reproductions supplied by edrs are the best that …and american indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower...
TRANSCRIPT
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 447 787 IR 020 408
TITLE Report of 1998-99 Student Performance North Carolina Testsof Computer Skills. Reporting on the Classes of 2001-2003for the State and 117 Public School Systems and 61 CharterSchools.
INSTITUTION North Carolina State Dept. of Public Instruction, Raleigh.Div. of Accountability/Testing.
PUB DATE 2000-00-00NOTE 79p.
PUB TYPE Numerical/Quantitative Data (110) -- Reports - Descriptive(141) Tests/Questionnaires (160)
EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Academic Achievement; *Computer Literacy; Degree
Requirements; *Elementary Secondary Education; Grade 10;Grade 8; Grade 9; *Graduation Requirements; High SchoolGraduates; Public Schools; Secondary Education; *StateStandards
IDENTIFIERS *North Carolina
ABSTRACTThe North Carolina State Board of Education, as part of the
Quality Assurance Program, initially established a computer proficiencyrequirement for diplomas issued to the Class of 2000. In October 1995, theBoard made the requirement effective beginning with the graduating class of2001. Students who were in grade eight for the 1996-97 school year and beyondare required to satisfy the computer proficiency requirement in order toreceive a high school diploma. The requirement is based on the kindergartenthrough grade 8 competencies of the K-12 computer skills curriculum approvedin July 1992 by the State Board of Education. These competencies are definedin the North Carolina "Standard Course of Study" (SCS). The goals of therequirement are to ensure that most students enter high school withsufficient computer skills and no student exits North Carolina high schoolswithout sufficient computer skills. The multiple choice and performance testassesses: word processing; keyboarding; database use; spreadsheet use;telecomputing skills; societal issues; ethics; terms, operation, and care ofcomputers; and use of computers in various curricular areas. The performancetest consists of four parts: keyboarding techniques; word processing/editing;database use; and spreadsheet use. This document reports the performance ofstudents in the class of 2001 as tenth graders, the class of 2002 as ninthgraders, and the class of 2003 as eighth graders on the computer skills test.For the 1998-99 school year, 74.9% of students who took the tests met therequirement at the end of eighth grade. There were disparities in performanceamong subgroups. Hispanic (49.7%), Black (58.5%), and American Indian (60.1%)subgroups had lower percentages passing the proficiency requirement thanAsian (72.8%), Multi-Racial (73.2%), and White (84%) subgroups. For the sameschool year, 76.6% of students who took the tests met the requirement by theend of ninth grade. Hispanic (50.7%), American Indian (62.1%), and Black(62.8%) subgroups had lower percentages passing the proficiency requirementthan the Asian (70.1%), Multi-Racial (74.2%), and White (84.7%) subgroups.Findings for tenth grade revealed 80.8% of students taking the tests had metthe requirements by the end of tenth grade. Hispanic (61.7%), Black (69.1%),and American Indian (69.1%) subgroups had lower percentages passing therequirement than the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%), and White (87%)
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.
subgroups. Findings are highlighted in the following categories: 1998-99student performance--comparison of 8th, 9th, and 10th grade performance; andstudent performance by ethnicity. Twenty-four tables and seven figurespresent findings. Sample questions and answers for the tests are included anda list of charter schools is appended. (AEF)
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.
Report of1998-99
,Audent PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests
of Computer Skills
1
PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE ANDDISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS
BEEN GRANTED BY
E. Brumback
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice of Educational Research and Improvement
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)
fig This document has been reproduced asreceived from the person or organizationoriginating it.Minor changes have been made toimprove reproduction quality.
Points of view or opinions stated in thisdocument do not necessarily representofficial OERI position or policy. J
Reporting on the Classes of 2001-2003for the state and 117 public school systems
and 61 charter schoolsPublished September 2000
Public Schools of North Carolinawww.NCPublicSchools.orgState Board of EducationDepartment of Public InstructionOffice of Instructional and Accountability ServicesDivision of Accountability Services/Testing SectionRaleigh, NC 27601-2825
2
1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
1998-99 Report of Student Performance
North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
September, 2000
Public Schools of North CarolinaState Board of Education
Department of Public InstructionOffice of Instructional and Accountability Services
Division of Accountability Services / Testing Section
1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
Acknowledgments
This report is the collaborative work of many individuals. The North Carolina Testing
Program is conducted by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI),
Division of Accountability Services, Testing Section. Technical support services for the
program are carried out in collaboration with the Center for Urban Affairs and Community
Services at North Carolina State University under the Technical Outreach to Public Schools
(TOPS) program.
Mildred Bazemore, Chief of the Testing Section, and Monica Geary, Education Research
and Evaluation Consultant at NCDPI, provided invaluable guidance in content and design.
Andrea Barefoot, Education Research and Evaluation Consultant with TOPS, serves as liaison
with NCDPI and leads the Analysis Group at TOPS. Betty Marsh, Statistician/Analyst with the
Analysis Group, collected and compiled the statistical data. Mary Daly, Social Research
Associate, produced the statistical graphics. Anthony Wells, Statistician, assisted in quality
control. Jeff LaBelle provided the cover and divider page graphics.
Thanks are due especially to the Regional Accountability Coordinators, and the Test
Coordinators and Accountability staff at the 117 public school systems and the many charter
schools who went to unprecedented lengths to organize, audit and confirm the data presented
here. This report could not exist without the dedication of these professionals.
4
Background
Findings forEighth Grade
(Class of 2003)
Findings for NinthGrade
(Class of 2002)
Findings for TenthGrade
(Class of 2001)
1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
Executive Summary1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
The State Board of Education, as part of the Quality Assurance Program,initially established a computer proficiency requirement for diplomas issuedto the Class of 2000. In October of 1995, the Board modified therequirement by making it effective beginning with the graduating class of2001. Students who were in grade eight for the 1996-97 school year andbeyond are required to satisfy the computer proficiency requirement in orderto receive a North Carolina high school diploma.
The first opportunity to meet the computer skills proficiency requirementarises during eighth grade. Passing the computer skills standard is defined aspassing both the multiple-choice and performance portions of the NorthCarolina Tests of Computer Skills.
The Class of 2001 completed the eighth grade at the end of the 1996-97school year. The Class of 2002 completed the eighth grade at the end of the1997-98 school year. The Class of 2003 completed the eighth grade at theend of the 1998-99 school year.
For the 1998-99 school year, 74.9 percent of students who took the tests metthe requirement at the end of grade eight.
There were disparities in performance among subgroups. The Hispanic(49.7%), Black (58.5%), and American Indian (60.1%) subgroups had lowerpercentages passing the proficiency requirement than the Asian (72.8%),Multi-Racial (73.2%), and White (84.0%) subgroups.
For the 1998-99 school year, 76.6 percent of students who took the tests hadmet the requirement by the end of grade nine.
There were disparities in performance among subgroups. The Hispanic(50.7), American Indian (62.1), and Black (62.8%), subgroups had lowerpercentages passing the proficiency requirement than the Asian (70.1%),Multi-Racial (74.2%), and White (84.7%) subgroups.
For the 1998-99 school year, 80.8 percent of students who took the tests hadmet the requirement by the end of grade ten.
There were disparities in performance among subgroups. The Hispanic(61.7%), Black (69.1%), and American Indian (69.5%) subgroups had lowerpercentages passing the proficiency requirement than the Multi-Racial(72.1%), Asian (72.8%), and White (87.0%) subgroups.
1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
The 1998-99 Report of Student Performance
North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures iii
Introduction
Background vii
Findings
Statewide Performance 1
Student Performance by LEA and Region 15
Sample Questions for the NC Tests of Computer Skills 35
Answers to Sample Questions 44
Appendix 45
V;
1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
List of Tables
Table 1. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category for the Class of 2003 at End of Grade 8, byLEA 8
Table 2. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category for the Class of 2002 at End of Grade 9, byLEA 9
Table 3. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category for the Class of 2001 at End of Grade 10, byLEA 10
Table 4. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance), for the Class of 2003 at End of Grade 8, by LEA 11
Table 5. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance), for the Class of 2002 at End of Grade 9, by LEA 12
Table 6 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choiceand Performance), for the Class of 2001 at End of Grade 10, by LEA 13
Table 7a-f. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2003 at End of Grade 8, by LEA andEthnicity, by Region 17
Table 8a-f. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2002 at End of Grade 9, by LEA andEthnicity, by Region 23
Table 9a-f. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2001 at End of Grade 10, by LEA andEthnicity, by Region 29
1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
List of Figures
Figure 1. 1996-97 to 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing(Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Classes of 2001, 2002, and 2003 atEnd of Grades 8 ,9, and 10 1
Figure 2. 1996-97 to 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing(Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Classes of 2001, 2002 and 2003 atEnd of Grade 8, by Ethnicity 2
Figure 3. 1997-98 to1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing(Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2001 and 2002 at End ofGrade 9, by Ethnicity 3
Figure 4. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2001 at End of Grade 10, by Ethnicity 4
Figure 5. 1996-97 to 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent of LEAsin Each Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category for theClass of 2001 at End of Grades 8, 9, and 10 5
Figure 6. 1997-98 to 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent of LEAsin Each Percent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category for theClass of 2002 at End of Grade 8 and 9 6
Figure 7. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills, Percent of LEAs in EachPercent Passing (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category for the Class of2003 at End of Grade 8 7
iii
8
1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
Introduction
The State Board of Education, as part of the Quality Assurance Program, initially establisheda computer proficiency requirement for diplomas issued to the Class of 2000. In October of1995, the Board modified the requirement by making it effective beginning with thegraduating class of 2001. Students who were in grade eight for the 1996-97 school year andbeyond are required to satisfy the computer proficiency requirement in order to receive aNorth Carolina high school diploma. The requirement is based on the kindergarten throughgrade 8 competencies of the K-12 computer skills curriculum approved in July 1992 by theState Board of Education. These competencies are defined in the North Carolina StandardCourse of Study (SCS). The goals of the requirement are to ensure that: (1) most studentsenter high school with sufficient computer skills, and (2) no student exits North Carolina highschools without sufficient computer skills.
The North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills (multiple-choice and performance) must beadministered by the end of grade eight with subsequent opportunities during high school, asneeded, to allow students to satisfy the requirement before completing their senior year inhigh school. The multiple-choice test assesses (1) word processing; (2) keyboarding; (3)database use; (4) spreadsheet use; (5) telecomputing skills; (6) societal issues; (7) ethics; (8)terms, operations, and care of computers; and (9) the use of computers in various curricularareas. The performance test consists of four parts: keyboarding techniques, wordprocessing/editing, database use, and spreadsheet use.
Computers have become an integral part of today's world, both in the home and in themarketplace; therefore, computer proficiency is necessary for graduates of North Carolina'shigh schools.
Initially, in order to meet the requirement, students were required to achieve a scale score onthe performance part of the test equal to or greater than 49 and a combined scale score equalto or greater than 46. Under the old standard when the pass/fail status was assigned, it wasassigned for student performance for both parts of the test. The multiple-choice andperformance parts of the test were not separate but considered together in determining astudent's pass/fail status.
At the recommendation of the Computer Skills Advisory Committee, after input fromeducators and others, the State Board of Education modified the standard for passing thecomputer skills requirement effective July 1, 1997. The modified standard requires that thetest be separated into two tests: a multiple-choice test and a performance test. Either test maybe passed independently of the other. To pass under the new standard, a student must achievea performance test scale score of 49 or above and a multiple-choice test scale score of 47 orabove.
When documented through the Individualized Education Program (IEP), some students withdisabilities may fulfill the computer skills proficiency requirement through the use of portfolioassessment accommodation.
The purpose of this document is to report the performance of students in the class of 2001 astenth graders, the class of 2002 as ninth graders, and the class of 2003 as eighth graders on thecomputer skills tests. Sample questions have been included in the report to provide examplesof items on the tests.
Definitions
1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
BackgroundThe first opportunity to meet the computer skills proficiencyrequirement is during the eighth grade. Passing the computer skillsstandard is defined as passing both the multiple-choice andperformance tests.
The Class of 2001 completed the eighth grade at the end of the 1996-97 school year. The Class of 2002 completed the eighth grade at theend of the 1997-98 school year. The Class of 2003 completed theeighth grade at the end of the 1998-99 school year.
The Standard Beginning with the fall of 1997 testing; a student must have a scalescore of at least 47 on the multiple-choice test and a scale score of atleast 49 on the performance test to meet the computer skillsproficiency requirement.
Students are retested only on the test that they have not passed.
Computer Skills Beginning with students in the eighth grade during the 1996-97 schoolRequirement year, in order to receive a North Carolina high school diploma,Guidelines students must demonstrate computer skills proficiency.
Beginning with the eighth grade, a student must be provided focusedinstructional remedial when the student has not passed the multiple-choice or performance tests until the proficiency requirement has beenmet.
Each senior must have at one additional opportunity during the lastmonth of school prior to graduation to demonstrate computer skillsproficiency.
Testing Accommodations are available for students with disabilities, studentsAccommodations identified under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and
students who are limited English proficient.
Accommodations must be developed in accordance with TestingModifications and Accommodations for Students Disabilities andGuidelines for Testing Students with Limited English Proficiency.
The need for accommodations must be documented (for example, inthe student's Individualized Education Program (IEP) or WrittenAccommodation Plan). Accommodations used are to be consistentwith routine instructional use and must not violate the intent of thetest.
The Computer The expectation is that all students will take the test during the eighthSkills Portfolio grade. The portfolio assessment is available for those students with
disabilities (only) who cannot take the test under standardadministration conditions or with the accommodations provided forthe tests. Portfolio use must be documented on the IndividualizedEducation Program (IEP).
vii
10
The ComputerSkills Portfolio
(Continued)
ScoringPortfolios
1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
The purpose of portfolio assessment is not to provide an easieralternative to demonstrating competency, but to provide an appropriatealternative that meets the same high standards as the tests.
There is no time limit for completion of the portfolio except thatsuccessful completion is required prior to graduation.
The expectation is that work to be included in the portfolio will becompleted within the school setting over a period of time. Thestudent's teacher and principal must verify the authenticity of thestudent's portfolio work.
The LEA is responsible for scoring all portfolios for that system.
The LEA test coordinator, the exceptional children's administrator,and the computer coordinator provide direction for the scoring andapproval process for completed portfolios. The LEA may involveother personnel as deemed appropriate.
Exemptions from Exemption from testing does not exempt students from the graduationTesting requirement. Exemption from the computer proficiency requirement
denies the opportunity for the student to meet one of the requirementsfor a North Carolina high school diploma.
When a student is exempted, the parent and student are advised of thelong-term consequences of exemption. LEAs are to reference themost recent publications of Testing Modifications andAccommodations for Students with Disabilities and Guidelines forTesting Students with Limited English Proficiency for properprocedures to follow for exemptions.
Resources Lesson plans and staff development activities have been provided byProvided by the NCDPI since the computer skills curriculum was revised in 1992.NCDPI Some of the lesson plans are available on the ,DPI InfoWeb
(www.NCPublicSchools.org) and through the NCDPI Office ofPublications.
A released form of the computer skills test was provided to all LEAs.Copies have been provided at conferences and workshoppresentations. In addition, a copy is available on the DPI InfoWeb.
The NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Testing Sectionprovides all school systems and charter schools with ample copies ofthe North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Student Handbook to bedistributed to the appropriate students. The handbook includesinformation about the proficiency requirement and computer skillstests taking strategies, and sample questions.
1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
Data Verification For the 1998-99 school year, the North Carolina Test of ComputerSkills multiple-choice was scored and aggregated locally. SchoolSystems reported summary data only to NCDPI. The performancetests were scored by a contractor who provided the score reports to theLEAs and subsequently the NCDPI.
Differences in The data collected for the Computer Skills test in 1997 and 1998 usedData Analysis: the same denominator, which included the number of pupils tested in
1996-97, 1997-98, both performance and multiple choice. In 1999, the denominator1998-99 included the number of pupils on the NCDPI masterbuild file,
including exempted and absent pupils.
