request for council action - amazon web services

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION

C!TY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MAY 23,2006

TITLE: TASKS TWO THROUGH FIVE- GREAT PARK MASTER PLAN

_/- .I . ~.;! 4'!. .. ---··"'"~ (1 }~./t--a,..tc:.~, .: · ~rv~~=:y--~

Chief Executive 0_1}1cer Orange County Great Park

RECOMMENDED ACTION

/-- \ ( \ \,. ~

'"- 0 (l, )ifjl <' r; . ';::- ~'· ~·,__ v 7\ ~~--~ City Manager l/

1. Approve the revised Scope of Work for Tasks Two through Five for the Master Plan of the Orange County Great Park.

2. Authorize the Mayor to sign a Novation Agreement to assign the Agreement for Master Designer Services to the City of Irvine, including a staff recommended budget not to exceed $9,575,000 for Tasks Two through Five.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

At its January 23, 2006, meeting, the Orange County Great Park Corporation Board of Directors selected the Ken Smith Landscape Architect team to prepare the Great Park Master Design. The Chief Executive Officer was directed to negotiate contract terms and deliverables and to return to the Board of Directors with a proposed master design services contract for approval. The Board selected a committee made up of Directors Pulido and Ray, and Chair Agran to work with staff on the details of the contract and to bring the contract back to the Board after their review.

On March 9, 2006, the Board approved and authorized the Chief Executive Officer to sign the Agreement for Master Designer Services including a five task Scope of Work and a budget for the Task One Critical Issues Assessment not to exceed $372,000. In accordance with Section 1.9.1. i of the Agreement, the detailed Scope of Work and budget for Tasks Two through Five were to be finalized and returned to the Board for approval prior to authorizing the consultant team to begin Task Two.

Based on the results of the Task One Critical Issues Assessment and the level of effort recommended by the Ad Hoc Committee, the consultant team expanded the originally proposed Tasks Two through Five to include schematic design and design development elements early in the planning process in order to provide refined cost estimates and to

City Council Meeting May 9, 2006

SCOPE OF WORK COMPARISON

Page 1

~;~~-TWO: Conceptual Master Plan (F;~r month-;----1 TASK TWO: P-;.~limi~;~-Maste-;-PI~~Fou;-~;~th~)--i

2A Based on information from Task One and other--lY' information and program direction identified by the I Great Park Board, the Master Design team will develop design alternatives and studies to address desired ideas, refinements and elements of the park ! program and design, including preliminary cost estimates and constructabil!ty reviews. Design studies will address but not be limited to the following:

a) Overall site organization.

b) Development of maJor park features and program areas

Based on information from Task One and other information and program direction identified by the Great Park Board, the Master Design team will develop design alternatives and studies to address desired ideas, refinements and elements of the park program and design, including preliminary cost estimates and constructability reviews. Design studies will address but not be limited to the following:

a) Overall site organization. Landscape architect will study options and alternatives for site organization. Overall site studies and diagrams will be developed at scales ranging from 1"=100 to 1 "=500. Plan blow ups will be studied at larger scale of 1"=20 to 1"=100 to study select areas in more detail These studies will focus on developing an integration of features, circulation, infrastructure, architecture, landscape, habitats in coordinated plans.

b) Development of major park features and program areas. Landscape architect will explore prototypes of similar program types including scale comparisons and program elements and typical layouts to determine appropriate scale and design for the park. Diagrammatic studies of integrated features for entire park will be

·---- <:J_eveloped_at scales of 1"=100 to 1"=500 and



Page 2

c) Definition of programs and future user experiences

d) Development of park circulation and parking

·-r i

I

e) Development of iconic and thematic concepts

plan blow up of selected areas will be developed at scales of 1"=20 to 1"=100 and typical sections will be developed at scales of 1/8"=1' to 1"=20.

c) Definition of programs and future user experiences. Landscape architect will narrative outlines and descriptions of park programs by area including description of function, target users, types of use, management implications and level of facility development. Prototypes information will be researched from other parks and related facilities and recommendations will be developed for application at the Great Park.

d) Development of park circulation and parking. Landscape architect will work with engineering consultants and city staff to develop and integrate circulation systems and parking for the park. Landscape architect will develop prototype and specific designs for streetscapes and parking areas.

e) Development of iconic and thematic concepts. Landscape architect, in conjunction with the collaborative design team will develop design concepts studies for iconic elements and overall thematic features integrated into the park. Landscape architect will develop design studies for distinctive park entry areas, memorial areas, terraces/plazas or other distinctive hardscape areas and other special landscape features of a

_________ di~tinctiv_~---~at~_r::~"-- such a~_~rbor::;;,. .. ~-~~~-----··



Page 3

f) Development of park edge conditions addressing private I public issues and separation I integration edge features.

g) Development of Sustainable design elements

I - _j --

allees, gardens etc.

f) Development of park edge conditions addressing private/public issues and separation/integration edge features. Landscape architect in conjunction with Lennar and the Heritage Fields design consultants will develop design studies for integration of park edges. Typical issues will include coordination of adjacent program and uses, integration of adjacent landscape features. Development of drainage landscape at property lines, development of edges, fencing as required, other barriers. visual markers, and typical signage. Development of entry ways features and trail head areas are park perimeter. Diagrammatic studies of integrated edge treatmen: for entire park will be developed at scales of 1 "~1 00 to 1 "~500 and plan blow up of selected areas will be developed at scales of 1 "~20 to 1 "~1 00 and typical sections will be developed at scales of 1/8"~1' to 1''~20.

g) Development of Sustainable design elements. Landscape architect will develop landscape design studies for sustainable elements and integrate ideas and concepts form other consultants on the design team and city and OCGP staff



Page 4

h) Identification of resource protection areas and development of ecological areas design I management parameters.

i) Identification of other special features and preservation areas and development of design I management parameters for these areas.

j) Development of architectural design features and thematic design and guidelines.

k) Development of plant massing I communities, and development of preliminary plant palettes

-------------- - - __ _l__

h) Identification of resource protection areas and development of ecological areas design/management parameters. Landscape architect will develop landscape design studies and assist the restoration ecologist in development of typical planting strategies and designs.

i) ldentificacion of other special features and preservation areas and development of design/management parameters for these areas. Landscape architect will develop inventory of special features to be preserved or reused on the srte and develop concepts and design studies for their incorporation into the overall park design.

j) Development of architectural design features and thematic design and guidelines. Landscape Architect will assist the architect in developing related landscape features and siting for proposed architectural features.

k) Development of plant massing/communities, and development of preliminary plant palettes. Working with the restoration ecologist, and local plant specialists, the landscape architect will develop overall plant massing and planting strategies for the park. Plant communities will be identified along with typical plant species and prototype plant massing studies, spacing or lan~sca~~ _l_aYQl:l_Lcriteri~_:_Qj_§g_!~_rn_~atic studies_



Page 5

----------------------- ---------,

I) Development of streetscape typical designs.

m) Development of park path systems, guidelines for bike, hiking, ADA requirements, and related issues

__ j_ ____ _

of integrated planting for entire park will be developed at scales of 1 "=1 00 to 1 "=500 and plan blow up of selected areas will be developed at scales of 1"=20 to 1 "=1 00 and typical sections will be developed at scales of 1/8"=1' to 1"=20.

I) Development of streetscape typical designs. Landscape architect will develop prototypical and specific treatments for distinctive streetscapes. Typical studies will be developed in section and plan blow up at scales of 1/8"=1' to 1 "=20.

m) Development of park path systems, guidelines for bike, hiking, ADA requirements, and related issues. Landscape architect will develop plans for service drives. Landscape architect will develop plans and prototype design for trails for walkways, hiking, jogging, bicycling, and equestrian uses as determined appropriate for the park. Typical sections, materials, gradients and associated landscaping will be developed for the areas along trails and trail nodes. Landscape architect will develop plans and guidelines for accessibility and ADA Diagrammatic studies of integrated circulation for entire park will be developed at scales of 1 "=1 00 to 1 "=500 and plan blow up of selected areas will be developed at scales of 1 "=20 to 1 "=1 00 and typical sections will be developed at scales of 1/8"= 1' to 1 "=20



Page 6

~----------------------

1 n) Develop Security and Maintenance concepts.

o) Develop mass grading concepts, typical slopes configurations and cut and fill evaluation

p) Develop Preliminary phasing concepts

n) Develop Security and Maintenance concepts. Landscape architect will work with city and OCGP officials and staff to develop security and maintenance concepts and develop related design studies for proposed security and maintenance features.

o) Develop mass grading concepts, typical slopes configurations and cut and fill evaluation. Working with the civil engineer the landscape architect will develop an overall grading plan focusing of balance cut and fill, landform shape and design. Landscape architect will develop grading studies at scales of 1 "-1 00 to 1" to 500 for the entire park and will develop detailed blow ups and sections at larger scales of 1"-20 to 1"=100. Landscape architect may produce study models in clay or contoured cardboard to study and illustrate landforms for the park of selected areas of the park. Typical sections will integrate drainage concepts, planting concepts, trails and view corridors.

p) Costing and phasing. While these are subject of later master plan tasks, the landscape architect will work with cost estimators in the process of developing design concepts to develop realm of magnitude cost estimates for the OCGP staff to help determining potential cost impacts of various alternative design studies. Landscape architect will also show sensitivity to issues of potential phasing in developing design studies.



Page 7

28 As part of the design studies-ihemasterdesig-n-- "T2B--Aspari orihedesignstudies the maste-rdeSig_n __ _ team will continue to review project background ! team will continue to review project background reports and new information for incorporation into reports and new information for incorporation into the design studies. The Master Design Team will the design studies. The Master Design Team will continue to synthesize this information and identify continue to synthesize this information and identify issues and information having impact on the issues and information having impact on the development and refinement of the competition development and refinement of the competition design and development of park program and design and development of park program and design features. The park design will develop and design features. The landscape architect will respond to the following: coordinate and develop design studies for

incorporating and integrating this information into the park design including followmg:

a)

b) c)

d) e) f) g)

h)

i)

j)

Local habitat, wildlife and ecological conditions Stream daylighting and flood control issues Hydrology, water supply and demand, and water management issues. Geotechnical, soils and related issues Existing and proposed utilities Consideration of community input Sports Park Needs Assessment program requirements Transportation, access, bike trails and related issues. Site demolition, removals and runway recycling program and temporary uses. Surrounding development program I design and private public boundaries.

a)

b) c)

d) e) g) g)

h)

i)

Local habitat, wildlife and ecological conditions Stream daylighting and flood control issues Hydrology, water supply and demand, and water management issues. Geotechnical, soils and related issues Existing and proposed utilities Consideration of community input Sports Park Needs Assessment program requirements Transportation, access, bike trails and related issues. Site demolition, removals and runway recycling program and temporary uses.

j) Surrounding development program/design I and private public boundarie~--__

2C. Designst_u_a,es in thistaskwlil be organized into th8T2c. -Design studies in this ta-skwi!T be organized into the __ _f()_llowing_p_hases~ _______ _ _____ followin_g_j)llases~--- ___ _



Page 8

a)

b)

c)

d)

e)

- ----.--

Preliminary studies. The team will develop design studies exploring and addressing rdentified issues and park and program design options, including up to three for each major feature or area. Major features or areas will include but not be limited to the canyon, sports area, entry areas, Fields, great lawn, parking, and military memorial.

Evaluation and feedback. The team will present design studies to the OCGP staff and Board, relevant agencies and affected stakeholders for evaluation and feedback.

Revised or preferred studies. The design team will prepare revised and refined design studies addressing evaluations and feedback, leading to identification and development of preferred alternatives and design options.

Evaluation and feedback. The team will present design studies to the OCGP staff and Board and affected stakeholders for evaluation and feedback.

Conceptual Master Plan. The design team will develop an overall master plan for the park based on preferred alternatives and design options.

___ )_

a)

b)

c)

d)

e)

Preliminary studies. The team will develop design studies exploring and addressing identified issues and park and program design options, including up to three for each major feature or area. Major features or areas will include but not be limited to the canyon, sports area, entry areas, Frelds, great lawn, parking, and military memorial.

Evaluation and feedback. The team will present design studies to the OCGP staff and Board, relevant agencies and affected stakeholders for evaluation and feedback.

Revised or preferred studies. The design team will prepare revised and refined design studies addressing evaluations and feedback, leading to identification and development of preferred alternatives and design options.

Evaluation and feedback. The team will present design studres to the OCGP staff and Board and affected stakeholders for evaluation and feedback.

Preliminary Master Plan. The design team will develop an overall master plan for the park based on preferred alternatives and design options.



Page 9

26 -ConceptuaiMaster Plan deliverables shall include '~2o-- Preliminary Maste'CPTanclell\/erablesshallinciUde Landscape architect will integrate and coordinate design studies and work products of other members of the design team into an overall master plan:

a)

b)

c)

d)

e)

f)

g)

h)

An overall master plan graphic of the entire park at full build out showing overall design elements and proposed park features at a minimum scale of 1''~500'.

Plan blow ups of principal areas at a minimum scale of 1"~100'.

Character sections of major features and illustration of the relationships of various parts of the plan to each other.

Perspectives including an oblique aerial.

Illustrations of programs and I or group activity detail of particular park spaces and program areas.

Illustrations of streetscapes and edge conditions.

Illustrations of thematic, art and iconic elements.

Illustrations and narrative descriptions of park ecological and sustainability systems and features.

a)

b)

c)

d)

e)

f)

g)

h)

An overall master plan graphic of the entire park at full build out showing overall design elements and proposed park features at a minimum scale of 1 "~500' _

Plan blow ups of principal areas at a minimcm scale of 1"~100'.



Illustrations of programs and/or group activity detail of particular park spaces and program areas



Illustrations and narrative descriptions of park ecological and sustainability systems and features.



Page 10

-----

i) l!!ustrations and narrative descriptions of l j)

k)

I)

m)

n)

park architectural and landscape architectural design elements.

The Design Team will develop a master plan level cost estimate for the pre-final park master plan including assessment of selected lifecycle impacts of identified features.

A set of boards 36"x48" or similar incorporating park design images, labels and short narratives.

A PowerPoint presentation incorporating park design rmages and short narratives.

The Design Team will develop a master plan level cost estimate for the revised park master plan.

Design Guidelines and Standards

i)

j)

k)

I)

m)

n)

lllustrations and narrative descriptions of park architectural and landscape architectural design elements.

The Design Team will develop a master plan level cost estimate for the pre-final park master plan including assessment of selected lifecycle impacts of identified features.


A PowerPoint presentation incorporating park design images and short narratives.

The Design Team will develop a master plan level cost estimate for the revised park master plan.


~TASK THREE:-~ity Review and Appr~val ~f~he ---~TASK T~RE~: City Review ~~~-A~~,~~al of the Master Master Plan (Two months) Plan (Two months)

-----------

Upon approval of the Conceptual Master Plan by ; 3A Upon approval of the Preliminary Master Plan by the OCGP Board, the plan will be submitted to the OCGP Board, the plan will be submitted to review and approvals by the relevant public review and approvals by the relevant public agencies. Agency review will include but not be agencies. Agency review will include but not be limitedto_City_F'Iall_njng C()l1lmission,_and ____ , ___ Jimited to Crty_Pianning_c;o_111_missio11,_and



Page 11

,~ .. ·-- ... --~--------.. ·~-.. -·.--........ ~ .. -:-·---·- - ------- __ T ___ _ Community Services Commission. During this

1

------~ --~-----------~~ ___ ,_,,_ ... ,_ .. _,___ .. -______, Community Services Commission. During this period the design team will prepare additional studies that address concerns or issues raised by the review agencies on a time and materials basis. Landscape architect will make presentations to agencies and respond to comments and concerns. Landscape architect will prepare design studies that address issues raised during this process.

38

3C

period the design team will prepare additional · studies that address concerns or issues raised by the review agencies on a time and materials basis.

Following the review and agency approval period, the design team will adjust the Conceptual Master Plan incorporating changes and produce a Final Master Plan for final Board approval.

Deliverables shall include: Updating deliverables identified in item 2D as appropriate to reflect plan changes and modifications.

38 Following the review and agency approval period, the design team will adjust the Preliminary Master Plan incorporating changes and produce a Final Master Plan for final Board approval. Landscape architect will develop refinements and revisions to the master plan as required.

3C Deliverables shall include: Updating deliverables identified in item 20 as appropriate to reflect plan changes and

1 modifications resulting in a designated Final Master

--·~---~---------~--~---------+-·-·- ___ _F'Ia_n~~------- ---------·----- ________ ·---------1

TASK FOUR: Phasing Plan (One month) I TASK FOUR: Phasing Plan (Three month) I

!-1 4A Based on the Final Master Plan cost estimate, and 1 identified park priorities, the Master Design Team

I ______ ;~~J~e~t:~fe~;l~:~a=~~:~~:;f~~=~s~n~d~~;~~~

I ! 4A Followir19tlleappro-vai-oT!r1eMaster P-lan, the 1

Master Design Team will continue to provide J additional refinem .. e. ·n·t·t·o the.pla···n. The p.r .. it.l1a. ry focus.

______ \1\fill be plan re_fin(lment_ra_tber:._~han the ad_d_ition of _



Page 12

~~-

1

-- --- ------~- -------------- --- ----~ program focusinrJ on identification of Phase One construction features and areas for Board approval. .

1------------- -------~~--------~-~-- --- ---L-48 Deliverables shall include: 1 4B

Diagrams and identification of Phase One developments with accompanying cost estimates.

new ideas or concepts. This phase will increase the plan's level of confidence 1 from approximately 50% to approximately 80%. Areas of refinement will cover engineering, conflict resolution, design alternatives and detailed cost estimates.

Based on the Final Master Plan cost estimate, and identified park priorities, the Master Design Team will develop park phasing strategies and phasing alternates leading to an overall phasing plan and program focusing on identification of Phase One construction features and areas for Board approval. Landscape architect will develop illustrations and design studies exploring alternative phasing strategies for the overall park development. Landscape architect will develop phasing studies at scales of 1 "-1 00' to 1" to 500' for the entire park.

Deliverables shalllndude_: __ _ Diagrams and identification of Phase One developments with accompanying cost estimates. J.

_,, .. ,"''"""'"'~""""~--~--- .. --.-- . ---~---- --- ---------~------------ --- --

1 Level of confidence is a measurement of completeness or level of assurance that the vision for the park is obtainable and that as many of the predictable and unpredictable issues affecting the park have been identified. Expressed as a percentage (0-1 00), the level of confidence expresses a sense of certainty that prior to starting the production drawings, a well thought out blueprint is in place. As an example, a confidence of 90% would indicate that the majority of critical issues have been identified, substantial studies are in place suggesting appropriate resolution estimates accurately reflect the proposed finish product and that ultimately there will be a minimum of surprises.



Page 13

TASK FIVE: Phase One Park and Design Illustrations (One month)

TASK FIVE: Phase One Park Schematic Design and Design Guidelines (Three months)

5A The MasterDeslgn Team will refine and develop ____ T5A--TheMasterDes!Qf11eam will refine and develop the Phase One construction features as a cohesive 1! the Phase One construction features as a cohesive first phase development and program package. , first phase development and program package.

I Landscape architect working with the design team

a)

b)

c)

Final Master Plan for all Phase One areas and features Critical Master Plan design guidelines and standards for design development

will develop a coordinated and integrated schematic • 1 design plan for phase one construction. This plan . will de designed as a stand alone park development

phase that will anticipate future phases and developments. Landscape architect will define the construction scope for these phase one areas, including design layouts, limits of work, typical or critical dimensions, identifications of typical and specific materials and material systems, preliminary planting concepts and specific planting plans where critical, prototypical details and sections of critical features, and written and graphic design guidelines to production documents to follow:

a)

b)

c)

Final Master Plan for all Phase One areas and features Critical Master Plan design guidelines and standards for design development i

Views, perspectives, models and illustrative I

·-- -~ _ j_ _____ tii __ ~~~~I~~ruJ~~ally-de~~r~~:-~e~ign an~J Views, perspectives, models and illustrative material to visually describe the design and

i major features. [_ ~9L _ _fl_ll_aL~o~t_pl§_fl ___ _



Page 14

! SB~The-Phase One Design deliverables shall include: The Phase One-Design-deTive-rabies shaliin-cfude:i I The team Will prepare the following final master The team will prepare the following final master plan 1

' plan products: products: ·

a)

b)

c)

d)

e)

f)

g)

h)

An overall phase one plan graphic of the entire park at full build out showing overall design elements and proposed park features at a minimum scale of 1"=500'.

Plan blow ups of major areas and features at a minimum scale of 1 "= 1 00'.






Illustrations and descriptions of park ecological and sustainability systems and features,

·~----------------"·---- -·-·--- --------

a)

b)

c)

d)

e)

f)

g)

h)

An overall phase one plan graphic of the entire park at full build out showing overall design elements and proposed park features at a minimum scale of 1 "=500'.

Plan blow ups of major areas and features at 1

a minimum scale of 1 "=1 00'.


Perspectives including an oblique aeriaL

Illustrations of programs and/or group activity detail of particular park spaces and program areas.



Illustrations and descriptions of park ecological and sustainability systems and features.



Page 15

i)

j)

k)

Illustrations and descriptions-of park----- --- --~ ---- - i)- -Illustration-s ancrcfescrlptions of park l architectural and landscape architectural I architectural and landscape architectural design guidelines. I design guidelines.


j) A set of boards 36"x48" or similar incorporating park design images, labels and short narratives.

A PowerPoint Presentation incorporating I k) A PowerPoint Presentation incorporating . park design images and short narratives. park design images and short narratives.

I_----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- --------- ____ L__ --------- -------------- --------------·-- __]

)>

=i )>

() (!)

I u ~ c m ro zo -I,_

c I'\) 0

0 'I-0 (!)

> (l)

__J

/

.--~"~- "'""'~ ·"~ ~"~"-'"""'·~--~"''~w•,~-"~~~-~,=4·--~-~··~- ~-•-••--·~~- .. -·•·-•'"•' ~~-'""-" "'"~-·~~~·---"·•-••·-•-•-· ~~-~·~--~"- , .• ,. ,-----~-~-----~··• -"'~~~o-.~-~~-~-"'<~•--~~- •·-----~ ••-~•<~•M=•~=·•·-~~---,~ -··- '~''" ••0•

Jan

Compelltion Plan

(Complele)

Feb Mar Apr

C'ri As (C

icallssue ::essment omplete)

May Jun Jul Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feh l'vlar Apr

I PllaseOne

C011t-'efl!uai Pia" City <>f II-Ane Phal!ing Plan& Ori' "+l!lrrwal Pla11 Design

lllu<!tra!ioo~

.... i :

Preiminaty Plan De'&:lopmelll R"'Jiew& . . · · . • PI! I Sd'l. atic Pbasin~usl Ai!-!l'i!l® .·· . IIIli! . :c . ... em . ..

Ap;>rov'\!11$ · . ·- · · · · · . •··. • ' .!l<Nlign & oes'l!l' Gu<.de! nres

I

Comprehensive Master 1Pian fPt~s 1 schematic l I l!lesign and \

1 -------..1~ ~_t:~lgn _ _:;u~~~~0

Timeiine

Revised Time line

i 00% ~---- -~--~--·---· ~[Pna_s_~~~>~~ -- -- :.~~-

75%

[Approved ... \\ •. I ''<•x- .,.. "'!"' ',_i../" J!'~~-~~~n ~\: • -+)_::''"'!-+

·--·~·-····-····---··-~---~-__!· -·-·- - .c ____ ·-·\~-· ·--·--'···- ... )~----·---'---·····--"- --

rP;elir~l;;~y ·-~ : . \~

~-~~~~~!_~an ____ f'~"-, / 1 i ~~

- ..., - Oril}inaf Timeline

- - - Revised Timeine

50% .,. __

~-~~-·--·. -,_ i~~:a~~=~:S \------ ~ ·----------1\ \ . ,.

25%

,...,.,""""" ~-·~·-------··1 ~\ \. ,. ·--·~;:petilion \---------. ___ _:_

1

___ -. --;,-,-~-:;,.~ I ~ ~~'

\..\,.. --F _________ !'-,\~ ' "\,..:!--

,/<;,. '\- ., j' · . Consultants Tasks Complete fill 1 llfllli

Ken Smith Gafcon Fuscoe

....... ~---~-.,....., ... ...

Jan Mar Apr fvlay Jun Sep r··Jov Dec Feb

J -·

Jul .fo .. ug Oct Jan Mar Apr Feb

·------------·-·-·------------~·

ATTACHMENT 3 IS ON FILE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE

City Council Meeting May 23,2006 Page 2

increase the level of confidence in the Master Plan. The refined Scope of Work for Tasks Two through Five will provide a Comprehensive Master Plan for the Orange County Great Park as well as a more thorough Phase One Design. By including this work in the Great Park Design Studio's scope, the City will maintain the momentum of the design team, gain the benefit of the Master Designer's involvement in the schematic design process, and expedite the schematic design for Phase One. Since the Great Park is a large-scale and complex undertaking with high public visibility, the impacts of the design decisions made during this phase of development will be visible for generations. The Comprehensive Master Plan will provide the Board and the City with the level of confidence necessary to insure that the park will be viable and is the next step in achieving the goal of creating the first great metropolitan park of the 21st Century.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the revised Scope of Work for Tasks Two through Five for the Master Plan of the Orange County Great Park and assign the Agreement for Master Designer Services to the City of Irvine, including a staff recommended budget not to exceed $9,575,000 for Tasks Two through Five.

The total Task One budget, including reimbursables and contingency, was $372,000. In approving the staff recommended budget for Tasks Two through Five, the total Great Park Design Studio budget for the Comprehensive Master Plan will be $9,947,000.

COMMISSION/ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION:

On April 27, 2006 the Board of Directors of the Orange County Great Park Corporation recommended that the City Council approve the revised Scope of Work for Tasks Two through Five for the Master Plan of the Orange County Great Park. At that meeting, the Board previewed a preliminary budget of $9,548,834. The proposed budget amount has continued to evolve through the on-going dialogue with the Great Park Design Studio team.

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES

Issue 1: Master Designer Preliminary Scope of Work

On March 9, 2006, the Orange County Great Park Board approved and authorized the Chief Executive Officer to sign the Agreement for Master Designer Services including a five task Scope of Work and a budget for the Task One Critical Issues Assessment not to exceed $372,000.

The Preliminary Scope of Work outlined the five tasks to be accomplished, the process for completing those tasks, and the deliverables. The Scope of Work included the work tasks summarized below:

City Council Meeting May 23, 2006 Page 3

Task One: Critical Issues Assessment- The competition plan will move forward by refining the boundaries and edge conditions, establishing primary access and circulation systems, and identifying utility and infrastructure corridors as further described below, (Note: This Task was completed and the work product was presented to the Orange County Great Park Board at its April 13, 2006, meeting.)

Task Two: Preliminary Master Plan - The design process will refine the competition plan to a Preliminary Master Plan through the preparation of design studies to address specific issues followed by the selection of preferred alternatives by the Board. Following the Board's approval of a Preliminary Master Plan, a comprehensive cost estimate will be prepared. This cost estimate will provide valuable information to the Board as it moves forward with updating its business plan for the construction of the Great Park.

Task Three: City Approval of the Final Master Plan -The approved Preliminary Master Plan will be submitted to the City of Irvine to be reviewed through the Park Master Plan process. The Community Services Commission serves as a recommending body and the Planning Commission has final approval authority. The action of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City CounciL

Task Four: Phasing Plan- Following City approval, the Final Master Plan will be used to prepare an overall phasing plan. Phasing alternatives will be presented to the Board for consideration and a Final Phasing Plan will be selected for construction,

Task Five: Phase One Plan and Design Illustrations - The final task of the design team will be to refine and develop the Phase One construction features into a cohesive first phase development. This task will result in a Phase One plan and design illustrations.

Tasks Two through Five are described in general, high level, conceptual terms in the Agreement for Master Designer Services. In accordance with Section 1.9.1.1 of the Agreement, the detailed Scope of Work and budget for Tasks Two through Five were to be finalized and returned to the Board for approval prior to authorizing the consultant team to begin Task Two.

Issue 2: Revised Scope of Work

The Scope of Work for Tasks Two through Five has been refined to reflect an expanded depth of work effort to be completed by the Great Park Design Studio team. Based on the results of the Task One Critical Issues Assessment and the level of effort recommended by the Ad Hoc Committee, the consultant team has suggested that Tasks Two through Five be expanded to include schematic design and design development elements early in the process to provide refined cost estimates (20%


margin of error) and to increase the level of confidence in the Master Plan (Attachment 1 -Scope of Work Comparison).

The Comprehensive Master Plan is defined as a framework to guide the long-term physical development of the Orange County Great Park. The Master Plan graphically portrays the design concepts and provides the background data and studies upon which the plan is based. The goal of the Master Plan is to provide guidelines for future development; integrate the physical, environmental and socioeconomic connections between the park and community; and address community needs in a financially feasible manner.

The additional work effort is clearly demonstrated in the revisions to Task Two regarding design alternatives and studies to address desired ideas, refinements and elements of the park program and design (Task 2A). Once the alternatives are refined, they will be presented to the Great Park Board for consideration and direction. The additional depth of work will filter through the remaining components of Task Two resulting in a more accurate and better defined Preliminary Master Plan.

Task Three is the City review and approval of the Master Plan. This task remains unchanged,

The depth of work in the Task Four Phasing Plan will also reflect the level of effort initiated in Task Two. Following the approval of the Master Plan, the design team will continue to provide additional maturity to the plan. The primary focus in this task will be plan refinement rather than the addition of new ideas or concepts. Additionally, the approved Master Plan will be used to prepare an overall phasing plan. Phasing alternatives will be presented to the Great Park Board for consideration and a Final Phasing Plan will be selected for construction. In order to accomplish the revised program outlined for this task, the consultant team requested two rnore months than were provided in the original scope.

Task Five evolved from the preparation of a Phase One Plan with conceptual design illustrations to a coordinated and integrated schematic design plan for Phase One. Design layouts, limits of work, typical or critical dimensions, identifications of typical and specific materials and material systems, preliminary planting concepts (and specific planting plans where critical), prototypical details and sections of critical features, and written and graphic design guidelines as well as operations and maintenance guidelines will be included in this task. In order to accomplish the revised program outlined for Task Five, the consultant team requested an additional two months for this component.

Overall, the refined Scope of Work for Tasks Two through Five will provide a Comprehensive Master Plan for the Orange County Great Park as well as schematic design and some level of design development for Phase One. The additional work involves design components that need to be completed in order to move forward with construction of the first phase of the Great Park. By including this work in the Great

City Council Meeting May 23, 2006 Page 5

Park Design Studio's scope, the Corporation will maintain the momentum of the design team, gain the benefit of the Master Designer's involvement in the process, and expedite the necessary schematic design and design development phase of work.

The benefits to this approach include:

• A reduction in the overall cost and timeline of the project Comprehensive planning has consistently been shown to reduce the cost of final design documents as well as a reduction in rework or on the ground issue resolution during construction.

• A reduction in design costs by mobilizing the design team and keeping them working continually through the project's duration. By efficiently managing the team, reducing delays related to rebidding schematic design, and by overlapping tasks, the result should be a better product at a more economical price.

• The Great Park is a large-scale and complex undertaking with high public visibility. The impacts of the design decisions made during this phase of development will be visible for generations. A comprehensive Master Plan, developed with a high level of confidence, will assure that what is designed can be built

As noted above, the revised Scope of Work will extend the time frame for reaching the Phase One Master Plan by four months, moving the completion schedule from December 2006 to April 2007. A revised timeline is included as Attachment 2. This timeline also compares the level of confidence achieved by the original scope of work to the revised Task Two through Five scope of work presented in this staff report

The Great Park Design Studio team has no budget authorization to work beyond Task One. The consultant team has chosen to continue its work efforts beyond Task One without the Chief Executive Officer's authorization and "at risk". Reimbursement for any work effort initiated beyond the Task One assignment is subject to Council approval of a budget for Tasks Two through Five.

Issue 3: Budget

a. Consultant Proposed Budget

Following !he preparation of the refined Scope of Work, a proposed budget was prepared by the Great Park Design Studio team based on the hourly rates of the consultants involved and the estimated hours necessary to complete the specified work products.

The proposed budget is broken down by the four remaining tasks as defined in the Scope of Work:


, Consultant Proposed Budget I

-T-a-sk- ---,--- Description ! Tim_e_f_r_am_e_[ Budget -~

Task 2 Preliminary Master Plan [ Four I $3,886,213[

[___ ___ ----+ [ months ; 1

I Task 3 i City Review and Approval of ! Two months 1· $1,771,992 I r------- ----+-i t_h_e _ Master Plan . ~ ____ ~ 1 Task4 I Phasing Plan 1 Thr~e ! $1,991,731 •

1

1.1 1 I montns I i ---T~-sk_5___ II PhaseOne Park ScherT1~-Three _$_1_,5_5_2_,5_4_61

Design and Design Guidelines i months [

!- Re-fi-n-ed_S_c--op-e-To_ta_l T ·- I ---i--$_9_, 1_72,4821

Travel Allowance Airfare, lodging, rental car $102,5181

Reimbursable Presentation model, computer $200.000 Expenses simulation and/or animation of I I

1 1 major features I I lo~ner Contingency rR~spond to additional work --+~--- ---t---$1o-o-,o00l

[ efforts required to complete I /

~ --------. i Proposed Contract L Total

1 individual tasks

·--- $9,575,000 1 !

_j

The proposed budget is an estimate of the hours of work required to complete the specific tasks in the work program based on the expertise of the Great Park Design Studio team. In a "cost not to exceed" contract, the Corporation is billed only for the work effort performed by the consultant team. In the Great Park Design Studio proposed budget, the cost control discipline would be applied by the consultant team members and reviewed by the Corporation and its Program Manager, Bevis Lend lease, Inc. as invoices are received.

