report of the committee on autonomous colleges in kerala · report of the committee on autonomous...

Report of the Committee on Autonomous Colleges in Kerala

Dr. Joy Job Kulavelil (Chairman)

Dr. J Rajan (Member)

Dr. KK Damodaran (Member)

Sri. Shefeeque V (Coordinator)

The Kerala State Higher Education Council

July 2018

FOREWORD

KSHEC‘s Committee on Autonomous Colleges in Kerala has made a thorough study

of the functioning of Autonomous Colleges in the state. It has probed the experience of

students, teachers, various academic bodies, the management, university and the government

with respect to the system of autonomous Colleges. Relationships across all these categories

are strained and aggravated through litigations. Court verdicts have resolved some of the

conflicts, but many issues still persist for want of appropriate rules and regulations. Whatever

provision exists is too dubious to be of any use. Appraising consequences thereof, the

Committee has provided in this report its suggestions, priorities and recommendations that

are brought to bear on the Government to ensure the smooth functioning of the system of

autonomy by providing necessary rules and regulations. A set of draft rules and regulations is

also provided in the report.

It is a matter of global consensus that higher education institutions should enjoy

academic autonomy and freedom for enabling teaching/learning to be excellent and

innovative. Autonomous Colleges should be free of interference from the university and the

state. Nevertheless, the institutions ought to create a deserving environment through its

distinct stature of academic credibility, status and ranking, which would preclude the need for

any extraneous regulatory control. Such institutional dispositions being rare in the country, a

college is affiliated to University for regulatory control. It is a university‘s constitutionally

ordained right to discharge regulatory functions over teaching and evaluation in an affiliated

college because only on being assured of due diligence and accountability thereof, the

university can award the degree. Kerala‘s Autonomous College Act 2015 granted autonomy

and freedom but under the tutelage of the University Acts in the state.

Granting much more academic and financial powers for instituting self-financing

courses and exacting higher fees, UGC‘s Graded Autonomy Regulation (GAR), 12 February

2018 has virtually nullified the supervisory function of the university. As the findings of the

present report vouch for, some of the autonomous colleges have already exercised this

freedom defying the university rules and upsetting government avowal of equity and access.

GAR makes it explicit that granting autonomy and freedom is mere rhetoric, and that the real

national agenda is not quality assurance but unbridled promotion of private trade in higher

education.

GAR has to be seen as a means to accelerate private financing of higher education,

and help the sector entrench itself as dominant. Permitting private institutions to start stand-

alone programmes, charge enhanced fees, and appoint teachers at whatever emoluments they

like, reflects the Government‘s strategic plan to withdraw itself from the higher education

sector. It is all done in great haste by the union Government using the neo-liberal

development strategy of functional autocracy that ignores democratic procedures under the

excuse of inordinate delay. Naturally this involves consequences of bypassing the state‘s

constitutional rights and privileges over items in the concurrent list. This is in alignment with

the union government‘s overt commitment to neo-liberal finance policy. NITI Ayog‘s advice

is to bring the financial allocation to higher education further down from 3.7% of the GDP. A

new Higher Education Financing Agency (HEFA) is in the making, which proposes a fresh

system of loan-funding scheme to be operated through the Canara Bank. There is sustained

bureaucratic pressure on the nation to reduce public investment in the higher education

sector. Indifference to filling teaching posts in colleges and universities is a clear indication

of it. All this shows a determined deviation in the national policy of higher education

funding.

KSHEC Report on Autonomous Colleges is of unprecedented significance in the

national context of overexposed and quick privatization. Kerala Government is not opposed

to the idea of autonomy and freedom to higher education institutions in the public sector. Its

policy has been to encourage public sector higher education institutions of heritage and

academic quality to acquire autonomy. Nevertheless, the Government, committed to the

cause of combining excellence in education with equity and access, cannot extend unstinted

support for privatization. This approach of the state government is being completely upset

now. KSHEC, therefore, feels that there is a need for the state government to stake its

constitutional claims against the union government‘s undemocratic rush about reforming

higher education, a vital item in the concurrent list.

Vice Chairman

Committee Chairman’s Note

The following report is an outcome of a review exercise commissioned by the Kerala

State Higher Education Council (KSHEC), following a directive from the Government of

Kerala. The Committee was assigned that task of studying the academic and other aspects of

autonomous colleges in the state, and of preparing a report for submission to the Autonomy

Approval Committee and the Government.

The scale and methodology of the study was determined in consultation with the Vice

Chairman and the Executive Body of the KSHEC. Recognizing the need to hold extensive

consultations with all the stakeholders, the committee entered into wide ranging dialogues

with the 19 autonomous colleges, represented by the managements, faculty, students, and

parents. The committee also met and obtained critical inputs from representatives of the

Teachers‘ and Students‘ organizations, and reviewed the documents pertaining to the granting

of autonomy in the state.

It was realized very early that the implementation of autonomy in the state had been

problematic. There seemed to be a pronounced gap between the professed outcome of

autonomy, and its real impact. Hardly any consensus could be perceived among the

stakeholders on what ―autonomy‖ signifies. The terms that dominate the autonomy debate

lack clarity. ‗Academic autonomy,‘ in particular, is no more than a vaguely apologetic

misnomer. The relation between an autonomous college and the parent university, procedures

of evaluation, development of new academic programmes, and the involvement of the

existing faculty in the aided stream, all remain extremely ill defined and fuzzy.

Beginning from 2014, autonomy has been granted to colleges in accordance with the

provision of Act (Third Amendment), 2014, passed by the Kerala Legislative Assembly.

Higher Education being a concurrent subject, autonomy could not be granted to colleges on

the strength of the UGC guidelines alone. This was the context of the legislation. But making

a departure from the practice of issuing guidelines, the UGC has now (February 2018) issued

two sets of regulations suggest direct transactions between the institutions and the UGC (by

passing or drastically reducing the role of the state governments and the universities). The

implications of the new regulations within the mandated concurrent structure are yet to

unfold. These developments are no reflected in the present report, as it had been nearly

finalized when the regulations were issued. Higher Education and autonomous institutions in

particular, would thrive only in an environment of responsible centre-state relations, as melt

as through the partnership of educational institutions, universities, state governments, central

government, and the UGC.

In recent times, there has been an aggressive projection of ‗autonomy‘ as a radically

innovative solution to all the ailments of higher education, and of the affiliating system in

particular. The rhetoric, however, circumvents the task of clarifying the concept. it needs to

be realized that autonomy is not a new concept. In the pristine sense of academic freedom has

never been static. From the medieval European university to the rise of the neoliberal regimes

during the later decade of the twentieth century, the substance and content of autonomy has

been in flux. At different points of time, autonomy has implied assertion of reason, freedom

from ecclesiastical dictates, freedom from the controls of the nation state, or a sublime

philosophical ideal. The Bologna Declaration of 1999 and its subsequent modifications have

asserted the importance of mobility and competitiveness. With the transformation of

education into a tradable commodity/service, autonomy has taken on an entrepreneurial

profile. The existing legislation for autonomy and the recent regulations of the UGC

foreground these entrepreneurial aspects. The mandate is for autonomy to be realized

commercially, and not through public funding. Such aspects are usually played down, while

the attractive ideal of academic freedom is played up in order to legitimize the demand for

autonomy.

While presenting this report, I must gratefully acknowledge the patronage and

guidance of the Hon. Minister for Education and Chairman of KSHCE, Prof. C.

Raveendranath, Vice-Chairman of the KSHEC, Prof (Dr.) Rajan Gurukkal, the Principal

Secretary, Higher Education, Dr. Usha Titus, Member Secretary of KSHEC Dr. Rajan

Varghese, Registrar Hemaprabha D, Mr. K.T. George, Dr. J. Rajan, Dr. K.K. Damodaran,

Mr. Shefeeque V, Dr. Saji Mathew, Dr. Manulal P Ram, Mr. Suresh Babu A, Mr. Hari

Krishnan K, Smt. Deepika Lakshman, Divya A.S, Dileep M, Vaishakh V, Manu Satheesh

P.S, Sreejith M.G, Vimala and all our colleagues in the Council. I also thank all the

universities, organizations and individuals who participated in the collective consultations

leading to the preparation of this report.

JOY JOB KULAVELIL

Contents

Page

1. Foreword i

2. Committee Chairman‘s Note iii

3. Terms of Reference 1

4. Context 2

5. Background 3

6. Overview of Autonomous Colleges 5

7. Autonomous Colleges in Kerala 7

8. Methodology 9

9. Experience of Different Stakeholders 10

10. Committee‘s Opinion on UGC Regulation 2018 15

11. Committee‘s Findings 20

12. Suggestions and Recommendations 21

13. Recommendation on University Acts 25

14. Appendix I (Govt. Letter) 30

15. Appendix II (Office Order) 31

16. Appendix III (Autonomous Colleges in Kerala) 33

17. Appendix IV (Proceedings of the committee) 34

18. Appendix V (List of Participants in sittings and meetings) 35

19. Appendix V1 (UGC Regulation 2018) 60

Terms of Reference

1. To study the academic and other aspects of the functioning of the Autonomous

Colleges in the state and submit a report in this regard to the Autonomous Approval

Committee and the Government.

Context

The Kerala State Higher Education Council (KSHEC) has undertaken the present

study of the functioning of Autonomous Colleges in Kerala, as required by the Department of

Higher Education, Government of Kerala, vide letter No. C3/135/2017/H.Edn dated

22/08/2017, addressed to the Registrar of the Council (Appendix I). As per the letter, the

Department required the Council to conduct a study and submit a Report on the subject of the

academic changes happening in Autonomous Colleges. KSHEC‘s newly constituted

Executive Body considered the requirement in its first meeting held on 29.11.2017 and

constituted a Committee consisting of Dr. Joy Job Kulavelil as the Chairman, and Dr. K. K.

