report on combined helicopter borne …...4101mmm16 2.7152 halcrow 010 report on combined helicopter...
TRANSCRIPT
4101MMM16 2 .7152 HALCROW 010
REPORT ON
COMBINED HELICOPTER BORNE
MAGNETIC, ELECTROMAGNETIC AND VLF SURVEY .
SWAYZE AREA, ONTARIO
TOOMS, HALCROW, GREENLAW TOWNSHIPS
PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION
for
REGAL PETROLEUM LTD.
by
AERODAT LIMITED
June, 1984
PROJECT 5433
11111l1111111111111
HI II Bl B II Bll B H BB IB BBI BMIBMB B I BB BB B B BB H
TABLE OF C DI llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll|ll4l01*NVMte 2.7152 HALCROW
1. INTRODUCTION
2. SURVEY AREA LOCATION
3. AIRCRAFT AND EQUIPMENT
3.1 Aircraft3.2 Equipment
3.2.1 Electromagnetic System3.2.2 VLF-EM System
3.2.3 Magnetometer
3.2.4 Magnetic Base Stationt1 3 .2.5 Radar Altimeter
3.2.6 Tracking Camera3.2.7 Analog Recorder
3.2.8 Digital Recorder3.2.9 Radar Positioning System
4. DATA PRESENTATION
4.1 Base Map and Flight Path Recovery4.2 Electromagnetic Profile Maps
4.3 Total Field Magnetic Contours
4.4 VLF-EM Total Field Contours
5 , INTERPRETATION
6. RECOMMENDATIONS
APPENDIX I - General Interpretive Considerations
ffi
1
1
2
3
3
3
33
33
33
3
3
3
4
44
4
4
5
6
APPENDIX II - Technical Data Statement and List of
LIST OF MAPS
(Scale: 1:10,000)
MAP 1 - Electromagentic Interpretation Map
MAP 2 - Electromagnetic Profile Map(946 Hz coaxial configuration)
MAP 3 - Total Field Magnetic Contours
MAP 4 - VLF-EM Total Field ContoursMap 5 - Claim Map
lilO10C
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 2
- 2
- 2
- 3
- 3
- 4-- 4
- 1
- 1
- 2
- 3- 4
- 1
- 1
Claims
4
l l l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1-1
1. INTRODUCTION
l This report describes an airborne geophysical survey
carried out by Aerodat Limited. Equipment operated
l included a 3- frequency electromagnetic system, a mag-
m netometer, a VLF-EM system, and a radar positioning
system.
The survey, located near Chapleau, Ontario, was flown
l from March 31 to April 3, 1984. A total of approxi
mately 925 line kilometers (575 line miles) of data
were collected. This report refers to a part of this
survey, consisting of 205.38 line miles.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
2-1
2. SURVEY AREA LOCATION
The index map below outlines the total survey block; the
shaded zone is the area relating to this report. The
nominal line spacing was 100 meters.
83aoo'
47045'
l
l
l
l 3. AIRCRAFT AND EQUIPMENT
l 3.1 Aircraft
l The helicopter used for the survey was an Aerospatiale
A-Star 350D owned and operated by Maple Leaf Helicopters,
l Installation of the geophysical and ancillary equipment
was carried out by Aerodat. The survey aircraft was
flown at a nominal altitude of 60 meters.
3.2 Equipment
B 3.2.1 Electromagnetic System
l The electromagnetic system was an Aerodat
3 frequency system. Two vertical coaxial
l coil pairs were operated at 946 and 4575 Hz
m and a horizontal coplanar coil pair at
4175 Hz. The transmitter-receiver separation
l was 7 meters. In-phase and quadrature
signals were measured simultaneously for the
l 3 frequencies with a time-constant of 0.1
m seconds. The electromagnetic bird was towed
30 meters below the helicopter.
3.2.2 VLF-EM System
l The VLF-EM System was a Herz 1A. This
instrument measures the total field and vertical
l l
l
l l l
3-2
l quadrature component of the selected frequency.
The sensor was towed in a bird 13.7 meters
J below the helicopter. The station used was
NAA (Cutler, Maine, 24.0 kHz)*
M 3.2.3 Magnetometer
The magnetometer was a Geometrics G-803 proton
J precession type. The sensitivity of the
instrument was l gamma at a 0.5 second sample
rate. The sensor was towed in a bird 13.7
B meters below the helicopter.
l 3.2.4 Magnetic Base Station
An IFG proton precession type magnetometer was
" operated at the base of operations to record
l diurnal variations of the earth's magnetic
field. The clock of the base station was
l synchronized with that of the airborne system.
3.2.5 Radar Altimeter
l A Hoffman HRA-100 radar altimeter was used to
record terrain clearance. The output from
the instrument is a linear function of altitude
for maximum accuracy.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
3-3
3.2.6 Tracking Camera
A geocam tracking camera was used to record
flight path on 35 mm film. The camera was
operated in strip mode and the fiducial numbers
for cross-reference to the analog and digital*
data were imprinted on the margin of the film.
3.2.7 Analog Recorder
An RMS dot-matrix recorder was used to display
the data during the survey. In addition to
manual and time fiducials, the following data
was recorded:
Channel Input
00 Altimeter (500 ft at top of chart)
04 high freq. quadrature
03 high freq. in-phase
06 mid freq. quadrature
05 mid freq. in-phase
02 low freq. quadrature
01 low freq. in-phase
15 magnetometer
14 magnetometer
07 VLP-EM Total Field
08 VLF-EM Quadrature
Scale
10 ft/mm
2 ppm/mm
2 ppm/mm
4 ppm/mm
4 ppm/mm
2 ppm/mm
2 ppm/mm
25 gamma/mm
2.5 gamma/mm
2.5%/mm
2.5%/mm
l l -l
l
l
3.2.8 Digital Recorder
A Perle DAC/NAV data system recorded the
survey data on magnetic tape. Information
recorded was as follows:
Equipment Interval
EM D.I second
l VLF-EM 0.5 second
magnetometer 0.5 second
l altimeter 1.0 second
m fiducial (time) 1.0 second
fiducial (manual) 0.2 second
MRS III 0.2 second
B 3.2.9 Radar Positioning System
A Motorola Mini-Ranger (MRS III) radar
l navigation system was utilized for both
m navigation and track recovery. Transponders
located at fixed known locations were inter-
l rogated several times per second and the ranges
from these points to the helicopter measured
l to several meter accuracy. A navigational
B computer triangulates the position of the
helicopter and provides the pilot with navi-
I gation information. The range/range data was
recorded on magnetic tape for subsequent
m flight path determination.
