side mass velocity
(kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1)119881tube Tube-side velocity (msdotsminus1)Retube Inside tube Reynolds numberPrtube Inside tube Prandtl numberNutube Inside tube Nusselt number119895
119891at 45 of baffle cut Shell side friction factor
ℎtubeside Inside heat transfer coefficient(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880i Overall heat transfer factor forinside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880o Overall heat transfer factor foroutside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880 Average heat transfer factor(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119865IMTP IMTP packing factor119871NaOH NaOH flow (m3sdoth1)Recycle Recycle of NaOH in absorber
(hminus1)119881scrubbertank Volume of scrubber tank (m3)119860abs Absorber area (m2)119863abs Absorber diameter (m)Δ119875abs Pressure drop on absorber tray
(Pa)119865IMTP IMTP packing factorIMTP packing Mark of absorber fill119873
119871 Number of theoretical plates or
traysHETP Height equivalent to the
theoretical plate (m)119867abs Height of absorption column
(m)119881bd Blow down volume (m3)119881max Maximal tank volume (m3)119902vent Heat release per unit mass at
reaction runaway (Wsdotsminus1)119888
119901 Specific heat of material
(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)(119889119879119889119905)
119898 Self heat rate at temperature
turn around or maximal overpressure defined by API RP 520during run away (Ksdotsminus1)
(119889119879119889119905)
119904 Self heat rate at set pressure of
pressure relief devices (Ksdotsminus1)
119879
119898 Temperature of reactant
correlates to the temperatureturn around or maximum overpressure defined by API RP520 during runaway (K)
119879
119904 Temperature of reactant
correlates to set pressure ofpressure relief devices (K)
Δ119879 Temperature difference (K)119905 Time (s)120578 Viscosity (Pasdots)120583 Kinematic viscosity (m2sdotsminus1)119881 Volume (m3)119863 diameter (m)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119865 Flow reduction factor119881 Voltage (V)119868 Current (A)119882 Power supply (W)GF Gas rate (m3sdothminus1)LF Liquid rate (m3sdothminus1)119888Li Liquid concentration (molsdotm3)119888gi Gas concentration (molsdotm3)119877 liquid rate to tank volume
(hminus1)0
119881Fan Ventilator fan flow (m3sdothminus1)V119903 Axial fan velocity (msdotsminus1)
Δ119875Fan Ventilator fan pressure (Pa)119875Fanmotor Ventilator motor power (W)0
119881Fan Rotational velocity ofventilator fan (RPM)
119860Fan Ventilator area (m2)119889Fan Fan diameter (mm)ℎchimney Height of outflow chimney
(mm)119892 Gravity acceleration (m2sdotsminus1)Vvapor Outflow vapor gas velocity
(msdots1)119891pipe Flow reduction factorΔ119867react Reaction enthalpy (Jsdotmol1)119866
lowast Gas flux (kgsdots1sdotm2)DN Inner diameter (m)bd Blow down119898 Pressure turnaround meanmax Maximal value119904 Relief set conditions shell119900 Initial conditionscin Cold incout Cold outabs Absorbervent VentBWG BirminghamWire Gaugedirt indirt out Coatings of dirt on the in and
out site of pipe119908 Walltube Tube sideshell Shell side119894 119895 Refers to tube and shell side119901 Specific heat
14 Journal of Industrial Engineering
1 2 3 Refers to positionS1 S2 Saturated pressure at position 1
and 2HZT Horizontalhin Hot inhout Hot outout Out sitesdot Unit in time119890 EquivalentIMTP IMTP packing type119888 Coldℎ Hot119905 Pitch119887 Bundleℎ Heat119891 Friction119894 Inside119900 Outsideabs Absorber119871 Theoretical120587 314119904 Set pointPE Electrically groundedU1 U2 Electro phasesV1 V2 Electro phasesW1 W2 Electro phasesTK Electro phasesL1 L2 L3 Electro phases119873 Neutral phaseS1 Switch 10 1 2 3 4 Position in switch and
correctionF1 Fusion 1AC3 Analog currentX1X2 ContactorM Motor3 sim ΛΔ Three phase electro motorMAWP Maximal allowed working
pressure
References
[1] H K Fauske ldquoEmergency relief system design for reactive andnon-reactive systems extension of the DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 7 no 3 pp 153ndash158 1988
[2] J C Leung ldquoSimplified vent sizing equations for emergencyrelief requirements in reactors and storage vesselsrdquo AIChEJournal vol 32 no 10 pp 1622ndash1634 1986
[3] J C Leung H K Fauske and H G Fisher ldquoThermal runawayreactions in a low thermal inertia apparatusrdquo ThermochimicaActa vol 104 pp 13ndash29 1986
[4] R C Rosaler Standard Handbook of Plant EngineeringMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 3rd edition 2002
[5] API RP 520 Sizing Selection and Installation of Pressure Reliev-ing Devices in Refineries American Petroleum Institution 2000
[6] API STD 526 Flanged Steel Pressure Relief Valves AmericanPetroleum Institution 6th edition 2012
[7] R H Perry and D W Green Perryrsquos Chemical EngineersrsquoHandbook McGraw-Hill New York NY USA 2007
[8] J L Gustin J Fillion G Treand and K E Biyaali ldquoThe phenol+ formaldehyde runaway reaction Vent sizing for reactorprotectionrdquo Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industriesvol 6 no 2 pp 103ndash113 1993
[9] H K Fauske ldquoGeneralized vent sizing monogram for runawaychemical reactionsrdquo PlantOperations Progress vol 3 no 4 pp213ndash215 1984
[10] J F Richardson J H Harker and J R Backhurst Coulson andRichardsonrsquos Chemical Engineering Butterworth-HeinemannBoston Mass USA 2009
[11] J D Seader E J Henley and D K Roter Separation ProcessPrinciples John Wiley amp Sons New York NY USA 2010
[12] F Bleier Fan Handbook Selection Application and DesignMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 1987
[13] S A Kudchadker A P Kudchadker R C Wilhoit and B JZwolinski ldquoIdeal gas thermodynamic properties of phenol andcresolsrdquo Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data vol 7no 2 pp 417ndash423 1978
[14] I Hace ldquoComparison of concentration profiles for boundarylayers in absorption with chemical reaction processesrdquo Chemi-cal Engineering and Technology vol 29 no 5 pp 574ndash582 2006
[15] J C Leung and H K Fauske ldquoRunaway system charac-terization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 6 no 2 pp 77ndash83 1987
[16] Crane Technical Paper ldquoA Process Design Engineerrsquos Perspec-tive on Using Equivalent Lengths of Valves and Fittings inPipeline Pressure Drop Calculations 410(TP-410)rdquo 2009
[17] L W Mays Hydraulic Design Handbook McGraw-Hill NewYork NY USA 1999
[18] ldquolsquoATEXDirective 949ECrsquo on equipment and protective systemsintended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX)rdquohttpeceuropaeuenterprisesectorsmechanicaldocumentslegislationatex
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of
Journal of Industrial Engineering 9
(vi) Overall heat transfer coefficients were assumed fromthe data reported in the literature [10] within theirminimum and maximum values and were between700Wsdotm2sdotK and 1000Wsdotm2sdotK Predicted heat trans-fer coefficients enabled calculation of minimum andmaximum provisional area which were taken as aver-age for heat exchanger design
119860 =
1
2
sdot (119860min + 119860max) (11)
Nextmain parameters used for heat exchanger designwere calculated using (12)ndash(18) Pressure drops andthe heat transfer coefficients for heat exchanger werecalculated using (19)ndash(25) for the shell and tube siterespectively
Equations used for horizontal and vertical heatexchanger design are as follows
119860 =
119902
119880 sdot 119863119879
119898
(12)
119873
119905=
119860
120587 sdot 119889out sdot 119871 (13)
119901
119905= 125 sdot 119889
119900 (14)
119863
119887= 119889
119900sdot (
119873
119905
119870
1
)
11198991
(15)
119863
119878= 119863
119887+ BDC (16)
119861
119878= 04 sdot 119863
119878 (17)
119860
119878=
(119901
119905minus 119889out) sdot 119863119878 sdot 119861119878
119901
119905
(18)
119866shell =shell side flow rate
119860
119904
(19)
119889
119890=
110
119889outsdot (119901
2
119905minus 0917 sdot 119889
2
out) (20)
Re =119889
119890sdot 120583 sdot 120588
120578
(21)
Pr =120583 sdot 119888
119901
120582
(22)
Nu =ℎshell sdot 119889119890
119896
119891
(23)
Nu = 119895ℎsdot Re sdotPr13 sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
014
(24)
Δ119875shell = 8 sdot 119895119891 sdot (119863
119904
119889
119890
) sdot (
119871
119897
119861
) sdot (
120588 sdot 119906
2
119904
2
) sdot (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus014
(25)
119897
119861=
07 sdot 119871
4
(26)
119873tpp =119873
119905
number of passes (27)
119866tube =119866in
119873tpp sdot (120587 sdot 1198892
in4) (28)
]tube =119866tube120588
119894
(29)
(vii) The heat transfer coefficient ℎtube for turbulent flowwas calculated by using next correlation
ℎtube = 0023 sdot119865
119903
119889insdot Re08 sdot Pr033 sdot (1 + 119889in
119871
) (30)
(viii) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquooutside pipes flowrdquo
119880shell = 1 times (
1
ℎshell+
1
ℎdirtout+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out119889in sdot ℎdirtin
+
119889out sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(31)
(ix) The overall heat transfer factor was calculated onldquoinside pipes flowrdquo
119880tube = 1 times (
1
ℎtube+
1
ℎdirtin+
119889in119889out sdot ℎdirtout
+
119889in119889out sdot ℎshell
+
119889in sdot ln (119889out119889in)2 sdot 120582
119908
)
minus1
(32)
(x) The tube-side pressure drop was calculated
Δ119875tube = (15 + 119873119905 sdot [25 +8 sdot 119895
119891sdot 119871
119889in+ (
120583
120583
119908
)
minus119898
]) sdot
120588
119894 sdot V2
2
(33)
Calculated parameters for horizontal and vertical condenserdesign are reported in Table 1
5 Vertical Heat Exchanger Design
For the vertical heat exchanger design exactly the sameprocedure as proposed for the horizontal heat exchanger wasused Firstly the amount of condensed vapor was calculatedfrom the ratio of vapor pressures at reactor release in the blowdown tank and after the volumetric expansion
119903
119888=
119901
1199041
119901
1199042
(34)
where 1199011199041
and 119901
1199042were the saturated pressures calculated
from (1) Obtained 119903
119888was used for calculation of gas flow
10 Journal of Industrial Engineering
which needs to be neutralized and cooled down in verticalheat exchanger
119866HZT = 119903
119888sdot 119866vent (35)
where 119866HZT and 119866vent are the reactor runaway flow and flowthrough horizontal condenser reported in Table 1 Calculated119866HZT flow was used for vertical condenser design at the exactsame procedure as for horizontal condenser In the next step119866HZT flow needed to be cooled down and neutralized inabsorption column using sodium hydroxide solution beforeit was left in the surrounding 119866HZT flows from blow downreactor with temperature which is equal to the temperature ofrunaway flow due to short residence time Similar predictionswere obtained at design of other blowdownprocesses [3 8 9]