Damodaran and Dr. J. Rajan as Members, to undertake the study. Mr. V. Shefeeque,

Research Officer, KSHEC has been made the Coordinator of the Committee (Appendix II).

Background

Over the years, higher education in India has gone through a phase of unprecedented

expansion, marked by a huge increase in the volume of students, an exponential increase in

the number of institutions and a quantum jump in the level and types of funding. However,

this growth coincides with a number of challenges the higher education system as a whole is

faced with. It is learnt that the main areas of challenges are financing and management,

access, equity and relevance as well as values, ethics and quality of higher education. These

issues are of vital importance for the nation, since higher education is the most powerful tool

to build a value based and knowledge based society for the future. A crucial policy matter has

been to evolve ways and means of providing equal opportunities for quality higher education

to an ever increasing number of students.

As we know, education is universally recognized as an important investment in

building quality human capital which in turn promotes economic development and growth.

There is a felt need to analyse the education system in total and reform it periodically in order

to address the burning issues. The Indian Higher Education System has received much

criticism for its inability to improve its quality over time and for failing to cater to the

evolving needs of the students and the society. Several studies have already revealed that the

most important shortcoming in our higher education system is decline in quality. In the

course of various deliberations at different levels on the subject, one of the reasons cited for

the decline is increase in the number of colleges affiliated to a parent university. The

affiliation system has its own inherent ineffectiveness and inefficiencies in addressing

positively the needs of the affiliated institutions. It has been criticized that the affiliation

system is gravely inefficient to provide the requirements of affiliated colleges, both

academically and administratively. On the basis of this criticism, a move has been initiated to

move away from the affiliation system, which has been on the cards since 1960s.

The Kothari Commission made the first specific recommendation in this regard in

1966, which was subsequently endorsed by the National Education Policy 1986. Conferring

the status of autonomy to individual affiliated colleges is regarded as a solution for improving

the quality of higher education. Thus the University Grants Commission prepared concrete

guidelines for setting up Autonomous Colleges in 1973 and revised the scheme of

Autonomous Colleges to incorporate changes in force in 1998. The UGC has also offered

substantial financial assistance to newly formed Autonomous Colleges for activities aimed at

improving academic standards. UGC further evolved a set of guidelines for Autonomous

Colleges in 2007 and encouraged the States and Universities to give autonomy to their

colleges during the 11th

Plan period. The Central Government has directed the UGC to grant

autonomous status to at least 10 % of the affiliated colleges in the country during the plan

period. Again, the UGC published another set of guidelines in 2017 in this regard. Recently,

the UGC has published a regulation on Autonomous Colleges (Conferment of Autonomous

status upon Colleges and Measures for Maintenance of Standards in Autonomous Colleges

Regulations, 2018).

Academic autonomy is the peculiar freedom accorded to the academic community

consisting of the teachers, students, researchers and scientists for deciding the subject matter,

method and pedagogy in the matters of research, generation, dissemination and exchange of

knowledge in the larger academic interest of the society. There should not be any external

interference in deciding any of the above matters is the basic postulate of the progressive

concept of academic autonomy.

The concept of Autonomous Colleges as envisaged by the UGC is a measure to come

out from the problems caused to the Colleges and students due to the slow pace of academic

administration of affiliating Universities arbitrarily attributed to the excessive number of

colleges affiliated to some universities. Thus the conceptual contradiction between these two

entities is the basic reason for the current chaos in the autonomous Colleges sector across the

country. It is in this context that we have to examine the academic and administrative

functioning of autonomous colleges in Kerala.

Overview of Autonomous Colleges in India

Starting with the three Universities namely, Madras, Bombay and Calcutta, and

colleges affiliated to them, India today has 621 Autonomous Colleges affiliated to 104

universities in 24 States as on 08.09.2017 (University Grants Commission, 2018). A serious

move towards autonomy began in the early 1970s in alignment with the recommendations of

the Kothari Commission Report. It was noted in the Report that the affiliating system had led

to a lot of inefficiency and contributed substantially to the widening gap between quality in

Indian education system and International standards. Undue delay befalls the decision-

making process of universities that struggle to manage numerous colleges affiliated to them.

Subsequently, Dr. P.B. Gajendragadkar Committee (1969-71) also stressed the need for

establishing Autonomous Colleges in the country to overcome the ill effects of affiliating

system prevailing for decades.

As a result of this continuous chain of progressive support for the idea of Autonomous

Colleges, the UGC became pro-active and sent a circular to all universities in 1973

recommending the setting up of Autonomous Colleges. The circular titled ‗Autonomous

Colleges: Criteria, Guidelines and pattern of Assistance‘ highlighted the objectives of

autonomy, the distortions and consequences of affiliation system, the relationship of

Autonomous Colleges with the parent universities, the procedures to be followed for the

conferment of autonomous status and the pattern of assistance given by the UGC to

Autonomous Colleges. It urged both the university and the government to involve in the

process of identifying colleges to be conferred with autonomous status.

The UGC defines autonomy to be a functional status conferred upon colleges,

granting them greater flexibility in academic matters for the uplift of academic standards and

excellence. In fact, the Government also encouraged granting the status of autonomy to more

colleges as suggested by the Kothari Commission Report. The Madras University was the

first University to grant the status to colleges affiliated to it. The lead came from the

American College, Madurai. Later, Madras University invited proposals from many colleges

for the purpose.

The National Policy of Education (1986) further suggested making statutory

provisions to enable Autonomous Colleges to award their own degrees or to confer Deemed

University status on them. Meanwhile the UGC prepared concrete guidelines for setting up

Autonomous Colleges in 1973, 1998, 2007 and 2017. It also offered substantial financial

assistance to newly formed Autonomous Colleges for activities related to the improvement of

academic standards in the college. Since these are only regulations, they seldom go binding

on the state-governments and state-universities. Hence many states did not implement it.

Of late, the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) made a

recommendation to confer autonomous status to colleges with a track record of good

performance. The Report on Autonomy of Higher Education (2005) published by the Central

Advisory Board of Education (CABE) has also recommended the establishment of

Autonomous Colleges.

The extent of autonomy enjoyed by the colleges differs in different states, depending

on the regulatory laws put in place by the State Governments. Similarly, the number of

Autonomous Colleges in different states indicates great disparities. For example, compared to

other states in the country, states like Tamil Nadu, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and

Odisha have more Autonomous Colleges.

Autonomous Colleges in Kerala

The first major initiative towards the establishment of Autonomous Colleges

in Kerala was made in 1987, with the then government constituting an expert committee

under the chairmanship of Dr. K. Gopalan to study the prospects of instituting Autonomous

Colleges in the state as well as to make recommendations to the government. However, the

concept of autonomy hardly evoked any enthusiasm in the state.

The Inter University Consultative Council (IUCC) constituted a committee in 1999,

chaired by Dr. K.K.N. Kurup, the then Vice Chancellor of the University of Calicut and Dr.

Syriac Thomas, the then Pro Vice Chancellor of the University of Kerala as the convener, and

representatives of various universities in the state as its members. It looked into the

possibilities of granting autonomy to colleges in the state. In fact, the committee took a

positive stand on granting no objection to eligible colleges in the state to seek Autonomous

status.

Meanwhile, Deemed University status was given to the Regional Engineering College

(REC) in Calicut. Further, initiatives were taken to convert REC into National Institute of

Technology. Similar steps were initiated under a World Bank funded project to grant

autonomous status to the Government Engineering College, Trivandrum. However, it went

unnoticed that academic autonomy was already given to the faculty and the departments in

the University of Kerala in 1995 as part of the introduction of the Choice Based Credit and

Semester System (CBCSS) in the PG courses conducted by the University Departments.

In early 2000s, a few colleges directly approached the UGC for autonomy. The UGC

provisionally granted autonomy to them subject to the concurrence of the universities and the

state government. However, the state government and the universities did not give the

concurrence. N. R. Madhavamenon Committee (2013), constituted by the Government of

Kerala submitted its report, voicing its consonance with previous reports and supporting the

issuance of no objection certificate to colleges with potential for excellence.

Kerala granted the status of autonomy to 9 colleges in 2014-15, 3 colleges in 2015-16

and 7 colleges in 2016-17. Today, Kerala has 19 Autonomous Colleges (18 Aided Colleges

and 1 Govt. College) affiliated to three universities: the University of Calicut, Mahatma

Gandhi University and the University of Kerala (See Appendix III). K.S.H.E.C‘s report on

Autonomous Colleges in Kerala emphasizes the importance of academic autonomy and

emphasizes that autonomy essentially implies academic autonomy as this is the domain of

quality. The State followed the UGC guidelines for the selection of colleges deserving

conferment of the status of autonomy but decided to refrain from granting status to many

colleges, on the ground that there must be further analysis of the problem before encouraging

more colleges to seek autonomy. By and large the State refrained from granting financial

autonomy to any college.

Methodology

This is an empirical study aimed at examining the functioning of the Autonomous

Colleges in Kerala. Both primary and secondary data have been used in this study. Primary

data is collected through public sittings, college visits, and meetings with the representatives

of students, teachers, management organizations and the representatives of universities.

Secondary data are official and unofficial documents published by the government,

Autonomous Colleges and different organizations working in this area.

Three public sittings were held at Thrissur (5, 6 January 2018), Ernakulam (11, 12

January 2018) and Trivandrum (9 February 2018). Students, representatives of students

unions, teachers, representatives of teachers‘ organizations, parents, representatives of PTA

committee, representatives of management, media journalists, political activists and general

public attended the sittings. A meeting with the representatives of Autonomous college

managements and principals was held on 12.01.2018 at Ernakulam. Managers and principals

of all Autonomous Colleges attended the meeting. A meeting with the representatives of

teachers‘ and students‘ organizations was held on 20.01.2018 at Trivandrum. Representatives

of all major teachers‘ and students‘ organizations attended the meeting. A meeting with the

representatives of universities was held on 30.01.2018 at Ernakulam. Registrars, Controllers

of Examinations, and Syndicate members attended the meeting. Further, the Committee also

visited Maharajas College, St. Teresa‘s College and St. Albert‘s College to garner the opinion

of different stakeholders as well as to understand the functioning of autonomy (For details,

please see Appendix 1V & V).

