1

2

i

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

NATIONAL FOOD AND NUTRITION SECURITY POLICY IMPLEMENTATION

FRAMEWORK

2017-2022

.

JUNE 2017

ii

(C) Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries Kilimo House P.O Box 30028 – 00100 Nairobi

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES AND TABLES ............................................................................................................... viLIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................. viiFOREWARD ................................................................................................................................ixACKNOWLEDGEMENT ...............................................................................................................xiEXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. xiii1.0 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT ...........................................................................................1

1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................11.2 Food and Nutrition Security ..............................................................................................11.3. Food and Nutrition Security Status ..................................................................................2

1.3.1 Chronic and acute malnutrition .................................................................................3

1.3.2 Micronutrient Deficiencies ........................................................................................3

1.3.3 Other diet-related Non-Communicable Diseases .................................................31.4 Agricultural Performance and Economic Growth .........................................................41.5 National Food and Nutrition Security Policy ...................................................................4

1.5.1 Policy Scope and Context .........................................................................................4

1.5.2. Policy Implementation Framework .........................................................................52.0 ACHIEVING FOOD SECURITY OBJECTIVES ..........................................................................7

2.1 National Food Availability .................................................................................................7

2.1.1 Overview............................................................................................................. 7

2.1.2 Domestic production ................................................................................................ 7

2.1.3 Domestic, Regional and International Food Trade .............................................. 8

2.1.4 Agro-Processing and Value-Addition .................................................................... 8

2.1.5 Storage facilities ....................................................................................................... 9

2.1.6 Strategic Food Reserve ............................................................................................. 9

2.1.7 Commercialization of Agriculture .......................................................................... 102.2 Food Accessibility........................................................................................................... 10

2.2.1 Improvement and Expansion of On-Farm and Off-Farm Employment ............... 11

2.2.2 Improvement of Urban and Peri-Urban Food Accessibility ................................... 11

2.2.3 Improving Food Access and Functioning of Markets ............................................ 12

2.2.4 Cultural, Social and Political Aspects in Food Access .......................................... 122.3 Household Resource Productivity ................................................................................ 13

2.3.1 Accessibility to Productive Resources for Rural Agriculture .................................13

2.3.2 Sustainable Intensification and Diversification of Agricultural Production Systems ........14

2.3.3 Urban and Peri-urban Agriculture ............................................................................14

iv

2.3.4 Food Storage, Preservation and Value-addition .................................................. 152.4 Food Safety And Quality ............................................................................................... 15

3.0 NUTRITION IMPROVEMENT ............................................................................................ 173.1 Nutrition Throughout Life Cycle ................................................................................... 173.2 Micronutrient Deficiency Prevention and Control ..................................................... 173.3 Nutrition Advocacy, Communication and Social Mobilization .............................. 183.4 Nutrition and Infection ................................................................................................ 193.5 Nutrition and Non-Communicable Diseases ............................................................. 193.6 Urban Nutrition .............................................................................................................. 203.7 Nutrition in Schools, Public and Private Institutions ................................................... 203.8 Food and Nutrition Education in Schools and Institutions ....................................... 21

4.0 FOOD AND NUTRITION DURING CRISIS AND EMERGENCY .......................................... 234.1 Emergency Preparedness ..............................................................................................234.2 Emergency Response ....................................................................................................234.3 Recovery, Building Resilience and Long-Term Development ...................................24

5.0 FOOD AND NUTRITION INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION ........................................255.1 Data Collection and Information Management .......................................................255.2 Information, Education and Communication ............................................................25

6.0 INSTITUTIONAL, LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND FINANCING ..................................................276.1 Institutional Framework ................................................................................................27

6.1.1 National Structures ...................................................................................................28

6.1.2 County Institutional Structures ................................................................................30

6.1.3 Stakeholder Technical Committees for Food and Nutrition (STC-FN) ................326.2 Legal Framework ...........................................................................................................326.3 Financing the Implementation of the Food and Nutrition Security policy ...............33

7.0 IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX ................................................................................................358.0 THE STRATEGIC RESULTS FRAMEWORK ............................................................................369.0 MONITORING AND EVALUATION .....................................................................................37

9.1 Rationale and Objectives .............................................................................................379.2 Performance Indicators ..............................................................................................37

10 RISK ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................... 39APPENDIX I: IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX ................................................................................. 42

FOOD SECURITY ....................................................................................................................42

PRIORITY AREAS, RESULTS, INTERVENTIONS AND BUDGETS ................................................42NUTRITION IMPROVEMENT .....................................................................................................54FOOD AND NUTRITION IN CRISIS, EMERGENCY SITUATIONS ..............................................615.0 Food and Nutrition Information & Communication ....................................................64

v

6.0 INSTITUTIONAL, LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND FINANCING ...............................................66Other Food Security Indicators ..........................................................................................71NUTRITION IMPROVEMENT KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ............................................72CRISIS AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ...........................................................................79

APPENDIX III: TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND CONTRIBUTORS ...............................81LIST OF REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................82

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS ................................................................................................83

vi

FIGURES AND TABLESFigure 1: Elements of national and household food and nutrition security (Adopted from FANTA) .........................................................................................................................................2Figure 2: National Food and Nutrition Security Policy Implementation Coordination Structure ................................................................................................................................... 28Figure 3: Schematic Representation of the National Food and Nutrition Security Results Framework ................................................................................................................................36Table 1: Priority listing of risks.................................................................................................. 39Table 2: Risk Analysis and Evaluation Matrix ........................................................................ 39

vii

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS4H Head, Heart, Hands and Health4K Kuungana, Kufanya, Kusaidia, KenyaASAL Arid and Semi-Arid LandsASCU Agricultural Sector Coordination UnitASDS Agricultural Sector Development StrategyAUC African Union CommissionATFFND African Task Force on Food and Nutrition DevelopmentSBCC Behaviour Change Communication BFHI Baby Friendly Hospital InitiativeCAADP Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Development ProgramCBS Central Bureau of StatisticsCFNSS County Food and Nutrition Security SecretariatsCG County GovernmentCoG Council of GovernorsCSTC-FN County Stakeholder Technical Committees on Food and Nutrition CSO Civil Society OrganizationsERS Economic Recovery Strategy for Wealth and Employment CreationFAO Food And Agriculture Organization of the United NationsFBO Faith Based OrganizationFNSC Food and Nutrition Security CouncilFSNIF Food and Nutrition Security Implementation FrameworkGDP Gross Domestic ProductGIZ German Corporation for International CooperationIEC Information, Education and CommunicationISCFN Inter-ministerial Steering Committee on Food and NutritionKALRO Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research OrganizationKDHS Kenya Demographic and Health SurveyKEPHIS Kenya Plant Health Inspectorate ServicesKES Kenya ShillingKFSM Kenya Food Security MeetingKIPPRA Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research Analysis KNBS Kenya National Bureau of StatisticsKNMS Kenya National Micronutrient SurveyMFI Micro Finance InstitutionsMoALF Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and FisheriesMoDP Ministry of Devolution and PlanningMoE Ministry of EducationMoENR Ministry of Environment and Natural ResourcesMoH Ministry of HealthMoL Ministry of Lands

viii

MoPSY&GA Ministry of Public Service,Youth and Gender AffairsMoRPW Ministry of Roads and Public WorksMoTC Ministry of Trade and Cooperatives MoWI Ministry of Water and IrrigationMSE Medium and Small EnterprisesMSME Micro, Small and Medium EnterprisesMTEF Medium Term Expenditure FrameworkMTIP Medium Term Investment PlanMTP Medium Term PlanNCD Non-Communicable DiseasesNCPB National Cereals and Produce BoardNCST National Council of Science and TechnologyNDMA National Drought Management AuthorityNDOC National Disaster Operations CenterNEPAD New Partnership for African DevelopmentNFNEC National Food and Nutrition Steering Committee NFNS National Food and Nutrition SecretariatNFNSC National Food and Nutrition Steering Committee NFNSP National Food and Nutrition Security PolicyNFNSP-IF National Food and Nutrition Security Policy Implementation FrameworkNFSCC National Food Safety Coordination CommitteeNFNSC National Food and Nutrition Steering CommitteeNFSNP National Food Security and Nutrition PolicyNGO Non-Governmental OrganizationOP Office of the PresidentPLWHA People Living with HIV and AIDSPRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy PaperSBCC Social and Behaviour Change CommunicattionSDG Sustainable Development GoalsSFR Strategic Food ReservesSGR Strategic Grain ReservesSP Social ProtectionSRA Strategy for Revitalizing AgricultureSTC Stakeholder Technical Committee TWG Technical Working Group UDHR Universal Declaration of Human RightsUN United NationsUNICEF United Nations Children Education FundVAT Value-Added TaxWASH Water, Sanitation, and HygieneWFS World Food Summit

ix

FOREWARDFood and nutrition security is key to achieving both human and economic development agenda of our country. Indeed the Government strives to achieve a food secure, healthy, productive and wealthy nation as enshrined in the Constitution of Kenya 2010 Article 43 (c), that assures kenyans of the right to be free from hunger and to have adequate food of acceptable quality. This is further emphasized in the country’s long term development blue print, Kenya Vision 2030 whose vision is “A globally competitive and prosperous country with a high quality of life [for its people] by 2030”.

Rapid population growth, poverty, unsustainable production systems and climate change pose the biggest challenge to sustainable food production, consumption expectations and patterns. Kenya experiences a 20-30% deficit in staple foods every year as the overall national food production has not increased in tandem with population growth. This scenerio is likely to continue especially with the current increase in the annual population growth rate by 2.6% (World Bank report, 2015). At this rate it is projected that the Kenyan population may reach 64 million by year 2030. Thus, more effort is needed to increase food production and productivity to satisfy future demand for food by the increasing population

Transformation strategies beyond dependence on rain fed agricultural production and embracing irrigation, mechanization and modern technologies are required to improve stability of food availability and access. This also implies that environmental sustainability for food production be assured at all times. We are aware of the social cultural and political obstacles that should be addressed as part of the prevailing food insecurity challenges. The National Food and Nutrition Security Policy adopts a wide range of approaches to address these challenges to attain the desired food and nutrition security status at individual, household, community and national levels. The overall goal of the policy is to ensure that all Kenyans throughout their lifecycle enjoy at all times safe food in sufficient quantity and quality to satisfy their nutritional needs for optimal health. It provides an overarching framework that covers the four dimensions of food security—availability, accessibility, utilization and stability.

Studies have shown that a significant proportion of the population cannot meet their daily food requirements. The Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS, 2014) report indicates that, nationally, 25% of children under five years are stunted. The attributing factors include: poverty, diseases and household resource constraints that many Kenyans face. The impact of acute malnutrition in early life has irreversible lifelong damages. A malnourished child is less able to fight off illness, cannot thrive, often ends up with poor cognitive development and is physically stunted. Such children are less likely to achieve highly in school due to poor attention, reasoning, learning and memory. Affected individuals later get trapped in the poverty and malnutrition cycle, which is difficult to break without external support. Good nutrition balance through dietary diversity is therefore key to achieving our human development goals. It is important to ensure availability of diverse, wholesome and nutritious foods, not just for survival, but for people to thrive and grow to their full potential for meaningful contribution to the socio-economic development of our country.

On the flipside, however, the opposite scenario of over-nutrition and increasing cases of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) has emerged as the new public health concern. This is associated with poor food choices and lifestyle mainly due to inadequate nutrition knowledge. The complications include overweight, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, gout and some types of cancers, among others. Increased effort is necessary to enhance nutrition education in order to improve nutrition knowledge among the populace. This would enable Kenyans to make better food choices, proper food utilization and adjust their lifestyles for better nutrition and health to lead more productive lives.

Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) issues are also essential for human nutrition and health. About 50% of cases of under nutrition and 25% of stunting cases are tied to chronic diarrhoea, intestinal worms, and other diseases that are linked to poor WASH.

This implementation framework (2016-2020) puts into consideration the complex nature of food and nutrition insecurity and recommends priority strategies for achieving our common goals and objectives. The proposed strategies embrace the multi-dimensional, multi-sectoral and holistic life cycle approaches

x

adopted in the National Food and Nutrition Security Policy. Based on the elements of our national and household food and nutrition security, a multi-sectoral approach will be employed involving the wide range of actors in Agriculture, Health, Water, Education, Food and other relevant sectors. The proposed priority interventions will also target the vulnerable populations including the poor, mothers, children, people with disabilities and the elderly citizens. Further, appropriate social protection programs will be scaled up or established to ensure regular access to adequate wholesome food by all people at all times. The impact of such initiatives will be felt by the populations today and in future.

This Implementation Framework is a tool for effective implementation of the National Food and Nutrition Security Policy. The main policy areas are elucidated in terms of the, development objectives, priority interventions, implementation approaches and result areas as described in the Implementation Matrix. It will guide all stakeholders in the implementation of the National Food and Nutrition Security Policy for the period 2017 to 2020. It is therefore recommended as the guide for developing effective programs, strategies, or action plans. The Implementation framework may be contextualized at all levels to satisfy the needs of diverse social economic and ecosystem settings. This will also guide in partnerships, mobilization and commitment of resources. The Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) aspects, critical to affirming nutritionally adequate and safe food are also specified this framework to measure performance and demonstrate results.

Good progress in the implementation of the Policy will require enhanced collaboration, mutual accountability and strengthening of coordination of all actors to ensure greater coherence, desired momentum and synergy of all food and nutrition security programs. This will be achieved through utilization of the mandates of relevant ministries and establishing effective linkages between existing institutional structures as proposed in this framework. All relevant stakeholders’ interests shall be integrated through the joint Secretariat that will be responsible for establishing appropriate horizontal and vertical linkages in order to promote broad multi-sectoral collaboration of diverse stakeholders. This framework provides the institutional coordination structure that will facilitate high level commitment, leadership by the Government, collaboration and joint planning by all sectors and stakeholders at all levels. This will be achieved through the establishment of the envisaged Food and Nutrition Security Council and Steering Committee.

This Implementation Framework was developed through a highly consultative and participatory process by a multi-disciplinary committee drawn from all key ministries. It is comprehensive enough to address most of the issues relating to food and nutrition security in our context. We acknowledge that overcoming these challenges is our collective responsibility and we should work together to achieve our objectives. We are confident that this Implementation Framework will guide us to realize our national food and nutrition security goal: ― “Ensuring that all Kenyans enjoy at all times safe food in sufficient quantity and quality to satisfy their nutritional needs for optimal health”.

Mr. Willy Bett, EGHCabinet Secretary Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries

Dr. Cleopa Kilonzo Mailu, EGHCabinet SecretaryMinistry of Health

Hon. Mwangi Kiunjuri, EGHCabinet Secretary Ministry of Devolution and Planning

Dr. Fred O. Matiang’i, EGH Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Education

Hon. Eugene Wamalwa, EGHCabinet Secretary Ministry of Water and Irrigation

H.E Hon. Josphat Nanok,Chair, Council of GovernorsGovernor Turkana County

xi

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTFood and nutrition security is a basic human right. It is with this in mind that the government through the relevant sector ministries developed the Food and Nutrition Security Policy and now this Implementation Framework as a guide in the development of action plans and programmes that address food and nutrition security matters. This Implementation Framework is a product of the review of the 2013-2017 draft that was not finalized after the adoption of the devolved governance system in 2013. Its development was through highly consultative and participatory processes led by a multi-disciplinary Technical Committee drawn from relevant sector ministries, with financial resources mobilized from the State Department of Agriculture. The additional financial support of the German Corporation for International Coorporation (GIZ) and United Nations Children Education Fund (UNICEF) at some stages during development of this Implementation Framework is highly acknowledged.

I wish to acknowledge the leadership and guidance provided by the Cabinet Secretaries: Willy Bett (EGH) Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries; Hon. Eugene Wamalwa (EGH), Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation; Dr. Cleopa K. Mailu (EGH), Ministry of Health; Mr. Mwangi Kiunjuri (EGH), Ministry of Devolution and Planning; and Dr. Fred Matiang’I (EGH), Ministry of Education, in developing this Implementation Framework.

The contributions of the County Executive Committee (CEC) Members responsible for Food and Nutrition Security matters during the County consultations are highly appreciated. The active role of Agriculture Secretary Ms. Ann Onyango and Dr. Johnson Irungu, Director Crops Resources, Agribusiness and Market Development in steering the review process is also highly acknowledged.

The exemplary dedication and good work of the following members of the National Inter-ministerial Food and Nutrition Security Policy dissemination committee, under the coordination of Mary Mwale, is specially acknowledged: Stephen Andika, Hilda Njoroge, Jacinta Ngwiri, Christopher Macharia, Jane Wambugu, Eng. Musa Sang, Leonard K. Kamaru, Tom Kinara, and Kithama Mbolu of the Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries; Ian Thande Githae and Phanuel Webi of the Ministry of Water and Irrigation; Gladys Mugambi, Grace Gichohi, Leila Akinyi and Florence Mugo of the Ministry of Health; Tom Obunde of the Ministry of Devolution and Planning; and Sicily Matu of UNICEF. The team successfully conducted extensive consultations at both National and County levels during review of the first Draft Implementation Framework (2013-2017) to give rise to this version.

Dr. Richard L. Lesiyampe, (PhD), CBSPrincipal Secretary, State Department of Agriculture

xii

xiii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYAbout 40% of Kenya’s population is poor and on average, 25% suffer from chronic food insecurity and poor nutrition. In recent years, it is estimated that at any one time about two million people require relief food assistance. During periods of drought, floods, or other calamities, the number of people in need more than doubles.

The growing problem of food and nutrition insecurity in Kenya is linked to the stagnated growth of agricultural production, low use of agricultural technology, high food prices, frequent disasters and climatic change. These factors have a direct effect on most of the country’s population (75%) as they reside in the rural areas where agriculture dominates. Even though the country has generally experienced positive growth in agricultural output over the past four decades, it has experienced serious periodic food deficits especially the main staples. While Kenya has achieved modest and sustained economic growth, and maternal and child nutrition over the last two decades, food insecurity and poverty levels have not shown satisfactory improvement.

The high burden of malnutrition in Kenya is not only a threat to the achievement of the goal of Kenya Vision 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), but also a clear indication of inadequate realization of human rights. Regional disparities in nutrition indicators are significant with the chronically food-insecure spread across all counties in Kenya. While this scenario is true for some regions, some sections of the population especially in urban areas are showing an increase in over nutrition. Kenya’s past policies have had limited success in addressing the country’s food and nutrition insecurity due to several reasons. Chief among these being inadequate budgetary allocations to agriculture and health, unstable macro-economic conditions, limited involvement of the private sector, inadequate sectoral coordination, lack of effective monitoring and evaluation systems, limited stakeholder participation, and lack of a clear food and nutrition security strategy.

This Implementation Framework is aligned to the National Food and Nutrition Security Policy (NFNSP), in which both food security and nutrition are recognized as basic human rights. The framework takes the view that the right to food includes not only sufficient numbers of calories but the right to nutritious foods that guarantee health, growth and development throughout a person’s lifecycle. The overall goal of this framework for action to achieve food and nutrition security is “ensuring that all Kenyans enjoy at all times safe food in sufficient quantity and quality to satisfy their nutritional needs for optimal health”.

The overarching framework covers all the four dimensions of food security—availability, accessibility, stability and meeting nutritional requirements. It also addresses the synergy linking food and nutrition security with poverty reduction.

Four broad objectives have been derived from the overall goal:

1. To achieve good nutrition for optimum health of all Kenyans;

2. To increase the quantity and quality of food available, accessible and affordable to all Kenyans at all times;

3. To protect vulnerable populations using innovative and cost-effective safety nets and emergency relief programs linked to long-term development; and

4. To develop implementation arrangements that would achieve the objective of the policy.

This Implementation Framework has been developed through a participatory and consultative process that was steered by a multi-disciplinary committee from all relevant Government ministries. The participants included technical staff of relevant government ministries including Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Public Health and Sanitation, Education, Water and Irrigation, Environment and Mineral Resources, Devolution and Planning. Several steps were undertaken in the process that included stakeholder consultative workshops and meetings to share relevant international, regional and national experiences, and to analyse both existing and new programs whose improved or new strategies had the potential to increase food security or address current nutrition challenges. The FNSP-IF recognizes the potential and significant efforts and range of on-going programs by all sectors and aims to support these initiatives and develop new

xiv

ones based on the identified cross-sectorial gaps and sector vision.

The main goals of the IF are:

i. To ensure that all Kenyans have the means to access affordable, nutritious and personally acceptable foods;

ii. To guarantee a sustainable, safe and high quality food supply; and

iii. To promote food consumption patterns that maximizes health and minimizes disease.

These three goals will be addressed through strategic interventions discussed in this Implementation Framework. A multi-sector implementation structure is proposed to achieve the desired linkages, and to coordinate and monitor food and nutrition strategies at both national and county levels.

The implementation structure emphasizes strong leadership at the Executive level and strengthening of inter-sectoral collaboration of all actors to create the desired synergy for achievement of the common goal. This will be achieved through the establishment of the National Food and Nutrition Security Council and Inter-ministerial Steering Committees at both National and County levels. The Council will be supported by a joint National Food and Nutrition Security Secretariat. The Secretariat will link the decision making and implementation actors at all levels. A robust Monitoring and Evaluation system is recommended in this framework.

The Food and Nutrition Security Policy statements inform the implementation approaches, which are discussed in Chapter 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. The objectives in the framework are supported by strategic interventions creating the Implementation Matrix captured in Appendix 1. Chapter 8 discusses the monitoring and evaluation framework critical to demonstrating results and measure performance of the implementation processes. A number of related programs are on-going and will require continued support and strengthening. In order to measure performance and achievement of results, a set of critical indicators harmonized with the Strategic Results Framework are set out in Appendix II.

Finally, this FNSP-IF recognizes that policies without workable and fundable plans do not have much impact; strategies are needed to identify areas where better linkages will work; and that food and nutrition security improvement requires much greater cross-sectoral collaboration and synergies, which this Implementation Framework recommends.

1

1.0 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT1.1 IntroductionFreedom from hunger is a constitutional right for all Kenyans and the Government is strongly committed to reducing hunger and malnutrition, build self-reliance to reduce chronic food insecurity, as well as institute measures that assist those in need when emergencies occur. The Food and Nutrition Security Policy (FNSP) was developed as an overarching framework that covers multiple dimensions of food security and nutrition improvement to add value and create synergy to existing sectoral and other government and partner initiatives. It is framed in the context of basic human rights, child rights and women’s rights, including the universal ‘Right to Food’.

This Food and Nutrition Security Policy Implementation Framework (FNSP-IF) is derived from the National Food and Nutrition Security Policy (NFSNP) and expresses the scope within which action should occur. It further integrates the major policies, objectives, programs, institutional structures and related actions into a coordinated and cohesive approach to managing the multifaceted challenges of food and nutrition security. Thus, the FNSP-IF provides a mechanism through which the government, private sector, Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) and other stakeholders will facilitate, in a comprehensive and coordinated manner, the implementation of actions to improve and ensure the food and nutrition security requirements of Kenyans. This will, in the most part, assist in boosting other spheres of the country’s economy and thus contribute to national development. It is only a food and nutritionally secure citizenry that can effectively participate in socio-economic activities.

The elements of the Implementation Framework (IF) are aimed at achieving the objectives of the Food and Nutrition Security Policy by making food accessible to all Kenyans at all times in safe and nutritionally acceptable quality. It also seeks to improve food security for Kenyans even in times of instability, emergencies and natural calamities. This IF will strengthen coordination and networking among relevant public and private institutions across sectors such as agriculture, trade water and health locally, regionally and globally. In addition, it reinforces efforts to safeguard food and nutrition security for the vulnerable groups in society, youth and women in urban, rural and other institutional contexts.

1.2 Food and Nutrition SecurityFood security is understood to exist when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life. Ensuring food and nutrition security in Kenya is a critical challenge. Food security encompasses food availability through production, storage or imports; and the access to food by people through their purchasing power in markets. Access derives from the constitutionally ensured entitlements a household has to food, either through own-production of foodstuffs or through income to buy food in the market. The household makes decisions over the amount and kind of food produced or bought, prepared, and its internal distribution within the household. To achieve nutrition security, food security should be combined with education, a sanitary environment, clean water, adequate health services and proper care and feeding practices for all household members.

The main elements of food and nutrition security, which are understood to include adequate food availability, adequate food access, and appropriate food use and nourishment, are influenced by several national and/ or household-level attributes. Food availability and access are influenced by both on-farm production and off-farm factors. The on-farm factors include farm resources (inputs) such as land, capital assets and access to information from research through extension; while off-farm factors include infrastructural development, marketing, processing and wage employment.

Food security is further seen as a relationship between household food consumption (which depends on availability and access) on the one hand and household structure (attributes), national and community level factors and on-farm and off--farm linkages on the other. Figure 1 shows the elements of national and household food and nutrition security, providing a simple conceptual scheme of food security and nutrition.

2

Resources: -Natural

-Physical -Human

-Technical -Financial

Adequate food availability (Own, other)

Adequate food access

(Own, other)

Appropriate food use and

nourishment

Nutrition and Health Consumption:

-Food (own, purchased)

Income: -Farm

-Non-farm

Production: - -Farm

-Non-farm on-farm -Non-farm off-farm

NATIONAL/HOUSEHOLD-LEVEL ELEMENTS

FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION ELEMENTS

Improved availability through

increased production,

productivity and use efficiency of

inputs

Increased and stable incomes through sales,

adequate markets for exchange, and

wages

Increased household food

intake

National and in-house food distribution

Food security and reduced poverty

Figure 1: Elements of national and household food and nutrition security (Adopted from FANTA)

One of the major attributes that determine the ability of a household to acquire adequate food is its ability to produce or purchase food. Implied in this is the ability of the household to use available resources efficiently. In turn, the resources should be sufficiently productive. Other attributes include the nature and extent of endowment of these resources to the household, production processes, income accrued from production, and the level and methods of consumption.

Household food availability is influenced by own-production, production by other households (which influences the availability of loans and gifts), and food markets. Production levels are, in turn, influenced by the productivity of the resources (inputs) available. The resources may be natural, physical, human, technological and financial.

Another major component of household-level elements of food security is production of farm and non-farm outputs, using the resources available such as land and labour. When land is limited, the labour resource of a household determines the income to be earned from non-farm employment to supplement own-farm production. Households may also be involved in generation of income from farm and/ or non-farm product sales. In addition to improved production, there should be improved in-house food distribution resulting in appropriate food use and intake and, therefore, adequate food consumption. When improved food availability and access is achieved, and assuming food is appropriately used, the household is then likely to realize improved nutrition and health.

1.3. Food and Nutrition Security StatusFood and nutrition insecurity is closely linked to poverty. About 50% of the Kenyan population fall below the poverty line. Among these are those living in extreme poverty. Some of these are resident in relatively well-endowed rural and urban areas. Chronically food insecure people suffer from extreme poverty and

3

with no access to some of the safety net programmes available to those suffering acute food shortages during emergencies.

Under-nutrition in Kenya is a serious public health challenge. For instance, chronic and acute malnutrition, micronutrient deficiencies and infectious diseases are prevalent, particularly among the rural populations and the urban poor. The main problems contributing to childhood malnutrition include inadequate household food security, inadequate care giving capacity, and an unhealthy environment coupled with limited access to health facilities, predisposing the young children to infections. Nutritional deficiencies significant in public health in Kenya include protein and energy malnutrition, iodine deficiency disorders, iron deficiency anaemia, vitamin A and zinc deficiencies.

1.3.1 Chronic and acute malnutritionNutritional trends show that, nationally, 26% of children less than five years are stunted1, depicting chronic undernourishment, which remains a serious and national development concern. The 2014 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) report shows that 4% are wasted and 11% are underweight (KDHS, 2014). There are significant regional disparities in nutrition indicators with the chronically food-insecure in arid and semi-arid areas showing consistently higher levels of acute malnutrition with Turkana leading at 22.9%.

Stunting is considered most serious because of the irreversible consequences. Stunting is highest in West Pokot and Kitui counties at 46%; Kilifi, Mandera, Bomet, Tharaka Nithi, Narok and Uasin Gishu counties at (31-39%); Kwale, Tana River, Lamu, Wajir, Marsabit, Meru, Embu, Machakos, Nyandarua, Samburu, Trans Nzoia, Uasin Gishu, Elgeyo Marakwet, Nandi, Baringo, Laikipia, Kericho, Kakamega, and Nairobi counties at (26-30%). The level of stunted children in the remaining counties range between 16-25%; while Nyeri, Garissa and Kiambu have the lowest with 15% (KDHS report 2014).

As in many other parts of the world, children living in rural areas and children from poorer households are more likely to be malnourished. Urban poverty and vulnerability are increasingly at the forefront of joint efforts to address the needs of the increasing number of malnourished people living in informal settlements. This represents more than 60% of the population of Nairobi, Mombasa and Kisumu cities.

1.3.2 Micronutrient Deficiencies Micronutrient deficiencies are highly prevalent in Kenya, particularly at the critical stages of life when requirements for specific micronutrients (minerals and vitamins) are high. Vitamin and mineral deficiencies exist even among population groups with sufficient food in terms of meeting energy requirements. The Kenya National Micronutrient Survey (KNMS)2 conducted in 2011 showed that children under five years are particularly affected by micronutrient deficiencies: vitamin A (9.2%), anemia is 26.3%, iron deficiency 21.3% and iron deficiency anemia is 13.3%, zinc (83.3%), Women, especially pregnant women, are also among the most vulnerable with anemia prevalence of 41.6%, iron deficiency 36.1% and iron deficiency anemia is 26% among pregnant woman. Among non-pregnant women of reproductive age anemia prevalence is 21.9%, iron deficiency 21.3% and iron deficiency anemia 14%. (KNMS, 2011).

The average national per capita calorie supply per day is less than the FAO recommended rate of 2,200 Kcal. Even in years of food self-sufficiency, chronic under-nutrition (nutritional stunting) affects nearly 30% of children, indicating insufficient food intake. This suggests that the problem goes well beyond national food availability and access. Thus, other major constraints to attaining good nutritional status include inadequate awareness and knowledge on nutritionally adequate diets, and limited resource allocation and capacity to support the implementation of comprehensive nutrition programs in the country.

1.3.3 Other diet-related Non-Communicable Diseases Kenya is increasingly faced with the emergence of diet-related non-communicable diseases such as diabetes, heart diseases, hypertension, obesity and gout. These diseases are mainly caused by a change in lifestyle characterised by excessive intake of highly refined and high-fat foods, sugar and salt, coupled with limited 1. KDHS, 20142. Kenya National Micronutrient Survey, 2011

4

physical activity, a characteristic of urban settings. Obesity is especially a big challenge in urban areas with 33% of women of reproductive age being overweight or obese. The Kenya Stepwise Survey for NCD risk factors (2015) shows that 28% of Kenyans aged 18-69 years are either overweight or obese. With the percentage being significantly higher in women (38.5%) than men (17.5%). It is especially high in urban areas with 43% as compared to rural areas (26%). 47% of women in Nairobi overweight or obese and 4th and 5th wealth quintile being the most affected with 41% and 50% respectively. Almost half of women living in Nyeri, Kirinyaga and Mombasa are overweight or obese. NCDs account for 50% of total hospital admissions and over 55% of hospital deaths. Approximately 7% of Kenyans die from cancer, 22.6% of adults aged 18-69 years have raised blood pressure or currently on medication for raised BP while 2.3 have elevated levels of fasting blood glucose (Ministry of Health, 2015).

Further, food safety is an important component of food security and nutrition considering that millions of children and adults suffer from ill-health due to effects of food-borne diseases.

