region 6 l epc update · 2014. 4. 9. · safety data s logists who p ating victims guages in the 50...

14
Vo Ap In th PHM advi EP Th For t may confe TX). beca serie from olume 27 No. 2 pril 2014 his issue we MSA, Resour ce from FrePA Sche hrougho hose of you t remember th erences, as w However, the me no longer Working w es of oneday May through La A Baton Ro W Ok M McA Co Dall Mid R give you wo ces from NO d Cowie on edules out Re that have bee hat EPA/State well as state co e source of fu r available a f with our State LEPC worksh h September Louis ake Charles A Alexandria Ar ouge/New Or Monroe Are Oklah Woodward Ar klahoma City A Tulsa Area McAlester Are Ardmore Are Lawton Area Tex El Paso Area Del Rio Area llen/Harlinge orpus Christi A las/Ft. Worth Amarillo Are dland/Odessa Regio H hilorkshop opp OAA and EER Surviving Fa LEPC W gion 6en around for es held 12 Reg onferences (4 unding for tho few years ago e partners, EP ops througho 2014. siana Area – 5/20/14 ea – 5/21/14 leans Area – a – 8/13/14 homa rea – 6/17/14 Area – 6/18/1 – 6/19/14 ea – 6/19/14 ea – 9/17/14 a – 9/18/14 xas a – 6/25/14 a – 6/26/14 n Area – 7/22 Area – 7/23/1 Area – 7/25/ ea – 8/26/14 Area – 8/27/ on6 L Steve Maso mason.sHilary Gafford ary.gafford@ portunities t RC, more po amily Memb Worksh , Summ many years, gional LEPC 4OK, 1LA, 2ose conferenc o. PA will condu out the Regio 4 4 5/22/14 4 14 2/14 14 /14 /14 LEPC on, EPA Reg t[email protected]o d, Weston So @westonsoluti o improve y ointers on id bers. – Steve hops mer 20 you ces uct a n We ho LEPC, By spr hope t attend to atte Below follow We wi works they w estima Upda ion 6 ov olutions ions.com your LEPC, m entifying ris e and Hilary 014 ope these wo as well as off reading the w to ensure tha d will not hav end one of th w the schedule wing for each ill send out fu shop. At that will be attend ate attendanc La Alb Spring Jo Little Ro El A T Be H San An ate messages fro sks in your c y orkshops will b ficers of the L workshops out at most LEPC ve to travel ex he workshops e of worksho one of the wo uture emails w time, we wil ing a particul ce at each on New Me as Cruces Area Gallup Area buquerque Ar Clovis Area Arkan gdale/Rogers onesboro Area ock/Jacksonvi l Dorado Area Texa Abilene Area Texarkana Are Tyler Area Waco Area eaumont Area Houston Area ntonio/Austin om CHEMTR community, be useful for LEPC, who cho t around each members wh xtraordinarily s. ps is the agen orkshops. with the locat l ask for peop lar workshop ne. exico a – 6/24/14 – 7/8/14 rea – 7/9/14 7/10/14 sas Area – 7/29/ a – 7/31/14 ille Area – 8/1 a – 8/12/14 as – 8/28/14 ea – 9/9/14 9/10/14 9/11/14 a – 9/23/14 – 9/24/14 n Area – 9/25/ REC and and some the chair of t oose to atten h State, we ho want to y long distanc nda we will be tion of each ple to RSVP if , so we can /14 1/14 /14 the d. es e

Upload: others

Post on 21-Nov-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Region 6 L EPC Update · 2014. 4. 9. · Safety Data S logists who p ating victims guages in the 50 key coun nce EC® h & Special P mento, CA to f responders st sums up C ing the

Vo

Ap

In thPHMadvi

 

EPThFor tmay confeTX).  beca

seriefrom

olume 27 No. 2 pril 2014 

his issue we MSA, Resource from Fred

PA Schehroughohose of you tremember therences, as wHowever, theme no longer

Working wes of one‐day  May through

La

A

Baton Ro

W

Ok

M

McA

Co

Dall

Mid

R

give you woces from NOd Cowie on 

edules out Rethat have beehat EPA/Statewell as state coe source of fur available a fwith our StateLEPC workshh September 

Louisake Charles A

Alexandria Ar

ouge/New Or

Monroe Are

OklahWoodward Ar

klahoma City A

Tulsa Area 

McAlester Are

Ardmore Are

Lawton Area

TexEl Paso Area

Del Rio Area

llen/Harlinge

orpus Christi A

las/Ft. Worth

Amarillo Are

dland/Odessa

Regio

Hhila

orkshop oppOAA and EERSurviving Fa

LEPC Wgion 6,en around fores held 12 Regonferences (4unding for thofew years agoe partners, EPops througho2014.    