All calculated parameters are presented in Table 1 During119866HZT neutralization reaction heat was formed The heatwhich needs to be cooled down was calculated as the sumof vapor gas heat and the heat produced by neutralizationreaction
119876total =
119876hot gas +
119876reaction (36)
where
119876react was calculated using reaction enthalpy as follows
119876reaction = Δ119867reaction sdot 119866HZT (37)
and the heat pro recycles using
119876recycle =
119876totalRecycle
(38)
6 Scrubber Design
Since the reaction enthalpy for the neutralization reactionof phenol acid with sodium hydroxide cannot be foundin the available literature it was calculated from formationenthalpies and was 2232 kJmol [10] Since the compositionof the blow down gas is not known exactly it was assumedthat it is composed from phenolic acid [8]The neutralizationreaction of phenolic acid with sodium hydroxide was writtenas
PhCOOH +NaOH 997888rarr PhCONa +H2O (39)
Neutralization reaction gives the stoichiometric ratio ofphenolic acid versus sodium hydroxide and enables the cal-culation of the amount of neutralization medium needed forneutralization The necessary 50wt neutralization liquidflow rate was calculated from the reaction and was 423 kgsTo decrease the necessary volume of used sodium hydroxideits recycling was assumed The recycle flow was calculatedusing
Recycle = 119866HZT119881scrubber tank
(40)
The recycle ratio gives scrubber volume of 45m3 and enablesthe calculation of the liquid and the gas flow rates used forabsorption column design Scrubber design was performedaccording to API RP 520 standard All main scrubberdimensions are presented in Table 1 MAWP of scrubber wasdesigned to be 15 sdot 105 Pa
7 Absorption Column Design
Before outflow gas from blow down system was left intosurrounding air it was neutralized by sodium hydroxidein counterflow absorption column A lot of literature forabsorption column design can be found in available literature[11 14] Due to high flow of gas and neutralization fluid thechemical reaction was the limiting step of this process Ageneralized approach proposed in the literature was used forcolumn design [7 11 14] Firstly (119871119866) sdot (120588
119866120588
119871)
12 factor wascalculated Pump characteristics limited the pressure drop inabsorption column to 110158401015840 water column per feet of packingBased on existing correlations factor (119866lowast2 sdot119865 sdot12058301)(322 sdot120588
119892sdot
(120588
119892minus 120588
119871)) was obtained to be 18 and enabled to calculate the
gas flux119866lowast A ceramic IMTP packing number 70was taken aspacking material with main parameters presented in Table 1Calculated parameters enabled to design an absorption col-umn area and diameter from the following equation
119866 = 119860 sdot 119866
lowast (41)
119860 =
120587 sdot 119863
2
4
(42)
Large absorption column diameter is a consequence of largegas flow at reaction runaway which was designed to be up to595m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 which is lower than allowed maximal liquidflow rate of 122m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 for IMTO packing number 70Next absorption column height was designed based on theprocedure proposed by Seader et al [11] and was obtained tobe 3000mm All other column parameters are presented inTable 1 and enabled to design the absorption column pressuredrop which was 30 sdot 103 Pa
8 Ventilator Fan Design
The vapor gas coming out from absorption column is mainlycomposed of different phenolic vapors which are heavierthan air therefore a ventilator fan needs to be inserted intooutflow chimney The role of the fan is to suck the vaporgas coming out from absorption column and to blow it outvia chimney into surrounding air Equations used for the fandesign are presented as follows [12]
Design equations for ventilator fan design in outflowchimney
Pressure of ventilator
Δ119875Fan = 120588 sdot 119892 sdot ℎchimney +120588 sdot V2
2
(43)
Gas vapor velocity
0
119881 Fan = 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan sdot 119860Fan (44)
where
119860Fan =120587sdot119889Fan
2
4
(45)
Ventilator motor power
119875Fan motor = 0 119881 Fan sdot Δ119875Fan (46)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 11
95
96
1 3 5
2 4 6
F5
F4F3 F2 F1
F6
Frompressuresensor
PC
CCC
M
3
M3 55 kW M3 34kW
F3 F1
1 3 5
2 4 6
C C C
M
3
Pump motor Fan motor
L1L2L3N
0
20A F20
120A
P
Figure 2 Electrical connections for pump and fan motor
Safety relief valve
Connection to pressurerelief system
Rupture disc
Connectionto reactor
Figure 3 Rupture disc and safety relief valve connection to reactor
Axial fan velocity
V119903= 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan (47)
The fan pressure and the fan capacity were designed basedon capacity of 823 kg sdot sminus1 of outcoming gas by (43)ndash(47)Radial velocity of ventilator fan speed V
119903was calculated from
(47) and clearly indicates that an axial ventilator must beapplied All main designed technical characteristics of theventilator fan are shown in Table 1 A 34 kW ventilator fanmotor with corresponding ATEX protection with II 2G EExde II B T4 code and motor thermal protection should beused since the motor is located in Ex cone According toATEX directive the electric board with all main connectionsshould be located outside Ex cone which is presented in
Figure 2 Chimney height was obtained from standards andwas approximately 6000mm All other chimney dimensionsare presented in Table 1 [4 15]
9 Blow Down and Cooling Water Pipes Design
Blow down equipment is connected using thick wall pipesmade of INOX AISI 316 due to highly corrosive mediumhigh fluid velocities and large pressures at reaction runawayFor the vent size pipes diameter design at reaction runawayfrequently used technique proposed by Bleier [12] was used
119863119873pipe = (119866
119891pipe)
12
sdot (
120588
119875
)
14
(48)
where all parameters are explained in the Nomenclature Thepipe system with 400mm pipe diameter was proposed asconnection between horizontal heat exchanger and absorp-tion column at given conditions All other data are presentedin Table 1 and Figure 2 Connection pipe system betweenreactors and blow down tank should be as short as possiblestraight with no elbows no reductions to decrease theamount of condensing flow and to prevent the appearance ofplugs which may lead to fatal accidents Additionally suchsystem configuration ensures easy maintain and fast pipecleaning In parallel the pipe pressure drops were calculatedby method proposed by Crane [16] to ensure smooth andeasy flow The pipe length was designed to be as short aspossible with minimal pressure drop which will result inlow amount of condensed fluid High fluid velocities lowfriction factors and minimal pressure drops are expectedwhich agrees with results obtained from the literature [16]For the cooling water pipes diameter and sodium hydroxidepipe diameter design a method proposed byMays [17] which
12 Journal of Industrial Engineering
is based on the steady state incompressible energy equationutilizing Hazel Williams friction loses and continuity equa-tion was used The results are presented in Table 1 and inFigure 2
10 Pump Design
Neutralization process characteristics demand 100m3sdothminus1 of50wt sodium hydroxide For this a corresponding pumpwith 55 kW electrical motor and capacity of 120m3sdothminus1 atapproximately 4sdot105 Pa is proposed A corresponding electricschema with all relevant parts is presented in Figure 2 Sincethe pump is situated in Ex cone a correct motor withmotor II 2G EEx de II B T4 code and correct connectionaccording toATEX standardmust be used [18] Electric boardwith necessary connections should be located outside theEx cone A pressure sensor (PC) is proposed on the pipefrom vertical heat exchanger to absorption column PC hastwo tasks to ensure that neutralization medium is pumpedall the time from scrubber tank on the absorption columnand to prevent the centrifugal pump running dry which canresult in pump failure and in the worst case in pump rotordamage
It needs to be mentioned that reaction mixture whichappears at reaction runaway is very viscous which mayresult in appearance of plug in designed pipes equipmentand huge pressure drops This problem will be avoided bydecreasing the connection pipe length without reductionsand low pipe elbow number Horizontal heat exchangerwhich is located above the blow down tank decreases thefluid temperature which results in fluid condensation thatis why lower amount of gas need to be neutralized inabsorption column Less required gas for neutralizationresults in lower NaOH consumption which decreases oper-ational costs of designed system Additionally horizontalheat exchanger produces huge pressure drop which results inlower gas velocities and higher gasliquid mass transfer coef-ficients which increases the efficiency of absorption columns[14]
11 Conclusions
Designed results of this study demonstrate that proposedmethod can be used for emergency relief system designBased on calculated data the following conclusions weremade
Emergency relief system for exothermic reaction forreactor volume up to 30m3 was designed A 60m3 blowdown tank with 700m3sdothminus1 of 13∘C26∘C cooling water andtwo condensersmdashhorizontal and verticalmdashwith cooling areaof 54m2 and 5m2 are proposed An absorber column withdiameter of 15m and 30m height 45m3 scrubber tankand corresponding outflow chimney were designed All othersystem parameters are presented in Table 1 It is hoped thatthe presented procedure will serve as an engineering tool foremergency relief system design in various process industriesall over the world
Nomenclature
119871 Length (m)120582
119908 Thermal conductivity
(Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1)119862
119901cold Specific heat of cold medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119862
119901hot Specific heat of hot medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
Cooling water Specific heat of cooling water(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119876 Heat transfer (W)119879hin Temperature of hot medium
(∘C)119898
119900 Reactor charge (kg)
119860 Area (m2)119881 Reactor volume (m3)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119902
119888 Heat release per unit mass cold
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119902
ℎ Heat release per unit mass hot
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119866 Discharge mass flow rate per
unit area (kgsdotm2sdotsminus1)119875 Pressure (Pa)119879 Temperature (K)119889119879119889119905 Self heat rate in runaway
