Extract from the

FINAL REPORT (2015-20)

of the 5th

SFC, Bihar

Relating to Urban Local Bodies

JANUARY, 2016

PATNA

Details of Contents relating to ULBs

Ch. Contents Ch. Contents

Ch. 3 Enabling the Urban Local Bodies to

function as self governments

3.4.5 SPUR Project

3.1 ULBs as self government 3.4.6 Accountability of the ULBs

3.1.1 Constitutional Provision 3.5 Friction between Elected and Official

functionaries

3.1.2 Municipalities and Census 2011 3.6 e-Municipality (Nagarseva)

3.1.3 Urban Policy of Bihar 3.6.1 Need for e-Municipality

3.1.4 Urbanization Scenario in Bihar 3.6.2 Features of e-Municipality

3.1.5 Imperatives of rapid urbanization 3.6.3 e-Municipality Modules

3.1.6 Future agenda for the ULBs 3.6.4 Status of e-Municipality

3.2 Functions 3.6.5 Recommendations of the Review Committee

3.2.1 Functions: Constitution & BMA, 2007 3.6.6 Decisions in the meeting of

Secretary UDD

3.2.2 Devolution of Functions 3.6.7 Recommendations in Divisional

level consultation

3.2.3 Parallel Bodies (PBs) 3.6.8 Need for complete relook at e-

municipality project

3.2.4 Status of the Regulatory Functions Ch. 7 ULB Finances: Review and

Forecast of Revenue and

Expenditure

3.2.5 Status of the Planning Functions 7.1 Computing Resource Gap

3.2.6 Status of the Civic Services 7.1.1 Framework for Projection of

Resource Gap

3.2.7 Urban Transport and Traffic 7.1.2 Methodologies for Computing

Resource Gap

3.2.8 Slums in Bihar 7.2 Resources of the ULBs

3.2.9 Status of the Agency Function 7.2.1 Powers of the ULBs to realize own

revenue (tax & non-tax)

3.2.10 Recent initiatives of Union Government 7.2.2 Leveraging resources through PPP

3.2.11 Urban Housing 7.2.3 Borrowing

3.3 Functionaries 7.2.4 Assignment from State Govt

3.3.1 Creation of Municipal Cadre 7.2.5 14th

FC Transfers

3.3.2 Model Staffing 7.2.6 Schemes transfers

3.3.3 Suggestions made in Divisional

meetings regarding Municipal Staffing

7.3 Review of Resources of the ULBs

3.3.4 Restructuring of PMC 7.3.1 Total revenue of the ULBs

3.4 Critically of Capacity Building 7.3.2 % of O&M cost met through user

charges

3.4.1 Underutilization of even Inadequate

funds by th ULBs

7.3.3 Productive use of public assets,

lands etc.

3.4.2 Highly unsatisfactory performance of

the ULBs Reasons

7.3.4 UFC and SFC transfers

3.4.3 Capacity building and the 14th

FC 7.4 Forecast of Resources of the ULBs

3.4.4 Strengthening training 7.4.1 Business – as – usual approach

Ch. Contents Ch. Contents

7.4.2 Normative approach 7.10 An interesting case of Revenue &

Expenditure of PMC

7.4.3 Revenue Projected by UDD Ch. 9 Recommendations on Devolution

and Grant

7.4.4 5th

SFC Approach 9.1 Imperative of full Capacity Building

& Reforms in the LBs

7.5.1 Broad Items of Expenditure (10-15) 9.2 Consolidated Fund of the State

7.6 Review of Expenditure (2010-15) 9.3 Divisible Pool of taxes etc

7.6.1 ULBs Allocation in State Budget 9.4 Resource gap of the LBs

7.6.2 Expenditure of the major ULBs 9.5 Devolution for 2015-20 & Inter LBs

share with uses

7.6.3 Maintenance expenditure of Bihar

ULBs vs All India

9.6 Grants for 2015-20 & Inter LBs

shares and purposes of Grants

7.7 Forecast of Expenditure (2015-20) 9.7 Total transfers for the 5th

SFC period

7.7.1 Business –as – usual approach 9.8 Impact of the Recommendations on

the State Finances

7.7.2 Normative (Principle of Equalization)

approach

9.9 5th

SFC transfer to be an additional to

the normal budgetary transfer for the

LBs

7.7.3 Forecast of Expenditure of the ULBs by

UDD

9.10 Utilization of unutilized grants in

the year

7.7.4 5th

SFC Approach 9.11 Resource Gap of the LBs after the 5th

SFC transfers

7.8 Computation of the Resource Gap 9.12 Release of funds to the LBs

7.8.1 Resource gap based on different

approaches

9.13 Uses of the Transferred (Devolution

+ Grants) Funds

7.9 Bridging the Resource Gap 9.14 Imperative of Capacity Building,

Sound Finance & Governance and

Accountability

24 5th SFC (2015-20)

Chapter III

Enabling the Urban Local Bodies to function as self governments

3.1 ULBs as self government: 3.1.1 Constitutional Provision: The 74th Amendment to the Constitution has given Constitutional status to the ULBs, provided it a complete framework and also imparted it certainty. Article-243 (W) envisions the ULBs as the institutions of self - governments and also the universal platform for planning and implementing programmes for economic development and social justice. (Box 3.1). It has deepened democracy and ensured social and political empowerment of the people, particularly the disadvantaged, through 140 ULBs and 3,305 elected representatives, over 50% of whom are women.

3.1.2 As per Census 2011, Bihar has 199 towns including 60 census towns. 55 new towns have been added since 2001. State Government has notified 140 towns as Municipalities u/s 3 of BMA, 2007 i.e. 11 Corporations, 42 Councils and 87 Panchayats.

Delimitation of the ULBs (done decades back) is now an imperative given the natural but haphazard growth of peri –urban and adjoining areas and the need for accelerating urbanization. UDD had initiated the process in 2013. But most of the ULBs have not responded.

3.1.3 Urban policy of Bihar: UDD has furnished elements of the possible Urban Policy of Bihar. (Annex 3.1). Evidently, Bihar needs to formulate a comprehensive Urban Policy since policy vacuum risks worsening urban scenario, a declining quality of life for citizens, and reluctance among investors to commit resources to the urban centers. Box. 3.3 gives key lessons regarding urban policies.

Constitutional provision for enabling the ULB

243W. Powers, authority and responsibilities of Municipalities, etc.—Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, endow— (a) the Municipalities with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-government and such law may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon Municipalities, subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, with respect to— (i) the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice; (ii) the performance of functions and the implementation of schemes as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule; (b) the Committees with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to carry out the responsibilities conferred upon them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule.

Box 3.1

Why is Patliputra urban area not a part of PMC?

• Patliputra colony is officially a Housing Co-operative Society in Patna, formed in 1954 consisting of both residential and business settlements. It is not a part of Patna Municipal Corporation (PMC) though GoB had notified the Patliputra area along with other areas to be included within the limits of Patna through notification no. 10203 L.S.G. dated 05/10/1960, and notification no.1795, dated 09.03.1967, under PMC Act.

• Both the notifications were contested by the Patliputra Housing Society through title no 170/67 and 171/67 in the civil court, Patna. In 1995, the case was disposed off in favour of Government. The society moved to the court of District judge in 1995 through title no.70/95. The appeal petition was accepted and the order of the lower court was stayed till the final orders. Finally on 04.12.2014, Civil court, Patna dismissed the said petition.

• Accordingly, State Government has notified inclusion of three Panchayat namely Digha, Mainpura East and Mainpura West (Patliputra Colony) and requested State Election Commission to start the process of election of councilors.

• However, the matter has once again become sub-judice. Pataliputra colony remains rural area, gets the best civic services but does not pay taxes & fees.

Box 3.2

25 5th SFC (2015-20)

3.1.4 Urbanization Scenario in Bihar: (i) Table 3.1 shows that urbanization in Bihar is way behind All-India in all its dimensions: (ii) Table 3.2 shows Bihar (11.29%) is among the least urbanized state in the country. Moreover Bihar’s level of urbanization has barely moved over the decades. (iii) Bihar’s urbanization is largely fertility-driven. Over 50 percent increase in the urban population during 2001-2011 represented the difference between births and deaths. Incidentally, Bihar has the highest birth rate in the country. Seventy two new towns, i.e. settlements that became urban for the first time in 2011, added around 35 percent to the urban population. Emergence of census towns is a recent development in Bihar and needs to be continuously monitored. (iv) Rural Bihar continues to absorb most of the increase in total population. i.e. 85 percent between 2001 and 2011. The role of rural - urban migration in the process of Bihar’s urbanization is relatively

modest, though rural– urban migration usually is central to urbanization. (v) Primacy and increasing weight of towns in the population ranges of 20,000–50,000 and 50,000 –100,000 are the main and unique characteristics of Bihar’s urban system. Projection of urban population is given in Table 3.3 and city size details of urban population is given in Appendix 3.1. 3.1.5 Imperatives of rapid urbanization: (i) As mentioned above, urbanization is the lowest for Bihar and has increased from mere 9.59 % in 1981 to just 11.29% in 2011 as against 22.89% and 31.16% respectively for All India. Analysis in Chapter IV shows that rural areas inherently have higher poverty, lower PCI, lower socio–economic infrastructure, and do not attract investment & talent. Imperative of urbanization is evident from the flow chart at Annex- 4.14. In fact both people and service providers do not wish to stay in the rural areas.

Lessons from National Urban Policies globally • Governments need to be more sensitive to the threats and opportunities posed by rapid urban growth. These

cannot be addressed by compartmentalized policy-making. Active support needs to be mobilized across the different spheres of government to ensure a coordinated approach to planning and managing cities and towns. The argument that well-functioning urban areas can help to unleash the development potential of nations is more persuasive than the argument that urban policy is about alleviating poverty and meeting basic needs.

• Implementation requires a sustained technical process to develop the legal foundations, capable institutions and financial instruments to design and build more productive, liveable and resilient cities and towns. In developing these capabilities, the public sector needs to work closely with local communities, private investors and other interests. Successful cities cannot be built by governments alone.

• Effective delivery requires active collaboration between spheres of government along with the devolution of appropriate responsibilities and resources to enable city authorities to respond to conditions on the ground and get things done, with support from the centre and in collaboration with other stakeholders. The active participation of cities is necessary to achieve many national policy goals.

• An important objective is to manage the peripheral expansion of cities in the interests of more compact and inclusive urban growth, with shorter commutes and less damage to surrounding agricultural land, fresh water sources and other ecosystems.

• Urban consolidation requires pro-active efforts to increase the quantity and quality of land and property developed within the urban core and along transport corridors, more intensive use of well-located vacant land, and upgraded urban infrastructure. It tends to go hand-in-hand with more mixed-use development and less segregation of land-uses.

• It is less socially disruptive and more cost-effective to plan for urbanization by preparing the land and infrastructure in advance, rather than trying to repair, redevelop or relocate informal settlements once they are established. Wherever possible, existing informal settlements should be formally recognized and upgraded.

• Urban policy requires a broader territorial perspective on metropolitan regions, including stronger connectivity between cities, towns and rural areas, to promote their distinctive strengths and to encourage mutually beneficial interactions between them in the interests of national prosperity and inclusive growth.

Source: UNHABITAT

Box 3.3

26 5th SFC (2015-20)

*****

Table 3.1: Urban Monitor Economy Bihar India

Size of the economy (2013-14; GSDP @ current prices, Rs. crore) 3,43,054 1,04,72,807 Per capita GSDP (2013-14; @ current prices, Rs.) 31,229 74,380 CAGR: Per capita GSDP (2004/05 – 2013/14) % 16.48 13.32 Total tax receipts to GSDP ratio (2012-13) % 15.6 17.22 State’s own tax receipts to GSDP ratio (2012-13) % 5.3 6.87 Urban demography Urban population (2011: million) 11.76 377.11 AEGR (2001-2011) % 3.06 2.76 Urbanization level (2011) % 11.29 31.15 Urban population density (2001: persons per sq.km.) 4811 3836 Urban poverty and housing Rural poverty level (2011-12) % 34.1 25.7 AEGR (2004/05 – 2011/12) % -1.37 -4.6 Urban poverty level (2011-12) % 31.2 13.7 AEGR (2004/05 – 2011/12) % 3.95 -2.5 Slum population as a % of total population 10.52 17.37 Number of census houses used as residence, urban (million) 1.92 76.56 Urban human development goals Urban literacy (2011) % 76.86 84.11 Urban female literacy (2011) % 70.49 79.11 Urban IMR (2012) / 1000 live births 34 28 Urban service access (2011) Water supply (% HH with treated water supply within premises) 13.17 49.37 Sewerage (% HH with latrines connected to piped sewer) 7.21 32.68 Solid Waste collection (% HH covered) 33.5 75.8 Road density (km/sq. km) 4.29 4.03 % HH with waste water outlet connected to closed drainage 29.95 44.5 Urban labor market Urban work force (2011-12) % 10.28 28.91 Female urban work force (2011-12) % 8.71 19.95 Urban unemployment rate (UPSS approach; 2011-12) % 5.6 3.5 Municipal finance (SR14FC) Per capita own revenue (2012-13) 58 2540 Per capita revenue expenditure (202-13; Rs.) 56 1986

Source: Census, 2011

Table 3. 2 Bihar: level of Urbanization

Year Urban Population

(Million) Level of Urbanization

(%) Bihar India Bihar India

1961 2.58 78.99 7.41 17.84

1971 3.24 109.11 7.70 19.75 1981 5.01 159.46 9.59 22.89 1991 6.49 217.18 10.05 25.50 2001 8.66 286.12 10.43 27.82 2011 11.76 377.10 11.29 31.16 2021(P) * 15.9 432.61 18.8 32.29 2031(P) * 21.6 600.00 34.2 40.00

Source: Census, 2011, * For projection, refer to Appendix 3.1

Table 3 .3 City Size class urban population projection (million) City-size class

AEGR % (2001-11)

Projected Urban Population*

2016 2021 2026 2031 >1million 1.93 2.38 2.78 3.23 3.76 100,000-1 million 4.21 6.12 7.12 8.28 9.64

50,000-100,000 2.93 1.86 2.16 2.51 2.92

20,000-50,000 1.66 2.81 3.27 3.81 4.43

<20,000 4.59 0.52 0.60 0.70 0.82 Total (Million) 3.06 13.68 15.92 18.53 21.57

Source: Census, 2011

27 5th SFC (2015-20)

(ii) Further, graph at Annex- 4.15 (i) shows that over the decades, correlation between PCI and urbanization is increasing, which is both the cause (as the engine of growth, enabler of economies of scale in providing goods & services and promoter of social mobility) and the consequence of development. Hence, Bihar has to make major conscious efforts to urbanize rapidly, provide quality infrastructure and services in cities & towns and thereby attract investment & talent. 3.1.6 Future agenda for the ULB: (i) Breaking out of the web of under-urbanization and under-development is central to Bihar’s urban Transition. It will be provided by creation of quality urban infrastructure capital, urban-led growth in areas which hold in comparative terms the maximum potential, urban sector reforms, and developing institutional capacities. (ii) Five key output of SPUR (details in para 3.4.5) comprehensively cover action points for the ULBs in Bihar. These include; (a) Urban Governance & Planning, (b) Municipal Finance, (c) Municipal Infrastructure, (d) Local Economic Development, (e) Social Development, Poverty Alleviation & Livelihoods.

(iii) WB identifies 4 goals for Cities (Box 3.4). MGI analysis identifies five important dimensions for Urban Development, i.e. funding, governance, planning, sectoral policies and shape as shown in Box 3.5. (iv) At the ULB level, three broad agenda need to be pursued towards rapid, planned and people-centric urbanization: Empowerment (through effective devolution of functions and finances), Enablement (capacity building through skilled manpower, IT,

office space, etc.) and Accountability (through Ward Sabha, Social Audit, Ombudsman, etc.).

3.2 Functions:

3.2.1 Functions of the ULBs under the Constitution and BMA 2007 may be seen at Annex – 3.2. The ULBs evidently need to perform following categories of Functions as self-government under BMA. (i) Regulatory Functions: Section 45 (1) (b) -perform such statutory or regulatory functions as may be provided under this Act or any other law. (ii) Planning functions : (a) Section 45 (1) (a) - (iv) - Preparation of plans for development and

social justice, (b) Section 47 (1) (a) Planned development of human settlement, (c) Section 287 - Slum Improvement and (d) Section 289 - Works to be executed in Slums. (iii) Provision of Core Civic Services: Section 45(1) (a) - (a) water-supply (domestic, industrial, and commercial purposes), (b) drainage and sewerage, (c) solid waste management, (d) markets and slaughterhouses, (e) promotion of educational, ports and cultural activities, (f) aesthetic environment.

Four Goals & Sub-Goals for Cities (World Bank)

Goals Sub Goals (i) Livability Low poverty and inequality, healthful environment (clean air & water and safe waste

disposal), safety & security, and integration of various groups in urban society

(ii) Competitiveness Growth and increased productivity of city output, broad-based employment, investments, and trade in response to market opportunities

(iii) Good Governance Accountability, transparency and integrity of self-government. (iv) Bankability Sound financial management and credit worthy self-government.

Box 3.4

Five important dimensions for Urban Development

Box 3.5

Source-McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) analysis.

28 5th SFC (2015-20)

(iv) Communication & Transport System : Sec. 45 (v),(vi) - (a) Construction and maintenance of roads, footpaths, pedestrian pathways, transport terminals (both for passengers and goods), bridges, over-bridges, subways, ferries, and inland water transport system, and (b) transport system accessories including traffic engineering schemes, street furniture, street lighting, parking areas, and bus stops. (v) Agency Functions :Section 46 - Subject to the underwriting of the costs by Central or State Government, undertake any function belonging to their functional domain viz primary education, curative health, transport, supply of energy, fire safety, and urban poverty alleviation. 3.2.2 Devolution of Functions:

(i) Devolution of functions: The ULBs in Bihar are an inferior tier of Government, almost entirely dependent on grants and subventions from State Govt. The ULBs have some powers in delivery of some functions, but decision on all key issues rests largely with State Government. There should be clear and true devolution of functions as shown in Box 3.6. (ii) Activity Mapping : No activity mapping has been done as reported by UDD. (iii) Actual Devolution – Not reported by UDD.

(iv) Functions that the ULBs are able to perform: As reported by UDD, following functions are being performed by the ULBs: Solid Waste Management, Drainage, Sewerage, Water Supply, Planning & Development of Human Settlement, Markets and Slaughterhouses, Street Lighting, Parking, Bus Stops, Slum Upgradation and BSUP. (v) Fnctions that the ULBs are unable to perform and the possible reasons: Many ULB functions are performed by Government departments, e.g. (a) Water Supply by PHED except in Patna, (b) Urban Forestry and protection of Environment by Forest & Environment Department, (c) Fire Services by by Home Department, (d) Promotion of Arts & Culture Department, (e) Primary Education by Education Department etc., apparently because the ULBs lack requisite capacity. 3.2.3 Parallel Bodies (PBs) (i) Due to poor staffing and technical incapability of the ULBs, a number of PBs has been created as described in Table 3.4 A for performing various functions. (ii) The aforementioned multiplicity of agencies seems to have led to overlap, ambiguity and wastage of resources. It is imperative that working relationship amongst these PBs and the ULBs be harmonized as per criteria given in Box 3.7.

Box 3.6

* It represents, PMU has got oral approval from respective Municipal Corporation. 1 It represents presentation of feasibility study of proposed development to respective Municipal Corporation.

Table 3.4 B: BUIDFT

29 5th SFC (2015-20)

(iii) For integrated planning and implementation and avoiding scattering of limited manpower and infrastructure, the existing agencies including BUIDCO could be used as the SPV for smart Cities, Waste Processing and Metro Rail. (iv) BUIDFT (Bihar Urban Infrastructure Development Fund Trust): State Government through BUIDCo has set up BUIDFT to develop a long term state – led and market – driven sustainable urban infrastructure financing mechanism. Three funds namely Urban Loan Fund (ULF), Grant and Credit Enhancement Fund (G&CEF) and Project Development Fund (PDF) are to be managed by BUIDFT with the assistance of a Project Management Unit (PMU) set up by a partner organization / consortium (AMC).

BUIDFT is to progressively increase external financing of ULB level capital projects in a sustainable manner, without a State Government guarantee through (a) catalyzing development of well-structured bankable projects, (b) building capacity in project appraisals and resource mobilization and (c) facilitating/incentivizing State and ULB level reforms that can be precursors for further investment flows. Table 3.4 B shows that BUIDFT is far from achieving its objective.

3.2.4 Status of the Regulatory Functions: (a) Trade licensing: As reported by UDD, being issued by the ULBs

(b) Death & Birth Certificate: issued by the ULBs. (c) Approving building plan & Habitat development: At present only approval of the building plan is being done. (d) Building Byelaws: The Bihar Urban Planning and Development Act. & Rules, 2014 have been approved. But basic steps like Constitution of Planning Authorities, Identification of Area Development Schemes, etc. have not been taken. (e) Other related Acts/ Rules viz; Bihar Apartment ownership Act 2006, Bihar Municipal Competent Authority for Sanction of Building Plan Rules 2014, Bihar Metropolitan Planning Committee Rules 2008 have also been notified. (f) Municipal Police: In the Divisional level consultation meetings, strong suggestions came for every ULB being given police force(1-6) full time and EO being notified as Executive Magistrate ex- officio, to deal with the problems of encroachment, enforcement of various provisions of BMA 2007, etc. In fact UDD has asked all ULBs on 18th sept. 2015 to submit following information in this regard: (i) Purpose of requirement of police force (Armed/Laathi/SAP/Home guards) (ii) Which source of fund will be utilized to bear the expenses on it? (iii) Will this deputation of police force (a) augment the resources of ULB and (b) support in implementation of provisions of BMA, 2007?

Table 3.4 A : Paralllel Bodies in Urban Sector

Parallel Body Functions BUIDCo (Bihar Urban Infrastructure Dev. Corporation)

Civic Services : Execute infrastructure related project Urban Transport Affordable Housing Commercial Market Development Nodal executing agency of State Government for implementing JNNURM, NGRBA, ADB and World Bank funded urban projects

BUSTL (Bihar Urban Transport Services Ltd.)

Responsible for operation of urban transport

BUDA (Bihar Urban Dev. Authority)

BUDA does technical monitoring of engineering works in the ULBs. Implementation of Central/State Schemes as state level coordinator. Incidentally, BUDA had over Rs. 950 crore undisbursed amount as on 31.3. 2015

BRJP (Bihar Rajya Jal Parshad)

Design, Construction and Maintenance of: (i)Water Supply Schemes, (ii)Sewage Treatment Plants, (iii)Storm water drainage etc

SPVs UDD has recently decided to constitute SPVs for Smart Cities and Waste Processing respectively*

30 5th SFC (2015-20)

3.2.5 Status of the Planning Functions: (A) Urban Strategic Planning: (i) The Working Group Report on Urban Strategic Planning for the 12th plan discusses (a) Critical issues; (b) Approach to and Principles of Urban Strategic Planning; and (c) Recommendations to State, Regional and Local Bodies. Details are given in Chapter X (Para 10.1.2) (ii) The Bihar Urban Planning and Development Act, 2012 and Rules, 2014 provide comprehensive framework for Spatial & Developmental Planning (Box 3.8). (iii) Strategic Plan Preparation would require: • Preparing State Spatial Strategy covering State Transportation Grids including High Speed Transit Networks and State priority Cities. • Giving major thrust to Regional and Urban Planning. • Preparing District, Metropolitan and City Spatial and Development Plans. • Strategic Densification of Cities. • Urban Renewal and Regeneration. • Developing AKIC and EEC corridors along with GEM cities.

• Building Institutional Capacities and Networking.

(B) Spatial Planning

(i) It usually comprises of Concept Plan, Master Plan and City Development Plan. Their inter-relationship is given in Box 3.9.

Harmonizing the Role of Parastatals with Elected Municipal Bodies

A key challenge is harmonizing the role of experts dominated parastatals with the elected municipal bodies representing people for whom the Plan is drawn. The roles and responsibilities of different institutions in such situations should be clarified along five principal dimensions: • Unique Purpose: Each institution should have a clearly defined ‘unique’ purpose for itself, in line with people’s aspirations. Typically it should not overlap with any other institution at the same federal level • Measure of Effectiveness: In line with the unique purpose, relevant measures of effectiveness should be put in place. These will not only help in creating external accountability for the institution as a whole, but will also provide guidance to the individual employees to discharge their duties. • Exclusive Decision Rights: The decisions which the institution is empowered to take and which others are required to follow must be specified. These decisions rights must be reconciled with decision rights granted to other institutions. • Expertise and Capabilities: Empowering any institution with certain decision rights alone is not enough. The critically necessary capabilities/expertise required by the institution to perform its functions and fulfil its purpose must be defined, along with processes for ensuring it will have these capabilities. • Inter-linkages within the Ecosystem: Lastly, it is critical to understand the inter-linkages with other institutions in a complex, multi-institutional environment. A particular institution may have different types of relationships with other institutions. These could range from being a regulator, to having a contractual arrangement or serving as a technical advisor.

Source – 12th Five Year Plan, GoI

Box 3.7

Salient aspects of Bihar Urban Planning & Development Rules 2014 • Constitution of Bihar Urban and Planning

Board • Declaration of Planning areas and

constitution of authorities • Preparation of Land use maps and land use

registers • Preparation, content and approval of

Development Plan • Control of Development and Use of Land • Area Development Scheme • Levy, assessment and recovery of Planning

Development charge • Acquisition and disposal of land • Constitution of fund • Constitution of urban Arts and Heritage

Commission for state. • Provision for Tribunal

Box 3.8

31 5th SFC (2015-20)

(ii)The status of each is as follows: (a) Concept Plan- is not being prepared (b) Master Plan: Master Plans have been under preparation for some towns including Patna for several years now, but are yet to be finalized and notified. . - Action is being taken for formation of Planning

Area Authority and for declaring planning area for 15 main towns by the Bihar Urban Planning and Development Board. - Development of satellites towns is under

process to mitigate the increasing population pressure in the major towns. - A critique of Draft Master Plan of Patna is given

in Box 3.10 and Annex. 3.3. (c) City Development Plan (CDP): CDPs have been prepared for 28 SPUR ULBs:

Developing Greater Patna as a Smart, Competitive and Sustainable City

• Greater Patna needs to be restored to the glory of Patliputra as a major urban hub of the world. It has unique endowment of 4 major rivers viz. Ganga, Sone, Gandak and Punpun. It has a huge pool of

Box 3.10

Box 3.9

Inter relationship between Concept, Master and Development Plans

young population when the world is greying. It is the entry point for several major religious & heritage circuits. • The draft Master plan of Patna has been prepared with a limited horizon and aspiration. While the same could be finalized for the pressing operational purposes, an ambitious Master Plan is required to make it Smart, Competitive and Sustainable City through internationally reputed Consultants. • Patna being the only major city of a densely populated State of Bihar with 1.8 million people and unique endowments as mentioned above, is ready for being developed as a great river city with entry point for tourists & devotees; a Health, Education & IT hub; and a major source of skilled work force for the whole world. • Why Patna couldn’t qualify as Smart City: Patna, the state capital city, couldn’t qualify as Smart City since it scored low in each of the 4 sets of criteria, viz (a) Existing Service Level (40%), (b) Institutional Systems - Capacities (0%), (c) Self-financing (50%), (d) Past track record of reforms (0%). SPUR program apparently couldn’t make significant difference because of the internal capacities and other problems of PMC.

Contd.

32 5th SFC (2015-20)

Recommendations on Spatial Planning: (i) Given the imperatives of accelerated but planned urbanization, all ULBs must prepare Master Plan, CDP, GIS maps and also DPRs for the priority projects. The SFC is recommending sufficient funds to engage reputed national & international experts for the purpose. The objective is that every Divisional HQ develops as a Smart City, every District HQ as an AMRUT City and every other town is ready for planned growth and attains the SLBs. (ii) Urban and Regional Development Plans Formulation and Implementation (URDPFI) guidelines of MoUD, GoI could be the main reference document for Spatial Planning. (Annex- 3.4) (iii) 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17) has suggested reforms and desired outcomes related to Water Supply and Sewerage & Sanitation as at Annex- 3.5. These need to be implemented.

(iv) Urban Bihar needs a proper Land Use Policy (Box 3.11) and proper estimation of space requirement for a sustainable growth of urban areas. Methodology for 4 major components viz residential space, Commercial space, Community space and Infrastructure space for assessing the urban space requirement is detailed in Annex. 3.6 (v) Frame Regulation on Fringe Area Development. (C) Industrial & Economic Corridors; Central

Government proposes to develop (i) Amritsar-Kolkata Industrial Corridor (AKIC), and (ii) Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC), which pass through Bihar (map below). These two corridors could provide urban-led growth stimulus to Bihar’s economy (Table 3.5).

Table 3.5 Districts covered by AKIC & EEC Corridor District covered Popln.

(million)

% of Bihar urban Popln.

AKIC 5 (Kaimur, Rohtas, Aurangabad, Gaya, and Nawada)

1.52 13.0

EEC 6(East Champaran, Muzaffarpur, Patna Samastipur, Nalanda and Nawada)

4.20 35.7

Total 11 5.72 48.7

Route of AKIC and EEC

Land Use Policy

(i) State needs a clear land use and conversion policy to ensure planned and sustainable urbanization. (ii) Pro-active efforts are needed to: • Increase the quantity and quality of land and property developed within the urban core and along transport corridors, • More intensive use of well-located vacant land • Upgraded urban infrastructure. (iii) All efforts must go hand-in-hand with more mixed-use development and less segregation of land-uses

Box 3.11

33 5th SFC (2015-20)

(D) Development Plan: (iii) Integrated District Plan: Article 243ZD of the Constitution (Box 2.3) envisages a Committee for District Planning to prepare development plan for the district as a whole, which will have regard to “(i) matters of common interest between the Panchayats and the Municipalities including spatial planning, sharing of water and other physical and natural resources, the integrated development of infrastructure and environmental conservation; (ii) the extent and type of available resources whether financial or otherwise; (b) consult such institutions and organizations as the Governor may, by order, specify.” But it is yet to happen. Recommendations on the Development Plan: Development Planning by the ULBs and the PRIs for their jurisdiction is detailed in Chapter X (Para 10.2.2). (E) Role of the State Planning Board: The Working Group on Urban Strategic Planning for the 12th Plan has suggested that “The State Planning Board (SPB) should (a) oversee preparation of the Spatial Development Plans for the State in a timely manner as prescribed;(b) approve plans of DPCs and MPCs;(c) prepare or get prepared plans by default when there is no functional Planning Authority; and (d) act as arbitrator for conflicting land uses between plans”. The 5th SFC endorses this.

3.2.6 Status of the Civic Services:

3.2.6.1 Service Level Benchmarks (SLBs): Under the Citizen’s Charter (Annex 3.7) SLBs are available for: Property Tax, Registration, Births/Deaths Certificate, Water Supply, Sewerage, Drainage, Solid Waste Management, Grievances and Suggestions, Building Approvals, Licenses, Accounting System and Personnel Information System. The UDD website has appraisal formats to assess status of different civic services provided by the ULBs. 3.2.6.2 UDD has reported status of implementation of the SLBs as in Table 3.6. Information available regarding status of various civic services is given below.

3.2.6.3 Percentage of HH covered by civic services: (i) Service levels as per census 2011 are given in Graph 3.1. (ii) City size and access to basic services: Table 3.7 shows that bigger the city size, better are the basic services. 3.2.6.4 Water Supply: (i) Graph 3.1 shows that 13.17% HHs have access to tap water within premises in Bihar. It is far below the national level of 49.37%. Citizen Charter’s targets 100% coverage within 10 years and it is a major challenge. Table 3.7 shows that the city with more population has higher percentage of HHs connected to tap water.

(ii) Some action taken by State Govt: • Transfer of Bihar Rajya Jal Parshad (BRJP) under UDD. • Implementation of big water supply projects in 31 cities at a cost of Rs 427.46 Crores through BRJP having 65 Tanks, and 628 KM long pipeline to ensure 24 x 7 water supply. • Under JnNURM –UIG, water supply project worth Rs. 711.81 crore approved for Patna, Khagaul, Phulwari sharif, Danapur and Bodh Gaya. • Under JnNURM – UIDSSMT, water supply project in Muzaffarpur approved

Table 3.6 : Implementation of the SLBs (UDD) Functions Actual Status

reported by UDD Solid Waste Management Extent of availability

of services differs in different ULBs. Street Light, Market, Slum up-gradation, Planning, solid waste management are fully managed by the ULBs. Infrastructure facilities are being developed to extend water supply and drainage system in all ULBs.

Drainage & Sewerage Water Supply Slum upgradation and provision of BSUP Markets and Slaughterhouses Planning & Development of human settlement Street Lighting, Parking, Bus stops

Public Transport

Functional in Patna and proposed in Gaya & Muzaffarpur through BUTSL

34 5th SFC (2015-20)

• Plan to ensure continuous Water Supply in 100% HH. Plan prepared for 6 lac HH. Remaining 10 lakh HH to be covered in next 5 years.

3.2.6.5 Solid Waste Management: (i) Central Government notified MSW 2000 Rules under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 which are applicable to all Municipalities in India. These Rules cover collection, segregation, storage, transportation, processing and disposal of Municipal Solid wastes. (ii) Some action taken by State Government: • State Government is providing grants to all 141

ULBs on a regular basis, for purchase of modern municipal equipment.

• ULBs can also hire workers on daily wage as per requirement.

• City Sanitation Plan has been prepared for 40 cities in the State.

• Target was to door to door collection in 2000 wards by June 2016 and all wards by March 2017. However, door to door collection in 879 wards out of 3193 wards. i. e. less than 1/3rd has been done though, Swachhata Anudan provides @ Rs, 1200/family/year.

• Work plan has been prepared for scientific management of waste generated with – in the ULBs limits. 23 solid waste management cluster are being developed.

• 81acres of land at Rama Chak Bairia has been made available to PMC for solid waste disposal and waste-to-energy plant. This plant is being executed by BUIDCo in PPP mode. But the execution of the work is very slow, as noted by UDD.

• SWM storage regional landfill sites are to be provided in all ULBs by December, 2017.

Table 3.7 City Size and coverage of basic services (%of HH)

City Size Tap water within premises

Piped sewer connected to latrines

Connected to closed drainage

Bihar India Bihar India Bihar India >1 million 50.8 19.6 61.3 100,000 – 1million 13.1 6.1 29.2

50,000 – 100,000 8.7 3.3 18.8 20,000 – 50,000 4.1 3 16.3 10,000 – 20,000 5.1 2.9 13.1 5,000 – 10,000 3.1 3.4 17.3

<5,000 5.1 2.1 12.9 Total Urban 16.7 49.4 7.2 32.7 29.9 44.5

Source: Census, 2011

35 5th SFC (2015-20)

3.2.6.6 Sewerage & Sanitation: (i) Graph 3.1 that shows that 7.21% HHs have access to latrine facility connected to piped sewer system in Bihar against 32.68% for All India. Citizen Charter’s targets 100% coverage within 10 years based on GIS maps and contour. (ii) Some action taken by State Government: • Rajgir project completed; Bodhgaya likely to be

completed in March, 2016. • Projects ongoing in Buxar, Begusarai and

Hajipur. • DPRs for 46 towns prepared at an estimated cost

of Rs 6357 cr. • Funding pattern for individual toilets under

Swachh Bharat Mission is Central Share: State Share = Rs 4000/HH : Rs 8000/HH.

• DPRs of Arrah & Chhapra, Bhagalpur & Patna and Gaya considered under NMCG, AMRUT and ADBs Tranche 2 respectively.

• Other cities to be proposed to MoUD/EAP. • Sewerage projects are being implemented in

stages in 8 cities of the State. • Families without toilet facility to be provided

enhanced grant of Rs.8000/-. Thus each family will get Rs. 12000/- including GOI grant. Estimated expenditure will be Rs. 600 crore in 4 years.

3.2.6.7 Drainage (i) Graph 3.1 shows that 29.95% HHs are connected to closed drainage in Bihar against 44.50% for All India. Citizen Charter’s targets 100% coverage within 10 years along with 0% incidence of water logging/flooding with special provision of 40% for the ULBs along river. It again seems a major challenge for the ULBs. Only Rajgir is covered with 100% drainage network. (ii) Some action taken by State Government: • Drainage Projects of 5 towns (Patna, Gaya,

Muzaffarpur, Darbhanga & Danapur) proposed for funding in 2016-17 at a cost of Rs 450 Cr. under AMRUT.

• Storm Water Drainage System is being implemented in stages in 6 cities viz Bodh Gaya, Buxar, Begusarai, Hajipur, Munger and Rajgir.

• DPRs for 59 more cities are prepared, to be financed under different programmes.

• Rs 3621 Cr. worth projects for 26 towns are ready & funding being explored.

• Drainage Master Plans to prepared for 55 towns in next 1 year.

• At least one major Drain will be constructed in each town from State Plan.

3.2.6.8 Street-lighting (i) Current Status: • Approx 1,24,000 street lights in all ULBs against

requirement of 14,60,000 i.e. less than 10%. (ii) Some action taken by State Government: • 100 street lights installed in Patna. 5000 street

lights in 10 important cities are being done by BUIDCo.

• Principal Main Road & Main Roads of all ULBs to be covered with LED street lights in 3 years at a cost of Rs 142 Cr.

• 15% of MMNVY fund proposed to be earmarked for Street Lights.

3.2.6.9 Internal Roads & Streets: Information not available. 3.2.6.10 Library/Museum: The ULBs do not own/manage Library/Museum. The new Museum set up in Patna is managed by State Government. 3.2.6.11 Market and Slaughter houses: Information not available.

Namami Gange Project

• An Integrated Ganga Conservation Mission called “Namami Gange” includes: (i) rehabilitation and upgradation of existing STPs along river Ganga (ii) Ensuring 100% sewerage infrastructure (iii) Interception & Diversion (I&D); River Front Development; Crematoria; Dhobi Ghats & Community Toilets (iv) In situ sewage treatment in open drains (v) Support for preparation of DPRs etc. • This Project is being implemented in 23 towns of Bihar (Ara, Bhagalpur, Buxar, Chapra, Hajipur, Munger, Patna, Danapur, Begusarai, Katihar, Jamalpur, Mokama, Fatuah, Barh, Phulwari Sharif, Sultanganj, Dumraon, Barhiya, Lakhisarai, Kahalgaon, Naugachia, Bakhtiyarpur, Sonepur. • GoB has recommended inclusion of 9 more towns, (Manhar, Maner, Teghra, Khagaria, Khagaul, Revil ganj, Dighwara, Manihari, Bihat in the project. • 6 Projects worth Rs. 2175 Cr already sanctioned.

Box 3.12

36 5th SFC (2015-20)

3.2.6.12 Fire Prevention: Information not available.

3.2.6.13 Cattle Pounds: Information not available. 3.2.6.14 Riverfront, Park & Green Cover: Some action taken by State Government: • At least one Neighborhood Park (3 to 5 acres) to

be developed in every town. • Patna Park Development & Maintenance Society

constituted. • MMNVY, State Plan, 4th SFC & 14th FC funds

will be used for park development. • A new policy framed for systematic development

of 70 parks in Patna. • An international level ultramodern “Budha

Smriti Park “in Patna constructed. • Facilities in Parks developed in all cities of State.

6 new parks constructed by BUIDCo in Patna. • Satyagraha Park in Motihari being constructed at

a cost of Rs. 2.20 crore, It would have a large statue of Mahatma Gandhi

• Rs. 71 crore project prepared for development of the bank of Falgu river in Gaya and integrated development of ponds in the city.

• DPR is being prepared for beautification of historical lake “Moti Jheel” in Motihari.

• River Front Development Project at a cost of Rs. 261 crore is being implemented in Patna along Ganges. 20 important ghats being developed, 5 meter wide Pathway in the length of 6.5 km from Collectorate ghat to Nauzar ghat being constructed with street lights, walkway and civic amenities. Ganga museum, Dolphin museum, Promenade and Electric Crematorium are under construction. An overview is given in Box 3.13

3.2.6.15 Crematorium etc. Some action taken by State Government: • Three Electric Crematoria in Patna and one in

Hajipur functional round the clock, Plan to build electric crematorium in other five ULBs in PPP mode.

• Electric Crematorium for animals (Rs. 3.57 Cr) at Rama Chak Bairia in PMC.

• Modernization of 38 burial grounds /places under Mukti Dham Yojna.

3.2.6.16 Earmarking services for outsourcing: (i) UDD has reported that it has not earmarked any service for outsourcing by the ULBs and it is for the ULBs to decide on outsourcing of such services. Some ULBs are out-sourcing management of solid waste. The coverage in these ULBs is very limited and user charges are not being levied.

Riverfront Development in the city of Patna

Patna Planning Area (PPA) has natural endowment of 4 major rivers viz. Ganges, Sone, Gandak, and Punpun. These river sides are among the most ignored parts of the city and are dirty, abused, derelict, and plagued by environmental issues: unstable landfills, contaminated soils and water, lost habitats, disturbed artifacts, trapped sedimentary pollutants, etc. Patna must be brought on the map of riverfront cities like London, Sydney, New York, through restoration and development.

Activities required • Linkages from the city to the riverfront • Restructuring Land Use • Development of cultural precinct in

Government areas • Improved cross sections of roads with

emphasis on pedestrian safety and non-MV usage.

• Improved MV movement • Parking facilities • Ferry terminals • Bus and Para transport stops • Signage

• Urban utilities and drainage • Improved infrastructure for floating restaurants • Strengthening of riverbanks through soil bio engineering • Riverside Promenade, Ghats, Plazas and Parks • Buildings for Social Infrastructure -Museums, Art

Gallery, Conservatory, Conference facilities and Youth Centre

• Local produce markets • Lighting, Street Furniture & Public Art • Heritage Management & Conservation • Public amenities • Riverfront management infrastructure • Reorganization of cremation activity • Dhobi Ghat

Box. 3.13

37 5th SFC (2015-20)

(ii) Experience of large scale outsourcing of collection and disposal of solid waste in the past in PMC is not encouraging. (Box 10.17). But many lessons could be drawn from PMC. (iii) Advantages of PPP over traditional EPC option is given in Box 10.16. Further, pros & cons of different private involvement option are given in Table 3.8.

3.2.7 Urban Transport and Traffic: (i) According to a 2008 Report on Traffic and Transportation Policies and Strategies in Urban Areas in India (MOUD), urban bus transport carried only 22 percent of the total traffic load in the country. Patna, which has a public transport system among the 30 cities covered by the survey, has the lowest public transport accessibility index and other indices (Annex 3.8). Table 3.9 shows the index for 5 comparable cities. Bihar has evidently a long way to go in Urban Transport. (ii) In 2011, Bihar’s urban roads network was 9,975 km, of which surfaced roads constituted about 43 percent of the total as against all-India average of

73 percent. Urban Bihar has only 325 km of surfaced roads per 1 million population as compared to 889 km for urban India.

(iii) Urban Transport Policy: The framework of National Urban Transport Policy contains various aspects of Urban Transport as given in Box 3.14.

Table 3.8 Pros and cons of the different private involvement options

Salient features of Urban Transport Policy

• Capacity to plan for sustainable urban transport • Coordinated planning for urban transport • Integrated land use and transport planning • Allocation of road space to focus on people and equity

• Investment in public transport and non-motorized modes

• Strategies for parking space and freight traffic movement

• Regulatory mechanisms for a level playing field • Innovative financing to raise resources • Cleaner fuel and vehicle technologies • Best practices in sustainable transport

Box 3.14

38 5th SFC (2015-20)

State Government also needs to formulate its own Urban Transport Policy, which is vital to the urban planning and development.

(iv) Some action taken by Government regarding urban transport: • BUTSL incorporated for managing public

transport in the urban areas. • City Mobility Plans for 11 corporation towns to

be prepared in next one year. • Purchase of 1098 Buses at a cost of Rs. 267.81

Crore in 19 towns of state viz Patna (phase I and phase II), Bodh Gaya, Purnia, Darbhanga, Katihar, Bhagalpur, Biharsharif, Madhepura, Aurangabad, Siwan, Muzaffarpur, Jehanabad, Gaya, Munger, Bhabua, Begusarai, Bairgania and Ara under JnNURM-UIG urban transport plan.

• Metro rail project envisaged to provide better and rapid transport facilities in Patna and surrounding areas. RITES Ltd. has already prepared a draft project report with route length of 31 km in two stages and is to cost Rs.14,845 crore.

• Construction of modern Bus stands at a cost of Rs. 115.35 Crore in 37 towns.

• Inter-state Bus Terminal in Patna being constructed at a cost of Rs.300.06 crore. 25 acres of land acquired for the project.

• Implementation of Ultra Modern Electronic Traffic Signal project at a cost of Rs. 26.06 crore to address traffic jam in Patna.

• 50 Bus Stands under construction. • Bus Stands in all remaining towns to be taken up

in next 2 years.

• Projects worth Rs 83.57 Cr. to be taken up under AMRUT over next 5 years for construction of footpath, cycle track, procurement of e-Rikshaw etc.

(v) Multimodal Transport System is yet to be thought of in Bihar. Its salient aspects are given in Annex – 3.9

3.2.8 Slums in Bihar: (i) BMA, 2007 mandates provision of basic infrastructure in slums irrespective of the land tenure. (ii) Major issue in Upgrading of Urban slum and squatter areas are (a) Upgrading as part of urban development policy, (b) Actual needs of slum and squatter households, (c) Financing, affordability and cost recovery, (d) Security of tenure and allocation of land and (e) Standards of physical development. (UN-HABITAT)

3.2.8.1 Slum Population:

(i) UDD has reported that physical survey was conducted in 28 largest towns in December, 2010 and thereafter Government approved Bihar Slum Policy, 2011. (Box 3.15) Data for 1847 slums in the 28 largest cities is available on request. The survey is now 5 years old and evidently needs updation besides coverage of all ULBs. Census 2011 data could be used for slums improvement in the meantime.

(ii) Slum population in Bihar has more than doubled in the Census decade of 2001 – 2011 from 5.2 lakh in 2001 to 12.4 lakh in 2011.

Table 3.9: Transport Performance Index of Patna vis a vis comparable cities

Index Patna Bhopal Varanasi Kanpur Hyderabad Public transport accessibility 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.71 1.62 Service accessibility 48.00 45.00 46.00 42.86 6.08 Congestion index 0.23 0.20 0.41 0.33 0.37 Walk ability 0.65 0.47 0.33 0.59 0.68 City bus transport supply 0.00 12.82 0.00 5.64 31.88 Safety 0.19 0.08 0.16 0.05 0.06 Para transit 88.80 79.70 64.49 19.30 76.60 Slow moving vehicle 0.14 0.08 0.14 0.09 0.03 On street parking interference 0.21 1.09 1.21 1.14 1.24

Source: Ministry of Urban Development and Wilbur Smith Associates

39 5th SFC (2015-20)

Usually slums are concentrated in large cities. But in Bihar the largest proportion of slum population is reported from small & medium towns in the population range of 20,000–50,000 persons (20.7% of the total ) and 50,000–1,00,000 persons. (Table 3.10) 3.2.8.2 Slums in Bihar vs. All India: The slums of Bihar in the most spheres are in a worse condition compared to All-India as is evident from Table 3.11.

3.2.8.3 Action taken by State Govt (i) UDD has reported that in Phase 1, 1402 slums in the 28 largest cities are being provided drinking water through hand pumps, individual toilets, paved internal roads, street lights and drains. Depending on the availability of space, community toilets and community halls may also be provided. Infrastructure is to be provided over the next 3 years with 80% contribution from Government and 20% from DFID. (ii) Govt. has Approved 32 projects in 28 cities under IHSDP. Total 28,623 housing units are under construction. DPRs for 29 District headquarters are under approval under RAY. Evidently, the ongoing efforts need to be scaled up.

Table 3.11 Services and shelter characteristics of Slums 2011

Service and shelter characteristics Bihar India Slums Urban Slums Urban

Access to latrine connected to piped sewer 9 13.2 42.5 49.4 Waste water connected to closed drainage 4.4 7.2 24.5 32.7 House classified as good 19.2 29.9 36.9 44.5 Attributes of Slums in Bihar vs. India Condition of Structure Good 37.5 57.7 Liveable 43.4 37.1 Dilapidated 8.8 3.9 Source of drinking water Tap water from treated source 10.5 64.5 Tap water from untreated source 3.5 8.6 Covered well 0.7 0.8 Uncovered well 2.4 2.2 Hand pump 68.9 12.5 Tap water from treated source 10.5 64.5 Access to latrine Septic tank 35.6 31.0 Open defecation 38.1 18.7

Source: Census of India 2011

Bihar Slum Policy 2011

The Bihar Slum Policy has been developed within the framework of the National Slum Policy with the following key objectives: • To integrate slum settlements and the resident communities into the urban area by creating awareness amongst public and Government of the underlying principles that guide slum development and improvement and the options that are available. • To strengthen legal and policy framework to facilitate slum development and improvement on a sustainable basis. • To establish a framework for involving all stakeholders for efficient and smooth implementation of the Policy objectives. • To ensure allocation of adequate resources for slum development and provision of basic services.

Box 3.15

Table 3.10: Distribution of slum population: Bihar-2011

City size No. of ULBs reporting slums

%age of urban Pop.

>1 million 1 4.6 1,00,000 – 1 million 21 13.9 50,000 – 100,000 19 18.3 20,000 – 50,000 39 20.7 <20,000 5 23.7 Total 85 10.52

40 5th SFC (2015-20)

(v) Redevelopment of slums : Slums, whether on Central /State Government land or ULB land, or Private Land, should be taken up for “in-situ” redevelopment. PMAY has provided a strategy for slum redevelopment using land as resource. It also requires combination of incentive and subsidies that can bridge the affordability gap for slum redevelopment as shown in Graph 3.2.

3.2.8.4 Poverty Alleviation: (i) With the urbanization, weight of poverty

historically borne by the rural areas, is shifting to cities and towns in Bihar too. (Table 3.12)

(ii) Urban poverty also is multi-dimensional and relate to the various forms of deprivations, disadvantages and risks and are manifested in lack of access of the poor to basic services, shelter and livelihood and to health, education, social security, empowerment and voice.

