regional transportation plan
DESCRIPTION
Regional Transportation Plan. First Draft Hybrid Scenario. Valley Metro Comments. The Regional Transit Study Documented large unmet transit needs. Modeling may understate ridership for LRT due to coding. Scenario C is aggressive – reducing the network will improve performance. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Regional Transportation Plan
First Draft Hybrid Scenario
![Page 2: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Valley Metro Comments The Regional Transit Study
Documented large unmet transit needs.
Modeling may understate ridership for LRT due to coding.
Scenario C is aggressive – reducing the network will improve performance.
Need to include supporting infrastructure in coding (park & ride, local bus, etc.)
![Page 3: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ADOT Comments Construct South Mtn as soon as possible. Construct L303 as an ultimate freeway, with
interim roadway in the near term. ROW preservation and interim construction of
L303 to Riggs Rd. Support I-10 Reliever and Williams Gateway
Parkway with consideration for staging with full ROW preservation.
Support L303: New River spur for staged construction with full ROW preservation.
![Page 4: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ADOT Comments (cont’d) Major reconstruction to SR51 from I-10 to
Glendale required if adding capacity. Funding for I-17 from I-10 to Dunlap inadequate.
Funding for SR 74 access control and widening to 4-lane divided.
Support regional bus, express and LRT funding at about $4.0 billion.
Support arterial funding for regional connectivity. Fund Grand Avenue from the Arterial Streets
category.
![Page 5: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Support Q of L projects such as “quiet” pavements, noise walls and landscaping.
Need to address additional maintenance funding.
Focus sales tax on expansion of the regional system and new corridors. Focus ADOT funding on other freeways/highways.
ADOT Comments (cont’d)
![Page 6: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Maricopa County Comments Only fund capital from ½ cent tax Encourage innovative approaches such
as tolled HOT / HOV lanes East-West mobility needs from L101 to
L303 Extend SR 74 to connect to proposed
Canamex Consider 5 cent gas tax increase and
index to inflation for maintenance
![Page 7: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Maricopa County Comments (continued) Fund specific arterial improvements
and only on the County’s Primary System
No sales tax for arterial maintenance Fund BRT and express bus capital, no
O&M No LRT funding Other regional programs funded 50/50.
![Page 8: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
½ CentSales TaxExtension
$9.0 BillionSales Tax
A DO T15% Funds
$0.8 Billion
- Legislated- Board Policy
Gas Tax
A DO TD iscretionary
Funds
$4.5 B illion
- Federal- State
Gas Tax
Phoenix/R PTA
Federal Sub-allocated5307 Funds
$0.8 B illion
Phoenix/R PTA
Federal D iscretionary5309 Funds
$1.3 Billion
M AG FederalSub-allocated
(STP)
Surface Transportation
Funds
$0.4 B illion
Federal
(C M AQ)
C ongestionM itigationA ir Quality
Funds
$0.8 B illion
Major Regional Revenue Sources (2006-2025)*
M A R IC O PAA SSO C IATIO N o f
G O VER N M EN TS
Controlled Access State H ighways
State H ighway Im provem ents
Bus - Capital
Light Rail - CapitalBus - Capita l
Streets and H ighwaysTransit - Capita l
Air Quality and Congestion Relief ProjectsTransit - Capita l
HighwaysArteria l StreetsTransit
$ 17.6 b illio n
![Page 9: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Insert Allocation Concept Here, Part I
Funding by Source and Mode
Total Funding by Mode
ModeProgram
Area 1/2 CentADOT Funds
FTA (5307)
FTA (5309)
MAG-CMAQ
MAG-STP
Total Regional Funding
Freeways Capital 4,447 3,688 0 0 149 0 8,284Operations 354 0 0 0 0 0 354Total 4,801 3,688 0 0 149 0 8,638
Streets Capital 864 0 0 0 50 322 1,236
Buses Capital 201 0 805 0 0 0 1,006Operations 1,095 0 0 0 0 0 1,095Total 1,296 0 805 0 0 0 2,100
LRT Capital 984 0 0 1,300 197 0 2,481
Other Transit Capital 13 0 46 0 0 0 59Operations 342 0 0 0 0 0 342Total 355 0 46 0 0 0 401
Planning Programs 26 0 0 0 0 0 26Bicycle/Ped Capital 0 0 0 0 132 0 132Air Quality Programs 0 0 0 0 113 0 113Total Funding Capital 6,509 3,688 851 1,300 528 322 13,198