reactions (Ksdotmin1)119902 Energy release rate (Jsdotkgminus1)
119876hot Heat of hot medium (W)
119876cold Heat of cold medium (W)119879
ℎout Temperature of hot medium(∘C)
LMTD Log mean temperaturedifference (∘C)
119877
119905 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119878 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119865
119905 Temperature correction factor
119879
119898 Mean temperature difference
(∘C)119880 Overall heat transfer coefficient
(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)119860 Average provisional area (m2)119873
119905 Number of tubes
119889 Pipe diameter (mm)119903 Ration Mass flow (kgsdots1)119865
119905 Friction factor
Δ119875shell Pressure drop on the shell side(Pa)
Δ119875tube Pressure drop on the tube side(Pa)
BDC Bundle diameter clearance(mm)
119908 Wall thickness (mm)119901
119905 Tube pitch (mm)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 13
119863
119887 Bundle diameter (mm)
119863
119904 Shell diameter (mm)
119861
119904 Baffle spacing (mm)
119860
119904 Area for cross-flow (m2)
119866shell Shell-side mass velocity(kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2)
119889
119890 Shell equivalent diameter (mm)
Re Reynolds numberPr Prandtl numberNu Nusselt numberℎshell Shell-side heat transfer
coefficient (Wsdotmminus2sdotK1)119895
ℎat 45 of baffle cut Shell-side heat transfer factor
119897
119887 Baffle spacing (mm)
119873tpp Number of tubes per pass119866tube Tube-side mass velocity
(kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1)119881tube Tube-side velocity (msdotsminus1)Retube Inside tube Reynolds numberPrtube Inside tube Prandtl numberNutube Inside tube Nusselt number119895
119891at 45 of baffle cut Shell side friction factor
ℎtubeside Inside heat transfer coefficient(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880i Overall heat transfer factor forinside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880o Overall heat transfer factor foroutside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880 Average heat transfer factor(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119865IMTP IMTP packing factor119871NaOH NaOH flow (m3sdoth1)Recycle Recycle of NaOH in absorber
(hminus1)119881scrubbertank Volume of scrubber tank (m3)119860abs Absorber area (m2)119863abs Absorber diameter (m)Δ119875abs Pressure drop on absorber tray
(Pa)119865IMTP IMTP packing factorIMTP packing Mark of absorber fill119873
119871 Number of theoretical plates or
traysHETP Height equivalent to the
theoretical plate (m)119867abs Height of absorption column
(m)119881bd Blow down volume (m3)119881max Maximal tank volume (m3)119902vent Heat release per unit mass at
reaction runaway (Wsdotsminus1)119888
119901 Specific heat of material
(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)(119889119879119889119905)
119898 Self heat rate at temperature
turn around or maximal overpressure defined by API RP 520during run away (Ksdotsminus1)
(119889119879119889119905)
119904 Self heat rate at set pressure of
pressure relief devices (Ksdotsminus1)
119879
119898 Temperature of reactant
correlates to the temperatureturn around or maximum overpressure defined by API RP520 during runaway (K)
119879
119904 Temperature of reactant
correlates to set pressure ofpressure relief devices (K)
Δ119879 Temperature difference (K)119905 Time (s)120578 Viscosity (Pasdots)120583 Kinematic viscosity (m2sdotsminus1)119881 Volume (m3)119863 diameter (m)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119865 Flow reduction factor119881 Voltage (V)119868 Current (A)119882 Power supply (W)GF Gas rate (m3sdothminus1)LF Liquid rate (m3sdothminus1)119888Li Liquid concentration (molsdotm3)119888gi Gas concentration (molsdotm3)119877 liquid rate to tank volume
(hminus1)0
119881Fan Ventilator fan flow (m3sdothminus1)V119903 Axial fan velocity (msdotsminus1)
Δ119875Fan Ventilator fan pressure (Pa)119875Fanmotor Ventilator motor power (W)0
119881Fan Rotational velocity ofventilator fan (RPM)
119860Fan Ventilator area (m2)119889Fan Fan diameter (mm)ℎchimney Height of outflow chimney
(mm)119892 Gravity acceleration (m2sdotsminus1)Vvapor Outflow vapor gas velocity
(msdots1)119891pipe Flow reduction factorΔ119867react Reaction enthalpy (Jsdotmol1)119866
lowast Gas flux (kgsdots1sdotm2)DN Inner diameter (m)bd Blow down119898 Pressure turnaround meanmax Maximal value119904 Relief set conditions shell119900 Initial conditionscin Cold incout Cold outabs Absorbervent VentBWG BirminghamWire Gaugedirt indirt out Coatings of dirt on the in and
out site of pipe119908 Walltube Tube sideshell Shell side119894 119895 Refers to tube and shell side119901 Specific heat
14 Journal of Industrial Engineering
1 2 3 Refers to positionS1 S2 Saturated pressure at position 1
and 2HZT Horizontalhin Hot inhout Hot outout Out sitesdot Unit in time119890 EquivalentIMTP IMTP packing type119888 Coldℎ Hot119905 Pitch119887 Bundleℎ Heat119891 Friction119894 Inside119900 Outsideabs Absorber119871 Theoretical120587 314119904 Set pointPE Electrically groundedU1 U2 Electro phasesV1 V2 Electro phasesW1 W2 Electro phasesTK Electro phasesL1 L2 L3 Electro phases119873 Neutral phaseS1 Switch 10 1 2 3 4 Position in switch and
correctionF1 Fusion 1AC3 Analog currentX1X2 ContactorM Motor3 sim ΛΔ Three phase electro motorMAWP Maximal allowed working
pressure
References
[1] H K Fauske ldquoEmergency relief system design for reactive andnon-reactive systems extension of the DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 7 no 3 pp 153ndash158 1988
[2] J C Leung ldquoSimplified vent sizing equations for emergencyrelief requirements in reactors and storage vesselsrdquo AIChEJournal vol 32 no 10 pp 1622ndash1634 1986
[3] J C Leung H K Fauske and H G Fisher ldquoThermal runawayreactions in a low thermal inertia apparatusrdquo ThermochimicaActa vol 104 pp 13ndash29 1986
[4] R C Rosaler Standard Handbook of Plant EngineeringMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 3rd edition 2002
[5] API RP 520 Sizing Selection and Installation of Pressure Reliev-ing Devices in Refineries American Petroleum Institution 2000
[6] API STD 526 Flanged Steel Pressure Relief Valves AmericanPetroleum Institution 6th edition 2012
[7] R H Perry and D W Green Perryrsquos Chemical EngineersrsquoHandbook McGraw-Hill New York NY USA 2007
[8] J L Gustin J Fillion G Treand and K E Biyaali ldquoThe phenol+ formaldehyde runaway reaction Vent sizing for reactorprotectionrdquo Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industriesvol 6 no 2 pp 103ndash113 1993
[9] H K Fauske ldquoGeneralized vent sizing monogram for runawaychemical reactionsrdquo PlantOperations Progress vol 3 no 4 pp213ndash215 1984
[10] J F Richardson J H Harker and J R Backhurst Coulson andRichardsonrsquos Chemical Engineering Butterworth-HeinemannBoston Mass USA 2009
[11] J D Seader E J Henley and D K Roter Separation ProcessPrinciples John Wiley amp Sons New York NY USA 2010
[12] F Bleier Fan Handbook Selection Application and DesignMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 1987
[13] S A Kudchadker A P Kudchadker R C Wilhoit and B JZwolinski ldquoIdeal gas thermodynamic properties of phenol andcresolsrdquo Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data vol 7no 2 pp 417ndash423 1978
[14] I Hace ldquoComparison of concentration profiles for boundarylayers in absorption with chemical reaction processesrdquo Chemi-cal Engineering and Technology vol 29 no 5 pp 574ndash582 2006
[15] J C Leung and H K Fauske ldquoRunaway system charac-terization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 6 no 2 pp 77ndash83 1987
[16] Crane Technical Paper ldquoA Process Design Engineerrsquos Perspec-tive on Using Equivalent Lengths of Valves and Fittings inPipeline Pressure Drop Calculations 410(TP-410)rdquo 2009
[17] L W Mays Hydraulic Design Handbook McGraw-Hill NewYork NY USA 1999
[18] ldquolsquoATEXDirective 949ECrsquo on equipment and protective systemsintended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX)rdquohttpeceuropaeuenterprisesectorsmechanicaldocumentslegislationatex
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of
10 Journal of Industrial Engineering
which needs to be neutralized and cooled down in verticalheat exchanger
119866HZT = 119903
119888sdot 119866vent (35)
where 119866HZT and 119866vent are the reactor runaway flow and flowthrough horizontal condenser reported in Table 1 Calculated119866HZT flow was used for vertical condenser design at the exactsame procedure as for horizontal condenser In the next step119866HZT flow needed to be cooled down and neutralized inabsorption column using sodium hydroxide solution beforeit was left in the surrounding 119866HZT flows from blow downreactor with temperature which is equal to the temperature ofrunaway flow due to short residence time Similar predictionswere obtained at design of other blowdownprocesses [3 8 9]
All calculated parameters are presented in Table 1 During119866HZT neutralization reaction heat was formed The heatwhich needs to be cooled down was calculated as the sumof vapor gas heat and the heat produced by neutralizationreaction
119876total =
119876hot gas +
119876reaction (36)
where
119876react was calculated using reaction enthalpy as follows
119876reaction = Δ119867reaction sdot 119866HZT (37)
and the heat pro recycles using
119876recycle =
119876totalRecycle
(38)
6 Scrubber Design
Since the reaction enthalpy for the neutralization reactionof phenol acid with sodium hydroxide cannot be foundin the available literature it was calculated from formationenthalpies and was 2232 kJmol [10] Since the compositionof the blow down gas is not known exactly it was assumedthat it is composed from phenolic acid [8]The neutralizationreaction of phenolic acid with sodium hydroxide was writtenas
PhCOOH +NaOH 997888rarr PhCONa +H2O (39)
Neutralization reaction gives the stoichiometric ratio ofphenolic acid versus sodium hydroxide and enables the cal-culation of the amount of neutralization medium needed forneutralization The necessary 50wt neutralization liquidflow rate was calculated from the reaction and was 423 kgsTo decrease the necessary volume of used sodium hydroxideits recycling was assumed The recycle flow was calculatedusing
Recycle = 119866HZT119881scrubber tank
(40)
The recycle ratio gives scrubber volume of 45m3 and enablesthe calculation of the liquid and the gas flow rates used forabsorption column design Scrubber design was performedaccording to API RP 520 standard All main scrubberdimensions are presented in Table 1 MAWP of scrubber wasdesigned to be 15 sdot 105 Pa
7 Absorption Column Design
