research article simultaneous estimation of four...

8
Research Article Simultaneous Estimation of Four Antitussive Components from Herbal Cough Syrup by HPTLC Sharada L. Deore, Payal S. Jaju, and Bhushan A. Baviskar Government College of Pharmacy, Kathora Naka, Amravati 444604, India Correspondence should be addressed to Sharada L. Deore; sharudeore [email protected] Received 10 June 2014; Accepted 16 August 2014; Published 28 October 2014 Academic Editor: Jiiang H. Jeng Copyright © 2014 Sharada L. Deore et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A new simple, rapid, selective and precise high performance thin layer chromatographic (HPTLC) method has been developed for simultaneous estimation of vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole in herbal cough syrup. e retention factors of vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole are 0.53, 0.44, 0.75, and 0.77, respectively. Chromatography was performed on 60F 254 percolated TLC plate using n-hexane : ethyl acetate : glacial acetic acid (8.5 : 1.0 : 0.5 v/v/v). Methods are validated according to ICH guidelines and can be adopted for the routine analysis of vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol and cineole in herbal cough syrup. 1. Introduction Herbal cough syrup is a pharmaceutical dosage form used to treat coughing and related conditions. Many of these herbal or ayurvedic cough syrups are incorporated with cough suppressants or expectorants from vasaka, liquorice, tulsi, ginger, kantkari, black pepper, camphor, and many more [1]. Out of these plants, constituents from vasaka, liquorice, tulsi and ginger are chosen for simultaneous estimation. Vasaka is perennial, evergreen shrub of biological source Adhatoda vasica belonging to family Acanthaceae. It contains quinazoline alkaloids like vasicine and vasicinone and also essential oil. Vasicine present in the leaves possesses respira- tory stimulant activity and induces bronchodilation as well as relaxation of the tracheal muscle. It offered significant protec- tion against histamine induced bronchospasm [2]. Liquorice is root of Glycerrhiza glabra belonging to family Legumi- nosae. It contains majorly triterpenoid saponin glycyrrhizin and few flavonoids. Glycyrrhizin exerts antitussive effect by stimulating salivation and inducing a more frequent swallow- ing reflex [3]. Tulsi is evergreen plant of Ocimum sanctum belonging to family Lamiaceae. It contains volatile oil 0.4– 0.8% comprising eugenol and beta-caryophyllene and many other monoterpenes. Eugenol shows an antitussive effect by central action mediated through both opioid and GABAer- gic system [4]. Ginger is dried as well as fresh rhizomes of Zingiber officinalis belonging to family Zingiberaceae. It contains 1–4% volatile oil containing cineole, zingibe- rene, borneol, and resins like gingerol and shogaol. Cineole shows antitussive effect by suppressing the cough reflex through direct action of cough centre in the medulla [5]. According to World Health Organisation’s (WHO) stan- dardisation guidelines, development and validation of analyt- ical methods are needed to help in discovery, development, and marketing of quality herbal formulations. e literature [69] revealed that various TLC methods are available for estimation of vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole as individual component only; hence, in present work attempt has been made to develop simple, rapid, accurate, precise, and economical method for simultaneous estimation of all these four constituents in herbal cough syrup. HPTLC is preferred over HPLC because HPTLC offers visual inspection throughout the process, less solvent con- sumption, multiple choices of fresh stationary phases, faster simultaneous estimation of many compounds with good analytical precision, and accuracy within less time. 2. Experimental 2.1. Reagents and Materials. All chemicals and solvents used were of AR and HPLC grade (E. Merck, Mumbai, India). Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Scholarly Research Notices Volume 2014, Article ID 976264, 7 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/976264

Upload: hadan

Post on 15-Mar-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Research ArticleSimultaneous Estimation of Four Antitussive Components fromHerbal Cough Syrup by HPTLC

Sharada L. Deore, Payal S. Jaju, and Bhushan A. Baviskar

Government College of Pharmacy, Kathora Naka, Amravati 444604, India

Correspondence should be addressed to Sharada L. Deore; sharudeore [email protected]

Received 10 June 2014; Accepted 16 August 2014; Published 28 October 2014

Academic Editor: Jiiang H. Jeng

Copyright © 2014 Sharada L. Deore et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons AttributionLicense, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properlycited.