(iii) In the past, different anti-poverty strategy comprising of a wide range of poverty alleviation and employment generating programmes has been implemented. But results are unsatisfactory. In 2013-14, GoI launched National Urban Livelihood Mission (NULM). Mobilizing beneficiaries for

skill training and other community mobilization related interventions are being undertaken under NULM in 42 towns in Bihar. Formation of 42 town level federations of SHGs and one state level federation each of SHGs of Street Vendors and Rickshaw Pullers is ongoing. UDD is engaged with the banks for financial inclusion and also seeking convergence with other departments. These efforts need to be scaled up manifold Below is the list of NULM towns: * Patna, Gaya, Bhagalpur, Muzaffarpur, Bihar Shariff, Darbhanga, Purnea, Ara, Begusarai, Katihar, Munger, Chhapra, Danapur, Saharsa, Sasaram , Hajipur, Dehri, Siwan, Betiah, Motihari, Bagha, Kishanganj, Jamalpur, Buxar, Jehanabad, Aurangabad, Lakhisarai, Nawada, Jamui, Araria, Madhubani, Sitamarhi, Gopalganj, Supaul, Samastipur, Shekhpura, Madhepura, Arwal, Bhabhua, Khagaria, Banka, Sheohar. (iv) Safeguard for Street Vendors: Survey of vendors as a first step towards effective implementation of the Street Vending Act is ongoing in the 42 NULM towns. Following the bio-metric survey, identity cards will be issued and financial inclusion initiated. UDD has written to the District Magistrates to not remove encroachments till completion of the survey. Vending Zones will be identified, as required and all basic facilities will be provided therein and spaces will be allocated to the surveyed vendors. This function would be carried out by the Town Vending Committees. The progress as of April 2015 is as follows: (a) survey ongoing in 41 towns, (b) 82352 street vendors have been estimated in 42 towns and survey completed of 35600, (c) 30 Town Level Federations formed, (d) data for RSBY completed for 19479 vendors, (e) 8917 bank accounts opened under Jan Dhan Yojana, (f) Town Vending Committees constituted in 11 towns.

3.2.9 Status of the Agency Functions: A. State Schemes: UDD is yet to report status in the format at Table 3.13A. It has, however, reported that Mukhya Mantri Nagar Vikas Yojna (MMNVY) includes construction of drains, road and street, water supply, park and other project of

Table 3.12 Rural vs. Urban Poverty

Poverty indices

2004-05 (Million)

2011-12 (Million)

% Change (04-05 to 11-12)

Total Poor 40.16 37.72 -2.45

Rural Poor 37.19 (92.6%)

33.79 (89.6%) -3.39

Urban Poor 2.98 (7.4%)* 3.93(10.4%)* +0.95

Source: NSSO, 61th, 2004-05 and 68th round 2011-12* %share in pop

Graph 3.2: Impact of incentives and subsidies

41 5th SFC (2015-20)

community importance in the main towns with the objective of environmental protection. Rs. 1368.30 crore has been provided since 2008-09.

B. Central Schemes: Table 3.13B shows that progress under various Central Schemes have been very unsatisfactory. 3.2.10 Recent initiatives of Union Government: (Smart City, AMRUT, etc.) (i) MoUD has restructured JnNURM and Mission Cities schemes into AMRUT and Smart Cities respectively. Bihar has been allocated only 3 Smart and 26 AMRUT cities due to the faulty criteria of urban population and number of statutory towns, which evidently go against the low urbanized (and also low income) states and is iniquitous. Urbanization is the engine of growth and for the national GDP to grow faster, the most populous and low income States like Bihar and UP have to grow even faster. Moreover, it is easier to build Smart Cities outside already densely populated cities. More appropriate criteria should be such that States with low urbanization get larger numbers as Smart Cities and AMRUT Cities.

(ii) State Government in any case needs to make full use of both Smart City & AMRUT schemes, Experience of JnNURM and Mission Cites in Bihar has not been encouraging. (Table 3.13B)

3.2.10.1 Smart Cities: (i) Muzaffarpur, Bhagalpur and Biharsharif have finally been selected by MoUD to be developed as 3 Smart Cities in Bihar. Incidentally, estimated investments are Rs 1027 Cr, Rs 1332 Cr and Rs

4494 Cr respectively and vary widely in Per Capita. (ii) Some changes are required (Annex 3.10) in the MoUD guidelines on Smart Cities such as scoring criteria and conditions precedent for the first level of City Challenge Competition to make them more clear and relevant. These include (a) Addition of some mission outcomes, (b) Replacement of existing sub- criteria with more appropriate ones (c) Change in scoring criteria for non-JnNURM cities etc.

What is a Smart City? (A) Smart Cities in the 12th Five year plan: The smart cities of our vision would be engines of growth as they would increasingly compete for investments nationally and internationally too. Therefore, cities must provide world class infrastructure and services at affordable costs to give a competitive edge to the economic activities they host. Besides, cities should be able to provide basic services to migrant workers, their families and other vulnerable sections of society including women and children. The future vision of our cities should facilitate transition from “informality” of large number of workers towards more formal livelihood in line with their aspirations. (B) Smart City in the recent GoI guidelines: Cities that provide core infrastructure and give a decent quality of life to its citizens, a clean and sustainable environment and application of ‘Smart’ Solutions. The focus is on sustainable and inclusive development. (C) Some other definition: A smart sustainable city (SSC) is an innovative city that uses information and communication technologies (ICTs) and other means to improve quality of life, efficiency of urban operation and services, and competitiveness, while ensuring that it meets the needs of present and future generations with respect to economic, social and environmental aspects. Source: International Telecom Union (Smart Cities)

Box 3.16

Table 3.13A: State Scheme Transfers (Rs Crore)

Table 3.13B: Central Scheme Transfers (Rs Crore)

42 5th SFC (2015-20)

(iii) The purpose of Smart City mission is to drive economic growth and improve quality of life of people by enabling local area development and harnessing technology, especially technology that leads to Smart solutions and outcomes (Box 3.17).

Para 5.3.3 of URDPFI provides good details of Smart City. (Appendix 3.4). 3.2.10.2 Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT): (i) AMRUT evidently is for urban transformation to enable better living and to drive economic growth by ensuring basic infrastructure and sanitation for 500 cities in the country. (ii) 26 cities of Bihar appear in AMRUT list. Following towns also need to be included: (a) Sitamarhi town has a population of over one lakh with notified Municipalities, and (b) Bodh Gaya qualifies as a Heritage city under HRIDAY Scheme. (iii) Reforms mandated under AMRUT are listed in Box 3.18.

(iv) A comparative statement under JNNURM and AMRUT reforms are given in Annex 10.15. Reforms suggested both under JNNURM and AMRUT evidently are preconditions for any concerted effort towards desirable urban development.

Box 3.17

Reforms required under AMRUT

1. e-Governance – It includes Digital India initiatives, Digital ULBs, coverage with E-MAAS.

2. Constitution and professionalization of municipal cadre – establishment of municipal cadre & cadre linked training, policy for engagement of interns in ULBs and implementation, preparation of policy for Right-sizing the number of municipal functionaries, generation of internal resources and expenditure on salaries.

3. Augmenting double entry accounting – Migration to double entry accounting system, appointment of internal auditor & publication of annual financial statement on website.

Box 3.18

4. Urban Planning and City level Plans – Preparation of Master Plan using GIS, Preparation of Service Level Improvement Plans (SLIP), State Annual Action Plans (SAAP), Establish Urban Development Authorities, Make action plan to progressively increase Green cover in cities to 15% in 5 years, Develop at least one Children Park every year in AMRUT cities, Establish a system for maintaining of parks, playground and recreational areas relying on People Public Private Partnership (PPPP) model, Make a State level policy to implement the parameters given in National Mission for Sustainable Habitat.

5. Devolution of funds and functions – Ensuring transfer of 14th FC devolution to ULBs, appointment of State Finance Commission (SFC) and making decisions, implementation of SFC recommendation within time, Transfer of all 18 functions to ULBs.

6. Review of Building by-laws – Periodic revision of building bye laws, Formulating policy and action plan for roof top and rain water harvesting architecture in all buildings, single window clearance for all approvals to give building permissions.

7. Set-up financial intermediary at state level – To establish and operationalize financial intermediary-pool finance, access external funds, float municipal bonds.

8. (a) Municipal tax and fees improvement – Periodic revision of property tax, levy charges and other fees, Post Demand Collection Book (DCB) of tax details on the website, etc. (b) Improvement in levy and collection of user charges – Separate accounts for user charges, Make action plan to reduce water losses to less than 20%, etc.

9. Credit rating – To complete credit ratings of all ULBs.

10. Energy and Water audit – Provide incentives for green buildings, optimizing energy consumption in street lights, Making STPs and WTPs more energy efficient.

11. Swachh Bharat Mission – Elimination of open defecation, waste collection, transportation of waste, scientific disposal.

Contd.

43 5th SFC (2015-20)

3.2.10.3 Developing Districts and Divisional Headquarters as AMRUT and Smart Cities: (i) Bihar has the highest population density (1,106 people per sq km) and paradoxically a very low level of urbanization (10.5% as per 2011 census). Urbanisation and urban hubs being the engines of growth, makes it compelling for Bihar to develop its remaining 7 Divisional HQs as Smart Cities and 28 (38-3-7) District HQs as AMRUT cities. Moreover, the remaining ULBs should be planned and developed to absorb increasing influx of people from the rural areas and provide decent livelihood and living to their citizens and migrants. (ii) There are two ways to fund (Table 3.14) the above proposal: (a) Funding as per the MoUD. It would imply a huge outlay, which is improbable, or (b) Besides using MoUD funds, leveraging State

grants, FC/SFC transfers, own revenue of the ULBs and Borrowing for 3 purposes: • Preparing Master Plan, CDP, GIS maps, DPRs, • Implementing AMRUT reforms • PPP in a big way for creating and maintaining

infrastructure & services. (iii) Funding proposed by UDD/SPUR for 23 AMRUT cities/towns do not match with their CDPs/CIP as given in Table 3.15. Interesting variations in total per capita investment in various services etc. could be seen in Annex 3.11. (iv) The SFC funding recommendations are given in Table 3.14 and is based on developing all Cities/Towns in a planned manner. Investment required can be met through convergence and leveraging of resources from Central/State Schemes, 14th FC & 5th SFC transfers, Own revenue, PPP, Borrowing etc. (para 7.7.4 (ii))

Table: 3.14 Proposed funding for Smart Cities, AMRUT and other Towns for 2015-20 (Rs Cr)

Sr. No.

City & Town type

No. GoI GoB ULB Total GoI GoB ULB Total GoI GoB ULB Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 78=

(5+6+7) 9 10 1112=(9+10+11)

13= (5+9)*4

14= (6+10)*4

15= (7+11)*4

16= 13+14+15

Type 1 (Bhagalpur, Muzaffarpur)

2 500 (50%)

500 (50%)

0 100064 38 26 128

1128 1076 52 2256

Type 2 (Patna)1 0 485

(50%)485

(50%)970 64

(50%)38

(30%)26

(20%)128 64 524 512 1100

Type 3 (Gaya)1 0 220

(60%)150

(40%)370 64

(50%)38

(30%)26

(20%)128 64 260 176 500

Type 4 (Darbhanga, Purnea)

2 0 130 (60%)

90 (40%)

220 64 (50%)

38 (30%)

26 (20%)

128 128 340 232 700

Type 5 (Munger, Saharsa, Chhapra)

3 0 90 (70%)

30 (30%)

120 64 (50%)

38 (30%)

26 (20%)

128 192 372 186 750

Biharsharif Smart city type 1 1 500

(50%)500

(50%)0 1000

64 38 36 128564 538 26 1128

Type 112 64

(50%)38

(30%)26

(20%)128 768 456 312 1536

2Type 316 0 100

(80%)25

(20%)125 0 1600 400 2000

AMRUT city type 24 64

(50%)38

(30%)26

(20%)128 256 152 104 512

Non-AMRUT13 0 50

(80%)10

(20%)60 0 650 130 780

4N. Panchayat (87-2 = 85)

Non-AMRUT85 0 25

(80%)5

(20%)30 0 2125 425 2550

Total 140 3164 8093 2555 13812

Per city Additional fund for AMRUT/city

A.1Divl HQs (9) as Smart Cities

B. Dist HQs as AMRUT (38-9=29)

Note: (1) indicates Already selected Smart City (3) & to be developed Smart City (7) are also covered under AMRUT city scheme. (2) indicates These are non-selected AMRUT cities. (3) shows 25 overlapped Dist HQs - Araria, Arwal, Aurangabad, Bettiah, Bhabhua, Buxar, Chhapra, Gopalganj, Hajipur, Jamui, Jehanabad, Khagaria, Kishanganj, Lakhisarai, Madhepura, Madhubani, Motihari, Nawada, Saharsa, Samastipur, Sasaram, Sheikhpura, Sitamarhi, Siwan, Supaul. & (4) shows Sheohar & Banka are overlapped Dist HQ. Amount rounded off to nearest 10.

Total for all cities

C.

3N. Parishads (42-25 = 17)

44 5th SFC (2015-20)

(v) Table 3.15 shows that: a. 30% more amount has been allocated to

sewerage and drainage sector by UDD than CDP (i.e. Rs 9060 Cr. vs 6153 Cr.).

b. UDD has allocated 1% (80.57 cr.) to urban transport, while CDP has allocated 30% (6473 cr.) of the total amount.

c. UDD has covered only 5 sectors: Water supply, sewerage and sanitation, drainage, parks and open spaces and urban transport. CDPs have covered all sectors.

3.2.11 Urban Housing: (i) Bihar has 2.70 million urban housing units vis-a-vis All India total of 110.14 million: (a) Residential 73.1%, (b) non residential 20.2% and (c) vacant units 6.2%. Overall urban housing situation shows (Census-2011): • 2.3% of the urban HHs do not have “exclusive”

housing unit and share the unit • 32.4% of the urban HHs have one room housing

unit and another 30.8% two room units; • 5.6 % of the urban HHs in Bihar have six rooms

(+) housing units, compared to 3.3% at the all-India level;

• The average floor area of urban houses in Bihar is 32.4 square meters compared to 39.2 square meters, for all-India urban;

• 53.1 % of urban HHs in Bihar have housing units classified as good. 68.3% of urban HHs in Patna

live in units classified as “good”, 27.1% in livable, and 4.6% dilapidated.

• 69.5% of urban HHs have secure tenure, compared to the all-India average of 71.3 %.

(ii) Stock of urban housing vs. requirement • The Report of the Technical Committee on

Urban Housing Shortage (2012) estimated the housing shortage of India and states by using a combination of three factors, i.e. (a) obsolescence, (b) congestion and (c) homelessness and concluded that Bihar has a shortage of 1.19 million urban houses.

• Housing has a major role in facilitating urban development in Bihar which will see its urban population double between 2011 and 2031. New housing units are and will continue to be a small proportion of the existing stock; and the issue is how to better and efficiently use the existing housing stock to address the urban housing shortage.

(iii) Roles of Govt and private sector: While Government should take lead role in housing for poor through grants & subsidies, it should play the role of regulator and facilitator in the private housing market. (Box 3.20). UN – HABITAT recommendations as scaling up housing supply is at Appendix 3.2.

(iv) Government as a Provider of Housing: Following programmes of GoI are intended to providing Housing for All in urban areas.

Table: 3.15 Sectoral allocation proposed by UDD for 23 AMRUT Cities vs Investment Assessment in CDPs (Rs Cr.)

Note: Cost of services as per HPEC norms = (PMC pop × HPEC Cl 1B city norms ) + (22 other cities pop × HPEC Cl 1C city norm )

Sector Amount %of Total

Per Capita

Amount %of Total

Per Capita

Water Supply 2587.38 22% 4,020 2488.92 11% 3,867 104% 3771Sewerage & Sanitation

5745.26 48% 8,926 4105.30 18% 6,378 140% 2405

Drainage 3314.28 28% 5,149 2048.30 9% 3,182 162% 3348Urban Transport 80.57 1% 125 6472.95 29% 10,056 1% 18975Park & open spaces 173.89 1% 270 0.00 0% - - 276Solid waste Mgt 0.00 0% - 842.78 4% 1,309 - - Social Infrastructure 0.00 0% - 1932.62 9% 3,003 - - Slum improvement 0.00 0% - 1716.91 8% 2,667 - - Heritage & Tourism 0.00 0% - 639.66 3% 994 - - Economic Dev. 0.00 0% - 1146.67 5% 1,781 - - Environment 0.00 0% - 837.76 4% 1,302 - - Others 0.00 0% - 275.89 1% 429 - - Total 11901 100% 18490 22508 100% 34968 - -

UDD CDP/CIP UDD as % of CDP

HPEC norms for 23 Cities

45 5th SFC (2015-20)

(a) Rajiv Awaas Yojna (RAY) (2013-2022): As reported by UDD, 29 DPRs have been approved for 27 towns by State Government. But MoUD has approved only seven projects, viz: Patna Phase 1, Patna Phase 2, Patna Phase 3, Gaya Phase I, Darbhanga Phase 1 and Katihar Phase 1 .Total project cost was 405.55 crore . Now RAY has been replaced by “Housing for All Yojana” (PMAY) (b) IHSDP (Integrated Housing and Slum Development Programmer): As reported by UDD, 32 Projects have been approved for 28 towns to construct 28,623 dwelling units at a cost of Rs. 757.88 Cr. The Project is to be completed by 31st March, 2017. 3323 units have been completed and transferred to the beneficiaries Work on the remaining units is going on. (c) Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) –

The PMAY Mission will be implemented during 2015-2022 through the four verticals (Box 3.19) giving option to beneficiaries, ULBs and State Government. (d)As reported by UDD, during 2015-22, 30 sq. mt.

Pucca House will be provided. An MOA has been signed between GoI and State Government. UDD has asked the ULBs to submit their Work Plan.

(v) Market as a provider of urban housing: Housing need of Middle & High income groups are generally met by the market. REIT and RERD (Box 3.20) are the instruments to promote regulated and orderly growth through efficiency, professionalism

and standardization. It enforces accountability against builders and developers to reduce frauds and delays which in turn will enable the real estate sector to access capital and financial markets essential for its long term growth. REIT is proposed to encourage investors while attracting long term finance. RERD Bill, 2013, is a significant first step towards bringing in transparency and governance in the real estate sector.

PMAY Mission

Box 3.19

REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust) • REITs are vertically integrated real estate companies that develop, own and actively manage commercial real estate. I-REITs (REITs in India) would issue securities, which would be listed on stock exchanges and REITs will invest in completed rent generating properties in India (to comprise minimum 90% of net asset value) and mortgage backed securities. Initially I-REITs are to be available only to high net worth individuals and institutions to develop the market. Gradually, it will be opened to retail investors. • Budget 2014-15 has introduced tax incentives for the REIT regime, and also provided for relaxations in FDI regime. The SEBI has announced REIT regulations. Now entities registered and regulated under the SEBI (REITs) Regulations 2014 will be able to access foreign investments which were prohibited under the FEMA Regulations. REITs would reduce pressure on the banking system free up existing funds of Banks and encourage construction activities. REITs while attracting long term finance from foreign and domestic sources including NRIs would make available fresh equity to the sector. The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill, 2013 • The RERD Bill seeks to establish Real Estate Regulatory Authorities (RERAs) at the state level for regulation and development of the real estate sector. It aims at (a) ensuring consumer protection and (b) standardization in business practices and transactions in the real estate sector. • The Bill contains provisions of registration of real estate projects and agents with RERA; functions and duties of promoters and allotters; establishment of RERA; establishment of fast track dispute resolution mechanism through adjudication; establishment of a Real Estate Appellate Tribunal; offences and penalties etc. • These measures are expected to boost domestic and foreign investment in the sector and help achieve the objective of the Government to provide ‘Housing for All by 2022’, through enhanced private participation.

Box 3.20

46 5th SFC (2015-20)

3.3 Functionaries: It is clear from the Divisional level consultation meeting with the officials and elected representatives of the ULBs that available personnel are grossly inadequate in skills vis-à-vis the functional assignments and the needs of emerging technologies and modern management. The existing staffing was sanctioned in a very different situation. 3.3.1 Creation of Municipal Cadre: • Section 43 (1) of BMA says “The State Government may constitute cadres of common municipal services of such officers of municipality referred to in sub-section (1) of section 36 and other employees as may be determined by that Government from time to time.” • Section 36 (1) of BMA says that “subject to the provision of section 41” and need for ensuring maximum possible economy in municipal administration, the Municipality shall have the following posts of Officers, (Box 3.21) • GOI has recommended constitution of Municipal Cadres as in Box 3.22. Box 3.23 gives status of

Municipal Cadre in various states. Details could be seen in Appendix 3.3 3.3.2 Model Staffing: (i) A comparative statement of Model Municipal Staffing Structures proposed by UDD and by the 5th SFC (tentative) based on MoUD model are given in Table 3.16 ULB/post wise details are given in Annex 3.12 A to C. Incidentally, total costs in both the cases are very similar. (ii) Analysis of UDD Proposal on the Municipal Cadre: This commission has analyzed staffing structure proposed by UDD. The positive thing is that the proposed staff strength is 37% of the existing sanctioned strength and 78% of the working strength. But there are following problems: • Selection of posts is traditional and based on Administrative Sections viz Engineering, Street, Sweeping, Revenue & Accounts, and General etc. This does not adequately meet the needs of modern management and technological advancement. • Position of Executive Engineer is proposed for Parishad at District HQ, whereas, this should be

Municipality posts as per BMA, 2007

Box 3.21

Status of Municipal Cadres in India

Proposed Municipal Cadres

47 5th SFC (2015-20)

uniform for all Parishads given the increased funding and functions. Similar is the case with the position of Supdt. Engineer for Div. HQ. • Posts under e-Governance have not been included. • Needs of Urban Transport have not been included • Skilled posts under SWM, Water and Sanitation etc, which are the primary functions of the ULB, have not been included. • No posts are proposed for Town Planning in Nagar Panchayats, which are bound to grow rapidly. • No posts for Social Development have been included though Urban Poverty Alleviation, Slum Development etc are critical.

• There is no mention of Sanitation staffs in Group D, where-as, post of peon has been mentioned. (iii) This Commission largely recommends model manpower suggested by MoUD since (see Box 3.24 also) (a) Nigams like Patna, Arrah, Biharshrif, Gaya, Bhagalpur, Munger, Darbhanga etc. are presentaly spending more than 200% of their total revenue on establishment. Similarly, establishment expenditure is more than 50% of the total expenditure in almost all Nigams. (Graph 3.3). Position in PMC, Nagar Parishad and Nagar Panchayat is even worse. Such a situation is totally unsustainable and would continue to frustrate all efforts of the ULBs to provide even basic services to the people.

Table 3.16: Interim recommendation of the 5th SFC for group A, B, C personnel

UDD MoUD/SFC UDD MoUD/SFC UDDPMC Except PMC

1 Municipal Commissioner 1 (IAS) 1 (IAS/BAS) … …2 Additional Commissioner 2 1 1 … … … …3 Engineer - in- Chief 1 1 1 … … … …4 Chief Engineer 1 … … …5 Superintending Enginner 3 … 1 … … … …6 Chief Town Planner 1 … … …7 Chief Finance Officer 1 … 1 … … … …8 Chief Social Development Officer 1 … … …9 Chief Fire Officer 1 … … …

10 Dy. Commissioner 3 2 … …11 Assistant Commissioner 8 1 1 1 (EO) 1 1 (EO)12 Social Development officer 3 1 … …13 Executive Enginner 3/sec 2 1 1 1 … …14 Assistant Enginner 16 1/lakh 1/lakh …15 Sanitary Officer 1/5 lakh 1 1 1 1 … …16 Senior Town Planner 1 1 1/6000Pop … 1/6000Pop … …17 Fire Officer 1 1 … …18 E-Governace Officer 1 1 1 …19 Revenue Officer 2 2 1 1 1 … …20 Senior Account Officer 2 1 1 121 Accounts Officer 1/2 Accountant 1/2 Accountant 1 …22 Asst. Revenue Officer 1/2Rev Ins 1/2Rev Ins 1/2 wards 1 1 1 …23 Asst. SDO 1/2CO 1/2CO 1 …24 Community Organizer 16 1/50K Pop 1/3 wards 2 1/10000pop 1 1/wards25 Senior Assistant 1/3 Sec 1/3 Sec 1 1 … … …26 Assistant 1/3 Sec 1/3 Sec 1/3 Sec 127 Junior Assistant 1/20K pop 1/20K pop 16 1/20K pop 5 1/10K pop 328 Sub Engineer 1/25K pop 1/25K pop 3 2 2 1 129 Sanitary Supervisor 1/ lakh 1/ lakh 1/ward 1 1/4000 pop 1 …30 Sanitary Inspector 1/30K pop 1/30K pop 1/20 wards 1 1/15 wards 1 131 Asst. Town Planner 1/2TPI 1/1 lakh Pop 2 1 1 1 …

32Town Planning Inspector (Building) 1/50K pop 1/50K pop 1/4000pop 2 1/4000pop

1 …

33 Leading Fireman 1/50K pop 1/50K pop 1 134 Fireman 2/50K pop 2/50K pop 2 235 MIS Associate 1/10lakh 1 1 136 GIS Associate 1/5lakh … 3 … 2 … 137 Rev Inspector 1/5 TA 1/4 TA1/4000 asses 1 1/4000 asses 11/4000 asses38 Tax Assistant 1/50K 1/4K HH 1/3K HH 1/2K HH39 Accountant 1/2lakh 1/1lakh 1/50K 240 Amin 1/2lakh 1/2lakh 1/2Lakh41 Draftman 2 2 1

(a) Note: Municipal Cadre in Bihar based on "Approach towards Establishing Municipal Cadres in India, MoUD (GoI) & World Bank"(b) Abbreviations: (i) CO - Community Organizer, (ii) Pop. - Population, (iii) Sec - Section, (iv) TPI - Town Planning Inspector, (v) TA - Tax Assistant, (vi) HH - Household, (vii) K - Thousands, (vii) 1/2CO indicates- 1 per 2 Community Organizer(c) Functions/Posts for Outsourcing: (i)Fire Officer, (ii) Fire man, (iii) Community Organiser, (iv) DEOs, (v) MIS Associate, (vi) GIS Associate, (vii) Rev Inspector, (viii) Draftman

Gro

up A

Gro

up B

Gro

up C

Sr. No. Post

Nagar Parisad Nagar PanchayatMoUD/SFC

Nagar Nigam

48 5th SFC (2015-20)

(b) MoUD model adequately meets the needs of professional manpower like Managers, Engineers, Accountants, Planners etc, which is a must given the imperatives of modern management and technological advancements. (c) A lot of professional and other works could better be done through contracting/outsourcing as given in Box 3.25. (iv) Overall cost of providing manpower in Group A, B, C is given in Table 3.17. It is based on 2011 Population. Detailed calculations are given at Annex 3.12 A to C. (v) Group D unskilled posts have not been included for computing regular establishment cost, since these need to be outsourced and existing posts abolished as & when incumbents retire. (vi) The recommendations are interim and the final recommendations would come as a

supplementary document on Model Municipal Cadre/Staffing given in Box 3.24 . These would include cadres, groups and services thereunder.

Graph 3.3: Establishment Exp as % of Total OTR and Total Expenditure (2010-15) of 11 Nagar Nigams

215.

13

230.

06

239.

47

217.

18

65.8

9

130.

32

80.7

8

221.

36

203.

44

137.

73

200.

30

79.9

4

83.7

2

65.7

8

82.5

1

58.2

2

69.3

8

35.7

9 81.9

8

78.9

3

76.3

5

78.9

3

0.00

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

300.00

PMC Arah Biharsharif Gaya Katihar Purnea Begusari Bhagalpur Munger Muzaffarpur Darbhanga

PER

CEN

TAG

E (%

)

NAGAR NIGAMS Establishment Exp. % of OTR Establishment Exp. % of Rev Exp

Table 3.17 Cost of model municipal manpower (Excluding Group D) (Rs. Cr.) 1 Year 5 Year Nagar Nigam

UDD 48.7 243.4 MoUD 76.7 383.6

Nagar Parishad

UDD 89.92 449.60 MoUD 62.91 314.57

Nagar Panchayat

UDD 66.45 332.27 MoUD 62.69 313.47

Total UDD 205.07 1025.27 MoUD 202.3 1011.64

5th SFC approach to the proposing Municipal Cadre for Bihar

a) The proposed municipal staffing should be based on MoUD model and 2021 population projection.

b) Establishment costs must not exceed 80% of own revenue. unlike the present spending of 150%. PMC is infact spending whopping 260%.

c) Wherever feasible, outsourcing of services must be done for efficiency, responsiveness and economy.

d) Adequate weightage is given to technical and professional manpower in consonance with modern management and technology, i.e. Urban Planning, Engineering, Finance, e-governance, Public Hygiene, etc.

e) More skilled workers (Electrician, Plumber, Sewerline Jamadar, Drainage cleaner, Pipeline Mistri, Pump Operater, etc.) and less supervisors.

f) Provision of PPP experts. g) Sr. E O (Group A) proposed for Nagar Parishad to

lead the expanding urban agenda. h) Urban Professionals as City Managers to assist EO. i) Every Staff excluding group D staff must be

proficient in computer application. j) If any ULBs raises more revenue, can employ more

employee based on rational assessment with prior approval of State Government.

k) Positions like Hakim, Vaidya,Yunani Chikitsak, etc. to be transferred to Health Department. The above should also meet the needs of Smart/AMRUT/ Model cities and towns.

Box 3.24

49 5th SFC (2015-20)

3.3.3 Further, based on Divisional consultation meetings and consultation with various stakeholders, followings are suggested in regard to Municipal staffing: • Given the requirements of modern management and emerging technologies, Model Municipal Cadres as recommended by MoUD must be implemented to have requisite professional, technical etc. manpower. While doing so, it should be carefully determined as to which of the posts could be regular or contractual and which of the function should be outsourced. • Model staffing should provide basic minimum. Additional staff should be engaged by the ULBs as per their own revenue & carefully assessed needs, with prior approval of State Government. • There should be comprehensive job description for each position, which should indicate required

job competencies and must have clearly defined and measurable performance indicators; • Handbook for functionaries with job description should be made available and circulated. • Capacity and productivity of staff at all levels be ensured through Performance Management System and intensive capacity building. • Inservice training before promotion be made compulsory. • Statewide database of employees be uploaded on website. • Biometric attendance system be maintained at all ULB • Local staff develop undesirable nexus. Local staff should therefore get transferred periodically as per govt. policy and invariably on promotion. New staff must be transferrable, say on completion of 3 years.

Box 3.25

50 5th SFC (2015-20)

• Role and responsibilities of Executive Officer and City Manager should be well defined. • Comprehensive training of EO and City Manager soon after appointment be a must. • 4 staff (one Accountant, one JE and 2 Clerks) provided by UDD to the ULBs through an HR agency, are not up to the mark. Staff selection should, therefore, be done through SSC and or a nationally accredited specialist agency • Pension & salary payment to the ULB employees from govt. budget amounts to perverse incentive. The ULBs must meet their entire establishment cost through own revenue.

3.3.4 Restructuring of Patna Municipal Corporation (PMC) Consequent upon merger of PRDA and Patna Water Board with PMC, reputed Consultants (E&Y and ASCI) were engaged in 2010 for the restructuring of PMC. Important recommendations on staffing are given at Annex. 3.13. These recommendations are evidently irrational and irresponsible, since these recommend around 6% increase over the present sanctioned strength of 5,884, when the Graph 3.4 shows that even with the existing depleted strength of 1883, PMC already spends more than double of its revenue on its establishment. Further, the share of establishment expenditure in total expenditure is around 80%. If recommendations of E&Y/ASCI are accepted, establishment expenditure would go up to 570% of own revenue.

It is totally unsustainable. Incidentally while E&Y/ASCI emphasizes outsourcing, it has suggested increase in already huge no. of posts. 3.4 Criticality of Capacity Building: 3.4.1 Though funds available with the ULBs are from various sources are grossly inadequate for their functions, they are unable to utilize even that. Some facts are given below: (i) More than Rs 1,000 Cr. is lying unspent in P/L account of the ULBs as mentioned in letter No. 2740, dated: 28.05.2015 of UDD. (ii) Unutilized funds for the last 4 years in 28 SPUR ULBs stand at Rs. 356 cr., Rs. 452 cr., Rs. 631 cr and Rs. 747 cr as on 31st March, 2012, 2013, 2014 & 2015 respectively. Evidently, unutilized funds are increasing each year. (iii) BUDA has undisbursed funds of Rs. 954.6 cr as on 31st March, 2015. This situation is untenable. (iv) Moreover, utilization of Central Scheme funds by the ULBs is highly unsatisfactory (Table 3.18). e.g. under JNNURM, the ULBs utilized only 14 % of the total allocation. 3.4.2 Such highly unsatisfactory performance is primarily due to (a) capacity constraints e.g. serious inadequacy of skilled man-power (technical, accounting and other professional staff), IT facility, equipments etc. (b) inability of the ULBs to prepare Master Plans/ CDPs/ DPRs and implement projects and (c) inability to contribute their financial share.

Graph 3.4: Establishment Exp as % of Total OTR and Total Expenditure (2010-15) for PMC

176.

63

226.

83

235.

55

170.

43

282.

60

215.

13

84.4

3

89.0

3

80.5

9

73.8

1

76.0

5

79.9

4

0.00

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

300.00

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2010-15

Perc

enta

ge (%

)

YearEstablishment Exp as % of OTR Establishment Exp as % of Total Exp.

51 5th SFC (2015-20)

It is an imperative both from the viewpoints of Subsidiarity & the Constitutional obligation and pragmatism that state government takes all measures urgently to build capacity of the ULBs to the fullest extent. 3.4.3 Capacity building becomes all the more important since the 14th FC has recommended release of Performance Grant to the ULBs subject to “(i) making available reliable data on local bodies' receipt and expenditure through audited accounts; (ii) improvement in own revenues; and (iii) measuring and publishing service level benchmarks for basic services.” First charge on the SFC transfers must, therefore, be for full capacity building of the ULBs. 3.4.4 Strengthening training: 3.4.4.1 Training imparted: As reported by UDD, training programmes of one week duration for officials of the ULBs including members of ESC were conducted in a phased manner. There were two exposure visits also. However, even basic information on training (Table 3.19) is not compiled. Training of newly appointed Executive Officers and City Managers appear to be sporadic and inadequate. Divisional level consultations with the ULBs clearly brought the strong need for training including exposure visits for all functionaries -elected or official.

3.4.4.2 School of Urban Planning and Architecture (SUPA): Government evidently needs to create a robust institution for producing Urban Planning and Governance professionals in a large number since Bihar is bound to urbanize rapidly and there is an acute shortage of such professionals all over the country. Moreover, continuous training and capacity building of the elected and official functionaries is required. Ad-hoc arrangements for training and skill building has been ineffective and detrimental to inculcate professional culture in the Bihar ULBs. SUPA is thus urgently required having four fold objectives i.e. Academics, Research, Consultancy and Training.

School of Urban Planning and Architecture (SUPA)

• DPR being prepared by the 5th SFC, proposes SUPA to perform functions of NIUA, IIHS, SPA etc. for synergy and economy.

• SUPA will follow standards of best International Institutions such as MIT School of Architecture and Planning, Berkley Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Georgia Tech School of City and Regional Planning.

• SUPA would impart knowledge and undertake research on Urban Governance, City Design and Development, Urban Finance, Environmental Policy and Planning, Land Economics, Real Estate and Housing, Transportation Systems, Building Technology, Architecture Design and other related sectors.

• SUPA would provide critical and objective analyses of trends and prospects for urban development, document and disseminate good practices and harness the resources of national, regional and global networks.

Box 3.26

Table 3.18 Central Scheme Transfers (Rs Crore)

Table 3.19 Training of the ULB functionaries

52 5th SFC (2015-20)

3.4.5 Support Programme for Urban Reforms (SPUR ) Project (I). Goal of the SPUR project : SPUR was started in August, 2010 with DFID support to run for 6 years, and covered 28 ULBs, which are expected to (i) become hubs for economic activities, (ii) directly improve quality of services received by 6.36 million urban citizens, of whom 2.83 million are poor. (iii) Benefit large numbers of people from nearby rural areas who depend on these cities. The project will promote state level institutions and improve financial and managerial capacities, as well as accountability of the ULBs. (II) Five distinct key outputs were identified as under: (A) Urban Governance & Planning – (i) Drafting policies, strategies & guidelines, (ii) Institutional re-positioning, (iii) Staffing of ULBs, (iv) Training & capacity building, (v) GIS mapping, (vi) IT interventions leading to e-Municipality, (vii) Grievance Redress; Citizen’s Charter, (viii) Creating & maintaining urban MIS. (B) Municipal Finance - (i) Developing comprehensive Revenue Enhancement Plan (REP), (ii) Accounting Reforms & Migration to Double Entry Accounting, (iii) Revision of Manuals & Rules, (iv) Preparation of Minimum Accountability Achievement Plan; Comprehensive Fiduciary Risk Mitigation Plan; Outcome Budgeting Manual; Action Plan for Public Finance Management and (v) Internal audit. (C) Municipal Infrastructure - (i) Prepare a bank of technically sound DPRs for seeking funding from various sources, (ii) Standard specifications for equipments; quality controls, design norms & standard drawings, (iii) Facilitate PPP in identified ULBs for SWM & infrastructure, (iv) Technical assistance to GoB to access funds from other sources – NGRBA, JNNURM, ADB, (v) Environmental profiling & service level benchmarking. (D) Local Economic Development –(i) Preparation of Bihar Urban Economic Vision and Local Economic Development Framework; (ii) Urban Pro Poor Business/Micro Enterprise Development guidelines, (iii) Preparation of City Business Plans, (iv) Bihar Urban Street Vendor and

Livelihood Protection Act; Guidelines for Operationalizing the Bihar Vending Rules and Regulations, (v) Develop pilot vending zones in select ULBs; (vi) Market based skill training & Enterprise Development Centers and (vii) Designing PPP based projects for utilization of municipal lands for commercial/market development. (E) Social Development, Poverty Alleviation & Livelihoods – (i) Facilitate development of State Slum Policy and related legislations, (ii) Capacity building of ULBs to address urban poverty; demonstrate Gender Mainstreaming, (iii) Community organizations and micro-planning for infrastructure, livelihoods and access to social welfare schemes (SVS and SHG), (iv) Technical assistance in planning and implementation of GoI supported schemes, (v) Effective linkages with Civil Society Forum and Ward Committees (proposed) and (vi) Create and maintain database on poor. III. Achievements: Objective and design of the SPUR programe is no doubt praiseworthy. But, achievement as per Annual Review of SPUR (Sept, 2014) is not very encouraging. Moreover, the Review seems to be ‘evasive’ and doesnot objectively bring out its strength, achievements and shortcomings for replication or rectification. Actual implementation of the Work Plan of SPUR could be seen in Annex- 3.14. Divisional level meeting indicate that even 6 years of SPUR have not made significant improvements in the functioning or outcomes of the ULB including of PMC. IV. Establishment of SPUR like Team: • The ongoing SPUR programme is likely to end in March, 2016. This would provide an opportunity to have a new team with updated mandate with Young Professionals from reputed institutions under an experienced Team Leader. Such Young Professionals would have acquired recent technical knowledge and would stay full time at Patna. Any team after 6 years is prone to be gripped by complacency, staleness & diminishing return and at best would do 'Business-as-usual'. This Commission, therefore, recommends new SPUR like Support Team as follows.

53 5th SFC (2015-20)

• Principal Secretary/Secretary UDD will be ex-officio Team Director. The team would comprise of Team Leader and experts in Urban Governance, Urban Planning, Urban Architect, E-Gov., GIS, Municipal Finance, Urban Infrastructure, Procurement, PPP, Urban Transport, Social Development. Office support would be provided by Administrative Officer, Office Executive-cum-Computer Operator, Accountant and MTS.

a. Candidates for expert posts must have obtained relevant degree from reputed institutions. b. They must have 3 years experience. It is relaxable in case suitable candidates with 3 years experience are not available. c. Selection of candidates would be done by a nationally reputed HR Agency empanelled by GoI or UN Agencies. Committee chaired by Principal Secretary (UDD) with representatives from Panchayati Raj and Finance Departments and State Planning Board as Members would select the HR Agency. d. Engagement would be on 3 years’ contract, subject to their continued good performance and extendable as & when required. e. Further details could be seen in Annex 3.15.

3.4.6 Accountability of the ULBs: (a) Ward Committee and Ward Sabha: Constitution of Ward Committees and their effective functioning needs to be incentivized. Further, there is a need to establish Area Sabhas and to create linkage between Area Sabhas and Ward Committees so as to ensure that accountability and participatory processes reach the last mile in a systemic manner. As reported by UDD, Ward Committee and Ward Sabha are yet to be made ‘fully’ functional. In a few ULBs, regular meetings are held with citizens. (b) Resident Welfare Association (RWA), Delhi: RWA is a civic body that represents the interests of the residents of a specific urban or suburban locality in urban areas and could be experimented in Bihar ULBs. (c) City Sanitation Task Force: It has to be constituted at ULB level, comprising 15 members (officials and nonofficial) with Chief Councilor as Chairman. But it has not yet been constituted.

(d) Social Audit: As reported by UDD, there is no system of social audit in the ULBs. (e) Ombudsman: As reported by UDD, it has drafted “Ombudsman Rules” and shared with PRD for their opinion, which is awaited since more than a year. Given the difference in the nature of Municipalities and Panchayats, and huge number of PRIs, separate Ombudsman is recommended for the ULBs. (f) Urban Regulator: Ch – X may be referred to.

3.5 Friction between elected and official functionaries: Act have been amended in 2011 to clearly demarcate the power and functions of Chief Councilor and CMO.

3.6 e-Municipality (Nagarseva):

3.6.1 Need for e-Municipality: e-Municipalities in the ULBs is absolutely necessary given (a) the ever-increasing and diverse responsibilities, (b) magnitude of transactions, record keeping & reporting and (c) limited manpower, which seriously affect their efficiency, transparency and accountability. The LBs also need to offer citizens services online and via mobile. All important documents should be digitized.

3.6.2 Features of e-Municipality: All the ULBs will have their own website which will be sub-domain of a central web portal called as “Nagarseva.in”. The application suite of e-municipality will be centrally implemented at the State Data Centre at Patna and will be accessed through the internet by the ULBs. The ULBs are being provided with computers, internet connectivity, human resources and training to run the services. The scheme also provides for manpower support for 5 years for handholding post- implementation. The system is so developed as to have integration with GIS base maps of the towns /cities as and when these get ready.

Issues in Friction between Elected and Official Functionaries

(a) Mutual Respect (b) Selection and Award of Works. (c) Ambiguity in Role (d)Difference in perception

Box 3.27

54 5th SFC (2015-20)

3.6.3 e-Municipality Modules: Table 3.20 indicates the modules under e-Municipality project.

3.6.4 Status of e-Municipality: (i) Software Development Agency (SDA) named ABM Knowledge ware Ltd. was assigned the contract in October 2013. Procurement of Hardware and Software for the State Data Centre, computers for the ULBs and other items like payment gateway etc are in progress. The Scheduled date of Completion of the Project is May, 2016. (ii) Current status of project is as follows: a) Requirement has been discussed with the ULBs for Citizen Facility Centre (CFC). The ULBs have to provide space with all the basic amenities. b) Five modules viz. Web Portal with CMS, Birth & Death Registration, Advertisements & Hoardings, Workflow & Document Management System, General Administration (Audit, RTI, Stores Management, Q & A of Legislative Assembly, IT support, Legal Matters) need changes before being taken to User Acceptance Test. c) Two modules viz Registration & Licensing and Rent, Lease & Sairat did not have completed Demo, but are ready for User Acceptance Test as per ABM Knowledge were Ltd. Complete review of the modules before Go-Live is essential. (d) Two other modules viz Property Tax Return and Building Plan approval & Regulation are in the

advanced stage of finalization. (e) The Data Centre hardware require for hosting the Solution is ready.

(f) Requirements like SMS Gateway, Payment Gateway that require State Govt. approvals are in process.

3.6.5 Recommendations of the Review Committee: • The Review Committee had suggested ; (a) Immediate review of the project at Secretary level as SDA is not showing improvement in quality of work despite guidance during the last one year. SDA has an ad-hoc approach in this ambitious project and is more interested in deploying its own software “MAINNET”, though it does not meet the requirements of the contract, FRS and UDD. (b) Cancel the contract and recover payments made against the inception report on which the approval was not given by the Core Committee.

3.6.6 Decisions of the meeting taken by Principal Secretary, UDD on 6.1.2016: i. The place and infrastructure for operations of

System Administrator and DBA is being prepared at PMU- SPUR. UD&HD and for Helpdesk at Indira Bhawan.

ii. DTPL is conducting training of manpower to be deployed at the ULBs by 15th Jan 2016. The IT Supervisors and DEO at PMC will be deployed on 11th Jan 2016.

Table. 3.20 Modules under e-municipality project

Citizen service Business services Mgmt. services Add-on services

▪ Registration of Birth, Death and Marriage ▪ Water & Sewerage Connection ▪ Solid Waste Management ▪ Grievance Redressal ▪ RTI ▪ Web Portal ▪ Booking of Community Hall & Other Utilities ▪ Welfare Schemes

▪ Property Tax ▪ Professional Tax ▪ Vehicle Tax ▪ Issuance of Trade License ▪ Issuance of Health Licenses ▪ Hawker Licenses ▪ Advertisement ▪ Building Permission ▪ Land and Estate

▪ File Management ▪ Finance Management ▪ Budget Preparation ▪ Workflow and Document ▪ Human Resource Management ▪ Employee Self Service ▪ Payroll and Pension ▪ Audit ▪ Asset Management ▪ Fire & Emergency

▪ Engineering/ Project Management ▪ Material Management ▪ Contract Management ▪ Transportation/ Workshop ▪ e-Procurement ▪ Hospital Management ▪ School Management ▪ Lease & Sales

55 5th SFC (2015-20)

iii. All IT supervision will also report to IT Manager, UD &HD through emails so that he is made aware of all activities in the project.

iv. Regarding CFC setup progress, the issues at Bhagalpur, Katihar and Darbhanga Municipal Corporation will be taken care by Secretary. DTL, SPUR will be coordinating and monitoring all actions required at PMC for Go – Live of e- Municipality.

v. The formal UAT sign – off 5 priority modules to be put & processed for signing.

vi. All files pertaining to e- Municipality should be put on priority and processed immediately.

vii. Proposal for augmentation of trained and highly skilled IT manpower in all Municipalities is to be prepared by SPUR and ABM.

viii. The attendance of developed manpower with their daily time sheet should be submitted by ABM every month duly signed and sealed by the Municipal Commissioner/ Executive Officer.

ix. Make wide publicity about Right to Public Services (RTPS) through distribution of Pamphlets, series of advertisement, Billboards, etc.

x. The ULBs should display the requirements of documents for each service (Birth & Death Certificate, Property Tax, Building Plan) etc.

including time frame for each service on the Board Placed at CFC.

xi. Authorize “Vasudha Kendra” to provide citizen’s services through online portal of e-municipality.

xii. The Progess of e-municipality project will be reviewed by the Principal Secretary every week on Tuesday at 3:30PM. All the stakeholders would attend the meeting.

3.6.7 At the Divisional level consultation meetings, with the ULBs it was recommended that (i) All e-Municipality modules must be implemented urgently, as it is the most important requirement for improving services, governance and financial management of the ULBs, and (ii) Nagar Seva (e-Municipality) should have access for customers as well.

3.6.8 Evidently, the e-Municipality project is seriously compromised and would need complete relook, particularly keeping in view the requirements of Smart/AMRUT Cities. (See Appendix 3.4).

3.7 Actions proposed in the paras above alone would fulfill the three key ULBs agenda of Empowerment, Enablement & Accountability as mentioned in para 3.1.6.

105 5th SFC (2015-20)

Chapter VII

ULB Finances: Review and Forecast of Revenue and Expenditure

7.1 Computing Resource Gap:

7.1.1 The primary purpose of this Chapter is to

project resource gap of the ULBs for the award

period of the 5th SFC i.e. 2015-16 to 19-20. This

evidentally would require review and forecast of

Revenue and Expenditure of the ULBs based on

logical approaches. The framework in Box 7.1

gives an overview of the same.

7.1.2 There could be 3 methodologies for

computing resource gap of the LBs as given in

Box 7.1:

(i) Business-as-usual: This essentially means

computing revenue and expenditure as per TGR

based on the State Budget and available historical

data.

(ii) Principle of Equalization: both Revenue &

Expenditure should be comparable to All India

averages, which is available in the Report on LB

Finances commissioned by the 14th UFC (SR

14FC).

(iii) Making optimistic but realistic assessment:

of Revenue and Expenditure so as to prepare the

State for rapid and planned urbanization and draw

talent and investment to spur socio-economic

growth.

7.2 Resources of the ULBs

Resources of the ULBs come primarily in three

ways i.e., own revenue, UFC/SFC transfers, and

scheme transfers for the agency functions

(flowchart below). Historically, most of the LB’s

resources comes by way of Agency functions and

UFC/SFC transfers. Own revenue of the ULBs in

Bihar is well below All India Average (i.e. 13.2%

vs 32% in the total revenue.)

Computation of Resource Gap

(Expenditure - Revenue)

Optimistic but realistic

projection

(assessed by 5th SFC)

Business – as – Usual

(State Budget etc)

Normative (SR14FC)

(Providing comparable Services

at Comparable Tax Effort)

A. Revenue: Own Revenue:

TGR on based year revenue +

ARM due to reforms & efforts

B. Expenditure

a. Capacity Building: Actual

need of MP, IT, Office Space,

Training etc.

b. Civic Services – (Capital +

O&M) as per HPEC Norms

c. Professional Services (MP,

CDP, DPR, GIS)

d. Other Socio – Economic Dev.

A. Revenue: TGR on base

year Revenue.

B. Expenditure: TGR on

base year Expenditure.

A. Revenue: Based on 20% of All

India since PCI of Bihar is 40% of AI

and poorer have lesser ability to pay.

B. Expenditure: 110% of AI since

Bihar has to catch up atleast with AI

12-13 Exp.

Bridging the

Resource Gap

ARM Borrowing Public Private

Partnership (PPP)

SFC Transfers UFC Transfers

Box 7.1

106 5th SFC (2015-20)

7.2.1 Powers of the ULBs to realize own revenue

(tax & non-tax):

(i) Constitutional Provision: As per article 243X,

the ULBs are to be authorized by the state

legislature to realize tax and non-tax revenue. (Box

7.2)

HPEC has recommended introduction of

(a) ‘Local Bodies Finance List’ in the Constitution,

empowering the ULBs with ‘exclusive’ taxes e.g.

property tax, profession tax, entertainment tax and

advertisement tax,

(b) constitutionally ensuring sharing of a pre-

specified percentage of State’s revenues from taxes

on goods and services with the ULBs on the basis

of formula designed by SFC, and

(c) provision of formula-based transfers and

grants-in- aid to the ULBs from the divisible pool.

(ii) State Act: As per Section 127 to 136 of BMA,

2007, the ULBs have the power to realize tax and

non-tax revenue as given in Box 7.3. Details are

given in Annex – 7.1

(iii) Measures taken for higher own revenues:

UDD has reported to be taking the measures

mentioned below. The measures actually taken

evidentally are far from satisfactory as SR14FC

report indicates that percentage of own revenue in

total revenue is 13.2% for the Bihar ULBs vs 32%

for All India. Recommendations of this

Commission in this regard are given in Chapter X.

A. Revenue generation

a) Incentivize revenue reforms.

b) Strengthen internal controls for mitigation of

revenue losses /leakages.

c) Explore fully all own sources such as parking

fee, trade license, road cutting charges, mobile

transmission towers fees, user charges for civic

services.

d) Harness User charges fully.

e) Monetize land, Buildings and shops for which

nominal rent is being charged and that too not

recovered fully.