In 1997, Fall and Spring data were merged centrally and LEAs had theopportunity to correct the final file of pupils. In 1998, all testadministrations from Fall 1997 to Spring 1998 were merged centrally,accounting for the .NC State Board of Education's change in thestandard. Most school systems edited the merged file locally andreturned a file of pupil data that had a pass/fail flag for performance anda pass/fail flag for multiple choice. In 1999, a blank form was sent toLEAs to collect summary data (not pupil data), with a column for thenumber of pupils on the masterbuild (including absent and exemptpupils) and a column for the number passing both performance andmultiple choice.
List of AppleWorks 2.x, 3.x, 4.xSupportedSoftware ClarisWorks for Macintosh 1.x, 2.x, 3..x, 4.x, 5.x
Packages ClarisWorks for Windows 3.x, 4.x, 5.x
ClarisWorks/AppleWorks for Macintosh 5.x
MS Works for Macintosh 2.x, 3.x, 4.x
MS Works DOS 2.0, 3.0
MS Works for Windows 2.x, 3.x, 4.x
MS Office Pro for Windows 4.x, 95, 97
PFS: First Choice
ix
'12
1998-99 Report of Student PerformanceNorth Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
Findings
1998-99 Student For the 1998-99 school year, 74.9 percent of eighth graders, 76.6Performance percent of ninth graders, and 80.8 percent of tenth graders had passed
the computer skills proficiency requirement.
At of the end of the 1998-99 school year, approximately 271,193students were eligible for both the multiple-choice and performancetests. Of these, 209,462 students passed both parts, for an overallpassing rate of 77.2 percent.
The percent of eighth graders passing the proficiency requirementincreased from 74.8 percent in 1996-97 to 77.5 percent in 1997-98, butthen decreased from 74.9 percent in 1998-99.
Student There were disparities in performance among subgroups of eighthPerformance by graders, ninth graders, and tenth graders.Ethnicity
By the end of the 1998-99 school year, a smaller percentage of eighthgraders had passed the proficiency requirement in the Hispanic(49.7%), Black (58.5%), and American Indian (60.1%) subgroups thanin the Asian (72.8%), Multi-Racial (73.2%), and White (84.0%)subgroups.
The percent of eighth graders passing the proficiency requirementincreased for the Black subgroup from 1997-98 (58.5%) to 1998-99(62.8%).
By the end of the 1998-99 school year, a smaller percentage of ninthgraders had passed the proficiency requirement in the Hispanic(50.7%), American Indian (62.1%), and Black (62.8%) subgroups thanin the Asian (70.1%), Multi-Racial (74.2%), and White (84.7%)subgroups.
By the end of the 1998-99 school year, a smaller percentage of tenthgraders had passed the proficiency requirement in the Hispanic(61.7%), Black (69.1%), and American Indian (69.5%) subgroups thanin the Multi-Racial (72.1%), Asian (72.8%) and White (87.0%)subgroups.
13x
100
-
90-
80 -
70-
60-
50-
40-
30-
20-
10-
0
Figu
re 1
. 199
6-97
to 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
assi
ng*
(Mul
tiple
-Cho
ice
and
Perf
orm
ance
)fo
r th
e C
lass
es o
f 20
01, 2
002,
and
200
3at
End
of
Gra
des
8, 9
, and
10
81.8
80.8
8th
Gra
de
Cla
ss o
f 20
01
9th
Gra
de10
th G
rade
1996
-97
N P
assi
ng =
66,
695
N E
ligib
le =
89,
217
Cla
ss o
f 20
01
Cla
ss o
f 20
02N
Pas
sing
= 7
1,20
4
1997
-98
N P
assi
ng =
70,
480
N E
ligib
le =
87,
061
N E
ligib
le =
90,
906
Cla
ss o
f 20
02C
lass
of
2001
Cla
ss o
f 20
03N
Pas
sing
= 7
3,83
9N
Pas
sing
= 6
4,16
6
1998
-99
N P
assi
ng =
71,
457
N E
ligib
le =
96,
431
N E
ligib
le =
79,
385
N E
ligib
le =
95,
377
1419
96-9
7n
1997
-98
pi 1
998-
9915
Not
es: '
The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ed. D
ata
rece
ived
from
LE
As
afte
r A
pril
30, 2
000
are
not i
nclu
ded
in th
is fi
gure
.
100- 90-
80-
77.5
74.8
74.9
Figu
re 2
. 199
6-97
to 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
assi
ng*
(Mul
tiple
-Cho
ice
and
Perf
orm
ance
)fo
r th
e C
lass
es o
f 20
01, 2
002
and
2003
at E
nd o
f G
rade
8, b
y E
thni
city
81.6
77.9
72.8
77.7
74.8
73.2
87.1
84.4
84.0
70-
60-
50-
62.2
60.6
60.1
58.1
58.
555
.056
.958
'3
49.7
40-
30-
20-
10-
1996
-97
Cla
ss o
f 20
01
1997
-98
Cla
ss o
f 20
02
1998
-99
Cla
ss o
f 20
03
Stat
e
N P
assi
ng =
66,
695
N E
ligib
le =
89,2
17
N P
assi
ng =
70,
480
N E
ligib
le=
90,
906
N P
assi
ng =
71,4
57N
Elig
ible
=95
,377
Am
eric
an I
ndia
n
N P
assi
ng =
954
N E
ligib
le=
1,5
73
N P
assi
ng =
867
N E
ligib
le =
1,3
94
N P
assi
ng =
861
N E
ligib
le =
1,4
33
Asi
an
N P
assi
ng =
781
N E
ligib
le=
957
N P
assi
ng =
1,12
0N
Elig
ible
= 1
,437
N P
assi
ng =
1,2
12
N E
ligib
le =
1,6
64
Bla
ck
N P
assi
ng =
14,
054
N E
ligib
le =
25,
547
N P
assi
ng =
14,
794
N E
ligib
le =
25,
467
N P
assi
ng =
16,
422
N E
ligib
le=
28,
071
His
pani
cN
Pas
sing
= 8
86
N E
ligib
le =
1,5
58
N P
assi
ng =
1,15
5N
Elig
ible
= 1
,982
N P
assi
ng =
1,3
03
N E
ligib
le=
2,6
22
1996
-97
1997
-98
1998
-99
:.:,..
:.:.:.
:.:.:.
:.:...
.:.:
::=
Mul
ti-R
acia
l
N P
assi
ng =
787
N E
ligib
le =
1,0
52
N P
assi
ng =
962
N E
ligib
le1,
238
N P
assi
ng =
469
N E
ligib
le =
641
Whi
te
N P
assi
ng =
48,
491
N E
ligib
le =
57,4
21
N P
assi
ng =
51,
282
N E
ligib
le =
58,9
10
N P
assi
ng =
51,1
76N
Elig
ible
= 6
0,92
4
Not
es: '
'The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ed.
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om L
EA
s af
ter
Apr
il 30
, 200
0 ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
this
figu
re.
Figu
re 3
. 199
7-98
to 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
assi
ng*
(Mul
tiple
-Cho
ice
and
Perf
orm
ance
)fo
r th
e C
lass
es o
f 20
01 a
nd 2
002
at E
nd o
f G
rade
9, b
y E
thni
city
89.6
1997
-98
Cla
ss o
f 20
01
1998
-99
Cla
ss o
f 20
02
Stat
e
N P
assi
ng =
71,
204
N E
ligib
le =
87,
061
N P
assi
ng =
73,
839
N E
ligib
le=
96,
43
Am
eric
an I
ndia
n
N P
assi
ng =
1,02
1
N E
ligib
le=
1,4
92
N P
assi
ng =
958
N E
ligib
le=
1,5
42
Asi
an
-N P
assi
ng =
1,0
37
N E
ligib
le =
1,25
51,
255
N P
assi
ng =
1,2
37
N E
ligib
le=
1,7
64
Bla
ck
N P
assi
ng =
15,
895
N E
ligib
le=
24,
113
N P
assi
ng =
18,
105
N E
ligib
le =
28,
809
His
pani
c
N P
assi
ng =
1,0
80
N E
ligib
le=
1,7
14
N P
assi
ng =
1,2
65
N E
ligib
le=
2,4
95
1997
-98
.,19
98-9
9:..
..:.:.
:.:.
:.:.:.
:....:
.:-..
Mul
ti-R
acia
l
N P
assi
ng =
858
N E
ligib
le =
1,07
4
N P
assi
ng =
446
N E
ligib
le=
601
Whi
te
N P
assi
ng =
50,
869
N E
ligib
le =
56,7
95
N P
assi
ng =
51,8
19
N E
ligib
le=
61,
200
Not
es: T
hese
dat
a re
pres
ent t
he h
ighe
st te
st s
core
of e
ach
stud
ent f
or a
ll te
st a
dmin
istr
atio
ns in
whi
ch th
e st
uden
t par
ticip
ated
. Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om L
EA
s af
ter
Apr
il 30
, 200
0 ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
this
figu
re. 19
18
100
90 80 70 50 30 20 10 0
80.8
69.5
Figu
re 4
. 199
8-99
Nor
th C
arol
ina
Tes
ts o
f C
ompu
ter
Skill
s
Perc
ent P
assi
ng*
(Mul
tiple
-Cho
ice
and
Perf
orm
ance
)fo
r th
e C
lass
of
2001
at E
nd o
f G
rade
10,
by
Eth
nici
ty
72.8
69.1
61.7
72.1
87.0
Stat
eA
mer
ican
Ind
ian
1998
-99
N P
assi
ng =
64,1
66N
Pas
sing
=74
9
Cla
ss o
f 20
01N
Elig
ible
= 7
9,38
5N
Elig
ible
= 1
,077
Asi
an
N P
assi
ng =
1,1
08
N E
ligib
le =
1,5
22
Bla
ck
N P
assi
ng =
15,
652
N E
ligib
le=
22,
636
His
pani
c
N P
assi
ng =
993
N E
ligib
le =
1,6
10
Mul
ti-R
acia
l
N P
assi
ng =
302
N E
ligib
le =
419
Whi
te
N P
assi
ng =
45,
345
N E
ligib
le =
52,0
92
Not
es: *
The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ed.
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om L
EA
s af
ter
Apr
il 30
, 200
0 ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
this
figu
re.
21
Figure 5. 1996-97 to 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent of LEAs in Each Percent Passing* (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category
for the Class of 2001at End of Grades 8, 9, and 10
End of Grade 8
11.4. ,. /41'11111'N-"Iwwwww--
End of Grade 10
45.6.%
18.4%
End of Grade 9
Percent PassingCategories:
90% or above
80-89%
I1== 70-79%
60-69%
Tr 50-59% .
111 Below 50%
Notes: 'These data represent the highest test score of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.Percent passing categories may not sum to 100% due to rounding.
Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this figure.
522
Figure 6. 1997-98 to 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent of LEAs in Each Percent Passing* (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category
for the Class of 2002at End of Grades 8 and 9
End of Grade 811.9% 6.7%
4.5%
13.4%
36.6%
l /1I V11 I//10 IOW
End of Grade 98.7% 9.4%
26.9%
63%
11.8%
39.4%
Illio..I /1 1//v1 .-1 "
24.4%
Percent PassingCategories:
90% or above
ri 80-89%
I1 70-79%
60-69%
50-59%
II Below 50%
Notes: These data represent the highest test score of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.Percent passing categories may not sum to 100% due to rounding.Data received from LEAs after April 30,2000 are not included in this figure.
6 23
Figure 7. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent of LEAs in Each Percent Passing* (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category
for the Class of 2003at End of Grade '8
31.9%
8.5% 7.1%
5.0%
AMIE.4MMEMEMEMMEMMIE.....AMMEMMEMEMEMMIME/AMMEMEMEM.M I
AMMIIIIMMEMMEMMEM4/EEMVAMMMF1110""IIIMMMUMMEMMEP-
30.5%
Percent PassingCategories:
17.0%
90% or above 60-69%
n 80-89% El 50-59%
70-79% Below 50%Il1
Notes: These data represent the highest test score of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.Percent passing categories may not sum to 100% due to rounding.Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this figure.
7
Li 24
Table 1. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent Passing* (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category
for the Class of 2003 at End of Grade 8, by LEA
Below 50%N=10
C.G. Woodson**Carter Community**Kennedy Charter**Lift Acad**Phase Acad**Quality Education**Right Step**Sankore School**WarrenWeldon City
50-59%N=7
Brevard Acad**HalifaxHertfordKestrel Heights**Lexington CityNashRobeson
60-69%N=24
AnsonAsheAsheville CityBladenCaldwellColumbusCurrituckDurhamEdgecombeForsythFranklinGreeneHickory CityHokeKannapolis CityLincolnMartinMontgomery
MoorePasquotankRichmondThomasville CityVanceWashington
70-79%N=43
AlamanceAlexanderAveryBeaufortBertieBridges**BurkeCabarrusCravenCumberlandDuplinEast Wake Acad**GastonHarnettImani Institute**IredellLeeLenoirMAST**MaconMadisonMecklenburgMooresville CityMount Airy CityNewton Conover CityNorthamptonOrange Co. Charter**PenderPittRandolphRockinghamRowanRutherfordSampsonScotlandShelby CityStan ly
The Learning Cntr**TyrrellWakeWayneWilsonYadkin
80-89%N=45
Asheboro CityBrunswickBuncombeCHill-Carrb. CityCIS Acad**CamdenCarteretCaswellCatawbaChathamCherokeeChowanClayClevelandClinton CityDareDavidsonDowntown Middle**GatesGrahamGranvilleGuilfordHaywoodHenderson
HydeJacksonJohnstonJonesKings Mm CityMcDowellNew HanoverOrangePamlicoPerquimansPersonPolkR. Rapids CityRiver Mill Charter**SurrySwainTransylvaniaUnionWhiteville CityWilkesWoods Charter**
90% or aboveN=12
AlleghanyArapahoe**Chatham Charter**DavieElkin CityMagellan**MitchellOns lowStokesSummit Charter**WataugaYancey
Notes: 'These data represent the highest test score of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.
Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated. The complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
Data are not reported where number tested is fewer than five. These systems include Grandfather Acad, Lakeside School", and Village Charter".Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this table.
25
Table 2. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent Passing* (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category
for the Class of 2002 at End of Grade 9, by LEA.
Below 50%N=12
70-79%N=31
80-89%N=50
Hertford Alamance Alexander Kings Mtn CityJ.H. Baker Jr High** Avery Ashe LeeJones Beaufort Asheboro City LenoirKennedy Charter** Bladen Brunswick LincolnLakeside School** Burke Buncombe MadisonLift Acad** Catawba CHill-Carrb. City MitchellNC Sch of Maritime* Chatham Cabarrus MontgomeryPasquotank Cleveland Caldwell MooreRight Step** Currituck Camden Mount Airy CityThomasville City Forsyth Carteret Newton Conover CityWarren Franklin Caswell PerquimansWoods Charter** Gaston Cherokee Person
Hickory City Chowan Polk50-59% Hoke Clay R. Rapids CityN=8 Kannapolis City Clinton City Randolph
Macon Craven RockinghamEdgecombe Martin Dare RutherfordGreene Mecklenburg Davidson StokesHarnett Mooresville City Gates SurryKestrel Heights** Pamlico Granville TransylvaniaLexington City Pitt Guilford UnionNew Century** River Mill Charter** Haywood WakeNorthampton Rowan Henderson WilkesWeldon City Sampson Hyde Yadkin
Scotland Jackson60-69% Stanly JohnstonN=15 Swain
Vance 90% or aboveAnson Washington N=11
Asheville City Whiteville CityBertie Wilson Alleghany PenderColumbus Davie TyrrellCumberland Elkin City WataugaDuplin Graham WayneDurham McDowell YanceyHalifax OrangeIredellNashNew HanoverOnslowRichmondRobesonShelby City
Notes: 'These data represent the highest test score of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.
"Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated. .
The complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix
Data are not reported where number tested is fewer than five. No system reported fewer than five.
Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this table.
st, 2 6
Table 3. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer SkillsPercent Passing* (Multiple-Choice and Performance) Category
for the Class of 2001 at End of Grade 10, by LEA
Below 50%N=7
70-79%N=23
80-89%
N=57
90% or above
N=25
Hertford Asheville City Alamance Johnston AlexanderLakeside School** Bladen Avery Kannapolis City AlleghanyLift Acad** Catawba Beaufort Lee AsheNC Sch of Maritime* Cumberland Brunswick Lexington City Asheboro CityNorthampton Currituck Buncombe Lincoln CamdenRight Step** Dare Burke Madison ChowanWarren Durham CHill-Carrb. City McDowell Clinton City
Greene Cabarrus Mitchell Davie50-59% Hickory City Caldwell Montgomery Elkin City
N=1 Hyde Carteret Pamlico HalifaxIredell Caswell Perquimans Hoke
Onslow Jones Chatham Polk Kings Mtn CityMacon Cherokee R. Rapids City Lenoir
60-69% Martin Clay Randolph Mount Airy CityN=12 Mecklenburg Cleveland River Mill Charter** Newton Conover City
Moore Columbus Rockingham OrangeAnson Mooresville City Craven Rowan PenderBertie New Century** Davidson Rutherford PersonDuplin Pitt Forsyth Sampson Shelby CityEdgecombe Richmond Franklin Scotland StanlyJ.H. Baker Jr High** Swain Gaston Stokes SurryNash Weldon City Gates Transylvania WataugaNew Hanover Wilson Graham Tyrrell WaynePasquotank Granville Union YadkinRobeson Guilford Vance YanceyThomasville City Harnett WakeWashington Haywood Whiteville CityWoods Charter** Henderson Wilkes
Jackson
Notes: *These data represent the highest test score of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated.
The complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
Data are not reported for Kennedy Charter** because number tested is fewer than five.
Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this table.
10 27
Table 4. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing*(Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2003 at End of Grade 8, by LEA
Percent Passing' 1999 LEA Performance97.0 Yancey96.0 Arapahoe**95.0 Magellan**94.0 Stokes, Summit Charter**93.0 Allegheny, Davie92.0 Chatham Charter**91.0 Mitchell, Ons low, Watauga90.0 Elkin City, Polk89.0 Camden, Graham88.0 Orange, Wilkes87.0 Gates, Haywood, Swain, Transylvania86.0 Buncombe, Clinton City, McDowell85.0 Cherokee, Henderson, Pamlico, Woods Charter**84.0 Granville83.0 Carteret, Catawba, CIS Academy**, Clay, Dare, Davidson, Downtown Middle**,
Kings Mountain City, New Hanover, River Mill Charter**82.0 Asheboro City, Guilford, Hyde, Johnston81.0 Brunswick, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Cleveland, Edenton/Chowan, Jackson,
Perquimans, Roanoke Rapids City, Whiteville City80.0 Caswell, Chatham, Jones, Person, Rutherford, Surry, Union, Wayne79.0 Alexander, Avery, Craven, Lenoir, Madison, Rockingham, Stan ly, Wilson, Yadkin
1998 State 78.0 Beaufort, Burke, East Wake Academy**, Mount Airy City, Randolph77.0 Bertie, Shelby City76.0 Gaston, Harnett
1997 & 1999 State 75.0 Lee, MAST**, Wake74.0 Iredell-Statesville, Mooresville City, Rowan/Salisbury, Sampson, Tyrrell73.0 Alamance-Burlington, Macon, Northampton, Orange Co. Charter**, Pender, Pitt72.0 Imani Institute**, Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Newton Conover City, Scotland71.0 Bridges**, Cabarrus, Cumberland, Duplin, The Learning Center**70.0 Asheville City, Columbus, Thomasville City69.0 Caldwell, Lincoln68.0 Anson, Currituck, Martin67.0 Edgecombe, Kannapolis City, Richmond, Washington66.0 Greene, Moore65.0 Bladen, Montgomery64.0 Durham63.0 Ashe, Franklin, Hickory City, Vance62.0
...Hoke
60.0 Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Winston-Salem/Forsyth
58.0 Hertford57.0 Brevard Academy**56.0 Nash-Rocky Mount55.0 Lexington City, Robeson54.0
...Halifax
50.0...
Kestrel Heights**
44.0...
Right Step**
40.0 PHASE Academy**
3 1.0...
Weldon City
25.0...
Warren
23.0...
Sankore School**
21.0...
C.G. Woodson**
18.0...
Quality Education**
12.0...
Lift Academy**
0.0 Carter Community**, Kennedy Charter**tt Grandfather**, Lakeside School**, Village Charter**
Notes: 'Percent passing are rounded to the nearest percent. "Data not reported where number tested is fewer than five.
These data represent the highest test score of each student for all the test administrations in which the student participated.**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated. The complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this table. I 1
28
Table 5. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing*(Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2002 at End of Grade 9, by LEA
Percent Passing 1999 LEA Performance96.0
...Orange, Yancey
94.0 Alleghany, Elkin City93.0 Davie, Watauga92.0 Tyrrell91.0 Graham, Pender90.0 Camden, McDowell, Wayne89.0 Clay, Lenoir88.0 Cherokee, Clinton City, Roanoke Rapids City, Transylvania, Yadkin87.0 Asheboro City, Edenton/Chowan, Person86.0 Alexander, Ashe, Craven, Stokes, Surry85.0 Buncombe, Dare, Henderson, Johnston, Kings Mountain City, Lee,
Madison, Montgomery, Mount Airy City, Newton Conover City84.0 Cabarrus, Caldwell, Davidson, Guilford, Jackson, Lincoln, Mitchell, Polk, Randolph83.0 Carteret, Caswell, Hyde, Moore, Wilkes
1998 State 82.0 Brunswick, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Gates, Haywood, Rutherford, Union81.0 Perquimans, Rockingham, Wake80.0 Beaufort, Currituck, Gaston, Granville79.0 Franklin, Pamlico, Swain78.0 Burke, Chatham, Mooresville City, Whiteville City
1999 State 77.0 Alamance-Burlington, Hickory City, Winston- Salem/Forsyth76.0 Martin, Sampson75.0 Cleveland, Kannapolis City, Stanly, Vance, Washington74.0 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Macon, Pitt, River Mill Charter**, Rowan-Salisbury, Wilson73.0 Avery, Catawba, Hoke72.0
...Bladen, Scotland
68.0 Iredell-Statesville, Nash-Rocky Mount67.0 Cumberland, Halifax, Richmond66.0 Duplin, New Hanover, Shelby City65.0
...Asheville City, Columbus, Durham
63.0 Anson62.0 Robeson61.0
...Bertie, Onslow
59.0...
Harnett, Lexington City
55.0 Greene54.0 New Century School**, Northampton, Weldon City53.0
...Edgecombe
50.0 Kestrel Heights**49.0 Elizabeth City/Pasquotank48.0 Warren47.0 Thomasville City46.0 Jones45.0 Woods Charter**
43.0...
Hertford
35.0...
Right Step**
31.0...
NC School of Maritime*
28.0...
Lakeside School**
25.0...
J.H. Baker Jr High**
13.0...
Kennedy Charter**
0.0 Lift Academy**
Notes: 'Percent passing are rounded to the nearest percent. "Data not reported where number tested is fewer than five.
*These data represent the highest test score of each student for all the test administrations in which the student participated.
"Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated. The complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this table. 1229
Table 6. 1998-99 North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills Percent Passing*(Multiple-Choice and Performance) for the Class of 2001 at End of Grade 10, by LEA
Percent Passingt 1999 LEA Performance99.0 Camden, Yancey
97.0 Asheboro City, Lenoir96.0 Alleghany, Davie, Halifax .
95.0 Newton Conover City94.0 Pender, Person, Watauga, Wayne93.0 Elkin City, Kings Mountain City, Mount Airy City, Surry92.0 Alexander91.0 Ashe, Orange, Shelby City, Stan ly90.0 Clinton City, Edenton/Chowan, Hoke, Montgomery, Polk, Yadkin89.0 Brunswick, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Cherokee, Gates88.0 Buncombe, Clay, Graham, Granville, Roanoke Rapids City, Rutherford87.0 Cabarrus, Caldwell, Carteret, Chatham, Gaston, Johnston, Sampson, Vance, Whiteville City86.0 Haywood, Kannapolis City, McDowell, Mitchell, Randolph, Winston-Salem/Forsyth85.0 Burke, Craven, Davidson, Henderson, Lee, Lexington City, Perquimans, Union, Wilkes84.0 Avery, Guilford, Jackson, Madison, Stokes,Transylvania, Tyrrell83.0 Alamance-Burlington, Lincoln, Pamlico, Rowan-Salisbury82.0 Caswell, Columbus, Rockingham, Wake
1999 State 81.0 Beaufort, Cleveland, Franklin, Harnett80.0 River Mill Charter**, Scotland, Swain, Wilson79.0 Dare, Hyde, Iredell-Statesville78.0 Catawba, Moore, Mooresville City77.0 Asheville City, Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Pitt76.0 Greene, Weldon City75.0 Currituck74.0 Hickory City, Martin73.0 Bladen, Cumberland72.0 Jones, Richmond71.0 Macon, New Century School**70.0 Durham69.0 Duplin68.0 Edgecombe67.0 Anson, Robeson, Washington, Woods Charter**
65.0 Nash-Rocky Mount, New Hanover.
62.0 Bertie, Elizabeth City/Pasquotank61.0 Thomasville City60.0
...J.H. Baker Jr High**
54.0...
Ons low
47.0...
Northampton
41.0 Hertford
38.0 Warren
30.0...
NC School of Maritime*
25.0...
Right Step**
11.0...
Lift Acad**
0.0 Lakeside School**tt Kennedy Charter**
Notes: 'Percent passing are rounded to the nearest percent. "Data not reported where number tested is fewer than five.
'These data represent the highest test score of each student for all the test administrations in which the student participated.
"Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated. The complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
Data received from LEAs after April 30, 2000 are not included in this table.
13 30
5ro ratt
ij4.rt,
Aqj ,
,
f14:`
411.,4 a'a
Cr'
TV
'
40
V.
1
'0-
t-.A
.'.....-''',..:
,,,i: .,,. -,,,,; ,
..;Z;04.;:+
`-
'!' ,'
Arldritrtr
"t.,..,i rt-'
r's,' A
.,4 f'
:fii,-,-.,-,,--
rf;
*-
t.:_, ''''f.`."-; ....
L
-T i,;:,_,`. `,,,
4rev-r
;er:4".)%;' -
`-,,
...
40 .
4
Tab
le 7
a. 1
998-
99 N
orth
Perf
orm
ance
)C
arol
ina
Tes
ts o
f C
ompu
ter
Skill
s Pe
rcen
t Pas
sing
(M
ultip
le-C
hoic
e an
dfo
r th
e C
lass
of
2003
at E
nd o
f G
rade
8, b
y L
EA
and
Eth
nici
ty
Tot
alA
mer
ican
Indi
anW
este
rn R
egio
nA
sian
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Mul
ti-R
acia
lWhite
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Sta
te95
,377
71,4
5774
.91,433
861
60.1
1,664
1,21
272
.828
,071
16,4
2258
.52,
622
1,30
349
.764
146
973
.260
,924
51,1
7684
.0
Wes
tern
Reg
ion
7,11
55,
991
84.2
66
5583
.048
4185
.444
027
161
.610
557
54.3
3930
76.9
6,41
75,
537
86.3
Bun
com
be1,
887
1,62
286
.07
710
0.0
1413
92.9
9562
65.3
3220
62.5
85
62.5
1,73
11,
515
87.5
Ash
evill
e C
ity31
121
769
.80
212
363
51.2
32
181
150
82.9
Che
roke
e24
020
384
.65
510
0.0
27
710
0.0
41
221
186
84.2
The
Lea
rnin
g C
ente
r7
571
.40
01
00
64
66.7
Cla
y11
394
83.2
00
00
21
1 1
9282
.9
Gra
ham
8777
88.5
30
00
0.8
474
88.1
I lay
woo
d57
149
987
.40
119
81.8
41
554
484
87.4
Hen
ders
on86
173
585
.41
97
77.8
4026
65.0
3413
38.2
1411
78.6
763
678
88.9
Jack
son
283
229
80.9
2115
71.0
03
125
720
981
.3
Sum
mit
Cha
rter
1716
94.1
00
0I
016
1593
.8
Mac
on32
623
973
.30
23
22'
317
232
73.2
Mad
ison
187
148
79.1
00
00
018
714
879
.1
McD
owel
l48
441
886
.40
13II
84.6
2319
82.6
12
445
387
87.0
Mitc
hell
198
180
90.9
00
02
019
617
890
.8
Pol
k19
417
489
.71
016
I I68
.85
240
.02
170
159
93.5
Rut
herf
ord
744
592
79.6
04
9855
56.
II7
63.6
362
852
483
.4
Sw
ain
122
106
86.9
2723
85.0
01
093
8187
.1
Tra
nsyl
vani
a29
521
5887
.50
016
956
.34
127
424
790
.1
Bre
vard
Aca
dem
y'7
457
110
00
00
74
57.1
Yan
cey
181
175
96.7
04
00
176
170
96.6
BE
ST C
OPY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
:
32
33
Not
es:
The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all
the
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ed.
Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
rmat
.D
ata
not r
epor
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r te
sted
is fe
wer
than
five
. Tire
eth
nic
cate
gorie
s m
ay n
ot s
um to
tota
l num
ber
test
ed a
nd to
taln
umbe
r pa
ssin
g be
caus
e et
hnic
cat
egor
y m
ay h
ave
not b
een
code
d.
"Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
epor
ting
purp
oses
the
char
ter
scho
ol n
ame
has
been
abb
revi
ated
. The
com
plet
e na
me
can
befo
und
in th
e A
ppen
dix.
..
Sta
teN
orth
wes
t Reg
ion
Ale
xand
er
Alle
ghan
y
Ash
e
Ave
ry
Gra
ndfa
ther
Aca
dem
y*
Bur
ke
Cal
dwel
l
Cat
awba
Hic
kory
City
New
ton
Con
over
City
Dav
idso
n
Lexi
ngto
n C
ity
Tho
mas
ville
City
Dav
ie
Win
ston
-Sal
em/F
orsy
th
Lill
Aca
dem
y*
Qua
lity
Edu
catio
n"..-
.oo
Dow
ntow
n M
iddl
e"
C.G
. Woo
dson
Ired
ell-S
tate
svill
e
Moo
resv
ille
City
Sto
kes
Sur
ly
Elk
in C
ity
Brid
ges*
Mou
nt A
iry C
ity
Wat
auga
Wilk
es
Yad
kin
34
Tot
al
Tab
le 7
b. 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
assi
ng (
Mul
tiple
-Cho
ice
and
Perf
orm
ance
) fo
r th
e C
lass
of
2003
at E
nd o
f G
rade
8, b
y L
EA
and
Eth
nici
tyN
orth
wes
t Reg
ion
Am
eric
an I
ndia
nA
sian
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Mul
ti-R
acia
lW
hite
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
95,3
7771
,457
74.9
1,43
386
160
.11,
664
1,21
272
.828
,071
16,4
2258
.52,
622
1,30
349
.764
146
973
.260
,924
51,1
7684
.015
,195
11,3
9475
.021
1466
.033
822
666
.92,
408
1,16
848
.543
417
640
.688
6675
.011
,906
9,74
481
.8
377
299
79.3
015
1280
.018
844
.43
034
127
781
.2
138
129
93.5
0a
0I
40
,13
312
694
.7
316
200
63.3
00
*.
27
342
.90
307
196
63.8
194
154
79.4
0,
01
00
193
153
79.3
40
03
00
I
1,07
984
778
.52
9567
70.5
6745
67.2
23II
47.8
65
83.3
886
718
81.0
935
647
69.2
17
457
.158
3763
.810
440
.06
350
.085
359
870
.1
1,26
11,
045
82.9
374
5574
.388
5663
.638
2052
.63
1,05
591
086
.3
355
224
63,1
025
832
.096
4749
.024
520
.85
510
0.0
205
159
77.6
214
154
72.0
010
1010
0.0
3413
38.2
126
50.0
I15
712
579
.6
1,49
41,
241
183.
18
810
0.0
1313
100.
032
3210
0.0
55
100.
