report excerpt - healthfocus€¦ · this summary section attempts to crystallize some global views...
TRANSCRIPT
NAVIGATING THE WORLD OF SWEETENERSUnderstanding Shopper Attitudes Towards
Sugar and Sweeteners Around the World HealthFocus International 2018 Global Topic Report
REPORT EXCERPT
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 2
BACKGROUND
Concern about sugar and other sweeteners continues to be an issue for
shoppers. This 2018 report from HealthFocus International takes a deeper
look at this topic globally, regionally and across 22 individual countries to
help companies better understand shopper concerns and attitudes—
allowing them to connect more powerfully with their targets and bring
market solutions faster and more profitably.
The report also sizes the sugar and artificial sweetener markets by grouping
respondents based on their usage and level of concern. This allows for
relative sizing of key shopper groups from Rejectors, Concerned, Avoiders, and Acceptors of both sugar and artificial sweeteners.
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 3
MARKETS COVERED
NORTH
AMERICAUSA
Canada
LATIN
AMERICABrazil
Mexico
Argentina
Colombia
EUROPEFrance
Germany
Russia
UK
WEST ASIA Saudi Arabia
Turkey
SOUTH ASIA India
Pakistan
EAST ASIA
PACIFICAustralia
China
Indonesia
Japan
Philippines
South Korea
Thailand
Vietnam
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 4
SUGAR REDUCTION IS TOP OF MIND
Addressing sugar content is critical for improving the health perception of products.
Nearly 95% of global shoppers believe that reducing sugar makes foods and beverages
seem at least somewhat healthier—and over half of shoppers believe it makes them seem
a lot healthier.
Global shoppers have become increasingly focused on reducing sugar, yet many don’t
prefer alternative options—and conflicting attitudes make sweeteners a challenging topic
without a one-size-fits-all solution.
There is a lot of variation within the different markets, and these differences are not just
based on attitudes but probably also due to labeling requirements and the degree of
awareness for various sweeteners. This summary section attempts to crystallize some
global views and opportunities. However, individual markets of interest should be explored
in the Detailed Findings by Region and Country section of the report.
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 5
MAJOR SHIFTS IN SUGAR REDUCTION
Globally, sugar reduction has become a top priority in food
and beverage selection, and this trend is clearly on the rise
with nearly 55% of shoppers saying that reducing sugar has
become more important in their diet over the last year.
Reducing sugar is top of mind for shoppers, and they are
looking for sugar information on labels.
Sugar ranks as the #1 entity shoppers want to see
information for on the front of food packages—just above
calories and far ahead of other perceived negatives such
as fat & sodium.
*Global Total
54%
42%
40%
39%
37%
Reducing sugar
Natural foods/beverages
Adding fiber
Eating clean
Avoiding preservatives
Top 5 dietary trendsWhich of the following have become more
important in your diet over the last year?
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 6
When attempting to cut back on sugar—
shoppers want to reduce, rather than replace
with alternative sweeteners or other flavors.
LIGHTER INDULGENCE
*Global Total (Base: Respondents who say reducing sugar
has become more important in their diet over the last year)
REDUCE VS REPLACE
What are you doing to
reduce sugar in your diet?
RED
UC
E
5 out of 10Choosing foods/beverages
that are less sweet
4 out of 10Choosing unsweet
foods/beverages
REP
LAC
E
2 out of 10Consuming more foods/beverages
with non-sugar sweeteners
2 out of 10Choosing foods/beverages that
substitute other flavors for sugar
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 7
OPPORTUNITIES FOR PERSONALIZATION
Nearly half of global shoppers always/usually add something to their
foods/beverages to make them more customized to their taste—and 44%
customize foods/beverages to make them more nutritious or healthier.
Since shoppers are reducing sugar consumption primarily by selecting less sweet
or unsweet foods and beverages—they have the option to adjust the sweetness
of products to fit their individual taste (e.g., sweetening their own cereal, adding
berries or honey to yogurt, using water enhancing drops, etc.).
So there are opportunities to address shoppers’ desire for personalization and
allow them options for customizing products to their preferred level of sweetness.
Finding the right fit for shoppers is clearly a challenge as tastes vary and shoppers
prefer not only different levels of sweetness but they also have distinct
preferences regarding the different types of sweeteners.