1.4 Agricultural Performance and Economic GrowthEconomic performance has a direct bearing on the food and nutrition situation of the Kenyan people. In the first two decades after independence, the country was food self-sufficient and witnessed acceptable per capita consumption with significant economic growth and improvement in living standards. However, economic growth was not in tandem with population growth rates, therefore affecting per capita consumption patterns.

The agricultural sector plays an important role in the overall economy of Kenya. Currently, the sector directly contributes about 26% of the GDP and an additional 25% through linkages with manufacturing, distribution and service sectors. In the years when the agricultural sector has shown impressive growth, so has the gross domestic product (GDP); when the sector has slipped, so has GDP. During the second half of the 1980s, for example, the annual growth in GDP peaked in 1986 at 5.5%. In that year, the agricultural sector grew at an impressive rate of 4.9%, similar to that of the early years after independence. In 1991, agricultural output fell by 1.1% and GDP declined to 2.3%. In 1992, it fell further by 4.2% and GDP slipped to its lowest level of 0.4% in the post-independence period. Within the period 1980–1990, the average economic growth declined to 3.5%, closely associated with dwindling agricultural performance. The period between 1990–2000, the average economic growth had declined to 1.3%, a reflection of the low agricultural growth rate compared to that of 6% during the first two decades after independence. In 2012 the agriculture sector powered the GDP growth from 4.4% in 2011 to 4.7% in 2012. This was attributed to the sector growth

The growing problem of food and nutrition insecurity in Kenya is linked to the slow growth of agricultural production. Kenya has about 75% of its population residing in the rural areas where agriculture dominates. Over the last four decades, the country has generally experienced positive growth in agricultural output but has often not managed to achieve national food self-sufficiency. This is partly due to over reliance on rain fed agriculture (98%), which results in recurrent crop failures due to vagaries of weather and climate change; and fast human population growth. The net deficit in staple foods has been met mainly through food imports annually. Kenya often experiences episodic food deficits and in a number of cases acute food shortages. The per capita food availability has declined by about 25% over the past three decades.

1.5 National Food and Nutrition Security Policy1.5.1 Policy Scope and ContextThe National Food and Nutrition Security Policy Sessional Paper Number 1 of 2012, recognizes food security as a basic human right. The overall goal of the policy is to ensure that all Kenyans throughout their lifecycle enjoy at all times safe food in sufficient quantity and quality to satisfy their nutritional needs for optimal health. The Policy provides an overarching framework covering all the four dimensions of food security—availability, accessibility, utilization and stability, as recognised by the World Food Summit. It also addresses the synergy linking food security and nutrition with poverty eradication. The broad objectives of the Policy are:

5

1) To achieve good nutrition for optimum health of all Kenyans

2) To increase the quantity and quality of food available, accessible and affordable to all Kenyans at all times

3) To protect vulnerable populations using innovative and cost-effective safety nets and emergency relief programs linked to long-term development

The success of the NFNSP is anchored in several international and national initiatives and commitments to end hunger and extreme poverty. The policy is formulated within the context of the international conventions, ratified by the country. The new initiatives to improve food and nutrition security are in line with the declaration of the World Food Summit (WFS) of 1996; the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); the African Union Commission (AUC) and the African Task Force on Food and Nutrition Development (ATFFND); the New Partnership for African Development (NEPAD) of 2002; the Comprehensive African Agriculture Development Program (CAADP); and the Malabo Declaration of 2014. The Policy is also aligned to relevant national strategic planning documents including the Kenya Vision 2030 and the Agricultural Sector Development Strategy (ASDS) 2010-2020.

Further, the policy is framed in the context of basic Human Rights, Child Rights and Women’s Rights; the Constitution of Kenya 2010: Article 43 (1) (c), Article 53 (l) (c), Article 21and Article 27. All these guarantee the right to food and adequate nutrition and the universal right to food and nutritional health and protection from discrimination. The right to food is considered as not only sufficient numbers of calories, but the right to nutritious foods that guarantee optimal health, growth and development throughout a person’s lifecycle. In the context of Child and Women’s Rights that are fundamental values, the policy also focuses on the right of every woman and child to share equally or to have greater shares of the available food because of their special needs, required for growth and development.

1.5.2. Policy Implementation FrameworkPast food policies have had limited success in addressing food and nutrition insecurity in the country. Some of the factors that have hindered effective implementation of the food policies include inadequate budgetary allocations, unstable macro-economic conditions, limited involvement of the private sector, inadequate sectoral coordination, ineffective monitoring and evaluation systems, and limited stakeholder participation.

A major impetus for this Implementation Framework (IF) is the need to achieve higher levels of success in improving food and nutrition security. The IF recognizes the significant efforts and range of programs relevant to food and nutrition security that are on-going or are being planned for implementation within multiple sectors. The aim is to support these initiatives and develop new ones based on the identified cross-sectoral gaps. Thus, the IF identifies priority areas and implementation approaches to achieve food and nutrition security. It also includes a snap shot of programs and projects that operate in support of the National Food and Nutrition Security Policy.

Among the factors underpinning the implementation framework is the National Food and Nutrition Security Policy that calls for multi-disciplinary approach at both National and County levels. An integrated approach with strong coordination mechanisms involving public-private partnerships, inter-ministerial linkages, County and National government synergies are clear requirements in achieving the envisaged goals.

This implementation framework also proposes the strengthening of oversight and implementation structure, legislations and coordination mechanism for purposes of ensuring harmonised implementation in an accountable manner. Establishment of a National Food and Security Council, Steering Committees and other support institutions for supervision and coordination of all food and nutrition matters in the country are necessary. To enhance monitoring and evaluation (M&E), a framework including regular surveys at all levels will continuously provide feedback on progress of policy implementation by all stakeholders.

Objectives of the Implementation Framework The main development objectives supported in this implementation plan are:

6

1. To guarantee a sustainable, adequate, safe and high quality food availability,

2. To ensure that all citizens have access to affordable, nutritious and socially acceptable foods,

3. To promote food consumption patterns that maximize health and minimize disease, and

4. To ensure collaboration and synergy among the institutions and related sector actors working to foster food and nutrition security

The main challenges to be addressed include:

• Low agricultural productivity hence low food self-sufficiency at household level.

• Recurrent/chronic food insecurity affecting large populations both in urban and rural Kenya.

• Poorly integrated and inefficient markets in agricultural sector that threaten food security.

• Low access to high quality foods for many rural and urban population groups.

• High levels of protein/energy malnutrition and vitamin and mineral deficiencies.

• Low collaboration and synergy between some existing actors and programs.

The priority program areas identified in this IF include:

• National food availability

• Food accessibility

• Household resource productivity

• Food safety, standards and quality control.

• Nutrition improvement

• Food and nutrition education in Schools and institutions

• Food and nutrition in crisis and emergency

• Food and nutrition security data and information management

• Domestic water availability and access.

These priority areas do not stand alone but are linked in a results matrix that brings development logic and causal effects to bear ( refer to figure 3).

National and local governments implement many of these interventions, while the private sector, development partners and CSOs also implement related programs. Food and nutrition security requires robust collaboration and institutional strategies to identify areas where better linkage will work, and close the gaps. The IF indicates that policies without workable and fundable programs and cross linkages cannot be fully implemented. Thus, another important part of the implementation plan is the institutional framework that links the many existing partners. The IF aims at strengthening the sectoral impact by converging knowledge, actions, and learning across all relevant sectors and groups.

Finally, this IF builds upon from the National Food and Nutrition Security Policy in several ways. First, it sets out implementation approaches, development objectives and interventions for the main Policy areas, discussed in 2, 3, 4, and 5. The objectives in the framework are supported by outputs and interventions to create a comprehensive framework, the Implementation Matrix, discussed in Appendix 1. Chapter 6, 8, and 7 presents the institutional and coordination arrangement, Results Framework and Monitoring and evaluation framework critical to demonstrate results and measure performance.

7

2.0 ACHIEVING FOOD SECURITY OBJECTIVES2.1 National Food Availability

2.1.1 OverviewFood availability in the country is mainly considered in terms of cereal supply, however, at the national level, food availability is a combination of domestic food production, domestic food stocks, commercial food imports and food aid. Food availability is influenced by the ability of individuals and households to produce their own food in sufficient quantity and/or presence of adequate stocks in the food supply chain. Other factors include access and control of productive resources (land, seed and water), governance, legal and regulatory frameworks, the macroeconomic environment, gender dynamics, pests and disease outbreaks, emergencies and conflicts. Kenya’s per capita food availability has however declined by about 25% over the last three decades due to population increase and declining agricultural land productivity and the effects of climate change.

The NFNSP presents the micro and macro-economic framework and incentives needed to increase food production and access in a sustainable manner; enhance availability of food that is diversified to promote health; expand food trade and market opportunities based on comparative and competitive advantages at domestic, regional and global levels; promote agro-processing and value addition; encourage investment in storage of surplus produce; establish and effectively manage strategic food reserves at county and national levels and improve re-distribution and accessibility of food from areas of high supply to deficit areas.

2.1.2 Domestic productionAgricultural production systems are largely rain fed (98%), making them susceptible to impacts of climate change such as droughts and floods, which hinder production. ( Water Master plan 2030). The country has diverse agro–ecological zones. Areas with relatively high rainfall have experienced rapid population growth, deforestation and continuous cultivation of soils which has decreased farming area, and led to a decline in soil fertility and yields. The arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs), which cover about 84% of the country, have the highest rate of food insecurity, due to unsustainable land and natural resources management practices such as over grazing and bush clearing and burning for charcoal. Significant loss of bio-diversity has been witnessed, which has adversely affected traditional sources of food, income and other basic needs of many rural communities. In addition the low budgetary allocation to the sector has affected the overall production of food for these communities.

Urban and peril-urban agriculture holds potential to improve food access and overall food and nutrition security. However, there has been inadequate support, guidance and concerted effort to develop this potential, including support to capture fisheries and aquaculture. Further, food production potential is often unexploited due to the high cost of inputs.

The objective is to increase agricultural productivity and production of food that is diversified, affordable and able to meet diverse nutritional requirements of all people.

Strategic interventions:• Establishment of an Agricultural Development Fund

• Increase in funding to food and agriculture sectors by at least 10% of the national budget

• Promote sustainable food production systems with special attention to increasing soil fertility, agro-biodiversity, organic farming and sustainable range and livestock management systems

• Promote nutrient-rich foods through increased production, diversification and bio-fortification

• Promote, expand and support sustainable irrigation and water management systems

8

• Promote measures that reduce cost of agricultural food production

• Support and promote agro-forestry, afforestation and re-afforestation to enhance livelihood systems and environmental resources

• Support investments in infrastructure, including roads, water, power, communications and markets, throughout the country to increase agricultural productivity

• Promote integrated climate change adaptation in agricultural development programmes and policies

• Improve weather forecasts and climatic change information dissemination to support communities respond to new opportunities and challenges

• Promote Urban and Peri-Urban agriculture to improve food availability and access for better nutrition.

2.1.3 Domestic, Regional and International Food Trade Kenya has increasingly become dependent on food imports (30-40%) to bridge the national deficit. This is attributed to declining per capita food production and self-sufficiency, urbanisation and globalisation trends and changing feeding habits. While consumers may benefit from cheap food imports, there should be deliberate efforts to improve local production and food distribution. Cross-border trade in the region has been on the increase which improves regional food availability. However, the major challenge is to improve on distributive and market efficiency to reduce the cost of production for enhanced competitiveness. Whereas some parts of the country occasionally experience surplus, poor infrastructural networks have hampered food distribution from surplus to deficit areas.

The objective is to promote national food availability and access through strategic liberalization of food trade and private sector participation along the value chains.

Strategic interventions:• Review and harmonise food and related trade policies and regulations to promote domestic, regional

and international food trade

• Increase competitiveness of local agricultural produce by addressing the cost of production including infrastructural constraints

• Support harmonization of regional and international food safety and quality standards and regulations

• Institutionalize multi-sectoral food and agricultural trade, policy formulation, implementation and coordination

• Negotiate for the removal of free trade barriers to trade by trade partners

2.1.4 Agro-Processing and Value-AdditionThe returns to agricultural production are relatively low as most produce is sold in its primary form. Small scale farmers operate at the lower levels of the commodity value-chains, with low profit margins, owing to their inability to engage in cottage industries or farm level agro-processing and value-addition. Whereas most of Kenya’s high quality agricultural produce such as tea and coffee is widely used for blending relatively low quality produce from other countries, the additional proceeds from the resultant products do not benefit the producers. The country has not adequately promoted the use of appropriate technology for value-addition by small and medium scale enterprises. This has been exacerbated by inadequate infrastructure and insufficient access to sources of credit, knowledge and skills on appropriate technology.

The objectives is to increase the level of value-addition for agricultural produce meant for domestic and export markets through adoption of appropriate technology and enhance net returns.

9

Strategic interventions:• Provide incentives to promote value-addition and agro-processing industries both in rural and urban

areas.

• Establish a fund to support SMEs involved in agro-processing and other means of value-addition

• Empower youth and women to utilize allocated development funds for promotion of value-addition, cottage type industries and agro-processing development

• Develop key infrastructure such as roads, power and water both in rural and urban areas to stimulate development of value-addition processes

• Capacity development of agro-processors, particularly SMEs, to meet relevant quality and safety standards

• Promote research and adoption of appropriate food processing methods and equipment suitable to the needs of small scale enterprise

• Promote technology incubation or value addition equipment development

2.1.5 Storage facilitiesDuring periods of sufficient rainfall, Kenya often realises surplus harvests of many agricultural commodities, particularly maize, fruits, milk and pasture/fodder. However, a significant proportion of produce is lost due to inadequate and inappropriate storage facilities, poor storage practices and lack of deliberate initiatives in post-harvest management. It has been estimated that post-harvest losses for small scale producers for maize range from 30–40%; up to 50% for fruits and about 7% for milk per annum.

Although the country generally lacks storage capacity, there are pockets of surplus capacity spread across the country under the management of National Cereals and Produce Board (NCPB). Out of the total NCPB storage capacity of 21 million bags (1.89 million tonnes), on average only about 40% of this is utilized. Farmers are at times forced to dispose of their produce at very low prices during glut periods due to lack of appropriate storage facilities.

The objectives are to promote appropriate storage practices and expansion of storage facilities to extend shelf life and reduce farm losses.

Strategic interventions:• Promote appropriate household post harvest handling of produce and food storage structures and

practices for improved food and nutrition security

• Develop farmers’ capacity to manage appropriate storage facilities from community to national level.

2.1.6 Strategic Food ReserveThe Strategic Food Reserve, currently managed by NCPB, comprises of mainly maize grain. The reserve acts as a buffer to stabilize supply of cereals in the market. The Strategic Food Reserve Trust Fund is also meant to cushion farmers from depressed market prices during glut periods, and to provide a first line of protection for coping with food emergencies. The recommended stocking level of the SFR, is at least 4 million Bags (3.6million MT) plus a cash equivalent for the same quantity of grain. However, NCPB is often not able to make prompt purchases of grain for the strategic reserve owing to insufficient funds. Further, other foods, other than maize should be included in the SFR.

The objective therefore is to diversify and attain sufficient nutritious foods in the SFR to stabilize food supply and staple food market prices.

10

Strategic interventions:• Increase budget support to the SFR to include other critical foodstuffs such as sorghum, millet, rice,

pulses, milk, meat, fish, root crops, fruits, nuts and livestock feeds.

• Regularly review the appropriate stocks and cash levels for the SFR based on demographic, economic and climate dynamics.

• Institutionalise and strengthen management of the Strategic Food Reserve (SFR) at national and county levels.

• Encourage continuous research and technology transfer for effective management of the SFR

2.1.7 Commercialization of AgricultureThe vision of the Government is to transform Kenya’s agriculture into a profitable commercially oriented, internationally and regionally competitive Sector that provides gainful employment. Currently, the major hindrances to commercialization of agriculture include low profitability of the agricultural sector due to high cost of production, poor access to agricultural support services, multiple taxation, and inefficient market systems. The sector can provide gainful employment and income if productivity and profitability area guaranteed.

The objective is to increase net incomes from farming and related value chain activities.

Strategic interventions:• Build the capacity of farmers, SMEs and Cooperatives to undertake farming as a business along

commodity value-chains

• Strengthen support services including extension and provision of financial services for sustainable commercialization of Agriculture.

• Support marketing of agricultural produce and products both locally and internationally.

• Promote the development and consumption of locally produced agricultural products.

• Promote linkages between supply and market demands through Public Private Partnerships.

• Strengthen legislation of food marketing and institutions to protect all actors along commodity value chains

• Expand food production through irrigation especially in the ASALs

• Promote agricultural research, innovation and technology transfer and uptake in production and post harvest management

• Streamline the taxation regime for food commodities to avoid multiple taxation along the value chains

2.2 Food AccessibilityFood access is ensured when all households and individuals within those households have sufficient resources to obtain appropriate foods for a nutritious diet. It is dependent on the level of household resources: – capital, labour and knowledge; and on food prices. Access is influenced by the ability of individuals and households to produce their own food in sufficient quantity and to generate sufficient income to purchase food, effectiveness and efficiency of infrastructure, effectiveness of food distribution systems and the affordability of food prices. Other limiting factors include: control of productive resources (land, seed and water), governance, legal and regulatory frameworks, the macroeconomic environment, gender dynamics, disabling diseases, emergencies and conflicts.

High poverty levels have affected household access to food. While most of the poor live in rural areas, the number of urban poor is rising fast and requires special focus and support. Kenyans living in urban areas

11

mainly rely on markets for some or all of their food needs, therefore there is need to improve markets and access to food.

2.2.1 Improvement and Expansion of On-Farm and Off-Farm Employment

Agricultural enterprises provide the bulk of employment to the rural population. However, income levels in these areas are generally low with high unemployment rates. These have exacerbated rural-urban migration putting pressure on the services and resources in urban centres. The high unemployment rates and low incomes are due to limited access to productive resources, low technology uptake, inadequate marketing infrastructure, low value-addition initiatives and inadequate regulatory frameworks.

The target of the government is to collaborate with other stakeholders in the creation of on-farm jobs to increase on-farm employment at a rate of 5% per year on a sustainable basis; and double the share of off-farm employment with respect to on-farm employment.

The objective is to support measures that enhance rural employment opportunities as a means of increasing the level of food and nutrition security.

Strategic interventions:• Support measures that improve security and access to land, water and technologies especially by

women, pastoralists and child-headed households.

• Support cooperatives, out-grower schemes and fair trade policies to increase the share of small producers in the production and export of high value crops and livestock.

• Review minimum wages regularly to taking into account the food and nutrition needs, inflation rates and labour productivity.

• Simplify business registration, licensing and regulation through the introduction of multi-user licences and operationalization of the Single Business Permits to minimize bureaucracy.

• Provide legal and institutional support to small rural enterprises

• Enhance linkages with training institutions to diversify technological innovations, research and development

• Strengthen business linkage opportunities by encouraging the establishment of agro-processing enterprises.

• Support investment in rural infrastructure including access roads and locally generated renewable energy to lower production and marketing costs.

2.2.2 Improvement of Urban and Peri-Urban Food AccessibilityUrban and peri-urban agriculture is increasingly being practiced and holds potential to improved food access and overall food and nutrition security in these areas. However, to date, there has been inadequate support, guidance and effort to develop this potential. Past policies and strategies did not adequately address chronic food insecurity of urban and peri-urban poor. Additionally, regulatory guidelines do not guarantee the safety and quality of food produced, sold and consumed in these areas.

Though the informal sector provides the bulk of employment opportunities, the wages are generally low. While the government has taken some measures to provide a favourable environment for urban food trade, the production, value addition and processing activities are not closely monitored resulting in the emergence of new challenges of food safety and quality assurance. The situation is further exacerbated by uncoordinated and poor waste management, and lack of safe water for irrigation.

12

Domestic and industrial wastewater is at times used in urban farming because it is the only reliable source of water for irrigation. However, use of untreated wastewater introduces the risk of exposure to high microbial and chemical contaminants by handlers and consumers of the agricultural produce. Poor waste disposal may also increase the risk of contamination of crops and farm produce.

The objective is to promote and regulate safe peri-urban agriculture for enhanced food security, and to promote employment creation activities for improved household incomes in order to enhance food accessibility in the urban and peri-urban settings.

Strategic interventions:• Fast track implementation of the micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME) policy.

• Review and streamline regulatory frameworks governing urban and peri-urban agriculture.

• Review and streamline regulatory frameworks governing formal and informal sectors focusing on employment creation and poverty alleviation.

• Support and promote mechanisms that enhance agro-processing, small businesses and entrepreneurial skills.

• Provide an appropriate working environment and suitable zones for the informal sector.

• Support activities that enhance the income generation capacity of vulnerable people with special needs..

• Promote urban and peri-urban agricultural extension services for safe food production

2.2.3 Improving Food Access and Functioning of MarketsEfficient and effective markets are a pre-requisite for optimum benefit for producers, intermediary traders, processors and consumers. There are on-going government efforts to enhance infrastructure development geared towards addressing inadequate access to markets. The key market infrastructure includes roads, power, telecommunications, work spaces, water and sanitation, among others. Furthermore, poor market information systems have significantly contributed towards poor functioning of the markets.

The objective is to improve market infrastructure, marketing skills and information systems for effective and efficient market functioning and access to food.

Strategic interventions:• Establish and maintain efficient market infrastructure to facilitate food access.

• Develop capacity building programs for food producers and traders.

• Improve governance and accountability of service providers in development and modernization of food commodity markets.

• Enforce the physical planning rules and regulations in market systems.

• Develop a comprehensive data base for agricultural products, markets and an information flow system for food market players.

2.2.4 Cultural, Social and Political Aspects in Food AccessCultural, social, governance and political factors play a key role in food production, processing, distribution, storage and consumption. Culture is known to influence intra-household food access. Women play a key role in primary agricultural production. Men and youth are more interested in cash intensive activities leaving the perceived low income generating food production to the women. This has contributed to the current status of food insecurity since women do not have adequate access to improved technologies and other productive resources. There is need to integrate more men and youth in food value chain systems.

13

Food accessibility is further influenced by the political environment which is exacerbated by the slow pace of appropriate policy development and implementation, corruption, lack of accountability and poor governance.

Lack of basic water and sanitation services also perpetuate the cycle of poverty, reduces household resources and opportunities to access nutritious foods. The poorest households spend a significant proportion of their income on securing water for general household needs, including food preparation. This is often diverted from their meagre food budget, and even when food is available, sometimes households cannot afford water for cooking and drinking.

The objective is to mainstream cultural, social and political considerations in the food and nutrition security strategies and activities, with particular attention to vulnerable groups (such as women, children and PLWHA).

Strategic interventions:• Advocate for the enforcement of Human Right to Food and Nutritional Health; and protection from

hunger, discrimination of right holders by duty bearers.

• Sensitize communities to discard retrogressive cultural practices with regard to access to nutritious foods.

• Facilitate access to land and other production resources especially for youth and women

• Promote active involvement of youth and men in food production activities.

• Enhance access to technology and promote adoption by vulnerable groups especially women and youth

• Fast track development and implementation of policies that enhance access to food.

• Promote accountability and good governance at all levels.

2.3 Household Resource Productivity

2.3.1 Accessibility to Productive Resources for Rural Agriculture High levels of poverty in the country have exacerbated food insecurity and vulnerability problems. At the household level the problem of poverty includes, in addition to inadequate incomes, factors such as poor access to productive resources like land (including pasture), seeds, water, technology and affordable credit. Other limitations relate to inadequate knowledge on existing agricultural and livestock support services. There is unequal access to, control and management of productive resources across gender which needs to be addressed. Poor organisation of farmers and their institutions have further compromised their abil-ity to advocate and demand for better services. Disabling diseases such as HIV/AIDS pandemic have also impacted negatively on agricultural labour and service delivery, compounding the problem of erosion of productive resources.

The objective is to improve equity in access and control of productive resources and harness the existing potential of productive resources by all genders and vulnerable groups.

Strategic interventions: • Develop an Agriculture Land Use Master Plan

• Establish an efficient and easily accessible land registry system.

• Adopt participatory approaches to rural development and sustainable management of productive resources.

• Promote equitable access to, control and management of productive resources across gender.

14

• Strengthen the capacity of communities to adapt to changing needs, environmental and socio-economic conditions.

• Promote technical and social options for improvement of productivity and incomes in marginal agricultural areas and other fragile ecosystems.

• Improve information flow and networking among stakeholders.

• Facilitate benefit sharing from community resources through sustainable management and conservation

2.3.2 Sustainable Intensification and Diversification of Agricultural Production Systems The growth rate in per capita food production has not kept pace with population growth rate in the country. High population density in high and medium agro-ecological areas has placed too much pressure on land leading to sub-divisions into non-economical units and encroachment into fragile ecosystems. In addition, over-reliance on rain-fed agriculture, unsustainable water, pastures and land use management practices have exacerbated this problem. High costs of inputs and limited diversification in terms of production of nutrient-rich foods have increased the risks of livelihood failure and health challenges. Increased produc-tivity of small land units and marginal ecosystems can be ensured through intensification of the production processes and diversification for adaptability to various agro-ecological zones.

The objective is to promote agricultural intensification through sustainable and efficient use of produc-tive resources and reduce the risk of livelihood failure and nutritional health challenges facing vulnerable households.

Strategic interventions:• Promote appropriate intensified and sustainable agricultural production systems that are friendly to

fragile ecosystems

• Promote diversification and production of nutrient rich foods

• Strengthen research and research-extension-farmer linkages to enhance flow and utilisation of technical information appropriate for intensified and diversified agricultural production systems.

• Support the development of training guidelines for the promotion of intensified and diversified agricultural production systems.

2.3.3 Urban and Peri-urban AgricultureAlthough urban and peri-urban areas have generally very small land holdings, there exists substantial po-tential for agricultural production. However, the urban by-laws discourage any agricultural activities within municipalities. There are instances where water from raw sewage, including waste products from indus-tries, is used to grow crops in urban and peri-urban areas. Keeping animals in urban and peri-urban areas can also be a public nuisance particularly in congested areas. There is need to develop guidelines for agri-cultural land use in urban and peri-urban areas.

The objective is to improve household food availability, through urban and peri-urban agriculture.

Strategic interventions:• Develop guidelines for urban and peri-urban agriculture

• Review the urban and peri-urban agriculture regulatory framework to align it with the developed legislation and guidelines.

• Target sensitization and capacity building of farmers and other stakeholders on good agricultural practices in urban and peri-urban areas.

15

• Strengthen monitoring and surveillance system in enforcement of urban/peri-urban agricultural production rules and regulations.

2.3.4 Food Storage, Preservation and Value-additionThe post-harvest losses and food waste at household level as a result of poor storage facilities, utilization and handling practices are high. These ranges from 10% - 40% of maize produced locally, 50% of fresh vegetable produce and an average of 2-5% of milk produced per annum. There are also high levels of post-harvest contamination that pose health risk to consumers. Effective preservation and processing of food is hindered by factors such as access to and limited knowledge on storage and preservation techniques and fluctuations in output due to seasonality and over-reliance on rain-fed agriculture. There is need to enhance use and application of modern cost-effective food and forage storage and preservation technologies at household level for the realization of food and nutrition security.

The objective is to minimize post-harvest losses and waste at house-hold level by enhancing capacity of households in food and forage storage, preservation and processing /value addition.

Strategic interventions:• Sensitize and promote community based food storage and preservation.

• Promote research and development of appropriate technologies for food/forage handling, preservation, value-addition and storage.

• Enhance capacity of households on indigenous technical knowledge and appropriate safe handling, preservation, value-addition and storage technologies of food products.

• Facilitate development of support infrastructure for cold storage and processing in food production zones.

• Promote warehouse receipting systems for storage of grains and other foods in all counties

2.4 Food Safety And QualityThe Kenyan food safety and quality control system is multi-sectoral in approach and is embodied in various statutes implemented by various Government ministries/departments and regulatory agencies. This has cre-ated inefficiencies, gaps or lack of accountability in the national food safety control system resulting in re-currence of food related hazards, rejections of export food shipments and other undesirable consequences.

The National Food Safety Bill 2007, proposes to addresses Food Safety concerns in the broad areas of legislation, institutional framework, monitoring and evaluation, traceability, resources, information, educa-tion and communication. The Bill envisages protecting and promoting consumer health while facilitating the orderly development of the food industries as well as fair practices in food trade. This will also ensure the country fulfils the international obligations or conventions, particularly those arising from member-ship in international organizations such as in the World Trade Organization. Furtherance to this, through the implementation of the National Food Safety Policy, all the existing food control infrastructure and services will be effectively coordinated to eliminate areas of overlap and conflict. There is therefore need to develop participatory national food safety legislation to ensure the policy is implemented systematically and effectively. While the proposed National Food Safety Bill provides for the formal food safety control mechanisms, the responsibility of food safety rests with all players along the food chains.

The main objective is to establish and maintain a rational, integrated farm-to-fork food safety system and to protect the public health and nutrition.

Strategic interventions:• Review and harmonize the current laws and regulations to address emerging challenges pertaining

to food safety and provide for functional responsibilities along the food value chain at both

16

national and counties levels.

• Enhance linkages between research and industry to promote food safety and quality control.

• Develop an effective farm to folk food safety monitoring and evaluation system to ensure that only safe food is availed to consumers.

• Strengthen capacity of institutions to undertake risk analysis and early warning at both national and county levels in order to prevent outbreak of food borne illnesses and diseases.

• Mobilize resources to mainstream food safety and quality concerns in programme planning and implementation at both national and county levels

• Develop a mechanism for certification and accreditation of food testing laboratories and maintain an inventory of certified/accredited laboratories for food testing and analysis

• Establish data banks on food safety at National and County levels by taking inventory of expertise and scientific works.

• Harmonize and strengthen inter-agency efforts in food safety and quality control monitoring to minimize overlaps and inter-agency conflicts.

• Develop a safeguard mechanism for safe food trade, communication, feedback and information dissemination for consumer protection and other food chain actors

17

3.0 NUTRITION IMPROVEMENTAchieving food security will only translate to nutrition security if utilization component of food is well addressed. Agriculture production also leads to increased income. This is further enhanced with increased youth and women empowerment in agricultural production.

3.1 Nutrition Throughout Life CycleThis Policy Implementation Framework adopts a lifecycle approach, which focuses on the health and nutri-tion needs of individuals. The lifecycle approach focuses on the health and nutrition needs of individuals through the six stages of human developmental and physiological lifecycle. The six stages include; preg-nancy and the new-born, early childhood, late childhood, adolescence, adulthood and the older persons. The nutritional needs change with different physiological states and developmental life cycle stages in terms of specific nutrient types, amounts and varieties of food. Using the lifecycle approach will ensure that nutritional needs of different age groups and stages of life are addressed appropriately. This will entail promoting optimal maternal, infant and young child nutrition; and improving nutrition care and support systems for older children, adolescents, adults and elderly persons.

The objective is to maintain optimal nutrition for developmental and physiological functions at all stages throughout the human lifecycle.

Strategic interventions: • Develop, review and disseminate appropriate cohort specific nutrition guidelines

• Institutionalise routine assessment and monitoring of the nutritional status of all cohorts

• Strengthen and support nutrition support systems for all cohorts at community, health facilities and workplaces.

• Promote and scale up high impact nutrition interventions while addressing disparities in various contexts including informal child care centres

• Promote consumption of diversified and nutritionally adequate diet across cohorts in the lifecycle.

• Implement and enforce Food and Nutrition related legislation and regulations

• Strengthen linkages with other sectors to promote good nutrition in all cohorts.