siana Area – 5/20/14

ea – 5/21/14

leans Area – 

a – 8/13/14 

homa rea – 6/17/14

Area – 6/18/1

– 6/19/14 

ea – 6/19/14 

ea – 9/17/14 

a – 9/18/14 

xas a – 6/25/14 

a – 6/26/14 

n Area – 7/22

Area – 7/23/1

 Area – 7/25/

ea – 8/26/14 

 Area – 8/27/

on6LSteve Maso

mason.stHilary Gaffordary.gafford@

portunities tRC, more poamily Memb

Worksh,  Summ many years, gional LEPC 4‐OK, 1‐LA, 2‐ose conferenco. PA will conduout the Regio

5/22/14 

14 

2/14 

14 

/14 

/14 

LEPCon, EPA [email protected], Weston So

@westonsoluti

o improve yointers on idbers.  – Steve

hops mer 20you 

‐ces 

uct a n 

 We hoLEPC, By sprhope tattendto atteBelowfollow

We wiworksthey westima

Updaion 6 ov olutions ions.com 

your LEPC, mentifying rise and Hilary

014 

ope these woas well as offreading the wto ensure thad will not havend one of thw the schedulewing for each 

ill send out fushop.  At that will be attendate attendanc

La

Alb

Spring

Jo

Little Ro

El

A

T

Be

H

San An

ate

messages frosks in your cy 

orkshops will bficers of the Lworkshops outat most LEPC ve to travel exhe workshopse of workshoone of the wo

uture emails wtime, we wiling a particulce at each on

New Meas Cruces Area

Gallup Area 

buquerque Ar

Clovis Area –

Arkangdale/Rogers 

onesboro Area

ock/Jacksonvi

l Dorado Area

 

 

TexaAbilene Area 

Texarkana Are

Tyler Area –

Waco Area –

eaumont Area

Houston Area

ntonio/Austin

om CHEMTRcommunity, 

be useful for LEPC, who chot around eachmembers whxtraordinarilys. ps is the agenorkshops. 

with the locatl ask for peoplar workshopne. 

exico a – 6/24/14 

– 7/8/14 

rea – 7/9/14

– 7/10/14 

sas Area – 7/29/

a – 7/31/14 

ille Area – 8/1

a – 8/12/14 

as – 8/28/14 

ea – 9/9/14 

– 9/10/14 

– 9/11/14 

a – 9/23/14 

 – 9/24/14 

n Area – 9/25/

REC and and some 

the chair of toose to attenh State, we ho want to y long distanc

nda we will be

tion of each ple to RSVP if , so we can 

/14 

1/14 

/14 

 

the d.  

es 

Page 2: Region 6 L EPC Update · 2014. 4. 9. · Safety Data S logists who p ating victims guages in the 50 key coun nce EC® h & Special P mento, CA to f responders st sums up C ing the

 

Up

The N

Orlea

CAM

discu

visit 

 

Eth

The E

indus

train

emer

ethan

Train

train

 

08:30

08:45

09:30

(LGR

09:45

10:00

11:00

EPCR

To

coming 

National Asso

ans, LA April 

MEO Training a

ussing plannin

http://nasttp

hanol Em

Ethanol Emer

stry and fire s

ing and know

rgencies.  The

nol related re

ning Toolbox, 

ing course.   

0‐08:45 ‐  Intr

5‐09:30 ‐  Req

0‐09:45 ‐  Loc

5‐10:00 ‐ Bre

0‐11:00 ‐  Sof

0‐11:30 ‐ Doe

RA? 

RSVPs be added to

NASTTP

ociation of SA

22‐25.  Draft

and Tier II, M

ng, emergenc

po.com/ 

mergency

rgency Respo

service profes

wledge prepar

e EERC websit

eference mate

instructional

roductions / 

quirements fo

cal Governme

ak 

ftware for Pre

es Your Emerg

Detailes are not ro email noti

PO Confe

ARA Title III P

 agenda topi

MAP 21, EPA a

cy operations

y Respo

nse Coalition

ssionals dedic

redness tools

te provides a 

erials, includi

 videos, and a

Workshop Pu

or LEPCs and

ent Reimburs

eparedness/P

gency Plan H

ed workshoequired, bifications fo

Hh

erence A

Program Offic

cs for the 201

and OSHA per

s, and lessons

nse Res

 is a group of

cated imparti

s for ethanol 

large body o

ing an extens

a 7‐module 

LEPC Wourpose 

  Industry 

sement Progr

Planning 

armonize wit

op locatiobut are appr future detHilary Gaffoilary.gafford

4

April 22n

cials (NASTTP

14 Conferenc

rspectives on

s learned.  Fo

ources A

ng 

ive 

The ref

website

orkshop A11:30‐

12:45‐

Dorma

ram  13:45‐

LEPC?