In order to accomplish the four tasks listed above, the Great Park Design Studio team has created ten working groups to address the design issues at the Great Park. These groups will focus on the following:


Working Group Description

Park Program and Design Creating the overall mission and vision for the I Pa~ 1

1---------------+--------------------1 I Sustainability Providing for the long term viability and value of I

L--------- the Park----------·-1 Natural Systems Insuring that flora and fauna can coexist in a i

1

natural environment I ! Park Infrastructure Designing the physical infrastructure for the

Park i ------ ---------+----~ --------- --~

I Neighborhood Integration Integrating the Park with the surrounding 'II

I, community ------- ----------+----~-----

f~chedules and Financial Project Budgeting, scheduling, and accounting within 1

anagement the Great Park Design Studio team I oecial Constraints . Addressing unique constraints imposed by the

L I Navy, the FAA, and the regulatory agencies _I. I Stakeholder Involvement Providing opportunities for the stakeholder to I

. help shape the Park program

j Safety and Security ---- - -- ---j----

L ____ _ i Business Plan I

1 Designing to address public safety (police and fire) concerns as well as visitor/participant safety and security

Understanding the economic and financial impacts of Park operations

The budget detail is provided under separate cover and can be reviewed and analyzed by the tasks, the working groups, or the individual consultant team members (Attachment 3).

b. Design Cost Analysis

Industry standards for the typical design cost range between 7 to 15% of the total construction value_ For example, assuming that the Phase One construction value is $150M, then the total design cost, including construction documents, would be estimated at between $1 0_5M and $22_5M_ While this is one gauge to measure the appropriateness of total design cost on an order of magnitude level, the size and complexity of the project will ultimately influence the final cost of the design_ In addition, the range referenced above generally applies to typical landscape architect and design firms. Since Ken Smith and other members of the Great Park Design Studio team are recognized as "world renowned", the typical cost range should be adjusted to reflect the status of the team members_


c. Staff recommended budget

Staff and the Great Park Design Studio team are continuing to refine expectations with regard to the deliverables assigned to each task or team member. As this process has evolved, the Corporation's Program Manager and staff have reached different conclusions than the Great Park Design Studio team with regard to the work effort required for some of the tasks and deliverables. Therefore, staff is recommending that a portion of task budgets be allocated to the contingency that is controlled by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). These funds will remain part of the overall budget and be available to the consultant team upon further refinement of the deliverables assigned to the remaining tasks and upon justification of the proposed work effort to the CEO.

The consultant proposed budget also includes funds for sub-consultants that have not yet been approved by the Corporation. Therefore, staff is recommending that the proposed budgets for these sub-consultants also be allocated to the contingency controlled by the CEO.

The recommended budget by task is:

~-----Ta_s_k--~- Description Budget . I Contingency i 1----- --- -j·--·------··- ------'-- ---t·----·--------""""""'--j

1----Ta_s_k 2 1 Preliminary Masl_e_r_P_Ia_n _____ J_$2,612,599! $1,728,770 ·

II Task 3 ' City Review and Approval of the . $631,058 i $78,884

M I !

i aster Plan ' I 1

r--T-a-sk_4_ I Phasing Plan I $1,103,9_7_5+--$-1_8_5.-1-32--ii 1- __ ,_,_ ---·

I

Task 5 Phase One Park Schematic Design $1,821,043 $611,021 i and Design Guidelines I

' ! ;

' Refined Scope $6,168,675 $2,603,807 ' ' ! Total I

' I ----Travel Allowance Airfare, lodging, rental car I $93,918 $8,600 i

Reimbursable -Large quantity prints, large copying [ --l

$200,000 $400,000 1

Expenses ! I

1 JObs, presentation model, computer I simulation and/or animation of 1 I I I ; I

I f-..-.-.-------·-·-- ----11-m.......:.aJ_or features ---l------+---------i

I $100,000 I Owner Contingency

I Respond to additional work efforts I required to complete individual tasks

Sub-Total ~

Proposed Contract Total

,____ ___ ----'----- ---------·-·-·-------.L

I , I I

-------!-----~ ! I

$6,462,593 1 $3,112,407 J $9,575,ooo 1


The worksheet developed by the Program Manager to detail the adjustments summarized in the recommended budget is included as Attachment 4 to this report. When staff and the Great Park Design Studio team have reached closure on the deliverables assigned to each task, the contingency will be used to adjust the budget amount committed to the appropriate team member. In addition, once the subconsultants have been approved by the Corporation, their scopes of work and deliverable work products have been clearly defined, and their specific budgets have been provided by the Great Park Design Studio team, funds will be committed to the Master Designer for those consultants at that time. The Master Designer is solely responsible for payment to sub-consultants.

The staff's proposed budgeting process allows the Chief Executive Officer to utilize the Program Manager's considerable expertise in maintaining close budget control over the project. If the Council adopts the staff recommendation, the City will authorize the overall budget amount proposed by the Great Park Design Studio team but will retain a portion of the authorized funds under the control of the CEO.

This mechanism worked extremely well in Task One of the Master Plan process where the Great Park Board adopted a CEO-controlled contingency. Close coordination with the Great Park Design Studio team lead to the conclusion that the budget was insufficient to complete a preliminary assessment of sustainability program opportunities. Based on the request from the consultant team. the CEO authorized an adjustment of $17,920 from the Task One contingency to allow Buro Happold to proceed with its assessment of sustainability issues.

As with all contracts, invoices will be carefully scrutinized to ensure proper billing consistent with the budgeted amount. All reimbursable expenses will also be checked to conform to the requirements of the Agreement and the adopted City policies. The proposed total of $9,575,000 for Tasks 2 through 5 will remain the "cost not to exceed" ceiling for the contract.

The consultant team suggests that the potential exists for reimbursements from the Community Facilities District (CFD) for some of the infrastructure design work. In addition, some of the neighborhood integration work effort may be assignable to Heritage Fields with their concurrence. These two assumptions will need to be further analyzed and confirmed, but staff agrees that the potential exists for reimbursement of some design costs. For budgeting purposes, however, the proposed budget for Tasks Two through Five does not assume any reimbursement from either the CFD or Heritage Fields.


d. Comprehensive Master Plan budget

The total Task One budget, including reimbursables and contingency, was $372,000. In approving the budget for Tasks Two through Five, the total Great Park Design Studio budget for the Comprehensive Master Plan will be $9,947,000.

Issue 4: Master Designer Services Agreement

On March 9, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Great Park Corporation approved the Master Designer Services Agreement and a not to exceed budget of $372,000 for Task One of the Scope of Work (Attachment 5). The Board was able to take this action because the approved budget allocation from the City of Irvine included funds for the Master Designer. In accordance with City and Corporation procurement policies, the CEO was authorized to sign the agreement.

With the submittal of the Task Two through Five budget, the total amount of the contract now exceeds the budget authority of the CEO and the funding approved within the 2005-2006 budget. The appropriate mechanism to transfer the Agreement for Master Designer Services from the Orange County Great Park Corporation to the City of Irvine is a Novation Agreement (Attachment 6). Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign a Novation Agreement to assign the Agreement for Master Designer Services to the City of Irvine, including a staff recommended budget not to exceed $9,575,000 for Tasks Two through Five.

a. Structure of the .Ag reemenl

The Great Park Design Studio team has recommended a change to the terms of the Agreement, modifying the delivery process from a task oriented process to a goal oriented process with the consultant able to move budgeted hours and costs between line items and disciplines. Staff does not recommend this change as it will substantial shift budgetary control from the Corporation to the consultant team. Staff recommends that the structure of the existing Agreement remain in place.

b. insurance

Section 2.1 .3 of the Master Designer Services Agreement includes special project insurance requirements for professional liability that will extend for ten years after the completion of the design work. The Corporation and the consultant are jointly pursuing insurance options and, depending on the relative costs of the insurance, will determine which entity should purchase the policy. The cost of insurance will either be absorbed within the contingency or brought back to the City Council for an additional budget authorization. This project insurance policy does not need to be in place prior to the commencement of Task Two.


ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

1) The City Council may choose to retain the Scope of Work and lime line included in the original contract and direct staff to work with the Great Park Design Studio team and return to the Council with a budget to reflect a level of work effort appropriate to that scope.

2) The City Council may choose to adopt the Great Park Design Studio recommended change to the terms of the Agreement and authorize the consultant team to move budgeted hours and costs between line items and disciplines without the approval of the Corporation.

FISCAL IMPACT

Funds are available to cover the projected cost of the work effort which will occur within this fiscal year by readjusting resources within the Corporation's budget. Funds for next fiscal year will be included in the Corporation's proposed budget for FY 06-07.

Report prepared by: Glen Worthington, Manager of Planning, Orange County Great Park Corporation

Reviewed by: W. D. Kreutzen, Chief Executive Officer, Orange County Great Park Corporation

Attachments:

cc

1. Scope of Work Comparison 2. Revised Timeline 3. Task 2-5 Scope and Fee Proposal (under separate cover) 4. Budget worksheet 5. Agreement for Master Designer Services 6, Novation Agreement

Ken Smith, 79 Chambers Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10007 Yehudi Gaffen, Gafcon, 701 B Street, Suite 1200, San Diego, CA 92101 Pat Fuscoe, Fuscoe Engineering, 16795 Von Karman, #10, Irvine, CA 92606 Allyson Gipson, Bovis Lend Lease, 800 West 6th Street, Suite 1250, Los Angeles,

CA 90017 OCGP Director Bill Kogerman, 25231 Mawson Drive, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 OCGP Director Miguel Pulido, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center, Santa Ana, CA

92701 OCGP Vice Chair Michael Pinto, 495 Arroyo Chino, Laguna Beach, CA 92651


OCGP Director Walkie Ray, Sanderson J. Ray, 2699 White Road #150, Irvine, CA 92614

Rob Thornton, Nossaman, 18101 Von Karman #1800, Irvine, CA 92612

•

•

•

Orange County Great Park

Scope & Fee Proposal

Tasks 2-5

Date: May 9, 2006

To: Me Wally Kreutzen, CEO

Orange County Great Park Corporation

I

Page 1 of 24

• Table of Contents

1. Introduction

2. Scope of Work by Task

3. Management and Fees

4. Team Summaries

a. Ken Smith

b. Gafcon, lnc .

• c. Buro Happold

d. Fuscoe Engineering

e. Mary Miss Studio

f. Mia Lehrer & Assoc.

g. Green Shield Ecology

h. TEN Arquitectos

l. Miscellaneous Consultants

5. Terms and Condition

6. Glossary

• Page 2 of 24

•

•

Introduction Great Park Design Studio (GPDS) is pleased to present for your consideration and input this drat! proposal for completion of the Comprehensive Master Plan for Great Park, under the prescribed tasks two through tive of the current agreement between Orange County Great Park (OCGP) and GPDS. For clarity, task one was the preparation of a Critical Issues Assessment and has been completed.

This Binder contains a detailed approach and process for the development of the Comprehensive Master Plan. Our intent is to solicit feedback from OCGP and your staff and make the necessary adjustment to the scope and fee structure.

Definitions The Great Park Comprehensive Master Plan is defined as the thorough and complete evaluation of design issues resulting in a detailed complete plan enabling subsequent final design development, and is the vision for the long-te1m development of the park. It graphically portrays the concept and reports the data and logic upon which the plan is based. The goal of the comprehensive master plan is to provide guidelines for future development, which will satisfy demand in a financiaily feasible manner, while at the same time resolving the physical, enviromncntai and socioeconomic issues existing in the communir-;.

The Comprehensive lvfaster Plan: A series of studies and documents, which include:

• A "preliminary master plan"

• Approval of the preliminary master plan by city

• Continued master plan refinements, a Phasing Plan, and recommendations for phases

• Schematic design, preliminary design development and design guidelines for the production of Phase One constmction documents.

Preliminary Master Plan: Defined as the Master Plan prior to approvaL All work on the master plan is considered preliminary until approved. This will include resolution of key issues resulting in a plan validating the competition plan and the critical issues assessment, showing additional levels of detail, clarifying boundaries and m~or elements, delivering a "go forward" presentation quality plan for approvaL

Although used interchangeably, it is important to remember that the Preliminary Master Plan and the Master Plan are only components of the "Comprehensive Master Plan."

lvtaster Plan: 1\n approved framework to guide the long-term physical development of a particular area,

' Page 3 of 24

•

•

•

Components of the Comprehensive Master Plan The Comprehensive Master Plan is broken down into four components as shown by Figure 1 (sec page 8). Each phase within the Comprehensive Master Plan represents an improvement in the project confidence level. Following the approval of the Master Plan, the Master Design Team wii! continue to provide additional maturity to the plan. The primary focus will he plan refinement and detailed issue resolution rather than addrtwnal ideas or concepts. Additionally, the approved Master Plan will be used to prepare an overall phasing plan. Phasing alternatives will be presented to the Board for consideration and a Final Phasing Pian wil1 be selected for construction.

The central debate surrounding any Comprehensive Master Plan is the level of detail presented within the plan and the level of issue identification and resolution. The higher the confidence in the feasibility of a Comprehensive Master Plan, the higher degree of effort and hence cost to develop the plan. Historically, a preliminary master plan is a preliminary document representing a vision with moderate attention given to the workability of the plan. The opposite of the preliminary master plan are the final construction documents. The construction documents describe in great detail the specitlc components of the projects and thus present with great predictability how the project will be constructed. GPDS believes the correct approach is the production of a comprehensive master plan and that this approach is consistent with the scope of work identifid for the Great Park.

A comprehensive master plan is the preferred deliverable because it builds on the initial findings of a prehminary master plan by:

• Defining a clear definition for the dements of the Great Park.

• Providing a high level of detail and issue resolution, thus supporting an accurate and predictable project outcome.

• Insuring compatible land use.

• Reducing the potential project risk by providing issue claritlcation and design standards prior to construction document production.

• Identifying and rcsolvmg potential project cont1icts with a high level of con!ldence.

• Providing sul1icicnt infrasn'llcture detail to allow an accurate and predictable cost estimate for the project.

• Identifying and resolving potential issuesicontlicts at the boundmics of the project.

Definition of Level of Confidence

Level of cont!dence is defined as a measurement of completeness or level of assurance that the vision for the park is obtainable and that as many of the predictable and unpredictable issues affecting the park have been identified. Expressed as a percentage (0-100), the level of confidence does not imply perfection of levels of financial contingency, but rather a sense of confidence that prior to starting the production drawings, a well thought out blueprint is in place .

Page 4 of 24

•

•

•

As an example, a confidence of 90% would indicate that the majority of critical issues have been identitled, substantial studies are in place suggesting appropriate resolution, edge boundary conditions have been resolved, estimates accurately reflect the proposed finish product and that ultimately there will be a minimum of surprises, Simply put, it's easier to fix a problem on paper that on the ground.

Composition

The key to the success ofthe project is the professional collaboration between the Master Design Team, the Great Park staff, the number of agencies involved and the community. 11 Work Groups were established to pursue the planning and design for their respective disciplines. These groups have coordinated their work with each other and were overseen by the principals, Ken Smith and Yehudi Gaffen. Approximately 20 highly qualified sub-consultants participated in the collaboration process.

Duration

The Comprehensive Master Plan is proposed to have a duration of l2rnonths with the first four months are dedicated to the development of the Preliminary Master Plan, The following months are dedicated to an iterative process of submittal to the City of Irvine, cost estimating, phasing and focus on Phase One construction plan will develop landscape desi!,'ll studies and assist the restoration ecologist in development

Team Composition and Consultant's Roles

Ken Smith Workshop West Green Shield Ecology • Master Designer • Wildlife/Habitats • Park Program and Design • Hydrology/Water Requirements • Habitat • Plants • Hydrology • Soils • Architecture/Structures • Botanic Gardens • Art/Signage/Lighting/ Acoustics • Design Guidelines/ ADA Accessibility

Gafcou TEN Arquitectos • Design Administration 31 Temporary Structures • Estimating • Core Structures • Scheduling • Distinctive Structures • Joint Venture Administration • Distinctive Guidelines • Information Collaboration • QA/QC

Page 5 of 2:4

•

•

•

Burro Happold • Sustainability/Grcen Streets • Energy Planning • Bridge Engineering • Building Engineering Concepts

'Fnscoe Engineering • Infrastructure • Utilities/Drainage • Grading/Lakes • Circulation • Edge Transition • Design Guide! ines • Sustainability Support • Agency Coordination

Other Proposed Consultants m Soils • Lighting m Acoustics • Signage • Security/Safety • Sports Park • Landscape Production • Model Building • Water Conservation, Urban Plants • Public Information

Consultant Selection Protocol

Mary Miss Studios

• • • •

Art Integration Edge Transition Uses and Features Sustainability Education Component

Mia Lehrer + Associates • • • • •

Landscape Program and Design Natural Systems Public Involvement Sustainability Neighborhood Integration

In addition to the consultants identified by name to support the Great Park Master Planning effort, there will be addition consultants which arc as yet unnamed. The following discussion identifies a management protocol to select "Second Tier" Consultants.

Purpose

To establish a consistent and prudent approach to the selection of additional professional resources tor the Orange County Great Park Design StLldio Team relevant to Tasks 2-5.

Preferences

To identify locally based professionals who can add both professional expertise, as well as being familiar with the Orange County design and regulatory environment.

Page6 of 24

•

•

•

Protocols

"Second Tier" consultants will be identified and selected on an as-needed basis under the Master Agreement contract parameters, The selection procedure and primities are as follows:

1, Reputation 4, Compatibility/Proximity L Expertise 5, Available resources 3, Relevant experience G, Schedule/Rates

These sub-consultants shall be identified and reviewed as follows:

1, Check industry networks for reputable referrals (marketplace reputation) 2, Investigate forms technical and professional expertise (on-line/client calls) 3, Request Statements of Qualifications and letters of interest (project experience) 4, Short list two to three (2-3) firms for interview (compatibility/resources) 5, Request submittal of fee estimate and/or rate schedule G, Make selection of preferred consultant for submittal to Orange County Great Park staff

tor approval 7, Contract with selected consultant under Master Agreement procedures/requirements

Page 7 of 24

•

•

•

Scope of Work by Task

Comprehensive Master Plan Upon completion of Task One and approval by the Board, the team will proceed in developing the Comprehensive Master Plan outlined below.

Preliminary Master Plan {four months)

Will tocus on developing overview design studies, alternatives, and design refinements to flesh out the critical issues and recommendations identitled in Task One and other information and direction provided by the Board. Concepts and designs will be addressed at levels appropriate to presentation for review and approval by the Great Park Board. The design studies will lead to development of preferred alternatives and ultimately an overall comprehensive master plan for the park.

Comprehensive Master Plan (tvve!ve months- inciudes all tasks)

Based on infonnation trom Task One and other information and program direction idenlilled by the Great Park Board, the Master Design Team will develop design alternatives and studies to address desired ideas, re!inements and elements of the park program and design, including preliminary cost estimates and reviews. Design studies will address but not he limited to the following:

a) Overall site organization. Landscape architect will study options and alternatives for site organization. Overall site studies and diagrams will be developed at scales ranging from l"~JOO to 1"=500. Plan Blowups will be studied at larger scale of 1 "=20 to 1 "= 100 to study select areas in more detail. These studies will focus on developing an integration of teatures, circulation, infrastructure, architecture, landscape, habitats in coordinated plans.

b) Development of major park features and program areas. Landscape architect will explore prototypes of similar program types including scale comparisons and program elements and typical layouts to determine appropriate scale and design for the park. Diagrammatic studies of integrated features for entire park will be developed at scales of l"~JOO to 1"=500 and plan Blowups of selected areas wili be developed at scales of 1 "=20 to 1 "~100 and typical sections will be developed at scales of 1/8"~]' to I "=20.

c) Definition of programs and future user experiences. Landscape architect will prepare narrative outlines and descriptions of park programs by area including description of function, target users, types of use, management implications and level of facility development. Prototypes information will be researched !rom other parks and related facilities and recommendations will be developed for application at the Great Park

Page 9 of 24

•

•

•

d) Development of park circulation and parking. Landscape architect will work with engineering consultants and city staff to develop and integrate circulation systems and parking for the park Landscape architect will develop prototype and specific designs tor streetscapes and parking areas.

e) Development of iconic and thematic conceplso Landscape architect, in conjunction with the coHaborative design team will develop design concepts studies tor iconic elements and overall thematic features integrated into the park Landscape architect will develop design studies for distinctive park entry areas, memorial areas, terraces/plazas or other distinctive hardscape areas and other special landscape features of a distinctive nature, such as arbors, screens, allees. gardens etc.

f) Development of park edge conditions addressing private/public issues and separation/integration edge features. Landscape architect in collaboration with Lennar and the Heritage Fields design consultants will develop design studies for integration of park edges. Typical issues will include coordination of adjacent program and uses, integration of adjacent landscape features, development of drainage landscape at property lines, development of edges, fencing as required, other baniers, visual markers, and typical signage. Development of entry ways features and trail head areas arc park perimeter. Diagrammatic studies of integrated edge treatment for entire park will be developed at scales of 1 "= 100 to l "=500 and plan blowc1ps of selected areas will be dcveioped at scales of 1 "~20 to l"~lOO and typical sections wili be developed at scales of l/8"~1' to 1"~20.

g) Development of sustainable design elements. Landscape architect will develop landscape design studies for sustainable elements and integrate ideas and concepts !i·om other consultants on the design team, city and OCGP staff.

h) Identification of resource protection areas and development of ecological areas design/management parameters. Landscape architect will develop landscape design studies and assist the restoration ecologist in development of typical planting strategies and designs.

i) Identification of other special features and preservation areas and development of design/management parameters for these areas. Landscape architect will develop inventory of special features to be preserved or reused on the site and develop concepts and design studies for their incorporation into the overall park design.

j) Development of architectural design features and thematic design and guidelines.

k)

Landscape architect will assist the architect in developing related landscape features and siting for proposed architectural features.

Development of plant massing/communities, and development of preliminary plant palettes. Working with the restoration ecologist, and local plant specialists, the landscape architect will develop overall plant massing and planting strategies for the park. Plant communities will be identified along with typical plant species and prototype plant massing studies, spacing or landscape layout criteria . Diagrammatic studies of integrated planting for entire park will be developed at

Page 10 of 24

•

•

•

scales of 1 "~ 100 to l "~500 and plan blowup of selected areas will be developed at scales of 1"=20 to 1"=100 and typical sections will be developed at scales of li8"=1' to 1 "~20,

l) Development of streetscape typical designs, Landscape architect will develop prototypical and specific treatments for distinctive strectscapes, Typical studies will be developed in section and plan blowup at scales of 1/8"=1' to 1"~20,

m) Development of park path systems, guidelines for bike, hiking, ADA requirements, and related issues, Landscape architect wili develop plans tor service drives, Landscape architect will develop plans and prototype design for h·ails for walkways, hiking, jogging, bicycling, and equestrian uses as determined appropriate for the park Typical sections, materials, gradients and associated landscaping will be developed for the areas along trails and trail nodes, Landscape architect will develop plans and guidelines for accessibility and ADA. Diagrammatic studies of integrated circulation for entire park will be developed at scales of 1"~100 to 1"~500 and plan blowups of selected areas will be developed at scales of 1 "=20 to I"~ I 00 and typical sections will be developed at scales of 1/8"=1' to 1 "~20,

n) Develop security and maintenance concepts. Landscape architect will work with city and OC:GP ot1icials and staff to develop security and maintenance concepts and develop related dcsi;,'TI studies for proposed security and maintenance features.

Develop mass grading concepts. typical slopes configurations and cut and fill evaluation, Working with the civil engineer, the landscape architect will develop an overall grading plan focusing on balance cut and fill, landform shape and design. Landscape architect will develop grading studies at scales of 1 "-! 00 to l" to 500 for the entire park and will develop detailed blowups and sections at larger scales of 1"-20 to 1 "=I 00, Landscape architect may produce study models in clay or contoured cardboard to study and illustrate landforms for the park of selected areas of the park Typical sections will integrate drainage concepts. planting concepts, trails and view corridors"

p) Costing and phasing, While these are subject of later master plan tasks, the landscape architect will work with cost estimators in the process of developing design concepts to develop realm of magnitude cost estimates for the OC:GP staff to help detemrine potential cost impacts of various alternative design studies, Landscape architect will also show sensitivity to issues of potential phasing in developing design studies for the park_

As part of the design studies, the Master Design Team will continue to review project background reports and new information for incorporation into the design studies. The Master Design Team will continue to synthesize this information and identify issues and information having impact on the development and refinement of the competition design and development of park program and design features_ The landscape architect will

Page 11 of 24 ~ .

•

•

•

coordinate and develop design studies for incorporating and integrating this information into the park design including following:

a) Local habitat, wildlife and ecological conditions

b) Stream daylighting and flood control issues

c) Hydrology, water supply and demand, and water rmnagcmen! issues

d) Geotechnical, soils and related issues

e) Existing and proposed utilities

f) Consideration of comnm.nity input

g) Sports Park Needs Assessment program requirements

h) Transportation, access, bike trails and related issues

i) Site demolition, removals and runway recycling program and temporary uses

j) Surrounding development program/design and private public boundaries.

Design studies will be organized into the following phases:

a) Preliminary studies. The learn will develop design studies exploring and addressing identified issues and park and program design options, including up to three for each major feature or area. Major features or areas will include but not be limited to the canyonj sports area~ entry areas, fields, great lawn, parking, and mi]ltary memorial.

b) Evaluation and feedback The team will present design studies to the OCGP staff and Board, relevant agencies and affected stakeholders for evaluation and feedback.

c) Revised or preferred studies. The design team will prepare revised and refined design studies addressing evaluations and feedback, leading to identification anc development of preferred alternatives and design options.

d) Evaluation and feedback. The team will present design studies to the OCGP staff and Board and affected stakeholders for evaluation and feedback.

e) Preliminary Master Plan. The design team wiil develop an overall master plan for the park based on preferred alternatives and design options.

Master Plan deliverables shall include: Landscape architect will integrate and coordinate design studies and work products of other members of the design team into an overa]: master plan including.

a) An overall master plan graphic of the entire park at full build out showing overall design elements and proposed park features at a minimum scale of 1 '"=500'.

b) Plan blowups of principal areas at a minimum scale of l "=100'.

c) Character sections of major teatures and gateways, and iliustration of the relationships of various parts of the plan to each other.

Page 12 of 24

•

•

•

d) Perspectives including an oblique aeriaL

e) Jllustrations of prog-rams and/or group activity detail of particular park spaces and program areas.

t) lllustrations of streetscapes and edge conditions.

g) Illustrations of thematic, mt and iconic elements

h) Illustrations and narrative descriptions of park ecological and sustainability systems and features

i) Illustrations and narrative descriptions of park architectural and landscape architectural design elements.

j) The Design Team will develop a master plan level cost estimate for the pre-final park master plan including assessment of selected lifecycle impacts of identified features.

k)

I)

m)

n)

o)

p)


A PowerPoint presentation incorporating park design images and short niirrati ves .

The Design Team will develop a master plan level cosl estimate for the revised park master plan.


Operation and Maintenance Guide] ines

Optional deliverables (to be negotiated separately).

• Presentation ModeL

• Computer Simulation and/or animation of major features or areas.

Review and Approval of the Preliminary Master Plan (two months)

Upon approval of the Preliminary Master Plan by the OCGP Board, the plan wiil be submitted to review and build consensus from the relevant public agencies. Agency review will include but not be limited to City Planning Commission, and Community Services Commission. Dming this period the design team will prepare additional studies that address concerns or issues raised by the review agencies on a time and materials basis. Landscape architect will make presentations to agencies and respond to cmnments and concerns. Landscape architect \Vi11 prepare design studies that address issues raised during this process.

During the review and approval period, the design team will adjust the Preliminary Master Plan incorporating changes and produce a Master Plan. Landscape architect will develop refinements and revisions to the master plan as required .

Page 13 of24

•

•

Deliverables shall include: Updating deliverables identified in preliminary master plan as appropriate to reflect plan changes and modifications resulting in a designated Final Master Plan:

Phasing Plan (three months)

Based on the Master Plan cost estimate, and rdentilled park priorillcs, the Master Design Team will develop park phasing strategies and phasing alternates leading to an overall phasing plan and program focusing on identification of Phase One construction features and areas for Board approvaL

Deliverables shall include: Master Plan at 75-80% confidence, including diagrams and identification of Phase One developments with accompanying cost estimates, Landscape architect will include illustrations and design studies exploring alternative phasing strategies for the overall park development Landscape architect will develop phasing studies at scales of 1 "-! 00 to l "-500 for the entire park

Phase One Park Schematic Design and Design Guidelines (three months)

r:::

The Master Design Team will refine and develop the Phase One construction features as a cohesive first phase development and program package, Landscape architect working with the design team will develop a coordinated and integrated schematic design plan for phase one construction" This plan will de designed as a stand alone park development phase that will anticipate future phases and developments" Landscape architect will define the construction scope tor these phase one areas, including design layouts, limits of work, typical or critical dimensions" identifications of typical and specific materials and material systems, preliminary planting concepts and specific planting plans where critical, prototypical details and sections of critical features, and written and graphic design guidelines to production documents to follow,

The Phase One Design deliverables shall include:

a) Comprehensive Master Plan

b) Master Plan design guidelines and standards for design development

c) Phase One schematic plan

d) Views, perspectives, models and illustrative material to visually describe the design and major features"

e) Comprehensive cost plan

The team will prepare the following t!nal master plan products:

a) An overall phase one plan graphic of the entire park at tlJll build out showing overall design clements and proposed park features at a minimum scale of 1 "=500' 0

b) Plan b!o'iVups of major areas and features at a minimum scale of 1 "= l 00' 0

Page 14 of 24

• c)

d)

e)

f)

g)

h)

i)

j)

k)

•

•

Character sections of major features and illustntion of the relationships of various parts of the plan to each other.


Illustrations of programs and/or group activity detail of particular park spaces and pro!,'fam areas.

lllustrations of streetscapes and edge conditions.

Illustrations ofthematic, mi and iconic elements

Illustrations and descriptwns of park ecological and sustainability systems and features

!liustrations and descriptions of park architectural and landscape architectural design guidelines.

A set of boards 36"x48" or similar incorporating park design images, labels and short narratives

A i'owcrPoinl Presentation incorporating park design images and short narratives .

Page 15 of 24

•

•

•

Management and Fees

Management Plan The production of a Comprehensive Master Plan was originaily broken down into the toll owing tasks:

•

• • • •

Comprehensive Critical Issues Assessment

Task 2: Preliminary Master Plan

Task 3: Approval of Master Plan

Task 4: Phasing Plan

Task 5: Phase One Schematic Design and Design Guidelines

GPDS recently completed Task One. This scope of work specit1caliy covers !he remaining Tasks 2-5 as idcntilied in the original [v1astcr Designer Services Contract

As referenced on page 4 of the OCGP staff report covering the ·'Master DcBigner Services Contract", "Tasks 2-5 have been defined within the Scope of Work but will be revised as appropriate concurrent with the Task One Critical Issues Assessment" GPDS believes the scope is adequate for the project but suggests recognition that the production of a Comprehensive Master Plan is an iterative process, starting with the critical issue assessment, flowing through a preliminary master plan and final! y evolving into a master plan, The Preliminary Master Plan, is not the end of the planning process but one step in the process.

To that end, the production of the Comprehensive Master Plan is spread over 12 months with substantial delivcrabks required at the end of each task

Page 16 of 24

•

•

•

Schedule The chronological and contractual flow for the Project Scope of Work is as follows:

Design Development and Const:ru<:tion Oocu:menti

(f-uture Cortran}

Normally, the scope of work outline would follow the work tlow. However in this case, with over 20 participants contributing to the development of the Master Plan, it is more appropriate to organize the work flow into the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) .

Work Breakdown Structure

A key strategy of effective planning is to pattition the project into manageable components that can be individually planned estimated and controilcd. The work breakdown structure is a graphical tool that displays the project's statement of work making it easier to understand and communicate. It is employed from the earliest stages of project planning.

For this project, eleven components of work have been identified and are represented as follows:

WO,O,.f-. GROUPS

Page 17 of 24

•

•

•

Core Values and Work Group Descriptions

Workgroup

1.1.01

Park Program and Design

1.1.02

Sustainability

1.1.03

Natural Systems

1.1.04

Park Infrastructure

1.1.05

Neighborhood Integration

Description

Activities related to the overall vision and mission for the park.

Activities related to insuring the long tenn viability and value of the park

The concept of meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Sustainability applies to many disciplines, including economic development, environment, food production, energy, and social organization. Basically, sustainability/sustainable development refers to doing something with the long tenn in mind.

Activities which identifY and support the sustainability of plants and animals. Insuring that t1ora and fauna can coexist in a natural environment, compatible with the use ofthe park

Activities related to designing the physical infrastructure of the park. Typically these activities include but are not limited to roads, water, sewer, electrical, transportation planning, grading, and water quality.

With over ten miles of park boundary, it is important to insure a seamless integration between inside and outside the park. The goal is to develop uses, standards and facilities that appear to seamlessly transition, such that the park boundary is transparent.

Page 18 of 24

•

•

•

1.1.06

Schedules/Financials

1.1.07

Special Constraints

1.1.08

Stakeholder Involvement

1.1.09

Fire/lifetSafety

1.1.10

Business Plan

1.1.11

Graphics/Modeling

Activities within this work group insure that both fiscal and performance goals are met. Activities would include budget control, schedule development and maintenance as well as project accounting.

Special constraints are to some extent a catch all for a myriad of individual activities. Individual issues which are generally unrelated are organized as a series of sub work groups under the. general heading of Special Constraints. These also include obtaining consensus and approval from all regulatory agencies.

Stakeholder involvement includes a series of activities giving stakeholders opportunities to help shape the program. Examples of activities would be: workshops to solicit public comment, design studio open houses, media communications and public presentations

Activities that take the overall safety of the public into consideration when designing the park. Issues of public safety regarding fire and police as well as the impact of design and design alternatives on the well being of the participants within the park.

Activities centered around the understanding of the economic impacts and tinancial modeling of the operations of the park. Activities include financial modeling, financial assumption research/data collection, market research/analysis, financial performa update, business plan narrative and economic I fiscal impacts.

Activities center around the development ofpresentation graphics and models to visually convey the functionality and alternatives of the park.