Constitutional provision regarding tax

& non-tax revenue of the ULBs

243X. Power to impose taxes by, and Funds

of, the Municipalities.—The Legislature of

a State may, by law,—

(a) authorize a Municipality to levy, collect

and appropriate such taxes, duties, tolls

and fees in accordance with such

procedure and subject to such limits;

(b) assign to a Municipality such taxes,

duties, tolls and fees levied and collected

by the State Government for such purposes

and subject to such conditions and limits;

(c) provide for making such grants-in-aid

to the Municipalities from the

Consolidated Fund of the State; and

(d) provide for constitution of such Funds

for crediting all moneys received,

respectively, by or on behalf of the

Municipalities and also for the withdrawal

of such moneys there-from, as may be

specified in the law.

Box 7.3 Municipal Revenue: BMA - 2007

Tax (Sec.127) User Charges:

(Sec. 128)

Fees and Fines

(Sec129 to133)

Property tax on

Lands and

buildings.

Water-

supply,drainage

and sewage

Sec. 129:

Surcharges on

transfer of lands

and buildings

Solid waste

Management

Licence fee for

non residential

use of

properties

Tax on deficit in

parking spaces

Parking of

Vehicles

Licensing fee

for trades &

Profession,

activities etc.

Water Tax

Staking of

materials or

rubbish on

public streets

Building plans

and issue of

completion

certificate

Fire Tax

Birth & death

Certificates fees

etc.

Tax on

Advertisements

Other specific

services (as

specified in Act) Sec. 130:

Surcharges on

Entertainment

Tax

Surcharges at

25% on tax or

user charge, or

fee or fines or

on electricity

consumption.

Congregation Tax

Sec. 131:

Development

Charge

Pilgrims/Tourists

Tax

Details in Sec.

132-136 of

Annex 7.1

Toll Tax

Profession Tax

Other Taxes

(Specified in

BMA)

Box 7.2

107 5th SFC (2015-20)

B. Regulation etc.

a) Formulate and Implement Tax Non-Tax

Recovery Regulations effectively.

b) Constitute Property tax Board or alternatively

Urban Services Regulator.

C. Human Resource

a) Appoint either outsourced firms or sufficient

skilled staff for reaching at least 90% coverage

and collection ratios.

b) Ensure minimum productivity from

Collectors engaged on 4% commission basis

Minimum commission of Rs. 10,000 need to be

earned each month during each 6 month period.

D. Use of Technology

a) Online property filing system in 28 SPUR

ULBs. It is proposed to cover the entire state.

b) Facilitate ease of payment through on-line

facility, mobiles and collection center set up in

each ward.

c) Computerized Integrated Revenue and

Accounting

systems for all the ULBs.

d) GIS mapping in 28 SPUR ULBs. It is planned

to cover the remaining ULBs.

7.2.2 Leveraging resources through PPP:

(i) Bihar ULBs need around Rs.30,000 Cr. over

5 years for providing and maintaining core civic

services (Annex 7.2B). This magnitude of funds

from Government or the ULBs is improbable.

PPP in a big way is, therefore, the only feasible

option.

(ii) Section 166 to 168 of BMA, 2007 provide

for private sector participation in planning

development, operation, maintenance and

management of municipal infrastructure and

services, (Details in Annex – 10.7).

(iii) Bihar State Infrastructure Development

Enabling (BSIDE) Act, 2006: Provides for

rapid development of physical and social

infrastructure in the State through attracting

Private sector participation (PPP) in the

designing, financing, construction, operation

and maintenance of infrastructure and services.

Schedule III of BSIDEA includes many item

pertaining to the ULBs viz. (i) Water Supply,

treatment and distribution (ii) Waste

management (iii) Sewerage, drainage (iv)

Public markets (v) Trade fair, convention,

exhibition and cultural centers (vi) Public

buildings (vii) Inland water transport (viii)

Sports and recreation Infrastructure, public

gardens and parks (ix) Real estate (x) Any other

Projects or sectors that may be notified by the

Government.

(iv) UDD has stated that matching grant for PPP

will improve implementation of projects in PPP.

Accordingly, Rs. 970 cr. has been proposed by

the 5th SFC for five years (2015-20) for

promoting PPP.

(v) UDD has prepared Guidelines for the ULBs

on PPP. But these have not been shared with the

ULBs.

Detailed recommendations of the 5th SFC on

PPP is being given separately.

7.2.3 Borrowing:

(i) Borrowing by the ULBs has become

increasingly necessary and feasible,

particularly to finance long term investment

plans, provided that debt service is assured and

does not jeopardize the fiscal stability.

Operational surpluses and own-capital revenues

can be used for co-financing or repaying debt.

(For details on borrowing, refer to para 10.12.3

in Chapter X).

(ii)Sections 106 to 125 of BMA, 2007

comprehensively cover all aspects of borrowing

by the ULBs. However UDD has not yet framed

u/s 106 of BMA, 2007 a comprehensive debt

limitation policy, including short-term loans to be

raised; laying down, inter-alia, the general

principles governing the raising of loans; the limit

of the loans having regard to its financial

capacity; the rate of interest to be paid for such

loans, and the terms and conditions, including the

period of repayment thereof.

(iii) UDD should note that Mumbai Municipal

Corporation has a debt ceiling which is 7 times

of its own revenue. Further, a ceiling of 4 times

of Own Revenue could be fixed for borrowing

by ULBs in the Tamil Nadu as recommended

by its 3rd SFC.

7.2.4 Assignment from State Govt: UDD has

reported that 2% of State Stamp duty devolves to

the LBs.

7.2.5 FC Transfers: Transfers from the Union and

State Finance Commissions are made to the ULBs

with a view to enabling them to provide

comparable services to all citizens irrespective of

place of their residence. These comprise of (a)

Grants from the UFC, and (b) Devolution & Grants

from the SFC. These transfers can be tied or untied.

(Details in Chapter –VIII)

108 5th SFC (2015-20)

7.2.6 Schemes transfers: Funds also flow to the

ULBs under State and Central schemes for specific

functions/purposes.

7.3 Review of Resources of the ULBs (2010-

15):

7.3.1 Total revenue of the ULBs:

(i) As reported by UDD, collection of data on

Tax and non-Tax revenues and time series

analysis of the same is not done by UDD.

Consequently, UDD is yet to furnish information

in the format given below (Table 7.1 & 7.2):

(ii) Table7.3 shows that between 07-08 to 12-

13, Bihar has significantly enhanced total

revenue vis a vis All India. But per capita

revenue is still way behind All India.

(iii)UDD has estimated own revenue (excluding

UFC/SFC transfers) of all the ULBs during 10-

11 to 14-15 as given in Table 7.4, based on the

data from 28 SPUR ULBs and the following

methodology: (UDD could not give actual

figures.)

Table 7.1: Tax – Revenue of the ULBs

Sr.

No.

Rs Lac

10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15

1 Property Tax

2 Water tax

3 Fire tax

4 Advertisements tax

5 Entertainment tax

6 Surcharge on electricity consume.

7 Congregations Tax

8 Pilgrims / tourists Tax

9 Toll Tax

10 Profession tax

11 Other Tax (Specify)

Total

Unrealized Revenue (Accrual Basis)

Table 7.2: Non – Tax Revenue of all ULBs format

Sr.

No.

Rs Lac

Item 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

a. User Charges

i Water-supply, drainage and sewerage

ii Solid waste management

iii Parking of vehicles

iv Stacking of materials or rubbish on public

streets

v Other specific services

b. Fees and fines

1 i License Fee

ii Registration Fee

iii Market Fee

iv Parking Fee

v Surcharge on tax

vi Animal Tax

vii Tax on Rickshaw/Thela

viii Development charges

ix Taxes on transfers of property

2 Royalty from Minor Minerals

3 Interest

4 Dividend

5 Income From Property

6 Receipt from Transferred Institutions

7 Other Income

109 5th SFC (2015-20)

Figures of 28 SPUR ULBs were categorized

into Corporation and Council Towns

Total income of council towns was estimated

based on per capita income (PCI) of council

towns covered under SPUR.

PCI in Panchayat towns was assumed @ 50%

of PCI of Council towns.

Per capita total revenue increase @ 15%.

Estimated Own Revenue (Table 7.4) reported by

UDD seems more reliable since it is based on

individual census, whereas, the above figures of

SR14FC are based on sample cities/ towns. Per

Capita estimated by Total Revenue and Property

Tax estimated by SPUR in 2012-13 is approx. 3

and 5 times respectively than that estimated in

SR14FC Report.

(iv) SPUR has reported own revenue collections

of 28 SPUR ULBs as given in Annex 7.3. Its

summary is given in Table 7.5:

(v) 11 Nagar Nigams (2010-15): Graph-7.1&

Graph-7.2 based on data in Annex 7.4 shows that

Property Tax is the major source of Revenue i.e.

ranging from 73.35 % in PMC to 49.91% in

Biharshariff. In Begusari, it is just 34.91%. It is

converse in the case of other taxes. Evidentally,

both sets of Nigams have to have to learn from each

other. Per capita total revenue of Patna and

Muzzaffarpur Nagar Nigams logically the highest

(more than Rs 200), and of Biharshariff, Begusarai

and Purnia Nigams are the lowest (87, 107, 114

respectively) i.e. much below the per capita

average revenue of all 11 Nigams (i.e. Rs 171).

Table 7.3: Total Municipal Revenue (excl. UFC transfer) estimated by SR14FC

Rs Cr.

Bihar All India

Items 07-08

Amount

(Rs Cr.)

12-13 CAGR

(%)

07-08

Amount

(Rs Cr.)

12-13 CAGR

(%) Amount

(Rs Cr.)

PC

(Rs)

Amount

(Rs Cr.)

PC

(Rs)

Property Taxes 5 15 13 23.2 8159 15110 517 13.1

Other Taxes 1 1 1 3.3 10207 15801 578 9.1

Non Taxes 5 6 6 4 9134 19002 640 15.8

State Grant 14 41 37 23.9 6653 14809 631 17.4

Other Sources 0.1 1 1 80.2 1355 4234 174 25.6

Total 26.1 98 58 30.2 38709 74072 1681 12.7

Source – Municipal Finances and Service Delivery in India, (SR14FC); PC – Per Capita

Table 7.4: Own Revenue for 10-11 to 14-15 of all 140 ULBs (Rs Cr.) estimated by SPUR

Table 7.5: Own Revenue for 28 SPUR ULBs estimated by SPUR 2008-09 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 (Est.) Increase

(08-09 to 13-14)

CAGR

Total (Rs Cr.)

PC (Rs)

Total (Rs Cr.)

PC (Rs)

Total (Rs Cr.)

PC (Rs)

Total (Rs Cr.)

PC

(Rs)

Total (Rs Cr.)

PC

(Rs)

Total PC

Property Tax 36.08 58 77.45 113 75.33

106 130.74 180 94.66 122 20.19 17.56

Other SGI* 15.78 25 56.19 83 49.06 69 69.26 96 53.48 71 23.54 21.19

Total revenue 51.86 83 133.64 195 124.39 175 200.00 276 148.14 193 21.27 18.73

* indicates Self Generated Incomes

Note – Property tax contributes about 2/3 rd of Own revenue

Items

TotalPer

CapitaTotal

Per

CapitaTotal

Per

CapitaTotal

Per

CapitaTotal

Per

Capita

Property tax 54 46 70 59 79 65 94 75 114 90

Assigned Revenue 36 30 52 43 66 54 89 71 118 93

Other Self Generated Revenue 29 25 42 35 53 43 67 53 88 69

Total Revenue 119 101 164 137 199 162 250 200 321 252

Projected Urban Pop (Cr.) 1.18 1.20 1.22 1.25 1.27

14-15 (Estimated)10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14

110 5th SFC (2015-20)

7.3.2 Percentage of the O&M cost met

through user charges: UDD has reported the

position as given in Table 7.6

7.3.3 Productive use of public assets, lands etc.

Fixed Assets Registers of all assets including

underground infrastructural assets with

comprehensive physical survey have been

prepared in 19 SPUR towns viz. Patna, Danapur,

Khagaul, Hajipur, Gaya, Nawada, Bodhagaya,

Aurangabad, Sasaram, Dehri, Bhagalpur,

Munger, Jamalpur, Muzaffarpur, Sitamarhi,

Darbhanga, Motihari and Bettiah. However,

other than markets, no other assets are put to

productive use. The main problems are (i) ULB

lands are undemarcated or encroached or

disputed, and (ii) lack of clear rules and

guidelines from govt.

Data available from GIS mapping and surveys

should be used for validation of information as

per Fixed Assets Registers (FAR), being

compiled by ULBs for accounting purposes.

Moreover, as per GIS, a separate Thematic layer

Graph – 7.1: Property Tax, Profession taxes & Non-Property Tax as % of Total OTR (2010-15)

Graph – 7.2: Per Capita Revenue for all 11 Nagar Nigam for (2010-15)

73.35

55.0449.91

57.8747.63 50.12

34.91

73.6167.72 70.37 72.11

66.15

3.50

5.067.74

3.74

4.425.75

6.80

4.225.50 3.51

4.54

4.18

23.15

39.91 42.35 38.3947.95 44.14

58.29

22.1726.78 26.11 23.35

29.67

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%A

s %

of

OT

R

Nagar Nigam

Propery Tax as % of OTR Profession Taxas % of OTR Non - Property Tax % of OTR

146

73

43

109

7757

37

131106

149124 113

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

9

7

87

46

53

37

73

78

5062

39

42

55

4051

0

50

100

150

200

250

Per

Cap

ita

Nagar Nigam

Propery Tax Profession Tax Non - Property Tax

(200)

(132)

(87)

(189)

(162)

(114)(107)

(178)

(157)

(211)

(171) (171)

111 5th SFC (2015-20)

should be created for Land and buildings owned

by each ULB which should carry Property ID

Number as per FAR. It is expected that the quality

of FAR would improve with this initiative.

7.3.4 UFC and SFC transfers: Table 7.7 shows

that the ULBs utilized 72% of total transfer from

the 13th UFC in 2010-11. Its utilization increased by

20% in the next year, but declined by 30% in 2012-

13. However, the ULBs fully utilized the 4th SFC

transfer except in 2010-11.

7.4 Forecast of Resources of the ULBs (2015-

20)

A framework of Resources of the LBs is given

in para 7.2. Further, Box 7.1 includes possible

methodology for projecting resources. Based on

these, resources are forecast as follows in

different scenarios:

7.4.1 Business - as – usual: based on historical

data:

It is based on Revenue for 13-14 & 14-15 as

given by SPUR for all 140 ULBs. Since (a)

CAGR of Own Tax Revenue (OTR) and Non-

Tax is high negative, and (b) CAGR of Assigned

Revenue and State Grants are high positive, and

(c) CAGR of total Revenue is 23%, this

Commission has taken annual increase of 25%

for Property Tax and 20% for others.

7.4.2 Normative approach: i.e. attaining All

India level as follows.

(i) Forcast of Population: This method involves

three steps:

(a) urban population of 2011 is divided into city-

size categories and the respective shares of each

city-size is maintained for the future years,

Table 7.6: O&M expenses met through user charges

Civic

Services

Charg

e Per

Unit

Assessed

Amount

Realized

Amount

Cost of

Mainte

nance

% O&M

Cost Met General response from UDD

Water Supply Presently, User charge is not collected.

Only in case of door to door collection

of solid waste, fee is levied and

collected by the outsourced agencies.

UDD plans to set up an Urban Service

Charges Advisory Board u/s 128 A of

BMA, 2007. In Patna, Bhagalpur,

Gaya and Darbhanga, major works for

augmentation of water supply are in

progress. These ULBs have plans to

charge user fees, when water supply

projects are commissioned.

Urban Transport is not managed by

the ULBs

Sewerage

Solid Waste

Management

Drainage

Street

Lighting

Urban

Transport

Urban Roads

Traffic

Support

Infrastructure

Table 7.7: 13th UFC and 4th SFC transfers to the Bihar ULBs

Source: 4th SFC Bihar Report, 13th UFC Report, Bihar Budget and UDD; R – Recommended, A – Actuals/Spent

Years

Items ( R ) ( A ) ( R ) ( A ) ( R ) ( A ) ( R ) (A/RE) ( R ) ( B.E)

1 Basic grant 67.78 78.61 91.88 108.86 128.88

2 Performance grant 26.88 63.05 74.37 178.67 87.73

3 Total transfer to ULBs 94.66 67.78 141.66 128.42 166.25 106.36 287.52 302.56 216.61

4 Divisible pool 6,436 9,377 7,227 12,010 8,114 15,637 9,110 10,226

5 7.5% of Devolution 483 703 542 901 609 1,173 683 767

6 Total Share of ULBs (30%) 145 211 163 270 183 352 205 450 230 554

a Tied amount 72 72 67 67 37 37 37 37 37 37

b Untied amount 72 139 95 203 145 315 168 413 193 517

7 Grants to ULBs 81 81 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53

8 Total transfer to ULBs 226 17.45 216 251.53 236 264.27 258 325.32 283

Recommended by the 13th FC

Recommended by the 4th SFC

Rs Cr.

Sl.

No

10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15

112 5th SFC (2015-20)

(b) annual exponential growth rate (AEGR) of

2001 – 11 is used for 2015-16 urban population

and the same is used as the base for projecting

urban populations for 16-17 to 19-20 according

to city – size categories and

(c) numbers of cities, towns and agglomerations

are arrived at by dividing the projected urban

populations by the average population size of

cities and towns in each size-class category. The

results of this method are shown in Table 7.9 A.

(ii) Forecast of Revenue:

Assumptions for revenue forecasts are as

follows: The assumptions are summarized in the

Table 7.10.

a.) Per Capita values for 2012-13 of All India

ULBs Revenues are taken from SR14FC. It is

multiplied by projected Bihar ULB population of

12-13 and assumed to be Bihar Municipal

Revenue for 2012-13.

b.) It is further projected for the next 3

subsequent years ( i.e. 13-14, 14-15 and 15-16)

with the tier-wise CAGR of All India.

c.) 20% of this projected revenue for 15-16 is

taken as estimated ULBs revenue for Bihar for

15-16 itself. For subsequent projections till 19-

20, it is increased annually by 20%, 15% & 10%

for Nigam, Parishad & Panchayat respectively.

d.) Population figures for 2011-12 reported by

UDD are taken and projected further @ 3%

annually.

7.4.3 Revenue Projected by UDD: UDD has

made forecast of revenue of the ULBs as in

Table 7.12 based on assumptions given in Table-

7.13, without mentioning the base year and

revenue therein. Moreover, per capita revenue

growth assumed for Corporations (15%) is

illogically lower than that of Councils &

Panchayats (30%).

Table 7.8: Forecast of Revenue of all 140 ULBs based on Business-as-usual approach

Table 7.9: A City size class urban population growth rate

City – size class > 10 lakh 1 – 10 lakh 0.5 – 1 lakh 0.200-0.50 lakh <0.20 lakh Total

AEGR % 1.93 4.21 2.93 1.66 4.59 3.06

Table7.9: B: Forecast of the ULBs Population using 3% growth (in Cr)

11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20

Nigam 0.476 0.490 0.500 0.510 0.520 0.530 0.541 0.552 0.563

Parisad 0.374 0.385 0.393 0.401 0.409 0.417 0.425 0.434 0.443

Panchayat 0.257 0.265 0.270 0.276 0.281 0.287 0.293 0.299 0.305

Total 1.107 1.140 1.163 1.186 1.210 1.234 1.259 1.284 1.310

Note: Tier wise populations of 2010-11 are taken as reported by UDD.

2013-14

(Actual)

2014-15

(Actual)CAGR 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20

Pop.(in Cr.) ---->> 1.210 1.234 1.259 1.284 1.310

1. OTR

a. Property Tax 126.09 123.03 -2% 153.79 192.23 240.29 300.37 375.46

b. Other Tax 4.23 0.81 -81% 0.97 1.17 1.40 1.68 2.02

2. Non-Tax 80.77 72.44 -10% 86.93 104.31 125.18 150.21 180.25

3. Assigned Revenue

a. Stamp Duty 175.47 280.13 60% 336.16 403.39 484.06 580.88 697.05

b. Profession Tax 19.37 25.14 30% 30.17 36.20 43.44 52.13 62.56

4. State Grants

(Excluding SFC) 129.78 157.07 21% 188.48 226.18 271.42 325.70 390.84

Total 535.71 658.62 23% 796.50 963.48 1,165.79 1,410.97 1,708.18

Rev

en

ue

113 5th SFC (2015-20)

7.4.4 5th SFC Approach:

If Bihar ULB revenue has to catch up with All

India ULB revenue (a) by19-20, it needs to

increase @ 83% p.a. and (b) if by 2024-25, @

49.2% p.a. Since both the cases are improbable,

optimistic but realistic approach has been

adopted and it is expected that Bihar LBs

revenue would catch up with at least All India

level of 2012-13 by year 2015-16, with around

20% growth rate p.a. subsequently.

Table 7.10: Summary of assumptions for revenue forecast (Rs Cr.)

Table: 7.11: Forecast of Revenue of the ULBs based on SR14FC (Rs Cr.)

Table 7.12: Forecast of Revenue by UDD

Forecast of Total Revenue (15-16 to 19-20) (in Cr.)

Particulars 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20

Property tax 139.47 170.45 208.92 256.83 372.55

Assigned Revenue 156.12 206.77 273.92 362.97 565.93

Other Self Generated Revenue 117.68 157.43 211.61 285.70 455.77

Total Revenue 413.27 534.65 694.45 905.50 1394.25

Table 7.13: Assumed per capita revenue growth rates for 3 tiers

Corporation Council Panchayat

Property tax 15% 30% 30%

Assigned Revenue 30% 30% 30%

Other Self Generated

Revenue

20% 40% 40%

Total

AI 12-13 CAGR 13-14 14-15 15-16 (P) 15-16 AI 12-13 CAGR 13-14 14-15 15-16 (P) 15-16 AI 12-13 CAGR 13-14 14-15 15-16 (P) 15-16 15-16

Pop.(in Cr.) ---->> PC 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.52 0.52 PC 0.39 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.41 PC 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.28 1.21

Property Tax 813 398 0.14 454 518 590 118 206 79 0.09 87 95 104 16 70 19 0.09 20 22 24 2 136

Other Tax 952 466 0.09 506 550 597 119 145 56 0.13 63 71 81 12 90 24 0.17 28 33 38 4 135

Non-Tax 992 486 0.15 559 644 741 148 243 94 0.19 112 133 158 24 215 57 0.20 69 82 99 10 182

State Grants 550 269 0.17 316 369 433 87 695 268 0.16 310 359 416 62 370 98 0.37 134 184 252 25 174

Others 193 95 0.21 114 138 167 33 161 62 0.33 82 110 146 22 108 29 0.43 41 58 83 8 64

Total (A) 1715 1950 2219 2528 506 559 654 768 904 136 226 292 379 497 50 691

Rev

en

ue

Nigam (20%) Parishad (15%) Panchayat (10%)

Bihar ULBs

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-20

Pop.(in Cr.) ---->> 0.52 0.53 0.54 0.55 0.56 0.41 0.42 0.43 0.43 0.44 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.30 0.30 1.21 1.23 1.26 1.28 1.31 6.30

Property Tax 118 142 170 204 245 16 18 21 24 27 2 3 3 3 3 136 162 193 231 275 998

Other Tax 119 143 172 206 248 12 14 16 18 21 4 4 5 5 6 135 162 193 230 275 994

Non-Tax 148 178 213 256 307 24 27 31 36 42 10 11 12 13 14 182 216 257 305 363 1323

State Grants 87 104 125 150 179 62 72 82 95 109 25 28 31 34 37 174 203 238 278 325 1218

Others 33 40 48 58 69 22 25 29 33 38 8 9 10 11 12 64 74 87 102 120 447

Total (A) 506 607 728 874 1048 136 156 179 206 237 50 55 60 66 73 691 817 968 1146 1358 4981

Bihar ULBs

Nigam Parishad Panchayat Total

Rev

en

ue

Table 7.14: Time frame for catching up with ULB

Revenue of All India PC Total Revenue CAGR for catching

up by Bihar**

2012-

13

CAGR

(07-08 to

12-13)

By

2019-20

By 2024-

25

India 1681* 12.7%

Bihar 58* 30.2% 83% 49.2%

∗∗ 𝑃𝐶 𝐵𝑖ℎ𝑎𝑟 𝑈𝐿𝐵 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑒(1 +CAGRs

100)t =

𝑃𝐶 𝐴𝑙𝑙 𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑈𝐿𝐵 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑒(1 +CAGRAI

100)t

* refer to Table 7.3 for details.

114 5th SFC (2015-20)

Assumptions:

(i) OTR:

Estimates of OTR of 140 ULBs are based on

the actuals of 28 SPUR ULBs. Since, actuals for

28 SPUR ULBs declined in 14-15 compared to

13-14, estimates for 140 ULBs show decline in

OTR. (Table 7.5).

Annual Population growth is assumed at 3%

effective 15-16 until 19-20. (para 7.4.2 (i))

Due to non-availability of data for ULBs

other than 28 SPUR ULBs, each item of OTR

has been projected for 2015-16 as per GIS-

based demand and reforms already being

carried out in 28 SPUR ULBs. Thereafter,

forecasts are made for all 140 ULBs.

Property Tax: All reforms specified in the

Chapter X are assumed to be implemented

effective 2016-17. While Per capita PT works

out to Rs. 180 for 28 SPUR ULBs, Per Capita

PT for the remaining ULBs is assumed to be Rs.

100 for 15-16. 20 % growth rate is assumed

after 2016-17 for PT Per capita, whereas, for

2015-16 to 2016-17 period growth rate of 15%

is taken.

Other Taxes:

− These include Mobile Tax, Advertisement

Tax, Betterment Tax and Surcharge on

Entertainment Tax;

− For non-SPUR ULBs, contribution is assumed

to be only 15% of total.

− Betterment Tax is assumed to be implemented

effective 2016-17. Contribution from this levy

would be Rs. 3Cr. 4 cr, 6 cr & 10 cr for 2016-17

to 2019-20;

− 10 % surcharge on the projected Entertainment

Tax (Table 5.5) is to be assigned to the ULBs.

− While .5% surcharge on Electricity

consumption could be levied, it is not included

in our calculations for want of reliable

information. In any case, it would work as a

buffer for any shortfall in incremental revenue

forecasts from 16-117 to 19-20.

(ii) Assigned Taxes (Table 7.15)

− Actual Professions Tax taken for 15-16 and

CAGR of 30% taken for forecasts from 16-17 to

19-20 and rounded off;

− Stamp Duty at CAGR of 25% taken from 15-

16 to 2019-20 and rounded off.

− 10 % of the Vehicle Taxes (Table 5.5) is

proposed to be assigned to the ULBs.

(iii) 14th UFC transfers: The 14th has

recommended grants for the ULBs of Bihar as in

Table 7.16

(iv) 5th SFC Transfers: Refer to Chapter IX.

(v) Agency Functions: Since the agency

functions are assigned along with funds, no

forecasts have been made by the Commission.

Table 7.15: Forecast of ULBs Revenue based on optimistic but realistic approach

2013-14

(Est.)

2014-15

(Est.)

CAGR

(13-15)

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20

Pop.(in Cr.) ---->> 1.25 1.27 1.31 1.35 1.39 1.43 1.48

1. OTR 163.70 162.17 -1% 249.27 473.65 585.27 721.19 893.69

a. Property Tax 110.00 106.00 -4% 189.00 392.00 484.00 598.00 738.00

b. Other Tax 7.70 8.17 6% 10.55 22.06 26.99 33.65 43.27

2. Non-Tax 46.00 48.00 4% 49.72 59.59 74.28 89.54 112.42

3. Assigned Revenue 278.06 463.08 570.02 704.05 871.75

a. Stamp Duty 150.00 200.00 33% 250.00 310.00 385.00 480.00 600.00

b. Professions Tax 19.37 22.17 14% 28.06 36.48 47.42 61.65 80.15

c. Motor Vehicle Tax 116.60 137.60 162.40 191.60

Total 462.85 541.41 17% 577 996 1230 1515 1878

Rev

enue

Table 7.16: 14th UFC grants for the ULBs of Bihar

Sl. Items 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total

1. Urban Basic grant 256.83 355.63 410.90 475.34 642.28 2140.98

2. Urban Performance grant - 104.96 118.78 134.89 176.62 535.25

Total 256.83 460.59 529.68 610.23 818.9 2676.23

115 5th SFC (2015-20)

7.5 : Expenditure:

7.5.1 Broad Items of Expenditure are as

follows:

7.6 Review of Expenditure (2010-15):

7.6.1 Allocation for the ULBs in the State

Budget:

(i) Overall allocation: Information furnished by

UDD is given below. However, data appear

suspect since UD’s share as % of the total Budget

declined by more than 3% in 09-10 as compared to

08-09.

(ii) LB Window: A summary of the LB window

of the State Budget (Table 7.18) is given below.

Evidentally, the LB window is incomplete as

figures for 13-14 (Actuals) are not available and

NGRBA in 12-13 & 13-14, CS + SS in 2012-13

etc. Moreover, it is irrational that Non- Plan

expenditure increased by 60% in 13-14 (RE) for

some important heads, data are not given. e.g. and

further by 25% in 14-15 (RE), where-as, Plan

expenditure increased by 64% in 13-14 (RE) and

then by 350% in 14-15 (RE). Changes in same

items also are irrationally high or low. It is

expected that the LB window would improve

in future.

7.6.2 Expenditure of the major ULBs:

(i) Expenditure of 28 SPUR ULBs: UDD has

reported expenditure of 28 SPUR ULBs during

2010-15 as in Annex 7.3. It shows that total

expenditure has increased from Rs. 137.76 cr in

10-11 to Rs. 314.19 Cr. in 14-15. Establishment

expenditure accounts for almost 67% of the total

in 14-15.

Table 7.17: Allocation of funds to the LBs (Rs cr.)

08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15(BE)

(i) UDD Budget: a. Plan 980.48 1903 2327 2047 2587 3605 7947

b. Non- Plan

(ii)Total Expenditure of GoB 13500 42796 50705 60180 69207 80405 116866

(iii) UD's share as % of total

budget 7.3% 4% 5% 3% 4% 4% 7%

Source: Budget summary published on the website of Finance Department, GoB as reported by UDD.

116 5th SFC (2015-20)

Table 7.18: ULB Window of the State Budget (Rs Cr)

Items

12-13

(Actual)

13-14

(R.E)

13-14

(Actual)

14‐15

(R.E)

15‐16

(B.E)

UDD transfers to LBs 675 1094 0 3238 2730

1 Non-Plan 325 519 0 645 720

A UFC Grants 60 184 0 217 257

i M.Corp 26 79 92 109

ii M.Council 21 63 73 86

iii N.Panchayat 14 42 52 62

B SFC Grants 264 323 407 435

i M.Corp 106 149 165 177

ii M.Council 92 112 139 149

iii N.Panchayat 66 62 102 108

C Professional Tax 0 12 22 28

i M.Corp 8 9.42 11.94

ii M.Council 0 7.32 9.44

iii N.Panchayat 4 5 7

2 Plan 350 575 2593 2011

A Water supply 32 53 200 200

B Sanitation Work 18 47 95 150

C NGRBA (state share 70:30) 200 51

D I.D.S.M.T UIDSSMT (CS+SS) 444 145

E Urban Information system 150 191

F IHSPD 194 245

G RAY 178 11

H EAP 39 110 80 30

I EAP-ADB 58 60 190 381

J Civic Amenities 27 106 327 281

K Master plan, DPR 0 2 10 4

L MMSVY 146 132 201 0

M Roads and Bridges 20 46 171 150

N Others* 11 18 0.16 153 171

Education Dept. transfers to LBs 1308 1308

SC & ST welfare dept. transfers 386 442

BC & EBC welfare dept. transfers to LBs 1031 1617

* For 15-16 (BE) Others contains funds allocated for I.L.C.S (0.01), BPL List (0.01), Construction/Renovation of Buildings

(10), Capacity Building (0.01), e-Governance (0.01), Strengthening of Housing Board and Completion of schemes (100),

Monitoring/ Evaluation/ Supervision/ Establishment of resource centre and urban planning (1), Strengthening of Urban

Poverty Alleviation Directorate (0.01), Establishment of Engineering cell (7), Allowances of Elected representative (3.2),

SJSRY (49.7) and Capital expenditure in land acquisition for construction of houses (0.01).

Graph: 7.3: Estab, Program, O&M and Other Exp. as % of Total Expenditure

79.94 83.72

65.78

82.51

58.22

69.38

35.79

81.98 78.93 76.35 78.93 77.51

2.72

9.75

20.37

5.54

4.32

2.70

36.57

9.54 16.29

1.590.78 6.25

14.742.01

6.6511.09

32.5519.41 22.77

8.38 4.53

20.11 18.59 13.68

0.00 0.00 3.070.62

0.110.00

0.000.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.242.59 4.52

4.14 0.244.81 8.51 4.87

0.10 0.25 1.66 1.70 2.32

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Establishment Exp. % of Rev Exp Program Exp. % of Rev Exp

O & M Exp. % of Rev Exp Finance & Interest Expenditure % of Rev Exp

117 5th SFC (2015-20)

(ii) Expenditure of 11 Nagar Nigams (2010-11

to 2014-15): Graphs 7.3 and 7.4 based on data

given in Annex 7.4 show that (a) establishment

expenditure accounts for 77.51% of total

expenditure and is Rs 332 per capita, (b)

expenditure on Program and O & M is mere 20%

of the total expenditure and Rs 86 Per capita.

Situation of Ara, Gaya, Bhagalpur and Patna

Nigams is particularly bad.

7.6.3 Maintenance expenditure of Bihar ULBs

vs All India: SR14FC has made comparison

between Bihar and All India Municipal

expenditure on Maintenance based on the sample

cities (Table 7.19). It shows that PC Bihar

Municipal ‘maintenance head’ expenditure is far

behind All India. The situation has not improved

between 09-10 and 12-13.

7.7 Forecast of Expenditure (2015-2020)

7.7.1 Business - as – usual: It is based on the

State Budget and other historical data: Forecast

of Expenditure as per CAGR based on the LB

Window for 2011-12 to 2015-16 (BE) can’t be

realistic; since (a) CAGRs of NGRBA,

I.D.S.M.T, RAY, EAP are high negative, and (b)

CAGR of Sanitation & Cleaning, Urban

Information, IHSDP and Others are high positive

and (c) GOI is restructuring its CSSs/ACAs. We

have, therefore, assumed annual increase of 15%

over 2015-16 (BE) for 2016-17 and for the

subsequent years till 19-20. (See Table 7.20)

7.7.2 Normative (Principle of Equalization):

Table 7.22 shows is Forecast of Expenditure for

based on Normative approach in SR14FC i.e.

providing comparable services at comparable tax

effort. Following are the assumptions (Table

7.21):

This is based on SR14FC Report on Municipal

Finances and Service Delivery in India.

It is assumed that expenditure of the ULBs of

Bihar would reach atleast All India average of

2012-13 in 15-16.

Per Capita values 2012-13 of All India ULBs

Expenditure are taken from SR14FC. It is

multiplied by projected Bihar ULB population of

12-13 and assumed to be Bihar ULBs

expenditure for 2012-13.

It is further projected for the next 3 subsequent

years ( i.e. 13-14, 14-15 and 15-16) with the tier-

wise CAGR of All India.

Graph: 7.4: Per Capita Expenditure of all 11 Nagar Nigam for (2010-15)

429

305

208

410

107148

86

393

320291

343 332

15

35

64

28

8

688

46

66

6

327

79

7

21

55

60

4155

40

18

77

81 59

0

0

10

3

00

0

0

01

0 1

14

16

13

1

918

12

0

1

6

7

10

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Establishment Exp. Program Exp. O & M Exp.

Finance & Interest Expenditure Other Revenue Exp.

Table 7.19: Municipal Revenue Expenditure in sample cities: Maintenance

Bihar All India

2009-10 2012-13 2009-10 2012-13

Amount PC Amount PC Amount PC Amount PC

Water Supply 0 1 0 1 1655 122 2158 159

Building 0 1 0 1 178 13 254 18

Road 1 6 1 8 1395 90 1833 118

Others 2 14 1 12 5483 376 8717 598

Source – Municipal Finances and Service Delivery in India, 14th FC Study Report

118 5th SFC (2015-20)

110% of this projected Expenditure for 15-16

is taken as estimated ULBs expenditure for Bihar

for 15-16 itself. For subsequent projections till

19-20, it is increased annually by 20%, 15% &

10% for Nigam, Parishad & Panchayat

respectively.

Population figures for 2011-12 are taken as

reported by UDD and projected for subsequent

years @ 3% annually.

Table 7.20: Forecast of ULBs Expenditure based on business-as-usual approach

Source: Local Bodies Window, State Budget for respective year

Table 7.21: Summary of the above assumptions (Rs Cr.)

Table 7.22: Forecast of Expenditure for Bihar ULBs based on SR14FC (Rs Cr.)

2011-12

(Act)

2012-13

(Act)

2014-15

(RE)

2015-16

(BE)

CAGR 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-20

Total

Pop.(in Cr.) ---->> 1.210 1.234 1.259 1.284 1.310 6

Water supply 65.0 31.9 200.0 200.0 0% 200.00 230.00 264.50 304.18 349.80 1808.62

Sanitation & Cleaning Work 49.0 18.2 95.0 150.0 58% 150.00 172.50 198.38 228.13 262.35 1356.47

NGRBA (state share 70:30) 200.0 51.3 -74% 51.30 59.00 67.84 78.02 89.72 463.91

I.D.S.M.T UIDSSMT (CS+SS) 444.0 144.8 -67% 144.75 166.46 191.43 220.15 253.17 1308.99

Urban Information system 150.0 191.0 27% 191.00 219.65 252.60 290.49 334.06 1727.23

IHSDP (CS+SS) 194.4 244.6 26% 244.59 281.28 323.47 371.99 427.79 2211.85

RAY 177.5 11.0 -94% 11.00 12.65 14.55 16.73 19.24 99.47

EAP 38.7 80.0 30.2 -62% 30.24 34.78 39.99 45.99 52.89 273.46

EAP-ADB 58.0 190.0 381.3 101% 381.34 438.54 504.32 579.97 666.97 3448.50

Civic Amenities 18.7 27.0 327.0 281.4 -14% 281.43 323.64 372.19 428.02 492.22 2544.99

MMSVY 148.0 145.7 201.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Road and Bridge 0.0 0.0 171.0 150.0 150.00 172.50 198.38 228.13 262.35 1356.47

SJSRY 0.0 0.0 83.0 49.7 49.70 57.16 65.73 75.59 86.93 449.44

Others 57.6 30.9 79.9 125.3 57% 125.26 144.05 165.66 190.50 219.08 1132.74

Total 2592.8 2010.6 -22% 2010.61 2312.20 2659.03 3057.88 3516.57 18182.13

Total

AI 12-13 CAGR 13-14 14-15 15-16 (P) 15-16 AI 12-13 CAGR 13-14 14-15 15-16 (P) 15-16 AI 12-13 CAGR 13-14 14-15 15-16 (P) 15-16 AI 15-16

Establishment 1443 707 0.17 826 966 1129 1355 550 212 0.16 245 283 327 377 404 107 0.17 126 147 173 190 1311 1922

Maintenance 972 476 0.10 525 580 640 768 333 128 0.19 153 183 218 251 384 102 0.21 123 148 179 197 883 1216

Capital Exp 1586 777 0.17 905 1054 1228 1474 684 264 0.25 330 413 517 595 628 167 0.23 204 251 308 339 1460 2408

Welfare Exp 202 99 0.10 109 120 131 158 115 44 0.16 51 60 69 80 121 32 0.20 39 46 56 61 192 298

Other 3247 1591 0.19 1891 2249 2674 3208 90 35 0.03 36 37 38 44 70 19 0.00 19 19 19 20 2738 3273

Total (B) 3650 4257 4969 5803 6963 1772 683 815 976 1171 1346 1607 426 510 612 734 808 6584 9117

Bihar ULBs

Nigam (20) Parishad (15) Panchayat (10)

Ex

pen

ditu

re

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-20

Pop.(in Cr.) ---->> 0.52 0.53 0.54 0.55 0.56 0.41 0.42 0.43 0.43 0.44 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.30 0.30 1.21 1.23 1.26 1.28 1.31 6.30

Establishment 1355 1626 1951 2342 2810 377 433 498 573 659 190 209 230 253 278 1922 2268 2679 3167 3747 13784

Maintenance 768 921 1106 1327 1592 251 289 332 382 439 197 217 238 262 288 1216 1427 1676 1971 2320 8610

Capital Exp 1474 1769 2123 2547 3057 595 684 787 905 1040 339 373 410 451 497 2408 2826 3320 3904 4594 17052

Welfare Exp 158 189 227 272 327 80 91 105 121 139 61 67 74 81 90 298 348 406 475 555 2082

Other 3208 3850 4620 5544 6653 44 51 58 67 77 20 22 25 27 30 3273 3923 4703 5638 6760 24298

Total (B) 6963 8356 10027 12032 14439 1346 1548 1780 2047 2354 808 889 977 1075 1183 9117 10793 12785 15155 17976 65826

Exp

en

dit

ure

Bihar ULBs

Nigam Parishad Panchayat Total

119 5th SFC (2015-20)

7.7.3 Forecast of Expenditure of the ULBs by

UDD:

(i) Assumptions:

a.) Establishment expenditure is based on the

Municipal Cadre Report of MoUD & PMC

Restructuring Report of E&Y. Positions under

section 36 of BMA, 2007, if not considered, are

included.

b.) 10% annual increase is assumed in

Establishment expenditure.

c.) O&M expenditure is based on per capita

expenditure as estimated by HPEC adjusted to

2014-15 prices and inflation of 5% and

population growth @ 2% p.a.

d.) 20 % increases is assumed in Programme,

Administrative and Misc. expenditure.

e.) Interest expenditure is assumed to be nil as

Capital expenditures are funded by

Government Grants.

(ii) Forecast:

7.7.4 5th SFC Approach: Optimistic but

realistic approach has been adopted by the 5th

SFC since Bihar LBs have to catch up with at

least the All India level of 12-13 by 2015-16.

(i) Assumptions:

a. Manpower requirement is computed based on

the Model Municipal Cadre (excluding Group

D). (para 3.3.2). i.e Rs 206 Cr. p.a. with 5 %

annual increase (Annex 3.7 ).

b. Training cost is computed based on HPEC

norms. i.e. 1.25% of total capital requirement

with annual increment of 5 Cr. : 4792 Cr. × 1.25

% = 59.9 Cr. ≡ 60 Cr. p.a.

c. Capital and O & M Exp on Civic Services (Rs

29,374 cr. over 5 years) are computed based on

per capita norms of HPEC (Annex 7.2B),

multiplied by the projected urban Population.

d.Model Cites & Towns: (Smart Cities,

AMRUT) etc. Details are given in para 3.2.10

and Annex 7.5. Resource required for the

purpose could be met comfortably through

convergence of own revenue, transfers from

UFC & 5th SFC, Plan transfer and PPP etc.

options as explained below.

e. SPUR type Professional Services: is to be

provided to all the ULBs. Rs 20 Cr. is provided

for 15-16 with annual increase of 10%

subsequently.

Table 7.23: Forecast of Expenditure 2015-16 to 2019-20 period ( Rs Cr.)

Item 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20

Establishment 237.11 260.82 286.90 315.59 347.15

O & M 199.97 214.17 229.36 245.66 263.09

Programme 78.11 93.73 112.48 134.97 161.97

Administration 30.41 36.50 43.80 52.55 63.07

Interest 0 0 0 0 0

Miscellaneous 6.68 8.01 9.62 11.54 13.85

Total Revenue Exp 552.28 613.23 682.15 760.32 849.12

Capital Expenditure 4791.91 5132.12 5496.50 5886.74 6304.66

Total Expenditure 5344.19 5745.35 6178.65 6647.06 7153.78 Source: UDD

Table 7.24: Forecast of ULBs Expenditure based on optimistic but realistic approach

Projection of ULB Expenditure based on need (5th SFC) Rs. Cr.

No. Items 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-20

1 Capacity Building

a Man Power 206 227 249 274 302 1258

b IT 2 2 2 2 8

c Training Program 60 64 69 74 79 346

d SUPA 5 15 20 25 35 100

e Infrastructure

f Office Space 5 15 75 100 120 315

2 Civic Services

a Capital Expenditure 4792 5182 5605 6062 6556 28197

b O & M 200 216 234 253 274 1177

3 SMART Cities/AMRUT 2156 2156 2156 2156 2156 10780

4 Professional Services 20 22 24 26 29 121

Total = ( 1+2+3+4) 7424 7875 8408 8944 9522 42173

120 5th SFC (2015-20)

The total need for developing all Cities and

Towns as models is Rs.10,779 crore (Table

3.14), whereasTable-7.25 shows that the ULBs

of Bihar as a whole would get approx. 33,668

Crore from various sources viz State Budget

(15505 Cr.), 14th FC transfers (2676.23 Cr.), 5th

SFC transfers (Rs 11780 Cr.), own revenue

(6196 Cr.) and Central/State schemes, Any gap

in the individual ULB, has to be filled through

PPP, ARM and borrowing options. Moreover,

UDD will naturally take due care of this aspect

while sub-allocating available funds among the

ULBs.

7.8 Computation of the Resource Gap:

Requirement of resources from UDD as per the

commission’s format (Annex–7.6) is still

awaited.

7.8.1 Resource gap based on different

approaches: is given in Table 7.26 .Bussiness –

as – usual (Row 1, Col 7) would be the least

desirable option, being too low. Attaining All

India level (Row 2, Col 7) would not be possible,

being too high. Resource gap projected by UDD

and the 5th SFC are close to each other and could

be accepted. The remaining resource gap must be

bridged by adopting innovative approaches as

given in para 7.9.

7.9 Bridging the Resource Gap remaining

even after UFC/SFC transfers:

(i) Own Additional Resources (Tax and Non-

Tax): The ULBs must make all efforts to raise

their own revenues (tax & non-tax). Incidentally,

one of the conditions imposed by the 14th UFC

for performance grants is improvement in own

revenues. This would also enhance their

autonomy and accountability. Chapter X may be

referred to for details of options available to the

ULBs for raising own resources.

(ii) PPP & Borrowing: It is evident that for

meeting the All India level of services, the Bihar

ULBs would need huge amounts, which cannot

be met through State budget, UFC/SFC transfers

or own revenue. Leveraging PPP in a big way

for creation of infrastructure & services is a

necessity. Moreover, the possibility of market

borrowing has to be explored (Details in

Chapter X). This Commission has specifically

provided Rs 970 Cr for leveraging PPP.

Table 7.25 Funds likely to become available to the ULBs (2015-20)

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total

1. OTR 249 474 585 721 894 2923

a. Property Tax 189 392 484 598 738 2401

b. Other Tax 11 22 27 34 43 137

2. Non-Tax 50 60 74 90 112 386

3. Assigned Revenue 278 463 570 704 872 2887

a. Stamp Duty 250 310 385 480 600 2025

b. Professions Tax 28 36 47 62 80 254

c. Motor Vehicle Tax 117 138 162 192 608

Total (1+2+3) 577 996 1230 1515 1878 6196

5. 14th FC Performance Grant 257 356 411 475 642 2141

6. 14th FC Basic Grant - 105 119 135 177 535

Total 14th FC Transfer (5+6) 257 461 530 610 819 2676

7. 5th SFC Devolution 760 1290 1595 1970 2440 8055

8. 5th SFC Grants 235 620 725 1020 1125 3725

Total 5th SFC Transfer (7+8) 995 1910 2320 2990 3565 11780

State Plan (9) 2132 2345 2580 2838 3121 13016

Total (1 to 9) 3961 5712 6659 7953 9383 33668

121 5th SFC (2015-20)

(iii) Central and State Schemes: UDD and the

ULBs have to make all efforts to utilize funds

under Central and State Schemes. The 5th SFC is

recommending sufficient funds for

Capacity Building of the ULBs to enable them to

do so.

(iv) Expenditure Management: Refer to

Chapter X for details.

7.10 An interesting case of Revenue &

Expenditure of PMC:

7.10.1 Table 7.28 shows that in 2013-14 (A) (i)

PMC had a big amount as cash & Bank balances,

(ii) Total receipts are much higher than total

expenditure, (iii) Capital exp was much lower

thus Capital receipts BE figures of 14-15 & 15-

16 are not reliable and are perhaps very

optimistic. It is borne by wide difference

between SPUR/UDD data and PMC Budget.

7.10.2 Graph 7.5 shows that (a) Total tax

revenue increased between 2010-11 to 2013-14

and then declined in 2014-15. It is a matter of

serious concern, (b) Share of non- property tax is

quite low and needs special efforts.

7.10.3 Graph 7.6 shows that (a) establishment

expenditure has gone upto 81% of Total

expenditure, (b) program exp is meagre and (c)

O & M exp again is low:

Table: 7.26 Projected Revenue and Expenditure (2015-20) in different Scenarios

Sr. Approach

Ref

Tabl

e

Revenue** (Rs Cr) Ref

Table Expenditure (Rs Cr)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)

Year 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20

1 Business –

as – usual 7.8 797 963 1166 1411 1708 7.20 2011 2312 2659 3058 3517

2 Normative

(SR14 FC) 7.11 691 817 968 1146 1358 7.22 9117

1079

3 12785

1515

5 17976

3 UDD 7.12 413 535 694 906 1394 7.23 5344 5745 6179 6647 7154

4 5th SFC 7.15 577 996 1230 1515 1878 7.24 7724 7875 8408 8944 9522

Note: ** 14th UFC Grant for 15-16 to 19-20 (Table 7.16) is added to the projected ULB total revenue.

Table: 7.27 Projected Resource Gap (2015-20) in the above Scenarios (Rs Cr.)

Sr. Approach (15) =

(10) - (4)

(16) =

(11) - (5)

(17) =

(12) - (6)

(18) =

(13) - (7)

(19) =

(14) - (8) (20) = (15)

to (19)

Year 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-20

1 Business – as – usual 957 888 964 1037 989 4835

2 Normative (SR14 FC) 8169 9515 11287 13399 15799 58170

3 UDD 4674 4749 4955 5131 4941 24451

4 5th SFC 6894 6726 6958 7131 7140 34850

Table 7.28: Patna Municipal Corporation (Rs Cr.)

SL NO Particulars 2013-14

(A)

2014-15

(BE)

2015-16

(BE)

A. Cash & Bank balances - 158.38 213.61

B = (i+ii) Total Receipts 201.99 314.94 251.89

i. Revenue Receipts 125.30 255.69 188.89

ii. Capital Receipts 76.69 59.25 63.00

C = (iii+iv) Total Expenditure 145.46 473.41 441.23

iii. Revenue Expenditure 126.46 280.52 300.13

iv. Capital Expenditure 19.00 192.90 141.10

D = A – B Closing Cash & Bank balances 56.53 -0.09 24.27

Details are in PMC Budget available at Annex 7.7

Table 7.29 Revenue & Expenditure of PMC (2010-15)

Sr.

