REPORT ON CE2016

JOHN IMPAGLIAZZO

CE2016 CHAIR

CE2016 STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS

ACM

JOHN IMPAGLIAZZO * (HOFSTRA U)

SUSAN CONRY (CLARKSON U)

VICTOR NELSON (AUBURN U)

JOSEPH HUGHES (GEORGIA TECH)

WEIDONG LIU (TSINGHUA U, CHINA)

JUNLIN LU (PEKING U, CHINA)

ANDREW MCGETTRICK (STRATHCLYDE U, SCOTLAND)

* = CHAIR

IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY

ERIC DURANT (MSOE)

HERMAN LAM (U OF FLORIDA)

ROBERT REESE (MISSISSIPPI

STATE)

LORRAINE HERGER (IBM

RESEARCH)

CE2016 BOK KNOWLEDGE AREAS

(AS OF 2015 AUGUST 12)

CIRCUITS AND ELECTRONICS

COMPUTING ALGORITHMS

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE AND ORGANIZATION

COMPUTER NETWORKS

DIGITAL DESIGN

EMBEDDED SYSTEMS

INFORMATION SECURITY

PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE

STRATEGIES FOR EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES

SIGNAL PROCESSING

SYSTEMS AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT

SYSTEMS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

SOFTWARE DESIGN

CE2016 RELATED MATHEMATICS(AS OF 2015 AUGUST 12)

ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS

DISCRETE STRUCTURES

LINEAR ALGEBRA

PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS

SALIENT FEATURES OF CE2016

ELIMINATED TOPICS

BOK DRIVEN BY LEARNING OUTCOMES

• INSPIRED BY COMMUNITY COLLEGE IT EFFORT

• REALIZATION OF NEW ABET ENGINEERING STUDENT OUTCOMES

EACH KNOWLEDGE AREA DEFINED BY AREA SCOPE

• THREE TO SEVEN BROAD STATEMENTS

• AGGREGATE OF ALL KNOWLEDGE AREA SCOPES ESTABLISHES COMPUTER ENGINEERING AS A DISCIPLINE

EXAMPLE – SCOPE FOR KACIRCUITS AND ELECTRONICS

AREA SCOPE

THE KNOWLEDGE UNITS IN THIS KNOWLEDGE AREA COLLECTIVELY ENCOMPASS THE FOLLOWING:

1. PURPOSE AND ROLE OF CIRCUITS AND ELECTRONICS IN COMPUTER ENGINEERING …

2. DEFINITIONS AND REPRESENTATIONS OF BASIC ELECTRICAL QUANTITIES AND ELEMENTS …

3. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF SIMPLE ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS USING APPROPRIATE TECHNIQUES …

4. PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS THAT MAKE THEM USEFUL FOR CONSTRUCTING DEVICES …

5. PROPERTIES OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES, THEIR USE AS AMPLIFIERS AND SWITCHES …

6. EFFECTS OF DEVICE PARAMETERS; VARIOUS DESIGN STYLES ON CIRCUIT CHARACTERISTICS …

7. PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND TRADE-OFFS ASSOCIATED WITH DISTRIBUTING SIGNALS …

FOLLOWED BY:

• CORE KNOWLEDGE UNITS [10]

• SUPPLEMENTAL KNOWLEDGE UNITS [2]

