reproductions supplied by edrs are the best that …and american indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower...

58
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 447 787 IR 020 408 TITLE Report of 1998-99 Student Performance North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills. Reporting on the Classes of 2001-2003 for the State and 117 Public School Systems and 61 Charter Schools. INSTITUTION North Carolina State Dept. of Public Instruction, Raleigh. Div. of Accountability/Testing. PUB DATE 2000-00-00 NOTE 79p. PUB TYPE Numerical/Quantitative Data (110) -- Reports - Descriptive (141) Tests/Questionnaires (160) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Academic Achievement; *Computer Literacy; Degree Requirements; *Elementary Secondary Education; Grade 10; Grade 8; Grade 9; *Graduation Requirements; High School Graduates; Public Schools; Secondary Education; *State Standards IDENTIFIERS *North Carolina ABSTRACT The North Carolina State Board of Education, as part of the Quality Assurance Program, initially established a computer proficiency requirement for diplomas issued to the Class of 2000. In October 1995, the Board made the requirement effective beginning with the graduating class of 2001. Students who were in grade eight for the 1996-97 school year and beyond are required to satisfy the computer proficiency requirement in order to receive a high school diploma. The requirement is based on the kindergarten through grade 8 competencies of the K-12 computer skills curriculum approved in July 1992 by the State Board of Education. These competencies are defined in the North Carolina "Standard Course of Study" (SCS). The goals of the requirement are to ensure that most students enter high school with sufficient computer skills and no student exits North Carolina high schools without sufficient computer skills. The multiple choice and performance test assesses: word processing; keyboarding; database use; spreadsheet use; telecomputing skills; societal issues; ethics; terms, operation, and care of computers; and use of computers in various curricular areas. The performance test consists of four parts: keyboarding techniques; word processing/editing; database use; and spreadsheet use. This document reports the performance of students in the class of 2001 as tenth graders, the class of 2002 as ninth graders, and the class of 2003 as eighth graders on the computer skills test. For the 1998-99 school year, 74.9% of students who took the tests met the requirement at the end of eighth grade. There were disparities in performance among subgroups. Hispanic (49.7%), Black (58.5%), and American Indian (60.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the proficiency requirement than Asian (72.8%), Multi-Racial (73.2%), and White (84%) subgroups. For the same school year, 76.6% of students who took the tests met the requirement by the end of ninth grade. Hispanic (50.7%), American Indian (62.1%), and Black (62.8%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the proficiency requirement than the Asian (70.1%), Multi-Racial (74.2%), and White (84.7%) subgroups. Findings for tenth grade revealed 80.8% of students taking the tests had met the requirements by the end of tenth grade. Hispanic (61.7%), Black (69.1%), and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%), and White (87%) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.

Upload: others

Post on 27-Apr-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 447 787 IR 020 408

TITLE Report of 1998-99 Student Performance North Carolina Testsof Computer Skills. Reporting on the Classes of 2001-2003for the State and 117 Public School Systems and 61 CharterSchools.

INSTITUTION North Carolina State Dept. of Public Instruction, Raleigh.Div. of Accountability/Testing.

PUB DATE 2000-00-00NOTE 79p.

PUB TYPE Numerical/Quantitative Data (110) -- Reports - Descriptive(141) Tests/Questionnaires (160)

EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Academic Achievement; *Computer Literacy; Degree

Requirements; *Elementary Secondary Education; Grade 10;Grade 8; Grade 9; *Graduation Requirements; High SchoolGraduates; Public Schools; Secondary Education; *StateStandards

IDENTIFIERS *North Carolina

ABSTRACTThe North Carolina State Board of Education, as part of the

Quality Assurance Program, initially established a computer proficiencyrequirement for diplomas issued to the Class of 2000. In October 1995, theBoard made the requirement effective beginning with the graduating class of2001. Students who were in grade eight for the 1996-97 school year and beyondare required to satisfy the computer proficiency requirement in order toreceive a high school diploma. The requirement is based on the kindergartenthrough grade 8 competencies of the K-12 computer skills curriculum approvedin July 1992 by the State Board of Education. These competencies are definedin the North Carolina "Standard Course of Study" (SCS). The goals of therequirement are to ensure that most students enter high school withsufficient computer skills and no student exits North Carolina high schoolswithout sufficient computer skills. The multiple choice and performance testassesses: word processing; keyboarding; database use; spreadsheet use;telecomputing skills; societal issues; ethics; terms, operation, and care ofcomputers; and use of computers in various curricular areas. The performancetest consists of four parts: keyboarding techniques; word processing/editing;database use; and spreadsheet use. This document reports the performance ofstudents in the class of 2001 as tenth graders, the class of 2002 as ninthgraders, and the class of 2003 as eighth graders on the computer skills test.For the 1998-99 school year, 74.9% of students who took the tests met therequirement at the end of eighth grade. There were disparities in performanceamong subgroups. Hispanic (49.7%), Black (58.5%), and American Indian (60.1%)subgroups had lower percentages passing the proficiency requirement thanAsian (72.8%), Multi-Racial (73.2%), and White (84%) subgroups. For the sameschool year, 76.6% of students who took the tests met the requirement by theend of ninth grade. Hispanic (50.7%), American Indian (62.1%), and Black(62.8%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the proficiency requirementthan the Asian (70.1%), Multi-Racial (74.2%), and White (84.7%) subgroups.Findings for tenth grade revealed 80.8% of students taking the tests had metthe requirements by the end of tenth grade. Hispanic (61.7%), Black (69.1%),and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing therequirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%), and White (87%)

Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.

Page 2: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

subgroups. Findings are highlighted in the following categories: 1998-99student performance--comparison of 8th, 9th, and 10th grade performance; andstudent performance by ethnicity. Twenty-four tables and seven figurespresent findings. Sample questions and answers for the tests are included anda list of charter schools is appended. (AEF)

Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.

Page 3: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Report of1998-99

,Audent PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests

of Computer Skills

1

PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE ANDDISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS

BEEN GRANTED BY

E. Brumback

TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice of Educational Research and Improvement

EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)

fig This document has been reproduced asreceived from the person or organizationoriginating it.Minor changes have been made toimprove reproduction quality.

Points of view or opinions stated in thisdocument do not necessarily representofficial OERI position or policy. J

Reporting on the Classes of 2001-2003for the state and 117 public school systems

and 61 charter schoolsPublished September 2000

Public Schools of North Carolinawww.NCPublicSchools.orgState Board of EducationDepartment of Public InstructionOffice of Instructional and Accountability ServicesDivision of Accountability Services/Testing SectionRaleigh, NC 27601-2825

2

Page 4: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

1998-99 Report of Student Performance

North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

September, 2000

Public Schools of North CarolinaState Board of Education

Department of Public InstructionOffice of Instructional and Accountability Services

Division of Accountability Services / Testing Section

Page 5: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

Acknowledgments

This report is the collaborative work of many individuals. The North Carolina Testing

Program is conducted by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI),

Division of Accountability Services, Testing Section. Technical support services for the

program are carried out in collaboration with the Center for Urban Affairs and Community

Services at North Carolina State University under the Technical Outreach to Public Schools

(TOPS) program.

Mildred Bazemore, Chief of the Testing Section, and Monica Geary, Education Research

and Evaluation Consultant at NCDPI, provided invaluable guidance in content and design.

Andrea Barefoot, Education Research and Evaluation Consultant with TOPS, serves as liaison

with NCDPI and leads the Analysis Group at TOPS. Betty Marsh, Statistician/Analyst with the

Analysis Group, collected and compiled the statistical data. Mary Daly, Social Research

Associate, produced the statistical graphics. Anthony Wells, Statistician, assisted in quality

control. Jeff LaBelle provided the cover and divider page graphics.

Thanks are due especially to the Regional Accountability Coordinators, and the Test

Coordinators and Accountability staff at the 117 public school systems and the many charter

schools who went to unprecedented lengths to organize, audit and confirm the data presented

here. This report could not exist without the dedication of these professionals.

4

Page 6: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Background

Findings forEighth Grade

(Class of 2003)

Findings for NinthGrade

(Class of 2002)

Findings for TenthGrade

(Class of 2001)

1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

Executive Summary1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

The State Board of Education, as part of the Quality Assurance Program,initially established a computer proficiency requirement for diplomas issuedto the Class of 2000. In October of 1995, the Board modified therequirement by making it effective beginning with the graduating class of2001. Students who were in grade eight for the 1996-97 school year andbeyond are required to satisfy the computer proficiency requirement in orderto receive a North Carolina high school diploma.

The first opportunity to meet the computer skills proficiency requirementarises during eighth grade. Passing the computer skills standard is defined aspassing both the multiple-choice and performance portions of the NorthCarolina Tests of Computer Skills.

The Class of 2001 completed the eighth grade at the end of the 1996-97school year. The Class of 2002 completed the eighth grade at the end of the1997-98 school year. The Class of 2003 completed the eighth grade at theend of the 1998-99 school year.

For the 1998-99 school year, 74.9 percent of students who took the tests metthe requirement at the end of grade eight.

There were disparities in performance among subgroups. The Hispanic(49.7%), Black (58.5%), and American Indian (60.1%) subgroups had lowerpercentages passing the proficiency requirement than the Asian (72.8%),Multi-Racial (73.2%), and White (84.0%) subgroups.

For the 1998-99 school year, 76.6 percent of students who took the tests hadmet the requirement by the end of grade nine.

There were disparities in performance among subgroups. The Hispanic(50.7), American Indian (62.1), and Black (62.8%), subgroups had lowerpercentages passing the proficiency requirement than the Asian (70.1%),Multi-Racial (74.2%), and White (84.7%) subgroups.

For the 1998-99 school year, 80.8 percent of students who took the tests hadmet the requirement by the end of grade ten.

There were disparities in performance among subgroups. The Hispanic(61.7%), Black (69.1%), and American Indian (69.5%) subgroups had lowerpercentages passing the proficiency requirement than the Multi-Racial(72.1%), Asian (72.8%), and White (87.0%) subgroups.

Page 7: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

The 1998-99 Report of Student Performance

North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

Table of Contents

List of Tables

List of Figures iii

Introduction

Background vii

Findings

Statewide Performance 1

Student Performance by LEA and Region 15

Sample Questions for the NC Tests of Computer Skills 35

Answers to Sample Questions 44

Appendix 45

V;

Page 8: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

List of Tables

Table 1. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category for the Class of 2003 at End of Grade 8, byLEA 8

Table 2. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category for the Class of 2002 at End of Grade 9, byLEA 9

Table 3. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category for the Class of 2001 at End of Grade 10, byLEA 10

Table 4. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance), for the Class of 2003 at End of Grade 8, by LEA 11

Table 5. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance), for the Class of 2002 at End of Grade 9, by LEA 12

Table 6 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choiceand Performance), for the Class of 2001 at End of Grade 10, by LEA 13

Table 7a-f. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2003 at End of Grade 8, by LEA andEthnicity, by Region 17

Table 8a-f. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2002 at End of Grade 9, by LEA andEthnicity, by Region 23

Table 9a-f. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2001 at End of Grade 10, by LEA andEthnicity, by Region 29

Page 9: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

List of Figures

Figure 1. 1996-97 to 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing(Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Classes of 2001, 2002, and 2003 atEnd of Grades 8 ,9, and 10 1

Figure 2. 1996-97 to 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing(Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Classes of 2001, 2002 and 2003 atEnd of Grade 8, by Ethnicity 2

Figure 3. 1997-98 to1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing(Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2001 and 2002 at End ofGrade 9, by Ethnicity 3

Figure 4. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2001 at End of Grade 10, by Ethnicity 4

Figure 5. 1996-97 to 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent of LEAsin Each Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category for theClass of 2001 at End of Grades 8, 9, and 10 5

Figure 6. 1997-98 to 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent of LEAsin Each Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category for theClass of 2002 at End of Grade 8 and 9 6

Figure 7. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent of LEAs in EachPercent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category for the Class of2003 at End of Grade 8 7

iii

8

Page 10: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

Introduction

The State Board of Education, as part of the Quality Assurance Program, initially establisheda computer proficiency requirement for diplomas issued to the Class of 2000. In October of1995, the Board modified the requirement by making it effective beginning with thegraduating class of 2001. Students who were in grade eight for the 1996-97 school year andbeyond are required to satisfy the computer proficiency requirement in order to receive aNorth Carolina high school diploma. The requirement is based on the kindergarten throughgrade 8 competencies of the K-12 computer skills curriculum approved in July 1992 by theState Board of Education. These competencies are defined in the North Carolina StandardCourse of Study (SCS). The goals of the requirement are to ensure that: (1) most studentsenter high school with sufficient computer skills, and (2) no student exits North Carolina highschools without sufficient computer skills.

The North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills (multiple-choice and performance) must beadministered by the end of grade eight with subsequent opportunities during high school, asneeded, to allow students to satisfy the requirement before completing their senior year inhigh school. The multiple-choice test assesses (1) word processing; (2) keyboarding; (3)database use; (4) spreadsheet use; (5) telecomputing skills; (6) societal issues; (7) ethics; (8)terms, operations, and care of computers; and (9) the use of computers in various curricularareas. The performance test consists of four parts: keyboarding techniques, wordprocessing/editing, database use, and spreadsheet use.

Computers have become an integral part of today's world, both in the home and in themarketplace; therefore, computer proficiency is necessary for graduates of North Carolina'shigh schools.

Initially, in order to meet the requirement, students were required to achieve a scale score onthe performance part of the test equal to or greater than 49 and a combined scale score equalto or greater than 46. Under the old standard when the pass/fail status was assigned, it wasassigned for student performance for both parts of the test. The multiple-choice andperformance parts of the test were not separate but considered together in determining astudent's pass/fail status.

At the recommendation of the Computer Skills Advisory Committee, after input fromeducators and others, the State Board of Education modified the standard for passing thecomputer skills requirement effective July 1, 1997. The modified standard requires that thetest be separated into two tests: a multiple-choice test and a performance test. Either test maybe passed independently of the other. To pass under the new standard, a student must achievea performance test scale score of 49 or above and a multiple-choice test scale score of 47 orabove.

When documented through the Individualized Education Program (IEP), some students withdisabilities may fulfill the computer skills proficiency requirement through the use of portfolioassessment accommodation.

The purpose of this document is to report the performance of students in the class of 2001 astenth graders, the class of 2002 as ninth graders, and the class of 2003 as eighth graders on thecomputer skills tests. Sample questions have been included in the report to provide examplesof items on the tests.

Page 11: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Definitions

1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

BackgroundThe first opportunity to meet the computer skills proficiencyrequirement is during the eighth grade. Passing the computer skillsstandard is defined as passing both the multiple-choice andperformance tests.

The Class of 2001 completed the eighth grade at the end of the 1996-97 school year. The Class of 2002 completed the eighth grade at theend of the 1997-98 school year. The Class of 2003 completed theeighth grade at the end of the 1998-99 school year.

The Standard Beginning with the fall of 1997 testing; a student must have a scalescore of at least 47 on the multiple-choice test and a scale score of atleast 49 on the performance test to meet the computer skillsproficiency requirement.

Students are retested only on the test that they have not passed.

Computer Skills Beginning with students in the eighth grade during the 1996-97 schoolRequirement year, in order to receive a North Carolina high school diploma,Guidelines students must demonstrate computer skills proficiency.

Beginning with the eighth grade, a student must be provided focusedinstructional remedial when the student has not passed the multiple-choice or performance tests until the proficiency requirement has beenmet.

Each senior must have at one additional opportunity during the lastmonth of school prior to graduation to demonstrate computer skillsproficiency.

Testing Accommodations are available for students with disabilities, studentsAccommodations identified under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and

students who are limited English proficient.

Accommodations must be developed in accordance with TestingModifications and Accommodations for Students Disabilities andGuidelines for Testing Students with Limited English Proficiency.

The need for accommodations must be documented (for example, inthe student's Individualized Education Program (IEP) or WrittenAccommodation Plan). Accommodations used are to be consistentwith routine instructional use and must not violate the intent of thetest.

The Computer The expectation is that all students will take the test during the eighthSkills Portfolio grade. The portfolio assessment is available for those students with

disabilities (only) who cannot take the test under standardadministration conditions or with the accommodations provided forthe tests. Portfolio use must be documented on the IndividualizedEducation Program (IEP).

vii

10

Page 12: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

The ComputerSkills Portfolio

(Continued)

ScoringPortfolios

1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

The purpose of portfolio assessment is not to provide an easieralternative to demonstrating competency, but to provide an appropriatealternative that meets the same high standards as the tests.

There is no time limit for completion of the portfolio except thatsuccessful completion is required prior to graduation.

