repeat speeding offenders – time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers dr...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as
just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers
Dr Judy Fleiter
CRICOS No. 00213J
Edmonton’s International Conference on Urban Traffic Safety,
23-26 April 2012
![Page 2: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Acknowledgements
Co-researchers– Barry Watson, Vic Siskind, Angela Watson
Australian Research Council– Department of Transport and Main Roads– Queensland Police Service– Office of Economic and Statistical Research
Australian Postgraduate Award
![Page 3: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Overview
Speeding and crash involvement in Australia
Speeding recidivist research in Queensland
Challenges from an Australian perspective Defining speeding
Community attitudes to speeding
Auditor-General reviews of speed camera programs
Implications for future speed management
![Page 4: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Australia
Brisbane
Australia = 22.8 million people
Queensland = 4.5 million people Land area = 1.7 million km2
Driver’s licences = 3.1 millionReg.vehicles = 4.3 million
![Page 5: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Australian Road Deaths:Improvements from 1970-2010
30.4 deaths/100,000 people 6.1 deaths/100,000 people
With a 2-fold increase in vehicles & 50% growth in population
![Page 6: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Improvements in Road Safety in Queensland since 1967
![Page 7: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Speed management in Australia (1)
Over the last 2 decades, jurisdictions have adopted a ‘holistic’ approach to reducing speeding:
– Road environment improvements (e.g. lower urban speed limits, school zones, road treatments)
– Enforcement programs (e.g. traffic patrols, fixed & mobile speed cameras, point-to-point cameras)
– Education programs (e.g. mass media education)
– Intelligent Transport System (ITS) measures (e.g. vehicle activated and variable message signs)
![Page 8: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Speed management in Australia (2)
Strong reliance on traffic law enforcement programs:
− traffic laws (eg. speed limits)
− traffic policing (eg. speed cameras)
− sanctions (eg. fines, demerit points, licence loss)
![Page 9: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Speeding enforcement in Queensland
History:– 1997: Mobile speed cameras (highly visible, randomly
deployed around selected ‘crash’ sites)
– 2003: Penalties for speeding substantially increased
– 2007: Fixed ‘blackspot’ speed cameras and increase in mobile speed camera sites
– 2010: Covert speed cameras introduced
– 2011: Point-to-point (average) speed cameras operational on 1 section of highway north of Brisbane
Policing supported by mass-media education Evaluations of mobile speed cameras indicate:
− 34% reduction in fatal crashes within 2km of sites
− 42% reduction in serious casualty crashes within 2kmNewstead, 2006; Cameron, 2008; Carnis, Rakotonirainy & Fleiter, 2008
![Page 10: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Focus of Traffic Policing
• The Fatal 4– Speeding– Drink driving– Fatigue – driving while tired– Non-use of Seatbelts
![Page 11: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
CRICOS No. 00213J
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
5
10
15
20
25
30
Percentage of fatalities involving speeding drivers/riders in Queensland: 12 months ending
January 2006 -2011
Year
%
Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2011
![Page 13: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Percentage of speeding infringements per penalty category, Queensland
< 13 13-20 21-30 31-40 40+0
10
20
30
40
50
60
40.3
50.7
7.6
1 0.4
Km/hour above the speed limit
% o
f in
frin
gem
ents
Queensland Transport, 2008
![Page 14: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Speeding offenders...
• Are they all the same?
• Does increasing penalties make any difference?
• What else do they do?
• How do they perceive current penalties?
• What might best change their driving behaviour?