COMPARISON: CE2016 WITH CE2004

CE201613

121

4

420

120

NONE

MANY

3 TO 7

ATTRIBUTE# KNOWLEDGE AREAS

# KNOWLEDGE UNITS

# MATHEMATICS AREAS

# CORE CE HOURS

# CORE MATH HOURS

# TOPICS

# LEARNING OUTCOMES

# SCOPE STATEMENTS PER KA

CE200416

170

2

420

66

NUMEROUS

MANY

NONE

CE2016 ACTIVITIES

CONFERENCESSIGCSE SYMPOSIUM 2012, RALEIGH

IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION

2012, SEATTLE

2013, OKLAHOMA CITY

2014, MADRID

2105, EL PASO

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, BRAZIL

PRESENTATIONS

IEEE TALE 2014, WELLINGTON, NZ

IEEE EDUCON 2015, TALLINN, ESTONIA

ASEE 2015, 2016

ECEDHA SYMPOSIUM, 2015, 2016

PUBLICATIONSIEEE COMPUTER

ECEDHA NEWSLETTER

IEEE EDUCATION SOCIETY NEWSLETTER

SIGCSE BULLETIN

ASEE ECE DIVISION

WHEN NEAR FINISHED SUMMARY IN:

ASEE PRISM / ADVANCES IN ENGG ED

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION

ACM INROADS

SCHEDULE

2015 SEPTEMBERLAUNCH FIRST INTERIM REPORT / PUBLIC REVIEW & COMMENT

2016 FEBRUARY LAUNCH SECOND INTERIM REPORT / PUBLIC REVIEW &

COMMENT

2016 SUMMER FINALIZE DOCUMENT

2016 FALL ENDORSEMENT BY ACM/IEEE-CS AND PUBLISH

REPORT ON IT2017

JOHN IMPAGLIAZZO

IT2017 EDUCATION BOARD LIAISON

IT2017 TASK GROUP MEMBERS

ACM (10) / IEEE-CS (1)MIHAELA SABIN * (U NEW

HAMPSHIRE)

HALA ALRUMAIH (AL IMAM U, KSA)

JOHN IMPAGLIAZZO (HOFSTRA U)

BARRY LUNT (BINGHAM YOUNG U)

MING ZHANG (PEKING U, CHINA)

BRENDA BYERS (INDUSTRY-CIPS-

IEEE)

WILLIAM NEWHOUSE (NIST/NSA)

WILLIAM PATERSON (MT. ROYAL U,

CANADA)

SVETLANA PELTSVERGER (KENNESAW

U)

CARA TANG (PORTLAND COMM COLLEGE)

BARBARA VIOLA (VIOLA SOLUTIONS)

* = CHAIR

Peltsverger

IT2017 REPORT CONTENT

BASED ON IT2008 REPORT

INFORMED BY

CURRICULUM REPORTS

• IT2014 FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGES

• CE2016 DEVELOPMENT AND CE2004

• CS2013, IS2010, SE2015

OTHER CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES

• CURRENT IT DEGREE PROGRAMS IN CHINA

• CS PRINCIPLES PROJECT

• LIAISE WITH CSAB AND ABET

• ACTIVITIES WITH JAPAN

MATHEMATICS BASED ON PROGRAM NEEDS

FEATURES OF IT2017

ELIMINATE “TOPICS”

LEARNING OUTCOMES GROUNDED IN KNOWLEDGE UNITS

• INSPIRED BY COMMUNITY COLLEGE IT EFFORT

• OTHER CURRENT ACTIVITIES

EACH KNOWLEDGE AREA DEFINED BY AREA SCOPE

• THREE TO FIVE BROAD STATEMENTS

• FIVE TO FOURTEEN KNOWLEDGE UNITS

• AGGREGATE OF ALL KNOWLEDGE AREA SCOPES ESTABLISHES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AS A DISCIPLINE

BOK COMPARISON: IT2017 WITH IT2008

IT201710

10 (MENU

4

5 TO 14

420

90

NONE

3 TO 8

3 TO 7

ATTRIBUTE# IT KNOWLEDGE AREAS ESSENTIAL

# IT KNOWLEDGE AREAS APPLIED

# MATHEMATICS KNOWLEDGE AREAS

# KNOWLEDGE UNITS PER KA

# CORE IT HOURS

# CORE MATH HOURS

# TOPICS PER KNOWLEDGE UNIT

# LEARNING OUTCOMES PER KNOWLEDGE UNIT

# SCOPE STATEMENTS PER KA

IT200812

NONE

1

3 TO 11

276

38

NUMEROUS

MANY

NONE

IT2017 ACTIVITY PLAN

MEETINGSCOMMITTEE CONVENED 2014 JUNE

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETINGS

2014 JULY (MINI)

2014 (AUGUST)