l
4-1
4. DATA PRESENTATION
l l l
4.1 Base Map and Flight Path Recovery
The base map is a photomosaic at a scale of
l 1:10,000.
l The flight path was derived from the Mini Ranger
radar positioning system. The distance from the
l helicopter to two established reference locations
j was measured several times per second, and the
position of the helicopter mathematically calcu-
I lated by triangulation. It is estimated that the
flight path is generally accurate to about 10
B meters with respect to the topographic detail of
B the base map. The flight path is presented with
fiducials for cross-reference to both the analog
l and digital data.
l
l
l
l
l
l
ll
4-2
4.2 Electromagnetic Profile Maps*
m The electromagnetic data was recorded digitally at
a sample rate of l O /second with a time constant of
l 0.1 second. A two stage digital filtering process
was carried out to reject major sferic events, and
l to reduce system noise. The process is outlined
m below.
Local atmospheric activity can produce sharp, large
B amplitude events that cannot be removed by conven-
M tional filtering procedures. Smoothing or stacking
will reduce their amplitude but leave a broader
l residual response that can be confused with a geo-
logical phenomenon. To avoid this possibility, a
computer algorithm searches out and rejects the
l major sferic events.
m The signal to noise ratio was further enhanced by
the application of a low pass digital filter. It
l has zero phase shift which prevents any lag or peak
displacement from occurring, and it suppresses only
l variations with a wavelength less than about 0.25
m seconds. This low effective time constant permits
maximum profile shape resolution.
' Following the filtering processes, a base level
l correction was made. The correction applied is a
l
l l 4-3
l linear function of time that ensures that the
corrected amplitude of the various in-phase and
l quadrature components is zero when no conductive
H or permeable source is present. The filtered and
levelled data was then presented in profile map form.
B The in-phase and quadrature responses of the 946 Hz
H coaxial configuration were presented with flight
path and electromagnetic anomaly information on the
l base map.
l The in-phase and quadrature responses of the 4575 Hz
coaxial and the 4175 Hz coplanar coil configurations
l were presented as a two colour overlay.
4.3 Total Field Magnetic Contours
l The aeromagnetic data was corrected for diurnal
g variations by subtraction of the digitally recorded
base station magnetic profile. No correction for
l regional variation was applied.
The corrected profile data was interpolated onto a
^ regular grid at a 25 m true scale interval using a
l cubic spline technique. The grid provided the basis
for threading the presented contours at a 10 gamma
p interval.
l
l
l l 4-4
l The aeromagnetic data was presented with electromagnetic
anomaly information on the base map.
4.4 VLF-EM Total Field Contours
The VLF-EM signal, from NAA (Cutler, Maine), was
l compiled in map form. The mean response level of
the total field signal was removed and the data was
l gridded and contoured at an interval of 2%.
H The VLF-EM data was presented with electromagnetic
M anomaly information on the base map.
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
5-1
5. INTERPRETATION
l l lB The Ontario Department of Mines, Geological Map # 2116
B indicates the survey area to be largely covered by basic
to intermediate volcanic rocks with some acid volcanic
l rocks noted, particularly in the northeast. Archean
acid igneous rocks border the survey area to the north
B and west. A zone of metasedimentary rock extends in an
B east-west direction through the southern map sheet then
continues in a NW/SE direction through the central sheet;
l a second more irregular unit occurs on the northern
sheet. Several faults have been mapped in the area and
l strike in a NNW/SSE direction.
lAe romagne t i c s
The aeromagnetic contour map reflects the general geology
l as mapped but adds considerable detail. The intense
magnetic activity along the southwestern margin of the
l survey area is the typical expression of basic volcanic
M rocks. Parallel to and in contact with this unit is a
zone of low magnetization, typical of metasedimentary
l rocks. This zone of metasedimentary rocks extends
through the central sheet into the southern sheet where
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
5-2
l lg it offsets to the north at a mapped fault. Other areas
of metasedimentary rocks are suggested at the extreme SE
* corner of the project, the NE corner of the central sheet
l and the NE corner of the northern sheet.
l In the NW corner of the northern sheet a sharp change in
magnetic pattern is noted along an ENE/WSW trending con"-
| tact. This is likely the edge of the acid igneous complex.
Scattered throughout the central part of the survey area
are isolated, sometimes elongated magnetic anomalies.
The stronger anomalies of several hundred or more gammas
l amplitude likely reflect basic volcanic rock. In some
cases, the very intense features may be indicative of iron
formation.
Also noted in the central region are numerous dykes
striking in a N to NNW direction as well as in a NE
direction. The amplitude of the associated magnetic
l anomalies ranges from tens to hundreds of gammas and may
reflect differences in composition as well as thickness,
Other weaker, 20 to 50 gamma, anomalies are noted
" throughout the central area. These anomalies form a
l low amplitude, often irregular background and probably
reflect acid volcanic rocks. As noted previously the
l
l
l l l l
l
M
l
l
5-3
metasedimentary rocks are also of low magnetization and
a clear differentiation between the two units is difficult
to make qualitatively. The magnetic lows in the central
l area may reflect sedimentary rocks or simply a transition
to lower magnetization in acid volcanic rocks.
