renewed motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
DESCRIPTION
This is a copy of the Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction that I filed in Florida Circuit Court. The Court that is to decide my Motion has decided the same Motion favorably in the past when presented with same. I'm not a lawyer, so I have an uphill battle all the way. At least my calf muscles will be in shape when I get to the top of the hill....TRANSCRIPT
1
I� THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
I� A�D FOR WALTO� COU�TY, FLORIDA
CIVIL DIVISIO�
CE�TE��IAL BA�K,
Plaintiff, Case �o.: 09CA001577
vs.
JOH� CARROLL, JODIE CARROLL,
CHAMBERS STREET BUILDERS, I�C.,
TAU�TO� TRUSS, I�C., and DEPARTME�T
OF THE TREASURY I�TER�AL REVE�UE
SERVICE, et al
Defendants.
____________________________________
JOH� CARROLL,
Counter-Plaintiff
vs.
COASTAL COMMU�ITY BA�K and
MIKE BYERS
Counter-Defendants.
____________________________________________/
DEFE�DA�T and COU�TER-PLAI�TIFF JOH� CARROLL’S RE�EWED
MOTIO� TO DISMISS COASTAL and CE�TE��IAL’S COMPLAI�T
FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTIO�
Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff John Carroll (“Carroll”), pursuant to Florida
Rule of Civil Procedure 1.140(b)(1) and 1.140(h)(2) moves for an Order Dismissing
Coastal Community Bank’s (“Coastal”) and Centennial Bank’s (“Centennial”)
Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and shows:
1. This Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to proceed. Subject matter
jurisdiction has not been established in Coastal’s First Amended Complaint. The
2
jurisdictional question can be raised at any time and can never be time-barred, Florida
Rule of Civil Procedure 1.140(h)(2).
2. The First Amended Complaint fails to describe the Status of Plaintiff
insomuch as no specific facts have been alleged which determine whether or not Coastal
or Centennial are a Corporation, LLC, LLP, etc. and if so, whether or not Coastal or
Centennial is currently authorized to do business in the State of Florida.
Argument and Citations
3. Parties cannot stipulate to jurisdiction over subject matter where none
exists Cunningham v. Standard Guar. Ins. Co., 630 So 2d 179 (Fla 1994) In re D.N.H.W.,
955 So 2d 1236 (Fla 2d DCA 2007); and subject-matter jurisdiction may not be conferred
on court by consent of parties MCR Funding v. CMG Funding Corp., 771 So 2d 32, 35
(Fla 4th DCA 2000)
4. This Court has dismissed similar claims with the right to Amend the
Complaint in HSBC Bank USA, etc. v Boone, Walton County 08 CA 557 and Lasalle
Bank, etc. v. Schumacher, et al, Walton County 09 CA 247.
WHEREFORE, Carroll requests that the court enter an Order Dismissing
Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint without Prejudice; and granting such other or
further relief as is appropriate.
3
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was forwarded to Frank A.
Baker, Esq., 4431 Lafayette Street, Marianna, FL. 32446, counsel for Coastal, and to Paul
Alan Sprowls, Asst. U.S. Attorney, 111 North Adams Street, Tallahassee, FL 32301,
counsel for the IRS, and to Mike Byers 12141 Panama City Beach, FL. 32407 by regular
mail this 10th day of September, 2010.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________
John Carroll
Box 613524
WaterSound, FL 32461
Phone (850) 231-5616
Fax (850) 622-5618