relevant dates for the project activity

GOLD STANDARD MONITORING REPORT

Version 01, 17/07/2020

Project: Avoided methane emission through aerobic composting at

Vietstar municipal solid treatment facility

UNFCCC Ref: 5556

GS ID: 2525

Monitoring period: 06/01/2018 – 05/01/2020 (both days included)

For Carbon monitoring, please refer to the CDM Monitoring Report version 2.0, dated

29/05/2020

Relevant dates for the project activity:

The project activity was registered as a CDM project on 06/06/2012.

The start date of the CDM crediting period is 06/01/2013.

Duration of this monitoring period: 06/01/2018 – 05/01/2020

1. General description

This Monitoring Report has been developed for the purpose of the Gold Standard verification

exercise for greenhouse gas emission reductions achieved by the project activity titled “Avoided

methane emission through aerobic composting at Vietstar municipal solid treatment facility” as

per relevant requirements for the period 06/01/2018 – 05/01/2020 (both days are included).

The proposed project activity -Vietstar municipal solid waste treatment facility - is located

within the territory of Tay Bac Solid Waste Treatment Complex Zone, in Ho Chi Minh city, Viet

Nam. The project is invested and operated by the private owned entity namely Vietstar Joint

Stock Company, specializing in economical wastewater treatment technology and investment in

residential solid waste plants.

The main purpose of the proposed project is to produce aerobic compost from MSW that would

have been left to decay anaerobically in waste landfills. The project activity is implemented in

two phases. The first phase has completed construction and started operating from December

2009. The designed capacity of phase one is 216,000 tons of solid waste per year (600 tons per

day, assuming 360 days per year) and the proposed product of organic compost is 26,420 tons

annually. The second phase has started operating from 24 November 2014; the treatment

capacity is doubled with the total designed capacity of 432,000 tons of solid waste per year with

daily waste reception of 1200 tons and the proposed product of organic compost as 53,568 tons

annually. About 4.66% of the total waste is recyclable plastic portion that will be recycled by

utilizing the Japanese advanced technology to produce expectedly 5,400 tons of recycled plastics

per year. The inert portion separated from composting process and the non-degradable waste is

designed to be transported and disposed in Phuoc Hiep landfill site number IA (hereafter called

as PhuocHiep IA) close to the MSW treatment plant site. The final product of organic compost

will be sold as bio-fertilizer to users.

In the absence of the project activity collected municipal waste containing approximately

70.81% organic matter on average would be disposed in dumpsites. The project reduces methane

emissions by establishing and operating composting facilities to treat organic matter collected

from municipal waste. The project results in the avoidance of a large quantity of methane (CH4)

that otherwise would have been released into the atmosphere due to the anaerobic decay of

organic waste in landfills. A total expected CO2 equivalent emission reduction is 1,814,928tCO2

over the fixed crediting period of 10- year period.

2. Calculation of emission reductions

Summary of calculation of emission reductions are as follow1:

Table 1: Emission reduction in the monitoring period

Year

Baseline

Emission

BEy

Project

Emission

PEy

Leakage

Emission

LEy

Emission

Reduction

ERy

(dd/mm/yyyy) (tCO2) (tCO2) (tCO2) (tCO2)

A B C D= A-B-C

06/01/2018 – 31/12/2018 218,894 14,498 467 203,928

01/01/2019 – 31/12/2019 232,895 14,977 456 217,461

01/01/2020 - 05/01/2020 3,594 187 6 3,401

Total

(06/01/2018 – 05/01/2020) 455,383 29,662 929 424,790

3. Sustainable Indicators and Parameters monitored according to the monitoring plan

According to the requirements of the Gold Standard, the project activity must be assessed against

a matrix of sustainable development indicators. The contribution of the proposed project activity

to the sustainable development of the country is based on indicators of local/ global

environmental sustainability, social sustainability & development and economic & technological

development.

Five indicators were added to the monitoring plan. All documents regarding these additional

parameters will be presented to the DOE during the on-site visit.

a. Monitoring procedures for “Quantitative employment and income generation”

Indicator No.1 Quantitative employment and income generation

Monitored parameter: Employment creation/household income

Description: The project creates jobs by employing people during the

construction and operation phase.

A number of waste-pickers are directly employed by the

project proponent at the sorting facility. They are provided

with proper safety equipment and health insurance. They

1 Further, refer to the ER calculation sheet for GS, version 01, dated 17/07/2020.

are paid accordingly as per payrolls and the signed labor

contract.