No.

Revenue and Expenditure for (2010-15) of PMC (Rs Cr)

Items 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16

SPUR

Data

SPUR

Data

SPUR

Data

SPUR

Data

PMC

Budget

SPUR

Data

PMC

Budget

PMC

Budget

A. Total Tax Revenue 26.83 31.87 35.4 45.02 125.3 28.91 255.69 188.89

1 Property Tax 20.64 24.52 24.33 33.32 20.42

2 Profession Tax 0 0 0 2.61 3.27

Assigned Revenues etc. 48.93 70 49

Revenue Grants & contribution 34.84 49.54 44.25

3 Non - Property Tax 6.19 7.35 11.06 9.08 5.21

Capital Receipts 76.66 59.25 63

B. Revenue Exp. 56.13 81.19 103.45 103.95 126.46 107.4 280.52 300.13

1 Establishment Exp. 47.39 72.29 83.37 76.73 89.85 81.69 139.86 168.81

2 Program Exp. 1.25 0.34 2.38 7.48 0.85

3 O & M Exp. 7.07 7.91 16.75 10.27 33.9 24.65 80.37 97.29

Capital Expenditure 18.9 167.85 134.95

4 Finance & Interest Exp. 0 0 0 0 0

5 Other Revenue Exp. 0.43 0.65 0.95 9.47 0.23

C. Total Exp. as % of revenue 209.2 254.77 292.27 230.9 371.6

D. Est. Exp. as % of revenue 176.63 226.83 235.55 170.43 282.6

Source: SPUR/UDD information, PMC Budget

Graph 7.5: Revenue of PMC (2010-15)

Graph 7.6: Expenditure of PMC (2010-15)

26.83

(100%)

31.87

(100%)

35.40

(100%)

45.02

(100%)

28.91

(100%)

20.64

(77%)

24.52

(77%)

24.33

(69%)

33.32

(74%)

20.42

(71%)

0.00 0.00 0.00

2.61

(6%)

3.27

(11%)

6.19 (23%)7.35 (23%)

11.06 (31%) 9.08 (20%)

5.21 (18%)

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

50.00

2 0 1 0 - 1 1 2 0 1 1 - 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 2 0 1 4 - 1 5

Total Tax Revenue Property Tax

Profession Tax Non - Property Tax

56.13

(100%)

81.19

(100%)

103.45

(100%)

103.95

(100%)

107.42

(100%)

47.39

(84%)

72.29

(89%)

83.37

(81%) 76.73

(74%) 81.69

(76%)

1.25 0.34 2.387.48 0.85

7.07

(13%)

7.91

(10%)

16.75

(16%) 10.27

(10%)

24.65

(23%)

0.43

0.65 0.95 9.47 0.23

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Revenue Exp. Establishment Exp. Program Exp.

O & M Exp. Other Revenue Exep.

122 5th SFC (2015-20)

131 5th SFC (2015-20)

Chapter-IX

Recommendations on Devolution and Grant

9.1 Introduction:

9.1.1 It must be reiterated that for the LBs to

function as ‘self-governments’ as envisaged in the

Constitution and as “Panchayat Sarkars” as

envisioned by State Govt., they must be

empowered, enabled and made accountable. Good

governance, maximization of own revenue, sound

planning, budgeting and expenditure management

particularly in the ULBs are preconditions to

enabling the cities and towns to provide

opportunities to the people arising from

urbanization. Similarly, if the villages are to be

made more livable and productive and the

Panchayats and Gram Katchahries are to contribute

to the ‘सात-निश्चय’ of State Govt., they have to be

managed professionally.

9.1.2 Further, though funds available to the LBs

(both the PRIs and the ULBs) from various sources

are grossly inadequate for their assigned functions,

they are unable to utilize even that. Such

unsatisfactory situation is primarily due to the

capacity constraints e.g. deficiencies in skilled man-

power, office space, IT facility etc. (Para 2.4 &

Para 3.4.2) and non-implementation of much

needed ‘reforms’ (Chapter-X). Full capacity

building and ‘reforms’ in the LBs is, therefore,

at the core of our recommendations. Performance

grant conditions of the 14th FC of audited accounts

and increase in own revenue, make it all the more

urgent and unavoidable.

9.2 Consolidated Fund of the State (CFS): Grants

for the LBs would come out of the CFS (Refer Box

5.1). Projections of CFS for 2015-16 to 2019-20 are

given in Table 9.1 (Details in Para 5.4).

Incidentally, the projected CFS for 15-16 is Rs.

1,25,079 Cr. as compared to 15-16 B.E figure of

Rs. 1, 21,064 Cr (Para 5.4.5). This increase is

primarily due to the enhanced capital receipts on

account of the higher FD limits recommended by

the 14th FC for Bihar.

9.3 Divisible Pool of taxes etc.: The divisible pool

is computed by deducting cost of collection and

appropriated taxes (entertainment tax in the case of

Bihar) from SOTR as given in the State Budget.

Adjustments are to be made in the divisible pool in

the case of deficiency or excess in the Actuals.

Table 9.2 gives projection of the divisible pool from

15-16 to 19-20. Detailed Projections of each item

have been made in Chapter-V (Para 5.4.1.3).

Table 9.1: Projection of CFS for 15-16 to 19-20

Table 9.2: Projected divisible pool for 15-16 to 19-20

*The divisible pool as per 15-16 B.E figure is Rs. 29,862 Cr., as compared to Rs. 29,110 Cr. projected by the 5th SFC due to the

enhanced FD limit by the 14th FC for Bihar (See Para 5.7.2).

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20

78841 110488 121064 125079 159496 193107 229971 274266

A. SOTR (Table 5.5) 19961 25663 30875 30141 37119 45781 56548 69954

B. SONTR (Table 5.7) 1545 3097 3396 2079 2412 2797 3245 3764

C. Share in Central taxes (Table 5.8) 34829 38082 50896 50896 64974 75083 86871 100626

D. Central Grants (Table 5.11) 12584 28903 18171 18171 21959 27778 33889 41345

E. Capital Receipts (Table 5.14) 9922 14743 17725 23791 33032 41668 49418 58576

ItemsProjections ( In Crores)

Consolidated fund of State (A to E)

13-14

(A)

14-15

(R.E)

15-16

(B.E)

15-16

B.E 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total

1 30875 30141 37119 45781 56548 69954 239544

2 33 64 78 94 114 138 489

3 30842 30077 37042 45686 56434 69816 239055

4 980 967 1161 1393 1671 2006 7198

5 29862 29110 35881 44294 54762 67811 231857

CoC: Cost of collection of taxes and duties

CoC

Divisible Pool (3-4)*

Sl.No. ItemsProjections ( In Crores)

SOTR

Entertainment tax & Sairats

Taxes excluding Ent. Tax & Sairats (1-2)

132 5th SFC (2015-20)

9.4 Resource gap of the LBs:

9.4.1 Rigorous resource gap (RG) analysis for the

LBs is not possible since required data (Annex

6.3 & Annex 7.7) are not available. However,

based on certain assumptions, the same has been

projected for the PRIs (Para 6.8) and the ULBs

(Para 7.8) for the period 2015-16 to 2019-20. A

summary is given in Table 9.3.

9.4.2 The Projected Resource Gap for the PRIs is

relatively low as their resources include Civic

Services grant recommended for the Bihar GPs

by the 14th FC totaling Rs. 21,018 Cr. Similarly,

the projected resource gap for the ULBs is

relatively low as they are expected to raise far

more own revenue and also leverage PPP and

Borrowing in a big way.

9.5 Devolution:

9.5.1 Table-5.25 (Para 5.7.2) gives scenarios of

varying devolution from 7.5% to 12% for 2015-16

to 2019-20 period as reproduced in Table 9.4.

9.5.2 Devolution for 15-16 to 19-20: Based on the

scenarios of varying % of devolution (Table 9.4),

devolution of 8.5% in 2015-16 and 9% in 2016-17

to 2019-20 of the divisible pool is recommended as

given in Table 9.5 (Details in Para 8.9.6). In case

the Actuals of SOTR is less than the projections,

the devolution would evidently be based on the

Actuals.

9.5.3 Inter LBs Share: The devolved funds would

be shared among the PRIs and the ULBs in the ratio

of 70:30 for the year 2015-16 and 60:40 for the

subsequent years as given in the Table 9.6

(justification given in Para 8.10).

Table 9.3: Resource Gap of the LBs for 15-16 to 19-20

Table 9.4: Scenarios of varying devolution to the LBs

Note: - Amount rounded off to the nearest multiple of 5.

Rev. Exp. RG Rev. Exp. RG Rev. Exp. RG

PRI 295 3216 2921 279 6652 6373 360 6652 6292

ULB 1054 2011 957 948 9117 8169 834 7427 6593

PRI 325 4049 3724 313 8544 8231 397 9324 8927

ULB 1424 2312 888 1278 10793 9515 1457 7878 6421

PRI 358 4645 4287 350 10029 9679 439 10809 10370

ULB 1696 2659 963 1498 12785 11287 1760 8411 6651

PRI 393 5336 4943 392 12457 12065 483 12737 12254

ULB 2021 3058 1037 1756 15155 13399 2125 8947 6822

PRI 432 7036 6604 438 14636 14198 534 14916 14382

ULB 2527 3517 990 2177 17976 15799 2697 9525 6828

PRI 1803 26282 24479 1771 52318 50547 2123 54438 52315

ULB 8721 13557 4836 7656 65826 58170 8872 42188 33316

Business-as-usual Normative (SR14FC) 5th SFC assessment

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

Total

(2015-20)

Sl. No.

15-16*

B.E 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total

1 29862 29110 35881 44294 54762 67811 231857

7.5% 2240 2185 2690 3320 4105 5085 17385

8.0% 2390 2330 2870 3545 4380 5425 18550

8.5% 2540 2475 3050 3765 4655 5765 19710

9.0% 2690 2620 3230 3985 4930 6105 20870

9.5% 2835 2765 3410 4210 5200 6440 22025

10.0% 2925 2910 3590 4430 5475 6780 23185

10.5% 3135 3055 3765 4650 5750 7120 24340

11.0% 3285 3200 3950 4870 6025 7460 25505

11.5% 3435 3350 4125 5095 6300 7800 26670

12.0% 3585 3495 4305 5315 6570 8135 27820

Divisible Pool

Devolution2

Projections ( In Crores)Items

Sl.

No

.

*15-16 B.E data are based on Bihar Budget documents

133 5th SFC (2015-20)

9.5.4 Inter PRIs: Devolved funds to the PRIs

would be distributed among GP: PS: ZP in the

ratio of 70:10:20 (justification given in Para

8.11.1). Thus distribution of the devolved funds

for 15-16 to 19-20 among GPs, PSs and ZPs would

be as given in Table 9.7.

9.5.5 Allocation of the devolved funds among

different tiers of the PRIs would be as per Para

8.11.2 & Table 8.8. Corresponding formula of

distribution is given in Box 9.1. Allocation of the

devolved funds among ZPs and PSs is provided

in Annex- 9.2(A) and Annex- 9.2(B)

respectively.

9.5.6 Inter & Intra ULBs distribution: The

devolved funds for 2015-20 for the ULBs as

projected in Para 9.5.2 would be distributed among

the ULBs as per criteria given in Para 8.11.3 and

Table 8.9 and as formulated in Box 9.2. Detailed

ULB wise distribution of devolved funds is given in

Annexures 9.3(A), 9.3(B) and 9.3(C).

9.5.7 State Govt. has announced conversion of the

GPs with more than 12000 population into Nagar

Panchayats. But its implementation may take time

and therefore, is not considered in our Report.

9.5.8 Use of the devolved funds: The devolved

funds would evidently be given to the LBs (which

are self-governments) as “Block Funds”. The 5th

SFC recommends the devolved funds to be used by

the LBs for the purposes given in Box 9.3 (See

Para 8.9.2 also) in that priority.

9.6 Grants:

9.6.1 Grants: SOTR of Bihar is low (i.e. 20% of

CFS/State Budget) as compared even to the other

LISs (Annex-8.5). The recommended devolution

Distribution of the Devolved funds

among different tiers of the PRIs

I. Devolved funds to all the LBs = D

II. Share of the PRI’s (60%) = 0.6*D

III. Share of GP:BP:ZP = (70:10:20)

(i) All GPs = 0.42*D, (ii) All BPs = 0.06*D,

(iii) All ZPs = 0.12*D

IV. Each

ZP(as share of total amount for all ZPs i. e. 0.12 ∗

D) =1

2(

𝑍𝑃𝑝

𝑇𝑝) +

1

10(

𝑍𝑃𝑎

𝑇𝑎) +

2

5(

𝑍𝑃𝑢𝑑𝑖

𝑇𝑢𝑑𝑖)

V. Each

BP (as share of total amount for all BPs i. e. 0.06 ∗

D) =1

2(

𝐵𝑃𝑝

𝑇𝑝) +

1

2(

𝐵𝑢𝑑𝑖

𝑇𝑢𝑑𝑖)

Where, p = Population, a = Area,

udi = Under Development Index, T = Total

VI. Each GP:

Step I – Distribute amount available to all the GPs

(i.e. 0.42*D) among the Blocks as per UDI.

Thus Block i gets, 𝐵𝑖 = (0.42 ∗ D) [𝐵𝑖𝑢𝑑𝑖

𝑇𝑢𝑑𝑖]

Where, Biudi= UDI of Block i

Step II – Each GP in a Block i gets = (𝐵𝑖

no.of GPs in 𝐵𝑖)

Table 9.5: Devolution to the LBs

Items 15-16

(BE) Projections

Total 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20

Divisible Pool (Rs Cr) 29862 29110 35881 44294 54762 67811 232610

Devolution (%) 8.5 8.5 9 9 9 9 8.5 to 9

Devolution (Rs Cr) 2540 2475 3230 3985 4930 6105 20790

Table 9.6: Inter LBs share in the devolved funds (Details in Annex-9.1)

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total

Devolution 2540 3230 3985 4930 6105 20790

PRIs 1780 1940 2390 2960 3665 12735

ULBs 760 1290 1595 1970 2440 8055

Note: - Amount rounded off to the nearest multiple of 5.

Table 9.7: Inter PRIs distribution of the devolved funds

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total

Devolved Funds 1780 1940 2390 2960 3665 12735

GPs (70%) 1245 1355 1670 2075 2565 8910

PSs (10%) 180 195 240 295 365 1275

ZPs (20%) 355 390 480 590 735 2550

Note: - Amount rounded off to the nearest multiple of 5.

Box 9.1

134 5th SFC (2015-20)

of 8.5% (Rs. 2450 Cr.) for 15-16, therefore,

amounts to only 2.10% of the State Budget. As

recommended in para 8.9.8, the total SFC

transfers (Devolution + Grants) would be 2.75%

in 2015-16, 3% in 16-17 & 17-18 and 3.25% in

18-19 & 19-20 of the State Budget. Accordingly,

amount of grants would be as given in Table 9.8.

In case the Actuals of CFS is lesser than the

projections, the Grant would evidently be

based on the Actuals only.

9.6.2 Inter LB Share of the available Grants:

The ratio of Grant between the PRIs and the

ULBs would be 70:30 in 2015-16 and 60:40 in

the subsequent years as given in Table 9.9

(justification given in Para 8.10.4).

Distribution of the Devolved funds

among different tiers of the ULBs

I. Devolved amount to all the LBs = D

II. Share of the ULBs (40%) = 0.4*D

III. 𝑁𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑁𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑚 =7

10(

𝑁𝑝∗1.5

𝑇𝑝) +

1

10(

𝑁𝑎

𝑇𝑎) +

1

5(

𝑁𝑏

𝑇𝑏) = N1

IV. 𝑁𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑑 =7

10(

𝑃𝑝∗1.3

𝑇𝑝) +

1

10(

𝑃𝑝

𝑇𝑝) +

1

5(

𝑃𝑏

𝑇𝑏) = N2

V. 𝑁𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑃𝑎𝑛𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑦𝑎𝑡 =7

10(

𝑁𝑃𝑝

𝑇𝑝) +

1

10(

𝑁𝑃𝑝

𝑇𝑝) +

1

5(

𝑁𝑃𝑏

𝑇𝑏) = N3

Where, (a) N1+N2+N3 = 0.4*D,

(b) N = Nigam, (c) P = Parishad,

(d) NP = Nagar Panchayat, (e) Population, (f) a = area,

(g) b = no. of BPL families, (h) T = Total.

Use of the Devolved Funds

Sl.No PRIs ULBs

1

Implementing Reforms recommended in Chapter-X including maximization of own revenues (tax & non-tax);

timely submission of accounts and internal audit; strengthening of Gram Sabha, Ward Sabha, Standing

Committees, Social Audit.

2

O&M of existing services and infrastructure (subject to a ceiling of 20% of the total devolution), since in the

prevailing situation, there are many sources of funding for new services and infrastructure but very less for O

& M.

3 Supplementing grants if the amount for a particular grant component is not adequate for the purpose. (Table

9.12)

4 Creating and replacing old facilities like piped

drinking water, sanitation, nali-gali with focus on

7-point agenda of State Govt. and Smart

Panchayats (Box 2.2) as per their plans

formulated in consonance with Article 243ZD of

the Constitution.

Creating and replacing old facilities like piped drinking

water, sanitation, nali-gali and solid waste management

with focus on 7-point agenda of State Govt. and

development of Model Cities and Towns viz : (a)

Divisional HQs on the lines of Smart Cities, (b) District

HQs as AMRUT Cities and (c) remaining ULBs as model

Towns, and be based on CDPs when prepared.

5 Completion of projects remaining incomplete under JNNURM, BRGF and RGPSA due to lack of funds, if

physical progress is more than 60%.

Table 9.8: Grants recommended for 2015-16 to 19-20 (Rs. Cr.)

Sl.No Items 15-16

B.E

Projections

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total

1 SOTR 30875 30141 37119 45781 56548 69954 240277

2 Divisible pool 29862 29110 35881 44294 54762 67811 232610

3 Devolution 2540 2475 3230 3985 4930 6105 20790

4 CFS 121064 125079 159496 193107 229971 274266 977904

5 Devol. as % of CFS 2.10 1.98 2.03 2.06 2.14 2.23 2.03 to 2.23

6 Transfers to the LBs (devol. +

grants) as % of CFS 2.75 2.75 3 3 3.25 3.25 2.75 to 3.25

7 Gap between 6 and 5 (% of CFS) 0.65 0.77 0.97 0.94 1.11 1.02 0.65 to 1.11

8 Recommended Grants( 7*4) 790 965 1555 1810 2545 2810 9510

9 Total Transfers (3+8) 3330 3440 4785 5795 7475 8915 30300

Note: - Amount rounded off to the nearest multiple of 5.

Box 9.2

Box 9.3

135 5th SFC (2015-20)

9.6.3 Grants would focus on Capacity Building

and would be utilized for (a) Manpower,

Training, e-Governance, Office Space, (b) GK,

(c) Preparation of Master Plans/CDPs/DPRs/GIS

Maps, (d) Developing Divisional and District

Headquarters on the lines of Smart and AMRUT

Cities, (e) SPUR Type Professional Services to

the ULBs and the PRIs, (f) Promoting PPP, (g)

Incentive for ARM and Performance Grants

(Para 8.9.2), (h) Regulatory Bodies including

Ombudsman, State Property Tax Board, Urban

Regulator, (i) DLFA and internal audit (j)

Professionalizing SFC Cell in Finance Deptt.

9.6.4 Distribution of Grants available to the

PRIs: Total Grants of Rs. 5785 Cr. available to

the PRIs would be distributed as in Table 9.10

(composite picture in Annex-9.1). PRD would

determine the norms based on letter and spirit of

this commission’s recommendations for

disbursement of item-wise Grants among the

PRIs. Being the first year of the SFC award,

unused amount of Grants for 2015-16 would be

disbursed as ‘Block Fund’ as per para 9.5.7.

(i) Rs. 2720 Cr. for Manpower (Details in Para

6.7.3.2).

(ii) Rs. 305 Cr. for e-Panchayat and Database

Management. (Details in Para 6.7.3.2)

(iii) Rs. 200 Cr. for Training Programmes and Rs.

180 Cr. for State/Distt/Block Panchayat Resource

Centres (Details in Para 6.7.3.2)

(iv) Rs. 38 Cr. for TSSP to provide SPUR type

support to the PRIs. (Details in Para 6.7.3.2)

Table 9.9: Inter LB Share of the total Grants (Rs. Cr.)

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total

Total Grants 790 1555 1810 2545 2810 9510

PRIs 555 935 1085 1525 1685 5785

ULBs 235 620 725 1020 1125 3725

Table 9.10: Distribution of Grants among the PRIs (15-16 to 19-20) Rs. Cr.

Note: 1e-Governance covers e-Panchayat for the PRIs. 2Training Programs includes exposure visit to reputed Panchayats. 3For ZPs without Bhawan. 4Professionalizing the SFC Cell in Finance Deptt.

Need for 5

Years

Referance

Table No.15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-20

1 1780 1940 2390 2960 3665 12735

2 555 935 1085 1525 1685 5785

Capacity building 6502 6.24 285 438 575 1010 1135 3443

i ManPower 5652 6.20 285 300 380 805 950 2720

ii e-Governance1 255 6.22 - 50 85 85 85 305

iii Training 556 6.21 - 80 100 110 90 380

a) Programms2

338 6.21 - 60 60 50 30 200

b) Institutions 218 6.21 - 20 40 60 60 180

iv TSSP 39 6.23 - 8 10 10 10 38

GK 1829 6.26 - 100 80 80 80 340

v Office Support 6.26 - 80 60 60 60 260

vi Case Disposal 6.26 - 10 10 10 10 40

vii Dispute free Village 6.26 - 10 10 10 10 40

C. viii PSB/ZPB3

2000 6.25 70 100 100 100 100 470

D. ix DPCs 122 6.27 - 20 20 20 20 80

Performance Grants 200 270 300 300 330 1400

x ARM 50 200 200 200 230 880

xi Overall Performance 150 70 100 100 100 520

F. xii Ombudsman - 5 5 5 5 20

G. xiii DLFA/Internal Audit - 1.80 4.80 9.80 14.80 31.20

H. xiv SFC Cell4

- 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.80

Abbreviations : (i) TSSP:Technichal Support for Smart Panchayats, (ii) GK: Gram Katchahry, (iii) PSB:

Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan, (iv) ZPB: Zila Parishad Bhawan, (v) DPC: District Planning Committee, (vi)

ARM: Additional Resource Mobilization., (vii) DLFA: Directorate of Local Fund Audit

E.

Devolution (In Cr.)

Grants (In Cr.)

A.

B.

136 5th SFC (2015-20)

(v) Rs. 340 Cr. for Gram Katchahry, of which Rs.

260 Cr. for office support, Rs. 40 Cr. for cases

filed and disposed, and Rs. 40 Cr. for promoting

dispute free village, under “मुख्यमंत्री ग्राम न्याय

प्रोत्साहन योजना”. (Details in Para 6.7.3.4).

(vi) Rs. 470 Cr. for Constructing Panchayat

Sarkar Bhawans and Zila Parishad Bhawans

(Details in Para 6.7.3.3).

(vii) Rs.80 Cr. for strengthening DPCs (Details in

Para 6.7.3.7).

(viii) Rs. 880 Cr. for ARM.

This amount for ARM would be given to the

PRIs as matching grant for ARM in the ratio of

1:4 to GPs, 1:3 to PSs and 1:2 to ZPs i.e., for

every additional Rs. 100 raised by a GP as their

own revenue, they will be given 4 times the

amount raised i.e. Rs. 400.

Unutilized ARM funds would be utilized by

PRD for capacity building of the PRIs.

(ix) Rs. 520 Cr. for overall performance under

“मुख्यमंत्री पंचायत प्रोत्साहन योजना” as follows:

10% of the GPs in a Block: to be decided by the

Panchayat Samiti.

15% of the PSs in a District: to be decided by

the Zila Parishad.

20% of the ZPs in the State: to be decided by

PRD.

The total amount of overall performance grants

would be divided among GPs, PSs and ZPs in the

ratio of 70:20:10 respectively and the best

performers would be selected on the basis of

objective parameters given in Annex-9.4(A). The

amount earmarked for the respective tier would

be distributed equally among the best performers

of the corresponding tier.

Unutilized performance grants would be

utilized by PRD for Capacity Building of the

PRIs.

(x) Rs. 20 Cr. for Ombudsman.

(xi) Rs. 31.20 Cr. for DLFA and internal audit.

(xii) Rs. 0.80 Cr. for Professionalizing the SFC

Cell in Finance Deptt.

9.6.5 Distribution of Grants available to the

ULBs (2015-20): Total grant of Rs. 3725 Cr.

available to the ULBs for 2015-20 would be

distributed as given in Table 9.11 (Composite

picture is at Annex-9.1). UDD would determine

the norms based on letter and spirit of this

Commission’s recommendations for

disbursement of the item-wise grants among the

ULBs. Being the first year of the SFC award,

unused amount of Grants for 2015-16 would be

disbursed as ‘Block Fund’ as per para 9.5.7.

(i) Rs.1035 Cr. for Manpower (Details in Para

7.7.4)

(ii) Rs.50 for e-Municipalities and Database

Management (Details in Para 7.7.4). Incidentally,

the problem in e-Municipality is not funds, but

weak implementation.

(iii) Rs. 71 Cr. for Training programmes (Details

in Para 7.7.4) and Rs. 89 Cr. for SUPA (Details

in Para 7.7.4).

(iv) Rs. 25 Cr. for Office space (Details in Para

7.7.4)

(v) Rs 1408 Cr. for enabling the ULBs to develop

Model Cities and Town as follows (Details in

Para 3.2.10):

Rs. 200 Cr. for preparing Master Plans/ CDPs/

DPRs/ GIS Maps for all the ULBs. (Details in

Para 3.2.10)

Rs. 970 Cr. for engaging PPP partners in

creation and O&M of infrastructure and services.

(Refer Annex 9.1 and Para 3.2.10)

Rs. 80 Cr. for providing SPUR Type

Professional services to all the ULBs.

Rs. 88 Cr. for expenditure needs of the

Reforms.

Amount provided here is for specific

components only. Refer Para 3.2.10.3 for details.

(vi) Rs. 835 Cr. for incentivizing ARM:

The amount of ARM would be provided to the

ULBs as a matching grant for ARM in the ratio

of 1:1 for Municipal Corporations, 1: 2 for Nagar

Parishad and 1:3 for Nagar Panchayats. i.e. for

every additional Rs. 100 raised by the Nagar

Panchayats as their own revenue, they would be

provided incentive of Rs.300.

Unutilized ARM funds would be utilized by

UDD for capacity building of the ULBs.

(vii) Rs. 200 Cr. for the best performing ULBs:

20% of the MCs, 15% of the Nagar Parishads

and 10% of N Panchayats would be selected on

137 5th SFC (2015-20)

the basis of objective parameters given in Annex-

9.4(B), to be decided by UDD under “मुख्यमंत्री नगर

ननकाय प्रोत्साहन योजना”.

The total amount would be divided among MCs,

N Parishads and N Panchayats in the ratio of 1:2:4

respectively.

(viii) Rs. 12 Cr. for Regulatory Bodies which

includes State Property Tax Board and Urban

Regulator.

9.6.6 These Grants are to supplement to the

normal State Budgetary Provisions.

9.6.7 It may be reiterated that the devolution

amount could be utilized to supplement those

component of the grants which need additional

amounts (Box 9.3).

9.7 Total recommended transfers for the 5th

SFC period (2015-16 to 19-20):

Summing up, the total recommended transfers to

the LBs for the period 2015-16 to 2019-20 would

be as given in Table 9.12, subject to SOTR/CFS

being limited to the Actuals in the State Budget.

9.8 Impact of the Recommendations on the State

Finances:

It may be reiterated that given the huge

underutilization of Central Schemes and

resources due to the low capacity of the LBs and

the need for reaching govt. services and judicial

redressal to the people etc., an outgo of 2.75% in

2015-16, 3% in 16-17 & 17-18 and 3.25% in 18-

19 & 19-20 from the State Budget to the LBs is

Table 9.11: Distribution of Grants among the ULBs (15-16 to 19-20) Rs. Cr.

Note: 1e-Governance includes e-Municipality for ULBs. 2Includes exposure visit to reputed Municipalities. 3Amount provided here is for specific components only. Refer to Para 3.2.10.3 for details. 4Needs of Reforms not implemented under JNNURM.

5Regulatory Bodies include (a) State Property Tax Board, (b) Urban Regulator, and (c) Ombudsman for the ULBs.

*DLFA, DPC, Professionalizing the SFC Cell etc., common to both ULBs and PRIs, are covered under grants for the PRIs

(Table 9.10).

Need for

5 Years

Referance

Table No.15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-20

760 1290 1595 1970 2440 8055

235 620 725 1020 1125 3725

Capacity building 1704 25 190 245 390 395 1245

i ManPower 1258 3.14 20 130 200 340 345 1035

ii e-Governance1 7.24 - 20 10 10 10 50

iii Training 446 5 40 35 40 40 160

a) Training Programms2

346 7.24 - 10 17 22 22 71

b) SUPA 100 7.27 5 30 18 18 18 89

Office Space 315 7.24 5 5 5 5 5 25

Model Cities & Towns3

10795 3.15 130 182 232 382 482 1408

i Preparation of MP/CDP/DPR/GIS 20 45 45 45 45 200

ii Viability Gap Funding for PPP 20 100 150 300 400 970

iii

SPUR Type Professional services

for all ULBs 12120 15 15 15 15 80

iv Exp needs of reforms4

- 22 22 22 22 88

Performance Grants 75 240 240 240 240 1035

i ARM 35 200 200 200 200 835

ii Overall Performance 40 40 40 40 40 200

Regulatory Bodies5

- 3 3 3 3 12

Abbreviations : (i) SUPA: School of Urban Planning and Architecture, (ii) MP: Master Plan, (iii)CDP: City Development

Plan, (iv) DPR: Detailed Project Report, (v) GIS: Geographic Information System, (vi) PPP: Public Private Partnership,

(vii) ARM: Additional Resource Mobilization..

D.

E.

Devolution (In Cr.)

Grants (In Cr.)

A.

B.

C.

138 5th SFC (2015-20)

not excessive. In fact this % is around the average

of the LISs and considerably lower than that of

similar state like UP.

9.8.1 Financial burden due to the increased

devolution: Scenarios of varying devolution and

consequential incremental financial burden on

State Govt. over the 4th SFC recommended level

of devolution of 7.5% can be seen in Para 5.7.3

(read with Table 5.26). The 5th SFC

recommendations would create incremental

financial burden on State Govt. due to the

increased devolution (going up to 9% in 2019-20)

over the 4th SFC recommended devolution as

given in Table 9.13. In case prohibition is

implemented, the loss in State Excise Duty would

automatically get excluded from the divisible

Table 9.12: Recommended transfers to LBs for 15-16 to 19-20 (Annex-9.3)

Note: 1e-Governance covers e-Panchayat for PRIs and e-Municipality for ULBs. 2Training Programs includes exposure visit to reputed Panchayats and reputed Municipalities. 3For ZPs without Bhawan. 4Amount provided here is for specific components only. Refer to Para 3.2.10.3 for details. 5Needs of Reforms not done under JNNURM

.6Regulatory Bodies for the ULBs include (a) State Property Tax Board, Urban Regulator and Ombudsman, (b) Separate Ombudsman

for the PRIs and (c) DLFA, DPC etc. for both the ULBs and the PRIs. 7Professionalizing the SFC Cell in Finance Deptt.

PRIs ULBs PRIs ULBs PRIs ULBs PRIs ULBs PRIs ULBs PRIs ULBs

1780 760 1940 1290 2390 1595 2960 1970 3665 2440 12735 8055

555 235 935 620 1085 725 1525 1020 1685 1125 5785 3725

Capacity building 285 25 438 190 575 245 1010 390 1135 395 3443 1245

i ManPower 285 20 300 130 380 200 805 340 950 345 2720 1035

ii e-Governance1 - - 50 20 85 10 85 10 85 10 305 50

iii Training - 5 80 40 100 35 110 40 90 40 380 160

a) Training Programms2

- - 60 10 60 17 50 22 30 22 200 71

b) Institutions/SUPA - 5 20 30 40 18 60 18 60 18 180 89

iv TSSP - - 8 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 38 -

GK - - 100 - 80 - 80 - 80 - 340 -

i Office Support - - 80 - 60 - 60 - 60 - 260 -

ii Case Disposal - - 10 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 40 -

iii Dispute free Village - - 10 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 40 -

Office Space/PSB/ZPB3

70 5 100 5 100 5 100 5 100 5 470 25

DPCs - - 20 - 20 - 20 - 20 - 80 -

Model Cities & Towns4

- 130 - 182 - 232 - 382 - 482 - 1408

i Preparation of MP/CDP/DPR/GIS - 20 - 45 - 45 - 45 - 45 - 200

ii Viability Gap Funding for PPP - 20 - 100 - 150 - 300 - 400 - 970

iii SPUR Type Professional services

for all ULBs- 20 - 15 - 15 - 15 - 15 - 80

iv Exp needs of reforms5

- - - 22 - 22 - 22 - 22 - 88

Performance Grants 200 75 270 240 300 240 300 240 330 240 1400 1035

i ARM 50 35 200 200 200 200 200 200 230 200 880 835

ii Overall Performance 150 40 70 40 100 40 100 40 100 40 520 200

Regulatory Bodies6

- - 5 3 5 3 5 3 5 3 20 12

DLFA/Internal Audit - - 1.80 - 4.80 - 9.80 - 14.80 - 31.20 -

SFC Cell7

- - 0.20 - 0.20 - 0.20 - 0.20 - 0.80 -

Abbreviations: (i) SUPA: School of Urban Planning and Architechture, (ii) TSSP:Technichal Support for Smart Panchayat, (iii) GK:

Gram Katchehry, (iv) PSB: Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan, (v) DPC: District Planning Committee, (vi) MP: Master Plan, (vii) CDP: City

Development Plan, (viii) DPR: Detailed Project Report, (ix) GIS: Geographic Information System, (x) PPP: Public Private Partnership,

(xi) ARM: Additional Resource Mobilization, (xii) DLFA: Directorate of Local Fund Audit, (xiii) SFC; State Finance Commission.

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-20Items

F.

G.

H.

I.

Devolution (In Cr.)

Grants (In Cr.)

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

139 5th SFC (2015-20)

pool and therefore not lead to increase in the

financial burden.

9.8.2 Financial burden due to the increased

Grants: The 4th SFC had recommended Grants

of Rs. 233 Cr. per year in addition to the

Devolution. Table 9.14 gives incremental

financial burden on the State Budget over the 4th

SFC recommended Grants of Rs. 233 Cr. per

year, due to the 5th SFC recommendation on

Grants (See Para 5.7.6). In case prohibition is

implemented, burden on account of loss of the

State Excise Duty would at best be around 1% of

Rs 4000 Cr = Rs 40 Cr p.a. only.

9.8.3 Financial burden due to the overall

Transfers: State finances would have overall

incremental financial burden as given in Table 9.15

due to the recommendations of the 5th SFC and less

if inflation and increased CFS are taken into

account.

9.9 It is emphasized that the total Transfers

(Devolution + Grants) recommended by the 5th

SFC are over and above the normal State

Budgetary provisions for the LBs. Moreover,

since some schemes like BRGF and RGPSA have

been discontinued by Central Govt., State Govt.

may consider providing equivalent amount to the

LBs in the State Budget, which would again be in

addition to the 5th SFC transfers.

9.10 Grants amount not likely to be utilized in a

year, would be given to the PRIs and the ULBs as

‘Block Grants’ (in the first week of the last quarter)

as per formula given in Box 9.1 and Box 9.2 for

Smart Panchayats and Model Cities/Towns

respectively.

9.11 Resource Gap of the LBs after the 5th SFC

transfers: (Table 9.16)

9.11.1 Out of the total resource gap of Rs 52315

Cr. for the PRIs, Rs 12735 Cr. would be available

as devolution and Rs. 5785 Cr. as Grants (See

para 9.4), leaving a resource gap of Rs 33795 Cr.

Similarly, out of the resource gap of Rs 33316 Cr.

for the ULBs, Rs 8055 Cr. would be available as

devolution and Rs. 3725 Cr. as Grants, leaving a

resource gap of Rs 21536 Cr. Thus, total resource

gap for the LBs post 5th SFC transfers (devolution

+ grants) would be Rs. 55331 Cr. for 2015-20.

9.11.2 Bridging the Resource Gap: This

Resource Gap inclusive of the 5th SFC transfers

(Table 9.16) has to be filled through following

sources:

(i) Own Additional Resources (Tax and Non-

Tax): The LBs must make all efforts to raise their

own resources (tax & non-tax). Incidentally, one

of the conditions imposed by the 14th FC for

performance grants is increase in own revenues.

This would also enhance their autonomy and

accountability. Chapter-X may be referred to for

details of the options available to the LBs for

raising own resources.

(ii) PPP: It is evident that for reaching All India

level of infrastructure and services, the Bihar LBs

would need huge amounts, which cannot be met

through State Budget, FC/SFC transfers, Central

Schemes and own revenues. Leveraging PPP in

a big way for creation and O&M of

infrastructure and services is a necessity.

BMA, 2006 and Bihar Infrastructure

Development Enabling Act, 2006 provide ample

scope and guidelines for implementation of PPP

Table 9.13: Incremental financial burden on the

State Finances due to the increased devolution (Cr.)

Note: - Amount rounded off to the nearest multiple of 5.

Year 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20

Devolution (%) 8.5 9 9 9 9

Additional

Financial Burden300 540 665 820 1015

*Inflation not taken into account

Table 9.14: Incremental financial burden on the

State Finances due to the increased Grants (Cr.)

Year 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20

Grants 790 1555 1810 2545 2810

Additional

Financial Burden557 1322 1577 2312 2577

Table 9.15: Impact of overall Transfers

(Devolution + Grants) on State Finances

*In case prohibition is implemented, additional burden would be

around Rs. 40 Cr. p.a. only.

Incremental

Financial Burden 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 15-20

Due to devolution 300 540 665 820 1015 3340

Due to grants 557 1322 1577 2312 2577 8345

Total 857 1862 2242 3132 3592 11685

140 5th SFC (2015-20)

schemes by the LBs (Para 7.2.2). Details on PPP

may be seen in Chapter-X.

(iii) Borrowing: The possibility of market

borrowing has to be explored seriously to finance

long-term investment plans, provided that debt

service is ensured and does not jeopardize the

fiscal stability of either the local or the State

Govt. Operational surpluses and own-capital

revenues can be used for co-financing or repaying

debt (Para 7.2.3). Details on borrowing may be

seen in Chapter-X.

(iv) Central and State Schemes: The LBs have

to make all efforts to fully utilize funds available

under Central and State Schemes. The 5th SFC is

recommending sufficient funds for Capacity

Building of the LBs to enable them to do so.

(v) Expenditure Management: Sound

Expenditure Management is necessary to ensure

that available funds are utilized efficiently and

effectively on improving service delivery and

achieving LB’s objectives through professionally

planning resources & expenditure, controlling &

executing expenditure and monitoring

expenditure performance (Details in Para 10.11).

9.12 Release of funds to the LBs:

Recommendations of the 4th SFC, 13th FC and 14th

FC are given in Annex-9.4. The 5th SFC

recommends the following:

(i). As recommended by the 13th FC & the 14th

FC, the 5th SFC transfers would be released

directly into the bank account of the LBs

concerned through electronic fund transfer and

core banking system. Where such facility is

unavailable, other modes of expeditious transfer

would be notified by State Govt.

(ii). Devolution amount for 2015-16 would be

released to each PRI/ ULB in one installment

based on R.E/Actuals of the preceding year i.e.

2014-15. In the subsequent years, while first

allocation of 50% of devolved funds would be

released based upon the R.E/Actuals of SOTR of

the preceding year in April, the second

installment shall be released by October of the

year subject to submission of accounts of the

previous year, audited even through internal

Audit.

(iii). Grants as recommended by the 5th SFC for

2015-16 would be released in one installment

based on the R.E/Actuals of the preceding year.

In the subsequent years, while 1st installment

would be released along with the 1st installment

of the devolved fund (based on the RE/Actuals of

the preceding year), the 2nd installment would be

released only after securing utilization report of

the 1st installment to the extent of 50%, audited

even through internal Audit.

(iv). The details of Devolution and Grants

received and utilized shall be placed before the

respective Gram/ Ward Sabhas and on the

website of the LB at least twice a year in

December and May respectively

(v). In case some LBs fails to submit utilization

report of 1st installment of Grants within a year

Table 9.16: Resource Gap of the LBs post 5th SFC transfers for 15-20 (Rs. Cr.)

Rev. Exp. RG Devol. Grants Total

PRI 360 6652 6292 1780 555 2335 3957

ULB 834 7427 6593 760 235 995 5598

PRI 397 9324 8927 1940 935 2875 6052

ULB 1457 7878 6421 1290 620 1910 4511

PRI 439 10809 10370 2390 1085 3475 6895

ULB 1760 8411 6651 1595 725 2320 4331

PRI 483 12737 12254 2960 1525 4485 7769

ULB 2125 8947 6822 1970 1020 2990 3832

PRI 534 14916 14382 3665 1685 5350 9032

ULB 2697 9525 6828 2440 1125 3565 3263

PRI 2123 54438 52315 12735 5785 18520 33795

ULB 8872 42188 33316 8055 3725 11780 21536

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20

Total

(2015-20)

LBsyear5th SFC assessment 5th SFC transfer

Gap after

5th SFC

transfer

2015-16

2016-17

141 5th SFC (2015-20)

from the date of its release, 2nd installment due to

them would be utilized by PR/UD Departments

on Capacity Building of the LBs.

9.13 Uses of the Transferred (Devolution +

Grants) Funds:

9.13.1 Salaries of at least the existing staffs of the

ULBs and the ZPs must come from their own

revenues. State Govt. could at best meet the

arrears. It will make the LBs more autonomous

and accountable and be consistent with the

performance grant condition of the 14th FC.

9.13.2 Funds earmarked for Manpower by the 5th

SFC is only for the sanction of new and filling of

the vacant positions as per the Model Panchayat

and Municipal Cadres (Para 2.3 and Para 3.3.2

respectively).

9.13.3 Funds for e-Governance must be used

for operationalizing e-Panchayat and e-

Municipality modules in a Mission Mode. This

would also create and continuously update much

needed database, which is virtually missing

presently and leading to ill-informed decision-

making in almost all spheres of the LBs.

9.14 Governance:

9.14.1 Enabling the LBs to function as the

institutions of self-government through Capacity

Building, Sound Finances & Governance and

Accountability is at the core of our

recommendations. Accordingly, the 5th SFC

emphasizes implementation of the

recommendations made in Chapter-X as

precondition to the LBs becoming the self-

governments and fulfilling their mandate.

9.14.2 Accordingly, the SFC Cell in Finance

Department should have professionals on

contract with degree from reputed institutions in

Statistics and Economics respectively, with

emoluments of Rs. 40,000-50,000 p.m. They

would pursue reforms agenda with PRD and

UDD, undertake required research and

documentation and build database on PRIs &

ULBs for use by Finance/Urban/ Panchayati

Raj/Planning Departments and the future

SFCs/UFCs.

5th SFC (2015-20)

Urban Policy of Bihar furnished by UDD

Urbanizations policy of Bihar a. ensure regionally balanced urbanization through decentralized development and hierarchically structured urban system; b. facilitate economic development, employment generation, reduction of inequality and poverty eradication through appropriate regulatory frameworks and infrastructure provisions; c. ensure optimum utilization of land resources and meet increased demand for housing and urban services through public-private and other partnerships; d. protect, preserve and enhance the urban environment, particularly water bodies; e. devolve authority at the local urban level and strengthen local governments through appropriate powers, resources and capabilities so that these can take effective responsibility for a wide range of planning, infrastructure provision, service delivery and regulatory functions; f. involve all sectors of the community, including women and the poor, in participatory decision-making and implementation processes; g. ensure social justice and inclusion by measures designed to increase the security of poor people through their access to varied livelihood opportunities, secure tenure and basic affordable services; h. take into account particular needs of women, men, children, youth, the elderly and the disabled in developing policy responses and implementation; i. protect, preserve and enhance the historical and cultural heritage of cities and enhance their aesthetic beauty; j. develop and implement urban management strategies and governance arrangements for enhancing complementary roles of urban and rural areas in sustainable development; and k. ensure good governance by enhancing transparency and establishing accountability.

MAJOR DIMENSIONS OF THE POLICY Effective responses to the challenges posed by rapid urbanization and fulfilling the stated objectives will require giving priorities to the following dimensions: a. Patterns and process of urbanization b. Local urban planning c. Local economic development and employment d. Urban local finance and resource mobilization e. Urban land management f. Urban housing g. Urban poverty and slum improvement h. Urban environmental management i. Infrastructure and services j. Urban transportation k. Health and education l. Social structure m. Gender concerns n. Urban children, aged, the disabled and the scavengers o. Urban Recreation, Playground, Park, Open Spaces and Graveyards p. Cultural and aesthetic development q. Rural-urban linkage r. Law and order s. Legislation t. Urban governance u. Urban Research, Training and Information

Annexure – 3.1

5th SFC (2015-20)

Annexure 3.2

Sl. N.

Functions under the Constitution

Corresponding functions under Bihar Municipality Act, 2007

1 Urban planning including town planning.

a. Town planning, urban development and development of commercial infrastructure. b. Planned development of new areas for human settlement. c. Beautification of the municipal area by setting up parks and fountains,

providing recreational areas, improving river banks, and landscaping. d. Integration of the development plans and schemes of the municipal area with the district or regional development plan, if any.

2 Regulation of land-use and construction of buildings.

3 Planning for economic and social development.

a. Preparation of Plans for development and social justice. b. Organization of voluntary labour and co-ordination of activities of

voluntary agencies for community welfare. c. Campaigns for dissemination of such information, vital for public

welfare. d. The Municipality may plan, build, operate, maintain or manage the

infrastructure required for the discharge of its functions, either by itself or by any agency (section 166).

4 Roads and bridges.

a. Communication systems, construction and maintenance of roads, footpaths, pedestrian b. Pathways, transportation terminals, both for passengers and goods, bridges, over-bridges, subways, ferries, and inland water transport system, c. Transport system accessories including traffic engineering schemes, street furniture, street lighting, parking areas, and bus stops.

5 Water supply for domestic, industrial and commercial purposes.

a. Water- supply for domestic, industrial and commercial purposes, b. Provision for unfiltered water-supply for non- domestic uses,

6 Public health, sanitation conservancy and solid waste management.

a. Community health b. Drainage and sewerage, soil waste management c. Curative health d. Mass inoculation campaigns for eradication of infectious diseases, e. Construction and maintenance of municipal markets and slaughterhouses

and regulation of all markets and slaughterhouses, f. Reclamation of unhealthy localities, removal of noxious vegetation and

abatement of all nuisances, g. Maintenance of all public tanks and regulating the re-excavation, repair

and up-keep of all private tanks, wells and other sources of water-supply on such terms and conditions as the Municipality may deem proper,

h. Advancement of civic consciousness of public health and general welfare by organizing discourses, seminars and conferences.

i. Measures for eradication of addiction of all kinds including addiction to drugs and liquor; j. Construction or maintenance of, or provision of to, hospitals,

dispensaries, asylums, rescue homes, maternity houses, and child welfare centres.

7 Fire services. a. Fire prevention & fire safety.

Functions assigned under the Constitution and the section 45 of the Bihar Municipal Act, 2007

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-20)

Sl. No.

Functions under the Constitution

Corresponding functions under Bihar Municipality Act, 2007

8 Urban forestry, protection of the environment and promotion of ecological aspects.

a. Protection of environment including planting and caring of trees on road Sides and elsewhere. b. Reclamation of waste lands, promotion of social forestry and maintenance of open spaces, c.Establishment and maintenance of nurseries for plants, vegetables and trees and promotion of greenery through mass participation, d. Organization of flower-shows and promotion of flower-growing as a civic culture, e. promotion of measures for abatement of all forms of pollution;

9 Safeguarding the interests of weaker sections of society, including the handicapped and mentally retarded.

a. Provision of shelter for the homeless,

b. Establishment and maintenance of shelters, in times natural disasters, and relief works, for, destitute persons.

c. Implementation programmes for liberation and rehabilitation of scavengers and their families,

10 Slum improvement and up gradation.

11 Urban poverty alleviation.

a. Urban poverty alleviation.

12 Provision of urban amenities & facilities such as parks, gardens, playgrounds.

a. Installation of statues, portraits and pictures in appropriate manner, b. Organization, establishment and maintenance of art galleries and botanical or

zoological collections, and c. Maintenance of monuments & places of historical, artistic & other importance;

13 Promotion of cultural, educational and aesthetic aspects.

a. Primary education. b. Promotion of educational, sports and cultural activities and aesthetic environment c. Promotion of civic education, adult education, social education and non- formal

education, d. Promotion of cultural activities including music, physical education, sports and

theatres and infrastructure therefore, e. Organization and management of fairs and exhibitions

14 Burial grounds; and electric crematoriums.

15 Cattle pounds; prevention of cruelty to animals.

a. Construction and maintenance of cattle pounds,

16 Vital statistics (births and deaths etc.)

a. Collection of statistics and data, significant to the community,

17 Public amenities (street lighting, parking, bus stops, conveniences.

a. Supply of energy.

18 Regulation of slaughter houses and tanneries.

a. Markets and slaughterhouses

(ii)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Comparative study of Draft Master Plan Patna 2031 and Master Plan Delhi 2021

Master Plan Delhi Draft Master Plan Patna Suggestions for Patna master plan Coverage area

- It covers area in and around Delhi, NCT, (NCR) and the Highway Corridor Zone - The NCT has three local municipal corporations: Municipal Corporation of Delhi, New Delhi Municipal Council and Delhi Cantonment Board - Proposed Area has a population of 16 Million people

- It covers PPA (Patna Planning Area) that includes Municipal Corporation - Patna Municipal Councils- Danapur Khagaul & Phulwari, Cantonment - Danapur, Nagar Panchayats - Maner and Fatuha. - PPA has a population of 2.9 million, covering 1144 sq k.m.

- PPA should include Hajipur, Sonpur in north, Masaurhi in south to take care of inevitable expansion of patna.

Vision - Vision-2021 is to make Delhi a global metropolis and a world class city. - Provision of housing, unorganized informal sector, up-gradation of old and dilapidated areas of the city. Provision of infrastructure services, conservation and preservation of Delhi's heritage and environment - Doing the above within a framework of sustainable development, public private and community participation

- The vision of Master Plan of Patna should be to make it a National level Competitive City and Regional Trade Centre in Eastern India by next two decades - The main objective of the Master Plan is to ensure improved quality of life for present and future mainly through allocation of land for various uses, Provision of quality physical and social infrastructures.