Before outflow gas from blow down system was left intosurrounding air it was neutralized by sodium hydroxidein counterflow absorption column A lot of literature forabsorption column design can be found in available literature[11 14] Due to high flow of gas and neutralization fluid thechemical reaction was the limiting step of this process Ageneralized approach proposed in the literature was used forcolumn design [7 11 14] Firstly (119871119866) sdot (120588
119866120588
119871)
12 factor wascalculated Pump characteristics limited the pressure drop inabsorption column to 110158401015840 water column per feet of packingBased on existing correlations factor (119866lowast2 sdot119865 sdot12058301)(322 sdot120588
119892sdot
(120588
119892minus 120588
119871)) was obtained to be 18 and enabled to calculate the
gas flux119866lowast A ceramic IMTP packing number 70was taken aspacking material with main parameters presented in Table 1Calculated parameters enabled to design an absorption col-umn area and diameter from the following equation
119866 = 119860 sdot 119866
lowast (41)
119860 =
120587 sdot 119863
2
4
(42)
Large absorption column diameter is a consequence of largegas flow at reaction runaway which was designed to be up to595m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 which is lower than allowed maximal liquidflow rate of 122m3sdothminus1sdotmminus2 for IMTO packing number 70Next absorption column height was designed based on theprocedure proposed by Seader et al [11] and was obtained tobe 3000mm All other column parameters are presented inTable 1 and enabled to design the absorption column pressuredrop which was 30 sdot 103 Pa
8 Ventilator Fan Design
The vapor gas coming out from absorption column is mainlycomposed of different phenolic vapors which are heavierthan air therefore a ventilator fan needs to be inserted intooutflow chimney The role of the fan is to suck the vaporgas coming out from absorption column and to blow it outvia chimney into surrounding air Equations used for the fandesign are presented as follows [12]
Design equations for ventilator fan design in outflowchimney
Pressure of ventilator
Δ119875Fan = 120588 sdot 119892 sdot ℎchimney +120588 sdot V2
2
(43)
Gas vapor velocity
0
119881 Fan = 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan sdot 119860Fan (44)
where
119860Fan =120587sdot119889Fan
2
4
(45)
Ventilator motor power
119875Fan motor = 0 119881 Fan sdot Δ119875Fan (46)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 11
95
96
1 3 5
2 4 6
F5
F4F3 F2 F1
F6
Frompressuresensor
PC
CCC
M
3
M3 55 kW M3 34kW
F3 F1
1 3 5
2 4 6
C C C
M
3
Pump motor Fan motor
L1L2L3N
0
20A F20
120A
P
Figure 2 Electrical connections for pump and fan motor
Safety relief valve
Connection to pressurerelief system
Rupture disc
Connectionto reactor
Figure 3 Rupture disc and safety relief valve connection to reactor
Axial fan velocity
V119903= 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan (47)
The fan pressure and the fan capacity were designed basedon capacity of 823 kg sdot sminus1 of outcoming gas by (43)ndash(47)Radial velocity of ventilator fan speed V
119903was calculated from
(47) and clearly indicates that an axial ventilator must beapplied All main designed technical characteristics of theventilator fan are shown in Table 1 A 34 kW ventilator fanmotor with corresponding ATEX protection with II 2G EExde II B T4 code and motor thermal protection should beused since the motor is located in Ex cone According toATEX directive the electric board with all main connectionsshould be located outside Ex cone which is presented in
Figure 2 Chimney height was obtained from standards andwas approximately 6000mm All other chimney dimensionsare presented in Table 1 [4 15]
9 Blow Down and Cooling Water Pipes Design
Blow down equipment is connected using thick wall pipesmade of INOX AISI 316 due to highly corrosive mediumhigh fluid velocities and large pressures at reaction runawayFor the vent size pipes diameter design at reaction runawayfrequently used technique proposed by Bleier [12] was used
119863119873pipe = (119866
119891pipe)
12
sdot (
120588
119875
)
14
(48)
where all parameters are explained in the Nomenclature Thepipe system with 400mm pipe diameter was proposed asconnection between horizontal heat exchanger and absorp-tion column at given conditions All other data are presentedin Table 1 and Figure 2 Connection pipe system betweenreactors and blow down tank should be as short as possiblestraight with no elbows no reductions to decrease theamount of condensing flow and to prevent the appearance ofplugs which may lead to fatal accidents Additionally suchsystem configuration ensures easy maintain and fast pipecleaning In parallel the pipe pressure drops were calculatedby method proposed by Crane [16] to ensure smooth andeasy flow The pipe length was designed to be as short aspossible with minimal pressure drop which will result inlow amount of condensed fluid High fluid velocities lowfriction factors and minimal pressure drops are expectedwhich agrees with results obtained from the literature [16]For the cooling water pipes diameter and sodium hydroxidepipe diameter design a method proposed byMays [17] which
12 Journal of Industrial Engineering
is based on the steady state incompressible energy equationutilizing Hazel Williams friction loses and continuity equa-tion was used The results are presented in Table 1 and inFigure 2
10 Pump Design
Neutralization process characteristics demand 100m3sdothminus1 of50wt sodium hydroxide For this a corresponding pumpwith 55 kW electrical motor and capacity of 120m3sdothminus1 atapproximately 4sdot105 Pa is proposed A corresponding electricschema with all relevant parts is presented in Figure 2 Sincethe pump is situated in Ex cone a correct motor withmotor II 2G EEx de II B T4 code and correct connectionaccording toATEX standardmust be used [18] Electric boardwith necessary connections should be located outside theEx cone A pressure sensor (PC) is proposed on the pipefrom vertical heat exchanger to absorption column PC hastwo tasks to ensure that neutralization medium is pumpedall the time from scrubber tank on the absorption columnand to prevent the centrifugal pump running dry which canresult in pump failure and in the worst case in pump rotordamage
It needs to be mentioned that reaction mixture whichappears at reaction runaway is very viscous which mayresult in appearance of plug in designed pipes equipmentand huge pressure drops This problem will be avoided bydecreasing the connection pipe length without reductionsand low pipe elbow number Horizontal heat exchangerwhich is located above the blow down tank decreases thefluid temperature which results in fluid condensation thatis why lower amount of gas need to be neutralized inabsorption column Less required gas for neutralizationresults in lower NaOH consumption which decreases oper-ational costs of designed system Additionally horizontalheat exchanger produces huge pressure drop which results inlower gas velocities and higher gasliquid mass transfer coef-ficients which increases the efficiency of absorption columns[14]
11 Conclusions
Designed results of this study demonstrate that proposedmethod can be used for emergency relief system designBased on calculated data the following conclusions weremade
Emergency relief system for exothermic reaction forreactor volume up to 30m3 was designed A 60m3 blowdown tank with 700m3sdothminus1 of 13∘C26∘C cooling water andtwo condensersmdashhorizontal and verticalmdashwith cooling areaof 54m2 and 5m2 are proposed An absorber column withdiameter of 15m and 30m height 45m3 scrubber tankand corresponding outflow chimney were designed All othersystem parameters are presented in Table 1 It is hoped thatthe presented procedure will serve as an engineering tool foremergency relief system design in various process industriesall over the world
Nomenclature
119871 Length (m)120582
119908 Thermal conductivity
(Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1)119862
119901cold Specific heat of cold medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119862
119901hot Specific heat of hot medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
Cooling water Specific heat of cooling water(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119876 Heat transfer (W)119879hin Temperature of hot medium
(∘C)119898
119900 Reactor charge (kg)
119860 Area (m2)119881 Reactor volume (m3)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119902
119888 Heat release per unit mass cold
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119902
ℎ Heat release per unit mass hot
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119866 Discharge mass flow rate per
unit area (kgsdotm2sdotsminus1)119875 Pressure (Pa)119879 Temperature (K)119889119879119889119905 Self heat rate in runaway
reactions (Ksdotmin1)119902 Energy release rate (Jsdotkgminus1)
119876hot Heat of hot medium (W)
119876cold Heat of cold medium (W)119879
ℎout Temperature of hot medium(∘C)
LMTD Log mean temperaturedifference (∘C)
119877
119905 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119878 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119865
119905 Temperature correction factor
119879
119898 Mean temperature difference
(∘C)119880 Overall heat transfer coefficient
(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)119860 Average provisional area (m2)119873
119905 Number of tubes
119889 Pipe diameter (mm)119903 Ration Mass flow (kgsdots1)119865
119905 Friction factor
Δ119875shell Pressure drop on the shell side(Pa)
Δ119875tube Pressure drop on the tube side(Pa)
BDC Bundle diameter clearance(mm)
119908 Wall thickness (mm)119901
119905 Tube pitch (mm)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 13
119863
119887 Bundle diameter (mm)
119863
119904 Shell diameter (mm)
119861
119904 Baffle spacing (mm)
119860
119904 Area for cross-flow (m2)
119866shell Shell-side mass velocity(kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2)
119889
119890 Shell equivalent diameter (mm)
Re Reynolds numberPr Prandtl numberNu Nusselt numberℎshell Shell-side heat transfer
coefficient (Wsdotmminus2sdotK1)119895
ℎat 45 of baffle cut Shell-side heat transfer factor
119897
119887 Baffle spacing (mm)
119873tpp Number of tubes per pass119866tube Tube-side mass velocity
(kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1)119881tube Tube-side velocity (msdotsminus1)Retube Inside tube Reynolds numberPrtube Inside tube Prandtl numberNutube Inside tube Nusselt number119895
119891at 45 of baffle cut Shell side friction factor
ℎtubeside Inside heat transfer coefficient(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880i Overall heat transfer factor forinside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880o Overall heat transfer factor foroutside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880 Average heat transfer factor(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119865IMTP IMTP packing factor119871NaOH NaOH flow (m3sdoth1)Recycle Recycle of NaOH in absorber