A new simple, rapid, selective and precise high performance thin layer chromatographic (HPTLC) method has been developedfor simultaneous estimation of vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole in herbal cough syrup.The retention factors of vasicine,glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole are 0.53, 0.44, 0.75, and 0.77, respectively. Chromatography was performed on 60F

254percolated

TLC plate using n-hexane : ethyl acetate : glacial acetic acid (8.5 : 1.0 : 0.5 v/v/v). Methods are validated according to ICH guidelinesand can be adopted for the routine analysis of vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol and cineole in herbal cough syrup.

1. Introduction

Herbal cough syrup is a pharmaceutical dosage form used totreat coughing and related conditions. Many of these herbalor ayurvedic cough syrups are incorporated with coughsuppressants or expectorants from vasaka, liquorice, tulsi,ginger, kantkari, black pepper, camphor, and many more [1].Out of these plants, constituents from vasaka, liquorice, tulsiand ginger are chosen for simultaneous estimation.

Vasaka is perennial, evergreen shrub of biological sourceAdhatoda vasica belonging to family Acanthaceae. It containsquinazoline alkaloids like vasicine and vasicinone and alsoessential oil. Vasicine present in the leaves possesses respira-tory stimulant activity and induces bronchodilation as well asrelaxation of the tracheal muscle. It offered significant protec-tion against histamine induced bronchospasm [2]. Liquoriceis root of Glycerrhiza glabra belonging to family Legumi-nosae. It contains majorly triterpenoid saponin glycyrrhizinand few flavonoids. Glycyrrhizin exerts antitussive effect bystimulating salivation and inducing amore frequent swallow-ing reflex [3]. Tulsi is evergreen plant of Ocimum sanctumbelonging to family Lamiaceae. It contains volatile oil 0.4–0.8% comprising eugenol and beta-caryophyllene and manyother monoterpenes. Eugenol shows an antitussive effect bycentral action mediated through both opioid and GABAer-gic system [4]. Ginger is dried as well as fresh rhizomes

of Zingiber officinalis belonging to family Zingiberaceae.It contains 1–4% volatile oil containing cineole, zingibe-rene, borneol, and resins like gingerol and shogaol. Cineoleshows antitussive effect by suppressing the cough reflexthrough direct action of cough centre in the medulla [5].

According to World Health Organisation’s (WHO) stan-dardisation guidelines, development and validation of analyt-ical methods are needed to help in discovery, development,and marketing of quality herbal formulations. The literature[6–9] revealed that various TLC methods are available forestimation of vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole asindividual component only; hence, in present work attempthas beenmade to develop simple, rapid, accurate, precise, andeconomical method for simultaneous estimation of all thesefour constituents in herbal cough syrup.

HPTLC is preferred over HPLC because HPTLC offersvisual inspection throughout the process, less solvent con-sumption, multiple choices of fresh stationary phases, fastersimultaneous estimation of many compounds with goodanalytical precision, and accuracy within less time.

2. Experimental

2.1. Reagents and Materials. All chemicals and solvents usedwere of AR and HPLC grade (E. Merck, Mumbai, India).

Hindawi Publishing CorporationInternational Scholarly Research NoticesVolume 2014, Article ID 976264, 7 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/976264

2 International Scholarly Research Notices

N

N

OH

OH

H3C

H3CHOHO

HOHO O

O

OO

OO

O

CH2

CH3

CH3

COOH

HOOC

HOOC

H

H

H

HO

Glycyrrhizin Vasicine Eugenol Cineole

Figure 1

Marker standard vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole(Figure 1) were obtained as gift sample from Natural Reme-dies, Bangalore, India. TLC aluminium plates precoated withsilica gel 60F254 (20 cm × 20 cm, 0.2mm thick) were from E.Merck, Darmstadt, Germany.

