report for the quarter ended 31 december 2012 … · 1/31/2013 · this work was carried out by...
TRANSCRIPT
ABN 52 007 626 575
Suite 12, 10 Jamieson St, Cheltenham, Victoria 3192, Australia Telephone: (03) 9583 0498 Facsimile: (03) 9583 0698
Email: [email protected] www.jervoismining.com.au
31 January, 2013 ASX Code: JRV
REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2012
Bullabulling Gold Project, WA
Bullabulling Gold Limited (BAB) reported on 21 January, 2013 that project pre-feasibility is expected to be complete in
draft form by the end of January, 2013. Work on the full feasibility study will follow from early February, 2013. BAB
reported the preparation of a preliminary production schedule and cash cost estimates for the Bullabulling project.
Results strongly support the financial viability of the project and progression to a full feasibility study.
The BAB production schedule indicates that 1.95 million ounces of gold would be recovered from an initial mine life of
just over 10 years. Of particular short term interest to Jervois shareholders is the 650,000 oz schedule to be produced in
the first three years at an estimated cash cost of $884.00 per oz. (The present gold price mostly exceeds $1,600 per oz).
The Jervois royalty is $30.00 per oz for 400,000 oz and $20.00 per oz thereafter.
Young Nickel and Cobalt in Laterites Exploration Licences 5527, 5571, 5152, Young NSW
JORC Resource Upgrade, 2012
In recent weeks the Company has been approached by two different groups with re-newed interest in the Company’s
nickel and cobalt assets. This is viewed as encouraging. Even in difficult times, nickel for stainless steel is always in
demand and some groups seek to position themselves early in anticipation of future better times. Shareholders should
realise that approaches of this type, whilst very encouraging, have a high failure rate due to the complexity of
economically treating nickel/cobalt laterites, the nickel price and the availability of cheap sulphuric acid.
Last year the Board sought an independent re-assessment and update of its nickel/cobalt resource at the above location.
This work was carried out by Geostat Services Pty Ltd using ‘state of the art’ 3D techniques and geostatistics (refer to the
diagrams below). As a consequence of this work, the overall JORC resource reduced slightly but with a 10% increase in
overall grade. As reported previously, at a cutoff grade of 0.6% nickel, there is now an inferred resource of 92.5 million
tonnes at a grade of 0.8% nickel and 0.06% cobalt. We are advised that 33 additional infill drill holes will up-grade the
project to an indicated resource status; under JORC rules.
3D plan-view showing a total view of the 23 wireframes (each shown in a different colour) used to determine the Young
deposit resource. The deposit comprises four main mineralisation zones; Ardnaree, Thuddungra East, Thuddungra West
and Tyagong; as illustrated above. To determine the inferred nickel/cobalt resource a series of perimeters or wireframes
were created around each known mineralization ‘blocks’, within the lithology. These formed block models used for
resource definition.
Ardnaree
Tyagong
Thuddungra East
Thuddungra West
N
31.5km
15km
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
2 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
Lithological profile showing the mineral bearing horizons of the Young deposit. Some lithologies are represented twice due
to a double lithological horizon resulting from the two distinct periods of laterisation present. This figure shows a typical
double horizon, with repetition of the saprolite unit (red) and the limonite unit (orange) in the section profile.
This renewed interest in Young may be partly attributable to the successful adaptation to nickel laterites of a process
developed by Jervois for the Nyngan scandium resource. At about 80% recovery of nickel the process is no ‘world first’
but the recovery is adequate if sulphuric acid can be manufactured or delivered to Young for less than $100 per tonne.
This latter aspect is being addressed by the Company.
Summary of Independent Scoping Study
Techno-Economics of Sulphuric Acid Baking and Water Leaching For Young Ni/Co Laterite
Introduction
Jervois Mining Limited has an inferred nickel/cobalt/iron laterite resource near Young in New South Wales. This resource
contains 167 million tonnes at 0.72% nickel and 0.07% cobalt*. The metallurgical test work Jervois Mining has
undertaken during the last five years is largely focused on sulphuric acid baking and water leaching to extract Ni/Co. In
this heat and leach process, the ore is mixed with concentrated sulphuric acid, heated under atmospheric pressure to
approximately 700oC and leached with water. However, this process has not found acceptance due to low recovery
rates: e.g., in the case of Young lateritic nickel ores, the nickel recovery rates remained around 75%. However, the more
recent thermodynamic calculations showed that carrying out the acid baking under a sulphur trioxide SO3 atmosphere
would improve the rate of recovery possibly to 90%.