• Strengthen and support integration of nutrition agenda in all agriculture sector projects and programs designs and plans in value chains and food security activities

• Promote hygienic food preparation, research and adoption of appropriate household food processing methods to reduce post-harvest losses and seasonality of food

3.2 Micronutrient Deficiency Prevention and ControlThere is a high prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies across the population in Kenya that affects mostly children under five years and women of reproductive age. There is a need to focus on micronutrients since they contribute to reduction in morbidity, mortality and improve overall development and well being of an individual. Strategies to alleviate micronutrient deficiencies include short term strategies such as supple-mentation, promotion of consumption of micronutrient rich foods and long-term strategies such as dietary diversification, fortification and public health measures, among others.

The objective is to reduce and prevent micro-nutrient deficiencies and disorders to promote public health among all cohort groups in Kenya.

18

Strategic interventions: • Promote production, appropriate utilization and preservation of micronutrient-rich foods at

household level.

• Promote consumption of diversified and nutritionally adequate diets throughout the lifecycle.

• Formulate legislation to promote blending of flours using traditional high value crops to guarantee production, productivity and consumption of these crops for improved food and nutrition security.

• Scale-up programs to promote and facilitate fortification, or bio-fortification of widely consumed staple foods, cooking oils and sugar.

• Strengthen routine and therapeutic micronutrient supplementation (vitamin A, iron and folate, zinc) for children, women and identified vulnerable groups

• Scale up interventions on public health measures that prevent micronutrient deficiencies

• Develop a monitoring and evaluation system on micronutrient deficiency prevention and control.

• Develop, review and implement micronutrient guidelines and strategies

3.3 Nutrition Advocacy, Communication and Social Mobilization Food and nutrition promotion agenda has not been given the priority it deserves for a long time. There is need to advocate for promotion of food and nutrition agenda to ensure that it is well articulated and prior-itized by Government and other stakeholders in decision making and planning. Reducing malnutrition calls for a multi-sectorial focus, driven by a political good will that acknowledges the integral role that nutrition plays in ensuring a healthy population and productive workforce. At population level, nutrition knowledge is a key aspect in confronting malnutrition at all levels of society and in all sectors. Therefore, there is need to foster social mobilization and communication strategies in order to influence decision making, behaviour change and modelling for healthy lifestyles.

The objectives are:

i. To improve prioritization, generate demand and adoption of food and nutrition agenda

ii. To enhance knowledge on nutrition and encourage attitude change towards diets among the population for enhanced and healthy lifestyles.

Strategic interventions: • Increase and sustain the political prioritization of nutrition at both National and County

levels

• Improve and maintain an enabling policy environment in support of an affectively coordinated and integrated food and nutrition sector.

• Increase financial resource allocation and expenditure on nutrition programmes.

• Develop and implement a comprehensive nutrition advocacy, communication and social mobilization strategy.

• Scale up and strengthen the human capacity and skills for nutrition promotion in the sector

• Improve knowledge and attitudes on optimal nutrition for increased demand of nutrition services and practices

• Strengthen community engagement, participation and feedback mechanism in nutrition services and decision making processes

• Promote utilization of appropriate energy and time saving technologies for nutrition promotion.

19

3.4 Nutrition and Infection Infection compromises the nutritional status of people, particularly the vulnerable who include children, pregnant and lactating women, and the elderly. Malnutrition is the single greatest underlying cause of child mortality in Kenya, estimated at 50%. Very often, infection and malnutrition become a spiral that leads to more illness and malnutrition, and for many, especially young children, to death. Improved survival and quality of life of individuals is therefore achieved through adequate nutrition. The aim of nutrition care and support for people with infections is to attain and maintain healthy weight and body composition, improve the immune system and optimize medical therapy. An integrated approach for nutritional care and support in disease management is necessary. Further, food safety in the home, at school lunch programs, and in the work place through the use of hygiene practices such as safe drinking water and washing of hands are cru-cial for food safety and disease prevention. Inadequate safe drinking water, poor sanitation, and improper hygiene often cause under-nutrition due to diarrheal and other intestinal tract diseases.

The objective is to improve the nutritional care, treatment and support during illness to support optimal body healing and functioning.

Strategic interventions:• Review, develop,and implement national guidelines and standards for nutritional care and support

during illness and diseases management.

• Strengthen the capacity of healthcare providers to give optimal nutrition care, treatment and support in management of illnesses/diseases

• Promote programs on awareness creation on disease prevention strategies at household level including investment in safe water and sanitation facilities

• Promote integration of water sanitation and hygiene with food and nutrition promotion

• Promote resource allocation and mobilization for medical nutrition therapy in all health facilities.

• Increase public awareness on nutrition management during infection and illness

• Promote appropriate management of malnutrition of pregnant and lactating women

• Strengthen referral mechanisms and linkage between the community and health facility

3.5 Nutrition and Non-Communicable DiseasesThere is an increase in the prevalence of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) such as diabetes, obesity, heart disease, some cancers, kidney and liver diseases in Kenya. This is largely attributed to dietary change reflected in the consumption of foods low in fibre and highly refined foods high in fat, sugar, and salt. These changes have been occasioned by changing lifestyles due to increased urbanization and globalization. There is limited awareness in the population about the effects of these lifestyle changes on health. There is an urgent need to determine the magnitude and effect of these diseases and to address their prevention, control and management modalities.

The objective is to halt and reverse the prevalence of diet related NCDs and enhances their control and management.

Strategic interventions:• Develop and implement a national nutrition guidelines for the management of NCDs• Promote routine screening of diet related NCDs• Increase support to programs on Screening, assessment, prevention and management of diet related

NCDs. • Support research and monitor prevalence and trends of NCDs using the life cycle approach to create

healthy lifestyles and effective nutrition interventions

20

• Sensitize and create awareness on the economic impacts of diet related NCDs and the importance of healthy lifestyles to prevent diet related diseases.

• Promote increased production and utilization of nutrient dense indigenous foods to prevent common nutrition related NCDs.

• Enhance public sensitization on healthy diets and lifestyles to reduce diet related diseases conditions.

3.6 Urban NutritionUrban poverty and vulnerability is on the increase affecting about 50% of the people living in informal set-tlements. Urban households spend up to 70 % of their income on staple foods, and are the most affected by inflation of basic food commodities. This impacts negatively on school attendance as families try to cope. On the other hand, there is an increase in diet related chronic diseases as a result of obesity due to utiliza-tion of highly processed foods. This poses a double burden of nutrition nationally.

The objective is to promote optimal nutrition and health for urban dwellers.

Strategic Interventions: • Establish an effective monitoring system to track urban malnutrition and other issues affecting people

living in urban areas.

• Analyse and address the barriers to multi-sectorial scaling up of high impact nutrition interventions in urban areas.

• Promote multi-sectoral coordination, joint planning and implementation by establishing linkages with relevant sectors for enhanced urban nutrition.

3.7 Nutrition in Schools, Public and Private InstitutionsGood nutrition is important for an active, productive and healthy life. Individuals who are confined or spend long hours away for their homes need special nutrition attention to ensure optimum nutritional health. There is need to review and harmonize guidelines for the achievement of adequate nutrition in schools, hospitals, institutions for higher learning, prisons, children’s homes, early childhood development centres, and homes for older persons, among others.

School meals and nutrition program in Kenya is one of the successful institutional meals programs. How-ever, this is only implemented in some parts of the country, mainly to address short term hunger. Many chil-dren go to school without breakfast and do not carry snacks to eat during time spent in school. This leads to under-nutrition and affects learning, resulting in poor performance, absenteeism and dropouts. There is need to improve nutrition status of school children to increase enrolment, retention and performance at school.

Malnutrition in early childhood affects school enrolment, retention and overall performance. Good nutri-tion therefore is essential to realise the learning potential of children and to maximise returns to educational investments. Nutrition education and promotion of good nutrition practices in schools are known to have a significant effect in fostering healthy eating habits. Further, schools provide an ideal setting to promote nutrition education and good nutrition habits early in life.

Institutional meals and nutrition needs to be regulated and monitored to ensure optimal nutrition for differ-ent target groups. Nutrition management in the hospital is disease specific and individualized. Currently, the health management system does not adequately respond to patients’ nutrition needs. In addition, regulatory mechanisms need to be developed or strengthened in order to monitor public health nutrition aspects in all institutions.

The objective is to transition institutional meals and nutrition programs to ensure optimal nutritional health for all individuals in the institutions.

21

Strategic interventions: • Develop, harmonize and disseminate institutional meals and nutrition guidelines to promote the

provision of nutritious meals to individuals in schools, private and public institutions

• Promote appropriate food safety, water sanitation and hygiene interventions in all institutions where provision of meals is part of the programs.

• Promote establishment of agricultural production projects at institutions (gardens, livestock and fish) for diverse foods and income generation.

• Mainstream basic nutrition training curriculum for all meal service providers in schools and other institutions

• Enforce compliance to food standards through capacity building, certification and licensing of food handlers and other service providers in the institutions

• Promote use of time and energy saving technologies to enhance institutional capacity in providing nutritionally adequate diets.

• Establish linkages between routine health and nutrition services providers and institutions

• Scale up home grown institutional meals approaches in all areas

3.8 Food and Nutrition Education in Schools and Institutions The current curriculum for primary and secondary schools, and institutions of higher learning does not include nutrition as a core subject. As a result, a significant proportion of the school population is not ad-equately sensitized on good nutrition. Nutrition education can be a long team measure in addressing the challenges of malnutrition through fostering long term healthy eating habits. This has immediate and long-term health benefits for individuals and their families..

The objective is to create and promote nutrition knowledge in schools and institutions for the achievement of optimal nutritional health and active life.

Strategic interventions: • Integrate food and nutrition education in school curricula at all levels including teacher

training, pre-service and in-service training institutions

• Build the capacity of school management and teachers on early identification of health and nutrition problems and timely referral for appropriate action.

• Develop, review and disseminate appropriate food and nutrition Information, Education and Communication (IEC) materials

• Strengthen and establish young farmers 4K and 4H clubs for demonstrations on production of nutrient rich foods that promote nutrition and health

• Promote linkages between routine health and nutrition services providers, including regular monitoring of nutritional status;

• Support the detection and referral of malnourished individuals to health facilities, counselling services, social protection, or meals programmes and other community agencies and services.

22

23

4.0 FOOD AND NUTRITION DURING CRISIS AND EMERGENCY 4.1 Emergency PreparednessThe main disasters that lead to food and nutrition emergencies in Kenya are droughts, floods, fires, land-slides, armed conflict and displacements, human/wildlife conflicts, political upheavals, pest and diseases outbreak, market disruptions, food price fluctuations, chronic poverty and marginalization. Some disasters such as droughts and floods are predictable and can be planned for with a view to reducing their adverse impact. Generally, poor management of crises in the past have contributed to poor access to water, sanita-tion, health care and erosion of livelihoods, leading to emergencies. The Government is tasked with the protection of people’s right to adequate quantity and quality of food at all times and to ensure that food security and nutrition is sustained even in times of emergencies.

The objective of emergency preparedness is to reduce risk and vulnerability to food insecurity and malnu-trition occasioned by such disasters, thus preventing crises from developing into emergencies.

Strategic interventions: • Strengthen and support early warning system(s) to detect and provide timely crucial information on

potential food insecurity and malnutrition.

• Support integrated vulnerability analysis for emergency preparedness

• Establish and strengthen food and animal feed distribution infrastructure and networks in crisis prone areas.

• Enhance support to appropriate social protection (SP), schemes to protect vulnerable populations.

• Enhance budget support to the Strategic Food Reserves for maintenance of appropriate food reserve stocks and price controls.

• Enhance capacities and opportunities for improving and sustaining food security livelihood assets and strategies.

• Enhance the contingency funds to manage emerging food and nutrition crises.

• Support continuous peace building initiatives and enhancement of national security

• Develop capacity of disaster response institutions to mitigate disasters effectively.

4.2 Emergency ResponseEmergency interventions during crisis are always costly and outweigh the capacity of Government to re-spond in an effective and timely manner. The response to crisis has generally been affected by ineffective coordination, poor resource management and accountability. The decision making processes have been top-down sometimes leading to implementation of programmes in some instances without considering the preferential needs of the recipients. Poor and untimely responses in many cases has in the past led to an increase in malnutrition, loss of lives and livelihoods amongst the affected.

The Government is committed to reducing vulnerability to shocks and to assist those in need when emer-gencies occur and to reduce recurrent food insecurity and malnutrition. Food and nutrition emergencies arise when depleted food supplies are not replaced in the short term which predisposes people to a high risk, or actual rise in mortality due to acute malnutrition. This therefore is considered the most serious public health problem in an emergency. Emergency food security and nutrition interventions are intended to pro-tect affected populations to maintain access to adequate and nutritious food.

The objective is to establish a well-coordinated response mechanism that ensures all persons in emergen-cies receive timely and appropriate assistance to protect their food security and nutritional status and to avoid loss of lives and livelihoods.

24

Strategic interventions:• Strengthen public-private sector for effective coordination mechanisms for efficient and

effective emergency response.

• Streamline and harmonies guidelines for timely management of targeted responses during emergencies

• Promote and support mechanisms for devolved decision making for emergency response

• Strengthen financial and technical capacity of devolved structures to respond to crisis.

• Promote timely operationalization of contingency programmes, plans and funds

• Promote priority intervention actions that minimize the loss of lives and livelihoods

• Promote emergency intervention programs that address special nutrition needs of the affected population.

• Establish an effective monitoring and evaluation system for the assessment of impacts of responses.

4.3 Recovery, Building Resilience and Long-Term DevelopmentRecovery from emergency situations has been poor leading to cumulative loss of livelihood assets. The problem has been accentuated by the climatic variability, global economic downturn, political uprising and conflict over resources. It is therefore necessary to deliberately plan for interventions that link emergency to recovery and long-term development to ultimately lift affected populations out of high vulnerability situ-ations.

All emergency response interventions should have recovery and long term development plans integrated in the programme design. To effectively address the issue of chronic poverty, it is essential to move poor households from relief to resilience and development. Traditionally emergency response and development programming have been distinctly separated in both Government and Development Partner programming.

The objective is to improve post-emergency recovery through resilience building and long term develop-ment in order to reduce vulnerability of the populations to food and nutrition insecurity.

Strategic interventions:• Invest in disaster recovery programmes to mitigate the impact of disasters

• Promote household and community managed disaster risk reduction and resilience building measures

• Promote appropriate social protection schemes to protect communities from food and nutrition insecurity.

• Support integration of Supplementary and Therapeutic feeding programs for populations with specific nutrition needs.

• Promote and support livelihood recovery programs by addressing primary production factors to improve food availability and access.

• Promote programs that activate market functioning and service provision

• Support primary health care/essential nutrition action programmes to promote health and nutrition security.

• Enhance school enrolment, retention and completion rates among food insecure households through appropriate programming.

• Establish and promote livelihood insurance schemes to cushion and support communities to recover from emergencies

25

5.0 FOOD AND NUTRITION INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION5.1 Data Collection and Information Management There are many organizations, both government and non-governmental, involved in food and nutrition programs. Currently, there are several information systems serving different sub-sectors of the agricultural sector yet these are not linked in any way. This situation is compounded by the lack of a harmonised ag-ricultural information management system. Most analyses in food and nutrition are usually conducted for specific purposes and therefore limited in scope and depth. Capacity for cross-sectoral analysis of food and nutrition security is inadequate. There is need to enhance capacity and coordination of food and nutrition information and knowledge systems, including data collection and management.

The objective is to enhance capacity for cross-sectoral data collection and management and coordination to facilitate information sharing and widespread utilization.

Strategic interventions: • Establish and strengthen coordination mechanisms on food and nutrition security

information systems.

• Strengthen capacity of the relevant institutions in cross-sectoral data collection and management at national and county levels.

• Streamline management and sharing of food and nutrition security information and knowledge management systems across sectors.

• Conduct inventory/diagnosis and needs assessment of data collection and management systems for both short and long-term decision making.

• Standardize and harmonize data sets and storage between the two levels of government and in various institutions for improved data sharing.

• Review existing legislation on data collection and sharing to enhance access and transparency

• Develop and implement an audit and validation mechanism to data collection and management

5.2 Information, Education and Communication Although food and nutrition information is available from various sources, the awareness of its existence among the population is low. Information generation and dissemination are not demand driven at the mo-ment. The general packaging and medium of communication are also not always appropriate to the needs of the users. There is therefore, a need to link appropriately packaged information to potential users at all levels.

Strategic interventions: • Strengthen the capacity to collect, collate, analyse and disseminate food and nutrition security

information among all stakeholders.

• Develop and implement communication strategy for food and nutrition security information.

• Develop a mechanism to ensure smooth flow of information between generators and uses of food and nutrition security information

26

27

6.0 INSTITUTIONAL, LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND FINANCINGIntroductionPast food policies in Kenya have not been very successful in addressing food and nutrition insecurity in part because of lack of a results and implementation framework. Other factors that have contributed to inadequacies in implementation include inadequate budgetary allocations, unstable macro-economic condi-tions, limited involvement of all stakeholders, inadequate sectoral coordination, and weak monitoring and evaluation systems.

This chapter sets out the implementation framework consisting of institutional and legal framework, fund-ing, and implementation matrix. The framework takes into consideration the wide range of actors who will be involved in the implementation of the NFNSP. The chapter thus describes a coordinated framework for effective management of resources, by building on the existing structures to implement programs and pro-jects. However, successful implementation requires a parallel advocacy plan based on principles of social justice and equity, environmental sustainability and health as they relate to issues of nutrition and food.

6.1 Institutional Framework Improvement in the country’s food and nutrition security requires multi-dimensional and multi-sectoral in-terventions. In order to achieve the overall goal of food and nutrition security, the complexities of the four dimensions; availability, accessibility, utilization and stability must be addressed concurrently by establish-ing effective linkages for collaboration and coordination of all sectors.

The existing structures lack clarity of function and are not effectively linked and coordinated. As a result, there are gaps and overlaps in dealing with implementation of food and nutrition policies and programs at both national and county levels. It is therefore important to strengthen linkages and put in place institutional structures involving the National and County governments, development partners’ private sector, civil so-ciety, and local communities. To achieve this, certain steps must be taken to establish functional, organiza-tional and legal frameworks. These include establishing effective leadership, coordination and stakeholder platforms at all levels that require the setting up of a National Food and Nutrition Security Council, at both levels Government, Food and Nutrition Security Steering Committees and Secretariats; and/or strengthen-ing Food and Nutrition Security Stakeholder Technical Committees.

The envisaged structures are essential for creating an enabling environment to facilitate multi-sectorial stakeholder participation. These will also enable effective flow of information from policy making to the implementation and beneficiary levels. Figure 3 shows the recommended National Food and Nutrition Se-curity Policy implementation coordination structure.

28

Figure 2: National Food and Nutrition Security Policy Implementation Coordination Structure

6.1.1 National Structures

National Food Security and Nutrition CouncilThe National Food and Nutrition Security Council will be the highest decision making body in the proposed structure. It will provide leadership and a national platform for review of progress on implementation of the National Food and Nutrition Security Policy. The Council will:

• Direct commitment of national resources for effective implementation of the FNS policy

• Provide policy direction, guidance and oversight on food and nutrition security matters

• Direct commitment of national resources for effective implementation of the Food and Nutrition Security strategy

• Approve and oversee the implementation of the National Food and Nutrition Implementation Framework

• Ensure mainstreaming of national food and nutrition policy function by the national and county governments.

Membership of the CouncilThe membership of the Council shall be drawn from both state and non-state actors working on diverse is-sues and in diverse ways in the area of food nutrition and security.

The Membership shall include the following:

i. The Presidency , Chair

ii. Chair of the Council of Governors

29

iii. Cabinet Secretaries responsible for matters related to Food and Nutrition Security: Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries, Health, The National Treasury, Devolution, Planning, Interior ,Coordination of National Government, Water, Irrigation, Education, Industrialization and Enterprise Development

iv. The Head of the National Food and Nutrition Security Secretariat will be an Ex-officio member and Secretary to the Council.

v. The Council may co-opt the following and not limited to representatives from: Strategic Food Reserve/Strategic Food Trust Fund, Apex body for Consumers, Apex body for farmers, Apex body for the private sector, Donors/Development Partners, Civil Society Organizations representative, the United Nations; Science, Research media and Academia

Meetings of the Council1) The Council shall meet at least two times in every financial year and not more than six months shall

elapse between the date of one meeting and the date of the next meeting.

2) The Presidency may convene a special meeting of the Council where it is expedient for the transaction of the business of the Council.

National Food Security and Nutrition Steering CommitteeThe National Food and Nutrition Steering Committee (NFNSC) shall be composed of Principal Secretaries of implementing/line ministries and representatives of the County Executive Committees. The committee shall be chaired by a Principal Secretary on rotational basis as determined by the Committee. The Head of the NFNS Secretariat shall be the secretary of Steering Committee. The committee shall meet at least once every quarter in a fiscal year.

The National Food and Nutrition Steering Committee will:

• Recommend for approval Policies to the Council,

• Provide Policy direction, guidance and oversight to implementing agencies

• Prepare the National Food and Nutrition Security status report to the Council

• Facilitate resource mobilization, allocation, supervision and guidance for FNSP implementation.

• Facilitate cross-section collaboration and cooperation between government ministries, development partners, civil society, the private sector, and academia in addressing Food and Nutrition Security matters

• Facilitate capacity building, research and analysis to improve food and nutrition security

• Coordinate development of national gender and inter-generational responsive public education strategy and implementation program for Food and Nutrition Security

National Food and Nutrition Secretariat (NFNS) It is recommended that The National Food and Nutrition Secretariat (NFN Secretariat) be set up in the Of-fice of the President. The Secretariat shall be headed by a Chief Executive Officer, and will be the Secretary to the Council. The Secretariat shall have at least four desks for coordinating emergencies; monitoring of food production, availability and access; food safety and standards; and monitoring of the SFR. It will work with all relevant institutions to ensure that they work collectively in addressing issues of food and nutrition in the country.

The Secretariat shall be the center of coordination of all actors. It will draw two critical factors into the institutional coordination process and decision making. Firstly it will bring Government and all stakehold-ers (public and private) together; and secondly ensure strong technical competencies are included and co-ordinated in addressing national food and nutrition security challenges. The inclusion of various relevant sectors and stakeholders will ensure appropriate linkages such that each will contribute from their own

30

technical and operational base to achieving the immediate and longer-term objectives. An important early task for the NFN Secretariat is to establish the right set of committees, technical working groups and draw appropriate stakeholders into them.

The mandates of the National Food and Nutrition Secretariat will be to:

• Provide technical support and back-up to the Food and Nutrition Security Council and Steering Committee

• Collate, consolidate, monitor & review progress on performance of key food and nutrition performance indicators and reports

• Analyse budget performance of food and nutrition programmes, constraints to implementation, and provide strategic direction.

• Coordinate development, formulation, review and implementation of national policy, programs, projects and plans that promote food and nutrition security across sectors.

• Monitor and support joint monitoring of food and nutrition security situation, emergency response, including SFR, food safety and quality control

• Support, joint monitoring and evaluation of food and nutrition plans and strategies including ensuring that international obligations are met.

• Facilitate and coordinate broad, multi-sectoral collaboration for effective implementation of all food and nutrition programs in the country.

• Set standards for Food and Nutrition Security actions during and after emergencies

• Convey executive decisions and recommendations to relevant stakeholders

• Create and manage a database on food and nutrition security interventions.

• Prepare progress reports for the NFNSC.

6.1.2 County Institutional Structures In line with the policy on devolution, counties will establish their local coordination structures. County Food and Nutrition Steering Committees will be established supported by a County Food and Nutrition Security Secretariat. The Steering Committees will be chaired by the Governors in each County.

The general role of the county institutions will be to plan, coordinate, implement and monitor food and nutrition security activities. A County may directly establish County Stakeholder Technical Committees (STCs) incorporating recognized local institutions, including communities’ and other stakeholders’ partici-pation to effectively address food and nutrition security concerns.

The Council of GovernorsThe Council of Governors (CoG) deal collectively with matters of public policy and governance that con-cern Counties. In this respect, the role of the Council of Governors shall include identifying priority food and nutrition security programs for their counties in line with the National Policy; considering matters of common interest to County governments and promoting best practice where necessary; mitigating food in-security by promoting linkages between various stakeholders and the national government; and monitoring the implementation of inter- agency and inter-county agreements on food and nutrition security.

County Food and Nutrition Steering Committees (CFNSC) The County Food and Nutrition Security Steering Committees shall provide leadership, oversight and policy guidance to achieve FNS objectives at the county level. The committees will facilitate appropriate linkages between diverse sectors operating in the county to facilitate stakeholder collaboration and harmonization of their activities to achieve the developmental goals. The committees shall approve and monitor all food

31

and nutrition security programs in the county, mobilize resources and recommend commitment of county resources to facilitate implementation of the Food and Nutrition Security programs.

Specific functions of the Steering Committee will be to:

• Provide policy direction, guidance and oversight to implementing agencies at the county level.

• Facilitate preparation and approval of the County Food and Nutrition Security status report for the county executive committee for necessary action.

• Facilitate resource mobilization and allocation for implementation of the FNS activities.

• Facilitate cross-sector collaboration and cooperation between departments, development partners, civil society, the private sector, and academia.

• Facilitate undertaking of research, analysis and uptake to improve food and nutrition security

• Provide the vital link to the County Executive Committee, Assembly and National -level committees.

County Food and Nutrition Security Secretariats (CFNSS) The County FNSS will be set up in the department of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries and directly sup-port the County FNS Steering Committee. It will be responsible for facilitating cross sector collaboration of all stakeholders in the county level. Their role will be to convey decisions of the steering committee and executive to the stakeholder technical; committees and ensure their responses and activities are appropri-ately synchronized. The main functions of the Secretariat will be:

• Consolidate, monitor & review progress on performance of key food and nutrition security indicators.

• Coordinate development, review and implementation of county plans, programs and projects that promote food and nutrition security.

• Support, joint monitoring and evaluation of food and nutrition plans and strategies.

• Coordinate development, review and implementation of County plans, programs and projects that promote food and nutrition security.

• Collate and review progress monitoring reports from counties’ food and nutrition security programs and projects.

• Facilitate and coordinate policy and strategy harmonization, review and formulation as necessary,

• Monitor implementation of policies and convey executive decisions and recommendations to relevant stakeholders.

• Coordinate response and the participation of relevant ministries, institutions, stakeholders for effective implementation of food and nutrition programs in the country.

• Apply National Standards for FNS interventions during emergency and recovery stages in the county.

• Facilitate appropriate horizontal and vertical linkages to promote broad, multi-sectoral collaboration between all stakeholders.

• Prepare quarterly reports on implementation plans and progress reports and report to the NFNS Responsible for knowledge management to facilitate information sharing among all actors, and archiving of FSN data.

• Responsible for consolidation and sharing of food security updates with the national secretariat and communication of feedback to counties.

32

6.1.3 Stakeholder Technical Committees for Food and Nutrition (STC-FN) The STC-FN will provide a platform for cooperation, collaboration and coordination of all food and nutri-tion security programmes. They will be the technical advisory groups responsible for generating pertinent information on food and nutrition security programs to be shared with the Secretariats. The Committees will plan jointly to create synergies and harmonization of programs to avoid overlap and gaps in activities of independent organizations. The stakeholder committees will specifically be responsible for:-

• Implementation and adherence to all relevant government policies and legislation.

• Generation, analysis and sharing of food and nutrition security data and information

• Facilitation and implementation of food security and nutrition security programs and projects

• Implementation protocols and standards on food security and nutrition interventions and responses

• Provision of support to the national and county Food and Nutrition Secretariat (NFNS)

6.2 Legal FrameworkThe “right to food” is a human right. This was first formally recognized by the United Nations in 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), UDHR Article 25, protecting the right for people to feed themselves in dignity. Further, at the UN World Food Summit of 1996, the Heads of States and Govern-ments reaffirmed the right of everyone to have access to safe and nutritious food, consistent with the right to adequate food and the fundamental right of everyone to be free from hunger. They pledged their political will and commitment to achieving food security for all and eradicate poverty and hunger in all countries. In 1990, the United Nations set the Millennium Development Goal to halve the number of people suffering from hunger by 2015. Later, in September 2015, Kenya was among 153 United Nations (UN) countries that unanimously adopted the 17 Sustainable Development Goals of Agenda 2030, among them the common goal to eradicate Hunger. To achieve this goal, everyone must play their part: governments, private sector, civil society and individuals. The Constitution of Kenya 2010: Article 43 (1) (c), Article 53 (l) (c), Article 21 and Article 27 guarantees the right to food and adequate nutrition and the universal right to food and nutritional health, and protection from discrimination.

The Policy implementation process shall involve revision of existing legislation and formulating new laws, regulations and guidelines to ensure availability and access of adequate, safe and quality food; and adher-ence to internationally recognized standards and nutritional guidelines. To ensure food and nutrition secu-rity is achieved, the National and County Governments shall:

• Review/Enact legislation for efficient and effective implementation of the FNSP at both national and county levels.

• Develop regulations and guidelines for implementation of the NFNS Policy

• Support measures to ensure compliance and enforcement of existing laws and regulations on Food and Nutrition Security.

• Establish or review existing laws, regulations and guidelines governing all institutions related to FNSP.

• Domesticate international and regional treaties, declarations and conventions related to food and nutrition security.

• Submit annual report to parliament on the national food and nutrition security status of the country in fulfilling its constitutional obligation.

33

6.3 Financing the Implementation of the Food and Nutrition Security policyThere has been limited awareness and linkage between planning priorities and budgets for food and nutri-tion security. Awareness and commitment needs to be improved to ensure effective planning and increased budgetary allocations for food and nutrition security activities by all sectors. The National and County governments shall commit financial resources annually through the normal budgetary processes to meet the goals of the FNSP. In addition, the National and County Secretariats shall adopt clear and consistent strate-gies for advocacy and resource mobilization over the implementation period.

The County Secretariats will establish specific budget lines for administration, coordination and operational purposes, which should be approved by the County FNS Steering Committees. Detailed rationalised budg-ets developed through consultative processes involving various stakeholders will be drawn each year to fund specific activities of the Secretariats.

The objective is to achieve high level commitment and increase overall budgetary allocation for food and nutrition activities.

Strategic interventions• Introduce specific budget lines for sustainable implementation of Food and Nutrition Security

programs/projects at both National and County levels.

• Establish resource mobilization desks for the inclusion of all stakeholders in financing Food and Nutrition Security programs/projects

• Develop guidelines for access and allocation of Food and Nutrition Security funds by various stakeholders

• Establish a mechanism for maintaining accountability and auditing in utilization of the Food and Nutrition Security funds

34

35

7.0 IMPLEMENTATION MATRIXThe past Food and Nutrition Security Policies have not shown significant impact because Policy documents are often shelved and not implemented. This is partly attributed to lack of high level commitment and lead-ership in implementation of policies. Consequently, resources allocated for roll out and full implementa-tions of Policy interventions are usually inadequate. In this IF, it is recognized that a FNS policy without feasible plans, funds, and cross linkages between programs cannot work. The Implementation Matrix pre-sented in Appendix 1 highlights the desired objectives and outcomes, including the necessary interventions with associated indicative budgets for each program area. The mandates, roles and functions of the wide range of actors to be involved in its implementation and their contribution to the overall Policy objective is recognized.

The detailed indicative budgets on specific sub-programs are provided in the Implementation Matrix (Ap-pendix 1). The matrix indicates the critical interventions that should be undertaken according to the speci-fied time-frames in order to successfully achieve the desired food and nutrition security impact. This will require a combination of immediate, short term and long term interventions. The matrix is informed by estimates from ongoing FNS programs, including Vision 2030 among others. For each intervention area, lead ministries/agencies are identified (highlighted in the Table in Appendix 1) together with the collaborat-ing link agencies for which work plans and result matrices will be developed. It will be therefore important to harmonize all new and follow-on projects, matching the priorities identified, to support the priorities of this Implementation framework.