![Page 16: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Background to recidivism research project
In April 2003, Queensland introduced changes to the speeding penalty regime:
– Increased monetary fines
– Automatic licence suspension for high range speeding (for >40 km/h over the speed limit)
– Increased the number of offence bands/categories
The stated rationale for this change was to deter speeding behaviour
![Page 17: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Speeding penalty changesSpeeding offences and penalties in Qld prior to 17 April, 2003
Speeding offences and penalties in Qld from 17 April, 2003
Offence Fine Demerit Points
<15 km/hr over speed limit $90 1
15-29 km/hr over speed limit $135 3
30-44 km/hr over speed limit $180 4
>44 km/hr over speed limit $255 6
Offence Fine Demerit Points
<13 km/hr over speed limit $100 1
13-20 km/hr over speed limit $150 3
21-29 km/hr over speed limit $250 4
30-40 km/hr over speed limit $300 6
>40 km/hr over speed limit $700 8 + 6 months suspension
![Page 18: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The effectiveness of increases in speeding penalties
Limited international research into effectiveness of different speeding penalties
Increasing speeding penalties severity (in isolation) has been found to produce very few impacts on behaviour in Sweden (1982 & 1987) and Norway (1995-2004)
Need to consider impact of speeding penalties in:
– deterring the general population from speeding (general deterrence)
– reducing recidivism among offenders (specific deterrence)
Watson et al. 2010
![Page 19: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Speeding recidivism research
Our research aimed to: examine the specific deterrent impact of the
changes
profile speeding offenders/recidivists
![Page 20: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Method (1)
Crash and offence data from 1996 to 2007 obtained for two cohorts of drivers: - 58,000 drivers convicted of speeding in May 2001
- 53,000 drivers convicted of speeding in May 2003
Data obtained included details of:– index offence
– previous and subsequent traffic crashes and offences
– demographic characteristics
– licence type and class
![Page 21: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Method (2)
Final sample for current analyses excluded interstate and international licence holders:
– 2001 pre-penalty change cohort (n = 46,681)
– 2003 post-penalty change cohort (n = 42,180)
Speeding offence records for two years after the index offence were examined
Distinction between:- Absolute specific deterrence – the total prevention of re-offending
- Marginal specific deterrence – a reduction in re-offending
![Page 22: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Measures of recidivism
In the follow up period:
1. Proportion of all offenders detected re-offending (Absolute specific deterrence)
2. Average number of offences (Absolute and marginal specific deterrence)
3. Length of delay to re-offence among re-offenders (Marginal specific deterrence)
4. Average number of re-offences among re-offenders (Marginal specific deterrence)
CRICOS No. 00213J
![Page 23: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Overall impact of penalty change
Measure of recidivism Hypotheses Outcome
Overall proportion of re-offending in the follow up period
Reduction in the proportion who re-offend after penalty change
Overall frequency of re-offending in the follow up period
Reduction in average number of offences committed (overall) after penalty change
Length of delay to re-offence among re-offenders
Among those who re-offend, longer delay to re-offence after penalty change
Average number of re-offences committed by those who re-offended
Among those who re-offend, reduction in the average number of re-offences after penalty change
Watson et al. 2010
![Page 24: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Potential influencing factors – differential effects
1.Index offence severity
2.Offence history
![Page 25: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
1. Index Offence Severity
Low-range offences: those from the lowest offence category
High-range offences: those that were 30km/hr or greater over the speed limit
Mid-range offences: all other offences
![Page 26: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Effects of index offence severity
Compared to those with mid- and low-range offences, those with high-range index offence had a significantly:
− greater proportion re-offending;
− higher average number of offences; and
− higher average number of re-offences.
No differential effects of penalty change
![Page 27: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
2. Offence History
Low-range offenders: no speeding offences prior to index
High-range offenders: 2 or more speeding offences prior to index, where at least two were 30 km/hr or greater over the speed limit
Mid-range offenders: all other offenders
![Page 28: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Effects of offence history
Compared to mid- and low-range offenders, high-range offenders had a significantly:
−greater proportion re-offending;
−higher average number of offences;
−fewer days until re-offence; and
−higher average number of re-offences.
No differential effects of penalty change
![Page 29: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Potential Confounding Factors
1. Intensity of speed enforcement– Speed enforcement hours
2. Community perceptions– Annual community attitudes surveys
3. Driving exposure– Fuel sales
![Page 30: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
1. Intensity of speed enforcement
Speed enforcement
Measure*
2001 Cohort periodMay 2001 – April 2003
2003 Cohort periodMay 2003 – April 2005
Percentage change
Hours of operation
414,699 594,093 43%
Number of offences detected
1,170,373 1,121,735 - 4%
Detection rate
2.82 1.89
* Includes all speed camera and radar based speed enforcement
![Page 31: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
2. Community perceptions
The trend in self-reported exposure (self and others) to speed cameras was stable from 1998 to 2005.
Reported awareness of penalty change: – 69% in 2003– 39% in 2004
However, knowledge of the penalty change varied in terms of accuracy.