Electromagnetics
l The HEM profile data was analysed and those responses
interpreted to be of bedrock as opposed to surficial
J origin were identified. Many of the conductors are of
low conductance, less than 2 mhos, and typical of electro-
' lytic conduction in faults or shears or possible minor
l disseminated mineralization. As a result their response
characteristics are most clearly noted on the higher
g frequency coil pairs.
l The survey area is geologically favorable for both gold
H and base metal mineralization. Higher conductance
responses of say 8 mhos or greater are an indication of
l electronic conduction due to significant sulphide or
graphite mineralization and therefore warrant added con-
I sideration as base metal targets. This is not the case
for gold mineralization where minor disseminated
l
5-4
indication of a favorable zone.
l ll accessory mineralization may provide the only indirect
The emphasis in the electromagnetic interpretation was
therefore directed at the identification of potential
B bedrock conductors without emphasis on conductance.
Although a formal magnetic interpretation is beyond the
J scope of this report the conductors have been grouped on
the basis of their geologic association as inferred from
the magnetic data. The general categorization is as
l follows t
m 1 . Conductors within a low featureless magnetic zone,
interpreted to be indicative of metasedimentary
rocks.
l 2. Conductors within a zone of low magnetic relief,
interpreted to be indicative of acid to intermediate
volcanic rocks.
" 3. Conductors within an area of strong magnetic relief,
j interpreted to be indicative of intermediate to
basic volcanic rocks.
l4. Conductor interpreted to be on a contact between
l volcanic and sedimentary rocks.
l
l
l lH
5-5
5. Conductor interpreted to be on a contact between
different volcanic rocks.
m As noted previously in the discussion of the magnetic data
the distinction between metasedimentary and acid volcanic
l rocks is the least reliable and hence categories l and 2
as well as 4 and 5 may often be interchanged.
l
l
l
l
l
l
VLF-EM
The VLF-EM system is sensitive to lower conductance
anomalies than the HEM system. It may map more clearly
l a weak conductor along a fault or shear but at the same
time be more responsive to conductive overburden and
l lake bottom sediments.
" The VLF contour maps were reviewed and conductive axes,
B not identified by the HEM system and interpreted to be
of probable bedrock as opposed to surficial origin, have
been indicated.
ll W 6-1
l 6- RECOMMENDATIONS
l The general survey area is favorable for both gold and
base metal mineralization. The airborne geophysical sur-
I vey has identified numerous conductors within both meta-
m sedimentary and volcanic rocks that may indirectly
indicate zones favorable to gold mineralization. Several
l conductors of higher conductance may also warrant inves
tigation as potential base metal prospects.
m Relative priorities for ground follow up investigation
should be assigned by those most familiar with the
l detailed geology of the area.
l Respectfully submitted,
f AERODAT LIMITED
ll R. L. Scott Hogg, P
l
l
l
l
l
RLSH/cb Encl.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
APPENDIX l
GENERAL INTERPRETIVE CONSIDERATIONS
l l l l
l
APPENDIX I
GENERAL INTERPRETIVE CONSIDERATIONS
Electromagnetic
f The Aerodat 3 frequency system utilizes 2 different
transmitter- receiver coil geometries. The traditional
B coaxial coil configuration is operated at 2 widely
H separated frequencies and the horizontal coplanar coil
pair is operated at a frequency approximately aligned
l with one of the coaxial frequencies.
B The electromagnetic response measured by the helicopter
system is a function of the "electrical" and "geometrical"
l properties of the conductor. The "electrical" property
M of a conductor is determined largely by its conductivity
and its size and shape; the "geometrical" property of the
l response is largely a function of the conductors shape
and orientation with respect to the measuring transmitter
l and receiver.
Electrical Considerations
l For a given conductive body the measure of its conductivity
or conductance is closely related to the measured phase
l shift between the received and transmitted electromagnetic
m field. A small phase shift indicates a relatively high
conductance, a large phase shift lower conductance. A
l small phase shift results in a large in-phase to quadrature
l
lm ^ - 2 - APPENDIX I
lratio and a large phase shift a low ratio. This relation-
g ship is shown quantitatively for a vertical half-plane
model on the accompanying phasor diagram. Other physical
models will show the same trend but different quantitative
U relationships.
m The phasor diagram for the vertical half-plane model, as
presented, is for the coaxial coil configuration with the
m amplitudes in ppm as measured at the response peak over
the conductor. To assist the interpretation of the survey
m results the computer is used to identify the apparent
m conductance and depth at selected anomalies. The results
of this calculation are presented in table form in Appendix II
l and the conductance and in-phase amplitude are presented in
symbolized form on the map presentation.
The conductance and depth values as presented are correct
l only as far as the model approximates the real geological
situation. The actual geological source may be of limited
length, have significant dip, its conductivity and thickness
l may vary with depth and/or strike and adjacent bodies and
overburden may have modified the response. In general the
l conductance estimate is less affected by these limitations
j than is the depth estimate, but both should be considered as
relative rather than absolute guides to the anomaly's
l properties.
l
lA - 3 - APPENDIX I
l Conductance in mhos is the reciprocal of resistance in
m ohms and in the case of narrow slab-like bodies is the
product of electrical conductivity and thickness.
* Most overburden will have an indicated conductance of less
M than 2 mhos; however, more conductive clays may have an
apparent conductance of say 2 to 4 mhos. Also in the low
g conductance range will be electrolytic conductors in faults
and shears.
lThe higher ranges of conductance, greater than 4 mhos,
l indicate that a significant fraction of the electrical
m conduction is electronic rather than electrolytic in
nature. Materials that conduct electronically are limited
l to certain metallic sulphides and to graphite. High
conductance anomalies, roughly 10 mhos or greater, are
l generally limited to sulphide or graphite bearing rocks.
g Sulphide minerals with the exception of sphalerite, cinnabar
g and stibnite are good conductors; however, they may occur
' in a disseminated manner that inhibits electrical conduction
l through the rock mass. In this case the apparent conductance
can seriously underrate the quality of the conductor in
l geological terms. In a similar sense the relatively non-
mm conducting sulphide minerals noted above may be present in
significant concentration in association with minor conductive
l
l
l
l
- 4 - APPENDIX I
l sulphides, and the electromagnetic response only relate
M to the minor associated mineralization. Indicated conductance
is also of little direct significance for the identification
l of gold mineralization. Although gold is highly conductive
it would not be expected to exist in sufficient quantity
l to create a recognizable anomaly, but minor accessory sulphide
mineralization could provide a useful indirect indication.
s
In summary, the estimated conductance of a conductor can
m provide a relatively positive identification of significant
B sulphide or graphite mineralization; however, a moderate
to low conductance value does not rule out the possibility
l of significant economic mineralization.