A potential process flowsheet has been developed for processing lateritic Ni/Co ores through to a mixed nickel/cobalt
hydroxide product (MHP) for sale to downstream processors to produce nickel and cobalt metal. The process flowsheet
essentially consists of two main sections:
Acid calcination plant
The ore is initially reacted with sulphuric acid (98% w/w) and/or sulphur trioxide to extract the metals from the ore as
sulphates, followed by decomposition of the iron and alumium sulphates to hematite and alumina respectively in the
calcination kiln. The sulphur dioxide emitted from the kiln is recycled via an acid plant, which includes a pyrite roaster to
make up for sulphur lost from the system in the tails. Hematite from the pyrite roaster is a by-product from the ore
calcination plant.
Hydrometallurgical plant
The hot product from the calcination plant is first leached with water at pH 0.5 to 1.5 to dissolve the soluble metal
sulphates, followed by neutralisation at an approximate pH of 3.5 with magnesite to precipite the iron and aluminium in
solution as hydroxides. The solids are removed by filtering and the pH of the filtrate is adjusted to 8 and the nickel and
cobalt in solution are precipitated as hydroxides by the addition of magnesia (MgO). The latter is prepared by crushing
and calcining magnesite (MgCO3). The final product is a dried mixed Ni-Co hydroxide product (MHP).
*Since this technoeconomic assessment was completed, the Young resource has been recalculated to 92.5 m/t at 0.8%
Ni and 0.06% Co.
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
3 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
To assess the likely economic viability of this processing flowsheet for extracting nickel and cobalt from the Young laterite
deposit, mass and energy balances were established for the process by modelling both with Excel and process simulation
software. These mass and energy balances were then used to estimate capital and operating costs for the process, and in
turn, the Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of the process based on the assumptions made in the
evaluation. Three variations of the proposed process flowsheet options were evaluated:
• Option A – sulphuric acid (H2SO4) only;
• Option B – sulphur trioxide (SO3) only;
• Option C – sulphuric acid (H2SO4) and sulphur trioxide (SO3) combined.
PROCESS SPECIFICATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS
In carrying out the techno-economic evaluation of the laterite processing options, certain process specifications provided
by Jervois Mining were included, plus a number of other assumptions that were made regarding the process. These
specifications and/or assumptions are listed below:
Production rate
Annual production rate of nickel: 40,000 tpa (as MHP)
Plant operating basis: Continuous (24 hours/day, 365 days/year)
Plant annual availability: 92%
Production profile: 100% of capacity from year #1 onwards
Acid/ore mixing
Sulphuric acid added: 98% w/w H2SO4 from acid plant
Option A : Amount determined by ore composition and reaction extents specified
below
Option B: SO3 from SO3 converter
Amount determined by ore composition and reaction extents specified
below
Option C: 250 kg 98% H2SO4/t ore, balance SO3 as required by reaction extents
specified below.
Demoisturising kiln
Temperature 300 ºC
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
4 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
Calcination
Temperature 300-600 ºC
Reactions & extents:
Option A: MgO + H2SO4 = MgSO4 + H2O (extent 60%)
2FeO(OH) + 3H2SO4 = Fe2(SO4)3 + 4H2O (extent 80%)
2Al(OH)3 + 3H2SO4 = Al2(SO4)3 + 6H2O (extent 80%)
NiO + H2SO4 = NiSO4 + H2O (extent 80%)
CoO + H2SO4 = CoSO4 + H2O (extent 80%)
CaO + H2SO4 = CaSO4 + H2O (extent 80%)
Na2O + H2SO4 = Na2SO4 + H2O (extent 80%)
MnO + H2SO4 = MnSO4 + H2O (extent 80%)
Cr2O3 + 3H2SO4 = Cr2(SO4)3 + 3H2O (extent 80%)
Option B: As for option A, but with one change
2FeO(OH) + 3H2SO4 = Fe2(SO4)3 + 4H2O (extent 95%)
Option C: As for option A, but with two changes
2FeO(OH) + 3H2SO4 = Fe2(SO4)3 + 4H2O (extent 95%)
NiO + H2SO4 = NiSO4 + H2O (extent 92%)
Temperature >600 ºC
Reactions & extents: 2Fe2(SO4)3 = 2Fe2O3 + 6SO2 + 3O2 (extent 80%)
2Al2(SO4)3 = 2Al2O3 + 6SO2 + 3O2 (extent 80%)
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
5 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
Ore feed composition
% w/w dry basis
(as reported)
% w/w dry basis
(assumed for study)
SiO2 38.72 38.72
Al2O3 7.741 1.55
Al(OH)3 - 9.47
CaO 0.72 0.72
FeO 26.092 -
Fe2O3 - 5.80
FeO(OH) - 25.81
Na2O 0.15 0.15
MnO 0.40 0.40
MgO 8.50 8.50
Cr2O3 1.00 1.00
NiO 0.923 0.92
CoO 0.094 0.09
Others - 6.87
TOTAL 84.33 100.00
Moisture 11.11 (wet basis) 11.11 (wet basis)
1. 20% of this assumed to be Al2O3, balance is Al(OH)3.