~

Page 19 of i24

•

•

Fee Summary The following section provides summary breakdowns by:

• Project Task • Work Breakdovm Schedule

Consultant • WorkGroup

Exclusions

• •

Project Insurance Policy Outreach Events or Collateral Materials

Preliminary Plan Development

Review and Approvals

Phasing Costs

Phase One Schematic Design and Design Guidelines

Contract Scope Total

Travel

Contingt-'llcy

Physical Model

Contract Total with Alternates

$3,886,213

$1,77!,992

$!,991,731

$1,522,546

$9,172,482

$102,518

$100,000

$200,000

$9,575,000

By Work Breakdown Schedule (WBS)

1. 1.0 l - Park Program and Design

1,1 .02 - Sustainability

1.1.03 - Natural Systems

l, 1.04 -Park Infrastructure

L 1.05 -Neighborhood Integration

L L06 - Schedules/Financials

1.1.07- Special Constraints

!. !.08- Stakeholder Involvement

1. 1.()9- Fire/Life/Safety

1.1.1 0 -- Business Plan

t .1. I l -- Graphics/Modeling

Miscellaneous Costs

Contract Scope Total

Travel

Contingency

Physical Model

Contract Total with Alternates

$2,425,349

490,393

797,495

1,245,145

407,830

2,071,825

70,105

484,745

35,000

84,625

159,970

900,000

$9,172,482

$102,518

$100,000

$200,000

$9,575,000

Page 22 of24

0

•

•

Ken Smith Workshop West

Scope of Work

Ken Smith Landscape Architect will focus on developing desi~o,m studies, alternatives, and refinements to flesh out the critical issues and recommendations identified during prior diagtamrnatic studies. These design studies will lead to the development of preferred alternatives, and to an overall Master Plan for the Great Park. Preliminary cost estimates and reviews will be undertaken.

Upon approval of the Preliminary Master Plan by the Board, the plan will be submitted for review and approval by the relevant public agencies. Agency comments will be incorporated into the Master Plan. And during this period, the design team will prepare as needed studies that address concerns or issues raised by the reviewing agencies.

Based on the Master Plan cost estimate and identified park priorities, the design team will develop park phasing strategies and alternates leading to an overali phasing plan and program focusing on identification of Phase One construction features and areas .

The design team will ret!ne and develop the Phase One construction features as a cohesive flrst phase development and program package, , critical Master Pian desi~o,m guidelines and standards for design development, and a final cost plan. Models, perspectives and views will be used to illustTatc and describe the major design featureso

Design Studies to include: 1. Overall site organization options and alternatives, including diagrams and plan blowups. 2. Development of major park features and program areas, including diagrams and plan

blowupso 3. Definition of programs and future user experiences. 4. Development of park circulation and parking, including develop prototype and specific

designs for streetscapes and parking areaso 5. Development of iconic and thematic concepts with the collaborative design team will

develop design concepts studies for iconic elements and overall thematic features integrated into the park, including design studies for distinctive park entry areas, memorial areas, terraces/plazas or other distinctive hardscape areas and other special landscape features of a distinctive nature, such as arbors, screens, allees, gardens etco

60 Development of park edge conditions addressing private I public issues and separation I integration edge features. Landscape architect in collaboration with Lennar and the Heritage Fields design consultants will develop design studies for integration of park edges. Diagrammatic studies of integrated edge treatment for entire park will be developed at scales of 1"=100 to 1"=500 and pian blowup of selected areas will be developed at scales of l "=20 to ! "= 1 00 and typical sections will be developed at scales of J!S"= I' to l "=20.

Page 1 of 4 ' 0 •

•

•

•

7. Development of Sustainable design elements. 8. ldenti fication of resource protection areas and development of ecological areas design

management parameters, including landscape design studies and assisting the restoration ecologist in development of typical planting strategies and designs.

9. Identification of other speciallcatures and preservation areas and development of design / management parameters fOr these areas, including inventory of special features to be preserved or reused on the site and develop concepts and desie,>TI studies for their incorporation into the overall park design.

!0. Development of architectural design features and thematic design and guidelines, including assisting with the architect in developing related landscape features and siting for proposed architectural features.

11. Development of plant massing I communities, and development of preliminary plant palettes with the restoration ecologist, and local plant specialists. Diagrammatic studies of integrated planting for entire park will be developed at scales of 1 "= l 00 to 1 "=500 and plan blowup of selected areas will be developed at scales of 1"=20 to 1"=100 and typical sections will be developed at scales of 1/8"=1' to 1 "~20.

12. Development of streetscape typical designs, including prototypical and specific treatments for distincti ye strcetscapes, Typical studies will be developed in section and plan blowup at scales of l/8"= 1' to I "=20.

13. Development of park path systems, guidelines for bike, hiking, ADA requirements, and related issues. Landscape architect will develop plans for service drives. Landscape architect will develop plans and prototype design for trails for walkways, hiking, jogging, bicycling, and equestrian uses as determined appropriate for the park. Landscape architect will develop plans and guidelines for accessibility and ADA. Diagrammatic studies of integrated circulation lor entire park will be developed at scaies of !''~ 100 to 1 ''~500 and plan blov;up of selected areas will be developed at scales of I "=20 to J "= !00 and typical sections will be developed at scaics of l/8"~ I' to l ""'20.

14. Develop Security and Maintenance concepts, along with city and OCGP officials and staff to develop security and maintenance concepts and develop related design studies for proposed security and maintenance features.

15. Develop mass grading concepts, typical slopes configurations and cut and fill evaluation. Working with the civil engineer lhe landscape architect will develop an overall grading plan focusing on balance cut and fill, landform shape and design. Landscape architect will develop grading studies at scales of 1"-100 to I" to 500 for the entire park and will develop detailed blowups and sections at larger scales of l "-20 to \ "~100. Landscape architect may produce study models in clay or contoured cardboard to study and i!lush-atc landforms for the park of selected areas of the park. Typical sections will integrate drainage concepts, planting concepts, trails and view corridors.

!6. Costing and phasing. While these are subject of later master plan tasks, the landscape architect will work with cost estimators in the process of developing design concepts to develop realm of magnitude cost estimates for the OCGP staff to help determining potential cost impacts of various alternative design studies. Landscape architect will also show sensitiYily to issues pfpotential phasing in developing design studies for the park.

Pl\l!Je 2 of 4 ~ ~

•

•

•

Master Plan deliverab!cs -Landscape architect will integrate and coordinate design studies and work products of other members of the desi1,>n team into an overall comprehensive master plan. including:

L

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10

An overall master plan graphic of the entire park at full build out showing overall design elements and proposed park features at a minimum scale of 1 "=500'.

Plan blowups of principal areas at a minimum scale of I"= 1 00'.

Character sections of major fCatures and illustration of the relationships of various parts of the plan to each other.

Perspectives including an oblique aeriaL



Illustrations or thematic, art and iconic elements

Illustrations and narrative descriptions of park ecological and sustainability systems and features

Illustrations and narrative descriptions of park architectural and landscape architectural design clements .

The Design Team will develop a master plan level cost estimate for the pre-final park master plan including assessment of selected lifecyde impacts of identified features.

11. A set of boards 36"x48" or similar incorporating park design irnagcs, labels and t~hort nan·atives.

12. A PowerPoint presentation incorporating park design images and short narratives.

13. The Design Team will develop a master plan level cost estimate for the revised park master p Jan.

14. Design Guidelines and Standards

Optional deliverables (to be negotiated separately):

I. Presentation ModeL

2. Computer Simulation and/or animation of major features or areas.

Review and Approval Deliverab!es

Updating dcliverables identified in preliminary master plan as appropriate to retiect plan clarifications, changes and modifications.

Phasing Deliverables

Diagrams and identification of Phase One developments with accompanying cost estimates .

Page 3 of4

•

•

•

Phase One Deliverables

The Master Design Team will ret1ne and develop the Phase One construction features as a cohesive first phase development and program package. Landscape architect working with the design team will develop:

1. Schematic design plan for phase one construction.

2. Final Master Plan for all Phase One areas and features.

3 Critical Master Plan design guidelines and standards for design development.

4. \liews, perspcctivest models and illustrative materia1 to visually describe the design und major features.

5. Final Cost plan

The team will prepare the following final master plan products for Phase One:

I.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

An overall phase one graphic of the park at full build out showing overall design elements and proposed park features at a minimum scale of 1 "~500'.

Plan blowups of major areas and features at a minimum scale of 1 "~I 00'.

Character sections of major features and iliustration of the relationships of various parts of the plan to each other.

Perspectives inciuding an obiique aeriaL

iiiustrations of programs and I or group activity detail of particular park spaces and program areas.

lllustrations of streetscapes and edge conditions.

Illustrations of thematic, art and iconic clements

lllustrations and descriptions of park ecological and sustainability systems and features

Illustrations and descriptions of park architectural and landscape architectural design guidelines.

I 0. A set of boards 36"x48" or similar incorporating park design images, labels and short narratives

11. A Powerl'oint Presentation incorporating park design images and shmi narratives .

Pf!!Je 4 of 4

------------------· • Orange Co. Great Park • <SWW

lTART DATE 17APR06 FINISH DATE i3APR07 Page 1 of 3

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT Preliminary_ Plan Development Review and Phasing/Costs/Alternates Phase 1 Schematic Design

Approvals And Design Guidelines APR MAY JUN JUl. AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR

Hours Rate DESC 2006 2006 .2006 2006 2006 ___ 2006 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 2007 TOTAL

'ARK PROGRAM AND DESIGN

Master Plan Framework 970 135.00 Project Manager 2 630 100.00 Production Support 230 250.00 Principal Ken Smith

1274 115.00 Production 718 175.00 Sr. Associate

3,822 TOTAL M.P Framework

Uses and Features 665 135.00 Project Manager 2 433 100.00 Production Support 155 250.00 Principal - Ken Smith 866 115.00 Production 485 175.00 Sr. Associate

2,604 TOTAL Uses & Features

Landscape Palette 329 135.00 Project Manager 2 221 100.00 Production Support

78 250.00 Principal- Ken Smith 432 115.00 Production 243 175.00 Sr. Associate

1.303 TOTAL Landscape Palette

Habitat 125 eo 30

160 90

485

135.00 100.00 250.00 115.00 175.00

TOTAL

Hydrology

Project Manager 2 Production Support Principal - Ken Srnith Production Sr. Associate Habitat

125 135.00 Project Manager 2 80 100.00 Production Support 30 250.00 Principal- Ken Smith


485 TOTAL Hydrology

15,262 7,361 6,588

16,930 14,429

-·--60,5.!!Jl.._

1,402 665 623

1,529 1,308

··---5-~!f

10,324 4,960 4,456

11,453 9 76.1

40,973 178,144

896 425 398 977 836

3,531 15,659

9,tm; 4,763 4,263.

10,955 9;336

39,1~2

857 406 381 934 800

3~37~

9,426 5.973 5,076 5;317 4,647 2,881 2,448 2;565 4,069 2,578 2,191 2,295

10,457 6,62? 5,631 5,899 8,912 5,647 4,799 5,027

37,41.Q __ 2'J,7()7 _,20,144 21,103 43,851

818 896 1,233 1,584 388 425 585 751 363 398 548 704 892 977 1,345 1,727 763 836 1 '151 1,478

3,224 3,531 4,861 6,243 . s,-392

5,317 2,565 2,295 5,899 5,027

21,103 62,35.0

1,713 812

1,713 812 762

1,868 1,599

5,076 2,448 2,191 5,631 4,799

20,144

1,636 775 727

1,783 1,527

_m_s ___ !,~ .. 19,446

5,559 4,834 5,317 2,417 89,775 2,681 2,332 2,565 1,166 43,300 2,480 2,087 2,295 1,043 38,750 6,167 5,363 5,899 2,681 99,590 5,256 4,570 5,027 2,285 84,875

:1~,063 19,185 21,103 9,592 . 71,943 ···-- - - - 35_6,290

1 ,'791 1,558 1,713 779 16,875 849 738 812 369 8,000 796 692 762 346 7,500

1,953 1,698 1,868 849 18,400 1,672 1,454 1,599 727 15,750 7,062 6,141 6,755 3,070 . -.- - 23,0.28 ---·---

66,525

• Orange coA Great Park <SWW

iT ART DATE 17APR06 FINISH DATE 13APR07

Hours Rate DESC

Architecture I Structures 125 135.00 Project Manager 2 80 100.00 Production Support 30 250.00 Principal -Ken Smith


485 TOTAL Arch/Structures

Art Features 125 135.00 Project Manager 2 80 100.00 Production Support 30 250.00 Principal- Ken Smith


485 TOTAL Art Features

Signage 125 135.00 Project Manager 2 80 100.00 Production Support 30 250.00 Principal- Ken Smith

160 115.00 Production 90 175.00 Sr. AssorJate

485 TOTAL Signage

Lighting & Acoustics 125 135.00 Project Manager 2

80 100.00 Production Support 30 250.00 Principal- Ken Smitll


-----·------COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN

PreUniinary Pian Development Review and Approvals

~~ ~o~~ 4~J1 i~~ ~~o~ :o~

1,402 896 857 . $18 896 665 425 406 3$8 425 623 3.98 381 363 398

1 ,5:19 977 934 892 977 1 ,308 836 800 763 836 5;527 37531 3,37r "3;224 3,531

15,659- . 8,392

8Q6 425. 398

857 406 381

1,233 585 548

1,345 1,151 4,861

Phasing/Costs/Alternates

OCT 2006

NOV 2006

DEC 2006

1,584 1,713 1,636 751 812 775 704 762 727

1.7~7 1,868 1,783 1.~78 1,599 1.527 6,~ 6,75~ & 448

. 19,44EJ

485 TOTAl Lighting&Acoustics -~---·!$,&~7 :,_ · ·3;~~_::._ __ 33ft· J,-'.&:4 ;j,O~--

Accessibility 125 135.00 Project Manager 2 1;402 896 857 813 896 1,233 1,584 1,713 . 1,636

80 100.00 Production Support 665 425 406. 388 425 585 "C51. 812 . 775

30 250.00 Principal- Ken Smith 623 398 381 363 398 548 704 762 727 160 115.00 Production 1,529 971 934 892 977 1,345 1;727 1,868 1,783 90 175.00 Sr. Associate 1,3Q8 1)36 800 763 836 1,151 1,478 . 1599 1,527

PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT Phase 1 Schematic Design

And Design Guidelines

• JAN FEB MAR APR 2007 2007 2007 2007

1,791 1,558 1,713 779 849 738 812 369 796 692 762 346

1 ,953 1,698 1,868 849 1,672 1,454 1,599 727

_1,062- -- s, 1_:41._ ___ 6,755 -· .3,(170 23,028

1,791 1,558 1,"113 779 849 738 812 369 796 692 762 346

1,953 1,698 1,868 849 1,672 1,454 1,599 727

Page 2 of 3

TOTAL

16,875 8,000 7,500

18,400 15,750 66,525

16,875 8,000 7,500

16,875 8,000 7,500

18,400 15,750

485 TOTAL Accessibility 5,527 ____ 3,5~1 3,377 3,224 3,531 4,86_1__ 6,243 6,755 .. 9i!:4_8 __ 7,0§2_ - §,141___ 6,755__, 3,070 ___ 66,5~~ -- . 8;392 23,028 15,659 19,446

• Orange Co. Great Park • KSWW

START DATE 17APR06 FINISH DATE 13APR07

Hours Rate DESC

Design Guidelines 125 135.00 Project Manager 2

80 100.00 Production Support 30 250.00 Principal- Ken Smith

·, 60 115.00 Production 90 175.00 Sr. Associate

485 TOTAL Design Guidelines

11 ,609 Travel

REPORT TOTAL

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Pretimin~ry Pi~n Development Review and

Approvals AIPR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 2006 200$ 2006 2006 2006 2006

1,402 .896 85.7 818 896 1,233 665 425 406 388 425 585 623 398 381 . 363 398 548

1,529 977 S34 892 977 1,345 1,308 836 8QQ 763 836 1.151 5,627 $.531 3,377 3,224 3,531 4,861 ..

15,659 - 8,392-

2,859 2,$59 2,550 2,550 2,550 8,26~ · · sioo

_224,094 152,740 146,222 139,444 -·-· 101,203 1 01,;166 662,500 202,469

Page 3 of 3

--

PHASE ·1 DEVELOPMENT Phasing!Costs/Aitemates Phase 1 Schematic Design

And Design Guidelines OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 2007 TOTAL

1,584 1,713 1,636 '! ,791 1,558 1,7'13 779 16,875 751 812 775 849 738 812 369 8,000 7Q4 762 727 796 692 762 346 7,500

1,727 1,868 1,783 ·.,953 1,698 1.868 849 18,400 1,478 1,599 1,527 1,672 1,454 1,599 727 15,750 6,243 6,755 6,446 7,062 6,141_ 6,755_ 3,070~- 66,525

19,446 23,028

2,550 2,550 7,650

2.5~- 2,5§0 2,550 2,550 2,550 31,118 16,200

115,168 119,262 113,!l_~I- _ 124,567 108,652 119,262 -~6_01 __1~62.1,_4_~ 348,387 --408,082 -

•

•

•

Gafcon

Scope of Work

Gafcon's role is to provide the design management component of the Great Park Master Plan project.

Design management is distinguished from the general management of corporations by the mission oriented nature of the project. According to the Project Management Institute, the discipline of design management is det1ned as follows: "Design management is the art of directing and coordinating human and material resources throughout the life of a project by using modem management techniques to achieve predetermined objectives of scope, cost, time, quality and stakeholder satisfaction"

As such, a project is defined as a series of specific or finite tasks to be accomplished, which, through their successful execution lead to a desired outcome .

Overview As the design manager, Gafcon's tasks or scope of work are woven throughout the entire fabric of the project as weli as maintaining an umbrella-like oversight relationship with the project.

Definition of Design Management

Gafcon Design Management

,~ ·--, i Gafcon Project Tasks

1. Estimating 2. Business Plan

Gafcon's scope of service is based on design management of the various disciplines participating in the production of the Great Park Master Plan. Gatcon' s Design Management scope is divided into four disciplines which mimic those defined by the Project Management Group:

L Scheduling 2. Joint Venture Administration 3. Design Administration Services 4. Information Collaboration

Additionally Gafcon is responsible for two project tasks; (1) estimating and (2) business plan .

Page 1 Of3 ~ "

•

•

•

Gafcon Design Management Scope

1. Scheduling • Prepare and maintain a master design schedule for the GPDS team and comprehensive

master plan • Prepare and maintain a 5 week cycle schedule which focuses on immediate issues with

progressive signoffs and forces forward movement Ill Prepare required meeting schedules • Provide ongoing evaluation of the performance of the project compared to the project

schedule, make recommendations as to impacts on the schedule, and evaluate cost and schedule impacts of additional or deleted work scope

2. Joint Venture Administration Gafcon will manage a11 administrative, legal and financial components of the Ken Smith, Gafcon joint venture to include but not be limited to administration of the joint venture contracts and subcontracts, budget set-up and project cost control

3. Design Administrative Services As part of Gafcon's design administration services, Ga!Con's project managers will provide oversight to • Develop and review consultant scopes • Review, manage and report on consultant progress • Review, manage and report on consultant budget and cost performance • Review deliverables. • Consultant Coordination - With over 20 consultants participating in the design of the

Great Park Master Plan, consultant coordination is imperative. Gatcon will coordinate with each consultant to insure the integration of their scope and performance with the overall project objectives.

4. Information Collaboration At the heart of any project are the systems to support information collaboration. • Gafcon will provide an electronic Enterprise Project Management System (EPM),

accessible by all members of the project team. This system will support cost and schedule.

• Gafcon will implement an elech·onic Document Management System (DMS) to facilitate access to project documentation information to all members of the GPDS and will house final documentation of the project This system works in conjunction with Fuscoe Engineering's FTP site which will house "working" graphics/simulations files.

• Gafcon will develop and provide training programs tor the EPM and DMS systems. • Gafcon will provide support and maintenance ofthe EPM and DMS system technology.

Gafcon Project Tasks

1. Estimating To assist the design team in considering potential alternatives, methodology and best practices, Gafcon proposes to provide estimating services to evaluate the costs associated with the construction of the project.

Page 2 of3

•

•

•

In addition to the above estimating support, Gafcon will prepare Preliminary and rough order of magnitude estimating to inciude: • 4-Month Milestone - Produce a Level One Order of Magnitude Estimate. This

estimate will have a target expected accuracy range of+ 30 I -30% and is derived from a full and complete outline/conceptual plan of the proposed project scope based on the Master Plan.

• 8-Month Milestone ·Produce a Level One Conceptual Estimate for Phase I scope of work. This estimate will have a target expected accuracy range of+ 25 I -25% and is derived from a refinement of information received at the 4 month milestone, i.e. a more developed scope of work for all of the various components of Phase ! work developed in the Master Plan.

2. Business Plan Gafcon will prepare a Great Park Business Plan to include: • Financial model • Financial assumption research/data collection • Market Research! Analysis • Financial Performa Update • Business Plan narrative • Economic I Fiscal Impacts

Deliverabies As a result of the above design management scope, Gateon proposes to provide the following project deliverables:

1. Design Management Plan 2. Meeting Facilitation 3. Meeting Minutes 4. Work Group Monthly Reports 5. Summary Monthly Reports 6. Submittal Plans and Monitoring Documents 7. Phased construction Estimates 8. Final Master Plan Estimate 9. Phase One Detail Estimate I 0. Estimates for Design Options 11. Value Engineering Reports and Estimates 12. Master Design Schedule 13. Periodic Project Schedule Updates 14. Monthly Design Budget cost Reports 15. QNQC Reports for Work in Progress 16. Document Management and Information Collaboration Portal ! 7. lntormation Collaboration System Support 18. Business Plan Financial Mode!

Page 3 of 3

• • • --- --------------··-------------"'-·----

Orange County Great Park Gafcon

START DATE 17Al'R06 FINISH DATE 13Al'R07 Page 1 ot 1

Hgurs Rate DESC

SCHEDULE I FINANCIAL Estimating

1,760 130.00 Sr. Estimator 1,7'60 Total Estimating

Scheduling 408 120.00 Sr. Scheduler 408 Total Scheduling

Joint Venture Administration 356 85.00 Cost Accountant

20 150.00 Project Manager 1 348 145.00 Project Manager 2 761 Total JV Admin.

Design Administration 4,100 65.00 Admin Staff 1

814 220.00 Principal 1.984 175.00 Sr. Project Manager 3,800 150.00 Project Manager 1

10,698 Total Design Admin.

Information Collaboration 72 135.00 IT Manager

136 135.00 Programmer 1 664 115.00 IT System Support

IT Hosting 872 Total Info Collaboration

BUSINESS PLAN Business Plan

195 175.00 Sr. Finan. Analyst 505 100.00 Financial Analyst 700 T ota! Business Plan

15,199 REPORT TOTAL

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Review and Phasinglcostsll\lternat~ Approvals

APR MAY JUN Jul. AUG SEP OCT NOV· 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2005 2006 2006

11,440 n,44o 33;390 33,e2o <1,440 23,4eo ;13Aao 11,440 11,440 33,390 33,920 11,440 22,880 22,880

-~-5$,!TOI) -~ -- 45,366 ~ --~ -~- 58.400

6,000 11,340 3,960 3,651 2,639 2,7.64 2, 764

DEC 2006

11,440 11 ,440


And Design Guidelines JAN FEB MAR APR 2007 2007 2007 2007 TOTAL

11,440 11 ,440 'l'i ,'+"l-U ;j::;t,.jLU

2,890 6,090 11,340 3;960

?[5,080

3,78P 3,780 3,651 2,639 2,764_ ~764

8,167

2,639 2,639 2,890 L,::>-_IJ 41:,104 --·-------~- ___ _

6,290

1,843 3,697 2,970 2,835 2.790 2,100 2,200 2,200 2,100 2.300 2.000 2,200 1 ,000 30,235 1,364 1,636 3,000

17,137 21,220 1,314 1.2S4 1,296 1.075 1,126 1,126 1,075 1,177 1,024 1,126 512 50,460 20,343 26,553 4,284 4,089 4,086 _3,175 3,326 3,326 3,175 3,477 3,024 3,326 1,512 83,695

55,269 7,261

10,496 24,496 20,496 24,496 20,496 20,497 7,333 16,867 16,133 15,400 16,627 14,642

13,523 30,948 29,441 28,103 30,985 28.583 15,364 61,738 62,1303 59,757 57,018 63,420 46,71~ 1:}4,049 128,673 127,756 125,126 127,342

437,194 252,468

2,160 4,968 2,592 4,080 .9,3:64 4,896 3,113 5,413 5,473 7,650 8.379 7,650 4.739 1o.soo 1Q,4:16 9,952 1o,goo 9,9sz

14,092 3(!,665 23,387 17,603 19,279 ___1L§03 85,747 36,88_2

1,845 4,243 4,058 3,874 4,243 3,874 2,730 6,278 6,005 5,732 6,278 5,732 4,574 _1jl,521 10-064 9.$06 10,521 9,606

34,765 20,127

116,723 246,858 205,140 191,094 209,372 191,278 694,855 368,388

9,827 11,339

20,497 20.,497 20,497 20,497 20,496 20,496 15,549 15,549 14,842 16,255 14,135 15,549 29,938 27,885 22,444 27,370 23,800 26,180 65,823 59,740 48,038 23,460 20,400 22,440

131,807 123,671 105,821 - 87,582 3§1,299

78,831 34,665 311,779

8,015 8,015 7,650 4,600 4,000 4,400 10,426 10_426 9,952 10.900 9,478 10,426 18,441 18,441 17,603 15,501 13,479 14 82'[

54,485 50,548

4,058 4,058 3,874 6,0Q5 6,005 5,732

10,064 10,064 ~.606 29;734

199,934 19o,763 521,912

165,314 1~6,157 92,310 101,541 451,327

22,501 266,500 179,08()

28,000 347,200 10,200 570,000 60,701 1,362,740

9,720 18,360

2,000 76,360 4,739 123,220 6,739 227,660

34,125 50,500 84,625

39,0j!~--~·036,480

•

•

•

Buro Happold

&

Scope of Work

Environmental sustainability and construction is an overriding paradigm lor the design of the Great Park. Sustainability must take into account physical, social, and economic, as well as environmental factors and how they impact the whole life cycle costs and benelits for the Great Park. Sustainable infrastructure~ siteworks~ and features, along with comtnensurate "green" practices for operation, maintenance, and management will be developed under our leadership. Sustainable features and systems tor the Park will be identified to be compared with and integrated into an overall concept developed alongside Heritage Fields (Lennar) and the City of Irvine (Green Team). During this phase of work, Buro Happold will collaborate with Orange County Great Park Design Stndio and other local resources to set overarching goals; define performance metrics; and identify type, location, and function of each sustainable measure or practice. Predicated outcome and derived benefits will be noted along with implementation guidelines.

Deliverables

Sustainability Master Plan Development

1. Goal Statement with supporting research, findings, and conclusion>; establishing goals as achievable for the Park.

2. A Draft Sustainability Measures Report identifying ail reasonable/viable features and practices both lor Park site development, as well as proposed (future) building zones. Collaborate with City/Team professionals and wider stakeholders to refine and finalize plan design.

3. Prepare a Sustainability Systems Management Plan that defines targets, requirements, functionality, benefits, performance metrics, and predicated outcome of each component feature or system.

4. Specifically identi(y issues or synergies for the integration of Orange County Great Park and He1itage Fields/Redevelopment Area sustainable protocols.

5. Work with the Great Park Design Studio in design development to integrate sustainable design strategies from the Sustainability Systems Management Plan, the Green streets document and the results fi·om the Green Team sub groups (Water, Energy Materials, Nature, and People).

6, Provide multi criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to alTive at optimal dec1sions with regards to S\lstainability options.

7. Specifically identify LEED related criteria applicable to the Orange County Great Park for a "composite rating" analysis of potential and targeted LEED rating goals.

8. Prepare a media version of the above adding illustrative graphics for general public and stakeholder appreciation

Page 1 of 3

•

•

•

Review and Approvals 1. Respond and liaise Yvith regulatory agencies comments on pre1irn1nary plan develop1ncnt

submission. Collaborate with City/Team professionals and wider stakeholders to refine and finalize.

Phasing Costs Alternatives L Develop cost and benefit model of sustainabiiity strategies to inform design and client

team. 2. Revise and Present Sustainability Measures Report with altemati ves for 3. Develop atten1ativc sustainabibty strategies for final consideration

Energy Planning Master Plan Development

L Prepare an Energy Plan reviewing energy demand reduction strategies, renewable energy resources on the site, potential for on-site generation, and potential for district heating or cooling systems.

2. Prepare a media version of the above adding illustrative graphics lor general public and stakeholder appreciation

Review and Approvals l. Respond and liaise with regulatory agencies comments on preliminary pian development

submission, Collaborate with City/Team professionals and wider stakeholders to refine and finalize preliminary plan"

Phasing Costs Allemmives l. Develop cost and benefit model of energy strategies to inform design and client team. 2. Revise and Present Energy Plan with altematives for meeting budgets and client

concerns. 3. Develop alternative energy plan strategies for final consideration

Bridge Concepts and Engineering Master Plan Development

l. Provide diagrammatic or illustrative plans tor specialized iconic structures, such as towers, bridges, space-frames, and thematic elements.

2. Active participation in form, sketches, renderings and presentations of bridge structures. 3. Integration into innovative sustainable material solutions for bridge stmctures. 4. Review and development of engineering design criteria for each bridge 5. Prepare a media version of the above adding illustrative graphics for general public and

stakeholder appreciation

Revievv and ApprovaLs l. Respond and liaise with regulatory agencies comments on preliminary plan development

submission. Collaborate with City/Team professionals and wider stakeholders to rellne and t!nalize .

Page 2of3 ' '

0

•

•

Phasing Costs Alternatives l. Develop alternative bridge engineering solutions for iconic bridges in the park 2. Develop costs of bridge altematives to infonn design and client team.

Park Design - Building Concept Engineering Master Plan Development

I. Provide diagrammatic or illustrative concepts and support design team to develop building concepts

2. Provide MEP engineering concepts for passive building design 3. Prepare a media version of the above adding illustrative graphics for general public and

stakeholder appreciation

l?eviev,• and Approvals 1. Respond and liaise with regulatory agencies connnents on preliminary plan development

submission. Coliaborate with City/Team professionals and wider stakeholders to refine and t!nalize.

Phasing Costs Alternatives 1. Develop cost and benefit model of design strategies to intorm design and client team. 2. Revise and present building altematives for meeting budgets and client concems .

Orange \Juur Great Park Buro Happoid


--------------COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN

Preliminary Plan Deyelqpment Review and l'hasing/Co~ts/AI!emates

Hours Rate DESC

NATURAL SYSTEMS

Sustainability 24 150.00 Associate 1 38 190.00 Associate Director 34 210.00 Director 75 110.00 Engineer 1 88 95.00 Graduate Engineer 25 220.00 Principal 63 140.00 Sr. Engineer 1 75 105.00 SL Technician 75 80.00 Technician

497 TOTAL Sustainability

Energy Planning '24 150.00 Associate 1 38 190.00 Associate Director 34 210.00 Director 75 110.00 Engineer1 88 95.00 Graduate Engineer 25 220.00 Principal 63 140.00 Sr. Engineer 1 75 105.00 Sr. Technician 75 80.00 Technician

497 TOTAL Energy Planning

Building Concepts 48 150.00 Associate 1 7 4 190.00 Associate Director 67 210.00 Director

150 110.00 Engineer1 174 95.00 Graduate Engineer

50 220.00 Principal 124 140.00 Sr. Engineer 1 150 105.00 Sr. Technician 150 80.00 Technician 987 TOTAL Building Concepts

Travel

1981 REPORT TOTAL

~~- -~t~

1,230 2,40:;! 2,404 2,819 2,824 1,879 :1,968 2;691 l!,05(}

~1,267

JUN 20Q6

1,177 . 2,298

2,299 z:t\97 2,701 1,798 . 2,837

. z,o74 1,961

20,342 G1,026

JUL' .. 200ll

562 1,126 1,114 1,287

1,123 2,193 2,195 2,574 2,579 1,716 2,708 2,457 1,872

19,417

Approvals AUG SEP 2006 2006

1 '193 605 2,330 I ,181 2,332 1,182 2,734 1,386 2,739 1,389 1.823 924 2,877 1,458 2,610 1,323 1,989 1,008

20,626 10,455 31,081

OCT 2006

634 1,231 1,238 . 1,452 1,455

9.68 1,528 1,386 1,056

10,953

NOV 2000

634 1,237 1.238 1,452 ·t,455

988 1,5:!8 1,3$6 1,056

10,953 32,361

DEC 2000:.

605 1;181

. 1,182 1,386 1,389 . 924 1;458 1,323 1,008

10,455



3,600 7,220 7,140 8,250 8,360 5.500 8,820 7

3,500 7,220 7,140 8,250 8,360 5,500 8,820 7

7,200 14,060 14,070 16,500 16,530 11,000 17,360 15,750 12,000

124,470

Page 1 of 1

•

•

•

Fuscoe Engineering

Scope of Work Fuscoe Engineering \Viil work to establish engineering feasibility of the Orange County Great Park (OCGP) Master Plan and features; validate the preferred plan's cost, schedule, and integration into the surrounding Heritage Fields development; and assure regulatory con1pliance,

During preliminary master plan development, Fuscoe will investigate and collaborate with the team to reline OCGP features for program uses: location; area; surfacing; integration with other features; infrastructure demands/connections; and other technical studies validating the preliminaty design of features.

Among the activities during this Task are preparations of a composite rough grading plan for the Bee Corridor, Agua Chinon, and Wildlife Corridor, plus the "Canyon-Lake" feature. Fuscoe wi1l also create geometry with boundary layouts and "use area" for Great Park feature components such as the Meadow, fields; canyon; sports park; memorial; lake/amphitheatre; and parking zones. A set of working ""base rnapsn for each Park design area will be prepared .