Geometrical Considerations
Geometrical information about the geologic conductor can
often be interpreted from the profile shape of the anomaly.
l The change in shape is primarily related to the change in
inductive coupling among the transmitter, the target, and
i the receiver.
l In the case of a thin, steeply dipping, sheet-like conductor,
M the coaxial coil pair will yield a near symmetric peak over
the conductor. On the other hand the coplanar coil pair will
l pass through a null couple relationship and yield a minimum
over the conductor, flanked by positive side lobes. As the
l dip of the conductor decreases from vertical, the coaxial
l
lB 0 - 5 - APPENDIX I
l anomaly shape changes only slightly, but in the case of
the coplanar coil pair the side lobe on the down dip side
B strengthens relative to that on the up dip side.
f As the thickness of the conductor increases, induced
g current flow across the thickness of the conductor becomes
* relatively significant and complete null coupling with the
l coplanar coils is no longer possible. As a result, the
apparent minimum of the coplanar response over the conductor
l diminishes with increasing thickness, and in the limiting
M case of a fully 3 dimensional body or a horizontal layer
or half-space, the minimum disappears completely.
B A horizontal conducting layer such as overburden will produce
j a response in the coaxial and coplanar coils that is a
function of altitude (and conductivity if not uniform). The
l profile shape will be similar in both coil configurations
with an amplitude ratio (coplanar/coaxial) of about 4/1*.
In the case of a spherical conductor, the induced currents
l are confined to the volume of the sphere, but not relatively
M restricted to any arbitrary plane as in the case of a sheet-
like form. The response of the coplanar coil pair directly
l over the sphere may be up to 8* times greater than that of
the coaxial coil pair.
l
l
l
l l - 6 - APPENDIX I
In summary, a steeply dipping, sheet-like conductor will
display a decrease in the coplanar response coincident.
* with the peak of the coaxial response. The relative
fl strength of this coplanar null is related inversely to
the thickness of the conductor; a pronounced null indicates
l a relatively thin conductor. The dip of such a conductor
m can be inferred from the relative amplitudes of the side-lobes.
lMassive conductors that could be approximated by a conducting
m sphere will display a simple single peak profile form on both
m coaxial and coplanar coils, with a ratio between the coplanar
to coaxial response amplitudes as high as 8.*
* Overburden anomalies often produce broad poorly defined
fl anomaly profiles.. In most cases the response of the coplanar
coils closely follows that of the coaxial coils with a
l relative amplitude ratio of 4.*
l Occasionally if the edge of an overburden zone is sharply
defined with some significant depth extent, an edge effect
B will occur in the coaxial coils. In the case of a horizontal
M conductive ring or ribbon, the coaxial response will consist
of two peaks, one over each edge; whereas the coplanar coil
l will yield a single peak.
l
l
l
l l - 7 - APPENDIX I
l *It should be noted at this point that Aerodat's
definition of the measured ppm unit is related to
l the primary field sensed in the receiving coil
m without normalization to the maximum coupled (coaxial
configuration). If such normalization were applied
l to the Aerodat units, the amplitude of the coplanar
coil pair would be halved.
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
lB
m
- 8 - APPENDIX I
Magnetics
l The Total Field Magnetic Map shows contours of the
M total magnetic field, uncorrected for regional varia-
* tion. Whether an EM anomaly with a magnetic correl-
ft ation is more likely to be caused by a sulphide
deposit than one without depends on the type of
g mineralization. An apparent coincidence between an
^ EM and a magnetic anomaly may be caused by a conductor
which is also magnetic, or by a conductor which lies
l in close proximity to a magnetic body. The majority
of conductors which are also magnetic are sulphides
l containing pyrrhotite and/or magnetite. Conductive
. and magnetic bodies in close association can be, and
* often are, graphite and magnetite. It is often very
B difficult to distinguish between these cases. If
the conductor is also magnetic, it will usually
g produce an EM anomaly whose general pattern resembles
p that of the magnetics. Depending on the magnetic
* permeability of the conducting body, the amplitude of
l the inphase EM anomaly will be weakened, and if the
l
l
l
conductivity is also weak, the inphase EM anomaly
may even be reversed in sign.
l l - 9 - APPENDIX I
m "VLF Electromagnetics
l The VLF-EM method employs the radiation from powerful
military radio transmitters as the primary signals.
^ The magnetic field associated with the primary field
B is elliptically polarized in the vicinity of electrical
conductors. The Herz Totem uses three coils in the X,
l Y, Z configuration to measure the total field and
vertical quadrature component of the polarization
ellipse.
l The relatively high frequency of VLF 15-25 kHz provides
m high response factors for bodies of low conductance.
Relatively "disconnected" sulphide ores have been found
l to produce measurable VLF signals. For the same reason,
poor conductors such as sheared contacts, breccia zones,
l narrow faults, alteration zones and porous flow tops
m normally produce VLF anomalies. The method can therefore
be used effectively for geological mapping. The only
l relative disadvantage of the method lies in its sensitivity
to conductive overburden. In conductive ground the depth
l of exploration is severely limited.
J The effect of strike direction is important in the sense
of the relation of the conductor axis relative to the
energizing electromagnetic field. A conductor aligned
9 along a radius drawn from a transmitting station will be
l
l l - 10 -
APPENDIX I
l in a maximum coupled orientation and thereby produce a
stronger response than a similar conductor at a different
l strike angle. Theoretically it would be possible for a
m conductor, oriented tangentially to the transmitter to
produce no signal. The most obvious effect of the strike
l angle consideration is that conductors favourably oriented
with respect to the transmitter location and also near
l perpendicular to the flight direction are most clearly
m rendered and usually dominate the map presentation.