2. 20% assumed to be Fe2O3, balance is FeO(OH).
3. 0.72% Ni.
4. 0.07% Co.
Pyrite roaster/acid plant
Temperature (roaster): 800 ºC
Pyrite composition: FeS2 (100% w/w)
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
6 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
Water leach & neutralisation
Solids in tank: 33% w/w
Leach extraction efficiencies (%): FeO(OH) 0
Al(OH)3 0
Fe2O3 0
Al2O3 0
Al2(SO4)3 100
Fe2(SO4)3 100
MgSO4 63
NiSO4 100
CoSO4 100
MnSO4 83
Na2SO4 100
CaSO4 100
Cr2(SO4)3 83
Others 0
EDTA addition rate: 100 g/t calcined ore
Magnafloc addition rate: 80 g/t calcined ore
Initial pH: 1.0
Final pH: 3.5
Temperature: 90 ºC
Duration: 90 minutes
Stoichiometric ratio of MgCO3: 200%
Precipitation: Al (100%)
Fe (100%)
Ni loss (co-precipitation – 0.5% of total Ni in solution)
Note: While the water leach and neutralisation stage in Figures 1-3 is shown as a single stage, it is in fact a two-step
process, water leach followed by neutralisation.
Water leach filter #1
Wash water: 1 bed volume
Moisture content of cake: 25%
Washing efficiency: 90% overall
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
7 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
Pregnant leach solution/MHP precipitation
Final pH: 8.0
Temperature: 90 ºC
Duration: 90 minutes
Stoichiometric ratio of MgO: 110%
Precipitation: Ni (100%)
Co (100%)
Filter #2
Wash water: 2 bed volumes
Moisture content of cake: 25%
Washing efficiency: 90% overall
Magnesite calcination & size reduction
Calciner temperature: 900 ºC
Calciner residence time: 1 hour
Bond Work Index: 15 kWh/t
Crusher P80: 10 mm
Pulveriser P80: 212 µm
TECHNO-ECONOMICS
The results of this preliminary techno-economic evaluation based on the assumptions made above are given in the table
below
Flowsheet option Operating cost
1 Operating cost
2
(US$/lb MHP) (US$/lb Ni) (US$/lb MHP) (US$/lb Ni)
A – H2SO4 only 2.20 3.81 3.12 5.41
B – SO3 only 1.63 2.83 2.37 4.12
C – H2SO4 & SO3 1.72 2.94 2.48 4.25
1. Without capital cost recovery.
2. With capital cost recovery.
Flowsheet option Capex NPV
(A$M)
IRR
(%) (A$M) (A$/annual lb
Ni)
A – H2SO4 only 1284 14.6 2391 37.4
B – SO3 only 1035 11.8 3064 51.4
C – H2SO4 & SO3 1049 11.9 2903 49.0
This data showed that the largest single contributor to the capital costs was the acid plant, followed by the ore/acid
calcination kilns and ore demoisturising kilns. The major contributing factors to the operating costs were natural gas (30-
35%), capital cost recovery (30-31%), labour and related costs (10-12%), maintenance and consumables (9-10%), followed
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
8 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
by electricity (7%). The hematite by-product (from pyrite roasting) credit contributed A$338 M, A$352 M and A$307 M to
the NPVs in the above table for options A, B and C respectively, corresponding to about 11 – 14% of the NPVs.