14:15‐

14:30‐

th 15:45‐

ns will be preciated sails, RSVP foord at Westod@westonso469‐666‐5524

nd‐25th in

PO) Annual Co

ce include PH

n Executive O

or a complete

Available

ference mate

e at http://ww

Agenda‐12:45 ‐ Lunch

‐13:45 ‐ Keep

ant LEPC 

‐14:15 ‐ What

‐14:30 ‐ Break

‐15:45 ‐ State

‐16:00 ‐ Close

announceso that weor a workshoon Solutionsolutions.com4

n New O

onference w

HMSA HMEP 1

Order 13650, 

e agenda and

e from E

rials are avail

ww.ethanolre

ping an LEPC A

t Can the Sta

e Issues Discu

eout 

ed at a latee can plan op, or for qus m 

rleans, L

 

ill be held in 

101, NFPA 47

as well as wo

d registration

EERC 

lable through

esponse.com/

Active /React

te or EPA Do

ussions 

er date.for attenduestions, ple

LA 

New 

72 and HMEP

orkshops 

n information

 

h the EERC 

/    

tivating a 

o to Help Your

dance. ease contact

t: 

Page 3: Region 6 L EPC Update · 2014. 4. 9. · Safety Data S logists who p ating victims guages in the 50 key coun nce EC® h & Special P mento, CA to f responders st sums up C ing the

CHE

By Do

You mengaabouthat commIndiaapprCHEM

  

EMTREC®

onna L. Lepik,

might imaginging in hundrut anything anstill seems tomunity is withanapolis, Indiaoached the joMTREC® key t

A round‐t Immediat

through Cprivate re

A state‐oflinking on

An expans Immediat

assistance Interpreta

speaking s In‐country

® Has Sav

, Director of O

e after servinreds of hazardnd everythingo resonate thehout questionana.  During toint CHEMTRtag and share

the‐clock comte access to thCHEMTREC’s desources;  f‐the‐art telecn‐scene resposive electronite access to me to on‐sceneation capabilistakeholders;y dial telepho

 

ved My Ba

Outreach & Sp

ng as CHEMTRdous materiag.  However, ae loudest andn the one thathis fire confeEC®/TRANSCAed: “CHEMTRE

mmunications housands of cdatabase of o

communicationders with chic library of omedical expere medical profties for more; and one numbers 

 

acon Mor

pecial Progra

REC®’s Directoals conferenceafter meetingd the one comt was shared erence and exAER® booth, EC® has save

center staffechemical prodover 30,000 m

ons system thhemical expever 5 million ts and toxicofessionals tree than 200 lan

in more than

 

re Than O

ams, CHEMTR

or of Outreaces from Sacrag thousands omment that bewith me dur

xposition, a sereached his hd my bacon m

Fs“rm4hrinmClascs

Crms

ed by trained duct specialismanufacturers

hat supports trts, transportSafety Data Slogists who peating victimsnguages in the

n 50 key coun

Once 

REC® 

ch & Special Pamento, CA toof respondersest sums up Cing the FDIC easoned Midwhand out to semore than on

For the past foservice of the “saving lots oresource and materials and42 years – 24 has provided fresponders hancidents”, saimanaging direCHEMTREC®’sargest netwosubject mattechemical and services and p

CHEMTREC® oresources thamitigate incidsuch as:  

and experiensts and hazards, shippers, ca

the virtual emtation compaSheets (SDS); provide advices of product ee event of an

tries around 

Programs for o Plymouth, Ms from coast tCHEMTREC®’sFirefighting Twestern Hazmecure his covnce!” 

our decades, American Ch

of bacon” as tsolutions pro dangerous ghours a day –free, timely aaving to deal id Randy Speector. s connection ork of chemicaer experts in tresponse speprivate contra

offers a broadt can help ements involvin

nced emergendous materiaarriers, public

mergency resnies, and me e and emergeexposure;  n emergency i

the world. 

the past six yMA, I have heto coast, the os value for thTraining Confemat Techniciaeted tradition

CHEMTREC®hemistry Counthe definitive ovider for hazgoods respons– every day, Cand crucial infwith hazardoight, CHEMTR

to industry linal and hazardthe world, incecialists, publactors.  

d range of critmergency respg hazardous m

ncy service spls experts c organization

ponse team, dical experts

ency medical 

involving non

years and eard just one commente response erence in an casually nal yellow 

, which is a ncil, has beeninformation 

zardous se.  “For overCHEMTREC formation to ous materials REC’s 

nks to the dous material cluding ic emergency

tical ponders materials, 

pecialists;  

ns and 

seamlessly ;  

treatment 

n‐English 

Page 4: Region 6 L EPC Update · 2014. 4. 9. · Safety Data S logists who p ating victims guages in the 50 key coun nce EC® h & Special P mento, CA to f responders st sums up C ing the