The project owner has conducted regular health checkups

during operation for employees.

Source of data to be used: Plant personnel records including payrolls, labor contracts,

social security, list of waste-pickers employed

Measurement procedures (if any): Evaluation of payrolls, labor contracts, etc. The relevant

plant operational records shall reflect the number of

employees that are part of the project proponent

organization.

Monitoring frequency: Once per verification period

QA/QC procedures to be applied: Cross-checking with operational records like payrolls,

attendance sheets, labor contracts.

Any comment:

Result:

The project activity has established a considerable and stable number of jobs at the

project site during operation. During the monitoring period, the project created 425 jobs

during the year 2018 and 388 in 2019. Evidence in form of work contracts will be

available on-site. Typical jobs range from the plant operation or the plant maintenance.

Through working for Vietstar municipal solid treatment facility, the income of the

employees has been improved. Salaries of employees are higher than minimum salary in

accordance with local regulation.

Conclusion:

The project positively impacts the quantitative employment and income generation for

the local community at the project site.

b. Monitoring procedures for “Technology transfer and technological self-reliance”

Indicator No.2 Technology transfer and technological self-reliance

Monitored parameter: Introduction of advance technology on solid waste

treatment.

Description: The advance technology on solid waste treatment will be

better known and applied in Vietnam.

Source of data to be used: Operation manuals of equipment, technical training and

servicing document.

Measurement procedures (if any): Evaluation of operation manuals of equipment and

technical training/servicing document shall reflect how the

advanced technology on solid waste treatment is trained

and applied in the project operation.

Monitoring frequency: Once per verification period

QA/QC procedures to be applied: Cross-checking with operational records like equipment

status and manuals, training and servicing reports.

Any comment:

Result:

The project activity has employed advance technology on solid waste treatment. The main

equipment of the facility was provided to project owner with its technical manuals, which are

accessible for operational staff

Conclusion:

The project has positive impact in terms of technology transfer for Vietnam.

c. Monitoring procedure for “Air quality”

Indicator No.3 Air quality

Monitored parameter: Dust, GHG, other air pollutant

Description: Proper mitigation measures were employed to mitigate the

negative impacts of air pollution. During monitoring

period, air examinations have been conducted to ensure

that the air quality is up to the relevant host country

standard.

Source of data to be used: Air quality examination results

Measurement procedures (if any): The air quality examinations were conducted every year in

form of the environmental reports.

Monitoring frequency: Once every year during construction phase

Twice every year during operation phase

QA/QC procedures to be applied: Cross-checking with the environmental reports

Any comment:

Result:

During the construction of the project, there were factors that affect the air quality such as dust,

waste gases from executing means, vehicles; however, the project proponent had applied proper

mitigation measures like spraying water on the road, covering material truck’s body to prevent

dust, using modern executing means, or implementing the plantation around the project site to

balance ratio O2/CO2 and evaporation. These measures can be cross-checked through interview

with the project owner.

During the monitoring period (06/01/2018 – 05/01/2020) the project owner has cooperated with

third parties (Dai Viet Environment Development Investment Corporation and Centre for

Environmental Technology and Management) perform the air quality examinations at the

project site. The results reveal that the air quality during the monitoring period is up to the

relevant standard. The examination results are shown in the table below.