B The total field response is an indicator of the existence
' and position of a conductivity anomaly. The response will
B be a maximum over the conductor, without any special filtering,
and strongly favour the upper edge of the conductor even in
l the case of a relatively shallow dip.
l The vertical quadrature component over steeply dipping sheet
like conductor will be a cross-over type response with the
l cross-over closely associated with the upper edge of the
m conductor.
B The response is a cross-over type due to the fact that it
is the vertical rather than total field quadrature component
l that is measured. The response shape is due largely to
geometrical rather than conductivity considerations and
f the distance between the maximum and minimum on either side
of the cross-over is related to target depth. For a given
target geometry, the larger this distance the greater the*
l
l- 11 - APPENDIX I
depth.
l The amplitude of the quadrature response, as opposed
to shape is function of target conductance and depth
l as well as the conductivity of the overburden and host
m rock. As the primary field travels down to the conductor
through conductive material it is both attenuated and
l phase shifted in a negative sense. The secondary field
produced by this altered field at the target also has an
l associated phase shift. This phase shift is positive and
m is larger for relatively poor conductors. This secondary
field is attenuated and phase shifted in a negative sense
l during return travel to the surface. The net effect of
these 3 phase shifts determine the phase of the secondary
l field sensed at the receiver.
l A relatively poor conductor in resistive ground will yield
I a net positive phase shift. A relatively good conductor
- in more conductive ground will yield a net negative phase
l shift. A combination is possible whereby the net phase
shift is zero and the response is purely in-phase with no
l quadrature component.
l A net positive phase shift combined with the geometrical
cross-over shape will lead to a positive quadrature response
B on the side of approach and a negative on the side of
m departure. A net negative phase shift would produce the
reverse. A further sign reversal occurs with a 180 degree
l
ll ^ - 12 - APPENDIX I
B change in instrument orientation as occurs on reciprocal
line headings. During digital processing of the quad-
I rature data for map presentation this is corrected for
by normalizing the sign to one of the flight line headings
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
REGAL PETROLEUM LTD.
CLAIM GROUPSWAYZE AREA
DENYES TWP.1ALCROW TWP "
GREENLAW TWPOOMS TWP.
Y, DAVID R. BELL GEOLOGICAL SERVICES INC. p/fOJecr
Ministry ofNaturalResources
Ontario
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, .geochemical and Expenditures)
The Mini 4101MWM16 2.7152 HALCROW 900Type of Survevts)
Claim H oldar(s)
Township or
~\C.L rTeMOwvi
Area
Address
Survey CompanySV.
bate of Survey (from fi to) ,3\ o, S-M A *i 9-4Kiy l (Ho. l Yr. tiSy l Mo. l Yr!
Total M i let of lin* Cut
Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)
fr-u. ; tCredits Requested per Each Claim m columns at right
Plitf
Special Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (Thisincludes line cutting)
For each additional surwyfusing the same grid:
Enter 20 df^i Mbr esch)J 0 J
Mtt'/ftii U/^xMan Days
9 i S i 1 VE fla liAUG 2 1 f)84
M ?- f'
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions
to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
Ir i ifajliometric
- Other
7384ogic.l
~ Geochemical
Geophysical
j - Magnetometer
"* - Radiometric
- Other
'G lological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric ̂ ̂ e* —
Days per Claim
Days per Claim
Days per Claim
4o-HO
__Expenditures (excludes power
Calculation of r uii^iiliiiinrDin i riinlil
Total ExpendituresTotal
Days Credits
S 15 -
InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the c laim h older's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
Date BfQrded Ho l a gr or Agent (Signature)
Certification Verifying Report of Work
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim
Prefix Number
b\O
Expend. Days Cr.
Mining ClaimPrefix Numbtr
-0^ q ̂ (D
(n
Expend. Days Cr.
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
\ — ̂ -^ \ 1 O
For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded
Date Recorded
Date A*prafc*d as Recorded
lining Rjfi*?*'// ff ~^
^W&dbL/Braj Records
\ hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Repon of Work annexed hereto, having performed the workD r witness?1 ;! s^mp cJu'tnn an ci 'o i 31 ' ** ( t? completion and The a r '"; e x H:: i e DO rt is fue.
i-^ie anu f'cstdi Adcresi of Person Certifying
I Date Certified
JOvXo-
Certified bv (Signature)
Ministry ofNaturalResources
Ontario
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
The Mining Act
Instructions: Pleas* type or print. If number of mining claims traversed
exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Not*: Only days credits calculated in the
"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.
Do not us* shaded areas below.
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right
Qrai.*7'*
Special Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 da^CDjis includes linej^tgngf" C
For each additional survey: using the same gr i 4} ( /C 'i
Enter 20 days (for each)l' 1''?/"!-,'"'"' '^ LAlii
Man Days
ft!p^imi^ ̂ . i E? i 1 V t. li'iyAUG211984
P.M.,9ilpillil2ili2|9|4|ri|fj
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
t tyMa^r^ometerv k. U
- Radiometric
^ 19&P-Geological
^Q&titta&iGeophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days per Claim
Days per Claim
Days perClaim
4fc
^
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total ExpendituresTotal
Days Credits
InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.
Da d ed Agent (Signature)
Certification Verifying Report of Work
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim
Prefix Number
to
"708 9T
Expend. Days Cr.
Mining ClaimPrefx
P*"*rf: '.'.'-:
Number
"l Cfl
"7090^1
Expend. Days Cr.
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded
Date Recorded
Date Approved as Recorded
Mining Recorder
Branch Director
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the workor witnessed same during a r.d/o" a fter its completion ana the annexed report is ti ue.
Name and Postal Acaress o* Person CertifyingO si '~
f'-ml -iT;DatV Certified by (Signatur*)
1362 (81 '91
Ministry ofNaturalResources
Ontario
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
The Mining Act
Instruction*-: Please type or print. If number of mining claims traversed
exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: Only days credits calculated in the
"Expenditure*" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.
Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(i) Township or
\OOVY\S trProspectorClaim Holaer(i)
v^vra rA
Survey Company Dete of Survey (from Si to)"5v "t O JLi l "\ M^t \ i -^ xi^T J ^^ i lDay l Mo. l Tr.' j Day ) Mo.