Experience of Different Stakeholders

Students

The students are of the opinion that the autonomy granted to their colleges did not

produce the desired effect in terms of academic quality, though most of them felt that the

status of autonomy has helped in timely conduct of admissions, examinations and more

importantly announcement of results. They expressed strong dissent over the fact that they

have no representation in any of the statutory bodies of the autonomous colleges as a result of

which they have no platform to raise their grievances. It is also to be particularly noted that

most of these colleges do not maintain any grievance redressal mechanism as stipulated by

the University. The students also pointed out instances of violation of reservation policies and

other criteria pertaining to admissions. They further drew the Committee‘s attention to the

instances of lack of transparency in evaluation, both internal and external. The students are

greatly aggrieved by the colleges‘ sole concern for completion of portions and conduct of

exams while not being concerned about the teaching-learning process. The students feel that

some of the colleges do not have sufficient infrastructure for the smooth conduct of academic

programmes.

Most students felt that the syllabi are rarely updated because of the ceiling prescribed

by the university. They also expressed their complaints about delay in obtaining final

certificates and migration certificates from the University. The students also complained that

their degrees do not receive equivalency or recognition in other Universities in Kerala.

Most students also feel that more regulatory powers should be vested with the

University in order to ensure access, equity and excellence. For them, it is vital in the context

of new UGC regulations on Autonomous Colleges.

Teachers

Teachers feel that the existing Act and new regulation by the UGC provides enormous

authority to the managements and this would have serious impact on the democratic rights of

teachers and students. According to them, the managements have violated the norms in the

appointments to many statutory bodies. They feel that the teachers‘ representatives in

statutory bodies are often arbitrarily chosen by managements. The absence of proper rules

and regulations at the University level creates much chaos that ultimately makes the

academic community suffer. They are also of the opinion that the Autonomous Colleges in its

present nature cannot make any kind of qualitative changes in the curriculum and pedagogy.

However, the admission and exams are taking place on time. Since the focus is more on the

conduct of exams on time, the teachers have to compromise the quality of teaching-learning

process. Moreover, strange compositions of Board of Studies (Sociology & Physical

Education) and single Board for both UG and PG also affect the quality of the syllabi and

curriculum.

The commencement of numerous self-financing courses without any check and by

using the infrastructure of Aided colleges affected the quality of both streams. The teachers

of self-financing stream are not paid well either.

The workload of teachers has tremendously increased. The examination related

additional duties from the University have doubled the workload of teachers. This has

affected the quality of teaching in these colleges. The Controller of Examinations, besides

his/her normal teaching assignments, has to attend to additional duties.

Most of the teachers expressed serious concern over the deteriorating academic

quality caused by insufficient teaching days. According to them, the emphasis is on timely

conduct of exams which force them to rush through the syllabus. They also feel that more

autonomy to bring in substantial changes in the syllabus and curriculum would help them

improve the system. The teachers feel that some of the colleges do not have sufficient

infrastructure for the smooth conduct of academic programmes.

Most teachers also feel that more regulatory powers should be vested with the

University in order to ensure access, equity and excellence. for them, it is vital in the context

of new UGC regulations on Autonomous Colleges.

Management

Managements expressed their satisfaction over the idea of Autonomous Colleges.

However, they have expressed concerns over rising expenses to run the institution. They are

of the opinion that the present Autonomous Grant from the UGC is insufficient. They also

feel that more academic and administrative freedom could be granted in areas such as

syllabus revision, starting of new programmes, fixing of fee structure etc. They demanded

more freedom to start new self-financing courses. Colleges affiliated to Mahatma Gandhi

University also feel that they are being ―victimized‖ by the University in terms of penalties

and additional fees. Since many provisions of the Act are either contradictory or unclear, they

are forced to approach court of justice to resolve many issues. The ambiguities in the Act and

statute result in the unending deadlocks with the University and the government.

The management of Maharajas College, the only government college that has been

conferred autonomous status, is facing multiple issues. They are issues pertaining to its

structure as a government college, and need to be addressed on priority basis. The Maharajas

College does not enjoy the administrative and financial flexibility enjoyed by aided colleges.

The Director of Collegiate Education being its manager, the college suffers from constraints

to get administrative sanctions from the Directorate at Trivandrum for any small decision,

and this in turn affects the development of the college seriously. Since administrative tasks

are enormously high in the Autonomous Colleges, the Maharajas College feels that such

bureaucratic hindrances would question the spirit of academic autonomy itself. The shortage

of supporting staff in different offices causes delay in extending various services to students.

The occasional transfer of teaching and non-teaching staff severely affects the functioning of

the college. Moreover, though Maharajas College is considered a heritage institution, its

infrastructural facilities are abysmally poor, when one takes note of class rooms, bathrooms,

staff rooms, administrative offices, etc.

The managements in general feel that they should be given more freedom and

flexibility in terms of academic, administrative and financial matters.

Parents

Parents expressed contentment over the conduct of exams and declaration of results.

However, they do not feel qualitative changes in the curriculum or the standard of question

paper. Some feel that the admission and examination procedures are not transparent and that

there is no regulatory mechanism to verify the system. They also point out that the individual

and political rights of students are curtailed by Autonomous managements. Some feel that

government should give additional support to Autonomous Colleges to run the institution

better. The new UGC regulations‘ provision that grant authority to the managements to fix

the fee structure is a matter of serious concern for many of them. Some parents complained

that the infrastructure in certain Autonomous Colleges is insufficient.

University

The universities feel that their regulatory powers have been curtailed by the Act

passed by the state legislature in 2014 and the UGC regulation (2018) on Autonomous

Colleges. The Universities feel that the new regulation would encourage commoditization of

higher education and that many provisions in the Act are contradictory in nature and hence

help the Autonomous Colleges to implement their vested interests. Many provisions in the

Act are not in harmony with University statutes. Though the University laws were amended

by the state legislature, subsequent rules and regulations were not made at the University

level. Hence, there are deadlocks in the relation between Autonomous Colleges and Parent

University.

The Universities feel that the procedures adopted by Autonomous Colleges reveal that

they are neither accountable nor transparent, and that the deeming provision granted by the

Act to the Autonomous Colleges is being used to violate the rules and regulations stipulated

by the government and universities to ensure quality, access, excellence and transparency in

the system. Many Autonomous Colleges have started many new programmes and revised the

syllabus without the proper consent of the parent University. This poses serious questions on

the quality of higher education. Some of the Autonomous Colleges went to the extent of

changing the curriculum proposed by the University including the number of credits of many

programmes. Universities also expressed concern over the provisions of new UGC

regulations on Autonomous Colleges that give unprecedented statutory powers to

Managements on the administration of these colleges.

Media/ Social Activists

Media representatives and social activists shared their experience of the Autonomous

Colleges. According to them, two major components of the Autonomous Colleges—

accountability and transparency have been crushed down by the managements. Some of the

managements and principals do not permit entry for media representatives to report the issues

raised by the students. Social activists feel that the present structure of Autonomous Colleges

is highly undemocratic in its nature and curtails the overall development of students as social

beings. They also feel that the students from the lower strata would naturally disappear from

the higher education sector. The new regulation introduced by the UGC would weaken the

idea of social justice in higher education. They also hope that the state government would

enact strong legislation that would challenge the authoritarian nature of UGC regulation.

Committee’s Opinion on UGC (Conferment of Autonomous Status upon

Colleges and Measures for Maintenance of Standards in Autonomous

Colleges) Regulations, 2018

The University Grants Commission (Conferment of Autonomous Status upon

Colleges and Measures for Maintenance of Standards in Autonomous Colleges) Regulations,

2018 was published on the UGC website on 12th

February 2018 (Appendix VI).

Article 246 (2) of the Constitution provides that a state legislature has power to make

laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in list 111(concurrent list). Clause (3) of

Article 246 also provides that state has exclusive power to make laws for such state with

respect to any of the matters enumerated in list 11 (State list). Entry 33 of the State list reads

as follows:

32 Incorporation, regulation and winding up corporations other than those specified

in list 1, and Universities, unincorporated trading literary, scientific, religious and

other societies and associations, Cooperative societies.

Entry 25 of list 111 Concurrent List reads as follows

25 Education, including technical education, medical education and universities,

subject to the provisions of Entries 63, 64, 65 and 66 of list 1, vocational and

technical training of labor

As such the State Legislature has power and competence to enact a law on the subject,

Universities and education. University Grants Commission in its notification has issued

detailed regulations with far reaching consequences for granting autonomous status to

colleges affiliated to a State University. The regulations further provide that the Autonomous

Colleges are empowered to formulate new courses and programmes, prescribe rules for

admission, fix fees for such courses and constitute their own Governing Body, Academic

council and Boards of Studies. The Governing Council of a private college shall consists of

12 members of whom 6 are nominated by the management, 2 by the Principal of the college

and one each by the UGC, the state government and the University respectively and the

Principal is the ex officio member. The Governing Council in which management has a

majority shall have the power to approve new programmes of study leading to degrees and

diplomas and institute scholarship, fellowships and studentships. Thus, the role of the

Universities is limited to the extent of forwarding applications from colleges for the

conferment of autonomous status.

The other function is to nominate persons to the committees of the Autonomous

Colleges. It is further provided that if the University does not forward the proposal or provide

nominees within 30 days, it shall be presumed that the University has no objection to the

proposal for conferment of autonomous status. Thus it can be seen that the University has

hardly any role in the matters pertaining to the conferment of autonomous status to colleges.