The expectation is that work to be included in the portfolio will becompleted within the school setting over a period of time. Thestudent's teacher and principal must verify the authenticity of thestudent's portfolio work.

The LEA is responsible for scoring all portfolios for that system.

The LEA test coordinator, the exceptional children's administrator,and the computer coordinator provide direction for the scoring andapproval process for completed portfolios. The LEA may involveother personnel as deemed appropriate.

Exemptions from Exemption from testing does not exempt students from the graduationTesting requirement. Exemption from the computer proficiency requirement

denies the opportunity for the student to meet one of the requirementsfor a North Carolina high school diploma.

When a student is exempted, the parent and student are advised of thelong-term consequences of exemption. LEAs are to reference themost recent publications of Testing Modifications andAccommodations for Students with Disabilities and Guidelines forTesting Students with Limited English Proficiency for properprocedures to follow for exemptions.

Resources Lesson plans and staff development activities have been provided byProvided by the NCDPI since the computer skills curriculum was revised in 1992.NCDPI Some of the lesson plans are available on the ,DPI InfoWeb

(www.NCPublicSchools.org) and through the NCDPI Office ofPublications.

A released form of the computer skills test was provided to all LEAs.Copies have been provided at conferences and workshoppresentations. In addition, a copy is available on the DPI InfoWeb.

The NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Testing Sectionprovides all school systems and charter schools with ample copies ofthe North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Student Handbook to bedistributed to the appropriate students. The handbook includesinformation about the proficiency requirement and computer skillstests taking strategies, and sample questions.

Page 13: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

Data Verification For the 1998-99 school year, the North Carolina Test of ComputerSkills multiple-choice was scored and aggregated locally. SchoolSystems reported summary data only to NCDPI. The performancetests were scored by a contractor who provided the score reports to theLEAs and subsequently the NCDPI.

Differences in The data collected for the Computer Skills test in 1997 and 1998 usedData Analysis: the same denominator, which included the number of pupils tested in

1996-97, 1997-98, both performance and multiple choice. In 1999, the denominator1998-99 included the number of pupils on the NCDPI masterbuild file,

including exempted and absent pupils.

In 1997, Fall and Spring data were merged centrally and LEAs had theopportunity to correct the final file of pupils. In 1998, all testadministrations from Fall 1997 to Spring 1998 were merged centrally,accounting for the .NC State Board of Education's change in thestandard. Most school systems edited the merged file locally andreturned a file of pupil data that had a pass/fail flag for performance anda pass/fail flag for multiple choice. In 1999, a blank form was sent toLEAs to collect summary data (not pupil data), with a column for thenumber of pupils on the masterbuild (including absent and exemptpupils) and a column for the number passing both performance andmultiple choice.

List of AppleWorks 2.x, 3.x, 4.xSupportedSoftware ClarisWorks for Macintosh 1.x, 2.x, 3..x, 4.x, 5.x

Packages ClarisWorks for Windows 3.x, 4.x, 5.x

ClarisWorks/AppleWorks for Macintosh 5.x

MS Works for Macintosh 2.x, 3.x, 4.x

MS Works DOS 2.0, 3.0

MS Works for Windows 2.x, 3.x, 4.x

MS Office Pro for Windows 4.x, 95, 97

PFS: First Choice

ix

'12

Page 14: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

Findings

1998-99 Student For the 1998-99 school year, 74.9 percent of eighth graders, 76.6Performance percent of ninth graders, and 80.8 percent of tenth graders had passed

the computer skills proficiency requirement.

At of the end of the 1998-99 school year, approximately 271,193students were eligible for both the multiple-choice and performancetests. Of these, 209,462 students passed both parts, for an overallpassing rate of 77.2 percent.

The percent of eighth graders passing the proficiency requirementincreased from 74.8 percent in 1996-97 to 77.5 percent in 1997-98, butthen decreased from 74.9 percent in 1998-99.

Student There were disparities in performance among subgroups of eighthPerformance by graders, ninth graders, and tenth graders.Ethnicity

By the end of the 1998-99 school year, a smaller percentage of eighthgraders had passed the proficiency requirement in the Hispanic(49.7%), Black (58.5%), and American Indian (60.1%) subgroups thanin the Asian (72.8%), Multi-Racial (73.2%), and White (84.0%)subgroups.

The percent of eighth graders passing the proficiency requirementincreased for the Black subgroup from 1997-98 (58.5%) to 1998-99(62.8%).

By the end of the 1998-99 school year, a smaller percentage of ninthgraders had passed the proficiency requirement in the Hispanic(50.7%), American Indian (62.1%), and Black (62.8%) subgroups thanin the Asian (70.1%), Multi-Racial (74.2%), and White (84.7%)subgroups.

By the end of the 1998-99 school year, a smaller percentage of tenthgraders had passed the proficiency requirement in the Hispanic(61.7%), Black (69.1%), and American Indian (69.5%) subgroups thanin the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%) and White (87.0%)subgroups.

13x

Page 15: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

100

-

90-

80 -

70-

60-

50-

40-

30-

20-

10-

0

Figu

re 1

. 199

6-97

to 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

assi

ng*

(Mul

tiple

-Cho

ice

and

Perf

orm

ance

)fo

r th

e C

lass

es o

f 20

01, 2

002,

and

200

3at

End

of

Gra

des

8, 9

, and

10

81.8

80.8

8th

Gra

de

Cla

ss o

f 20

01

9th

Gra

de10

th G

rade

1996

-97

N P

assi

ng =

66,

695

N E

ligib

le =

89,

217

Cla

ss o

f 20

01

Cla

ss o

f 20

02N

Pas

sing

= 7

1,20

4

1997

-98

N P

assi

ng =

70,

480

N E

ligib

le =

87,

061

N E

ligib

le =

90,

906

Cla

ss o

f 20

02C

lass

of

2001

Cla

ss o

f 20

03N

Pas

sing

= 7

3,83

9N

Pas

sing

= 6

4,16

6

1998

-99

N P

assi

ng =

71,

457

N E

ligib

le =

96,

431

N E

ligib

le =

79,

385

N E

ligib

le =

95,

377

1419

96-9

7n

1997

-98

pi 1

998-

9915

Not

es: '

The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ed. D

ata

rece

ived

from

LE

As

afte

r A

pril

30, 2

000

are

not i

nclu

ded

in th

is fi

gure

.

Page 16: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

100- 90-

80-

77.5

74.8

74.9

Figu

re 2

. 199

6-97

to 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

assi

ng*

(Mul

tiple

-Cho

ice

and

Perf

orm

ance

)fo

r th

e C

lass

es o

f 20

01, 2

002

and

2003

at E

nd o

f G

rade

8, b

y E

thni

city

81.6

77.9

72.8

77.7

74.8

73.2

87.1

84.4

84.0

70-

60-

50-

62.2

60.6

60.1

58.1

58.

555

.056

.958

'3

49.7

40-

30-

20-

10-

1996

-97

Cla

ss o

f 20

01

1997

-98

Cla

ss o

f 20

02

1998

-99

Cla

ss o

f 20

03

Stat

e

N P

assi

ng =

66,

695

N E

ligib

le =

89,2

17

N P

assi

ng =

70,

480

N E

ligib

le=

90,

906

N P

assi

ng =

71,4

57N

Elig

ible

=95

,377

Am

eric

an I

ndia

n

N P

assi

ng =

954

N E

ligib

le=

1,5

73

N P

assi

ng =

867

N E

ligib

le =

1,3

94

N P

assi

ng =

861

N E

ligib

le =

1,4

33

Asi

an

N P

assi

ng =

781

N E

ligib

le=

957

N P

assi

ng =

1,12

0N

Elig

ible

= 1

,437

N P

assi

ng =

1,2

12

N E

ligib

le =

1,6

64

Bla

ck

N P

assi

ng =

14,

054

N E

ligib

le =

25,

547

N P

assi

ng =

14,

794

N E

ligib

le =

25,

467

N P

assi

ng =

16,

422

N E

ligib

le=

28,

071

His

pani

cN

Pas

sing

= 8

86

N E

ligib

le =

1,5

58

N P

assi

ng =

1,15

5N

Elig

ible

= 1

,982

N P

assi

ng =

1,3

03

N E

ligib

le=

2,6

22

1996

-97

1997

-98

1998

-99

:.:,..

:.:.:.

:.:.:.

:.:...

.:.:

::=

Mul

ti-R

acia

l

N P

assi

ng =

787

N E

ligib

le =

1,0

52

N P

assi

ng =

962

N E

ligib

le1,

238

N P

assi

ng =

469

N E

ligib

le =

641

Whi

te

N P

assi

ng =

48,

491

N E

ligib

le =

57,4

21

N P

assi

ng =

51,

282

N E

ligib

le =

58,9

10

N P

assi

ng =

51,1

76N

Elig

ible

= 6

0,92

4

Not

es: '

'The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ed.

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om L

EA

s af

ter

Apr

il 30

, 200

0 ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

this

figu

re.

Page 17: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Figu

re 3

. 199

7-98

to 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

assi

ng*

(Mul

tiple

-Cho

ice

and

Perf

orm

ance

)fo

r th

e C

lass

es o

f 20

01 a

nd 2

002

at E

nd o

f G

rade

9, b

y E

thni

city

89.6

1997

-98

Cla

ss o

f 20

01

1998

-99

Cla

ss o

f 20

02

Stat

e

N P

assi

ng =

71,

204

N E

ligib

le =

87,

061

N P

assi

ng =

73,

839

N E

ligib

le=

96,

43

Am

eric

an I

ndia

n

N P

assi

ng =

1,02

1

N E

ligib

le=

1,4

92

N P

assi

ng =

958

N E

ligib

le=

1,5

42

Asi

an

-N P

assi

ng =

1,0

37

N E

ligib

le =

1,25

51,

255

N P

assi

ng =

1,2

37

N E

ligib

le=

1,7

64

Bla

ck

N P

assi

ng =

15,

895

N E

ligib

le=

24,

113

N P

assi

ng =

18,

105

N E

ligib

le =

28,

809

His

pani

c

N P

assi

ng =

1,0

80

N E

ligib

le=

1,7

14

N P

assi

ng =

1,2

65

N E

ligib

le=

2,4

95

1997

-98

.,19

98-9

9:..

..:.:.

:.:.

:.:.:.

:....:

.:-..

Mul

ti-R

acia

l

N P

assi

ng =

858

N E

ligib

le =

1,07

4

N P

assi

ng =

446

N E

ligib

le=

601

Whi

te

N P

assi

ng =

50,

869

N E

ligib

le =

56,7

95

N P

assi

ng =

51,8

19

N E

ligib

le=

61,

200

Not

es: T

hese

dat

a re

pres

ent t

he h

ighe

st te

st s

core

of e

ach

stud

ent f

or a

ll te

st a

dmin

istr

atio

ns in

whi

ch th

e st

uden

t par

ticip

ated

. Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om L

EA

s af

ter

Apr

il 30

, 200

0 ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

this

figu

re. 19

18

Page 18: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

100

90 80 70 50 30 20 10 0

80.8

69.5

Figu

re 4

. 199

8-99

Nor

th C

arol

ina

Tes

ts o

f C

ompu

ter

Skill

s

Perc

ent P

assi

ng*

(Mul

tiple

-Cho

ice

and

Perf

orm

ance

)fo

r th

e C

lass

of

2001

at E

nd o

f G

rade

10,

by

Eth

nici

ty

72.8

69.1

61.7

72.1

87.0

Stat

eA

mer

ican

Ind

ian

1998

-99

N P

assi

ng =

64,1

66N

Pas

sing

=74

9

Cla

ss o

f 20

01N

Elig

ible

= 7

9,38

5N

Elig

ible

= 1

,077

Asi

an

N P

assi

ng =

1,1

08

N E

ligib

le =

1,5

22

Bla

ck

N P

assi

ng =

15,

652

N E

ligib

le=

22,

636

His

pani

c

N P

assi

ng =

993

N E

ligib

le =

1,6

10

Mul

ti-R

acia

l

N P

assi

ng =

302

N E

ligib

le =

419

Whi

te

N P

assi

ng =

45,

345

N E

ligib

le =

52,0

92

Not

es: *

The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ed.

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om L

EA

s af

ter

Apr

il 30

, 200

0 ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

this

figu

re.

21

Page 19: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Figure 5. 1996-97 to 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent of LEAs in Each Percent Passing* (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category

for the Class of 2001at End of Grades 8, 9, and 10

End of Grade 8

11.4. ,. /41'11111'N-"Iwwwww--

End of Grade 10

45.6.%

18.4%

End of Grade 9

Percent PassingCategories:

90% or above

80-89%

I1== 70-79%

60-69%

Tr 50-59% .

111 Below 50%

Notes: 'These data represent the highest test score of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.Percent passing categories may not sum to 100% due to rounding.

Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this figure.

522

Page 20: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Figure 6. 1997-98 to 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent of LEAs in Each Percent Passing* (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category

for the Class of 2002at End of Grades 8 and 9

End of Grade 811.9% 6.7%

4.5%

13.4%

36.6%

l /1I V11 I//10 IOW

End of Grade 98.7% 9.4%

26.9%

63%

11.8%

39.4%

Illio..I /1 1//v1 .-1 "

24.4%

Percent PassingCategories:

90% or above

ri 80-89%

I1 70-79%

60-69%

50-59%

II Below 50%

Notes: These data represent the highest test score of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.Percent passing categories may not sum to 100% due to rounding.Data received from LEAs after April 30,2000 are not included in this figure.

6 23

Page 21: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Figure 7. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent of LEAs in Each Percent Passing* (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category

for the Class of 2003at End of Grade '8

31.9%

8.5% 7.1%

5.0%

AMIE.4MMEMEMEMMEMMIE.....AMMEMMEMEMEMMIME/AMMEMEMEM.M I

AMMIIIIMMEMMEMMEM4/EEMVAMMMF1110""IIIMMMUMMEMMEP-

30.5%

Percent PassingCategories:

17.0%

90% or above 60-69%

n 80-89% El 50-59%

70-79% Below 50%Il1

Notes: These data represent the highest test score of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.Percent passing categories may not sum to 100% due to rounding.Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this figure.

7

Li 24

Page 22: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Table 1. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent Passing* (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category

for the Class of 2003 at End of Grade 8, by LEA

Below 50%N=10

C.G. Woodson**Carter Community**Kennedy Charter**Lift Acad**Phase Acad**Quality Education**Right Step**Sankore School**WarrenWeldon City

50-59%N=7

Brevard Acad**HalifaxHertfordKestrel Heights**Lexington CityNashRobeson

60-69%N=24

AnsonAsheAsheville CityBladenCaldwellColumbusCurrituckDurhamEdgecombeForsythFranklinGreeneHickory CityHokeKannapolis CityLincolnMartinMontgomery

MoorePasquotankRichmondThomasville CityVanceWashington

70-79%N=43

AlamanceAlexanderAveryBeaufortBertieBridges**BurkeCabarrusCravenCumberlandDuplinEast Wake Acad**GastonHarnettImani Institute**IredellLeeLenoirMAST**MaconMadisonMecklenburgMooresville CityMount Airy CityNewton Conover CityNorthamptonOrange Co. Charter**PenderPittRandolphRockinghamRowanRutherfordSampsonScotlandShelby CityStan ly

The Learning Cntr**TyrrellWakeWayneWilsonYadkin

80-89%N=45

Asheboro CityBrunswickBuncombeCHill-Carrb. CityCIS Acad**CamdenCarteretCaswellCatawbaChathamCherokeeChowanClayClevelandClinton CityDareDavidsonDowntown Middle**GatesGrahamGranvilleGuilfordHaywoodHenderson

HydeJacksonJohnstonJonesKings Mm CityMcDowellNew HanoverOrangePamlicoPerquimansPersonPolkR. Rapids CityRiver Mill Charter**SurrySwainTransylvaniaUnionWhiteville CityWilkesWoods Charter**

90% or aboveN=12

AlleghanyArapahoe**Chatham Charter**DavieElkin CityMagellan**MitchellOns lowStokesSummit Charter**WataugaYancey

Notes: 'These data represent the highest test score of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.

Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated. The complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.

Data are not reported where number tested is fewer than five. These systems include Grandfather Acad, Lakeside School", and Village Charter".Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this table.

25

Page 23: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Table 2. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent Passing* (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category

for the Class of 2002 at End of Grade 9, by LEA.