Fuscoe Engineering will also update and expand the Master Stormwater Management Plan and Report, addressing site hydrology, groundwater recharge, and run-off Water Quality Assurance. We will prepare a Master Canyon and Lake Plan reflecting engineered surface, perimeter, details, and infrastructure services, including recycled or well water {shallow groundwater aquifer) system layout and related pooling, flow regimen, and infiltration or injection disposal.

A Master Circulation Plan will be prepared, defining all vehicular roadways; class I bike and walking trails; bridges and parking zones; and alternative transitways. A Master Utility Plan for the OCGP and public roads and cotTidors establishing sewer collection system: domestic and recycled water system; "dry" utility joint conduit system; and potential district heating/cooling loops will be prepared, as well. This includes a technical repott compiling engineering analysis, and will indicate on all circulation and utility infrastructure plans a point of connection or line of demarcation showing what components will be designed and built by the corporation and what components will be designed and built by others"

Fuscoe will prepare a Wildlife Corridor Master Plan with supporting technical ecologist/landscape desif,>n, including corridor grading, environmental hydrology and water budgeting, adjoining golf use and accessicrossing coordination, and habitat design support in fi vc (5) Reaches.

As part of its servrces, Fuscoe proposes to assist Green Shield/LSA with preparation of an Environmental Mitigation Plan and attendant studies, details, and regulatory processing. inciuding Wildlife CorTidor Mitigation Bank Credit processing. We will assist Buro Happold with the Master Plan of Sustainable Features and Operations, including "Green Streets" component . NTS related facilities, and other infrastructure related issues. We will lead and resolve special

Page 1 Of 7

•

•

•

constraints, including design disposition of Park site LLFD.C. sites, Fixed Guideway impacts. FAA network and Reserve uses, Upper Borrego Wash, demolition/recycling impacts, Irvine Company off~sites, and other planning Phase Onessues.

Other services will include coordination of the Site Demolition Plan addressing USMCAS removals, recycling operations, hazardous materials remediation, Heritage fields deconstmction and materials recycling and other site development opportunities and constraints, assisting the Great Park Design Studio team in all public and stakeholder outreach efforts, including special graphics, technical clarifications, presentation talks, and other documentation or evaluation work association with these sessions. Fuscoe will prepare view simulations; 3-D graphics; motion video "tours" and other GIS based spatial graphics and provide the GPDS team desif,>tl a graphics/simulations document management system via a "smart" FTP site.

During Review and Approval, Fuscoc Engineering will perform quantity take-offs for a preliminary cost estimate and prepare a GIS graphical database for derived information. We will assist Gafcon and the team with unit pricing and local cost considerations.

During Phasing, Fuscoe Engineering will prepare a phasing plan reflecting sequential Park development to support a phasing program by KSLA. This includes Phase One infrastructure and interim facilities.

During Phase One, Fuscoe Engineering will prepare a preliminary engineering design fi.1r the designated Phase One sub-area. This includes additional details, cross sections, and technical studies, as well as cost estimate assistance. We will also prepare a preliminary designs and studies for the 165 acre Sports Park area as directed.

Miscellaneous services provided by Fuscoe Engineering include providing coordination. leadership, and meeting attendance. As optional services, we may provide liaison to Heritage Fields for integration and intertaee engineering resolving mutually beneficial perimeter conditions.

Deliverables I. Technical studies validating Preliminary design of features 2. Composite Rough Grading Plan@ I"= 200' scale with 1" = 100' scale enlargements for

Bee Corridor, Agua Chinon, and Wildlife Corridor, plus "Canyon-Lake" feature. • Earthwork • Lake bed and perimeter • Soil Type mappingimanipulation • Canyon slopes and fonn (3 reaches)

3. Geometry with boundar; layouts and "use area" for Great Park feature components@ 1" = 100 scale

4. One (I) set of working "base maps" for each Park design area@ 1" = 100' scale 5. Update and expand Master Stormwater Management Plan and Report addressing site

hydrology, groundwater recharge, and run-off Water Quality Assurance. • Run-on flood conveyance • Site run-off routing and stormdrains :111 Stormwater harvesting/entrainment concept

Page 2 of 7

•

•

•

• NTS treatment train array and NPES compliance • San Diego Creek/SAMP protection measures

6. Master Canyon and Lake Plan reflecting engineered surface, perimeter, details, and infrastmcture services @ 1" = 100' scale. Includes recycled or well water (shallow grmmdwater aquifer) system layout and related pooling, flow regimen, and infiltration or injection disposal. Also, anticipates defining sub-component uses, such as access ramping, "back-of~house" services.

7. Mester Circulation Plan @ 1" = 200' scale defining all vehicular roadways; class I bike and walking trails; bridges and parking zones; and alternative transitways • Horizontal layout and alignments • Profiles/crossings/perimeter match-ups • Cross sections and context details • Bridge location, size, and style • Regional transit interface • Parking sites and interconnectivity

8. Master Utility Plan @ 1" ~ 200' scale for the OCGP and public roads and corridors establishing sewer collection system; domestic and recycled water system; "dry" utility joint conduit system; and potential district heating - cooling loops. Includes Technical Report compiling engineering analysis. • Sewer capacity, alignment, profile, and service connections :w Domestic water location, volume, and pressure; plus fire protection service m Recycled water layout for travclways and on-site park irrigation~ Canyon; Bee

Corridor, and Canyon/ Lake service systen1; plus other \Vater features or reservoiring requirements

s Power, gas, telephone, and CATV conduit layout and service nodes 9. Prepare a Wildlife Corridor Master Plan @ 1" ~ 100' scale with supporting technical

ecologist/landscape design including corridor grading; environmental hydrology and water budgeting; adjoining golf use and access/crossing coordination; plus habitat dcsiga supp01t in five ( 5) Reaches as follows: • Upper Reach - Borrego Wash splitter/low t1ow channel and underpass • Park District- Terrace and channel grading • Agua Chinon - switchover and common wetland zone • Serrano Creek Reach -- sewer and existing habitat preservation • Transit District- Barranca/Bake undcrcrossing and setbacks • J-5 terminus and downstream otT-site considerations • Plantings/habitat zones in aquatic, riparian, emergent, and woodland steps

Cross sections with edge conditions at key locations Location and disposition of all NTS facilities including infiltration hydrology for habitat

10. Assist Green Shicld!LSA with preparation of 1" ~ 200' scale Environmental Mitigation Plan and attendant studies, details, and regulatory processing, including Wildlife Corridor Mitigation Bank Credit processing

ll. Lead and resolve special constraints, including coordination and desiga disposition of Park site L.I.F.O.C:. sites; FAA network and Reserve uses; Upper BmTego Wash; demolition/recycling impacts; Irvine Company off-sites; and other planning Phase Onessues .

Page 3 of 7

•

•

•

12. Coordinate with City consultants (Bovis/Mike Brown) addressing USMCAS removals and hazardous site remediation; deconstruction and concrete removal staging sites and access; and other demolition phase operations to ensure Master Plan designs minimize interference and maximize oppottunities. View simulations; 3·D graphics; motion video "tours" and other GIS based spatial graphics as directed.

13. Provide OCGP Studio team design document management via "smmt" FTP site including: • Web based CAD file/deliverable posting or exchange • Compilation and conversion of team deliverable as GIS layers • GIS layering and composite graphics for studies and presentation

14. Quantity take-offs for Preiiminary Cost Estimate and prepare GIS graphical database for derived information. Assist Gafcon and team with unit pricing and local cost considerations.

15. 1" ~ 200' scale Phasing Plan reflecting sequential Park development to support a Phasing Program by KSLA, including Phase One Infrastructure and interim facilities.

16. 1 ,. = 1 00' scale preliminary engineering design for the designated Phase One sub-area includes additional details, cross sections, and technical studies, as well as cost estimate assistance.

17. 1" = 100' scale preliminary designs and studies lor the 165 acre Sports Park area as directed .

"Pane4of7

•

•

•

Consultant: TBD

Scope of Work Circulatiolt!Parking

• Traffic generatlon/routing within "cap" [j Parking demand, location, connectivity • Multi-modal transitway and vehicular circulation • Regional transportation interface • Heritage Fields circulation interface

Biology/Environmental Compliance • Mitigation design for project impacts • Native habitat types/parameters input • Wildlife corridor habitat/species consulting • Wildlife corridor mitigation credit and banking • Regulatory pre-approvals and resource agencies interface

Consultant: TBD

Scope of Work

Urban Forestry • Agricultural plant palettes

v J

• California friendly native plant palettes & \Vater conservation measures • Wildfire prevention planning

-

~ "' Page 5 of7

•

•

•

Wallace Labs

Scope of Work

Soils l!ll Topsoil cvaluationlmanagement • Structural soil design l1l Soil corrosivity • Soil fertility • Land restoration guidelines

Consultant: TBD

Scope of Work

IJry Utility Service !Ill Assess and locate "bring up" service corridors • Park demand analysis • Concept service layout • Cost/fee budget (utility deposits/credit)

Consultant: TBD

Scope of Work

Geotechnical and soils engineering • Build on previous work for City (report dated 3/31/06) • Specific consulting on Canyon, Agua recharge zone, Lake, and porcus parking • General consulting for excavation, slope, and structural stability • Conslllting for permeability and topsoil management

Pa9<> 6 of'T'

•

•

•

Consultant: TBD

Scope of Work

Lake Design • Lake consulting • Water feature design 111 \Vater conservation measures • Rock leatun; design

~ ~ ' ' '

, , , , Page7o:f7

------- -·~---·---~---------~ ----- o~a~ge c~;ftGre,;t-P~rk-~--- ----- --- ------~------ --e---------Fuscoe Engineering

START DATE 17APR06 FINISH DATE 13APRO'T Page 1 of 5 ------- --- -------------

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Preliminary Plan Development Review and Phasing/Costs! Alternates

PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENi Phase 1 Schematic Design

And Design Guidelines APR 2006

C PROGRAM & DESIGN :er Plan Framework 157 60.00 Information Coord 1,732 107 220.00 Principal1 4,329

?1 200.00 Principal2 2,611 Sports Park Des. All

335 TOTAL MP Framework 8,673

SUSTAINABILITY Sustainability

Consultant: TBD 2,874 120 100.00 Designer 1,379 97 100.00 Engineer 2 1,764 llO 80.00 Environmental Tech 883 80 80.00 Graphics Tech il 736

120 60.00 Information Coord 828 260 145.00 Project Manager VII 6,933

70 220.00 Principal 1 2,832 39 200.00 Principal 2 1,434

846 TOTAL Sustainability 19,683

NAT]JRAL SYSTEMS Wild Life I Habitat

Consultant: TBO 16,000 Consultant: Wallace L.ab 8,276

178 100.00 Designer 3,274 178 100.00 Engineer 2 3,274 118 80.00 Environmental Tech 1,736 163 80.00 Graphics Tech II 2,398 295 60.00 Information Coord 3,255 771 145.00 Project Manager V!l 20,560 72 220.00 Principal 1 2,913

163 200.00 Principal 2 5,995 91 190.00 Principal3 3,180

2,029 TOTAL Wild Life I Habitat 70,861

PARKINFRASTRUCTUR~ Parking & Circulation

Consultant: TBD 14,998 327 100.00 Engineer 2 6,014

82 80.00 Environmental Tech 1,206 82 80.00 Graphics Tech I! 1,206

17'1 60.00 Information Coord 1,953 378 145.00 Project Manager VII 10,080

32 220.00 Principal1 1,295 65 200.00 Principal2 2,391 43 190.00 Principal3 1,503

196 125.00 Sr. Engineer II 4,506 1,382 TOTAL Parking & Circulation 45,151

MAY JUN JUL 2006 2005 2006

3,985 1,624 1,364 9,957 4,059 3,409 6,006 2,448 2,057

19,948 8,131 6,830 47,160

6,609 6,322 6,034 3,172 3,034 2,897 4,103 1,672 1,405 2,030 828 695 1,692 1,618 1,545 1,903 1,821 1,738

15,947 6,500 5,460 6,514 2,655 2,230 3,299 1,345 1,130

45,270 25,795 23,134 126,000

36,800 15,000 12,600 19,034 7,759 6,517 7,529 3,069 2,578 7,529 3,069 2,578 3,993 1,628 1,367 5,516 2,248 1,889 7,487 3,052 2,563

47,288 19,275 16,191 6,700 2,731 2,294

13,789 5,621 4,721 7,313 2 981 2,504

162,980 66,432 55,802 385,305

34,495 14,080 11 ,81'1 13,832 5,638 4,736 2,775 1,131 950 2,775 1,131 950 4,492 1,831 1,538

23,164 9,450 7,938 2,978 1,214 1,020 5,499 2,241 1,883 3,456 1,409 1,183

10,363 4,224 3,548 103,648 42,329 35,557

Approvals AUG SEP OCT 2006

715 1,'186 1,07"1

NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 2007 TOTAL

9,420 23,540 14,200

30,667 26,667 29,333 13,333 100,000 - 3,_57_8 -~~~~~~~~~~~~~"'30=,667 __ ~6,667 29,333 13,333 147,160

3,161 1,517

736 364 809 910

2,860 1,168

592 12,118

6,600 3,414 1,350 1,350

716 989

1,34.3 8.481 1,202 2,473 1,312

29,3_2_o_

6,187 2,48'1

498 498 806

4,158 534 986 620

""""""_1,85_~---· 18,625""

100,000

25,000 12,000 9,700 4,800 6,400 7,200

37,700 15,400

7,800 126,000

87,000 45,000 17,800 17,800 9,440

13,040 17,700

111,795 15,840 32,600 17,290

385,305

81,550 32,700

6,560 6,560

10,620 54,810

7,040 13,000

8,170 24,500

245,510

Orange County Great Park Fuscoe Engineering

START DATE 17APR06 FINISH DATE 13APR07 Page 2 of 5

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT Preliminary Plan Development Review and Phasing/Costs/Alternates Phase 1 Schematic Deslgn

Approvals And Design Guidelines APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR

Hours Rate DESC 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 :!007 TOTAL

PARK INFRASTRUCTURE (CONTD) Utilities

Consultant TBD 7,315 16,824 6,858 5,760 3,017 39,774 182 -!00.00 Engineer 2 3,347 7,698 3,138 2,636 1,381 18,200 79 80.00 Environmental Tech 1,162 2,673 1,090 915 479 6,320 59 80.00 Graphics Tech II 868 1,997 814 684 358 4,720

185 60.00 lnfom1ation Coord 2,041 4,695 1,914 1,608 842 11,100 740 145.00 Project Manager VII 12,533 28,827 11,750 9,870 5,170 68,150

25 220.00 Principal 1 1,011 2,326 948 797 411 5,500 80 200.00 Principal 2 2,943 6,768 2,759 2,317 1,214 16,000 50 190.00 Pnnc1pal 3 1,747 4,018 1,638 1,376 721 9,500

152 125.00 Sr. Engineer il 3,494 8,037 3,276 2,752 1,441 19,000 1,282 TOTAL Utilities 36,462 83,863 34,183 28,714 __ 1~,~41 _____ 198,264

--- ----- ------------ --

198,264 Drainage

217 100.00 Engineer 2 3,991 9,179 3,741 3,143 1,646 21,700 68 80.00 Environmental Tech 1,000 2,301 938 788 413 5,440

136 80.00 Graphics Tech II 2,001 4,602 1,876 1,576 825 10,880 217 60.00 Information Coord 2,394 5,507 2,245 1,886 988 13,020 532 145.00 Project Manager VII 14,187 32,629 13,300 11,172 5,852 77,140

39 220.00 Principal1 1,578 3,629 1,479 1,243 651 8,580 130 200.00 Principal2 4,782 10,998 4,483 3,766 1.972 26,000 171 190.00 Principal3 5,975 13,743 5,602 4,705 2,465 32,490 174 125.00 Sr. Engineer II 4,000 9,200 3,750 3,150 1,650 21,750

1,684 TOTAL Drainage 39,908 91,789 37,414 31,428 - __1_6,_46~-··- ···-· -· -· ~- --- -·- -- -- --- 217,000 217,000

Grading 614 100.00 Engineer 2 11,292 25,971 10,588 8,892 4,658 61,400

101 80.00 Environmental Tech 1,486 3,418 1,393 1,170 61:l 8,080

109 80.00 Graphics Tech II 1,604 3,688 1,503 1,263 662 8,720

208 60.00 Information Coord 2,295 5,279 2,152 1,807 947 12,480

919 145.00 Project Manager VII 24,507 56,365 22,975 19,299 10,109 133,255

44 220.00 Principal 1 1,780 4,095 1,669 1,402 734 9,680

166 200.00 Principal 2 6,106 14,043 5,724 4,808 2,5!9 33,200

97 190.00 Principal 3 3,389 7,796 3,178 2,669 1,398 18,430

362 125.00 Sr. Engineer II 8,322 19,140 7,802 6,553 3.433 45,250

2,620 TOTAL Grading 50 7S1 139,796 56,982 47,865 25,072 ----~-·-·· ··-- --~-·'"-----·

330,495

330,495

l--~~---~--~----~·----- - --~ -·--~~

Orange Cmh Great Park Fuscoe Engineering


COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN

Hours Rate DESC

pARKINFRASTRUCTURE(CONTD) Soils

Consultant: TBD TOTAL Soils

lake Consultant: TBD

104 100.00 Engineer 2 32 80.00 Environmental Tech 32 80.00 Graphics Tech II 35 60.00 Information Coord

218 145.00 Project Manager VII 141 220.00 Principal 1

41 200.00 Principal 2 27 190.00 Principal3 79 125.00 Sr. Engineer II

709 TOTAL Lake

Base Mapping 50 100.00 Engineer 2 6 80.00 Environmental Tech 6 80.00 Graphics Tech II

18 60.00 Information Coord Phase 1 Preliminary

46 145~00 Project Manager VII 4 220.00 Principal 1

12 200.00 Principal 2 7 190~00 Principal 3

16 125~00 Sr. Engineer II 165 TOTAL Base Mapping

NEIGHBORHOOD INTEGRATION Edge TrQ.n::o•uuu

Consultant TBD TOTAL Edge Transition

Const J Demo I Recycle 71 100.00 Engineer 2 39 60.00 Information Coord 32 145.00 Project Manager VII 2·1 220.00 Principal1 24 200.00 Principal 2

187 TOTAL Cons/Demo/Recycle

Preliminary Plan Development Review and Approvals

APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006

9,839 22,630 9,224 7,748 4,059 9,839 22,830 9,224 7,748 4,059

53,500

10,510 24,174 9,853 8,277 4,336 1,913 4,399 1,793 1,506 789

471 1,083 441 371 194 471 1,083 441 371 194 386 888 362 304 159

5,813 13,371 5,450 4,578 2,398 5,745 13,214 5,386 4,524 2,370 1,545 3,553 1,448 1,217 637

978 2,250 917 770 404 1,816 4,177 1,703 1,430 749

29,537 67,934 27,691 23,260 _g~18.4_ 160,605

920 2,115 862 724 3'19 88 203 83 70 36 88 203 83 70 36

199 457 186 156 82

1,227 2,821 1,150 966 506 162 372 152 127 67 441 1,015 414 348 182 245 563 229 193 101 368 846 345 290 152

3,737 8,595 3,503 2,943 1,542 20,320

51,126 117,591 47,931 40,262 21,090 51,126 117,591 47,931 40,262 __ 2!,!!_90 -- --· --

278,000

1,306 3,003 1,224 1,028 539 430 990 403 339 178 853 1,963 800 672 352 850 1,954 797 669 350 883 2,030 828 695 364

4,322 9,940 4,052 3,403 1,783 23,500

PhasingJCostsiAiternates

OCT 2006

NOV 2006

DEC 2006

Page 3 of 5

-------- ----~-- - - ~~~- -


And Design Guidelines JAN FEB MAR APR 2007 2007 2007 2007

30,667 26,667 29.333 13,333

TOTAL

53,500 53,500

57,150 10,400 2,560 2,560 2,100

31,610 31,240

8,400 5,320 9,875

160,605

5,000 480 480

1,080 100,000

6,670 880

2,400 1,330 2,000

30,667 26,667 29,333 13,333 120,320 100,000 ~~---~--

278,000 ---~----- 278,000

7,100 2,340 4,640 4,620 4,800

--~·--- 23,500

---Fuscoe Engineering

START DATE 17APR06 FINISH DATE 13APR07 Page 4of5

Hours Rate DESC

SCHEDULE I FINANCIAL Information Collaboration

Cost Est. Quant Assist 360 80.00 GIS AnalysVCoord 414 145.00 Project Manager VII

Phasing Plan/Schedule 27 220.00 Principal1 90 200.00 Principal 2

391 TOTAL Info. Collaboration

SPECIAL CONSTRAINTS Hazardous Material

28 100.00 Engineer 2 12 60.00 Information Coord 29 145.00 Project Manager V!l 16 220.00 Principal 1 14 200.00 Principal2 99 TOTAL Hazardous Material

FAA 28 100.00 Engineer 2 12 60.00 Information Coord 29 145.00 Project Manager VII 16 220.00 Principal 1 14 200.00 Pnncipal 2 99 TOTAL FAA

Upper Borrego 28 100.00 Engineer 2 12 60.00 information Coord 29 145.00 Project Manager Vll 16 220.00 Principal1 14 200~00 Principal 2 99 TOTAL Upper Borrego

Off Sites 28 100.00 Engineer 2 11 60.00 Information Coord 29 145.00 Project Manager VII 16 220.00 Principal1 14 200.00 Principal2 98 TOTAL Off Sites

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT Preliminary Plan Development Review and PhasinglCostslAitemates Phase 1 Schematic Design

Approvals And Design Guidelines APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 2007 TOTAL

6,621 15,228 6,207 5,214 11,040 25,392 10,350 8,694

1,092 2,513 1,024 860 3,310 7,614 3,103 2,607

22,063 50,746 20,684 17,375 119,970

515 1,184 483 406 132 305 124 104 773 1,779 725 609 647 1,489 607 510 515 1.184 483 406

2,583 5,941 2,422 2,034 14,045

515 1,184 483 406 132 305 124 104 773 1,779 725 609 647 1,489 607 510 515 1,164 483 406

2,583 5,941 2,422 2,034 14,045

515 1,164 483 406 132 305 124 104 773 1,779 725 609 647 1,489 607 510 515 1,184 483 406

2,583 5,941 2,422 2,034 14,045

515 1,184 483 406 121 279 114 96 773 1,779 725 609 647 1,489 607 510

13,636 23,864 2,731 4,554

451 1,366 9,102 23,864 ~~·-- 50,000 ~

212 55

3'19 267 212

1,o6:;_,,,

212 55

319 267 212

1,065

2'12 55

349 267 212

1,06!;~ --------

12,500

6,545 12,000 11,455

19,045 12,000 11,455 30,000

----------· ..

50,000 36,000 60,030 30,000

5,940 18,000

199,970

2,800 720

4,205 3,520 2,800

14,045

2,800 720

4,205 3,520 2,800

~~---~~~~~ 14,045

2,800 720

4,205 3,520 2,800

~-~·~~~·~-~- .. -- ~ 14,045

2,800 660

4,205 3,520

==--=------==•-----==------ - ----orange--couii:YGreatPark ___ --- --- 8=~---·--··· Fuscoe Engineering


Hours Rate DESC

SPECIAL CONSTRAINTS (CONTD) Fixed Guide Ways

28 100.00 Engineer 2 11 60.00 Information Coord 29 145.00 Project Manager VII 16 220.00 Principal1 14 200.00 Principal 2 98 TOTAL Fixed Guide Ways

STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT Public Relations

'120 100.00 Designer 300 60.00 Information Coord 55 145.00 Project Manager VII

182 220.00 Principal1 10 200.00 Principal 2

667 TOTAL Public Relations

GRAPHICS I MODELING Presentation Graphics

320 100.00 GIS AnalysUCoord 340 80.00 Graphics Tech II 133 60.00 Information Coord 474 145.00 Project Manager VII

73 220.00 Principal1 40 200.00 Principal 2

Reprog./ Deliveries 1,380 TOTAL Present/Graphics

'14,670 REPORT TOTAL

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT Preliminary Plan Development Review and Phasing/Costs/Alternates Phase 1 Schematic Design

Approvals And Design Guidelines APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 2007 TOTAL

515 1,184 483 406 212 2,800 121 279 114 96 50 660 773 1,779 725 609 319 4,205 647 1,489 607 510 267 3,520 515 1,184 483 406 212 2800

2,572 5,915 2,411 2,025 1,061 13,985 ____ , ______ ----------------·--13,985

2,207 5,076 2,069 1,738 910 12,000 3,310 7,614 3,103 2,607 1,366 18,000 1,467 3,373 1,375 1,155 605 7,975 7,384 16,936 6,903 5,799 3,038 40,040

368 846 345 290 152 2,000 ·---14,715 33,845 13,796 11,588 6,070 80,015 -------- ----~-----------·--·-·

80,015

3,678 8,460 8,092 7,724 4,046 32,000 3,126 7,191 6.878 6,566 3,439 27,200

917 2,110 2,018 1,926 1,009 7,980 7,900 18,170 17,380 16,590 8,690 68,730 1,846 4,246 4,061 3,877 2,031 16,060

920 2,115 2,023 1,931 1 ,011 8,000 9,195 21,149 20,230 19,310 10,i15 80,000

27,583 63,440 60,682 57,924 30,3_~1 ___ . -----·--""" 239,970

239,970

455,178 1,046,910 471 ,362 404,853 225,702 23,864 19,045 12,000 11,455 61,3~-- 53,333 58,667 26,667 2,870,370 2,590,370 ----- -50,000 30,000 200,000

•

•

•

Mary Miss Studio

Scope of Work The role of the artist within the Orange County Great Park desrgn team is to serve as a leader in establishing the Park as a Living Laboratory, a concept which enables new ideas about environmental and social sustainability to be investigated, tested and built over the next 5, lO, 20 or 50 years. The goal will be to make sustainability accessible to Park visitors by giving them a notable form of expression. The artist will set the precedent for this approach through her input into the Park Master Plan while proposing specific interventions to be included in phase one construction. These interventions will begin to define a framework where investigations by artists become an integral part of the Park's evolution over time. While the Park as a Living Laboratory is a vision for the future of the Park, the concept will be lmmched during its design and construction phases an important part of public outreach efforts to arouse interest and excitement about the Park even before it is built The artist's work will involve participation in a number of work groups as summarized below.

Park Program ami Design iii Participate in reflning I\'laster Plan tfamework, focusing on integration of Park as a

Living Laboratory concept oo Participate in design of proposed uses and teatures, tOcusing on engagement of multiple

communities • Investigate and propose ways to revcai/highlight/make tangible to people the physical

aspects ofthe site such as habitat and hydrology • Integrate art features into architecture/stmctures, signage and lighting • Assist in development of iconic clements and specific artworks in the Park • Assist in developing guidelines for incorporating public art in the Park • Select specific elements to incorporate in Phase One.

Suslainability • Investigate ways in which sustainability concepts promoted by the Green Team and

LEED requirements can be made tangible to the public • Establish environmental education programs and art features that draw attention to issues

such as water use and reuse, energy and resource conservation, green building technology, alternative energy sources, recycling of materials, etc.

• Create public awareness of sustainable practices during constmction of Park (e.g. recycling of materials) by desi):,'lling temporary viewing areas and interpretive displays

Natural Systems • Collaborate with team ecologist and hydrologist to identify oppmtunities where

functional systems can be designed creatively to serve multiple !unctions such as educational displays or unique public spaces (e.g. biotiltration areas, wildlife corridor, botanical garden, etc.)

• Assist in development of park wide planting programs

Page 1 of 2.

•

•

•

Park Infrastructure • IdentifY opportunities and propose ways in which Park utilities, particularly as related to

the conveyance of water, might be revealed as art/educational features • Investigate ways in which Park circulation (such as hiking and bike trails) and

transportation systems within Park can be used to make people aware of the Park's natural features such as hydrology, topography, plants, wildlife, distant views, etc, through careful consideratiou of routing, station stops and adjacent areas

• Propose rest areas along circulation routes where visitors can see di!Terent landscapes of the Park

• Participate in design of lake area focusing on its use as a public amenity

Neighborhood Integration • Collaborate with design team to define the character of edge tnmsJtlOns along Park

boundaries and propose specitic features to enhance crossovers between areas, For example, visual icons/markers appearing on neighborhood streets or botanical garden plan markers throughout the Park

• Propose and give visual expression to programs that promote use/exchange between Park and community such as a recycling drop-off or a fanner's market

• Propose physical features to enhance edge transitions between Park and adjacent developments, specifically the Life Long Learning District, proposed TOD area and agricultural lands

• Study the exchange between sports park and Park through physical features such as warm np mnning paths into park, practice areas/fields in park and '"markers" or "outdoor rooms" to make people more aware ofthc exchange.

In addition to work group tasks outlined above, the upon direction form client, Artist wili work with Lennar to set up an on-site working studio as a base for implementing the Park as a Living Laboratory concept during the design and construction phases. This studio will serve as a catalyst for the Artist's propose to establish a Research and Residency Center in the Lifelong Learning district. This Center is a place where the public will be made aware of issues of sustainability while enabling art programs proposed in the Master Plan to continue as the Park gets established over time. Given that the City of Irvine is making major efforts towards sustainable practice, fhe Park can be viewed as an opportunity to showcase green design, by giving it a visible presence throughout the Park. In order to begin the process of establishing the Research Center, Mary Miss will collaborate with local museums, universities and art institutions to generate a base of support and to t1gure out how the Center will be mn in the future.

Deliverables Mary Miss Studio's deliverable work will include drawings, diagrams, illustrations and viritten material to be incorporated into the deliverable& produced by Ken Smith's office for Task two through five. Other deliverables will be in the form of drawings, prototypes, temporary installations, pem1ancnt works and theoretical investigations. The on-site studio/future Research Center will serve as a place where these work products can be displayed and viewed by the public, The Studio will also be producing reports including nan,ati ves, maps, diagrams, and precedents and describing research in progress,

Page 2 of2

• Orange ~~~~~at Park .---lllary Miss

>TART DATE 17APR06 FINISH DATE 13A:_P:_R_:_07:__ ____ _ Page 1 of 1 ------· .. , _____ , _________ _.:_:""'-'_::.:....:__

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Preliminary Plan Development Review and Phasing/Costs/Alternates


And Design Guidelines

Uses and Features 249 90.00

80 55.00 800 140.00 500 220.00

1,629 TOTAL

SUSTAINABILITY Sustainable Master Plan

45 90.00 15 55.00

146 140.00 90 220.00

296 TOTAL

NATURAL SYSTEMS Wild Life 1 Habitat

55 18

175 110

90.00 55.00

140.00 220.00

358 TOTAL

PARK INFRASTRUCTURE Transportation

Studio Assistant Admin Assistant i! Project Manager 1 Principal Uses & Features

Studio Assistant Admin Assistant II Project Manager 1 Principal Sustainable M.P.

Studio Assistant Admin Assistant il Project Manager 1 Principal Wild Life I Habitat

40 90.00 Studio Assistant 13 55.00 Admin Assistant II

128 140.00 Project Manager 1 80 220.00 Principal

261 TOTAL Transportation

NEIBORHOOD INTEGRATION Edge- Transition

110 90.00 Studio 1\ssistant 35 55.00 Admin Assistant ll

347 140.00 Project Manager 1 220 220.00 Principal 711 TOTAL Edge Transition

Travel

3,255 REPORT TOTAL

372 76

1133 856

·--~7

156 30

780 761 .

1,726

__ 25,!58

857 819 782 410 174 167 159 83

2605 2492 2378 2045 1398 1,969 1,884 1,798 1,969 1.798 5,!llnl 5,362 . 5,11!1 .. 4,507 '_3,197

18,522 7,704

450 492 450 87 96 87

358 342 327 358 327 68 65 62 68 62

1793 17.15 1637 1793 1637 1,750 1,674 1,598 1,750 1,598 3,910 3,7117 .3,624 3,970 3,624

.13,117. 7,594 ---

2,550 . 2,550 2,550 850 7,!!50 ________ , .. 850

1465. 1465 1398 1 ,il84 1,884 1,798 3,349 3,349 3,197 _____ ,

9,895

471 471 450 92 92 37

342 342 327 65 65 62

1715 1715 1837 1,674 1,674 1.,598 3,797 3,797 _ _!&2~,

11,218

214 44

1,204 1,214

FEB MAR APR 2007

186 205 196 38 42 40

1.047 1.151 647 1.056 1.162 528

2,676 2,327 2,559 1,411 ----8,954 __ ,_,- -- ,.

304 67

221 192 211 96 51 44 48 22

1,073 933 1,027 467 1,0'19 939 1.033 469

TOTAL

4,041 823

20,429 19,800 45,093

3,600 715

17,920 17.600

2,424 2,108 2,31!!__,!,054 __ 39,835 _, -- -~ 7,905

___ 13,600, ~----,.-'2~,5"'50 2,550 5,100 ---- ---

62,\)24 59,438 56,852 50,511 37,130 38,898 41,448 39,680 29,629 . 204,172 . ,_,,.,_, __ --87,641-· -----120,026------------

25,784 28,341 15,118 510,692 98;834 -- ...

•

•

•

Mia Lehrer + Associates

I

Scope of Work Mia Lehrer & Associates will work as a member of a large collaborative team to study, create, and refine a master plan that will define the proposed Park uses, and the size, scaie and location of Park features through research, design studies, and plans. Our work will largely tocus on tlve distinct areas: Park Program and Design, Sustainability, Natural Systems, Neighborhood Integration and to a smaller extent Stakeholder Involvement. These five areas are brietly summarized as follows:

Park Program and Design We will collaborate with the design team to establish a design framework to help site various proposed park uses and features, assist in the development of an overall landscape palette, integrate habitat and hydrological features into the overall park framework, explore and study how different grade conditions will affect proposed programmed uses within the park, and study and determine how various art features can become integrated throughout the park. The observations and conclusions of this work will become the basis for the Master Plan and Design Guidelines that will regulate the location, size, massing and scope of the distinct and different park features aud uses.

