relation of oral health, general health and ncds (christoph benz)
TRANSCRIPT
General Health
relation of
and
Christoph Benz
prologueprologue
medicine is an “art of probabilities,”at best, a “science of uncertainty”
uncertainty
Sir William Osler1849-1919
„measurement has over promisedaugust 2015
Gene Glass1940
and under delivered“
prologueprologue
mechanistic evidencethere is a physiological or (micro)biological
explanation how condition A maypathomechanism
empirical evidenceevidence in patients that proofs there is a
dependance of condition B on condition Agold standard: RCT
NCD evidence
lead to condition B
prologueprologue
primary outcome
surrogate outcomes
the most important outcome,
freedom from myocardial infarction and survival a real clinical endpoint
measures of an effect that may correlate witha real clinical endpoint, but not necessarily
cholesterol level probing depth, BOP
tooth lossendocarditis
bacteremia
outcome measures
prologueprologue
ethical considerationsprolongation of a study
difficulty to standardize study-groupslarge group sizes
why surrogate?
prologueprologue
because of the multitude of individualinfluences the same cause maylead to very different effects
periodontitis is a risk factor
one cause one effect?
the clinical relevance is dependent on acomplex interplay from genetics to behavior
what we knowwhat we know
Disease periodontitisasriskfactor
association patho-mechanism
Intervention:surrogate
Intervention:primary
Endocarditis ++ yes yes yes no
RecurrentPneumonia
++ yes yes n.a. yes
CardiovascularDisease
+ yes yes yes no
ChronicKidneydisease
+ yes yes n.a. yes
DiabetesMellitus + yes yes yes no
Cancer yes yes no no
COPD yes yes n.a. yes
Dementia yes yes no no
Gastritis yes yes n.a. yes
RheumatoidArthritis
yes yes no no
periodontitis
what we knowwhat we know one example
cardiovascular disease
periopathogens in atherosclerotic vessel wallsHaraszthy et al. 2000, 2001, Mastragelopoulos
et al. 2002, Desvarieux et al. 2006
animal model: periopathogensOffenbacher et al. 1999, Li et al. 2002
initiate atherosclerotic plaques
endothelial dysfunction reversedTonetti et al. 2007
by periodontal therapy
what we knowwhat we know
problems …
no large scale industrial orpharmaceutical interests that lead
little interest of general medicineto the funding of expensive studies
and politics in dental topics
dental science
what we knowwhat we know
we have found …, but the evidence is not
often because they …feel insecure about their study
want new research-funding
sufficient. Further research is necessary.
classical expression of a scientist …
were obliged by peer reviewers
dental science
what we knowwhat we know
considering periodontitis, we want torecommend preventive measures
what we need are relevant endpoints
because we want to convince …
the insurance-systems to spendmoney on prevention
the patients to spendtheir own money on prevention
underline our recommendationsin the field of general medicine to
What do we want?
the practitionerthe practitioner
what we know
in the mouth
clinical endpoints
what we know
we have observational evidence for
the practitioner
tooth losssevereperiodontitis
inflammation
less …
what we knowwhat we know
The information and
concerning
60
70
80
90
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
12 years
35-44-years
65-74 years
prevention-baseddental visits [%]
to talk to our patientsis more than enoughevidence we have today
the practitioner
general health?
what we knowwhat we know
Insurance-systems?at least in Germany the highest levels
2 questions …Will we ever reach these levels?
Do we really want insurance money?
of evidence are required
the practitioner
concerninggeneral health?
take hometake home
never hesitate to recommendhigh-class preventive measures
we have all the hard endpoints in dentistryand sufficient evidence in general medicine
relying on the money of our patients
people in the need of carepoor people
leaves at least 2 groups without prevention
(less developed countries)