Below 50%N=12

70-79%N=31

80-89%N=50

Hertford Alamance Alexander Kings Mtn CityJ.H. Baker Jr High** Avery Ashe LeeJones Beaufort Asheboro City LenoirKennedy Charter** Bladen Brunswick LincolnLakeside School** Burke Buncombe MadisonLift Acad** Catawba CHill-Carrb. City MitchellNC Sch of Maritime* Chatham Cabarrus MontgomeryPasquotank Cleveland Caldwell MooreRight Step** Currituck Camden Mount Airy CityThomasville City Forsyth Carteret Newton Conover CityWarren Franklin Caswell PerquimansWoods Charter** Gaston Cherokee Person

Hickory City Chowan Polk50-59% Hoke Clay R. Rapids CityN=8 Kannapolis City Clinton City Randolph

Macon Craven RockinghamEdgecombe Martin Dare RutherfordGreene Mecklenburg Davidson StokesHarnett Mooresville City Gates SurryKestrel Heights** Pamlico Granville TransylvaniaLexington City Pitt Guilford UnionNew Century** River Mill Charter** Haywood WakeNorthampton Rowan Henderson WilkesWeldon City Sampson Hyde Yadkin

Scotland Jackson60-69% Stanly JohnstonN=15 Swain

Vance 90% or aboveAnson Washington N=11

Asheville City Whiteville CityBertie Wilson Alleghany PenderColumbus Davie TyrrellCumberland Elkin City WataugaDuplin Graham WayneDurham McDowell YanceyHalifax OrangeIredellNashNew HanoverOnslowRichmondRobesonShelby City

Notes: 'These data represent the highest test score of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.

"Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated. .

The complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix

Data are not reported where number tested is fewer than five. No system reported fewer than five.

Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this table.

st, 2 6

Page 24: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Table 3. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent Passing* (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category

for the Class of 2001 at End of Grade 10, by LEA

Below 50%N=7

70-79%N=23

80-89%

N=57

90% or above

N=25

Hertford Asheville City Alamance Johnston AlexanderLakeside School** Bladen Avery Kannapolis City AlleghanyLift Acad** Catawba Beaufort Lee AsheNC Sch of Maritime* Cumberland Brunswick Lexington City Asheboro CityNorthampton Currituck Buncombe Lincoln CamdenRight Step** Dare Burke Madison ChowanWarren Durham CHill-Carrb. City McDowell Clinton City

Greene Cabarrus Mitchell Davie50-59% Hickory City Caldwell Montgomery Elkin City

N=1 Hyde Carteret Pamlico HalifaxIredell Caswell Perquimans Hoke

Onslow Jones Chatham Polk Kings Mtn CityMacon Cherokee R. Rapids City Lenoir

60-69% Martin Clay Randolph Mount Airy CityN=12 Mecklenburg Cleveland River Mill Charter** Newton Conover City

Moore Columbus Rockingham OrangeAnson Mooresville City Craven Rowan PenderBertie New Century** Davidson Rutherford PersonDuplin Pitt Forsyth Sampson Shelby CityEdgecombe Richmond Franklin Scotland StanlyJ.H. Baker Jr High** Swain Gaston Stokes SurryNash Weldon City Gates Transylvania WataugaNew Hanover Wilson Graham Tyrrell WaynePasquotank Granville Union YadkinRobeson Guilford Vance YanceyThomasville City Harnett WakeWashington Haywood Whiteville CityWoods Charter** Henderson Wilkes

Jackson

Notes: *These data represent the highest test score of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.

**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated.

The complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.

Data are not reported for Kennedy Charter** because number tested is fewer than five.

Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this table.

10 27

Page 25: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Table 4. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing*(Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2003 at End of Grade 8, by LEA

Percent Passing' 1999 LEA Performance97.0 Yancey96.0 Arapahoe**95.0 Magellan**94.0 Stokes, Summit Charter**93.0 Allegheny, Davie92.0 Chatham Charter**91.0 Mitchell, Ons low, Watauga90.0 Elkin City, Polk89.0 Camden, Graham88.0 Orange, Wilkes87.0 Gates, Haywood, Swain, Transylvania86.0 Buncombe, Clinton City, McDowell85.0 Cherokee, Henderson, Pamlico, Woods Charter**84.0 Granville83.0 Carteret, Catawba, CIS Academy**, Clay, Dare, Davidson, Downtown Middle**,

Kings Mountain City, New Hanover, River Mill Charter**82.0 Asheboro City, Guilford, Hyde, Johnston81.0 Brunswick, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Cleveland, Edenton/Chowan, Jackson,

Perquimans, Roanoke Rapids City, Whiteville City80.0 Caswell, Chatham, Jones, Person, Rutherford, Surry, Union, Wayne79.0 Alexander, Avery, Craven, Lenoir, Madison, Rockingham, Stan ly, Wilson, Yadkin

1998 State 78.0 Beaufort, Burke, East Wake Academy**, Mount Airy City, Randolph77.0 Bertie, Shelby City76.0 Gaston, Harnett

1997 & 1999 State 75.0 Lee, MAST**, Wake74.0 Iredell-Statesville, Mooresville City, Rowan/Salisbury, Sampson, Tyrrell73.0 Alamance-Burlington, Macon, Northampton, Orange Co. Charter**, Pender, Pitt72.0 Imani Institute**, Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Newton Conover City, Scotland71.0 Bridges**, Cabarrus, Cumberland, Duplin, The Learning Center**70.0 Asheville City, Columbus, Thomasville City69.0 Caldwell, Lincoln68.0 Anson, Currituck, Martin67.0 Edgecombe, Kannapolis City, Richmond, Washington66.0 Greene, Moore65.0 Bladen, Montgomery64.0 Durham63.0 Ashe, Franklin, Hickory City, Vance62.0

...Hoke

60.0 Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Winston-Salem/Forsyth

58.0 Hertford57.0 Brevard Academy**56.0 Nash-Rocky Mount55.0 Lexington City, Robeson54.0

...Halifax

50.0...

Kestrel Heights**

44.0...

Right Step**

40.0 PHASE Academy**

3 1.0...

Weldon City

25.0...

Warren

23.0...

Sankore School**

21.0...

C.G. Woodson**

18.0...

Quality Education**

12.0...

Lift Academy**

0.0 Carter Community**, Kennedy Charter**tt Grandfather**, Lakeside School**, Village Charter**

Notes: 'Percent passing are rounded to the nearest percent. "Data not reported where number tested is fewer than five.

These data represent the highest test score of each student for all the test administrations in which the student participated.**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated. The complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.

Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this table. I 1

28

Page 26: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Table 5. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing*(Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2002 at End of Grade 9, by LEA

Percent Passing 1999 LEA Performance96.0

...Orange, Yancey

94.0 Alleghany, Elkin City93.0 Davie, Watauga92.0 Tyrrell91.0 Graham, Pender90.0 Camden, McDowell, Wayne89.0 Clay, Lenoir88.0 Cherokee, Clinton City, Roanoke Rapids City, Transylvania, Yadkin87.0 Asheboro City, Edenton/Chowan, Person86.0 Alexander, Ashe, Craven, Stokes, Surry85.0 Buncombe, Dare, Henderson, Johnston, Kings Mountain City, Lee,

Madison, Montgomery, Mount Airy City, Newton Conover City84.0 Cabarrus, Caldwell, Davidson, Guilford, Jackson, Lincoln, Mitchell, Polk, Randolph83.0 Carteret, Caswell, Hyde, Moore, Wilkes

1998 State 82.0 Brunswick, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Gates, Haywood, Rutherford, Union81.0 Perquimans, Rockingham, Wake80.0 Beaufort, Currituck, Gaston, Granville79.0 Franklin, Pamlico, Swain78.0 Burke, Chatham, Mooresville City, Whiteville City

1999 State 77.0 Alamance-Burlington, Hickory City, Winston- Salem/Forsyth76.0 Martin, Sampson75.0 Cleveland, Kannapolis City, Stanly, Vance, Washington74.0 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Macon, Pitt, River Mill Charter**, Rowan-Salisbury, Wilson73.0 Avery, Catawba, Hoke72.0

...Bladen, Scotland

68.0 Iredell-Statesville, Nash-Rocky Mount67.0 Cumberland, Halifax, Richmond66.0 Duplin, New Hanover, Shelby City65.0

...Asheville City, Columbus, Durham

63.0 Anson62.0 Robeson61.0

...Bertie, Onslow

59.0...

Harnett, Lexington City

55.0 Greene54.0 New Century School**, Northampton, Weldon City53.0

...Edgecombe

50.0 Kestrel Heights**49.0 Elizabeth City/Pasquotank48.0 Warren47.0 Thomasville City46.0 Jones45.0 Woods Charter**

43.0...

Hertford

35.0...

Right Step**

31.0...

NC School of Maritime*

28.0...

Lakeside School**

25.0...

J.H. Baker Jr High**

13.0...

Kennedy Charter**

0.0 Lift Academy**

Notes: 'Percent passing are rounded to the nearest percent. "Data not reported where number tested is fewer than five.

*These data represent the highest test score of each student for all the test administrations in which the student participated.

"Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated. The complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.

Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this table. 1229

Page 27: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Table 6. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing*(Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2001 at End of Grade 10, by LEA

Percent Passingt 1999 LEA Performance99.0 Camden, Yancey

97.0 Asheboro City, Lenoir96.0 Alleghany, Davie, Halifax .

95.0 Newton Conover City94.0 Pender, Person, Watauga, Wayne93.0 Elkin City, Kings Mountain City, Mount Airy City, Surry92.0 Alexander91.0 Ashe, Orange, Shelby City, Stan ly90.0 Clinton City, Edenton/Chowan, Hoke, Montgomery, Polk, Yadkin89.0 Brunswick, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Cherokee, Gates88.0 Buncombe, Clay, Graham, Granville, Roanoke Rapids City, Rutherford87.0 Cabarrus, Caldwell, Carteret, Chatham, Gaston, Johnston, Sampson, Vance, Whiteville City86.0 Haywood, Kannapolis City, McDowell, Mitchell, Randolph, Winston-Salem/Forsyth85.0 Burke, Craven, Davidson, Henderson, Lee, Lexington City, Perquimans, Union, Wilkes84.0 Avery, Guilford, Jackson, Madison, Stokes,Transylvania, Tyrrell83.0 Alamance-Burlington, Lincoln, Pamlico, Rowan-Salisbury82.0 Caswell, Columbus, Rockingham, Wake

1999 State 81.0 Beaufort, Cleveland, Franklin, Harnett80.0 River Mill Charter**, Scotland, Swain, Wilson79.0 Dare, Hyde, Iredell-Statesville78.0 Catawba, Moore, Mooresville City77.0 Asheville City, Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Pitt76.0 Greene, Weldon City75.0 Currituck74.0 Hickory City, Martin73.0 Bladen, Cumberland72.0 Jones, Richmond71.0 Macon, New Century School**70.0 Durham69.0 Duplin68.0 Edgecombe67.0 Anson, Robeson, Washington, Woods Charter**

65.0 Nash-Rocky Mount, New Hanover.

62.0 Bertie, Elizabeth City/Pasquotank61.0 Thomasville City60.0

...J.H. Baker Jr High**

54.0...

Ons low

47.0...

Northampton

41.0 Hertford

38.0 Warren

30.0...

NC School of Maritime*

25.0...

Right Step**

11.0...

Lift Acad**

0.0 Lakeside School**tt Kennedy Charter**

Notes: 'Percent passing are rounded to the nearest percent. "Data not reported where number tested is fewer than five.

'These data represent the highest test score of each student for all the test administrations in which the student participated.

"Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated. The complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.

Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this table.

13 30

Page 28: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

5ro ratt

ij4.rt,

Aqj ,

,

f14:`

411.,4 a'a

Cr'

TV

'

40

V.

1

'0-

t-.A

.'.....-''',..:

,,,i: .,,. -,,,,; ,

..;Z;04.;:+

`-

'!' ,'

Arldritrtr

"t.,..,i rt-'

r's,' A

.,4 f'

:fii,-,-.,-,,--

rf;

*-

t.:_, ''''f.`."-; ....

L

-T i,;:,_,`. `,,,

4rev-r

;er:4".)%;' -

`-,,

...

40 .

4

Page 29: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Tab

le 7

a. 1

998-

99 N

orth

Perf

orm

ance

)C

arol

ina

Tes

ts o

f C

ompu

ter

Skill

s Pe

rcen

t Pas

sing

(M

ultip

le-C

hoic

e an

dfo

r th

e C

lass

of

2003

at E

nd o

f G

rade

8, b

y L

EA

and

Eth

nici

ty

Tot

alA

mer

ican

Indi

anW

este

rn R

egio

nA

sian

Bla

ckH

ispa

nic

Mul

ti-R

acia

lWhite

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Sta

te95

,377

71,4

5774

.91,433

861

60.1

1,664

1,21

272

.828

,071

16,4

2258

.52,

622

1,30

349

.764

146

973

.260

,924

51,1

7684

.0

Wes

tern

Reg

ion

7,11

55,

991

84.2

66

5583

.048

4185

.444

027

161

.610

557

54.3

3930

76.9

6,41

75,

537

86.3

Bun

com

be1,

887

1,62

286

.07

710

0.0

1413

92.9

9562

65.3

3220

62.5

85

62.5

1,73

11,

515

87.5

Ash

evill

e C

ity31

121

769

.80

212

363

51.2

32

181

150

82.9

Che

roke

e24

020

384

.65

510

0.0

27

710

0.0

41

221

186

84.2

The

Lea

rnin

g C

ente

r7

571

.40

01

00

64

66.7

Cla

y11

394

83.2

00

00

21

1 1

9282

.9

Gra

ham

8777

88.5

30

00

0.8

474

88.1

I lay

woo

d57

149

987

.40

119

81.8

41

554

484

87.4

Hen

ders

on86

173

585

.41

97

77.8

4026

65.0

3413

38.2

1411

78.6

763

678

88.9

Jack

son

283

229

80.9

2115

71.0

03

125

720

981

.3

Sum

mit

Cha

rter

1716

94.1

00

0I

016

1593

.8

Mac

on32

623

973

.30

23

22'

317

232

73.2

Mad

ison

187

148

79.1

00

00

018

714

879

.1

McD

owel

l48

441

886

.40

13II

84.6

2319

82.6

12

445

387

87.0

Mitc

hell

198

180

90.9

00

02

019

617

890

.8

Pol

k19

417

489

.71

016

I I68

.85

240

.02

170

159

93.5

Rut

herf

ord

744

592

79.6

04

9855

56.

II7

63.6

362

852

483

.4

Sw

ain

122

106

86.9

2723

85.0

01

093

8187

.1

Tra

nsyl

vani

a29

521

5887

.50

016

956

.34

127

424

790

.1

Bre

vard

Aca

dem

y'7

457

110

00

00

74

57.1

Yan

cey

181

175

96.7

04

00

176

170

96.6

BE

ST C

OPY

AV

AIL

AB

LE

:

32

33

Not

es:

The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all

the

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ed.

Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

rmat

.D

ata

not r

epor

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r te

sted

is fe

wer

than

five

. Tire

eth

nic

cate

gorie

s m

ay n

ot s

um to

tota

l num

ber

test

ed a

nd to

taln

umbe

r pa

ssin

g be

caus

e et

hnic

cat

egor

y m

ay h

ave

not b

een

code

d.

"Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

epor

ting

purp

oses

the

char

ter

scho

ol n

ame

has

been

abb

revi

ated

. The

com

plet

e na

me

can

befo

und

in th

e A

ppen

dix.

..

Page 30: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Sta

teN

orth

wes

t Reg

ion

Ale

xand

er

Alle

ghan

y

Ash

e

Ave

ry

Gra

ndfa

ther

Aca

dem

y*

Bur

ke

Cal

dwel

l

Cat

awba

Hic

kory

City

New

ton

Con

over

City

Dav

idso

n

Lexi

ngto

n C

ity

Tho

mas

ville

City

Dav

ie

Win

ston

-Sal

em/F

orsy

th

Lill

Aca

dem

y*

Qua

lity

Edu

catio

n"..-

.oo

Dow

ntow

n M

iddl

e"

C.G

. Woo

dson

Ired

ell-S

tate

svill

e

Moo

resv

ille

City

Sto

kes

Sur

ly

Elk

in C

ity

Brid

ges*

Mou

nt A

iry C

ity

Wat

auga

Wilk

es

Yad

kin

34

Tot

al

Tab

le 7

b. 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

assi

ng (

Mul

tiple

-Cho

ice

and

Perf

orm

ance

) fo

r th

e C

lass

of

2003

at E

nd o

f G

rade

8, b

y L

EA

and

Eth

nici

tyN

orth

wes

t Reg

ion

Am

eric

an I

ndia

nA

sian

Bla

ckH

ispa

nic

Mul

ti-R

acia

lW

hite

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

95,3

7771

,457

74.9

1,43

386

160

.11,

664

1,21

272

.828

,071

16,4

2258

.52,

622

1,30

349

.764

146

973

.260

,924

51,1

7684

.015

,195

11,3

9475

.021

1466

.033

822

666

.92,

408

1,16

848

.543

417

640

.688

6675

.011

,906

9,74

481

.8

377

299

79.3

015

1280

.018

844

.43

034

127

781

.2

138

129

93.5

0a

0I

40

,13

312

694

.7

316

200

63.3

00

*.