36

8.0 THE STRATEGIC RESULTS FRAMEWORK A key part of the Implementation Framework is the Strategic Results Framework that sets out the goals, objectives and outcomes that build a logical framework to achieve food and nutrition security (figure 3). This will create a strategic frame where programs fit together and support the higher level goal and objectives.

The Implementation Framework operates as an effective communication tool as it succinctly captures the elements of the multi-sector approach. Further, the harmonization of programs by the counties, develop-ment partners and other investors will be facilitated through the use of this Strategic Results Framework. The design of individual programs and the selection of their inputs, outputs and outcomes will be driven by this results framework. The existing food and nutrition programs operating across multiple sectors also have outcomes that support the planned results.

As illustrated in the results framework ( Figure 3), the first objective — improved (nutritious) food avail-ability and access — will be supported by achieving three outcomes, namely: improved household resource productivity; improved national food availability; and improved food/market access and incomes. The sec-ond objective — improved quality and safety of food — will be supported by achieving improved food safety and quality control, improved public food service and domestic water supply. The third objective — which is improved food utilization/consumption for maximum health and minimum disease, is expected to be achieved through four main outcomes: improved nutrition in public institutions and among consumers; improved food and nutrition education in schools; improved food nutrition in crisis and emergency; and im-proved food nutrition information and communication, and improved water availability, access and safety.

This Implementation Framework also provides a hierarchy of results and a set of indicators needed to design and implement a robust monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system. An effective M&E system is critical to monitoring and comparing county performance and information arising from the performance indicators will therefore be useful in revising and improving implementation of programs.

Program 2Improvement of food production

and processing

Program 3

Improvement of

household resource

productivity

Program 4Improvement of Food safety and

quality

Program 5Improvement of Food

Service and Public Health

Program 6Improvem

ent of Domestic

Water Supply

Program 7

Improvement of Nutrition

Program 8Improved Food and

Nutrition in Crisis and

Emergency

Program 9Improved Food and Nutrition

Education in

Institutions

Program 10

Improvement of

Domestic Water

Availability Supply

Program 1Improvement of food

and markets access

Result 1:Improved food availability and

access

Result 3: Improved Food Utilization and

Nutritional Health

Result 2:Improved Food

Quality and Safety

GOAL:Improved Food and Nutrition

Figure 3: Schematic Representation of the National Food and Nutrition Security Results Framework

37

9.0 MONITORING AND EVALUATIONIntroductionAn effective, harmonized and well coordinated Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) framework is an im-portant aspect of the overall strategy given that a wide range of actors are involved in the implementation of the Food and Nutrition Security programs and for the management of the available resources. The aim is to determine a set of appropriate indicators to measure performance and results during implementation of the food and nutrition security programs. The common results framework in the implementation matrix will guide the development of objectively verifiable indicators and performance targets. Overall, a set of performance indicators for each thematic area are provided in Appendix 2.

The Secretariats will refer to the results framework to harmonize outcomes, and draw indicators for the performance targets at each level. The results framework provides missing linkage between policy and im-plementation of food and nutrition security programs and the results framework. This will show the causal linkage and enable effective performance monitoring toward achievement of our National Food and Nutri-tion Security Goal.

9.1 Rationale and ObjectivesMonitoring feedback for policy makers and other stakeholders on the outcomes of their interventions is important. The rationale for putting in place a food and nutrition security monitoring system is to provide feedback information concerning emerging developments, which in turn would form the basis for program design/redesign and implementation during planning. A participatory M&E system helps to improve pro-gram design and delivery; and also provides the basis for timely corrective actions in case of poor per-formance. The objectives is to institutionalise effective M&E and link Food and Nutrition Security invest-ments to other development programs.

A robust monitoring and evaluation tool shall be designed to collect and analyze information on all indica-tors covering the four food and nutrition security pillars. This will effectively stimulate the active participa-tion and reporting of all stakeholders in order to ensure improved planning and implementation of programs towards the achievement of the common FNS goal.

9.2 Performance Indicators The monitoring and evaluation of policy impact on food and nutrition security would require taking into account the long term measurement of global level performance indicators and the national sectoral goals and objectives. Careful selection of indicators at all levels is therefore crucial for effective monitoring and evaluation. The selection of program performance indicators should take place at the design stage of each of the food and nutrition security programs areas, and harmonized with the Strategic Results Framework (Figure 3).

The indicators should take into consideration the program objectives and outputs, and include performance measures for activities and inputs. Outcome or impact indicators measure the effect of activities in respect of the extent to which they meet the set objectives, while process and output indicators measure how activi-ties are planned and implemented.

The national indicators considered in the M&E framework is illustrated in Table 3. The elements of food security and nutrition as illustrated in Figure 1 and the goals and programs of the FSNP-IF shown in Figure 3 provide a framework for determining the major categories of indicators related to the four dimensions of food and nutrition security; —improved food availability, increased food access, increased stability in food pro-duction, reduced vulnerability and nutritional adequacy. These indicators include increased food production, improved food access and food markets, increased income of households and individuals, reduced inflation, reduced consumer price index, and increased employment opportunities. Others are stable food production, increased food stocks, increased food intake, more appropriate food use, and increased nourishment. Howev-

38

er, the precise indicators and measures will depend on the program and aspect of food security it is addressing, taking into account the specific nature of target groups, such as women, children and farmers, consumers e.t.c.

39

10 RISK ASSESSMENTRisk analysis is the systematic use of available information to determine how often specified events may occur and the magnitude of their consequences. Risk evaluation is used to determine risk management pri-orities whereby the level of risk is compared against predetermined standards or target risk levels.

The successful implementation of the FNSP will require enhanced coordination of the relevant stakehold-ers. In addition, political goodwill and support is necessary to provide an enabling environment for policy implementation, including adequate resources and accountability. The threats to food and nutrition security require constant monitoring and assessment for appropriate mitigation and accountability measures.

The highly consultative process through which the policy and Implementation Framework were developed provides an opportunity for the harmony and therefore efficiency with which the implementing minis-tries and other collaborators will perform. Furthermore, considering that Kenya has successfully managed food and nutrition security crisis and emergencies, through the Kenya Food and Nutrition Security Meeting (KFSM), the institutional memory will provide vital lessons learnt for this implementation framework for the Policy. Table 3 and Table 4 show the risk priority listing, risk analysis and evaluation matrix.

Table 1: Priority listing of risks

Likelihood of OccurenceImpact

High Medium Low

Highf 5 4 3Medium 4 3 2Low 3 2 1

Key: The Numers represent the risk ranking:- Where 5 is High and 1 is Low

Table 2: Risk Analysis and Evaluation Matrix

Risk event Risk consequence Likelihood Impact Risk priority Strategy Responsibility

Inadequate political support

Inadequate funding affecting implementation

Medium High 4 •Adapt FSNP-IF to the changed political landscape, identifying new key stakeholders and frameworks in which they operate

•Stakeholder advocacy to maintain momentum for implementation.

• Empowerment of rural communities in the monitoring process.

FNS Council,Development Partners Civil society

Inadequate funding

•Activities slowed or halted.

• Implementation linkages and relationships disrupted.

High High 5 •Maintain dialogue with Development Partner funders to facilitate funding forecasts.

• Identify possible alternative funding streams.

• Identify and adopt contingency plans based on priority interventions.

FNS Council,FNS Secretariats, Development Partners

40

Risk event Risk consequence Likelihood Impact Risk priority Strategy Responsibility

Mechanisms for financial management and external funding not consolidated

Timely implementation of activities disrupted

medium High 3 Streamline financial management system with a view to enhancing accountability and reducing red-tape.

FNS Council, Development Partners

Disasters (drought, floods, landslides, fires, earthquakes)

•Unable to respond to disasters on time and therefore unable to achieve the national/county FSNS goals and objectives

Medium High 5 •Monitor situation and develop contingency plans.

•Estsblish contingency fund for Instituting mitigation plans and early response.

•Mainstream in all relevant sectors.

FNS Council, FNS Secretariats, Development Partners

Deterioration in security

• Interruption of FNS programs, projects and communication infrastructure. Human safety risk.

Medium High 4 Continous monitoring through early warning system and development of effective contingency plans

FNS Council, FNS Secretariats, Ministry of Interior and Coordination of Government.

Poor adherence to financial agreements

• Ineffective and inefficient program implementation.

•Poor accountability and credibility in implementation of FNS programs and

Low Medium 3 •All stakeholders to promote accountability as part of program sensitization and ensure transparent procedures.

•Ensure monitoring systems are in place with appropriate mechanisms for enforcing compliance consistent with legislative requirements.

•Enhance feedback mechanisms between implementers and accounting officers.

FNS Council, Development Partners

Resistance to collaboration by key stakeholders

•Fragmentation and duplication of FNS programs and projects

•Lack of accountability, confusion and mistrust among stakeholders

Low High 4 • Initiate regular dialogue with stakeholders at all levels.

•Sensitization and development of stakeholder operational and consultation procedures

• Joint planning and prioritization of interventions by all stakeholders

•Regular reporting and briefings on the programs.

FNS CouncilFNS Secretariats, Development Partners Beneficiary communities

41

Risk event Risk consequence Likelihood Impact Risk priority Strategy Responsibility

Poor resource absorption and responsive capacity management of the collaborating partners

•Resource wastage.•Support

constricted.•FSNP-IF

objectives not realised to the detriment of beneficiaries.

Medium Medium 4 •Sound and effective work plans

•Streamlining and reduction of ecessive procurement procedures and bureaucracy.

•Effective monitoring and support at all levels.

FNS Secretariat, Development Partners

42

APP

ENDI

X I:

IMPL

EMEN

TATIO

N M

ATR

IX

FOO

D SE

CUR

ITY

PRIO

RITY

ARE

AS,

RES

ULTS

, IN

TERV

ENTIO

NS

AN

D BU

DGET

S

RE

SULT

AR

EA

1:I

MPR

OV

ING

FO

OD

AVA

ILA

BIL

TY

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(Mill

. KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

2.1

Nat

iona

l foo

d Av

aila

bilit

y2.

1.2.

Impr

ovin

g do

mes

tic fo

od

avai

labi

lity

To in

crea

se fo

od

prod

uctiv

ity a

nd

prod

uctio

n of

food

th

at is

div

ersi

fied

affor

dabl

e an

d ab

le to

mee

t

dive

rse

nutri

tiona

l re

quire

men

ts o

f all

peop

le.

Agr

icul

tura

l fun

d Es

tabl

ishe

dEs

tabl

ish

an A

gric

ultu

ral D

evel

opm

ent F

und

200

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

Tre

asur

y,

DP,

CG

Fund

ing

to a

gric

ultu

re se

ctor

en

hanc

ed to

10%

of n

atio

nal b

udge

t.In

crea

se fu

ndin

g to

the

food

and

agr

icul

ture

se

ctor

s to

10%

of t

he n

atio

nal b

udge

t20

17-2

022

Sust

aina

ble

food

pro

duct

ion

syst

ems

prom

oted

Prom

ote

sust

aina

ble

food

pro

duct

ion

syst

ems

100

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

CG

, DP,

Incr

ease

d nu

trien

t-ric

h fo

ods

prod

uced

Prom

ote

prod

uctio

n of

trad

ition

al h

igh

valu

e an

d nu

trien

t-ric

h fo

ods

250

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

CG

Irrig

atio

n an

d w

ater

man

agem

ent

syst

ems p

rom

oted

and

supp

orte

dPr

omot

e an

d su

ppor

t sus

tain

able

irrig

atio

n an

d w

ater

man

agem

ent s

yste

ms

100

2017

-202

2M

WI,

MO

ALF

, DP,

C

GIm

prov

ed a

cces

sibi

lity

to a

fford

able

fa

rm in

puts

and

cre

dits

.Im

prov

e ac

cess

ibili

ty to

affo

rdab

le fa

rm in

puts

an

d cr

edits

700

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

CG

, DP,

Incr

ease

d co

nser

vatio

n of

Nat

ural

re

sour

ces.

Prom

ote

natu

ral r

esou

rce

man

agem

ent f

or

impr

oved

liv

elih

oods

100

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

CG

, MEN

R,

DP

Incr

ease

d in

vest

men

ts in

in

fras

truct

ure

deve

lopm

ent t

o in

crea

se

food

pro

duct

ion

and

avai

labi

lity

Supp

ort i

nves

tmen

ts in

infr

astru

ctur

e, to

in

crea

se fo

od p

rodu

ctio

n; a

nd a

vaila

bilit

y40

020

17-2

022

MO

AL

F, C

G, D

P

Clim

ate

chan

ge a

dapt

atio

n an

d m

itiga

tion

prac

tices

in a

gric

ultu

ral

deve

lopm

ent p

rogr

amm

es a

nd p

olic

ies

adop

ted

Prom

ote

inte

grat

ion

of c

limat

e ch

ange

ad

apta

tion

and

miti

gatio

n pr

actic

es in

ag

ricul

tura

l dev

elop

men

t pro

gram

mes

and

po

licie

s

8020

17-2

022

MO

AL

F, C

G, M

WI,

MEN

R, D

P

Urb

an a

nd p

eri-u

rban

agr

icul

ture

pr

omot

ed fo

r bet

ter f

ood

and

nutri

tion

secu

rity.

Prom

ote

Urb

an a

nd P

eri-U

rban

agr

icul

ture

to

impr

ove

food

ava

ilabi

lity

and

acce

ss fo

r bet

ter

nutri

tion

100

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

CG

, DP,

43

RE

SULT

AR

EA

1:I

MPR

OV

ING

FO

OD

AVA

ILA

BIL

TY

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(Mill

. KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

Sub

Tota

l2,

030

2.1.

3 D

omes

tic,

Reg

iona

l and

In

tern

atio

nal F

ood

Trad

e

To p

rom

ote

natio

nal

food

ava

ilabi

lity

and

acce

ss th

roug

h st

rate

gic

liber

aliz

atio

n of

food

trad

e an

d pr

ivat

e se

ctor

pa

rtici

patio

n al

ong

the

valu

e ch

ains

Har

mon

ized

food

and

rela

ted

trade

po

licie

s and

regu

latio

ns to

enh

ance

fo

od fl

ow.

Rev

iew

and

har

mon

ise

the

exis

ting

food

and

re

late

d tra

de p

olic

ies a

nd re

gula

tions

2020

17-2

022

MO

TE

&I,

MFA

Impo

ved

acce

ss to

food

by

addr

essi

ng

the

high

cos

t of p

rodu

ctio

n.In

crea

se th

e co

mpe

titiv

enes

s of K

enya

’s

agric

ultu

ral p

rodu

ce b

y ad

dres

sing

the

high

co

st o

f pro

duct

ion.

5020

17-2

022

MO

AL

F, C

G, M

FA

Incr

ease

d do

mes

tic, r

egio

nal a

nd

inte

rnat

iona

l foo

d tra

de

Prom

ote

dom

estic

, reg

iona

l and

inte

rnat

iona

l fo

od tr

ade

100

2017

-202

2M

OT

E&

I, M

FA,

EAC

& IT

Food

safe

ty a

nd q

ualit

y st

anda

rds a

nd

regu

latio

ns h

arm

oniz

ed.

Supp

ort h

arm

oniz

atio

n of

regi

onal

and

in

tern

atio

nal f

ood

safe

ty a

nd q

ualit

y st

anda

rds

and

regu

latio

ns to

impr

ove

heal

th

100

2017

-202

2M

OH

, MO

ALF

, MFA

Agr

ibus

ines

s Cou

ncil

esta

blis

hed

and

oper

atio

naliz

edIn

stitu

tiona

lize

mul

ti-se

ctor

al fo

od a

nd

agric

ultu

ral t

rade

, pol

icy

form

ulat

ion

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d co

ordi

natio

n (C

reat

e an

ag

ribus

ines

s Cou

ncil)

200

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

MO

TE&

In

dust

rializ

atio

n

Trad

e su

bsid

ies a

nd o

ther

bar

riers

by

trade

par

tner

s neg

otia

ted

and

rem

oved

Neg

otia

te fo

r the

rem

oval

of f

ree

trade

bar

riers

by

trad

e pa

rtner

s10

2017

-202

2M

OT

E&

I, Tr

easu

ry,

MO

ALF

,In

reas

ed ir

rigat

ed a

gric

ultu

reIm

prov

e irr

igat

ion

infr

astru

ctur

e to

pro

mot

e irr

igat

ed a

gric

ultu

re60

2017

-202

2M

oWI,

MoA

LF

Incr

ease

d w

ater

har

vest

ing

and

stio

rage

Wat

er h

arve

stin

g a

nd st

orag

e50

2017

-202

2M

oWI,

MoA

LF

Sub

Tota

l

590

44

RE

SULT

AR

EA

1:I

MPR

OV

ING

FO

OD

AVA

ILA

BIL

TY

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(Mill

. KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

2.1.

4 A

gro-

Proc

essi

ng a

nd

Valu

e-A

dditi

on

To in

crea

se th

e le

vel

of v

alue

-add

ition

for

agric

ultu

ral p

rodu

ce

mea

nt fo

r dom

estic

an

d ex

port

mar

kets

th

roug

h ad

optio

n of

app

ropr

iate

te

chno

logy

.

Tax

ince

ntiv

es to

pro

mot

e va

lue-

addi

tion

and

agro

-pro

cess

ing

indu

strie

s bot

h in

rura

l and

urb

an

area

s in

plac

e

Prov

ide

tax

ince

ntiv

es to

pro

mot

e va

lue-

addi

tion

and

agro

-pro

cess

ing

indu

strie

s bot

h in

ru

ral a

nd u

rban

are

as

500

2017

-202

2Tr

easu

ry,

MO

ALF

, MO

TE&

In

dust

rializ

atio

n

Fund

for s

uppo

rting

SM

ES in

Agr

o-pr

oces

sing

est

ablis

hed

Esta

blis

h a

fund

to su

ppor

t SM

Es in

volv

ed

in a

gro-

proc

essi

ng a

nd o

ther

mea

ns o

f val

ue

addi

tion

500

2017

-202

2Tr

easu

ry, M

OA

LF,

MO

TE&

I

Incr

ease

d nu

mbe

r of y

outh

and

w

omen

acc

essi

ng a

lloca

ted

fund

s for

in

vest

men

t in

valu

e-ad

ditio

n, c

otta

ge

indu

strie

s and

agr

o-pr

oces

sing

Empo

wer

you

th a

nd w

omen

to u

tiliz

e al

loca

ted

fund

s for

pro

mot

ion

of v

alue

-ad

ditio

n, c

otta

ge in

dust

ries a

nd a

gro-

proc

essi

ng d

evel

opm

ent.

500

2017

-202

2M

OT

E&

I, Tr

easu

ry,

MO

ALF

,

Key

infr

astru

ctur

e su

ch a

s roa

ds,

pow

er a

nd w

ater

bot

h in

rura

l and

ur

ban

area

s to

stim

ulat

e de

velo

pmen

t of

val

ue-a

dditi

on p

roce

sses

dev

elop

ed

Dev

elop

key

infr

astru

ctur

e su

ch a

s roa

ds,

pow

er a

nd w

ater

bot

h in

rura

l and

urb

an a

reas

to

stim

ulat

e de

velo

pmen

t of v

alue

-add

ition

pr

oces

ses

800

2017

-202

2M

oI T

reas

ury,

DP

Agr

o-pr

oces

sors

, par

ticul

arly

SM

Es,

able

to m

eet i

nter

natio

nal q

ualit

y an

d sa

fety

stan

dard

s

Dev

elop

cap

acity

of a

gro-

proc

esso

rs,

parti

cula

rly S

MEs

, to

mee

t int

erna

tiona

l qu

ality

and

safe

ty st

anda

rds

100

2017

-202

2M

OT

E&

I, Tr

easu

ry,

MO

ALF

,

Res

earc

h fo

r app

ropr

iate

pro

cess

ing

met

hods

and

equ

ipm

ent s

uita

ble

to

smal

l sca

le e

nter

pris

e ne

eds p

rom

oted

an

d ad

optio

n

Prom

ote

rese

arch

and

ado

ptio

n fo

r app

ropr

iate

pr

oces

sing

met

hods

and

equ

ipm

ent s

uita

ble

to

smal

l sca

le e

nter

pris

e ne

eds

9020

17-2

022

MO

E, T

reas

ury

Incr

ease

d nu

mbe

r of v

alue

add

ition

pr

oduc

ts a

nd e

quip

men

t Pr

omot

e te

chno

logy

incu

batio

n or

val

ue

addi

tion

equi

pmen

t dev

elop

men

t.10

020

17-2

022

MO

TE

&I,

NA

CO

STI

Trea

sury

, MO

ALF

,Su

b To

tal

2,59

02.

1.5

Impr

ovin

g fo

od st

orag

e fa

cilit

ies

To p

rom

ote

appr

opria

te st

orag

e pr

actic

es a

nd

expa

nsio

n of

stor

age

faci

litie

s to

ext

end

shel

f life

and

redu

ce

farm

loss

es

Impr

oved

food

stor

age

stru

ctur

es a

nd

prac

tices

Prom

ote

appr

opria

te h

ouse

hold

food

stor

age

stru

ctur

es a

nd p

ract

ices

for i

npro

ved

food

and

nu

tritio

n se

curit

y

2520

17-2

022

MoA

LF

Impr

oved

inst

itutio

nal a

nd fa

rmer

s ca

paci

ty to

man

age

food

stor

age

faci

litie

s

Dev

elop

farm

ers’

capa

city

for m

anag

emen

t of

appr

opria

te st

orag

e fa

cilit

ies f

rom

com

mun

ity

to n

atio

nal l

evel

.

5020

17-2

022

MoA

LF

Sub

Tota

l75

45

RE

SULT

AR

EA

1:I

MPR

OV

ING

FO

OD

AVA

ILA

BIL

TY

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(Mill

. KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

2.1.

6 St

rate

gic

Food

Res

erve

To

div

ersi

fy a

nd a

ttain

su

ffici

ent n

utrit

ious

fo

ods i

n th

e SF

R to

st

abili

ze fo

od su

pply

an

d fo

od m

arke

t pric

es

Rec

omm

ende

d St

rate

gic

Food

R

eser

ve b

udge

t inc

reas

ed a

nd o

ther

cr

itica

l foo

d st

uffs i

nclu

ded:

sorg

hum

, m

illet

, ric

e, p

ulse

s, m

ilk, m

eat,

fish,

ro

ot c

rops

, fru

its, n

uts a

nd li

vest

ock

feed

s

Incr

ease

bud

get s

uppo

rt to

the

Stra

tegi

c Fo

od

Res

erve

to in

clud

e ot

her c

ritic

al fo

odst

uffs

such

as s

orgh

um, m

illet

, ric

e, p

ulse

s, m

ilk,

mea

t, fis

h, ro

ot c

rops

, fru

its, n

uts a

nd li

vest

ock

feed

s

39,0

0020

17-2

022

Trea

sury

, M

OA

LF, N

CPB

Ade

quat

e SF

R st

ock

and

cash

leve

ls

achi

eved

and

mai

ntai

ned

base

d on

de

mog

raph

ic, e

cono

mic

and

clim

ate

dyna

mic

s

Reg

ular

ly re

view

the

appr

opria

te st

ock

and

cash

leve

ls fo

r the

SFR

bas

ed o

n de

mog

raph

ic,

econ

omic

and

clim

ate

dyna

mic

s

2020

17-2

022

Trea

sury

, M

OA

LF, N

CPB

SFR

man

agem

ent i

nstit

utio

naliz

ed

and

esta

blis

hed

at b

oth

Nat

iona

l and

C

ount

y le

vels

.

Stre

ngth

en m

anag

emen

t of S

FR a

t nat

iona

l an

d C

ount

y le

vels

200

2017

-202

2M

OA

F, C

G

SFR

effe

ctiv

ely

man

aged

. En

cour

age

cont

inuo

us re

sear

ch a

nd te

chno

logy

tra

nsfe

r on

pres

erva

tion

tech

nolo

gies

In

stitu

tiona

lise

man

agem

ent o

f SFR

8020

17-2

022

MO

E, K

AR

LO

Sub

Tota

l39

,300

2.1.

7 C

omm

erci

aliz

atio

n of

Agr

icul

ture

To in

crea

se n

et

inco

mes

from

farm

ing

and

rela

ted

valu

e ch

ain

activ

ities

.

Cap

acity

of f

arm

ers,

SME,

co

oper

ativ

es t

o un

derta

ke fa

rmin

g as

a

busi

ness

enh

ance

d

Stre

ngth

en c

apac

ity o

f far

mer

s, SM

Es a

nd

Coo

pera

tives

to u

nder

take

farm

ing

as a

bu

sine

ss a

cros

s the

com

mod

ity v

alue

-cha

ins

100

2017

-202

2M

DP,

MO

ALF

, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts

Supp

ort s

ervi

ces i

nclu

ding

ext

ensi

on

and

prov

isio

n of

fina

ncia

l ser

vice

s fo

r sus

tain

able

com

mer

cial

izat

ion

of

Agr

icul

ture

stre

ngth

ened

Stre

ngth

en su

ppor

t ser

vice

s inc

ludi

ng

exte

nsio

n an

d pr

ovis

ion

of fi

nanc

ial s

ervi

ces

for s

usta

inab

le c

omm

erci

aliz

atio

n of

A

gric

ultu

re.

100

2017

-202

2M

DP,

MO

ALF

, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts

Con

sum

ptio

n of

loca

lly p

rodu

ced

agric

ultu

ral p

rodu

cts i

ncre

ased

Prom

ote

deve

lopm

ent a

nd c

onsu

mpt

ion

of

loca

lly p

rodu

ced

agric

ultu

ral p

rodu

cts.

100

2017

-202

2 M

OA

LF,

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, MT&

In

dust

ryLi

nkag

es b

etw

een

supp

ly a

nd m

arke

t de

man

ds st

reng

then

ed.

Prom

ote

linka

ges b

etw

een

food

supp

ly a

nd

mar

ket d

eman

ds th

roug

h Pu

blic

Priv

ate

Partn

ersh

ips

3020

17-2

022

MD

P, M

OA

LF,

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

46

RE

SULT

AR

EA

1:I

MPR

OV

ING

FO

OD

AVA

ILA

BIL

TY

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(Mill

. KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

Legi

slat

ion

and

regu

latio

ns o

n fo

od

mar

ketin

g an

d in

stitu

tions

to p

rote

ct

all a

ctor

s alo

ng c

omm

odity

val

ue

chai

ns in

pla

ce

Stre

ngth

en le

gisl

atio

n an

d re

gula

tions

of f

ood

mar

ketin

g an

d in

stitu

tions

to p

rote

ct a

ll ac

tors

al

ong

com

mod

ity v

alue

cha

ins

2020

17-2

022

MD

P, M

OA

LF,

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, K

AR

LO, A

FA

Agr

icul

tura

l res

earc

h, in

nova

tion

and

tech

nolo

gy tr

ansf

er p

rom

oted

Prom

ote

agric

ultu

ral r

esea

rch,

inno

vatio

n an

d te

chno

logy

tran

sfer

and

upt

ake

in p

rodu

ctio

n an

d po

st-h

arve

st m

anag

emen

t

6020

17-2

022

MD

P, M

OA

LF,

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

Taxa

tion

regi

me

to a

void

mul

tiple

ta

xatio

n al

ong

the

food

com

mod

ities

va

lue

chai

ns st

ream

lined

Stre

amlin

e th

e ta

xatio

n re

gim

e fo

r foo

d co

mm

oditi

es to

avo

id m

ultip

le ta

xatio

n al

ong

the

valu

e ch

ains

520

17-2

022

MD

P, M

OA

LF,

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, K

AR

LO, T

reas

ury,

M

FASu

b To

tal

415

RE

SULT

AR

EA

1:I

MPR

OV

ING

FO

OD

AC

CE

SSIB

ILIT

Y

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(Mill

. KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

2.3

Nat

iona

l foo

d A

cces

sibi

lity

2.2.

1. Im

prov

emen

t an

d Ex

pans

ion

of

On-

Farm

and

Off-

Farm

Em

ploy

men

t

To e

nhan

ce ru

ral

empl

oym

ent

oppo

rtuni

ties a

s a

mea

ns o

f inc

reas

ing

the

leve

l of f

ood

and

nutri

tion

secu

rity

Impr

oved

acc

ess t

o H

ouse

hold

re

sour

ces

Supp

ort m

easu

res t

hat i

mpr

ove

secu

rity

and

acce

ss to

land

, wat

er a

nd te

chno

logi

es

espe

cial

ly b

y w

omen

, pas

tora

lists

and

chi

ld-

head

ed h

ouse

hold

s

200

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

Tre

asur

y,

DP,

CG

Prod

uctio

n a

nd m

arke

ting

of

smal

lhol

der p

rodu

ce e

nhan

ced.

Supp

ort c

oope

rativ

es, o

ut-g

row

er sc

hem

es a

nd

fair

trade

pol

icie

s to

incr

ease

the

shar

e of

smal

l pr

oduc

ers i

n th

e pr

oduc

tion

and

expo

rt of

hig

h va

lue

crop

s and

live

stoc

k

200

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, MT&

In

dust

ry

Impr

oved

food

acc

ess

Rev

iew

min

imum

wag

es re

gula

rly to

take

ac

coun

t of f

ood

and

nutri

tion

need

s, in

flatio

n ra

tes a

nd la

bour

pro

duct

ivity

100

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

CG

, DP,

CG

47

RE

SULT

AR

EA

1:I

MPR

OV

ING

FO

OD

AC

CE

SSIB

ILIT

Y

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(Mill

. KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

Incr

ease

d fo

od tr

ade

Sim

plify

bus

ines

s reg

istra

tion,

lice

nsin

g an

d re

gula

tion

thro

ugh

the

intro

duct

ion

of

mul

ti-us

er li

cenc

es a

nd o

pera

tiona

lizat

ion

of th

e Si

ngle

Bus

ines

s Per

mits

to m

inim

ize

bure

aucr

acy

5020

17-2

022

MO

AL

F, C

G

Incr

ease

d fo

od p

rodu

ctio

nPr

ovid

e le

gal a

nd in

stitu

tiona

l sup

port

to sm

all

rura

l ent

erpr

ises

5020

17-2

022

MW

I, M

OA

LF, D

P,

CG

Incr

ease

d an

d di

vers

ified

food

pr

oduc

tion

Enha

nce

linka

ges w

ith tr

aini

ng in

stitu

tions

to

dive

rsify

tech

nolo

gica

l inn

ovat

ions

, res

earc

h an

d de

velo

pmen

t

250

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

CG

, DP,

Incr

ease

d fo

od tr

ade

and

valu

e ad

ditio

nSt

reng

then

bus

ines

s lin

kage

opp

ortu

nitie

s by

enc

oura

ging

the

esta

blis

hmen

t of a

gro-

proc

essi

ng e

nter

pris

es

400

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

CG

, MEN

R,

DP

Inpr

oved

food

acc

ess

Supp

ort i

nves

tmen

t in

rura

l inf

rast

ruct

ure

incl

udin

g ac

cess

road

s and

loca

lly g

ener

ated

re

new

able

ene

rgy

to lo

wer

pro

duct

ion

and

mar

ketin

g co

sts

200

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

CG

, DP

Sub

Tota

l1,

450

2.2.

2 Im

prov

emen

t of

Urb

an a

nd

Peri-

Urb

an F

ood

Acc

essi

bilit

y

To p

rom

ote

and

regu

late

safe

per

i-ur

ban

agric

ultu

re a

nd

to im

prov

e ho

useh

old

inco

mes

in o

rder

to

enh

ance

food

ac

cess

ibili

ty

Polic

y im

plem

ente

dFa

st tr

ack

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

mic

ro, s

mal

l an

d m

ediu

m e

nter

pris

es (M

SME)

pol

icy.