(hminus1)119881scrubbertank Volume of scrubber tank (m3)119860abs Absorber area (m2)119863abs Absorber diameter (m)Δ119875abs Pressure drop on absorber tray
(Pa)119865IMTP IMTP packing factorIMTP packing Mark of absorber fill119873
119871 Number of theoretical plates or
traysHETP Height equivalent to the
theoretical plate (m)119867abs Height of absorption column
(m)119881bd Blow down volume (m3)119881max Maximal tank volume (m3)119902vent Heat release per unit mass at
reaction runaway (Wsdotsminus1)119888
119901 Specific heat of material
(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)(119889119879119889119905)
119898 Self heat rate at temperature
turn around or maximal overpressure defined by API RP 520during run away (Ksdotsminus1)
(119889119879119889119905)
119904 Self heat rate at set pressure of
pressure relief devices (Ksdotsminus1)
119879
119898 Temperature of reactant
correlates to the temperatureturn around or maximum overpressure defined by API RP520 during runaway (K)
119879
119904 Temperature of reactant
correlates to set pressure ofpressure relief devices (K)
Δ119879 Temperature difference (K)119905 Time (s)120578 Viscosity (Pasdots)120583 Kinematic viscosity (m2sdotsminus1)119881 Volume (m3)119863 diameter (m)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119865 Flow reduction factor119881 Voltage (V)119868 Current (A)119882 Power supply (W)GF Gas rate (m3sdothminus1)LF Liquid rate (m3sdothminus1)119888Li Liquid concentration (molsdotm3)119888gi Gas concentration (molsdotm3)119877 liquid rate to tank volume
(hminus1)0
119881Fan Ventilator fan flow (m3sdothminus1)V119903 Axial fan velocity (msdotsminus1)
Δ119875Fan Ventilator fan pressure (Pa)119875Fanmotor Ventilator motor power (W)0
119881Fan Rotational velocity ofventilator fan (RPM)
119860Fan Ventilator area (m2)119889Fan Fan diameter (mm)ℎchimney Height of outflow chimney
(mm)119892 Gravity acceleration (m2sdotsminus1)Vvapor Outflow vapor gas velocity
(msdots1)119891pipe Flow reduction factorΔ119867react Reaction enthalpy (Jsdotmol1)119866
lowast Gas flux (kgsdots1sdotm2)DN Inner diameter (m)bd Blow down119898 Pressure turnaround meanmax Maximal value119904 Relief set conditions shell119900 Initial conditionscin Cold incout Cold outabs Absorbervent VentBWG BirminghamWire Gaugedirt indirt out Coatings of dirt on the in and
out site of pipe119908 Walltube Tube sideshell Shell side119894 119895 Refers to tube and shell side119901 Specific heat
14 Journal of Industrial Engineering
1 2 3 Refers to positionS1 S2 Saturated pressure at position 1
and 2HZT Horizontalhin Hot inhout Hot outout Out sitesdot Unit in time119890 EquivalentIMTP IMTP packing type119888 Coldℎ Hot119905 Pitch119887 Bundleℎ Heat119891 Friction119894 Inside119900 Outsideabs Absorber119871 Theoretical120587 314119904 Set pointPE Electrically groundedU1 U2 Electro phasesV1 V2 Electro phasesW1 W2 Electro phasesTK Electro phasesL1 L2 L3 Electro phases119873 Neutral phaseS1 Switch 10 1 2 3 4 Position in switch and
correctionF1 Fusion 1AC3 Analog currentX1X2 ContactorM Motor3 sim ΛΔ Three phase electro motorMAWP Maximal allowed working
pressure
References
[1] H K Fauske ldquoEmergency relief system design for reactive andnon-reactive systems extension of the DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 7 no 3 pp 153ndash158 1988
[2] J C Leung ldquoSimplified vent sizing equations for emergencyrelief requirements in reactors and storage vesselsrdquo AIChEJournal vol 32 no 10 pp 1622ndash1634 1986
[3] J C Leung H K Fauske and H G Fisher ldquoThermal runawayreactions in a low thermal inertia apparatusrdquo ThermochimicaActa vol 104 pp 13ndash29 1986
[4] R C Rosaler Standard Handbook of Plant EngineeringMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 3rd edition 2002
[5] API RP 520 Sizing Selection and Installation of Pressure Reliev-ing Devices in Refineries American Petroleum Institution 2000
[6] API STD 526 Flanged Steel Pressure Relief Valves AmericanPetroleum Institution 6th edition 2012
[7] R H Perry and D W Green Perryrsquos Chemical EngineersrsquoHandbook McGraw-Hill New York NY USA 2007
[8] J L Gustin J Fillion G Treand and K E Biyaali ldquoThe phenol+ formaldehyde runaway reaction Vent sizing for reactorprotectionrdquo Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industriesvol 6 no 2 pp 103ndash113 1993
[9] H K Fauske ldquoGeneralized vent sizing monogram for runawaychemical reactionsrdquo PlantOperations Progress vol 3 no 4 pp213ndash215 1984
[10] J F Richardson J H Harker and J R Backhurst Coulson andRichardsonrsquos Chemical Engineering Butterworth-HeinemannBoston Mass USA 2009
[11] J D Seader E J Henley and D K Roter Separation ProcessPrinciples John Wiley amp Sons New York NY USA 2010
[12] F Bleier Fan Handbook Selection Application and DesignMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 1987
[13] S A Kudchadker A P Kudchadker R C Wilhoit and B JZwolinski ldquoIdeal gas thermodynamic properties of phenol andcresolsrdquo Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data vol 7no 2 pp 417ndash423 1978
[14] I Hace ldquoComparison of concentration profiles for boundarylayers in absorption with chemical reaction processesrdquo Chemi-cal Engineering and Technology vol 29 no 5 pp 574ndash582 2006
[15] J C Leung and H K Fauske ldquoRunaway system charac-terization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 6 no 2 pp 77ndash83 1987
[16] Crane Technical Paper ldquoA Process Design Engineerrsquos Perspec-tive on Using Equivalent Lengths of Valves and Fittings inPipeline Pressure Drop Calculations 410(TP-410)rdquo 2009
[17] L W Mays Hydraulic Design Handbook McGraw-Hill NewYork NY USA 1999
[18] ldquolsquoATEXDirective 949ECrsquo on equipment and protective systemsintended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX)rdquohttpeceuropaeuenterprisesectorsmechanicaldocumentslegislationatex
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of
Journal of Industrial Engineering 11
95
96
1 3 5
2 4 6
F5
F4F3 F2 F1
F6
Frompressuresensor
PC
CCC
M
3
M3 55 kW M3 34kW
F3 F1
1 3 5
2 4 6
C C C
M
3
Pump motor Fan motor
L1L2L3N
0
20A F20
120A
P
Figure 2 Electrical connections for pump and fan motor
Safety relief valve
Connection to pressurerelief system
Rupture disc
Connectionto reactor
Figure 3 Rupture disc and safety relief valve connection to reactor
Axial fan velocity
V119903= 120587 sdot 119889Fan sdot 120599Fan (47)
The fan pressure and the fan capacity were designed basedon capacity of 823 kg sdot sminus1 of outcoming gas by (43)ndash(47)Radial velocity of ventilator fan speed V
119903was calculated from
(47) and clearly indicates that an axial ventilator must beapplied All main designed technical characteristics of theventilator fan are shown in Table 1 A 34 kW ventilator fanmotor with corresponding ATEX protection with II 2G EExde II B T4 code and motor thermal protection should beused since the motor is located in Ex cone According toATEX directive the electric board with all main connectionsshould be located outside Ex cone which is presented in
Figure 2 Chimney height was obtained from standards andwas approximately 6000mm All other chimney dimensionsare presented in Table 1 [4 15]
9 Blow Down and Cooling Water Pipes Design
Blow down equipment is connected using thick wall pipesmade of INOX AISI 316 due to highly corrosive mediumhigh fluid velocities and large pressures at reaction runawayFor the vent size pipes diameter design at reaction runawayfrequently used technique proposed by Bleier [12] was used
119863119873pipe = (119866
119891pipe)
12
sdot (
120588
119875
)
14
(48)
where all parameters are explained in the Nomenclature Thepipe system with 400mm pipe diameter was proposed asconnection between horizontal heat exchanger and absorp-tion column at given conditions All other data are presentedin Table 1 and Figure 2 Connection pipe system betweenreactors and blow down tank should be as short as possiblestraight with no elbows no reductions to decrease theamount of condensing flow and to prevent the appearance ofplugs which may lead to fatal accidents Additionally suchsystem configuration ensures easy maintain and fast pipecleaning In parallel the pipe pressure drops were calculatedby method proposed by Crane [16] to ensure smooth andeasy flow The pipe length was designed to be as short aspossible with minimal pressure drop which will result inlow amount of condensed fluid High fluid velocities lowfriction factors and minimal pressure drops are expectedwhich agrees with results obtained from the literature [16]For the cooling water pipes diameter and sodium hydroxidepipe diameter design a method proposed byMays [17] which
12 Journal of Industrial Engineering
is based on the steady state incompressible energy equationutilizing Hazel Williams friction loses and continuity equa-tion was used The results are presented in Table 1 and inFigure 2
10 Pump Design
Neutralization process characteristics demand 100m3sdothminus1 of50wt sodium hydroxide For this a corresponding pumpwith 55 kW electrical motor and capacity of 120m3sdothminus1 atapproximately 4sdot105 Pa is proposed A corresponding electricschema with all relevant parts is presented in Figure 2 Sincethe pump is situated in Ex cone a correct motor withmotor II 2G EEx de II B T4 code and correct connectionaccording toATEX standardmust be used [18] Electric boardwith necessary connections should be located outside theEx cone A pressure sensor (PC) is proposed on the pipefrom vertical heat exchanger to absorption column PC hastwo tasks to ensure that neutralization medium is pumpedall the time from scrubber tank on the absorption columnand to prevent the centrifugal pump running dry which canresult in pump failure and in the worst case in pump rotordamage
It needs to be mentioned that reaction mixture whichappears at reaction runaway is very viscous which mayresult in appearance of plug in designed pipes equipmentand huge pressure drops This problem will be avoided bydecreasing the connection pipe length without reductionsand low pipe elbow number Horizontal heat exchangerwhich is located above the blow down tank decreases thefluid temperature which results in fluid condensation thatis why lower amount of gas need to be neutralized inabsorption column Less required gas for neutralizationresults in lower NaOH consumption which decreases oper-ational costs of designed system Additionally horizontalheat exchanger produces huge pressure drop which results inlower gas velocities and higher gasliquid mass transfer coef-ficients which increases the efficiency of absorption columns[14]
