regional linking icp 2005 round. past practice: bridge countries disadvantage: reliance on single...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: REGIONAL LINKING ICP 2005 ROUND. Past Practice: Bridge Countries Disadvantage: Reliance on single links](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514fd6c550346935c8b6269/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
REGIONAL LINKING
ICP 2005 ROUND
![Page 2: REGIONAL LINKING ICP 2005 ROUND. Past Practice: Bridge Countries Disadvantage: Reliance on single links](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514fd6c550346935c8b6269/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
REGION 1
REGION 2
REGION 3
bridgecountry
bridgecountry
bridgecountry
bridgecountry
Past Practice: Bridge Countries
Disadvantage:
Reliance on single links
![Page 3: REGIONAL LINKING ICP 2005 ROUND. Past Practice: Bridge Countries Disadvantage: Reliance on single links](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514fd6c550346935c8b6269/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Ring Region
REGION 1
REGION 2
REGION 3
RING
![Page 4: REGIONAL LINKING ICP 2005 ROUND. Past Practice: Bridge Countries Disadvantage: Reliance on single links](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514fd6c550346935c8b6269/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Principles of Ring Linking
1. Ring product list is created (because Regional lists have limited overlap);
2. Regional fixity is retained at BH level; 3. Regional BH parities are produced with CPRD; 4. Ring Region is used for linking only [with a CPRD-
style index].
![Page 5: REGIONAL LINKING ICP 2005 ROUND. Past Practice: Bridge Countries Disadvantage: Reliance on single links](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514fd6c550346935c8b6269/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The CPRD model:
(1) Pikr = i k r ikr i = 1, 2, … n
(2) 1 = 1 = 1 = 1 k = 1, 2. r = 1, 2, … 6
![Page 6: REGIONAL LINKING ICP 2005 ROUND. Past Practice: Bridge Countries Disadvantage: Reliance on single links](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514fd6c550346935c8b6269/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
y X β ε
2 1
2 1
... ...
... ...
cp Nc Np cp
T
Nc Np
x Dc Dc Dp Dp R
Where Rcp stands for representativity dummy, and is its respective regression coefficient.
![Page 7: REGIONAL LINKING ICP 2005 ROUND. Past Practice: Bridge Countries Disadvantage: Reliance on single links](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514fd6c550346935c8b6269/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Ring linking: an example
Table 1: Item Prices in Domestic Currencies for the Ring Countries at a Specific Basic Heading Level Item Region A Region B Region C Country A1 Country A2 Country A3 Country B1 Country B2 Country C1 Country C2 1 1 r 2 r 4 r 2 r 6 r 3 r 30 r 2 2 r 5 __ 6 10 r 5 r __ 3 6 r 10 r __ 10 r __ 22 160 r 4 4 r __ 18 __ 30 10 r 150 5 5 r __ 20 r __ __ __ 180 6 12 r 30 40 r 24 r 72 r 36 r 360 r
![Page 8: REGIONAL LINKING ICP 2005 ROUND. Past Practice: Bridge Countries Disadvantage: Reliance on single links](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514fd6c550346935c8b6269/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Table 2: Basic Heading PPP’s for Each Region for the Ring Countries Country A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 C1 C2 Basic Heading PPP 1 2 4 1 3 1 10
Table 3: Item Prices in Numeraire Country Currencies for the Ring Countries at a Specific Basic Heading Level Item Region A Region B Region C Country A1 Country A2 Country A3 Country B1 Country B2 Country C1 Country C2 1 1 r 1 r 1 r 2 r 2 r 3 r 3 r 2 2 r 2.5 __ 6 3 1/3 r 5 r __ 3 6 r 5 r __ 10 r __ 22 16 r 4 4 r __ 4.5 __ 10 10 r 15 5 5 r __ 5 r __ __ __ 18 6 12 r 15 10 r 24 r 24 r 36 r 36 r
![Page 9: REGIONAL LINKING ICP 2005 ROUND. Past Practice: Bridge Countries Disadvantage: Reliance on single links](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514fd6c550346935c8b6269/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Table 4: Basic Heading CPD and CPRD PPP’s between the Three Regions Method Region A Region B Region C CPD 1 2.047 3.006 CPDR 1 2.014 2.937
![Page 10: REGIONAL LINKING ICP 2005 ROUND. Past Practice: Bridge Countries Disadvantage: Reliance on single links](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514fd6c550346935c8b6269/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
FIXITY
Item level BH level GDP level All aggregates
![Page 11: REGIONAL LINKING ICP 2005 ROUND. Past Practice: Bridge Countries Disadvantage: Reliance on single links](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514fd6c550346935c8b6269/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Fixity at the GDP level (OECD)
Version 1. Running full global BH matrix, with each OECD country as a separate entity, then the OECD total is redistributed on the basis of the regional OECD comparison.
Version 2. Creating an OECD “country” to be included in the global comparison, then the OECD “country’s” GDP is redistributed on the basis of the regional OECD comparison.
![Page 12: REGIONAL LINKING ICP 2005 ROUND. Past Practice: Bridge Countries Disadvantage: Reliance on single links](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082700/5514fd6c550346935c8b6269/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Questions?