![Page 32: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
3. Driving exposureTime period Litres sold* %change
Pre-penalty change
May 2001 – April 2003 4,515,314,862
Post-penalty change
May 2003 – April 2005 5,902,016,763
30.71% increase
There was an increase in fuel sales from 2001-03 to 2003-05 period. As such, the results obtained in the study would not appear to be due
to any reduction in driving exposure.
*All fuel types sold by fuel retail outlets in Queensland
![Page 33: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Speeding offenders...
• Are they all the same?
• Does increasing penalties make any difference?
• What else do they do?
• How do they perceive current penalties?
• What might best change their driving behaviour?
![Page 34: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Speeding recidivists
![Page 35: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Speeding recidivist profiling (1)
Examined demographic characteristics, traffic offence histories and criminal histories of speeding offenders
Compared characteristics and offence histories of low and mid-range offenders with high-range, repeat speeding offenders
![Page 36: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Speeding recidivist profiling (2)
Utilised the data from the speeding penalty change study for the combined 2001 and 2003 cohorts (because no differences on key variables of interest)
Examined five years of traffic offence history, prior to the index speeding offence
Examined lifetime criminal history
Watson et al. 2009
![Page 37: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Speeding recidivist profiling (3)
Three classifications of offenders were determined ‘a priori’
– Low-range: one offence less than 15km/hr over speed limit during study timeframe
– Mid-range: at least one offence more than 15km/hr over the speed limit
– High-range: two or more offences, with at least two being 30 km/hr or more over the speed limit (i.e. high range, repeat offenders)
![Page 38: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Low-range5.8%
Mid-range90.5%
High-range3.7%
Breakdown of offenders(n = 84,468)
![Page 39: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Previous profiling results (1)
• Significant differences between high-range offenders compared to low- and mid-range offenders
• Demographics - High-range offenders more likely:– Male– Younger– Hold Provisional licence– Hold Motorcycle licence
![Page 40: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Previous profiling results (2)
Traffic History
• High-range offenders more likely than low- and mid-range offenders to have committed:– Alcohol– Unlicensed driving– Dangerous driving– Seatbelt, and– ‘Other’ traffic offences in the 5 years prior to index
offence
![Page 41: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Additional results
![Page 42: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Crash history
Low range Mid range High range0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3% 6.3%14%
97% 93.7%
86%
CrashNo Crash
Low-range vs. high-range: 2 (1) = 358.6, p < .001, c= .21Mid-range vs. high-range: 2 (1) = 286.2, p < .001, c= .06
![Page 43: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Compared to low- and mid-range offenders...
• High-range offenders involved in significantly greater proportion of single-vehicle crashes
• A significantly greater proportion of high-range offenders had ‘speed’ allocated as a contributing circumstance in crash
• But for multi-vehicle crashes, no significant differences between offender types for most-at-fault in a crash.
![Page 44: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Speeding offenders...
• Are they all the same?
• Does increasing penalties make any difference?
• What else do they do?
• How do they perceive current penalties?
• What might best change their driving behaviour?
![Page 45: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Criminal histories 1000 offenders selected
– 300 random sample of low-range– 300 random sample of mid-range– 400 random sample of high-range
Data provided by Queensland Police Service
Overall, 30.5% had at least one criminal offence– 15.9% property (eg. stealing, break and enter)– 14.9% drug offences– 10.2% offences against order (eg. public nuisance)– 7.3% offences against the person (eg. assault)– 7.2% traffic offences (ie. those requiring attendance at court)– 4.6% regulation offences (eg. prostitution, liquor licensing)
![Page 46: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Comparison of criminal histories
Low-range offenders
Mid-range offenders
High-range offenders
Overall Criminal history
7.0% 21.0% 55.2%
Property* 38.1% 44.4% 44.3%
Drug* 14.3% 36.5% 53.8%
Person* 14.3% 15.9% 27.1%
Traffic* 52.4% 28.6% 19.5%
Order* 14.3% 28.6% 36.7%
Regulation* 4.8% 3.2% 19.5%
Standardised residuals +/- 1.96 bolded*% of those with criminal history
![Page 47: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Conclusions for recidivism research
The introduction of more severe speeding penalties in Queensland appears to have had a absolute specific deterrent effect and reduced re-offending in the following two years
However, the change appears to have had little impact on the overall frequency of re-offending among those who did re-offend
Further research into the effectiveness of speeding penalties and sanctions needed
![Page 48: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Conclusions for recidivism research
High-range, repeat speeding offenders appear to be a problematic group of drivers
The are substantially different from low- and mid-range offenders on many demographic, traffic and criminal history factors
Need to consider innovative, tailored strategies for reducing recidivism among high-range, repeat offenders
![Page 49: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Speeding offenders...