11 Conclusions
Designed results of this study demonstrate that proposedmethod can be used for emergency relief system designBased on calculated data the following conclusions weremade
Emergency relief system for exothermic reaction forreactor volume up to 30m3 was designed A 60m3 blowdown tank with 700m3sdothminus1 of 13∘C26∘C cooling water andtwo condensersmdashhorizontal and verticalmdashwith cooling areaof 54m2 and 5m2 are proposed An absorber column withdiameter of 15m and 30m height 45m3 scrubber tankand corresponding outflow chimney were designed All othersystem parameters are presented in Table 1 It is hoped thatthe presented procedure will serve as an engineering tool foremergency relief system design in various process industriesall over the world
Nomenclature
119871 Length (m)120582
119908 Thermal conductivity
(Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1)119862
119901cold Specific heat of cold medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119862
119901hot Specific heat of hot medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
Cooling water Specific heat of cooling water(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119876 Heat transfer (W)119879hin Temperature of hot medium
(∘C)119898
119900 Reactor charge (kg)
119860 Area (m2)119881 Reactor volume (m3)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119902
119888 Heat release per unit mass cold
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119902
ℎ Heat release per unit mass hot
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119866 Discharge mass flow rate per
unit area (kgsdotm2sdotsminus1)119875 Pressure (Pa)119879 Temperature (K)119889119879119889119905 Self heat rate in runaway
reactions (Ksdotmin1)119902 Energy release rate (Jsdotkgminus1)
119876hot Heat of hot medium (W)
119876cold Heat of cold medium (W)119879
ℎout Temperature of hot medium(∘C)
LMTD Log mean temperaturedifference (∘C)
119877
119905 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119878 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119865
119905 Temperature correction factor
119879
119898 Mean temperature difference
(∘C)119880 Overall heat transfer coefficient
(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)119860 Average provisional area (m2)119873
119905 Number of tubes
119889 Pipe diameter (mm)119903 Ration Mass flow (kgsdots1)119865
119905 Friction factor
Δ119875shell Pressure drop on the shell side(Pa)
Δ119875tube Pressure drop on the tube side(Pa)
BDC Bundle diameter clearance(mm)
119908 Wall thickness (mm)119901
119905 Tube pitch (mm)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 13
119863
119887 Bundle diameter (mm)
119863
119904 Shell diameter (mm)
119861
119904 Baffle spacing (mm)
119860
119904 Area for cross-flow (m2)
119866shell Shell-side mass velocity(kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2)
119889
119890 Shell equivalent diameter (mm)
Re Reynolds numberPr Prandtl numberNu Nusselt numberℎshell Shell-side heat transfer
coefficient (Wsdotmminus2sdotK1)119895
ℎat 45 of baffle cut Shell-side heat transfer factor
119897
119887 Baffle spacing (mm)
119873tpp Number of tubes per pass119866tube Tube-side mass velocity
(kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1)119881tube Tube-side velocity (msdotsminus1)Retube Inside tube Reynolds numberPrtube Inside tube Prandtl numberNutube Inside tube Nusselt number119895
119891at 45 of baffle cut Shell side friction factor
ℎtubeside Inside heat transfer coefficient(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880i Overall heat transfer factor forinside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880o Overall heat transfer factor foroutside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880 Average heat transfer factor(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119865IMTP IMTP packing factor119871NaOH NaOH flow (m3sdoth1)Recycle Recycle of NaOH in absorber
(hminus1)119881scrubbertank Volume of scrubber tank (m3)119860abs Absorber area (m2)119863abs Absorber diameter (m)Δ119875abs Pressure drop on absorber tray
(Pa)119865IMTP IMTP packing factorIMTP packing Mark of absorber fill119873
119871 Number of theoretical plates or
traysHETP Height equivalent to the
theoretical plate (m)119867abs Height of absorption column
(m)119881bd Blow down volume (m3)119881max Maximal tank volume (m3)119902vent Heat release per unit mass at
reaction runaway (Wsdotsminus1)119888
119901 Specific heat of material
(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)(119889119879119889119905)
119898 Self heat rate at temperature
turn around or maximal overpressure defined by API RP 520during run away (Ksdotsminus1)
(119889119879119889119905)
119904 Self heat rate at set pressure of
pressure relief devices (Ksdotsminus1)
119879
119898 Temperature of reactant
correlates to the temperatureturn around or maximum overpressure defined by API RP520 during runaway (K)
119879
119904 Temperature of reactant
correlates to set pressure ofpressure relief devices (K)
Δ119879 Temperature difference (K)119905 Time (s)120578 Viscosity (Pasdots)120583 Kinematic viscosity (m2sdotsminus1)119881 Volume (m3)119863 diameter (m)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119865 Flow reduction factor119881 Voltage (V)119868 Current (A)119882 Power supply (W)GF Gas rate (m3sdothminus1)LF Liquid rate (m3sdothminus1)119888Li Liquid concentration (molsdotm3)119888gi Gas concentration (molsdotm3)119877 liquid rate to tank volume
(hminus1)0
119881Fan Ventilator fan flow (m3sdothminus1)V119903 Axial fan velocity (msdotsminus1)
Δ119875Fan Ventilator fan pressure (Pa)119875Fanmotor Ventilator motor power (W)0
119881Fan Rotational velocity ofventilator fan (RPM)
119860Fan Ventilator area (m2)119889Fan Fan diameter (mm)ℎchimney Height of outflow chimney
(mm)119892 Gravity acceleration (m2sdotsminus1)Vvapor Outflow vapor gas velocity
(msdots1)119891pipe Flow reduction factorΔ119867react Reaction enthalpy (Jsdotmol1)119866
lowast Gas flux (kgsdots1sdotm2)DN Inner diameter (m)bd Blow down119898 Pressure turnaround meanmax Maximal value119904 Relief set conditions shell119900 Initial conditionscin Cold incout Cold outabs Absorbervent VentBWG BirminghamWire Gaugedirt indirt out Coatings of dirt on the in and
out site of pipe119908 Walltube Tube sideshell Shell side119894 119895 Refers to tube and shell side119901 Specific heat
14 Journal of Industrial Engineering
1 2 3 Refers to positionS1 S2 Saturated pressure at position 1
and 2HZT Horizontalhin Hot inhout Hot outout Out sitesdot Unit in time119890 EquivalentIMTP IMTP packing type119888 Coldℎ Hot119905 Pitch119887 Bundleℎ Heat119891 Friction119894 Inside119900 Outsideabs Absorber119871 Theoretical120587 314119904 Set pointPE Electrically groundedU1 U2 Electro phasesV1 V2 Electro phasesW1 W2 Electro phasesTK Electro phasesL1 L2 L3 Electro phases119873 Neutral phaseS1 Switch 10 1 2 3 4 Position in switch and
correctionF1 Fusion 1AC3 Analog currentX1X2 ContactorM Motor3 sim ΛΔ Three phase electro motorMAWP Maximal allowed working
pressure
References
[1] H K Fauske ldquoEmergency relief system design for reactive andnon-reactive systems extension of the DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 7 no 3 pp 153ndash158 1988
[2] J C Leung ldquoSimplified vent sizing equations for emergencyrelief requirements in reactors and storage vesselsrdquo AIChEJournal vol 32 no 10 pp 1622ndash1634 1986
[3] J C Leung H K Fauske and H G Fisher ldquoThermal runawayreactions in a low thermal inertia apparatusrdquo ThermochimicaActa vol 104 pp 13ndash29 1986
[4] R C Rosaler Standard Handbook of Plant EngineeringMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 3rd edition 2002
[5] API RP 520 Sizing Selection and Installation of Pressure Reliev-ing Devices in Refineries American Petroleum Institution 2000
[6] API STD 526 Flanged Steel Pressure Relief Valves AmericanPetroleum Institution 6th edition 2012
[7] R H Perry and D W Green Perryrsquos Chemical EngineersrsquoHandbook McGraw-Hill New York NY USA 2007
[8] J L Gustin J Fillion G Treand and K E Biyaali ldquoThe phenol+ formaldehyde runaway reaction Vent sizing for reactorprotectionrdquo Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industriesvol 6 no 2 pp 103ndash113 1993
[9] H K Fauske ldquoGeneralized vent sizing monogram for runawaychemical reactionsrdquo PlantOperations Progress vol 3 no 4 pp213ndash215 1984
[10] J F Richardson J H Harker and J R Backhurst Coulson andRichardsonrsquos Chemical Engineering Butterworth-HeinemannBoston Mass USA 2009
[11] J D Seader E J Henley and D K Roter Separation ProcessPrinciples John Wiley amp Sons New York NY USA 2010
[12] F Bleier Fan Handbook Selection Application and DesignMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 1987
[13] S A Kudchadker A P Kudchadker R C Wilhoit and B JZwolinski ldquoIdeal gas thermodynamic properties of phenol andcresolsrdquo Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data vol 7no 2 pp 417ndash423 1978
[14] I Hace ldquoComparison of concentration profiles for boundarylayers in absorption with chemical reaction processesrdquo Chemi-cal Engineering and Technology vol 29 no 5 pp 574ndash582 2006
[15] J C Leung and H K Fauske ldquoRunaway system charac-terization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 6 no 2 pp 77ndash83 1987
[16] Crane Technical Paper ldquoA Process Design Engineerrsquos Perspec-tive on Using Equivalent Lengths of Valves and Fittings inPipeline Pressure Drop Calculations 410(TP-410)rdquo 2009
[17] L W Mays Hydraulic Design Handbook McGraw-Hill NewYork NY USA 1999
[18] ldquolsquoATEXDirective 949ECrsquo on equipment and protective systemsintended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX)rdquohttpeceuropaeuenterprisesectorsmechanicaldocumentslegislationatex
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of
12 Journal of Industrial Engineering
is based on the steady state incompressible energy equationutilizing Hazel Williams friction loses and continuity equa-tion was used The results are presented in Table 1 and inFigure 2
10 Pump Design
Neutralization process characteristics demand 100m3sdothminus1 of50wt sodium hydroxide For this a corresponding pumpwith 55 kW electrical motor and capacity of 120m3sdothminus1 atapproximately 4sdot105 Pa is proposed A corresponding electricschema with all relevant parts is presented in Figure 2 Sincethe pump is situated in Ex cone a correct motor withmotor II 2G EEx de II B T4 code and correct connectionaccording toATEX standardmust be used [18] Electric boardwith necessary connections should be located outside theEx cone A pressure sensor (PC) is proposed on the pipefrom vertical heat exchanger to absorption column PC hastwo tasks to ensure that neutralization medium is pumpedall the time from scrubber tank on the absorption columnand to prevent the centrifugal pump running dry which canresult in pump failure and in the worst case in pump rotordamage