27

342

.90

307

196

63.8

194

154

79.4

0,

01

00

193

153

79.3

40

03

00

I

1,07

984

778

.52

9567

70.5

6745

67.2

23II

47.8

65

83.3

886

718

81.0

935

647

69.2

17

457

.158

3763

.810

440

.06

350

.085

359

870

.1

1,26

11,

045

82.9

374

5574

.388

5663

.638

2052

.63

1,05

591

086

.3

355

224

63,1

025

832

.096

4749

.024

520

.85

510

0.0

205

159

77.6

214

154

72.0

010

1010

0.0

3413

38.2

126

50.0

I15

712

579

.6

1,49

41,

241

183.

18

810

0.0

1313

100.

032

3210

0.0

55

100.

04

1,43

21,

179

82.3

268

147

54.9

017

741

.213

372

54.1

182

11.1

199

6565

.7

152

106

69.7

05

360

.078

4962

.84

065

5076

.9

436

404

92.7

00

3931

79.5

1310

76.9

338

136

094

.5

3,21

81,

936

60.2

52

40.0

2516

64.0

1,25

350

240

.113

645

33.1

3325

75.8

1,76

61,

346

76.2

172

11.8

00

172

11.8

0a

00

112

111.

20

011

218

.20

00

155

183

.20

131

1754

.80

212

110

990

.1

143

21.4

00

143

21.4

00

0

1,23

190

773

.70

2315

65.2

234

116

49.6

207

35.0

195

376

880

.6

332

245

73.8

0a

354

3463

.03

227

020

776

.7

536

503

93.8

11

2617

65.4

134

30.8

449

147

997

.6

571

457

8011

I3

1712

70.6

4120

48.8

54

80.0

504

417

82.7

6155

90.2

00

52

40.0

10

5552

94.5

1410

71.4

00

0a.

00

1410

71.4

182

142

78.0

09

333

.317

847

.16

350

.03

147

126

85.7

395

360

91.1

02

22

138

835

591

.5

807

709

87.9

0a

103

30.0

5945

76.3

239

39.1

371

265

091

.3

428

336

78.5

00

1814

77.8

2810

35.7

53

60.0

377

309

82.0

35

Not

es:

t The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all

the

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

entp

artic

ipat

ed.

Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

nnat

.'D

ata

not r

epor

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r te

sted

is fe

wer

than

five

. The

eth

nic

cate

gorie

s m

ay n

ot s

tun

to to

tal n

umbe

r te

sted

and

tota

l num

ber

pass

ing

beca

use

ethn

ic c

ateg

ory

may

hav

e no

t bee

n co

ded.

Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

eam

ing

Pur

pose

s th

e ch

arte

r sc

hool

nam

e ha

s be

en a

bbre

viat

ed. T

he c

ompl

ete

nam

e ca

n be

foun

d in

the

App

endi

x.

Page 31: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

-I O

DIC

Sta

teS

outh

wes

t Reg

ion

Ans

oit

Cab

arru

s

Tot

alN

umbe

rT

este

d95

,377

20,2

28

348

1,41

7

Num

ber

Pas

sing

71,4

5714

,754

238

1,00

3

Per

cent

Pas

sing

74.9

72.9

68.4

70.8

Kan

napo

lis C

ity28

519

066

.7

Cle

vela

nd62

350

781

.4

Kin

gs M

ount

ain

City

333

277

83.2

She

lby

City

237

183

77.2

Gas

ton

2,39

51,

818

75.9

tloke

426

262

61.5

Linc

oln

905

621

68.6

Cha

rlotte

/Mec

klen

burg

7,12

95,

144

72.2

Ken

nedy

Cha

rter

"8

0' 0

.0

Mon

tgom

ery

379

248

65.4

Moo

re76

950

563

.741

MA

ST

"28

2175

.0

Ric

hmon

d63

843

067

.4,-

-. c:)

Row

an-S

alis

bury

1,43

31,

057

73.8

Sco

tland

516

369

711

.5

Sta

nly

805

6137

79.1

Uni

on1,

554

1,24

480

,1

36

1770

..77

!WI I

II I..

.411

1111

14 I

C3I

3 IJ

I I.V

IIIIII

IIILI

.311

,111

11a1

GII

Cur

saa

..a6

vas

was

ilac-

a-..g

urga

.c...

.,Pe

rfor

niiii

ce)

for

the

Cla

ss o

f 20

03 it

End

of

Gra

de 8

, by

LE

A a

nd E

thiik

itySo

uthw

est R

egio

nA

mer

ican

Indi

anA

sian

Bla

ckH

ispa

nic

Mul

ti-R

acia

lW

hite

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

.P

assi

ngT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ngT

este

dP

assi

ng1,

433

861

60.1

1,66

41,

212

72.8

28,0

7116

,422

158

9660

.046

935

174

.85,

910

3,22

9

I2

I20

911

7

64

66.0

109

90.0

186

66

3'6

350

.091

50

0I

134

80

I10

1010

0.0

8361

0I

104

'63

435

2982

.941

425

6

5017

34.0

419

611

4

33

8444

2920

69.0

308

232

75.3

2,91

81,

574

00

4

017

1270

.610

654

5I

20.0

53

60.0

197

92

00

94

26

610

0.0

252

145

64

66.0

1814

77.8

293

144

4537

82.0

54

80.0

232

140

130

1550

.012

175

28

675

.027

715

0

BE

ST

CO

PY

AV

AIL

AB

LE

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

58.5

2,62

21.

303

49.7

54.6

577

270

46.8

56.0

1

35.5

2310

43.5

54.9

125

41.7

59.7

64

66.7

73.5

53

60.0

60.6

I

61.8

3825

65.8

58.2

106

60.0

52.4

5718

31.6

53.9

251

132

52.6

0

50.9

319

29.0

46.7

2910

34.5

44.4

0

57.5

136

46.2

49.1

4018

45.0

60.3

3

62.0

92

22.2

54.2

4818

37.5

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

PT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ngT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ng64

146

973

.260

,924

51,1

7684

.082

5972

.013

,026

10,7

4582

.51

; it_

f

I13

411

787

.3

II5

45.5

1,18

190

977

.0

Is

172

130

75.6

I48

142

187

.5

023

420

286

.3

0.1

3111

990

.8

1010

100.

01,

894

1,49

478

.9

416

211

872

.8

475

255

173

.3

2114

66.7

3,60

03,

172

88.1

0*

4

022

517

376

.9

353

039

774

.9

I18

1794

.4

236

327

174

.7

13II

84.6

1,06

386

681

.5

I23

018

580

.4

54

80.0

639

540

84.5

41,

213

1,06

387

.6

37

Nci

tes:

t The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all

the

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

strid

ent p

artic

ipat

ed.

:Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

rmat

.D

ata

not r

epen

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r te

sted

is fe

wer

than

five

. The

eth

nic

cate

gorie

s m

ay n

ot s

um to

tota

l num

ber

test

ed a

nd to

tal n

umbe

r pa

ssin

g be

caus

eet

hnic

cat

egor

y m

ay h

ave

not b

een

code

d.

"Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

epor

ting

purp

oses

the

char

ter

scho

ol n

ame

has

been

abb

revi

ated

The

com

plet

e na

me

can

be fo

und

in th

e A

ppen

dix.

Page 32: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Tot

al

Tab

le 7

d. 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

assi

ng(M

ultip

le-C

hoic

e an

dPe

rfor

man

ce)

for

the

Cla

ss o

f 20

03 a

t End

of

Gra

de 8

, by

LE

A a

nd E

thni

city

Nor

thea

st R

egio

nA

mer

ican

Indi

anA

sian

Bla

ckH

ispa

nic

Mul

ti-R

acia

lW

hite

I

'

1

Num

ber

Num

ber

Pt

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Sta

te95

,377

71,4

5774

.91,

433

861

60.1

1,66

41,

212

72.8

28,0

7116

,422

58.5

2,62

21,

303

49.7

641

469

73.2

60,9

2451

,176

84.0

Nor

thea

st R

egio

n6,

835

4,84

270

.836

2569

.027

2385

.23,

464

2,06

759

.770

3854

.318

1372

.23,

220

2,67

683

.1

Bea

ufor

t59

045

977

.80

225

317

167

.63

233

028

285

.5B

errie

295

226

76.6

10

229

174

76.0

I1

6350

79.4

Cam

den

9383

89.2

00

1713

76.5

00

7670

92.1

Ede

nton

/Cho

wan

209

170

81.3

00

9160

65.9

I3

114

107

93.9

Cur

rituc

k25

617

568

.43

123

1252

.24

I22

415

669

.6D

are

351

292

83.2

12

1510

66.7

97

77.8

3.3

2127

184

.4

Edg

ccom

be59

239

466

.60

1'

'334

201

60.2

143

21.4

I24

218

978

.1

Gat

es16

914

787

.00

078

6178

.20

091

8694

.5

Hal

ifax

480

261

54.4

2516

64.0

042

422

352

.6I

129

2172

.4

Roa

noke

Rap

ids

City

243

197

81.1

24

4628

60.9

3a

018

816

185

.6

Wel

don

City

6520

' 30.8

0a

161

2032

.80

03

Her

tford

339

197

58.1

I0

254

123

48.4

I1

8271

86.6

Hyd

e45

3781

20

022

1672

.70

023

2191

.3

Mar

tin38

226

068

.1I

020

2I 1

155

.08

'3

37.5

017

114

685

.4

Nor

tham

pton

291

211

72.5

00

223

151

67.7

11

6659

89.4

NO

Eliz

abet

h C

ity/P

asqu

otan

k 47

328

660

.5I

222

210

145

.5I

124

618

173

.6

Per

quim

ans

151

122

8b.8

00

6551

78.5

I0

8570

l''82

.4

Pitt

1.52

11:

112

73.1

I13

II84

.673

343

158

.820

1365

.03

751

654

87.1

Rig

ht S

tep

2712

44.4

00

2712

44.4

00

0

Tyr

rell

6548

73.8

00

.27

1970

.41

a0

3728

75.7

Was

hing

ton

198

133

67.2

0I

118

7966

.9I

078

5367

.9

BE

STC

OPY

AV

AIL

AB

LE

3839

Not

es:

t The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all

the

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ed.

Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

rmat

.D

ata

not r

epor

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r te

sted

is fe

wer

than

five

. The

eth

nic

cate

gorie

s m

ay n

ot s

um to

tota

l num

ber

test

ed a

nd to

tal n

umbe

r pa

ssin

g be

caus

eet

hnic

cat

egor

y m

ay h

ave

not b

een

code

d.rr

unne

Ar

a rh

,nA

r cr

lInn1

Fnr

rrn

nrtin

n nn

rnrw

e ilt

o rit

2npr

...k

rill!

nam

e hi

s be

en a

lthre

viat

ed T

he e

nmnl

ete

nam

e ca

n he

ran

d in

the

Ann

endi

a

Page 33: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Tab

le 7

e. 1

998-

99N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perf

orm

ance

) fo

r th

e C

lass

of

2003

at E

nd o

f Gra

Perc

ent P

assi

ng (

Mul

tiple

-Cho

ice

and

de 8

, by

LE

A a

nd E

thni

city

Tot

alA

mer

ican

Indi

anSo

uthe

ast R

egio

nA

sian

Bla

ckH

ispa

nic

Mul

ti-R

acia

lW

hite

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

P e

rcen

tN

umbe

rN

umbe

rPe

rcen

tN

umbe

rN

umbe

rP

erce

ntN

umbe

rN

umbe

rPe

rcen

tT

este

dPa

ssin

gPa

ssin

gT

este

dPa

ssin

gPa

ssin

gT

este

dPa

ssin

gPa

ssin

gT

este

dPa

ssin

gP

assi

ngP

Tes

ted

Pass

ing

Pass

ing

Tes

ted

Pass

ing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pass

ing

Pas

sing

Stat

e95

,377

71,4

5774

.91,

433

861

60.1

1,66

41,

212

72.8

28,0

7116

,422

58.5

2,62

21,

303

49.7

641

469

73.2

60,9

2451

,176

84.0

Sout

heas

t Reg

ion

17,4

6813

,126

75.1

1.01

358

357

.017

513

275

.46,

408

4,14

964

.750

233

566

.717

014

585

.39,

193

7,77

784

.6

Bla

den

411

273

65.5

0'19

010

555

.37

457

.10

219

-16

474

.9

Bru

nsw

ick

775

624

80.5

66

100.

01

183

124

67.8

64

66.7

357

648

684

.4

Car

tere

t68

656

982

.92

266

3654

.510

660

.03

603

522

86.6

Col

umbu

s61

042

669

.835

2365

.02

278

173

62.2

20

293

230

78.5

Whi

tevi

lle C

ity23

018

680

.92

093

6064

.52

II3

212

393

.2C

rave

n1,

051

833

79.3

312

I I

91.7

369

247

66.9

2014

70.0

76

85.7

.640

552

86.3

Cum

berl

and

3,81

32,

692

70.6

6937

53.0

6349

77.8

1,75

01,

073

61.3

186

138

74.2

5845

77.6

1,68

71,

350

80.0

Dup

l in

651

464

71.3

00

273

152

55.7

5130

58.8

I32

628

286

.5

Gre

ene

264

173

65.5

01

133

7556

.418

422

.21

1 1

192

82.9

Jone

s10

181

80.2

00

5442

77.8

0I

4638

82.6

Len

oir

815

646

79.3

23

408

291

71.3

136

46.2

88

100.0

376

333

88.6

New

Han

over

1,58

91,

323

83.3

147

50.0

2816

57.1

424

305

71.9

149

64.3

1614

87.5

1,09

397

288

.9

Ons

1,60

01,

460

91.3

2121

100.

033

2987

.939

636

993

.249

4910

0.0

5047

94.0

1,05

194

589

.9

PHA

SE A

cade

my"

156

40.0

0.0

123

25.0

02

Pam

lico

152

129

84,9

059

4067

.80

9187

95.6

Ara

paho

2625

96.2

03

00

2221

95.5

Pend

er46

434

14 73

.50

118

8370

.39

555

.6I

335

251

74.9

Rob

eson

1,89

81,

050

55..3

823

454

55.0

73

42.9

643

303

47.1

27I

I40

.73

395

277

70.1

CIS

Aca

dem

y23

1982

:615

1280

.00

65

83.3

00

2

Sam

pson

563

416

73.9

98

88.0

216

810

059

.540

2255

.05

480

.033

928

182

.9

Clin

ton

City

175

151

86.3

53

60.0

I84

6779

.86

583

.30

7975

94.9

Way

ne1,

550

1,23

979

.93

2017

85.0

698

493

70.6

4025

62.5

1210

83.3

775

692

89.3

BE

STC

OPY

AV

AIL

AB

LE

40

41

tote

s:}T

hese

dat

a re

pres

ent t

he h

ighe

st te

st s

core

of e

ach

stud

ent f

or a

ll th

e te

st a

dmin

istr

atio

ns in

whi

ch th

e st

uden

t par

ticip

ated

.M

ata

cann

ot b

e ve

rifie

d in

this

form

at.

'Dat

a no

t rep

orte

d w

here

num

ber

test

ed is

few

erth

anfiv

e. T

he e

thni

c ca

tego

ries

may

not

sum

to to

tal n

umbe

r te

sted

and

tota

l num

ber

pass

ing

beca

use

ethn

ic c

ateg

ory

may

hav

e no

t bee

n co

ded.

t-ti.

ur,fr

t a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

orre

noni

nenu

rnos

es th

e ch

arte

r sc

hool

nam

e ha

s be

en a

bbre

viat

ed. T

he c

ompl

ete

nam

e ca

n be

foun

d in

the

App

endi

x.