2020

17-2

022

MO

TE

&I,

MFA

Reg

ulat

ory

fram

ewor

k in

pla

ce a

nd

enfo

rced

Rev

iew

and

stre

amlin

e re

gula

tory

fram

ewor

ks

gove

rnin

g ur

ban

and

peri-

urba

n ag

ricul

ture

.20

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, MFA

Rev

iew

and

stre

amlin

e re

gula

tory

fram

ewor

ks

gove

rnin

g fo

rmal

and

info

rmal

sect

ors

focu

sing

on

empl

oym

ent c

reat

ion

and

pove

rty

alle

viat

ion.

5020

17-2

022

MO

TE

&I,

MFA

, EA

C &

IT, D

P, C

oG

48

RE

SULT

AR

EA

1:I

MPR

OV

ING

FO

OD

AC

CE

SSIB

ILIT

Y

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(Mill

. KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

Impr

oved

food

pro

cess

ing

skill

sSu

ppor

t and

pro

mot

e m

echa

nism

s to

enha

nce

agro

-pro

cess

ing,

smal

l bus

ines

ses a

nd

entre

pren

euria

l ski

lls.

200

2017

-202

2M

OH

, MO

ALF

, M

FA, D

P, C

oG

App

ropr

iate

wor

king

env

ironm

ent a

nd

suita

ble

zone

s for

the

info

rmal

sect

orPr

ovid

e an

app

ropr

iate

wor

king

env

ironm

ent

and

suita

ble

zone

s for

the

info

rmal

sect

or.

100

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,

MO

TE&

In

dust

rializ

atio

n, D

P,

CoG

Inco

me

gene

ratio

n ca

paci

ty o

f vu

lner

able

peo

ple

enha

nced

Supp

ort a

ctiv

ities

that

enh

ance

the

inco

me

gene

ratio

n ca

paci

ty o

f vul

nera

ble

peop

le w

ith

spec

ial n

eeds

.

500

2017

-202

2M

OT

E&

I, Tr

easu

ry,

MO

ALF

, CoG

Safe

food

pro

duct

ion

in u

rban

and

pe

ri-ur

ban

area

sPr

omot

e ur

ban

and

peri-

urba

n ag

ricul

tura

l ex

tens

ion

serv

ices

for s

afe

food

pro

duct

ion

100

2017

-202

2M

OH

, MO

ALF

, M

FA, D

P, C

oGSu

b To

tal

990

2.2.

3 Im

prov

ing

Food

Acc

ess a

nd

Func

tioni

ng o

f M

arke

ts

To im

prov

e m

arke

t in

fras

truct

ure,

m

arke

ting

skill

s an

d in

form

atio

n sy

stem

s for

effe

ctiv

e an

d effi

cien

t mar

ket

func

tioni

ng a

nd fo

od

acce

ss

Impr

oved

mar

kets

acc

ess a

nd ro

ads

Mar

kets

inst

alle

d w

ith a

ppro

pria

te

faci

litie

s

Esta

blis

h an

d m

aint

ain

effici

ent m

arke

t in

fras

truct

ure

to fa

cilit

ate

food

acc

ess.

100

2017

-202

2Tr

easu

ry,

MO

ALF

, MO

TE&

In

dust

rializ

atio

n, C

oGC

apac

ity o

f foo

d pr

oduc

ers e

nhac

edD

evel

op c

apac

ity b

uild

ing

prog

ram

s for

food

pr

oduc

ers a

nd tr

ader

s.10

020

17-2

022

Trea

sury

, MO

ALF

, M

OTE

&I,

CoG

Impr

oved

gov

erna

nce

and

acco

unta

bilit

y of

mar

ket s

ervi

ce

prov

ider

s

Impr

ove

gove

rnan

ce a

nd a

ccou

ntab

ility

of

serv

ice

prov

ider

s in

deve

lopm

ent a

nd

mod

erni

zatio

n of

food

com

mod

ity m

arke

ts.

5020

17-2

022

MO

TE

&I,

Trea

sury

, M

OA

LF, C

oG

Impr

oved

phy

sica

l pla

nnin

g an

d ru

nnin

g of

food

mar

kets

En

forc

e th

e ph

ysic

al p

lann

ing

rule

s and

re

gula

tions

in m

arke

t sys

tem

s.20

2017

-202

2M

oI T

reas

ury,

Don

ors,

CoG

Mar

ket i

nfor

mat

ion

and

tech

nolo

gy

enha

nced

Dev

elop

a c

ompr

ehen

sive

dat

a ba

se fo

r ag

ricul

tura

l pro

duct

s, m

arke

ts a

nd a

n in

form

atio

n flo

w sy

stem

for f

ood

mar

ket

play

ers.

100

2017

-202

2M

OT

E&

I, Tr

easu

ry,

MO

ALF

, CoG

Sub

Tota

l37

0

49

RE

SULT

AR

EA

1:I

MPR

OV

ING

FO

OD

AC

CE

SSIB

ILIT

Y

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(Mill

. KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

2.2.

4 A

ddre

ss

cultu

ral,

Soci

al a

nd

Polit

ical

Asp

ects

aff

ectin

g Fo

od

Acc

ess

To m

ains

tream

cu

ltura

l, so

cial

an

d po

litic

al

cons

ider

atio

ns in

the

food

and

nut

ritio

n se

curit

y st

rate

gies

an

d ac

tiviti

es, w

ith

parti

cula

r atte

ntio

n to

vu

lner

able

gro

ups

Hum

an R

ight

to F

ood

and

nutri

tiona

l he

alth

effe

cted

Adv

ocat

e fo

r the

enf

orce

men

t of H

uman

R

ight

to F

ood

and

nutri

tiona

l hea

lth; a

nd

prot

ectio

n of

righ

t hol

ders

from

hun

ger a

nd

disc

rimin

atio

n of

by

duty

bea

rers

.

5020

17-2

022

Com

mun

ities

sens

itize

d on

re

trogr

essi

ve p

ract

ices

with

rega

rd to

in

divu

dual

s’ ac

cess

to n

utrit

ious

food

s.

Sens

itize

com

mun

ities

to d

isca

rd re

trogr

essi

ve

cultu

ral p

ract

ices

with

rega

rd to

acc

ess t

o nu

tritio

us fo

ods.

8020

17-2

022

Impr

oved

acc

ess t

o la

nd a

nd o

ther

pr

oduc

tion

reso

urce

s esp

ecia

lly fo

r yo

uth

and

wom

en

Faci

litat

e ac

cess

to la

nd a

nd o

ther

pro

duct

ion

reso

urce

s esp

ecia

lly fo

r you

th a

nd w

omen

2020

17-2

022

Invo

lvem

ent o

f you

th a

nd m

en in

food

pr

oduc

tion

activ

ities

enh

ance

dPr

omot

e ac

tive

invo

lvem

ent o

f you

th a

nd m

en

in fo

od p

rodu

ctio

n ac

tiviti

es40

020

17-2

022

Tech

nolo

gy a

cces

s and

ado

ptio

n by

vu

lner

able

gro

ups e

spec

ially

wom

en

and

yout

h en

hanc

ed.

Enha

nce

tech

nolo

gy a

cces

s and

ado

ptio

n by

vul

nera

ble

grou

ps e

spec

ially

wom

en a

nd

yout

h.

2020

17-2

022

Polic

ies t

o en

hanc

e fo

od a

cces

s in

plac

eFa

st tr

ack

deve

lopm

ent a

nd im

plem

enta

tion

of

polic

ies t

hat w

ill e

nhan

ce fo

od a

cces

s. 20

2017

-202

2

Acc

ount

abili

ty a

nd g

ood

gove

rnan

ce

enha

nced

at a

ll le

vels

Prom

ote

acco

unta

bilit

y an

d go

od g

over

nanc

e at

all

leve

ls.

4020

17-2

022

Sub

Tota

l63

0

50

RE

SULT

AR

EA

: 2.3

IMPR

OV

ING

HO

USE

HO

LD

RE

SOU

RC

E P

RO

DU

CT

IVIT

YPR

IOR

ITY

PR

OG

RA

M

AR

EA

S

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(Mill

. KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

2.3.

1 A

cces

sibi

lity

to P

rodu

ctiv

e R

esou

rces

fo

r Rur

al

Agr

icul

ture

To im

prov

e eq

uity

in

acce

ss a

nd c

ontro

l of

prod

uctiv

e re

sour

ces

and

har

ness

the

exis

ting

pote

ntia

l of p

rodu

ctiv

e re

sour

ces b

y al

l gen

ders

an

d vu

lner

able

gro

ups

Agr

icul

ture

land

use

Mas

ter P

lan

deve

lope

dD

evel

opm

ent o

f an

Agr

icul

ture

Lan

d U

se

Mas

ter P

lan

100

2017

-202

2

Effici

ent a

nd re

adily

acc

essi

ble

land

regi

stry

syst

em d

evel

oped

Esta

blis

h an

effi

cien

t and

eas

ily a

cces

sibl

e la

nd re

gist

ry sy

stem

.15

2017

-202

2

Sust

aina

ble

man

agem

ent o

f pr

oduc

tive

reso

urce

sA

dopt

par

ticip

ator

y ap

proa

ches

to ru

ral

deve

lopm

ent a

nd su

stai

nabl

e m

anag

emen

t of

prod

uctiv

e re

sour

ces.

2020

17-2

022

Impr

oved

acc

ess t

o, c

ontro

l an

d m

anag

emen

t of p

rodu

ctiv

e re

sour

ces a

cros

s gen

ders

Prom

ote

equi

tabl

e ac

cess

to, c

ontro

l and

m

anag

emen

t of p

rodu

ctiv

e re

sour

ces a

cros

s ge

nder

incl

udin

g w

omen

and

you

th.

2020

17-2

022

Cap

acity

of c

omm

uniti

es to

ad

apt t

o ch

angi

ng n

eeds

and

en

viro

nmen

tal a

nd so

cio-

econ

omic

co

nditi

ons s

treng

then

ed.

Stre

ngth

en th

e ca

paci

ty o

f com

mun

ities

to

adap

t to

chan

ging

nee

ds a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal

and

soci

o-ec

onom

ic c

ondi

tions

.

100

2017

-202

2

Tech

nica

l and

soci

al o

ptio

ns fo

r im

prov

emen

t of p

rodu

ctiv

ity a

nd

inco

mes

in m

argi

nal a

gric

ultu

ral

area

s and

oth

er fr

agile

eco

syst

ems

prom

oted

.

Prom

ote

tech

nica

l and

soci

al o

ptio

ns fo

r im

prov

emen

t of p

rodu

ctiv

ity a

nd in

com

es in

m

argi

nal a

gric

ultu

ral a

reas

and

oth

er fr

agile

ec

osys

tem

s.

6020

17-2

022

Impr

oved

info

rmat

ion

flow

and

ne

twor

king

am

ong

stak

ehol

ders

Impr

ove

info

rmat

ion

flow

and

net

wor

king

am

ong

stak

ehol

ders

.20

2017

-202

2

Impr

oved

ben

efit s

harin

g fr

om

com

mun

ity re

sour

ces

Faci

litat

e be

nefit

shar

ing

from

com

mun

ity

reso

urce

s thr

ough

sust

aina

ble

man

agem

ent

and

cons

erva

tion

2020

17-2

022

350

51

RE

SULT

AR

EA

: 2.3

IMPR

OV

ING

HO

USE

HO

LD

RE

SOU

RC

E P

RO

DU

CT

IVIT

YPR

IOR

ITY

PR

OG

RA

M

AR

EA

S

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(Mill

. KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

2.3.

2 Su

stai

nabl

e In

tens

ifica

tion

and

Div

ersi

ficat

ion

of A

gric

ultu

ral

Prod

uctio

n Sy

stem

s

To p

rom

ote

agric

ultu

ral

inte

nsifi

catio

n th

roug

h su

stai

nabl

e an

d effi

cien

t us

e of

pro

duct

ive

reso

urce

s and

redu

ce

the

risks

of l

ivel

ihoo

d fa

ilure

Incr

ease

d ou

tput

per

uni

t are

aPr

omot

e ap

prop

riate

inte

nsifi

ed a

nd

sust

aina

ble

agric

ultu

ral p

rodu

ctio

n sy

stem

s th

at a

re fr

iend

ly to

frag

ile e

cosy

stem

s

1000

2017

-202

2

Impr

oved

div

ersi

ficat

ion

and

prod

uctio

n of

nut

rient

rich

food

sPr

omot

e di

vers

ifica

tion

and

prod

uctio

n of

nu

trien

t ric

h fo

ods

2520

17-2

022

Res

earc

h an

d re

sear

ch-e

xten

sion

-fa

rmer

link

ages

to e

nhan

ced

Stre

ngth

en re

sear

ch a

nd re

sear

ch-

exte

nsio

n-fa

rmer

link

ages

to e

nhan

ce fl

ow

and

utili

satio

n of

tech

nica

l inf

orm

atio

n ap

prop

riate

for i

nten

sifie

d an

d di

vers

ified

ag

ricul

tura

l pro

duct

ion

syst

ems.

5020

17-2

022

Trai

ning

gui

delin

es fo

r pr

omot

ion

of in

tens

ifica

tion

and

dive

rsifi

catio

n of

agr

icul

tura

l pr

oduc

tion

syst

ems d

evel

oped

Supp

ort d

evel

opm

ent o

f tra

inin

g gu

idel

ines

fo

r pro

mot

ion

of in

tens

ifica

tion

and

dive

rsifi

catio

n of

agr

icul

tura

l pro

duct

ion

syst

ems.

1020

17-2

022

2.3.

3 Im

prov

ing

Urb

an a

nd

Peri-

urba

n A

gric

ultu

re

To im

prov

e ho

useh

old

food

ava

ilabi

lity,

th

roug

h ur

ban

and

peri-

urba

n ag

ricul

ture

Gui

delin

es fo

r urb

an a

nd p

eri-

urba

n ag

ricul

ture

dev

elop

edD

evel

op g

uide

lines

for u

rban

and

per

i-urb

an

agric

ultu

re10

2017

-202

2

Urb

an a

nd p

eri-u

rban

agr

icul

ture

re

gula

tory

fram

ewor

k re

view

edR

evie

w th

e ur

ban

and

peri-

urba

n ag

ricul

ture

re

gula

tory

fram

ewor

k to

be

in li

ne w

ith th

e de

velo

ped

legi

slat

ion

and

guid

elin

es.

2020

17-2

022

Farm

ers s

ensi

tized

on

good

ag

ricul

tura

l pra

ctic

es in

urb

an a

nd

peri-

urba

n ar

eas

Sens

itiza

tion

and

capa

city

bui

ldin

g of

farm

ers

and

othe

r sta

keho

lder

s on

good

agr

icul

tura

l pr

actic

es in

urb

an a

nd p

eri-u

rban

are

as.

2020

17-2

022

Mon

itorin

g an

d su

rvei

llanc

e sy

stem

in e

nfor

cem

ent o

f urb

an/

peri-

urba

n ag

ricul

tura

l pro

duct

ion

rule

s and

regu

latio

ns st

reng

then

ed.

Stre

ngth

en m

onito

ring

and

surv

eilla

nce

syst

em in

enf

orce

men

t of u

rban

/per

i-urb

an

agric

ultu

ral p

rodu

ctio

n ru

les a

nd re

gula

tions

.

2020

17-2

022

2.3.

4 Im

prov

ing

Food

Sto

rage

, Pr

eser

vatio

n an

d Va

lue-

addi

tion

at

hous

ehol

d le

vel.

To m

inim

ize

post

-ha

rves

t los

ses a

nd w

aste

at

hou

se-h

old

leve

l by

enha

ncin

g ca

paci

ty

of h

ouse

hold

s in

food

an

d fo

rage

stor

age,

pr

eser

vatio

n an

d va

lue

addi

tion.

Com

mun

ity b

ased

food

stor

age

and

pres

erva

tion

syst

ems

prom

oted

Sens

itiza

tion

and

prom

otio

n of

com

mun

ity

base

d fo

od st

orag

e an

d pr

eser

vatio

n.20

2017

-202

2

52

RE

SULT

AR

EA

: 2.3

IMPR

OV

ING

HO

USE

HO

LD

RE

SOU

RC

E P

RO

DU

CT

IVIT

YPR

IOR

ITY

PR

OG

RA

M

AR

EA

S

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(Mill

. KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

App

ropr

iate

tech

nolo

gies

forf

ood/

fora

ge h

andl

ing,

pre

serv

atio

n,

valu

e-ad

ditio

n an

d st

orag

e in

pl

ace.

Prom

ote

rese

arch

and

dev

elop

men

t of

appr

opria

te te

chno

logi

es o

f foo

d/fo

rage

ha

ndlin

g, p

rese

rvat

ion,

val

ue-a

dditi

on a

nd

stor

age.

2020

17-2

022

Hou

seho

lds k

now

ledg

e on

ap

prop

riate

safe

han

dlin

g,

pres

erva

tion,

val

ue-a

dditi

on a

nd

stor

age

tech

nolo

gies

enh

ance

d

Enha

nce

capa

city

of h

ouse

hold

s on

indi

geno

us k

now

ledg

e an

d ap

prop

riate

safe

ha

ndlin

g, p

rese

rvat

ion,

val

ue-a

dditi

on a

nd

stor

age

tech

nolo

gies

of f

ood

prod

ucts

.

2020

17-2

022

Supp

ort i

nfra

stru

ctur

e fo

r col

d st

orag

e an

d pr

oces

sing

in fo

od

prod

uctio

n zo

nes p

rom

oted

.

Faci

litat

e de

velo

pmen

t of s

uppo

rt in

fras

truct

ure

for c

old

stor

age

and

proc

essi

ng

in fo

od p

rodu

ctio

n zo

nes.

1000

2017

-202

2

War

ehou

se re

ceip

ting

syst

ems f

or

stor

age

of g

rain

s and

oth

er fo

ods

prom

oted

Prom

ote

war

ehou

se re

ceip

ting

syst

ems

for s

tora

ge o

f gra

ins a

nd o

ther

food

s in

all

coun

ties

6020

17-2

022

Sub

Tota

l1,

370

RE

SULT

AR

EA

: 2.

4 IM

PRO

VIN

G F

OO

D S

AFE

TY

AN

D Q

UA

LIT

Y A

SSU

RA

NC

E

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(Mill

. KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

2.4

Prot

ect t

he

publ

ic h

ealth

and

nu

tritio

n of

all

Har

mon

izin

g th

e In

stitu

tiona

l an

d Le

gisl

ativ

e Fr

amew

ork

for p

rote

ctin

g fo

od sa

fety

and

qu

ality

.

To e

stab

lish

and

mai

ntai

n a

ratio

nal,

inte

grat

ed fa

rm-to

-fork

fo

od sa

fety

syst

em to

pr

otec

t pu

blic

hea

lth

and

nutri

tion

Law

s and

regu

latio

ns to

add

ress

em

ergi

ng c

halle

nges

per

tain

ing

to

food

safe

ty a

nd q

ualit

y re

view

ed

and

harm

oniz

ed.

Rev

iew

and

har

mon

ize

the

curr

ent l

aws a

nd

regu

latio

ns to

add

ress

em

ergi

ng c

halle

nges

pe

rtain

ing

to fo

od sa

fety

and

pro

vide

for

func

tiona

l res

pons

ibili

ties a

t alo

ng th

e fo

od

valu

e ch

ain

at b

oth

natio

nal a

nd c

ount

ies

leve

ls.

100

2017

-202

2M

oALF

, MoH

, MoD

P,

MTI

C, D

P, C

G

Enha

nced

link

ages

bet

wee

n re

sear

ch a

nd in

dust

ry to

pro

mot

e fo

od sa

fety

and

qua

lity

cont

rol.

Enha

nce

linka

ges b

etw

een

rese

arch

and

in

dust

ry to

pro

mot

e fo

od sa

fety

and

qua

lity

cont

rol.

2020

17-2

022

MoA

LF, M

oH, M

oDP,

M

TIC

, DP,

CG

To c

reat

ed e

ffici

enci

es

in th

e na

tiona

l foo

d sa

fety

con

trol s

yste

m,

An

effec

tive

farm

to fo

lk fo

od

safe

ty m

onito

ring

and

eval

uatio

n sy

stem

in d

evel

oped

.

Dev

elop

an

effec

tive

farm

to fo

lk fo

od sa

fety

m

onito

ring

and

eval

uatio

n sy

stem

to e

nsur

e th

at o

nly

safe

food

is a

vaile

d to

con

sum

ers.

2020

17-2

022

MoA

LF, M

oH, M

oDP,

M

TIC

, DP,

CG

53

RE

SULT

AR

EA

: 2.

4 IM

PRO

VIN

G F

OO

D S

AFE

TY

AN

D Q

UA

LIT

Y A

SSU

RA

NC

E

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(Mill

. KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

To re

duce

gap

s or

lack

of a

ccou

ntab

ility

re

sulti

ng in

recu

rren

ce

of fo

od re

late

d ha

zard

s,

Cap

acity

of i

nstit

utio

ns to

un

derta

ke ri

sk a

naly

sis a

nd e

arly

w

arni

ng e

nhan

ced.

Stre

ngth

en c

apac

ity o

f ins

titut

ions

to

unde

rtake

risk

ana

lysi

s and

ear

ly w

arni

ng a

t bo

th n

atio

nal a

nd c

ount

y le

vels

in o

rder

to

prev

ent o

utbr

eak

of fo

od b

orne

illn

ess a

nd

dise

ases

.

100

2017

-202

2M

oALF

, MoH

, MoD

P,

MTI

C, D

P, C

G

Incr

ease

d re

sour

ces f

or

mai

nstre

amin

g fo

od sa

fety

and

qu

ality

con

cern

s at a

ll le

vels

.

Mob

ilize

reso

urce

s to

mai

nstre

am fo

od sa

fety

an

d qu

ality

con

cern

s in

prog

ram

me

plan

ning

an

d im

plem

enta

tion

at b

oth

natio

nal a

nd

coun

ty le

vels

100

2017

-202

2M

oALF

, MoH

, MoD

P,

MTI

C, D

P, C

G

A m

echa

nism

for c

ertifi

catio

n an

d ac

cred

itatio

n of

food

test

ing

labo

rato

ries i

n pl

;ace

A

n in

vent

ory

of c

ertifi

ed/

accr

edite

d la

bora

torie

s for

food

te

stin

g an

d an

alys

is in

pla

ce

Dev

elop

a m

echa

nism

for c

ertifi

catio

n an

d ac

cred

itatio

n of

food

test

ing

labo

rato

ries a

nd

mai

ntai

n an

inve

ntor

y of

cer

tified

/acc

redi

ted

labo

rato

ries f

or fo

od te

stin

g an

d an

alys

is

2020

17-2

022

MoA

LF, M

oH, M

oDP,

M

TIC

, DP,

CG

Dat

a ba

nk o

n fo

od sa

fety

de

velo

ped.

Esta

blis

h da

ta b

ank

on fo

od sa

fety

at N

atio

nal

and

Cou

nty

leve

ls b

y ta

king

inve

ntor

y of

ex

perti

se a

nd sc

ient

ific

wor

ks.

2020

17-2

022

MoA

LF, M

oH, M

oDP,

M

TIC

, DP,

CG

A h

arm

oniz

ed a

nd c

oord

inat

ed

inte

r – a

genc

y in

stitu

tiona

l fr

amew

ork

in p

lace

.

Food

safe

ty re

gula

tions

that

are

in

con

form

ity w

ith lo

cal a

nd

inte

rnat

iona

l tra

de re

quire

men

ts

in p

lace

Har

mon

ize

and

stre

ngth

en in

ter-a

genc

y eff

orts

in

food

safe

ty a

nd q

ualit

y co

ntro

l mon

itorin

g to

min

imiz

e ov

erla

ps a

nd in

ter-a

genc

y co

nflic

ts.

2020

17-2

022

MoA

LF, M

oH, M

oDP,

M

TIC

, DP,

CG

A sa

fegu

ard

mec

hani

sm fo

r sa

fe fo

od tr

ade,

com

mun

icat

ion,

fe

edba

ck a

nd in

form

atio

n di

ssem

inat

ion

for c

onsu

mer

s pr

otec

tion

and

othe

r foo

d ch

ain

acto

rs in

pla

ce.

Dev

elop

a sa

fegu

ard

mec

hani

sm fo

r saf

e fo

od tr

ade,

com

mun

icat

ion,

feed

back

and

in

form

atio

n di

ssem

inat

ion

for c

onsu

mer

s pr

otec

tion

and

othe

r foo

d ch

ain

acto

rs

2020

17-2

022

MoA

LF, M

oH, M

oDP,

M

TIC

, DP,

CG

Sub

Tota

l42

0

54

NUT

RITIO

N IM

PRO

VEM

ENT

3.0

NU

TR

ITIO

N IM

PRO

VE

ME

NT

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(M

iLL

KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

3.1

Life

cycl

e A

ppro

ach

to N

utrit

ion

Impr

ovem

ent

To a

chie

ve

optim

al n

utrit

ion

deve

lopm

enta

l an

d ph

ysio

logi

cal

func

tions

at a

ll st

ages

th

roug

hout

hum

an

lifec

ycle

.

Dev

elop

ed, r

evie

wed

and

di

ssem

inat

ed a

ppro

pria

te

coho

rt sp

ecifi

c nu

tritio

n gu

idel

ines

Dev

elop

, rev

iew

and

dis

sem

inat

e ap

prop

riate

coh

ort s

peci

fic n

utrit

ion

guid

elin

es

105

2017

-202

2M

OH

, MO

ALF

, Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, Dev

elop

men

t and

im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s

Rou

tine

asse

ssm

ent a

nd

mon

itorin

g of

the

nutri

tiona

l st

atus

of a

ll co

horts

in

stitu

tiona

lized

Prom

ote

rout

ine

asse

ssm

ent a

nd

mon

itorin

g of

the

nutri

tiona

l sta

tus

of a

ll co

horts

at c

omm

unity

, hea

lth

faci

litie

s and

wor

kpla

ce

200

2017

-202

2M

OE,

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, pr

ivat

e in

stitu

tions

Nut

ritio

n sy

stem

s for

all

coho

rts a

t com

mun

ity, h

ealth

fa

cilit

ies a

nd w

orkp

lace

st

reng

then

ed a

nd su

ppor

ted

Stre

ngth

en a

nd su

ppor

t nut

ritio

n sy

stem

s for

all

coho

rts a

t com

mun

ity,

heal

th fa

cilit

ies a

nd w

orkp

lace

600

2017

-202

2M

OH

,MO

PD, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

inst

itutio

ns G

ood

nut

ritio

n pr

actic

es

amon

g al

l life

cycl

e co

horts

pr

omot

ed

Prom

ote

good

nut

ritio

n pr

actic

es

amon

g co

horts

80

020

17-2

022

MO

H, M

OE,

MoA

LF, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts,D

evel

opm

ent a

nd

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

inst

itutio

nsC

onsu

mpt

ion

of d

iver

sifie

d an

d nu

tritio

nally

ade

quat

e di

et

acro

ss th

e lif

ecyc

le p

rom

oted

Prom

ote

cons

umpt

ion

of d

iver

sifie

d an

d nu

tritio

nally

ade

quat

e di

et a

cros

s th

e lif

ecyc

le.

800

2017

-202

2M

OH

, MO

DP,

MoA

LF, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

inst

itutio

nsIm

plem

ente

d an

d en

forc

ed

food

and

nut

ritio

n re

late

d le

gisl

atio

ns a

nd la

ws

Impl

emen

t and

enf

orce

the

food

and

nu

tritio

n re

late

d le

gisl

atio

ns a

nd la

ws

500

2017

-202

2M

OH

, MO

WI,

MO

E, M

OD

P,

MoA

LF, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts,

Dev

elop

men

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

inst

itutio

ns,

Empl

oyer

sN

utrit

ion

agen

da in

all

agric

ultu

re se

ctor

pro

ject

s an

d pr

ogra

ms i

n de

sign

s and

pl

ans i

n va

lue

chai

ns a

nd fo

od

secu

rity

activ

ities

inte

grat

ed

Stre

ngth

en a

nd su

ppor

t int

egra

tion

of

nutri

tion

agen

da in

all

agric

ultu

re se

ctor

pr

ojec

ts a

nd p

rogr

ams d

esig

ns a

nd

plan

s in

valu

e ch

ains

and

food

secu

rity

activ

ities

6020

17-2

022

MO

H, M

oALF

, Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, Dev

elop

men

t and

im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, pr

ivat

e in

stitu

tions

,

55

3.0

NU

TR

ITIO

N IM

PRO

VE

ME

NT

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(M

iLL

KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

Hyg

ieni

c fo

od p

repa

ratio

n,

rese

arch

and

ado

ptio

n of

ap

prop

riate

hou

seho

ld fo

od

proc

essi

ng m

etho

ds to

redu

ce

post

-har

vest

loss

es a

nd

seas

onal

ity o

f foo

d pr

omot

ed

Prom

ote

hygi

enic

food

pre

para

tion,

re

sear

ch a

nd a

dopt

ion

of a

ppro

pria

te

hous

ehol

d fo

od p

roce

ssin

g m

etho

ds

to re

duce

pos

t-har

vest

loss

es a

nd

seas

onal

ity o

f foo

d

600

2017

-202

2M

OH

, MoA

LF, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

inst

itutio

ns,

Tota

l 3,

665

3.2.

Mic

ronu

trien

t D

efici

ency

Pr

even

tion

and

Con

trol

To p

reve

nt a

nd

redu

ce m

icro

-nut

rient

de

ficie

ncy

diso

rder

s,

Prod

uctio

n, b

io-f

ortifi

catio

n an

d pr

eser

vatio

n of

m

icro

nutri

ent-r

ich

food

s at

hous

ehol

d le

vel p

rom

oted

.

Prom

ote

prod

uctio

n, b

io-f

ortifi

catio

n an

d pr

eser

vatio

n of

mic

ronu

trien

t-ric

h fo

ods a

t hou

seho

ld le

vel.

900

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF,M

OH

, MO

E, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

inst

itutio

ns, r

esea

rch

inst

itutio

nsC

onsu

mpt

ion

of d

iver

sifie

d an

d nu

tritio

nally

ade

quat

e di

et th

roug

hout

the

life

cycl

e pr

omot

ed.

Prom

ote

cons

umpt

ion

of d

iver

sifie

d an

d nu

tritio

nally

ade

quat

e di

et th

roug

hout

th

e lif

ecyc

le.

600

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF, M

OH

,MO

E, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

inst

itutio

ns

Scal

ed u

p pr

ogra

ms t

o pr

omot

e an

d fa

cilit

ate

forti

ficat

ion

of w

idel

y co

nsum

ed st

aple

food

s, co

okin

g oi

ls a

nd su

gar.

Scal

e up

pro

gram

s to

prom

ote

and

faci

litat

e fo

rtific

atio

n of

wid

ely

cons

umed

stap

le fo

ods,

cook

ing

oils

an

d su

gar.

800

2017

-202

2M

OH

, MO

ALF

, Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, Dev

elop

men

t and

im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, pr

ivat

e in

stitu

tions

Stre

ngth

ened

rout

ine

and

ther

apeu

tic m

icro

nutri

ent

supp

lem

enta

tion

(vita

min

A,

iron

and

fola

te, M

NPs

) for

ch

ildre

n, w

omen

and

iden

tified

vu

lner

able

gro

ups.

Stre

ngth

en ro

utin

e an

d th

erap

eutic

m

icro

nutri

ent s

uppl

emen

tatio

n (v

itam

in

A, i

ron

and

folia

te, z

inc)

for c

hild

ren,

w

omen

and

iden

tified

vul

nera

ble

grou

ps.