The acid consumption amounted to 624 kg 98% (w/w) H2SO4/t moist ore for option A based on the ore composition and
sulphation reaction extents assumed. The sulphuric acid and/or sulphur trioxide consumption rates for the other two
options are given in the following table. The annual quantities of the main inputs and outputs for the three options are
also given in this table. The pyrite combusted in the roaster makes up for the sulphur leaving the calcination plant as
sulphates in the hot calcined product. This product goes to the hydrometallurgical plant for leaching. In the order of 1.2 –
1.6 Mt of pyrite (100% FeS2) is required annually.
A – H2SO4 only B – SO3 only C – H2SO4 & SO3
H2SO4 consumption (kg/t moist ore) 624 - 250
SO3 consumption (kg/t moist ore) - 546 346
Mined ore (Mtpa) 7.93 7.93 6.89
Pyrite (Mtpa) 1.29 1.35 1.18
Magnesite – process – total (Mtpa)
- as magnesite (Mtpa)
- as magnesia (ktpa)
1.45
1.38
33
1.61
1.54
33
1.41
1.34
33
Magnesite – low grade – tailings (Mtpa) 1.69 1.69 1.46
MHP (dry) (tpa) 69,270 69,281 68.340
Contained nickel (tpa) 39,955 39,961 39,881
Hematite by-product (Mtpa) 0.86 0.90 0.78
Overall nickel recovery (%) 78.7 78.7 90.5
A sensitivity analysis was carried out by varying the values of the process parameters/variables by ±50% about their base
case values, although in the case of sulphuric acid/sulphur trioxide consumption an increase of only 15%-25% (depending
on the option) was possible as this corresponded to maximum sulphation reaction extents of 100%. The results of this
analysis indicate that the nickel selling price had the greatest effect on the NPV followed by the natural gas price (or
conversely consumption) and acid consumption. A 10% change in the nickel selling price changes the NPV by A$460 M,
while a 10% change in the natural gas price changes the operating cost by 0.11, 0.07 and 0.07 US$/lb MHP for options A,
B and C respectively, while the changes in NPV were A$90 M, A$54 M and A$60 M respectively.
The significant effect of natural gas price and/or consumption on the process operating cost and NPV, indicates that
opportunities to recover and utilise waste heat from the process should be realised wherever possible. Sources of waste
heat include hot gases from the ore calcination kiln and the pyrite roaster, as well as exothermic reaction heat from
pyrite roasting, SO2 to SO3 conversion and SO3 absorption stages. Even if only 35% of the available waste heat could be
recovered and utilised, it would reduce the operating cost by about US$0.28/lb MHP or US$0.49/lb Ni (Option A).
However, offsetting this reduction in operating cost is a potential increase of US$0.11/lb MHP (or US$0.19/lb Ni) resulting
from a carbon tax on the direct emissions of CO2 from the process (Option A).
Summervale Project Exploration Licence 7281, Nyngan NSW
Permits are in place to conduct a 30+ hole drilling program on the Company’s nickel iron mineralisation at EL 7281
‘Summervale’ approximately 25 km north of Nyngan in NSW.
Further drilling is planned at EL 7281 to realize the extent of the prospective mineralization and determine a rudimentary
calculation on the potential of the project.
Negotiations with the land owner as to timing of the program are in progress and the drilling program should be
completed by the end of this calendar year.
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
9 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
Syerston Project, Exploration Licence 7805, NSW
As previously announced, further work has been completed on the polymetallic discovery at EL 7805, near Syerston,
NSW.
Original assays from Hole Sy10a showed a significant interval of scandium mineralisation within the licence boundaries, at
relatively shallow depth.
Assay results from Hole Sy10a indicate an 11 meter interval averaging 352ppm Sc (from 10-11 to 20-21 meters; in red
below).
Syerston Drill Hole Sy10A
Depth (m) ME-ICP61
Sc ppm
0- 1 116
1- 2 87
2- 3 84
3- 4 90
4- 5 113
5- 6 173
6- 7 176
7- 8 160
8- 9 142
9- 10 192
10- 11 425
11- 12 274
12- 13 240
13- 14 431
14- 15 351
15- 16 339
16- 17 311
17- 18 389
18- 19 461
19- 20 398
20- 21 258
21- 22 178
22- 23 144
23- 24 92
24- 25 95
25- 26 99
26- 27 90
27- 28 84
These encouraging results prompted a soil sampling program consisting of 83 soil samples around and to the north and
north-west of the ‘discovery’ Hole Sy10a. The average spacing interval between soil samples was approximately 100 x 50
meters.