• Are they all the same?• Does increasing penalties make any difference?• What else do they do?
• How do they perceive current penalties?• What motivates non-compliance?• Why don’t penalties make a difference to some
offenders?
• What might best change their driving behaviour?
![Page 50: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Understanding driver perceptions
• Key part of speed management
• Important to understand
• Can provide insight into behaviour
• Can provide direction for future countermeasures
![Page 51: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Focus group interviews
• Qualitative exploration• Queensland car drivers (n=67)• Participants
– Community members & university students – Purposive sampling (8 types) – Stratified by age, gender & self-identified speeding
• ‘Excessive’ vs. ‘Rare’ speeders
Fleiter, Lennon & Watson, 2007; 2010
![Page 52: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Definitions of Speeding (1)
1. Excess, illegal, over-speeding– Any amount above the posted limit
2. Inappropriate speed– unsuitable for the prevailing road and traffic
conditions (WHO, 2004)
3. A ‘psychological’ definition of speeding?What does speeding mean to you?
![Page 53: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Definitions of Speeding (2)
• ‘Technical’ definition widely acknowledged• Examples of compliance
– Safe; speeding unnecessary; moral imperative
“It’s a choice to be as safe as I can be.’’ Male, 39 years
![Page 54: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Definitions of Speeding (3)
• Justifications for non-compliance
– Compliance is discretionary not mandatory (personal choice)– Safe (vehicle design, control)– Enforcement tolerance perceptions
• 10% and 10 km/hour– ‘Outdated’/unreasonably low limits– Depends on speed zone/road type
![Page 55: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Definitions of Speeding (4)
“Actually, I’ll be honest, I’ve lived here 24 years and I don’t even know what the speed limit is out on our roads….I
don’t even know what speed I drive,
I just get in and drive.” Female, 53 years
“I see it [speeding] as road management. I don’t look at what speed I’m driving, I’m just going by instinct.”
Male, 58 years
![Page 56: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Question...
If you received a speeding ticket, who would you be embarrassed
to tell?
![Page 57: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Embarrassment Dichotomy (1)
‘Hide the ticket’ vs. ‘No big deal’
‘I wouldn’t tell my friends for fear they’d joke about it to their parents.’
‘Yeah, I’d rather tell my parents than a friend’s parents. You wouldn’t really have respect from
your friend’s parents.’
• Not disclosing a ticket linked to-Not wanting to breach trust-Projecting responsible image
![Page 58: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Embarrassment Dichotomy (2)
• ‘No big deal’ linked to:– Speeding viewed as widely acceptable– A common occurrence
“I’m never embarrassed to tell anyone, and I never ever flinch when I get a ticket, because I’ve had
that many… hundreds of them.” Male, 54 years
“It’s just one of those occupational hazards in getting from A to B.”
Male, 30 years
Fleiter, Lennon & Watson, 2007; 2010
![Page 59: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Avoiding Detection & Penalty (1)
For Excessive speeders, penalties appeared to have limited deterrent effect
• Avoiding detection– site learning (most common)– ability to detect covert enforcement
• Avoiding punishment– fraudulent demerit point use (opportunistic and
systematic– driving while unlicensed
![Page 60: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Avoiding Detection & Penalty (2)
“I think it’s [speeding] a lot more stressful at night ‘cause usually in your rear mirror, you can work out whether it’s a cop car.
At night they can hide.” Female, 46 years
“My [relative] buys points off people so he can keep driving. He gets them off other people for [$X] a point.