 

now Chem

  

 All thinteryour 

“CHEworld“CHEheart

If you800‐2such 

CHEMhaza

For m

 

 

Loc

 

 

 

available on‐mistry Counci

Video 1 – 

Video 2: ‐

Video 3: ‐

hree of theseested in receproper shipp

EMTREC’s visid’s foremost EMTREC® will t and takes ad

u are interest262‐8200, or as spills, leak

MTREC® is a nrdous materi

more informa

cal Gove

‐line. These FRl’s web sites. 

An Overview

 How CHEMT

 What’s Being

e videos are aiving a copy oping informat

on is to contiemergency cbe successfudvantages of 

ted in schedufrom outsideks, fire, expos

national sponals with comp

tion about CH

ernment

EPA HeseveralsubmittParish, under tReimbu

By havinand undplanning

REE instructio 

w of CHEMTRE

TREC® Helps F

g Said About 

lso available of this DVD, sion to dlepik@

nue to be recall center forul when everythe resource

ling a FREE tre the USA or Csures or accid

sor of TRANSpliance with g

HEMTREC®, v

ts Reimb

eadquarter applicatioted by CalcLA to the athe Local Gursement P

ng an on‐goingerstand the vg, three newlyonal videos ar

EC®  

First Respond

CHEMTREC®

on one FREE send your req@CHEMTREC

cognized by einformation 

y single emerges we have to 

raining drill orCanada at +1‐ents, call CHE

SCAER®. CHEMgovernment r

visit us at www

burseme

rs evaluateons casieu agency GovernmenProgram. 

g commitmenvalue of includy refreshed Cre available fo

ers  

 

DVD. If you auest along w

C.com. 

emergency reon hazardougency responoffer.” 

r exercise wit‐703‐741‐550EMTREC®’s em

MTREC® is alsregulations. 

w.CHEMTREC

ent Succe

nts 

Basedis eligincurrrespomultipbetwe2011 2012.

nt to continueding the CHEHEMTREC® vor download 

are with 

esponders, inds materials annder knows CH

th CHEMTREC00. During an mergency cen

so a cost‐effec

C.com. 

ess

d on our evible for anred nding to ple drug laeen Marchand March

e ensuring thMTREC® intovideos for Emeon the CHEM

dustry, governd dangerousHEMTREC®’s 

C®, call our cuincident invonter at 1‐800

ctive method

valuation, C award of 

abs h, h, 

at all respond community rergency Resp

MTREC® and t

nment, and os goods,” stattelephone nu

ustomer serviolving hazardo‐424‐9300. 

d to assist ship

Calcasieu P$10,783.0

ders know response ponders are he American 

others as the ted Speight. umber by 

ce staff at 1‐ous materials

ppers of 

 

Parish, LA 6 for costs

Page 5: Region 6 L EPC Update · 2014. 4. 9. · Safety Data S logists who p ating victims guages in the 50 key coun nce EC® h & Special P mento, CA to f responders st sums up C ing the

PrePha

wbcR Ihcassct A ThciwTmt Tacccmac

eparing Case II – A

wide. Bob lebest practiccontributingResponse:

n my Octobhazards placommunitiearticle tacklsources of tsources. I recould impacthese hazar

Assessing

There are mhazards so consistent mntended rewill be utilizTo avoid biamethod outthe method

There are sare calculatcommunity’communitiecontrol meamanagemearticle illustrcould trigge

CommuAssessin

Bob CaPresidewww.asAbout thand conthe deve60 commmaterial

eads ASG ces and casg author in tA Human F

ber 2013 aranning usinges around thed the first technologicecommendct your comrds. This st

the Risks

many ways that plans

method thasult. Beforeed so that tas and gainlined belowconsistent

several typeting the risks populatio

es might conasures. Thisnt measurerates how t

er a hazardo

nities thng the Ri

mpbell, PEnt, Alliance

sg-inc.org; rhe Author: Bnsultant for elopment omunities. Al response with a focusse studies tothe recentlyFactors and

rticle, I outlig a comprehe US rangstep in the

cal hazards ded several mmunity. Th

ep is critica

to define riand resourt captures te conductinthe planninn more specw. Regardlely across a

es of risks tk of a hazaron. Since risnsider the rs can be coes which wito determinous materia

hrough Aisk 

e Solutions robert.campBob Campbthe last 18

of all-hazardASG has con

exercises ws on capturo improve cy released bd Systems E

ined a provehensive, rising from smmodel - idethat could different te

his article wal to conduc

sk, but the ces can adthe contribug a risk assg committecificity, com

ess of the mll hazards i

hat may berdous matesk controls risk to the sonsidered wll be discuse the produal release.