The soil samples were collected from 20-25 cm depth below surface, with -80um fraction samples submitted for assay.
Results (in Sc ppm) are shown on the map below, including zones indicating >200pm Sc within the first meter.
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
10 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
These extraordinary scandium results from near surface have proved to be an exciting development for the Company.
Samples for platinum assay have also been submitted from the same area. Once these results are received, an additional
soil sampling program will take place to extend the area of interest. Results from both sampling programs will guide the
extent of a drilling program planned for later this year.
Jervois believes that the outlook for Scandium in the near future, and longer-term, is very encouraging, given the broad
range of potential applications for the metal. Jervois is relatively optimistic that the Scandium mineralization at Syerston
could be extensive and a possible contributor to the supply of Scandium for any of these applications.
Internal Metallurgical Test Work- Syerston (Fifield) NSW
Bench-scale tests by Dr Hal Aral on the Syerston scandium (Sc), platinum (Pl) and gold (Au) mineralisation (with some low
nickel/cobalt grades but perhaps recoverable) showed wet magnetic separation will not upgrade Sc, Pt and Au contents
to any significant extent. On the other hand, chemical extraction gave better results.
The best tests completed involved a proprietary reduction in particle size of the ore samples. This technique was
followed by the Company’s acid bake process and yielded an excellent 91.2% recovery of Scandium and 66% of the nickel
content which is low grade (about 0.3% Ni). Dr Aral believes that this radical new approach can be improved by more
efficient roasting. It is also likely to be applicable to the Company’s Nyngan scandium resource and possibly even to the
Company’s nickel/cobalt resource at Young NSW. This work is considered to be a real breakthrough for the treatment of
Scandium bearing laterites and with possible application to nickel/cobalt laterites in general. Further laboratory work is
essential to fully establish this.
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
11 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
EMC Metals and Nyngan Scandium Resource. Exploration Licences 6095, 6009, 7664, NSW
The dispute with Toronto Stock Exchange listed EMC Metals and Jervois, continues. In dispute is the adequacy of a self-
stated pre-feasibility study delivered under the terms of the now expired Exploration Joint Venture Agreement. The
matter goes to trial in the Victorian Supreme Court on 4 February, 2013. Jervois retains 100% equity in the project
pending the trial outcome.
Exploration in Western Australia – December Quarter 2012
Exploration in WA at Lake Barlee and Lake Austin has been hampered by wet conditions during the period. Exploration
Licences 29/652, 77/1460, 77/1461 and 77/1398 have now been surrendered to permit more funds to be allocated to
those WA tenements where exploration prospects are higher.
Exploration Licence 29/861 at the Mt Ida Gold Project is expected to be granted soon.
Mt Ida Project – Exploration Licence 29/861
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
12 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
Exploration Licence 59/1257 at the Nalbarra Project has had no work completed in the quarter. Drilling programs for
uranium and a palaeo channel for precious metals has been planned for this tenement, subject to funding.
Lake Austin has better access with a road crossing the tenement, so preliminary exploration work was able to be carried
out during the quarter.
Lake Austin Project Exploration Licence E21/130
50% Jervois Mining Limited & 50% Peter Alexander Peebles (Jervois has earned a 100% holding 50% is subject to
transfer)
Exploration in Western Australia consisted of mapping, sampling and spectrometer survey of Exploration Licence 21/130
near the gold mining town of Cue in the state’s Midwest. The results have been superimposed on the topographic map
of the tenement. The licence is 3.8 kilometres from Austin Downs Uranium Resource. Exploration focus was on precious
metals Gold and Platinum Group Elements, Rare Earth Oxides and Uranium.
The reprocessed radiometric map (below) shows surface radioactive activity in a red colour. This activity can be a result
of radioactive granites or a near surface uranium deposit. The drainage channels, which are mainly subsurface, are
shown in a yellow colour.