The role of the State government is also the same, as it shall have no role except that

the state government will continue to provide funds to autonomous colleges as it has been

providing before the conferment of autonomous status. It is also provided that the state shall

ensure filling up of all the sanctioned faculty positions on a regular and ongoing basis.

Further, regulation 7.4 stipulates that if the University and the State Government fail to

provide nominees for UGC expert committee, the UGC may proceed with on – spot visit and

take decision on the proposal of the college. UGC is, thus, assuming all the powers of the

affiliating universities even in matters regarding the award of degrees and diplomas,

instituting fellowships and maintaining academic excellence in the programme of study and

research conducted in the state.

Regulation 10.1 provides that Autonomous Colleges are free to start diploma

(undergraduate & postgraduate) and certificate courses without the prior approval of the

University. Autonomous Colleges are empowered to issue diplomas and certificates under the

seal of the college. The colleges are merely expected to inform the Universities about the

introduction of new courses. Issuance of graduate & post graduate diplomas by the colleges,

it is feared, would pave the way for commercialization of education. Moreover, autonomous

colleges have been empowered by the regulations to start new degrees or post graduate

courses / Ph.D with the approval of respective academic councils. An autonomous college

may rename an existing course as per the UGC notifications and the college is merely

expected to inform the University about it. It is further stated that an autonomous college

shall have an examination cell headed by a Controller of Examinations and the Principal shall

be the chief controller of examination. The regulation further states the constitution of

Governing body, Academic council, Boards of studies and the Finance committees of the

Autonomous Colleges. The most important body of a private college is its Governing council,

and majority of its members belong to the management and the teachers of the college. It has

power to take any decision on the functioning of the college as well as to approve new

programmes of study leading to degrees and diplomas.

From the above discussion it can be seen that autonomous colleges have the power to

start undergraduate & postgraduate courses including courses of studies leading to

conferment of PhD. The Autonomous Colleges can admit students on their own, prescribe

syllabus, fix fees for such courses at their own level. It is just mandatory that the colleges

shall inform the parent University about the introduction of new programmes. The

Universities are compelled to award degrees to the students of such courses without ever

having any opportunity to evaluate the necessity of such a courses, its standards, curriculum,

syllabi, the facilities in the colleges for such courses and the manner in which the

examinations are conducted etc. The State governments have absolutely no role in any of the

matters except granting of funds. The regulations have blatantly encroached upon several

powers hitherto exercised by Universities. Some of these regulations are also in conflict with

The University Laws (Third Amendment).

The University Regulations have been issued in exercise of the powers conferred by

clause (j) of section 12 read with clauses (g) of sub-section (1) of section 26 of the University

Grants Commission Act, 1956. Section 26 of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956

empowers the Commission to make regulations consistent with the Act and the Rules made

by the Central Government. Neither the Act nor the rules provide for the establishment of

Autonomous Colleges, now envisaged by the UGC. Clauses (f) & (g) of section 26 provide

only for defining the minimum standards for the award of a degree by the University and for

regulating the maintenance of standards and the coordination of work for facilities in

Universities. The UGC has in exercise of its powers under clauses (f) & (g) of section 26 of

the Act already issued (Minimum qualifications required for the Appointment and career

advancement of teachers in Universities and Institutions affiliated to it) regulations 2000, and

the UGC grants commission (The minimum standard of instructions for the Grant of the first

degree , etc ) Regulations 1985. The commission is empowered to issue guidelines or

instruction for coordination and determination and maintenance of standards of education in

Universities. But the UGC has now issued the new Regulations even to the extent of

conferring the powers so far exercised by the Universities on Autonomous Colleges. As such,

the Regulations issued are really beyond the powers of UGC, since the matter of

establishment of Autonomous Colleges cannot override the provisions contained in The

University Laws (Third Amendment) Act 2014.

Article 254 of the Constitution provides that where a law made by a State Legislature

with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent list contains any provisions

repugnant to the provision of an earlier law made by the parliament or an existing law with

respect to that matter, the law made by the parliament shall prevail. Here, there is no law

made by the parliament. The law made by the parliament in this case is the UGC Act which

empowers the UGC to fix the standards of education and the UGC is not empowered to issue

regulations which take away the existing provisions of University Act enacted by the State

Legislature. Moreover, University is a subject included in the State List.

Hence, it is clear that the UGC regulation would demolish the concepts of equity,

access and excellence in higher education. While the autonomy in the matter of fixing fees

and admission violates the fundamental principles of equity and access, the elimination of

regulatory powers of University and governments (on quality and adequacy of infrastructure)

lead to fall in academic excellence. This will also sideline all democratic bodies within higher

education and replace it with authoritarian structures. The absence of regulatory bodies might

result in the violation of reservation rules in admission and other matters. Moreover,

unrestrained powers to impose fee would exclude large numbers of students belonging to the

deprived sections from entering these institutions. These changes would question the very

idea of public education itself.

While pushing for more Autonomous Colleges, the same regulation direct the state

governments to continue their funding to these colleges—to those colleges where the state

government or universities do not have any say on academic or administrative matters. The

UGC is dictating the state governments on a matter that is in the ―concurrent list‖. Hence, it is

clear that the UGC‘s directions not only push towards unlimited commercialization and

privatization of higher education, but also rampant centralization of power in the higher

education sector.

While the UGC claims that autonomy gives greater academic freedom and allows

autonomous institutions to innovate, this regulation empowers the managements to raise

student fees, and start courses in the self-financing mode. This NITI Aayog-prompted policy

is a decisive move towards the privatization of higher education, and will mean the exclusion

of economically and socially disadvantaged sections.

The new regulation would have profound influence on the curriculum and methods of

dissemination. The introduction of Choice Based Credit and Semester System (CBCSS) has

altered the quality of teaching–learning in fundamental ways. Students feel encouraged to

choose courses that do not require great investment of time in study and library work.

Applied courses are preferred over theoretical courses in the traditional sciences, social

sciences, and humanities. Teachers constantly complain of reduced time for teaching and

greater burden of evaluation and examinations. All the new programmes would have modules

that train students in job skills immediately required by the market. This will undermine the

idea of education as a means to develop critical-thinking and knowledge base for

empowering a democratic citizenry capable of progressive social transformation.

Hence, amendments are required in the University Laws in Kerala for achieving the

objectives of establishing Autonomous Colleges by conferring more powers on the

Universities for proper guidance and evaluation of syllabi, curricula, evaluation

arrangements, conduct of examinations etc. It is also necessary for regulating fee structure in

such colleges to ensure social access, equity and excellence as well as for the promotion of

study and research considering the present socio-economic scenario of the state.

Committee Findings

1. Though the three academic and administrative components namely admission,

examination and declaration of results are on time to a certain extent in Autonomous

Colleges, certain discrepancies have been reported.

2. The Committee could find no qualitative change effected by the Autonomous

Colleges in the Higher Education sector of the state. There is no substantial qualitative

change in the curriculum or pedagogy. The Committee has found only cosmetic

changes in the syllabi.

3. The present Autonomous Colleges Act [University Law (Third Amendment) 2014]

does not seem to have incorporated provisions to ensure equity, transparency and

social justice in the functioning of Autonomous Colleges in the state.

4. Many provisions of the Act are contradictory and unclear because of which impasse is

created in the relation between different stakeholders.

5. The Act does not provide substantial regulatory powers to Universities/Government.

6. The Act passed by the state legislature does not ensure the representation of all the

stakeholders. The students, the primary stakeholders of Autonomous Colleges do not

have any representation in any of the statutory bodies. It is also to be seriously noted

that the teacher representatives are nominated by the managements.

7. Many Autonomous Colleges have started Self Financing courses without the

permission of University/Government.

8. The democratic rights of students and teachers are violated in many Autonomous

Colleges.

9. Instances of violations have been reported with regard to the Act, admission

procedures, appointment to various statutory bodies, conduct of Board of Studies etc.

10. There is no statutory mechanism to monitor the system as a whole.

11. Many complaints have been reported about the conduct of internal assessment and

End Semester examinations in Autonomous Colleges.

12. Rules and regulations have not been framed on the basis of Autonomous College Act

passed by the state legislature.

Suggestions and Recommendations

1. The University Laws (Third Amendment) Act, 2014 cannot ensure access, equity and

excellence in the realm of Higher Education in the state of Kerala. The many

provisions of the Act are either contradictory or unclear. This has resulted in many

academic, administrative and legal issues in the implementation of the Act. Moreover,

the University Grants Commission (Conferment of Autonomous Status upon Colleges

and Measures for Maintenance of Standards in Autonomous Colleges) Regulations,

2018 have generated serious academic and administrative concerns.

Hence this committee recommends a comprehensive amendment of University Laws

in the state to ensure social justice and academic excellence in Autonomous Colleges.

(A detailed recommendation on Act amendment is attached). This amendment shall

unequivocally ensure regulatory powers for Universities over autonomous colleges.

Major recommendations on the Act amendment are:

1.1 Representation of College Union Chairman/ Secretary in the Governing Council/

Academic Council respectively of Autonomous Colleges.

1.2 Teacher representatives in the Governing Council and Academic Council shall be elected

from the permanent teachers of the Autonomous Colleges.

1.3 The Ward member/ Councilor of the Grama Panchayath/ Urban local Body concerned

shall be included in the Governing Council of the Autonomous Colleges.

1.4 A Grievance Redressal Cell to look into students‘ grievances on teaching learning and

evaluation the conduct of Examinations and declaration of results shall be created. This

Cell shall have representatives of students, teachers and parents, in addition to the

Principal. The Report of the Grievance Redressal Cell shall be placed in the Governing

Council meeting.

2. The University Laws of Kannur, Calicut, Mahatma Gandhi and Kerala Universities

have been amended to establish Autonomous Colleges in the state. However, rules

and regulations have not been framed yet in this regard. This has resulted in deadlocks

between different stakeholders, especially between Autonomous Colleges and Parent

Universities.