04
1,43
21,
179
82.3
268
147
54.9
017
741
.213
372
54.1
182
11.1
199
6565
.7
152
106
69.7
05
360
.078
4962
.84
065
5076
.9
436
404
92.7
00
3931
79.5
1310
76.9
338
136
094
.5
3,21
81,
936
60.2
52
40.0
2516
64.0
1,25
350
240
.113
645
33.1
3325
75.8
1,76
61,
346
76.2
172
11.8
00
172
11.8
0a
00
112
111.
20
011
218
.20
00
155
183
.20
131
1754
.80
212
110
990
.1
143
21.4
00
143
21.4
00
0
1,23
190
773
.70
2315
65.2
234
116
49.6
207
35.0
195
376
880
.6
332
245
73.8
0a
354
3463
.03
227
020
776
.7
536
503
93.8
11
2617
65.4
134
30.8
449
147
997
.6
571
457
8011
I3
1712
70.6
4120
48.8
54
80.0
504
417
82.7
6155
90.2
00
52
40.0
10
5552
94.5
1410
71.4
00
0a.
00
1410
71.4
182
142
78.0
09
333
.317
847
.16
350
.03
147
126
85.7
395
360
91.1
02
22
138
835
591
.5
807
709
87.9
0a
103
30.0
5945
76.3
239
39.1
371
265
091
.3
428
336
78.5
00
1814
77.8
2810
35.7
53
60.0
377
309
82.0
35
Not
es:
t The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all
the
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
entp
artic
ipat
ed.
Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
nnat
.'D
ata
not r
epor
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r te
sted
is fe
wer
than
five
. The
eth
nic
cate
gorie
s m
ay n
ot s
tun
to to
tal n
umbe
r te
sted
and
tota
l num
ber
pass
ing
beca
use
ethn
ic c
ateg
ory
may
hav
e no
t bee
n co
ded.
Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
eam
ing
Pur
pose
s th
e ch
arte
r sc
hool
nam
e ha
s be
en a
bbre
viat
ed. T
he c
ompl
ete
nam
e ca
n be
foun
d in
the
App
endi
x.
-I O
DIC
Sta
teS
outh
wes
t Reg
ion
Ans
oit
Cab
arru
s
Tot
alN
umbe
rT
este
d95
,377
20,2
28
348
1,41
7
Num
ber
Pas
sing
71,4
5714
,754
238
1,00
3
Per
cent
Pas
sing
74.9
72.9
68.4
70.8
Kan
napo
lis C
ity28
519
066
.7
Cle
vela
nd62
350
781
.4
Kin
gs M
ount
ain
City
333
277
83.2
She
lby
City
237
183
77.2
Gas
ton
2,39
51,
818
75.9
tloke
426
262
61.5
Linc
oln
905
621
68.6
Cha
rlotte
/Mec
klen
burg
7,12
95,
144
72.2
Ken
nedy
Cha
rter
"8
0' 0
.0
Mon
tgom
ery
379
248
65.4
Moo
re76
950
563
.741
MA
ST
"28
2175
.0
Ric
hmon
d63
843
067
.4,-
-. c:)
Row
an-S
alis
bury
1,43
31,
057
73.8
Sco
tland
516
369
711
.5
Sta
nly
805
6137
79.1
Uni
on1,
554
1,24
480
,1
36
1770
..77
!WI I
II I..
.411
1111
14 I
C3I
3 IJ
I I.V
IIIIII
IIILI
.311
,111
11a1
GII
Cur
saa
..a6
vas
was
ilac-
a-..g
urga
.c...
.,Pe
rfor
niiii
ce)
for
the
Cla
ss o
f 20
03 it
End
of
Gra
de 8
, by
LE
A a
nd E
thiik
itySo
uthw
est R
egio
nA
mer
ican
Indi
anA
sian
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Mul
ti-R
acia
lW
hite
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
.P
assi
ngT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ngT
este
dP
assi
ng1,
433
861
60.1
1,66
41,
212
72.8
28,0
7116
,422
158
9660
.046
935
174
.85,
910
3,22
9
I2
I20
911
7
64
66.0
109
90.0
186
66
3'6
350
.091
50
0I
134
80
I10
1010
0.0
8361
0I
104
'63
435
2982
.941
425
6
5017
34.0
419
611
4
33
8444
2920
69.0
308
232
75.3
2,91
81,
574
00
4
017
1270
.610
654
5I
20.0
53
60.0
197
92
00
94
26
610
0.0
252
145
64
66.0
1814
77.8
293
144
4537
82.0
54
80.0
232
140
130
1550
.012
175
28
675
.027
715
0
BE
ST
CO
PY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
58.5
2,62
21.
303
49.7
54.6
577
270
46.8
56.0
1
35.5
2310
43.5
54.9
125
41.7
59.7
64
66.7
73.5
53
60.0
60.6
I
61.8
3825
65.8
58.2
106
60.0
52.4
5718
31.6
53.9
251
132
52.6
0
50.9
319
29.0
46.7
2910
34.5
44.4
0
57.5
136
46.2
49.1
4018
45.0
60.3
3
62.0
92
22.2
54.2
4818
37.5
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
PT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ngT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ng64
146
973
.260
,924
51,1
7684
.082
5972
.013
,026
10,7
4582
.51
; it_
f
I13
411
787
.3
II5
45.5
1,18
190
977
.0
Is
172
130
75.6
I48
142
187
.5
023
420
286
.3
0.1
3111
990
.8
1010
100.
01,
894
1,49
478
.9
416
211
872
.8
475
255
173
.3
2114
66.7
3,60
03,
172
88.1
0*
4
022
517
376
.9
353
039
774
.9
I18
1794
.4
236
327
174
.7
13II
84.6
1,06
386
681
.5
I23
018
580
.4
54
80.0
639
540
84.5
41,
213
1,06
387
.6
37
Nci
tes:
t The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all
the
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
strid
ent p
artic
ipat
ed.
:Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
rmat
.D
ata
not r
epen
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r te
sted
is fe
wer
than
five
. The
eth
nic
cate
gorie
s m
ay n
ot s
um to
tota
l num
ber
test
ed a
nd to
tal n
umbe
r pa
ssin
g be
caus
eet
hnic
cat
egor
y m
ay h
ave
not b
een
code
d.
"Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
epor
ting
purp
oses
the
char
ter
scho
ol n
ame
has
been
abb
revi
ated
The
com
plet
e na
me
can
be fo
und
in th
e A
ppen
dix.
Tot
al
Tab
le 7
d. 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
assi
ng(M
ultip
le-C
hoic
e an
dPe
rfor
man
ce)
for
the
Cla
ss o
f 20
03 a
t End
of
Gra
de 8
, by
LE
A a
nd E
thni
city
Nor
thea
st R
egio
nA
mer
ican
Indi
anA
sian
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Mul
ti-R
acia
lW
hite
I
'
1
Num
ber
Num
ber
Pt
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Sta
te95
,377
71,4
5774
.91,
433
861
60.1
1,66
41,
212
72.8
28,0
7116
,422
58.5
2,62
21,
303
49.7
641
469
73.2
60,9
2451
,176
84.0
Nor
thea
st R
egio
n6,
835
4,84
270
.836
2569
.027
2385
.23,
464
2,06
759
.770
3854
.318
1372
.23,
220
2,67
683
.1
Bea
ufor
t59
045
977
.80
225
317
167
.63
233
028
285
.5B
errie
295
226
76.6
10
229
174
76.0
I1
6350
79.4
Cam
den
9383
89.2
00
1713
76.5
00
7670
92.1
Ede
nton
/Cho
wan
209
170
81.3
00
9160
65.9
I3
114
107
93.9
Cur
rituc
k25
617
568
.43
123
1252
.24
I22
415
669
.6D
are
351
292
83.2
12
1510
66.7
97
77.8
3.3
2127
184
.4
Edg
ccom
be59
239
466
.60
1'
'334
201
60.2
143
21.4
I24
218
978
.1
Gat
es16
914
787
.00
078
6178
.20
091
8694
.5
Hal
ifax
480
261
54.4
2516
64.0
042
422
352
.6I
129
2172
.4
Roa
noke
Rap
ids
City
243
197
81.1
24
4628
60.9
3a
018
816
185
.6
Wel
don
City
6520
' 30.8
0a
161
2032
.80
03
Her
tford
339
197
58.1
I0
254
123
48.4
I1
8271
86.6
Hyd
e45
3781
20
022
1672
.70
023
2191
.3
Mar
tin38
226
068
.1I
020
2I 1
155
.08
'3
37.5
017
114
685
.4
Nor
tham
pton
291
211
72.5
00
223
151
67.7
11
6659
89.4
NO
Eliz
abet
h C
ity/P
asqu
otan
k 47
328
660
.5I
222
210
145
.5I
124
618
173
.6
Per
quim
ans
151
122
8b.8
00
6551
78.5
I0
8570
l''82
.4
Pitt
1.52
11:
112
73.1
I13
II84
.673
343
158
.820
1365
.03
751
654
87.1
Rig
ht S
tep
2712
44.4
00
2712
44.4
00
0
Tyr
rell
6548
73.8
00
.27
1970
.41
a0
3728
75.7
Was
hing
ton
198
133
67.2
0I
118
7966
.9I
078
5367
.9
BE
STC
OPY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
3839
Not
es:
t The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all
the
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ed.
Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
rmat
.D
ata
not r
epor
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r te
sted
is fe
wer
than
five
. The
eth
nic
cate
gorie
s m
ay n
ot s
um to
tota
l num
ber
test
ed a
nd to
tal n
umbe
r pa
ssin
g be
caus
eet
hnic
cat
egor
y m
ay h
ave
not b
een
code
d.rr
unne
Ar
a rh
,nA
r cr
lInn1
Fnr
rrn
nrtin
n nn
rnrw
e ilt
o rit
2npr
...k
rill!
nam
e hi
s be
en a
lthre
viat
ed T
he e
nmnl
ete
nam
e ca
n he
ran
d in
the
Ann
endi
a
Tab
le 7
e. 1
998-
99N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perf
orm
ance
) fo
r th
e C
lass
of
2003
at E
nd o
f Gra
Perc
ent P
assi
ng (
Mul
tiple
-Cho
ice
and
de 8
, by
LE
A a
nd E
thni
city
Tot
alA
mer
ican
Indi
anSo
uthe
ast R
egio
nA
sian
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Mul
ti-R
acia
lW
hite
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
P e
rcen
tN
umbe
rN
umbe
rPe
rcen
tN
umbe
rN
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
rN
umbe
rPe
rcen
tT
este
dPa
ssin
gPa
ssin
gT
este
dPa
ssin
gPa
ssin
gT
este
dPa
ssin
gPa
ssin
gT
este
dPa
ssin
gP
assi
ngP
Tes
ted
Pass
ing
Pass
ing
Tes
ted
Pass
ing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pass
ing
Pas
sing
Stat
e95
,377
71,4
5774
.91,
433
861
60.1
1,66
41,
212
72.8
28,0
7116
,422
58.5
2,62
21,
303
49.7
641
469
73.2
60,9
2451
,176
84.0
Sout
heas
t Reg
ion
17,4
6813
,126
75.1
1.01
358
357
.017
513
275
.46,
408
4,14
964
.750
233
566
.717
014
585
.39,
193
7,77
784
.6
Bla
den
411
273
65.5
0'19
010
555
.37
457
.10
219
-16
474
.9
Bru
nsw
ick
775
624
80.5
66
100.
01
183
124
67.8
64
66.7
357
648
684
.4
Car
tere
t68
656
982
.92
266
3654
.510
660
.03
603
522
86.6
Col
umbu
s61
042
669
.835
2365
.02
278
173
62.2
20
293
230
78.5
Whi
tevi
lle C
ity23
018
680
.92
093
6064
.52
II3
212
393
.2C
rave
n1,
051
833
79.3
312
I I
91.7
369
247
66.9
2014
70.0
76
85.7
.640
552
86.3
Cum
berl
and
3,81
32,
692
70.6
6937
53.0
6349
77.8
1,75
01,
073
61.3
186
138
74.2
5845
77.6
1,68
71,
350
80.0
Dup
l in
651
464
71.3
00
273
152
55.7
5130
58.8
I32
628
286
.5
Gre
ene
264
173
65.5
01
133
7556
.418
422
.21
1 1
192
82.9
Jone
s10
181
80.2
00
5442
77.8
0I
4638
82.6
Len
oir
815
646
79.3
23
408
291
71.3
136
46.2
88
100.0
376
333
88.6
New
Han
over
1,58
91,
323
83.3
147
50.0
2816
57.1
424
305
71.9
149
64.3
1614
87.5
1,09
397
288
.9
Ons
1,60
01,
460
91.3
2121
100.
033
2987
.939
636
993
.249
4910
0.0
5047
94.0
1,05
194
589
.9
PHA
SE A
cade
my"
156
40.0
0.0
123
25.0
02
Pam
lico
152
129
84,9
059
4067
.80
9187
95.6
Ara
paho
2625
96.2
03
00
2221
95.5
Pend
er46
434
14 73
.50
118
8370
.39
555
.6I
335
251
74.9
Rob
eson
1,89
81,
050
55..3
823
454
55.0
73
42.9
643
303
47.1
27I
I40
.73
395
277
70.1
CIS
Aca
dem
y23
1982
:615
1280
.00
65
83.3
00
2
Sam
pson
563
416
73.9
98
88.0
216
810
059
.540
2255
.05
480
.033
928
182
.9
Clin
ton
City
175
151
86.3
53
60.0
I84
6779
.86
583
.30
7975
94.9
Way
ne1,
550
1,23
979
.93
2017
85.0
698
493
70.6
4025
62.5
1210
83.3
775
692
89.3
BE
STC
OPY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
40
41
tote
s:}T
hese
dat
a re
pres
ent t
he h
ighe
st te
st s
core
of e
ach
stud
ent f
or a
ll th
e te
st a
dmin
istr
atio
ns in
whi
ch th
e st
uden
t par
ticip
ated
.M
ata
cann
ot b
e ve
rifie
d in
this
form
at.
'Dat
a no
t rep
orte
d w
here
num
ber
test
ed is
few
erth
anfiv
e. T
he e
thni
c ca
tego
ries
may
not
sum
to to
tal n
umbe
r te
sted
and
tota
l num
ber
pass
ing
beca
use
ethn
ic c
ateg
ory
may
hav
e no
t bee
n co
ded.
t-ti.
ur,fr
t a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
orre
noni
nenu
rnos
es th
e ch
arte
r sc
hool
nam
e ha
s be
en a
bbre
viat
ed. T
he c
ompl
ete
nam
e ca
n be
foun
d in
the
App
endi
x.
Tab
le 7
f. 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
assi
ng (
Mul
tiple
-Cho
ice
and
Perf
orm
ance
) fo
r th
e C
lass
of
2003
at E
nd o
f G
rade
8, b
yL
EA
and
Eth
nici
tyC
entr
al R
egio
nT
otal
Am
eric
an In
dian
Asi
anB
lack
His
pani
cM
ulti-
Rac
ial
Whi
te
Num
ber
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Sta
leC
entr
al R
egio
n95
,377
28,5
3671
,457
21,3
50
Ala
man
ce-B
urlin
gton
1,52
41,
118
Lake
side
Sch
ool
2
Riv
er M
ill C
hart
er"
1815
Cas
wel
l25
520
5
Cha
tham
529
423
Cha
tham
Cha
rter
12I 1
Woo
ds C
hart
er"
131
1
Dur
ham
2,23
21,
434
Can
er C
omm
unity
"6
0
Kes
trel
I ki
ghts
"30
15
Fra
nklin
551
346
Gra
nvill
e58
949
4
Gui
lford
4,51
73,
703
Iman
i Ins
titut
e"10
13
I lam
ett
1,20
991
6
IJ
John
ston
IJ
1,38
61,
138
Lee
677
509 i
Nas
h-R
ocky
Mou
nt1,
338
752
Ora
nge
372
329
Ora
nge
Co.