Table 2: Ambient air quality

Air examination results for 2018

Date of monitoring: 02/03/2018

No Paramet

er Unit KK1 KK2 KK3 KK4 KK5

QCVN

05:2013

/BTNM

T

QCVN

06:2009

/BTNM

T

1 Noise dB 55.3 51.9 50.1 51.0 50.2 ≤ 70* -

2 Dust mg/m3 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.12 ≤ 0.3 -

3 NO2 mg/m3 0.068 0.063 0.058 0.055 0.057 ≤ 0.2 -

4 SO2 mg/m3 0.059 0.065 0.063 0.068 0.059 ≤ 0.35 -

5 CO mg/m3 5.58 5.24 5.11 5.13 5.12 ≤ 30 -

6 NH3 mg/m3 0.026 0.021 0.026 0.023 0.022 - ≤ 0.2

7 H2S mg/m3 0.015 0.013 0.016 0.014 0.011 - ≤ 0.042

8 CH3SH mg/m3 KPH KPH KPH KPH KPH - ≤ 0.05

KK1: Gate of the plant

KK2: Outsite of the plant, channel 17


KK4: Outsite of the plant, near to effluent of wastewater treatment system

KK5: Outsite of the plant, near to composting area

(*) - QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT

KPH: Undetected


No Paramet


QCVN

05:2013

/BTNM

T

QCVN

06:2009

/BTNM

T

1 Noise dB 66.2 54.4 54.5 54.2 54.7 ≤ 70* -

2 Dust mg/m3 0.16 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.13 ≤ 0.3 -

3 NO2 mg/m3 0.071 0.060 0.068 0.062 0.065 ≤ 0.2 -

4 SO2 mg/m3 0.062 0.067 0.065 0.060 0.068 ≤ 0.35 -

5 CO mg/m3 5.31 5.16 5.19 5.28 5.18 ≤ 30 -

6 NH3 mg/m3 0.021 0.023 0.027 0.028 0.025 - ≤ 0.2

7 H2S mg/m3 0.014 0.015 0.015 0.016 0.013 - ≤ 0.042







(*) – QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT

KPH: Undetected


No Paramet


QCV

N

05:201

3/BTN

MT

QCVN

06:200

9/BTN

MT

1 Noise dB 67.8 63.8 64.7 63.3 62.7 70* -

2 Dust mg/m3 0.27 0.09 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.3 -

3 NO2 mg/m3 0.096 0.040 0.046 0.091 0.061 0.2 -

4 SO2 mg/m3 0.050 0.013 0.018 0.026 0.037 0.35 -

5 CO mg/m3 3.10 3.10 3.28 2.74 3.83 30 -

6 H2S mg/m3 0.007 0.006 0.008 0.006 0.007 - 0.042

7 NH3 mg/m3 0.18 0.09 0.15 0.20 0.20 - 0.2

8 CH3SH mg/m3 0.025 KPH KPH 0.033 0.040 - 0.05






KPH: Undetected

(*) – QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT

Air examination results for 2019


No Paramet


QCVN

05:2013

/BTNM

T

QCVN

06:2009

/BTNM

T

1 Noise dB 68.1 67.3 60.6 62.1 67.1 ≤ 70* -

2 Dust mg/m3 0.13 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.17 ≤ 0.3 -

3 NO2 mg/m3 0.016 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.022 ≤ 0.2 -

4 SO2 mg/m3 0.014 0.015 0.012 0.007 0.014 ≤ 0.35 -

5 CO mg/m3 4.11 3.21 3.75 4.11 3.21 ≤ 30 -

6 H2S mg/m3 0.006 0.017 0.006 0.006 0.006 - ≤ 0.042

7 NH3 mg/m3 KPH KPH KPH KPH KPH - ≤ 0.2







(*) - QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT

KPH: Undetected


No Paramet


QCVN

05:2013

/BTNM

T

QCVN

06:2009

/BTNM

T

1 Noise dB 65.4 60.3 62.3 61.3 65.7 ≤ 70* -

2 Dust mg/m3 0.30 0.22 0.30 0.25 0.20 ≤ 0.3 -