Name and Address of Author (of Geo Technical report)
Total Miles of line Cut
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Cottrmns at right
fcInA.
7i
Special Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. fl?iiC f*includes line cufflno}. V.
For each additional su/Vf vr*using the same grid: ' - '~ O
Enter 20 days (for each)
iViimljjj jj
Man Days
PORCUPINE MiMir.'o CIV;:.:CM
) Igsd ejjtelBptjJKsrinerjsl ;
i y1. P.M.
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions
to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
i. l (vUgafijcjT^ter
- Radiometric M fi 1QO/1" Isnt}
- Otffer ^
'fWu^Ci'lONGeochemical
rophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days per Claim
Claim
Days per Claim
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed
Performed on ClaimU)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total Expenditures
S H- 15
Total Days Credits
ss
Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
,rded Holder or Agent (Signature)
ajj^^^j ̂ y jj*** v ^ ̂ V t ^^*V.
Certifi^tion Verifying Report of Work
Mining Claims TraversecnList in numerical sequence)Mining Claim
Prefix
i:4-'T;r
^i^kty..
Number
^
Expend. Days Cr.
Total number of mining claim* covered by this report of work.
For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded
Date Recorded
Date Approved as Recorded
Mining Recorder
Branch Director
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the workor witnessed same durina and/or after its comoietion and tne annexed reDOrt is true.
Name and Postai Aaorass of Person Certifying
" - (\~Vp-XS c H ~^f^0fr fr.
MirffstryofNaturalResources
Ontario
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
c?** H vj( M The
Instructions: Please type or print. If number of mining claim traversed
exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: Only days credits calculated in the
"Expenditure*" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Day* Cr." column*.
- Do not use (haded area* below.Type of SurvevU)
Claim Holder(s)
Township or Area
P tTT ?-'
Prospector's Licence No.
Address
Survey Company te of Survey (from 6 to) Total Miles of line Cut
Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Techmcal report)
iQ .L . r^. ix-.\ VXv^CvaLnAlcffCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right
K
1
II.
ri *
Special Provisions
For first survey:
E mer 40 days. (Thisincludes line cutting)
For each additional survey:using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
" ifa iSterIkofiaT(s)fierfn\ '.l w^L O 1 |j
AUG21S84'P.M.
l*y|*.*l*~ 1 f 1 4l*?l?lv|"
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions
to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days per Claim
Days per
Days per Claim
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total ExpendituresTotal
Days Credits
InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)
Certification Verifying Report of Work
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical seqinAiceT
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded
Date Recorded
Date Approved as Recorded
Mining Recorder
Branch Director
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after us completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Aotiress of Person Certifymj
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
#5433 Type of Survey(s) Hp-1 KM and
Township or Area Tooms. Halcrow f Greenlaw Claim HniHer(s) Regal Petroleum Ltd.-—^
Aerodat Ltd
Author of Report Scott HoggAddress of Anrhnr 3883 Nashue Dr., Misslagaucfa t Qnf Covering Dates of Survey Mar. 31/84 to Aug.
(finecutting to office'
Total Miles of Line Cut______N/A————
1QRA
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer..—Radiometric———Other^————
DAYS per claim
Geological.Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne turveyi)
Magnetometer Electromagnetic —— Afl Radiometric(enter days per claim)
HATE- Sept. 5/84 SIGNATURE
Res. Geol.. . Qualifications.Previous Surveys
File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(muter)claims. 6 pages•^••••••••••••••^••••••••CvTl^p******
TOTAL CLAIMS IZ3-
837 (5/79)
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations _________________________Number of Readings — Station interval————————————————————————— Line spacing -——--.-.Profile scale___________________________.____-———-^—-—^—-Contour interval.
Instrument —
ad ZC
i
Sd
s
UL
Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ___
Instrument ________________________________________________——___—— Coil configuration ——————————————————————————————————————————————————Coil separation —^—.——————^-^^————^—^——————^-^^^-^—^-^———.^^—^^^—^
Accuracy ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— Method: CD Fixed transmitter G Shoot back CD In line CD Parallel line
Frequency—————————————————————————————————— n (specify V.L.F. tUtion)
Parameters measured ——^^^————^^^^—^——-^——^^^————.
InstrumentScale constant.Corrections made.
Base station value and location.
Elevation accuracy.
Instrument ———————————————————————————————————————————-— Z Method D Time Domain CD Frequency DomainP Parameters - On time __________________________ Frequency —————<
-Off time—————————————————————————— Range— Delay time ———
— Integration time.
Power.^ Electrode array — {z Electrode spacing .
Type of electrode
SELF POTENTIAL
Instrument——————————————————————————————————^——— Range.Survey Method _________________________________________-——-—
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRIC
Instrument-———Values measured.Energy windows (levels)_______________________________________—
Height of instrument___________________________Background Count. Size of detector^^^^^-—^——-^^^-———————..—.—^^^——————.^———Overburden ———^—.^^...—.—.——...—.^^^——....^^^————————_____-—
(type, depth — indude outcrop nup)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)
Type of survey^^^^^^—^^^^—^^^^^^-^———- Instrument ——————————^—^———^—^^^—^— Accuracy——————————————————————————Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS
Type of cnrvpyM EM and Magnetics (Helicopter Sortie)1^-—^————l-——---—Instrument(s) Aerodat 3 frequency Geonics EM/Geometrics G-803 proton
(specify for each type of survey)Accuracy___0 ± l gamma___
(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft ""*^ Aerospatlale A-Star 35QD Helicopter1Sensor altitude EM *30m j Mag L f\
Navigation and flight path recovery mpthnH Mnt-nrnlradar positioning path system/Geochem tracking r.atnera to record flight
Aircraft altitude ——— 60m _______________________ Une Sparing IQQm ,^-^^-———..^..—Miles flown over total arpa 205rSfi miles_____________Over claims only "1*33 mil,
S" 7 f
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————
Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain-^——————
Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis.
ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent
p. p. m. p. p. b.
n aa
Cu, Pb,
Others—
Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-{circle)
Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——
Field Laboratory AnalysisNo.(-^—-^-———
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, icreening, crushing, uhing)
Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used——
Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory—- Extraction Method— Analytical Method—— Reagents Used —————
.tests)
.tests)
-tests)
General. General.
REGAL PETROLEUM LIMITED - J5433 (SWAYZE PROJECT)
173 Staked Claims in Tooms, Halcrow and Greenlaw Townships, Porcupine Mining Division
Claim No.
P688585-P688586- -.P688587-P688588-P688589*P688590.P688595*P688596-P688597*P688598*P688599*P688600-P68860rP688602*P688603-P688604-P688605-P688606-P688607-P688608-P688609.P688610-P708930-P708931-P708932'P708933-P708934-P708935'P708936'P708937-P708938-
Township
ToomsToomsToomsTooms
ToomsTooms
Tooms
Tooms
Tooms
Tooms
Tooms
Tooms
Tooms
Tooms
Tooms
Tooms
ToomsToomsToomsToomsToomsGreenlawGreenlawGreenlawGreenlawGreenlawGreenlawGreenlawGreenlawGreenlawGreenlaw
Recording Date
March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4 ,March 4,March 4,March 4 ,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,
1983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983
2.
REGAL PETROLEUM LIMITED - J5433 (SWAYZE PROJECT)173 Staked Claims in Tooms, Halcrow and
Greenlaw Townships, Porcupine Mining Division
Claim No.
P708939-P708940-P70894TP708942'P708943-P708944-P708945-P708P46-P708950-P708951-P708952-P708953-P708954-P708955-P708956.P708957-P708958-P708959.P708960.P708961,P708962*P708963-P708964-P708965'P708966-P708967*P708968-P708969*P708970-P708971*P708972*P708973 '
Township
GreenlawGreenlawGreenlawGreenlawGreenlawGreenlawGreenlawGreenlawToomsToomsToomsTooms
Tooms
ToomsTooms
ToomsToomsToomsTooms
ToomsHalcrowHalcrowHalcrow
HalcrowHalcrowHalcrowToomsToomsHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrow
Recording Date
March 4 ,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4 ,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,
19831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983
REGAL PETROLEUM LIMITED - f 54 33 (SWAYZE PROJECT)
173 Staked Claims in Tooms, Halcrow and Greenlaw Townships , Porcupine Mining Division
Claim No.
P708974-P708975* -.P708976-P708977-P708978-P708979-P708980-P7089"81.P708982-P708983*P708984'P708985-P708986-P708987-P708988-P709030-P709031'P709032-P709033'P709034-P709035-P709036-P709037-P709038-P709039'P709040-P709041-P709042'P709043-P709045-
Township
HalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrow
HalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrow
Recording Date
March 4 ,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4 ,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4 ,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4,March 4 ,March 4,March 4,March 4,
198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983198319831983
REGAL PETROLEUM LIMITED - 15433 (SWAYZE PROJECT)
173 Staked Claims in ToomsGreenlaw Townships, Porcupine
Claim No.
P709046 *P709047* -.P709048-P709049-P709050-P709051-P709052-P709v)53-P709054'P709055-P709056-P709057-P709058.P709059-P709060-P709061-P709062-P709063-P709064-P709065-P709066-P709067-P709068-P757390-P757391-P757392*P757393-P757394.P757395-P757396.
Township
HalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrow
HalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowTooms .HalcrowHalcrowHalcrow
HalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrow
, Halcrow andMining Division
Recording Date
March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4 , 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983March 4, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983
REGAL PETROLEUM
0 173 StakedLIMITED - #5433
Claims in Tooms,Greenlaw Townships , Porcupine
Claim No.
P757397.P757398- .P757399*P757400-P757401*P757402*P757403*P757404.P758284.P758285*P758310 mP758311-P758312-P758313-P758314'P758315-P758316-P758317-P758318-P758319*P752003-P752004-P752005*P752006-P752007*P752008"P779840*P779841"P779842.P779843.
Township
HalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrow
HalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrow
HalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrow
5.4
(SWAYZE PROJECT)
Halcrow and-Mining Division
Recording Date
May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983May 5, 1983December 23, 1983December 23, 1983December 23, 1983December 23, 1983December 23, 1983December 23, 1983December 23, 1983December 23, 1983December 23, 1983December 23, 1983
REGAL PETROLEUM LIMITED - 15433 (SWAYZE PROJECT)
173 Staked Claims in ToomsGreenlaw
Claim No.
P779844-P779845*P779846'P779847-P779870-P779871*P779872*P779873-P783631*P783632-P783633*P783634-P783637-P783638.P783639-P783640*P783641-P783642'P783643-P783644'
Townships , Porcupine
Township
HalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrow
HalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrow
HalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrowHalcrow
, Halcrow and -Mining Division
Recording Date
DecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecemberDecember
23, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 198323, 1983
1984 09 17 Your File: 335 Our File: 2.7152
Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioPAN 2S7
Dear Sir:
We have received reports and maps for an Airborne Geophysical (Electromagnetic 4 Magnetometer) Survey submitted on Mining Claims P 688585 et al In the Townships of Tooms, Greenlaw ft Halcrow,
This material will be examined and assessed anda statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.
Yours sincerely,
S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block. Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: (416)965-6918
A. Barr:se
cc: Regal Petroleum Limited 403 - 595 Howe Street Vancouver, B.C. V6C 2T5
cc: Scott Hogg3883 Nashua Drive Mlsslssauga, Ontario L4V 1R3
DAVID R. BELL GEOLOGICAL SERVICES INC.231 THIRD AVC.. SUITE 14
•OX 128O TIMMINS, ONTARIO
MN 7JS 170S l 2*4-42*6
REGISTERED
Se.pte.mbeA 5, J 9S4
Alt.. F. Mathew Land* kdminiA&iation Blanch Mining Land* Section MiniA&iy o^ Natural Room 6610, Whitne.y Block Qu.e.e.n'A Pauk Toronto, Ontasu.0 M7A 7W3
Peat. Mn..