2.2. Instrumentation. The method has been developed onCamag HPTLC system (Camag, Muttenz, Switzerland) con-sisting of twin trough chamber, Linomat V applicator, TLCscanner III, andWinCATS software version 1.4.4. Separationand identification of vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, andcineole were performed on aluminium backed silica gel60F254 (20 cm × 10 cm of plate size, layer thickness 0.2mm).

2.3. Chromatographic Conditions. Standard solutions of vas-icine (99%), glycyrrhizin (98%), eugenol (98%), and cineole(98%) were prepared either separately or in a mixture ata concentration of 1mgmL each in absolute methanol.Ultrasonication of mixture was required to ensure completedissolution. The experiment was performed on a silica gel60F254 (0.2mm thickness) HPTLC plates (20 × 10 cm).Samples were applied by Linomat-V applicator to the platesas 4mm bands with 4mm distance. Many mobile phasecompositions from solvents toluene, ethyl acetate, n-hexane,methanol, glacial acetic acid, and water were tried. Finallythe plates were developed by the ascending technique, in atwin trough glass chamber with a stainless steel lid, usingan optimised mobile phase composed of n-hexane : ethylacetate : glacial acetic acid (8.5 : 1 : 0.5 v/v/v). The chambersaturation time was kept as 20min. After development, plateswere driedwith a hot hair dryer; the spots which separated onplate were visualised when it was placed in iodine chamberand then scanned with a TLC Scanner, using WinCATSsoftware in absorbance mode, with slit dimensions 3.00 ×0.45mm.The detection wavelength 300 nmwas selected.TheRf values for vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole were0.53, 0.44, 0.75, and 0.77, respectively, as shown in Figure 2.

2.4. Quantification of Vasicine, Glycyrrhizin, Eugenol, andCineole through Calibration Curve. All the standards werespotted in triplicate on 20 × 10 cm TLC plates for preparingsix-point linear calibration curves. The calibration graph was

E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 A

Figure 2:HPTLCplate showing simultaneous estimation of eugenol(E1–E5), cineole (C1–C5), glycyrrhizin (G1–G5), vasicine (V1–V5),and adulsa cough syrup (A).

plotted using the concentration versus average peak areaat 300 nm for all standards. Peak area and concentrationdata were treated by linear least-squares regression analysis.Various standard dilutions of vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol,and cineole were applied on TLC plate, developed, andscanned to know linearity range with reference to peak area.

2.5. Validation. As per ICH guidelines the method is vali-dated for linearity, accuracy, precision, LOD, LOQ, rugged-ness, and robustness [10].

(i) Linearity: standard stocks of 1mgmL−1 of vasicine,glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole were prepared anddiluted to appropriate concentrations. The linearitywas evaluated using linear least-squares regressionanalysis for generation of calibration curve. Theregression equation with slope, intercept, and coeffi-cient of correlation was calculated (Table 1).

(ii) Accuracy (recovery): the accuracy of the methodwas assessed by spiking preanalyzed samples withknown amounts of standard vasicine, glycyrrhizin,eugenol, and cineole solution and then reanalysed bythe HPTLC method. The spiking was done at threedifferent concentration levels and average percentrecovery at each concentration level was calculated(Table 1).

International Scholarly Research Notices 3

Table 1:Method validation parameters for quantification of vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole in herbal cough syrup by the proposedHPTLC method.