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 8
Global shoppers have a clearly negative view of artificial sweeteners;
however, opinions are largely neutral when it comes to specific types
of sweeteners. When respondents were asked to rate different types
of sweeteners as good, bad or neutral—19 of the 24 sweeteners
surveyed were rated as “neither good nor bad” by most shoppers.
Neutral opinions are likely due to low awareness of the many different
sweetener options available and a lack of understanding when it
comes to the benefits associated with specific types of sweeteners.
The only sweeteners to receive predominantly positive ratings were
honey and fruit juices, while the only sweetener to be rated
negatively by the majority of shoppers was artificial sweeteners.
NOT ALL SWEETENERS ARE EQUAL
Top 5: “Good” Sweeteners
Honey 81%
Fruit juices 61%
Maple syrup 39%
Coconut palm sugar 37%
Stevia 30%
Top 5: “Bad” Sweeteners
Artificial sweeteners 52%
Sweet’N Low/Saccharine 35%
Aspartame/Equal 34%
Cyclamate 32%
Sugar 30%
*Global Total
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 9
Global shoppers are equally concerned about sugar and artificial sweeteners; however, opinions are
mixed when it comes to sugar, and shoppers seem
more interested in reduction rather than complete
avoidance. While shoppers are actively trying to
reduce consumption, only 30% classify sugar as a
“bad” sweetener compared to over half of shoppers
who rate artificial sweeteners as bad.
Not only are sugar opinions mixed globally, but they
vary drastically by market. Sugar is rated as a “good”
sweetener by far more shoppers in West and South
Asia. Four out of 10 shoppers in these regions rate
sugar as good compared to just 26% globally.
On the other hand, Latin America and Europe stand
out with a much more negative view of sugar. Four
out of 10 Latin American shoppers and 36% of European shoppers rated sugar as a “bad”
sweetener compared to only 30% globally.
SUGAR OPINIONS ARE MIXED
26%
44%
30%
Good sweetener
Neither good nor bad
Bad sweetener
Sugar RatingGlobal Total
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 10
Honey stands out as the top sweetener globally—
fulfilling many core needs for shoppers such as
natural, recognizable and clean.
67% of global shoppers believe it is important on a
food ingredient label that most of the ingredients
are things they recognize and would use at home—
and half of global shoppers say they always/usually
choose foods/beverages because they contain
only ingredients they recognize.
While shoppers are seeing many sweeteners on
labels with names they don’t recognize or can’t
pronounce—honey provides them with a familiar
ingredient that they know and trust.
HONEY’S HEALTH HALO
81%
16%
3%
Good sweetener
Neither good nor bad
Bad sweetener
Honey RatingGlobal Total
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 11
SWEETENERS & CLEAN LABELING
With so many sweeteners ranking in the neutral category, sweeteners
clearly present a problem for brands trying to fit in with the macro trend
of clean eating. Shoppers only expressed notable positive ratings when
it came to recognizable sweeteners like honey, fruit juices, maple syrup
and coconut palm sugar—while less recognized sweeteners like allulose,
Reb-A, steviol glycosides, and Erythritol were rated as neutral by more
than 65% of shoppers.
Balancing these two major trends—sugar reduction and clean eating—
is a clear problem area for shoppers as they have a strong desire to
reduce sugar, but many alternative sweeteners do not fit their
requirements for natural and recognizable.
Even natural alternative sweetener options like Stevia don’t have the
same mass appeal because shoppers want natural and recognizable
ingredients—which is why whole food ingredients like honey have such
wide-spread appeal.
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 12
SIZING THE SUGAR MARKETS
In order to more closely define the size of each different group in terms of sugar, shoppers
have been grouped based on their use and concern. Groups are defined as:
No opinion/not concerned
about sugar +
usage is the same or has
increased over last 2 years
Sugar
Acceptors
Sugar use has decreased
over last 2 years
Sugar
Avoiders
Doesn’t use sugar
Sugar
Rejectors
Extremely/very/somewhat
concerned about sugar +
usage is the same or has
increased over last 2 years
Sugar
Concerned
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 13
WHERE MARKETS ARE HIGHER THAN AVERAGE
When comparing individual markets to the global average, Sugar Concerned shoppers are
more likely to be found in the West Asia and South Asia regions. Higher than average Concerned
is one way to estimate where there may be more Sugar Rejectors at some point. Sugar Avoiders
are more prominent in Latin America, while Sugar Acceptors are more common in Europe.