Page 34: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Tab

le 7

f. 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

assi

ng (

Mul

tiple

-Cho

ice

and

Perf

orm

ance

) fo

r th

e C

lass

of

2003

at E

nd o

f G

rade

8, b

yL

EA

and

Eth

nici

tyC

entr

al R

egio

nT

otal

Am

eric

an In

dian

Asi

anB

lack

His

pani

cM

ulti-

Rac

ial

Whi

te

Num

ber

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Sta

leC

entr

al R

egio

n95

,377

28,5

3671

,457

21,3

50

Ala

man

ce-B

urlin

gton

1,52

41,

118

Lake

side

Sch

ool

2

Riv

er M

ill C

hart

er"

1815

Cas

wel

l25

520

5

Cha

tham

529

423

Cha

tham

Cha

rter

12I 1

Woo

ds C

hart

er"

131

1

Dur

ham

2,23

21,

434

Can

er C

omm

unity

"6

0

Kes

trel

I ki

ghts

"30

15

Fra

nklin

551

346

Gra

nvill

e58

949

4

Gui

lford

4,51

73,

703

Iman

i Ins

titut

e"10

13

I lam

ett

1,20

991

6

IJ

John

ston

IJ

1,38

61,

138

Lee

677

509 i

Nas

h-R

ocky

Mou

nt1,

338

752

Ora

nge

372

329

Ora

nge

Co.

Cha

rter

"11

8

Cha

pel h

ill-C

arrb

oro

City

689

556

Vill

age

Cha

rter

"I

Per

son

419

336

Ran

dolp

h1,

266

982

Ash

ebor

o C

ity29

123

8

Roc

king

ham

1,10

687

6

Van

ce55

034

6

Wak

e7,

555

5,64

6

Mag

ella

n"59

56

Eas

t Wak

e A

cade

my"

3628

San

kore

Sch

ool"

133

War

ren

288

73

Wils

on97

476

9

Not

es:

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

74.9

1,43

386

160

.11,

664

1,21

272

.828

,071

16,4

2258

.52,

622

1,30

349

.7

74.8

139

8863

.060

743

972

.39,

441

5,53

858

.793

442

745

.7

73.4

73

42.0

1912

63.2

390

249

63.8

7525

33.3

00

00

83.3

00

00

80.4

00

109

7972

.52

80.0

03

124

7963

.743

1739

.5

91.7

I0

I0

84.6

00

I0

64.2

53

60.0

3426

76.5

1,26

564

651

.160

2643

.3

0.0.

00

40

50.0

00

175

29.4

0

h2.8

54

80.0

322

594

41.8

84

50.0

83.9

24

218

173

79.4

147

50.0

82.0

3828

73.0

165

124

75.2

1,65

81,

118

67.4

6646

69.7

72.2

00

16I I

68.8

0

75.8

13I I

84.0

54

80.0

354

223

63.0

5036

72.0

82.1

34

283

199

70.3

9040

44.4

1

75.2

47

571

.417

410

560

.376

3748

.7

56.2

,

88.4

6 3

466

.014 2

857

.170

5

61

275

51

39.0

83.6

42 6

15 5

35.7

83.3

72.7

00

20

80.7

I42

3378

.698

4950

.013

430

.8

00

00

80.2

10

146

9565

.1I

77.6

75

71.0

359

3661

.042

1740

.5

81.8

16

466

.748

3572

.931

2064

.5

79.2

44.

237

144

60.8

2516

64.0

62.9

33

361

201

55.7

73

42.9

74.7

2013

65.0

279

194

69.5

2,13

41.

255

58.8

244

8735

.7

94.9

02

75

71.4

0

77.8

00

30

23.1

00

122

16.7

0

25.3

131

7.0

019

735

17.8

1

79.0

28

450

.053

236

869

.238

2155

.3

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

641

469

73.2

60,9

2451

,176

84.0

244

156

63.9

17,1

6214

,697

85.6

127

58.3

1,02

182

280

.5'

1I

018

1583

.3

414

012

387

.9

64

66.7

353

320

90.7

010

990

.0

39

888

.9

4530

66.7

819

700

85.5

02

013

1076

.9

430

623

978

.1

334

830

687

.9

5643

76.8

2,52

92,

342

92.6

02

137

53.8

774

635

-82.

0

41,

002

888

'',88

.6

74

57.1

409

355

86.8

52

40.0

566

448

79.2

I29

926

889

.6

27

571

.4

6I

16.7

529

468

88.5

01

226

923

888

.5

31,

152

921

79.9

020

517

987

.3

483

270

684

.9

017

613

878

.4

5728

49.1

4,82

14,

069

84.4

I49

4898

.0

033

2575

.8

I0

077

3748

.1

439

037

295

.4

0-he

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

hst

uden

t for

all

the

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ed.

:Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

rmat

.D

ata

not r

epor

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r te

sted

is fe

wer

than

five

. The

ethn

ic c

ateg

orie

s m

ay n

ot s

um to

tota

l num

ber

test

ed a

nd to

tal n

umbe

r pa

ssin

g be

caus

eet

hnic

cat

egor

y m

ay h

ave

not b

een

code

d.

--*

hP^,

rom

niel

e na

me

can

he fo

nd in

the

Ann

endm

4

BE

ST

CO

PY

AV

AIL

AB

LE

Page 35: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Tab

le 8

a. 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

assi

ng (

Mul

tiple

-C

hoic

e an

d Pe

rfor

man

ce)

for

the

Cla

ss o

f 20

02 a

t End

of

Gra

de 9

, by

LE

Aan

d E

thni

city

-W

este

rn R

egio

nT

otal

Am

eric

an In

dian

Asi

anB

lack

His

pani

cM

ulti-

Rac

ial

Whi

te

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Sta

te96

,431

73,8

3976

.61,

542

958

62.1

1,76

41,

237

70.1

28,8

0918

,105

62.8

2,49

51,

265

50.7

601

1Ves

tern

Reg

ion

7,50

36,

272

83.6

9979

79.8

5143

84.3

499

351

70.3

118

7261

.048

Bun

com

be1,

891

1,60

184

.78

787

.515

II73

.310

678

73.6

2718

66.7

11

Ash

evill

e C

ity34

122

064

.52

311

969

58.0

83

37.5

5

Che

roke

e30

927

388

.38

810

0.0

06

583

.32

2

Cla

y12

110

889

.3I

00

00

Gra

ham

7770

90.9

77

100.

00

00

0

Hay

woo

d66

654

882

.33

212

1191

.712

1191

.72

Hen

ders

on95

780

984

.52

'8

810

0.0

5535

63.6

5026

52.0

10

Jack

son

300

253

84.3

3022

73.3

22

'I

5

Mac

on36

527

074

.01

46

583

.3I

2

Mad

ison

195

165

84.6

0.

00

'0

0

McD

owel

l43

839

590

.20

1414

100.

016

1593

.82

3

Mitc

hell

200

168

184.

00

0a

I2

0

Pol

k19

716

548

3.8

00

1913

68.4

32

Rut

herf

ord

758

623

i82

.20

212

187

71.9

76

85.7

3

Sw

ain

159

125

78.6

3428

82.4

0I

I1

Tra

nsyl

vani

a36

632

2$8

.02

134

2882

.41

2

Yan

cey

163

157

96.3

I0

1I

0

BE

ST C

OPY

AV

AIL

AB

LE

44

446

74.2

61,2

0051

,819

84.7

3572

.96,

688

5,69

285

.1

981

.81,

724

1,47

885

.7

480

.020

414

370

.1

291

256

88.0

120

107

89.2

7063

90.0

635

520

81.9

660

.083

273

388

.1

480

.026

022

385

.8

'35

125

973

.8

195

165

84.6

403

362

89.8

197

165

83.8

'17

314

986

.'

625

526

84.2

122

9678

.7

326

291

89.3

160

156

97.5

45

Not

es:

t The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all

the

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ed.

t Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

rmat

.D

ata

not r

epor

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r te

sted

is fe

wer

than

five

. The

ethn

ic c

ateg

orie

s m

ay n

ot s

um to

tota

l num

ber

test

ed a

nd to

tal n

umbe

r pa

ssin

g be

caus

e an

ethn

ic c

ateg

ory

may

not

hav

e be

en c

oded

.

Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

epor

ting

purp

oses

the

char

tersc

hool

nam

e ha

s be

en a

bbre

viat

ed. T

he c

ompl

ete

nam

e ca

n be

foun

d in

the

App

endi

x.

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om L

EA

s af

ter

Apr

il 30

, 200

0 ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

this

tabl

e.

Page 36: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Tab

le 8

b. 1

998-

99N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of C

ompu

ter

Skill

sPe

rcen

t Pas

sing

(Mul

tiple

-C

hoic

e an

dPe

rfor

man

ce)

for

the

Cla

ss o

f 20

02 a

tE

nd o

f G

rade

9, b

y L

EA

and

Eth

nici

ty

Nor

thw

est R

egio

nT

otal

Am

eric

an In

dian

Asi

anB

lack

His

pani

cM

ulti-

Rac

ial

Whi

te

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cen

Pas

sin;

Sta

te96

,431

73,8

3976

.61,

542

958

62.1

1,76

41,

237

70.1

28,8

0918

,105

62.8

2,49

51,

265

50.7

601

446

74.2

61,2

0051

,819

84. /

Nor

thw

est R

egio

n14

,777

11,7

4079

.434

2367

.637

025

067

.62,

105

1,26

560

.136

015

342

.563

5079

.411

,845

9,99

984

.4.

Ale

xand

er41

535

685

.80

*11

436

.421

1781

.03

038

033

487

.9

Alle

ghan

y10

397

94.2

00

2I

0*

100

9494

.0

Ash

e27

323

686

.40

01

7I

14.3

0a

265

234

88.3

Ave

ry20

114

672

.60

00

a0

020

114

672

.6

Bur

ke1,

045

816

78.1

310

982

75.2

7645

59.2

307

23.3

97

77.8

818

.673

82.3

Cal

dwel

l91

276

684

.04

370

5375

.711

545

.52

*82

270

185

,3

Cat

awba

1,17

985

872

.83

6239

62.9

6944

63.8

1812

66.7

31,

024

761

74.3

Hic

kory

City

298

230

77.2

031

1961

.366

4669

.76

233

.33

192

160

83.3

New

ton

Con

over

City

178

151

84.8

015

1386

.717

1164

.712

541

.70

134

122

91.0

Dav

idso

n1,

533

1,29

0,8

4.t

52

40.0

54

80.0

3827

71.1

128

66.7

31,

470

1,24

684

.8

Lexi

ngto

n C

ity23

613

958

.90

2113

61.9

117

6353

.817

423

.55

510

0.0

7654

71.1

Tho

mas

ville

City

171

8046

.80

295

3637

.910

440

.00

6439

60.9

Dav

ie43

840

8'9

3.2

23

4840

83.3

53

60.0

137

936

095

.0

Win

ston

-Sal

em/F

orsy

th3,

000

2,30

047

6.7

76

85.7

4633

71.7

1,00

363

162

.910

836

33.3

2821

75.0

1,80

81,

573

87.0

Lift

Aca

dem

y*42

10

0.0

00

420

0.0

00

0.

Ired

ell-S

tate

svill

e1,

245

851

68.4

4a

3422

64.7

262

123

46.9

2515

60.0

391

768

474

.6

Moo

resv

ille

City

321

249

77.6

0*

53

60.0

4521

46.7

01

*27

022

583

.3

Sto

kes

638

551

86.4

2a

2922

75.9

98

88.9

259

651

886

.4

Sur

ry64

355

386

.02

325

1872

.035

1645

.72

576

515

89.4

Elk

in C

ity77

7293

.50

05

510

0.0

53

60.0

067

6495

.5

Mou

nt A

iry C

ity11

710

085

.50

105

50.0

1513

86.7

2*

0*

9080

88.9

Wat

auga

447

415

92.8

03

3*

10

440

408

92.7

Wilk

es82

869

083

.30

62

33.3

4132

78.0

187

38.9

176

264

885

.0

Yad

kin

437

386

88.3

21

1512

80.0

2512

48.0

039

436

091

.4

4647

Not

es:

't T

hese

dat

a re

pres

ent t

he h

ighe

stte

st s

core

of e

ach

stud

ent f

or a

ll th

ete

st a

dmin

istr

atio

ns in

whi

ch th

e st

uden

tpa

rtic

ipat

ed.

t Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

rmat

.D

ata

not r

epor

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r test

ed is

few

er th

an fi

ve. T

he e

thni

cca

tego

ries

may

not

sum

to to

tal n

umbe

rte

sted

and

tota

l num

ber

pass

ing

beca

use

an e

thni

c ca

tego

ry m

ay n

ot h

ave

been

cod

ed.

Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

epor

ting

purp

oses

the

char

ter

scho

ol n

ame

has

been

abbr

evia

ted.

The

com

plet

ena

me

can

be fo

und

in th

e A

ppen

dix.

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om L

EA

s af

ter

Apr

il30

, 200

0 ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

this

tabl

e.B

ES

T C

OP

Y A

VA

ILA

BLE

Page 37: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Tab

le 8

c. 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

assi

ng (

Mul

tiple

-C

hoic

e an

d Pe

rfor

man

ce)

for

the

Cla

ss o

f 20

02 a

t End

of

Gra

de 9

, by

LE

A a

nd E

thni

city

Sout

hwes

t Reg

ion

Tot

alA

mer

ican

Indi

anA

sian

Bla

ckHispanic

Mul

ti-R

acia

lW

hite

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

gass

ing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Sta

te96

,431

73,8

3976

.61,

542

958

62.1

1,76

41,

237

70.1

28,8

0918

,105

62.8

2,49

51,

265

50.7

601

446

74.2

61,2

0051

,819

84.7

Sou

thw

est R

egio

n21

,375

16,3

1076

.320

412

159

.351

836

971

.26,

867

4,16

260

.656

727

949

.264

4570

.313

,154

11,3

3386

.1

Ans

on33

821

463

.32

221

812

256

.00

011

689

76.7

Cab

arru

s1,

441

1,20

783

.85

510

0.0

109

90.0

196

117

59.7

3015

50.0

65

83.3

1,19

41,

056

88.4

Kan

napo

lis C

ity34

526

075

.40

412

173

60.3

136

46.2

220

517

685

.9

Cle

vela

nd68

951

875

.20

.1

150

8858

.74

053

342

880

.3

Kin

gs M

ount

ain

City

303

257

84.8

19

777

.873

5169

.92

221

619

690

.7

She

lby

City

239

158

66.1

04

129

6449

.60

210

490

86.5

Gas

ton

2,37

91,

900

79.9

117

63.6

3520

57.1

477

325

68.1

3215

46.9

66

100.

01,

818

1,52

784

.0

Hok

e49

135

872

.971

4259

.24

250

168

67.2

15I I

73.3

414

713

088

.4

Linc

oln

763

641

84.0

03

6842

61.8

4325

58.1

164

857

188

.1

Cha

rlotte

/Mec

klen

burg

8,07

05,

932

73.5

3318

54.5

351

259

73.8

3,59

92,

122

59.0

274

131

47.8

1510

66.7

3,79

83,

392

89.3

Ken

nedy

Cha

rter

"8

112

.50

40

I2

Mon

tgom

ery

383

324

.84.

61

2016

80.0

117

9076

.932

2062

.52

211

195

92.4

Moo

re91

475

882

.910

880

.02

239

175

73.2

2213

59.1

64

66.7

635

557

87.7

Ric

hmon

d58

039

11

67.4

92

22.2

324

014

660

.817

635

.32

309

233

75.4

Row

an-S

alis

bury

1,56

41,

152

73.7

323

1669

.632

216

450

.935

1851

.45

360

.01,

176

949

80.7

Sco

tland

606

434

71.6

4628

60.9

64

66.7

279

177

63.4

I0

274

225

82.1

Sta

n ly

750

564

75.2

84

50.0

29II

37.9

9553

55.8

11I

9.1

62

33.3

601

493

82.0

Uni

on1,

512

.1,2

4182

.14

1 I

872

.729

018

563

.836

1644

.44

°1,

167

1,02

687

.9

49

48

Mite

s:t T

hese

dat

a re

pres

ent t

he h

ighe

st te

st s

core

of e

ach

stud

ent f

or a

ll th

e te

st a

dmin

istr

atio

nsin

whi

ch th

e st

uden

t par

ticip

ated

.

Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

nnat

.D

ala

not r

epor

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r te

sted

is fe

wer

than

five

. The

eth

nic

cate

gorie

s m

ay n

ot s

um to

tota

l num

ber

test

ed a

nd to

tal n

umbe

r pa

ssin

g be

caus

e an

eth

nic

cate

gory

may

not

hav

e be

en c

oded

.

"Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

epor

ting

purp

oses

the

char

ter

scho

ol n

ame

has

been

abb

revi

ated

. The

com

plet

e na

me

can

be fo

und

in th

e A

ppen

dix.

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om L

EA

s af

ter

Apr

il 30

, 200

0 ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

this

tabl

e.