Sustainabllity We will collaborate with the design team and the Great Park Community to research and design implementation strategies for utilizing and integrating state of the art technologies for soft!hardscapes, alternatives modes of transportation and infrastructure such as those in the Green Streets plan, solar technologies, embedded building stmctures and green waste recycling. We will be building on work completed by others to incorporate the latest sustainable technologies that deal with innovative landscape and building strategies.

Natural Systems We will collaborate with the Natural Systems work group to study and assess the Park's proposed natural systems and regional linkages and prepare detailed studies focusing on: the size, scale and massing of the proposed canyons /corridors, size and design of water systems, iakes and streams, location of tree and plant massing.

Neighborhood Integration We will work with the collaborative team, Lennar and other adjacent landowners to study and design a seamless transition along Park boundaries, specifically the proposed TOO area, golf course, interface with Agua Chinon, the Canyon corridor, Irvine Boulevard intertace, Life Long Leaming District, adjacent agricultural lands, Sports Park and County of Orange property, These studies will emphasize community integration and may include landscape, circulation, transportation, land use, and all other adjacency issues, This work group may also address phasing issues and agency coordination .

Page 1 of 3 ' '

•

•

•

Stakeholder Involvement We will collaborate with the Stakeholder Involvement work group, the city and OCGP staff, and Great Park community to formulate a public participation campaign that presents the design team's Master Plan concept and informs the general public about the approval process.

Deliverabies Research, design studies and plans, to include:

1. Park Program and Design: Guidelines that will regulate the location, size, massing and scope of the distinct and ditlerent park features and uses.

2. Sustainability: Research and design implementation strategies: softihardscapes, alternative modes of transportation and infrastructure {green street plan, solar technologies, embedded building structures and green waste recycling.

3. Natural Systems: Detailed studies focusing on size, scale and massing of the proposed canyons/corridors, size and design of water systems, lakes and streams, and location of tree and plant massing. Additional studies may include examining how wildlife will use the Corridor and development strategies for the long-term survival of wild] ife.

4. Neighborhood Integration: Study and design a seamless transition along Park boundaries, specifically the proposed TOO area, golf course, interface with Agua Chinon, the Canyon corridor, Irvine Boulevard interlace, Life Long Learning District, adjacent agricultural lands, Sports Park and County of Orange property. These studies will emphasize community integration and may inchrdc landscape, circulation, transportation. land use and all other adjacency issues .

5. Stakeholder Involvement: Participate in a public outreach campaign that presents the design team's Master Plan concept.

Scope of Work- Phase One Schematic Mia Lehrer+ Associates will continue iis role as a collaborative team member in task 5 and focus on the development and execution of a Comprehensive Master Plan and development of a Phase One Plan.

Deliverables Assist in the:

l Creation of a schematic design plan tor Phase One. 2. Work to finalize Master Plan for Phase One. 3. Work to finalize the cost plan. 4. Phase One:

Assist in creation and development of the following: a) Overall Phase One plan graphic that illustrates proposed uses ad features at a

minimum of 1" - 500'. b) Blowup of major areas and features at 1" -100'. c) Sections that depict important features and uses throughout the Park. d) Illustrations that detail park programs and activity spaces. e) lllustrations that depict streetscapes and edge conditions. f) lllustrations that depict thematic, art and iconic elements. g) Illustrations that depict park ecological and sustainability systems and features . h) Illustrations and brief descriptions of park architectural and landscape architectural

design guidelines.

Page 2 of3

•

•

•

i) 36"x48" or similar boards that depict park design images and nanatives that describe the park programs and features.

j) Plant palette, paving materials, building systems, and site furnishing research and alternative selections.

k) Development of a PowerPoint presentation that high] ights park design, imagery and narration of the park.

'

Page 3 of3 ~ • "'" <

• Mia Lehrer & Associates

START DATE 17APR06 FINISH DATE i3APR07

Master Plan Framework 109 70.00 86 150.00 36 220.00

231 TOTAL

Uses and Features 40 70.00 82 '150.00 66 220.00

188 TOTAL

DESC

Admin Design Staff Associate 1 Principal Master P!an Frmwk

Admin Design Staff Associate 1 Principal Uses & Features

Landscape Palette 50 40

70.00 Admin Design Staff 150.00 Associate 1

37 220.00 Principal 127 TOTAl Landscape Palette

Habitat 57 70.00 8 150.00 4 220.00

69 TOTAL

Hydrology 70.00

8 150.00 220.00

8 TOTAL

Architecture I Structures 42 70.00 54 150.00

220.00 96 TOTAL

Admin Design Staff Associate 1 Principal Habitat

Admin Design Staff Associate 1 Principal Hydrology

Admin De.sign Staff Associate 1 Principal Arch. I Structure

Art Features 8

52 70.00 Admin Design Staff

150.00 Associate 1

Orange coA Great Park • Page 1 of4 _______________ .. __________________________ _

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Preliminary Plan Development Review and Phasing/CostsJAlternates

771 1,773 1,696 1,618 906 2,085 1,994 1,904 428 sa!; 942 ass

2,105 - 4,842 4,632 4;421 16,000 . -

1.773 1,813 1,025

985 899 4,570 _1,92_4

6,494

. 1,074 942

2,016

1;Q74 942

2,016 M56

1,025 $99

1,_924_


And Design Guidelines JAN FEB MAR

7,630 12,900 7,920

28,450_

368 847 811 774 2,147 1,867 2,053 933 9,800 66!'; 1,529 1.463 1,3S6 1,529 1,396 1,463 1,463 1,396 4,600 4,000 4,400 2,000 27,300 785 1805 1,727 1,848 1,805 1.648 1,727 1,727 1,848 3,238 2,816 3,098 1,408 25,080

1,818 4,182 .4,000 3,818 3,334 3,044 3,189 3,189 3,044 9,985 8,683 9,551 4,341 62,180 13,818 - - 6,:\78 -- - 9,422 --- - .. -.. 32,560 --- - -

461 324

1,059 746

525 1,208 158 363

1,013 714

1,155 347

967 681

1,103 332

____ 683 - 1,571 1,502 1 .~ ----$,190

158 363 347 332

158 363 347 332 1,200

387 890 851 812 96 569 U!Q9 1,252 1,1

956 2,199 - 2,103 2;008 -{1:1_8_ .

74 650

7,266 1,782

169 1,495

162 1,430

155 1,365 1,495

681 714

88Q 880

844 674

644 674

1.365

714

a so

674

674 1,992.

681

844

6~.

75'1 1,564

719 1,496 1

5950 11100

3,990 1,200

880 6,070

1,200

1,200

2,940 8,100

11,040

560 7,800

• i'lia Lehrer & Associates

>TART DATE 17APR06 FINISH DATE 13APR07

Total Hours Rate OESC 'ARKPROGRAM & DESIGN Art Features

12 220.00 Principal n TOTAL Art Features

Sign age 4 70.00 Admin Design Staff 8 150.00 Associate 1

220.00 Principal 12 TOTAL Signage

Lighting & Acoustics 4 70.00 8 150.00

220.00 12 TOTAL

Design Guidelines 266 151 62

70.00 150.00 220.00

479 TOTAL

SUSTAINABILITY

Admin Design Staff Associate 1 Principal Lighting/Acoustics

Admin Design Staff Associate 1 Principal Design Guidelines

Green Street 160

60 30

70.00 Admin Design Staff 150.00 Associate 1 220.00 Principai

250 TOTAL Green Street

LEEDS 160 70.00 60 150.00 30 220.00

250 TOTAL

Recycling 30 50 30

110

70.00 ·tso.oo 220.00

TOTAL

Admin Design Staff Associate 1 Principal LEEDS

Admin Design Staff Associate 1 Principal Recycling

Orange colt~-~re<it Park

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Preliminary Plan Development Review and Phasing/Costs/Alternates

Approvals APR tliAY JUN. JUl.. AUG SEP OCT. NOV DEC 2006 20.06 2006 . 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 .. 2006

920 . ·. 880 . 840 724 -- ll,584 2,472 . 2,360 1 ,495 1 ,365

101 1,224

295 1,620.

787 632 464

1,1183.

148 527 464

. 8,140 . . . . . 2,860 ------ •

523 1,570 2.816 2,694

678 1,180 4,018 5,443

18,187

1,810 . 1,731 1;455 .. .1.3.91 1:06.7 1,020 4,331 4,143

14,312

339 325 1,212 1,159 1 067. 1,020

280 627 573

907 573 f,48(f - ---~--:-

3,296 2,571 1,239

280 627

907 ---·1,480

5,324 2,816 1,357

573

573

4,137 2,571 1,239

7,,106_ - 9,49"/' __ _7,946 --17,443

1,653 1.574 890 1,328 1,265 715

974 928 524

2,441 2,694 2 219 7,354

932 749 .549

966 2,694 2:602

262 2,571 2,632

... • 5,46'5 6'.:-t~ .. 1S,2ou

932 890 749 715 549 524

. ~;955 ___ p66. . 2.,130 --· _2,2:}1 . 2,231, ___ 2" 130_ 6;592 5,896

310 295 167 175 175 167 1,107 1,054 596 624 624 596

974 928 524 549 549 524

- I -


And Design Guidelines JAN FEB MAR APR

Page 2 of4

2007 2007 2007 2007 TOTAL

687' 1,472 1,079 _3,238

597 657 299 1 ,280 1,408 640

939 1 ,033 469 2,816 3,098 1,408 . 10,56if-- - ---- ·-

2,640 11,000

280 1,200

1,480

280 1,200

1,480

20,860 27,450 17,160 65,470

11,200 9,000

11,200 9,000 6,600

__ 26,80~ .. --

2,100 7,500 6,600

1,138 2,618 2,504 2.~91 2,277 1,287 1,349 1,349 1,21!,?_ ------~------···-·-·- -----a;651-------.- - .. 3,564-- .

16"20!)_ 3,985

• Mia Lehrer & Associates


Total Hours Rate DESC

Building Concepts 26 70.00 Admin Design Staff 30 150.00 Associate 1 19 220.00 Principal 75 TOTAL Building Concepts

NATURAL SYSTEMS Hydrology {Environmental)

144 70.00 Admin Design Staff 90 150.00 Associate 1 42 220.00 Principal

276 TOTAL Hydrology (Env.)

Plants 132 42 36

70.00 150.00 220.00

Admin Design Staff Associate 1 Principal

210 TOTAL Plants

Botanical 156 102 42

300

70.00 150.00 220.00

TOTAL

Admin Design Staff Associate 1 Principal Botanical

NEIBORHOOD INTEGRATION Edge Transition

112 36 18

70.00 Admin Design Staff 150.00 Assodate ·1 220.00 Principal

166 TOTAL Edge Transition

Design Guidelines 18 18 9

70.00 150.00 220.00

Admin Design Staff Associate 1 Principal

45 TOTAL Design Guidelines

Sports Park 18 18

70.00 Admin Design Staff 150.00 Associate 1

Orange Co.y Great Park

COMPREHENSIVE. MASTER PLAN Prelimin~ry Ptan Development Review and PhasinglCosts/Aiternates

Approvals APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

. 2006 2000 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 200Ei 2006

239 .. 229 218 239 218 229 . 229 • 218 316 727 :696. 6.6'4 632 358 375 375 358 226. 520 . 497 . .474 520 474 497 497 474 542. 1,486 1,422 1,357 1,391 1,050 1,100 1,100 1,050

-· 4:,801 2,441 3,250

649 1,493 1,428 1,364 1,299 734 769. 769 734 341. 783 749 715 783 7'15 749 749 715 5.57 1,280 1;224 1,169 1.113 629 659 659 629

• PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT

Phase 1 Schematic Design And Design Guidelines

JAN FEB MAR APR

Page 3 of 4

2007 2007 2007 2007 TOTAL

1,820 4,500 4,180

10,500

10,080 13,500

-- ------ ---- .,"',0"~-

9,240 6,300 7,920

1,546 3,551 . 3,'102 3,24'! 3,195 2,079 2,178 ~.178 2,079 -------- 17,457 ----·---- ... '5,274"- 6,435 ·-·---·---- -- ---·--

23,46~.

767 1,075

649

1.'f65 1,1588 1,611 1,535 2.47;3 2,36q 2,258 2,150 1,49;! 1,428 1,364 1.299

2,492 5,731 5,482 5,233 4,984 -1S,93if ··-~-·-- -·i,8o2

68 157 150 143 146 336 321 306 107 246 235 225

,:3£1__ 738- ·-- 706 . . -~6~-2,439

68 146

157 336

150 321

143 306

157 336 246 738

1,412

157 336

868 1,216

734 2,818

909 . 1,274

769 2,952

143 150 306 321 225 235 674 706 ------·-·

143 306

150 321

909 1,274

769 2,952

8,722

868 1,216

734 2,818

150 143 321 306 235 225 .7.06 674

2,0.86

150 321

143 306

10,920 15,300

9,240 35,460

7,640 5,400

···-~ _ _______ ·a 1 .~uu.

1,260 2,700 1,980

--~\lj_Q

1,260 2,700

-- • Mia Lehrer & Associates


Total Hours Rate OESC

NEIBORHOOD INTEGRATION Sports Park

9 220.00 Principal 45 TOTAL Sports Park

STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT Communication

45 70.00 45 150.00 27 220.00

117 TOTAL

Community Outreach 45 70.00 45 150.00 27 220.00

117 TOTAL

Public Relations 45 45

70.00 150.00 220.00 27

117 TOTAL

Board Updates 9 9 9

70.00 150.00 220.00

27 TOTAL

3399

Admin Design Staff Associate 1 Principal Communication

Admln Des'1gn Staff Associate 4 Principal Comm. Outreach

Admin Design Staff Associate i Principal Public Relations

Admin Design Staff Associate i Principal Board Updates

Travel

REPORT TOTAL

Orange coJl, Great Park

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN l'r<llimlnary Plan oeveloplllent Review and phasing/CostsiAitern;o)es

· · . · . Approvals · _APFI_ ·. MAY ~UN_ _JUl. AUG SEP ·oCt . N()v OE_C 2006 ·c __ ;,~Ql\. ·:::!006 ; 2J!~I; 2006 2006 2006 '200'6 ~OQ~

~g . :~ ~b~ 321 73? 'l'oe

. Q$6 . 0(;~~ . ");884~ -:-:--- .6;1!0'7

3513 766 67'4

'f,79!1

392 358 37.5 375 839 766 603 8Q3 738 67 4 70fl . 706

1 969 1 798 . f8ll4 .. ·. · 1·Sil4 L_ __________ •------'-'~~

3,767 5,566

358 7()$ 674

1,798



• Page4 of4

2007 2007 2007 2007 TOTAL

3,150 6,750 5,940

15,84.Q.

3,150 6,750

3,150 6,750

·-·--·~

630 1,350 1

_._.,_ .1 ~~- I ~~ V"J>l'U\1 .......... -----

2,550 2,$60 .··• 2,550' 851) .. ......... --2•,5® 1,700 . 2,500

6,750 ___ 13,1;00_

7,255 483,500. ~.103 :sz,rrz 61,754 - 59,27J~ ___ sr,~:n ___ 40"99_:r_·_~2,294. 39,672 3'a;o_~_ 1s,68s 14,so9 1_s,sso 211,902 98,830 120,009 54,410

(_)

Green Shield Ecology, Inc.

Scope of Work Park Designed Programs Participate in core design group meetings and discussions to advance the Great Park overall design and programming.

Wildlife/Habitats We will determine appropriate and varied habitat types and microhabitats to support native wildlife communities that are sustainable as well as determining site preparation and landforming needs for these habitats. We will determine reasonable needs to introduce wildlife to the site, and coordinate with regulatory agencies on requirements to establish these natural communities. In addition, we will monitor requirements to allow assessment of restoration protocols and adaptive management of future phased introductions.

Hydrology/Water Requirements We will assess water requirements to support natural communities of plants and animals on site, and water regimes (l1ows, variations, and quality). Working with the project civil engineer, we will review water treatment needs and how water flows between natural habitats and development zones should be managed.

Plants We will determine plant species needed tor each habitat type being considered for the restoration, and general phasing needs to achieve plant community types that are targeted. We will consider which species need contract growing and/or local seed collection to allow materials to be available during the phased park development. Many invasive plant species are in the area; these must be identified as to threat level, so that management protocols can be addtessed during design stages. Threats to Phase I plantings are to be identified.

Soils Working with geotechnical and soil consultants, we will characterize soils needed to support the targeted habitat types, assist in identifying soil amendments needed to enhance soil quality, and recommend coordination steps among green waste suppliers and the planting needs of the site. Questions that will be addressed include: what materials will be in short supply and require additional sources, and what materials should be sequestered immediately, as the site demolition is initiated. We will assist in management (movement and storage) guidelines for soil materials.

Page 1 of 2

J

Botanic Garden Advance mission, programs, and landscape elements of the proposed botanic garden. Coordinate activities of the design team with client approved interested parties.

Deliverables Research, design studies, and Schematic Plans to include:

1. Wildlife/Habitats: Determination of appropriate and varied habitat types and microhabitats to support sustainable native wildlife communities on the Great Park site.

2. Native Plant Communities: Work with local Urban Forestry and A.rborist consultants to identify appropriate zones for native/natural plant communities accessible by the public, including:

Agua Chi non drainageway Bee Canyon Creek bosque/woodland Other specific locations for "natural systems" planting development, such as treatment wetlands, bioswales, other NTS features, and areas in and near the canyon feature.

3. Hydrology/Water Requirements: Assess water requirements to support natural communities of plants and animals on site, and water regimes. Review water treatment needs with hydrologist and hydrogeologists to ensure sustainability of planted environments.

4. Plants: Collaborate with local botanists and arhorists and determine plant species for each habitat type and approved species for natural areas.

5. Soils: Work with soil scientists and Agronomist to characterize soils needed to support the targeted habitat types and identify site locations for sources of importing/ amendments.

6. Compile the above work into a bound report with supporting findings, conclusions, preliminary designs, and outline implementation strategies.

Page 2 of 2

• tJ Orange Co~ ... ~ Great Park

~ Green Shield

~ START DATE 17APR06 FINISH DATE 13APR07

, COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN PreJIIJl.il)llry Pl<!n Devel<!PrnG!lt Review and Phasi!jg!Costs!Aitemates

, -- ': , , , Approvals ~.·~ ~· M- ~ ~ ·~ ~

Hours Rate DESC 2006 2006 2006 ZDP6 2006 2006 2bo6 2006 2006 . NATURAL SYSTEMS

Wild Life I Habitat 86 140.00 Sr. Ecologist 40 1 00.00 Restoration Ecologist 80 1 00.00 Wildlife Ecologist

435 35.00 Field Technician 614 140.00 Project Manager 346 220.00 Principal

1601 TOTAL Wild Life/Habitat

Hydrology (Environmental) 20 100.00 Wildlife Ecologist 40 140.00 Project Manager 60 220.00 Principal

120 TOTAL Hydrology (Env.)

Plants 38 140.00 Assoc 1/Sr. Botanist 30 140.00 Sr. Ecologist 40 100.00 Restoration Ecologist

150 35.00 Field Technician 70 140.00 Project Manager 30 220.00 Principal

358 TOTAL Plants

Soils (Chemistry) 20 140.00 Sr. Ecologist 20 100.00 Restoration Ecologist 80 35.00 Field Technician 50 140.00 Project Manager 60 220.00 Principal

230 TOTAL Soils (Chern)

Botanical 210

80 70

360

140.00 140.00 220.00

TOTAL

Assoc 1/Sr. Botanist Project Manager Principal Botanical

Travel

2:~93

1,708

1i701!.•

.1,392 .. >

9,877

810 19.687

3,211

2,'722 1;383 l!esa

• 1oo» 2,..,.,

1833 3I~it 14,~

)10,271

9,349 2;445 1126

12:920 ,32,275

6;4313 f;909 2.?45

.2.5~8 2;817 1;36'1 2,®4 1,55.9 s:22a

1.$,)29

4,$00 :!.33t 1:478 8,§68

. 2,550 2;550 . 2,550 . . 7,650 ~··-~ ~

1,708

1,IQ!_ 3,267

5,318 2,531 1,619 9,468

12.203

850 850

1,559

1,559

1,257 1,478 2,735

Ul$3

1.,!>33

1,317 2,385. 3,701

1,633

1,317 3,362 4,678 '

.11,521

2,550 $,242

3;142 3.1"42

2,550



Page 1 of 1

2007 2007 2007 2007 TOTAL

--·-·-·

12,040 4,000 8,000

15,225 85,960

2,000 5,600

5,320 4,200 4,000 5,250 9,800 6,600

35,170

2,800 2,000 2,800 7,000

29,400 11,200 15,400 56,000

13,600

I REPORT TOTAL ll8;589 . !13:352 85,949 57,954 18,476 19,598 21.'191 19,306 354,715 217;!190 ~-.!~430 60,395

TEN Arquitectos

Scope of Work TEN Arquitcctos will develop Design Guidelines and Master Plan implt:m<::ntation for temporary programs including proposed temporaty structures, permanent programs, park wide utilitarian structures and distinctive park structures, contract programs, and design guideline structures including sports park structures and museum programs, including the following:

Information Hanger in the Great Park A temporary structure for the park which would be utilized in phase one for providing updated information on the park, elevated observation of earthworks projects, dedications, public presentations and general education of the park. The Information Hanger would be constructed on site and remain until a tuture point at which it will be dismantled and its materials will be reused elsewhere in the park. Potential programs may include exhibition space, cafe, performance events and ground breakings, sales area (offices), support spaces, and view (observation) platfotms.

Great Park Tethered Balloon Ride A potentially long term and distinctive element of the park will be a tethered helium balloon which rises !OOOft above the ground. This icon will be visible lrom all over Orange County and the surrmmding area identifying its greater context. Conversely, it will give an entirely new vantage point by which park workers and visitors can view the park and surrounding landscape as it changes over time. Potential uses include signage and advertising, corporate sponsorships, tourist attraction to the park, surveying the site (general observation), identifying the park from great distances, and revenue generation.

Gateway structures guidelines in the Great Park The design of Gateway Structures by the Master Plan Design Team will help to define major entries and programs into the Great Park. Each Gateway Structure will be unique in scale and design as they relate to specific programmatic elements and orientation to the park and may include park entry, security, park iconography, program linkages, park information and maps, connections to community, and associated parking.

Canyon Bridges guidelines in the Great Park The design of the Canyon Bridges are critical both as distinctive elements in the park and for their service and accessibility throughout the park. The bridges need to integrate into the overall park circulation and canyon design, as well as provide unique moments of structure in the otherwise natural setting. These elements also will allow for utilities to be carried across the canyon to adjacent development parcels. Potential uses for canyon bridges include pedestrian crossings, dedicated guide way crossings, utilities and infrastructure crossings, maintenance and security access, and program linkages.

Page 1 of 2

•

Sports Park at the Great Park The new Sports Park will create an immediate draw and revenue for the Great Park in the first

phase. The design of the Sports Park will be directed by Design Guidelines prescribed by the Master Plan Design Team which foresee the sports program as it connects into the future development of the park. Potential programs include action sports facilities (BMX, rock climbing wall, skate park), associated retail and pro shops, playing fields for various outdoor sports, indoor soccer, a wave park, maintenance facilities, and a Held house (indoor sports courts).

Amphitheater at the Great Park A distinctive feature in the Canyon and of the Great Park will be the Amphitheater located near the Cultural Terrace. The Amphitheater will provide a large performance space for the park with a flexibility of uses. Its correct scale, orientation and design will be developed by the Master Plan Design Team. Here potential programs may include concerts, lectures and presentations, graduations, weddings, and a lounge space.

Botanical Gardens at the Great Park The design and construction of a Botanical Gardens by the Master Plan Design Team will add a new and powerful educational and esthetic elements to the park. Located across the Canyon from the Cultural Ten·ace this facility will instantly become a icon of the park and will remain so for generations to come. Potential programs include agricultural development, nursery, educational and display facilities, associated retail and sales of11ce, associated administration and oft!ce space.

Deliverables

l. Design Guidelines and Master Plan Implementation for Temporary Programs, including proposed temporary stmctures, information hanger and kiosks

2. Design Guidelines and Master Plan Implementation for Permanent Programs, including park-wide utilitarian structures, such as tethered balloon rides, maintenance facilities, toilets, cafe, bridges, gateway structures, amphitheater, botanical gardens, runway museum and view decks/platforms.

3. Design Guidelines and Master Plan Implementation for Contract Programs, including design guidelines structures, sports park structures, and museum programs.

Guidelines consist of materials and exterior finishes, windows and entry, orientations to parks/streets/canyon, access/delivery for emergency vehicles, signage, lighting, associated parking, associated utilities, relationship to other park structures and maintenance needs/coordination .

Page 2 of 2

{j TEN Arquitectos


Total Rate DESC

Master Plan Framework 120 125.00 Associate 2 192 75.00 Intermediate Designer

80 65.00 Intern Designer 20 220.00 Principal!

180 180.00 Project Manager 5 TOTAL Master Plan Framework

Architecture I Structures 340 125.00 Associate 2 580 75.00 Intermediate Designer 230 65.00 Intern Designer

56 220.00 Principal 25 180.00 Project Manager 5

TOTAL Architecture/Structure

Design Guidelines 115 125.00 192 75.00 74 65.00 20 220.00 10 180.00

TOTAL

Associate 2 Intermediate Designer Intern Designer Principal Project Manager 5 Design Guidelines

Travel

REPORT TOTAL

Orange Couty1Great Park

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Preliminary Plan Development Review and

Approvals Phasing/Costs/Alternates

APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT 2006 . 2006 200!> •2006 . 2006 2006 2006

789.

2,297 g}~

1,097 1,440 930

1,5TI 1,817

.5;0$4. . 4,824 5,284 4,824 5.054 5,4~. 5,220 5,717 5,220 5,469

866 .. :M22 1,810 1,652 1;987

NOV 2006

5,054 5,469 3,602

DEC 2006

4,824 5,:;!20 3,511

~.791 M6s, · 2,ii4s 1 ,503 1,372 1'.437 24 12~ 379. 7,97 1,287 1,000 590 234 63

2;322:. -15,600-14,068- f4.~:3.1 14,559 . t~.619 29,668 42;715 . . . ..

2,322

756

2,550 7,650

1.051' '834

2,6.50

23,664 25,375 78,805

1;380 1,273

21sso

27,44.5.

1 ,511 1,743

850

1,380 1,592

. -856-- .

28,750 26,771 ··· ss;~-

2,226 1,914

2,550

32,235

3,138 3,663 2,461

1,700 5,100

39,418 108,230

850

36,577

Page 1 of 1

PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT Phase 1 Schematic

And Design Guidelines JAN FEB MAR APR 2007 2007 2007 2007

.. - ..

TOTAL

15,000 14,400

5,200

42,500 43,500 14,950 12,320 4,500

117,770

14,375 14,400

4,810 4,400

13,600

242,555

~. ) Orange coL~~ Great Park Miscellaneous


ACTIO DESC

Park Program & Design

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Preliminary Plan Development Review and P~a$ing/CosWAJternates

Approvals APR MAY JUN . JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2006 ~6 200$' 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006



Architectural Structure 3;1:54 .3,017. ' 2,680 1,524 1,080 1;132: 1,132 1,080 15,000 Signage 7,360 7,040 6,720 3,560 2,520 2,540 · 2,640 2,520 35,000 Lighting and Acoustics 1(} 51'4 10 051 9,600 5,086 3,600 3;772 · 3,7.72 3,600 50,000

TOTAL Park Prog. & Des. 21,026 20,114. 1$;200 __ 10,170 .___'l'dOO 7;544 7,544 7,200 . ··-------------~- ... _ 100,000

Stakeholder Involvement

TOTAL Public Outreach Stakeholder lnv.

Fire I Lite I Safety

TOTAL Safety I Security Fire/Life/Safety

Contingency I Reimbursables

TOTAL

Contingency Reimbursables Reimbursable

REPORT TOTAL

60,342 17,370 22,288

50.4oe 4:1.417 45.651 49,998 37,499 17,934 17,934 11,119 18,749 16,304 17,935 16,304 353,250 50,406 . 47;417 45,65f . -~;998 . 37,499 11,934 11,934

143,474. 87,497 52;987 17.'119 18,749 16,304 17,935 16,304 353,250

-- --- --- -- 69,292 ---

. 239.~20 --13~.466'-- 126;834 95,954 56,764 ... - 1'52;-718 - -

65;390 $5,735 48;563 42,543 3~,994 -·-~~L69,:l 36,994 988,250 4$8,620 179,688 157,224

Terms and Conditions

Budget

The proposed Budget for Tasks 2 through 5 was developed by GPDS's design and management team and the subconsultants after analysis of the scope, review of findings of critical issues performed under Task I, and collaboration and discussions with multiple agencies and entities directly affecting the Master Plan for the Park.

The proposed Budget is based on a reasonably anticipated level of effort for the listed disciplines and is the summation of cost of the projected labor and reimbursable allowances. Based on the complexity of the project, the creative process which is goal oriented and not task oriented, as well as anticipated changes to the scope of work provided here, the Budget should be considered as an estimated amount for the scope of work which will not be exceeded without the Client's prior authorization. It is also assumed that this Budget will be used to control and monitor the bottom line and not specific line items. As such OPDS reserves the right to move budgeted hours and allocated costs between line items and disciplines, if required.

GPDS will submit monthly reports to OCGP showing labor expended versus budgeted labor, as well as a projection for the next 30 day period and the cumulative effect of this "look back - look forward." Upon receipt of each monthly report, it is anticipated and recommended that the Client and GPDS meet and confer to review progress and cost to date, as well as the forecast to complete, with the intention of reaching consensus on any changes that may be needed to the Budget. Due to the nature of any large master plan, and the complexities of this project in particular, it is anticipated that constant monitoring and Budget revision will be necessary in order to complete the final Master Plan. Adjustments may be caused by a variety of unforeseen conditions and events, including but not limited to environmental issues, budget issues, outside agency and developer input and timelinc constraints, public input, and Client initiated scope and schedule changes.

Hazardous Materials or Toxic Materials GPDS and GPDS consultants shall have no responsibility for the discovery, presence, handling, removal or disposal of hazardous materials or toxic substances in any form at the Project site.

Insurance GPDS coverage is current and pursuant to the insurance certificates that have been previously provided to the Client. Any additional insurance required by the OCGP is not included in this proposal.

Page 1 of 1

Glossary

ACOE

C&D

CA

CAD

Caltrans

CD

CEQA

Army Corp of Engineers

Construction and Demolition

Construction Administration. All services that are customarily rendered by the Architect/ Engineer of Record during the construction phase of a project as more fully described in the Agreement.

Computer Aided Design. An integrated and automated process that utilizes automated systems and equipment to prepare the documentation (drawings, specifications, and calculations) needed for construction. Also commonly referred to as CADD (Computer Aided Drafting/Design)

California Department of Transportation

Construction Documents (Phase of Design). The phase of design during which final drawings. Construction details, specifications, project manuals, construction cost estimates and other engineering data necessary to define the building systems, materials and methods for construction are produced. Construction Documents are normally prepared by the Architect/ Engineer of Record and are sufficiently complete for the City to use to obtain not-to-exceed construction bids.

California Environmental Quality Act as amended on March I, 1986 and adopted and supplemented by the City of Los Angeles in the "Environmental Document Reporting Procedures and Guidelines" on November 17, 1987.

Page 1 of 7

Comprehensive Master Plan

Construction Cost

Construction Contractor

Constructor

Cost Index

CPM

Critical Master Plan Design Guidelines

A series of documents which include a "preliminary master plan", an approval of the preliminary master plan (referred to as a master plan once approved), a Phasing Plan and specific design specifications for the production of Phase l construction documents. Although used interchangeably with "Master Plan," it is important to remember that the "Approval" document is the Master Plan and is a component of the "Comprehensive Master Plan."

The total amount paid for fees, labor, material, constructor general and administrative expenses, overhead and profit to construct the Project-including all sitework, utilities and infrastructure and related facilities and structures ("Hard Costs")

The entity responsible for procuring and coordinating all building trade services and materials needed to execute the Project Design. Also referred to as the "Constructor" or "Construction Element".

The entity responsible for procuring and coordinating all building trade services and materials needed to execute the Project Design. Also referred to as the "Construction Contractor" or "Construction Element"

The current Engineering News Record (ENR) Building Cost Index applicable to Los Angeles as published in the Engineering News Record" by the Mcgraw- Hill Publishing Company of New York, New York or any such other similar cost index as stipulated in the Agreement.

Critical Path Method of project scheduling using an automated Network Analysis System (NAS).

Core guidelines that capture principal concepts consistent with the broad goals of the comprehensive master plan.

Page 2 of 7

DB

DO

DPP

DVBE

Edison

FAA

Design-Build. A capital project acquisition mechanism in which the City prepares a Program, solicits guaranteed maximum price proposals from pre-qualified Design-Build entities to design and construct the programmed facility and contracts with a selected Design- Build Entity to design and construct the facility defined in the Program.

Design Development (Phase of Design). The second phase of design during the preliminary building concepts and schematic designs, specifications, cost estimates and other relevant project data are refined and the building systems and materials to be used are more fully defined.

Design Production Plan. Consisting of a resourceloaded CPM schedule a for all project design activities including, but not limited to, all activities and levels of effort for each design discipline for each phase of design, all Value Engineering activities, all jurisdictional reviews, all City review processes and the design- related activities of all governmental agencies, other agencies and consultant entities.

Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise. A business concern that is at least 51 percent owned by one or more disabled veterans, is certified by the State Office of Small Minority Business, is a domestic business with its home office located in the United States (and is not a branch or subsidiary of a foreign corporation, firm or business) and performs a commercially useful function.

Southern California Edison

Federal Aviation Administration

Page 3 of 7

FEIR

GPDS

Green (Design)

HazMit

IRWD

Jurisdictional Agencies

LCPD

Life Cycle Cost

LEED

MasterPlan

Final Environmental Impact Report. Prepared in accordance with the CEQA and City guidelines as amended on March 1, 1986 and adopted and supplemented by the City of Los Angeles in the "Environmental Document Reporting Procedures and Guidelines" as approved on November 17, 1987.