Validation parameters Vasicine Glycyrrhizin Eugenol CineoleCorrelation coefficient, 𝑛 = 3 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.97Linearity range (ng/spot), 𝑛 = 3 300–900 1000–5000 400–1000 2000–10,000Rf 0.53 0.44 0.75 0.77Limit of detection (ng/spot), 𝑛 = 3 45 105 60 225Limit of quantification (ng/spot), 𝑛 = 3 125 350 175 800Instrumental precision (RSD), 𝑛 = 6 0.58 0.48 0.35 0.47Method precision (RSD), 𝑛 = 6 0.72 0.59 0.42 0.58Specificity Specific Specific Specific SpecificRobustness (RSD), 𝑛 = 3 0.92 0.94 0.85 0.92

−0.07 0.13 0.33 0.53 0.73 0.93

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

(AU

)(A

U)

(AU

)

Vasicine

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0

0.00

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

300.00

350.00

400.00

450.00

(ng)

0.00

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

300.00

350.00

400.00

450.00

(ng)

100

80

90

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Track 19, ID: standard 4

600.0

400.0

200.0

0.0−0.20

0.000.20

0.400.60

0.801.00

1.20 0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

All tracks at 300nm

(AU

)600.0

400.0

200.0

0.0

(AU

)

(mm)

Substance: vasicine at 300nm. Regression mode: linearr = 0.99665, sdv = 4.65%

Substance: vasicine at 300nm. Regression mode: linearr = 0.99972, sdv = 1.33%Y = 7.573 + 0.185 ∗ X,Y = 184.056 + 4.647 ∗ X,

Rf

Rf

Figure 3: Chromatogram, calibration curve, and 3D display of vasicine.

(iii) Precision: the precision (%RSD) was determined byanalysing standard solution of vasicine, glycyrrhizin,eugenol, and cineole over the entire calibration rangefor different days.

(iv) Limit of detection: the limit of detection (LOD) wasdetermined using formula LOD = 3.3(SD)/𝑆, whereSD is standard deviation of response and 𝑆 is average

of the slope of the calibration curve. The minimumdetectable limit was found to be ng/spot for vasicine,glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole.

(v) Limit of quantification: the limit of quantitation(LOQ) was determined using formula LOQ =10(SD)/𝑆, where SD is standard deviation of responseand 𝑆 is average of slope of the calibration curve.

4 International Scholarly Research Notices

(ng) (ng)

500

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

(AU

)(A

U)

(AU

)

−0.07 0.13 0.33 0.53 0.73 0.93

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00

5000

4500

4000

3500

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0

Glycyrrhizine

Track 13, ID: standard 3

−0.200.00 0.20

0.400.60

0.801.00

1.20

All tracks at 300nm

600.0

400.0

200.0

0.0

(AU

)

600.0

400.0

200.0

0.0

(AU

)

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

(mm)

Regression mode: linear Regression mode: linearY = 20.172 + 0.820 ∗ X, r = 0.99626, sdv = 4.08% Y = 334.224 + 27.668 ∗ X, r = 0.99643, sdv = 4.51%

Substance: glycyrrhizine at 300nm. Substance: glycyrrhizine at 300nm.

RfRf

Figure 4: Chromatogram, calibration curve, and 3D display of glycyrrhizin.

The minimum quantified limit was found to beng/spot for vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cine-ole. It was observed that other constituents presentin the formulation did not interfere either with thepeak of vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, or cineole.Therefore the developed method is specific.

(vi) Ruggedness of the method:it expresses the precisionwithin laboratories variations like different analysts.Ruggedness of themethodwas assessed by spiking thestandards 5 times with different analyst by using thesame equipment.

(vii) Robustness of the method: by introducing smallchanges in the mobile phase composition, develop-ment distance, mobile phase volume, and durationof chamber saturation, the effects on the results wereexamined.

3. Results and Discussion

HPTLC method was optimized with view to quantify allfour constituents in liquid herbal cough syrup. As far asindividual estimation of vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, andcineole by chromatographicmethods is concerned, a number

of solvent systems have been reported. However, there hasnot been cited a single report for separation of vasicine,glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole simultaneously in a singlesolvent system. n-Hexane : ethyl acetate : glacial acetic acidin ratio of 8.5 : 1.0 : 0.5 v/v/v shown good resolution forvasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole with Rf valueof 0.53, 0.44, 0.75, and 0.77, respectively. Well-defined spotswere obtained after chamber was saturated for 20min atroom temperature. TLC plate was visualized when placedin iodine chamber without derivatization. The identity ofvasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole was confirmed bycomparing chromatogram of standard vasicine, glycyrrhizin,eugenol, and cineole with that of extract and by comparingretention factor of reference with standard.