Cha
rter
"11
8
Cha
pel h
ill-C
arrb
oro
City
689
556
Vill
age
Cha
rter
"I
Per
son
419
336
Ran
dolp
h1,
266
982
Ash
ebor
o C
ity29
123
8
Roc
king
ham
1,10
687
6
Van
ce55
034
6
Wak
e7,
555
5,64
6
Mag
ella
n"59
56
Eas
t Wak
e A
cade
my"
3628
San
kore
Sch
ool"
133
War
ren
288
73
Wils
on97
476
9
Not
es:
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
74.9
1,43
386
160
.11,
664
1,21
272
.828
,071
16,4
2258
.52,
622
1,30
349
.7
74.8
139
8863
.060
743
972
.39,
441
5,53
858
.793
442
745
.7
73.4
73
42.0
1912
63.2
390
249
63.8
7525
33.3
00
00
83.3
00
00
80.4
00
109
7972
.52
80.0
03
124
7963
.743
1739
.5
91.7
I0
I0
84.6
00
I0
64.2
53
60.0
3426
76.5
1,26
564
651
.160
2643
.3
0.0.
00
40
50.0
00
175
29.4
0
h2.8
54
80.0
322
594
41.8
84
50.0
83.9
24
218
173
79.4
147
50.0
82.0
3828
73.0
165
124
75.2
1,65
81,
118
67.4
6646
69.7
72.2
00
16I I
68.8
0
75.8
13I I
84.0
54
80.0
354
223
63.0
5036
72.0
82.1
34
283
199
70.3
9040
44.4
1
75.2
47
571
.417
410
560
.376
3748
.7
56.2
,
88.4
6 3
466
.014 2
857
.170
5
61
275
51
39.0
83.6
42 6
15 5
35.7
83.3
72.7
00
20
80.7
I42
3378
.698
4950
.013
430
.8
00
00
80.2
10
146
9565
.1I
77.6
75
71.0
359
3661
.042
1740
.5
81.8
16
466
.748
3572
.931
2064
.5
79.2
44.
237
144
60.8
2516
64.0
62.9
33
361
201
55.7
73
42.9
74.7
2013
65.0
279
194
69.5
2,13
41.
255
58.8
244
8735
.7
94.9
02
75
71.4
0
77.8
00
30
23.1
00
122
16.7
0
25.3
131
7.0
019
735
17.8
1
79.0
28
450
.053
236
869
.238
2155
.3
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
641
469
73.2
60,9
2451
,176
84.0
244
156
63.9
17,1
6214
,697
85.6
127
58.3
1,02
182
280
.5'
1I
018
1583
.3
414
012
387
.9
64
66.7
353
320
90.7
010
990
.0
39
888
.9
4530
66.7
819
700
85.5
02
013
1076
.9
430
623
978
.1
334
830
687
.9
5643
76.8
2,52
92,
342
92.6
02
137
53.8
774
635
-82.
0
41,
002
888
'',88
.6
74
57.1
409
355
86.8
52
40.0
566
448
79.2
I29
926
889
.6
27
571
.4
6I
16.7
529
468
88.5
01
226
923
888
.5
31,
152
921
79.9
020
517
987
.3
483
270
684
.9
017
613
878
.4
5728
49.1
4,82
14,
069
84.4
I49
4898
.0
033
2575
.8
I0
077
3748
.1
439
037
295
.4
0-he
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
hst
uden
t for
all
the
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ed.
:Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
rmat
.D
ata
not r
epor
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r te
sted
is fe
wer
than
five
. The
ethn
ic c
ateg
orie
s m
ay n
ot s
um to
tota
l num
ber
test
ed a
nd to
tal n
umbe
r pa
ssin
g be
caus
eet
hnic
cat
egor
y m
ay h
ave
not b
een
code
d.
--*
hP^,
rom
niel
e na
me
can
he fo
nd in
the
Ann
endm
4
BE
ST
CO
PY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
Tab
le 8
a. 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
assi
ng (
Mul
tiple
-C
hoic
e an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce)
for
the
Cla
ss o
f 20
02 a
t End
of
Gra
de 9
, by
LE
Aan
d E
thni
city
-W
este
rn R
egio
nT
otal
Am
eric
an In
dian
Asi
anB
lack
His
pani
cM
ulti-
Rac
ial
Whi
te
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Sta
te96
,431
73,8
3976
.61,
542
958
62.1
1,76
41,
237
70.1
28,8
0918
,105
62.8
2,49
51,
265
50.7
601
1Ves
tern
Reg
ion
7,50
36,
272
83.6
9979
79.8
5143
84.3
499
351
70.3
118
7261
.048
Bun
com
be1,
891
1,60
184
.78
787
.515
II73
.310
678
73.6
2718
66.7
11
Ash
evill
e C
ity34
122
064
.52
311
969
58.0
83
37.5
5
Che
roke
e30
927
388
.38
810
0.0
06
583
.32
2
Cla
y12
110
889
.3I
00
00
Gra
ham
7770
90.9
77
100.
00
00
0
Hay
woo
d66
654
882
.33
212
1191
.712
1191
.72
Hen
ders
on95
780
984
.52
'8
810
0.0
5535
63.6
5026
52.0
10
Jack
son
300
253
84.3
3022
73.3
22
'I
5
Mac
on36
527
074
.01
46
583
.3I
2
Mad
ison
195
165
84.6
0.
00
'0
0
McD
owel
l43
839
590
.20
1414
100.
016
1593
.82
3
Mitc
hell
200
168
184.
00
0a
I2
0
Pol
k19
716
548
3.8
00
1913
68.4
32
Rut
herf
ord
758
623
i82
.20
212
187
71.9
76
85.7
3
Sw
ain
159
125
78.6
3428
82.4
0I
I1
Tra
nsyl
vani
a36
632
2$8
.02
134
2882
.41
2
Yan
cey
163
157
96.3
I0
1I
0
BE
ST C
OPY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
44
446
74.2
61,2
0051
,819
84.7
3572
.96,
688
5,69
285
.1
981
.81,
724
1,47
885
.7
480
.020
414
370
.1
291
256
88.0
120
107
89.2
7063
90.0
635
520
81.9
660
.083
273
388
.1
480
.026
022
385
.8
'35
125
973
.8
195
165
84.6
403
362
89.8
197
165
83.8
'17
314
986
.'
625
526
84.2
122
9678
.7
326
291
89.3
160
156
97.5
45
Not
es:
t The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all
the
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ed.
t Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
rmat
.D
ata
not r
epor
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r te
sted
is fe
wer
than
five
. The
ethn
ic c
ateg
orie
s m
ay n
ot s
um to
tota
l num
ber
test
ed a
nd to
tal n
umbe
r pa
ssin
g be
caus
e an
ethn
ic c
ateg
ory
may
not
hav
e be
en c
oded
.
Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
epor
ting
purp
oses
the
char
tersc
hool
nam
e ha
s be
en a
bbre
viat
ed. T
he c
ompl
ete
nam
e ca
n be
foun
d in
the
App
endi
x.
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om L
EA
s af
ter
Apr
il 30
, 200
0 ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
this
tabl
e.
Tab
le 8
b. 1
998-
99N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of C
ompu
ter
Skill
sPe
rcen
t Pas
sing
(Mul
tiple
-C
hoic
e an
dPe
rfor
man
ce)
for
the
Cla
ss o
f 20
02 a
tE
nd o
f G
rade
9, b
y L
EA
and
Eth
nici
ty
Nor
thw
est R
egio
nT
otal
Am
eric
an In
dian
Asi
anB
lack
His
pani
cM
ulti-
Rac
ial
Whi
te
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cen
Pas
sin;
Sta
te96
,431
73,8
3976
.61,
542
958
62.1
1,76
41,
237
70.1
28,8
0918
,105
62.8
2,49
51,
265
50.7
601
446
74.2
61,2
0051
,819
84. /
Nor
thw
est R
egio
n14
,777
11,7
4079
.434
2367
.637
025
067
.62,
105
1,26
560
.136
015
342
.563
5079
.411
,845
9,99
984
.4.
Ale
xand
er41
535
685
.80
*11
436
.421
1781
.03
038
033
487
.9
Alle
ghan
y10
397
94.2
00
2I
0*
100
9494
.0
Ash
e27
323
686
.40
01
7I
14.3
0a
265
234
88.3
Ave
ry20
114
672
.60
00
a0
020
114
672
.6
Bur
ke1,
045
816
78.1
310
982
75.2
7645
59.2
307
23.3
97
77.8
818
.673
82.3
Cal
dwel
l91
276
684
.04
370
5375
.711
545
.52
*82
270
185
,3
Cat
awba
1,17
985
872
.83
6239
62.9
6944
63.8
1812
66.7
31,
024
761
74.3
Hic
kory
City
298
230
77.2
031
1961
.366
4669
.76
233
.33
192
160
83.3
New
ton
Con
over
City
178
151
84.8
015
1386
.717
1164
.712
541
.70
134
122
91.0
Dav
idso
n1,
533
1,29
0,8
4.t
52
40.0
54
80.0
3827
71.1
128
66.7
31,
470
1,24
684
.8
Lexi
ngto
n C
ity23
613
958
.90
2113
61.9
117
6353
.817
423
.55
510
0.0
7654
71.1
Tho
mas
ville
City
171
8046
.80
295
3637
.910
440
.00
6439
60.9
Dav
ie43
840
8'9
3.2
23
4840
83.3
53
60.0
137
936
095
.0
Win
ston
-Sal
em/F
orsy
th3,
000
2,30
047
6.7
76
85.7
4633
71.7
1,00
363
162
.910
836
33.3
2821
75.0
1,80
81,
573
87.0
Lift
Aca
dem
y*42
10
0.0
00
420
0.0
00
0.
Ired
ell-S
tate
svill
e1,
245
851
68.4
4a
3422
64.7
262
123
46.9
2515
60.0
391
768
474
.6
Moo
resv
ille
City
321
249
77.6
0*
53
60.0
4521
46.7
01
*27
022
583
.3
Sto
kes
638
551
86.4
2a
2922
75.9
98
88.9
259
651
886
.4
Sur
ry64
355
386
.02
325
1872
.035
1645
.72
576
515
89.4
Elk
in C
ity77
7293
.50
05
510
0.0
53
60.0
067
6495
.5
Mou
nt A
iry C
ity11
710
085
.50
105
50.0
1513
86.7
2*
0*
9080
88.9
Wat
auga
447
415
92.8
03
3*
10
440
408
92.7
Wilk
es82
869
083
.30
62
33.3
4132
78.0
187
38.9
176
264
885
.0
Yad
kin
437
386
88.3
21
1512
80.0
2512
48.0
039
436
091
.4
4647
Not
es:
't T
hese
dat
a re
pres
ent t
he h
ighe
stte
st s
core
of e
ach
stud
ent f
or a
ll th
ete
st a
dmin
istr
atio
ns in
whi
ch th
e st
uden
tpa
rtic
ipat
ed.
t Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
rmat
.D
ata
not r
epor
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r test
ed is
few
er th
an fi
ve. T
he e
thni
cca
tego
ries
may
not
sum
to to
tal n
umbe
rte
sted
and
tota
l num
ber
pass
ing
beca
use
an e
thni
c ca
tego
ry m
ay n
ot h
ave
been
cod
ed.
Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
epor
ting
purp
oses
the
char
ter
scho
ol n
ame
has
been
abbr
evia
ted.
The
com
plet
ena
me
can
be fo
und
in th
e A
ppen
dix.
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om L
EA
s af
ter
Apr
il30
, 200
0 ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
this
tabl
e.B
ES
T C
OP
Y A
VA
ILA
BLE
Tab
le 8
c. 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
assi
ng (
Mul
tiple
-C
hoic
e an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce)
for
the
Cla
ss o
f 20
02 a
t End
of
Gra
de 9
, by
LE
A a
nd E
thni
city
Sout
hwes
t Reg
ion
Tot
alA
mer
ican
Indi
anA
sian
Bla
ckHispanic
Mul
ti-R
acia
lW
hite
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
gass
ing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Sta
te96
,431
73,8
3976
.61,
542
958
62.1
1,76
41,
237
70.1
28,8
0918
,105
62.8
2,49
51,
265
50.7
601
446
74.2
61,2
0051
,819
84.7
Sou
thw
est R
egio
n21
,375
16,3
1076
.320
412
159
.351
836
971
.26,
867
4,16
260
.656
727
949
.264
4570
.313
,154
11,3
3386
.1
Ans
on33
821
463
.32
221
812
256
.00
011
689
76.7
Cab
arru
s1,
441
1,20
783
.85
510
0.0
109
90.0
196
117
59.7
3015
50.0
65
83.3
1,19
41,
056
88.4
Kan
napo
lis C
ity34
526
075
.40
412
173
60.3
136
46.2
220
517
685
.9
Cle
vela
nd68
951
875
.20
.1
150
8858
.74
053
342
880
.3
Kin
gs M
ount
ain
City
303
257
84.8
19
777
.873
5169
.92
221
619
690
.7
She
lby
City
239
158
66.1
04
129
6449
.60
210
490
86.5
Gas
ton
2,37
91,
900
79.9
117
63.6
3520
57.1
477
325
68.1
3215
46.9
66
100.
01,
818
1,52
784
.0
Hok
e49
135
872
.971
4259
.24
250
168
67.2
15I I
73.3
414
713
088
.4
Linc
oln
763
641
84.0
03
6842
61.8
4325
58.1
164
857
188
.1
Cha
rlotte
/Mec
klen
burg
8,07
05,
932
73.5
3318
54.5
351
259
73.8
3,59
92,
122
59.0
274
131
47.8
1510
66.7
3,79
83,
392
89.3
Ken
nedy
Cha
rter
"8
112
.50
40
I2
Mon
tgom
ery
383
324
.84.
61
2016
80.0
117
9076
.932
2062
.52
211
195
92.4
Moo
re91
475
882
.910
880
.02
239
175
73.2
2213
59.1
64
66.7
635
557
87.7
Ric
hmon
d58
039
11
67.4
92
22.2
324
014
660
.817
635
.32
309
233
75.4
Row
an-S
alis
bury
1,56
41,
152
73.7
323
1669
.632
216
450
.935
1851
.45
360
.01,
176
949
80.7
Sco
tland
606
434
71.6
4628
60.9
64
66.7
279
177
63.4
I0
274
225
82.1
Sta
n ly
750
564
75.2
84
50.0
29II
37.9
9553
55.8
11I
9.1
62
33.3
601
493
82.0
Uni
on1,
512
.1,2
4182
.14
1 I
872
.729
018
563
.836
1644
.44
°1,
167
1,02
687
.9
49
48
Mite
s:t T
hese
dat
a re
pres
ent t
he h
ighe
st te
st s
core
of e
ach
stud
ent f
or a
ll th
e te
st a
dmin
istr
atio
nsin
whi
ch th
e st
uden
t par
ticip
ated
.
Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
nnat
.D
ala
not r
epor
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r te
sted
is fe
wer
than
five
. The
eth
nic
cate
gorie
s m
ay n
ot s
um to
tota
l num
ber
test
ed a
nd to
tal n
umbe
r pa
ssin
g be
caus
e an
eth
nic
cate
gory
may
not
hav
e be
en c
oded
.
"Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
epor
ting
purp
oses
the
char
ter
scho
ol n
ame
has
been
abb
revi
ated
. The
com
plet
e na
me
can
be fo
und
in th
e A
ppen
dix.
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om L
EA
s af
ter
Apr
il 30
, 200
0 ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
this
tabl
e.
Tab
le 8
d. 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
assi
ng (
Mul
tiple
-C
hoic
e an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce)
for
the
Cla
ss o
f 20
02 a
t End
of
Gra
de 9
, by
LE
A a
nd E
thni
city
Nor
thea
st R
egio
nT
otal
Am
eric
an In
dian
Asi
anB
lack
His
pani
cM
ulti-
Rac
ial
Whi
teN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
rP
assi
ngP
erce
ntP
assi
ngN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
rP
assi
ngP
erce
ntP
assi
ngN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
rP
assi
ngP
erce
ntP
assi
ngN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
rP
assi
ngP
erce
ntP
assi
ngN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
rP
assi
ngP
erce
ntP
assi
ngN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
rP
assi
ngP
erce
ntP
assi
ngN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
rP
assi
ngP
erce
ntP
assi
ng
Sla
te. 9
6,43
173
,839
76.6
1,54
295
862
.11,
764
1,23
770
.128
,809
18,1
0562
.82,
495
1,26
550
.760
144
674
.261
,200
51,8
1984
.7
Nor
thea
st R
egio
n7,
508
5,16
668
.841
3175
.635
2468
.64,
084
2,36
357
.967
3755
.229
1862
.13,
252
2,69
382
.8
Bea
ufor
t59
547
479
.70
52
40.0
260
180
69.2
107
70.0
231
828
489
.3
Ber
tie35
621
660
.70
130
117
357
.50
a0
5442
77.8
Cam
den
109
9889
.90
026
2076
.90
083
7894
.0
Ede
nton
/Cho
wan
239
207
86.6
00
110
8577
.33
212
411
895
.2
Cur
rituc
k29
823
779
.5I
e1
3624
66.7
1'
225
72.