Great Park Design Studio

Design guidelines for improved occupant well-being, environmental performance and economic returns of buildings

Hazard Mitigation. Any appropriate, cost- effective repairs and/or improvements which will help reduce the risk ofloss oflife or injury and/or limit future damage to facilities during a disaster. Hazard Mitigation repairs and improvements are typically in addition to those required for code companies.

Irvine Ranch Water Department

All governmental or other agencies having regulatory authority and responsibility under the law with respect to the design, construction, operation and/or occupancy of the project.

Life Cycle Project Delivery. The systematic and systemic management by a single entity of a project from its inception through completion and occupancy.

The total facility and operating cost incurred in a facility during its useful life and occupancy for staffing, maintenance and alteration, utilities, insurance, interest, taxes, design/space-use efficiency, etc.

Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design

A preliminary master plan that has been reviewed and approved by an oversight agency.

Page 4 of 7

NTS

O&M

OCTA

Partnering

PP&D

Phase One Schematic Design

Preliminary Master Plan

Program

Natural Treatment System

Operations & Maintenance Guideline

Orange County Transportation Authority

A formalized process which creates and fosters a positive and productive collaboration between users, owners, designers, and contractors resulting in a Project Delivery Team which is motivated to succeed through increased teamwork, productive behaviors, minimized disruption and expedited disputes resolution with the pride earned from delivering a high quality project safely, on time and within the budget and which achieves its functional and operational goals.

Park Program and Design

After phases, priorities and sequence of construction have been approved, Phase One will be further refined and documented for the purpose of receiving proposals for project specific design and construction documents.

A preliminary document representing a vision with moderate attention given to the workability ofthe plan. The preliminary master plan includes design studies, alternatives, design refinements and recommendations.

The definition of space needs, architectural design criteria and project budgets relative to a development of a specific City facility as documented in the approved Facility Services and Architectural Programs.

Page 5 of 7

QA/QC

QBS

RDA

RFP

RFSQ

RWQCB

so

Quality Assurance/ Quality Control is the systematic and systemic application ofa plan incorporating stanclards, policies, procedures and measurements and reflects a philosophy that ensures the total quality of the project design throughout the life cycle of project evaluatiot; design, and constru(;tiort. A QA/QC plan ensureS: that the project d~esign and documentation meets the needs of the client and tenant dep!!11ments and ljl'e well coordinated, techpically sufficient, meet or ell;ceed the standards of the industry and/or City, are· l>id<;Jable an~ constructable with. a minimum of cha:ft~s- and represent the best life cycle value to the Citjl.

Qualifications- Based Selection. A process for the selection of professional architectural, engineering, and other project consultants based on professional qualifications, experience, expertise, staffing, work plan and other evaluation criteria aimed at selecting a firm or entity which offers the best value and service to the City. Implementation of this process is governed by Chapter 10 ~ 4526 of Division 5 of Title 1 of the Governmental Code- commonly known as the Mini-Brooks Act.

Redevelopment Agency

Request for Proposal

Request for Statement of Qualifications

Regional Water Quality Control Board

Schematic Design (Phase of Design) The first project design phase during which the Architect/Engineer, Client and tenant departments explore and adjust proposed alternative building and site concepts, configurations and systems until a functionally efficient and affordable design is approved for further development.

Page 6 of 7

VE

WBS

Value Engineering. A creative, systematic and systemic process applied throughout the design and construction of the project to insure provision of the project's functional requirements at the lowest total cost--- including life cycle costs.

Work Breakdown Structure

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommended Budget

TASK 2 TASK3 TASK 4 TASK 5 Total Cost Recommended GPDS Preliminary Master City Review Phasing Plan Phase One Park (without contingency Recommended

Plan and Approval of Schematic contingency) Budget the Master Design and

Plan Design Guidelines

KSWW $ 610,745 $ 149,562 $ 299,862 $ 561,269 $ 1,621,438 $ $ 1,621,438 GAFCON $ 630,608 $ 269,172 $ 326,062 $ 489,093 $ 1,714,935 $ 321,545 $ 2,036,480 Buro Happold $ 114,216 $ 19,036 $ 19,036 $ 38,072 $ 190,360 $ 76,640 $ 267,000 Fuscoe $ 480,395 $ 121,000 $ 165,000 $ 291,000 $ 1,057,395 $ 1,065,996 $ 2,123,391 Mary Miss $ 165,506 $ $ 60,184 $ 75,230 $ 300,920 $ 209,772 $ 510,692 Mia Lehrer $ 144,441 $ 32,098 $ 64,196 $ 80,245 $ 320,980 $ 162,520 $ 483,500 Green Shield $ 195,093 $ $ 70,943 $ 88,679 $ 354,715 $ $ 354,715 Ten Arquitectos $ 117,480 $ 5 42,720 $ 53,400 $ 213,600 $ 28,955 $ 242,555

Sub-Consultants Architectural Structures $ 8,000 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 4,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Signage $ 15,000 $ 3,500 $ 5,250 $ 11,250 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 Lighting & Acoustics $ 20,000 $ 5,000 $ 7,500 $ 17,500 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Sustainability TDB -included in Fuscoe $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Traffic/Parking/ Regional TDB .. irtcluded in Fuscoe $ 81,555 $ 81,555 Biology/Wildlife TUB -Included in Fuscoe $ 132,000 $ 132,000 Lake Engineering TDB ·included 1n Fuscoe $ 57,150 $ 57,150 Soils/Geotechnical TDB -included in Fuscoe $ 53,500 $ 53,500 Dry Utility TDB -Included in Fuscoe $ 39,774 $ 39,774 Neighborhood Integration TDB included in Fuscoe $ 278,000 $ 278,000 Safety/Security $ 15,000 $ 3,500 $ 5,250 $ 11,250 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 Public Information $ 142,200 $ 35,325 $ 52,985 $ 122,740 $ 353,250 $ 353,250 Sub-Total $ 2,658,684 $ 639,693 $ 1,120,488 $ 1,843,728 Recommended Contingency $ 1,732,640 $ 79,744 $ 186,852 $ 613,171 $ 2,612,407 Relmbursables $ 168,000 $ 14,000 $ 42,000 $ 56,000 $ 200,000 $ 480,000 Contract Totals $ 4,559,324 $ 733,437 $ 1,349,340 $ 2,512,899 $ 2,812,407 $ 9,275,000 Alternates Scale Model $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Owner contingency $ 100,000 $ 100,000

$ 3,112,407 $ 9,575,000 Note· Tmvelallowancc 1s mcliidcd in individuill conSLtltilnt budgets

i Page l of -+4 OR/Gil/Ail AGREEMENT FOR MASTER DESIGNER SERVICES

THIS AGREEME~T FOR MASTER DESlG"'ER SERVICES (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of March Z. 2000 ("Effective Date"), by and between the ORANGE COUNTY (iREAT PARK CORPORATION. a California non-profit public benefit corporation ("Corporation"), and GREAT PARK DESIGN STliD!O, a Joint Venture comprised of Gafcnn, !nc., a Cali Cornia corporation and Ken Smith Landscape Architect. lne,, a California corporation ('::\~1a~tcr Designer'~). (The ten11 Ma;>;ter Designer includes professionais perforn1ing in a c; l!'l~u iting capacity.)

PART I

FUNDAMENTAL TERMS

\. Location of Pro,ject: The location(s) as set forth in PART IV, Scope of Services, included herein.

B. Description of ServicesiGoods to be Provided:

ill. i\··1aster Designer shall peribm1 all work necessary to cornplete, 1n a rnanner ~JtisLtctory to Corporation, the Orange County· Great Park ("'G-reat Parkj') final I'v1aster Plan Desig1L :1 Phasing Plan for Great Park construction, GTeat Park Design Guidelines, and J Plan fOr Phase One Construction of' the Great Park, all in accordance with PART [V, Scope of Services, wdudecl herein. The ~v1as1er Designer rnay a1so be asked to pcrfonn folknv-on \vork relating to the final design of the Great Park.

B.2. Master Designer shall provide the personnel listed below to perfonn the above-'pcci!ied sen ices. which persons are hereby designated as key personnel under this A~c,>Teement.

Names

Ken Smith

Yehudi Gaffcn

'\lia Lehrer

Mary Miss

Steven Handel

Enrique Norton

Design Lead and Landscape Architect

Design Administration

Local Landscape Architect

Artist

Restoration Ecologist

Architect

ATTACHMENT 5

Craig Schwitter Sustainability Engineer

Pat Fuscoe Civil Engineering

Steve Blake Hydrogeology Engineering

B.3. Ken Smith shall on average throughout the Term ali ocate not less than 40% of his prGfcssional time to perfomnnce of services hereunder. Commitment levels for key personnel mav be included as in each Contract Task Order. No person named in Paragraph 8,2 ofthis Part, or :ris,-her successor approved by Corporation, shaH he removed or replaced by Master Designer, nor shail hisiher agreed-upon function or level of commitment hereunder be changed, without tbc prior \Vritten consent of Corporation. Should the services of any key person become no longer available w Master Designer, the resume and qualifications of the proposed replacement shaH be ,~ubrnitted to Corporation for approval as soon as possiblc 1 but in no event later than seven (7) calendar day~s prior to the departure of the incun1bent key person, unless Master Designer is not provickd with such notice by the departing employee. Corporation shall respond lo Master Designer within seven (7) calendar days f(lllowing receipt of these qualifications concerning acceptance of the candidate for replacement.

B.4. All individuals performing work shall have the skill and experience and any licenses and certifications required to perform the work assigned to them. If Corporation determines in its sole discretion that any person employed by Master Designer or by any subconsultant is not performing the work in a proper, safe and skillful manner, then at the written reque:-;t of Corporation. iVfaster Designer or such subconsuhant shaH ren1ovc that person and that person shall not be re-ernployed on the Project vvithout the prior \vritten approval of Corporation in its sole discretion, If Master Designer or such subconsultant fills to rcn1o\:e such pcrson(s) or fails to furnish skilled and experienced personnel for rbe proper performance of the work, 'hen Ccrporation may, in its sole discretion, suspend the affected portion of the work by delivery of \'vTitten notice to l\1aster Designer. Such suspension shall in no \vay relieve the l\1aster Designer of any obligation contained herein. or entitle the Master Designer to an amendment or change in cost. Once compliance has been achieved, Corporation wiil notify Master Designer in writing and Master Designer shall promptly resume work.

C. Term: The term shall commence upon the Effective Date and unless terminated earlier or cxtcended as set hJrth in this Agreement shall continue through" Cnrporation, at its sole discretion. may elect to extend the term of this Agreement up to an additional twelve (i2) months (the ··Option T crm "'), and thereupon require l\!1aster Designer to continue to pro\Iide scn:ices~ including foilow-on work relating to the final design of tbe Great Park, and otherwise to perfonn in accordance with this Agreement. Corporation may extend the Option Term annually for an additional twelve months tt·om expiration of the then-effective Option Term, up to a torai of thiny-

rnonths from the expiration of the initial Option Tenn.

D. Party Representatives:

D. I. The Corporation hereby designates its Chief Executive Officer to be its authorized rcpresentanve in administering all matters relative to tbis Agreement. With regard to technical :nattcrs. Design Manager will report to and be managed by the Corporation ·s Manager of Planning.

2

D.2. The Master Designer designates Ken Smith to be its representative in administering all matters relative to this Agreement. No change shall be made in such representative without the prior written approval of the Corporation.

E. Notices: Master Designer shaH deliver ail notices and other writings required to be delivered under this Agrcc1nent to Corporation at the address set f-{xth in Part II (' 1General Provisions"). The Corporation shall deliver all notices and other writings required to be delivered to l\!aster Designer at the address set forth following Master Designer's signahrre below.

F. Attachments: This Agreement incorporates by reference the following Attachments to this Agreen1cnt:

F.l. Pan!: F.l. Part ll: f.3. Pan HI F.4. Pan lV: F.5. Part V:

Fundamental Terms General Provisions Special Provisions Scope of Services Budget

integration: This Agreement represents the entire understanding of" Corporation and Master Designer as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any !orce or effect with regard to those matters covered by this Agreement. This Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements. agreements, and understandings. if any, between the parties with regard to those matters covered by this Agreement, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement.

!'\ WITNESS WHEREOf, the parties have executed and entered into tlm Agreement as of the date first set f(nt:h above.

ORANGE COUNTY GREAT PARK CORPORATION

By: _//+-f-··--~---Chief E>[email protected] Officer

3

GREAT PARK DESIGN STUDIO. a California .. Joint Venture

By:

And By: Ken Smith Landscape Architect, Inc., a C a! i fomia corpo rati --"7. //A/ --~"--vl/tt~_t'_ __ 'f. ~· of:,

By:

:By: lts:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

'<OSSAMAN, GUTHNER, KNOX &

r~OTT. LLP :J <~ ~._;~--v. \1 ~/~~~

'\--~ . . -1·· ···---· ... ~-AHcrneys for the Orange County Great Park Co!·poration

i\dc:ress for Notices and Payn1ent:-;: GREAT PARK DESIGN STUDIO c/o GatCon 70 l B. Street Suite 1600 Diego. CA 92101 attn: Yehudi Geffen

San

T dcphonc Number: ( 619) 23 1-61 00 FAX !\umber: (619) 231-6995

4

and copy to:

KEN SMITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 79 Chambers Street New York, NY 9!007 attn: Ken Smith Telephone Number: (212) 791-3595

PARTU

GENERAL PROVISIONS

SECTION l: SERVICES OF MASTER DESIGNER

I.! Seopc of Services.

In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement. Master Designer shall provlde the goods and/or services shown on Part l V hereto ("Scope of Services")~ ':\·hieh nla)' be referred

l . h ,, . " h " k " Jj' ! . ' . . f' h .. c ' to 1eren1 as t1.c serv1ces or t _e woL . t HS ;-"\_gree!nent 1s or t e prov1S1on 01 gooas" supptJes, equipnwnt or personal property, the lerm.s "servicesn and \'workp shall include the provision (and, if designated in the Scope of Services, the installation) of such goods._ supplies, equipment or personal property.

i.2 Changes and Additions to Scope of Services.

Corporation shall have the right at any time during the perfom1ance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order work suspension or extra work beyond that specified in the Scope or Services or make changes by aitcring, adding to, or deducting from said work. No SJch exrra work shall be under1aken unless a written order is first given by Corporation !o Master De:;igncr. incorporating therein any adjus1n1ent in (i} the Budget~ andior (ii) the tim_e to pcrfonn thls ,.\grcen1cnt vvhich alijustn1ents are subject to the written approval of the rY1aster Designer. H is

understood by Master Designer that the provrsions of this Sec:ion 1.2 shall not apply to ""rvices specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or reasonably contemplated therein. IV!asrer Designer hereby acknuwledgcs that it accepts thr: risk that the servlees to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Sen'ice::; 111ay be rnore costly or tirne conswning than Master Designer anticipates and thm Masrer Designer shali not be entitled to additional compensation therefor, except to the extent such additional cost or delay is a direct result of a Differing Site Condition. ''Differing Site Condition" means a physical condition (excluding the presence of hazardous substances) of an unusual nature, differing materially from those ordinarily encountered or reasonably contemplated and generally recognized as inherent in the type of work provided for in this Agrecn1ent or typical in the area, provided in all cases that Master Designer had no actual or co;1structive knovvledge of such condition as of the date of the parties execution of this Agreement with respect to I ask One set forth in the Scope of Services, and as of the date of the Contract Task Order (''CTO") for any other task to be performed pursuant to the Scope of Services, and such condition would not have been discoverable through a reasonable site inYestigation perf()rtncd in accordance with prudent and generally accepted professional practices for purposes of preparing the relevant Budget for any particular task to be performed pur:-uant to the Scope of Services" lf any such work suspension or change causes an increa~c or dccre::tsc in the price of this Agree_ment or in the tin1e required for perforn1ancc, Master Designer slmli promptly notify Corporat10n thereof and assert its claim for adjustment within ten ( l 0) days otter ihe change or work SLLSpension is ordered, and an equitable adjustment shaH be negotiated and issued as a Contract Task Order (''CTO''). However, nothing in this clause shall excuse Master Designer from proceeding imn1cdiately w-ith the Agreerncnt as changed.

5

1.3 Standard of Performance.

Master Designer agrees that all services shall be performed in a competent, professionaL and satisfactory manner in accordance with the level of professional skill and care ordinarily used by n1crnhcrs of the design profession practicing under similar conditions at the same time and gc;neral local.ity. and that ail goods, materials, equipment or personal property included withm the services herein shall be of good quality. free of defects and fit for the purpose intended. "Jotwithstanding the preceding sentence. if this Agreement establishes a specific performance standard !or any aspect of the work, Master Designer's services shall be perf()m1ed to achieve such standards. ln performing the services. Master Designer shail keep in mind funding limitahnns on construction of the project, and shall produce a iv1aster Plan Design that \Vill address !'unding limitations. The Plan for Phase ! Constmction of the Great Park shall be capable of.~onstruction within the Phase l funding limitations established by Corporation.

I ..I Performance to Satisfaction of Corporation.

Master Designer agrees to perform all work to the satisfaction of Corporation within the time specified in the Scope of Services and the relevant Contract Task Order. If Corporation reasonably determines that the work is not satisfactory, Corporation shall notify Master Designer in writing, including in reasonable detail the deficiencies in Master Designer's work. Thereafter, Corporation ,hail have the right to take appropriate action, including but not limited to: (i) meeting with Master Designer to review the quality of the work and resolve matters of concem: (ii) requiring Master Designer to repeat unsatisfactory work at no additional charge until it is reasonably satisfactory; (iii) suspending the delivery of work to iv1aster Designer tOr an indefinite (iv) \h/ithholding payrncnt: and (v) tern1inating this Agreen1cnt as herejnatter set forth,

i .5 Instructions from Corporation.

In the pcrfixn1a.nce of this Agreement, Jv1astcr Designer shall repo11 to and rccei·ve instructions fron1 the Corporation's Representative designated in Paragraph D, I of Part I ("Fundamental Tenw;") of this Agreement. Tasks or services other than those specifically described m the Scope of Sen ices shall not be pertonned without the prior written approval of the Corporation's Representative, i\1askr Designer shall provide Corporation or its designee with the opportunity to perfonn continuous "over the shoulder" reviews of the design in progress during the design process, The uY:.::r-the-shoulder reviews r:nay be conducted during norn1al businc:ss hours in the office of \/laster De:-;igncr or its Subcontractors pcrfonning design and in the presence of Iv1aster _Designer's design personnel with the intent to n1inirnizc disruption of on-going design work. C orporat1on shall be entitled to review progress prints, cornputcr in1ages, draft docun1ents, \vorking calculations, draa :-;pccifications or reports or other design documents as detennined by Corporation.

!.6 Familiarity with \'Vork.

By executing this Agreen1ent, fvla::;ter Designer \varrants that !\1aster Design.er (i) has thoroughly im e:stigatcd and considered the scope of services to be perfonned, (ii) has carefully considered how ttK services should be performed. and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions ancnding pertormance of the sen·ices under the Agreement. lf the services involve work upon any site, l\1aster Designer 'Narrants that I\1aster Designer has or wiH investigate the site

6

and is or will be J~1lly acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of se1vices hereunder. Should the Master Designer discover any conditions, including any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the perfonmmce of the services hereunder, Master Designer shall immediately notify the Corporation of such fact and shall not proceed except at :vhlsrer Designer\ risk until ~;vritten instructions are received from the Corporation's Representative.

1.7 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.

I. 7.1 Master Designer shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express wntten approval of Corporation< ln addit;on, neither the i\greerncnt nor any interest herein tnay be transferred, assigned, conveyed. hypoth~.:cated) or cncmnbered voluntarily or by operation of law, \vhether for the benefit of creditms or otherwise, without the prior written approval of Corporation. Consent by Corporation shall not be deemed to relieve 'vfastcr Designer of its obligations to comply with all the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event of any unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, Corporation may void the Agreement at Corporation's option in its sole and absolute discretion. No approved transfer shall release any surety of Master Designer of any liability hereunder without the express consent of Corporation.

l.i.2 Master Designer shail be fully responsible and liable for services, products and actions of all subconsultants of any tier, and shall include in each subconsultant agreement any provisions necessary to make all the provisions ofthis Agreement fully effective.

L 73 Corporation herehy consents to Master Designer's subcontracting of ponions of the scope of scrv to the panics identified below for the functions described in Master Designer's proposaL ~vi aster Designer shall1ndudc in each subconsultant agreen1ent the stipulation that ~/laster DcsigncL not Corporation. is solely responsible for payinent to the subconsultant fOr the arnounts O\\-"ing and thm the subconsu!tant shaH have no claim, and shall take no action, against Corporation, its officers,

~.:!l!~~s~tors, en}Qlovees or_5urcties for no~p~vtnent bv ivJ.aster Design~_r_. __ _

1. .

Subconsultant i\ame I Snbconsultant Functions

~-- ~--------·-------1 ___ _

i ! Planting Soils Consuita"n"'t"'s __

1

1 \V::J.ltacc Labs

i ~F u_sc_'~~-_f~ri:c:ns;;'c.______ --1-c_·, i_v_il_J?.nginecrs _____ _

! Buro Happold _ _ _______ <- 1 Sustainability Er1gineers ,---<- -r I I ' fe.x_c_'d_<_ _______ I fiydrog;eoll.lgy ___ ~

- --~----- ----~--j

---- ____ _J

1.8 Requirements for Registration of Designers.

Ail design and engineering work furnished by Master Designer shaH be performed by or under the supervision of persons licensed to practice architecture~ landscape architecture. engineering or 'mveying (as applicable) in the State of California, by personnel who are careful. skilled_ experienced and cotnpetent in their respective trades or professions, \vho arc professional!~;'

qualified to perform the work in accordance with the contract documents and who shall assume professional responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the design documents and construction documents prepared or checked by them.

L 9 CompcnsatioR

For Master Design0r's full and complete perfonnancc of its obligations under this Agreement, and subject to the maximum cumulative payment obligation provisions set forth in Section l. !0, Master Des11mer shall be compensated on a time and expense basis subject to a not-to-exceed budget limitation in accordance with the rates and terms of Part V hereto ("Bndget"). The parties have established the not-to exceed Budget for Task One of the Scope of Services, set furth in Part V. Schedule Hl ("Task One Budget"), based upon Master Designer's estimate of what will be required to complete Task One, including ali ordinary and overhead expenses to be incurred by Master Des1gner and its agents and cn1ployees, and including 1neetings v,rith Corporation reprcsentalive.s, and incidental costs incurred in pcrfonning Task One under this Agreement. The parties agree that the Ta:ik One Budget constitutes fair and adequate consideration for the performance of Task One, including 'York perlormed prior to the Etlective Date, and in consideration therd"or, Master Designer at,~·ees not to bill amounts in excess of the Task One Budget for perl(Jrmance of Task One notwithstanding any additional time and materials it may take to complete Task One. The not-toexceed budget for completion of Tasks Two through Five of the Scope of Services (the "Tasks Two Through Five Budget") to be determined by the parties pursuant to Section 1.9.1, below, shall include all ordinary and overhead expenses to be incuned by Master Desit,'1ler and its agents and employees. including meetings with Corporation representatives, and incidental costs to be incurred by Master Designer in perforrning Tasks Two through five under this Agreement. The not-toexceed Budget values for Tasks One through Five do not include changes in co1npen~at.ion for perforrnance of CTOs issued pursuant to Section 1, 9 .l for additional work not conternplated ptc;uant to Tasks One through Five orthe Scope of Services or for Differing Site Conditions

L 9.1 Corporation n1ay dete1mine frorr1 time to time that it is appropriate to require tvlaster Desi~o·ner to perlorm services hereunder rdated to the design of the Project, including but not limited to the services identified as Task Two, Task Three, Task Four, and Task Five in the Scope of Services. and shall have the right to issue, in its sole discretion, one or more CTOs for the same. CTOs may be issued for services to proceed on a time and expense basis. subject to a not-toexceed amount, a llrm flxed-pricc basis, or other bas1s for payment. Each cro will specifically define tht: ~cope of services to be performed thereunder, shall specif)' how payn1ent \ViH be n1ade_ and shall include any other infOnnation necessary.

L9,!,l Tasks Two through Five of the Scope of Services sd forth in Part IV as of the Effective Date are described in general, high level, conceptual terms. The Scope of Services I(Jr Tcsk One includes Master Designer's preparation and delivery of a detailed description of ddiverablcs and a detalled schedule for the performance of all services n~cessary to complete Tz,~k.s Tvv'O through Five, and a detailed written cost estin1ale for such services. Corporation ivhbter Designer shall promptly meet and confer as nec~ssary to attempt to reach agreement on the Tasks Two through Five Budget and detailed scope of services. Upon agreement of the parties on the detailed scope of services and the Tasks Two Through Five Budget, the Scope of Sen ices in Part !V hereof shall be supplemented with the detailed scope of services for Tasks [\''' througb Five, and the Budget in Part V hereof shall be supplemented by the addition of

8

Tasks Two Through Five Budget as Schedule IV thereto. Unon establishment of the Tasks Two Through Five Budget, the parties shall be deemed to have agreed that the Tasks Two Through Five Budget constitutes fair and adequate consideration for the performance of Tasks Two through Five of the Scope of Services, and in consideration therefor, Master Designer agrees not to bill smounts in excess of the Tasks Two Through Five Budget for performance of Tasks Two through Five, notwithstanding any additional time and materials it may take to complete any such Tasks, except as provided herein with respect to a CTO for Differing Site Conditions.

1.9. L2 For each CTO requested by Corporation (other than the CTOs for Task> Two through Five provided for in SectionL'LLl. above), Master Designer shaH submit a written technical and cost estimate within 48 hours from Corporation's written request. Master Designer shall submit a tina! written technical and cost proposal within ten (10) workmg days from Coq1oration's 1nitial request.

;\o v,ork shaH commence with respect to any work other than Task One until both Corporation and Master Designer have executed a CTO, and Corporation has issued its Notice to Proceed with the relevant task. Corporation does not guarantee any CTO will be issued to Master Designer, nor does the Corporation make any guarantee that a Notice to Proceed will be issued f(Jr any or all CTOs, or that the CTO budgeted amount will be expended. For services sa:istactorily perfom1ed by Master Designer on a time and expense basis under ll:tis Agreement, Corporation shall pay Master Designer at the hourly rates specified in Part V, Schedule !, idenri fied as "Hourly Rate Schedule," and other direct costs, i.e., reimbursable expenses, specified in Part V, Schedule JL "Other Direct Costs Schedule." Rates identified on Schedule I shall remain fixed through the later to occur of the completion of Task V or expiration of the !nl!ial Term. Any approved mcrcasc in the rates set forth in Schedule l applicable to servrces to be per!()rmed during any Option Terrn shall not relieve Master Designer from its obligation to complete the services required by any CTO issued prior to such rate increase within the noHocxcccd budget amount established by such CfO. Master Designer shall be paid for its drrect costs oth,:r than direct labor at the rates specified in Part V, Schedule ll, "Other Direct Costs Schedule." provided that actual costs shall be payable for types of costs not specified on Schedule ll, subject to verification by Corporation. All schedules are incorporated into and made a part or this Agreement.

L 9.2 Corporation's payment in li.lll for any task completed shall not constitute Cmvoration 's final acceptance of ivlaster Designer's vvork under such task~ final acceptance shall occur only ai1,c:r completion or all work hereunder.

1.9.3 Master Designer shall be entitled to a payment for mobiiization in the amounl of 5'0,000.00 (the "Mobilization Payment''), payable upon submittal of Master Designer's in voice w:1ich Master Designer may submit at any time after issuance of a Notice to Proceed fbr Task (}u:: of the Scope ot' Services. The Mobilization Pay1ncnt shall be credited against the final S50.000 to be paid by Corporation to Master Designer for Task One. ln the evcnr this >\grecment is terminated prior to Corporation receiving credit f'or the full amount of the !Vlobilizalion Paymc\1! against amounts earned by Master Designer, or unpaid invoices at completion of Task One do not total an amount at least as great as the Mobilization Payment. iviaster Designer shall promptly reimburse Corporation for any amount of the Mobilization Payment that is not earned in perfOrn1ance of the work con1prising Task One.

9

1.9.4 Invoices shall be submitted by Master Designer on a monthly basis and shall be submitted in duplicate to Corporation's Accounts Payable office" Corporation shall pay Master Designer on a monthly basis in accordance with the costs of services actually rendered as certified and billed by Master Designer in its monthly invoices" Payments of monthly invoices ,hail be madc only after a determination by Corporation that mvoice charges are in agreement '' ith the services that Master Designer is obligated to perform under the Task Orders" Corporation agrees that it will expeditiously li1rward approved invoices to the City of Irvine Accounts Payable for payment Corporation, through the City of Irvine, shall remit payment of approved invoices within thirty (30) calendar days of the receipt and approval of each invoice and accompanying documentation" In the event an invoice submitted by Master Designer is not suDported by the accompanying documentation. Corporation may withhold payment of the portion or such invoice in dispute until such time as Corporation and Master Designer can resolve the areas of disagreerncnt pertainjng to that portion of the invoice in dispute. Curpcn:1tion shall docun1ent the amounts and reasons fOr withholding paytnent of' any portion of an invoice to Maskr Designer within fifteen ( 15) days of its receipt of Master Designer's !11'/0Jceo Upon compliance hy Master Designer with all the terms and conditions of this Agreement and submission by Master Designer of a final, properly documented invoice" Corporation shall promptly pay to Master Designer the balance due under such invoice" Within ten ( 1 0) calendar days of execution of this Agreement, Master Designer and Corporation shaH develop and agree to an acceptable invoice format for this project, which shall be incorporated by reference into this Agreement Each invoice shaH inciude the following information:

a. Agreen1ent 'No.

b. Tin1e period covered by the invoice;

c. For tin1e and expense \vork, specify the nan1e af staff title and fttnction \\. ith their corresponding hourly rates, actual hours expended, other direct costs and the mnount of payrnent;

do Backup for the invoice" including invoices from Master Designer's subcontractors" suhconsultants or suppliers, time sheets, copies of receipts. Corporation's authorization of travel and other documentation requested by Corporation, as well as a spreadsheet showing subcontractor invoices included in prior billings to Master Designer aml payments 111ade on account of~:mch irn/o.ices:

eo Totai monthly invoice (including project-to-date cumulative HlVOlCC

amount):

f Certitlcation signed hy the Master Designer or his1l1er designated alternate that ( i) the trn-·oice is a true, complete and correct state1nent of rcirnbursable CD~ts and progress; (iii tht backup information included vvith the invoice is true~ cornplete and correct in all m.atenal rcspeclsc (iii) ali payments due and ovving to subcontractors, subconsuitants and supp!Jers have been made: (iv) timely payments will be made to subcontractors, subconsultants and suppliers t!"om the proceeds of the payments covered by the certification, and (v) the invoice does not include any amount which Master Designer intends to withhold or retain from a suhcontractor. <.;ubconsullant or supplier unless so identified on the invoice~ and

g. A monthly progress report reflecting budgeted and actual man-hours and costs expended to date broken down by Task, scheduled and actual progress with an explanation of any significant variations, and such other information as agreed to in the sample invoice format identified a hove or otherwise requested by Corporation to substantiate the validity of an 111\'0Jce.

1.10 iV!aximum Obligation

Notv.,:ithsranding any provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, Corporation and :V1aster Designer tnutually agree that Corporatior{-; n1axirnum cun1ulative payrnent obligation (Including ob:igation !(Jr Master Designer's profit) for Tasks One through Five of the Scope of Services shall be the amounts set forth in the Task One Budget and to be set forth in the Tasks Two through five Budget, which shail include all amounts payable to Master Designer En its subcontracts, subconsultants, licenses, n1ateriais and costs arising frorn~ or due to tennination of, this Agreernent. Funding for this Agreen1ent is subject to Corporation· s Board of I)ireclors approval. The Corporation's maximum cumulative payment obligation for any other work not reasonably contemplated hy the Scope of Services for Tasks One through Five sha!i be as provided pursuant to the CTO(s) for such work.

SECTION 2: INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

2.1 Insurance.

\V:thoul lirniting Tvfaster Designer's indemnification obligations_ iv1astcr Designee or each joint \·enturer of the lV1aster Designer) shaH procure and n1aintain, at its sole cost and for the duration of this /\gree1nent anJ 10 years after completion of aH vvork under this r\greem_ent~ insurance coverage as provided below, against claims for injuries against persons or damages to property wlnch may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Master Designer. its agents. representatives, employees, and/or subcontractors. In the event that Master Designer subcontracts any portion of the work in compliance with Section 1.7 of this Agreement, the contract between the Master Designer and such subcontractor or subconsultant shall require the subcontractor or subconsultant to maintain the same policies of insurance that the Master Designer is required to maintain pursuant to this Section 2.1, and that copies of ouch policies mnst be proVIded to Corporation before that subcontractor or consultant wmmences any work. in circum.stances where the subcontractor or subconsultant is not covered by Master Designerprovided insurance: provided that Master Designer shall have the sole responsibility for de'ermining the limits of coverage required to be obtained by subcontractors and subconsultants, which determination shall be made in accordance with reasonable and prudent business practice>, but which shall not be less than One Million Dollars ($1.000,000.00) for each type of coverage required. IVIaster Designer elects to contract vvith subcontractors or subconsultants llwt do not 111eet the insurance requirernents outlined belovv, ho\veveL IV1aster Designer does so at

tts own risk and 'ha lJ ti.tlly indemnif)' and defend Corporation, to the full effect of the indemnity in Section 2 .. ~2_1 for any failure of any subcontractor"s or subconsultanfs insurance coverage to co:nply with the insurance requirement outlined below.

) I

2. 1.1 Insurance Coverage Required.

The policies and amounts of insurance required hereunder shall be as follows:

(a) GcneraL!,@bility (including premises and operations, contractual liahiiiry, personal injury, independent contractors liability): Five Million Dollars (S5,000,000,00) single limit, per occurrence, If commercial general liability insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate shall apply separately to this project. or the general aggregate limrt shall be three times the occurrence limit

(b) :-'\utotnqj:)ile Liabilil\,:. (including O\vncd, non~ovvncd, leased, and hired autos): Five 'v1iliion Dollars (S5,000,000,00), single limit, per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.