- Vision should be to make Patna a great river city with focus on Tourism, Health, education and IT sector. - To be a major source of young and skilled workforce for the whole world. - To make Patna smart, competitive and sustainable city.

Area of Focus - Unauthorized colonies and jhuggi jhompri settlements - Redevelopment of the existing urban areas and city improvement - Growth of automobiles in Delhi - Finalize all Zonal Plans within a year of notification of MPD-2021.

- Draft Master Plan prepared with Generic approach.

- Proper Zoning policy for land utilization - Provision for physical and social infrastructure as per URDPFI guidelines - IT enabled infrastructure

Methodology - The Ministry of Urban development issued guidelines for the preparation of the MPD 2021 - Seminars were organized on various aspects with experts and stakeholders, presentations made by DDA before various forums. - The success of Master plan policies and strategies depends on action plan timelines, periodic reviews and close monitoring.

- The project is the revision of Patna Master Plan 2021. - The methodology includes baseline information on population characteristics and its socio-economic attributes, proposing land utilization details Analysis of existing situation & Future projections - Updated Base Map and Existing Land Use Map

- Methodology should be aligned with the current URDPFI guidelines 2014 - Development aims and objectives - Development proposals Resource mobilization proposals Implementation, Monitoring and review - Emphasis on phasing and follow up actions - Emphasis on IT enabled system

Contd.

Annexure 3.3

5th SFC (2015-20)

Master Plan Delhi Draft Master Plan Patna Suggestions for Patna master plan Socio economic scenario

Demography - As per 2001 Census, NCT of Delhi had a total population of 138 lakh. NCT Delhi is highly urbanized with 93.18% of its population living in urban areas as against the national average of 27.81%. - Population estimates at five year intervals

- PPA has population of 28.74 lakh as per 2001 census. - The population density of PPA is 2,475 persons per sq.kms. - Nearly 12% of PPA population belong to SC category while only 0.1% belongs to ST category - Population estimates at ten year intervals

- Provision for Migration, Floating population - Age, Gender wise Population projection. - Projected density area wise under PPA

Work Force and Occupation - Workforce participating rate of population is 32.72 % as per census 2001. - With generation of employment in different sectors and assigned population of 220 lakh the participation rate for 2021 would be 38.1 percent in NCTD.

- 28% of the total population comprises working population. - In the PPA region, of the total main workers, 37% are engaged in primary sector and related activities whereas the remaining 63% are engaged in secondary and tertiary sector

- Details on employment generation strategies and types of employment - Workforce needed by 2031 to sustain the pace of urbanization - Projected contribution of private and public sector in employment generation

Land use plan - Suggested Zonal development plans and special area regulations - Decentralized local area planning by participatory approach - Planned Areas: Major Transport Corridor, underutilized areas, commercial centres, Industrial areas and resettlement colonies. - Unplanned Areas: unauthorized colonies and JJ Clusters.

- Classification is done in various zones. Details about the extension and proposed land are not given - Projections needed for year 2031are mentioned following the provisions in guidelines

- Concept of hierarchy of planning units and spatial development of various activity nodes, facility centers and network of roads - With limited land resources, trade-offs have to be made between different land uses. - Objective should be to Conserve and enhance natural or scenic resources. - Zoning regulations for proposed land use categories

- Land use policy - Mixed use of residential and commercial spaces

2183 streets have been notified by the GNCTD (Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi) for local commercial and mixed-use activities.

General stores have been permitted on ground floor, in residential areas

Mention of mixed land use for transit oriented development

No mention of this considering horizon year of 2031

Should discuss mixed land use of residential and commercial space in detail.

It should include policies and restrictions for mixed use of land.

Shelter/Housing

- Shift from plotted housing to group housing - Private sector participation for development / redevelopment of housing; - Enhancement of ground coverage, FAR and height for all categories of residential plots.

- No study on proposed housing needs - Only theoretical mention of UDPFI guidelines as to show projected population growth - Study of housing in Ahmadabad shown as reference which has to be incorporated

- Existing housing pattern and projections.( both Government & Non-Government) - Classification of residential area on the basis of density. - Existing rules and regulations & need for amendment in these rules and regulations. - A special rent regulation for Migrants/ floating population

Contd.

(ii)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Master Plan Delhi Draft Master Plan Patna Suggestions for Patna master plan Housing for poor

- Mandatory provision for EWS (Economically Weaker Sections) housing and development control norms to make housing viable and economical. - Housing for urban poor to the extent of 50-55% of total.

- No proposals for housing for poor , slum rehabilitation

- Mapping of slums, squatter settlements/JJ clusters, other informal settlements - Provision for orphan homes, old age homes etc. - Slum redevelopment with private sector participation

Unauthorized colonies

- Unauthorized colonies, to be regularized as per government policy, should be effectively incorporated in the mainstream of urban development.

- No study on unauthorized colonies.

- Un-notified Slums should also be taken into account for a proper spatial planning

Trade and commerce

- Norms for Service Markets & Organized Informal Bazaars - District & Community Centres to be developed as facility corridors along major transport networks for synergy between public transport and work centres. - Development of Integrated Freight Complexes / Wholesale markets.

- No proposals for Community Centres, freight complexes, wholesale markets - No mention of any proposal for improvement in infrastructure or any other facility leading to better trade and commerce situation

- Projections for commercial activities & classification of commercial places based on activities. - Projected commercial infrastructure needed for this Agri-market, wholesale market etc. should be taken in to account under spatial planning.

Informal sector - Earmarking of 'Hawking' and 'No Hawking' Zones at cluster levels. - New areas for informal trade to be developed and integrated with housing, commercial, institutional and industrial areas.

- No mention of informal sector - Earmarking of 'Hawking' and 'No Hawking' Zones missing

- Detailing on vending zones and footpath market and Local Market - Projection on infrastructure required.

Industry - Modernization and up gradation of existing industries. - Proposed eco-friendly schemes - Inclusion of new activities like IT industry.

- No proposal for areas, special provisions for industry sector or industrial corridors - Only mention of existence of BSEDC for IT sector

- Categorization of industrial estate on the basis of pollution/hazard. - Land Conversion policies. - IT/BPO industry should be focus area.

Contd.

(iii)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Physical infrastructure Water

- Delhi depends largely on river Yamuna and partially on river Ganga for its share of raw water. - It is projected that Water supply system in new areas should incorporate separate lines - The drains and waterfront can be landscaped in the form of interconnected parkways.

- The part of the town north of the railway line supplied with surface water from river Ganga, and south of railway line supplied by ground water from Tube wells. - Mention of current water supply system, issues involved and projected requirement of water in 2031.

- Water quality standards as prescribed by Indian standard organization - Land requirement for water supply system - Recycling of waste water - Infrastructure needed in future - Water treatment plant facility. - Achieve SLB

Sewage and Drainage

- Have discussed the current issues of sewage and drainage system - Sewerage Augmentation Plan for recycling infrastructure and decentralized treatments. - Bio-drainage, concept to link drainage with ecology and green networks

- Brief description about Decentralized Wastewater Management, Suggested to be used in rural areas. - Have discussed the current issues of drainage system but no definite projections. - Sewerage system has been discussed

- Selection of sewage treatment technology. - Discuss the benefits of reuse and recycle of sewage - Concrete projection of Drainage system because Patna has grave water logging and flooding problem

Solid waste management

- Decentralized methods of waste treatment, reduction, recycle and use, which include vermiculture, fossilisation and composting

- Existing scenario and issues involved are given but action plan only shows JNNURM guidelines. - Estimation of solid waste generation till 2031. - Proposed SWM landfill site is mentioned - Casual approach to Hazardous waste treatment

- Municipal solid waste management (MSWM) should be followed. - Provide details for whole SWM process i.e waste generation stage to waste disposal. - Detail analysis of Bio Medical waste and E-Waste

Power & Energy

- Plan gives emphasis on energy conservation, efficiency and alternative sources of energy. - All Thermal Power plants located in the NCT should be gradually converted to gas based plants. - The present total availability of power is 3170 MW. Projected requirement of power for Delhi in the year 2021, estimated by the Delhi Transco Ltd. is 11000 MW. - Proposals given to overcome future shortcomings and energy saving.

- Power for Patna Urban Area is supplied from the following power stations Paptratu , Khalgawar and Kanti - Details about electric substations

- Existing and projected energy demand, supply and supply gap - Infrastructure needed to match future demand - Alternative source of energy and Renewable source of energy

(iv)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Master Plan URDPFI Guidelines, January 2015, Vol 1 McKinsey Global Institute Framework

Purpose/ Definition

To prepare a comprehensive Development Plan for urban areas, Peri‐urban areas under control of Development authority/ Metropolitan Planning Committee.

-

Timeframe 20‐30 years (Review every 5 years) 20 years Contents

• Existing Conditions and Development Issues • Projected Requirements and assessment of

deficiencies • Development Aims & Objectives • Development Proposals • Resource mobilization • Implementation • Monitoring & Review

• socioeconomic forecasts • Economic development strategy • Broad ward-level land-use plan and FAR including

areas for regeneration and Greenfield expansion. • Key projects and policies with a sequencing and

funding plan in - Metropolitan transportation - Affordable housing - Education and health care - Environment and climate-change mitigation

Preparation and Approving Authority

Municipal Corporation/ Development Authority/ Metropolitan Planning Committee

Metropolitan Planning committee

CDP

URDPFI, Guidelines, January 2015, Vol 1

Toolkit for Preparation of City Development Plan, JNNURM April 2013

Purpose/ Definition

To identify the needs of the special areas which require special plan within the framework of the development plan/master plan.

A comprehensive document outlining the vision and development strategy for future development of the city, prepared in consultation with a wide range of stakeholders to identify the thrust areas to be addressed on priority basis in order to achieve the objectives and the vision. It thus provides the overall framework within which projects are identified and put forward in a City Investment Plan.

Timeframe 5‐20 year (within city utilities 30 year plan) 20 years horizon, but reviewed every 5 years Contents

• City Profile • City vision and development of goals and

strategies • Demographic Profile • Land Management and Urban Growth • Inner city, Economic Profile, Financial

Profile, Infrastructure, Environment Profile • Disaster Management, Urban Poor and Slum • Conservation and Heritage Management • Governance and Institutional Arrangement • Community Consultation • SWOT Analysis • Investment Framework, • City Investment Plan • Institutional Reforms

• Initiating the Process of CDP preparation • Formation of CDP Policy Committee & CDP

Technical Committee • Institutional Assessment • Stakeholder Consultation • Conducting Workshop • City Assessment • SWOT Analysis • Vision Formulation • Identification of Development Goals • Preparation of Sector Plans • Financial Assessment • Preparation of Financial Operating Plan • Finalization of CDP document • Finalization of Time Frame for Review and

Monitoring of CDP

Technical Planning Board

Metropolitan Authority

Guidelines of MOUD, GoI : Main reference document for Spatial Planning Annexure 3.4

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-20)

Approving Authority

Municipal Corporation/ Development Authority/ MPC

CDP Policy Committee + CDP Technical Committee

DPR URDPFI, Guidelines, January 2015, Vol 1 Toolkit for Preparation of DPR, JNNURM Purpose/ Definition

To focus on project related investments, costing and returns & for the studies required prior to or post plan formulation. This should be a continuous process to support planning and implementation at all stages and promotes innovation in practice.

The Detailed Project Report (DPR) is an essential building block for the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) in creating infrastructure and enabling sustainable quality service delivery. The DPR is to be prepared carefully and with sufficient details to ensure appraisal, approval, and subsequent project implementation in a timely and efficient manner

Timeframe 5‐20 year Depending upon projects Contents

• Location • Site Planning • Environment Impact Assessment • Spatial Impact Assessment • Financing Plan • Project Administration and Organisation • Legal Support / Constraints (if any)

• Sector background context & broad project rationale

• Project definition, concept and scope • Project cost • Project institution framework • Project financial structuring • Project phasing • Project O&M framework and planning • Project financial viability/sustainability • Project benefits assessments

Approving Authority

Municipal Corporation/ Development Authority/ MPC

ULB Committee

(ii)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Source: 12th Five year Plan

Suggested Reforms and Desired outcomes related to Civic Services as per the 12th Plan

Annexure 3.5

5th SFC (2015-20)

Annexure 3.6

Methodology of estimation of the urban space requirement

5th SFC (2015-20)

Service Level Benchmarks (SLBs) Key Performance Indicator Service Level Benchmark

A. Registration and Issue of Births / Deaths Certificate

1. Number of Birth/Death Registered as against applied for Registration

100%

2. Number of Birth/Death Registered as against actual number of Birth/ Death

100%

3. Timeframe for issuing a birth/ death certificate (New/ Modified)

Case 1: Timeframe for issuing a birth/death certificate (New/Modified) on registering online and on receiving the filled in application form and required proofs for applications within 21 days of birth - 1 day, for other cases – 5 working days from the receipt of all documents from the block. Case 2:Timeframe for obtaining birth/death certificate (New/Modified) after filled in application form and required proofs are submitted in physical format within 21 days of birth – 1 day, for other cases – 5 working days from the receipt of all documents from the block.

4. Digitization of legacy data 100 % records digitized in six months

B. Property Tax

1. Level of coverage in terms of property

Total number of properties registered in the assessed area should be 100% and this should be updated every year.

2. Number of properties recorded on GIS map, wherever applicable

100 %

3. Reassessment of Properties Every five year

4. Updating of self-assessment on ULBs website before the commencement of the financial year

100% Updation of guidelines before start of assessment year

5. Accessibility/ Availability of facilities for payment of property tax

Availability/Accessibility of Facilities: • Internet - 24*7 • Kiosk/ Citizen Facility Center- 9.00am to 8.00pm • Municipal Corporations/ Councils - Office hours

C. Water Supply 1. Coverage of Water Supply Connections 100 % over 10 years

2. Extent of metering of water connections 100 % over 10 years

3. Continuity of water supply 24 x7 over 10 years

4. Cost recovery in water supply services 100 %

5. Efficiency in collection of water supply related charges

90 %

D. Sewerage 1. Coverage of Toilets 90 % over 10 years

2. Coverage of sewage network services 100% over 10 years on the basis of GIS maps and contour

3. Collection efficiency of sewage network 24 x 7 over 10 years

4. Adequacy of sewage treatment capacity 100 %

5. Quality of sewage treatment 90 %

Contd.

Annexure 3.7

5th SFC (2015-20)

Key Performance Indicator Service Level Benchmark

6. Extent of reuse and recycling of sewage 20 % of total treated sewage

7. Extent of cost recovery in sewage management

100 %

8. Efficiency in collection of sewage charges 90 %

E. Drainage 1. Coverage of storm water drainage network 100 % over 10 years 2. Incidence of water logging/flooding 0 % w i t h s p e c i a l provisions of 40% for

ULBs along rivers F. Grievances and Suggestions 1. Resolution of complaints 100 % resolution within the timeframe mentioned in

resolution matrix 2. Level of awareness amongst citizens 100% awareness about the grievance cell and the arious

guidelines, regulations etc. of municipality G. Building Approvals 1. Coverage on GIS/ MIS platform Total number of building constructions that are approved

and digitized / maintained in database form as percentage of total number of buildings in the service area (100%)

H. Licenses 1. Generation of Receipt Number N u m b e r o f r e c e i p t / acknowledgement generated

automatically by the application software as percentage of total number of license applications applied for.

2. Timeframe for communicating deficiencyfound in received applications to Applicants

Within 3 working days

3. Timeframe for approval of New/ Renewal of licenses

10 working days

4. Coverage of Trades for Licensing 90 % I. Solid Waste Management 1. Household level coverage of solid waste

management services 100 %

2. Efficiency of collection of municipal solid waste

100 %

3. Extent of segregation of municipal solid waste

100 %

4. Extent of scientific disposal of municipal solid waste

100 %

5. Extent of cost recovery in SWM services 100 %

6. Efficiency in collection on SWM charges 90% J. Accounting System 1.

Accounts are updated in Ledgers with the Receipt of Taxes and Charges

Updation of Receipts of Taxes and Charges on software application system on the same day as against all receipts (100%) from various services

2. Payments to Vendors/Employees are posted into respective accounts

Payments updated on system as against all payments to Vendors/ Employees in the corresponding edgers on the same day of payment

3. Receivables are updated online on the same day on which demand is raised

Receivables updated in the application system as against all receivables (100%) updated online

4. Payables are updated on receipt of goods or services

Payables updated on system as against all Payables (100%) updated online on the same day on receipt of goods or services Contd.

(ii)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Key Performance Indicator Service Level Benchmark

5. Reconciliation of Subsidiary Accounts (Monthly)

Subsidiary accounts updated in the system as against all subsidiary accounts (100%)

6. Closure of book/ chart of accounts

The closure of books or chart of accounts should be done with 30 days of the end of the financial year

K. Personnel Information System 1. Coverage in terms of vailability of online

login facility 100 % Coverage

3. All the employee related information should be made available online

Time taken for updation of information in the ULBs database, as against maximum timeframe defined as benchmark. Some the important information mentioned below should be made available within the time frame set as benchmark • Salary and Increments/Additional pay – Within 5 working days • Time, Attendance and Leave Management–Within 2 working days • Loans & Advances–Within 5 working days • LTC details Within 5 working days • Service Register–Within 5 working days • Resignation, Retirement, Pension– Within 2 working days • Performance Appraisal–Within 5 working days • Seniority/Transfers–Within 2 working days

(iii)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Transport Performance Index for 30 Cities (May, 2011)

City Public transport accessibility index

Service accessibility index (per cent of work trips accessible in 15 minutes)

Congestion index

Walk ability index

City bus transport supply index

Safety index

Para-transit index

Slow- moving vehicle index

On-street parking interference index

Gangtok 0.00 94.12 0.21 0.30 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.59 Panaji 0.88 73.47 0.07 0.32 7.64 0.02 30.20 0.02 0.47 Shimla 0.70 76.84 0.13 0.22 8.66 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.54 Pondicherry 2.12 85.68 0.20 0.37 8.62 0.04 39.70 0.07 1.80 Bikaner 0.00 77.00 0.20 0.43 0.00 0.04 64.50 0.08 0.75 Raipur 0.00 93.27 0.30 0.41 0.00 0.02 104.00 0.10 0.67 Bhubaneswar 1.27 31.72 0.33 0.28 2.93 0.05 40.50 0.10 1.14 Chandigarh 1.64 83.13 0.00 0.91 17.54 0.08 75.10 0.08 0.66 Hubli-Dharward

0.97 43.68 0.23 0.39 15.15 0.04 86.85 0.09 0.63

Guwahati 1.22 56.00 0.33 0.39 5.55 0.03 52.50 0.09 1.37 Amritsar 0.00 68.85 0.20 0.31 0.00 0.06 91.30 0.09 1.24 Trivandrum 1.71 54.00 0.23 0.34 20.03 0.06 63.70 0.09 0.74 Madurai 2.13 69.50 0.10 0.40 42.77 0.11 53.70 0.08 0.69 Agra 0.00 57.30 0.07 0.38 0.00 0.14 35.70 0.10 2.42 Bhopal 0.95 45.00 0.20 0.47 12.82 0.08 79.70 0.08 1.09 Kochi 1.47 57.30 0.17 0.57 16.07 0.09 70.10 0.03 1.00 Patna 0.00 48.00 0.23 0.65 0.00 0.19 88.80 0.14 1.21 Varanasi 0.00 46.00 0.41 0.33 0.00 0.16 64.49 0.08 0.98 Nagpur 1.06 34.45 0.30 0.66 10.21 0.10 50.50 0.11 1.13 Jaipur 1.38 51.00 0.30 0.64 11.11 0.06 46.70 0.05 1.33 Kanpur 0.71 42.86 0.33 0.59 5.64 0.05 19.30 0.09 1.14 Surat 0.00 53.95 0.31 0.62 2.87 0.15 63.15 0.07 1.31 Pune 3.15 54.35 0.20 0.81 16.43 0.22 106.20 0.04 0.98 Ahmedabad 2.49 21.54 0.30 0.85 12.99 0.14 73.90 0.06 2.03 Hyderabad 1.62 6.08 0.37 0.68 31.88 0.06 76.60 0.03 1.24 Chennai 1.38 12.00 0.37 0.77 33.39 0.07 64.18 0.04 1.26 Bangalore 1.01 13.00 0.40 0.63 39.22 0.11 89.70 0.02 1.28 Delhi 1.09 16.36 0.47 0.87 43.86 0.32 75.60 0.04 2.82 Kolkata 1.12 14.00 0.40 0.81 26.20 0.08 28.50 0.03 3.00 Mumbai 1.34 17.00 0.47 0.85 16.66 0.25 88.30 0.03 2.80 Source: Ministry of Urban Development and Wilbur Smith Associates

Annexure 3.8

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-20)

Transport indices are defined as: • Accessibility index (public transport): Inverse of the average distance (km) to the nearest bus stop or railway station. • Account liability Index • (Service): Percent of work trips within 15-30 minutes travel time. • Congestion index: Defined as = 1-(A/M), where A= average peak-hour speed on major city corridors M= desirable average peak-hour speed on major city corridors (assumed @ 30 kmph) • Walkability index: Calculated as = [(w1 x availability of footpath) + (w2 x pedestrian facility rating)] w1, w2 are assigned parametric weights (assumed @ 50 per cent for both); availability of footpath: footpath length/length of major roads; and pedestrian facility rating: score based on opinions on available pedestrian facilities. • City bus supply index: City bus fleet (public + private) per 100,000 population • Safety index: is defined as = 1/accident fatality index • Accident fatality index: Number of road accident deaths per 100,000 population • Para-transit index: Number of para-transit vehicles per 100,000 population • Slow-moving vehicles index: Computed as = [(w1 x availability of cycle tracks) + (w2 x slow-moving vehicle share in trips)]; w1, w2 are parametric weights (assumed @ 50 per cent for both) • On-street parking interference index: is defined as = 1/ (w1 x % of major road length used for on-street parking + w2 x on-street parking demand on major roads) w1, w2 are parametric weights (assumed @ 50 per cent for both)

(ii)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Integrated Multi Modal Transportation System (IMMTS) • Co-ordinated use of two or more modes of transport for speedy, safe, pleasant and comfortable movement of

passengers in urban areas. • convenient and economical connection of various modes to make complete journey from origin to destination. • increased capacity, efficient access and better location of both integration and nodes. • Public transport is an important constituent of multi–modal transportation system • In IMMTS, integration of various modes should be in such a way that commuters do not have to walk more than 500 mt. to reach public transport. commuters not spend too much time at interchange

National Urban Transport Policy, 2014. • Multi-modal integration means all modes work in unison to provide seamless connectivity to commuters.

Multi-Modal Integration is not limited to integration of buses with Metro rail. It includes integrating private modes of transport i.e. walk, cycle, cars and 2-wheelers and para transit modes i.e. tempos, autos, mini bus and cycle rickshaw to the mass rapid transit network. The cities/states would also be encouraged to adopt National Common Mobility Card named ‘’More’’ which should be a fare payment medium across different operators, different modes including parking, toll, etc. in all cities in India.

India Transport Report- MOVING INDIA TO 2032- Volume I (Executive Summary) National Transport Development Policy Committee • The most important aspect is multimodal integration: physical integration, network integration, fare

integration, information integration and institutional integration. Besides the passenger information display system, integrated ticketing for all modes (common mobility card) and interchange facilities, use of intelligent transport system, facilities for the handicapped, safety and security against hooliganism, vandalism and terrorism, national public transport helpline number are critical to promote public transport and should be a part of planning. It is essential to improve the quality of all types of buses so that they are seen as a high mode of transport.

World Bank Papers on Urban Transport Sector by Ken Gwilliam • Efforts to secure multimodal integration need to be carefully managed to ensure that these efforts do not

increase the number of times poor people must pay per trip, and that fares on the services on which they are particularly dependent do not increase.

Integration Characteristics Network 1. BRTS 2. MRTS 3. River ways 4. Para-Transit 5. Non Motorized Vehicles Fare • Integrated Ticketing System Information • Traveler Information Services (TIS) Physical • Provision of transfer facilities among modes such as covered link ways, overhead bridges,

under passes, bus shelters, taxi stands, etc. Financial • Sharing of budget allocation and cost sharing among various agencies.

• PPP Institutional • One Controlling Authority above all

Components Planning Approach Role of ULBs Challenges

• Transport Supply • Travel Demand • Transport Services • Traffic operation • Travel Information and

Guidance • Inter-organization Co-

ordination

• Integration of Land use and Transport

• Transit Oriented Development

• Comprehensive mobility Plan

• URDPFI guidelines, 2014

• restricting on- street parking • prohibiting entry of low

occupancy vehicles in congested areas/roads

• higher penalty charges for violation

• increasing tax on personalized vehicles

• Multiple agencies, jurisdictions, modes, disciplines

Salient aspects of Integrated Multimodal Transport System

Annexure 3.9

5th SFC (2015-20)

1. Case for 100 Smart Cities to be covered under

AMRUT Mission: For sustainable institutional strengthening and improvement of governance and capacities of cities, all selected Smart city mission cities should be made automatically eligible for AMRUT, where reforms are an integral component of mission. It is suggested that under section 2.1 of AMRUT Guidelines, Smart cities should be explicitly included in the planned 500 cities covered under AMRUT.

2. Conditions precedent ( Annexure 3.3 Challenge Stage I): • State Undertaking to make city Smart (Form 1, Part 3): It should include State Government’s commitment on equal amount contribution as provided by Central Government for the Smart Cities development and should ensure operational independence and autonomy of SPV in decision making and mission implementation. • Elected City Council’s Resolution (Form 2, Part-5): It must include a clause to agree to the contents regarding delegation of council’s rights and obligations to SPV and its CEO with respect to Smart City Project.

3. Scoring Criteria • Existing Service Levels (Form 2, Part 3): Monthly e-newsletter This vague criteria could be replaced by relevant criteria, like “ Did ULB publish on its website the Service Level benchmarks for essential municipal services” or “ Did ULB achieve the Service Level benchmark set for FY 14-15” with provision for differential score grading. • Institutional Systems/ Capabilities (Form 2 Part 7): Levy of compensatory penalty for delays in service delivery As ULBs are not directed to levy penalty for delay in service delivery, this criteria may be replaced by, “Is Participatory, outcome based budgeting practice used by ULB” or “Is model municipal accounting manual used by ULB for accounting” or “Is ULB’s accounts completed unto end of last month”. • Self-Financing (Part 9): Payment of Salaries Most ULBs have huge arrears of salary and pensions persisting, therefore criteria should have been “Payment of all arrears of salary and pensions by ULB up-to end of last month.” (Part 10): Audit of Accounts up to FY 12-13 It is more suited to be included under “Institutional Systems and Capabilities.” Or, it

may be replaced by following: “Project completed by ULB in last three years, where the total project cost is fully linked with revenue sources”, “Financing of any capital works project by ULB in the last three years through SPV or through issuance of Tax –free Municipal Bonds or PFDF Scheme or through external finance from a private or public financial institution or mix of above”. Past Track record and reforms- Part 14 and Part 15 Non-JnNURM cities may be considered out of total 80 score only and may be adjusted upwards as against total score of 100 as these two criteria place almost all cities at a comparative disadvantage by allocating maximum 20 score against 66 JnNURM cities. 4. Annexure 7: Mission Outcomes Some examples of relevant and appropriate outcomes at each Smart City level, which may be considered, could be as follows: 1. SPV set up and fully operational by specific target date 2. X acres or sq. meters of retrofitting with core infrastructure elements and smart solutions 3. X acres or sq. meters of redevelopment with core infrastructure elements and smart solutions 4. X acres or sq. meters of Greenfield (new areas) development with core infrastructure elements and smart solutions 5. X unit of affordable houses with smart solutions 6. Intelligent and efficient traffic management system in the city 6.1 Rehabilitate xx blocks of arterial streets and xxx blocks of residential streets annually 6.2 Maintain roadway capacity to ensure that average vehicle delay does not exceed xx seconds per vehicle on arterials within the central core and xx seconds per vehicle on arterials in the outlying area 6.3 Increase the average number of lane miles of new arterials constructed to xx lane miles per year 6.4 Increase the level of durable pavement markings by xx% 6.5 Maintain 100% compliance with Government standards for traffic control signs by replacing an average of 2,000 signs annually etc.

Annexure 3.10

Summary of Suggested changes on “Smart City Mission Statement and Guidelines”

5th SFC (2015-20)

S.No. City Sector w.s. s.s. dn. pos. ut. swm sif. si. ht. ed. sl. ev. isu. rf. cb. up. T. T.(lk.) Popl Pn(lk.) PCCDP 275 197 7 196 64 14 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 761 76116 29,115 UDD 137 314 93 1 1 545 54500 20,847 CDP 164 89 6 185 25 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 488 48837 19,379 UDD 69 249 7 1 327 32673 12,965 CDP 62 312 227 179 264 96 70 32 9 0 250 0 0 10 0 1510 151042 37,747 UDD 0 480 228 10 1 719 71925 17,975 CDP 208 147 13 188 33 25 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 620 62022 20,864 UDD 208 357 66 2 1 633 63333 21,305 CDP 42 333 118 116 22 40 179 12 216 0 12 0 6 0 0 1095 109476 36,980 UDD 50 355 166 1 1 572 57240 19,335 CDP 137 140 57 287 69 36 47 63 49 10 0 0 0 0 4 899 89903 18,963 UDD 352 290 5 1 649 64880 13,685 CDP 137 142 100 145 6 175 176 0 3 14 82 10 0 0 0 991 99106 41,152 UDD 166 241 81 6 1 495 49454 20,535 CDP 26 5 98 100 0 0 197 93 304 0 5 0 6 0 0 833 83332 39,066 UDD 99 354 372 2 30 856 85585 40,122 CDP 5 445 149 167 22 106 106 12 306 0 4 0 6 0 0 1327 132729 37,445 UDD 82 205 12 1 300 29967 8,454 CDP 0 789 462 3219 0 460 0 240 17 0 282 42 0 0 0 5511 551066 32,718 UDD 427 1500 135 56 30 2148 214775 12,752 CDP 104 171 115 117 9 134 168 0 3 27 1 0 12 0 0 861 86071 30,495 UDD 218 282 214 14 1 730 72951 25,846 CDP 54 37 20 79 23 17 61 3 36 3 0 0 3 0 0 336 33646 32,908 UDD 83 82 39 1 1 206 20622 20,169 CDP 29 167 50 84 5 76 123 10 91 0 3 0 5 0 0 641 64127 48,504 UDD 100 159 72 13 1 344 34420 26,035 CDP 227 115 17 173 24 50 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 610 61046 30,168 UDD 151 86 108 3 1 349 34895 17,245 CDP 0 64 9 158 0 175 76 0 1 2 131 11 0 0 0 626 62625 34,328 UDD 69 219 105 1 1 395 39470 21,636 CDP 96 80 48 43 7 113 52 19 0 26 0 2 0 0 13 498 49836 36,315 UDD 83 138 96 1 1 319 31881 23,231 CDP 222 129 26 232 50 27 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 696 69570 47,106 UDD 80 121 20 1 222 22172 15,013 CDP 138 99 68 68 78 40 56 12 2 0 2 0 0 6 0 569 56930 53,996 UDD 28 127 90 1 1 247 24654 23,383 CDP 37 102 71 227 5 102 170 0 2 16 55 12 0 0 0 799 79928 75,559 UDD 62 107 52 10 1 232 23189 21,921 CDP 2 172 67 91 9 123 57 99 101 0 3 0 6 0 0 728 72807 57,711 UDD 148 128 126 1 1 404 40395 32,019 CDP 321 168 274 161 103 96 94 5 7 0 7 0 0 10 0 1245 124544 79,560 UDD 164 188 175 3 1 530 52987 33,849 CDP 73 67 41 103 21 16 60 39 0 11 0 0 4 0 0 434 43441 29,470 UDD 118 147 163 1 1 430 42957 29,142 CDP 129 137 5 156 29 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 475 47536 35,195 UDD 47 132 69 3.30 1 252 25213 18,667 CDP 2489 4105 2048 0 6473 843 1933 1717 640 1147 109 838 78 47 26 17 22557UDD 2587 5745 3314 174 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11901CDP 1161 2768 1352 0 4899 513 1100 961 452 907 51 636 53 29 10 4 14897UDD 1455 4235 2098 116 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7973CDP 1328 1337 696 0 1574 330 832 756 187 240 58 202 25 18 16 13 7660UDD 1132 1511 1216 58 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3929

Bihar 297,268 2.973

Aarah 261,430 2.6

Begus. 252,008 2.520

Bhagal. 400,146 4.001

Katihar 240,830 2.408

Munger 213,313 2.133

Darbhn 296,039 2.960

Gaya 474,093 4.741

Purnea 282,248 2.822

Auranga. 102,244 1.022

Muzaffar. 354,462 3.545

Patna 1,684,297 16.843

105,434 1.054

Danapur 182,429 1.824

Dehri 137,231 1.372

Hajipur 147,688 1.477

Jamalpur

Bettiah 132,209 1.322

Chhapra 202,352 2.024

Non-corp

Saharsa 156,540 1.565

Sasaram 147,408 1.474

Siwan 135,066 1.351

Total

Total. corp

Kishan. 105,782 1.058

Motihari 126,158 1.262

12

21

22

23

16

17

18

19

20

1

2

13

14

15

6

7

8

9

10

3

4

5

11

Funding Proposed by UDD/SPUR for 23 AMRUT cities/towns (Rs. in Cr.)

Annexure 3.11

5th SFC (2015-20)

Ass. Enginner

A/C OfficerAssistt

Revenue Officer

Asst. SDO Community Organizer

Senior Assistant

Assistant Junior Assistant

Sub Engineer

Sanitary Supervisor

Sanitary Inspector

Asst. Town Planner

Town Planning Inspector (Building)

Leading Fireman

Fireman Rev Inspector

Tax Assistant

Accountant Total p.a. (in Cr.) **

5 Years Total

(in Cr.)

Sr. No. 587160 587160 587160 377460 377460 377460 377460 377460 377460 377460 377460 377460 377460 377460 377460 377460 377460 3774601 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

1 Patna 7611804 17 8 15 17 34 17 34 84 67 17 56 34 34 34 67 21 84 17 25.9 129.7

2 Bihar Shariff 7611804 3 1 3 3 6 3 6 15 12 3 10 6 6 6 12 4 15 3 4.6 23.2

3 Arrah 7611804 3 1 2 3 5 3 5 13 10 3 9 5 5 5 10 3 13 3 4.5 22.3

4 Gaya 7611804 5 2 4 5 9 5 9 24 19 5 16 9 9 9 19 6 24 5 7.5 37.5

5 Bhagalpur 7611804 4 2 3 4 8 4 8 20 16 4 13 8 8 8 16 5 20 4 6.8 34.0

6 Muzzaffarpur 7611804 4 2 3 4 7 4 7 18 14 4 12 7 7 7 14 4 18 4 5.9 29.3

7 Darbhanga 7611804 3 1 3 3 6 3 6 15 12 3 10 6 6 6 12 4 15 3 4.6 23.2

8 Katihar 7611804 2 1 2 2 5 2 5 12 10 2 8 5 5 5 10 3 12 2 4.1 20.6

9 Begusarai 7611804 3 1 2 3 5 3 5 13 10 3 8 5 5 5 10 3 13 3 4.4 21.9

10 Purnea 7611804 3 1 2 3 6 3 6 14 11 3 9 6 6 6 11 4 14 3 4.6 23.2

11 Munger 7611804 2 1 2 2 4 2 4 11 9 2 7 4 4 4 9 3 11 2 3.8 18.8Total 76.7 383.6

Manpower Costing for Nigams as per Model Municipal Cadre Annex 3.12A

Nagar Nigam

nnual Salary --

ExpenditurePost Annual Req for common

Posts

Sr. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Common Post

Municipal Commissio

ner

Additional Commissio

ner

Dy. Commiss

ioner

Assis. Commissi

oner

Social Dev

Officer

Executive Enginner

Sanitary Officer

Fire Officer

E - Governance Officer

Revenue Officer

Sn. A/C Officer

MIS Associate Cashier Total

No. of Post

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3

Annual Salary

620712 620712 587160 587160 587160 587160 587160 587160 587160 587160 587160 377460 236160

Total Annual Req.

620712 620712 587160 587160 587160 587160 587160 587160 587160 587160 587160 377460 708480 8E+06

List & Cost of Common Posts for all Nagar Nigams (in Rs)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Sr. No

.Nagar Parisad

Cost of common

Posts

Assis. Enginee

r

Assistant

Jr. Assistan

t

Tax Assista

nt

Accountant

Total p.a. (in Cr.)

5 Years Total (in

Cr.)587160 377460 377460 377460 377460

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 Barh 8975160 1 1 3 4 1 1.30 6.52 Khagaul 8975160 0 1 2 3 1 1.19 5.93 Danapur 8975160 2 4 9 12 4 2.08 10.44 Mokama 8975160 1 1 3 4 1 1.29 6.55 Masaurhi 8975160 1 1 3 4 1 1.29 6.46 Phulwari Sharif 8975160 1 2 4 5 2 1.43 7.17 Buxur 8975160 1 2 5 7 2 1.57 7.88 Dumraon 8975160 1 1 3 4 1 1.25 6.29 Sasaram 8975160 1 3 7 10 3 1.86 9.3

10 Dehri Dalmiya Nag 8975160 1 3 7 9 3 1.79 8.911 Bhabhua 8975160 1 1 3 3 1 1.22 6.112 Hilsa 8975160 1 1 3 3 1 1.23 6.113 Jehanabad 8975160 1 2 5 7 2 1.57 7.814 Aurangabad 8975160 1 2 5 7 2 1.56 7.815 Nawada 8975160 1 2 5 7 2 1.53 7.716 Arval (Created in 2 8975160 1 1 3 3 1 1.23 6.217 Sitamarhi 8975160 1 1 3 5 1 1.34 6.718 Hajipur 8975160 1 3 7 10 3 1.86 9.319 Motihari 8975160 1 3 6 8 3 1.72 8.620 Raxaul 8975160 1 1 3 4 1 1.26 6.321 Bettiah 8975160 1 3 7 9 3 1.76 8.822 Bagaha 8975160 1 2 6 8 2 1.63 8.123 Narkatiaganj 8975160 0 1 2 3 1 1.22 6.124 Sultanganj 8975160 1 1 3 4 1 1.24 6.225 Benipur (Created in 8975160 1 2 4 5 2 1.39 6.926 Madhubani 8975160 1 2 4 5 2 1.39 6.927 Samastipur 8975160 1 1 3 5 1 1.34 6.728 Jamalpur 8975160 1 2 5 7 2 1.58 7.929 Lakhisarai 8975160 1 2 5 7 2 1.55 7.730 Sheikhpura 8975160 1 1 3 4 1 1.31 6.531 Jamui 8975160 1 2 4 6 2 1.47 7.332 Khagaria 8975160 0 1 2 3 1 1.22 6.133 Beehat (Created in 8975160 1 1 3 5 1 1.34 6.734 Barauni (Created in 8975160 0 0 0 0 0 0.90 4.535 Chapra 8975160 2 4 10 13 4 2.21 11.136 Siwan 8975160 1 3 7 9 3 1.78 8.937 Gopalganj 8975160 1 1 3 4 1 1.34 6.738 Saharsa 8975160 2 3 8 10 3 1.92 9.639 Madhepura 8975160 1 1 3 4 1 1.25 6.340 Supaul 8975160 1 1 3 4 1 1.32 6.641 Araria 8975160 1 2 4 5 2 1.41 7.142 Forbesganj 8975160 1 1 3 3 1 1.23 6.143 Kishanganj 8975160 1 2 5 7 2 1.59 7.9

Total 62.91 314.57

Manpower Costing for Nagar Parishads as per Model Municipal Cadre

Annex 3.12 B

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-20)

Sr. No. Common PostNo. of Post

Annual Salary

Annual Requirement

1 Assistant Commissioner 1 587160 5871602 Executive Enginner 1 587160 5871603 E- Governance Officer 1 587160 5871604 Accounts Officer 1 587160 5871605 Asst. Revenue Officer 1 587160 5871606 Asst. SDO 1 377460 3774607 Community Organizer 2 377460 7549208 Senior Assistant 1 377460 3774609 Sub Engineer 2 377460 754920

10 Sanitary Supervisor 1 377460 37746011 Sanitary Inspector 1 377460 37746012 Asst. Town Planner 1 377460 37746013 Town Planning Inspector 2 377460 75492014 Leading Fireman 1 377460 37746015 Fireman 2 377460 75492016 MIS Associate 1 377460 37746017 Rev Inspector 1 377460 377460

8975160Total

List & cost of Common Posts for all Nagar Parisads (in Rs)

(ii)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Sr. No.

Nagar Panchayat No. of Wards

Area (Sq km)

Pop '2011 (in Lakh)

Annual Req for common

Post

Jr. Assistant

Tax Assistant

Total p.a. (in Cr.)

5 Years Total

(in Cr.)

377460 3774601 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 Fatwah 23 4.90 50961 5150232 5 5 0.90 4.50

2Maner 19 12.00 40068 5150232 4 4 0.82 4.09

3Bakhtiarpur 20 13.18 47897 5150232 5 5 0.88 4.38

4 Khusrupur 10 4.23 15731 5150232 2 2 0.63 3.175 Vikram (Created in 2009) 14 22486 5150232 2 2 0.68 3.426 Bihta (Created in 2009) 5150232 0 0 0.52 2.587 Naubatpur (Created in 2009) 15 25011 5150232 3 3 0.70 3.528 Piro 17 6.47 33785 5150232 3 3 0.77 3.859 Behea 14 4.06 26707 5150232 3 3 0.72 3.5810 Jagdishpur 18 25.63 32447 5150232 3 3 0.76 3.8011 Koilwar 14 5.60 17725 5150232 2 2 0.65 3.2412 Shahpur 11 11.04 17767 5150232 2 2 0.65 3.2513 Bikramganj 23 15.64 48465 5150232 5 5 0.88 4.4014 Koath 12 5.87 18890 5150232 2 2 0.66 3.2915 Nokha 15 13.45 27302 5150232 3 3 0.72 3.6116 Nasriganj 14 23819 5150232 2 2 0.69 3.4717 Islampur 19 6.00 35641 5150232 4 4 0.78 3.9218 Silao 14 9.00 25674 5150232 3 3 0.71 3.5419 Rajgir 19 50.18 41587 5150232 4 4 0.83 4.1420 Makhdumpur 19 23.47 31994 5150232 3 3 0.76 3.7821 Bodh Gaya 19 19.58 38439 5150232 4 4 0.81 4.0322 Sherghati 20 10.79 40666 5150232 4 4 0.82 4.1123 Tikari 13 2.66 21324 5150232 2 2 0.68 3.3824 Rafiganj 16 4.56 35536 5150232 4 4 0.78 3.9225 Nabinagar 14 17.42 23984 5150232 2 2 0.70 3.4826 Daudnagar 23 13.96 52364 5150232 5 5 0.91 4.5527 Warisaliganj 20 31.11 34056 5150232 3 3 0.77 3.8628 Hisua 17 6.33 32585 5150232 3 3 0.76 3.8129 Rajauli (Created in 2009) 5150232 0 0 0.52 2.5830 Naugachhia 23 49069 5150232 5 5 0.89 4.4331 Kahalgaon 17 0.63 33700 5150232 3 3 0.77 3.8532 Banka 22 18.87 45977 5150232 5 5 0.86 4.3133 Amarpur 14 11.18 25336 5150232 3 3 0.71 3.5334 Bairgania 21 14.32 42895 5150232 4 4 0.84 4.1935 Belsand 13 10.09 20566 5150232 2 2 0.67 3.3536 Dumra 11 2.28 15674 5150232 2 2 0.63 3.1737 Janakpur Road 11 3.10 15129 5150232 2 2 0.63 3.1538 Motipur 15 12.77 28572 5150232 3 3 0.73 3.6539 Kanti 14 16.16 25051 5150232 3 3 0.70 3.5240 Sahebganj 13 23224 5150232 2 2 0.69 3.4541 Lalganj 19 7.86 37098 5150232 4 4 0.80 3.9842 Mahnar Bazar 23 10.02 48293 5150232 5 5 0.88 4.4043 Sheohar 15 9.33 28116 5150232 3 3 0.73 3.6444 Chakia 12 6.23 20686 5150232 2 2 0.67 3.36

Annual Salary --->

Manpower Costing for Nagar Panchayats as per Model Municipal Cadre

Annex 3.12 C

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-20)

Sr. No.

Nagar Panchayat No. of Wards

Area (Sq km)

Pop '2011 (in Lakh)

Annual Req for common

Post

Jr. Assistant

Tax Assistant

Total p.a. (in Cr.)

5 Years Total

(in Cr.)

45 Sugauli 20 19.25 38815 5150232 4 4 0.81 4.0446 Dhaka 20 12.93 42063 5150232 4 4 0.83 4.1647 Areraj 14 13.70 26014 5150232 3 3 0.71 3.5648 Kesaria 11 18984 5150232 2 2 0.66 3.2949 Mahesi 15 25995 5150232 3 3 0.71 3.5650 Pakaridayal (Created in 2009) 12 29582 5150232 3 3 0.74 3.6951 Madhuban (Created in 2009) 5150232 0 0 0.52 2.5852 Chanpatia 15 7.57 27095 5150232 3 3 0.72 3.6053 Ramnagar 23 16.20 48411 5150232 5 5 0.88 4.4054 Jainagar 14 1.55 21782 5150232 2 2 0.68 3.4055 Jhanjharpur 16 12.44 30590 5150232 3 3 0.75 3.7356 Ghoghardiha 11 8.73 18257 5150232 2 2 0.65 3.2657 Dalsinghsarai 14 2.94 23862 5150232 2 2 0.70 3.4858 Rosera 18 1.03 31155 5150232 3 3 0.75 3.7559 Haweli Kharagpur 18 9.74 31385 5150232 3 3 0.75 3.7660 Barahiya 24 26.54 43032 5150232 4 4 0.84 4.2061 Jhajha 22 9.87 40646 5150232 4 4 0.82 4.1162 Barbigha 23 15.60 46075 5150232 5 5 0.86 4.3163 Gogari Jamalpur 20 9.49 37753 5150232 4 4 0.80 4.0064 Bakhree (Created in 2009) 20 40043 5150232 4 4 0.82 4.0965 Tegharha (Created in 2009) 25 56234 5150232 6 6 0.94 4.7066 Balia (Created in 2009) 24 47550 5150232 5 5 0.87 4.3767 Sonepur 21 8.27 37776 5150232 4 4 0.80 4.0068 Dighwara 18 13.27 32741 5150232 3 3 0.76 3.8169 Madhaura 16 29932 5150232 3 3 0.74 3.7070 Revelganj 21 12.48 39039 5150232 4 4 0.81 4.0571 Maharajganj 14 7.60 24282 5150232 2 2 0.70 3.4972 Mairwa 13 6.23 23565 5150232 2 2 0.69 3.4673 Mirganj 16 5.48 26240 5150232 3 3 0.71 3.5774 Barauli 21 22.21 41877 5150232 4 4 0.83 4.1675 Kataiya 13 12.06 20193 5150232 2 2 0.67 3.3476 Birpur 13 8.67 19932 5150232 2 2 0.67 3.3377 Nirmali 12 5.30 20189 5150232 2 2 0.67 3.3478 Murliganj 15 14.07 28691 5150232 3 3 0.73 3.6679 Kasba 17 15.74 30421 5150232 3 3 0.74 3.7280 Banmankhi 17 20.15 30336 5150232 3 3 0.74 3.7281 Jogbani 19 15.12 39281 5150232 4 4 0.81 4.0682 Baadurganj 18 29.17 36993 5150232 4 4 0.79 3.9783 Thakurganj 12 10.46 18348 5150232 2 2 0.65 3.2784 Manihari 15 11.31 26629 5150232 3 3 0.72 3.58

62.69 313.47Total

(ii)

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-20)

Sr. No. Common PostNo. of Post

Annual Salary

Total Annual Req.

1Assistant Commissioner 1 620712 620712

2Community Organizer 1 377460 377460

3 Assistant 1 377460 3774604 Sub Engineer 1 377460 3774605 Asst. Town Planner 1 377460 3774606 Town Planning Insp 1 377460 3774607 Leading Fireman 1 377460 3774608 Fireman 2 377460 7549209 MIS Associate 1 377460 377460

10 Rev Inspector 1 377460 37746011 Accountant 2 377460 754920

Total 5150232

List of Common Posts for all Nagar Panchayats

(iii)

5th SFC (2015-20)

S. No. Designation Number

1 Municipal Commissioner 1 2 Additional Municipal Commissioners 3 3 Joint Commissioners 3 4 Chief Municipal Engineer 1 5 Chief Controller of Finance and Accounts 1 6 Deputy Commissioners 5 7 Planning Officer 1 8 Chief Municipal Architect and Town Planner 1 9 Municipal Health Officer 1 10 Estate Officer 1 11 Public Relation Officer 1 12 Municipal Law Officer 1 13 Vigilance Officer 1 14 OSD to Municipal Commissioner 1 15 Municipal Secretary 1 16 Director Urban Town Planning 1 17 Municipal Architect(Director) 1 18 Deputy Directors 6 19 Assistant Directors 12 20 Deputy Health Officer 1 21 Assistant Health Officer 2 22 Office Executive cum Computer Operator 120 23 Stenos 25 24 PA to Municipal Commissioner 1 25 Chief Account Officer 1 26 Budget and Finance Officer 1 27 Municipal Internal Auditor 1 28 Revenue Officers 3 29 Accounts Officers 3 30 Finance Executives 3 31 Auditors 3 32 Office Superintendent 1 33 Store In-charge 3 34 Record Room In-charge 3 35 Head Assistant/Head Accounts Assitant 51 36 Executive Officers 5 37 Tax Collectors 75 38 Sweepers 4000 39 Chaukidars 25 40 Pipeline Gang Coolies 10 41 Sewer Line Jamadars 10 42 Record Keepers 5 43 Sanitary Inspectors 250 44 Road Cutting Supervisors 5 45 Encroachment Inspectors 5 46 Assistant Storekeepers 5 47 Miscellaneous License Supervisors 35 48 Certificate Issuing Officers 5 49 Chief Sanitary Inspectors 25 50 Professional Tax Inspectors 10 51 Vehicle License Inspectors 10

Important recommendations on merger of PRDA and Water Board with PMC

Annexure 3.13

5th SFC (2015-20)

52 Account Clerks 70 53 Surveyors 68 54 Amins 55 Chain Man 50 56 Peons 276 57 Clerks 58 58 Health Supervisors 8 59 Community Mobilizers 50 60 Director Urban Poverty Alleviation 4 61 Draftsman 12 62 Architecture Assistant 6 63 Blue Printer 6 64 Superintendent Engineer 4 65 Executive Engineer 20 66 Assistant Engineer 61 67 Junior Engineer 168 68 Workshop Superintendent 1 69 Malis 100 70 Foreman 1 71 Mechanics 15 72 Assistant Mechanics 29 73 Electricians 25 74 Electric Mistries 50 75 Pipeline Inspectors 12 76 Chargeman 6 77 Helper/Welder/Latheman 12 78 Pipeline Mistry 36 79 Pipeline Khalasi 80 80 Pump Operator 150 81 Pump Khalasi 150 82 Cashier 1 83 Garden Supervisors 5 84 Compost cum Garden Development Officer 1 Total 6280

(ii)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Work Plan Status Current Status A. Urban Governance & Planning

(i) Drafting policies, strategies & guidelines,

• 3rd amendment to BMA 2007 in Dec 2013 ratified; introduction of Self-Assessment for property tax; notification of user charges in July 2013; Bihar Urban Planning Development Rules 2013

• 40% ULBs achieving new policy targets by 2012-14

• High degree of percolation in ULBs of policies-SAS

All the Interventions are ongoing

(ii) Institutional re-positioning,

• An agency appointed to run BUIDF focusing on funding through PPP

• UDHD approved BUDA restructuring • PMC restructuring based on High Court

order

All the Interventions are ongoing

(iii) Staffing of ULBs,

UTAST recommendations:- • Staffing rationalization; • Identification of dying cadres and

outsourced functions; • Staff numbers and Salary bands

determination.