My son’s got a friend they call the Points Man because he never speeds, so he just takes everyone’s tickets and gets $X for every
point”. Female, 53 years
![Page 61: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
The importance of community perceptions
![Page 62: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Community attitudes & perceptions (1)
Gradual increase in public awareness of speed-related risks through 1990s to early 2000s but has been stable in recent years
Views of those opposed to stricter/more innovative speed management have considerable influence in Australia
National Road Safety Strategy (2011-2020) highlighted the need for: ongoing dialogue with motoring groups and other stakeholders Improvement in community understanding of the need for
compliance and of the social costs of low-level speeding for national dialogue to explain safety rationale of speed
managementAustralian Transport Council, 2011; Petroulis, 2011
![Page 63: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Community attitudes & perceptions (2)
In 2011, the Auditor-General’s Office in 2 jurisdictions (New South Wales & Victoria) conducted reviews of speed camera programs
Addressing community concern over use of cameras
![Page 64: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
NSW Auditor-General’s report (1)
“Improving Road Safety: Speed Cameras” Performance Audit Election commitment made before 2011 State Election Acknowledged much public debate 2 issues covered:
– were speed cameras located in areas identified as having greatest road safety risk?
– do speed cameras reduce speeding and the number and severity of road crashes in these locations?
Public submissions invited on how to improve speed camera program and speed management generally
![Page 65: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
NSW Auditor-General’s report (2)
Fixed cameras generally located in areas with high road safety risk
May be other locations for mobile cameras with greater road safety risk than currently used
Speed cameras change driver behaviour and have positive road safety impact overall
Results from individual cameras varied – crashes decreased at some but not others
Too early to tell impact of mobile and safety (intersection) cameras – introduced 2010 but early signs encouraging
![Page 66: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
NSW Auditor-General’s report (3)
No evidence that camera sites were chosen based on potential revenue. Site selection based on road safety
No incentives for private contractors to generate more offences (ie contractor payments do not relate to number of offences)
Traffic authority, not contractor, decides site location, roster of enforcement hours, alternative deployment sites
Not all camera locations consistent with site location criteria
Annual review needed of all camera locations as part of overarching strategy.
![Page 67: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
NSW Auditor-General’s report (4)
Need to annually monitor the effectiveness of each camera and publish trends in crashes, revenue, and speeding or infringement data for each camera
Cameras do not change behaviour of high level speeders (ie >45km/hr over the limit)
Less public concern about revenue raised by police speed enforcement (ie not cameras) yet they raise almost same amount of money
![Page 68: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
NSW Auditor-General’s report (5)
93 of 141 fixed camera locations effective with clear road safety benefits.
Noted plan to review and relocate the remaining 38 cameras
But, public ‘outrage’ at this possible removal saw some cameras retained
Current situation.... Some cameras reactivated (not issuing fines) Small number removed Ongoing stakeholder consultation to determine future of the
remaining questioned cameras
![Page 69: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Victorian Auditor-General’s report (1)
‘Sections of the community and media have shown significant interest in the road safety camera program,
voicing concerns about whether using cameras is appropriate, the accuracy of cameras, and the validity of
infringements.
Some allege that the purpose of the road safety camera program is to raise revenue, while major faults such
as those of the Western Ring Road fixed speed cameras in 2003 and the 9 incorrect fines issued on the Hume
Freeway point-to-point cameras in 2010 have served to erode public confidence in the program’.
2011, p.vii
![Page 70: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Victorian Auditor-General’s report (2)
• The Audit examined:
– whether there is a sound rationale for the road safety camera program
– whether the cameras are sited for road safety outcomes
– the accuracy of the camera system, and– whether the public can be confident that an
infringement is valid
![Page 71: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Victorian Auditor-General’s report (3)
• The supporting technology used and camera operations systems provide high degree of confidence that infringements are issued only when clear evidence of speeding or red-light running
• Processes and controls in place provide a particularly high level of confidence in reliability and integrity of road safety camera system
![Page 72: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Victorian Auditor-General’s report (4)
• Revenue generation demonstrably not the primary purpose of camera program
• In fact, more revenue could be raised through tightening operational polices that provide for some leniency to speeding drivers
• Deployment and siting of fixed and mobile cameras based on road safety objectives
![Page 73: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Victorian Auditor-General’s report (5)
• Further revisions (eg. random deployment of mobile cameras) should strengthen current program
• Cameras cannot identify a large proportion of speeding motorcyclists
• Need to address gap in enforcement for motorcyclists
![Page 74: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Victorian Auditor-General’s report (6)
• Suggest improvements to allay public perceptions about program integrity & purpose:
– Ongoing systematic review and evaluation of fixed cameras on freeways
– Program of independent testing of mobile cameras
– Need for communication strategy and public education campaigns to specifically address widely held misconceptions of revenue raising and camera inaccuracy
– Greater attention to promote positive contribution of road safety camera program in Victoria
![Page 75: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Speeding offenders...