(c) Workers Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers compensation msurancc (if Master Designer is required to have) in an amount required by the laws of the State of California and employer's liability insurance in the amount of One Million Dollars

1.000,000,00) per occurrence for injuries incurred in providing services under this Agreement

(d) Professional Ljabililv (covering errors and omissions); Two Million Dollars IS2,000,000,00) per claims made for Task One, and Five Million Dollars (SS,OOO,OOOJlO per claims made for Tasks Two through Five,

(e) Oth~r Insurance: Such other policies of insurance as may be required in Part Ill hereto CSpccia1 Provisions'~)"

2.L2 General Requirements for General, Automobile, Workers Compensation and

Employer's Liability.

Master Designer's insurance, including policies issued to each joint venturer:

(a) Shall be issued by an insurance company which is an approved carrier in the State of Cali f;_Jrnia and rnaintains a Secure Best's Ratings of '"'A'' or higher: unless otherwise approved by Corporation:

(bJ General liability and auto1nobile liability shall narne the Corporation and the City of lnmc. and their directors, officers, officials, employees, agents, representatives and \olunteers (collectively hereinafter "Corporation and Corporation Personnel") as additional insureds and contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to Corporation and Corporation Pcrsonn-:L AH insurance prO\ilded heL~under shaH include the appropriate endorsen1ents.

(c) Shall be pri1nary insurance vvith respect ro the insureds, additional insureds, and their respective men1bers. directors, officers) ernployees, agents and consultants and any insurance or scif-insurance maintained by Corporation or Corporation Personnel shall be in excess of Master Designer's insurance and shall not contribute v . .-ith it:

(d) Shall be "occurrence" rather than "claims made" msurance, excluding professional liability:

(e) Shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brougbL except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability;

(I) ShaH be endorsed to state that the insurer (whether insuring Master Designer, each joint venturer of Master Designer, or any of Master Designer's subcontractors or subconsultants) shall waive all rights of subrogation against Corporation and Corporation PersonneL excluding professional liability:

(g) Shall be written by good and solvent insurer(s) approved to do business in the State of California and approved in VvTiting by Corporation~ and

(h) Shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled, reduced in coverage or in limits, non-renewed, or materially changed for any reason, without thirty (30) days prior written notice thereof given by the insurer to Corporation by US mail, or by personal delivery, except for nonpayment of premiums, in which case ten (l 0) days prior notice shaH be provided. Such endorsement shall not include any limitation of liability of the insurer for iaJure to provide such notice,

(i) Ail endorsements adding additional insureds to required policies shall be on f(Jm1

CG 20 lO I ! 85) or an equivalent form providing additional insureds with coverage for "completed operauons.

u 1 Any 1i1llure on the part of a nanx~d insured to con1ply with reporting provisions or m:1cr conditions of the policies. any breach of warranty) any action or inaction or a nanwd insured ,;r others, or any change in ownership of all or any portion of the project or the named insured shall nc1 affect coverage provided to the other insureds or additional insureds (and their respective members, directors, oHicers, employees, agents and consultants.)

2.1 ,3 Special Insurance Requirements for Professional Liability

The fo!lowing additional requirements shall apply with respect to the professional liability coverage for Master Designer's errors and omissions required pursuant to Sec lion 2, l, l 1 cl ). Prior to the commencement of its work, Master Designer shall deliver to the Owner a policy of Insurance evidencing compliance with the following requirements, The Certillcate must olainlv designate the name of the Orange Countv Great Park Project Anv t~1ilure to furnish this ' -· ..... - '"' ~ ~

policy or Certificate of insurance shaH not relieve the Master Designer frmn its obligations under !his Section,

(a) 1\1inirnurn Scope of insurance: Coverage shall be at least as broad as Errors and Omissions Liability insurance appropriate to the l\1aster Designer~s profession and shall be in a fonn reasonably satisfactory to Corporation. Architects~ and engineers) coverage shall be ccdorsed to include contractual liability and shall designate this Agreement as an insured contract.

13

(b) Minimum Limits of Insurance: Master Designer's insurance shall be written with limits of liability that meet the requirements of the Agreement, but at a minimum not less than the foi1owing:

(i) fm~s and Omis§iQltS Liabilitv Insurance:

Task One Tasks Two- Five

Each Occurrence Limit S2,000,000

Policy Aggregate Limit 'S2,000,000 $5,000,000

insurance dcductibles shall not be greater than S25,000 unless prcapprcn ed by CoqJoration.

Each Errors and Ornissions Liability policy shall contain~ or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

(c) [Intentionally omitted. l

(d) The policy shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by the insurer except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the Corporation, ten (!G) day's fOr non-payn1ent of pren1iurn.

(e) If the Errors and Ontissions Liabilitv nolicy is ·written on a clairns-rnadc forn1 tO 1 io\ving provisions apply:

(i) The Retroactive Date of the policy shall be shown on the Certlficatc of Insurance and on the policy must be before February 6, 2006.

(ii) The insurance policy shall include language to the effect that it will pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as a result of a claim made during the policy period, and reported in a timely manner, when based upon aikged wrongfi.d acts, omissions, or breach of professional duty occurring or alleged to have been committed subsequent to February 6, 2006. The policy shail not limit coverage to claims that allege that the wrongful act, o1nission or breach of profe-s:';ional duty occurred or vvas cornrnitted in the san1e policy year as the claitn is first made against the insured iviaster Designer, Join! V cnturer or subcontractor or subconsultanL

(iii) Insurance must be maintained and evidence in the form of a copy of the msurance policy must be provided to the Corporation for at least ten (I 0) years after the cuutpktion of the 'vvork.

(iv) If co,erage iS cancelled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy J\)rm with a Retroactive Date prior to February 6, 2006, !'v1aster Designer must purchase "extended reporting'' coverage for the iongest extended reporting period available l'rom the insurer. (v) A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to Ccrpuration for re·v·iew at least thirty days prior to the effective date of the policy.

14

(vi) The policy of each of Master Designer's joint venturers must provide coverage for joint ventures in which the Named Insured is named as a co-venturer, at least as respects the Insured's legal liability arising out of the Insured's participation in such joint venture,

(vii) If any CTO mcludes liquidated damages, coverage must be provided for liquidated damages.

2.1.4 Deductihles.

Any deduclibles or self-insured retention's must be declared to and approved by Corporation prior to the execution of this Agrccrnent by Corporation"

2. L5 Evidence of Coverage.

Master Designer shall deliver to Corporation complete copies of ali required insurance policies. including endorsements effecting the coverage required by this Agreement. Such endorsements shall include a statement to the effect that the separate insurance coverages maintained by each of the Master Designer's joint venture partners shall cover the activities of Master Designer. and shall not be limited to such individual joint venture partner's own activities, regardless of. which member of Master Designer causes the event giving rise to Master Designer's liability. The Corporation shall have no duty to pay or perfonn under this Agreement utlti! such policies are received and approved by Corporation.

2. !.6 Waiver of Subrogation

Cm11oratlon and I'v1aster De:;igner Vv'ai ~, c all rights against each other, against each of their agent':: ~md t2lnployees and against Subcontractors and their respective n1en1bers, directors .. officers. employees. agents and consultants for any ciaims to the extent covered by insurance obtained ru;·s;wnt to S.".ction 2.1.1 (a), (h) aD_<:i.UJ, except such rights as they may have to the proceeds oi' such msurance. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall contain a waiver of the insurer's right to subrogation against Corporation and Corporation Personnel. Master Designer shall require all Subcontractors to provide similar waivers in writing each in favor of Corporation and Corporation PersonneL Each policy, including workers' cornpcnsation, shall include a waiYer of any right of subrogation against the additional insureds (and thcir respective memhers, directors. officers, employees, agents and consultants).

2.Li Workers Compensation Insurance.

ff Master Designer is required to provide workers' compensation insurance, Master Designer shall file wilh Corporation the foHowing signed ccrtificat.ion:

~ v

•;I a1n avvare of, and vviU cornply \VIth~ Divisions 4 and S of the Cali!~Jmia Labor Code by securing, paying for, and maintaining in full force and effect for the duration of the contract, complete workers' compensation insurance for at least the minimum statutory iimits. and shall furnish a certificate of insurance to Corporation before execution of the /\.greement."

15

ln the event Master Designer has no employees requinng Master Designer to provide workers' compensation insurance, Master Designer shall so certify to Corporation in writing prior to Corporation's execution of this Agreement. Corporation and Corporation Personnel shall not be responsible J(Jr any claims in law or equity occasioned by failure of the Master Designer to comply '' ith this section or with the provisions of law relating to workers' compensation insurance.

2. U! Notice of Changes.

Corporation shail notify Ma<;ter Designer in writing of any changes in the requirements applicable to insurance reyuired to be provided by Master Designer. Any additional cost from such change shali be paid by Corporation and any reduction in cost shall reduce the Budget hereunder

2,2 I ndemnif1cation.

2.2.1 Indemnity for Errors and Omissions Related to Professional Se1-vices.

Except for the negligence or willful misconduct of Corporation or Corporation PersonneL \;laster Designer shall indemnify to the full extent of the Jaw, protect and hold harmless Corporation and Corporation Persom1el fi"om and against any claims, actions, suits, demands, charges. damages, costs. expenses (including attomeys fees), judgments, civil fines and penalties, liabilities or losses of any kind or nature whatsoever which may be sustained or suffered by or secured against the Corporation or Corporation Personnel by reason of any damage to property, injury to persons or any action that may arise out of the perf()rmance of such services rendered pursuant to this Agreement that is caused byr any act 1 on1ission or negligence of 1'/laster Designer, its officers, agents" en1ployees. subcontractors or subconsuitants in the performance of such services.

2.L2 Indemnity for Uabiiity Other Than Professional l\"egligence

Except for the sole negligence or willful miswnduct of Corporation or Corporation PersonneL Master Designer shall indemnify, protect, defend ;md hold harmless Corporation and Corporation Personnel from and against any claims, actions, suits, demands, charges, damages, co>h. expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments, civil fines and penalties, liabilities or losses of an)' kind or nature whatsoever which may be sustained or suffered by or secured against the Corporation or Corporation Persom1el or any action that may arise out of the perf(mnance of such sen-ices rendered pursuant to this Agreement that is caused by any act, omission or negligence of lvL:~srer Designer. its ot1icers. agents. ernployees, subcontractors or suhconsultants regardless of \vhcther any act omission or negligence of Corporation or Corporation Personnel contribated thereto.

2.2.3 Defense Obligation

:\Jaster Dcsigr}Cf shalt defend Corporation and Corporation Personnel, v,.·jth separate counsel of c·orporauon 'sand Corporation Personnd\; choosing~ any action or actions filed in connection \vilh any such Clain1s or Liabilities, and shall pay all costs and expenses~ including attorneysfees incuJTed in connection therewith.

16

2.2.4 Payment of Judgment

Master Designer shall promptly pay any jtrdgmcnt rendered against Corporation or any Corporation Personnel for any strch Claims or Liabilities.

2.2.5 Payment of Costs and Expenses

In the event Corporation and/or any Corporation Personnel is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted for any such dan1ages or other dain1s arising out of or in connection \v·lth tvlaster Design-::r's negligent pcrfonnancc or f\1aster Designerls f~iilure to perform the vvork or rJCriviues of Master Designer. Master Designer shall pay to Corporation any and all costs and expenses incurred by Corporation or Corporation Personnel in such action or proceeding, together wirh attorney's fees and expen witness fees.

SECTION 3: LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES

3.1 Compliance with Laws.

Master Designer shall keep itself fully informed of all existing and future state and federal laws and all county and city ordinances and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of services pursttant to this Agreement. Master Designer shall at all times observe and comply with ali such laws, ordinances, and regulations and shall be responsible for the compliance of all work and services perfonned by or on behalf of l\'1s.ster Designer. \A/hen applicable~ l\1aster Designer shall not pay less than the prevailing wage. 11 hich rate is determined by the Director of Industrial Relations of the State ofCalifomia.

3.2 Licenses, Permits, fees and Assessments.

\1Estcr Designer shaH obtain at its sole cost and expense all licenses. permits. and approvals that may be required by law for the perfi:.mnance of the services required by this Agreement. Master Designer shall have the sole obligation to pay any fees. assessments, and taxes. plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for '1.1astcr Designer's perfonmmce of the services required by this Agreement and shaH indemnif';. defend. and hold harmless Corporation against any such fees. assessments, taxes. penalties. or interest lt:\'icd, assessed~ or in1posed against Corporation thereunder.

.'U Covenant Against Discrimination.

'\.lnsler Designer covenants for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns. and all persons claiming under or thr(mgh it, that there sha11 be no dlscrin1ination against anyr person on accounl of' race, color, creed. religion. sex. rnarital status. national origin, or ancestry,, the performance of this ,\grcement. Master Designer further covenants and agrees to comply with the terms of the .\mcricans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC. §12101 ct seq.) as the same may be amended frmn tin1c to time.

17

3.4 Independent Contractor.

Master Designer shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of Corporation and shall remain at all times as to Corporation a wholly independent contractor. COlroration shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Master Designer in its business or othcnvisc~ or a joint venturer, or a rnernber of any joint enterprise 'r/ith I\'lastcr Designer. I\lastcr Designer shall not at any time or in any ma1mer represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of Corporation, Master Designer·s personnel pertcnming services under this Agreement shall at all times be under Master Designer's exclusive direction and control and shall be employees of Master Designer and not Corporation, Master Designer shall pay ail wages, salaries and other amounts due its en1ployees in connection \Vith this Agreement and shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting thern, including Social Security lax, inco1ne tax withholding, unetnployment compensation, \vorker's con1pensation, employee benefits and sitnitar n1atters. Neither Master Designer nor any of Master Designer's employees shalL at any time, or in any way, be entitled to any sick leave, vacation, retiremen', or other tl'inge bend'its from the Corporation; and neither Master Designer nor any of its employees shall be paid by Corporation time and one-half or other rates in excess of standard rates for working in excess of forty (40) hours in any one week Corporation is under no obligation to withhold state and federal tax deductions from Master Designer's compensation, Neither Master Designer nor any of Master Designer's employees shall be included in the competitive service, have any properly righl to any position. or any- of the rights an en1ployee lnay have in the event of termination of this J-\greeJnent.

3.5 Use of Patented Materials; Patent ami Copyrigl!t Infringement.

3.5. 1 f\1aster Designer shall assun1c all costs arising fron1 the use of patented or copyrighted matena1s. including but not hrnitcd to equipn1ent, devices, processes, and software pro~-ratns, used or incoqJoraied in the services or \vork perfonned by Master Designer under this Agrccn1ent

3.5,2 ln I ieu of any other warranty by Corporation or Master Designer against patent or copyright intfingement, statutory or otherwise, it is agreed that Master Designer shall def;~nd at ih expense any claim or suit against Corporation on account of any allegation that any item fl,rnished under this Agreement or the normal use or saie thereof arising out of the perfom1ance of this Agreement. infringes upon any presently existing U. S, letters patent or copyright and 1rylaster Designer shall pay all costs and dan1ages finally a\varded in any such suit or claim, pro·vidcd that 1\1aster Des1gner i:-. prmnptly notified in \vriting of !he suit or clain1 and gi\'en r.tuthority, infonnation and assistance at Master Dcsigner1s expense for the defense of s£:nJe. Ho\vevcr, !\:faster Designer "vVill not inden1nif)' Corporation if the suit or claim results fr01n: ( l} Corporation's alteration of a deliverable, such that said deliverable in its altered form infi'ingcs upun any presently existing US, letters patent or copyright; or (2) the use of a deliverable in combination with other rnaterial not provickd by ?v1aster Designer \Vhen such usc in cornbinatHJn infl·ingcs upon an existing U.S" letters patent or copyright

3.5.3 Master Designer shall have sole control of the defense of any such claim or suit and ail negotiations for settlement thereof Master Designer shall not be obligated to indemnify Corporation under any sett!en1ent tnade \vithout Master Designer's consent or in the event Corporation t~1ils LO cooperate fully in the defense of any suit or clairr;, prov]dcdo ho\,/ever. that

IX

said defense sh8ll be at Master Designer's expense. If the use or sale of said item is enjoined as a result of such suit or claim, Master Designer, at no expense to Corporation, shall obtain for C c>rporation the right to use and sell said item, or shall substitute an equivalent item acceptable to Corporation and extend this patent and copyright indemnity thereto.

3.6 Proprietary Information and Ownership of Materials.

3.6.1 Except as provided in this Section 3 .6. l, all proprietary information developed specit1cally for Coqx)fation by Master Designer in connection with, or resulting from, this Agreement, including but not limited to inventions, ideas, discoveries, improvements, copyrights, patents, maps, reports. textual material, or software programs, but not mcluding Master Designer's underlymg 1natcriats, soJh:varc, or kno\v-how. and the origina-ls of all letters, docun1ents, reports and other products and data produced under the Agreement shall be delivered to and shall be the sole and cx•..:lusivc property of Corporation, and are confidential and shall. not be rnade available to any pe•·son or entity without the prior written approval of Corporation. Such deliverables shall be deemed works made f(x hire and all rights in copyright therein shall be retained by Corporation. Co pi eo; may be made for Master Designer's records but shall not be furnished to others without written authorization from Corporation. Master Designer agrees that the compensation to be paid pmsuant to this Agreement includes adequate and sufficient compensation for any proprietary information developed in connection with or resulting from the perfom1ance of Master Designer's services under this Agreement. Master Designer further understands and agrees that ti!ll disclosure of all proprietary infonnation developed in connection with, or resulting from, the perfi)rmance of services by Master Desilo,n1er under this Agreement shall be made to Corporation, and that Master Designer ?)hall do aU things necessatJ: and proper to perfect and nmintain ownership of such proprieiary infon11ation hy Corporation. Corporation shall not be 1in1ited in any way in its use of the proprietary infonnation at any time, provided that any such use not \vithin the purposes of the Agreement shall be at the sole risk of Corporation, and provided rbat Corporation shall imkn,nit); and defend iv1aster Designer against any dan1agcs resulting from such usej including rhe release of ,uch material to third parties for a use not intended in the Agreement, and if this Agreement is tem1inated without cause, the use of partially completed materials by Corporation or any third party to complete the work described herein. Master Designer shall include this provision in all sLtbcontracts entered into in connection with this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties acknowledge that in performing the work, Master Designer may develop certain invention5, ideas. discoveries and improvements that are not developed exclusively with fhnding from the projecL arc not uniquely concerned \vith the project, and arc useful for general applications other than the project (a "Master Designer Development''). Master Desilo,n1er Developments shall be the sole and exclusive property of Master Designer provided, however, that Corporation shali have an irrevocabk nonexclusive, fuliy paid up, perpetual right and license to usc any such Master Designer Development. including the right to assign such license. Master Designer shall promptly notifY Cotporation in \\Titing of any devdoptnent that it considers to be a l'v1aster Designer Develop1nent Corporation shall notify Master Designer in wTiting \\'ithin ninety (90) days of any objection that Ccrporation classification oft:he developn1cnt as a Master Designer Devclopn1cnt

3.6.2 1\:o copies. sketches. computer graphics or graphs, including graphic artwork, are to be released by Master Designer to any other person or agency except atler prior written approval by Corporation, except as necessary for the performance of services under this Agreement. All press releases, including graphic display information to be published in newspapers, magazines.

19

etc.. arc to be handled only by Corporation unless otherwise agreed to by Master Designer and Corporation. Master Designer shall not use Corporation's name, photographs of the project. artistic representations of the designs of the project or any other publicity pertaining to the project in any promotional or professional publication. magazine, trade paper. newspaper, seminar or other mcdiun1 \Vithout the express written consent of Corporation, \vhich shaH not be unreasonably withheld. Corporation shall respond to Master Designer's written request for coasent to use photographs of the project. artistic representations of the designs of the project or any other publicity pertaining to the project in such manner within 30 days of Corporation's receipt or such request. Corporation's failure lo respond to any such request within the 30-day period shall be deemed Corporation ·s consent to such use. The Corporation shall provide professional credit il1r the Master Designer in the Corporation's promotional materials for the project as and in the rnanner the Corporation reasonably deerns appropriate,

3.6.3 i\ll office furnishings; tools, cquipn1cnt, and rnaterlals purchased for Master Designer's u:-:-:e, at Corpt)ration 's cost, in connection \,vith pert(wmlng services hereunder shall be the property of Corporation. Master Designer shall maintain accurate records and inventory or' all such items. shall exercise reasonable care in the use and handling of the same, and shall upon Corporation's request from time to time provide Corporation with a copy of such records. upon completion of the services to be performed hereunder, or at any time upon Corporation's request, Master Designer shall deliver to Corporation any such materials that are not consumed in perl(Jnnance oflvlaster Designer's services hereunder.

:u [l:"<TEl\TIONALL Y OMITTED] .

.3.8 Termination by Corporation .

. :tS.l Coq;oration reserves the right to lenTlinate this A.greernent en any tirne, vJith or \Vithovr cause. upon "'vrinen notice ~.o tv'iaster DesigneL Corporation n1ay tenninate this Agreen1ent for Msster Designer's default if a federal or state proceeding for the relief of debtors is undertaken by or against Master Designer, or if Master Designer makes an assignment for the: benefit of creditors. or if Master Designer breaches any term(s) or violates any provision(s) of this Agreement and does not cure such breach or violation within ten ( 10) calendar days after written notice thereof by Corporation. Upon receipt of any notice oftennination from Corporation, Master Designer shall Immediately initiate action for ( i) the cessation of all services hcreundcr except such as m_ay be specificall;: approved in \\-Titing by Corporation; (ii) the turnover as requested by c·o~voration of all appropriate records, docwnents and \vork products arising frotTt this /\grcemcnt: (iii) the disposal as directed b)' Corporation of all non-expendable property purcha~ed krr ('orporation"s account: and (iv) the de1nobilization of Master Designer personneL

3.8.2 ln case of tennination without cause, Master Designer shail he entitled to compensation for all :-;cr\ ices rendered prior to receipt of Corporation's notice of tenninalion and l{):r an;,; serv1ces aut:torizcd in writing Corporation thcreafkr, but no arnount shall be allovvcd tOr anticipated profit on unperfon11ed sen--ices. In addition to payrnent for services pcrfonncd, Coq;oration shaH pay Master Designer the allowable costs incurred prior to termination and other costs reasonably incurred by Master Designer in impiementing the termination as described in Section 3.8.1.

20

3.8.3 Corporation shall give Master Designer fifteen days· prior written notice of its intent to terminate this Agreement for cause. If, at the end of the fifteen day notice, the cause remains uncured, unless such cause is not susceptible of being cured within fifteen days and Master Designer in good faith has commenced to cure such cause and thereafter diligently pursues to cure such cause, Corporation r11ay ixn1ncdiately thereafter exercise its right of tern1lnation. Tf ten11inatioa is due to the failure of Master Designer to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. Master Designer will be compensated fi.)r those services, which have been performed and accepted by Corporation. ! n such case. Corporation may take over the work and prosecute the same to ,;omplction by contract or otherwise, and Master Designer shall be liable to the extent that the total cost lor completion of the services required hereunder, including costs incuned by Corporation in reL1ining a replacen1ent contractor and similar expenses, exceeds the Budget.

~.8.4 IL after notice of tennination fOr cause, it is deten11ined that there was no cause, the tcnnination shall he deemed to have heen eft'el~ted t()r the convenience of Corporation. In such eYent, adjustrn.ent shaH be :made as provided in Section 3.8.2.

3.8.5 Any claim for compensation payable upon tennination of this Agreement must be filed in writing with Corporation within 120 calendar days after the termination of1lllS Agreement.

3.9 Waiver.

Neither the Corporation's review, acceptance, nor payment for any of Master Designer's services under this Agreement shall be construed lo operate as a waiver of any rights under this i\grcen1ent or or any cause of action arising out of the perfon11ance of this .A.greetnent. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting party on any default shall in:pair such right or rernedy or be construed as a \vaiver. .A pany's consent to or approval of any act by the other party requiring the part/s consent or approval shall not deemed to \vaive or render unnecessary the other part)i's consent to or approval of any subsequent act ;\ny \va:·ver

erther party of any default must be in writing.

:uo Disputes.

3.1 O.l Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, if Master Designer objects to any dccrsion. position or direction of Corporation under this Agreement, Master Designer s~all submit its objection, in writing, to Corporation's Manager of Planning and Environmental Services ("Contract Manager"). The objection shall be submitted within thirty (30) calendar days following the date on which Master Designer first becomes aware of the decision, position or direction or Corporation to which it objects. "-io evidentiary hearing or oral argument shall be provided. The Contract Manager shall consider any material submitted by Master Designer. as well as any material submitted by any representative of Corporation. and, within thirty (30) calendar days !i.1i!owing submittal of Master Designer's objection, shail issue a decision, ln \\Titing, and !nail or othcrYvise furnish a copy thereof to i'v1aster Designer. The Contract ~d_anager's failure to issue a deci:..jon within the t.itne provided by this paragraph shaH be dee:med a decision denying Ma::;ter De>igner's objection.

3, I 0.2 The decision of the Contract Manager shall be final and conclusive unless, within thirty (30) calendar days following the date of receipt of the Contract Manager's decision (or within

21

thirty (30) calendar days f()l!owing the date of a deemed denial, if applicable), Master Designer mails or otherwise furnishes to the Contract Manager a written appeal addressed to Corporation's Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"). In connection with any such appeal, Master Designer shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard and to offer material in support of its appeal, and a representative of Co'l)Oration shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard and to offer material in response. The CEO (or duly authorized representative for the determination of such appeals) shall consider all material submit!ed and presentations made, and, within thirty (30) calendar days following submittal of Master Designer's appeal, shall issue a decision, in writing, and mail cr otherwise flm1ish a copy thereof to Master Designer. The CEO's failure to issue a decision within the time provided by this paragraph shall be deemed a decision denying Master Designer·s appeal. Such decision shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties unless either party files a con1plaint challenging the decJsion in the Orange County Superior Court within thirty (30) calendar days following the issuance (or deemed issttancel of the decision.

3. HLJ Timely subn1ission of an objection and an appeal in accordance wjth this Section 3 shall be a prerequisite to the right of Master Designer to pursue any legal action based on its objection to any decision, position or direction of Corporation, and failure to submit a timely objection and apnea! shall bar any such legal action, whether or not there is any showing of prejudice to Corporation resulting ti·om such failure.

J. lOA Pending final decision of a dispute hereunder, Master Designer shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Agreement and in accordance with the decision of the Contracts !\1anager.

3.11 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.

The rights and rerncdics of the parties are cumuiative and the exercise by either party of one or more rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by at the same or eli fferent times" of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other p2.rty.

3. !2 Attorneys' Fees.

In any action he tween the parties hereto seeking enforcement of any of the terms or provisions of this Agrecn1ent or in connection with the performance of the work hereundeL the party prevailing in the final judgment in such action or proceeding., in addition to any' other relief "hch may be granted. shall be entitled to have and recover from the other party its reasonable costs and expenses. including. but nor limited teL reasonable attorney~s fees, expen vvltness and courts costs. If either party to this Agreernent ls required to initiate or defend litigation vvith 2 tl1ird party because of the violation of any tem1 or provision of this Agreement by the other party. then the party so litigating shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney's fees and costs ti·mn

other party to this Agree1nent.

3. Ll Force :'Ha_jcurc.

The time period spccitled in this Agreement for perfom1ance of services shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fauit or negligence of (\wporation or Master Desie,'lleL including, but not restricted to. acts of God or of the public enemy. unusually S\~\:'ere \veather) f1res, earthquakes) floods~ epidemics. quarantine restrictions. riots, strikes,

22

ii"eight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including Corporation, if the delaying pmty shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notifY tl1e other party in writing of the causes of the delay. If Master Designer is the delaying party, Corporation shall ascertain the facts am! the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the en!iJn.:ed delay when and if in the judgment of Corporation such delay is justified. Corporation!s detern1ination shaH be final and condusive upon the parties to this A.grcerncnt In no event shall :Vlaster Designer be entitled to recover damages against Corporation fi)r any delay in the perfonnance of this Agreement~ however caused. Master Designer's sole ren1edy shall be extension of rhis Agreement pursuant to this Section 3 .14 .

.3.14 I'\ on-liability of Corporation Officers and Employees.

)Jo officeL orficiaL cn1p!oycc, agent~ representative, or Yolunteer of Corporation shaH be personally liable to J\I1aster Designer, or any successor interest, in the event of any default or breach by Corporation, or for any arnount which n1ay becorne due to !\·laster Designer or its successor, or fOr breach of any obligation of the tem1s of this A.grcement.

3.15 Conflict of Interest.

"<o officer, ofl!cial, employee, agent, representative, or volunteer of Corporation shall have any tinancial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or participate in any decision relating to this ;\greement which affects his or her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, pminership, or association in which he or she is interested, in violation of any federal, stale, or Corporation statute, ordinance~ or regulation. The Master Designer shaH not ernploy any such person \Vhile this _i\greernent is in effecL

3.16 Compliance with California Unemployment Insurance Code St:dion !088.8.

if !\:'laster Designer is a sole proprietor, then prior to signing the Agrcerncnt, tv1aster Designer ,;ball provide to the Coqooration a completed and signed Form W -9. Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification. Master Designer anderstands that pursuant to Cali!(xnia Unemployment Insurance Code Section 1088.8, the Corporation will report the information from Forrn W-9 to the State ofCalit(Jrnia Cnemployment Development Department, and that the inforrnation ntay be used for the purposes of establishing) rnodif:ying, or enforcing child support obligations, including collections, or reported to the franchise Tax Board for tax enforcen1ent purposes.

SECTIO\\ 4: \HSCELLAi\EOl'S PROViSIONS

4, I Complete Agreement,

lbs Ag:reernent, including all exhibits and docutncnts incorporated herein by constitute~ the cmnp1etc and exclusive statement of the tenns and conditions of the agree1nent between Corporation and Master Designer and it supersedes all prior representations. 'mderstandings and communications. The invalidity in whole or in part of any term or condition of tim Agreement shall not affect the validity of other terms or conditions.

4.2 Records and Reports.

Upon request by Corporation, Master Designer shall prepare and submit to Corporation any reports concerning Master Designer's performance of the services rendered under this Agreement. Corporation shall have access, upon reasonable notice, to the books and records of Master Designer related to Master Designer's performance of this Agreement in the event any audit is required. Ali drawings, documents, and other materials prepared by Master Designer in the performance of this ·\greement (i) shall be the property of Corporation and shall at no additional cost be delivered to COlvoration upon request of Corporation or upon the termination of this Agreement, and (ii) are confidential and shall not be made available to any individual or entity without prior written approval of Corporation. Master Designer shall keep and maintain all records and reports related to tim Agreement fi.rr a penod of three (3) years followmg termmation of this Agreement, and CoqJoration shaH have access to such records in the event any audit is required. Corporation ~ha1l haYe the riu:ht to revie\\' and audit the books and financial records of I\!faster Desi~ner reu:arJinfl

~ ~· ~' ~

this Agre<:mcnt during the tem1 of this Agreement and for a period or not less than four ( 4) years t(rliowing the completion or termination of this Agreement, except in the event of litigation or 'ettlernent of claims arising from the performance of this Agreement, in which case Master Designer agrees to maintain the same until Corporation and its duly authorized representatives, have disposed of ail such litigation, appeals, claims or exceptions thereto. Master Designer agrees to permit Corporation to reproduce by any means whatsoever or to copy excerpts and transcriptions as reasonably needed. Master Designer also agrees to include these requirements in each first tier subcontract. modified only if necessary to identify the affected panics.

4,3 '\oticcs.

Unlc,;s otherwise provided herein, all notices required to be delivered under this Agreement or under applicable law shall be personally delivered. or delivered by United States mail, prepaid, ccnif!ed. retum receipt requested, or by reputable document delivery scr.ricc that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery. Notices personally delivered or delivered by a document delivery service shail be effective upon receipt Notices delivered by mail shall be effective at 5:00 p.m. on the second calendar day following dispatch. Notices to the Corporation shall be delivered to the following address, to the attention of the Corporation Representative set forth in Paragraph D.l of the Fundamental Terms of this Agreement:

To Comoration:

Orange County Great Park Corporation One Civic Cent"r Plaza~ P. 0. Box 19575 Irvine, CA 92623·9575

V•/ith a copy H_l:

Nossaman, Guthncr, Knox & Elliott, LLP l g I 0 I Von Karman A venue, Suite 1800 Irvine, CA 92626·192'\ I Altn: Roben D. Thornton, Esq.

24

'\otices to Master Designer shall be delivered to the address set forth below Master Designer's signature on Part I of this Agreement, to the attention of Master Designer's Representative set forth in Paragraph D,2 of the Fundamental Tenns of this Agreement Copies of such notice shall he provided to Master Designer's counsel as fc>llows:

1\·'lenaker &: Hernnann lO East 40'h Street 4Yd Fioor l\ew York, l\ew York l 0016 Attn: Robert Herrrnann 1 Esq.

/\nd to:

Joshun S.:bert GafCon 70 l R Street, Suite l oOO San Diego, CA 92!0!

Changes in the address to be used for receipt of notices shall be effected in accordance with this Section 4,3,

4.4 Construction and Amendment

tcrrns of this Agreen1ent shall be construed in accordance vv-ith the n1eaning of language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agrcernent or any other rule of construction \"ihich 1night otheiv'vise apply'< The headings of sections and paragraphs of this Agrccrnent arc for convenience or reference only, and shall not be construed to iin1it or extend the meaning of the terms~ covenants and conditions of thjs AgreemenL This Agreement may only be amended by the mutual consent of the parties by an in~trun1ent in \vriting. Either part;(s waiver of any breach or failure to enfOrce any of the terms, covenants, conditions or other provisions hereof at any time shall not in any way iimit or waive that party's right thereafter to enforce or compel strict compliance with every term, covenant, condition or other provision, any course of deaiing or custom of the trade notwithstanding. Furthermore, if the parties make and implement any interpretation of this Agreement without documentmg such interpretation by an instrument in writing signed by both parlles, such interpretation and in1pietncntation thereof will not be binding in the event of any future disputes.