Re: Regod PitSLote.um Ltd. #5433, 173 clown ptiopeAty P68&S8S vt at ___ in ToomA, tiatcsiou) and Gteenlaw
ptea&e. ^ind 2 copi&A o^ a. HeJLic.optM. BoAne EM and Magnetic finpont covesUng the. above. pnopeJity a* pet Ontcvuo
0(5 NatuAat ReAousiceA le^uiAementA . The. Repo/ut o fi Wo-tfe thiA uxu* lecotded August 21, 1984.
acknowledge MLUzJupt o^ the. above.
R.A.
RECEIVED
SEP i O 1984- 5433 - COM.&AP., claim*
M.pont* M INING U\i-jDS SECTION
Mining Lands Section
Control Sheet
File No J? 7/SZ.
TYPE OF SURVEY (̂ GEOPHYSICAL
____ GEOLOGICAL
____ GEOCHEMICAL
EXPENDITURE
MINING LANDS COMMENTS:
r
Signature of Assessor
Date
c-\
Crockett Twp.-M.740
v*W'.,t#'W
X*0 MWv-ffiijiiw;
Tooms Twp.-M. 1159
THE TOW OF
NSHIP
HALCROWDISTRICT OF
SUDBURY
PORCUPINEMINING DIVISION
SCALE: MUCH 40 CHAINS
LEGENDPATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SAIFLEASESLOCATED UNOLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYS *"POWER LINESMARSH G R MUSKEGMINESCANCELLED
®c.soLoc L.O.
MR,0 S.fl.O
^C.
NOT|S
400* Surfoc* Wight* Rtttrvation around ali' take* dnd rivert
OF ISSUE
' - SE? ^1 .284*1 Wt
r Ministry of Naluraf Resourcesj/l __ TORONTO
MINISTRY OF NATURL RESOURCES' * f
SURVEYS A ND MAPPING BRANCH
ro 0
m ai
(D 3 rr
o CD i* X) 00
Mou
ntba
tten
Twp.
- M
.875
IN
DIA
N
RE
SE
RV
E
No.
76 A
w?
n
l w
—l
—
^-
t _
——
. —
—f
—
i ,
- v
a.—
— -
*- 4
- —
L-
—K
^ w
'' S—
LL"•
'wf^
-11!
™.
—*
***Z
.—
o -^ o "O C
(T)
Gre
enla
w T
wp. -
"M.8
95
O m O m
"O ,
i—
' > z z
o en UD
o o
o
oD
4*
ax o M A
"^
<
O O O c 3 Q
.
o -4 m
-r-
; '
i*
"c
^-
T
~-.
' i.
*i
v
—
^-
s •*
-5
r; ^
q
5 5
^ o
Z -
2 s
5-
P -
?
^ S-
c; v^ ac
T
m .--/-
o O t.'
S
"*^
.0
^
m ^
O ^
o
"*>
W
*
mw
m
-S
x
r"
01
z -
O
.-
rn
-n
j*
V.
ZZ
O
" o
c
o
-z -o
m
o
m Z O
M l) "i
^ ^
]^
y y
Z
53l
l l
o c
*' r
'f
-
o
S '
C/)
O o
i:o
x
IS Z^
J
C5O
oC
iI5
^?2
om
o
3? 2 00 1C -o
Toom
s Tw
p. -
M.1
159
N
r\)
ro
s .a.
s a
r Ut
JU V
J? J
l
o CD 13 v; (D C/)
-p l Ol
00
Cun
ning
ham
Tw
p.-M
.744
i LT
> O S -o 2 C O3 Z
I
z CO O •n Z rn O c n rn
"D r z O 00
CD
Ol
o -p*
~
O
O
tften c o
o
oD
*
a.
Z O H m en
UO
r m O m Z o
(J) o > r m z n i
CD-o
zorn
rn
O Si!
O Z z en
(/m O>
H I m
00 Z en i
Al
RE
GA
L P
ET
RO
LEU
M
RB
OR
NE
E
LE
CT
RO
MA
GN
IN
TE
RP
RE
TA
TIO
N
SW
AY
ZE
AR
EA
ON
TA
RIO
SC
A^S
V
10,
000
'^
33C
66
0 '3
20
~ 'O
C 20
0 50
0
LIM
ITE
D
ET
IC S
UR
VE
Y
MA
P
zd
; K
ilor^
efr
e
.... ,. .;,
-A^E
: M
arch
, A
pril
1984
—•^
VA
ER
OD
AT
LIM
ITE
D
sV
i-'
NO
:
41 0
1
o
V
(M
VL
F-E
M
con
du
cto
r a*
9
WW
WV
-^P
EM
RE
SP
ON
SE
>
®
se-
2;30
- G
C
3-5
4-8
U
2 -
4 "
O
<
2
© © © ©
23
0
RE
GA
L P
ET
RO
LEU
M
LIM
ITE
D
PR
OJ
EC
T
54
33
A
IRB
OR
NE
EL
EC
TR
OM
AG
NE
TIC
SU
RV
EY
P
RO
FIL
ES
SW
AY
ZE
AR
EA
ON
TA
RIO
Mar
ch,
Apr
il 19
84
T A
ER
OD
AT
LIM
ITE
D41
O
CO
AX A
L-
946
Hz
RE
GA
L P
ET
RO
LEU
M
LIM
ITE
D
PR
OJE
CT
5
43
3
TO
TA
L F
IEL
D M
AG
NE
TIC
MA
P
SW
AY
ZE
AR
EA
.O
NTA
RIO
•00
20C
Mar
ch,
Apr
il 19
84
TA
ER
OD
AT
LIM
ITE
D41
O
V
V 25
0
RE
GA
L P
ET
RO
LEU
M
LIM
ITE
D
PR
OJE
CT
5433
VL
F-E
M T
OT
AL
FIE
LD
CO
NT
OU
RS
SW
AY
ZE
AR
EA
ON
TA
RIO
33O
66
O
q r
/\'
p ! 7
10
^•^
-— k
—
i '
i ^
1320
1/2
mile
;oo
200
5OO
; Kilo
met
re
Mar
ch,
Apr
il 19
84
41 O
83
S3
000
'
4704
5'
\