All‐hazar

Group, Incpbell@asg-bell has beeyears. Afte

ds plans witnducted ovwhile supporing and shacommunity book “HandEngineering

ven model fosk-based mmall, rural aentifying theimpact a co

echniques foill focus on cting risk-ba

overall objedress the huting factorssessment, iee can selecmmunities mmethod chos

n order to a

e consideredrials releasvary greatly

surroundingwhen evaluassed in nextuct of sever

rds Plan

. (ASG) -inc.org en prepariner founding th emphasiver 2,000 haorting 760 laring lessopreparedn

dbook of Emg Approach

for how commethod. Thiareas to large hazards. ommunity, for identifyin

how to objased plann

ective of a highest relars is utilizedit is importact the most

may prefer tsen, it’s critattain a vali

d. For the pse occurringy and are d

g communitating the cot quarter’s arity and pro

ning and

ng communASG in 20

is on hazardazardous locations woons learned,ess. He is amergency h.”

mmunities cis has beenge metropoI detailed pnamely mo

ng hazardojectively asing.

risk assessative risks. Sd, the outcoant to detert applicableto use the qtical that theid risk asse

purposes ofg and impacdifficult to mty without controls and article. The

obability of v

d Analys

nities as a r005, he has rdous mater

world-d, a

can conducn used in ovolitan areaspotential typobile and stous materiasess the ris

sment is to So, as long

ome will prormine how te and usefuquantitativee risk asses

essment.

f our discuscting the su

measure quaonsidering implement

e remaindervarious eve

sis: 

responder overseen

rials in over

t all-ver 60 . My last pes and ationary ls which sks from

prioritize as a

ovide the the output l approach

e risk ssor apply

ssion, we urrounding antitatively,the risk ing risk r of this ents that

r

.

,

Page 6: Region 6 L EPC Update · 2014. 4. 9. · Safety Data S logists who p ating victims guages in the 50 key coun nce EC® h & Special P mento, CA to f responders st sums up C ing the

S OdcsapqwGeutbob

Amcomkr Iicd

Severity

One of the mdetermine tcommunity sufficient quanalyze andpopulationsquantitativeweighted byGuideline Lexample shusing ALOHthe area anbased on toorange (AEbased on di

Additionallymodeling. Ocan be calcout box. Thmass in kilokilojoules pereferences)

f the plumempact on thcontinue thedetermining

most consishe impact ois through

uantity to pod associates at risk. Seely as the toy the exposevels – AE

hown belowHA and thend populatio

oxicity whichGL-2) and ifferent win

y, planners One pound culated usine variables

ograms ander kilogram.

e or overprehe surrounde risk assesg the proba

stent and reof a hazmadispersion ose a toxic

e exposure verity can b

otal populatsure levels (GL-3, AEG

w, a release n imported

on affected h is indicateyellow (AEd directions

should conper square

ng an empir in the form

d the materim (obtained

essure modding commssment for bility of the

eliable wayt release onor plume minhalation levels with be determinion at risk o(i.e., Acute

GL-2, AEGLof chlorineto MARPLOby the chloed by the reGL-1) expos and wind

sider the ime inch (psi) orical model mula includeial’s heat cofrom NIOS

del estimateunity, then the specificrelease.

ys to n a

modeling. Thhazard. Plugeographic

ned of exposureExposure

L-1). In the e was modeOT; this sho

orine plumeed (AEGL-3osure levelsspeeds and

mpact of a cof overpresshown in th

e the materombustion H or chemi

es an adverplanners s

c hazard by

his methodume modelscal areas a

e, or

eled ows

e 3), s. Planners d extent of

chemical exssure may che call-rial in ical

rse hould

y

Risk

a

d accounts fs enable tend the corr

may also rdownwind

xplosion thrcause light

ExplosivDista

Ex: 1698 kiloD

1.6(Mass X H

1.6(16

Dista

k = Severity x

Severity = P

Ex: 555 peoparea of the ch

blowing

Sev

for materialchnical exp

responding

run plume mpopulation

rough overpinjuries. Th

ve Overpressuance to 1 PSI

ograms (550 giesel fuel

Heat Combust

698X45).33=65

ance: 65 feet

Probability

Population Aff

ple reside withlorine when wg from the wes

verity = 555

ls in perts to

models .

pressure his distance

ure

gal) of

tion).33

fected

hin the winds are st.

e

Page 7: Region 6 L EPC Update · 2014. 4. 9. · Safety Data S logists who p ating victims guages in the 50 key coun nce EC® h & Special P mento, CA to f responders st sums up C ing the