Hence this committee recommends framing of appropriate rules and regulations at the

University level with immediate effect.

3. The provisions of the Act are violated by some of the Autonomous Colleges. The

grievances of different stakeholders are unaddressed. The Autonomous Approval

Committee should meet regularly as envisaged in the Act.

There should be a separate section/wing in the Universities deal with the academic

and administrative issues related to Autonomous colleges.

4. Board of Studies of Autonomous Colleges can make 30% of change in the syllabus

approved by the University. The Autonomous Colleges have to follow the University

regulations on the syllabus revision. The University shall not levy exorbitant fee for

syllabus revision.

5. Separate Board of Studies for all subjects of teaching (including the

subsidiary/complimentary courses) is mandatory in Autonomous Colleges.

Autonomous Colleges must send the complete list of Board of Studies to the

University after the reconstitution of the Boards.

6. University laws/ regulation with regard starting of new programme shall be

mandatorily followed by the Autonomous Colleges. This is vital to ensure

transparency and accountability in the process. The University must give its decision

within 90 working days after the receipt of application. The University has the power

to fix the fee in this regard. Deeming approval provision shall be used by the

Autonomous Colleges only after this period.

7. Teachers of Self Financing programmes of Autonomous Colleges shall have

qualifications prescribed by UGC. The recognition and approval of these teachers is

the responsibility of the Universities concerned.

8. In the light of proliferation of Self Financing Programmes in Autonomous colleges

beyond their Academic resources and infrastructural facilities, Universities have to

tighten their regulatory function.

9. The University has to distribute the final certificate to the students within 45 working

days after the receipt of final Tabulation Report from the Autonomous Colleges. The

final Tabulation Report cannot be altered under any circumstance.

10. The University and the State Government representatives in the Governing Council of

Autonomous Colleges have to ensure that the Autonomous Colleges follow the rules

and regulations stipulated by the University and the State Government in these

matters. Any violation in this regard may be reported to the Universities, the State

Government and Autonomous Approval Committee.

11. The academic programmes of Autonomous Colleges are not recognized by the

Universities of the state. This would affect the future of the students.

Steps should be taken to recognize the academic programmes of Autonomous

Colleges by the Universities of the State.

12. The post of Controller of Examinations shall be created in all Autonomous Colleges.

He/ she shall be a permanent faculty of the college. His/her workload shall be equal to

the Principal of the College.

13. The democratic rights of students and teachers have been violated by certain

Autonomous College managements. This is in fact an issue that prevails in many

other educational institutions as well. As far as Autonomous Colleges are concerned,

elected representatives of students need to be included in the Governing Councils and

Academic Councils.

14. The service of the principal and teaching faculty for a longer period is required in

Autonomous Colleges on academic grounds

15. Considering the specific problems of the Maharaja‘s College, the only government

college with Autonomy, the committee recommends the following to be implemented

specifically for the Govt. Autonomous College:

15.1More financial and administrative powers to be delegated to the Principal (especially as

the Secretary of the Governing Council).

15.2More staff members to be provided for the office of the Controller of Examinations.

15.3Expansion and upgrading of the college office to be urgently undertaken.

15.4Arrangements are to be made for the efficient utilization of funds for undertaking

innovative initiatives with ease. There should be proper coordination of the use of funds

from different sources (CDC, RUSA, Plan Fund, Autonomy Fund, etc.).

15.5A separate scheme for Government Autonomous College with regard to academic and

administrative matters may be worked out.

Recommendations on University Laws (Third Amendment) Act, 2014

The Autonomous Colleges were established in the state of Kerala as per the

University Laws (Third Amendment) Act, 2014 passed by the Kerala State Legislature. The

Acts of Kerala, Mahatma Gandhi, Kannur and Calicut Universities have been amended in this

regard. Now, an amendment of the Act is proposed at a time when the UGC has published a

new Regulation- University Grants Commission (Conferment of Autonomous Status Upon

Colleges and Measures for Maintenance of Standards in Autonomous Colleges) Regulations,

2018.

Most of the clauses in the Regulation issued by the UGC can be adopted in the

amendment so as to give statutory backing to such regulations. With this purpose and for

conferring academic autonomy to colleges in the present socio-economic scenario, The

University Laws may be amended on the following lines:

Following major amendments are suggested in the Kerala University Act as a

model to all other University Laws.

1. Academic Council, being an important authority with regard to all academic matters

like conduct of examination, prescription of course of study etc., it is very important

that the students, the primary stakeholders are to be included in the constitution of

Academic Council of an Autonomous College. It may also be noted that students‘

representatives are already there in the Academic Councils of every university.

In the present situation, Academic Councils do have four teachers from colleges representing

different departments not below the rank of Associate Professor, nominated by the Director

of Collegiate Education in the case of Government Colleges and by the Principal in the case

of other than a Government College are included. The method is by mere nominations. As for

giving more democratic structure to the Academic Council, the teachers are to be elected. For

that purpose, the following amendments are suggested in the Section 69 E:

(i) in section 69 E, in subsection (2), for Clause ©, the following clause shall be

substituted, -

―(c), four permanent teachers of colleges representing the different departments to be

elected from among themselves.

(ii) after Clause (f), the following Clause shall be added:

―(g) Students Union Chairman and General Secretary to be nominated by the

Principal.

1. Governing Council, being an important authority with regard all matters of an

Autonomous Colleges., it is very important that the students, primary stakeholders are

to be included in the constitution of Governing Council of an Autonomous Colleges.

And the teachers included in the Governing Council are to be elected from among

them and shall not be mere nominations. it may also be noted that students

representatives are already there in the Syndicates of all universities.

(i) In section 69I, in sub section (2),for clause (c), the following clause shall be

substituted namely:-

―(c) Three permanent teaches having not less than 8 years of service to be elected from

among themselves for a period of 2 years, provided that such teachers shall not eligible to

hold for more than two consecutive terms.

(ii) after clause (f), the following clauses shall be added to ensure the democratic

nature of the Governing Council.

―(g), the Students Union Chairman to be nominated by the principal, provided that

he/she shall vacate the office when a new Chairman is elected.

―(h), The Ward member/ Councilor of the Grama Panchayath/ Urban local Body

concerned shall be nominated by the respective body.

Similar amendments are also required in clause (b) and addition of clause (g) in

subsection of 4 of Section 69I.

2. The existing provision in section 69 N is that Controller of Examinations shall be a

person not below the rank of Associate Professor and having experience of not less

than two years in a department offering Post Graduate course of study. In most of the

Autonomous Colleges, there may not be sufficient Associate Professor and even in

cases where Associate Professors are available they may not be having experience in

department offering Post Graduate courses. As such, that provision has to be

modified:

(i) in section 69N, in sub section (i), for the words ―shall appoint a person not below

the rank of an Associate Professor, with experience of not less than two years as

the Head of a Department offering Post Graduate Course of study in a

Government College or a college other than an Unaided College‖, the words

―shall appoint a permanent teacher having not less ten years of service‖, shall be

substituted.

3. After section 65 N, the following section shall be inserted.

―69 NA (i). Grievance Redressal Cell.- there shall be a redressal cell in every Autonomous

College to consider the grievances of students with respect any matters connected with the

conduct of Examinations, Evaluation and declaration of the result.

(ii)- The Grievance Redressal Cell of an Autonomous Colleges shall consist of following

members, namely:-

(a) the Principal, who shall be the Chairman of the Cell

(b) Two senior most teachers, of whom one shall be a woman to be nominated by the

Principal.

(c) the Students Union Chairman

(d) PTA president

(iii)- the Grievance Rederessal Cell shall enquire into any complaint or petition regarding the

conduct of examinations, evaluations and declaration of the results and take a decision after

hearing the complainant.

4. Amendment of Section 69 P. –

1. as there is an apparent contradiction between the provisions in Section 69 F and 69P,

the opening sentence of sub section (i) of 69P may be amended as follows:-

In section 69P, in subsection (i) for the words ―Subject to the provisions of this Chapter and

the provisions of the Statutes, Ordinances, Regulations, bye-laws and rules made there

under,‖ the words ―Subject to the provisions of this Chapter‖ shall be substituted.

2A. In sub section (3), for the words ―thirty working days‖, the words ―Ninety days‖ shall be

substituted.

2B. in the second proviso for the words ―thirty working days‖, the words ―Ninety days‖ shall

be substituted.

Similar amendments are also required on above lines in all other University Acts

Autonomous Colleges in Kerala

Sl.No. Name of Colleges Affiliated

University

Autonomy first

time given w.e.f.

Autonomy valid up to as per

records available with UGC

1 Mar Ivanios College,

Nalanchira

University of

Kerala

2014-2015 2014-2015 to 2019-2020

2 Fatima Mata National

College, Kollam

2014-2015 2014-2015 to 2019-2020

3 St. Berchmans College,

Changanassery

Mahathma

Gandhi

University,

Kottayam.

2014-2015 2014-2015 to 2019-2020

4 Maharaja's College,

Ernakulam

2014-2015 2014-2015 to 2019-2020

5 Rajagiri College of Social

Sciences, Kalamassery,

Eranakulam.

2014-2015 2014-2015 to 2019-2020

6 St. Teresa's College,

Ernakulam

2014-2015 2014-2015 to 2019-2020

7 Secred Heart College,

Eranakulam

2014-2015 2014-2015 to 2019-2020

8 Assumption College,

Chanaganacherry

2016-2017 2016-2017 to 2021-2022

9 CMS College, Kottayam, 2016-2017 2016-2017 to 2021-2022

10 Mar Athanasious College,

Kothamangalam

2016-2017 2016-2017 to 2021-2022

11 Marian College,

Kuttikkanam

2016-2017 2016-2017 to 2021-2022

12 St. Albert’s College, 2016-2017 2016-2017 to 2021-2022

Ernakulam

13 Christ College Irinjalakuda

University of

Calicut,

Malappuram.