7520

17-2

022

MO

H ,

MO

E, M

OD

P, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

inst

itutio

ns

Scal

e up

inte

rven

tions

of

publ

ic h

ealth

mea

sure

s th

at p

reve

nt m

icro

nutri

ent

defic

ienc

ies s

uppo

rted

Supp

ort S

cale

up

inte

rven

tions

on

publ

ic h

ealth

mea

sure

s tha

t pre

vent

m

icro

nutri

ent d

efici

enci

es

117

2017

-202

2M

OH

,MO

ALF

, Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, Dev

elop

men

t and

im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, pr

ivat

e in

stitu

tions

M

onito

ring

and

eval

uatio

n sy

stem

on

mic

ronu

trien

t de

ficie

ncy

prev

entio

n an

d co

ntro

l dev

elop

ed a

nd

revi

ewed

Dev

elop

and

,rev

iew

a m

onito

ring

and

eval

uatio

n sy

stem

on

mic

ronu

trien

t de

ficie

ncy

prev

entio

n an

d co

ntro

l

3020

17-2

022

MO

H,M

OA

LF, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts, d

evel

opm

ent a

nd

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

sect

or

56

3.0

NU

TR

ITIO

N IM

PRO

VE

ME

NT

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(M

iLL

KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

Dev

elop

ed, r

evie

wed

and

im

plem

ente

d m

icro

nutri

ent

guid

elin

es a

nd st

rate

gies

Dev

elop

, rev

iew

and

impl

emen

t m

icro

nutri

ent g

uide

lines

and

stra

tegi

es40

2017

-202

2M

OH

,MO

ALF

, Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, dev

elop

men

t and

im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, pr

ivat

e se

ctor

Sub-

tota

l 2,

562

3.3

Nut

ritio

n ad

voca

cy,

com

mun

icat

ion

and

soci

al

mob

iliza

tion

amon

g th

e po

pula

tion

The

obje

ctiv

e is

to

impr

ove

prio

ritiz

atio

n of

food

and

nut

ritio

n ag

enda

To

gene

rate

de

man

d an

d ad

optio

n of

food

and

nut

ritio

n se

rvic

es a

nd p

ract

ices

.

The

polit

ical

prio

ritiz

atio

n of

nu

tritio

n at

regi

onal

, nat

iona

l an

d co

unty

leve

l inc

reas

ed a

nd

sust

aine

d

Incr

ease

and

sust

ain

the

polit

ical

pr

iorit

izat

ion

of n

utrit

ion

at re

gion

al,

natio

nal a

nd c

ount

y le

vel

9420

17-2

022

MO

H, M

OA

LF, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts, S

UN

N

ETW

OR

KS,

Enab

ling

polic

y en

viro

nmen

t in

supp

ort o

f a c

oord

inat

ed

inte

grat

ed a

nd e

ffect

ive

nutri

tion

n se

ctor

Impr

oved

an

d m

aint

aine

d

Impr

ove

and

mai

ntai

n an

ena

blin

g po

licy

envi

ronm

ent i

n su

ppor

t of a

co

ordi

nate

d in

tegr

ated

and

effe

ctiv

e nu

tritio

n se

ctor

230

2017

-202

2M

OH

, MO

ALF

, Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, SU

N

NET

WO

RK

S

Incr

ease

d fin

anci

al re

sour

ce

allo

catio

n an

d ex

pend

iture

on

nut

ritio

n fo

r sus

tain

ed a

nd

mor

e eq

uita

ble

serv

ices

Incr

ease

the

finan

cial

reso

urce

al

loca

tion

and

expe

nditu

re o

n nu

tritio

n fo

r sus

tain

ed a

nd m

ore

equi

tabl

e se

rvic

es

9020

17-2

022

MO

H, M

OA

LF, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts, S

UN

N

ETW

OR

KS

Incr

ease

and

stre

ngth

enin

g of

th

e hu

man

cap

acity

and

skill

s of

the

nutri

tion

sect

or sc

aled

up

Scal

e up

the

Incr

ease

and

stre

ngth

enin

g of

the

hum

an c

apac

ity a

nd sk

ills o

f the

nu

tritio

n se

ctor

7520

17-2

022

MO

H, M

OA

LF, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts, S

UN

N

ETW

OR

KS

The

effici

ency

of n

utrit

ion

sect

or fi

nanc

ial,

mon

itorin

g an

d ev

alua

tion,

and

kno

wle

dge

man

agem

ent s

yste

ms

Impr

ove

the

effici

ency

of n

utrit

ion

sect

or fi

nanc

ial m

onito

ring,

eva

luat

ion

and

know

ledg

e m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

s

1120

17-2

022

MO

H, M

OA

LF, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts, S

UN

N

ETW

OR

KS

Kno

wle

dge

attit

udes

and

pr

actic

e on

opt

imal

nut

ritio

n im

prov

ed a

nd d

eman

d nu

tritio

n se

rvic

es a

nd p

ract

ice

incr

ease

d

Impr

ove

know

ledg

e an

d at

titud

es o

n op

timal

nut

ritio

n fo

r inc

reas

ed d

eman

d of

nut

ritio

n se

rvic

es a

nd p

ract

ice

300

2017

-202

2M

OH

, MO

ALF

, Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, SU

N

NET

WO

RK

S

Com

mun

ity e

ngag

emen

t, pa

rtici

patio

n an

d fe

edba

ck

mec

hani

sm in

nut

ritio

n se

rvic

es a

nd d

ecis

ion

mak

ing

proc

esse

s stre

ngth

ened

.

Stre

ngth

en C

omm

unity

eng

agem

ent,

parti

cipa

tion

and

feed

back

mec

hani

sm

in n

utrit

ion

serv

ices

and

dec

isio

n m

akin

g pr

oces

ses

125

2017

-202

2M

OH

, MO

ALF

, Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, SU

N

NET

WO

RK

S

57

3.0

NU

TR

ITIO

N IM

PRO

VE

ME

NT

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(M

iLL

KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

Prio

ritiz

atio

n of

reso

urce

al

loca

tion

to su

ppor

t med

ical

nu

tritio

n th

erap

y in

hos

pita

ls

Prio

ritiz

atio

n of

reso

urce

allo

catio

n to

su

ppor

t med

ical

nut

ritio

n th

erap

y in

ho

spita

ls

600

2017

-202

2M

OH

The

adop

tion

of n

utrit

ion

appr

oach

es b

y se

ctor

act

ors t

o re

ach

and

supp

ort i

ndiv

idua

ls

with

nut

ritio

n in

crea

sed

Incr

ease

the

adop

tion

of n

utrit

ion

appr

oach

es b

y se

ctor

act

ors t

o re

ach

and

supp

ort i

ndiv

idua

ls w

ith n

utrit

ion

120

2017

-202

2M

OH

, MO

ALF

, Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, SU

N

NET

WO

RK

S

Sub-

tota

l1,

645

3.4

Nut

ritio

n an

d In

fect

ion

To im

prov

e th

e nu

tritio

nal c

are,

tre

atm

ent a

nd su

ppor

t du

ring

illne

ss

Nat

iona

l gui

delin

es a

nd

stan

dard

s for

nut

ritio

nal c

are

and

supp

ort d

urin

g ill

ness

an

d di

seas

es m

anag

emen

t de

velo

ped,

revi

ewed

and

di

ssem

inat

ed.

Dev

elop

, rev

iew

and

dis

sem

inat

e na

tiona

l gui

delin

es a

nd st

anda

rds f

or

nutri

tiona

l car

e an

d su

ppor

t dur

ing

illne

ss a

nd d

isea

ses m

anag

emen

t

110

2017

-202

2M

OH

,dev

elop

men

t and

im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, pr

ivat

e se

ctor

, pub

lic a

nd p

rivat

e re

ferr

al h

ospi

tals

, tra

inin

g in

stitu

tions

Cap

acity

of h

ealth

care

pr

ovid

ers t

o gi

ve o

ptim

al

nutri

tion

care

, tre

atm

ent a

nd

supp

ort i

n m

anag

emen

t of

com

mon

dis

ease

s stre

ngth

ened

Stre

ngth

en th

e ca

paci

ty o

f hea

lthca

re

prov

ider

s to

give

opt

imal

nut

ritio

n ca

re,

treat

men

t and

supp

ort i

n m

anag

emen

t of

com

mon

dis

ease

s

200

2017

-202

2M

OH

, Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, de

velo

pmen

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

and

mis

sion

ho

spita

ls

Prog

ram

s on

awar

enes

s cr

eatio

n on

dis

ease

pre

vent

ion

stra

tegi

es a

t hou

seho

ld le

vel

incl

udin

g in

vest

men

t in

safe

w

ater

and

sani

tatio

n fa

cilit

ies

prom

oted

Prom

ote

prog

ram

s on

awar

enes

s cr

eatio

n on

dis

ease

pre

vent

ion

stra

tegi

es a

t hou

seho

ld le

vel i

nclu

ding

in

vest

men

t in

safe

wat

er a

nd sa

nita

tion

faci

litie

s

300

2017

-202

2M

OH

, Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

, de

velo

pmen

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

partn

ers

Inte

grat

ion

of w

ater

sani

tatio

n an

d hy

gien

e w

ith n

utrit

ion

prom

oted

Prom

ote

inte

grat

ion

of w

ater

sani

tatio

n an

d hy

gien

e w

ith n

utrit

ion

2020

17-2

022

MO

H,M

OD

P,M

OW

I, C

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts, d

evel

opm

ent a

nd

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

and

mis

sion

hos

pita

lsPr

ocur

ed m

edic

al n

utrit

ion

ther

apy

equi

pmen

tPr

ocur

e m

edic

al n

utrit

ion

ther

apy

equi

pmen

t14

,000

2017

-202

2M

OH

,Cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

deve

lopm

ent a

nd im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, pr

ivat

e an

d m

issi

on

hosp

itals

58

3.0

NU

TR

ITIO

N IM

PRO

VE

ME

NT

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(M

iLL

KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

App

ropr

iate

m

anag

emen

t of

mal

nutri

tion

of

preg

nant

and

lact

atin

g w

omen

, chi

ldre

n an

d ot

her l

ifecy

cle

coho

rts

prom

oted

Prom

ote

appr

opria

te m

anag

emen

t of

mal

nutri

tion

for p

regn

ant,

lact

atin

g w

omen

, chi

ldre

n<5

year

s and

oth

er

lifec

ycle

coh

orts

200

2017

-202

2M

OH

, cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

deve

lopm

ent a

nd im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, pr

ivat

e an

d m

issi

on

hosp

itals

.

stre

ngth

ened

refe

rral

m

echa

nism

s and

lin

kage

bet

wee

n th

e co

mm

unity

and

hea

lth

faci

lity

Stre

ngth

en th

e re

ferr

al m

echa

nism

s and

lin

kage

bet

wee

n th

e co

mm

unity

and

he

alth

faci

lity

1020

17-2

022

MO

H, C

OU

NTY

G

OV

ERN

MEN

T, d

evel

opm

ent

and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

and

mis

sion

hos

pita

ls

Pers

ons w

ith o

ther

chr

onic

co

nditi

ons o

unse

lled

on g

ood

nutri

tion

prac

tices

Ensu

re p

erso

ns w

ith o

ther

chr

onic

co

nditi

ons a

re o

unse

lled

on g

ood

nutri

tion

prac

tices

700

2017

-202

2M

OH

, cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

deve

lopm

ent a

nd im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, pr

ivat

e an

d m

issi

on

hosp

itals

Sub-

Tota

l15

,540

3.5

Nut

ritio

n an

d N

on-

Com

mun

icab

le

Dis

ease

s

To h

alt a

nd re

vers

e th

e pr

eval

ence

of d

iet

rela

ted

NC

Ds a

nd

enha

nce

thei

r con

trol

and

man

agem

ent

Dev

elop

men

t and

im

plem

enta

tion

of n

atio

nal

nutri

tion

stra

tegi

es a

nd

guid

elin

es fo

r man

agem

ent o

f N

CD

s sup

porte

d

Supp

ort d

evel

opm

ent a

nd

impl

emen

tatio

n of

nat

iona

l nut

ritio

n st

rate

gies

and

gui

delin

es fo

r m

anag

emen

t of N

CD

s

1020

17-2

022

MO

H, c

ount

y go

vern

men

t, de

velo

pmen

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers

Rou

tine

scre

enin

g of

die

t re

late

d N

CD

s and

its

pred

ispo

sing

fact

ors l

ike

over

wei

ght a

nd o

besi

ty

prom

oted

Prom

ote

rout

ine

scre

enin

g of

die

t re

late

d N

CD

s and

its p

redi

spos

ing

fact

ors l

ike

over

wei

ght a

nd o

besi

ty

700

2017

-202

2M

OH

, cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

deve

lopm

ent a

nd im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, pr

ivat

e an

d m

issi

on

hosp

itals

Supp

ort t

o pr

ogra

ms o

n as

sess

men

t; pr

even

tion

and

man

agem

ent o

f die

t rel

ated

N

CD

s inc

reas

ed.

Incr

ease

supp

ort t

o pr

ogra

ms

on a

sses

smen

t; pr

even

tion

and

man

agem

ent o

f die

t rel

ated

NC

Ds.

1,17

020

17-2

022

MO

H, c

ount

y go

vern

men

t, de

velo

pmen

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

and

mis

sion

ho

spita

ls

59

3.0

NU

TR

ITIO

N IM

PRO

VE

ME

NT

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(M

iLL

KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

Res

earc

h an

d m

onito

r pr

eval

ence

and

tren

ds o

f N

CD

s usi

ng th

e lif

e cy

cle

appr

oach

to c

reat

e he

alth

y lif

esty

les a

nd e

ffect

ive

nutri

tion

inte

rven

tions

su

ppor

ted

Supp

ort r

esea

rch

and

mon

itor

prev

alen

ce a

nd tr

ends

of N

CD

s usi

ng

the

life

cycl

e ap

proa

ch to

cre

ate

heal

thy

lifes

tyle

s and

effe

ctiv

e nu

tritio

n in

terv

entio

ns

7020

17-2

022

MO

H, c

ount

y go

vern

men

t, de

velo

pmen

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

and

mis

sion

ho

spita

ls

Subt

otal

1950

3.6

Urb

an

Nut

ritio

nTo

pro

mot

e op

timal

nu

tritio

n an

d he

alth

fo

r urb

an d

wel

lers

Trac

king

syst

emn

for u

rban

m

alnu

tritio

n in

est

ablis

hed

Esta

blis

h an

effe

ctiv

e m

onito

ring

syst

em to

trac

k m

alnu

tritio

n in

urb

an

indi

vidu

als

8020

17-2

022

MO

H, C

ount

y go

vern

men

t, de

velo

pmen

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

and

mis

sion

ho

spita

lsH

igh

impa

ct n

utrit

ion

inte

rven

tions

scal

ed u

p in

ur

ban

area

s

Scal

e up

of h

igh

impa

ct n

utrit

ion

inte

rven

tions

in u

rban

are

as10

020

17-2

022

MO

H, C

ount

y go

vern

men

t, de

velo

pmen

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

and

mis

sion

ho

spita

lsM

ulti-

sect

oral

coo

rdin

atio

n pl

atfo

rm e

stab

lishe

d in

urb

an

area

s

Esta

blis

h a

mul

ti-se

ctor

al c

oord

inat

ion,

jo

int p

lann

ing

and

impl

emen

tatio

n m

echa

nism

in u

rban

are

as

2020

17-2

022

MO

H, C

ount

y go

vern

men

t, de

velo

pmen

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

priv

ate

and

mis

sion

ho

spita

lsSu

b-to

tal

200

3.7

Nut

ritio

n in

sc

hool

s, pu

blic

an

d pr

ivat

e in

stitu

tions

To im

prov

e op

timal

nu

tritio

n an

d he

alth

fo

r ind

ivid

uals

in th

ese

inst

itutio

ns.

Inst

itutio

nal m

eals

and

nu

tritio

n st

rate

gies

and

gu

idel

ines

dev

elop

ed

harm

oniz

ed a

nd d

isse

min

ated

Dev

elop

, har

mon

ize

and

diss

emin

ate

inst

itutio

nal m

eals

and

nut

ritio

n st

rate

gies

and

gui

delin

es

200

2017

-202

2M

OE,

MO

H, M

OA

LF,

MO

DP,

cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

Prom

ote

the

prov

isio

n of

nu

tritio

us m

eals

to in

divi

dual

s in

scho

ols,

priv

ate

and

publ

ic in

stitu

tions

dev

elop

ed

harm

oniz

ed a

nd d

isse

min

ated

Prom

ote

the

prov

isio

n of

nut

ritio

us

mea

ls to

indi

vidu

als i

n sc

hool

s, pr

ivat

e an

d pu

blic

inst

itutio

ns

100

2017

-202

2M

OE,

MO

H, M

OA

LF,

MO

DP,

cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

Bas

ic n

utrit

ion

train

ing

mai

nstre

amed

in a

ll sc

hool

s an

d ot

her i

nstit

utio

ns c

urric

ula

Mai

nstre

am b

asic

nut

ritio

n tra

inin

g in

all

scho

ols a

nd o

ther

inst

itutio

ns

curr

icul

a

4020

17-2

022

MO

E, M

OH

, MO

ALF

,M

OD

P, K

ICD

60

3.0

NU

TR

ITIO

N IM

PRO

VE

ME

NT

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

(M

iLL

KE

S)

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

App

ropr

iate

nut

ritio

n in

terv

entio

ns in

scho

ols a

nd

othe

r ins

titut

ions

impl

emen

ted

Supp

ort i

mpl

emen

t of a

ppro

pria

te

nutri

tion

inte

rven

tions

in sc

hool

s and

ot

her i

nstit

utio

ns.

3,00

020

17-2

022

MO

E, M

OH

, MO

ALF

,M

OD

P co

unty

gov

ernm

ent,

Dev

elop

men

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

Esta

blis

hmen

t of a

gric

ultu

ral

prod

uctio

n (g

arde

ns, l

ives

tock

an

d fis

h) fo

r foo

d an

d nu

tritio

n ed

ucat

ion

and

To in

crea

se

acce

ss to

div

erse

food

s and

for

inco

me

gene

ratio

n pr

omot

ed

Prom

ote

esta

blis

hmen

t of a

gric

ultu

ral

prod

uctio

n (g

arde

ns, l

ives

tock

and

fish

) fo

r foo

d an

d nu

tritio

n ed

ucat

ion

and

to

incr

ease

acc

ess t

o di

vers

e fo

ods a

nd fo

r in

com

e ge

nera

tion.

500

2017

-202

2M

OE,

MO

H, M

OA

LF,

MO

DP,

cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

Dev

elop

men

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

Cap

aciti

es o

f sch

ool

man

agem

ent a

nd te

ache

rs o

n ea

rly id

entifi

catio

n of

hea

lth

and

nutri

tion

prob

lem

s and

tim

ely

refe

rral

for a

ppro

pria

te

actio

n bu

ild.

Cap

acity

bui

ldin

g of

scho

ol

man

agem

ent a

nd te

ache

rs o

n ea

rly

iden

tifica

tion

of h

ealth

and

nut

ritio

n pr

oble

ms a

nd ti

mel

y re

ferr

al fo

r ap

prop

riate

act

ion.

5020

17-2

022

MO

E, M

OH

, MO

ALF

,M

OD

P, c

ount

y go

vern

men

t, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s,

Link

ages

bet

wee

n ro

utin

e he

alth

and

nut

ritio

n se

rvic

es

and

scho

ol a

ctiv

ities

, inc

ludi

ng

regu

lar m

onito

ring

of

nutri

tiona

l sta

tus p

rom

oted

;

Prom

ote

linka

ges b

etw

een

rout

ine

heal

th a

nd n

utrit

ion

serv

ices

and

scho

ol

activ

ities

, inc

ludi

ng re

gula

r mon

itorin

g of

nut

ritio

nal s

tatu

s.

200

2017

-202

2M

OE,

MO

H, M

OA

LF,

MO

DP,

cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

Dev

elop

men

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

Det

ectio

n an

d re

ferr

al o

f m

alno

uris

hed

stud

ents

to

heal

th fa

cilit

ies,

coun

selin

g se

rvic

es, s

ocia

l pro

tect

ion,

or

mea

ls p

rogr

ams a

nd o

ther

co

mm

unity

age

ncie

s and

se

rvic

es su

ppor

ted.

Supp

ort t

he d

etec

tion

and

refe

rral

of

mal

nour

ishe

d st

uden

ts to

hea

lth

faci

litie

s, co

unse

ling

serv

ices

, soc

ial

prot

ectio

n, o

r mea

ls p

rogr

ams a

nd o

ther

co

mm

unity

age

ncie

s and

serv

ices

.

150

2017

-202

2M

OE,

MO

H, M

OA

LF,

MO

DP

coun

ty g

over

nmen

t, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s,,

Use

of t

ime

and

ener

gy sa

ving

te

chno

logi

es to

enh

ance

ca

paci

ties o

f hou

seho

lds t

o pr

ovid

enut

ritio

nally

ade

quat

e di

ets p

rom

oted

.

Prom

ote

use

of ti

me

and

ener

gy sa

ving

te

chno

logi

es to

enh

ance

cap

aciti

es o

f ho

useh

olds

to p

rovi

de n

utrit

iona

lly

adeq

uate

die

ts.

200

2017

-202

2M

OE,

MO

H, M

OA

LF,

MO

DP,

cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

Dev

elop

men

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers.

Prio

ritiz

atio

n of

reso

urce

al

loca

tion

to su

ppor

t med

ical

nu

tritio

n th

erap

y in

hos

pita

ls

Prio

ritiz

atio

n of

reso

urce

allo

catio

n to

su

ppor

t med

ical

nut

ritio

n th

erap

y in

ho

spita

ls

600

2017

-202

2M

OH

, , c

ount

y go

vern

men

t, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, pr

ivat

e pa

rtner

sSu

b-to

tal

5,04

0

61

FOO

D A

ND

NUT

RITIO

N IN

CRI

SIS,

EM

ERG

ENC

Y SI

TUA

TION

SPR

IOR

ITY

PR

OG

RA

M A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

SC

OST

E

STIM

ATE

TIM

E

FRA

ME

RE

SPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

(Mill

. KE

S)4.

0 F

OO

D A

ND

NU

TR

ITIO

N IN

CR

ISIS

, EM

ER

GE

NC

Y A

ND

RE

CO

VE

RY

4.

1 Em

erge

ncy

prep

ared

ness

To m

anag

e ris

k an

d vu

lner

abili

ty to

food

in

secu

rity

and

mal

nutri

tion

occa

sion

ed b

y ca

tast

roph

es,

thus

pre

vent

ing

cris

es

from

dev

elop

ing

into

em

erge

ncie

s.

Red

uced

impa

ct o

f dro

ught

and

oth

er

cata

stro

phe

on h

uman

live

s and

liv

elih

ood

asse

tR

educ

ed m

orbi

dity

and

pre

vale

nce

of m

icro

nutri

ent d

efici

enci

es d

urin

g em

erge

ncie

sM

orta

lity

and

mal

nutri

tion

leve

ls

mai

ntai

ned

belo

w th

e em

erge

ncy

thre

shol

ds.

Loss

of p

rodu

ctiv

e liv

elih

ood

asse

ts

durin

g em

erge

ncy

redu

ced

by 7

5% b

y 20

17.

Effec

tive

early

war

ning

info

rmat

ion

syst

em in

pla

ce T

imel

y an

d eff

ectiv

e di

sast

er re

spon

se

and

man

agem

ent

of re

lief o

pera

tions

Cap

acity

of c

omm

uniti

es to

sust

ain

food

se

curit

y an

d nu

tritio

n en

hanc

ed

Stre

ngth

en a

nd su

ppor

t ear

ly

war

ning

syst

em(s

) to

dete

ct a

nd

prov

ide

timel

y cr

ucia

l inf

orm

atio

n on

pot

entia

l foo

d in

secu

rity

and

mal

nutri

tion.

200

2017

-202

2N

DM

A, M

OH

Supp

ort i

nteg

rate

d vu

lner

abili

ty

anal

ysis

for e

mer

genc

y pr

epar

edne

ss

100

2017

/18

MO

DP,

ND

MA

Esta

blis

hmen

t and

stre

ngth

enin

g fo

od a

nd a

nim

al fe

ed d

istri

butio

n in

fras

truct

ure

and

netw

orks

in

cris

is p

rone

are

as.

1,50

020

17-2

022

MO

ALF

, ND

MA

Enha

nce

budg

et su

ppor

t to

the

Stra

tegi

c Fo

od R

eser

ves f

or

mai

nten

ance

of a

ppro

pria

te fo

od

rese

rve

stoc

ks.

5,00

020

17-2

022

MO

ALF

, MO

DP

Enha

ncin

g ca

paci

ties a

nd

oppo

rtuni

ties f

or im

prov

ing

and

sust

aini

ng fo

od se

curit

y liv

elih

ood

asse

ts a

nd st

rate

gies

.

25,0

0020

17-2

022

ND

MA

Enha

nce

the

cont

inge

ncy

fund

s to

man

age

emer

ging

food

and

nu

tritio

n cr

ises

.

15,

000

2017

-202

2N

DM

A

Supp

ort t

o co

ntin

uous

pea

ce

build

ing

initi

ativ

es a

nd

enha

ncem

ent o

f nat

iona

l sec

urity

500

2017

-202

2M

OIC

NG

, ND

MA

62

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

AR

EA

SO

BJE

CT

IVE

SO

UT

PUT

SIN

TE

RV

EN

TIO

NS

CO

ST

EST

IMAT

ET

IME

FR

AM

ER

ESP

ON

SIB

ILIT

Y*

(Mill

. KE

S)Su

ppor

t cap

acity

and

dev

elop

men

t to

dis

aste

r res

pons

e in

stitu

tion

and

cent

re fo

r im

prov

emen

t of

coor

dina

tion

250

2017

-202

2M

OIC

NG

, ND

MA

32,5

504.

2 Em

erge

ncy

Res

pons

eTo

est

ablis

h a

wel

l-co

ordi

nate

d re

spon

se

mec

hani

sm th

at e

nsur

es

all p

erso

ns in

em

erge

ncie

s re

ceiv

e tim

ely

and

appr

opria

te a

ssis

tanc

e to

pr

otec

t the

ir fo

od se

curit

y an

d nu

tritio

nal s

tatu

s, an

d to

avo

id lo

ss o

f liv

es a

nd

livel

ihoo

ds.

Hum

an li

ves,

nutri

tiona

l sta

tus a

nd

livel

ihoo

ds p

rote

cted

Mor

talit

y an

d m

alnu

tritio

n le

vels

m

aint

aine

d be

low

the

emer

genc

y th

resh

olds

.R

educ

ed lo

ss o

f liv

elih

ood

asse

ts to

ca

tast

roph

es.

Effec

tiven

ess a

nd ti

mel

ines

s of

inte

rven

tions

impr

oved

Func

tiona

l mul

ti-se

ctor

al c

oord

inat

ion

stru

ctur

es fo

r hum

anita

rian

resp

onse

in

plac

eJo

int p

lann

ing

for h

uman

itaria

n re

spon

se a

chie

ved

Tim

ely

diss

emin

atio

n of

ear

ly w

arni

ng

info

rmat

ion

from

all

rele

vant

sour

ces

Inte

r-sec

tora

l lin

kage

s and

effe

ctiv

e co

ordi

natio

n of

hum

anita

rian

resp

onse

ac

hiev

ed.

Har

mon

ized

stan

dard

s, fo

r H

uman

itaria

n as

sist

ance

in p

lace

Har

mon

ized

pro

toco

l for

Hum

anita

rian

assi

stan

ce in

pla

ce

Stre

ngth

en p

ublic

-priv

ate

partn

ersh

ip to

ens

ure

effec

tive

coor

dina

tion

for e

ffici

ent a

nd

effec

tive

resp

onse

.

100

2017

-202

2M

OD

P, M

OA

LF,

ND

MA

Stre

amlin

e an

d ha

rmon

ise

guid

elin

es fo

r tim

ely

man

agem

ent

of ta

rget

ed re

spon

se d

urin

g em

erge

ncie

s

3020

17-2

022

MO

DP,

MO

ALF

, N

DM

A

Prom

ote

and

supp

ort m

echa

nism

s fo

r dev

olve

d de

cisi

on m

akin

g fo

r em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

120

2017

-202

2M

OD

P, C

oG, N

DM

A

Stre

ngth

en fi

nanc

ial a

nd te

chni

cal

capa

city

of d

evol

ved

stru

ctur

es to

re

spon

d to

cris

is.

200

2017

-202

2M

OD

P, C

oG

Tim

ely

oper

atio

naliz

atio

n of

co

ntin

genc

y pr

ogra

mm

es, p

lans

an

d fu

nds

8020

17-2

022

MO

DP,

ND

MA

Prom

ote

prio

rity

inte

rven

tion

actio

ns th

at m

inim

ise

the

loss

of

lives

and

live

lihoo

ds

2500

2017

-202

2M

OD

P, C

oG,

MO

ALF

, MO

WI,

MO

H, M

OE,

ND

MA

Prom

ote

emer

genc

y in

terv

entio

n pr

ogra

ms t

hat a

ddre

ss sp

ecia

l nu

tritio

n ne

eds o

f the

affe

cted

po

pula

tion.

8,00

020

17-2

022

MO

H, M

OA

LF

Esta

blis

hmen

t of a

n eff

ectiv

e an

d m

onito

ring

and

eval

uatio

n sy

stem

fo

r the

ass

essm

ent o

f im

pact

of

resp

onse

.

200

2017

-202

2M

OD

P, C

oG,

MO

ALF

, MO

WI,

MO

H, M

OE,

ND

MA

11,2

30

63

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

AR

EA

SO

BJE

CT

IVE

SO

UT

PUT

SIN

TE

RV

EN

TIO

NS

CO

ST

EST

IMAT

ET

IME

FR

AM

ER

ESP

ON

SIB

ILIT

Y*

(Mill

. KE

S)4.

3 .R

ecov

ery,

R

esili

ence

Bui

ldin

g an

d Lo

ng-te

rm

Dev

elop

men

t

To e

nsur

e qu

ick

reco

very

fr

om h

azar

ds a

nd b

uild

re

silie

nce

in o

rder

to

redu

ce v

ulne

rabi

lity

of th

e po

pula

tions

to fo

od a

nd

nutri

tion

inse

curit

y

Dis

aste

r rec

over

y pr

ogra

mm

es

impl

emen

ted

Inve

st in

dis

aste

r rec

over

y pr

ogra

mm

es to

miti

gate

the

impa

ct

of d

isas

ters

20,0

0020

17-2

022

MO

DP,

CoG

, M

OA

LF, M

OW

I, M

OH

, MO

E, N

DM

AD

isas

ter r

isk

redu

ctio

n an

d re

silie

nce

build

ing

carr

ied

out

Prom

ote

hous

ehol

d an

d co

mm

unity

man

aged

dis

aste

r ris

k re

duct

ion

and

resi

lienc

e bu

ildin

g m

easu

res

5,00

020

17-2

022

MO

DP,

CoG

, M

OA

LF, M

OW

I, M

OH

, MO

E, N

DM

A

Soci

al p

rote

ctio

n pr

ogra

mm

es

intro

duce

d an

d im

plem

ente

d Pr

omot

e ap

prop

riate

soci

al

prot

ectio

n sc

hem

es to

pro

tect

co

mm

uniti

es fr

om fo

od a

nd

nutri

tion

inse

curit

y.

30,0

0020

17-2

022

ND

MA

Popu

latio

ns w

ith sp

ecifi

c nu

tritio

n ne

eds b

enefi

t fro

m su

pple

men

tary

and

th

erap

eutic

feed

ing

prog

ram

s

Supp

ort i

nteg

ratio

n of

Su

pple

men

tary

and

The

rape

utic

fe

edin

g pr

ogra

ms f

or p

opul

atio

ns

with

spec

ific

nutri

tion

need

s.