Calibration plot shown in Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6 indicatesthat the response is linear function of concentration inthe range of 300–900, 1000–5000, 400–1000, and 2000–10,000 ng/spot for vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cine-ole, respectively. The correlation coefficient, intercept, andslope for vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole are givenin Table 1.

As per validation results given in Table 2, lower %RSD(<2%) suggests precision of the method. The good recoverywithin acceptable limit indicates accuracy of method. The

International Scholarly Research Notices 5

−0.07 0.13 0.33 0.53 0.73 0.93

500

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

(AU

) Eugenol

Track 3, ID: standard 3

20000

15000

10000

5000

00.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

(ng)0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00

(ng)

(AU

)

(AU

)

600.0

400.0

200.0

0.0

600.0

400.0

200.0

0.0

−0.200.000.20

0.400.60

0.801.001.20 0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

All tracks at 300nm

(AU

) (AU

)

(mm)

Substance: eugenol at 300nm. Regression mode: linear Substance: eugenol at 300nm. Regression mode: linearY = 3437.825 + 965.974 ∗ X, r = 0.99167, sdv = 5.55% Y = 83.972 + 16.016 ∗ X, r = 0.98030, sdv = 7.55%

Rf

Rf

Figure 5: Chromatogram, calibration curve, and 3D display of eugenol.

Table 2: Parameters used for ruggedness and robustness.

Sr. number Parameter Initial condition Changed condition Effect

1 Mobile phasen-Hexane : ethyl

acetate : glacial acetic acid(8.5 : 1 : 0.5)

n-Hexane : ethylacetate : glacial acetic acid

(8 : 1 : 1)

Very minute effect on the resolution,quantitative estimations, Rf, and peak

area/height

2 Development distance 4 cm 3 cmVery minute effect on the resolution,quantitative estimations, Rf, and peak

area/height

3 Temperature 27 ± 3∘C (winter) 35 ± 3∘C (summer) Affects greatly the resolution, quantitativeestimations, Rf, and peak area/height

4 Tank saturation time 25min 30minVery minute effect on the resolution,quantitative estimations, Rf, and peak

area/height

5 Analyst Analyst 1 Analyst 2Very minute effect on the resolution,quantitative estimations, Rf, and peak

area/height

limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) ofvasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole show adequatesensitivity of method. Good correlation of 0.99, 0.99, 0.99,and 0.97 was obtained between the standard and sample ofvasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineole, respectively.

Ruggedness and robustness parameters confirmed thatthe method is able to withstand minor experimental changes(Table 2). It was observed that other constituents present inthe formulations did not interfere with any of the peaks of allfour constituents (Figure 7); therefore the method is specific.

6 International Scholarly Research Notices

500

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

−0.07 0.13 0.33 0.53 0.73 0.93

(AU

)(A

U)

(AU

)

Cineole

Track 6, ID: standard 1

250

200

150

100

50

00.00 500.00 1000.00 1500.00 2000.00

(pg) (pg)

10000

9000

8000

7000

6000

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

00.00 500.00 1000.00 1500.00 2000.00

All tracks at 300nm

600.0

400.0

200.0

0.0

600.0

400.0

200.0

0.0(AU

)

(AU

)

−0.200.00

0.200.40

0.600.80

1.001.20 0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

(mm)

Substance: cineole at 300nm. Regression mode: linear Substance: cineole at 300nm. Regression mode: linearY = 126.242 + 0.035 ∗ X, r = 0.95317, sdv = 4.87% Y = 6232.699 + 1.687 ∗ X, r = 0.97968, sdv = 3.05%

Rf Rf

Figure 6: Chromatogram, calibration curve, and 3D display of cineole.

600.0

400.0

200.0

0.0

−0.200.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80

1.201.00 0.050.0

100.0

150.0200.0

All tracks at 300nm

(AU

)

600.0

400.0

200.0

0.0

(AU

)

(mm)

Rf

Figure 7: 3D display of vasicine, glycyrrhizin, eugenol, and cineolein simultaneous estimation.