P HdopDpwf

F E T H A

Th

(faac TisSho“cgcre Tddts

Probability

Hazardous disasters. Wof statisticaprobability oDespite theplanners in well as hazmfollowing caFloods, EarthquakeTornados, Hurricanes,Accidental s

The probabhazard/trigg

(http://wwwfor that locaassigned anassigned ancapable of r

The probabs estimatedSurvey modhttp://earthqotion.php. U“Probabilistcorrespondground motcapable of crupture a taestimate of

The probabdamage of determined tornado or gstatistics fro

y

materials rWhile the prl data availof these inc assumptiosupportingmat releaseausal event

es,

and spills/uncon

bility of eachger type.

.floodsmartation as hign annual flon annual prrupturing a

bility of an ed based on del can be dquake.usgsUsing the faic hazard cing annual tions. Sincecausing stru

ank, the assannual pro

bility of a tora storage taby establis

greater. Theom the Nati

eleases carobability ofable on nat

cidents that ons made th allocation es. The rems based on

ntrolled rele

h trigger ev

t.gov/floodsh, moderat

ood probabrobability ofstorage tan

earthquake exceedanc

downloadeds.gov/hazaracility’s zip ccurve” analy

frequency e 10%-gravuctural damsociated freobability.

rnado resulank and sushing a three frequencyonal Ocean

n result frof man-madetural disasteare capab

hroughout tand prioritiz

mainder of tn governme

eases (histo

ent is base

smart/) reque, or low. Fility of 1%. f 0.5%. Thisnk resulting

strong enoce of 10%-gd from rds/designmcode underysis option, is shown foity (0.1) mo

mage sufficiequency is u

ting in strucbsequent r

eshold basey of a tornanic and Atm

m accidente incidents ers and accle of resultihe processzation of scthis article ient datasets

orical/statist

ed on locatio

FthabMflT

uires the facFacilities locThose locas method asg in a releas

ugh to causgravity peak

maps/grdmr the the

or various otion is ient to used as an

ctural release is ed on windado in a parmospheric A

ts, man-mais difficult tcidents. Thng in a rele

s, this approcarce resoullustrates h

s:

tical analys

on of the fa

First let’s exhat could ru

a release. Tbased on thManagemenlood zones

The flood riscility’s addrcated in theated in the “ssumes thase.

se structurak ground ac

speed forcerticular locaAdministrati

de incidentto predict, tis method e

ease of hazoach can beurces for thehow to estim

sis).

acility and s

xplore the pupture a stoThe flood pr

e Federal Ent Agency’sand maps

sk website ress, and the “high” risk“low to modat a flood of

al damage cceleration

e associateation can beion,

ts and natuhere is an aestimates azardous mae extremelye trigger ev

mate the pro

statistical da

probability oorage tank,robability mEmergencys (FEMA) 1and facility

hen rates thk area can bderate” zonef this magn

and result . The U.S.

ed with an Ee estimated

ral abundanceannual aterials. y helpful to vents as obability of

ata for the

of flooding and cause

method is y 00-year

y location.

he flood riskbe e may be

nitude is

in a releaseGeological

EF2 d by using

e

k

e

Page 8: Region 6 L EPC Update · 2014. 4. 9. · Safety Data S logists who p ating victims guages in the 50 key coun nce EC® h & Special P mento, CA to f responders st sums up C ing the

hawoaTsM

TPPtwc

ToNcalo( Fadtcmc

http://www.nand compileweather-relof an EF2 oaverage nuThe exampsearch perioMiguel Cou

The probabProf. WilliamProbability the Atlantic wind damagcurrent data

The probabor storage tNational Rechemical faassumes a ocal condit(http://www

For mobile average andivided by tthe most recounty. Thismodes of trconsider us

ncdc.noaa.e incident sated events

or greater tomber of torle shows thod we selecnty, New M

bility of a hum Gray (httDisplay shoand Gulf c

ge and deba for Nuece

bility of an atank can beesponse Cecilities (httpsingle acciions or spe.nrc.uscg.m

sources sunual releasthe total milcent year tos method mansportatio

sing nationa

gov/stormestatistics ovs. Based onornado mayrnados per here were thcted, but no

Mexico.

urricane impp://www.e-tows the curoasts. The ris which ca

es County, T

accidental ree estimated enter dividep://www.blsdental relea

ecific facilitymil/incident_

ch as railcases (from Nles of activeo obtain the

may also beon to the exal statistics

events/. Thier time pern this history be estimayear and thhree tornado EF2 or hig

pacting the transit.org/hrrent year hwind assocan result inTexas.