3 NO2 mg/m3 0.019 0.013 0.011 0.012 0.010 ≤ 0.2 -

4 SO2 mg/m3 0.266 0.018 0.242 0.012 0.145 ≤ 0.35 -

5 CO mg/m3 1.38 10.52 2.84 3.28 2.99 ≤ 30 -

6 H2S mg/m3 0.006 0.007 0.006 KPH KPH - ≤ 0.042

7 NH3 mg/m3 KPH KPH KPH KPH KPH - ≤ 0.2







(*) – QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT

KPH: Undetected

Table 3: Air quality at production area

Air quality examination results at produciton area for 2018


No Paramete

r Unit KK6 KK7 KK8 KK9 KK10

TCVS

3733/2002

/QD-BYT

1 Noise dB 62.7 77.3 78.1 77.8 75.6 ≤ 85*

2 Dust mg/m3 0.16 0.18 0.16 0.18 0.28 ≤ 8

3 NO2 mg/m3 0.068 0.071 0.069 0.071 0.073 ≤ 10

4 SO2 mg/m3 0.070 0.077 0.072 0.075 0.079 ≤ 10

5 CO mg/m3 5.17 5.16 5.22 5.17 5.13 ≤ 40

6 NH3 mg/m3 0.281 0.236 0.255 0.216 0.315 ≤ 25

7 H2S mg/m3 0.085 0.136 0.177 0.122 0.185 ≤ 15

8 CH3SH mg/m3 0.011 0.016 0.015 0.019 0.025 ≤ 2

KK6: Waste reception area

KK7: Sorting area

KK8: Plastic recycling area

KK9: Composting area – at the beginning of

composting process

KK10: Composting area – at the manure

composting

(*) - QCVN 24:2016/BYT


No Parame

ter Unit KK6 KK7 KK8 KK9 KK10

TCVS

3733/2002

/QD-BYT

1 Noise dB 70.5 77.6 66.7 64.5 58.9 ≤ 85*

2 Dust mg/m3 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.25 ≤ 8

3 NO2 mg/m3 0.071 0.073 0.065 0.073 0.077 ≤ 10

4 SO2 mg/m3 0.078 0.081 0.070 0.078 0.082 ≤ 10

5 CO mg/m3 5.23 5.19 5.16 5.19 5.18 ≤ 40

6 NH3 mg/m3 0.293 0.287 0.245 0.235 0.326 ≤ 25

7 H2S mg/m3 0.092 0.153 0.169 0.108 0.191 ≤ 15

8 CH3SH mg/m3 0.017 0.018 0.016 0.020 0.027 ≤ 2


KK7: Sorting area


KK9: Composting area – at the beginning of

composting process

KK10: Composting area – at the manure

composting

(*) - QCVN 24:2016/BYT


No Parameter Unit KK06 KK07 KK08 KK09 KK10

TCVS

3733/2002

/QD-BYT

1 Noise dB 69.3 70.3 65.7 65.3 63.2 85

2 Dust mg/m

3 0.18 0.15 0.08 0.19 0.08 8

3 NO2 mg/m

3 0.064 0.063 0.081 0.081 0.093 10

4 SO2 mg/m

3 0.016 0.020 0.015 0.020 0.030 10

5 CO mg/m

3 3.63 3.82 3.80 3.83 3.09 40

6 H2S mg/m

3 0.016 0.014 0.008 0.012 0.018 15

7 NH3 mg/m

3 1.04 0.86 0.40 0.74 0.92 25

8 CH3SH mg/m

3 0.405 0.882 KPH KPH 0.196 2


KK07: Sorting area


KK09: Composting area, at the beginning of

composting process

KK10: Composting area, at manure

composting

KPH: Undetected

Air quality examination results at produciton area for 2019


No Parame


TCVS

3733/2002

/QD-BYT

1 Noise dB 76.2 79.3 75.1 76.3 70.5 85

2 Dust mg/m3 0.30 0.12 0.10 0.12 0.08 8

3 NO2 mg/m3 0.020 0.019 0.012 0.006 0.010 10

4 SO2 mg/m3 0.032 0.014 0.015 0.007 0.008 10

5 CO mg/m3 4.11 4.29 3.04 4.82 4.64 40

6 H2S mg/m3 0.023 0.024 0.028 0.006 0.005 15

7 NH3 mg/m3 KPH KPH KPH KPH KPH 25

8 CH3SH mg/m3 KPH KPH KPH KPH KPH 2


KK07: Sorting area



composting process