Page 38: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Tab

le 8

d. 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

assi

ng (

Mul

tiple

-C

hoic

e an

d Pe

rfor

man

ce)

for

the

Cla

ss o

f 20

02 a

t End

of

Gra

de 9

, by

LE

A a

nd E

thni

city

Nor

thea

st R

egio

nT

otal

Am

eric

an In

dian

Asi

anB

lack

His

pani

cM

ulti-

Rac

ial

Whi

teN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

rP

assi

ngP

erce

ntP

assi

ngN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

rP

assi

ngP

erce

ntP

assi

ngN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

rP

assi

ngP

erce

ntP

assi

ngN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

rP

assi

ngP

erce

ntP

assi

ngN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

rP

assi

ngP

erce

ntP

assi

ngN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

rP

assi

ngP

erce

ntP

assi

ngN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

rP

assi

ngP

erce

ntP

assi

ng

Sla

te. 9

6,43

173

,839

76.6

1,54

295

862

.11,

764

1,23

770

.128

,809

18,1

0562

.82,

495

1,26

550

.760

144

674

.261

,200

51,8

1984

.7

Nor

thea

st R

egio

n7,

508

5,16

668

.841

3175

.635

2468

.64,

084

2,36

357

.967

3755

.229

1862

.13,

252

2,69

382

.8

Bea

ufor

t59

547

479

.70

52

40.0

260

180

69.2

107

70.0

231

828

489

.3

Ber

tie35

621

660

.70

130

117

357

.50

a0

5442

77.8

Cam

den

109

9889

.90

026

2076

.90

083

7894

.0

Ede

nton

/Cho

wan

239

207

86.6

00

110

8577

.33

212

411

895

.2

Cur

rituc

k29

823

779

.5I

e1

3624

66.7

1'

225

72.

1182

.1

Dar

e36

631

185

.00

020

1575

.07

571

.40

339

291

85.8

Edg

ecom

be66

935

553

.10

'1

423

210

49.6

145

35.7

I23

013

860

.0

Gat

es16

813

781

.50

083

6274

.70

I84

7488

.1

Hal

ifax

578

387

67.0

.34

2985

.30

520

339

65.2

I1

2218

81.8

Roa

noke

Rap

ids

City

218

192

88.1

0."

336

2569

.43

1a

175

161

92.0

Wel

don

City

127

6853

.50

011

560

52.2

0a

Ia

II7

63.6

Her

tford

414

178

143.

02

a0

342

125

36.5

04

6649

74.2

ts..)

Hyd

e60

500

030

2480

.00

030

2686

.7O

N48

3.3

Mar

tin41

4i

315

76.1

04

227.

152

67.0

3'

018

0,16

189

.4

Nor

tham

pton

363

197

54.3

0'

028

314

651

.60

a1

7950

63.3

Eliz

abet

h C

ity/P

asqu

otan

k 53

626

449

.3I

53

60.0

293

III37

.94

a3

230

145

63.0

Per

quim

ans

176

142

80.7

00

6847

69.1

2a

110

592

87.6

Pitt

1,53

01,

127

73.7

3a

1412

85.7

709

437

61.6

176

35.3

82

25.0

779

669

85.9

Rig

ht S

tep*

4315

34.9

00

a42

1433

.30

01

Tyr

rell

5954

91.5

01

3128

90.3

I0

2624

92.1

.

Was

hing

ton

190

142

74.7

0'

012

986

66.7

1a

Ia

5954

91.5

50-

51

Not

es:

The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

riden

t for

all

the

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ed.

Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

rmat

.D

ata

not r

epor

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r te

sted

is fe

wer

than

five

. The

eth

nic

cate

gorie

s m

ay n

ot s

um to

tota

l num

ber

test

ed a

nd to

tal n

umbe

r pa

ssin

g be

caus

ean

eth

nic

cate

gory

may

not

hav

e be

en c

oded

.

"Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

epor

ting

purp

oses

the

char

ter

scho

ol n

ame

has

been

abb

revi

ated

. The

com

plet

e na

me

can

be fo

und

in th

e A

ppen

dix.

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om L

EA

s af

ter

Apr

il 30

. 200

0 ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

this

tabl

e.

Page 39: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Tab

le 8

e. 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

assi

ng (

Mul

tiple

-C

hoic

e an

d Pe

rfor

man

ce)

for

the

Cla

ss o

f 20

02 a

t End

of

Gra

de 9

, by

LE

A a

nd E

thni

city

Sout

heas

t Reg

ion

Tot

alA

mer

ican

Indi

anA

sian

Bla

ckH

ispa

nic

Mul

ti-R

acia

lW

hite

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Num

ber

Num

ber

Per

cent

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

'P

assi

ngP

assi

ng

, Sta

te96

,431

73,8

3976

.61,

542

958

62.1

1,76

41,

237

70.1

28,8

0918

,105

62.8

2,49

51,

265

50.7

601

446

Sout

heas

t Reg

ion

18,7

9013

,604

72.4

1,04

263

060

.519

615

478

.66,

947

4,56

965

.859

736

461

.015

911

9

Bla

den

429

308

71.8

20

223

156

70.0

I0

Bru

nsw

ick

780

641

82.2

1I

216

162

75.0

149

64.3

4

Car

tere

t76

563

783

.34

54

80.0

9252

56.5

73

42.9

77

NC

Sch

ool o

f Mar

itim

e49

1530

.60

'0

a4

I'

I

Col

umbu

s62

340

765

.333

2575

.80

265

151

57.0

30

Whi

tevi

lle C

ity19

315

077

.71

285

5564

.70

0

Cra

ven

1,19

41,

026

85.9

216

1275

.040

830

073

.528

2175

.04

Cum

berla

nd4,

010

2,69

067

.186

5462

.885

6981

.21,

844

1,14

061

.821

414

165

.941

33

Dup

lin73

948

565

.60

'0

263

145

55.1

7232

44.4

1

Gre

ene

245

135

55.1

00

134

7052

.217

423

.50

I

Jone

s11

553

46.1

00

7129

40.8

1.

0y

Leno

ir91

881

388

.6I

76

85.7

509

442

86.1

;20

1680

.0I

t,..)

---.

1N

ew H

anov

er1,

823

1,20

966

.38

675

.014

1178

.649

123

547

.920

1155

.010

8

Ons

low

1,94

11,

190

61.3

2516

64.0

4229

69.0

465

237

51.0

7742

. 54.

566

41

Pam

lico

191

151

79.1

21

6549

75.4

12

Pen

der

572

522

91.3

01

261

241

92.3

2121

100.

0I

Rob

eson

1,96

51,

228

62.5

861

505

58.7

75

71.4

620

350

56.5

239

39.1

3

Sam

pson

487

372

76.4

4a

015

597

62.6

259

36.0

0

Clin

ton

City

200

176

88.0

88

100.

01

9674

77.1

54

80.0

2

Way

ne1,

551

1,39

690

.04

1414

100.

068

058

385

.747

3880

.916

16

BE

ST C

OPY

AV

AIL

AB

LE

52

74.2

74.8

100.

0

80.5

80.0

62.1

100.

0 53

61;2

0651

,819

84.7

9,84

07,

768

78.9

203

149

73.4

544

467

85..1

650

568

87.4

4213

31.0

322

231

71.7

105

9287

.6

736

687

93.3

1,74

01,

253

72.0

403

308

76.4

9461

64.9

4323

53.5

376

349

92.8

1,28

093

873

.3

1,26

682

565

.2

120

9680

.0

288

258

89.6

451

356

78.9

303

264

87.1

8888

100.

0

786

742

94.4

Not

es:

The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all

the

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ed.

t Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

nnat

.D

ata

not r

epor

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r te

sted

is fe

wer

than

five

. The

eth

nic

cate

gorie

s m

ay n

ot s

umto

tota

l num

ber

test

ed a

nd to

tal n

umbe

r pa

ssin

g be

caus

e an

eth

nic

cate

gory

may

not

have

bee

n co

ded.

Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

epor

ting

purp

oses

the

char

ter

scho

ol n

ame

has

been

abb

revi

ated

. The

com

plet

e na

me

can

be fo

und

in th

e A

ppen

dix.

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om L

EA

s af

ter

Apr

il 30

, 200

0 ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

this

tabl

e.

Page 40: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

IJ W

Sta

le

Cen

tral

Reg

ion

Ala

man

ce-B

urlin

gton

Lake

side

Sch

ool"

Riv

er M

ill C

hart

er

Cas

wel

l

Cha

tham

Woo

ds C

hart

er

Dur

ham

Kes

trel

Hei

ghts

Fra

nklin

Gra

nvill

e

Gui

lford

Har

nett

John

ston

Lee

Nas

h-R

ocky

Mou

nt

Ora

nge

Cha

pel H

ill-C

arrb

oro

City

New

Cen

tury

Sch

ool*

Per

son

Ran

dolp

h

Ash

ebor

o C

ity

Roc

king

ham

Van

ce

Wak

e

J.H

. Bak

er J

r H

igh

War

ren

Wils

on

54

Tab

le 8

f .19

98-9

9 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

assi

ng(M

ultip

le-

Cho

ice

and

Perf

orm

ance

) fo

r th

e C

lass

of

2002

at E

nd o

f G

rade

9, b

y L

EA

and

Eth

nici

ty

Cen

tral

Reg

ion

Tot

alA

mer

ican

Indi

anA

sian

Bla

ckN

umbe

r N

umbe

rP

erce

ntN

umbe

r N

umbe

rP

erce

ntN

umbe

r N

umbe

rP

erce

ntN

umbe

r N

umbe

rP

erce

ntT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ngT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ngT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ngT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ng

96,4

31

26,4

78

1,58

6

18 23 283

484

11

1,92

1

20 528

567

4,45

8

1,12

5

1,40

1

618

1,42

9

362

749

24 465

1,23

6

301

1,03

5

523

6,12

9

8 282

892

Num

ber

Tes

ted

His

pani

cN

umbe

r P

erce

ntP

assi

ngP

assi

ng

Mul

ti-R

acia

lN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

r

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Whi

teN

umbe

r N

umbe

r P

erce

ntT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ng

73,8

3976

.61,

542

958

62.1

1,76

41,

237

70.1

28,8

0918

,105

62.8

2,49

51,

265

50.7

601

446

74.2

61,2

0051

,819

84.7

20,7

4778

.412

274

60.7

594

397

66.8

8.30

75,

395

64.9

786

360

45.8

238

179

75.2

16,4

2114

,334

87.3

1,22

877

.42

.23

II47

.839

827

769

.670

2332

.914

1392

.91,

079

902

83.6

527

.80

011

218

.20

63

50.0

1773

.90

00

02

2115

71.4

235

83.0

20

122

9376

.20

158

140

88.6

378

78.1

I2

133

9571

.444

1329

.52

302

266

88.1

545

.50

00

23

63

50.0

1,25

265

.28

225

.055

2443

.696

052

654

.858

1525

.931

2064

.580

966

582

.2

1050

.00

012

433

.30

08

675

.0

417

79.0

32

229

155

67.7

96

66.7

2'28

325

188

.7

454

80.1

02

242

169

69.8

103

30.0

312

280

89.7

3,73

983

.935

1954

.315

910

767

.31,

545

1,10

671

.660

4371

.773

;66

90.4

2,57

62,

390

92.8

666

59.2

126

50.0

332

116

150

.256

2035

.716

956

.371

747

065

.6

1,18

984

.95

480

.012

1083

.330

421

470

.410

142

41.6

75

71.4

972

914

94.0

525

85.0

33

159

121

76.1

4623

50.0

55

100.

040

237

192

.3

972

68.0

75

71.4

159

60.0

709

417

58.8

3317

51.5

6.

350

.065

952

179

.1

349

96.4

00

7573

97.3

46

610

0.0

277

266

96.0

615

82.1

446

4087

.012

173

60.3

2214

63.6

129

75.0

544

476

87.5

1354

.20

01

I0

2213

59.1

405

87.1

22

155

117

75.5

65

83.3

030

027

993

.0

1,03

583

.711

872

.76

583

.364

4570

.328

1553

.63

1,12

496

185

.5

262

87.0

07

571

.448

4083

.329

1551

.71

216

201

93.1

834

80.6

35

360

.025

517

468

.216

956

.34

752

643

85.5

394

75.3

14

312

204

65.4

107

70.0

419

217

691

.1

4,95

680

.911

872

.724

417

069

.71,

420

922

64.9

157

7749

.045

2657

.84,

252

3,75

388

.3

225

.00

07

228

.60

0

134

47.5

125

41.7

022

999

43.2

00

4130

73.2

656

73.5

04

475

306

64.4

229

40.9

139

033

986

.9

55

Not

es:

The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all

the

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ed.

Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

rmat

Dat

a no

t rep

orte

d w

here

num

ber

test

ed is

few

er th

an fi

ve. T

he e

thni

c ca

tego

ries

may

not

sum

to to

tal n

umbe

r te

sted

and

tota

l num

ber

pass

ing

beca

use

an e

thni

c ca

tego

ry m

ay n

ot h

ave

been

cod

ed.

Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

epor

ting

purp

oses

the

char

ter

scho

ol n

ame

has

been

abb

revi

ated

. The

com

plet

e na

me

can

be fo

und

in th

e A

ppen

dix.

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om L

EA

s M

ier

Apr

il 30

, 200

0. a

re n

ot in

clud

ed in

this

tabl

e.

Page 41: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

t ..)

Tab

le 9

a. 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

assi

ng (

Mul

tiple

-C

hoic

e an

d Pe

rfor

man

ce)

for

the

Cla

ss o

f 20

01 a

t End

of

Gra

de 1

0, b

y L

EA

and

Eth

nici

ty

Wes

tern

Reg

ion

Tot

alA

mer

ican

Ind

ian

Asi

anB

lack

His

pani

cM

ulti-

Rac

ial

Whi

teN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

rP

assi

ngP

erce

ntP

assi

ngN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

rP

assi

ngP

erce

ntP

assi

ngN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

rP

assi

ngP

erce

ntP

assi

ngN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

rP

assi

ngP

erce

ntP

assi

ngN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

rP

assi

ngP

erce

ntP

assi

ngN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

rP

assi

ngP

erce

ntP

assi

ngN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

rP

assi

ngP

erce

ntP

assi

ng

Stat

e79

,385

64,1

6680

.81,

077

749

69.5

1,52

21,

108

72.8

22,6

3615

,652

69.1

1,61

099

361

.741

930

272

.152

,092

45,3

4587

.0

Wes

tern

Reg

ion

6,24

85,

348

85.6

8061

76.3

4739

83.0

400

304

76.0

7751

66.2

3217

53.1

5,61

24,

876

86.9

Bun

com

be1,

617

1,41

587

.58

787

.522

1777

.375

6080

.024

2083

.314

1071

.41,

474

1,30

188

.3

Ash

evill

e C

ity31

424

377

.4I

110

882

75.9

126

50.0

4..

188

155

82.4

Che

roke

e24

521

788

.66

583

.3I.

I3

223

220

688

.8

Cla

y97

8587

.60

00

00

9785

87.6

Gra

ham

7465

87.8

1010

100.

00

00

064

5585

.9

Ilayw

ood

485

415

85.6

20

84

50.0

23

470

407

86.6

Hen

ders

on75

964

785

.22

87

87.5

4631

67.4

169

56.3

468

359

687

.3

Jack

son

270

226

83.7

1610

62.5

23

20

247

212

85.8

Mac

on26

518

971

.3I

24

2q

256

184

71.9

Mad

ison

162

136

84.0

00

10

016

113

583

.9

McD

owel

l42

236

185

.5I

99

100.

022

1672

.70

039

033

585

.9

Mitc

hell

160

138

86.3

02

00

015

813

786

.7

Pol

k13

712

389

.8I

a0

1210

83.3

40

120

109

90.8

Rut

herf

ord

662

584

88.2

00

100

8080

.06

466

.70

556

500

89.9

Sw

ain

138

110

79.7

3023

76.7

0I

23

102

8583

.3

Tra

nsyl

vani

a29

224

684

.22

017

1376

.50

227

123

185

.2

Yan

cey

149

148

99.3

00

24

0t

143

143

100.

0

BE

ST

CO

PY

AV

AIL

AB

LE

56

Not

es:

The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all

the

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ed.

I Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

rmat

.'D

ata

not r

epor

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r te

sted

is fe

wer

than

five

. The

eth

nic

cate

gorie

s m

ay n

ot s

um to

tota

l num

ber

test

ed a

nd to

tal n

umbe

r pa

ssin

g be

caus

eet

hnic

cat

egor

y m

ay n

ot h

ave

been

cod

ed.

"Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

epor

ting

purp

oses

the

char

ter

scho

ol n

ame

has

been

abb

revi

ated

. The

com

plet

e na

me

can

be fo

und

in th

e A

ppen

dix.

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om L

EA

s al

ter

Apr

il 30

. 200

0 ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

this

tabl

e.

