relating forage components to forage quality shelby filley, douglas county david bohnert, eoarc,...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
212 views
TRANSCRIPT
RELATING FORAGE COMPONENTS TO FORAGE
QUALITY
Shelby Filley, Douglas County
David Bohnert, EOARC, Harney County
Oregon State University Extension Service, Department of Animal Sciences
Quality Forage - What is it ?
“contains a high level of digestible energy and is consumed in large amounts per unit time”
Kim Cassel, former University of Maryland dairy nutritionist
Quality Forage - What is it ?
“must be high in intake, digestibility, and efficiency of utilization”
Dale Waldo, USDA nutritionist
Importance of Forage Quality
Accurate Prediction of Livestock production
Forage Marketing
The Nutrition Puzzle
PROTEIN FAT
ASHORMINERALS
SUGARS & STARCHES
WATER
FIBER
D
RY
MATTER
MAINTENANCE
GROWTH
PREGNANCY &REPRODUCTION
PRODUCTION
COMPONENETSOF FEED
ANIMALREQUIREMENTS
Plant Cell
•PROTEIN•SUGARS•STARCH•PECTINS•FATS
PRIMARYWALL
SECONDARYWALL
CELL CONTENTS
CROSS SECTION
Inside
SECONDARY WALL
PRIMARY WALL
CELLULOSE
HEMICELLULOSE
LIGNIN ACIDDETERGENTFIBER (ADF)
NEUTRALDETERGENTFIBER (NDF)
OUTSIDE
Forage ADF and Dry Matter Digestibility
57
59
61
63
65
67
69
28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Forage ADF (%)
Dry
Mat
ter
Dig
esti
bili
ty (
%)
Adapted from Miller et al. (1991)
Derived Terms
DDM - digestible DM 88.9 - (.779 X ADF%)
TDN - total digestible nutrients 88.9 - (.79 X ADF%)
Derived Terms, cont’d
NEm - net energy for maintenance; Mcal/lb (TDN% X .01318) - .132
NEg - net energy for growth; Mcal/lb (TDN% X .01318) - .459
NEl - net energy for lactation; Mcal/lb (TDN% X .01114) - .054
Inside
SECONDARY WALL
PRIMARY WALL
CELLULOSE
HEMICELLULOSE
LIGNIN ACIDDETERGENTFIBER (ADF)
NEUTRALDETERGENTFIBER (NDF)
OUTSIDE
Forage NDF and Dry Matter Intake
.0
.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78
Forage NDF (%)
Dry
Mat
ter
inta
ke (
% o
f B
W)
Adapted from Mertens (1985) & Burns et al. (1997)
DMI - dry matter intake 120 / NDF%
RFV - relative feed value (DDM X DMI) / 1.29
CP - crude protein N% X 6.25
Derived Terms, cont’d
Forage Quality and Animal Performance
Chemical Composition(CP, NDF, ADF, Vit., & Minerals)
Digestibility
Palatability
Rate of Passage
Availability
ForageNutritiveValue
ForageConsumed
AnimalPerformance
Proper sampling
Analysis Results
COMPONENTAS
SAMPLEDDRY
MATTERBASIS
% MOISTURE 9 *****
% DRYMATTER
91 *****
Analysis Results
COMPONENTAS
SAMPLEDDRY
MATTERBASIS
% CRUDEPROTEIN
18.6 20.4
% ADJUSTEDCRUDEPROTEIN
18.6 20.4
Analysis Results
COMPONENTAS
SAMPLEDDRY MATTER
BASIS
% ACIDDETERGENTFIBER (ADF)
30.6 33.6
% NEUTRALDETERGENTFIBER (NDF)
37.0 40.7
% NON-STRUCTURALCARBOHYDRATES(NSC)
24.5 26.9
Analysis Results
COMPONENTAS
SAMPLEDDRY MATTER
BASIS
% TOTALDIGESTIBLENUTRIENTS(TDN)
55 60
TYPICAL CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GRASSES
MATURITY CP ADF NDF
VEG-BOOT >18 <33 <55
BOOT-EARLY HEAD 13-18 34-38 55-60
HEAD-MILK 8-12 39-41 61-65
DOUGH <8 >41 >65
TYPICAL CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF ALFALFA
MATURITY CP ADF NDF
Bud-First Flower >19 <31 <40
F.F.- mid bloom 17-19 31-35 40-46
Mid-full bloom 13-16 36-41 46-51
Post bloom <13 >41 >51
Forage Marketing
Moore (1978) suggested producers will invest in high quality forage if: Forage is a large part of the diet Animal productivity increases as forage
quality increases Increased animal productivity is
profitable
Forage Monetary Value
The monetary value of a
forage must reflect its
intended use in a feeding
program !
Influence of Alfalfa Quality on Milk Production
50
55
60
65
70
95 117 136 148
Relative feed Value (RFV)
Milk
pro
duct
ion
(lb/d
)
Adapted from Turnbull et al. (1982)
Influence of Alfalfa Quality on ADG of Beef Steers
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
128 137 167
Relative feed Value (RFV)
ADG
(lb/
d)
Adapted from Miller et al. (1991)
WHY DO I NEED THIS INFORMATION ??
FORAGE
COMPONENETS
&
QUALITY
ANIMAL
REQUIR
EMENTS
THE NUTRITION PUZZLE
Thank-you
Forage Quality Determinants
Total Nitrogen
ADF
NDF
Measured
Crude Protein
TDN
Digestible DM
Dry matter intake
Derived
Other Terms
NET ENERGY (MCAL/LB)NE lactation
NE maintenance
NE growth
DIGESTIBLE ENERGY (DE) (MCAL/LB)
TDN (%) for HORSES
Measured Terms
DM - dry matter
Total N - nitrogen content
DIN - rumen degradable intake nitrogen
UIN - rumen undegradable intake nitrogen
Measured Terms
NDF - neutral detergent fiber
ADF - acid detergent fiber
ADFN - acid detergent fiber N
Derived Terms
CP - crude protein N% X 6.25
DIP - degradable intake protein
DIN% X 6.25
UIP - undegradable intake protein
UIN% X 6.25
ADFCP - ADF CP
ADFN% X 6.25
Derived Terms
ACP - available CP (CP% X [100 - {ADFCP% -12%}]) / 100
DCP - digestible CP CP% X .72
DDM - digestible DM 88.9 - (.779 X ADF%)
TDN - total digestible nutrients 88.9 - (.79 X ADF%)
GRASS/CLOVER HAYAND HALAGE
LOW-PROTEIN
(5-8.9%CP)
MID-PROTEIN
(9-11.9%CP)
HIGH-PROTEIN
(12-16%CP)
HAYLAGE(1 SAMPLE)
CRUDEPROTEIN (%) 6.9 9.9 12.5 9.0ACIDDETERGENTFIBER (%) 42 39 37 44.1NEUTRALDETERGENTFIBER (%) 66 64 57 65.8TOTALDIGESTIBLENUTRIENTS(%) 56 58 60 57
% OF SAMPLES 64 28 8 -
ALFALFA BASED FORAGESALFALFA/
GRASS MIXALFALFA ALFALFA
HAYLAGE
CRUDEPROTEIN(%) 17 - 20 16- 20 20ACIDDETERGENTFIBER (%) 31 -38 34-43 41
NEUTRALDETERGENTFIBER (%) 43 - 50 41-53 50TOTALDIGESTIBLENUTRIENTS(%)
59 - 61 56-60 57