composting

KPH: Undetected


No Parame


TCVS

3733/2002

/QD-BYT

1 Noise dB 72.3 73.1 71.7 72.0 70.9 85

2 Dust mg/m3 0.13 0.08 0.06 0.24 0.24 8

3 NO2 mg/m3 0.084 0.073 0.078 0.108 0.105 10

4 SO2 mg/m3 0.010 0.008 0.015 0.016 0.010 10

5 CO mg/m3 3.66 1.03 4.15 10.20 KPH 40

6 H2S mg/m3 0.007 KPH 0.008 KPH KPH 15

7 NH3 mg/m3 KPH KPH KPH KPH KPH 25

8 CH3SH mg/m3 KPH KPH KPH KPH KPH 2


KK07: Sorting area



composting process


composting

KPH: Undetected

Table 4: Waste air at chimney in plastic recycling area

For 2018


No Parameter Unit Result

QCVN

19:2009/BTNMT,

Class B

1 Dust mg/Nm3 55 ≤ 160

2 NOx mg/Nm3 51 ≤ 680

3 SO2 mg/Nm3 KPH ≤ 400

4 CO mg/Nm3 396 ≤ 800

5 NH3 mg/Nm3 KPH ≤ 40

6 H2S mg/Nm3 KPH ≤ 6


1 Dust mg/Nm3 12 ≤ 160

2 NOx mg/Nm3 KPH ≤ 680


4 CO mg/Nm3 6 ≤ 800




1 Dust mg/Nm3 9 ≤ 160



4 CO mg/Nm3 5 ≤ 800

5 H2S mg/Nm3 1.72 ≤ 6

6 NH3 mg/Nm3 3.39 ≤ 40


1 Dust mg/Nm3 26 ≤ 160

2 NOx mg/Nm3 2 ≤ 680


4 CO mg/Nm3 4 ≤ 800

5 H2S mg/Nm3 0.91 ≤ 6

6 NH3 mg/Nm3 2.66 ≤ 40

For 2019


1 Dust mg/Nm3 23 ≤ 160



4 CO mg/Nm3 4 ≤ 800


6 NH3 mg/Nm3 4.35 ≤ 40


1 Dust mg/Nm3 20 ≤ 160



4 CO mg/Nm3 14 ≤ 800




1 Dust mg/Nm3 13 ≤ 160


3 SO2 mg/Nm3 19 ≤ 400

4 CO mg/Nm3 10 ≤ 800




1 Dust mg/Nm3 21 ≤ 160

2 NOx mg/Nm3 6 ≤ 680


4 CO mg/Nm3 1 ≤ 800



Conclusion:

The air quality at the project site is within the limit as per Vietnam Standard

d. Monitoring procedures for “Water quality and quantity”

Indicator No.4 Water quality and quantity

Monitored parameter: Contamination of public water resources

Description: The waste water including rainfall flow, domestic

wastewater, and productive wastewater including

wastewater release from workshop cleaning, plastic

washing, leachate from solid waste reception area and

composting process and other sources is directed to

wastewater treatment system. Wastewater from plant is

treated to be satisfied with B level of Viet Nam standard

QCVN 40:2011/BTNM, ensuring quality of water

resource before discharging into reception sources.

Source of data to be used: Water quality examination results and site observation

Measurement procedures (if any): The water quality examination is conducted every year in

form of the environmental reports to ensure that the water

quality is up to relevant standards.

Monitoring frequency: Twice every year

QA/QC procedures to be applied: Cross-checking with the environmental reports and site

observation

Any comment:

Result:

According to the examination conducted by Dai Viet Environment Development Investment

Corporation and Centre for Environmental Technology and Management, the water quality is up

to standard. The examination results are described in the table below:

Table 5: Water examination results

For 2018


Position: Effluent after wastewater treatment system


QCVN

40:2011/BTNMT,

Class B

1. 1 pH - 6.92 5.5 - 9.0

2. 2 TSS mg/l < 15 100

3. 3 COD mg/l 50 150

4. 4 BOD5 mg/l 21 50

5. 5 Amoni (N-NH4+) mg/l 2.58 10

1. 6 Total N mg/l 21.8 40

6. 7 Total P mg/l 2.52 6

7. 8 Chlorine residual mg/l KPH 2

8. 9 Cu mg/l 0.12 2

9. 10 Zn mg/l 0.58 3

10. 11 As mg/l KPH 0.1

11. 12 Hg mg/l KPH 0.01

12. 13 Pb mg/l 0.077 0.5

13. 14 Cd mg/l KPH 0.1

14. 15 Cr mg/l KPH -

15. 16 Coliform MPN/100ml 1200 5000



1 pH - 7.49 5.5 - 9.0

2 TSS mg/l < 15 100

3 COD mg/l 67 150

4 BOD5 mg/l 32 50

5 Amoni (N-NH4+) mg/l 0.24 10

6 Total N mg/l 26.7 40

7 Total P MPN/100ml 3.24 6

8 Chlorine residual mg/l KPH 2

9 Cu mg/l 0.12 2

10 Zn mg/l 0.051 3

11 As mg/l 0.015 0.1

12 Hg mg/l 0.003 0.01

13 Pb mg/l 0.077 0.5

14 Cd mg/l 0.005 0.1

15 Cr mg/l 0.048 -

16 Coliform MPN/100ml 1900 5000



1 pH - 8.51 5.5-9.0

2 TSS mg/l 15 100

3 COD mg/l 59 150

4 BOD5 mg/l 14 50

5 Total N mg/l 3.6 ≤ 40

6 Total P mg/l 1.44 ≤ 6

7 As mg/l 0.0063 ≤ 0.1

8 Cd mg/l KPH ≤ 0.1

9 Hg mg/l KPH ≤ 0.01

10 Pb mg/l KPH ≤ 0.5

11 Coliform MPN/100ml KPH ≤ 5000



1 pH - 7.92 5.5-9.0

2 TSS mg/l 20 ≤ 100

3 COD mg/l 15 ≤ 150

4 BOD5 mg/l 5 ≤ 50

5 Total N mg/l 3.4 ≤ 40

6 Total P mg/l 1.52 ≤ 6

7 As mg/l 0.0060 ≤ 0.1





KPH: Undetected

For 2019




QCVN

40:2011/BTNMT,

Class B

1 pH - 7.83 5.5 - 9.0

2 TSS mg/l 8 100

3 COD mg/l 33 150

4 BOD5 mg/l 10 50


6 Total P mg/l 1.84 6

7 As mg/l 0.0054 0.1

8 Cd mg/l KPH 0.1

9 Hg mg/l KPH 0.01

10 Pb mg/l 0.011 0.5

16. 11 Coliform MPN/100ml KPH 5000



1 pH - 7.47 5.5 - 9.0

2 TSS mg/l 6 100

3 COD mg/l 13 150

4 BOD5 mg/l 3 50


6 Total P MPN/100ml 0.58 6

7 As mg/l 0.0057 0.1

8 Cd mg/l KPH 0.1

9 Hg mg/l KPH 0.01

10 Pb mg/l 0.009 0.5

11 Coliform MPN/100ml KPH 5000



1 pH - 7.31 5.5-9.0

2 TSS mg/l 8 100

3 COD mg/l 17 150

4 BOD5 mg/l 6 50

5 Total N mg/l 3.9 ≤ 40

6 Total P mg/l 0.80 ≤ 6

7 As mg/l KPH ≤ 0.1







1 pH - 6.82 5.5-9.0

2 TSS mg/l 2 ≤ 100

3 COD mg/l KPH ≤ 150

4 BOD5 mg/l KPH ≤ 50

5 Total N mg/l 2.5 ≤ 40

6 Total P mg/l 0.28 ≤ 6

7 As mg/l 0.0070 ≤ 0.1





KPH: Undetected

Conclusion:

The water quality at the project site is within B level of Viet Nam standard QCVN

40:2011/BTNMT.

e. Monitoring procedures for “Other pollutants”

Indicator No.5 Other pollutants

Monitored parameter: Hazardous waste, domestic solid waste

Description: Hazardous waste and domestic watse are collected and

treated in accordance with local laws and regulations as

relevant.

Workers are provided with proper personal protective

equipment. Labour safety and hygiene regulations are

implemented in working areas.

Source of data to be used: Documentary records on treatment of hazardous waste,

labour safety and Hygiene at working areas.

Protective equipment on site.

Measurement procedures (if any): Documentary records on treatment of hazardous waste,

labour safety and Hygiene at working areas shall reflect

the proper treatment and in accordance with national laws

and regulations

Protective equipment shall ensure safety procedure for the

staff according to national regulation

Monitoring frequency: Once per monitoring period

QA/QC procedures to be applied: Cross-checking with documentary records on treatment of

hazardous waste, labour safety and Hygiene, and

interview

Any comment:

Result:

The project owner has cooperated with a specialized agency to collect and treat hazardous waste

at the plant. Solid/liquid waste from the construction stage are properly and safely collected and

disposed in dumping area in accordance with local laws and regulations as relevant. Other

pollutants, such as domestic waste are sourced from staffs, workers are directly collected,

classified and treated at the plant.

Workers are provided with proper personal protective equipment including face mask, hand

gloves, and protective clothing. Safety and hygiene regulations are strictly checked at working

areas.

Conclusion:

Vietstar municipal solid treatment facility has applied appropriate measures for other pollutants

according to current national law and regulations.

4. Overall conclusion

It can suitably be established that the project has complied with the Monitoring Plan laid out in

the Gold Standard passport, version 2.1 dated 22/04/2015 and hence the 424,790 CERs for the

monitoring period under consideration are eligible for issuance under Gold Standard.

relevant dates for the project activity

Documents