4,00

020

17-2

022

MO

H, M

OE,

CoG

, M

OD

P, M

OA

LF

Live

lihoo

d re

cove

ry p

rogr

ams

supp

orte

d Pr

omot

e an

d su

ppor

t liv

elih

ood

reco

very

pro

gram

s by

addr

essi

ng

prim

ary

prod

uctio

n fa

ctor

s to

impr

ove

food

ava

ilabi

lity

and

acce

ss.

5,00

020

17-2

022

MO

ALF

, CoG

, M

OD

P, M

OW

I, N

DM

A

Prog

ram

s tha

t act

ivat

e m

arke

t fu

nctio

ning

and

serv

ice

prov

isio

n pr

omot

ed

Prom

ote

prog

ram

s tha

t act

ivat

e m

arke

t fun

ctio

ning

and

serv

ice

prov

isio

n

1,00

020

17-2

022

MO

ALF

, CoG

, M

OD

P, N

DM

A

Prim

ary

heal

th c

are/

ess

entia

l nut

ritio

n ac

tions

pro

gram

mes

supp

orte

d Su

ppor

t the

prim

ary

heal

th

care

/ess

entia

l nut

ritio

n ac

tions

pr

ogra

mm

es to

pro

mot

e he

alth

and

nu

tritio

n se

curit

y

5,00

020

17-2

022

MO

H, M

OA

LF, C

oG,

ND

MA

Scho

ol e

nrol

men

t, re

tent

ion

and

com

plet

ion

rate

s am

ong

food

inse

cure

ho

useh

olds

enh

ance

d

Enha

nce

scho

ol e

nrol

men

t, re

tent

ion

and

com

plet

ion

rate

s am

ong

food

inse

cure

hou

seho

lds.

10,

000

2017

-202

2M

OE,

CoG

, MO

DP,

M

OA

LF, M

OH

, N

DM

A

Live

lihoo

d in

sura

nce

sche

mes

es

tabl

ishe

d an

d pr

omot

ed

Esta

blis

h an

d pr

omot

e liv

elih

ood

insu

ranc

e sc

hem

es to

cus

hion

and

su

ppor

t com

mun

ities

to re

cove

r fr

om e

mer

genc

ies

15,0

00

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF, C

oG,

MO

DP,

ND

MA

Sub

tota

l85

,000

64

5.0

Food

and

Nut

ritio

n In

form

atio

n &

Com

mun

icat

ion

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ESO

UTP

UTS

INTE

RVEN

TIO

NS

CO

ST

EST

IMAT

E

(MiL

L K

ES

TIM

E FR

AM

ER

ESPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

5.1

dat

a co

llect

ion

and

info

rmat

ion

man

agem

ent

To im

prov

e fo

od a

nd

nutri

tion

info

rmat

ion

and

com

mun

icat

ion

man

agem

ent

Coo

rdin

atio

n m

echa

nism

s of f

ood

and

nutri

tion

secu

rity

info

rmat

ion

syst

ems

esta

blis

hed

and

stre

ngth

ened

.

Esta

blis

h an

d st

reng

then

co

ordi

natio

n m

echa

nism

s for

food

an

d nu

tritio

n se

curit

y in

form

atio

n sy

stem

s.

400

2017

-202

2M

OE,

MO

H, M

OA

LF,

MO

DP,

, co

unty

gov

ernm

ent,

Dev

elop

men

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

Cap

acity

of t

he re

leva

nt in

stitu

tions

in

col

lect

ion

and

man

agem

ent o

f foo

d an

d nu

tritio

n se

curit

y da

ta a

t nat

iona

l an

d co

unty

leve

ls st

reng

then

ed.

Stre

ngth

en c

apac

ity o

f the

rele

vant

in

stitu

tions

in c

olle

ctio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t of f

ood

and

nutri

tion

secu

rity

data

at n

atio

nal a

nd c

ount

y le

vels

.

640

2017

-202

2M

OE,

MO

H, M

OA

LF,

MO

DP,

cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

Dev

elop

men

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

Man

agem

ent a

nd sh

arin

g of

food

an

d nu

tritio

n se

curit

y in

form

atio

n an

d kn

owle

dge

man

agem

ent s

yste

ms

acro

ss se

ctor

s stre

amlin

ed.

Stre

amlin

e m

anag

emen

t and

shar

ing

of fo

od a

nd n

utrit

ion

secu

rity

info

rmat

ion

and

Kno

wle

dge

man

agem

ent s

yste

ms a

cros

s sec

tors

.

140

2017

-202

2M

OE,

MO

H, M

OA

LF,

MO

DP

, cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

Dev

elop

men

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

Inve

ntor

y/di

agno

sis a

nd n

eeds

as

sess

men

t of d

ata

colle

ctio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

s for

bot

h sh

ort

and

long

-term

dec

isio

n m

akin

g co

nduc

t.

Con

duct

inve

ntor

y/di

agno

sis

and

need

s ass

essm

ent f

or fo

od

and

nutri

tion

data

col

lect

ion

and

man

agem

ent s

yste

ms f

or b

oth

shor

t an

d lo

ng-te

rm d

ecis

ion

mak

ing.

270

2017

-202

2M

OE,

MO

H, M

OA

LF,

MO

DP,

, co

unty

gov

ernm

ent,

Dev

elop

men

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

Dat

a se

ts a

nd st

orag

e be

twee

n th

e tw

o le

vels

of g

over

nmen

t and

in v

ario

us

inst

itutio

ns fo

r im

prov

ed d

ata

shar

ing

Stan

dard

izat

ion

and

harm

oniz

atio

n.

Stan

dard

izat

ion

and

harm

oniz

atio

n da

ta se

ts a

nd st

orag

e be

twee

n th

e tw

o le

vels

of g

over

nmen

t and

in

vario

us in

stitu

tions

for i

mpr

oved

da

ta sh

arin

g.

7020

17-2

022

MO

E, M

OH

, MO

ALF

,M

OD

P, c

ount

y go

vern

men

t, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s,

Prom

ote

use

of a

ppro

pria

te te

chno

logy

to

enh

ance

qua

lity

of d

ata

colle

ctio

n.Pr

omot

e us

e of

app

ropr

iate

te

chno

logy

to e

nhan

ce q

ualit

y of

da

ta c

olle

ctio

n.

700

2017

-202

2M

OE,

MO

H, M

OA

LF,

MO

DP,

cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

Dev

elop

men

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

Exis

ting

legi

slat

ion

on d

ata

colle

ctio

n an

d sh

arin

g to

enh

ance

acc

ess a

nd

trans

pare

ncy

revi

ewed

Rev

iew

exi

stin

g le

gisl

atio

n on

dat

a co

llect

ion

and

shar

ing

to e

nhan

ce

acce

ss a

nd tr

ansp

aren

cy

8020

17-2

022

MO

E, M

OH

, MO

ALF

,M

OD

P, ,

coun

ty g

over

nmen

t, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s,

65

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ESO

UTP

UTS

INTE

RVEN

TIO

NS

CO

ST

EST

IMAT

E

(MiL

L K

ES

TIM

E FR

AM

ER

ESPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

An

audi

t and

val

idat

ion

mec

hani

sm

to d

ata

colle

ctio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t de

velo

ped

and

impl

emen

ted

Dev

elop

and

impl

emen

t an

audi

t an

d va

lidat

ion

mec

hani

sm fo

r dat

a co

llect

ion

and

man

agem

ent

7020

17-2

022

MO

E, M

OH

, MO

ALF

,M

OD

P, c

ount

y go

vern

men

t, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, R

esea

rch

coor

dina

tion

mec

hani

sms a

t na

tiona

l and

cou

nty

leve

l stre

ngth

ened

/es

tabl

ishe

d

Stre

ngth

en/e

stab

lish

rese

arch

co

ordi

natio

n m

echa

nism

s at n

atio

nal

and

coun

ty le

vel

8520

17-2

022

MO

E, M

OH

, MO

ALF

,M

OD

P, c

ount

y go

vern

men

t, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, R

esou

rce

mob

iliza

tion

to a

ddre

ss

criti

cal g

aps i

n fo

od a

nd n

utrit

ion

rese

arch

con

duct

ed

Con

duct

reso

urce

mob

iliza

tion

to

addr

ess c

ritic

al g

aps i

n fo

od a

nd

nutri

tion

rese

arch

4520

17-2

022

MO

E, M

OH

, MO

ALF

,M

OD

P

Nee

d ba

sed

rese

arch

to in

form

pol

icy,

pr

ogra

m d

esig

n an

d im

plem

enta

tion

for f

ood

and

nutri

tion

cond

ucte

d

Con

duct

nee

d ba

sed

rese

arch

to

info

rm p

olic

y, p

rogr

am d

esig

n an

d im

plem

enta

tion

for f

ood

and

nutri

tion

prog

ram

s

210

2017

-202

2M

OE,

MO

H, M

OA

LF,

MO

DP,

cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

Dev

elop

men

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,,

C

apac

ity o

f rel

evan

t res

earc

h in

stitu

tions

to c

ondu

ct fo

od a

nd

nutri

tion

rese

arch

stre

ngth

ened

Stre

ngth

en th

e ca

paci

ty o

f rel

evan

t re

sear

ch in

stitu

tions

to c

ondu

ct fo

od

and

nutri

tion

rese

arch

140

2017

-202

2M

OE,

MO

H, M

OA

LF,

MO

DP,

, co

unty

gov

ernm

ent,

Dev

elop

men

t and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

A n

atio

nal m

onito

ring

plan

for

nutri

tion

com

mod

ities

dev

elop

edD

evel

op a

nat

iona

l mon

itorin

g pl

an

for n

utrit

ion

com

mod

ities

7020

17-2

022

MO

E, M

OH

, MO

ALF

,M

OD

P, c

ount

y go

vern

men

t, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s,,

2,92

05.

2 In

from

atio

n,

Edu

catio

n,

Com

mun

icat

ion

To c

ontri

bute

to th

e im

prov

emen

t of

nutri

tion

and

heal

th

outc

omes

thro

ugh

enha

nced

serv

ice

prov

isio

n

Exis

tenc

e of

syst

emat

ic,

orga

niza

tiona

l, te

chni

cal a

nd

com

mun

ity c

apac

ity sy

stem

s for

su

ppor

ting

nutri

tion

serv

ice

deliv

ery

supp

orte

d

Supp

ort t

he e

xist

ence

of e

stab

lishe

d sy

stem

atic

, org

aniz

atio

nal,

tech

nica

l an

d co

mm

unity

cap

acity

syst

ems f

or

supp

ortin

g nu

tritio

n se

rvic

e de

liver

y

4520

17-2

022

MO

H,M

OA

,Dev

elop

men

t and

im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, co

unty

go

vern

men

t, M

OE,

rese

arch

in

stitu

tions

, reg

ulat

ory

bodi

es

Syst

em w

ide

capa

city

dev

elop

men

t to

impr

ove

over

all e

nviro

nmen

t for

fo

od a

nd n

utrit

ion

serv

ice

deliv

ery

stre

ngth

ened

Stre

ngth

en sy

stem

wid

e ca

paci

ty

deve

lopm

ent t

o im

prov

e ov

eral

l en

viro

nmen

t for

nut

ritio

n se

rvic

e de

liver

y

150

2017

-202

2M

OH

,MO

A, D

evel

opm

ent

and

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers

MO

E,C

ount

y go

vern

men

t, re

sear

ch in

stitu

tions

, reg

ulat

ory

bodi

es

66

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ESO

UTP

UTS

INTE

RVEN

TIO

NS

CO

ST

EST

IMAT

E

(MiL

L K

ES

TIM

E FR

AM

ER

ESPO

NSI

BIL

ITY

*

The

wor

king

arr

ange

men

ts a

nd

coor

dina

tion

fram

ewor

k of

ke

y in

stitu

tions

for i

mpr

oved

or

gani

zatio

nal c

apac

ity fo

r nut

ritio

n en

hanc

ed

Enha

nce

the

wor

king

arr

ange

men

ts

and

coor

dina

tion

fram

ewor

k of

ke

y in

stitu

tions

for i

mpr

oved

or

gani

zatio

nal c

apac

ity fo

r nut

ritio

n

1,21

520

17-2

022

MO

H,M

OA

, cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

Dev

elop

men

t and

im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s MO

E,

rese

arch

inst

itutio

ns, r

egul

ator

y bo

dies

The

com

mun

ity a

bilit

y to

acc

ess,

cons

ume

and

dem

and

for f

ood

and

nutri

tion

serv

ices

thro

ugh

incr

ease

d nu

tritio

n se

rvic

e aw

aren

ess

stre

ngth

ened

Stre

ngth

en th

e co

mm

unity

abi

lity

to a

cces

s, co

nsum

e an

d de

man

d fo

r nu

tritio

n se

rvic

es th

roug

h in

crea

sed

nutri

tion

serv

ice

awar

enes

s

4020

17-2

022

MO

H,M

OA

, cou

nty

gove

rnm

ent,

Dev

elop

men

t and

im

plem

entin

g pa

rtner

s, M

OE,

re

sear

ch in

stitu

tions

The

pres

ence

as w

ell a

s the

pro

ficie

ncy

leve

ls o

f foo

d an

d nu

tritio

n se

rvic

e pr

ovid

ers s

uppo

rted

and

stre

ngth

ened

Supp

ort a

nd st

reng

then

the

pres

ence

as

wel

l as t

he p

rofic

ienc

y le

vels

of

food

and

nut

ritio

n se

rvic

e pr

ovid

ers.

860

2017

-202

2M

OH

,MO

A, c

ount

y go

vern

men

t, D

evel

opm

ent a

nd

impl

emen

ting

partn

ers,

MO

E,

rese

arch

inst

itutio

ns,

2,31

0

6.0

INST

ITUTIO

NA

L, L

EGA

L FR

AM

EWO

RK A

ND

FIN

AN

CIN

GPR

IOR

ITY

PR

OG

RA

M

AR

EA

S

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

S

CO

ST

EST

IMAT

ET

IME

FR

AM

ER

ESP

ON

SIB

ILIT

Y*

6.1

and

6.2

. In

stitu

tiona

l and

Le

gal F

ram

ewor

k

To e

stab

lish

and

stre

ngth

en

inst

itutio

nal

fram

ewor

k fo

r effe

ctiv

e co

ordi

natio

n,

over

sigh

t and

im

plem

enta

tion

of

the

NFN

SP

•N

atio

nal F

ood

and

Nut

ritio

n Se

curit

y C

ounc

il es

tabl

ishe

d an

d op

erat

iona

lized

•

Nat

iona

l Foo

d an

d N

utrit

ion

Secu

rity

Stee

ring

Com

mitt

ee

esta

blis

hed

and

oper

atio

naliz

ed

•N

atio

nal F

ood

and

Nut

ritio

n Se

curit

y Se

cret

aria

t est

ablis

hed

and

oper

atio

naliz

ed

•R

elev

ant S

take

hold

er

tech

nica

l com

mitt

ees i

n pl

ace

•Es

tabl

ish

and

oper

atio

naliz

e N

atio

nal F

ood

and

Nut

ritio

n Se

curit

y C

ounc

il, S

teer

ing

Com

mitt

ee a

nd S

ecre

taria

t•

Esta

blis

h an

d op

erat

iona

lize

rele

vant

Sta

keho

lder

Tec

hnic

al

Com

mitt

ees a

t Nat

iona

l lev

el.

400

200

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF, C

oG, M

OD

P, M

OW

I, M

OH

, MO

E, N

DM

A

67

PRIO

RIT

Y

PRO

GR

AM

A

RE

AS

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

OU

TPU

TS

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

S

CO

ST

EST

IMAT

ET

IME

FR

AM

ER

ESP

ON

SIB

ILIT

Y*

•C

ount

y Fo

od a

nd N

utrit

ion

Secu

rity

Stee

ring

Com

mitt

ee

esta

blis

hed

and

oper

atio

naliz

ed

•C

ount

y Fo

od a

nd N

utrit

ion

Secu

rity

Secr

etar

iat e

stab

lishe

d an

d op

erat

iona

lized

.

•Es

tabl

ish

and

oper

atio

naliz

e C

ount

y le

vel F

ood

and

Nut

ritio

n Se

curit

y St

eerin

g C

omm

ittee

s an

d Se

cret

aria

ts•

Esta

blis

h an

d op

erat

iona

lize

rele

vant

Sta

keho

lder

Tec

hnic

al

Com

mitt

ees a

t cou

ntie

s lev

els.

300

2017

-202

2M

OA

LF, C

oG, M

OD

P, M

OW

I, M

OH

, MO

E, N

DM

A

To p

rovi

de a

lega

l an

d re

gula

tory

fr

amew

ork

for

impl

emen

tatio

n of

th

e N

FNSP

Legi

slat

ive

fram

ewor

k an

d gu

idel

ines

fo

r effi

cien

t im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e FN

SP d

evel

oped

/ rev

iew

ed

Rev

iew

the

exis

ting

legi

slat

ive

fram

ewor

k an

d gu

idel

ines

for

effici

ent i

mpl

emen

tatio

n of

the

FNSP

2020

17-2

022

MO

DP,

CoG

, MO

ALF

, MO

WI,

MO

H, M

OE,

ND

MA

Legi

slat

ion

regu

latin

g en

acte

d an

d

enfo

rced

En

act l

egis

latio

n an

d gu

idel

ines

re

gula

ting

effec

tive

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

FNSP

at b

oth

the

natio

nal a

nd

coun

ty le

vels

En

forc

e ex

istin

g le

gisl

atio

n on

Foo

d an

d nu

tritio

n se

curit

y

3020

17-2

022

MO

DP,

CoG

, MO

ALF

, MO

WI,

MO

H, M

OE,

ND

MA

Mea

sure

s to

ensu

re c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith e

xist

ing

law

s and

regu

latio

ns

supp

orte

d

Supp

ort m

easu

res t

o en

sure

co

mpl

ianc

e an

d en

forc

emen

t of

exis

ting

law

s and

regu

latio

ns

6020

17-2

022

MO

DP,

CoG

, MO

ALF

, MO

WI,

MO

H, M

OE,

ND

MA

, KEB

S

Inte

rnat

iona

l and

regi

onal

trea

ties,

decl

arat

ions

and

con

vent

ions

rela

ted

to fo

od a

nd n

utrit

ion

secu

rity

dom

estic

ated

Dom

estic

ate

inte

rnat

iona

l and

re

gion

al tr

eatie

s, de

clar

atio

ns a

nd

conv

entio

ns re

late

d to

food

and

nu

tritio

n se

curit

y

6020

17-2

022

MO

DP,

CoG

, MO

ALF

, MO

WI,

MO

H, M

OE,

ND

MA

, KEB

S

Sub

Tota

l1,

070

6.3

Fund

ing

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

th

e N

FNS

To m

obili

ze a

nd

advo

cate

for

reso

urce

s for

eff

ectiv

e pl

anni

ng

and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

NFN

SP

Adv

ocac

y an

d re

sour

ce m

obili

zatio

n de

sk a

t the

NFN

S es

tabl

ishe

dR

esou

rce

Mob

iliza

tion

Stra

tegy

de

velo

ped

Bud

geta

ry a

lloca

tion

for f

ood

and

nutri

tion

secu

rity

inte

rven

tions

Esta

blis

h an

Adv

ocac

y an

d R

esou

rce

Mob

iliza

tion

Des

k at

the

NFN

S.

Dev

elop

a g

over

nmen

t Res

ourc

e M

obili

zatio

n St

rate

gy

50 20

2017

/18

2017

/18

MO

ALF

MO

ALF

, MO

DP,

ND

MA

, M

OW

I, C

oG, M

OH

, MO

ESu

b To

tal

70

*The

lead

min

istri

es (h

ighl

ight

ed) r

espo

nsib

le fo

r im

plem

enta

tion;

the

rest

are

link

min

istri

es a

nd in

stitu

tions

. The

min

istry

nam

es a

re a

s wer

e kn

own

befo

re th

e C

oalit

ion

Gov

ernm

ent w

as

form

ed in

Apr

il 20

08. T

he d

epar

tmen

ts c

once

rned

still

rem

ain

rele

vant

.**

Incl

udes

infr

astru

ctur

al c

onst

ruct

ion

cost

s, e.

g. ro

ads.

68

APP

ENDI

X II:

FO

OD

SEC

URITY

PER

FORM

AN

CE

INDI

CA

TORS

St

rate

gic

Obj

ectiv

e: G

oal:

Impr

oved

food

sel

f suf

ficie

ncy

Obj

ectiv

e: In

crea

se o

vera

ll fo

od p

rodu

ctio

n an

d pr

oces

sing

Prog

ram

/pr

ojec

tE

xpec

ted

outp

utO

bjec

tivel

y ve

rifia

ble

indi

cato

r

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

(2

022)

Bas

elin

eA

nnua

l Tar

gets

2017

/18

2018

/19

2019

/20

2020

/21

2021

/22

2022

/202

3C

erea

ls

prod

uctio

nIm

prov

e st

aple

ce

real

s pro

duct

ion

Tota

l ann

ual

cere

al fo

od

prod

uctio

n

KIH

BS

repo

rt,

Ann

ual f

ood

prod

uctio

n re

ports

, Foo

d as

sess

men

t re

ports

6.57

m M

T4.

05m

MT

4.55

4m M

T5.

058m

MT

5.56

2m M

T6.

066m

MT

6.57

m M

T7.

17m

MT

Prot

ein

Food

s (M

T)Se

lf-su

ffici

ency

in

prot

ein

food

s.To

tal a

nnua

l pr

otei

n fo

od

prod

uctio

n

KIH

BS

repo

rt A

nnua

l foo

d pr

oduc

tion

repo

rts, F

ood

asse

ssm

ent

repo

rts

1.

445m

MT

1.6

56m

MT

FIFI

1.48

3m

MT

1.

522m

M

T

1.

561m

MT

1.

602M

T 1

.643

m

MT

1.68

6,05

7MT

Ani

mal

pro

tein

so

urce

s (M

T)Se

lf-su

ffici

ency

in

anim

al p

rote

ins

Tota

l ann

ual

anim

al

prot

ein

food

s pr

oduc

tion

KIH

BS

repo

rt,

Ann

ual f

ood

prod

uctio

n re

ports

, Foo

d as

sess

men

t re

ports

662,

475M

T 4,

839,

416M

T

59

3,19

2MT

60

8,61

5MT

62

4,43

9MT

640,

675M

T

65

7,33

2MT

67

4,42

3MT

Plan

t pro

tein

so

urce

s (M

T)Se

lf-su

ffici

ency

in

plan

t pro

tein

sTo

tal a

nnua

l pl

ant p

rote

in

food

s pr

oduc

tion

KIH

BS

repo

rt,

Ann

ual f

ood

prod

uctio

n re

ports

, Foo

d as

sess

men

t re

ports

993,

713M

T

88

9,78

8MT

91

2,92

3MT

93

6,65

9MT

961,

012M

T

98

5,99

8MT

1,01

1,63

4 M

T

69

Prog

ram

/pr

ojec

tE

xpec

ted

outp

utO

bjec

tivel

y ve

rifia

ble

indi

cato

r

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

(2

022)

Bas

elin

eA

nnua

l Tar

gets

2017

/18

2018

/19

2019

/20

2020

/21

2021

/22

2022

/202

3N

uts /

oil c

rops

(F

ats/

oils

) (M

T)

35

% in

crea

se

in n

uts a

nd o

ils

crop

s

Tota

l ann

ual

anim

al

prot

ein

pr

oduc

tion

KIH

BS

repo

rt,

KIH

BS

repo

rt,

Ann

ual f

ood

prod

uctio

n re

ports

, Foo

d as

sess

men

t re

ports

28

0,66

2 M

T

187,

108

20

0,20

6MT

21

4,22

0MT

229,

215M

T

245,

260M

T

262,

429M

T

28

0,79

9MT

Vege

tabl

e pr

oduc

tion

(MT)

Cur

rent

4,

117,

200,

000M

TTo

tal a

nnua

l ve

geta

ble

pr

oduc

tion

KIH

BS

repo

rt,

Ann

ual f

ood

prod

uctio

n re

ports

, Foo

d as

sess

men

t re

ports

4.81

8 m

M

TTB

D

Frui

t pro

duct

ion

Cur

rent

2,74

4,80

0MT

Tota

l an

nual

frui

t pr

oduc

tion

KIH

BS

repo

rt,

Ann

ual f

ood

prod

uctio

n re

ports

, Foo

d as

sess

men

t re

ports

3.21

2m M

TTB

D

Mai

ze

prod

uctio

n pe

r un

it ar

ea

Incr

ease

d m

aize

pr

oduc

tion

per

unit

area

Yie

ld p

er H

aA

nnua

l foo

d pr

oduc

tion

repo

rts, F

ood

asse

ssm

ent

repo

rts

4.05

1.9

MT

2.28

2.74

3.28

3.94

4.73

5.68

Mai

ze

prod

uctio

n co

stR

educ

ed/

affor

dabl

e co

st o

f pr

oduc

tion

Cos

t of

prod

ucin

g on

e ba

g of

m

aize

Ann

ual f

ood

prod

uctio

n re

ports

, Foo

d as

sess

men

t re

ports

Less

that

10

% a

nnua

l st

eady

in

crea

se in

pr

oduc

tion

cost

1,80

01,

800

Roo

ts a

nd

tube

r cro

ps

prod

uctio

n

Impr

oved

pr

oduc

tion

of

root

/tube

r cro

ps

Tota

l ann

ual

root

s and

tu

ber c

rops

pr

oduc

tion

Ann

ual f

ood

prod

uctio

n re

ports

, Foo

d as

sess

men

t re

ports

129,

600

MT

81M

T91

102

114

127

143

70

Prog

ram

/pr

ojec

tE

xpec

ted

outp

utO

bjec

tivel

y ve

rifia

ble

indi

cato

r

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

(2

022)

Bas

elin

eA

nnua

l Tar

gets

2017

/18

2018

/19

2019

/20

2020

/21

2021

/22

2022

/202

3U

tiliz

atio

n of

tra

ditio

nal h

igh

valu

e fo

od

crop

s

Incr

ease

d ut

iliza

tion

of

Trad

ition

al h

igh

valu

e fo

ods

Num

ber o

f hi

gh v

alue

tra

ditio

nal

food

cro

ps

wid

ely

cons

umed

.

Ann

ual f

ood

prod

uctio

n re

ports

, Foo

d as

sess

men

t re

ports

10%

in

crea

se2%

3%5%

7%8%

10%

Ferti

lizer

cos

t re

duct

ion

(Ksh

)In

crea

sed

use

of

ferti

lizer

Fe

rtiliz

er

mar

ket p

rice

Ann

ual f

ood

prod

uctio

n re

ports

, Foo

d as

sess

men

t re

ports

2,00

03,

200

2,00

02,

000

2,00

02,

000

2,00

0

Cer

eal

Prod

uctio

n yi

eld

gap

Red

uced

pr

oduc

tion

yiel

d ga

p

Cer

eal y

ield

ga

pA

nnua

l foo

d pr

oduc

tion

repo

rts, F

ood

asse

ssm

ent

repo

rts

50%

0%30

%20

%10

%10

%0%

Agr

icul

tura

l m

echa

niza

tion

equi

pmen

t/m

achi

nery

Incr

ease

d ag

ricul

tura

l m

echa

niza

tion

equi

pmen

t /m

achi

nery

Num

ber

of fa

rm

equi

pmen

t/tra

ctor

s

Ann

ual

agric

ultu

ral

mec

hani

zatio

n re

ports

16,0

0012

,600

13,2

30

13,8

92

14

,586

15

,315

16,0

81

Irrig

ated

A

gric

ultu

reIn

crea

sed

irrig

ated

ag

ricul

ture

Are

a un

der

irrig

ated

ag

ricul

ture

Ann

ual w

ater

an

d irr

igat

ion

repo

rts,

600,

000

Ha

161,

840

210,

392.

0027

3,50

9.60

355,

562.

4846

2,23

1.22

600,

900.

59

Wat

er

harv

estin

g an

d st

orag

e

Incr

ease

am

ount

of

wat

er h

arve

sted

an

d st

ored

Ann

ual w

ater

ha

rves

ted

and

stor

ed

Ann

ual w

ater

an

d irr

igat

ion

repo

rts

TBD

TBD

Dom

estic

wat

erTo

incr

ease

am

ount

ot w

ater

ha

rves

ted

and

stor

ed

Am

ount

ot

wat

er

harv

este

d an

d st

ored

Cen

sus r

epor

t, ho

useh

old

surv

ey re

ports

80%

65%

68%

70%

75%

78%

80%

SFR

bud

get

Incr

ease

d SF

R

allo

catio

nSF

R

allo

catio

nA

nnua

l bud

get

estim

ates

, SFR

m

inut

es,

SFR

repo

rts

2 m

onth

s st

ocks

for

10%

of

popu

latio

n

5 B

illio

n24

Bill

ion

24B

30 B

30 B

36B

30 B

71

Prog

ram

/pr

ojec

tE

xpec

ted

outp

utO

bjec

tivel

y ve

rifia

ble

indi

cato

r

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

(2

022)

Bas

elin

eA

nnua

l Tar

gets

2017

/18

2018

/19

2019

/20

2020

/21

2021

/22

2022

/202

3SF

R fo

od st

ocks

(B

ags o

f mai

ze

or e

quiv

alen

t).

Rec

omm

ende

d SF

R le

vel

achi

eved

.

SFR

leve

lN

CPB

repo

rts,

SFR

min

utes

,SF

R re

ports

12 M

illio

n ba

gs1.

67 M

illio

n ba

gs8M

9M10

M11

M12

M13

M

Agr

icul

ture

se

ctor

bud

get

allo

catio

n

To a

lloca

te a

t le

ast 1

0% o

f the

N

atio

nal b

udge

t to

Agr

icul

ture

Se

ctor

.

Allo

catio

n at

le

ast 1

0%.

Agr

icul

ture

se

ctor

bud

get

Ann

ual

econ

omic

su

rvey

re

ports

, A

nnua

l pr

inte

d es

timat

es,

10%

(229

B

illio

n)2.

8%(3

5B)

6%7%

8%9%

10%

Oth

er F

ood

Secu

rity

Indi

cato

rs

Prog

ram

/pr

ojec

tO

bjec

tive

Exp

ecte

d ou

tput

Obj

ectiv

ely

veri

fiabl

e in

dica

tor

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

(202

2)B

asel

ine

Ann

ual T

arge

ts

2017

/18

2018

/19

2019

/20

2020

/21

2021

/22

2022

/202

3

Con

sum

er

pric

e in

dex

(CPI

)

Red

uce

the

cons

umer

pr

ice

leve

l ind

ex to

an

affo

rdab

le

CPI

redu

ced

and

mai

ntai

ned

with

in

affor

dabl

e ra

nge

Mon

thly

CPI

Ann

ual

econ

omic

surv

ey

repo

rts, K

NB

S C

onsu

mer

su

rvey

repo

rts

9918

2.98

Food

in

flatio

n ra

teFo

od in

flatio

n re

duce

d be

low

3%

Mon

thly

Fo

od

infla

tion

Ann

ual

econ

omic

surv

ey

repo

rts ,

KN

BS

Con

sum

er

surv

ey re

ports

<3%

18.5

6%

Tree

cov

erIn

crea

se to

tal l

and

fore

st c

over

to th

e re

com

men

ded

leve

l.

Impr

oved

land

pr

oduc

tivity

Tota

l lan

d fo

rest

cov

erA

nnua

l NR

M

repo

rts10

%6.