2015-2016 2015-2016 to 2020-2021

14 St. Thomas College,

Thrissur

2014-2015 2014-2015 to 2019-2020.

15 M E S Mampad College,

Malappuram

2015-2016 2015-2016 to 2020-2021

16 Farook College, Kozhikode 2015-2016 2015-2016 to 2020-2021

17 St. Josephs’ College,

Devagiri, Kozhikkode

2014-2015 2014-2015 to 2019-2020

18 St. Joseph’s College,

Irinjalakuda

2016-2017 2016-2017 to 2021-2022

19 Vimala College, Thrissur 2016-2017 2016-2017 to 2021-2022

Appendix IV

Committee on Autonomous Colleges

Summary of Proceedings

Sl. No Date Place Details

1 8.2.2017 KSHEC Committee meeting

2 5.1.2018 Thrissur Public sitting

3 6.1.2018 Thrissur Public sitting

4 11.1.2018 Ernakulam Public sitting

5 12.1.2018 Ernakulam Public sitting

6 12.1.2018 Ernakulam Meeting with Autonomous college

managements and principals

7 20.1.2018 KSHEC Meeting with students and teachers org.

8 30.1.2018 Ernakulam Meeting with University authorities

9 9.2.2018 KSHEC Committee meeting

10 9.2.2018 KSHEC Public sitting

11 15.3.2018 Ernakulam Maharajas College visit

12 16.3.2018 Ernakulam St. Teresas, St. Alberts college visit

13 23.3.2018 KSHEC Meeting to discuss the report

14 26.3.2018 KSHEC Meeting to discuss the report

Appendix – V

List of Participants in Public Sittings and Meetings with different

Stakeholders

SL

NO. NAME DESIGNATION NAME OF COLLEGE

DATE OF

MEETING

1 MATHEW K

KOOLA

PROFESSOR ST. MARY'S COLLEGE

,THRISSUR

05.01.2018

2 A J

THANKACHAN

ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR

CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

3 SOBHANA

PUSHPANGADAN

PTA PRESIDENT ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

4 C A THOMAS PTA COMMITTEE ST THOMAS COLLEGE 05.01.2018

THRISSUR

5 ANO P.S SENIOR CLERK ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

6 SHINE JOY

MORIYADAN

CLERK ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

7 ANTO JOHNY

THOTTIL

CLERK ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

8 PREETHA K PARENT ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

9 JINESH PAUL C ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

10 ALICE N K ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

11 BINDHIA K F HEAD, DEPT OF

COMPUTER

APPLICATION

ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

12 SAGAR K P ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

13 SOORAJ M R ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

14 C CLINSON JOSE

K

ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

15 JOSEPH

VARGHESE

ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

16 SANTHMATHEW

P S

ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

17 AJIL JOHNSON M ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

18 JEAS SHAJAN ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

19 ALBIN K L ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

20 DR. JOSE JOHN

MALLIKESAAN

ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR

ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE,

DEVAGIRI, CALICUT

05.01.2018

21 DR. GEROGE

MATHEW

ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR


DEVAGIRI, CALICUT

05.01.2018

22 DR. ANTO N J ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR


DEVAGIRI, CALICUT

05.01.2018

23 GOKULNATH P N PTA EXCUTIVE

MEMBER


DEVAGIRI, CALICUT

05.01.2018

24 ANULA TOM STUDENT ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE,

DEVAGIRI, CALICUT

05.01.2018

25 VARGHESE P A CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

26 NAMITHA

GEORGE

STUDENT ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE,

DEVAGIRI, CALICUT

05.01.2018

27 TOMSON A S LIBRARIAN ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE,

DEVAGIRI, CALICUT

05.01.2018

28 SAJAD M STUDENT MES MAMPAD COLLEGE,

MALAPPURAM

05.01.2018

29 MOHAMMED IJAS

C

STUDENT MES MAMPAD COLLEGE,

MALAPPURAM

05.01.2018

30 SHERIN

FARSANA C H

STUDENT MES MAMPAD COLLEGE,

MALAPPURAM

05.01.2018

31 JISHNU P STUDENT MES MAMPAD COLLEGE,

MALAPPURAM

05.01.2018

32 DR. V M CHACKO ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR & HOD ,

DEPT OF

STATISTICS

ST THOMAS COLLEGE

,THRISSUR

05.01.2018

33 DR. JOHNS

NODUVATH

ASSISTANT

PROFESSOR

DEPT. OF PHYSICS

ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

34 DR. ANIL

GEORGE K

ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

35 JOSE MYLADOOR

CHACKO

05.01.2018

36 LITTY DOMINS ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

37 DR. JOY K L ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR,

DEPT. OF

CHEMISTRY

ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

38 DR. SR LILLY K O VICE PRINCIPAL ST JOSEPH'S

COLLEGE,IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

39 SAJA SANJEEV

KUMAR

P.T. W .A

REPRESENTATIVE


IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

40 DR. SR . ROSE

BASTIN

ASSISTANT

MANAGER


IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

41 DR. N R

MANGALAMBAL

HEAD & ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR


IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

42 DR. ASHA

THOMAS

ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR,

DEPT. OF ENGLISH


IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

43 JYOTHI A J JR. SUPDT ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE,

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

44 RESHMA

AUGUSTIN


IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

45 PARVATHI ARUL

JOSHI


IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

46 SANTIYA JOY STUDENT ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE,

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

47 RIKSON P R STUDENT ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE,

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

48 ALBIN TOMY STUDENT ST THOMAS COLLEGE,

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

49 AMAL JOSEPH STUDENT ST THOMAS COLLEGE,

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

50 ALISH JACOB STUDENT ST THOMAS COLLEGE,

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

51 LIVIN T JOY STUDENT ST THOMAS COLLEGE,

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

52 SNEHA JOHNY STUDENT CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

53 BETTINA BENNY STUDENT CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

54 ANAGHA JOY STUDENT CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

55 ASHA FRANCIS STUDENT CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

56 SILPA WILSON STUDENT CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

57 JIYA JOSEPH STUDENT CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

58 DIVYA JOY P STUDENT CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

59 AKHIL

VARGHESE

STUDENT CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

60 JOSE JOHN STUDENT CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

61 LINCE JOSE STUDENT CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

62 DR. ROBINSON P ASSISTANT

PROFESSOR

IQAC

COORDINATOR

CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

63 DR. JOLLY

ANDREWS

VICE PRINCIPAL CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

64 PROF. V P ANTO CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

05.01.2018

65 DR. MINIMOL K IQAC

COORDINATOR

VIMALA COLLEGE, THRISSUR 05.01.2018

66 DR. O J JAYCEE ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR


67 DR. SARANEENA

T T

ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR


68 DR. KARUNA M S ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR


69 MS. ROSE DIUS ASSISTANT VIMALA COLLEGE, THRISSUR 05.01.2018

PROFESSSOR

70 DR. JAYA

CHERIAN

CONTROLLER OF

EXAMINATION


71 RAGINA RAZACK STUDENT VIMALA COLLEGE, THRISSUR 05.01.2018

72 MIRFA KS STUDENT VIMALA COLLEGE, THRISSUR 05.01.2018

73 AISWARYA

PRADEEP

STUDENT VIMALA COLLEGE, THRISSUR 05.01.2018

74 NIKITHA BABU STUDENT VIMALA COLLEGE, THRISSUR 05.01.2018

75 JINEESH V P OFFICE STAFF VIMALA COLLEGE, THRISSUR 05.01.2018

76 SARITHA K A OFFICE STAFF VIMALA COLLEGE, THRISSUR 05.01.2018

77 DR. S RITTY J

NEDUMPARA

MANAGEMENT

REPRESENTATIVE


78 MARTIN K

GEORGE

MANAGEMENT

REPRESENTATIVE


79 DR. JENSON P O PRINCIPAL ST THOMAS COLLEGE,

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

80 DR. Fr. MARTIN K

A

VICE PRINCIPAL ST THOMAS COLLEGE,

THRISSUR

05.01.2018

81 ANAS E ASSISTANT

CONTROLLER OF

EXAMINATION

MES MAMAPAD COLLEGE,

MALAPPURAM

05.01.2018

82 DR. K S ANOOP

DAS

MES MAMPAD COLLEGE,

MALAPPURAM

05.01.2018

83 SABIQUE M K MES MAMPAD COLLEGE,

MALAPPURAM

05.01.2018

84 HASKER E MES MAMPAD COLLEGE,

MALAPPURAM

05.01.2018

85 DR. S

SREEKUMAR

CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

06.01.2018

86 PHILOMINA M M PARENT ST THOMAS COLLEGE

THRISSUR

06.01.2019

87 MIDHUN SHAH TEACHER ST THOMAS COLLEGE 06.01.2019

THRISSUR

88 MUHAMMED

RASHEED P

TEACHER FAROOK COLLEGE, CALICUT 06.01.2019

89 DR. SALIL

VARMA

ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR & HOD ,

DEPT OF ENGLISH

ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE ,

DEVAGIRI

06.01.2019

90 ROBIN XAVIER ASSISTANT

PROFESSOR


DEVAGIRI

06.01.2019

91 DR. ARAVINDA B

P

HEAD , DEPT OF BPE CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

06.01.2019

92 P V MANOJ

KUMAR

PTA, EXECUTIVE

MEMBER & PARENT


93 DAVIS ANTONY

M

PTA MEMBER CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

06.01.2019

94 M L BABU PTA VICE

PRESIDENT

CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

06.01.2019

95 K N SUBHASA PTA MEMBER CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

06.01.2019

96 K A TONY PTA PRO VIMALA COLLEGE, THRISSUR 06.01.2019

97 ABHILASH P J MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

20.01.2018

98 JISHNU DAS V S MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

20.01.2018

99 SUSAN

ABRAHAM

MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

20.01.2018