1182
.1
Dar
e36
631
185
.00
020
1575
.07
571
.40
339
291
85.8
Edg
ecom
be66
935
553
.10
'1
423
210
49.6
145
35.7
I23
013
860
.0
Gat
es16
813
781
.50
083
6274
.70
I84
7488
.1
Hal
ifax
578
387
67.0
.34
2985
.30
520
339
65.2
I1
2218
81.8
Roa
noke
Rap
ids
City
218
192
88.1
0."
336
2569
.43
1a
175
161
92.0
Wel
don
City
127
6853
.50
011
560
52.2
0a
Ia
II7
63.6
Her
tford
414
178
143.
02
a0
342
125
36.5
04
6649
74.2
ts..)
Hyd
e60
500
030
2480
.00
030
2686
.7O
N48
3.3
Mar
tin41
4i
315
76.1
04
227.
152
67.0
3'
018
0,16
189
.4
Nor
tham
pton
363
197
54.3
0'
028
314
651
.60
a1
7950
63.3
Eliz
abet
h C
ity/P
asqu
otan
k 53
626
449
.3I
53
60.0
293
III37
.94
a3
230
145
63.0
Per
quim
ans
176
142
80.7
00
6847
69.1
2a
110
592
87.6
Pitt
1,53
01,
127
73.7
3a
1412
85.7
709
437
61.6
176
35.3
82
25.0
779
669
85.9
Rig
ht S
tep*
4315
34.9
00
a42
1433
.30
01
Tyr
rell
5954
91.5
01
3128
90.3
I0
2624
92.1
.
Was
hing
ton
190
142
74.7
0'
012
986
66.7
1a
Ia
5954
91.5
50-
51
Not
es:
The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
riden
t for
all
the
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ed.
Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
rmat
.D
ata
not r
epor
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r te
sted
is fe
wer
than
five
. The
eth
nic
cate
gorie
s m
ay n
ot s
um to
tota
l num
ber
test
ed a
nd to
tal n
umbe
r pa
ssin
g be
caus
ean
eth
nic
cate
gory
may
not
hav
e be
en c
oded
.
"Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
epor
ting
purp
oses
the
char
ter
scho
ol n
ame
has
been
abb
revi
ated
. The
com
plet
e na
me
can
be fo
und
in th
e A
ppen
dix.
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om L
EA
s af
ter
Apr
il 30
. 200
0 ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
this
tabl
e.
Tab
le 8
e. 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
assi
ng (
Mul
tiple
-C
hoic
e an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce)
for
the
Cla
ss o
f 20
02 a
t End
of
Gra
de 9
, by
LE
A a
nd E
thni
city
Sout
heas
t Reg
ion
Tot
alA
mer
ican
Indi
anA
sian
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Mul
ti-R
acia
lW
hite
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Num
ber
Num
ber
Per
cent
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
'P
assi
ngP
assi
ng
, Sta
te96
,431
73,8
3976
.61,
542
958
62.1
1,76
41,
237
70.1
28,8
0918
,105
62.8
2,49
51,
265
50.7
601
446
Sout
heas
t Reg
ion
18,7
9013
,604
72.4
1,04
263
060
.519
615
478
.66,
947
4,56
965
.859
736
461
.015
911
9
Bla
den
429
308
71.8
20
223
156
70.0
I0
Bru
nsw
ick
780
641
82.2
1I
216
162
75.0
149
64.3
4
Car
tere
t76
563
783
.34
54
80.0
9252
56.5
73
42.9
77
NC
Sch
ool o
f Mar
itim
e49
1530
.60
'0
a4
I'
I
Col
umbu
s62
340
765
.333
2575
.80
265
151
57.0
30
Whi
tevi
lle C
ity19
315
077
.71
285
5564
.70
0
Cra
ven
1,19
41,
026
85.9
216
1275
.040
830
073
.528
2175
.04
Cum
berla
nd4,
010
2,69
067
.186
5462
.885
6981
.21,
844
1,14
061
.821
414
165
.941
33
Dup
lin73
948
565
.60
'0
263
145
55.1
7232
44.4
1
Gre
ene
245
135
55.1
00
134
7052
.217
423
.50
I
Jone
s11
553
46.1
00
7129
40.8
1.
0y
Leno
ir91
881
388
.6I
76
85.7
509
442
86.1
;20
1680
.0I
t,..)
---.
1N
ew H
anov
er1,
823
1,20
966
.38
675
.014
1178
.649
123
547
.920
1155
.010
8
Ons
low
1,94
11,
190
61.3
2516
64.0
4229
69.0
465
237
51.0
7742
. 54.
566
41
Pam
lico
191
151
79.1
21
6549
75.4
12
Pen
der
572
522
91.3
01
261
241
92.3
2121
100.
0I
Rob
eson
1,96
51,
228
62.5
861
505
58.7
75
71.4
620
350
56.5
239
39.1
3
Sam
pson
487
372
76.4
4a
015
597
62.6
259
36.0
0
Clin
ton
City
200
176
88.0
88
100.
01
9674
77.1
54
80.0
2
Way
ne1,
551
1,39
690
.04
1414
100.
068
058
385
.747
3880
.916
16
BE
ST C
OPY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
52
74.2
74.8
100.
0
80.5
80.0
62.1
100.
0 53
61;2
0651
,819
84.7
9,84
07,
768
78.9
203
149
73.4
544
467
85..1
650
568
87.4
4213
31.0
322
231
71.7
105
9287
.6
736
687
93.3
1,74
01,
253
72.0
403
308
76.4
9461
64.9
4323
53.5
376
349
92.8
1,28
093
873
.3
1,26
682
565
.2
120
9680
.0
288
258
89.6
451
356
78.9
303
264
87.1
8888
100.
0
786
742
94.4
Not
es:
The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all
the
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ed.
t Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
nnat
.D
ata
not r
epor
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r te
sted
is fe
wer
than
five
. The
eth
nic
cate
gorie
s m
ay n
ot s
umto
tota
l num
ber
test
ed a
nd to
tal n
umbe
r pa
ssin
g be
caus
e an
eth
nic
cate
gory
may
not
have
bee
n co
ded.
Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
epor
ting
purp
oses
the
char
ter
scho
ol n
ame
has
been
abb
revi
ated
. The
com
plet
e na
me
can
be fo
und
in th
e A
ppen
dix.
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om L
EA
s af
ter
Apr
il 30
, 200
0 ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
this
tabl
e.
IJ W
Sta
le
Cen
tral
Reg
ion
Ala
man
ce-B
urlin
gton
Lake
side
Sch
ool"
Riv
er M
ill C
hart
er
Cas
wel
l
Cha
tham
Woo
ds C
hart
er
Dur
ham
Kes
trel
Hei
ghts
Fra
nklin
Gra
nvill
e
Gui
lford
Har
nett
John
ston
Lee
Nas
h-R
ocky
Mou
nt
Ora
nge
Cha
pel H
ill-C
arrb
oro
City
New
Cen
tury
Sch
ool*
Per
son
Ran
dolp
h
Ash
ebor
o C
ity
Roc
king
ham
Van
ce
Wak
e
J.H
. Bak
er J
r H
igh
War
ren
Wils
on
54
Tab
le 8
f .19
98-9
9 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
assi
ng(M
ultip
le-
Cho
ice
and
Perf
orm
ance
) fo
r th
e C
lass
of
2002
at E
nd o
f G
rade
9, b
y L
EA
and
Eth
nici
ty
Cen
tral
Reg
ion
Tot
alA
mer
ican
Indi
anA
sian
Bla
ckN
umbe
r N
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
r N
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
r N
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
r N
umbe
rP
erce
ntT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ngT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ngT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ngT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ng
96,4
31
26,4
78
1,58
6
18 23 283
484
11
1,92
1
20 528
567
4,45
8
1,12
5
1,40
1
618
1,42
9
362
749
24 465
1,23
6
301
1,03
5
523
6,12
9
8 282
892
Num
ber
Tes
ted
His
pani
cN
umbe
r P
erce
ntP
assi
ngP
assi
ng
Mul
ti-R
acia
lN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
r
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Whi
teN
umbe
r N
umbe
r P
erce
ntT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ng
73,8
3976
.61,
542
958
62.1
1,76
41,
237
70.1
28,8
0918
,105
62.8
2,49
51,
265
50.7
601
446
74.2
61,2
0051
,819
84.7
20,7
4778
.412
274
60.7
594
397
66.8
8.30
75,
395
64.9
786
360
45.8
238
179
75.2
16,4
2114
,334
87.3
1,22
877
.42
.23
II47
.839
827
769
.670
2332
.914
1392
.91,
079
902
83.6
527
.80
011
218
.20
63
50.0
1773
.90
00
02
2115
71.4
235
83.0
20
122
9376
.20
158
140
88.6
378
78.1
I2
133
9571
.444
1329
.52
302
266
88.1
545
.50
00
23
63
50.0
1,25
265
.28
225
.055
2443
.696
052
654
.858
1525
.931
2064
.580
966
582
.2
1050
.00
012
433
.30
08
675
.0
417
79.0
32
229
155
67.7
96
66.7
2'28
325
188
.7
454
80.1
02
242
169
69.8
103
30.0
312
280
89.7
3,73
983
.935
1954
.315
910
767
.31,
545
1,10
671
.660
4371
.773
;66
90.4
2,57
62,
390
92.8
666
59.2
126
50.0
332
116
150
.256
2035
.716
956
.371
747
065
.6
1,18
984
.95
480
.012
1083
.330
421
470
.410
142
41.6
75
71.4
972
914
94.0
525
85.0
33
159
121
76.1
4623
50.0
55
100.
040
237
192
.3
972
68.0
75
71.4
159
60.0
709
417
58.8
3317
51.5
6.
350
.065
952
179
.1
349
96.4
00
7573
97.3
46
610
0.0
277
266
96.0
615
82.1
446
4087
.012
173
60.3
2214
63.6
129
75.0
544
476
87.5
1354
.20
01
I0
2213
59.1
405
87.1
22
155
117
75.5
65
83.3
030
027
993
.0
1,03
583
.711
872
.76
583
.364
4570
.328
1553
.63
1,12
496
185
.5
262
87.0
07
571
.448
4083
.329
1551
.71
216
201
93.1
834
80.6
35
360
.025
517
468
.216
956
.34
752
643
85.5
394
75.3
14
312
204
65.4
107
70.0
419
217
691
.1
4,95
680
.911
872
.724
417
069
.71,
420
922
64.9
157
7749
.045
2657
.84,
252
3,75
388
.3
225
.00
07
228
.60
0
134
47.5
125
41.7
022
999
43.2
00
4130
73.2
656
73.5
04
475
306
64.4
229
40.9
139
033
986
.9
55
Not
es:
The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all
the
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ed.
Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
rmat
Dat
a no
t rep
orte
d w
here
num
ber
test
ed is
few
er th
an fi
ve. T
he e
thni
c ca
tego
ries
may
not
sum
to to
tal n
umbe
r te
sted
and
tota
l num
ber
pass
ing
beca
use
an e
thni
c ca
tego
ry m
ay n
ot h
ave
been
cod
ed.
Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
epor
ting
purp
oses
the
char
ter
scho
ol n
ame
has
been
abb
revi
ated
. The
com
plet
e na
me
can
be fo
und
in th
e A
ppen
dix.
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om L
EA
s M
ier
Apr
il 30
, 200
0. a
re n
ot in
clud
ed in
this
tabl
e.
t ..)
Tab
le 9
a. 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
assi
ng (
Mul
tiple
-C
hoic
e an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce)
for
the
Cla
ss o
f 20
01 a
t End
of
Gra
de 1
0, b
y L
EA
and
Eth
nici
ty
Wes
tern
Reg
ion
Tot
alA
mer
ican
Ind
ian
Asi
anB
lack
His
pani
cM
ulti-
Rac
ial
Whi
teN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
rP
assi
ngP
erce
ntP
assi
ngN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
rP
assi
ngP
erce
ntP
assi
ngN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
rP
assi
ngP
erce
ntP
assi
ngN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
rP
assi
ngP
erce
ntP
assi
ngN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
rP
assi
ngP
erce
ntP
assi
ngN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
rP
assi
ngP
erce
ntP
assi
ngN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
rP
assi
ngP
erce
ntP
assi
ng
Stat
e79
,385
64,1
6680
.81,
077
749
69.5
1,52
21,
108
72.8
22,6
3615
,652
69.1
1,61
099
361
.741
930
272
.152
,092
45,3
4587
.0
Wes
tern
Reg
ion
6,24
85,
348
85.6
8061
76.3
4739
83.0
400
304
76.0
7751
66.2
3217
53.1
5,61
24,
876
86.9
Bun
com
be1,
617
1,41
587
.58
787
.522
1777
.375
6080
.024
2083
.314
1071
.41,
474
1,30
188
.3
Ash
evill
e C
ity31
424
377
.4I
110
882
75.9
126
50.0
4..
188
155
82.4
Che
roke
e24
521
788
.66
583
.3I.
I3
223
220
688
.8
Cla
y97
8587
.60
00
00
9785
87.6
Gra
ham
7465
87.8
1010
100.
00
00
064
5585
.9
Ilayw
ood
485
415
85.6
20
84
50.0
23
470
407
86.6
Hen
ders
on75
964
785
.22
87
87.5
4631
67.4
169
56.3
468
359
687
.3
Jack
son
270
226
83.7
1610
62.5
23
20
247
212
85.8
Mac
on26
518
971
.3I
24
2q
256
184
71.9
Mad
ison
162
136
84.0
00
10
016
113
583
.9
McD
owel
l42
236
185
.5I
99
100.
022
1672
.70
039
033
585
.9
Mitc
hell
160
138
86.3
02
00
015
813
786
.7
Pol
k13
712
389
.8I
a0
1210
83.3
40
120
109
90.8
Rut
herf
ord
662
584
88.2
00
100
8080
.06
466
.70
556
500
89.9
Sw
ain
138
110
79.7
3023
76.7
0I
23
102
8583
.3
Tra
nsyl
vani
a29
224
684
.22
017
1376
.50
227
123
185
.2
Yan
cey
149
148
99.3
00
24
0t
143
143
100.
0
BE
ST
CO
PY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
56
Not
es:
The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all
the
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ed.
I Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
rmat
.'D
ata
not r
epor
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r te
sted
is fe
wer
than
five
. The
eth
nic
cate
gorie
s m
ay n
ot s
um to
tota
l num
ber
test
ed a
nd to
tal n
umbe
r pa
ssin
g be
caus
eet
hnic
cat
egor
y m
ay n
ot h
ave
been
cod
ed.
"Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
epor
ting
purp
oses
the
char
ter
scho
ol n
ame
has
been
abb
revi
ated
. The
com
plet
e na
me
can
be fo
und
in th
e A
ppen
dix.
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om L
EA
s al
ter
Apr
il 30
. 200
0 ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
this
tabl
e.