Results have shown anomalous background counts and eU ppm (spectrometer results). Samples taken where the current
drainage system ‘pinched’ showed anomalous Gold Au, Platinum Pt, Palladium Pd and Uranium U. This may indicate the
presence of palaeochannels enriched by these minerals. Rare earth elements were also present in the samples as well as
Beryllium, Thorium and Strontium which indicate that pegmatitic rocks or later stage granite intrusives may be present in
the area and may be enriched in these minerals. Further work such as the purchase of close spaced aerial magnetics is
warranted to better understand the underlying geology. Drilling across the drainage system is also warranted to test for
palaeo channels for precious metals as well as lake sediments for potash (fertiliser) and uranium.
Reprocessed Radiometrics Map showing
areas of high radiometric activity and drainage
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
13 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
Lake Austin showing wet conditions
SAMPLE
ID ZONE EASTING NORTHING
Spectrometer
Results eU ppm
Laboratory
Results U ppm COMMENTS
LA001 50 576282 6950286 5.7 4.8 Rb Ls (Lake)
LA002 50 576177 6950009 2.5 5.6
Lake Channel - Near
Causeway Drainage (Rb Ls)
LA003 50 573158 6946609 4.1 5.6 Rd Br Ls
LA004 50 572935 6946577 No sample 7.8 Main Surface channel - sand
LA005 50 575931 6949558 3.9 5 Lake Sed Rd Br
Table showing Lake Austin Spectrometer (eU) and Laboratory Uranium (U) Results (above).
Map showing Spectrometer Uranium Results
SAMPLE ID ZONE EASTING NORTHING Au1 ppb Pt ppb Pd ppb COMMENTS
LA001 50 576282 6950286 2 10 5 Rb Ls (Lake)
LA002 50 576177 6950009 13 5 5 Lake Channel - Near Causeway Drainage (Rb Ls)
LA003 50 573158 6946609 4 0 5 Rd Br Ls
LA004 50 572935 6946577 3 5 0 Main Surface channel - sand
LA005 50 575931 6949558 4 0 0 Lake Sed Rd Br
Table showing Lake Austin Laboratory Gold Au, Platinum (Pt) and Palladium (Pd) Results (above).
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
14 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
Map showing Laboratory Gold Results
SAMPLE ID ZONE EASTING NORTHING La ppm Ce ppm Pr ppm Nd ppm Sm ppm Eu ppm Gd ppm Tb ppm
LA001 50 576282 6950286 19.2 35.3 3.52 11.8 2.3 0.35 2 0.3
LA002 50 576177 6950009 18.7 35.5 4.04 12.4 2.4 0.45 2.2 0.35
LA003 50 573158 6946609 15 28.4 2.9 10.4 2 0.4 1.8 0.25
LA004 50 572935 6946577 25.7 48.5 5.4 16.6 3.15 0.65 2.8 0.4
LA005 50 575931 6949558 20.8 38.7 4.44 13.4 2.55 0.5 2.4 0.35
Dy ppm Ho ppm Er ppm Tm ppm Yb ppm Lu ppm COMMENTS
1.75 0.34 1.6 0.16 1.35 0.18 Rb Ls (Lake)
2 0.4 1.25 0.18 1.3 0.2 Lake Channel - Near Causeway Drainage (Rb Ls)
1.6 0.32 0.9 0.12 0.85 0.12 Rd Br Ls
2.45 0.5 1.4 0.22 1.35 0.24 Main Surface channel - sand
2.05 0.42 1.2 0.18 1.3 0.22 Lake Sed Rd Br
Tables showing Lake Austin Laboratory Rare Earth Results (above).
Sample ID ZONE EASTING NORTHING Ca % K % Mo ppm
Rb ppm S ppm
Sr ppm Th ppm
LA001 50 576282 6950286 2.32 1.38 2.8 67.6 17700 979 13.6
LA002 50 576177 6950009 5.63 1.23 6.1 63.2 44500 655 13.3
LA003 50 573158 6946609 14.4 0.79 3.4 40.8 122000 1340 9
LA004 50 572935 6946577 0.94 1.52 8.9 77.4 10300 6450 15.6
LA005 50 575931 6949558 1.65 1.36 7.4 70.4 13600 152 14
Table showing Lake Austin other anomalous results (above).
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
15 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
GLOSSARY
Later stage Granite Intrusives Cylindrical intrusion of younger igneous rocks into an older geological terrain. ppm Parts per million by weight (10,000ppm equals 1.00%). Other symbols used Calcium (Ca), Potassium (K), Molybdenum (Mo), Rubidium (Rb), Sulphur (S), Strontium (Sr), Thorium
(Th), Uranium (U) and Spectrometer Uranium (eU)
Rights Issue Results
The non–renounceable pro–rata Rights Issue to Eligible Shareholders at an issue price of $0.001, closed on 12 October
2012. One new fully paid ordinary share was offered for every three shares held. If fully subscribed the issue would have
raised approximately $1,198,197.07 before issue costs.