7%7%

8%9%

10%

10%

Land

use

m

anag

emen

t (s

oil f

ertil

ity)

To c

onse

rve

agric

ultu

ral l

and

Impr

oved

land

pr

oduc

tivity

Con

serv

ed

land

are

aLa

nd

degr

adat

ion

map

s.

40%

37.5

%35

%32

.5%

30%

27.5

%25

%

72

Prog

ram

/pr

ojec

tO

bjec

tive

Exp

ecte

d ou

tput

Obj

ectiv

ely

veri

fiabl

e in

dica

tor

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

(202

2)B

asel

ine

Ann

ual T

arge

ts

2017

/18

2018

/19

2019

/20

2020

/21

2021

/22

2022

/202

3

Emer

rgen

cy

and

cris

is

man

agem

ent

To re

duce

the

risk

of

food

inse

curit

y an

d m

alnu

tritio

n

Red

uced

food

in

secu

rity

and

emer

genc

ies

Num

ber

of fo

od

inse

cure

pe

ople

Food

secu

rity

repo

rtsFo

od se

curit

y as

sess

men

t re

ports

26%

5%

20%

20%

20%

20%

20%

To p

reve

nt c

risis

fr

om d

evel

opin

g in

to

emer

genc

ies

Tim

ely

resp

onse

to

cris

is a

nd

emer

genc

ies

Num

ber

of c

risis

ep

isod

es th

at

deve

lop

into

cr

isis

Dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t re

ports

No

emer

genc

y si

tuat

ions

re

porte

d

Num

ber

of c

risis

de

velo

ping

in

to

emer

genc

ies

No

cris

is

deve

lopi

ng

into

em

erge

ncie

s

No

cris

is

deve

lopi

ng

into

em

erge

ncie

s

No

cris

is

deve

lopi

ng

into

em

erge

ncie

s

No

cris

is

deve

lopi

ng

into

em

erge

ncie

s

No

cris

is

deve

lopi

ng

into

em

erge

ncie

s

Inst

itutio

nal

stru

ctur

e fo

r Fo

od a

nd

nutri

tion

Esta

blis

h a

lead

ersh

ip a

nd

coor

dina

tions

truct

ure

for i

mpl

emen

tatio

n of

th

FN

SP

Food

and

N

utrit

ion

Secu

riy

Cou

ncil,

St

eerin

g co

mm

ittee

and

Se

cret

aria

ts in

pl

ace

Esta

blis

hed

Cou

ncil,

St

eerin

g C

omm

ittee

s, an

d Se

cret

aria

ts

for m

anag

ing

Food

and

N

utrit

ion

Secu

rity

Food

and

N

utrit

ion

secu

rity

repo

rts

FNSP

Im

plem

enta

tion

Cou

ncil,

St

eerin

g C

omm

ittee

s an

d Se

cret

aria

ts

in p

lace

Not

in p

lace

In

stitu

tiona

l st

yruc

ture

in

plac

e

Inst

itutio

nal

styr

uctu

re in

pl

ace

Inst

itutio

nal

styr

uctu

re in

pl

ace

Inst

itutio

nal

styr

uctu

re in

pl

ace

Inst

itutio

nal

styr

uctu

re in

pl

ace

NUT

RITIO

N IM

PRO

VEM

ENT K

EY P

ERFO

RMA

NC

E IN

DIC

ATO

RSK

EY

RE

SULT

AR

EA

: NU

TR

ITIO

N IM

PRO

VE

ME

NT

Prog

ram

or

proj

ect a

rea

Obj

ectiv

eE

xpec

ted

oupu

t/ou

tcom

eO

bjec

tivel

y ve

rifia

ble

Indi

cato

rs

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

Bas

elin

eta

rget

s

Y

1Y

2Y

3Y

4Y

5Li

fecy

cle

appr

oach

to

nut

ritio

n im

prov

emen

t

To a

chie

ve

optim

al

nutri

tion

for a

ll co

hort

grou

ps

thro

ugho

ut th

e lif

e cy

cle

Red

uced

leve

ls o

f st

untin

g am

ong

child

ren

<5 y

ears

Prop

ortio

n of

ch

ildre

n <

5 ye

ars s

tunt

ed

KD

HS,

nu

tritio

n su

rvey

s, K

NM

S

15%

26%

(KD

Hs 2

014)

2220

1816

15

73

Prog

ram

or

proj

ect a

rea

Obj

ectiv

eE

xpec

ted

oupu

t/ou

tcom

eO

bjec

tivel

y ve

rifia

ble

Indi

cato

rs

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

Bas

elin

eta

rget

s

Y

1Y

2Y

3Y

4Y

5R

educ

ed le

vels

of

und

erw

eigh

t am

ong

child

ren

<5 y

ears

Prop

ortio

n re

duct

ion

in

child

ren

<5 y

ears

un

derw

eigh

t

KD

HS,

nu

tritio

n su

rvey

s, K

NM

S

Sust

atin

be

low

5%

as

per

WH

A

targ

ets

11%

(KD

Hs 2

014)

1110

9 8

7

Red

uced

leve

ls o

f w

astin

g am

ong

child

ren

<5 y

ears

Prop

ortio

n of

ch

ildre

n <5

yea

rs

was

ted

KD

HS,

nu

tritio

n su

rvey

s, K

NM

S

Sust

ain

belo

w 5

% a

s pe

r the

WH

A

targ

ets

4% (KD

Hs 2

014)

<5%

<5%

<5%

<5%

<5%

Red

uced

leve

ls

of o

verw

eigh

t/ob

esity

in

child

ren

<5 y

ears

Prop

ortio

n of

ch

ildre

n <5

ye

ars w

ho a

re

over

wei

ght o

r ob

ese

KD

HS,

N

utrit

ion

Surv

eys,

KN

MS

Sus

tatin

be

low

5%

as

per

WH

A

targ

ets

4.1%

(KD

Hs 2

014)

<5%

<5%

<5%

<5%

<5%

Incr

ease

d ex

clus

ive

brea

stfe

edin

g ra

tes f

or c

hild

ren

aged

bel

ow si

x m

onth

s

Prop

ortio

n of

ch

ildre

n <6

m

onth

s who

ar

e e

xclu

sive

ly

brea

stfe

d

KD

HS,

N

utrit

ion

surv

eys

75%

61%

(KD

Hs 2

014)

65%

68%

70%

7

2%75

%

Incr

ease

d m

inim

um

acce

ptab

le d

iet

amon

g ch

ildre

n ag

ed 6

-23

mon

ths

with

Prop

ortio

n of

ch

ildre

n 6-

23

mon

ths w

ith

min

imum

ac

cept

able

die

t

MIY

CN

K

AP

surv

ey,

Nut

ritio

n su

rvey

s, K

DH

S

60%

31%

(KD

Hs 2

014)

35%

40 5

0% 5

5% 6

0%

Incr

ease

d m

inim

um d

ieta

ry

dive

rsity

- w

omen

Prop

ortio

n of

W

RA

with

m

inim

um d

ieta

ry

dive

rsity

- w

omen

MIY

CN

K

AP

surv

ey,

Nut

ritio

n su

rvey

s

60%

TBD

74

Prog

ram

or

proj

ect a

rea

Obj

ectiv

eE

xpec

ted

oupu

t/ou

tcom

eO

bjec

tivel

y ve

rifia

ble

Indi

cato

rs

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

Bas

elin

eta

rget

s

Y

1Y

2Y

3Y

4Y

5R

educ

ed

over

wei

ght o

r ob

esity

am

ong

adul

ts a

ged

18-6

9 ye

ars

Prop

ortio

n of

ad

ults

18-

69

year

s who

are

ov

erw

eigh

t or

obes

e

Step

wis

e su

rvey

, nut

ritio

n su

rvey

repo

rts

20%

Ensu

re th

at

ther

e is

no

incr

ease

in

obes

ity

28%

26%

24%

22%

21%

20%

2.5.

2.

Mic

ronu

trien

t D

efici

ency

Pr

even

tion

and

Con

trol

To p

reve

nt

and

redu

ce

mic

ro-n

utrie

nt

defic

ienc

y di

sord

ers,

Red

uced

pr

eval

ence

of

anae

mia

am

ong

WR

A

Prop

ortio

n re

duct

ion

in

anae

mia

am

ong

WR

A

KN

MS

Rep

ort,

15%

%21

%19

%18

%

17%

1

6% 1

5%

Red

uced

pr

eval

ence

of

anae

mia

am

ong

preg

nant

wom

en

Prop

ortio

n re

duct

ion

in

anae

mia

am

ong

preg

nant

wom

en

KN

MS

Rep

ort,

20%

36%

30%

28%

25%

23

%

20%

Incr

ease

d co

nsum

ptio

n of

fo

rtifie

d fo

ods.

Prop

ortio

n of

ho

useh

olds

co

nsum

ing

forti

fied

food

s

Surv

ey R

epor

ts;

KD

HS;

KIH

BS

80%

Red

uced

pr

eval

ence

of z

inc

defic

ienc

y am

ong

preg

nant

wom

en

Prop

ortio

n of

pre

gnan

t w

omen

with

zin

c de

ficie

ncy

KN

MS

repo

rt,

othe

r stu

dy a

nd

surv

ey re

ports

55%

60%

59

%

58%

57%

56%

55%

Red

uced

pr

eval

ence

of

zinc

defi

cien

cy

amon

g pr

e-sc

hool

ch

ildre

n in

Ken

ya

Prop

ortio

n of

und

er fi

ve

child

ren

with

zi

nc d

efici

ency

am

ong

pre-

scho

ol c

hild

ren

in K

enya

KN

MS,

oth

er

stud

y an

d su

rvey

repo

rts

50%

83.3

% 7

8% 7

0% 6

0%65

%

50%

75

Prog

ram

or

proj

ect a

rea

Obj

ectiv

eE

xpec

ted

oupu

t/ou

tcom

eO

bjec

tivel

y ve

rifia

ble

Indi

cato

rs

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

Bas

elin

eta

rget

s

Y

1Y

2Y

3Y

4Y

5R

educ

ed V

itam

in

A Defi

cien

cy a

mon

gch

ildre

n<5

year

s

Prop

ortio

n of

ch

ildre

n <5

yea

rs

with

Vita

min

Ade

ficie

ncy

KN

MS,

oth

er

stud

y an

d su

rvey

repo

rts

4%9.

2%8%

7%6%

5%4%

Red

uced

iodi

neD

efici

ency

am

ong

child

ren<

5yea

rs

Prop

ortio

n of

ch

ildre

n <5

yea

rs

with

iodi

nede

ficie

ncy

KN

MS,

oth

er

stud

y an

d su

rvey

repo

rts

<10%

22%

18%

16%

15

%

13%

<

10%

Red

uced

iodi

nede

ficie

ncy

amon

gno

n-pr

egna

nt

wom

en

Prop

ortio

n of

no

n-pr

egna

nt

wom

en w

ith

iodi

nede

ficie

ncy

KN

MS,

oth

er

stud

y an

d su

rvey

repo

rts

<10%

25.6

%22

%20

%

27%

15

%

<10%

Red

uced

fola

teD

efici

ency

am

ong

non-

preg

nant

w

omen

Prop

ortio

n of

no

n-pr

egna

nt

wom

en w

ith

fola

te d

efici

ency

KN

MS,

oth

er

stud

y an

d su

rvey

repo

rts

20%

39%

35%

30%

36%

30%

20%

Incr

ease

d po

pula

tion

cons

umin

g iro

n ric

h fo

ods

Prop

ortio

n of

ch

ildre

n ag

ed

6-23

mon

ths

who

con

sum

e iro

n ric

h fo

ods

KD

HS,

Per

iodi

c nu

tritio

n pr

ogra

m

asse

ssm

ents

60%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

60%

Incr

ease

d po

pula

tion

cons

umin

g

vita

min

A r

ich

food

s

Prop

ortio

n of

ch

ildre

n ag

ed

6-23

mon

ths

who

con

sum

e

vita

min

A r

ich

food

s

KD

HS,

Per

iodi

c nu

tritio

n pr

ogra

m

asse

ssm

ents

80%

68%

70%

72%

73%

75%

80%

76

Prog

ram

or

proj

ect a

rea

Obj

ectiv

eE

xpec

ted

oupu

t/ou

tcom

eO

bjec

tivel

y ve

rifia

ble

Indi

cato

rs

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

Bas

elin

eta

rget

s

Y

1Y

2Y

3Y

4Y

5In

crea

sed

popu

latio

n ad

optin

g en

ergy

savi

ng

tech

nolo

gies

Prop

ortio

n of

pop

ulat

ion

who

ado

pt

ener

gy sa

ving

te

chno

logi

es

Agr

icul

ture

se

ctor

repo

rts

Nut

ritio

n ad

voca

cy

com

mun

icat

ion

and

soci

al

mob

iliza

tion

To im

prov

e nu

tritio

n kn

owle

dge

attit

ude

and

prac

tice

of th

e po

pula

tion

for e

nhan

ced

nutri

tion

and

heal

thy

lifes

tyle

s

Incr

ease

d kn

owle

dge

attit

ude

and

prac

tices

in th

e po

pula

tion

Prop

ortio

n of

co

mm

unity

m

embe

rs

repo

rting

aw

aren

ess o

f ba

sic

nutri

tion.

-nat

iona

l and

co

unty

repo

rts;

KA

P

TBD

Incr

ease

d po

pula

tion

adop

ting

heal

thy

diet

s

Prop

ortio

n of

po

pula

tion

who

ad

opt h

ealth

y di

ets (

i.e. p

erce

nt

taki

ng v

ario

us

num

bers

of

serv

ings

of f

ruits

an

d ve

geta

bles

on

ave

rage

per

da

y).

KD

HS,

St

epw

ise

surv

ey20

%6% (>

or e

qual

to 5

se

rvin

gs)

(Ste

pwis

e su

rvey

)

8%10

%13

%16

%20

%

Incr

ease

d kn

owle

dge

on

dang

ers o

f hig

h sa

lt in

take

Prop

ortio

n of

po

pula

tion

with

kn

owle

dge

on

dang

ers o

f hig

h sa

lt in

take

KD

HS,

St

epw

ise

surv

ey90

%78

%(S

tepw

ise

surv

ey)

80%

82%

84%

86

%90

%

Incr

ease

d po

pula

tion

adop

ting

phys

ical

ac

tivity

Prop

ortio

n of

po

pula

tion

who

ad

opt p

hysi

cal

activ

ity

KD

HS,

St

epw

ise

surv

ey60

%34

%38

%42

%46

%50

%60

%

77

Prog

ram

or

proj

ect a

rea

Obj

ectiv

eE

xpec

ted

oupu

t/ou

tcom

eO

bjec

tivel

y ve

rifia

ble

Indi

cato

rs

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

Bas

elin

eta

rget

s

Y

1Y

2Y

3Y

4Y

5Es

tabl

ishm

ent

of N

atio

nal a

nd

coun

ty n

utrit

ion

Nut

ritio

n m

ulti-

stak

ehol

der f

orum

Mul

tista

keho

lder

Pl

atfo

rms

esta

blis

hed

at

Nat

iona

l and

co

unty

leve

ls

Prog

ram

pr

ogre

ss

impl

emen

tatio

n re

port

24 (0%

) 0

10 1

5 1

7 1

9 2

0

Incr

ease

d nu

tritio

nist

s/di

etic

ians

em

ploy

ed

at n

atio

nal

and

coun

ty

gove

rnm

ents

Num

ber

of c

linic

al

nutri

tioni

sts/

diet

icia

ns

empl

oyed

at

nat

iona

l an

d co

unty

go

vern

men

ts

Hea

lth se

ctor

re

ports

,5,

400

(50%

In

crea

se)

2,70

0(A

re

regi

ster

ed)

3,00

035

004,

000

4,50

05,

400

Nut

ritio

n an

d in

fect

ion

To im

prov

e th

e nu

tritio

nal

care

, tre

atm

ent

and

supp

ort

durin

g ill

ness

Incr

ease

d al

loca

tion

for

med

ical

nu

tritio

n th

erap

y co

mm

oditi

es a

nd

equi

pmen

t

Allo

catio

n fo

r pr

ocur

emen

t of

med

ical

nu

tritio

n th

erap

y co

mm

oditi

es a

nd

equi

pmen

t at

both

nat

iona

l and

co

unty

leve

ls

Ann

ual

proc

urem

ent

plan

s

To su

stai

n cu

re

rate

s for

acu

te

mal

nutri

tion

at

abov

e 75

%

Incr

ease

d cu

re

rate

s of a

cute

ly

mal

nour

ishe

d ch

ildre

n.

Prop

ortio

n of

acu

tely

m

alno

uris

hed

child

ren

cure

d.

DH

ISM

aint

ain

SPH

ERE

stan

dard

s (G

reat

er th

an

75%

)

82%

>75%

>75%

>75%

>75%

>75%

To m

aint

ain

mor

talit

y ra

tes

at b

elow

10%

fo

r MA

M a

nd

3% fo

r SA

M

Red

uced

m

orta

lity

rate

s am

ong

acut

ely

mal

nour

ishe

d ch

ildre

n.

Prop

ortio

n of

dea

ths

amon

g ac

utel

y m

alno

uris

hed

child

ren

DH

ISM

aint

ain

SPH

ERE

stan

dard

s

MA

M

mor

talit

y 0.

2%

and

SAM

1.7

%

Mai

ntai

n SP

HER

E St

anda

rds

Mai

ntai

n SP

HER

E St

anda

rds

Mai

ntai

n SP

HER

E St

anda

rds

Mai

ntai

n SP

HER

E St

anda

rds

Mai

ntai

n SP

HER

E St

anda

rds

78

Prog

ram

or

proj

ect a

rea

Obj

ectiv

eE

xpec

ted

oupu

t/ou

tcom

eO

bjec

tivel

y ve

rifia

ble

Indi

cato

rs

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

Bas

elin

eta

rget

s

Y

1Y

2Y

3Y

4Y

5N

on-

com

mun

icab

le

dise

ases

To h

alt a

nd

reve

rse

the

rise

of d

iet r

elat

ed

NC

Ds a

nd

enha

nce

thei

r co

ntro

l and

m

anag

emen

t

Red

uced

po

pula

tion

with

ra

ised

blo

od

pres

sure

or

curr

ently

on

med

icat

ion

for

Prop

ortio

n of

po

pula

tion

with

ra

ised

blo

od

pres

sure

or

curr

ently

on

med

icat

ion

Step

wis

e su

rvey

s, he

alth

an

d nu

tritio

n su

rvey

s

24%

Red

uctio

n of

po

pula

tion

with

ra

ised

fast

ing

bloo

d su

gar

Prop

ortio

n of

ad

ults

18-

69

year

s with

rais

ed

fast

ing

bloo

d su

gar

Step

wis

e su

rvey

s, he

alth

an

d nu

tritio

n su

rvey

s

2.3%

Incr

ease

in m

en

with

nor

mal

wai

st

hip

ratio

Prop

ortio

n of

m

en w

ith n

orm

al

wai

st h

ip ra

tio

Step

wis

e su

rvey

s, he

alth

an

d nu

tritio

n su

rvey

s

73%

Incr

ease

in

wom

en w

ith

norm

al w

aist

hip

ra

tio

Prop

ortio

n of

w

omen

with

no

rmal

wai

st h

ip

ratio

Step

wis

e su

rvey

s, he

alth

an

d nu

tritio

n su

rvey

s

64%

Nut

ritio

n in

sc

hool

s, pu

blic

an

d pr

ivat

e in

stitu

tions

Impr

ove

optim

al

nutri

tion

and

heal

th fo

r in

divi

dual

s in

inst

itutio

ns.

Incr

ease

d ag

ricul

tura

l pr

oduc

tion

proj

ects

in

scho

ols a

nd o

ther

in

stitu

tions

%of

agr

icul

tura

l pr

oduc

tion

proj

ects

in

scho

ols a

nd

inst

itutio

ns

-Min

utes

of

feed

ing

com

mitt

ee

Incr

ease

d nu

tritio

n kn

owle

dge

amon

g w

orke

rs

in sc

hool

s and

in

stitu

tions

de

alin

g w

ith

mea

ls a

nd h

ealth

fo

r sch

ools

% o

f foo

d an

d nu

tritio

n sk

illed

staff

in

inst

itutio

ns

79

Prog

ram

or

proj

ect a

rea

Obj

ectiv

eE

xpec

ted

oupu

t/ou

tcom

eO

bjec

tivel

y ve

rifia

ble

Indi

cato

rs

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

Bas

elin

eta

rget

s

Y

1Y

2Y

3Y

4Y

5Sc

hool

s and

in

stitu

tions

off

erin

g nu

tritio

us

mea

ls

Num

ber o

f sc

hool

s offe

ring

nutri

tious

mea

ls

Scho

ol

asse

ssm

ent

repo

rts,

Mon

itorin

g su

rvey

repo

rts

90%

Incr

ease

d sc

hool

s w

ith sc

hool

ga

rden

s

Num

ber o

f sc

hool

s with

sc

hool

gar

dens

Scho

ol

asse

ssm

ent

repo

rts, s

urve

y re

ports

TBD

TBD

CRI

SIS

AN

D EM

ERG

ENC

Y M

AN

AG

EMEN

TK

EY

PE

RFO

RM

AN

CE

IND

ICAT

OR

SPr

ogra

m o

r pr

ojec

t are

aO

bjec

tive

Exp

ecte

d ou

tput

/ou

tcom

eO

bjec

tivel

y ve

rifia

ble

Indi

cato

rsM

eans

of

veri

ficat

ion

Targ

etB

asel

ine

targ

ets

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Emer

genc

y pr

epar

edne

ssTo

redu

ce

risk

and

vuln

erab

ility

to

food

inse

curit

y an

d m

alnu

tritio

n oc

casi

oned

by

disa

ster

s

Incr

ease

d al

loca

tion

of d

roug

ht

cont

inge

ncy

fund

to n

utrit

ion

prog

ram

min

g-

Prop

ortio

n of

D

roug

ht c

ontin

genc

y fu

nd a

lloca

ted

to n

utrit

ion

prog

ram

min

g

ND

MA

Ear

ly

war

ning

repo

rts

ND

OC

repo

rts

MoD

P

C

ontin

genc

y fu

nd 1

0 B

illio

n pe

r yea

r

2%4%

6%8%

10%

Con

tinge

ncy

plan

s in

pla

ce in

all

coun

ties

Stak

ehol

der

disa

ster

m

anag

emen

t pl

anni

ng

com

ittee

s in

plac

e

Emer

genc

y co

ntin

genc

y pl

ans

- Sta

keho

lder

di

sast

er m

anag

emen

t te

chni

cal c

omm

ittee

s in

pla

ce a

t Nat

iona

l an

d C

ount

y le

vels

Con

tinge

ncy

plan

sM

inut

es o

f co

ntin

genc

y pl

anni

ng m

eetin

gs

48

Bia

nnua

l co

ntin

genc

y pl

anni

ng

Bia

nnua

l co

ntin

genc

y pl

anni

ng

80

Prog

ram

or

proj

ect a

rea

Obj

ectiv

eE

xpec

ted

outp

ut/

outc

ome

Obj

ectiv

ely

veri

fiabl

e In

dica

tors

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

Bas

elin

eta

rget

s

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Emer

genc

y re

spon

sePr

even

t de

terio

ratio

n in

food

and

nu

tritio

n st

atus

an

d sa

ve li

ves

of v

ulne

rabl

e gr

oups

in

emer

genc

ies

Tim

ely

cont

inge

ncy

plan

ning

at

natio

nal a

nd

coun

ty le

vel

stre

ngth

ened

Num

ber o

f cou

ntie

s ha

ving

upd

ated

co

ntin

genc

y pl

ans

Con

tinge

ncy

plan

s48

C

ontin

genc

y pl

ans

23 C

ount

ies

4848

4848

48

incr

ease

d in

op

erat

iona

lizat

ion

of c

ontin

genc

y fu

nds

% o

f con

tinge

ncy

fund

s al

loca

ted

% o

f con

tinge

ncy

fund

s op

erat

iona

lized

Num

ber o

f su

pple

men

tary

and

th

erap

eutic

pro

gram

s

Fina

ncia

l ret

urn

repo

rt 20

16/2

017

incr

ease

in

coun

ties c

arry

ing

out m

ass

scre

enin

g du

ring

emer

genc

ies

Num

ber o

f affe

cted

co

untie

s with

N

utrit

ion

mas

s sc

reen

ing

Nut

ritio

n su

rvey

re

ports

, A

sses

smen

t rep

orts

, N

DM

A E

arly

war

n-in

g re

port

23

1111

315

1720

23

Rec

over

y,

resi

lienc

e bu

ildin

g a

long

term

de

velo

pmen

t

To

impr

ove

po

st-e

mer

genc

y re

cove

ry

thro

ugh

resi

lienc

e bu

ildin

g an

d lo

ng te

rm

deve

lopm

ent

prog

ram

mes

Incr

ease

d su

pple

men

tary

an

d th

erap

eutic

pr

ogra

ms

Num

ber o

f fa

cilit

ies o

fferin

g su

pple

men

tary

and

th

erap

eutic

pro

gram

s

DH

IS, c

over

age

surv

eys

Mai

ntai

n ab

ove

75%

75%

>75

%>7

5%>7

5% >

75%

>75

%

Incr

ease

in

coun

ties

impl

emen

ting

SBC

C st

rate

gy

No

of c

ount

ies

impl

emen

ting

an

SBC

C st

rate

gy

Cap

acity

ass

essm

ent

Rep

orts

from

Pa

rtner

s and

MO

H

154

810

1214

15

Dis

aste

r rec

over

y pr

ogra

mm

es in

pl

ace

Num

ber o

f pr

ogra

mm

es

Prog

ranm

/Pro

ject

re

ports

81

Prog

ram

or

proj

ect a

rea

Obj

ectiv

eE

xpec

ted

outp

ut/

outc

ome

Obj

ectiv

ely

veri

fiabl

e In

dica

tors

Mea

ns o

f ve

rific

atio

nTa

rget

Bas

elin

eta

rget

s

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Com

mun

ity

man

aged

dis

aste

r ris

k re

duct

ion

and

resi

lienc

e bu

ildin

g

Num

ber o

f C

omm

unity

m

anag

ed d

isas

ter

risk

redu

ctio

n an

d re

silie

nce

build

ing

prog

ram

s in

plac

e

Prog

ram

/pro

ject

re

ports

50

%TB

D

Live

lihoo

d in

sura

nce

sche

mes

to

cus

hion

an

d su

ppor

t co

mm

uniti

es to

re

cove

r fro

m

emer

genc

ies i

n pl

ace

Live

lihoo

d in

sura

nce

sche

mes

in p

lace

Insu

ranc

e pr

ogra

mm

e re

ports

TBD

7

Func

tiona

l Dis

ater

ris

k re

duct

ion

com

mun

ity u

nits

Num

ber o

f co

mm

unity

uni

ts

form

ed a

gain

st

reco

mm

ende

d

Cap

acity

ass

essm

ent

50%

TBD

82

Appendix III: Technical Committee Members and Contributors

NAME MINISTRY/STATE DEPARTMENT1 Dr, Johnson Irungu Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries2 Ann Onyango Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries3 Mary Mwale Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries4 Stephen Andika Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries5 Hilda Njoroge, Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries6 Eng. Musa Sang Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries7 Tom Kinara Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries8 Kithama Mbolu Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries9 Leonard K. Kamaru Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries10 Ian Thande Githae Ministry of Water and Irrigation11 Phanuel Webi Ministry of Water and Irrigation12 Gladys Mugambi, Ministry of Health13 Grace Gichohi Ministry of Health14 Leila Akinyi Ministry of Health15 Florence Mugo Ministry of Health16 Tom Obunde Ministry of Devolution and Planning17 Paul Kimeu Ministry of Devolution and Planning18 Jacinta Ngwiri, Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries19 Christopher Macharia Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries20 David Ombalo Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries21 Jane Wanbugu Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries22 Dr. Boaz Otieno Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries22 Josephine Mogere Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries23 Demeke Mulat Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO)24 Sicily Matu United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)25 Janet Ntwiga United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)26 Grainne Moloney United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)27 Shadrack Mutavi German Corperation for International Cooperation (GIZ)

83

LIST OF REFERENCES 1. Butta Z.A et al., Maternal and child under nutrition study group. What works? Interventions for

Maternal and Child Under-nutrition and Survival. Lancet 2008:37:417-40.2. Kenya national Bureau of statistics (KNBS) and ICF Macro.2010. Kenya Demographic and Health

Survey 2014. Calverton, Maryland: KNBS and ICF Macro.3. Republic of Kenya (2005). Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey. Central4. Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Planning and National Development, Nairobi, Kenya.5. Republic of Kenya (2007). Basic Report on well-being in Kenya. Kenya National Bureau Of

Statistics, Ministry of Planning and National Development, Nairobi, Kenya6. Republic of Kenya (2008). Kenya Vision 2030. A globally competitive and prosperous Kenya.

Nairobi: Ministry of Planning and National Development and the National Economic and Social Council (NESC).

7. Republic of Kenya (2012). Food and Nutrition Security Strategy8. Republic of Kenya (2011). The Kenya National Micronutrient Survey 2011.9. Republic of Kenya (2012). The Kenya National Nutrition Action Plan 2012 – 2017.10. Republic of Kenya (2012). National Food and Nutrition Security Policy 2012. Sessional Paper No. 1

of 201211. Republic of Kenya (MOH, 2015). Kenya STEPwise Survey for NCDs Risk Factors 2015 Report12. Republic of Kenya (2017). National Disaster Risk Management Policy 13. FANTA (1999).Food Security Indicators and Framework for Use in the Monitoring and Evaluation of

Food Aid Programs14. Republic of Kenya( 2012). The National Policy for Sustainable Development of Northern Kenya and

Other Arid lands: Sessional Paper No. 8 of 2012.15. Republic of Kenya (2014). Kenya National Capacity Development Framework 2014-2019.16. Republic of Kenya (2016). Kenya Nutrition Advocacy, Communication and Social Mobilization

Strategy 2016 – 2020.17. Republic of Kenya (MOH, 2017). Kenya Guidelines on Healthy diets and lifestyle 18. Republic of Kenya (2014). Ending Drought Emergencies: Common Programming Framework

19. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. (2016). Food Security mapping and Analysis Report

20. Republic of Kenya (2008). National Livestock Policy: Session Paper No 2 of 200821. Republic of Kenya (2016). Kenya National Bureau of Statistics: Economic Survey report22. Republic of Kenya (2010). Agricultural Sector Development Strategy (2010-2020).

23. IPC Global Partners. 2012. Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Technical Manual Version 2.0. Evidence and Standards for Better Food Security Decisions. FAO

24. FAO. 2011. A Response Analysis Framework for Food and Nutrition Security Interventions. Rome.

25. FAO. 1996. World Food Summit (WFS) – Rome Declaration on World Food Security and WFS Plan of Action. Rome.

26. UNICEF (2013). Improving Child Nutrition. Newyork, United Nations Children’s Fund

84

Online resourceswww.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/FSGuide.pdfhttp://www.fao.org/elearning/course/FA/en/pdf/P-01_RG_Concept.pdfwww.ipcinfo.org/.../docs/IPC-Manual-2-Interactive.pdf

https://www.knbs.or.ke. Quarterly Gross Domestic Product Report First Quarter 2017

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org. SDG 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculturehttps://www.disasterriskreduction.net/east-central-africa/reglap

http://www.urbangateway.org

https://www.jica.go.jp/kenya/english/office/topics/140529.html

http://ilakenya.org/three-out-of-ten-households-going-without-food-shows-new-survey

85

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS

Adopted from UNICEF by Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance (FANTA)

UNICEF’S Original Conceptual Framework of Malnutrition

86

FAO IPC Global Partners. 2012. Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Technical Manual Version 2.0. Evidence and Standards for Better Food Security Decisio

87

88