All the Interventions are ongoing – recommendation submitted to UDHD

(iv) Training & capacity building,

(v) GIS mapping ,

• GIS mapping going for 12 additional towns other than 17 completed in 2013

• Municipal land mapping completed in 20 ULBs as part of FAR of ULBs as well GIS base maps

GIS Mapping Completed

(vi) E-Municipality,

• On-going E-Municipality intervention • UDHD wish to continue with present

systems to further habituate ULBs on reporting

In advanced stage of implementation

(vii) Grievance Redress; Citizen’s Charter,

• Role of Grievance Redress Cell was expanded to an ‘information center’ assisting in the roll out of the self-assessment system for filing property tax

• 89% calls of both enquiries and grievances resolved

• 50%, 72% and 32% complaints received from Corporations, Nagar Parishads and Nagar Panchayats resolved respectively

Cell remains operational

(viii) Creating urban • Centralized MIS operational going for 12 Cell remains operational

Contd.

Annexure: 3.14 Achievement of Support Programme for Urban Reforms (SPUR)

Table 1: Five distinct key outputs were identified as under:

5th SFC (2015-20)

Work Plan Status Current Status MIS. additional towns other than 17 completed

in 2013 B. Municipal Finance

(i) Developing Revenue Enhancement Plan(REP),

• 21.9% increase in actual per capita collections of property taxes against target for 2013-14

• Total collections increased by 159% in 2008-09 to 2013-14

• Own sources share in Establishment Expenditure is increase by 9% during 2012-13 to 2013-14

• Implementation of Trade License Fees in ULBs

• Formation of Revenue Enhancement Committees in ULBs

• 36% of Target (Based on GIS) and for FY 2015-16 achieved till Nov, 2015

• 91% of total collection of FY 2015-16 achieved in Nov, 2015.

• Mandatory Self -Assessment system of property tax.

• Proposed a one-time settlement scheme to clear backlogs of PT arrears.

• Prepared holding wise targets for individual tax collectors.

• Street announcement for payment of holding taxes.

• Arranging camps for payment of taxes.

• Arranging tenders/sairats for parking lots.

• Enforcements of Tax & Non-Tax Recovery Regulations.

• Regulation for Road cutting Charges

(ii) Accounting Reforms (DEAS),

• Formal notification for migration to DEAS effective 1st April 2014

• GoB in the process of scaling up support for DEAS in all ULBs of the state.

• Establishment of Municipal Accounting Committees in 18 ULBs

• Implementation of DEAS in 35 ULB in progress and for another 87 ULBs procurement progress is in final stage.

• A directive being issued to all 140 ULBs for constitution of MAC.

(iii) Revision of Manuals & Rules,

• Notification of the Bihar Municipal Accounting Rules 2014 replacing 1928 Rules

• BMAM; BMICM; BMBM; Bihar Municipal Accounts Rules 2014 prepared.

• All except BMAM approved by the cabinet, BMAM expected during 2014

BMAM was also approved by Cabinet.

(iv) Preparation of Minimum Accountability Achievement Plan;

• 85% SPUR ULBs achieved 50-75% of MAAP Benchmarking

Due to non-deployment of accounting staffs target of more than 75% benchmark in 21 ULBs could not be achieved. However, 25 ULBs achieved more than 50% PEMA benchmark.

(v) Comprehensive Fiduciary Risk

• Low, Medium or High, taken from the overall Output risk score calculated in

Done independently by DFID for their internal records

(ii)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Work Plan Status Current Status Mitigation Plan; ARIES.

(vi) Outcome Budgeting Manual;

• Approval of the Bihar Municipal Budget Manual by UDHD in February 2014

Budget for ULBs is being prepared on the basis of MANUAL. Additionally annual budget circular is also issued by UD&HD.

(vii) Action Plan for Public Finance Management,

• 60% of the municipal bodies achieved three-fourth of PFMA Benchmarks

Status of MAAP is annexed as Annexure-1

(viii) Internal audit.

• Recommendations for preparation of Municipal Internal Audit Manual and formation of Audit Committee at UDHD level to follow up on CAG Audit and Internal Audit Reports.

• External as well as Internal audit of accounts have been completed and reports shared with DFID.

• Bihar Municipal Internal Audit Manual Prepared.

• Internal Audit is also scaled for all ULBs and selection of CA firm is under process of technical evaluation.

C. Municipal Infrastructure (i) Self of

technically sound DPRs,

• State now has a substantial bank of DPRs for basic city level infrastructure.

(ii) Standard specifications for equipments; quality controls, design norms & standard drawings,

• Introduction of mandatory E-Procurement for all procurements above Rs 1 lakh.

This is mandatory as per GoB norms

(iii) Facilitate PPP for SWM & infrastructure,

• 2 PPP projects finalized- Modern Slaughter House for Patna & Waste to Energy plant for PUA- technical assistance through SPUR

• A Bus Terminus is also proposed to be developed on a PPP mode

• Sewerage projects under implementation in 6 towns.

Implementation responsibility lies with BUIDCo

(iv) Technical assistance to GoB to access funds from– NGRBA, JNNURM, ADB,

• 40 CSPs; 18 DPRs for SWM; 22 DPRs Sewerage; 8 DPRs for River Front Development (RFD) under preparation for funding under NGRBA or GoI

• The amount sanctioned for Bihar has shown a 349% increase from the initial allocation in 2008-09

No additional DPRs are being prepared in the state till these are implemented

(v) Environmental profiling & SLB

• World Bank approached for partially funding of Ganga Cleaning projects.

Contd.

Contd.

(iii)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Work Plan Status Current Status D. Local Economic Development (i) Preparation of

Bihar Urban Economic Vision and Local Economic Development Framework;

• Fully achieved embedding economic vision in the IU business plan.

• 70% (20 ULBs) completed municipal land mapping

Component has ceased to exist as a stand alone one with the introduction of NULM. All components under this component of SPUR under LED are now being implimented under NULM by the UDHD direct – SPUR has no role any longer. Stratagies demonstrated under SPUR have been adopted.

(ii) Urban Pro Poor Business/Micro Enterprise Development guidelines,

• Six Enterprise and Skills Development Centres were established.

• Project support to GoB for implementation of NULM.

(iii) Preparation of City Business Plans,

• DPRs for Economic Cluster development under preparation for two clusters (Printing in the Patna Urban Agglomeration and Litchi in North Bihar) as follow up to the CBP

(iv) Bihar Urban Street Vendor and Livelihood Protection Act;

(v) Guidelines for Operationalizing the Bihar Vending Rules and Regulations,

• GoB has notified the formation of ‘Town Vending Committees’ in all ULBs of the state

• Work has been initiated for formation of 42 Town Level and 1 State Level Federation of street vendors.

• 10 town level federations already been constituted.

(vi) Develop pilot vending zones in select ULBs;

• Feasibility studies for development of regularized vending zones approved by ULBs in 5 towns.

(vii) Market based skill training & Enterprise Development Centers,

• Skill training imparted to 11628 candidates (122% achievement)

• Enterprise training for 4829 candidates (161% achievement)

• Employment to 8125 candidates (90% achievement)

• 1044 micro-enterprise set up (95% achievement)

(viii) Designing PPP based projects for commercial utilization of municipal lands.

• 30% (8 ULBs) using municipal land for leveraging private investments unable to meet milestones

• Guidelines prepared, PPP Policy is not a government priority

• No progress of project ULBs issuing PPP contracts for service delivery

Contd.

(iv)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Work Plan Status Current Status E. Social Development, Poverty Alleviation & Livelihoods (i) Development of

State Slum Policy and related legislations,

•

Work continues with slum communities for their strengthening

(ii) Capacity building of ULBs to address urban poverty; demonstrate Gender Mainstreaming,

• Recommendations to organize a workshop on the Urban SHG movement initiated under SPUR as Jeevika is in the rural area by the end of December 2014.

(iii) Community organizations and micro-planning for infrastructure, livelihoods and access to social welfare schemes (SVS and SHG),

• SVS & SHGs have emerged as two functionally distinct but organically linked community structures that are recognized by the state and the ULBs

• SPUR initiated the urban SHG movement in Bihar

• UDHD issued a notification to ULBs to recognize the SVS as “community partner’s responsible” for construction of individual toilets and installation of hand pumps.

(iv) Technical assistance in planning and implementation of GoI supported schemes,

• 100% funds sanctioned for urban infrastructure.

• 50% of sanctioned funds utilized

(v) Effective linkages with Civil Society Forum and Ward Committees,

• Absence of any progress since election and creation of Ward Committees is outside the control of SPUR

• Focused on establishing platforms for community and ULB interface.

(vi) Create and maintain database on poor.

• Recommendations to develop a succinct document by end of December 2014.

(v)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Sl, Post No. Qualification Experience-Years

(Rs.in Lakhs)

1 Team Leader 1 MBA 5 1-1.50 Urban Governance - Expert 1 MBA 3 0.5-1.00 Municipal Finance Specialist 1 CA/MBA 3 0.5-1.00 Urban Planner 1 Master Degree in

Urban Planning 3 0.5-1.00

Urban Architect 1 Master Degree in Urban Planning & Architecture

3 0.5-1.00

E-Gov .Expert 1 MCA 3 0.5-1.00 GIS Specialist 1 Masters Degree in

GIS

3 0.5-1.00

Community Dev./Social Dev. Specialist

2 Masters Degree in Social Science

3 0.5-1.00

PPP Expert 2 MBA with PPP expertise

3 0.5-1.00

Procurement Expert 1 MBA with Procurement expertise

3 0.5-1.00

Urban Transport 1 MBA Expertise in Urban Transport

3 0.5-1.00

Municipal Engineer 1 Masters Degree in Civil Engineering

3 0.5-1.00

Administrative Officer 1 Graduate/Post Graduate

3 0.5

IT Assistant cum DEO 1 BCA 1 0.25 Office Executive 2 Graduate 1 o.25 Note-

1. Candidates must have obtained degree from reputed institution 2. Criteria of experience is relaxable in case of bright candidate 3. Selection of individual candidates would be decided by the selection committeebased on his/her

ability 4. Selection committee may be chaired by Principal Secretary with representatives of PRD and

Finance Department as members 5. Employment would be on 3 years contract subject to their continued good performance and

extendable as and when required

Bihar Urban Technical Support Team

Annexure 3.15

5th SFC (2015-20)

Section 127- 136 of the Bihar Municipal Act, 2007

127. Power to levy taxes.- (1) Subject to the provisions of section 10, the Municipality shall have, for the purposes of this Act, the power to levy the following taxes:- (a) property tax on lands and buildings. (b) surcharge on transfer of lands and buildings, (c) tax on deficit in parking spaces in any non-residential building, (d) water tax, (e) fire tax, (f) tax on advertisements, other than advertisements published in newspapers, (g) surcharge on entertainment tax (h) surcharge on electricity consumption within the municipal area, (i) tax on congregations, (j) tax on pilgrims and tourists, and (k) toll – (i) on roads, bridges, ferries and navigable channel and (ii) on heavy trucks which shall be heavy goods vehicles, and buses, which shall be heavy passenger motor vehicles, within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988, plying on a public street. (l) Tax on profession (2)Subject to the prior approval of the State Government, the Municipality may, for raising revenue for discharging its duties, and performing its functions, under this Act, levy any other tax which the State Legislature has the power to levy under the Constitution of India. (3) The levy, assessment and collection of taxes under this Act shall be in accordance with the provisions of this Act and the Rules and the regulations made there under, Provided that any person may make self-assessment and make payment of any levy or tax under this Act and rules and regulations made there under; Provided further that if any discrepancy or under-assessment is found in such self-assessment, such person shall be liable for payment of differential amount and a fine of not less than fifty percent and upto100% of such differential amount. (4)1) The holding in the Municipal area shall be classified by the Municipality on the following criteria:- (a) Situation of the holding – (i) Holdings on the Principal Main Road, (ii) Holdings on the Main Road,

(iii) Holdings other than sub-clauses (i) and (ii) (b) Use of the Holding – (i) Purely residential, (ii) Purely commercial or industrial (whether self owned or otherwise), (iii) Partly residential and partly commercial/industrial, (iv) All Holdings other than sub-clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) (c) Type of Construction – (i) Pucca building with R.C.C. Roof, (ii) Pucca building with asbestos/corrugated sheet roof, (iii) All other buildings not covered in sub-clauses (i) and (ii). (5) Subject to the approval of the State Government, the Municipality may from time to time, publish the list of principal main roads as well as main roads and if necessary modify the lists for the purposes of this Act. (6) For the purpose of calculation of Annual Rental value of a holdings measurement of carpet area shall be calculated as under :- (i) Rooms – Full measurement of Internal Dimension, (ii) Covered Verandah- Full measurement of Internal Dimension, (iii) Balcony/Corridor, Kitchen and Store- 50 per cent measurement of Internal dimension, (iv) Garrage- One-fourth measurement of internal dimension, (v) Area covered by bath room, latrines, portico and Staircase shall not form part of the Carpet area. (7) (i) The rate of rental value per sq. ft. shall be fixed by the Municipality with the prior approval of the State Government having regard to the situation, use and the type of construction of the holdings. (ii) The Annual Rental Value shall be commuted as a multiple of the Carpet area and the rental value fixed under sub-rule (1). (iii) The rental value per sq. ft. of carpet area for different classes of holdings shall be published from time to time by the Municipality with the prior approval of the State Government. (8) Tax shall be assessed on the basis of Annual Rental value on the following rates: (i) Holding Tax – at the rate of 2.5% per cent of Annual Rental Value,

Annexure 7.1

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-20)

(ii) Water Tax- at the rate of 2 per cent of Annual Rental Value, (iii) Latrine Tax- at the rate of 2 per cent of Annual Rental Value. (iv) Tax on any other item included in 12th schedule of the Constitution of India on such rate as prescribed. (9) The Municipality may revise the rate of Tax on Annual Rental Value with the prior approval of the State Government. (10) If any difficulty arises in giving effect to this section, the Government shall in consistent with the provisions of this section have power to issue any direction in the matter. 128 Power to levy user charges.-- The Municipality shall levy user charges for – (i) provision of water-supply, drainage and sewerage, (ii) solid waste management, (iii) parking of different types of vehicles in different areas and for different periods, (iv) stacking of materials or rubbish on public streets for construction, alteration, repair or demolition work of any type v) other specific services rendered in pursuance of the provisions of this Act, at such rates as may be determined from time to time by regulations. Provided that a Municipality may, having regard to the conditions obtaining in the municipal area, decide not to levy, or postpone the levying of, any of the user charges as aforesaid: Provided further that the State Government may direct the Municipality to levy any of the user charges as aforesaid, not levied, or postponed, by the Municipality. 129 Power to levy fees and fines.- The Municipality shall have the power to levy fees and fines in exercise of the regulatory powers vested in it by or under this Act or the rules or the regulations made there under for- (a) sanction of building plans and issue of completion certificates, (b) issue of municipal licenses for various non-residential uses of lands and buildings, (c) licensing of- (i) various categories of professionals such as plumbers and surveyors, (ii) various activities such as sinking of tube-wells, sale of meat, fish or poultry, or hawking

of articles (iii) sites used for advertisements or premises used for private markets, slaughterhouses, hospitals, nursing homes, clinics, factories, warehouses, god owns, goods transport depots, eating-houses, lodging- houses, hotels, theatres, cinema- houses and places of public amusement and for other nonresidential uses, (iv) animals, (v) carts or carriages, and (vi) such other activities as require a license or permission under the provisions of this Act, (d) issue of birth and death certificates. 130. Levy of surcharge on tax or fee.- The Municipality may levy a surcharge at the rate of 25 percent on a tax,or user charge, or fee or fines or on electricity consumption within the municipal area. 131. Power to levy development charge.- The Municipality may levy such development charge as may be determined by regulation, from time to time, on any residential building with a height of more than fourteen metres, or any non-residential building, having regard to its location along a particular category of street, its use characteristics, and sanctioned built up area. 132. Realization of tax fees cosset under any other law.- The Municipality may, if so authorized by any other law for the time being in force, realize any tax, development charge, cess, or fee, imposed under that law, or any dues payable under that law, in accordance with the provisions thereof. 133. Power to impose consolidated tax.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing sections, the Chief Municipal Officer, in lieu of imposing separately any two or more of the taxes described in section 127 subsection (1) or subject to anyone or more of the said taxes and a drainage tax, or surcharge, may, with the previous approval of the Empowered Standing Committee, impose a consolidated tax, at such rate as it deems fit, assessed on the annual value of holdings situated within the Municipality (2) Such consolidated tax shall be payable in such proportion by the owners and occupiers of holdings as the Chief Municipal Officer, may determine. 134. Holding occupied by more than one person.- When any holding is occupied by or let to two or more persons, being severally responsible for the maintenance or payment of

(ii)

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-20)

rent for the portions occupied, the Municipality may for the purposes of assessing such holding, either treat the whole there of as one holding, or, with the written consent of owner or owners of such holding, treat each of the said several portions therein or any two or more of several portions together, or each floor or flat as a separate holding. 135. Taxes by whom payable - Any tax which is assessed on the value of the holding shall subject to the provisions of sections 127 be payable by the owners and in his absentia the occupier of holdings within the Municipality. (2) Any tax which is assessed on without the annual value of holding shall be payable by the person sin actual occupation of the holding within the Municipality. 136. Duty on certain transfers of property– (1) In every municipality a duty shall be imposed on transfers of immovable property in accordance with the provision contained in sub-section (2). (2) The duty imposed by the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (II of 1899), as modified from time to time in its application to the State of Bihar, on instruments of sale, gift and usufructuary

mortgage, respectively or immovable property situated within the limits of a municipality and executed on or after the date on which the provision of this Act came into force within that municipality be increased by two per centum on the value of the property so situated, or in the case of an usufructuary mortgage, on the amount secured by the instrument, as set forth in the instrument. (3) On the introduction of the transfer duty - (i) Section 27 of the said Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (II of 1899) as from time to time so modified, shall be read as if it specifically required the particulars referred to therein to be set forth separately in respect of property situated within the limits of municipality and outside such limits respectively; and (ii) Section 64 of that Act, as from time to time so modified, shall be read as if it referred to the Municipality as well as the Government. (4) All collections resulting from the said increase shall, after the deduction of incidental expenses, if any, be credited to the municipal fund at such time as may be prescribed.

(iii)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Per Capita Investment (Rs.)

Expenditure (Rs in Cr.)

Sector /FY 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total Water Supply a. Capital Exp. 413 562.96 602.93 645.74 691.58 740.68 3243.89 b. O & M Exp. 41 55.89 59.85 64.1 68.66 73.53 322.03 Sewerage a. Capital Exp. 381 519.34 556.21 595.7 638 683.29 2992.54 b. O & M Exp. 23 31.56 33.8 36.2 38.77 41.52 181.85 Solid Waste Management a. Capital Exp. 32 43.14 46.21 49.49 53 56.76 248.6 b. O & M Exp. 13 17.11 18.32 19.62 21.02 22.51 98.58 Urban Roads a. Capital Exp. 1,861 2536.73 2716.83 2909.72 3116.3 3337.55 14617.13 b. O & M Exp. 32 43.62 46.72 50.03 53.58 57.39 251.34 Storm Water Drainage a. Capital Exp. 286 389.85 417.52 447.17 478.92 512.92 2246.38 b. O & M Exp. 4 5.45 5.84 6.25 6.7 7.17 31.41 Urban Transport a. Capital Exp. 436 594.04 636.21 681.38 729.76 781.57 3422.96 b. O & M Exp. 30 40.89 43.8 46.91 50.24 53.8 235.64 Traffic Support Infrastructure a. Capital Exp. 77 104.96 112.41 120.39 128.94 138.09 604.79 b. O & M Exp. 3 4.09 4.38 4.69 5.02 5.38 23.56 Street Lighting a. Capital Exp. 30 40.89 43.8 46.91 50.24 53.8 235.64 b. O & M Exp. 1 1.36 1.46 1.56 1.67 1.79 7.84 Total a. Capital Exp. 3,515 4,791.91 5,132.12 5,496.50 5,886.74 6,304.66 27611.93 b. O & M Exp. 147 199.97 214.17 229.36 245.66 263.09 1152.25 Projected Urban Population (Cr)

1.298 1.324 1.351 1.378 1.405 6.756

Source: - The per capita investment cost and per capita annual O & M cost is from DrIsherAhluwalia report on Indian Urban Infrastructure and Services. Important Note: Per capita expenditure and O&M expenditure indicated above is at FY 2014-15 prices. These needs to be adjusted for each FY with assumed increase of 5% over each previous year. Likewise, Urban Population is each city is be assumed to increase @ 2 % annually. Assumption

1. Annual inflation is assumed at 5% 2. Population growth is based on decadal growth rate of population in Bihar i.e. 2% per annum. 3. Per capita investment cost derived from Dr. IsherAhluwalia Report has been adjusted to prices for FY 2014-15 on the basis of Cost Inflation Index notified by CBDT for computation of capital gain.

Annexure 7.2 A

Capital and O & M Expenditure for Urban Services/ Infrastructure (2014-15) prices- UDD Approach

5th SFC (2015-20)

Per Capita Investment (Rs.)

Expenditure (Rs in Cr.)

Sector /FY 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total Water Supply a. Capital Exp. 413 563 609 658 712 770 3313 b. O & M Exp. 41 56 60 65 71 76 329 Sewerage a. Capital Exp. 381 519 562 607 657 710 3056 b. O & M Exp. 23 32 34 37 40 43 186 Solid Waste Management a. Capital Exp. 32 43 47 50 55 59 254 b. O & M Exp. 13 17 19 20 22 23 101 Urban Roads a. Capital Exp. 1,861 2537 2743 2967 3209 3470 14927 b. O & M Exp. 32 44 47 51 55 60 257 Storm Water Drainage a. Capital Exp. 286 390 422 456 493 533 2294 b. O & M Exp. 4 5 6 6 7 7 32 Urban Transport a. Capital Exp. 436 594 642 695 751 813 3495 b. O & M Exp. 30 41 44 48 52 56 241 Traffic Support Infrastructure a. Capital Exp. 77 105 114 123 133 144 618 b. O & M Exp. 3 4 4 5 5 6 24 Street Lighting a. Capital Exp. 30 41 44 48 52 56 241 b. O & M Exp. 1 1 1 2 2 2 8 Total a. Capital Exp. 3,515 4,792 5,182 5,605 6,062 6,556 28196 b. O & M Exp. 147 200 216 234 253 274 1177

Projected Urban Population (Cr) 1.298 1.337 1.377 1.419 1.461 6.892

Source: - The per capita investment cost and per capita annual O & M cost is from DrIsherAhluwalia report on Indian Urban Infrastructure and Services.

Important Note: Per capita expenditure and O&M expenditure indicated above is at FY 2014-15 prices. These needs to be adjusted for each FY with assumed increase of 5% over each previous year. Likewise, Urban Population is each city is be assumed to increase @ 3 % annually.

Assumption 1. Annual inflation is assumed at 5%

2. Population growth is based on decadal growth rate of population in Bihar i.e. 3% per annum. 3. Per capita investment cost derived from Dr. IsherAhluwalia Report has been adjusted to prices for FY 2014-15 on the basis of Cost Inflation Index notified by CBDT for computation of capital gain.

Annexure 7.2 B

Capital and O & M Expenditure for Urban Services/ Infrastructure (2014-15) prices- 5th SFC Approach

5th SFC (2015-20)

Sr. No.Items 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2010-15A Total Tax Revenue 68.01 86.15 103.28 134.62 128.77 520.831 Property Tax 46.49 58.61 64.71 77.53 74.50 321.832 Professional Tax 0.00 0.00 0.03 10.74 13.77 24.533 Non - Property Tax 21.53 27.54 38.54 46.36 40.50 174.465 Revenue Exp. 137.76 … 266.65 294.57 314.19 …1 Establishment Exp. 109.53 182.01 203.34 213.84 227.67 936.382 Program Exp. 10.45 13.86 19.07 29.56 29.80 102.743 O & M Exp. 14.36 … 37.68 31.99 48.55 …4 Finance & Interest Exp. 0.01 0.00 1.31 2.03 2.37 5.725 Other Revenue Exp. 3.42 … 5.24 17.16 5.80 …

C No. of PT Assesses at Year End 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.29

Total 28 SPUR ULBs (Rs Cr.)

Annexure 7.4

Annexure 7.3 Total Revenue and Expenditure of 28 SPUR ULBs (2010-15)

Revenue & Expenditure and Per Capita (2010-15) for all Nagar Nigams

Sr. No. Items

PMC Arah Biharsharif Gaya Katihar Purnea Begusari Bhagalpur Munger Muzaffarpur Darbhanga All 11 Nigams

A Total Tax Revene 168.02 17.31 12.90 44.79 19.56 16.02 13.44 35.55 16.77 37.42 25.36 407.131 Propery Tax 123.24 9.53 6.44 25.92 9.32 8.03 4.69 26.17 11.36 26.33 18.28 269.302 Profession Tax 5.88 0.88 1.00 1.67 0.86 0.92 0.91 1.50 0.92 1.31 1.15 17.023 Non - Property Tax 38.90 6.91 5.46 17.19 9.38 7.07 7.83 7.88 4.49 9.77 5.92 120.81B Revenue Exp. 452.14 47.56 46.96 117.89 22.14 30.10 30.34 95.98 43.22 67.50 64.34 1,018.181 Establishment Exp. 361.46 39.82 30.89 97.28 12.89 20.88 10.86 78.69 34.12 51.53 50.79 789.202 Program Exp. 12.29 4.64 9.57 6.53 0.96 0.81 11.10 9.16 7.04 1.07 0.50 63.663 O & M Exp. 66.65 0.95 3.12 13.07 7.21 5.84 6.91 8.04 1.96 13.57 11.96 139.284 Finance & Interest Exp. 0.01 0.00 1.44 0.74 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 2.415 Other Revenue Exp. 11.73 2.15 1.94 0.28 1.06 2.56 1.48 0.09 0.11 1.12 1.10 23.62C No. of PT Assesses at Year End 0.10 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.29

Sr. No. Items PMC Arah Biharshariff Gaya Katihar Purnea Begusari Bhagalpur Munger Mzpur Darbhanga

All 11 Nigams

A Total Tax Revene 200 132 87 189 162 114 107 178 157 211 171 1711 Propery Tax 146 73 43 109 77 57 37 131 106 149 124 1132 Profession Tax 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 9 7 8 73 Non - Property Tax 46 53 37 73 78 50 62 39 42 55 40 51B Revenue Exp. 537 364 316 497 184 213 241 480 405 381 435 4281 Establishment Exp. 429 305 208 410 107 148 86 393 320 291 343 3322 Program Exp. 15 35 64 28 8 6 88 46 66 6 3 273 O & M Exp. 79 7 21 55 60 41 55 40 18 77 81 594 Finance & Interest Exp. 0 0 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 Other Revenue Exp. 14 16 13 1 9 18 12 0 1 6 7 10C No. of PT Assesses at Year End 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Revenue and Expenditure (2010-15) of 11 Nagar Nigams (Rs Cr.)

Per Capita Revenue and Per Capita Expenditure (2010-15) all 11 Nagar Nigam

5th SFC (2015-20)

Annexure 7.5

Sr. No.

City & Town type

No. GoI GoB ULB Total GoI GoB ULB Total GoI GoB ULB Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 78=

(5+6+7) 9 10 1112=(9+10+11)

13= (5+9)*4

14= (6+10)*4

15= (7+11)*4

16= 13+14+15

Type 1 (Bhagalpur, Muzaffarpur)

2 500 (50%)

500 (50%)

0 100064 38 26 128

1128 1076 52 2256

Type 2 (Patna)1 0 485

(50%)485

(50%)970 64

(50%)38

(30%)26

(20%)128 64 524 512 1100

Type 3 (Gaya)1 0 220

(60%)150

(40%)370 64

(50%)38

(30%)26

(20%)128 64 260 176 500

Type 4 (Darbhanga, Purnea)

2 0 130 (60%)

90 (40%)

220 64 (50%)

38 (30%)

26 (20%)

128 128 340 232 700

Type 5 (Munger, Saharsa, Chhapra)

3 0 90 (70%)

30 (30%)

120 64 (50%)

38 (30%)

26 (20%)

128 192 372 186 750

Biharsharif Smart city type 1 1 500

(50%)500

(50%)0 1000

64 38 36 128564 538 26 1128

Type 112 64

(50%)38

(30%)26

(20%)128 768 456 312 1536

2Type 316 0 100

(80%)25

(20%)125 0 1600 400 2000

AMRUT city type 24 64

(50%)38

(30%)26

(20%)128 256 152 104 512

Non-AMRUT13 0 50

(80%)10

(20%)60 0 650 130 780

4N. Panchayat (87-2 = 85)

Non-AMRUT85 0 25

(80%)5

(20%)30 0 2125 425 2550

Total 140 3164 8093 2555 13812

Total for all cities

C.

3N. Parishads (42-25 = 17)

Per city Additional fund for AMRUT/city

A.1Divl HQs (9) as Smart Cities

B. Dist HQs as AMRUT (38-9=29)

Note: (1) indicates Already selected Smart City (3) & to be developed Smart City (7) are also covered under AMRUT city scheme. (2) indicates These are non-selected AMRUT cities. (3) shows 25 overlapped Dist HQs - Araria, Arwal, Aurangabad, Bettiah, Bhabhua, Buxar, Chhapra, Gopalganj, Hajipur, Jamui, Jehanabad, Khagaria, Kishanganj, Lakhisarai, Madhepura, Madhubani, Motihari, Nawada, Saharsa, Samastipur, Sasaram, Sheikhpura, Sitamarhi, Siwan, Supaul. & (4) shows Sheohar & Banka are overlapped Dist HQ. Amount rounded off to nearest 10.

Assumptions behind proposed funding for Smart Cities, AMRUT, & other Towns for 2015-20 (Rs in Cr)

Smart Cities, AMRUT Resource Requirement Calculations

List of Cities/ULBs category Sl. Model Cities & Towns Benchmark List 1 Smart city (3) GoI 1Bhagalpur, 2Muzaffarpur, 3Bihar sharif

2 Smart City + (1) Above 10 lakh Popul.

4Patna

3 Smart city 1 (3) Above 3 lakh 5Purnia, 6Darbhanga, 7Gaya,

4 Smart City 2 (3) Remaining Div HQs

8Munger, 9Saharsa, 10Chhapra

5 AMRUT city 1(12) AMRUT Dist HQ

11Ara, 12Begusarai, 13Katihar, 14Hajipur, 15Sasaram, 16Siwan, 17Bettiah, 18Motihari, 19Kishanganj, 20Jehanabad, 21Buxar, 22Aurangabad

6 AMRUT city 2 (4) Non-Dist AMRUT cities

23Dinapur Nizamat, 24Dehri, 25Bagha, 26Jamalpur

7 AMRUT city 3 (16) Remaing District HQ

27Araria, 28Arwal, 29Banka, 30Bhabhua, 31Gopalganj, 32Jamui, 33Khagaria, 34Lakhisarai,35Madhepura,36Madhubani,37Nawada, 38Samastipur, 39Sheikhpura, 40Sheohar, 41Sitamarhi, 42Supaul

8 Remaining ULBs (98) (a) Rem. N Parishads (13)

43Barh, 44Khagaul, 45Mokama, 46Masaurhi, 47Fulwarisharif, 48Dumraon, 49Hilsa, 50Raxaul, 51Narkatiyaganj, 52Benipur, 53Sultanganj, 54Bihta, 55Forbesganj

(b) *Rem. N Panchayats (85)

Total

140 *Except Sheohar & Banka

5th SFC (2015-20)

Item 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Total

I. Capacity Building

a. Man Power

b. Office Space

c. IT facility

d. Training

e. Others

II Regulatory

a. Licensing

b. Issuing Death & Birth Certificate

III O & M

a. Civic Services

b. Infrastructure

IV New Services

a. Drinking Water

b. Sanitation

c. Drainage

d. Street& lighting

V. Socio- eco develop

VI. Others

Requirement of resources form UDD as per the Commission’s format Annexure 7.6

5th SFC (2015-20)

Patna Municipal Corporation (Receipt and Expenditure)

Source – PMC Budget

Sl No Major Head Account

2013-14 (Actuals)

2014-15 (BE)

2015-16 (BE)

A Revenue Receipts1 Tax Revenue 34.62 88.34 84.15 2 Assigned Revenues & Compensations 48.93 70.00 49.00 3 Rental Income from Municipal properties 2.04 33.08 3.75 4 Fees & User Charges 4.48 12.73 6.14 5 Sales & Hire Charges 0.32 0.02 0.30 6 Revenue Grants, Contribution and Subsidies 34.84 49.54 44.25 7 Income from Investments - 1.00 0.50 8 Interest Earned - 0.50 0.50 9 Other Income 0.06 0.48 0.30

TOTAL (1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9) 125.30 255.69 188.89 B CAPITAL RECEIPTS - - - 1 Grants, Contribution For specific purposes 76.66 59.25 63.00 2 Secured Loans - - - 3 Unsecured Loans - - - 4 Deposits Received 0.01 - - 5 Deposit works(Works as executing Agencies) - - - 6 Other Receipts (Returned of Loan , Advance ,Deposit etc) 0.03 - -

TOTAL (1+2+3+4+5+6) 76.69 59.25 63.00 C Revenue Expenditure - - - 1 Establishment Expenses 89.85 139.86 168.81 2 Administrative Expenses 1.62 9.26 5.74 3 Operations & Maintenance 33.90 80.37 97.29 4 Interest & Finance Charges - 0.00 0.00 5 Programme Expenses 1.09 48.24 4.12 6 Revenue Grants, Contribution & Subsidies - 2.55 21.66 7 Miscellaneous Expenses - 0.22 2.50 8 Prior Period Item - - -

TOTAL (1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8) 126.46 280.52 300.13 D Capital Expenditure - - - 1 Fixed Assets 18.77 158.58 124.04 2 Capital Works in Progress - 9.26 9.26 3 Investments(General Funds) - - 1.00 4 Investment (Other Funds) - - - 5 Stock – in- hand (Current asset) - - - 6 Loans, Advance and Deposits with others 0.14 - 0.65

TOTAL (1+2+3+4+5+6) 18.90 167.85 134.95

Annexure 7.7

Summary of proposed Financial Recommendations on Devolution and Grants

Sl.No.

123456789

PRIs ULBs Total PRIs ULBs Total PRIs ULBs Total PRIs ULBs Total PRIs ULBs Total PRIs ULBs Total1780 760 2540 1940 1290 3230 2390 1595 3985 2960 1970 4930 3665 2440 6105 12735 8055 20790

555 235 790 935 620 1555 1085 725 1810 1525 1020 2545 1685 1125 2810 5785 3725 9510Capacity building 285 25 310 438 190 628 575 245 820 1010 390 1400 1135 395 1530 3443 1245 4688

i ManPower 285 20 305 300 130 430 380 200 580 805 340 1145 950 345 1295 2720 1035 3755ii e-Governance1 - - - 50 20 70 85 10 95 85 10 95 85 10 95 305 50 355iii Training - 5 5 80 40 120 100 35 135 110 40 150 90 40 130 380 160 540

a) Training Programms2 - - - 60 10 70 60 17 77 50 22 72 30 22 52 200 71 271b) Institutions/SUPA - 5 5 20 30 50 40 18 58 60 18 78 60 18 78 180 89 269

iv TSSP - - - 8 - 8 10 - 10 10 - 10 10 - 10 38 - 38GK - - - 100 - 100 80 - 80 80 - 80 80 - 80 340 - 340

i Office Support - - - 80 - 80 60 - 60 60 - 60 60 - 60 260 - 260ii Case Disposal - - - 10 - 10 10 - 10 10 - 10 10 - 10 40 - 40iii Dispute free Village - - - 10 - 10 10 - 10 10 - 10 10 - 10 40 - 40

Office Space/PSB/ZPB3 70 5 75 100 5 105 100 5 105 100 5 105 100 5 105 470 25 495DPCs - - - 20 - 20 20 - 20 20 - 20 20 - 20 80 - 80Model Cities & Towns4 - 130 130 - 182 182 - 232 232 - 382 382 - 482 482 - 1408 1408

i Preparation of MP/CDP/DPR/GIS - 20 20 - 45 45 - 45 45 - 45 45 - 45 45 - 200 200ii Viability Gap Funding for PPP - 20 20 - 100 100 - 150 150 - 300 300 - 400 400 - 970 970iii SPUR Type Professional services for all

ULBs - 20 20 - 15 15 - 15 15 - 15 15 - 15 15 - 80 80

iv Exp needs of reforms5 - - - - 22 22 - 22 22 - 22 22 - 22 22 - 88 88Performance Grants 200 75 275 270 240 510 300 240 540 300 240 540 330 240 570 1400 1035 2435

i ARM 50 35 85 200 200 400 200 200 400 200 200 400 230 200 430 880 835 1715ii Overall Performance 150 40 190 70 40 110 100 40 140 100 40 140 100 40 140 520 200 720

Regulatory Bodies6 - - - 5 3 8 5 3 8 5 3 8 5 3 8 20 12 32DLFA/Internal Audit - - - 1.80 - 1.80 4.80 - 4.80 9.80 - 9.80 14.80 - 14.80 31.20 - 31.20SFC Cell7 - - - 0.20 - 0.20 0.20 - 0.20 0.20 - 0.20 0.20 - 0.20 0.80 - 0.80

0.65% to 1.11%3.25%

Recommended Devol. as % of divisible pool

2.03% to 2.23%

9% 8.5% to 9%4930 6105 207909%

2.14% 2.23%

Divisible Pool out of SOTR (In Cr.)

H.I.

121064 159496

D.E.

F.

G.

Devol. + Grants ( In Cr.)Inter-se among LBs

CFS (In Cr.)

Devolution ( In Cr.)Devolution (% of CFS)Recommended Devol. + Grants as % of CFS

39852.10% 2.03% 2.06%2.75% 3.00% 3.00%

C.

Devolution (In Cr.)Grants (In Cr.)

2540 3230

A.

B.

67811 232610229971193107

8.5% 9% 9%

19-20 15-20

30300790 1555 1810 2545 2810 9510

3330 4785 5795 7475 8915

3.25% 2.75% to 3.25%

Items 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19

Grants as % of CFSGrants(In Cr.)

Abbreviations: (i) CFS: Consolidated fund of State, (ii) SOTR: State Own Tax Revenue, (iii)Devol.: Devolution, (iv) SUPA: School of Urban Planning and Architechture, (v) TSSP:Technichal Support for Smart Panchayat, (vi) GK: Gram Katchehary, (vii) PSB: Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan, (viii) ZPB: Zila Parishad Bhawan, (ix) DPC: District Planning Committee,(x) MP: Master Plan, (xi) CDP: City Development Plan, (xii) DPR: Detailed Project Report, (xiii) GIS: Geographic Information System, (xiv) PPP: Public Private Partnership, (xv)ARM: Additional Resource Mobilization, (vi) DLFA: Directorate of Local Fund Audit. *Funds allocated to Smart Cities/AMRUT Cities in 2015-16 is replaced by Model Cities and Towns.Note: 1 e-Governance covers e-Panchayat for PRIs and e-Municipality for ULBs. 2 Training Programs includes exposure visit to reputed Panchayats and reputed Municipalities. 3 For ZPs without Bhawan.4 Amount provided here is for specific components only. Refer to Para 3.2.10.3 for details. 5 Needs of Reforms not done under JNNURM. 6 Regulatory Bodies for the ULBs include (a) State Property Tax Board, Urban Regulator and Ombudsman, (b) Separate Ombudsman for the PRIs and (c) DLFA, DPC etc. for both the ULBs and the PRIs. 7 Professionalizing the SFC Cell in Finance Deptt.

State Finances

0.65% 0.97% 0.94% 1.11% 1.02%

274266 97790429862 35881 44294 54762

Annexure-9.1

5th SFC (2015-20)

Distribution of Devolved funds among Zila Parishads (Rs. Lakhs.)

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 Araria 2642792 2830 5.92 0.031 31.23 1109 1218 1499 1843 2295 79642 Arwal 648994 637 4.75 0.015 15.30 543 597 734 902 1124 39003 Aurangabad 2303219 3305 3.63 0.025 24.55 872 957 1178 1448 1804 62604 Banka 1963450 3020 4.53 0.024 24.50 870 955 1176 1445 1800 62465 Begusarai 2400718 1918 3.95 0.024 24.34 864 949 1168 1436 1789 62066 Bhagalpur 2435234 2569 3.52 0.024 24.22 860 945 1163 1429 1780 61777 Bhojpur 2338546 2395 3.34 0.023 23.09 820 901 1108 1362 1697 58888 Buxar 1541853 1703 3.60 0.019 18.62 661 726 894 1098 1368 47479 Darbhanga 3554057 2279 4.73 0.033 32.82 1165 1280 1576 1937 2413 837010 E.Champaran 4698028 3968 4.13 0.039 39.46 1401 1539 1894 2328 2901 1006311 Gaya 3809817 4976 3.81 0.035 34.96 1241 1364 1678 2063 2570 891612 Gopalganj 2399207 2033 3.79 0.024 24.08 855 939 1156 1421 1770 614113 Jamui 1615072 3098 5.24 0.024 24.34 864 949 1168 1436 1789 620614 Jehanabad 514154 932 4.62 0.015 14.58 517 568 700 860 1071 371715 Kaimur 1560813 3362 3.89 0.021 21.18 752 826 1017 1249 1557 540016 Katihar 2797207 3057 5.56 0.031 31.48 1117 1228 1511 1857 2313 802617 Khagaria 1579727 1486 5.67 0.023 23.42 831 913 1124 1382 1721 597218 Kishanganj 1529277 1884 6.31 0.025 25.06 890 978 1203 1479 1842 639119 Lakhisarai 857901 1228 4.24 0.016 15.88 564 619 762 937 1167 404920 Madhepura 1913301 1788 6.10 0.027 26.56 943 1036 1275 1567 1952 677321 Madhubani 4325884 3501 5.03 0.039 39.04 1386 1522 1874 2303 2869 995422 Munger 987645 1419 3.59 0.015 15.27 542 596 733 901 1123 389523 Muzaffarpur 4327625 2172 4.09 0.035 35.43 1258 1382 1700 2090 2604 903424 Nalanda 2419759 2355 4.25 0.026 25.61 909 999 1229 1511 1882 653125 Nawada 2003567 2494 5.04 0.025 25.34 900 988 1216 1495 1862 646126 Patna 3323875 3202 1.74 0.026 25.59 908 998 1228 1510 1881 652527 Purnea 2921614 3229 5.63 0.033 32.50 1154 1268 1560 1918 2389 828828 Rohtas 2532153 3851 2.65 0.024 24.10 855 940 1157 1422 1771 614529 Saharsa 1744121 1687 5.85 0.025 24.95 886 973 1198 1472 1834 636230 samastipur 4113769 2904 4.78 0.037 36.66 1301 1430 1760 2163 2694 934831 Saran 3598660 2641 3.56 0.031 30.73 1091 1198 1475 1813 2258 783532 Sheikhpura 527340 689 4.59 0.014 14.32 508 558 687 845 1052 365133 Sheohar 628130 349 5.53 0.017 16.69 593 651 801 985 1227 425734 Sitamarhi 3233076 2294 5.59 0.033 33.10 1175 1291 1589 1953 2433 844035 Siwan 3147551 2219 3.22 0.027 27.02 959 1054 1297 1594 1986 689136 Supaul 2123518 2425 5.76 0.028 27.60 980 1076 1325 1628 2028 703737 Vaishali 3261942 2036 4.22 0.030 29.78 1057 1162 1430 1757 2189 759538 W.Champaran 3541877 5228 5.03 0.037 36.62 1300 1428 1758 2161 2692 9339

Total 91865473 93163 171.48 1 1000 35500 39000 48000 59000 73500 255000

Devolved FundsS.No. List of ZPs

Population (Rural)

Area in sq.km

UDI WeightageWeightage

*1000

Annexure-9.2(A)

*Grants amount would depends on need of each ULBs in: (i) Requsite Manpower, (ii) e-Governance, (iii) Training, (iv) Office Spaces, (v) Developing Model Cities and Towns, (vi) Incentives for ARM, (vii) Overall Performance. Explanation: Col-2: Population (2011) of Zila Parishads as reported by Census 2011. Col-3: Area (Sq. Km) of Zila Parishads as reported by PRD. Col-4: Under Development Index (UDI) as computed in Chapter-IV. Col-5: Weightage computed based on formula given in Box 9.1. Col-6: Col-5 * 1000. Col-7: Distribution of devolved funds for the FY 2015-16 based on the Col-5. e.g- Devolved funds for Araria = Weightage * Total Devolution of funds in ZPs for 15-16. Col-8 to Col-11: Similarly computed as Col-7 for respective years. 5th SFC (2015-20)

Distribution of Devolved funds among Panchayat Samitis (Rs. Lakhs.)

15-16 16-17` 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 Arwal Karpi 0.959 192213 0.0020 1.981 35.66 38.63 47.54 58.44 72.31 252.582 Arwal Kurtha 0.850 121818 0.0015 1.494 26.89 29.14 35.86 44.08 54.54 190.503 Arwal Kaler 0.722 148941 0.0015 1.515 27.26 29.53 36.35 44.68 55.28 193.114 Arwal Sonbhadra B 1.102 78185 0.0015 1.509 27.16 29.42 36.21 44.50 55.06 192.355 Arwal Arwal 0.633 107837 0.0012 1.205 21.69 23.49 28.91 35.54 43.97 153.606 Araria Araria 1.275 386508 0.0033 3.339 60.10 65.11 80.14 98.50 121.87 425.727 Araria Bhargama 1.553 230835 0.0028 2.776 49.96 54.12 66.61 81.88 101.31 353.898 Araria Forbesganj 1.071 396364 0.0032 3.191 57.44 62.22 76.58 94.13 116.47 406.859 Araria Jokihat 1.511 322192 0.0032 3.225 58.06 62.89 77.41 95.15 117.73 411.2310 Araria Kursaktta 1.389 149231 0.0022 2.174 39.12 42.38 52.17 64.12 79.34 277.1311 Araria Narpatganj 1.376 351773 0.0033 3.251 58.52 63.40 78.03 95.91 118.67 414.5512 Araria Palasai 1.554 248369 0.0029 2.870 51.66 55.97 68.88 84.67 104.76 365.9513 Araria Raniganj 1.512 398977 0.0036 3.640 65.53 70.99 87.37 107.39 132.87 464.1514 Araria Sikti 1.524 158543 0.0024 2.357 42.43 45.97 56.58 69.54 86.04 300.5615 AurangabadAurangabad 0.010 180949 0.0010 0.984 17.72 19.20 23.63 29.04 35.93 125.5116 AurangabadBarun 0.634 200052 0.0017 1.703 30.65 33.21 40.87 50.23 62.15 217.1117 AurangabadDaudnagar 0.530 154490 0.0014 1.354 24.38 26.41 32.51 39.96 49.44 172.6918 AurangabadDeo 0.746 173216 0.0017 1.669 30.03 32.54 40.05 49.22 60.90 212.7419 AurangabadGoh 0.949 234400 0.0022 2.198 39.57 42.87 52.76 64.85 80.24 280.3020 AurangabadHaspur 0.586 160820 0.0014 1.444 26.00 28.16 34.66 42.61 52.72 184.1421 AurangabadKutumba 0.695 226599 0.0019 1.906 34.31 37.16 45.74 56.22 69.57 243.0022 AurangabadMadanpur 0.776 211329 0.0019 1.903 34.26 37.12 45.68 56.15 69.48 242.7023 AurangabadNabinagar 0.646 281252 0.0022 2.151 38.72 41.95 51.63 63.46 78.52 274.2924 AurangabadObra 0.628 226007 0.0018 1.836 33.05 35.81 44.07 54.17 67.02 234.1225 AurangabadRafiganj 0.649 276831 0.0021 2.131 38.36 41.56 51.15 62.87 77.79 271.7426 Banka Amarpur 0.856 201351 0.0019 1.929 34.72 37.61 46.29 56.90 70.40 245.9327 Banka Banka 1.020 171324 0.0019 1.929 34.72 37.61 46.29 56.89 70.40 245.9028 Banka Barahat 1.013 149188 0.0018 1.803 32.46 35.16 43.28 53.19 65.81 229.9029 Banka Bausi 1.269 185000 0.0022 2.248 40.46 43.83 53.95 66.31 82.04 286.5930 Banka Belhar 1.082 167719 0.0020 1.970 35.47 38.42 47.29 58.13 71.92 251.2331 Banka Chanan 1.502 165634 0.0024 2.374 42.73 46.29 56.97 70.03 86.64 302.6632 Banka Dhuraiya 1.234 239762 0.0025 2.509 45.16 48.92 60.21 74.01 91.57 319.8633 Banka Katoria 1.557 186646 0.0025 2.541 45.74 49.56 60.99 74.97 92.76 324.0134 Banka Phulidumar 1.277 125251 0.0019 1.935 34.82 37.73 46.43 57.07 70.62 246.6835 Banka Rajaun 0.972 197601 0.0020 2.023 36.42 39.45 48.56 59.69 73.85 257.9736 Banka Shambhuga 0.897 173974 0.0018 1.822 32.79 35.52 43.72 53.74 66.49 232.2737 Begusarai Bachhwara 0.834 195815 0.0019 1.878 33.80 36.61 45.06 55.39 68.53 239.3938 Begusarai Bakhri 0.878 100054 0.0014 1.405 25.28 27.39 33.71 41.43 51.27 179.0839 Begusarai Balia 0.682 134628 0.0014 1.398 25.16 27.25 33.54 41.23 51.01 178.2040 Begusarai Barauni 0.034 205462 0.0011 1.140 20.52 22.23 27.36 33.64 41.62 145.3741 Begusarai Begusarai 0.146 288001 0.0017 1.694 30.50 33.04 40.67 49.99 61.85 216.0442 Begusarai Bhagwanpu 0.734 172676 0.0017 1.654 29.77 32.25 39.70 48.79 60.37 210.8943 Begusarai Birpur 0.778 97467 0.0013 1.292 23.26 25.19 31.01 38.11 47.16 164.7344 Begusarai Cheria Baria 0.690 146680 0.0015 1.470 26.47 28.67 35.29 43.38 53.67 187.4845 Begusarai Chhorahi 1.016 124191 0.0017 1.671 30.08 32.59 40.11 49.30 60.99 213.0646 Begusarai Dandari 1.102 77256 0.0015 1.503 27.06 29.31 36.07 44.34 54.86 191.6547 Begusarai Garhpura 1.101 111108 0.0017 1.685 30.32 32.85 40.43 49.70 61.49 214.7948 Begusarai Khudaband 0.837 90358 0.0013 1.312 23.62 25.59 31.50 38.71 47.90 167.3249 Begusarai Mansurchak 0.438 80510 0.0009 0.865 15.58 16.88 20.77 25.53 31.59 110.3450 Begusarai Matihani 0.660 152725 0.0015 1.474 26.53 28.74 35.37 43.48 53.79 187.91

Devolved FundsWeightage*1000

S.NO. DISTT. Block UDI Population Weightage

Explanation: Col-3: Under Development Index (UDI) as computed in Chapter-IV Col-4: Population (2011) of as reported by Census 2011. Col-5: Weightage computed based on formula given in Box 9.1. Col-6: Col-5 * 1000. Col-7: Distribution of devolved funds for the FY 2015-16 based on the Col-5. e.g- Devolved funds for Karpi = Weightage * Total Devolution of funds in BPs for 15-16. Col-8 to Col-11: Similarly computed as Col-8 for respective years.