• Are they all the same?• Does increasing penalties make any difference?• What else do they do?• How do they perceive current penalties?• What motivates non-compliance?• Why don’t penalties make a difference to some
offenders?
• What might best change their driving behaviour?
![Page 76: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Speed management priorities (1)
Reduce opportunities to avoid detection and punishment by:− identifying best mix of automatic and manned enforcement
− developing strategies to reduce enforcement ‘site learning’ without compromising overall visibility
− investigating individuals who accumulate large amount of demerit points (NSW)
− developing better detection of speeding motorcyclists
− implementing innovative strategies like point-to-point (average) enforcement which identifies persistent speeding over longer distances
![Page 77: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Speed management priorities (2)
Implement and evaluate innovative sanctions for reducing speeding recidivism
− vehicle impoundment
− intelligent speed adaption (ISA)
− behaviour change/rehabilitation programs
![Page 78: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Speed management priorities (3)
Innovative communication strategies needed to:
− challenge perception that speeding is okay and that everyone speeds
− address community perceptions of enforcement tolerances
− challenge perception that low level speeding is safe
− encourage voluntary use of ISA (private and fleet vehicles)
![Page 79: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Speeding offenders...
• Are they all the same?• Does increasing penalties make any difference?• What else do they do?• How do they perceive current penalties?• What motivates non-compliance?• Why don’t penalties make a difference to some
offenders?• What might best change their driving behaviour?
• ........and many more questions yet to be answered.
![Page 80: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Thank you, any questions?
Mark your Diaries!
International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety Conference (ICADTS T2013)
August 2013, Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre
![Page 81: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
References (1)
Auditor-General New South Wales. (2011). Improving Road Safety: Speed Cameras, Road and Traffic Authority - New South Wales Auditor-General’s Report.
Auditor-General Victoria (2011). Victorian Auditor-General’s Report: Road Safety Camera Program.Australian Transport Council. (2011). National Road Safety Strategy 2011-2020.
Cameron, M. (2008). Development for strategies for best practice in speed enforcement in Western Australia –, Supplementary Report. Report 277. Melbourne: Monash University Accident Research Centre.
Carnis, L., Rakotonirainy, A., & Fleiter, J. (2008) Speed enforcement programmes in France and Queensland: First elements for a systematic comparison. In High risk road users - motivating behaviour change: what works and what doesn't work? National Conference of the Australasian College of Road Safety and the Travelsafe Committee of the Queensland Parliament, 18-19 September 2008, Brisbane.
Fleiter, J. J., Lennon, A., & Watson, B. (2007). Choosing not to speed: A qualitative exploration of differences in perceptions about speed limit compliance and related issues. Paper presented at the Australasian Road Safety Research Policing Education Conference, Melbourne, 17-19 October, Melbourne.
Fleiter, J. J., Lennon, A., & Watson, B. (2010). How do other people influence your driving speed? Exploring the 'who' and the 'how' of social influences on speeding from a qualitative perspective. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 13, 49-62.
![Page 82: Repeat speeding offenders – Time to stop thinking of them as just ‘unlucky normal’ drivers Dr Judy Fleiter CRICOS No. 00213J Edmonton’s International Conference](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022110320/56649c9a5503460f94957227/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
References (2)
Newstead, S. (2006). Evaluation of the crash effects of the Queensland speed camera program in the year 2005. Melbourne: Monash University Accident Research Centre.
Petroulias, T. (2011). Community Attitudes to Road Safety – 2011 Survey Report. In Department of Infrastructure and Transport (Ed.). Canberra.
Queensland TMR (2011). Queensland Road Toll Weekly Report No. 689. Year to date to Sunday 10 April 2011. Brisbane: Queensland Department of Transport & Main Roads.
Watson, B., Watson, A., Siskind, V. & Fleiter, J. (2009). Characteristics and predictors of high-range speeding offences. Proceedings of the 2009 Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference. Sydney: Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW.
Watson, B., Siskind, V., Fleiter, J. & Watson, A. (2010). Different approaches to measuring specific deterrence: some examples from speeding offender management. Proceedings of the 2010 Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference. Canberra: Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development & Local Government.
World Health Organization (2004) World report on road traffic injury prevention. Geneva.