Page 42: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Tab

le 9

b. 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

assi

ng (

Mul

tiple

-C

hoic

e an

d Pe

rfor

man

ce)

for

the

Cla

ss o

f 20

01 a

t End

of

Gra

de 1

0, b

y L

EA

and

Eth

nici

ty

Nor

thw

est R

egio

nT

otal

Am

eric

an In

dian

Asi

anB

lack

His

pani

cM

ulti-

Rac

ial

Whi

te

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Sta

te79

,385

64,1

6680

.81,

077

749

69.5

1,52

21,

108

72.8

22,6

3615

,652

69.1

1,61

099

361

.741

930

272

.152

,092

45,3

4587

.0

Nor

thw

est R

egio

n12

,232

10,4

4085

.320

1575

.026

719

171

.51,

726

1,25

872

.924

015

263

.342

2866

.79,

937

8,79

688

.5

Ale

xand

er31

429

092

.40

7 '

5 -

'..71

.418

1688

.93

028

626

693

.0

Alle

ghan

y10

298

96.1

00

02

010

096

96.0

Ash

e22

420

491

.10

02

'0

022

220

291

.0

Ave

ry16

413

884

.10

00

II

162

136

84.0

Bur

ke88

975

785

.24

a83

6578

.361

4878

.719

1 1

57.9

371

962

787

.2

Cal

dwel

l77

967

887

.00

355

3970

.98

562

.53

710

630

88.7

Cat

awba

1,02

580

278

.22

5331

58.5

6847

69.1

2113

61.9

52

40.0

876

708

80.8

Hic

kory

City

242

180

74.4

019

1157

.940

1947

.57

685

.71

175

144

82.3

New

ton

Con

over

City

214

203

94.9

017

1482

.440

3895

.09

666

.71:

147

145

98.6

Dav

idso

n1,

152

978

84.9

52

40.0

86

75.0

1916

84.2

95

55.6

3,

1,10

894

685

.4

Lexi

ngto

n C

ity14

712

585

.00

.10

880

.068

5682

.43

1y

6559

90.8

Tho

mas

ville

City

122

7561

.50

0a

5729

50.9

93

33.3

155

4276

.4

Dav

ie36

034

495

.60

433

3193

.93

032

030

695

.6

Win

ston

-Sal

em/F

orsy

th2,

626

2,26

686

.33

2118

85.7

867

648

74.7

7044

62.9

149

64.3

1,65

11,

544

93.5

Lill

Aca

dem

y"18

211

.10

018

211

.10

00

Ired

ell-S

tate

svill

e99

878

478

.61

2113

61.9

205

140

68.3

1310

76.9

075

862

081

.8

Moo

resv

ille

City

243

189

77.8

08

787

.541

.

3175

.63

0t

191

148

77.5

Sto

kes

485

406

83.7

32

1712

70.6

3a

245

838

984

.9

Sur

ry52

749

193

.20

Ia

3624

66.7

1913

68.4

147

045

396

.4

Elk

in C

ity84

7892

.90

0a

53

60.0

20

7775

97.4

Mou

nt A

iry C

ity13

012

193

.11

a7

571

.411

1090

.92

010

910

495

.4

Wat

auga

354

331

93.5

II

43

2a

343

320

'542

93.3

Wilk

es67

757

885

.40

242

2866

.713

646

.22

618

87.7

Yad

kin

356

322

90.4

00

1915

78.9

1811

61.1

231

729

492

.7

5859

Not

es:

r T

hese

dat

a re

pres

ent t

he h

ighe

st te

st s

core

of e

ach

stud

ent f

or a

ll th

e te

st a

dmin

istr

atio

ns in

whi

ch th

e st

uden

t par

ticip

ated

.

Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

rmat

.D

ata

not r

epor

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r te

sted

is fe

wer

than

five

. The

eth

nic

cate

gorie

s m

ay n

ot s

umto

tota

l num

ber

test

ed a

nd to

tal n

umbe

r pa

ssin

g be

caus

e et

hnic

cat

egor

y m

ay n

otha

ve b

een

code

d.

"Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

epor

ting

purp

oses

the

char

ter

scho

ol n

ame

has

been

abb

revi

ated

. The

com

plet

e na

me

can

be fo

und

in th

e A

ppen

dix.

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om L

EA

s af

ter

Apr

il 30

, 200

0 ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

this

tabl

e.

Page 43: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Tab

le 9

c. 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

asN

ng (

Mul

tiple

-C

hoic

e an

d Pe

rfor

man

ce)

for

the

Cla

ss o

f 20

01 a

t End

of

Gra

de 1

0, b

y L

EA

and

Eth

nici

ty

Sout

hwes

t Reg

ion

Tot

alA

mer

ican

Ind

ian

Asi

anB

lack

His

pani

cM

ulti-

Rac

ial

Whi

teN

umbe

r N

umbe

r P

erce

ntN

umbe

r N

umbe

rP

erce

nt N

umbe

r N

umbe

rP

erce

ntN

umbe

r N

umbe

rP

erce

ntN

umbe

r N

umbe

r P

erce

ntN

umbe

r N

umbe

rP

erce

nt N

umbe

r N

umbe

r P

erce

ntT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ngT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ngT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ngT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ngT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ngT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ngT

este

dP

assi

ngP

assi

ng

Stat

e4

I79

,385

64,1

6680

.81,

077

749

69.5

1,52

21,

108

72.8

22,6

3615

,652

69.1

1,61

099

361

.741

930

2

Sout

hwes

t Reg

ion

16,8

2613

,727

81.6

120

9175

.846

834

273

.14,

868

3,33

968

.631

819

461

.056

47

Ans

on26

617

766

.5I

I16

493

56.7

00

*

Cab

arru

s1,

152

1,00

687

.36

583

.313

861

.513

095

73.1

247

29.2

54

Kan

napo

lis C

ity24

320

986

.00

64

66.7

7761

79.2

53

60.0

I

Cle

vela

nd62

750

881

.0I

I'

135

9469

.66

350

.02

Kin

gs M

ount

ain

City

256

237

92.6

0*

87

87.5

7264

88.9

02

.

She

lby

City

173

157

90.8

03

a74

6486

.51

I

Gas

ton

1,73

91,

514

87.1

235

2365

.733

825

976

.618

1372

.2I

I lok

e37

133

490

.036

2775

.03

205

179

87.3

45

5

Linc

oln

643

536

83.4

27

571

.455

4072

.718

I I61

.13

:

Cha

rlotte

/Mec

klen

burg

6,21

24,

789

77.1

1713

76.5

317

238

75.1

2,33

91,

488

63.6

155

9360

.022

18I

Ken

nedy

Cha

rter

"2

00

10

0f

Mon

tgom

ery

286

257

89.9

09

666

.790

7280

.0I I

981

.80

Moo

re71

855

977

.95

360

.05

360

.018

111

764

.613

1076

.93

Ric

hmon

d55

940

372

.16

466

.710

770

.025

416

966

.54

I

Row

an-S

alis

bury

1,29

71,

076

83.0

320

1785

.025

516

665

.128

2175

.04

.

Sco

tland

398

320

80.4

3531

88.6

418

113

574

.61

0

Sta

nly

659

602

91.4

2' '

20.

I 155

.011

389

78.8

65

83.3

1

Uni

on1,

225

1,04

385

.14

65

83.3

204

154

75.5

24II

45.8

55

60

72.1

52,0

9245

,345

87.0

83.9

10,9

95.

9,71

488

.3

100

8484

.0

80.0

974

887

91.1

154

140

90.9

481

407

84.6

174

164

94.3

9490

95.7

1,34

51,

216

90.4

100.

011

811

698

.3

'55

8. 4

7685

.3

81.8

3,36

22,

939

87.4

aI

a

176

170

96.6

'51

142

583

.2

284

220

77.5

987

869

88.0

177

151

85,3

517

494

95.6

100.

098

286

688

.2

61

Not

es:

The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all

the

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ed.

Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

rmat

.'D

ata

not r

epor

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r te

sted

is fe

wer

than

five

. The

eth

nic

cate

gorie

s m

ay n

ot s

um to

tota

l num

ber

test

ed a

nd to

tal n

umbe

r pa

ssin

g be

caus

eet

hnic

cat

egor

y m

ay n

ot h

ave

been

cod

ed.

"Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

epor

ting

purp

oses

the

char

ter

scho

ol n

ame

has

been

abb

revi

ated

. The

com

plet

e na

me

can

befo

und

in th

e A

ppen

dix.

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om L

EA

s af

ter

Apr

il 30

, 200

0 ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

this

tabl

e.

Page 44: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Tab

le 9

d. 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

asin

g (M

ultip

le-

Cho

ice

and

Perf

orm

ance

) fo

r th

e C

lass

of

2001

at E

nd o

f G

rade

10,

by

LE

A a

nd E

thni

city

Nor

thea

st R

egio

nT

otal

Am

eric

an In

dian

Asi

anB

lack

His

pani

cM

ulti-

Rac

ial

Whi

teN

umbe

r N

umbe

r P

erce

ntN

umbe

r N

umbe

rP

erce

ntN

umbe

r N

umbe

rP

erce

ntN

umbe

r N

umbe

rP

erce

ntN

umbe

r N

umbe

r P

erce

nt N

umbe

r N

umbe

rP

erce

ntN

umbe

r N

umbe

rP

erce

nt

.Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Pas

sing

Pas

sing

45,3

4587

.0

2,25

084

.7

Sta

le79

,385

64,1

6680

.81,

077

749

69.5

1,52

21,

108

72.8

22,6

3615

,652

69.1

1,61

099

361

.741

930

272

.152

,092

Nor

thea

st R

egio

n5,

699

4,20

273

.730

2170

.039

2974

.42,

902

1,86

264

.251

2854

.917

1270

.62,

658

Bea

ufor

t46

437

781

.30

aI

202

143

70.8

53

60.0

I25

5

Ber

tie26

516

562

.30

022

813

358

.30

136

Cam

den

8887

98.9

01

2222

100.

00

065

Ede

nton

/Cho

wan

134

121

90.3

00

6856

82.4

10

'65

Cur

rituc

k22

216

674

.8I

I25

1664

.02

219

1

Dar

e33

526

579

.11

214

1410

0.0

63

50.0

131

0

Edg

ecom

be51

034

567

.60

030

317

959

.11

I4

36.4

0a

196

Gat

es12

411

088

.70

065

5483

.10

059

Hal

ifax

336

323

96.1

2214

63.6

0a

299

299

100.

0I

3'

11

Roa

noke

Rap

ids

City

200

176

88.0

47

571

.434

2985

.33

0'

115

2

Wel

don

City

6348

76.2

00

6046

76.7

00

?3

Her

tford

296

122

41.2

00

'23

174

32.0

01

64

Hyd

e56

4478

.60

022

1568

.20

034

Mar

tin33

725

174

.50

0'

184

.128

69.6

40

149

Nor

tham

pton

265

124

46.8

00

227

9341

.00

038

Eliz

abet

h C

ity/P

asqu

otan

k 39

824

561

.6I

a3

198

100

50.5

53

60.0

I18

9

Per

quim

ans

118

100

84.7

0a

042

3071

.40

274

Pitt

1,24

496

377

.4I

2216

72.7

515

330

64.1

127

58.3

369

1

Rig

ht S

tep"

82

25.0

00

82

25.0

00

0

Tyr

rell

5748

84.2

01

3026

86.7

00

26

Was

hing

ton

179

120

67.0

01

125

7358

.4I

250

62

229

89.8

3186

.1

6498

.5

6498

.5

144

75.4

246

119.

4

162

82.7

5694

.9

981

.8

136

89.5

4773

.4

2985

.3

122

81.9

3181

.6

139

73.5

6891

.9

606

87.7

2180

.8

4488

.0

63

Not

es:

The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all

the

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ed.

S D

ata

cann

ot b

e ve

rifie

d in

this

form

at.

Dat

a no

t rep

orte

d w

here

num

ber

test

ed is

few

er th

an fi

ve. T

he e

thni

c ca

tego

ries

may

not

sum

to to

tal n

umbe

rte

sted

and

tota

l num

ber

pass

ing

beca

use

ethn

ic c

ateg

ory

may

not

hav

e be

en c

oded

.

Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

epor

ting

purp

oses

the

char

ter

scho

ol n

ame

has

been

abb

revi

ated

. The

com

plet

e na

me

can

befo

und

in th

e A

ppen

dix.

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om L

EA

s af

ter

Apr

il 30

, 200

0 ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

this

tabl

e.

Page 45: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Tab

le 9

e. 1

998-

99 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of

Com

pute

r Sk

ills

Perc

ent P

astin

g (M

ultip

le-

Cho

ice

and

Perf

orm

ance

) fo

r th

e C

lass

of

2001

at E

nd o

f G

rade

10,

by

LE

A a

nd E

thni

city

Sout

heas

t Reg

ion

Tot

alA

mer

ican

Indi

anA

sian

Bla

ckH

ispa

nic

Mul

ti-R

acia

lW

hite

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Sta

te79

,385

64,1

6680

.81,

077

749

69.5

1,52

21,

108

72.8

22,6

3615

,652

69.1

1,61

099

361

.741

930

272

.152

,092

45,3

4587

.0

Sou

thea

st R

egio

n15

,252

11,6

2876

.273

850

969

.014

710

873

.55,

610

3,98

371

.042

128

768

.212

686

68.3

8,20

66,

653

81.1

lilad

en38

728

272

.93

115

011

476

.03

'0

230

162

70.4

Bru

nsw

ick

606

540

89.1

43

157

135

86.0

54

80.0

043

739

590

.4

Car

tere

t63

355

187

.02

54

80.0

8262

75.6

.7

710

0.0

353

447

388

.6

NC

Sch

ool o

f Mar

itim

e'23

730

.40

07

342

.90

016

425

.0

Col

umbu

s52

743

181

.831

3096

.80

235

169

71.9

40

257

230

89.5

Whi

tevi

lle C

ity18

616

186

.62

081

5972

.80

0.

103

100

97.1

Cra

ven

962

820

85.2

54

80.0

77

100.

033

124

574

.020

2010

0.0

159

854

491

.0

Cum

berla

nd3,

475

2,54

773

.365

4670

.862

4674

.21,

636

1,06

665

.218

513

573

.037

2670

.31,

490

1,22

882

.4

Dup

lin53

236

969

.40

021

613

863

.932

I I34

.41

:28

321

977

.4

Gre

ene

198

150

75.8

00

115

7767

.06

583

.30

,77

6888

.3

Jone

s10

475

72.1

00

'61

4065

.60

0p

4335

81.4

Leno

ir69

967

596

.63

2'

'35

834

496

.17

457

.1I

328

324

98.8

New

Han

over

1,43

392

564

.59

444

.410

770

.033

615

847

.014

750

.08

562

.51,

056

744

70.5

w u.)

Ons

low

1,55

884

454

.22

3318

54.5

361

.187

51.8

5128

54.9

5733

57.9

1,05

457

754

.7

Pam

lico

154

128

83.1

I0

6955

79.7

20.

82.

7085

.4

Pen

der

412

386

93.7

02

145

137

94.5

88

100.

0I

256

238

93.0

Rob

eson

1,43

896

066

.860

140

166

.70

'44

426

459

.520

735

.00

372

287

77.2

Sam

pson

467

408

87.4

20

'18

815

180

.320

1365

.03

'25

423

994

.1

Clin

ton

City

162

146

90.1

87

87.5

I71

6287

.37

571

.4I

7369

94.5

Way

ne1,

296

1,22

394

.40

2119

90.5

567

517

91.2

3027

90.0

1313

100.

066

364

797

.6

BE

ST

CO

PY

AV

AIL

AB

LE65

64

Not

es:

The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all t

he le

st a

dmin

istr

atio

ns in

whi

ch th

e st

uden

t par

ticip

ated

.

t Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

rmat

.D

ata

not r

epor

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r te

sted

is fe

wer

than

five

. The

ethn

ic c

ateg

orie

s m

ay n

ot s

um to

tota

l num

ber

test

ed a

nd to

tal n

umbe

r pa

ssin

gbe

caus

e et

hnic

cat

egor

y m

ay n

ot h

ave

been

cod

ed.

"Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

epor

ting

purp

oses

the

char

ter

scho

ol n

ame

has

been

abb

revi

ated

. The

com

plet

e na

me

can

be fo

und

in th

e A

ppen

dix.

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om L

EA

s af

ter

Apr

il 30

. 200

0 ar

e no

t inc

lude

din

this

tabl

e.