Contd. 5th SFC (2015-20)

Annexure-9.2(B)

15-16 16-17` 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

51 Begusarai Naokothi 0.966 103357 0.0015 1.510 27.18 29.44 36.23 44.54 55.11 192.5052 Begusarai Sahebpur K 0.666 194172 0.0017 1.702 30.64 33.20 40.86 50.22 62.14 217.0553 Begusarai Shamho Ak 1.347 30777 0.0015 1.495 26.90 29.15 35.87 44.09 54.56 190.5754 Begusarai Teghra 0.134 129857 0.0008 0.832 14.97 16.22 19.96 24.53 30.35 106.0355 Bhagalpur Bihpur 0.607 123386 0.0013 1.263 22.74 24.63 30.32 37.26 46.11 161.0656 Bhagalpur Colgong 0.724 331585 0.0025 2.500 45.00 48.75 60.00 73.76 91.26 318.7857 Bhagalpur Gopalpur 0.889 94952 0.0014 1.388 24.99 27.07 33.32 40.95 50.67 177.0058 Bhagalpur Goradih 1.146 146210 0.0019 1.918 34.52 37.39 46.02 56.57 69.99 244.4959 Bhagalpur Ismailpur 1.572 43440 0.0018 1.784 32.12 34.80 42.83 52.64 65.13 227.5260 Bhagalpur Jagdishpur -0.646 172107 0.0003 0.290 5.21 5.65 6.95 8.54 10.57 36.9361 Bhagalpur Kharik 1.016 132898 0.0017 1.718 30.93 33.51 41.24 50.69 62.72 219.1162 Bhagalpur Narayanpur 0.859 106701 0.0014 1.422 25.60 27.73 34.13 41.96 51.91 181.3363 Bhagalpur Nathnagar 0.652 151291 0.0015 1.458 26.25 28.44 35.00 43.02 53.23 185.9464 Bhagalpur Naugachhia 0.596 105359 0.0012 1.155 20.79 22.52 27.72 34.08 42.16 147.2765 Bhagalpur Pirpainti 1.064 285357 0.0026 2.586 46.55 50.43 62.07 76.29 94.40 329.7466 Bhagalpur Rangra Cho 1.078 90284 0.0016 1.550 27.90 30.23 37.20 45.73 56.58 197.6467 Bhagalpur sanour 0.153 142805 0.0009 0.920 16.56 17.94 22.08 27.14 33.58 117.3168 Bhagalpur Shahkund 0.728 188078 0.0017 1.731 31.16 33.76 41.55 51.07 63.19 220.7369 Bhagalpur Sonhaula 1.103 192397 0.0021 2.124 38.24 41.42 50.98 62.67 77.54 270.8570 Bhagalpur Sultanganj 0.353 195109 0.0014 1.398 25.17 27.27 33.56 41.25 51.04 178.2971 Bhojpur Agiaon 0.720 148373 0.0015 1.509 27.17 29.43 36.22 44.52 55.09 192.4372 Bhojpur Arrah -0.332 201188 0.0008 0.755 13.60 14.73 18.13 22.29 27.57 96.3273 Bhojpur Barhara 0.508 240636 0.0018 1.797 32.35 35.04 43.13 53.02 65.60 229.1474 Bhojpur Behea 0.389 151722 0.0012 1.200 21.61 23.41 28.81 35.41 43.81 153.0475 Bhojpur Charpokhar 0.766 101363 0.0013 1.302 23.43 25.38 31.24 38.40 47.51 165.9776 Bhojpur Garhani 0.759 103262 0.0013 1.305 23.49 25.44 31.32 38.49 47.63 166.3677 Bhojpur Jagdishpur 0.577 231512 0.0018 1.816 32.69 35.42 43.59 53.58 66.29 231.5778 Bhojpur Koilwar 0.362 184450 0.0014 1.350 24.31 26.33 32.41 39.84 49.29 172.1879 Bhojpur Piro 0.558 221126 0.0017 1.742 31.35 33.96 41.80 51.38 63.57 222.0580 Bhojpur Sahar 0.800 110276 0.0014 1.383 24.89 26.97 33.19 40.79 50.47 176.3181 Bhojpur Sandesh 0.661 109712 0.0012 1.243 22.37 24.23 29.82 36.66 45.35 158.4382 Bhojpur Shahpur 0.349 194486 0.0014 1.391 25.04 27.13 33.39 41.04 50.78 177.3983 Bhojpur Tarari 0.667 182631 0.0016 1.642 29.55 32.02 39.40 48.43 59.93 209.3384 Bhojpur Udwant Nag 0.637 157809 0.0015 1.478 26.61 28.82 35.48 43.61 53.95 188.4785 Buxar Barhampur 0.552 196070 0.0016 1.600 28.81 31.21 38.41 47.21 58.41 204.0586 Buxar Buxar -0.213 188328 0.0008 0.804 14.47 15.68 19.30 23.72 29.35 102.5287 Buxar Chakki 0.669 42256 0.0009 0.888 15.98 17.31 21.31 26.19 32.40 113.1888 Buxar Chaugain 0.763 48743 0.0010 1.015 18.28 19.80 24.37 29.95 37.06 129.4689 Buxar Chusa 0.675 103670 0.0012 1.224 22.03 23.86 29.37 36.10 44.67 156.0390 Buxar Dumraon 0.417 179064 0.0014 1.376 24.77 26.83 33.02 40.59 50.23 175.4491 Buxar Itarhi 0.810 170629 0.0017 1.718 30.92 33.50 41.23 50.68 62.71 219.0492 Buxar Kesath 0.499 33820 0.0007 0.675 12.14 13.15 16.19 19.90 24.62 86.0193 Buxar Nawanagar 0.847 166534 0.0017 1.732 31.18 33.77 41.57 51.10 63.22 220.8494 Buxar Rajpur 0.862 213534 0.0020 2.000 36.01 39.01 48.01 59.01 73.01 255.0495 Buxar Simri 0.513 207225 0.0016 1.622 29.20 31.63 38.93 47.85 59.20 206.8096 Darbhanga Alinagar 1.437 143797 0.0022 2.192 39.46 42.75 52.61 64.67 80.02 279.5197 Darbhanga Bahadurpur 0.822 261805 0.0022 2.221 39.97 43.31 53.30 65.51 81.06 283.1598 Darbhanga Baheri 1.238 302645 0.0029 2.851 51.32 55.60 68.43 84.11 104.07 363.5299 Darbhanga Benipur 1.014 175040 0.0019 1.943 34.98 37.89 46.64 57.32 70.93 247.76100 Darbhanga Biraul 1.288 286113 0.0028 2.811 50.60 54.82 67.47 82.94 102.61 358.45101 Drabhanga Darbhanga -0.033 280997 0.0015 1.480 26.65 28.87 35.53 43.67 54.03 188.74102 Drabhanga Ghanshyam 1.262 133210 0.0020 1.963 35.33 38.28 47.11 57.90 71.64 250.27103 Drabhanga Gora Bauram 1.617 152112 0.0024 2.414 43.45 47.07 57.94 71.21 88.11 307.79104 Darbhanga Hanumanna 0.956 154631 0.0018 1.776 31.97 34.64 42.63 52.40 64.83 226.48105 Darbhanga Hayaghat 0.775 148081 0.0016 1.562 28.11 30.46 37.49 46.08 57.01 199.15106 Darbhanga Jale 1.112 264248 0.0025 2.520 45.36 49.15 60.49 74.35 91.99 321.33107 Darbhanga Keotiranwa 0.950 270722 0.0024 2.395 43.10 46.70 57.47 70.64 87.41 305.32108 Darbhanga Kiratpur 1.613 81423 0.0020 2.030 36.54 39.58 48.72 59.88 74.09 258.81109 Darbhanga Kusheshwa 1.579 162870 0.0024 2.435 43.83 47.48 58.44 71.83 88.88 310.46110 Darbhanga Kusheshwa 1.889 128817 0.0026 2.557 46.03 49.86 61.37 75.43 93.33 326.02

S.NO. DISTT. Block UDI Population Weightage Weightage*1000

Devolved Funds (Rs. Lakhs)

Contd. 5th SFC (2015-20)

(ii)

15-16 16-17` 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

111 Darbhanga Manigachh 0.981 228618 0.0022 2.199 39.58 42.88 52.78 64.87 80.27 280.39112 Darbhanga Singhwara 0.957 267601 0.0024 2.385 42.94 46.51 57.25 70.37 87.07 304.14113 Darbhanga Tardih 1.123 123299 0.0018 1.772 31.90 34.56 42.53 52.28 64.68 225.94114 E. ChamparaAreraj 0.668 137909 0.0014 1.402 25.23 27.33 33.64 41.35 51.16 178.70115 E. ChamparaChakia 0.900 276809 0.0024 2.379 42.81 46.38 57.08 70.17 86.82 303.26116 E. ChamparaMotihari 0.438 237818 0.0017 1.712 30.82 33.39 41.10 50.52 62.50 218.33117 E. ChamparaRaxual 0.907 176492 0.0018 1.845 33.22 35.98 44.29 54.44 67.36 235.28118 E. ChamparaAdapur 1.418 203513 0.0025 2.495 44.90 48.64 59.87 73.59 91.05 318.06119 E. ChamparaBanjaria 1.238 162684 0.0021 2.098 37.76 40.90 50.34 61.88 76.56 267.44120 E. ChamparaBankatwa 1.445 116863 0.0021 2.055 36.99 40.07 49.32 60.63 75.01 262.03121 E. ChamparaChiraria 1.367 195590 0.0024 2.402 43.23 46.83 57.64 70.85 87.66 306.20122 E. ChamparaDhaka 1.151 276081 0.0026 2.622 47.20 51.14 62.94 77.36 95.72 334.36123 E. ChamparaGhorasahan 1.234 174864 0.0022 2.159 38.86 42.10 51.81 63.69 78.80 275.25124 E. ChamparaHarsidhi 1.230 222551 0.0024 2.412 43.42 47.03 57.89 71.15 88.04 307.53125 E. ChamparaKalyanpur 1.124 267568 0.0026 2.550 45.90 49.73 61.20 75.23 93.08 325.15126 E. ChamparaKesaria 1.102 175595 0.0020 2.033 36.59 39.64 48.79 59.97 74.19 259.17127 E. ChamparaKotwa 1.215 168788 0.0021 2.108 37.94 41.10 50.58 62.17 76.93 268.72128 E. ChamparaMadhuban 1.263 143250 0.0020 2.018 36.32 39.35 48.43 59.53 73.65 257.29129 E. ChamparaMehsi 1.164 147145 0.0019 1.940 34.93 37.84 46.57 57.24 70.83 247.40130 E. ChamparaNarkatia 1.324 170758 0.0022 2.226 40.06 43.40 53.42 65.66 81.24 283.78131 E. ChamparaPaharpur 1.242 183018 0.0022 2.211 39.80 43.12 53.07 65.23 80.71 281.93132 E. ChamparaPakri Dayal 1.308 116634 0.0019 1.919 34.53 37.41 46.04 56.60 70.03 244.61133 E. ChamparaPatahi 1.289 166445 0.0022 2.168 39.03 42.29 52.04 63.97 79.15 276.48134 E. ChamparaPhenhara 1.149 80329 0.0016 1.566 28.19 30.54 37.59 46.20 57.16 199.68135 E. ChamparaPiprakothi 1.089 77089 0.0015 1.489 26.80 29.04 35.74 43.93 54.35 189.86136 E. ChamparaRamgarhwa 1.302 200998 0.0024 2.367 42.60 46.15 56.80 69.81 86.38 301.74137 E. ChamparaSugauli 1.271 191992 0.0023 2.288 41.18 44.61 54.90 67.48 83.50 291.67138 E. ChamparaTetaria 1.455 102808 0.0020 1.989 35.80 38.79 47.74 58.68 72.60 253.61139 E. ChamparaSangrampur 0.942 144071 0.0017 1.705 30.69 33.24 40.92 50.29 62.23 217.37140 Gopalganj Baikunthpu 0.913 217165 0.0021 2.070 37.27 40.37 49.69 61.08 75.57 263.99141 Gopalganj Barauli 0.833 221999 0.0020 2.017 36.31 39.33 48.41 59.50 73.62 257.17142 Gopalganj Bhorey 0.864 178199 0.0018 1.812 32.61 35.32 43.48 53.44 66.12 230.97143 Gopalganj Bijaipur 0.839 133038 0.0015 1.544 27.79 30.10 37.05 45.54 56.35 196.83144 Gopalganj Gopalganj 0.196 152188 0.0010 1.013 18.23 19.75 24.30 29.87 36.96 129.10145 Gopalganj Hathua 0.550 221804 0.0017 1.737 31.27 33.88 41.70 51.25 63.41 221.51146 Gopalganj Katiya 0.661 110637 0.0012 1.248 22.46 24.33 29.95 36.81 45.54 159.09147 Gopalganj Kuchaikote 0.631 332041 0.0024 2.411 43.39 47.01 57.86 71.12 87.99 307.38148 Gopalganj Manjha 0.736 199452 0.0018 1.800 32.40 35.10 43.19 53.09 65.69 229.47149 Gopalganj Pach Deuri 0.882 99933 0.0014 1.408 25.35 27.46 33.80 41.55 51.41 179.58150 Gopalganj Phulwaria 0.529 130801 0.0012 1.226 22.06 23.90 29.42 36.16 44.74 156.29151 Gopalganj Sidhwalia 1.027 141563 0.0018 1.775 31.96 34.62 42.61 52.38 64.81 226.37152 Gopalganj Thawe 0.412 116106 0.0010 1.031 18.56 20.11 24.75 30.42 37.64 131.49153 Gopalganj Uchkagaon 0.428 151437 0.0012 1.238 22.28 24.13 29.70 36.51 45.17 157.80154 Jamui Barhat 1.091 92207 0.0016 1.573 28.32 30.67 37.75 46.41 57.42 200.57155 Jamui Chakai 1.451 235188 0.0027 2.698 48.57 52.62 64.76 79.60 98.49 344.03156 Jamui Gidhapur 0.848 77558 0.0013 1.254 22.57 24.46 30.10 37.00 45.78 159.90157 Jamui Islamnagar 1.127 136768 0.0018 1.849 33.28 36.05 44.37 54.54 67.48 235.73158 Jamui Jamui 0.543 144757 0.0013 1.316 23.68 25.65 31.57 38.81 48.02 167.73159 Jamui Jhajha 0.745 226858 0.0020 1.957 35.22 38.16 46.96 57.73 71.42 249.49160 Jamui Khaira 1.008 235761 0.0023 2.264 40.74 44.14 54.33 66.78 82.62 288.60161 Jamui Lakshmipur 1.089 124149 0.0017 1.743 31.38 34.00 41.84 51.43 63.63 222.28162 Jamui Sikandara 1.099 148711 0.0019 1.885 33.93 36.76 45.24 55.61 68.80 240.33163 Jamui Sono 1.094 210445 0.0022 2.213 39.83 43.15 53.11 65.28 80.77 282.13164 Jehanabad Ghoshi 0.734 108130 0.0013 1.306 23.51 25.47 31.35 38.53 47.67 166.52165 Jehanabad Hulasganj 0.675 94485 0.0012 1.175 21.15 22.92 28.20 34.67 42.89 149.83166 Jehanabad Jehanabad 0.277 151551 0.0011 1.089 19.61 21.24 26.15 32.14 39.76 138.90167 Jehanabad Kako 0.876 173487 0.0018 1.798 32.37 35.06 43.15 53.04 65.63 229.26168 Jehanabad Makhdump 0.797 228160 0.0020 2.015 36.27 39.29 48.36 59.44 73.54 256.89169 Jehanabad Modanganj 0.982 87718 0.0014 1.442 25.95 28.11 34.60 42.53 52.62 183.81170 Jehanabad Ratni Faridp 0.870 146586 0.0016 1.648 29.66 32.14 39.55 48.62 60.15 210.12

Weightage*1000

Devolved Funds (Rs. Lakhs)S.NO. DISTT. Block UDI Population Weightage

Contd. 5th SFC (2015-20)

(iii)

15-16 16-17` 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

171 Kaimur Bhabua 0.570 251261 0.0019 1.916 34.48 37.36 45.98 56.51 69.92 244.24172 Kaimur Bhagwanpu 0.933 91113 0.0014 1.411 25.40 27.52 33.87 41.63 51.51 179.93173 Kaimur Chainpur 1.090 187692 0.0021 2.086 37.55 40.67 50.06 61.53 76.13 265.94174 Kaimur chand 1.015 133682 0.0017 1.721 30.98 33.56 41.30 50.77 62.81 219.42175 Kaimur Durgawati 0.711 136962 0.0014 1.439 25.90 28.06 34.53 42.45 52.52 183.45176 Kaimur Kudra 0.414 165145 0.0013 1.298 23.36 25.30 31.14 38.28 47.36 165.43177 Kaimur Mohania 0.515 225181 0.0017 1.721 30.98 33.56 41.30 50.77 62.81 219.42178 Kaimur Nuoan 0.695 106530 0.0013 1.259 22.67 24.56 30.23 37.15 45.97 160.58179 Kaimur Adhaura 1.632 57100 0.0019 1.917 34.51 37.39 46.01 56.56 69.98 244.45180 kaimur Ramgarh 0.563 132663 0.0013 1.269 22.85 24.75 30.47 37.45 46.33 161.85181 Kaimur Rampur 0.910 88876 0.0014 1.376 24.77 26.83 33.03 40.59 50.23 175.45182 Katihar Amdabad 1.406 167398 0.0023 2.289 41.20 44.64 54.94 67.53 83.55 291.85183 Katihar Azamnagar 1.568 315610 0.0032 3.246 58.43 63.30 77.91 95.76 118.48 413.89184 Katihar Balrampur 1.606 158976 0.0024 2.441 43.93 47.59 58.57 72.00 89.08 311.17185 Katihar Barari 1.391 285381 0.0029 2.909 52.36 56.72 69.81 85.81 106.18 370.89186 Katihar Barsoi 1.658 344133 0.0035 3.489 62.80 68.03 83.73 102.92 127.34 444.82187 Katihar Dandkhora 1.300 68055 0.0016 1.649 29.69 32.16 39.58 48.66 60.20 210.29188 Katihar Falka 1.527 155663 0.0023 2.345 42.21 45.73 56.28 69.18 85.59 298.98189 Katihar hasanganj 1.329 55906 0.0016 1.612 29.02 31.44 38.69 47.56 58.84 205.55190 Katihar Kadwa 1.418 346902 0.0033 3.267 58.81 63.71 78.41 96.38 119.25 416.56191 Katihar Katihar -0.282 95556 0.0002 0.236 4.25 4.60 5.66 6.96 8.61 30.09192 Katihar Kohra 1.409 282813 0.0029 2.913 52.43 56.80 69.91 85.93 106.32 371.39193 Katihar Kursela 0.974 63928 0.0013 1.305 23.49 25.44 31.32 38.49 47.63 166.37194 Katihar Manihari 1.261 164778 0.0021 2.131 38.36 41.55 51.14 62.86 77.78 271.70195 Katihar Mansahi 1.378 84257 0.0018 1.813 32.64 35.36 43.52 53.49 66.18 231.19196 Katihar Pranpur 1.401 144297 0.0022 2.160 38.88 42.11 51.83 63.71 78.83 275.36197 Katihar Sameli 1.275 84486 0.0017 1.713 30.84 33.41 41.12 50.54 62.53 218.44198 E. ChamparaTurkaulia 1.202 180366 0.0022 2.157 38.83 42.06 51.77 63.63 78.73 275.03199 Gaya Amas 0.762 105027 0.0013 1.318 23.72 25.70 31.63 38.87 48.10 168.02200 Gaya Atri 1.119 82296 0.0015 1.547 27.84 30.16 37.12 45.63 56.46 197.21201 Gaya Banke Baza 1.005 129624 0.0017 1.690 30.42 32.95 40.56 49.85 61.68 215.47202 Gaya Barachatti 1.073 142534 0.0018 1.826 32.88 35.62 43.84 53.88 66.67 232.88203 Gaya Belaganj 0.753 222003 0.0019 1.939 34.90 37.81 46.53 57.19 70.76 247.19204 Gaya Bodh Gaya 0.879 197804 0.0019 1.932 34.77 37.67 46.37 56.99 70.51 246.32205 Gaya Dhobi 1.202 155413 0.0020 2.022 36.40 39.44 48.54 59.66 73.82 257.85206 Gaya Dumaria 1.199 128699 0.0019 1.876 33.77 36.58 45.02 55.34 68.47 239.18207 Gaya Fatehpur 1.216 235612 0.0025 2.468 44.43 48.13 59.24 72.81 90.09 314.71208 Gaya Gaya Town -0.668 178342 0.0003 0.301 5.42 5.88 7.23 8.89 11.00 38.41209 Gaya Guraru 0.744 139379 0.0015 1.485 26.73 28.96 35.64 43.81 54.20 189.34210 Gaya Gurua 0.924 184286 0.0019 1.904 34.26 37.12 45.69 56.16 69.48 242.71211 Gaya Imamganj 1.051 192812 0.0021 2.075 37.35 40.46 49.80 61.21 75.73 264.55212 Gaya Khizirsarai 0.975 176048 0.0019 1.910 34.37 37.24 45.83 56.33 69.70 243.47213 Gaya Konch 0.807 201920 0.0019 1.884 33.91 36.73 45.21 55.57 68.76 240.17214 Gaya Manpur 1.015 148418 0.0018 1.800 32.41 35.11 43.21 53.11 65.72 229.56215 Gaya Mohanpur 1.348 200149 0.0024 2.408 43.34 46.95 57.78 71.03 87.88 306.98216 Gaya Muhra 1.216 100820 0.0017 1.743 31.37 33.98 41.83 51.41 63.61 222.21217 Gaya Neemchak B 1.070 98603 0.0016 1.586 28.56 30.94 38.08 46.80 57.91 202.28218 Gaya Paraiya 0.903 101969 0.0014 1.440 25.92 28.08 34.57 42.49 52.57 183.63219 Gaya Sherghati 0.616 114759 0.0012 1.226 22.07 23.91 29.42 36.17 44.75 156.32220 Gaya Tan Kuppa 1.333 124940 0.0020 1.988 35.79 38.77 47.71 58.65 72.57 253.48221 Gaya Tikari 0.601 239187 0.0019 1.881 33.85 36.68 45.14 55.48 68.65 239.81222 Gaya Wazirganj 20.995 221731 0.0219 21.910 394.37 427.24 525.83 646.33 799.70 2793.48223 Khargaria Alauli 1.608 282127 0.0031 3.106 55.90 60.56 74.53 91.61 113.35 395.96224 Khargaria Beldaur 1.488 200223 0.0025 2.546 45.83 49.65 61.10 75.10 92.93 324.60225 Khargaria Chautham 1.171 153831 0.0020 1.983 35.70 38.68 47.60 58.51 72.40 252.89226 Khagaria Gogri 0.769 279017 0.0023 2.261 40.70 44.09 54.27 66.71 82.54 288.31227 Khagaria Khargaria 0.763 331952 0.0025 2.540 45.72 49.53 60.96 74.93 92.71 323.86228 Khargaria Mansi 0.707 88511 0.0012 1.174 21.14 22.90 28.19 34.64 42.86 149.73229 Khargaria Parbatta 0.757 244066 0.0021 2.061 37.09 40.18 49.45 60.79 75.21 262.73230 Kishanganj Bahadyrgan 1.263 216589 0.0024 2.413 43.43 47.05 57.91 71.18 88.06 307.62

S.NO. DISTT. Block UDI Population Weightage Weightage*1000

Devolved Funds (Rs. Lakhs)

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-20)

(iv)

15-16 16-17` 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

231 Kishanganj Dighalbank 1.633 208356 0.0027 2.733 49.19 53.29 65.59 80.62 99.75 348.43232 Kishanganj Kishanganj 0.531 135352 0.0013 1.253 22.55 24.43 30.07 36.96 45.73 159.75233 Kishanganj Kochadham 1.300 292124 0.0029 2.856 51.40 55.69 68.54 84.24 104.24 364.11234 Kishanganj Pothia 1.404 262494 0.0028 2.799 50.37 54.57 67.16 82.56 102.15 356.81235 Kishnaganj Terhagachh 1.595 141039 0.0023 2.334 42.00 45.51 56.01 68.84 85.18 297.53236 Kishanganj Thakurganj 1.417 273323 0.0029 2.869 51.65 55.95 68.87 84.65 104.73 365.85237 Lakhisarai Barahiya 0.448 85945 0.0009 0.904 16.28 17.64 21.71 26.68 33.01 115.31238 Lakhisarai Chanan 1.327 107144 0.0019 1.886 33.94 36.77 45.26 55.63 68.83 240.44239 Lakhisarai Halsi 1.236 115997 0.0018 1.845 33.20 35.97 44.27 54.41 67.33 235.18240 Lakhisarai Lakhisarai 0.348 121216 0.0010 0.996 17.92 19.41 23.89 29.37 36.34 126.94241 Lakhisarai Pipariya 0.907 51496 0.0012 1.172 21.10 22.86 28.13 34.58 42.79 149.46242 Lakhisarai Ramgarh Ch 1.051 85105 0.0015 1.495 26.91 29.15 35.88 44.10 54.57 190.62243 Lakhisarai Surajgarha 0.519 290998 0.0021 2.079 37.42 40.54 49.90 61.33 75.89 265.08244 Madhepura Alamnagar 1.586 175401 0.0025 2.509 45.17 48.93 60.22 74.02 91.59 319.93245 Madhepura Bihariganj 1.172 135534 0.0019 1.886 33.96 36.78 45.27 55.65 68.85 240.51246 Madhepura Chausa 1.509 152693 0.0023 2.311 41.59 45.06 55.46 68.17 84.34 294.62247 Madhepura Gamharia 1.441 82522 0.0019 1.866 33.59 36.38 44.78 55.04 68.10 237.90248 Madhepura Ghailarh 1.591 91818 0.0021 2.064 37.15 40.24 49.53 60.88 75.33 263.14249 Madhepura Gwalpara 1.423 126020 0.0021 2.082 37.48 40.60 49.97 61.43 76.00 265.48250 Madhepura Kishanganj 1.438 189159 0.0024 2.437 43.87 47.53 58.50 71.91 88.97 310.78251 Madhepura Kumarkhan 1.420 243629 0.0027 2.713 48.84 52.91 65.12 80.04 99.03 345.94252 Madhepura Madhepura 0.958 191375 0.0020 1.976 35.56 38.53 47.42 58.29 72.12 251.92253 Madhepura Murliganj 1.280 185631 0.0023 2.263 40.73 44.12 54.30 66.75 82.59 288.49254 Madhepura Puraini 1.518 104436 0.0021 2.060 37.08 40.16 49.43 60.76 75.18 262.62255 Madhepura Shankarpur 1.426 106222 0.0020 1.979 35.62 38.58 47.49 58.37 72.22 252.28256 Madhepura Singhehwar 1.278 134159 0.0020 1.983 35.70 38.68 47.60 58.51 72.40 252.89257 MadhubaniAnd hratha 1.134 191680 0.0022 2.151 38.73 41.95 51.63 63.47 78.53 274.31258 MadhubaniBabubarhi 1.273 217331 0.0024 2.426 43.67 47.31 58.23 71.57 88.55 309.33259 MadhubaniBasopatti 1.233 173499 0.0022 2.151 38.71 41.93 51.61 63.44 78.49 274.19260 MadhubaniBenipatti 0.945 361400 0.0029 2.878 51.81 56.13 69.08 84.91 105.06 367.00261 MadhubaniBifsi 1.178 320704 0.0029 2.890 52.01 56.35 69.35 85.24 105.47 368.42262 MadhubaniGhoghardih 1.233 174831 0.0022 2.158 38.85 42.08 51.79 63.66 78.77 275.15263 MadhubaniHarlakhi 1.307 196251 0.0023 2.346 42.23 45.75 56.30 69.21 85.63 299.12264 MadhubaniJainagar 1.067 171918 0.0020 1.979 35.61 38.58 47.49 58.37 72.22 252.27265 Madhubani Jhanjharpur 1.061 174930 0.0020 1.989 35.80 38.78 47.73 58.67 72.59 253.56266 MadhubaniKajauli 1.191 117282 0.0018 1.807 32.52 35.23 43.36 53.30 65.95 230.37267 MadhubaniKaluahi 1.068 143583 0.0018 1.827 32.89 35.63 43.86 53.91 66.70 232.98268 MadhubaniLadania 1.410 175561 0.0023 2.337 42.07 45.57 56.09 68.94 85.30 297.96269 MadhubaniLakhanpur 1.062 167841 0.0020 1.952 35.13 38.06 46.84 57.57 71.23 248.83270 MadhubaniLaukaha 1.411 212127 0.0025 2.534 45.62 49.42 60.82 74.76 92.50 323.13271 MadhubaniLaukahi 1.603 208317 0.0027 2.704 48.66 52.72 64.89 79.76 98.68 344.70272 MadhubaniMadhepur 1.337 267606 0.0028 2.760 49.69 53.83 66.25 81.43 100.75 351.94273 MadhubaniMadhubani 0.588 247856 0.0019 1.915 34.47 37.34 45.96 56.49 69.90 244.16274 MadhubaniMadhuwap 1.246 134704 0.0020 1.955 35.19 38.12 46.92 57.67 71.36 249.27275 MadhubaniPamdaul 0.795 270642 0.0022 2.242 40.35 43.72 53.81 66.14 81.83 285.84276 MadhubaniPhulparas 1.355 166018 0.0022 2.231 40.15 43.50 53.54 65.81 81.42 284.43277 MadhubaniRajnagar 0.954 246933 0.0023 2.271 40.88 44.29 54.50 67.00 82.89 289.56278 MuzzafarpuAurai 1.159 290545 0.0027 2.708 48.74 52.80 64.99 79.88 98.83 345.24279 MuzzafarpuBandra 1.088 124057 0.0017 1.742 31.35 33.96 41.80 51.37 63.57 222.04280 MuzzafarpuBaruraj 0.905 378223 0.0029 2.930 52.74 57.13 70.32 86.43 106.94 373.55281 MuzzafarpuBochacha 1.135 245659 0.0024 2.442 43.96 47.63 58.62 72.05 89.15 311.41282 MuzzafarpuDholi 0.583 90490 0.0011 1.062 19.12 20.72 25.50 31.34 38.78 135.45283 MuzzafarpuGaighat 1.082 259719 0.0025 2.466 44.38 48.08 59.18 72.74 90.00 314.39284 MuzzafarpuKanti 0.426 247807 0.0018 1.755 31.58 34.22 42.11 51.76 64.05 223.72285 MuzzafarpuKatra 1.142 244823 0.0024 2.445 44.02 47.68 58.69 72.14 89.26 311.78286 MuzzafarpuKurhani 0.580 435676 0.0029 2.918 52.52 56.90 70.03 86.08 106.50 372.03287 MuzzafarpuMarwan 0.620 164858 0.0015 1.499 26.98 29.23 35.97 44.22 54.71 191.12288 MuzzafarpuMinapur 1.118 340925 0.0029 2.939 52.90 57.31 70.54 86.70 107.28 374.73289 MuzzafarpuMusahri -0.659 328611 0.0011 1.119 20.15 21.83 26.86 33.02 40.85 142.71290 MuzzafarpuParoo 0.835 361662 0.0028 2.771 49.88 54.03 66.50 81.74 101.14 353.30

Weightage*1000

Devolved Funds (Rs. Lakhs)S.NO. DISTT. Block UDI Population Weightage

(v)

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-20)

15-16 16-17` 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

291 MuzzafarpuSahebganj 0.898 218214 0.0021 2.061 37.11 40.20 49.47 60.81 75.24 262.83292 MuzzafarpuSakra 0.464 306833 0.0021 2.109 37.97 41.14 50.63 62.23 77.00 268.96293 MuzzafarpuSaraiya 0.745 331651 0.0025 2.520 45.37 49.15 60.49 74.35 92.00 321.36294 Munger Asarganj 0.467 74380 0.0009 0.861 15.49 16.79 20.66 25.39 31.42 109.75295 Munger Bariarpur 0.597 109359 0.0012 1.178 21.21 22.97 28.28 34.76 43.00 150.22296 Munger Dharhara 0.517 131753 0.0012 1.220 21.95 23.78 29.27 35.98 44.52 155.51297 Munger Jamalpur 102896 0.0006 0.554 9.97 10.80 13.30 16.34 20.22 70.64298 Munger Kharagpur 0.7207 180920 0.0017 1.685 30.34 32.86 40.45 49.72 61.51 214.87299 Munger Munger -0.4732 134089 0.0003 0.255 4.59 4.97 6.12 7.53 9.31 32.53300 Munger Sangrampur 0.7675 97729 0.0013 1.284 23.10 25.03 30.80 37.86 46.85 163.65301 Munger Tarapur 0.3527 110214 0.0009 0.941 16.95 18.36 22.60 27.77 34.36 120.04302 Munger Tetiha Bamb 0.8607 76303 0.0013 1.260 22.68 24.57 30.24 37.17 45.99 160.66303 Nalanda Asthawan 0.941 163938 0.0018 1.811 32.60 35.32 43.47 53.43 66.11 230.93304 Nalanda Ben 0.985 87387 0.0014 1.442 25.96 28.13 34.62 42.55 52.65 183.91305 Nalanda Bihar -0.0131 197221 0.0010 1.049 18.88 20.46 25.18 30.95 38.29 133.75306 Nalanda Bind 1.1605 61984 0.0015 1.479 26.62 28.84 35.49 43.62 53.98 188.55307 Nalanda Chandi 0.8945 152156 0.0017 1.702 30.63 33.19 40.85 50.21 62.12 216.99308 Nalanda Ekangarsara 0.577 171214 0.0015 1.491 26.84 29.08 35.79 43.99 54.43 190.13309 Nalanda Giriak 0.8415 96845 0.0014 1.352 24.33 26.36 32.44 39.88 49.34 172.35310 Nalanda Harnaut 0.9285 176140 0.0019 1.865 33.56 36.36 44.75 55.01 68.06 237.73311 Nalanda Hilsa 0.7736 146257 0.0016 1.551 27.92 30.24 37.22 45.75 56.61 197.73312 Nalanda Islampur 0.6915 196696 0.0017 1.741 31.35 33.96 41.79 51.37 63.56 222.03313 Nalanda Karai Parsur 1.1518 73951 0.0015 1.535 27.62 29.93 36.83 45.27 56.02 195.67314 Nalanda Katrisarai 0.9202 41821 0.0011 1.133 20.40 22.10 27.20 33.43 41.36 144.48315 Nalanda Nagar Naus 1.0613 94467 0.0016 1.556 28.01 30.34 37.34 45.90 56.79 198.37316 Nalanda Noorsarai 0.9741 172351 0.0019 1.889 34.01 36.84 45.34 55.73 68.95 240.87317 Nalanda Parbalpur 0.6575 70316 0.0010 1.027 18.49 20.03 24.66 30.31 37.50 130.99318 Nalanda Rahui 0.9972 144040 0.0018 1.760 31.67 34.31 42.23 51.91 64.22 224.34319 Nalanda Rajgir 0.6631 88596 0.0011 1.131 20.36 22.06 27.15 33.37 41.29 144.24320 Nalanda Sarmera 1.2814 97083 0.0018 1.787 32.17 34.85 42.89 52.72 65.23 227.85321 Nalanda Silao 0.7832 125575 0.0014 1.449 26.08 28.25 34.77 42.74 52.89 184.74322 Nalanda tharthari 0.9926 68393 0.0013 1.348 24.26 26.28 32.34 39.76 49.19 171.83323 Nawada Akbarpur 1.0787 237292 0.0023 2.342 42.16 45.67 56.21 69.09 85.49 298.61324 Nawada Gobindpur 1.1824 95454 0.0017 1.681 30.25 32.77 40.34 49.58 61.34 214.28325 Nawada Hisua 0.9282 108489 0.0015 1.500 27.00 29.25 36.00 44.25 54.75 191.25326 Nawada Kashi Chak 1.0352 71886 0.0014 1.408 25.35 27.47 33.80 41.55 51.41 179.58327 Nawada Kawakol 1.4613 143439 0.0022 2.214 39.86 43.18 53.14 65.32 80.82 282.31328 Nawada Meskaur 1.2904 94358 0.0018 1.781 32.06 34.74 42.75 52.55 65.02 227.12329 Nawada Nardiganj 1.2611 124716 0.0019 1.916 34.49 37.36 45.98 56.52 69.93 244.27330 Nawada Narhat 1.0271 112042 0.0016 1.617 29.10 31.53 38.80 47.69 59.01 206.13331 Nawada Nawada 0.3505 223462 0.0015 1.549 27.88 30.21 37.18 45.70 56.54 197.51332 Nawada Paribarawan 1.2428 183066 0.0022 2.212 39.82 43.13 53.09 65.25 80.74 282.03333 Nawada Rajauli 0.9895 136056 0.0017 1.709 30.76 33.32 41.01 50.41 62.38 217.89334 Nawada Roh 1.1623 162507 0.0020 2.022 36.39 39.43 48.52 59.64 73.80 257.79335 Nawada Sirdala 1.2339 178472 0.0022 2.178 39.21 42.48 52.28 64.26 79.51 277.76336 Nawada Warisaligan 0.9825 153067 0.0018 1.794 32.29 34.98 43.05 52.91 65.47 228.69337 Patna Athmalgola 0.7463 90964 0.0012 1.226 22.07 23.91 29.43 36.17 44.76 156.34338 Patna Bakhtiyapur 0.6258 179485 0.0016 1.584 28.51 30.89 38.01 46.73 57.81 201.95339 Patna Barh 0.2992 154878 0.0011 1.129 20.33 22.02 27.10 33.31 41.21 143.97340 Patna Belchhi 1.1125 66165 0.0015 1.454 26.17 28.35 34.90 42.89 53.07 185.38341 Patna Bihta 0.2139 213878 0.0014 1.363 24.53 26.57 32.70 40.20 49.74 173.74342 Patna Bikram 0.3201 147024 0.0011 1.108 19.94 21.60 26.58 32.67 40.42 141.21343 Patna Daniawan 0.867 75086 0.0013 1.260 22.68 24.57 30.23 37.16 45.98 160.62344 Patna dhanarua 1.0628 211376 0.0022 2.187 39.36 42.64 52.48 64.51 79.82 278.82345 Patna Dinapu-cum -0.5086 142301 0.0003 0.264 4.76 5.16 6.35 7.80 9.65 33.71346 Patna Dulhin Baza 0.69 124966 0.0014 1.354 24.37 26.40 32.49 39.93 49.41 172.60347 Patna Fatwa 0.5455 147047 0.0013 1.330 23.94 25.94 31.92 39.24 48.55 169.58348 Patna Ghoswari 1.3132 74898 0.0017 1.699 30.58 33.13 40.78 50.12 62.01 216.62349 Patna Khusrupur 0.7701 93773 0.0013 1.265 22.77 24.66 30.35 37.31 46.16 161.26350 Patna Maner 0.5574 228930 0.0018 1.783 32.09 34.76 42.78 52.59 65.07 227.29

S.NO. DISTT. Block UDI Population Weightage Weightage*1000

Devolved Funds (Rs. Lakhs)

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-20)

(vi)

15-16 16-17` 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

351 Patna Masaurhi 0.6515 181413 0.0016 1.620 29.15 31.58 38.87 47.78 59.12 206.51352 Patna Mokameh 0.224 141733 0.0010 0.984 17.72 19.19 23.62 29.03 35.92 125.48353 Patna Naubatpur 0.5167 178583 0.0015 1.471 26.49 28.69 35.31 43.41 53.71 187.61354 Patna Paliganj 0.7813 254904 0.0021 2.143 38.58 41.80 51.44 63.23 78.24 273.29355 Patna Pandarak 0.8868 154613 0.0017 1.708 30.74 33.30 40.98 50.37 62.32 217.71356 Patna Patna Rural -1.2887 86918 -0.0008 -0.804 -14.46 -15.67 -19.28 -23.70 -29.33 -102.45357 Patna Phulwari -0.3182 191389 0.0007 0.717 12.90 13.97 17.20 21.14 26.16 91.36358 Patna Punpun 0.9422 138143 0.0017 1.674 30.12 32.63 40.16 49.37 61.08 213.37359 Patna Sampatchak 0.3395 106866 0.0009 0.910 16.39 17.75 21.85 26.86 33.23 116.08360 Purnia Amour 1.6958 290559 0.0032 3.238 58.28 63.14 77.71 95.51 118.18 412.82361 Purnia Baisa 1.7607 193127 0.0028 2.777 49.99 54.15 66.65 81.93 101.37 354.09362 Purnia Baisi 1.707 227706 0.0029 2.910 52.39 56.75 69.85 85.86 106.23 371.07363 Purnia Banmankhi 1.3246 321079 0.0030 3.036 54.65 59.20 72.86 89.56 110.81 387.07364 Purnia Barhara 1.3202 209000 0.0024 2.428 43.70 47.35 58.27 71.63 88.62 309.57365 Purnia Bhawanipur 1.505 161720 0.0024 2.356 42.40 45.94 56.54 69.49 85.99 300.36366 Purnia Dagarua 1.564 221142 0.0027 2.734 49.21 53.31 65.61 80.65 99.79 348.58367 Purnia Dhamdaha 1.293 288084 0.0028 2.827 50.89 55.13 67.85 83.40 103.19 360.44368 Purnia Jalalgarh 1.4965 112951 0.0021 2.085 37.53 40.65 50.03 61.50 76.09 265.81369 Purnia Kasba 1.3122 157920 0.0021 2.145 38.61 41.83 51.48 63.28 78.29 273.50370 Purnia Krityanand 1.3335 230504 0.0026 2.557 46.02 49.86 61.37 75.43 93.33 326.01371 Purnia Purnia East 0.2051 163078 0.0011 1.080 19.45 21.07 25.93 31.87 39.44 137.76372 Purnia Rupauli 1.5461 234686 0.0028 2.789 50.21 54.39 66.94 82.28 101.81 355.62373 Purnia Srinagar 1.6285 110058 0.0022 2.199 39.59 42.89 52.79 64.88 80.28 280.43374 Rohtas Akhorhi Go 0.3846 120145 0.0010 1.026 18.48 20.02 24.63 30.28 37.46 130.87375 Rohtas Bikramganj 0.1176 115100 0.0007 0.736 13.24 14.35 17.66 21.71 26.86 93.81376 Rohtas Chenari 0.7088 131528 0.0014 1.408 25.34 27.45 33.78 41.52 51.38 179.47377 Rohtas Dawath 0.6267 89565 0.0011 1.101 19.81 21.46 26.42 32.47 40.17 140.33378 Rohtas Dehri -0.299 137783 0.0004 0.447 8.04 8.71 10.73 13.18 16.31 56.98379 Rohtas Dinara 0.5872 225468 0.0018 1.793 32.28 34.97 43.04 52.91 65.46 228.66380 Rohtas Karakat 0.3825 209284 0.0015 1.504 27.08 29.33 36.10 44.38 54.91 191.80381 Rohtas Kargahar 0.3811 225082 0.0016 1.588 28.58 30.97 38.11 46.85 57.96 202.47382 Rohtas Kochas 0.5237 170025 0.0014 1.432 25.78 27.93 34.37 42.25 52.28 182.61383 Rohtas Nasriganj 0.418 115117 0.0010 1.032 18.58 20.13 24.78 30.45 37.68 131.62384 Rohtas Nauhatta 0.9489 94065 0.0014 1.443 25.97 28.13 34.63 42.56 52.66 183.95385 Rohtas Nokha 0.4293 146025 0.0012 1.210 21.78 23.59 29.04 35.69 44.16 154.26386 Rohtas Rajpur 0.4641 75213 0.0009 0.863 15.53 16.83 20.71 25.46 31.50 110.02387 Rohtas Rohtas 0.2284 86049 0.0007 0.689 12.40 13.43 16.53 20.32 25.14 87.81388 Rohtas Sanjhauli 0.3357 62621 0.0007 0.668 12.03 13.03 16.04 19.72 24.40 85.22389 Rohtas Sasaram -0.2098 210875 0.0009 0.928 16.71 18.11 22.28 27.39 33.89 118.38390 Rohtas Sheosagar 0.5934 176080 0.0015 1.534 27.61 29.91 36.81 45.24 55.98 195.54391 Rohtas Suryapur 0.491 57529 0.0008 0.794 14.30 15.49 19.06 23.43 28.99 101.26392 Rohtas Tilouthu 0.24 109249 0.0008 0.825 14.85 16.09 19.80 24.34 30.11 105.20393 Saharsa Banma Itahr 1.4977 90943 0.0020 1.967 35.41 38.37 47.22 58.04 71.81 250.85394 Saharsa Kahara 0.1852 141805 0.0009 0.946 17.03 18.45 22.71 27.92 34.54 120.65395 Saharsa Mahishi 1.6065 206774 0.0027 2.699 48.57 52.62 64.76 79.61 98.50 344.06396 Saharsa Nauhatta 1.4321 161784 0.0023 2.284 41.12 44.54 54.82 67.38 83.37 291.23397 Saharsa Patarghat 1.2745 128322 0.0019 1.948 35.07 38.00 46.76 57.48 71.12 248.43398 Saharsa Salkhua 1.7478 132844 0.0024 2.440 43.92 47.58 58.56 71.98 89.05 311.08399 Saharsa Satar kataiy 1.2503 151060 0.0020 2.047 36.85 39.92 49.13 60.39 74.72 261.00400 Saharsa Saur Bazar 1.4255 214166 0.0026 2.560 46.07 49.91 61.43 75.51 93.43 326.36401 Saharsa Simri Bakhti 1.3497 280582 0.0028 2.843 51.17 55.43 68.22 83.86 103.75 362.43402 Saharsa sonbarsa 1.2677 235841 0.0025 2.521 45.37 49.15 60.50 74.36 92.01 321.39403 Samastipur Bibhutpur 1.0216 338149 0.0028 2.829 50.92 55.16 67.89 83.45 103.25 360.67404 Samastipur Bithan 1.5905 148565 0.0024 2.369 42.65 46.20 56.86 69.89 86.48 302.08405 Samastipur Dalsinghsar 0.7456 184956 0.0017 1.732 31.17 33.77 41.56 51.08 63.20 220.78406 Samastipur Hasanpur 1.1291 227421 0.0023 2.339 42.10 45.60 56.13 68.99 85.36 298.18407 Samastipur Kalyanpur 0.9276 310439 0.0026 2.587 46.56 50.44 62.08 76.31 94.42 329.82408 Samastipur Khanpur 1.2409 195729 0.0023 2.278 41.01 44.43 54.68 67.21 83.16 290.48409 Samastipur Mohanpur 1.0556 115032 0.0017 1.661 29.90 32.39 39.86 49.00 60.62 211.77410 Samastipur Mohiuddina 0.9676 184521 0.0019 1.948 35.07 37.99 46.76 57.47 71.11 248.41

Weightage*1000

Devolved Funds (Rs. Lakhs)S.NO. DISTT. Block UDI Population Weightage

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-20)

(vii)