The Board is pleased to announce that Shareholders subscribed for a total of $456,806.73 (including funds from the issue
of Additional Shares to those Shareholders who applied). This is equivalent to an acceptance rate of 38% which was
viewed as an excellent response in the current investment climate. Jervois subsequently placed a further 17,000,000
shares of the rights issue shortfall during the quarter at $0.001 per share.
A further 450,000 fully paid ordinary shares were issued to Baycrest Capital, LLC at $0.10 per share to satisfy the
commitment fee payable under the Continuous Investment Agreement entered into by the parties on 12 December,
2012.
Offer of Purchase: Nyngan Scandium Project
Jervois Mining Limited (The Company) has received, and rejected, an offer of $4.0 Million, from Bloom Energy of
California, for the outright purchase of 100% of the Nyngan Scandium project. The offer was conditional and is
considered totally inadequate.
Share Consolidation Completed
Also during the quarter, Jervois completed a one hundred (100) for one (1) share consolidation on 10 December, 2012.
Shareholders approved the consolidation at Jervois’ 2012 Annual General Meeting held on 29 November, 2012. As at the
end of the quarter, Jervois currently has 41,134,606 fully paid ordinary shares on issue. All of these shares are quoted
securities on the ASX.
AUD $3 Million Continuous Investment Agreement Signed With Baycrest Capital, Llc
As noted above, Jervois Mining Limited (“Jervois” or “Company”) entered into a Continuous Investment Agreement
(“CIA” or “Agreement”) with Baycrest Capital, LLC (“Baycrest”) for the provision of up to AUD $3 million, over a 36 month
period on 12 December, 2012.
Baycrest is a long-only Australian fund, part of a global family of funds that invests in growth-stage and mature public
companies.
Under the terms and conditions of the Agreement, Jervois has the right to require Baycrest to purchase up to $3 million
worth of Jervois fully paid ordinary shares via a series of placements. The total dollar amount and issue price of each
For
per
sona
l use
onl
y
16 | P a g e J R V Q R 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 2
purchase is governed by the Agreement. Jervois has full control over the timing, price and number of shares Baycrest
purchases; the issuance of shares is strictly at the discretion of Jervois, and there are no obligations for Jervois to issue
shares to Baycrest.
The main features and benefits of the Agreement are as follows:
1. Baycrest will commit to purchase up to AUD $3 million of Jervois’ fully paid ordinary shares (“Shares”) over a 36 month
period on 12 December, 2012.
2. When Jervois requests capital, Baycrest will directly purchase a minimum amount of $25,000. Jervois has the option to
request Baycrest to purchase larger amounts by mutual agreement by both parties. The agreement does not have any
penalties for non-usage or termination, and it is entirely Jervois’ decision when Baycrest buy shares.
3. The price of the shares issued to Baycrest will be set at the lowest daily volume weighted average price per share
within a 20-day pricing period, minus a commission of 4%.
4. There is a hard floor set at $0.10 per share that Jervois will not request Baycrest to purchase shares, thus protecting
existing shareholders.
5. Baycrest will undertake to not hold more than 19.99% of the Company’s Shares.
6. There are strict anti-shorting provisions
7. The agreement is secured by a $45,000 commitment fee to Baycrest to be settled via the placement of 450,000 Shares
at an issue price of $0.10 per Share. Baycrest qualifies as a professional investor under section 708(11) of the
Corporations Act 2001 Cth.
Expenditure For Quarter Ended 31 December 2012
Combined expenditure on exploration and evaluation assets, and investments in exploration partnerships for the Quarter
was $187,188.
DUNCAN C. PURSELL
MANAGING DIRECTOR
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results or Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by D.C. Pursell (MAusIMM)
and Mr D. Foster, (MAusIMM). D.C. Pursell and D. Foster have sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of
deposit under consideration and to the activity which they are undertaking to qualify as Competent Persons as defined in the 2004 Edition of the
‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. D.C. Pursell and D. Foster consent to the inclusion. For
per
sona
l use
onl
y