2014 (MONTHLY)

COMMITTEE MEETINGS

2014 SEPTEMBER (FIRST VIRTUAL MEETING)

FACE-TO-FACE MEETINGS

2014 SEPTEMBER 17(AFTER THIS ED COUNCIL MEETING)

2014 OCTOBER, SIGITE (WHOEVER CAN MAKE IT)

2015 MARCH, SIGCSE (WHOEVER CAN MAKE IT)

2015 JULY ITICSE WORKING GROUP

2015 OCTOBER, SIGITE

CONFERENCES & PUBS

SIGITE CONFERENCES

2013, 2014

2015, 2016, 2017

SIGCSE SYMPOSIA

2015 (BOAF)

2016, 2017

POTENTIAL PUBLICATIONS

SIGITE NEWSLETTER

SIGCSE BULLETIN

ITICSE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS

ACM INROADS

OTHER RELATED AREAS

SCHEDULE

2015 NOVEMBERLAUNCH FIRST INTERIM REPORT / PUBLIC REVIEW & COMMENT

2016 APRIL LAUNCH SECOND INTERIM REPORT / PUBLIC REVIEW & COMMENT

2016 FALL LAUNCH THIRD INTERIM REPORT / PUBLIC REVIEW & COMMENT

2017 SPRING FINALIZE DOCUMENT

2017 SUMMER ENDORSEMENT BY ACM/IEEE-CS/OTHERS AND PUBLISH

REPORT ON EITBOK

JOHN IMPAGLIAZZO

MEMBER EITBOK COMMITTEE

WHAT IS EITBOK?

MEANINGENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BODY OF

KNOWLEDGE

PRINCIPAL SPONSORIEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY

EVOLUTIONSWEBOK

ENCOMPASSES IT, IS SWE

EITBOK SCOPE

A COMPENDIUM OF HIGH-LEVEL DESCRIPTIONS OF KNOWLEDGE AREAS REQUIRED FOR SUCCESSFUL OPERATIONS OF IT SERVICES

ENTERPRISE IT IS VITAL TO ALL ENTERPRISES

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYo CRITICAL AS ENTERPRISES BECOME LARGER

o EVOLVING, INCREASINGLY COMPLEX, MATURING DISCIPLINE

o FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLIE ASPECTS OF WHAT THE ORGANIZATIONS DO

UNDERSTAND, USE AND MANAGE TECHNOLOGY AS IT EVOLVES

EITBOK PROVIDES DIRECTION TO COMMONLY ACCEPTED ACTIVITIES AND BEST PRACTICES, REQUISITE KNOWLEDGE, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES, AND TERMINOLOGY.

EIT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE(AS OF 2015 JULY)

PART 1: THE ENTERPRISE PERSPECTIVE

1: ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE

2: STRATEGY AND GOVERNANCE

3: CHANGE INITIATIVES

4: INTEROPERABILITY

5: SECURITY

6: QUALITY

7: DISASTER PREPAREDNESS AND RECOVERY

PART 2: THE LIFE CYCLE PERSPECTIVE

8: REQUIREMENTS

9: ACQUISITION

10: CONSTRUCTION

11: TRANSITION

12: SUSTAINMENT

13: OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT

14: RETIREMENT

ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS

CONFLICTIT2017 BOK CALLED ITBOK VS. EITBOK

DISCUSSIONSFEBRUARY THRU MAY OF 2015

POSSIBILITYPROFESSIONAL ENTERPRISE EXAM

OUTCOME EITBOK PROJECT NOW A JOINT EFFORT – IEEE-CS WITH ACM

IT2017 NOW A JOINT EFFORT – ACM WITH IEEE-CS

QUESTIONS ON CE2016QUESTIONS ON IT2017QUESTIONS ON EITBOK

? ? ?