Operations 1,817 0 0 0 113 0 1,931Total 8,326 3,688 851 1,300 641 322 15,129
![Page 10: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Insert Allocation Concept Here, Part II
Percent Funding by Mode
ModeProgram
Area 1/2 CentADOT Funds
FTA (5307)
FTA (5309)
MAG-CMAQ
MAG-STP
Total Regional Funding
Freeways Capital 53.4% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.2% 0.0% 54.8%Operations 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.3%Total 57.7% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.2% 0.0% 57.1%
Streets Capital 10.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.8% 100.0% 8.2%
Buses Capital 2.4% 0.0% 94.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.6%Operations 13.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.2%Total 15.6% 0.0% 94.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 13.9%
LRT Capital 11.8% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 30.7% 0.0% 16.4%
Other Transit Capital 0.2% 0.0% 5.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4%Operations 4.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.3%Total 4.3% 0.0% 5.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7%
Planning Programs 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%Bicycle/Ped Capital 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.6% 0.0% 0.9%Air Quality Programs 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.7% 0.0% 0.7%Total Funding Capital 78.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 82.3% 100.0% 87.2%
Operations 21.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.7% 0.0% 12.8%Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
![Page 11: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Guidance for Hybrid Changes Fiscally balance the plan. Reflect different needs in sub-
regions. Focus on regionally significant
projects. Incorporate local match for
regional bus O&M. Refine revenues and costs
![Page 12: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Freeway / Highway Changes Lanes configuration and costs for
widening confirmed with ADOT. Grand Ave increased by $20 mil.
Total investment = $231 million I-10 Reliever moved to interim
![Page 14: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
I-17 Investments I-10 (east) to I-10 (west)$ 30 mil I-10 (west) to L101 $557
mil L101 to New River $282
milTotal Investment $869
mil
![Page 15: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
I-10 Investments I-10 West $ 336
mil I-10 Central $ 500 mil I-10 East (south) $ 138 mil
Total Investment $ 974 mil
![Page 16: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Freeway/Highway Comments More funding for I-17 SR 51 improvements needed SR 74 – access control and widening Funding for neighborhood mitigation:
Walls Rubberized asphalt on balance of system
Show routes for future development. Look at I-10 Reliever options.
![Page 17: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
I-10 Reliever Corridor
Section Length (miles)
ROW Cost
Interim Construction
Cost
Total Interim
Cost (with cont.)
Total Freeway
Cost (with cont.)
South Mountain to L303 15 40 260 360 600L303 to SR85 12 35 160 234 396
Total 27 75 420 594 996
Cost Summary for I-10 Reliever Corridor(millions of 2002 dollars)
Planning cost estimates based on L303 Corridor Study: MC 85 to Riggs Rd., June 11, 2003
![Page 18: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Arterial Street Changes Costs checked and updated Additions:
L101 Frontage Roads: Princess Dr. to Scottsdale Rd: $25 mil.
15 Intersection improvements to improve regional traffic flow in Chandler and Gilbert.
Deletions: 99th ave connector ($30 mil) Sun Valley Extension to Grand Ave. ($130 mil) Jomax Rd: L303 to Sun Valley Extension ($228 mil) Riggs Rd: Gilbert Rd to Meridian. ($54 mil)
![Page 20: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Next Steps Refine the fiscally balanced hybrid plan. Present revised plan at July 16th TPC
workshop. Possible TPC acceptance of the revised
hybrid to submit to agencies and public for comments.
Modeling of hybrid. Plan refinements based on modeling and
comments. September adoption for AQ conformity
![Page 25: Regional Transportation Plan](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062323/56815fb0550346895dceaabe/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
For more informationEric AndersonTransportation [email protected]