15-16 16-17` 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

411 Samastipur Morwa 1.0388 186075 0.0020 2.027 36.48 39.52 48.65 59.79 73.98 258.43412 Samastipur Patori 0.8904 179956 0.0018 1.848 33.26 36.03 44.34 54.50 67.44 235.56413 Samastipur Pusa 0.3406 132932 0.0011 1.052 18.93 20.51 25.24 31.03 38.39 134.11414 Samastipur Roser 0.8357 169469 0.0017 1.737 31.27 33.87 41.69 51.24 63.40 221.48415 Samastipur Samastipur 0.0429 283174 0.0016 1.567 28.21 30.56 37.61 46.23 57.20 199.81416 Samastipur Sarairajan 0.9696 254835 0.0023 2.329 41.92 45.41 55.89 68.70 85.00 296.93417 Samastipur Shivaji Nag 1.21 193850 0.0022 2.238 40.28 43.64 53.70 66.01 81.68 285.31418 Samastipur Singhia 1.3959 210035 0.0025 2.508 45.15 48.91 60.20 73.99 91.55 319.80419 Samastipur Tajpur 0.5851 161626 0.0014 1.448 26.06 28.23 34.74 42.70 52.84 184.57420 Samastipur Ujiarpur 0.8727 297811 0.0025 2.465 44.36 48.06 59.15 72.71 89.96 314.25421 Samastipur Vidhyapati N 0.9906 152916 0.0018 1.801 32.41 35.12 43.22 53.12 65.73 229.60422 Samastipur Warisnagar 0.8462 216123 0.0020 1.999 35.98 38.97 47.97 58.96 72.95 254.83423 Saran Amnour 0.8671 200395 0.0019 1.935 34.82 37.72 46.43 57.07 70.61 246.66424 Saran Baniapur 0.7234 262673 0.0021 2.128 38.31 41.50 51.08 62.78 77.68 271.34425 Saran Chapra -0.1662 240287 0.0011 1.130 20.34 22.03 27.12 33.33 41.24 144.06426 Saran Dariapur 1.0376 296164 0.0026 2.619 47.13 51.06 62.84 77.25 95.58 333.86427 Saran Dighwara 0.391 96811 0.0009 0.907 16.33 17.69 21.77 26.76 33.11 115.65428 Saran Ekma 0.5275 214445 0.0017 1.675 30.15 32.67 40.20 49.42 61.14 213.58429 Saran Garkha 0.7861 268156 0.0022 2.220 39.95 43.28 53.27 65.48 81.01 282.99430 Saran Ishupur 0.8041 146822 0.0016 1.584 28.51 30.89 38.02 46.73 57.81 201.96431 Saran Jalalpur 0.515 174156 0.0014 1.446 26.03 28.20 34.70 42.65 52.78 184.35432 Saran Lahladpur 0.6612 79969 0.0011 1.083 19.49 21.12 25.99 31.95 39.53 138.08433 Saran Maker 1.011 84695 0.0015 1.454 26.16 28.34 34.89 42.88 53.06 185.33434 Saran Manjhi 0.4036 268073 0.0018 1.842 33.15 35.91 44.20 54.33 67.22 234.82435 Saran Marhaura 0.7468 235191 0.0020 2.003 36.06 39.06 48.08 59.10 73.12 255.42436 Saran Mashrakh 0.7746 188899 0.0018 1.781 32.07 34.74 42.75 52.55 65.02 227.13437 Saran Nagra 0.5787 124028 0.0012 1.239 22.30 24.16 29.73 36.55 45.22 157.95438 Saran Panapur 1.1217 121738 0.0018 1.762 31.72 34.36 42.29 51.99 64.32 224.69439 Saran Parsa 0.9505 155838 0.0018 1.777 31.99 34.65 42.65 52.42 64.86 226.56440 Saran Revelganj 0.2546 80621 0.0007 0.685 12.34 13.36 16.45 20.22 25.01 87.38441 Saran Sonepur 0.3843 232340 0.0016 1.630 29.34 31.79 39.13 48.09 59.50 207.86442 Saran Taraiya 0.8599 138721 0.0016 1.595 28.72 31.11 38.29 47.06 58.23 203.41443 Seohar Dumri Katsa 1.0911 93398 0.0016 1.579 28.43 30.80 37.91 46.59 57.65 201.38444 Seohar Piprarhi 1.1297 117948 0.0017 1.750 31.50 34.12 41.99 51.62 63.87 223.09445 Seohar Purnahiya 1.0101 91949 0.0015 1.492 26.85 29.09 35.80 44.01 54.45 190.20446 Seohar Seohar 0.8308 127142 0.0015 1.504 27.08 29.33 36.10 44.38 54.91 191.80447 Seohar Tariani Cho 1.1911 197693 0.0022 2.240 40.32 43.67 53.75 66.07 81.75 285.57448 Shekhpura Ariari 1.2121 112070 0.0018 1.799 32.39 35.09 43.19 53.08 65.68 229.43449 Shekhpura Barbigha 0.5096 90092 0.0010 0.988 17.78 19.26 23.71 29.14 36.06 125.96450 Sheikhpura Chewara 1.1805 73267 0.0016 1.559 28.07 30.41 37.42 46.00 56.91 198.81451 Sheikhpura Ghat Kusum 1.3251 48346 0.0016 1.568 28.22 30.57 37.63 46.25 57.22 199.89452 Sheikhpura Sheikhpura 0.6212 136084 0.0013 1.346 24.22 26.24 32.30 39.70 49.12 171.58453 Sheikhpura Shekhopur 0.6823 67481 0.0010 1.037 18.66 20.21 24.88 30.58 37.83 132.16454 Sitamarhi Bairgania 0.9917 89259 0.0015 1.459 26.26 28.45 35.02 43.04 53.26 186.04455 Sitamarhi Bajpatti 1.2901 215507 0.0024 2.433 43.80 47.45 58.40 71.78 88.82 310.25456 Sitamarhi Bathnaha 1.3736 262527 0.0028 2.769 49.84 53.99 66.45 81.68 101.07 353.04457 Sitamarhi Belsand 1.2895 100340 0.0018 1.813 32.63 35.35 43.50 53.47 66.16 231.11458 Sitamarhi Bokhara 1.3834 130886 0.0021 2.070 37.26 40.36 49.67 61.06 75.55 263.89459 Sitamarhi Charaut 1.2177 79310 0.0016 1.629 29.31 31.76 39.09 48.04 59.44 207.64460 Sitamarhi Dumra 0.673 354748 0.0026 2.574 46.34 50.20 61.78 75.94 93.96 328.21461 Sitamarhi Majorganj 1.3619 102785 0.0019 1.897 34.15 37.00 45.53 55.97 69.25 241.90462 Sitamarhi Nanpur 1.2904 182429 0.0023 2.256 40.60 43.98 54.13 66.54 82.33 287.58463 Sitamarhi Parihar 1.4809 338222 0.0033 3.282 59.08 64.01 78.78 96.83 119.81 418.50464 Sitamarhi Parsauni 1.4145 86016 0.0019 1.859 33.46 36.25 44.61 54.84 67.85 237.00465 Sitamarhi Pupri 1.0316 156473 0.0019 1.860 33.49 36.28 44.65 54.88 67.90 237.20466 Sitamarhi Riga 1.1208 206979 0.0022 2.220 39.97 43.30 53.29 65.50 81.04 283.10467 Sitamarhi Runisaidpu 1.2208 372579 0.0032 3.211 57.79 62.61 77.06 94.72 117.19 409.37468 Sitamarhi Sonbrsa 1.3628 251248 0.0027 2.698 48.56 52.60 64.74 79.58 98.46 343.93469 Sitamarhi Suppi 1.2451 122239 0.0019 1.887 33.96 36.79 45.28 55.66 68.87 240.56470 Sitamarhi Sursand 1.208 209945 0.0023 2.322 41.80 45.29 55.74 68.51 84.77 296.10

S.NO. DISTT. Block UDI Population Weightage Weightage*1000

Devolved Funds (Rs. Lakhs)

Contd. 5th SFC (2015-20)

(viii)

15-16 16-17` 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

471 Supaul Basantpur 0.9099 182075 0.0019 1.878 33.81 36.62 45.08 55.41 68.55 239.47472 Supaul Chhatapur 1.1601 286456 0.0027 2.687 48.37 52.40 64.49 79.27 98.08 342.61473 Supaul Kishanpur 1.4543 167669 0.0023 2.338 42.08 45.59 56.11 68.96 85.33 298.07474 Supaul Marauna 1.6199 145136 0.0024 2.380 42.84 46.41 57.12 70.21 86.86 303.43475 Supaul Nirmali 1.1655 78246 0.0016 1.571 28.28 30.64 37.71 46.35 57.35 200.34476 Supaul Pipra 1.4435 201399 0.0025 2.509 45.16 48.92 60.21 74.01 91.57 319.86477 Supaul Pratapganj 1.0551 106884 0.0016 1.617 29.10 31.52 38.80 47.69 59.01 206.11478 Supaul Raghopur 1.1629 215643 0.0023 2.309 41.55 45.02 55.41 68.10 84.26 294.34479 Supaul Saraigarh B 1.3212 122772 0.0020 1.965 35.36 38.31 47.15 57.96 71.71 250.50480 Supaul Supaul 0.9794 294761 0.0026 2.554 45.96 49.79 61.28 75.33 93.20 325.57481 Supaul Tribeniganj 1.1543 322477 0.0029 2.875 51.76 56.07 69.01 84.82 104.95 366.61482 Siwan Andar 0.481 110027 0.0011 1.067 19.21 20.81 25.61 31.48 38.95 136.05483 Siwan Barharia 0.5667 321292 0.0023 2.289 41.21 44.64 54.94 67.53 83.56 291.87484 Siwan Basantpur 0.6401 105229 0.0012 1.198 21.57 23.36 28.76 35.35 43.73 152.77485 Siwan Bhagwanpu 0.6082 220651 0.0018 1.788 32.19 34.87 42.92 52.75 65.27 228.00486 Siwan Darauli 0.4819 174357 0.0014 1.414 25.46 27.58 33.94 41.72 51.62 180.33487 Siwan Daraundha 0.4598 173200 0.0014 1.386 24.95 27.03 33.27 40.90 50.60 176.75488 Siwan Goriakothi 0.6283 223709 0.0018 1.825 32.84 35.58 43.79 53.82 66.59 232.63489 Siwan Guthani 0.4436 128155 0.0011 1.128 20.30 21.99 27.07 33.27 41.16 143.79490 Siwan Hasanpura 0.439 149580 0.0012 1.239 22.29 24.15 29.73 36.54 45.21 157.92491 Siwan Hussaingan 0.1429 182794 0.0011 1.125 20.25 21.94 27.01 33.20 41.07 143.47492 Siwan Lakri Nabig 0.8284 128899 0.0015 1.511 27.21 29.47 36.27 44.59 55.17 192.71493 Siwan Maharajgan 0.4509 165935 0.0013 1.338 24.09 26.10 32.12 39.48 48.85 170.64494 Siwan Mairwa 0.3168 89934 0.0008 0.797 14.34 15.54 19.12 23.51 29.08 101.60495 Siwan Nautan 0.6353 90714 0.0011 1.115 20.08 21.75 26.77 32.90 40.71 142.20496 Siwan Pachrukhi 201759 0.0011 1.086 19.56 21.18 26.07 32.05 39.65 138.51497 Siwan Raghunathp 0.4495 157694 0.0013 1.293 23.27 25.21 31.02 38.13 47.18 164.81498 Siwan Siswan 0.557 153953 0.0014 1.379 24.81 26.88 33.09 40.67 50.32 175.77499 Siwan Siwan -0.1292 205917 0.0010 0.981 17.66 19.14 23.55 28.95 35.82 125.12500 Siwan Ziradei 0.3881 163752 0.0013 1.265 22.76 24.66 30.35 37.31 46.16 161.25501 Vaishali Bhagwanpu 0.6011 207762 0.0017 1.712 30.81 33.38 41.08 50.50 62.48 218.26502 Vaishali Bidupur 0.4663 268849 0.0019 1.908 34.34 37.20 45.79 56.28 69.63 243.24503 Vaishali Burmu 0.8742 131004 0.0016 1.568 28.22 30.58 37.63 46.25 57.23 199.92504 Vaishali Chehra kala 0.8285 87606 0.0013 1.289 23.21 25.14 30.94 38.03 47.06 164.37505 Vaishali Desri 0.4776 177586 0.0014 1.427 25.69 27.84 34.26 42.11 52.10 182.00506 Vaishali Goraul 0.6837 296288 0.0023 2.270 40.86 44.26 54.48 66.96 82.85 289.42507 Vaishali Hajipur -0.0128 276217 0.0015 1.475 26.54 28.76 35.39 43.50 53.83 188.02508 Vaishali Lalganj 0.4034 228286 0.0016 1.627 29.29 31.73 39.05 48.00 59.39 207.48509 Vaishali Mahnar 0.587 132046 0.0013 1.290 23.22 25.16 30.96 38.06 47.09 164.50510 Vaishali Mahua 0.7129 284526 0.0022 2.235 40.24 43.59 53.65 65.95 81.59 285.02511 Vaishali Patepur 0.9425 370182 0.0029 2.923 52.62 57.00 70.16 86.24 106.70 372.71512 Vaishali Paterhi Bels 0.7294 95669 0.0012 1.235 22.23 24.08 29.64 36.43 45.07 157.44513 Vaishali Raghopur 1.345 232909 0.0026 2.581 46.46 50.33 61.95 76.15 94.21 329.10514 Vaishali Raja Pakar 0.6716 158130 0.0015 1.514 27.25 29.53 36.34 44.67 55.27 193.05515 Vaishali Sahdai Buzu 0.5039 127396 0.0012 1.183 21.30 23.07 28.40 34.90 43.19 150.85516 Vaishali Vaishali 0.716 187486 0.0017 1.716 30.89 33.46 41.18 50.62 62.63 218.79517 W. Champa Bagaha 1.1424 285366 0.0027 2.664 47.95 51.94 63.93 78.58 97.23 339.63518 W. Champa Bairia 1.2476 206098 0.0023 2.341 42.13 45.64 56.18 69.05 85.44 298.45519 W. Champa Bettiah -0.3876 91991 0.0001 0.113 2.03 2.20 2.71 3.33 4.12 14.39520 W. Champa Bhitaha 1.6003 66203 0.0019 1.935 34.84 37.74 46.45 57.10 70.64 246.77521 W. Champa Chanpatia 1.102 270653 0.0025 2.545 45.80 49.62 61.07 75.07 92.88 324.45522 W. Champa Gaunaha 1.32 208169 0.0024 2.423 43.62 47.25 58.16 71.49 88.45 308.97523 W. Champa Jogapatti 1.4509 243516 0.0027 2.743 49.37 53.48 65.83 80.91 100.11 349.71524 W. Champa Lauriya 1.1257 230162 0.0024 2.350 42.30 45.83 56.40 69.33 85.78 299.63525 W. Champa Madhubani 1.6887 89608 0.0021 2.149 38.68 41.90 51.57 63.39 78.43 273.96526 W. Champa Mainatanr 1.4515 190744 0.0025 2.459 44.27 47.96 59.02 72.55 89.76 313.56527 W. Champa Majhulia 1.1977 329347 0.0030 2.955 53.19 57.63 70.92 87.18 107.86 376.78528 W. Champa Narkatiagan 1.1388 328335 0.0029 2.892 52.05 56.39 69.40 85.30 105.54 368.68529 W. Champa Nautan 1.3088 233575 0.0025 2.549 45.88 49.71 61.18 75.20 93.04 325.01530 W. Champa Piprasi 1.519 38592 0.0017 1.707 30.72 33.28 40.96 50.34 62.29 217.59531 W. Champa Ramnagar 1.1338 200691 0.0022 2.199 39.59 42.89 52.78 64.88 80.28 280.42532 W. Champa Sidhaw 1.3904 309874 0.0030 3.040 54.73 59.29 72.97 89.69 110.98 387.66533 W. Champa Sikta 1.4192 189496 0.0024 2.421 43.57 47.20 58.10 71.41 88.35 308.63534 W. Champa Thakrahan 1.3756 52766 0.0016 1.641 29.55 32.01 39.39 48.42 59.91 209.28

507 92857628 1 1000 18000 19500 24000 29500 36500 127500

Weightage*1000

Devolved Funds (Rs. Lakhs)

Total

S .NO. DISTT. Block UDI Population Weightage

5th SFC (2015-20)

(ix)

Distribution of Devolved funds among Nagar Nigams (Rs. Cr.)

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 TOTAL1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

1 Patna Patna 108.34 1684297 0.208 0.162 162.170 123.25 209.20 258.66 319.47 395.69 1306.282 Nalanda Bihar Shariff 23.5 297268 0.037 0.029 28.791 21.88 37.14 45.92 56.72 70.25 231.923 Bhojpur Arrah 30.97 261430 0.033 0.026 25.719 19.55 33.18 41.02 50.67 62.75 207.174 Gays Gaya 50.17 474093 0.059 0.046 46.409 35.27 59.87 74.02 91.43 113.24 373.825 Bhagalpur Bhagalpur 30.17 400146 0.050 0.039 38.699 29.41 49.92 61.72 76.24 94.43 311.726 Muzzaffarpur Muzzaffarpur 26.43 354462 0.044 0.034 34.269 26.04 44.21 54.66 67.51 83.62 276.047 Darbhanga Darbhanga 19.18 296039 0.036 0.029 28.509 21.67 36.78 45.47 56.16 69.56 229.648 Katihar Katihar 24.54 240838 0.030 0.024 23.539 17.89 30.37 37.54 46.37 57.43 189.619 Begusarai Begusarai 8.98 252008 0.031 0.024 23.984 18.23 30.94 38.26 47.25 58.52 193.1910 Purnea Purnea 44.52 282248 0.036 0.028 28.196 21.43 36.37 44.97 55.55 68.80 227.1211 Munger Munger 17.5 213303 0.026 0.021 20.684 15.72 26.68 32.99 40.75 50.47 166.61

384.3 4756132 0.590 0.461 460.970 350 595 735 908 1125 3713Total

Normalized Weightage*

1000

Devolved FundSl. No. Nagar Nigams

Area (Sq Km)

Popu. (2011)

WeightageDistrictNormalized Weightage

Annexure-9.3(A)

*Grants amount would depends on need of each ULBs in followings: (i) Manpower, (ii) e-Governance, (iii) Training, (iv) Office Spaces, (v) Developing Model Cities and Towns, (vi) Incentives for ARM, (vii) Overall Performance, (viii)Regulatory Bodies. Explanation: Col-3: Area (Sq. Km) of ULBs as reported by UDD Col-4: Population (2011) of ULBs as reported by UDD Col-5: Weightage computed based on formula given in Box 9.2 Col-6: Normalized weightage. e.g.- for Patna = Weightage of Patna(i.e. 0.208) ÷ Weightage of Total ULBs (i.e. 1.2802 = 0.590+0.268+0.329) Col-7: Col-6 * 1000 Col-8: Distribution of devolved funds for the FY 2015-16 based on the Col-6. e.g- Devolved funds for Patna = Normalized weightage * Total Devolution of funds in ULBs for 15-16 Col-9 to Col-12: Similarly computed as Col-8 for respective years

5th SFC (2015-20)

Distribution of Devolved funds among Nagar Parishads (Rs. Cr.)

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 TOTAL1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

1 Patna Barh 4.5 61470 0.007 0.005 5.171 3.93 6.67 8.25 10.19 12.62 41.652 Patna Khagaul 5.32 44364 0.005 0.004 3.812 2.90 4.92 6.08 7.51 9.30 30.713 Patna Danapur 11.63 182429 0.020 0.015 15.279 11.61 19.71 24.37 30.10 37.28 123.084 Patna Mokama 14.18 60678 0.007 0.005 5.481 4.17 7.07 8.74 10.80 13.37 44.155 Patna Masaurhi 9.43 59803 0.007 0.005 5.226 3.97 6.74 8.34 10.30 12.75 42.106 Patna Phulwari Sharif 6.48 81740 0.009 0.007 6.895 5.24 8.89 11.00 13.58 16.82 55.547 Buxur Buxur 5.16 102861 0.011 0.009 8.561 6.51 11.04 13.65 16.87 20.89 68.968 Buxur Dumraon 15.33 53618 0.006 0.005 4.952 3.76 6.39 7.90 9.76 12.08 39.899 Rohtash Sasaram 10.9 147408 0.016 0.012 12.404 9.43 16.00 19.78 24.44 30.27 99.9210 Rohtash Dehri Dalmiya N 21.32 137231 0.015 0.012 11.980 9.11 15.45 19.11 23.60 29.23 96.5011 Kaimur Bhabhua 7.12 50179 0.006 0.004 4.355 3.31 5.62 6.95 8.58 10.63 35.0812 Nalanda Hilsa 12.67 51052 0.006 0.005 4.640 3.53 5.99 7.40 9.14 11.32 37.3813 Jehanabad Jehanabad 20.23 103202 0.012 0.009 9.172 6.97 11.83 14.63 18.07 22.38 73.8814 Aurangabad Aurangabad 21.33 102244 0.012 0.009 9.137 6.94 11.79 14.57 18.00 22.29 73.6015 Nawada Nawada 5.68 98029 0.010 0.008 8.188 6.22 10.56 13.06 16.13 19.98 65.9616 Arval Arval* 24.43 51849 0.007 0.005 5.160 3.92 6.66 8.23 10.17 12.59 41.5717 Sitamarhi Sitamarhi 7.77 67818 0.007 0.006 5.814 4.42 7.50 9.27 11.45 14.19 46.8318 Vaisali Hajipur 19.64 147688 0.016 0.013 12.765 9.70 16.47 20.36 25.15 31.15 102.8319 E.champaran Motihari 13.89 126158 0.014 0.011 10.793 8.20 13.92 17.21 21.26 26.33 86.9420 E.champaran Raxaul 5.82 55536 0.006 0.005 4.740 3.60 6.11 7.56 9.34 11.56 38.1821 W.champaran Bettiah 8.01 132209 0.014 0.011 11.057 8.40 14.26 17.64 21.78 26.98 89.0622 W.champaran Bagaha 46.83 112634 0.014 0.011 10.968 8.34 14.15 17.49 21.61 26.76 88.3523 W.champaran Narkatiaganj 10.96 49507 0.006 0.004 4.449 3.38 5.74 7.10 8.76 10.85 35.8324 Bhagalpur Sultanganj 12.29 52892 0.006 0.005 4.775 3.63 6.16 7.62 9.41 11.65 38.4625 Darbhanga Benipur* 46.02 75317 0.010 0.008 7.904 6.01 10.20 12.61 15.57 19.28 63.6626 Madhubani Madhubani 2.52 75736 0.008 0.006 6.254 4.75 8.07 9.98 12.32 15.26 50.3827 Samastipur Samastipur 3.45 67925 0.007 0.006 5.655 4.30 7.29 9.02 11.14 13.80 45.5528 Munger Jamalpur 10.65 105434 0.011 0.009 8.983 6.83 11.59 14.33 17.70 21.92 72.3629 Lakisarai Lakhisarai 24.79 99979 0.012 0.009 9.087 6.91 11.72 14.49 17.90 22.17 73.1930 Sheikhpura Sheikhpura 15.58 62927 0.007 0.006 5.718 4.35 7.38 9.12 11.26 13.95 46.0631 Jamui Jamui 26.45 87357 0.010 0.008 8.125 6.17 10.48 12.96 16.01 19.82 65.4532 Khagaria Khagaria 2.97 49406 0.005 0.004 4.131 3.14 5.33 6.59 8.14 10.08 33.2833 Begusarai Beehat* 23.45 67952 0.008 0.006 6.431 4.89 8.30 10.26 12.67 15.69 51.8034 Saran Chapra 16.96 202352 0.022 0.017 17.105 13.00 22.07 27.28 33.70 41.74 137.7835 Siwan Siwan 13.05 135066 0.015 0.011 11.484 8.73 14.81 18.32 22.62 28.02 92.5136 Gopalganj Gopalganj 11.11 67339 0.008 0.006 5.904 4.49 7.62 9.42 11.63 14.41 47.5637 Saharsa Saharsa 21.13 156540 0.017 0.014 13.543 10.29 17.47 21.60 26.68 33.04 109.0938 Madhepura Madhepura 25.84 54472 0.007 0.005 5.428 4.13 7.00 8.66 10.69 13.24 43.7239 Saupaul Supaul 22.37 65437 0.008 0.006 6.185 4.70 7.98 9.87 12.18 15.09 49.8240 Araria Araria 30.97 79021 0.010 0.008 7.622 5.79 9.83 12.16 15.02 18.60 61.4041 Araria Forbesganj 4.98 50475 0.005 0.004 4.296 3.26 5.54 6.85 8.46 10.48 34.6042 Kishanganj Kishanganj 30.12 105782 0.013 0.010 9.765 7.42 12.60 15.57 19.24 23.83 78.65

653.33 3741116 0.422 0.329 329 250 425 525 649 804 2653

Sl. No.

Nagar Parisads

Area (Sq Km)

Popu. (2011)

Weightage Normalized Weightage

Devolved FundNormalized Weightage*

1000District

Total

5th SFC (2015-20)

Annexure-9.3(B)

Distribution of Devolved funds among Nagar Panchayats (Rs. Cr.)

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 TOTAL

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 131 Patna Fatwah 4.9 50961 0.004 0.003 3.376 2.57 4.36 5.39 6.65 8.24 27.202 Patna Maner 12 40068 0.004 0.003 2.970 2.26 3.83 4.74 5.85 7.25 23.923 Patna Bakhtiarpur 13.18 47897 0.004 0.004 3.505 2.66 4.52 5.59 6.91 8.55 28.234 Patna Khusrupur 4.23 15731 0.001 0.001 1.147 0.87 1.48 1.83 2.26 2.80 9.245 Patna Bikram* 13.99 22486 0.002 0.002 1.948 1.48 2.51 3.11 3.84 4.75 15.696 Rohtas kochas 24795 0.002 0.002 1.550 1.18 2.00 2.47 3.05 3.78 12.497 Patna Naubatpur* 14.39 25011 0.003 0.002 2.121 1.61 2.74 3.38 4.18 5.17 17.088 Bhojpur Piro 6.47 33785 0.003 0.002 2.363 1.80 3.05 3.77 4.66 5.77 19.039 Bhojpur Behea 4.06 26707 0.002 0.002 1.827 1.39 2.36 2.91 3.60 4.46 14.7210 Bhojpur Jagdishpur 25.63 32447 0.004 0.003 3.021 2.30 3.90 4.82 5.95 7.37 24.3311 Bhojpur Koilwar 5.6 17725 0.002 0.001 1.325 1.01 1.71 2.11 2.61 3.23 10.6712 Bhojpur Shahpur 11.04 17767 0.002 0.002 1.538 1.17 1.98 2.45 3.03 3.75 12.3913 Rohtas Bikramganj 15.64 48465 0.005 0.004 3.636 2.76 4.69 5.80 7.16 8.87 29.2914 Rohtas Koath 5.87 18890 0.002 0.001 1.408 1.07 1.82 2.25 2.77 3.44 11.3415 Rohtas Nokha 13.45 27302 0.003 0.002 2.228 1.69 2.87 3.55 4.39 5.44 17.9416 Rohtas Nasriganj 8.69 23819 0.002 0.002 1.826 1.39 2.36 2.91 3.60 4.45 14.7117 Nalanda Islampur 6 35641 0.003 0.002 2.461 1.87 3.17 3.93 4.85 6.00 19.8218 Nalanda Silao 9 25674 0.003 0.002 1.954 1.48 2.52 3.12 3.85 4.77 15.7419 Nalanda Rajgir 50.18 41587 0.006 0.005 4.543 3.45 5.86 7.25 8.95 11.08 36.5920 Jahanabad Makhdumpur 23.47 31994 0.004 0.003 2.909 2.21 3.75 4.64 5.73 7.10 23.4321 Gaya Bodh Gaya 19.58 38439 0.004 0.003 3.161 2.40 4.08 5.04 6.23 7.71 25.4722 Gaya Sherghati 10.79 40666 0.004 0.003 2.960 2.25 3.82 4.72 5.83 7.22 23.8523 Gaya Tikari 2.66 21324 0.002 0.001 1.436 1.09 1.85 2.29 2.83 3.50 11.5724 Aurangabad Rafiganj 4.56 35536 0.003 0.002 2.399 1.82 3.09 3.83 4.73 5.85 19.3225 Aurangabad Nabinagar 17.42 23984 0.003 0.002 2.174 1.65 2.80 3.47 4.28 5.30 17.5126 Aurangabad Daudnagar 13.96 52364 0.005 0.004 3.815 2.90 4.92 6.08 7.51 9.31 30.7327 Nawada Warisaliganj 31.11 34056 0.004 0.003 3.334 2.53 4.30 5.32 6.57 8.13 26.8528 Nawada Hisua 6.33 32585 0.003 0.002 2.283 1.73 2.94 3.64 4.50 5.57 18.3929 Vaishali Mahuaa 25964 0.002 0.002 1.624 1.23 2.09 2.59 3.20 3.96 13.0830 Bhagalpur Naugachhia 11.24 49069 0.004 0.004 3.503 2.66 4.52 5.59 6.90 8.55 28.2231 Bhagalpur Kahalgaon 0.63 33700 0.003 0.002 2.132 1.62 2.75 3.40 4.20 5.20 17.1732 Banka Banka 18.87 45977 0.005 0.004 3.605 2.74 4.65 5.75 7.10 8.80 29.0433 Banka Amarpur 11.18 25336 0.003 0.002 2.017 1.53 2.60 3.22 3.97 4.92 16.2534 Sitamarhi Bairgania 14.32 42895 0.004 0.003 3.236 2.46 4.18 5.16 6.38 7.90 26.0735 Sitamarhi Belsand 10.09 20566 0.002 0.002 1.677 1.27 2.16 2.67 3.30 4.09 13.5036 Sitamarhi Dumra 2.28 15674 0.001 0.001 1.068 0.81 1.38 1.70 2.10 2.61 8.6137 Sitamarhi Janakpur Road 3.1 15129 0.001 0.001 1.066 0.81 1.38 1.70 2.10 2.60 8.5938 Muzzaffarpur Motipur 12.77 28572 0.003 0.002 2.281 1.73 2.94 3.64 4.49 5.57 18.3739 Muzzaffarpur Kanti 16.16 25051 0.003 0.002 2.192 1.67 2.83 3.50 4.32 5.35 17.6640 Muzzaffarpur Sahebganj 9.81 23224 0.002 0.002 1.832 1.39 2.36 2.92 3.61 4.47 14.7641 vaishali Lalganj 7.86 37098 0.003 0.003 2.624 1.99 3.38 4.19 5.17 6.40 21.1442 vaishali Mahnar Bazar 10.02 48293 0.004 0.003 3.408 2.59 4.40 5.44 6.71 8.31 27.4543 Sheohar Sheohar 9.33 28116 0.003 0.002 2.119 1.61 2.73 3.38 4.17 5.17 17.0744 E.champaran Chakia 6.23 20686 0.002 0.002 1.535 1.17 1.98 2.45 3.02 3.74 12.3645 E.champaran Sugauli 19.25 38815 0.004 0.003 3.172 2.41 4.09 5.06 6.25 7.74 25.5546 E.champaran Dhaka 12.93 42063 0.004 0.003 3.131 2.38 4.04 4.99 6.17 7.64 25.2247 E.champaran Areraj 13.7 26014 0.003 0.002 2.157 1.64 2.78 3.44 4.25 5.26 17.3748 E.champaran Kesaria 17.1 18984 0.002 0.002 1.849 1.41 2.39 2.95 3.64 4.51 14.8949 E.champaran Mahesi 7.16 25995 0.002 0.002 1.903 1.45 2.45 3.03 3.75 4.64 15.3350 E.champaran Pakaridayal* 19.13 29582 0.003 0.003 2.590 1.97 3.34 4.13 5.10 6.32 20.86

S.NoNagar

PanchayatsArea

(Sq Km)Population (2011) Weightage

Normalized Weightage

Normalized Weightage*

1000District

Devolved Fund

Contd. 5th SFC (2015-20)

Annexure-9.3(C)

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 TOTAL1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

51 Kaimur Mohniya 32221 0.003 0.002 2.015 1.53 2.60 3.21 3.97 4.92 16.2352 W.champaran Chanpatia 7.57 27095 0.003 0.002 1.987 1.51 2.56 3.17 3.91 4.85 16.0153 W.champaran Ramnagar 16.2 48411 0.005 0.004 3.654 2.78 4.71 5.83 7.20 8.92 29.4354 Madhubani Jainagar 1.55 21782 0.002 0.001 1.422 1.08 1.83 2.27 2.80 3.47 11.4555 Madhubani Jhanjharpur 12.44 30590 0.003 0.002 2.394 1.82 3.09 3.82 4.72 5.84 19.2956 Madhubani Ghoghardiha 8.73 18257 0.002 0.001 1.479 1.12 1.91 2.36 2.91 3.61 11.9257 Samastipur Dalsinghsarai 2.94 23862 0.002 0.002 1.606 1.22 2.07 2.56 3.16 3.92 12.9458 Samastipur Rosera 1.03 31155 0.003 0.002 1.988 1.51 2.56 3.17 3.92 4.85 16.0159 Munger Haweli Kharagp 9.74 31385 0.003 0.002 2.339 1.78 3.02 3.73 4.61 5.71 18.8460 Lakhisarai Barahiya 26.54 43032 0.005 0.004 3.718 2.83 4.80 5.93 7.32 9.07 29.9561 Jamui Jhajha 9.87 40646 0.004 0.003 2.924 2.22 3.77 4.66 5.76 7.13 23.5562 Sheikhpura Barbigha 15.6 46075 0.004 0.003 3.485 2.65 4.50 5.56 6.87 8.50 28.0763 Khagaria Gogari Jamalpur 9.49 37753 0.003 0.003 2.728 2.07 3.52 4.35 5.37 6.66 21.9764 Begusarai Bakhree* 10.65 40043 0.004 0.003 2.916 2.22 3.76 4.65 5.74 7.12 23.4965 Begusarai Tegharha* 15.8 56234 0.005 0.004 4.128 3.14 5.32 6.58 8.13 10.07 33.2566 Begusarai Balia* 14.74 47550 0.005 0.004 3.544 2.69 4.57 5.65 6.98 8.65 28.5567 Saran Sonepur 8.27 37776 0.003 0.003 2.682 2.04 3.46 4.28 5.28 6.54 21.6168 Saran Dighwara 13.27 32741 0.003 0.003 2.561 1.95 3.30 4.08 5.04 6.25 20.6369 Saran Madhaura 12.62 29932 0.003 0.002 2.360 1.79 3.04 3.76 4.65 5.76 19.0170 Saran Revelganj 12.48 39039 0.004 0.003 2.924 2.22 3.77 4.66 5.76 7.13 23.5571 Siwan Maharajganj 7.6 24282 0.002 0.002 1.812 1.38 2.34 2.89 3.57 4.42 14.6072 Siwan Mairwa 6.23 23565 0.002 0.002 1.715 1.30 2.21 2.73 3.38 4.18 13.8173 Gopalganj Mirganj 5.48 26240 0.002 0.002 1.853 1.41 2.39 2.96 3.65 4.52 14.9274 Gopalganj Barauli 22.21 41877 0.004 0.003 3.478 2.64 4.49 5.55 6.85 8.49 28.0275 Gopalganj Kataiya 12.06 20193 0.002 0.002 1.729 1.31 2.23 2.76 3.41 4.22 13.9376 Supaul Birpur 8.67 19932 0.002 0.002 1.582 1.20 2.04 2.52 3.12 3.86 12.7477 Supaul Nirmali 5.3 20189 0.002 0.001 1.468 1.12 1.89 2.34 2.89 3.58 11.8278 Madhepura Murliganj 14.07 28691 0.003 0.002 2.339 1.78 3.02 3.73 4.61 5.71 18.8479 Purnia Kasba 15.74 30421 0.003 0.003 2.511 1.91 3.24 4.01 4.95 6.13 20.2380 Purnia Banmankhi 20.15 30336 0.003 0.003 2.677 2.03 3.45 4.27 5.27 6.53 21.5681 Araria Jogbani 15.12 39281 0.004 0.003 3.041 2.31 3.92 4.85 5.99 7.42 24.5082 Kishanganj Baadurganj 29.17 36993 0.004 0.003 3.442 2.62 4.44 5.49 6.78 8.40 27.7383 Kishanganj Thakurganj 10.46 18348 0.002 0.002 1.552 1.18 2.00 2.48 3.06 3.79 12.5084 Katihar Manihari 11.31 26629 0.003 0.002 2.103 1.60 2.71 3.35 4.14 5.13 16.9485 Saran Parsa Bazar 36520 0.003 0.002 2.284 1.74 2.95 3.64 4.50 5.57 18.3986 Saran Ekama Bazar 30449 0.002 0.002 1.904 1.45 2.46 3.04 3.75 4.65 15.3487 Saharsa S.Bakhtiyarpur 21654 0.002 0.001 1.354 1.03 1.75 2.16 2.67 3.30 10.91

980.46 2745688 0.268 0.210 209.64 159 270 334 413 512 1689

Devolved FundArea (Sq Km)

Population (2011)

Weightage Normalized Weightage

Normalized Weightage*

1000

Total

S.NoDistrict Nagar Panchayats

5th SFC (2015-20)

(ii)

Performance Grants Criteria for GP

Sl. Criteria Marks (FM: 100)

Remarks

1 Minimum four Meetings of Gram Sabha in a year 10 2 Regular Meetings of the Standing Committees (1 per month) 10 3 Enhance Own Revenue at least 10% 20 4 Submit audited accounts every year by next June 10 5 Implement PRIASoft accounting software 10 6 Prepare Annual Plan 5 7 Prepare Annual Budget 5 8 Provide Drinking Water, Drainage and Sanitation as per

Govt. Programmes 15

9 Have at least one Playground in every GP 5 10 Make Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan functional if the Building is

constructed 10

Note:

a. Use of Performance Grants will be untied. b. PRD will announce the report card for performance grant.

Performance Grants Criteria for GK

Sl. Criteria Marks(FM: 100) Remarks 1 Dispute free Village 50 2 Cases Filed and Disposed in a year 30 3 No. of sittings of GK 10 4 Case records properly maintained 10

Annexure-9.4(A)

5th SFC (2015-20)

Performance Criteria for ULBs

Note:

a. Use of Performance Grants will be untied. b. Conditions 1a, 2a are mandatary, whereas, others are additional/optional. c. UDD will announce the report card for performance grant. d. Qualifying marks for performance grants will be 60, 50 and 40 for Nigams, Parishads and

Panchayats respectively.

Sr. No.

Criteria Marks (FM: 100)

Remarks

1.a Additional revenue from Own Sources exceeding 20%, 15% and 10% for Nigams, Parishads and Panchayats respectively compared to previous year

15

b Meeting 90% of target of OTR 5 Target must be fixed based on no. of holdings and GIS

2.a CAG audit report/Internal Auditor reports 10 CA&G should rate ULBs as: a. Satisfactory, b. Less than Satisfactory, c. Unsatisfactory

b Double entry system of accounting 5 c. Preparation of Annual Plan 5 d. Preparation of Annual Budget 5 3. 75%, 65%, 60% Expenditure of

a. Total Central Grants for Nigams, Parishads and Panchayats respectively

10

b. MMNVY funds for Nigams, Parishads and Panchayats respectively

5

4. Functional Ward Sabha/Committee 10 5. Regular Standing Committee Meeting (Min 1 in a

month) 10 Action taken report must be

submitted to UDD. 6. Preparation of CDP/Master Plan 5 Based on GIS mapping 7. Improve levy and collection of user charges by 10% 5 8. e-municipality functional 5 Atleast 5 modules 9. Meeting the 40%, 30% and 20% SLB for Nigams,

Parishads and Panchayats respectively 5

Annexure-9.4(B)

5th SFC (2015-20)

5th SFC (2015-15)

Appendix 3.1

Projection of urban population of Bihar using different methods

Bihar - Projected Urban Population (million)

Year RGI1 Method 1 Method 2 Method 3 total % total % total % total %

1991 6.49 10.05 6.49 10.05 6.49 10.05 6.49 10.05 2001 8.66 10.43 8.66 10.43 8.66 10.43 8.66 10.43 2011 11.76 11.29 11.76 11.29 11.76 11.29 11.76 11.29 2016 1096 10.5 11.86 N.A. 13.76 N.A. 13.63 N.A. 2021 11.58 10.6 13.17 N.A. 16.16 N.A. 15.92 N.A. 2026 13.22 11.6 14.63 N.A. 19.04 N.A. 18.53 N.A. 2031 N.A N.A. 16.23 N.A. 22.53 N.A. 21.57 N.A.

RGI1- Registrar General Of India

Method 1: Population of all cities and towns which are common to the two censuses, 2001 and 2011, is projected using the 2001-2011 AEGR to the years 2016, 2021, 2026 and 2031, and aggregated according to the city-size categories to which they belong to in the base year. This method excludes the effect of what is called the “size-class jumping”, i.e., when a city moves from one size category to the next higher category. The AEGRs in this method are dampened on this account. AEGR % city size wise is given below:

Method 2 : Population of each city-size class is projected to the years 2016, 2021, 2026, and 2031 on the basis of the AEGR observed for 2001-2011 for each city-size class category. These AEGRs incorporate the effect of size-class jumping. For instance, the number of cities in the size category of 100,000 and 1 million population increased from 18 in 2001 to 25 in 2011. The AEGR of this city-size class includes the effect of this charge as well. AEGR % city size wise is given below : City Size >1 million 100,000-1 million 50,000-100,000 20,000-50,000 <20,000 Total

AEGR (2001-11)% 1.62 3.93 3.14 1.69 5.87 3.03

Method 3 : The third method for city-size class projections of urban populations has involved three steps: (i) Bihar’s urban population has been projected by using AEGR of 2001-2011 for the years 2016, 2021, 2026, and 2031 and used as the base for placing urban populations according to city-size categories, (ii) urban population of the year 2011 is divided into city-size categories and the respective shares of each city-size is maintained For the estimation exercise, the population growth rates for the seven cities (excluding Patna) are applied to project the population for all other size classes. AEGR % city size wise is given below: City Size >1 million 100,000-1 million 50,000-100,000 20,000-50,000 <20,000 Total

AEGR (2001-11)% 1.93 4.21 2.93 1.66 4.59 3.06

City Size >1 million 100,000-1 million 50,000-100,000 20,000-50,000 <20,000 Total

AEGR(2001-11)% 1.62 2.02 2.60 2.16 1.95 2.07

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-15)

Projected Population of Bihar Cities , United Nations methodology*

Cities Population (Million) 2016 2021 2026 2030

Patna 2.247 2.472 2.763 3.016 Gaya 0.516 0.569 0.641 0.704 Bhagalpur 0.445 0.489 0.550 0.605 Muzaffarpur 0.449 0.505 0.571 0.628 Purna 0.394 0.468 0.534 0.587 Dharbhanga 0.329 0.359 0.404 0.445 Bihar Shariff 0.337 0.479 0.429 0.472 Begusari 0.390 0.514 0.597 0.657

* United Nations in the 2014 World Urbanization Prospects have provided a methodology for making size-class projections of urban populations as also the quinquennial estimates of urban population, up to the year 2030, by size classes, for countries. These estimates are available for all cities with a population of 3,00,000 and above. There are 8 cities of Bihar which are included in the United Nations estimates.

Projected population for each size-class, -United Nations methodology

Size class Projected population (million) 2016 2021 2026 2030

>1 million 2.23 2.53 2.87 3.15 1,00,000 – 1 million 6.07 6.86 7.58 8.37

50,000-1,00,000 1.84 2.08 2.30 2.54 20,000-50,000 2.74 3.15 3.48 3.85

<20,000 0.51 0.58 0.64 0.71 Total 13.45 15.20 16.87 18.61

Projected Urban Population (Million) and level of Urbanization (in%) under different methods

Year 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Total %. Total %. Total. %. Total. %. Total %

10.96 10.5 11.58 10.6 13.22 11.6 - -

Linear 11.76 11.29 13.84 11.80 15.92 12.20 18.01 12.52 20.09 12.79

Exponential 11.76 11.29 13.67 11.74 15.92 12.20 18.53 12.67 21.57 13.17

URGD 11.76 11.29 13.67 11.72 15.88 12.16 18.45 12.62 21.44 13.09

Increasing URGD 11.76 11.29 15.11 11.84 19.10 12.63 23.83 13.68 29.43 15.05

Scenario-one* N.A. N.A. 16.97 14.6 24.49 18.8 35.35 24.2 51.03 34.2

Scenario-Two** N.A. N.A. 15.11 13.0 19.10 14.6 23.83 16.3 29.42 18.0

* Bihar reaching India’s urbanization level of 2011 ** Bihar registers the same percentage point increase in urban population as India did during 2001-2011

(ii)

5th SFC (2015-15)

1

1. POLITICAL WILL: Solving housing problems on a city-wide scale requires political will on the part of government and on the part of society as a whole.

2. INTEGRATED APPROACHES AND A CITY VISION: Long-term, sustainable housing planning has to be driven by need, and needs are different in different areas.

3. A SUPPORTIVE LOCAL POLICY ENVIRONMENT: Including a good information base on the city’s informal settlements. Regulatory and procedural bottlenecks, building and land-use bylaws which make it difficult for poor communities to plan and implement their own self-help housing must be adjusted and made more flexible.

4. THE RIGHT NATIONAL REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: There has to be a national regulatory framework that stimulates on-site upgrading and provision of services for the poor, including effective land and housing rights and land registration systems, flexible infrastructure standards, formal planning which recognizes informal participation, clear responsibilities for after-project supervision and evaluation, and regulations which make it easier for finance institutions to lend to the poor.

5. RESPONSIVE LAND AND HOUSING POLICIES: There have to be mechanisms to release un-used public land for low-income housing in cities — for today’s and for future needs.

6. POLICIES TO SECURE LAND TENURE: Policies and procedures to help communities in informal settlements to regularize and secure their land tenure are essential. (See Quick Guide 3 on Land)

7. MECHANISMS FOR FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY: Subsidy systems and cost recovery strategies that are clear and transparent make a housing programme more financially sustainable. (See Quick Guide 5 on Housing Finance)

8. STRATEGIC ALLIANCES: Big housing problems are impossible for any one group to solve alone. City-wide solutions require partnership, and should include poor communities, local authorities, utility companies, land owners, formal and informal land developers, NGOs, academics, religious groups and the private-sector.

9. STRONG AND WELL-COORDINATED INSTITUTIONS: Developing institutional arrangements in cities which effectively support city-wide housing solutions requires strong coordination that is acceptable to all parties.

10. TECHNICAL CAPACITY: City-wide housing solutions require a wide range of special services: social and technical support to communities, participatory planning, architecture and engineering, guidance on appropriate technologies, programme coordination, project and contract management, construction skills that match needs in informal areas, engineering and construction, affordable building materials and micro-finance services.

Source: Housing the poor in Asian Cities, UN-HABITAT

Appendix: 3.2

What do you need to go up to city-wide scale? : - UN-HABITAT

5th SFC (2015-15)

Summary of GoI recommended Municipal Cadres

Appendix 3.3

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-15)

(ii)

5th SFC (2015-15)

IT Framework of Smart City: Draft, URDPFA Guidelines, 2014, MoUD, GoI 5.3.3 SMART city A smart city uses information, communication and technology to enhance its liveability, workability and sustainability. A smart city is build-up by three key basic functions: Information collection, communicating, and crunching (analyzing). The two aspects of a smart city are- 1. DATA- Created by the already implemented information technology. Some of the Indian cities have created a cornucopia of data in past few decades which can form the basis for the development of a Smart city. 2. DIGITAL DNA (BUILT ENVIRONMENT DATA)-Data collected by building departments, engineering departments, land department, planning department, tax department and department of postal services. India is still finding its footprints in this regard. India’s urban population is estimated to be 590 million by 2030 and to accommodate this, 68 cities with population of more than 1 million, 13 cities with more than 4 million, and 6 megacities with population of 10 million is expected to grow50. In order to meet growing urban class India will need- _ US$1.2 trillion in capital investment _ 2.5billion square meters roads to be paved _ 700-900 million square meters of commercial and residential space _ 7400 kms of subways and transportation to be constructed 5.3.3.1 Need for a smart city 1. Growing urbanization-over 700 million people will be added to urban population over the next 10 years. The United Nations projects that the world’s cities will need to accommodate an additional 3 billion residents by the middle of the century. A recent UN report suggests that 40,000 new cities will be needed worldwide. 2.Growing stress- Today’s cities face significant challenges such as increasing populations, environmental and regulatory requirements, declining tax bases and budget and increased costs, pollution, crowding and sprawl to inadequate housing, high unemployment and rising crime rates. 3. Inadequate infrastructure- Much of the developed world has infrastructure that is near or past its design life, requiring massive upgrades51. While, new developments have put pressure on infrastructure. 4. Growing economic competition- The world has seen a rapid rise in competition between cities to secure the investments, jobs, businesses and talent for economic success. 5. Growing expectation-As per United Nations survey of over 560,000 citizens from 194 countries revealed their top priorities are a good education, better healthcare and an honest and responsive government. 6. Growing environmental challenges-Cities house half of the world’s population but use two-thirds of the world’s energy and generate three-fourths of the world’s CO2 emissions, which needs to be managed. 7. Rapidly improving technology capabilities 8. Protection of Business from Cyber Crime 9. Revolutionize people’s relationship with Government

5.3.3.2 Important Insights The following figure provides the important insights of Smart City application globally.

Appendix 3.4

Contd.

5th SFC (2015-15)

Figure 5.5: Important insights of SMART city application globally

5.3.3.3 Universal Targets to achieve SMART city development There are mandatory targets that must be accomplished in order to propel on the smart city path, these are termed as “Universal” as each of them applies to every city responsibility. The Check Sheet (Implementation Progress) reflects the strong and the weak points in the existing city infrastructure. Status of this matrix reflects the preparedness of the city to be a Smart city and helps in prioritizing the points on the basis of the status (progress) in order to drive on the path of development towards being a Smart city.

(ii) Contd.

5th SFC (2015-15)

The essential elements of focus in a Smart city include: 5.3.3.4 Smart grid concept A smart grid is a modernized electrical grid that uses analogue or digital information and communications technology to gather and act on information, such as information about the behaviors of suppliers and consumers, in an automated fashion to improve the efficiency, reliability, economics, and sustainability of the production and distribution of electricity. Metering and Smart power generations are the two basic steps taken in the direction of handling power in cities. Smart meter- Smart meters help utilities to better detect and manage outages. Smart meters coupled with advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) helps to pinpoint problems in the grid, allowing determination of faults and failures in no time52. b. Smart power generator- Smart power generation is a concept of matching electricity production with demand using multiple generators, alternatively to buffer the peak and high demand for load balancing. These generators are designed on smart technologies to operate efficiently at chosen load53. 5.3.3.5 Smart Transportation Concept The smart transportation refers to the integration of information and communication technologies with transport infrastructure to improve economic performance, safety, mobility and time saving of the citizens. The above can be accomplished by incorporating the following technologies in the existing structure: a. Digital view terminals-These terminals provide users with an intelligent navigation system that optimizes the best routes, alternative destinations, efficient movement by a well-informed guidance from the terminal. For example, the entire city's bus lines, their stops, and drop-off and pick-up times are displayed on the terminals along with satellite street views of locations, such as of restaurants and other tourist attractions. Alternative destinations such as coordinates for banks, schools, hospitals, and real estate are also featured for the citizens to determine best suited route. b. Intelligent roads- It includes setting up of sensor technologies in the pavements and over the bridges which can be combined with the data collected from moving vehicles to provide operators, maintenance authorities and road users with rapid warning of emerging problems. c. Traffic Prediction Tool-It predicts traffic flows over pre-set durations (10, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes) by stimulations. With these predictions, traffic controllers can anticipate and better manage the flow of traffic to prevent congestion and save time. Other smart applications in the intelligent Transportation system may consist of:

Contd. (iii)

5th SFC (2015-15)

_Optimised dynamic signalling _ Automatic parking system, _ Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), _ Satellite application for emergency handling, traffic alerts, road safety and incident prevention _ Automated transport systems

5.3.3.6 Application of Built Environment Data The built environment data of the city is captured by the different departments to develop a blue print of the city and its attributes for virtual representation of the physical city. This data forms the DNA for the smart city. It includes: _ Demographic distribution _ Land uses _ Transportation and other infrastructure framework _ Forests and parks _ General urban plan _ Space and organization plan This data when linked with the Information communication and technology develops the digital DNA which forms the basis for the Smart city. The software and service layers for the built environment data can contain the following layers54: _ Data layer: that presents all the information, which is required, produced and collected in the smart city. _ User layer: that concerns all e-service end-users and the stakeholders of a smart city for dialoguing and in decision making. The participation includes: – the local stakeholders –who supervise the smart city, and design – those who offer e-services- and – the end-users –who “consume” the smart city’s services _ Service layer: This incorporates all the particular e-services being offered by the smart city. _ Infrastructure layer: that contains network, information systems and other facilities, which contribute to e-Service deployment. 5.3.3.7 Urban planning and smart city interrelations On the attributes discussed in the preceding section, various e-service portfolios can be offered in a modern smart city, some of which have been mentioned below:

(iv)