Sugar Concerned(Global Total: 45%)
Saudi Arabia: 69%Turkey: 56%
Pakistan: 53%Japan: 53%China: 51%India: 51%
Indonesia: 48%
Sugar Acceptors(Global Total: 11%)
Pakistan: 25%Japan: 22%Russia: 22%France: 19%
Germany: 17%UK: 16%
Sugar Avoiders/Rejectors(Global Total: 45%)
Colombia: 63%Argentina: 56%
Brazil: 57%Mexico: 53%
Thailand: 52%
Higher than average sugar markets vs. Global TotalMarkets noted have a group sizing >5 percentage points vs. Global Total
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 14
SIZING THE ARTIFICIAL SWEETENER MARKETS
In order to more closely define the size of each different group in terms of artificial sweeteners,
shoppers have been grouped based on their use and concern. Groups are defined as:
No opinion/not concerned
about artificial sweeteners +
usage is the same or has
increased over last 2 years
Artificial
Acceptors
Artificial sweetener
use has decreased
over last 2 years
Artificial
Avoiders
Doesn’t use
artificial sweeteners
Artificial
Rejectors
Extremely/very/somewhat concerned
about artificial sweeteners +
usage is the same or has
increased over last 2 years
Artificial
Concerned
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 15
WHERE MARKETS ARE HIGHER THAN AVERAGE
All markets are more likely to reject artificial sweeteners than sugar, however; there are a few
markets that are slightly more accepting of artificial sweeteners. Over 15% of shoppers in Japan,
UK and Pakistan fall into the Artificial Acceptors group, compared to only 9% of global shoppers.
Artificial Concerned(Global Total: 45%)
Saudi Arabia: 63%Turkey: 52%China: 49%
Pakistan: 47%Vietnam: 45%
Artificial Acceptors(Global Total: 9%)
Pakistan: 21%UK: 20%
Japan: 16%Canada: 15%
Germany: 15%
Artificial Avoiders/Rejectors(Global Total: 45%)
Russia: 74%Colombia: 71%Indonesia: 62%Philippines: 60%
USA: 59%Mexico: 58%
Higher than average artificial sweetener markets vs. Global TotalMarkets noted have a group sizing >5 percentage points vs. Global Total
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 16
REJECTOR/AVOIDER/CONCERNED
SUGAR
AR
TIFIC
IAL S
WEETE
NER
S
REJEC
TOR
/AV
OID
ER
/CO
NC
ER
NED
Axes cross at median values
WHICH BECOMES THE PRIORITY: ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERS VS. SUGAR
Higher negativity
for artificial sweeteners
Lower negativity
for both
Higher negativity
for sugar
Higher negativity
for both
While the strong majority of shoppers are not accepting of both sugar and artificial sweeteners, the following charts
show which countries are more focused on avoidance/rejection/concern of artificial sweeteners vs. sugar.
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 17
North America
Latin America
Europe
West Asia
South Asia
East Asia Pacific
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
80% 85% 90% 95% 100%
REJECTOR/AVOIDER/CONCERNED
SUGAR
AR
TIFIC
IAL S
WEETE
NER
S
REJEC
TOR
/AV
OID
ER
/CO
NC
ER
NED
SUGAR AND ARTIFICIAL SWEETENER NEGATIVITY BY REGION
Axes cross at median values
Higher negativity
for artificial sweeteners
Higher negativity
for sugar
Higher negativity
for both
Lower negativity
for both
HealthFocus® International 2018 Global Sweetener Report | 18
USA
Canada
Mexico
Brazil
Colombia
Argentina
France
Germany
UK
Russia
TurkeySaudi Arabia
India
Pakistan
Australia
China
Japan
Thailand
VietnamIndonesia
Philippines
South Korea
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%
REJECTOR/AVOIDER/CONCERNED
SUGAR
AR
TIFIC
IAL S
WEETE
NER
S
REJEC
TOR
/AV
OID
ER
/CO
NC
ER
NED
SUGAR AND ARTIFICIAL SWEETENER NEGATIVITY BY COUNTRY
North America Latin America Europe West Asia South Asia East Asia Pacific