It needs to be mentioned that reaction mixture whichappears at reaction runaway is very viscous which mayresult in appearance of plug in designed pipes equipmentand huge pressure drops This problem will be avoided bydecreasing the connection pipe length without reductionsand low pipe elbow number Horizontal heat exchangerwhich is located above the blow down tank decreases thefluid temperature which results in fluid condensation thatis why lower amount of gas need to be neutralized inabsorption column Less required gas for neutralizationresults in lower NaOH consumption which decreases oper-ational costs of designed system Additionally horizontalheat exchanger produces huge pressure drop which results inlower gas velocities and higher gasliquid mass transfer coef-ficients which increases the efficiency of absorption columns[14]
11 Conclusions
Designed results of this study demonstrate that proposedmethod can be used for emergency relief system designBased on calculated data the following conclusions weremade
Emergency relief system for exothermic reaction forreactor volume up to 30m3 was designed A 60m3 blowdown tank with 700m3sdothminus1 of 13∘C26∘C cooling water andtwo condensersmdashhorizontal and verticalmdashwith cooling areaof 54m2 and 5m2 are proposed An absorber column withdiameter of 15m and 30m height 45m3 scrubber tankand corresponding outflow chimney were designed All othersystem parameters are presented in Table 1 It is hoped thatthe presented procedure will serve as an engineering tool foremergency relief system design in various process industriesall over the world
Nomenclature
119871 Length (m)120582
119908 Thermal conductivity
(Wsdotmminus1sdotKminus1)119862
119901cold Specific heat of cold medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119862
119901hot Specific heat of hot medium(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
Cooling water Specific heat of cooling water(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)
119876 Heat transfer (W)119879hin Temperature of hot medium
(∘C)119898
119900 Reactor charge (kg)
119860 Area (m2)119881 Reactor volume (m3)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119902
119888 Heat release per unit mass cold
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119902
ℎ Heat release per unit mass hot
medium (Wsdotkgminus1)119866 Discharge mass flow rate per
unit area (kgsdotm2sdotsminus1)119875 Pressure (Pa)119879 Temperature (K)119889119879119889119905 Self heat rate in runaway
reactions (Ksdotmin1)119902 Energy release rate (Jsdotkgminus1)
119876hot Heat of hot medium (W)
119876cold Heat of cold medium (W)119879
ℎout Temperature of hot medium(∘C)
LMTD Log mean temperaturedifference (∘C)
119877
119905 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119878 Parameter for temperature
correction factor prediction119865
119905 Temperature correction factor
119879
119898 Mean temperature difference
(∘C)119880 Overall heat transfer coefficient
(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)119860 Average provisional area (m2)119873
119905 Number of tubes
119889 Pipe diameter (mm)119903 Ration Mass flow (kgsdots1)119865
119905 Friction factor
Δ119875shell Pressure drop on the shell side(Pa)
Δ119875tube Pressure drop on the tube side(Pa)
BDC Bundle diameter clearance(mm)
119908 Wall thickness (mm)119901
119905 Tube pitch (mm)
Journal of Industrial Engineering 13
119863
119887 Bundle diameter (mm)
119863
119904 Shell diameter (mm)
119861
119904 Baffle spacing (mm)
119860
119904 Area for cross-flow (m2)
119866shell Shell-side mass velocity(kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2)
119889
119890 Shell equivalent diameter (mm)
Re Reynolds numberPr Prandtl numberNu Nusselt numberℎshell Shell-side heat transfer
coefficient (Wsdotmminus2sdotK1)119895
ℎat 45 of baffle cut Shell-side heat transfer factor
119897
119887 Baffle spacing (mm)
119873tpp Number of tubes per pass119866tube Tube-side mass velocity
(kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1)119881tube Tube-side velocity (msdotsminus1)Retube Inside tube Reynolds numberPrtube Inside tube Prandtl numberNutube Inside tube Nusselt number119895
119891at 45 of baffle cut Shell side friction factor
ℎtubeside Inside heat transfer coefficient(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880i Overall heat transfer factor forinside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880o Overall heat transfer factor foroutside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880 Average heat transfer factor(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119865IMTP IMTP packing factor119871NaOH NaOH flow (m3sdoth1)Recycle Recycle of NaOH in absorber
(hminus1)119881scrubbertank Volume of scrubber tank (m3)119860abs Absorber area (m2)119863abs Absorber diameter (m)Δ119875abs Pressure drop on absorber tray
(Pa)119865IMTP IMTP packing factorIMTP packing Mark of absorber fill119873
119871 Number of theoretical plates or
traysHETP Height equivalent to the
theoretical plate (m)119867abs Height of absorption column
(m)119881bd Blow down volume (m3)119881max Maximal tank volume (m3)119902vent Heat release per unit mass at
reaction runaway (Wsdotsminus1)119888
119901 Specific heat of material
(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)(119889119879119889119905)
119898 Self heat rate at temperature
turn around or maximal overpressure defined by API RP 520during run away (Ksdotsminus1)
(119889119879119889119905)
119904 Self heat rate at set pressure of
pressure relief devices (Ksdotsminus1)
119879
119898 Temperature of reactant
correlates to the temperatureturn around or maximum overpressure defined by API RP520 during runaway (K)
119879
119904 Temperature of reactant
correlates to set pressure ofpressure relief devices (K)
Δ119879 Temperature difference (K)119905 Time (s)120578 Viscosity (Pasdots)120583 Kinematic viscosity (m2sdotsminus1)119881 Volume (m3)119863 diameter (m)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119865 Flow reduction factor119881 Voltage (V)119868 Current (A)119882 Power supply (W)GF Gas rate (m3sdothminus1)LF Liquid rate (m3sdothminus1)119888Li Liquid concentration (molsdotm3)119888gi Gas concentration (molsdotm3)119877 liquid rate to tank volume
(hminus1)0
119881Fan Ventilator fan flow (m3sdothminus1)V119903 Axial fan velocity (msdotsminus1)
Δ119875Fan Ventilator fan pressure (Pa)119875Fanmotor Ventilator motor power (W)0
119881Fan Rotational velocity ofventilator fan (RPM)
119860Fan Ventilator area (m2)119889Fan Fan diameter (mm)ℎchimney Height of outflow chimney
(mm)119892 Gravity acceleration (m2sdotsminus1)Vvapor Outflow vapor gas velocity
(msdots1)119891pipe Flow reduction factorΔ119867react Reaction enthalpy (Jsdotmol1)119866
lowast Gas flux (kgsdots1sdotm2)DN Inner diameter (m)bd Blow down119898 Pressure turnaround meanmax Maximal value119904 Relief set conditions shell119900 Initial conditionscin Cold incout Cold outabs Absorbervent VentBWG BirminghamWire Gaugedirt indirt out Coatings of dirt on the in and
out site of pipe119908 Walltube Tube sideshell Shell side119894 119895 Refers to tube and shell side119901 Specific heat
14 Journal of Industrial Engineering
1 2 3 Refers to positionS1 S2 Saturated pressure at position 1
and 2HZT Horizontalhin Hot inhout Hot outout Out sitesdot Unit in time119890 EquivalentIMTP IMTP packing type119888 Coldℎ Hot119905 Pitch119887 Bundleℎ Heat119891 Friction119894 Inside119900 Outsideabs Absorber119871 Theoretical120587 314119904 Set pointPE Electrically groundedU1 U2 Electro phasesV1 V2 Electro phasesW1 W2 Electro phasesTK Electro phasesL1 L2 L3 Electro phases119873 Neutral phaseS1 Switch 10 1 2 3 4 Position in switch and
correctionF1 Fusion 1AC3 Analog currentX1X2 ContactorM Motor3 sim ΛΔ Three phase electro motorMAWP Maximal allowed working
pressure
References
[1] H K Fauske ldquoEmergency relief system design for reactive andnon-reactive systems extension of the DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 7 no 3 pp 153ndash158 1988
[2] J C Leung ldquoSimplified vent sizing equations for emergencyrelief requirements in reactors and storage vesselsrdquo AIChEJournal vol 32 no 10 pp 1622ndash1634 1986
[3] J C Leung H K Fauske and H G Fisher ldquoThermal runawayreactions in a low thermal inertia apparatusrdquo ThermochimicaActa vol 104 pp 13ndash29 1986
[4] R C Rosaler Standard Handbook of Plant EngineeringMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 3rd edition 2002
[5] API RP 520 Sizing Selection and Installation of Pressure Reliev-ing Devices in Refineries American Petroleum Institution 2000
[6] API STD 526 Flanged Steel Pressure Relief Valves AmericanPetroleum Institution 6th edition 2012
[7] R H Perry and D W Green Perryrsquos Chemical EngineersrsquoHandbook McGraw-Hill New York NY USA 2007
[8] J L Gustin J Fillion G Treand and K E Biyaali ldquoThe phenol+ formaldehyde runaway reaction Vent sizing for reactorprotectionrdquo Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industriesvol 6 no 2 pp 103ndash113 1993
[9] H K Fauske ldquoGeneralized vent sizing monogram for runawaychemical reactionsrdquo PlantOperations Progress vol 3 no 4 pp213ndash215 1984
[10] J F Richardson J H Harker and J R Backhurst Coulson andRichardsonrsquos Chemical Engineering Butterworth-HeinemannBoston Mass USA 2009
[11] J D Seader E J Henley and D K Roter Separation ProcessPrinciples John Wiley amp Sons New York NY USA 2010
[12] F Bleier Fan Handbook Selection Application and DesignMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 1987
[13] S A Kudchadker A P Kudchadker R C Wilhoit and B JZwolinski ldquoIdeal gas thermodynamic properties of phenol andcresolsrdquo Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data vol 7no 2 pp 417ndash423 1978
[14] I Hace ldquoComparison of concentration profiles for boundarylayers in absorption with chemical reaction processesrdquo Chemi-cal Engineering and Technology vol 29 no 5 pp 574ndash582 2006
[15] J C Leung and H K Fauske ldquoRunaway system charac-terization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 6 no 2 pp 77ndash83 1987
[16] Crane Technical Paper ldquoA Process Design Engineerrsquos Perspec-tive on Using Equivalent Lengths of Valves and Fittings inPipeline Pressure Drop Calculations 410(TP-410)rdquo 2009
[17] L W Mays Hydraulic Design Handbook McGraw-Hill NewYork NY USA 1999
[18] ldquolsquoATEXDirective 949ECrsquo on equipment and protective systemsintended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX)rdquohttpeceuropaeuenterprisesectorsmechanicaldocumentslegislationatex