100 JOBY JOSE MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

20.01.2018

101 ALEX VARGHESE MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

20.01.2018

102 BIBIN SEBASTIAN MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

20.01.2018

103 SRUTHY

SATHYANATH

MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

20.01.2018

104 CHIPPY DANIE MARIAN COLLEGE , 20.01.2018

KUTTIKANAM

105 ANGELA AJITH SACRED HEART COLLEGE 11.01.2018

106 M. R MARTIN ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 11.01.2018

107 DR. IVE JOSEPH ASSUMPTION COLLEGE 11.01.2018

108 V S SASIKUMAR ASSUMPTION COLLEGE 11.01.2018

109 SANDRA THERES

TES MATHEW

ASSUMPTION COLLEGE 11.01.2018

110 NEENU RACHAL

PHILIP


111 FATHIMA

SHANAVAS


112 VINSA SABAN ASSUMPTION COLLEGE 11.01.2018

113 UNNIKRISHNAN

NAMBOOTHIRI

PTA ASSUMPTION COLLEGE 11.01.2018

114 SONIA SAJI ASSUMPTION COLLEGE 11.01.2018

115 DR. REGIMOL C ASSUMPTION COLLEGE 11.01.2018

116 DR. RIJU C ISSAC M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

117 DR. RAJESH K

THUMBALAKARA

M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

118 JAYAN P NAIR PTA M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

119 FEBA KURIAN M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

120 GOWRI ANIL M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

121 DR. ABY P

VARGHESE

M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

122 PAUL VARGHESE M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

123 BABURAJ A M A COLLEGE, 11.01.2018

KOTHAMANGALAM

124 MARIA SHAJU M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

125 LOGIA JOLLY M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

126 ARYA SONY M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

127 ANJU V N M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

128 AKHIL

HAREENDRAN

M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

129 ASHIN SHIBU M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

130 DR. MANJU

KURIAN

M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

131 ANU GEORGE ASSISTANT

PROFESSOR

M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

132 EVIN MATHEWS STUDENT ST. BERCHMANS COLLEGE,

CHANGANACHERRY

11.01.2018

133 AUGUS KURIAN STUDENT ST. BERCHMANS COLLEGE,

CHANGANACHERRY

11.01.2018

134 AMITHA SHAJI FORMER STUDENT ST. BERCHMANS COLLEGE,

CHANGANACHERRY

11.01.2018

135 RUBY JAMES FORMER STUDENT ST. BERCHMANS COLLEGE,

CHANGANACHERRY

11.01.2018

136 JANSSER JOSEPH ASSISTANT

PROFESSOR

ST. BERCHMANS COLLEGE,

CHANGANACHERRY

11.01.2018

137 DR. ANTONY

MATHEWS

ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR


CHANGANACHERRY

11.01.2018

138 JOSE MATHEW MANAGEMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

ST. BERCHMANS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

139 DR. JAYAMMA

FRANCIS

M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

140 DR. JOGE K MARIAN COLLEGE , 11.01.2018

JOSEPH KUTTIKANAM

141 FR. JOHN J

CHAVARA


CHANGANACHERRY

11.01.2018

142 MATHAI T JACOB ST. BERCHMANS COLLEGE,

CHANGANACHERRY

11.01.2018

143 DR. SIBY JOSEPH ST. BERCHMANS COLLEGE,

CHANGANACHERRY

11.01.2018

144 DR. RAJIMOL A MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

11.01.2018

145 DIN MATHEW

JOHN

MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

11.01.2018

146 DR. BINU

THOMAS

MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

11.01.2018

147 JOBY JOSE MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

11.01.2018

148 M C JOSE ASSISTANT

PROFESSOR


CHANGANACHERRY

11.01.2018

149 PROF. JOSEPH

TITE

11.01.2018

150 DR. K B SHERLY M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

151 DR. MANJULA K M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

11.01.2018

152 DR. JOSEPH T

MOOLAYIL

SACRED HEART COLLEGE 11.01.2018

153 FR. DR. JOSE

JOHN


154 DR.

GERORGEKUTTY

JOSEPH


155 DR. JOSEPH

GEORGE


156 VINIL K V SACRED HEART COLLEGE 11.01.2018

157 DR. SIBY SACRED HEART COLLEGE 11.01.2018

MATHEW

158 BENNY

VARGHESE


159 DR. ASHA ADI

JOSEPH


160 CHANDRA

SEKHARAN P

ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 11.01.2018

161 SUMA

RAVINDRAN

PRESIDENT ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 11.01.2018

162 DR. B HARILAL ASSUMPTION COLLEGE 11.01.2018

163 DR. PHILIP

MATHEW


164 FUAD

MUHAMMAD

MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

165 ARHAMSHA MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

166 BABIN SAI MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

167 REGITHA BAIJI SACRED HEART COLLEGE,

THEVARA

11.01.2018

168 DR. CHERIAN P E SACRED HEART COLLEGE,

THEVARA

11.01.2018

169 SIDHARTH K

BHATTATHIRI

SACRED HEART COLLEGE,

THEVARA

11.01.2018

170 HARI KRISHNAN

J


THEVARA

11.01.2018

171 ULLAS U SACRED HEART COLLEGE,

THEVARA

11.01.2018

172 ADITH

AUGUSTINE


THEVARA

11.01.2018

173 JEMMA OLIVER STC COLLEGE, ASTA 11.01.2018

174 SOYA P S STC COLLEGE, ASTA 11.01.2018

175 SHOBHA NAIR STC COLLEGE, ASTA 11.01.2018

176 JEFIN ANTONY SACRED HEART COLLEGE,

THEVARA

11.01.2018

177 ADV. GEETHA

JOB

STC COLLEGE, ASTA 11.01.2018

178 ALIKOYA M STC COLLEGE, ASTA 11.01.2018

179 NEENA

UNNIKRISHNAN


180 GEETHA

KISHORE


181 JISHNU T R MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

182 PREJITH K BABU MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

183 ABHIJITH K K MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

184 NANDU K V MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

185 MOHAMMED

YASEEN K M


186 AJMILA SHAN MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

187 SHAHANA

MANSUR


188 IRFANA P I MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

189 ABHINAV K

CHANDRAN


190 JOSHAL MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

191 RETHU

KRISHNAN


192 ASWIN P DINESH MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

193 ATHUL KRISHNA

T B


194 RAHUL MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

195 ARJUN KRISHNA

N R


196 FEBIN MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

197 ABDUL REBIN N

R


198 AMAL P M MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

199 JULIA DAVID MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

200 SUMI JOY

OLIAPPURAM


201 JITHIN JOHNSON SACRED HEART COLLEGE

,ERNAKULAM

11.01.2018

202 ARUN HARRY ST ALBERT'S COLLEGE 11.01.2018

203 V M GEORGE SACRED HEART COLLEGE

,ERNAKULAM

11.01.2018

204 BENNY

VARGHESE

SACRED HEART COLLEGE

,ERNAKULAM

11.01.2018

205 NIHAD C P MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

206 NABEEL MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

207 VISHNU P.K MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

208 FEMI ANN

MATHEW


209 SAJIMOL

AUGUSTINE

ST. TERESA'S COLLEGE 11.01.2018

210 DR. KALA M S ST. TERESA'S COLLEGE 11.01.2018

211 DR. BEENA JOB ST. TERESA'S COLLEGE 11.01.2018

212 DR USHA NAIR ST. TERESA'S COLLEGE 11.01.2018

213 DR. LATHA NAIR

R


214 DR. ELSAM

JOSEPH


215 DR.ALPHONSA

VIJAYA JOSEPH


216 DRL NIRMALA

PADMANABHAN


217 BETTY JOSEPH ST. TERESA'S COLLEGE 11.01.2018

218 DR. CYRIAC

ANTONY

MEMBER,

ACADEMIC

COUNCIL

11.01.2018

219 ROSALIND

GONZAGA

ST. ALBERT'S COLLEGE 11.01.2018

220 DR. TIA

MATHEWS


221 SITHARA

SATHAR


222 ANANDHU K

KUMAR

11.01.2018

223 SABA M C ST. ALBERT'S COLLEGE 11.01.2018

224 ALICE RAJAN SACRED HEART COLLEGE 11.01.2018

225 LAKSHMY DAS ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

226 PARVTHY SALIL ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

227 SHAMIL VENU ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

228 VAISHNAVI

VENU


229 BLESSY

JOHNSON


230 SREELAKSHMI

ANAND


231 MARY SHILPA

FRANCIS


232 MEGHA MANI ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

233 SB MEENAKSHI ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

234 SELAS JOSEPH ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

235 DEVIKA ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

MANNAMPAT

236 MAREENA

JAISON


237 AMALA ANNA

JOBY


238 DEVIKA V S ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

239 SUSAN THOMAS ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

240 NAZRA SIRAJ ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

241 CAROLINE

ELIZABETH

LOYED


242 ALEENA

AUGUSTINE


243 SHEETHA I V S ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

244 FATHIMA

HISANA


245 ANEETA TREESA

AJITH


246 OLIVIA ANNA

FERNANDEZ


247 ASWINI P V ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

248 PREEJITH K

BABY


249 ABHIJITH K K MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 12.01.2018

250 RAHUL MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 12.01.2018

251 ABHINAV K

CHANDRAN


252 MUHAMMED

ANEES


253 ASNA K AMEEN FAROOK COLLEGE, CALICUT 12.01.2018

254 SHIRON ZEYYAD FAROOK COLLEGE, CALICUT 12.01.2018

255 LUBINA P A FAROOK COLLEGE, CALICUT 12.01.2018

256 JOSHY P G ST. TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

257 JERIN K P ST. TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

258 MAGGIE P T ST. TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

259 GLADIS D'SILVA ST. TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

260 MARYA C P ST. TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

261 JIJI JOSEPH CMS COLLEG KOTTAYAM 12.01.2018

262 JOHN MATHEW CMS COLLEG KOTTAYAM 12.01.2018

263 DR. S ANIL

KUMAR

GOVT SANSRIT COLLEGE,

TRIPUNITHURA

12.01.2018

264 DRL DENSELY

JOSE

M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

12.01.2018

265 VARGHESE V A PARENT SACRET HEART COLLEGE 12.01.2018

266 TP TOMY VICE PRESIDENT ,

PTA

SACRET HEART COLLEGE 12.01.2018

267 J PAUL EXECUTIVE

MEMBER, PTA


268 LUIZ E O SACRET HEART COLLEGE 12.01.2018

269 C S FRANCIS ASSISTANT

PROFESSOR


270 SUNNY THOMAS MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

12.01.2018

271 GEROGEKUTTY

JAMES


272 HARI KRISHNAN

M S


273 FR.

PALAKKAPPILLIL

(PRASANT)