Page 46: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Tab

le 9

f .19

98-9

9 N

orth

Car

olin

a T

ests

of C

ompu

ter

Ski

lls P

erce

nt P

asA

ing

(Mul

tiple

-C

hoic

e an

d P

erfo

rman

ce)

for

the

Cla

ss o

f 200

1 at

End

of G

rade

10,

by

LEA

and

Eth

nici

ty

Cen

tral

Reg

ion

Tot

alA

mer

ican

Indi

anA

sian

Bla

ckhi

span

icM

ulti-

Rac

ial

Whi

teN

umbe

rT

este

dN

umbe

r

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Num

ber

Tes

ted

Num

ber

Pas

sing

Per

cent

Pas

sing

Sta

te79

,385

64,1

6680

.81,

077

749

69.5

1,52

21,

108

72.8

22,6

3615

,652

69.1

1,61

099

361

.741

930

272

.152

,092

45,3

4587

.0

Cen

tral

Reg

ion

23,1

2818

,821

81.4

8952

58.4

554

399

72.0

7,13

04,

906

.68.

8 .

503

i:281

55.9

146

112

76.7

.14

,684

13,0

5688

.9

Ala

man

ce-B

urlin

gton

1,10

991

882

.83

199

47.4

225

161

71.6

2812

42.9

283

273

388

.1

Lake

side

Sch

ool

50

0.0

00

20

03

Riv

er M

ill C

hart

er"

1512

80.0

00

00

I14

1285

.7

Cas

wel

l26

521

681

.50

I13

910

777

.0I

012

410

887

.1

Cha

tham

417

362

86.8

0I

9880

81.6

106

60.0

130

727

489

.3

Woo

ds C

hart

er9

6.6

6.7

00

00

18

.5

62.5

Dur

ham

1,57

91,

107

70.1

442

2969

.076

745

759

.632

1 5

46.9

19I I

57.9

715

593

82.9

Fra

nklin

441

357

81.0

40

192

137

71.4

64

66.7

323

621

089

.0

Gra

nvill

e39

534

988

.40

1'

122

100

82.0

I I3

27.3

026

124

593

.9

Gui

lford

4,69

23,

938

83.9

2413

.54

.216

811

669

.01,

662

1,21

473

.078

5469

.268

5682

.42,

670

2,47

092

.5

linne

t!99

180

080

.714

750

.08

810

0.0

309

228

73.8

3217

53.1

109

90.0

618

531

85.9

John

ston

1,10

796

0t 8

6.7

46

350

.021

615

873

.139

2769

.24

838

767

91.5

(.4

Lee

541

461

85.2

25

360

.014

811

779

.142

2457

.12

342

313

91.5

-FN

ash-

Roc

ky M

ount

1,32

186

165

.25

I20

.09

777

.868

236

253

.118

950

.01

606

481

79.4

Ora

nge

230

210

91.3

0I

3432

94.1

00

195

177

90.8

Cha

pel T

ill-C

arrb

oro

City

652

580

19.0

133

3090

.999

6363

.616

743

.87

710

0.0

496

472

95.2

New

Cen

tury

Sch

ool"

2115

71.4

0I

2I

017

1376

.5

Per

son

405

382

94.3

20

144

130

90.3

53

60.0

025

424

797

.2

Ran

dolp

h96

983

486

.1I

352

3771

.226

934

.62

885

783

88.5

Ash

ebor

o C

ity22

922

196

.51

443

4093

.014

1285

.7I

166

164

98.8

Roc

king

ham

867

709

81.8

4*

88

100.

022

116

373

.810

440

.0I

623

531

85.2

Van

ce38

633

586

.8I

222

418

080

.44

215

314

997

.4

Wak

e5,

428

4,44

88

1 . 9

1 2

975

.023

41

7 1

73.1

1 , 1

7 1

809

69.1

117

6353

.8.

201

I55

.03,

874

3,38

587

.4

Ili. B

aker

Jr

high

53

60.0

00

40

0I

War

ren

235

8937

.97

457

.10

176

58'

33.0

II

5027

54.0

Wils

on81

464

879

.60

84

50.0

398

269

67.6

129

75.0

039

636

692

.4

6667

Not

es:

The

se d

ata

repr

esen

t the

hig

hest

test

sco

re o

f eac

h st

uden

t for

all

the

test

adm

inis

trat

ions

in w

hich

the

stud

ent p

artic

ipat

ed.

Dat

a ca

nnot

be

verif

ied

in th

is fo

rmat

.D

ata

not r

epor

ted

whe

re n

umbe

r te

sted

is fe

wer

than

five

. The

eth

nic

cate

gorie

s m

ay n

ot s

tun

to to

tal n

umbe

r te

sted

and

tota

l num

ber

pass

ing

beca

use

ethn

ic c

ateg

ory

may

not

hav

e be

en c

oded

.

"Den

otes

a c

hart

er s

choo

l. F

or r

epor

ting

purp

oses

the

char

ter

scho

ol n

ame

has

been

abb

revi

ated

. The

com

plet

e na

me

can

be fo

und

in th

e A

ppen

dix.

Dat

a re

ceiv

ed fr

om I.

EA

s af

ter

Apr

il 30

, 200

0 ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

this

tabl

e.

Page 47: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

a

. a

Page 48: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

°IF= V. Sample Test Questions

North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills

Multiple-Choice Test This test consists of 70 questions that ask you about the use of computers insociety, hardware and software components, keyboarding, and how to use specific softwareapplicationsword processing, database, spreadsheet, and telecomputing.

Directions: To answer a question, first decide which is the best answer choice for a particularquestion. Then, find the question number on your answer grid (below) and make a mark in thecircle containing the letter of the correct answer. Remember to mark only one answer for eachquestion.

1 (XX)2 esc)3 ®®®®

4 SCXD®

5 ®®®®

6 OC:D7 (XXX.)

8 ®®®®

9 ®®®®

Performance Test This test consists of four partsKeyboarding Techniques, Word Processing/Editing, Database Use, and Spreadsheet Usethat assess how well you can use specific softwareapplications.

Directions: Read the directions at the beginning of each part. Then complete the task or questions.For the Keyboarding Techniques and Word Processing/Editing parts you must print out your work.For the Database Use and Spreadsheet Use parts you should mark your answers in the spaceprovided next to each question.

37 69

Page 49: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

- Noith Crrolina Tette of Computer Skills

Multiple-Choice Test

1. Doing research by using an on-linedatabase instead of a printed set ofsimilar information offers whichadvantage?

* A more current information

B better charts

C easier to understand tables

D more legible diagrams

2. Upon walking into Mr. Johnson'sworkroom, Daryl saw a test fortomorrow on the computer screen.Which of the following can Darylethically do?

A Correct obvious errors on thetest to help Mr. Johnsonavoid embarrassment.

B Read the questions as astudy guide.

C Add a few well-chosenquestions that Mr. Johnsonleft out.

* D Leave the room withoutreading the test questions.

. What is the function ofa disk drive?

A to print sheets of paper

* B to read from or write informationto a floppy disk

C to display information or pictureson a screen

D to calculate numbers

4. For a social studies report, Fred needsto illustrate the products of NorthCarolina with pictures and comparisongraphs. He would most likely usewhich software programs?

A spreadsheet and statistical

B spreadsheet and database

* C graphing and clip art

D clip art and drawing

5. For correct keyboarding, what is therecommended placement of fingers onthe home row keys?

* A fingers of the left hand onA-S-D-F and fingers on the right-hand on J-K-L-;

B fingers of the right hand onA-S-D-F and fingers on the lefthand on J-K-L-;

C fingers of the left hand onA-S-E-F and fingers on the righthand on J-K-O-P

D fingers of the left hand onQ-W-E-R and fingers on the righthand on U-I-O-P

38 70

Page 50: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

North Carolina Taw of Computer Skills

Jim is typing a song on his wordprocessor. The song has four verses,and the chorus is repeated after eachverse. What would be the mostefficient way to enter the song,making sure the chorus is repeatedafter each verse?

A type the chorus four times

B copy the chorus on a copymachine and then cut and pasteit into his document

C use the Copy Command on hisword processor

D highlight the text and change itto Bold

Which is not an advantage of usingcomputerized spreadsheets?

A speed of calculation

B flexibility of moving entries

C cost of initial set-up

D ability to generate tables

8. Bob Smith plans to run for governor ofNorth Carolina. One part of hisplatform deals with increasing medicalservices to rural areas. Which of thefollowing will best help determinewhere money should be spent to openclinics?

* A Search a NC database for type ofcommunity = "rural" and thenSort on the field showing thenumber of doctors.

B Sort a NC database on the type ofcommunity and then Searchnumber of doctors < = 5.

C Search a NC database for type ofcommunity = "rural" and thenSearch number of doctors < = 5.

D Sort a NC database on the type ofcommunity and then Sort on thefield showing the number ofdoctors.

9. Using an electronic bulletin board,Andy can do all of the following exceptwhich one?

A send private messages to a friend

B send a public message to friendsinterested in one topic

C send pictures to a friend

D send a package to a friend

39

Page 51: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

North Carolina Tests of Computer Slas

Performance TestPart I: Keyboarding Techniques

Directions:

1. Key as accurately as possible the paragraphs below. Remember to usecorrect keyboarding techniques. Note: Do not worry about anydifferences in word wrap between what you type and how theparagraphs appear on this page.

2. When you have finished keying the paragraphs, print your work.

USING DATABASES IN THE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASS

In our eighth grade social studies class we are using computers with adatabase program. When we need information on a country, we look up thename of the country on an atlas program. We have six different diskettes.

Yesterday, we were doing a project on the United States of America. Oneof our assignments was to find the following:

North CarolinaUtahNew MexicoVermontFloridaTexas.

4072

Page 52: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Performance TestPart Word Processing/Editing

Nests Casabas Tests et Computer Skills

Directio s:

1. Edit the paragraph below. You may use the "Edit Symbol ReferenceTable" provided below if you need assistance.

2. When you have finished editing the paragraph, print your work.

Edit Symbol Reference Table

= capitalize 3C center

1 C. lower case J indentI delete A insert

replace word cp../ move

111` insert space c: spell out

CR new paragraph

3 USING DATABASES FOR SOCIAL STUDIES

9,14Cie"In our eighth

Asocial studies class we are using computers

with a database program. When we need information on a441

country, we look up thenA ame of the co-linty on an atlas program.

We have six different diskettes.

41 73

Page 53: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

North Carding Tests of Computer Sidlis

Performance TestPart III: Database Use

Directions: Use your database program and the file called PLANETS.

1. Read the scenario.2. Use the database file to respond to the questions below.3. When asked to "describe the steps you took to find your answer," use

appropriate database terms. For example, "Sorted the Number of Moonsfield in descending order" or "Searched the Number of Moons field for allrecords greater than 2."

Scenario:

Your eighth grade science classes have entered a contest to build a new solar system.Before you start making planets for the solar system in your class, you must gatherdata on each planet. Use the database PLANETS to find the data you need.

Sample Record from PLANETS Database.

Planet: EarthProb Temp (F): . 72Number of Moons: 1

Length of Year: 365.3Gravity at Surf: 1

Dist from Sun: 93,000,000Atmosphere: nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide,

water vapor

1. Which planet has the smallest Gravity at Surface?

2. Which planet, with surface gravity (Gravity at Surf) of atleast 1.10, has the most moons?

WO.

Explanation: Use database terms to describe the steps you tootto find your answer.

42 74

Page 54: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

Performance TestPart IV: Spreadsheet Use

North Carolina Testi of Ccanputcy Skills

Directions: Use your spreadsheet program and the file called NUTRIENTS.

1. Read the scenario.2. Use the spreadsheet file to respond to the questions below.

Scenario:

The school cafeteria staff is letting your class plan the meals for a week. You canserve pizza, but you also must serve one plate of "regular" food. Use the spreadsheetNUTRIENTS to help plan the meals.

Excerpt from NUTRIENTS Spreadsheet.

Item Qty. Protein Vitamin C Calcium IronServings (grams) (mg) (mg) (ms)

Chicken Drumstick 0 0 0 0 0Hamburger Patty 0 1 0 0 0 0Fresh Spinach 0 0 0 0 0Baked Potato 0 0 0 0 0Fresh Corn 0 1 0 0 0 o:Cooked Fresh Carrots 0 0 0 0 0Raw Cabbage 0 1 0 0 0 0Banana 0 0 0 0Apple 000 0 0

Total Nutrients:I 0 0 0 0I

1. How many milligrams (mg) of Iron are in 2 Bananas and 4 servingsof Fresh Spinach?

2. How many servings of Cooked fresh Carrots will give the sameamount of calcium as 24 servings of Apples?

43 75

Page 55: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

North Case hos Thou of Computer Slolb

Answers to Sample Tests and Notes

multiple-Cholce Test

1. The correct answer is A. This questionmeasures how well you understand howcomputers are used as a tool for accessinginformation.

2. The correct answer is D. This questionmeasures how well you understand theethical use of computers and respect thecomputer-generated work of others.

3. The correct answer is B. This questionmeasures your understanding of thecomponents of a computerhardware andsoftware. You may also be asked about otherphysical components of a computer, theirfunction, and use.

4. The correct answer is C. This questionmeasures your knowledge of the use ofsoftware in various subjects to solveproblems. You may also be asked about othertypes of software, e.g., probeware used inscience, database programs in social studies.

5. The correct answer is A. This questionmeasures your knowledge of correctkeyboarding skills and finger placement onthe home row keys.

6. The correct answer is C. This questionmeasures you ability to use the Copy andPaste functions while word processing. Youmay also be asked about other functions (e.g.,Move, Print) and utilities (e.g., spell checker,grammar checker), and about producingdesktop published documents.

7. The correct answer is C. This questionmeasures your understanding of theadvantages (or disadvantages) of using acomputerized spreadsheet versus a printedspreadsheet. You may also be asked to use aspreadsheet to test simple "What if?"statements.

8. The correct answer is A. This questionmeasures your ability to use sorting andsearching techniques to solve a problem whileusing a database program

9. The correct answer is D. This questionmeasures your understanding of how anelectronic bulletin board works.

Performance Test

Part I: Keyboarding Techniques. This task isscored for typing accuracy, spacing, andlength.

Part II: Word Processing/Editing. This task isscored for the number of correct edits and ifother errors are made while editing.

Part III: Database Use.

1. The correct answer is "Pluto." This questionmeasures your ability to Sort a database.

2. The correct answer is "Saturn." Your answeris also scored for how well you explain howyou determined your answer to the question("I searched the field Gravity at Surf > or =1.10 and then sorted the records on the fieldNumber of Moons in descending order.") Thisquestion measures your ability to usesearching and sorting techniques to solve aproblem.

Part IV: Spreadsheet Use.

r The correct answer is 6.8.. This questionmeasures your ability to use a spreadsheetto test simple "What if?" statements.

2. The correct answer is 5. This question alsomeasures your ability to use a spreadsheetto test simple "What if?" statements.

44

Page 56: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),
Page 57: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

List of Charter Schools

American RenaissanceArapahoe CharterArts & Basics Charter School (ABCS)Brevard AcademyBridgesBright Horizons AcademyCarter CommunityCarter G. Woodson School of ChallengeCatawba Valley AcademyChange For YouthChatham CharterChildren's Village AcademyCommunities in Schools Academy (CIS)Community Charter SchoolDillard AcademyDowntown Middle SchoolEast Wake AcademyEast Winston PrimaryEnglemann School of the Arts and SciencesExplorisFrancine Delaney New School for ChildrenFranklin AcademyGrandfather AcademyHarnett Co. TechnicalHarnett Early ChildhoodHealthy Start AcademyHighland KindergartenImani InstituteJohn H. Baker, Jr. HighKennedy CharterKestrel HeightsLake NormanLakeside SchoolLaurinburgLift AcademyLincoln CharterMagellan CharterMaureen JoyNC School of Maritime StudiesNew Century SchoolNguzo Saba CharterOrange County CharterPHASE AcademyQuality Education Academy

47

Right Step AcademyRiver Mill CharterRocky Mount Charter Public SchoolSallie B. Howard SchoolSankore SchoolSchool in the CommunitySchool of Mathematics, Arts, Sciences, and

Technology (MAST)SPARC AcademySterling Montessori AcademySummit CharterThe Learning CenterTiller SchoolTurning PointUnited Children's Ability Nook (UCAN)Village CharterWilkes Co. AlternativeWoods Charter

78

Page 58: Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that …and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the requirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%),

U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)

National Library of Education (NLE)Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)

NOTICE

REPRODUCTION BASIS

ERIC

This document is covered by a signed "Reproduction Release(Blanket) form (on file within the ERIC system), encompassing allor classes of documents from its source organization and, therefore,does not require a "Specific Document" Release form.

This document is Federally-funded, or carries its own permission toreproduce, or is otherwise in the public domain and, therefore, maybe reproduced by ERIC without a signed Reproduction Release form(either "Specific Document" or "Blanket").

EFF-089 (9/97)