elease fromusing the d

ed by the tot.gov/data). ase rate wit

y control me_type_2000

ars, the proRC data) toe rail in the e frequencye applied to xtent that thfrom the bu

s site enabriods for varric data, the

ated based ohe area of tdo events dgher tornad

communityhurricane/w

hurricane fociated with a storage

m a stationadata collecttal number This metho

thout accoueasures. 0up.html)

obability cano a specificUS; and (2

y of each chhazmat coe data is avureau of tra

bles users torious e probabilityon the he county.

during the does in San

y is based owelcome.htmorecast proba Categorytank ruptur

ary facility ted by the of

od unting for

n be estimac county bas2) reviewinghemical bei

ommodities vailable. W

ansportation

o select the

y

n

on the meteml). The Intbabilities foy 3 storm mre. The figu

ated by (1) ased on lengg the comming transpobeing trans

When the dan statistics.

Acc# report

Ex: In 24

Cat

T

Avg n(or squ

Assumof ave

eir location

eorology resteractive La

or each coumay cause s

re below sh

apportioningth of rail in

modity flow sorted througsported by ta does not

cident Probabted releases /

2008, 18,420 a38,576 facilitie

4.2%

t 3 Probability: 5.4%

Tornado Proba

number of EF2greater) per y

uare miles in th

es area of facility aerage tornado are b

by county,

search of andfall nty along sufficient hows the

ng the n the countystudy from

gh the other t exist,

bility = # facilities

accidents/ es =

ability =

2 tornadoes year / total he county

and impact area both 1 sq mile.

y

Page 9: Region 6 L EPC Update · 2014. 4. 9. · Safety Data S logists who p ating victims guages in the 50 key coun nce EC® h & Special P mento, CA to f responders st sums up C ing the

Twsp T

t

wc

R Wticecpae(

The final dewind rose sspeed. Regprobability a

The probab

total probab

where, Pw iscause a rele

Risk Calcu

While the ethe actual nntended to consistent, each scenacalculated aplanners anand prioritizeach potent(probability)

Threat

123 Chemical Company Chemical: Chlorine

ABC Chemical Company Chemical: Isocyanate

123 Chemical Company Chemical: Chlorine

ABC Chemical Company Chemical: Isocyanate

etermining fhould be us

gardless of tassociated

bility estima

bility can be

s the probaease. 

ulation

stimate of snumber of c

generate amethodical

ario is the prand sorted nd emergenze mitigationtial hazard ).

Flood

0.01

0.005

0.01

0.005

avg # r

Ex: 718

factor in estsed when rthe conditiowith a spec

tes for each

e calculated

ability of win

severity andcasualties oa relative risl approach roduct of eain a spread

ncy managen and prepabased on d

Tornado

0

0

0

0

releases x cou

releases/year

timating therunning plumons selectecific wind sp

h trigger ev

d using deM

nd direction

d probabilitor probabilitsk for each is necessaach severity

dsheet as sers to furthearedness redownwind p

Hurrican

0

0

0

0

Mobile Sunty rail miles

ca

r x 200 rail-mil

e probabilityme modelsd, a wind ropeed and d

vent can be

Morgan’s the

n and Pi is th

y is not intey of an incirelease scery to yield ay and probahown belower investigaesources apopulation (

ne Earthqu

0.00056

0.00056

0.00056

0.00056

ource Probabs / US rail milear / total cars

les / 140,810 rcars =

y is wind dis to aid in seose can be

direction.

compiled i

eorem: pro

he probabil

ended to prdent, it is enario. Thea valid risk ability. Thisw. This prioate control mccording to(severity), w

uake Winds (from)

6 0 dg 2.5%

6 270 dg5%

6 270 dg5%

6 0 dg 2.5%

bility = es x frequency

rail-miles x 12

irection andelecting win used to de

n a table (s

Pyobabilit

lity of each

redict

e assessmen

s data can boritization ofmeasures ao risk. Note which is bas

Accide

0.042

g 0.042

g 0.042

. 0.042

y of each chem

chlorine cars

d wind speend directionetermine the

shown belo

1(1wP

event whic

nt. Relativebe compiledf risks enabat high-risk how risk va

sed on wind

ent Total

2.37

4.76

4.74

2.37

Risk = SeveProbabil

mical

s / 200

ed. A local n and e

ow). The

)iP ,

ch could

e risk for d, bles the facilities aries for d direction

l

erity X lity

Page 10: Region 6 L EPC Update · 2014. 4. 9. · Safety Data S logists who p ating victims guages in the 50 key coun nce EC® h & Special P mento, CA to f responders st sums up C ing the

Su

The risksconsresocontreso

 

 

 