274 DR. TOMY

JOSEPH

SB COLLEGE ,

CHANGANACHERRY

12.01.2018

275 E P IMPICHIKOYA PRINCIPAL FAROOK COLLEGE, CALICUT 12.01.2018

276 C P KUNHI

MOHAMMED

FAROOK COLLEGE, CALICUT 12.01.2018

277 DR. ROY SAM

DAVID

PRINCIPAL CMS COLLEG KOTTAYAM 12.01.2018

278 DR JACOB

GEROGE

MANAGER CMS COLLEG KOTTAYAM 12.01.2018

279 DR. SIBICHAN M

THOMAS


DEVAGIRI

12.01.2018

280 FR. JOSEPH

PAIKADA


DEVAGIRI

12.01.2018

281 DR. FR JOLLY

ANDREWS

CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

12.01.2018

282 DR. MATHEW

PAUL UKKEY

PRINCIPAL CHRIST COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

12.01.2018

283 FR. DR. JOSE

KURADATH

MANAGER &

PRESIDENT

RAJAGIRI COLLEGE 12.01.2018

284 FR.DR. GIGI

THOMAS

PRINCIPAL MAR IVANIOS COLLEGE 12.01.2018

285 FR. JAMES

KOZHIMALA

MANAGER MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

12.01.2018

286 DR. F ROY

ABRAHAM P

PRINCIPAL MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

12.01.2018

287 DR. JENSON P.O PRINCIPAL MARIAN COLLEGE ,

KUTTIKANAM

12.01.2018

288 P M MATHEW K ST THOMAS COLLEGE 12.01.2018

289 DR. LISSY ANTO ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

290 DR. SR LILLY P L ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE

IRINJALAKUDA

12.01.2018

291 DR. K

SEEDIKKOYA

MGT

REPRESENTATIVE

MES MAMPAD COLLEGE,

MALAPPURAM

12.01.2018

292 DR. P K BABU PRINCIPAL MES MAMPAD COLLEGE,

MALAPPURAM

12.01.2018

293 FR. ROLDEW

JACOB,

PRO. MANAGER FATIMA MATA NATIONAL

COLLEG, KOLLAM

12.01.2018

294 DR. VINCENT B

NETTO,

PRINCIPAL FATIMA MATA NATIONAL

COLLEG, KOLLAM

12.01.2018

295 ABRAHAM MGT

REPRESENTATIVE

12.01.2018

296 GEROGE JACOB MGT

REPRESENTATIVE

12.01.2018

297 DR. DENSELY

JOSE

M A COLLEGE,

KOTHAMANGALAM

12.01.2018

298 DR. M S VIJAYA

KUMARY

12.01.2018

299 SR. THRESIAMMA

DEVASIA


300 DR. SR LISSY

JOHN IRIMPAN,

MANAGER VIMALA COLLEGE, THRISSUR 12.01.2018

301 DR. SR

MARRIETW A

THERATTIL

PRINCIPAL VIMALA COLLEGE, THRISSUR 12.01.2018

302 DR. M L JOSEPH, PRINCIPAL ST. ALBERT'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

303 P.K RAVINDRAN MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 12.01.2018

304 DR. K N

KRISHNAKUMAR


305 DR. SUNISH K S MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 12.01.2018

306 SAJITH

DHANAPAL


307 RUBIN FRANCIS MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 12.01.2018

308 DR. SR. MANOJ

KUTTY JOSEPH

PRINCIPAL ASSUMPTION COLLEGE 12.01.2018

309 SRI. VINEETHA DIRECTOR ST TERESA'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

310 DR. SUJIMOL

AUGUSTINE M

PRINCIPAL SB COLLEGE ,

CHANGANACHERRY

12.01.2018

311 JOSE M C SB COLLEGE ,

CHANGANACHERRY

12.01.2018

312 FR. DR. JOSE

JOHN

VICE PRINCIPAL SECREAT HEART COLLEGE 12.01.2018

313 DR. BINOY

JOSEPH

PRINCIPAL RAJAGIRI COLLEGE 12.01.2018

314 FR ANTONY

ARACKAL

MANAGER ST ALBERT'S COLLEGE 12.01.2018

315 DR. K

SHARAFUDEEN

SYNDICATE

MEMBER

MG UNIVERSITY 30.01.2018

316 PROF. TOMICHAN

JOSEPH

SYNDICATE

MEMBER


317 RAVEENDRAN C CONTROLLER OF

EXAMINATION


318 DR. ABDUL

MAJEED T A

REGISTRAR UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT 30.01.2018

319 DR. JOSHY C L SYNDICATE

MEMBER

UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT 30.01.2018

320 DR. RIJU LAL G SYNDICATE

MEMBER

UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT 30.01.2018

321 HARI P SO MG UNIVERSITY 30.01.2018

322 DR. JAYA

CHANDRAN R

REGISTRAR KERALA UNIVERSITY 30.01.2018

323 DR. K MADHU

KUMAR

KERALA UNIVERSITY 30.01.2018

324 DR. JIJIMON K

THOMAS

ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR

MAR IVANIOS COLLEGE 09.02.2018

325 DR. JOLLY JACOB ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR

MAR IVANIOS COLLEGE 09.02.2018

326 CHRISTY

CLEMENT

ASSISTANT

PROFESSOR

FATIMA MATA NATIONAL

COLLEG, KOLLAM

09.02.2018

327 DR. TITUS A R ASSISTANT

PROFESSOR


COLLEG, KOLLAM

09.02.2018

328 DR. SAJIMON P F ASSISTANT FATIMA MATA NATIONAL 09.02.2018

PROFESSOR COLLEG, KOLLAM

329 DR. K S

DARSANAMBIKA

ASSOCIATE

PROFESSOR


COLLEG, KOLLAM

09.02.2018

330 MS. LINDA PIONS

JOHN

ASSISTANT

PROFESSSOR


COLLEG, KOLLAM

09.02.2018

331 ANN VARGHESE ASSISTANT

PROFESSOR


COLLEG, KOLLAM

09.02.2018

332 JOSE MATHAI PTA FATIMA MATA NATIONAL

COLLEG, KOLLAM

09.02.2018

333 VARGHESE T J TREASURER FATIMA MATA NATIONAL

COLLEG, KOLLAM

09.02.2018

334 ROSHNI JOYSON FATIMA MATA NATIONAL

COLLEG, KOLLAM

09.02.2018

335 ARCHA SURESH FATIMA MATA NATIONAL

COLLEG, KOLLAM

09.02.2018

336 EDISON P

ALOYSCIOUS


COLLEG, KOLLAM

09.02.2018

337 ANJU ABRAHAM FATIMA MATA NATIONAL

COLLEG, KOLLAM

09.02.2018

338 SAIRA

ALEXANDER


COLLEG, KOLLAM

09.02.2018

339 VISHNU PRIYA FATIMA MATA NATIONAL

COLLEG, KOLLAM

09.02.2018

340 SHARON JOSE FATIMA MATA NATIONAL

COLLEG, KOLLAM

09.02.2018

341 FR. ANTONY

ANACKAL

CHAIRMAN ST ALBERT'S COLLEGE 16.03.2018

342 DR. M L JOSEPH, PRINCIPAL ST ALBERT'S COLLEGE 16.03.2018

343 DR.

SADANANDAN V

S

VICE PRINCIPAL ST ALBERT'S COLLEGE 16.03.2018

344 DR. TITUS

CORREYA

VICE PRINCIPAL ST ALBERT'S COLLEGE 16.03.2018

345 DR AJITH IQAC ST ALBERT'S COLLEGE 16.03.2018

THOMAS JOHN

346 DR VIJAY JOHN

GENSON

DEAN STUDENT

AFFAIRS

ST ALBERT'S COLLEGE 16.03.2018

347 DR. M A SOLOMN MS, ACADEMIC

COUNCIL


348 DR. TERENCE

ROBELLO

DEAN ACADEMIC ST ALBERT'S COLLEGE 16.03.2018

349 K J BENNY CONTROLLER OF

EXAMINATION


350 DR. JUDE

MARTIN MENDEZ

MEMBER,

GOVERNING

COUNCIL


351 SEENA BHASKAR MEDIA

352 HARIKRISHNAN

M S

SFI MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

353 SHAZ I F SFI MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

354 GEROGE

KUTTYJAMES


355 RAHUL M S SFI MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

356 ABHINAND M S SFI MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

357 ANANDU SFI MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 11.01.2018

358 ARJUN KRISHNA

N


359 PRATHIN SAJ

KRISHNA


360 PRABHASH P. K AIDSO MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 20.01.2018

361 A SHYJU AIDSO MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 20.01.2018

362 M K SHAHAZAD DRSO MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 20.01.2018

363 J S AKHIL KSU MAHARAJAS COLLEGE 20.01.2018

report of the committee on autonomous colleges in kerala · report of the committee on autonomous...

Documents