Tab
le 9
b. 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
assi
ng (
Mul
tiple
-C
hoic
e an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce)
for
the
Cla
ss o
f 20
01 a
t End
of
Gra
de 1
0, b
y L
EA
and
Eth
nici
ty
Nor
thw
est R
egio
nT
otal
Am
eric
an In
dian
Asi
anB
lack
His
pani
cM
ulti-
Rac
ial
Whi
te
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Sta
te79
,385
64,1
6680
.81,
077
749
69.5
1,52
21,
108
72.8
22,6
3615
,652
69.1
1,61
099
361
.741
930
272
.152
,092
45,3
4587
.0
Nor
thw
est R
egio
n12
,232
10,4
4085
.320
1575
.026
719
171
.51,
726
1,25
872
.924
015
263
.342
2866
.79,
937
8,79
688
.5
Ale
xand
er31
429
092
.40
7 '
5 -
'..71
.418
1688
.93
028
626
693
.0
Alle
ghan
y10
298
96.1
00
02
010
096
96.0
Ash
e22
420
491
.10
02
'0
022
220
291
.0
Ave
ry16
413
884
.10
00
II
162
136
84.0
Bur
ke88
975
785
.24
a83
6578
.361
4878
.719
1 1
57.9
371
962
787
.2
Cal
dwel
l77
967
887
.00
355
3970
.98
562
.53
710
630
88.7
Cat
awba
1,02
580
278
.22
5331
58.5
6847
69.1
2113
61.9
52
40.0
876
708
80.8
Hic
kory
City
242
180
74.4
019
1157
.940
1947
.57
685
.71
175
144
82.3
New
ton
Con
over
City
214
203
94.9
017
1482
.440
3895
.09
666
.71:
147
145
98.6
Dav
idso
n1,
152
978
84.9
52
40.0
86
75.0
1916
84.2
95
55.6
3,
1,10
894
685
.4
Lexi
ngto
n C
ity14
712
585
.00
.10
880
.068
5682
.43
1y
6559
90.8
Tho
mas
ville
City
122
7561
.50
0a
5729
50.9
93
33.3
155
4276
.4
Dav
ie36
034
495
.60
433
3193
.93
032
030
695
.6
Win
ston
-Sal
em/F
orsy
th2,
626
2,26
686
.33
2118
85.7
867
648
74.7
7044
62.9
149
64.3
1,65
11,
544
93.5
Lill
Aca
dem
y"18
211
.10
018
211
.10
00
Ired
ell-S
tate
svill
e99
878
478
.61
2113
61.9
205
140
68.3
1310
76.9
075
862
081
.8
Moo
resv
ille
City
243
189
77.8
08
787
.541
.
3175
.63
0t
191
148
77.5
Sto
kes
485
406
83.7
32
1712
70.6
3a
245
838
984
.9
Sur
ry52
749
193
.20
Ia
3624
66.7
1913
68.4
147
045
396
.4
Elk
in C
ity84
7892
.90
0a
53
60.0
20
7775
97.4
Mou
nt A
iry C
ity13
012
193
.11
a7
571
.411
1090
.92
010
910
495
.4
Wat
auga
354
331
93.5
II
43
2a
343
320
'542
93.3
Wilk
es67
757
885
.40
242
2866
.713
646
.22
618
87.7
Yad
kin
356
322
90.4
00
1915
78.9
1811
61.1
231
729
492
.7
5859
Not
es:
r T
hese
dat
a re
pres
ent t
he h
ighe
st te
st s
core
of e
ach
stud
ent f
or a
ll th
e te
st a
dmin
istr
atio
ns in
whi
ch th
e st
uden
t par
ticip
ated
.
Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
rmat
.D
ata
not r
epor
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r te
sted
is fe
wer
than
five
. The
eth
nic
cate
gorie
s m
ay n
ot s
umto
tota
l num
ber
test
ed a
nd to
tal n
umbe
r pa
ssin
g be
caus
e et
hnic
cat
egor
y m
ay n
otha
ve b
een
code
d.
"Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
epor
ting
purp
oses
the
char
ter
scho
ol n
ame
has
been
abb
revi
ated
. The
com
plet
e na
me
can
be fo
und
in th
e A
ppen
dix.
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om L
EA
s af
ter
Apr
il 30
, 200
0 ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
this
tabl
e.
Tab
le 9
c. 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
asN
ng (
Mul
tiple
-C
hoic
e an
d Pe
rfor
man
ce)
for
the
Cla
ss o
f 20
01 a
t End
of
Gra
de 1
0, b
y L
EA
and
Eth
nici
ty
Sout
hwes
t Reg
ion
Tot
alA
mer
ican
Ind
ian
Asi
anB
lack
His
pani
cM
ulti-
Rac
ial
Whi
teN
umbe
r N
umbe
r P
erce
ntN
umbe
r N
umbe
rP
erce
nt N
umbe
r N
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
r N
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
r N
umbe
r P
erce
ntN
umbe
r N
umbe
rP
erce
nt N
umbe
r N
umbe
r P
erce
ntT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ngT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ngT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ngT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ngT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ngT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ngT
este
dP
assi
ngP
assi
ng
Stat
e4
I79
,385
64,1
6680
.81,
077
749
69.5
1,52
21,
108
72.8
22,6
3615
,652
69.1
1,61
099
361
.741
930
2
Sout
hwes
t Reg
ion
16,8
2613
,727
81.6
120
9175
.846
834
273
.14,
868
3,33
968
.631
819
461
.056
47
Ans
on26
617
766
.5I
I16
493
56.7
00
*
Cab
arru
s1,
152
1,00
687
.36
583
.313
861
.513
095
73.1
247
29.2
54
Kan
napo
lis C
ity24
320
986
.00
64
66.7
7761
79.2
53
60.0
I
Cle
vela
nd62
750
881
.0I
I'
135
9469
.66
350
.02
Kin
gs M
ount
ain
City
256
237
92.6
0*
87
87.5
7264
88.9
02
.
She
lby
City
173
157
90.8
03
a74
6486
.51
I
Gas
ton
1,73
91,
514
87.1
235
2365
.733
825
976
.618
1372
.2I
I lok
e37
133
490
.036
2775
.03
205
179
87.3
45
5
Linc
oln
643
536
83.4
27
571
.455
4072
.718
I I61
.13
:
Cha
rlotte
/Mec
klen
burg
6,21
24,
789
77.1
1713
76.5
317
238
75.1
2,33
91,
488
63.6
155
9360
.022
18I
Ken
nedy
Cha
rter
"2
00
10
0f
Mon
tgom
ery
286
257
89.9
09
666
.790
7280
.0I I
981
.80
Moo
re71
855
977
.95
360
.05
360
.018
111
764
.613
1076
.93
Ric
hmon
d55
940
372
.16
466
.710
770
.025
416
966
.54
I
Row
an-S
alis
bury
1,29
71,
076
83.0
320
1785
.025
516
665
.128
2175
.04
.
Sco
tland
398
320
80.4
3531
88.6
418
113
574
.61
0
Sta
nly
659
602
91.4
2' '
20.
I 155
.011
389
78.8
65
83.3
1
Uni
on1,
225
1,04
385
.14
65
83.3
204
154
75.5
24II
45.8
55
60
72.1
52,0
9245
,345
87.0
83.9
10,9
95.
9,71
488
.3
100
8484
.0
80.0
974
887
91.1
154
140
90.9
481
407
84.6
174
164
94.3
9490
95.7
1,34
51,
216
90.4
100.
011
811
698
.3
'55
8. 4
7685
.3
81.8
3,36
22,
939
87.4
aI
a
176
170
96.6
'51
142
583
.2
284
220
77.5
987
869
88.0
177
151
85,3
517
494
95.6
100.
098
286
688
.2
61
Not
es:
The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all
the
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ed.
Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
rmat
.'D
ata
not r
epor
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r te
sted
is fe
wer
than
five
. The
eth
nic
cate
gorie
s m
ay n
ot s
um to
tota
l num
ber
test
ed a
nd to
tal n
umbe
r pa
ssin
g be
caus
eet
hnic
cat
egor
y m
ay n
ot h
ave
been
cod
ed.
"Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
epor
ting
purp
oses
the
char
ter
scho
ol n
ame
has
been
abb
revi
ated
. The
com
plet
e na
me
can
befo
und
in th
e A
ppen
dix.
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om L
EA
s af
ter
Apr
il 30
, 200
0 ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
this
tabl
e.
Tab
le 9
d. 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
asin
g (M
ultip
le-
Cho
ice
and
Perf
orm
ance
) fo
r th
e C
lass
of
2001
at E
nd o
f G
rade
10,
by
LE
A a
nd E
thni
city
Nor
thea
st R
egio
nT
otal
Am
eric
an In
dian
Asi
anB
lack
His
pani
cM
ulti-
Rac
ial
Whi
teN
umbe
r N
umbe
r P
erce
ntN
umbe
r N
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
r N
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
r N
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
r N
umbe
r P
erce
nt N
umbe
r N
umbe
rP
erce
ntN
umbe
r N
umbe
rP
erce
nt
.Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Pas
sing
Pas
sing
45,3
4587
.0
2,25
084
.7
Sta
le79
,385
64,1
6680
.81,
077
749
69.5
1,52
21,
108
72.8
22,6
3615
,652
69.1
1,61
099
361
.741
930
272
.152
,092
Nor
thea
st R
egio
n5,
699
4,20
273
.730
2170
.039
2974
.42,
902
1,86
264
.251
2854
.917
1270
.62,
658
Bea
ufor
t46
437
781
.30
aI
202
143
70.8
53
60.0
I25
5
Ber
tie26
516
562
.30
022
813
358
.30
136
Cam
den
8887
98.9
01
2222
100.
00
065
Ede
nton
/Cho
wan
134
121
90.3
00
6856
82.4
10
'65
Cur
rituc
k22
216
674
.8I
I25
1664
.02
219
1
Dar
e33
526
579
.11
214
1410
0.0
63
50.0
131
0
Edg
ecom
be51
034
567
.60
030
317
959
.11
I4
36.4
0a
196
Gat
es12
411
088
.70
065
5483
.10
059
Hal
ifax
336
323
96.1
2214
63.6
0a
299
299
100.
0I
3'
11
Roa
noke
Rap
ids
City
200
176
88.0
47
571
.434
2985
.33
0'
115
2
Wel
don
City
6348
76.2
00
6046
76.7
00
?3
Her
tford
296
122
41.2
00
'23
174
32.0
01
64
Hyd
e56
4478
.60
022
1568
.20
034
Mar
tin33
725
174
.50
0'
184
.128
69.6
40
149
Nor
tham
pton
265
124
46.8
00
227
9341
.00
038
Eliz
abet
h C
ity/P
asqu
otan
k 39
824
561
.6I
a3
198
100
50.5
53
60.0
I18
9
Per
quim
ans
118
100
84.7
0a
042
3071
.40
274
Pitt
1,24
496
377
.4I
2216
72.7
515
330
64.1
127
58.3
369
1
Rig
ht S
tep"
82
25.0
00
82
25.0
00
0
Tyr
rell
5748
84.2
01
3026
86.7
00
26
Was
hing
ton
179
120
67.0
01
125
7358
.4I
250
62
229
89.8
3186
.1
6498
.5
6498
.5
144
75.4
246
119.
4
162
82.7
5694
.9
981
.8
136
89.5
4773
.4
2985
.3
122
81.9
3181
.6
139
73.5
6891
.9
606
87.7
2180
.8
4488
.0
63
Not
es:
The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all
the
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ed.
S D
ata
cann
ot b
e ve
rifie
d in
this
form
at.
Dat
a no
t rep
orte
d w
here
num
ber
test
ed is
few
er th
an fi
ve. T
he e
thni
c ca
tego
ries
may
not
sum
to to
tal n
umbe
rte
sted
and
tota
l num
ber
pass
ing
beca
use
ethn
ic c
ateg
ory
may
not
hav
e be
en c
oded
.
Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
epor
ting
purp
oses
the
char
ter
scho
ol n
ame
has
been
abb
revi
ated
. The
com
plet
e na
me
can
befo
und
in th
e A
ppen
dix.
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om L
EA
s af
ter
Apr
il 30
, 200
0 ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
this
tabl
e.
Tab
le 9
e. 1
998-
99 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of
Com
pute
r Sk
ills
Perc
ent P
astin
g (M
ultip
le-
Cho
ice
and
Perf
orm
ance
) fo
r th
e C
lass
of
2001
at E
nd o
f G
rade
10,
by
LE
A a
nd E
thni
city
Sout
heas
t Reg
ion
Tot
alA
mer
ican
Indi
anA
sian
Bla
ckH
ispa
nic
Mul
ti-R
acia
lW
hite
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Sta
te79
,385
64,1
6680
.81,
077
749
69.5
1,52
21,
108
72.8
22,6
3615
,652
69.1
1,61
099
361
.741
930
272
.152
,092
45,3
4587
.0
Sou
thea
st R
egio
n15
,252
11,6
2876
.273
850
969
.014
710
873
.55,
610
3,98
371
.042
128
768
.212
686
68.3
8,20
66,
653
81.1
lilad
en38
728
272
.93
115
011
476
.03
'0
230
162
70.4
Bru
nsw
ick
606
540
89.1
43
157
135
86.0
54
80.0
043
739
590
.4
Car
tere
t63
355
187
.02
54
80.0
8262
75.6
.7
710
0.0
353
447
388
.6
NC
Sch
ool o
f Mar
itim
e'23
730
.40
07
342
.90
016
425
.0
Col
umbu
s52
743
181
.831
3096
.80
235
169
71.9
40
257
230
89.5
Whi
tevi
lle C
ity18
616
186
.62
081
5972
.80
0.
103
100
97.1
Cra
ven
962
820
85.2
54
80.0
77
100.
033
124
574
.020
2010
0.0
159
854
491
.0
Cum
berla
nd3,
475
2,54
773
.365
4670
.862
4674
.21,
636
1,06
665
.218
513
573
.037
2670
.31,
490
1,22
882
.4
Dup
lin53
236
969
.40
021
613
863
.932
I I34
.41
:28
321
977
.4
Gre
ene
198
150
75.8
00
115
7767
.06
583
.30
,77
6888
.3
Jone
s10
475
72.1
00
'61
4065
.60
0p
4335
81.4
Leno
ir69
967
596
.63
2'
'35
834
496
.17
457
.1I
328
324
98.8
New
Han
over
1,43
392
564
.59
444
.410
770
.033
615
847
.014
750
.08
562
.51,
056
744
70.5
w u.)
Ons
low
1,55
884
454
.22
3318
54.5
361
.187
51.8
5128
54.9
5733
57.9
1,05
457
754
.7
Pam
lico
154
128
83.1
I0
6955
79.7
20.
82.
7085
.4
Pen
der
412
386
93.7
02
145
137
94.5
88
100.
0I
256
238
93.0
Rob
eson
1,43
896
066
.860
140
166
.70
'44
426
459
.520
735
.00
372
287
77.2
Sam
pson
467
408
87.4
20
'18
815
180
.320
1365
.03
'25
423
994
.1
Clin
ton
City
162
146
90.1
87
87.5
I71
6287
.37
571
.4I
7369
94.5
Way
ne1,
296
1,22
394
.40
2119
90.5
567
517
91.2
3027
90.0
1313
100.
066
364
797
.6
BE
ST
CO
PY
AV
AIL
AB
LE65
64
Not
es:
The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all t
he le
st a
dmin
istr
atio
ns in
whi
ch th
e st
uden
t par
ticip
ated
.
t Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
rmat
.D
ata
not r
epor
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r te
sted
is fe
wer
than
five
. The
ethn
ic c
ateg
orie
s m
ay n
ot s
um to
tota
l num
ber
test
ed a
nd to
tal n
umbe
r pa
ssin
gbe
caus
e et
hnic
cat
egor
y m
ay n
ot h
ave
been
cod
ed.
"Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
epor
ting
purp
oses
the
char
ter
scho
ol n
ame
has
been
abb
revi
ated
. The
com
plet
e na
me
can
be fo
und
in th
e A
ppen
dix.
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om L
EA
s af
ter
Apr
il 30
. 200
0 ar
e no
t inc
lude
din
this
tabl
e.
Tab
le 9
f .19
98-9
9 N
orth
Car
olin
a T
ests
of C
ompu
ter
Ski
lls P
erce
nt P
asA
ing
(Mul
tiple
-C
hoic
e an
d P
erfo
rman
ce)
for
the
Cla
ss o
f 200
1 at
End
of G
rade
10,
by
LEA
and
Eth
nici
ty
Cen
tral
Reg
ion
Tot
alA
mer
ican
Indi
anA
sian
Bla
ckhi
span
icM
ulti-
Rac
ial
Whi
teN
umbe
rT
este
dN
umbe
r
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Num
ber
Tes
ted
Num
ber
Pas
sing
Per
cent
Pas
sing
Sta
te79
,385
64,1
6680
.81,
077
749
69.5
1,52
21,
108
72.8
22,6
3615
,652
69.1
1,61
099
361
.741
930
272
.152
,092
45,3
4587
.0
Cen
tral
Reg
ion
23,1
2818
,821
81.4
8952
58.4
554
399
72.0
7,13
04,
906
.68.