4.5 Severability

Each provision of this Agreement shall be severable trom the whole, If any provision of this ,·;g:rcen1cn.t shall be found contrary to lav/ the rernainder of this A.~green1ent shall continue in full

4.6 Authority,

The pcrson(s) executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto Wflrrant that (i) such party 1s duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver 1his Agree1nent on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing th1s Agreen1enL such party is fonnail:y

25

bound to the provisions of this Agreement and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound,

4.7 Joint Liability.

Each joint venturer or i\'faster Designer shall be jolntly and severally liable for all obligations nnd responsibilities imposed upon Master Designer by this Agreement. Accordingly, if any Joint \cnturer of Master Designer shall withdraw from the Joint Venture, become bankrupt. refuse to perform services under this Agreement or othetwise fail to meet its obligations a responsibilities under this Agreement, then the other joint venturers and each cf them shall perform the services required hy this Agreement and meet all obligations and responsibilities imposed on the Master Designer by this Agreen1cnt

4Jl Special Provisions.

·\ny additional or supplementary provisions or modi!icationo. or alterations of these General f'nlVlsions shall be set forth in Pmi Ill of this Agreement ("Special Provisions").

4.9 Precedence.

[n ihe event of any discrepancy between Part l (''Fundamental Terms"). Part II ("General Provisions"). Part Ill ("Special Provisions"), Part IV ("Scope or Services"), and/or Part V ("Budget"), Part Ill shall take precedence and prevail over Parts l. ll, IV and V; Part II shall cake rrecedence and prevail over Parts l, IV and V; Part IV shall take precedence and prevail over Parts I and V: and Part V shall take precedence over Part L

4. HJ Third I' arty Beneficiary Option.

The Parties acknowledge and agree that the City or Irvine ("City") shall haec the option, upon no; lc:ss than thirty (30) days' prior written notic~ to Tv1aster Designer at any- ti1ne during the Initial Term or any Option Term. to enter into an agreement with Master Designer on substantially the same terms as are set forth herein. modifying only those provisions that are necessary to reflect that the City, and not the Corporation, is a party to such new agreement, and that the City shall have all the rights and obligations under ·mch new agreement as are pro' ided to the Corporation in this Agreement (a "City Contract"), The City sball be deemed to have notified I\.'1aster Designer of its intent to enter into a City Contract upon deli·very to ;\;'laster DcsiPncr of a fon11. Cit\' Contract for its review and execution. T\1laster Designer shall ]Jro'~-ide '-' ~ '-

any comments that it may have on the form of the proposed City Contract within ten days of its receipt or the City Contract: provided, however. that Master Designer's comments shall be limited to the changes nmde to ret1ect the City of"lnine as a party, and Master Designer shall not be entitled to renegoriate any of the tenns and conditions. Upon the execution of the City Contract by the Cit)' of Irvine and Iv'laster Designer, this Agreernent be dee1ned tenninated \Yithout further action by the Parties. The City· shall be a third party beneficiary of this ·\grccment for pmposes of en forcmg the option in this Section 4. i 0 and all other rights afforded to the City under this Agreement. The City shall be entitled to withdraw its notice of intent to enter into a City Contract at any time prior to the City's and Master Designer's execution thereof. in which case this Agreement shall continue in full torce and effect

26

PART HI

SPECIAL PROVISIONS

1) parties acknowledge that !\'laster Designer con1rnenced the Task One services on febrmu-y 6, 2006. Such services are included in the Task One Budget and Master Designer shall be entitled to invoice Corporation for the same in accordance with Section i.9.4. All obligations ol 'vlaster Designer with respect to the services to be provided under the Agreement shall apply '' ith equal force and effect to the services perfom1ed during the period of time fi·om february (i 2006 to the Effective Date.

2) Master Designer's invoices Cor sn1aH purchases of rei1nbursable cost items totaling less than Five Thousand Doliars ($5,000) shall be supported by Master Designer"s written statement that the Miisler Designer determined the price paid to be fair and reasonable, and the basis tor such deten11.inatiorL For any purchases of reilnbursabie cost iterns that have a total value exceeding Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000), Master Designer shall request at least three (3) written quotations. Master Designer shall not split a procurement totaling more than Five Thousand Dollars (S5,000) into several purchases that are less than the limit in order to avoid the requirement to obtain at least three (3) quotations, nor shall any procurement be parceled, split, di,ided, or purchased over a period of time in order to avoid the dollar limitations.

2~Page 28 of 44

PART IV

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Scr; ices shall be peri(lflned in accordance with the attached Scope of Services.

Final Scope of Services tor Task One is Attached.

Conceptual Scope of Services for Tasks TYvo through five is attached.

D(·ta.ded Scope of Services fOr Tasks T\"\'O through Fi\.-e is to be developed per Section -J .9.1.1 of '\grecment. and added as supplerr1ent to this Scope of Services upon the parties final agreen1cnt with respect thereto, at \vhich point it shall be incorporated by reference and deemed a part of this Scope of Services.

Master Plan Scope of Services Ken Smith Landscape Architect WORKSHOP WEST

\1aster Plan Phase

\YORK TASKS

I '\SK 0:"\E: Critical Issues Assessment (Two months)

The !irst task will focus on "Principals Only''- Executive Design Team, minimizing team structure and staffing in order to move the project forward quickly and address critical issues in the short term. This task will focus on preparing a "Framework of Issues" and Diagratnn1atlc Studies·~.

The focus wiil be on critical issues and developing recommendations for addressing these critical issues in moving forward in developing the full master plan in Tasks Two through Six.

The approach will be to take the competition plan apart by critical issue area and to study these individual issues and develop a critical issue framework using straightforward graphic studies, short and to the point namttiv·es. The team wiil develop one to three diagranb for each issue area. Cost assessn1ent \vi11 be provided only for those iss-ues \Vith alternatives considered to have major cost implicatjons, These a~:;sessments will lead to a ··rrarncvvork or is:-;ues and Diagrarnrnatic Studies~·. Preliminary identification of these critical issues to be addressed in this task include:

/\) Boundary refinement, adjustment and perimeter recommendations. The team will overlay the competition plan and the existing boundaries and make recommendation for adjusting the concept to confom1 to the boundaries and/or identify critical areas, if they cxist, where "boundary trading" may be desirable.

B) Access, Circulation and Integration with Surrounding Areas. The team will develop diagran1n1atic studies looking at the issues ofhoYv rnajor access and circulation systems will provide connectivity between and with adjoining area> to and within the park. This will include accessing the five access points identitl~d in the original plan.

C) Utility and Infrastructure Coordination. The team will develop diagrammatic studies identifying "most likely" utility corridors, site drainage, patterns and critical linkages that vvlH affect the master plan des1gn.

D) Canyon Refinement, Hydrology and Mass Grading. The team will develop diagrammatic level studies of canyon hydrology i stream and lake, mass grading and identify areas of alignment shift or layout adjustment at a diagrammatic level of study. The team will also assess edge conditions, critical gradients, ADA accessibility, and refine cut/fill assumptions.

29

E)

F)

(~ \ j.

Wildlife Corridor Plan review and Response to City's updated Corridor Design Concept and its coordination with Great Park ecosystems. The team will review the recently updated City wildlife corridor conceptual design and address issues in the report and develop recommendations for incorporation into the park concept and plan. Park Program Refinements and Adjustments. The team wili review program ideas and submittals recently received by the OCGP board along with the findings prepared by Grifiln Structures for the sport park and develop responses and recommendations for incorporating this information into the park design and progran1< Refinements of Landscape, Architecture. Structures, Art and Iconic Elements. The team will study and refine distinctive design elements and further dcvclor critical features and detYiCnts relative to the overall park progran1.

The process will include:

1) Principals-Only will meet for a one-day workshop of work through issues and develop responses.

2) Prepare preliminary findings. 3 I Principals meet for a one-day workshop with OCGP staff and Heritage Fields

staff and consultants. 5) 5')

6)

Incorporate and respond to feedback and direction. Prepare iinal findings, "Fram•:work of Issues" and Diagrammatic Studies'' TcatTi leaders \:ViU rnakc a sun1n1ary presentation to the oc-GP Board at the this ta:-;k, Business Pian suppori to be provided m the request the UCGP staff.

De!iverables:

of

A) Framework oflssues Summary and Recommendations. including Images and Diagrams trom the topic boards, in 8.5 x ll format Executive Summary. approximately 15 pages in length. The report may be supported with appendices containing more detailed infonnation.

B) Seven each, 36"x48" or other appropriately scaled "Issue Panels" with Sketches, Diagrarns~ Labels and Short Narratives sun11narizing the work and direct!on from the C critical issLtes outlined above.

C) Po'.verPoint Presentation Sun11nary

30

TASKS TWO- FIVE Upon completion of Task One and approval by the Board, the team will proceed in developing the Park Master Plan outlined in Tasks Two through Five below,

TASK TWO: Conceptual Master Plan. (Four months)

This task \\'ill tOcus on developing design studies and alternatives and design refinetnents ro flesh out the cntical issue and recommendations identified in Task One and other inforn1ation and direction provided by the Board. The design studies will lead to development of preferred alternatives and ultimately an overall master plan for !he park,

2A, Based on infonnation from Task One and other intonnation and program direction identified by the Great Park Board, the Master Design team will develop design airematives and studies to address desired ideas, refinements and elements of the park program and design, including preliminary cost <::stimates and constructability reviews, Design studies wiH address but no! be limited to the following:

a) Overall site organization, b) Development of major park features and program areas c) Definition of programs and future user experiences d l Development of park circulation and parking c) Dev-eloprncnt of iconic and thematic concepts n Development of park edge condjtions addressing private i puhlic issues and

separation/ integration edge features. g) Development of Sustainable design elements

Identification of resource protection areas and development of ecological areas design / m.anagement parameters.

i) Identification of other special features and preservation areas and development of design ! management parameters for these areas,

j) Development of architectural design features and thematic design and guidelines, k i Development of plant massing I communities, and development of preliminary

plant palettes l) Development of streetscape typical designs, m J Development of park path systems, guidelines for bike, hiking, ADA

requiren1ents~ and related issues n) Develop Security and Maintenance concepts, o) Develop mass grading concepts, typical slopes conl1guratwns and cut and fill

evaluation p) Develop Prelimmary phasing concepts

2B As part of the design studies the master design team will continue to review project background reports and new infonnation for incorporation into the design studies, The Master Design Team \vill continue to synthesize this infonnation and identify issues and

3I

information having impact on the development and refinement of the competition design and development of park program and design features. The park design will develop and respond to the following: a) Local habitat. wildlife and ecological conditions b) Stream daylighting and flood control issues c) Hydrology) \Vater supply and de.tnand, and water rnanagement issues. d) Geotechnical. soils and related issues e) f)

g) h) i)

I

Existing and proposed utilities Consideration of community input Sports Park Needs Assessment program requirements Transportation. access. bike trails and related issues. Site den1olition, ren1ovals and runway recycling prograrn and ten1porary uses. Surrounding development program I design and private public boundaries.

2C Design studies in this task will be organized into the f(lllowing phases: a) Preliminary studies. The team will develop design studies exploring and

addressing identitied issues and park and program design options. including up 10

three for each major feature or area. Major features or areas will include but not be limited to the canyon, spmis area, entry areas. Fields, great lawn, parking, and military memorial.

bl Evaluation and feedback. The team will present design studies to the OCGP staff and Board, relevant agencies and affected stakeholders for evaluation and feedback,

c) Revised or preferred studies, The design tcarn will prepare revJsed and refined design studies addressing evaluations and feedback, leading to identification and devc!opn1cnt of prefened alternatives and design options.

d) Evaluation and feedback. The team will present design studies to the OCGP staff and Board and atfected stakeholders for evaluation ami feedback_

c 1 Conceptual Master Plan. The design team will develop an overall master plan for the park based on preferred alternatives and design options,

ZD Conceptual Master Plan deliverables shall include:

A) An overall master plan graphic of the entire park ar full build out showing overall design elen1ents and proposed park features at a minin1urn scale of l "=500'.

B) Plan blow ups ofpnncipal areas at a minimum scale of 1"=100' C) Character sections of major features and illustration of the relationships of' arious

parts ofthe plan to each other. D) Perspectives including an oblique aerial. E) Illustrations ofprograrns and/ or group activity detaiJ of particular park spaces

and program areas. F 1 Illustration;; of streetscapcs and edge conditions. G} Illustrations of therru1lic, art and IConic ele1nents H) l!Justrations and narrative descriptions of park ecological and sustainability

systems and features

32

,, •I

J)

K)

L) !VI)

\i)

lllustrations and narrative descriptions of park architectural and landscape architectural design elements. The Design Team will develop a master plan level cost estimate for the pre-final park master plan including assessment of selected lifccycle impacts of identified features. A set of boards 36"x48'. or si1nilar incorporating park design lrnages, 1abels and short nanatives. A PowerPoint presentation incorporating park design images and short mmatives. The Design Team will develop a master plan level cost estimate for the revised park rnastcr plan. Design Guidelines and Standards

Optional dcliverables (to be negoimted separately) A) Presentation ModeL B) Computer Simulation andior Animation of major features or ar~a';.

TASK THREE: City Approval Of The Final Master Plan (Two months)

3A Upon approval of the Conceptual Master Plan by the OCGP Board, the plan will be submitted to review and approvals by the relevant public agencies. Agency review will include but not be limited to City Planning Commission. and Community Sen'ices Connnission. During this period the design temn -v.'ill prepare additional studies that address concerns or issues raised by the revievv' agencies on a tin1e and n1aterials basis.

JB FoHowing the revievt and agency approval period, the design tearn villi adjust the Conceptual Master Plan incorporating changes and produce a Final JY!aster Plan for final Board approval.

3C Dcliverables shall inciude: Updating deliverables identitled in item 2D as appropriate to reflect plan changes and

modifications:

TASK FOlJR: (One month)

Phasing Plan

4A Based on the Final Master Plan cost estimate, and identified park priorities, the Master Design Team will develop park phasing strategies and phasing alternates leading to an overall phasing plan and program f(Jcusing on identification of Phase One construction features and areas f(lf Roard approvaL

33

4B Deliverables shall include:

a l Diagrams and identification of Phase One developments with accompanying cost estimates.

TASK FfVE Phase One Park and Design Illustrations (One month)

5A The _!\'laster Design Tcmn \viH refine and develop the Phase One construction features as a cohesive first phase devcloprnent and program_ package a) Final Master Plan for all Phase One areas and features h) Critical Master Plan design guidelines and standards for design development c) V' icv/s. perspectives, 1nodels and iHustrati vc m.aterial to ·v[sually describe the

design and major features. d) Final Cost plan

5B The Phase One Design deliverables shall include:

The team will prepare the following final master plan products: A) An overall phase one plan graphic of the entire park at full build out showing

overall design elements and proposed park features at a minimum scale of i "=500'

8) Plan blow ups of major areas and features at a 1nini1num scale of 1 "'= l 00'. C) Character sections of major features and illustration of the relationships or various

paris of the plan to each other. D) Perspectives including an oblique aeriaL E) Illustrations of programs and/ or group activity detail of particular park spaces

and program areas. F) lllustrations of streetscapes and edge conditions. G) Illustrations of thematic. art and iconic elements H) fllustrations and descriptions of park ecological and sustainability systems and

features l) Illustrations and descriptions of park architectural and landscape architectural

design guidelines. J) '\set of hoards 36"x48" or similar incorporating park design images. lahels and

short narratives K) A PoYvcrPoint Presenta1ion incorporating park design i1nages and short narratives.

Optional deliverables (to be negotiated separately) i\) Presentation ModeL

Con1putcr Sitnulation and-' or Anin1ation of major in Phase I.

34

;s or4.~t

---··---- ~-~-~------···-"·-·· -----·-------~··------·-~--------------------·-·-------------------··-

1 ORANGE COUNTY GREAT PARK

Ken Smith WORKSHOP WEST---- MASTER PLAN HEDULE (Diagrarnatic) [- "'C~JfiBtltliitG-t-\

-. --~--- ·--------~---- • --~------·· -· __ T _________ ___::__ _____ ~ ! :: ::--=:___~-~-- ------ -- -· -- ·-~----~ -·----····~--------··-----------····-··· --·-------

2006

- --- - -- -~~SK ----- ----J -L---'-_ : - - k-~-~--~ ------ . d ~~:,:~---------- -=--~--~---------~-•-------- i

1. CRITICAL ISSUES ASSES-SME-NT J1 : : - ---- -- -lrask Two ConceP'tclai-1------ -- ----- ------- __ Master P!a11 I

~:~~~~:i;~-~{~~~~~~~=-~=--~-~ ~~--~-~~-t=·=: ;;;:;;;r~-.t~-,---sott(:~~L,--~-:}~~~:'' ct5t E~'fim7>iel-~~-}-l - ~

'-;·c~~--v-A-rr--R~v ~~--;)~~;~~~ M-A~~ER ~~=~ -j- --:-------t~ --------l1~skorf,;;;'0':'t;~A,!-pr;;;,~:;,r=,----,-- ----- cf'i"Y{f--!~;~.:_~1~;'•de~'~"1

] --------~- I : ·C01''::Prturl M-:>ster Phn L --o· -~~----~r-- -

1

4.PHASING PI AN --· --------·------ --~----------r----~-- --=--= . -- it ""k;-;,;~~i~~;;,;c,;~o;iitn:::_-1 -c.so7---~ --~---- ~------ -- _ ~----- _____ ---~-' _ l!'ccompanymg cost estirnatf~s "~;:--?""mll!lll! II : ·- ·-----·------r---------- -F-- --~-----------"

5. PHASE 1 PLAN & DESIGN lLLUSlRArtONS ! l ' ---T~~~-=~-= ·=-=---~---,--·-rmy~----·-------·---- i---------- _______ ______ ______ _ \fa~K F.ve Phaso 0• e P ;;;;-,;,CT",-1115 Ell .

- - ~--·-~e~lgn lliuslratlors 1 --- ---- -· ,-- _j

I

--- ... --------------' __ " _______ , ___ -----~--~ " ___ ,_

I rCFGEND- ---- -- --- - ---l ElD "" Great P;Hk Board

f -~?.~:; :;-g-H~\~~ L·ff5,;: ::;i 01 ;··i; ;;rn £·---·-- -·- --~ --y ;-l·s~-~ ~;;;·:i ,;-r(;ji;:;,8;r,;;:b;,o-uic T.cisKo:

f<un Uute ''.Jb ::'C<JU

( 1 I ~ I ! i ( ,

J6Pagc .16 of44

i r--'

PARTY

BUDGET

OCGP Master Plan Task 1 - Proposed Fee Great Park Design Studio - Ken Smith Landscape Architect

I I :FEE STRUCTURE TASK 1

. -·~·--··----·even Handel -------·--n Architectos -~·--

L SUBTOTAL

I

r--IR

-~-·~--

' i 18,000.0oi

18,000.00 '

_ _2 -- 284,000.001

-----~---- - --~---~ -------------

---, 311/20061

--1

______§] 61 I

10~ ----j EIMBURSABLES- TASK 1* - +-------- I -------·-

t= --~=-------~----~--~~-~ ~Budget Reimb. @_~_(}% ------------+ __ 28,400 0~--------J

~ss~:::I~-(~-~-- ___ -_-_---_-:_•-~------------r-~--~-~~ ~ :::;,_~_--_-_--._==l __ ..:T.=O:cT..:.A::::L:___ _______ =t $1 323,320.001 """!contract

I I i I !owNER Contingency @15%+ +-- 48,6_il() 001------~

!Proposed Budget --------+------~- 372,000.00~ jsudget

I

--------------~----~------L_ ___ _j

ADDED OPTIONS FOR OWNER

Presentation Model at end of Master Plan - To be negotiated Computer simulation or animation of major features- To be negotiated

REIMBURSABLE$ CATEGORIES • GP Business

Airfare

Lodging Rental Car

Large Quantity Prints

Large Copying -Jobs

PART V SCHEUULE l

HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE

----------~------~--- ------·- ---------- ----~--------·-- ----· ---- -----, MIA LEHRER&

------·· KEN SMITH ASSOC. ---- MARY MISS ARTIFEXED FUSCOE -assification ------ ------r-------4 Vlan Surve Crew ' ··--$145,0_2 ....

-~=~.~~==~-t---=--------r---~---_-----Vlan Survey Crew $195.00 ·---Vlan Surve1 Crew ---- ----- ···-········- ---' --------~·--·-··-·· $230.00 lmin Asst. I -------~- -··t-·---- . i -------· lmin Asst. II - $55.00 ·--lmin Asst. Ill I ·==~+-=--=~~--===~=:t I

··-···--· --lminAsst.IV $50.0 +- $50.00 -------·--- ·-· ~----·--· ------ -------··-"-r--~-~---lmin Coordinator I $80.0 $80.00 ------+- .... ·--------L. ----- --~----·- -

I imin Coordinator II $90.0 $90.00 i ---- ---------·--- ---ji ------ -------1-.. --------- --sociate I $150 .. 00 ___ H5Q001 +----- -- ··-- ------------1--· . -------sociate II 1 $125.0 , - +~- ....... ----------====f-------t-··--·--r-sociate Ill ____ $_105 0

1

_________ J_

==-===-==---r==-- -· ----- $19000 .... $105 .. 00 sociate Director ____ j1J_Il~OO _______ -----------

!lc Proje~-"-~~-~-r~--~·.J180Jl0! ..... .J13tO.OO ·--~"-"~--=---=i- I <-~==="-"~~=T"~~~~

-=~--,-·~-·-·-·

st. Proiect Mgr. II =t= __ _J85_0 __ $85_00 ___ st Project Mgr. Ill _____ J~_IlO ___ _$80_29 I t I ---·--+------ i --

$80.00 \l)_12_Qesigner_l_==t_ !'OO __ ·----

_-:~ -£~-- ~-~~-J 1DD Designer II ___ _$7~ __ ·-· __ _ ----·- $75.00 -~-----·-

lief Accountant ______________ $_1_15_ 0 ___ 11_15 00 ___ ·-·

'itlff:§ti!TI~.!Cl_r ___ . _________ _$_130 Q ___ _!13Q_QO _________

PAR TV SCHEDULE I - rov 3-31.doc

--~-~-------- ------------- .... -----~-- ---------- --r-- r--------y-------TEN BURO HAPPOLD

MIA LEHRER & GREEN SHIELDS ARQUITECT OS CONSULTING ASSOC. MARY MISS ECOLOGY ·--2006 ENGINEERS TIFEXED FUSCOE

1nstruction Mana er I -·---~~- -------

! --1st Accountant ----- -----~-~~- ---- -------------- -------- -~- ---~-------- ------ ----- -- --:livery Services -·------+------------I

-·--·--------- ---· ---------•signer ----- -------- ------------ $100 Q() ·ector $210.00 ·-- ----D!fleer I -----· $110.:9_1! ---- ··----- --ijineer II $100.00 --- -r-·----- -----------r-·----- -·------- -~----- ---1---gineer Ill I I $80.00 " "----·--·------ ----------------------- --------vironmental Tech i 1 $80.00 -- ----·---------·-r-· -------- -i- ·---timator $115.0 $115.00 1 - " -------- --· " ·--[--------------- ---------+----- ------- --

~dA~:~;~i~i~~o~dinatorl-~-- ~:~jJ~~~~ --=--~+---------~~==t--- -==:==-~=------ ~====~' $J

5.00

__ $100.00

§~:~. ~-1~t- .. ~:=------ :__ --~t-~ I --~-=----. ~~" -- """" -=-~~~~ ~~~~ ~:~h II _ _: __ $~~~ ~~ ___ $13S.OD _ -+-----~~=~~ ::::_ . _________ _________ $80.00

o Sys. Support t---$11~0 ___ H1_5_0_(lr---------------- r------ ______________ _ _____ L _____ .j _

~;~~~~ec~:~~~:~r ----~~~06 -::-=::::::::~ =--- --=------ ____ -==-::l _ ____l!)Qa ______ l__ $6o.oo .. i ! I

ern ~65.0 _____ _ ____ ---r-- ·------+- $65.00! ______ ! ________ Designer --t-------_$75.0 _ _____ ___ _________ __ ____ ---1---~~- ______ 1 _ _ ___

~:~:~~iaiAnalyst ___ !~&% _ $10000, ·------------------------ i- - ----- __ :::!= $jgooo -------------+-----·- -----" ----f-. -·----------- -----------+---· ---- ·--·-·--+-------~------J-- -----~~:o:: ~Ken Smith --~------ ~~;~'~o --$220 ool $

2SO.OO $z2CJ]or-·-· $220.00 $22<ioot----$22o.OO ··-- -$22tioo - $200.00

2 PART V SCHEDULE l -rev 3-3l.doc

[rEN BURO HAPPOLD [

I ~_lA LEHRER & GREEN SHIELDS. ARQUITECTOS CONSULTING

1 -------- fil@iijQ!§ I JGAFCON_ KEN SMITH _ Ai?§OC. MARY MISS ECOLOGY . 12006 ENGINEERS IARTIFEXED FUSCOE ___ _

~£P;~~~ ---· -~--- _i~~~ 001--==--···· _...) $115.00 ---- -- ··- _______ !__ . - T $145.00

M111"'fil'\n Support f $111f1 flf"'

:::~~;~ '~¥~~!~~ =~ ~~~~ - "00

1--~,f :r~ --1--:- r=-~ t ,,.J · -· · M ---··· . - moot OJect anager II $135.00 $135.00 •- -·--·-----'-- ·-~ .35.00 ··==r=·------- --- ----·--' oject Manager Ill __ $125.0C $125.0C ~!Manager IV $110.0( $110_:9~

:~:~::%-·---~-----1~~~%----~-tOQ,.QCl m ---- - - ---~- --·-----T-$1so:oo ojict ManagerVII ·:-· $145 00 +---- -- --- --- - · ------- $145.00 ~ect Manager/Designer =t- ~----~~_7_ti:_2()~_:_ -=~=:_-+- -=== ~]75 ooL _______ j_ _______ =-t-----+=-.i= I oject Scientist I I $100.01] JjectScientist II r~~~=-=_!as.o{-_--- -- __ -r---------i----- ----------- --l--------__ $-100.0···0 heduler __ __!loo.o~----$1oo.oo r----- ---- --~- $85.oo ________ _ nior Scheduler _..§'13~.:.00 _ ----~-~~?_0 00 --------· -· ·--- -- --- ------- ---·- -------

$175.0 - - --- ·---· --- --------- ---~ $175.00 ------

. Designe~ :I =.I~=:-1~~ 0 ~-- - 1 -------~--- t----;:;-,,;(1~ rIll

---- --------- ------ --------·--- ------ J ' cd--_::: .I "woo . , ---~"~I f:_ ::::11--_:. .F- 4-u.JHO ,_ -----=-1 _'"ooiol_- - -$i4ooot ------Englneersll $125.b~- 1 1 _ __ _ _! __ -··-·- -·---·--- $125.00 Financial Analyst $175.00 $175 OC

_ProjectMgr ---T==$~7_s:Qt--$17som=~=--t= --=-~~-~T--- =f_: ______ _:Ir:::-~=----1-=-=~-~~-r--=i-=- $16s.oo ProjectMgr.l _ ~_11l~~oj __ !1_§()__0Ql-.----·----t--·-·· __ . J_______ _ ____________________ -------+- __ i~~l:~: ~~~----=--l ~=-~~!%~~~-=--~t~~ ~l=~=--=- _l_ -~=== -J~ --===l-=---=== -=~~-==:-==-~ _ ~ =-:-=-:_-.~_t_ I -~~=-=--=

:J PART V SCHEDULE l -rev 3-3l.doc

______ T ______ --- ------- -- -----l--------~-:---- -------:------- -------1 lrEN IBURO HAPPOLD

MIA LEHRER & GREEN SHIELDS ARQUITECTOS CONSULTING GAFCQN __ f'" S!'ITH ASSOC~ _ . "'"YMISS ECQOG' 1'1l06 E~NEERS f"FEXED FCSCOE

~~§1 i=~:l!l:::=.~t~=- f_ -~~ ,~== ~0.00 =-=~"" _ . -_ ~~--@"c::::= -=-~;hnica!Asst.ll .·· --$so.oo: ----$-8o~oo - ~--------r------ J -------- -------··------------~· . --'Q!!.~~~I1_ _________ f ____ ..J§~L __ 1 ---=·-=--T-=~==--- =~-~~~=~= --===-~- _=::.-·ssooat· -----

r

4 PART V SCHEDULE I rev 3-3l.Joc

Lodging

Rentai Car

PART V SCHEDULE II

OTHER DIRECT COSTS SCHEDULE

Large Quantity Prints

Large Copying Jobs

CTOs may include cap" on pennitted expenditures for any of the foregoing expense categfJr1es

Table of Contents

AGREEMENT FOR MASTER DESIGNER SERVICES . ., ......... ., ....... ., ......... .,.,.,,., ..................... 1

PART l FUNDAME'\TTAL TERMS ............................................ ., .. , ......................... i

PART II GENERAL PROVJSfONS "" ....................................... ., ...... .,.,.,., ... " ....... ., . ., ... .,.,.5

SECTION 1: SERVICES OF MASTER DESIGNER ............... ., ........................................... 5 1 . 1 Scope of Services.,., ... ., ... ., . ., . ., ........................................................................ ., ............. . 1.2 Changes and Additions to Scope of Services. . .... o ..... « ............................... "' ........... ., ...... 5 1.3 Standard of Performance ........... .,.................................................. . . ................................ 6 l A Performance to Satisfaction of Corporation. ... .. ...... ......................... .. ............. ., ............ ., .6 !.5 Instructions from Coq-,oration ............................................................................................. 6 1.6 Familiarity with VVork ................................................................ -- ........................................ 6 J .7 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment ............. .-p •.••••••• ., ................. .,"' ...... , •• 7

SECTION 2: INSURANCE AND l'\TDEMNIFICATTO'\T ........................................................ ll 2.1 Insurance .................... ,. ........ ,. ....... ,. ........... ,. ......... ,. .......... ,. ............................................... 11

2. Ll Insurance Coverage Required ............................................................................ 12 2.1.2 General Requirements for General, Automobile, Workers Compensation

d~ l IT.,.~.. 1~ an J:",mp oyer s ua01l1ty .......................................... ,. ........................................ L

2.1.3 Special Insurance Requirements for Professional Liabihty .................................. : 3 2.1 A Deductibles ................................................................................................... 15 2.1.5 Evidence of Coverage......................................... ............ ...... .. ... 15

2.2 In<iemnif1cation ... , .................... « ................. , .................................................................... 16 2.2.1 Indemnity for Errors and Omissions Related to Professional Services ................. 16 2.2.2 Indemnity for Liability Other Than Professional Negligence ............................. 16 2.2.3 Defense Obligation ................ oo••·o·- .. ···""·············.,··········· .......................... - ••••••••• 16 2.2.4 Payment of Judgment. ......................................................................................... l7 2.2.5 Payment of Costs and Expenses ........................................................ ,, ............... 17

SECT!O"' 3: LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ..................... .. .. ........ !7 3.1 0 ~ .J.L.

3.3 3.4 1 ~ ... ) 0 r; .J ',J

3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.1 J 3.12

Compliance with Laws. ........................ ............................... . .. ............ 17 Licenses, Pcm1its, Fees and Assessments ........................................ , .............................. 17 Covenant Against Discrimination ............................................................ » ....................... 17 Independent Contractor. ...................................................................................................... 18 l'se of Patented Materials; Patent and Copyright Infringement. ...................................... 18 Proprietary Information and Ownership of Materials ..................................................... !'! [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED] ............................................................................... 20 Termination by Corporation ............................................. ·······-·····0····· .............................. 20 Vi ai ver. ........ , ............... , ....................................................................................... -....... . Disputes ............................................................................................................................. 21 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative ................................................................................ 22 Attorneys' Fees ................................................................................................................. 22

l

TOC Boided OCGPC Master Design Comract Revised Per Board Request 3 __ 2 1 ~()6 a! i 0 _ 00 am (2)

3,13 Force Majeure,,,,,.,., .. , .. ,, ...... ,.:".,,,,,,.,,,.,,..,., .. ,,,,,, .. ,.,,. .. ,,,,,,,.,,,,, ... ,,.,,,.,,,,,,,,.,,,.,,.,,,, .. ,,,,,,, ,,,22 3,14 Non-liability of Corporation Officers and Employees .... , .. ,,,.,,.,,., .. ,,,,,,,.,,,.,,.,,,,. . .,,, . ., . ., . .,,23 3 0 15 Conflict of Interest. ., ,. . .,., , ..... 0., ..... 0., ,. ••• ,. ... 0. 0 Oo,. 0 .. ,.,. ••• ,. 0,. ., ,. ,. ,,., ,,. ,, ... , 0., 0 .,,. 0,. 000 0,. 0 00 0 0., 0 ., •• • 23 3,16 Compliance with Califomia Unemployment Insurance Code Section 1088,8, ,. . ., . ., .. ,.,,.,,23

SECT! ON 4: MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.,.,, ... .,.,.,,.,,., ..... ,.,,., .. ,.,., .. ,.,.,, .. ,,, .. ,.,, ........ .,.,,23

PART IIl SPECIAL PROVISIONS.,., . .,,..,,,.,,.,.,,.,,., .. ,.,, .. .,.,,., .. .,., .,., .... ,. ,, , .,.,,,.,.,,., .. .,,.27

PART IV SCOPE OF SERVICES,,..,, . .,,,,.., .. ,..,.,., .. ,. ,,,.,,.,,.,.,,.,,,,., .. , ,., .,, ,,,,., ... ,, . .,.,,.,., .28

P16,.R'I' '! BUDGET ................................................................................ , ............ , ....................... 36

TOC Boldcd OCGPC M astt.'r Deslgn Contract Revised ?er Board Request 3 __ 21 _06 at l 0_ 00 am {2)