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of
Journal of Industrial Engineering 13
119863
119887 Bundle diameter (mm)
119863
119904 Shell diameter (mm)
119861
119904 Baffle spacing (mm)
119860
119904 Area for cross-flow (m2)
119866shell Shell-side mass velocity(kgsdotsminus1sdotmminus2)
119889
119890 Shell equivalent diameter (mm)
Re Reynolds numberPr Prandtl numberNu Nusselt numberℎshell Shell-side heat transfer
coefficient (Wsdotmminus2sdotK1)119895
ℎat 45 of baffle cut Shell-side heat transfer factor
119897
119887 Baffle spacing (mm)
119873tpp Number of tubes per pass119866tube Tube-side mass velocity
(kgsdotmminus2sdotsminus1)119881tube Tube-side velocity (msdotsminus1)Retube Inside tube Reynolds numberPrtube Inside tube Prandtl numberNutube Inside tube Nusselt number119895
119891at 45 of baffle cut Shell side friction factor
ℎtubeside Inside heat transfer coefficient(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880i Overall heat transfer factor forinside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880o Overall heat transfer factor foroutside tubes flow (Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119880 Average heat transfer factor(Wsdotmminus2sdotKminus1)
119865IMTP IMTP packing factor119871NaOH NaOH flow (m3sdoth1)Recycle Recycle of NaOH in absorber
(hminus1)119881scrubbertank Volume of scrubber tank (m3)119860abs Absorber area (m2)119863abs Absorber diameter (m)Δ119875abs Pressure drop on absorber tray
(Pa)119865IMTP IMTP packing factorIMTP packing Mark of absorber fill119873
119871 Number of theoretical plates or
traysHETP Height equivalent to the
theoretical plate (m)119867abs Height of absorption column
(m)119881bd Blow down volume (m3)119881max Maximal tank volume (m3)119902vent Heat release per unit mass at
reaction runaway (Wsdotsminus1)119888
119901 Specific heat of material
(Jsdotgminus1sdotKminus1)(119889119879119889119905)
119898 Self heat rate at temperature
turn around or maximal overpressure defined by API RP 520during run away (Ksdotsminus1)
(119889119879119889119905)
119904 Self heat rate at set pressure of
pressure relief devices (Ksdotsminus1)
119879
119898 Temperature of reactant
correlates to the temperatureturn around or maximum overpressure defined by API RP520 during runaway (K)
119879
119904 Temperature of reactant
correlates to set pressure ofpressure relief devices (K)
Δ119879 Temperature difference (K)119905 Time (s)120578 Viscosity (Pasdots)120583 Kinematic viscosity (m2sdotsminus1)119881 Volume (m3)119863 diameter (m)120588 Density (kgsdotmminus3)119865 Flow reduction factor119881 Voltage (V)119868 Current (A)119882 Power supply (W)GF Gas rate (m3sdothminus1)LF Liquid rate (m3sdothminus1)119888Li Liquid concentration (molsdotm3)119888gi Gas concentration (molsdotm3)119877 liquid rate to tank volume
(hminus1)0
119881Fan Ventilator fan flow (m3sdothminus1)V119903 Axial fan velocity (msdotsminus1)
Δ119875Fan Ventilator fan pressure (Pa)119875Fanmotor Ventilator motor power (W)0
119881Fan Rotational velocity ofventilator fan (RPM)
119860Fan Ventilator area (m2)119889Fan Fan diameter (mm)ℎchimney Height of outflow chimney
(mm)119892 Gravity acceleration (m2sdotsminus1)Vvapor Outflow vapor gas velocity
(msdots1)119891pipe Flow reduction factorΔ119867react Reaction enthalpy (Jsdotmol1)119866
lowast Gas flux (kgsdots1sdotm2)DN Inner diameter (m)bd Blow down119898 Pressure turnaround meanmax Maximal value119904 Relief set conditions shell119900 Initial conditionscin Cold incout Cold outabs Absorbervent VentBWG BirminghamWire Gaugedirt indirt out Coatings of dirt on the in and
out site of pipe119908 Walltube Tube sideshell Shell side119894 119895 Refers to tube and shell side119901 Specific heat
14 Journal of Industrial Engineering
1 2 3 Refers to positionS1 S2 Saturated pressure at position 1
and 2HZT Horizontalhin Hot inhout Hot outout Out sitesdot Unit in time119890 EquivalentIMTP IMTP packing type119888 Coldℎ Hot119905 Pitch119887 Bundleℎ Heat119891 Friction119894 Inside119900 Outsideabs Absorber119871 Theoretical120587 314119904 Set pointPE Electrically groundedU1 U2 Electro phasesV1 V2 Electro phasesW1 W2 Electro phasesTK Electro phasesL1 L2 L3 Electro phases119873 Neutral phaseS1 Switch 10 1 2 3 4 Position in switch and
correctionF1 Fusion 1AC3 Analog currentX1X2 ContactorM Motor3 sim ΛΔ Three phase electro motorMAWP Maximal allowed working
pressure
References
[1] H K Fauske ldquoEmergency relief system design for reactive andnon-reactive systems extension of the DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 7 no 3 pp 153ndash158 1988
[2] J C Leung ldquoSimplified vent sizing equations for emergencyrelief requirements in reactors and storage vesselsrdquo AIChEJournal vol 32 no 10 pp 1622ndash1634 1986
[3] J C Leung H K Fauske and H G Fisher ldquoThermal runawayreactions in a low thermal inertia apparatusrdquo ThermochimicaActa vol 104 pp 13ndash29 1986
[4] R C Rosaler Standard Handbook of Plant EngineeringMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 3rd edition 2002
[5] API RP 520 Sizing Selection and Installation of Pressure Reliev-ing Devices in Refineries American Petroleum Institution 2000
[6] API STD 526 Flanged Steel Pressure Relief Valves AmericanPetroleum Institution 6th edition 2012
[7] R H Perry and D W Green Perryrsquos Chemical EngineersrsquoHandbook McGraw-Hill New York NY USA 2007
[8] J L Gustin J Fillion G Treand and K E Biyaali ldquoThe phenol+ formaldehyde runaway reaction Vent sizing for reactorprotectionrdquo Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industriesvol 6 no 2 pp 103ndash113 1993
[9] H K Fauske ldquoGeneralized vent sizing monogram for runawaychemical reactionsrdquo PlantOperations Progress vol 3 no 4 pp213ndash215 1984
[10] J F Richardson J H Harker and J R Backhurst Coulson andRichardsonrsquos Chemical Engineering Butterworth-HeinemannBoston Mass USA 2009
[11] J D Seader E J Henley and D K Roter Separation ProcessPrinciples John Wiley amp Sons New York NY USA 2010
[12] F Bleier Fan Handbook Selection Application and DesignMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 1987
[13] S A Kudchadker A P Kudchadker R C Wilhoit and B JZwolinski ldquoIdeal gas thermodynamic properties of phenol andcresolsrdquo Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data vol 7no 2 pp 417ndash423 1978
[14] I Hace ldquoComparison of concentration profiles for boundarylayers in absorption with chemical reaction processesrdquo Chemi-cal Engineering and Technology vol 29 no 5 pp 574ndash582 2006
[15] J C Leung and H K Fauske ldquoRunaway system charac-terization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 6 no 2 pp 77ndash83 1987
[16] Crane Technical Paper ldquoA Process Design Engineerrsquos Perspec-tive on Using Equivalent Lengths of Valves and Fittings inPipeline Pressure Drop Calculations 410(TP-410)rdquo 2009
[17] L W Mays Hydraulic Design Handbook McGraw-Hill NewYork NY USA 1999
[18] ldquolsquoATEXDirective 949ECrsquo on equipment and protective systemsintended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX)rdquohttpeceuropaeuenterprisesectorsmechanicaldocumentslegislationatex
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of
14 Journal of Industrial Engineering
1 2 3 Refers to positionS1 S2 Saturated pressure at position 1
and 2HZT Horizontalhin Hot inhout Hot outout Out sitesdot Unit in time119890 EquivalentIMTP IMTP packing type119888 Coldℎ Hot119905 Pitch119887 Bundleℎ Heat119891 Friction119894 Inside119900 Outsideabs Absorber119871 Theoretical120587 314119904 Set pointPE Electrically groundedU1 U2 Electro phasesV1 V2 Electro phasesW1 W2 Electro phasesTK Electro phasesL1 L2 L3 Electro phases119873 Neutral phaseS1 Switch 10 1 2 3 4 Position in switch and
correctionF1 Fusion 1AC3 Analog currentX1X2 ContactorM Motor3 sim ΛΔ Three phase electro motorMAWP Maximal allowed working
pressure
References
[1] H K Fauske ldquoEmergency relief system design for reactive andnon-reactive systems extension of the DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 7 no 3 pp 153ndash158 1988
[2] J C Leung ldquoSimplified vent sizing equations for emergencyrelief requirements in reactors and storage vesselsrdquo AIChEJournal vol 32 no 10 pp 1622ndash1634 1986
[3] J C Leung H K Fauske and H G Fisher ldquoThermal runawayreactions in a low thermal inertia apparatusrdquo ThermochimicaActa vol 104 pp 13ndash29 1986
[4] R C Rosaler Standard Handbook of Plant EngineeringMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 3rd edition 2002
[5] API RP 520 Sizing Selection and Installation of Pressure Reliev-ing Devices in Refineries American Petroleum Institution 2000
[6] API STD 526 Flanged Steel Pressure Relief Valves AmericanPetroleum Institution 6th edition 2012
[7] R H Perry and D W Green Perryrsquos Chemical EngineersrsquoHandbook McGraw-Hill New York NY USA 2007
[8] J L Gustin J Fillion G Treand and K E Biyaali ldquoThe phenol+ formaldehyde runaway reaction Vent sizing for reactorprotectionrdquo Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industriesvol 6 no 2 pp 103ndash113 1993
[9] H K Fauske ldquoGeneralized vent sizing monogram for runawaychemical reactionsrdquo PlantOperations Progress vol 3 no 4 pp213ndash215 1984
[10] J F Richardson J H Harker and J R Backhurst Coulson andRichardsonrsquos Chemical Engineering Butterworth-HeinemannBoston Mass USA 2009
[11] J D Seader E J Henley and D K Roter Separation ProcessPrinciples John Wiley amp Sons New York NY USA 2010
[12] F Bleier Fan Handbook Selection Application and DesignMcGraw-Hill New York NY USA 1987
[13] S A Kudchadker A P Kudchadker R C Wilhoit and B JZwolinski ldquoIdeal gas thermodynamic properties of phenol andcresolsrdquo Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data vol 7no 2 pp 417ndash423 1978
[14] I Hace ldquoComparison of concentration profiles for boundarylayers in absorption with chemical reaction processesrdquo Chemi-cal Engineering and Technology vol 29 no 5 pp 574ndash582 2006
[15] J C Leung and H K Fauske ldquoRunaway system charac-terization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodologyrdquoPlantOperations Progress vol 6 no 2 pp 77ndash83 1987
[16] Crane Technical Paper ldquoA Process Design Engineerrsquos Perspec-tive on Using Equivalent Lengths of Valves and Fittings inPipeline Pressure Drop Calculations 410(TP-410)rdquo 2009
[17] L W Mays Hydraulic Design Handbook McGraw-Hill NewYork NY USA 1999
[18] ldquolsquoATEXDirective 949ECrsquo on equipment and protective systemsintended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX)rdquohttpeceuropaeuenterprisesectorsmechanicaldocumentslegislationatex
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Modelling amp Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of