8 .
503
i:281
55.9
146
112
76.7
.14
,684
13,0
5688
.9
Ala
man
ce-B
urlin
gton
1,10
991
882
.83
199
47.4
225
161
71.6
2812
42.9
283
273
388
.1
Lake
side
Sch
ool
50
0.0
00
20
03
Riv
er M
ill C
hart
er"
1512
80.0
00
00
I14
1285
.7
Cas
wel
l26
521
681
.50
I13
910
777
.0I
012
410
887
.1
Cha
tham
417
362
86.8
0I
9880
81.6
106
60.0
130
727
489
.3
Woo
ds C
hart
er9
6.6
6.7
00
00
18
.5
62.5
Dur
ham
1,57
91,
107
70.1
442
2969
.076
745
759
.632
1 5
46.9
19I I
57.9
715
593
82.9
Fra
nklin
441
357
81.0
40
192
137
71.4
64
66.7
323
621
089
.0
Gra
nvill
e39
534
988
.40
1'
122
100
82.0
I I3
27.3
026
124
593
.9
Gui
lford
4,69
23,
938
83.9
2413
.54
.216
811
669
.01,
662
1,21
473
.078
5469
.268
5682
.42,
670
2,47
092
.5
linne
t!99
180
080
.714
750
.08
810
0.0
309
228
73.8
3217
53.1
109
90.0
618
531
85.9
John
ston
1,10
796
0t 8
6.7
46
350
.021
615
873
.139
2769
.24
838
767
91.5
(.4
Lee
541
461
85.2
25
360
.014
811
779
.142
2457
.12
342
313
91.5
-FN
ash-
Roc
ky M
ount
1,32
186
165
.25
I20
.09
777
.868
236
253
.118
950
.01
606
481
79.4
Ora
nge
230
210
91.3
0I
3432
94.1
00
195
177
90.8
Cha
pel T
ill-C
arrb
oro
City
652
580
19.0
133
3090
.999
6363
.616
743
.87
710
0.0
496
472
95.2
New
Cen
tury
Sch
ool"
2115
71.4
0I
2I
017
1376
.5
Per
son
405
382
94.3
20
144
130
90.3
53
60.0
025
424
797
.2
Ran
dolp
h96
983
486
.1I
352
3771
.226
934
.62
885
783
88.5
Ash
ebor
o C
ity22
922
196
.51
443
4093
.014
1285
.7I
166
164
98.8
Roc
king
ham
867
709
81.8
4*
88
100.
022
116
373
.810
440
.0I
623
531
85.2
Van
ce38
633
586
.8I
222
418
080
.44
215
314
997
.4
Wak
e5,
428
4,44
88
1 . 9
1 2
975
.023
41
7 1
73.1
1 , 1
7 1
809
69.1
117
6353
.8.
201
I55
.03,
874
3,38
587
.4
Ili. B
aker
Jr
high
53
60.0
00
40
0I
War
ren
235
8937
.97
457
.10
176
58'
33.0
II
5027
54.0
Wils
on81
464
879
.60
84
50.0
398
269
67.6
129
75.0
039
636
692
.4
6667
Not
es:
The
se d
ata
repr
esen
t the
hig
hest
test
sco
re o
f eac
h st
uden
t for
all
the
test
adm
inis
trat
ions
in w
hich
the
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ed.
Dat
a ca
nnot
be
verif
ied
in th
is fo
rmat
.D
ata
not r
epor
ted
whe
re n
umbe
r te
sted
is fe
wer
than
five
. The
eth
nic
cate
gorie
s m
ay n
ot s
tun
to to
tal n
umbe
r te
sted
and
tota
l num
ber
pass
ing
beca
use
ethn
ic c
ateg
ory
may
not
hav
e be
en c
oded
.
"Den
otes
a c
hart
er s
choo
l. F
or r
epor
ting
purp
oses
the
char
ter
scho
ol n
ame
has
been
abb
revi
ated
. The
com
plet
e na
me
can
be fo
und
in th
e A
ppen
dix.
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om I.
EA
s af
ter
Apr
il 30
, 200
0 ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
this
tabl
e.
a
. a
°IF= V. Sample Test Questions
North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
North Carolina Tests of Computer Skills
Multiple-Choice Test This test consists of 70 questions that ask you about the use of computers insociety, hardware and software components, keyboarding, and how to use specific softwareapplicationsword processing, database, spreadsheet, and telecomputing.
Directions: To answer a question, first decide which is the best answer choice for a particularquestion. Then, find the question number on your answer grid (below) and make a mark in thecircle containing the letter of the correct answer. Remember to mark only one answer for eachquestion.
1 (XX)2 esc)3 ®®®®
4 SCXD®
5 ®®®®
6 OC:D7 (XXX.)
8 ®®®®
9 ®®®®
Performance Test This test consists of four partsKeyboarding Techniques, Word Processing/Editing, Database Use, and Spreadsheet Usethat assess how well you can use specific softwareapplications.
Directions: Read the directions at the beginning of each part. Then complete the task or questions.For the Keyboarding Techniques and Word Processing/Editing parts you must print out your work.For the Database Use and Spreadsheet Use parts you should mark your answers in the spaceprovided next to each question.
37 69
- Noith Crrolina Tette of Computer Skills
Multiple-Choice Test
1. Doing research by using an on-linedatabase instead of a printed set ofsimilar information offers whichadvantage?
* A more current information
B better charts
C easier to understand tables
D more legible diagrams
2. Upon walking into Mr. Johnson'sworkroom, Daryl saw a test fortomorrow on the computer screen.Which of the following can Darylethically do?
A Correct obvious errors on thetest to help Mr. Johnsonavoid embarrassment.
B Read the questions as astudy guide.
C Add a few well-chosenquestions that Mr. Johnsonleft out.
* D Leave the room withoutreading the test questions.
. What is the function ofa disk drive?
A to print sheets of paper
* B to read from or write informationto a floppy disk
C to display information or pictureson a screen
D to calculate numbers
4. For a social studies report, Fred needsto illustrate the products of NorthCarolina with pictures and comparisongraphs. He would most likely usewhich software programs?
A spreadsheet and statistical
B spreadsheet and database
* C graphing and clip art
D clip art and drawing
5. For correct keyboarding, what is therecommended placement of fingers onthe home row keys?
* A fingers of the left hand onA-S-D-F and fingers on the right-hand on J-K-L-;
B fingers of the right hand onA-S-D-F and fingers on the lefthand on J-K-L-;
C fingers of the left hand onA-S-E-F and fingers on the righthand on J-K-O-P
D fingers of the left hand onQ-W-E-R and fingers on the righthand on U-I-O-P
38 70
North Carolina Taw of Computer Skills
Jim is typing a song on his wordprocessor. The song has four verses,and the chorus is repeated after eachverse. What would be the mostefficient way to enter the song,making sure the chorus is repeatedafter each verse?
A type the chorus four times
B copy the chorus on a copymachine and then cut and pasteit into his document
C use the Copy Command on hisword processor
D highlight the text and change itto Bold
Which is not an advantage of usingcomputerized spreadsheets?
A speed of calculation
B flexibility of moving entries
C cost of initial set-up
D ability to generate tables
8. Bob Smith plans to run for governor ofNorth Carolina. One part of hisplatform deals with increasing medicalservices to rural areas. Which of thefollowing will best help determinewhere money should be spent to openclinics?
* A Search a NC database for type ofcommunity = "rural" and thenSort on the field showing thenumber of doctors.
B Sort a NC database on the type ofcommunity and then Searchnumber of doctors < = 5.
C Search a NC database for type ofcommunity = "rural" and thenSearch number of doctors < = 5.
D Sort a NC database on the type ofcommunity and then Sort on thefield showing the number ofdoctors.
9. Using an electronic bulletin board,Andy can do all of the following exceptwhich one?
A send private messages to a friend
B send a public message to friendsinterested in one topic
C send pictures to a friend
D send a package to a friend
39
North Carolina Tests of Computer Slas
Performance TestPart I: Keyboarding Techniques
Directions:
1. Key as accurately as possible the paragraphs below. Remember to usecorrect keyboarding techniques. Note: Do not worry about anydifferences in word wrap between what you type and how theparagraphs appear on this page.
2. When you have finished keying the paragraphs, print your work.
USING DATABASES IN THE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASS
In our eighth grade social studies class we are using computers with adatabase program. When we need information on a country, we look up thename of the country on an atlas program. We have six different diskettes.
Yesterday, we were doing a project on the United States of America. Oneof our assignments was to find the following:
North CarolinaUtahNew MexicoVermontFloridaTexas.
4072
Performance TestPart Word Processing/Editing
Nests Casabas Tests et Computer Skills
Directio s:
1. Edit the paragraph below. You may use the "Edit Symbol ReferenceTable" provided below if you need assistance.
2. When you have finished editing the paragraph, print your work.
Edit Symbol Reference Table
= capitalize 3C center
1 C. lower case J indentI delete A insert
replace word cp../ move
111` insert space c: spell out
CR new paragraph
3 USING DATABASES FOR SOCIAL STUDIES
9,14Cie"In our eighth
Asocial studies class we are using computers
with a database program. When we need information on a441
country, we look up thenA ame of the co-linty on an atlas program.
We have six different diskettes.
41 73
North Carding Tests of Computer Sidlis
Performance TestPart III: Database Use
Directions: Use your database program and the file called PLANETS.
1. Read the scenario.2. Use the database file to respond to the questions below.3. When asked to "describe the steps you took to find your answer," use
appropriate database terms. For example, "Sorted the Number of Moonsfield in descending order" or "Searched the Number of Moons field for allrecords greater than 2."
Scenario:
Your eighth grade science classes have entered a contest to build a new solar system.Before you start making planets for the solar system in your class, you must gatherdata on each planet. Use the database PLANETS to find the data you need.
Sample Record from PLANETS Database.
Planet: EarthProb Temp (F): . 72Number of Moons: 1
Length of Year: 365.3Gravity at Surf: 1
Dist from Sun: 93,000,000Atmosphere: nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide,
water vapor
1. Which planet has the smallest Gravity at Surface?
2. Which planet, with surface gravity (Gravity at Surf) of atleast 1.10, has the most moons?
WO.
Explanation: Use database terms to describe the steps you tootto find your answer.
42 74
Performance TestPart IV: Spreadsheet Use
North Carolina Testi of Ccanputcy Skills
Directions: Use your spreadsheet program and the file called NUTRIENTS.
1. Read the scenario.2. Use the spreadsheet file to respond to the questions below.
Scenario:
The school cafeteria staff is letting your class plan the meals for a week. You canserve pizza, but you also must serve one plate of "regular" food. Use the spreadsheetNUTRIENTS to help plan the meals.
Excerpt from NUTRIENTS Spreadsheet.
Item Qty. Protein Vitamin C Calcium IronServings (grams) (mg) (mg) (ms)
Chicken Drumstick 0 0 0 0 0Hamburger Patty 0 1 0 0 0 0Fresh Spinach 0 0 0 0 0Baked Potato 0 0 0 0 0Fresh Corn 0 1 0 0 0 o:Cooked Fresh Carrots 0 0 0 0 0Raw Cabbage 0 1 0 0 0 0Banana 0 0 0 0Apple 000 0 0
Total Nutrients:I 0 0 0 0I
1. How many milligrams (mg) of Iron are in 2 Bananas and 4 servingsof Fresh Spinach?
2. How many servings of Cooked fresh Carrots will give the sameamount of calcium as 24 servings of Apples?
43 75
North Case hos Thou of Computer Slolb
Answers to Sample Tests and Notes
multiple-Cholce Test
1. The correct answer is A. This questionmeasures how well you understand howcomputers are used as a tool for accessinginformation.
2. The correct answer is D. This questionmeasures how well you understand theethical use of computers and respect thecomputer-generated work of others.
3. The correct answer is B. This questionmeasures your understanding of thecomponents of a computerhardware andsoftware. You may also be asked about otherphysical components of a computer, theirfunction, and use.
4. The correct answer is C. This questionmeasures your knowledge of the use ofsoftware in various subjects to solveproblems. You may also be asked about othertypes of software, e.g., probeware used inscience, database programs in social studies.
5. The correct answer is A. This questionmeasures your knowledge of correctkeyboarding skills and finger placement onthe home row keys.
6. The correct answer is C. This questionmeasures you ability to use the Copy andPaste functions while word processing. Youmay also be asked about other functions (e.g.,Move, Print) and utilities (e.g., spell checker,grammar checker), and about producingdesktop published documents.
7. The correct answer is C. This questionmeasures your understanding of theadvantages (or disadvantages) of using acomputerized spreadsheet versus a printedspreadsheet. You may also be asked to use aspreadsheet to test simple "What if?"statements.
8. The correct answer is A. This questionmeasures your ability to use sorting andsearching techniques to solve a problem whileusing a database program
9. The correct answer is D. This questionmeasures your understanding of how anelectronic bulletin board works.
Performance Test
Part I: Keyboarding Techniques. This task isscored for typing accuracy, spacing, andlength.
Part II: Word Processing/Editing. This task isscored for the number of correct edits and ifother errors are made while editing.
Part III: Database Use.
1. The correct answer is "Pluto." This questionmeasures your ability to Sort a database.
2. The correct answer is "Saturn." Your answeris also scored for how well you explain howyou determined your answer to the question("I searched the field Gravity at Surf > or =1.10 and then sorted the records on the fieldNumber of Moons in descending order.") Thisquestion measures your ability to usesearching and sorting techniques to solve aproblem.
Part IV: Spreadsheet Use.
r The correct answer is 6.8.. This questionmeasures your ability to use a spreadsheetto test simple "What if?" statements.
2. The correct answer is 5. This question alsomeasures your ability to use a spreadsheetto test simple "What if?" statements.
44
List of Charter Schools
American RenaissanceArapahoe CharterArts & Basics Charter School (ABCS)Brevard AcademyBridgesBright Horizons AcademyCarter CommunityCarter G. Woodson School of ChallengeCatawba Valley AcademyChange For YouthChatham CharterChildren's Village AcademyCommunities in Schools Academy (CIS)Community Charter SchoolDillard AcademyDowntown Middle SchoolEast Wake AcademyEast Winston PrimaryEnglemann School of the Arts and SciencesExplorisFrancine Delaney New School for ChildrenFranklin AcademyGrandfather AcademyHarnett Co. TechnicalHarnett Early ChildhoodHealthy Start AcademyHighland KindergartenImani InstituteJohn H. Baker, Jr. HighKennedy CharterKestrel HeightsLake NormanLakeside SchoolLaurinburgLift AcademyLincoln CharterMagellan CharterMaureen JoyNC School of Maritime StudiesNew Century SchoolNguzo Saba CharterOrange County CharterPHASE AcademyQuality Education Academy
47
Right Step AcademyRiver Mill CharterRocky Mount Charter Public SchoolSallie B. Howard SchoolSankore SchoolSchool in the CommunitySchool of Mathematics, Arts, Sciences, and
Technology (MAST)SPARC AcademySterling Montessori AcademySummit CharterThe Learning CenterTiller SchoolTurning PointUnited Children's Ability Nook (UCAN)Village CharterWilkes Co. AlternativeWoods Charter
78
U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)
National Library of Education (NLE)Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)
NOTICE
REPRODUCTION BASIS
ERIC
This document is covered by a signed "Reproduction Release(Blanket) form (on file within the ERIC system), encompassing allor classes of documents from its source organization and, therefore,does not require a "Specific Document" Release form.
This document is Federally-funded, or carries its own permission toreproduce, or is otherwise in the public domain and, therefore, maybe reproduced by ERIC without a signed Reproduction Release form(either "Specific Document" or "Blanket").
EFF-089 (9/97)