4. Conclusion

Therapeutic efficacy, safety, and quality evaluation of herbalformulations is basic requirement ofmany regulatory author-ities all over the world to grant its marketing approval andadvanced analytical techniques are proving to be rapid andspecific tool in the herbal drug research as well as in settingspecific quality standards by their manufacturers. Hence, inthe present work, for the first time, a rapid, simple, accurate,

and specific HPTLC method for quantitative estimation offour antitussive constituents, that is, vasicine, glycyrrhizin,eugenol, and cineole present in herbal cough syrup, has beendeveloped and validated. The present method could be partof routine quality analysis of any polyherbal cough syrupsavailable in market despite interference of other constituents.Limitation like closeness of Rf values of cineole and eugenolis overcome by the use of HPTLC method instead of HPLC.Still future perspective involves better resolution with thesetwo components along with separation and estimation ofmaximum antitussive components from herbal cough syrupby HPTLC.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgment

The authors are highly thankful to the Principal of Govern-ment College of Pharmacy, Amravati,Maharashtra, India, forhis support.

International Scholarly Research Notices 7

References

[1] N. Chattopadhyay, G. Nosal’Ova, S. Saha, S. S. Bandyopadhyay,D. Fleskova, and B. Ray, “Structural features and antitussiveactivity of water extracted polysaccharide from Adhatodavasica,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1970–1974,2011.

[2] J. Kamei, A. Saitoh, T. Asano et al., “Pharmacokinetic andpharmacodynamic profiles of the antitussive principles of Gly-cyrrhizae radix (licorice), a main component of the Kampopreparation Bakumondo-to (Mai-men-dong-tang),” EuropeanJournal of Pharmacology, vol. 507, no. 1–3, pp. 163–168, 2005.

[3] P. Prakash andN. Gupta, “Therapeutic uses ofOcimum sanctumLinn (tulsi) with a note on eugenol and its pharmacologicalactions: a short review,” Indian Journal of Physiology andPharmacology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 125–131, 2005.

[4] P. D. Nadig and S. Laxmi, “Study of anti-tussive activityof Ocimum sanctum linn in guinea pigs,” Indian Journal ofPhysiology and Pharmacology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 243–245, 2005.

[5] F. Sayyad Sadikali and S. Chaudhary R, “Isolation of volatileoil from some plants of zingiberaceae family and estimation oftheir antibacterial potential,” Journal of Current PharmaceuticalResearch, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2010.

[6] N. A. Patel, M. Patel, and R. P. Patel, “Standardization andevaluation of polyherbal cough syrup,” The Indian Pharmacist,vol. 5, no. 45, pp. 29–35, 2012.

[7] J. A. J. Sunilson, K. Anandarajagopal, A. Khan, K. Pasha, Q.B. Hassan, and P. V. Kunaraja, “Antihistaminic evaluation offormulated polyherbal cough syrup,” Journal ofMedicinal PlantsResearch, vol. 4, no. 14, pp. 1482–1485, 2010.

[8] A. Meher, T. K. Mohapatra, R. R. Nayak et al., “Antitussiveevaluation of formulated polyherbal cough syrup,” Journal ofDrug Delivery &Therapeutics, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 61–64, 2012.

[9] V. V. Kadlag, V. S. Kasture, S. A. Gosavi, and R. D. Bhalke,“Standardization of marketed adulsa syrup containing vasakaby high performance thin layer chromatography,”Asian Journalof Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1917–1921, 2011.

[10] “Q2 (R1) validation of analytical procedure: text and method-ology,” in Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference onHarmonization, November 2005.

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Stem CellsInternational

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Behavioural Neurology

EndocrinologyInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Disease Markers

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

BioMed Research International

OncologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

PPAR Research

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

ObesityJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

OphthalmologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Diabetes ResearchJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Research and TreatmentAIDS

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Parkinson’s Disease

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com