NOCouMa

Incident

# Fa

1 AC

2 AC

3 12C

4 12C

ummary

last two ars. While thesistent, metources. A qutrol measurources. This

OAA Offeurtesy of rch 2014 

Facility

BC ChemicaCompany(270

BC ChemicaCompany(0de

23 Chemical Company(270

23 Chemical Company (0de

rticles have ere are manthodical apuantitative res can be es will be dis

ers UpdaGulf of M

Haza

al 0deg) Isoc

al eg) Isoc

l0deg) Chlo

leg) Chlo

presented ny alternativproach to srisk methodevaluated.

scussed in d

ated GuiMexico Na

 

Two nethe NOupdate(or ShoshoreliaffecteOR&R a 

ard

cyanate

cyanate

orine

orine

methods fove methodssupport riskd was illustThese appdetail in nex

idance foational Re

ew/updated gOAA OR&R weed in August 2oreline Cleanune habitats. Ted areas to dealso offers: 

Shoreline Aobservationupdated, soShoreline Ato supplemeterms used 

Most Prob

Severity

1000

2000

555

50

or (1) identis to conduck-based plarated in thisly to each fxt quarter’s

or Spill Response C

guidance docebsite.  The N2013, helps trup and AssessThe SCAT systetermine the 

ssessment Fons during a sho check back sssessment Joent the manuand conditio

bable or Wor

P

4.

2.

4.

2.

ifying all-hacting risk asnning, allocs article. Onfacility and s article.

RespondCenter Ne

uments for spNOAA Shorelinrained spill resment Techntem allows reappropriate m

orms, which ahoreline survesoon for updaob Aid, which ual. The job ans found dur

rst Case Sce

Probability

.76%

.37%

.74%

.37%

azards and ssessmentscation and pnce the riskthe commu

ders  ewsletter 

pill respondene Assessmenesponders useique) when sesponders to methods to u

are standard fey. The formsated versionswas developid provides a ing shoreline

enario

Risk

47.6

47.4

26.3

1.2

(2) assesss, the key isprioritizatioks are stratunity’s resp

 

rs are now avnt Manual (4te a system knpilled oil impsystematicaluse in the spil

forms used tos are currentlys. ed for use in visual guide  assessments

ing the s applying an of ified, risk onse

vailable on th edition), nown as SCATacts ly survey l response. 

o record y being 

the field andto man of thes.  

a

Page 11: Region 6 L EPC Update · 2014. 4. 9. · Safety Data S logists who p ating victims guages in the 50 key coun nce EC® h & Special P mento, CA to f responders st sums up C ing the

 

  In ad

Cons

was w

mars

publi

Reefs

NOAAhttp: Oil Sphttp: 

 

 

PHintoCou

Initiaor mcomtransapprcan b

 

 

 

ddition, you ca

siderations, jo

written to ass

shes are at ris

ications prepa

s, Oil and Sea

A Shoreline A//response.re

pills in Marsh//response.re

MSA Uro Local Purtesy of 

al suggestedmodifying emmodity flowsported throropriately tobe viewed a

an review a n

ointly publishe

sist those wh

sk of oil spills.

ared by OR&R

a Turtles, and 

Assessment Mestoration.no

hes: Planning estoration.no

ges HMEPreparePHMSA w

d steps recommergency plaw studies to dough local coo bulk crude t http://ww

 

new report, O

ed by OR&R a

o work in spil

. The report is

R, supplemen

Oil Spills in M

Manual: oaa.gov/erdp

and Responseoaa.gov/erdp

EP Grandness Plwebsite, M

mmended byns to accoundetermine thommunities,incidents.   Tw.phmsa.do

Oil Spills in Ma

and the Amer

ll response an

s the fourth in

nting the com

Mangroves. 

ub/manual_s

e Consideratiub/marshes_

tees to Ilans March 20

As theexamicrude grantetheir lAdminMaterapplicdevelo

y the Associant for bulk che frequency, and traininThe letter froot.gov/hazm

arshes: Planni

rican Petroleu

nd planning w

n a series of s

mpanion repor

shore_assess

ions: _oil 

Incorpor

014 

e rail and emne the specoil rail shipmees to considocal preparenistrator at trials Safety, aants in a lettop emergen

ate Administrude oil rail y of crude shg emergencom Associatat 

ing and Respo

um Institute. 

where fresh a

spill response

rts: Oil Spills i

rate Cru

mergency resial hazards rments acrosder incorporedness plansthe U.S. DOTaddressed Hter this pastcy plans to a

trator includshipments, hipments bey responderte Administr

onse 

The report 

nd salt 

in Coral 

ude Oil R

sponse commrelated to ths the U.S., Prating this ems.  Dr. MagdT/PHMSA’s OHMEP grantet February, eaccount for c

de:  developdeveloping eing rs to respondrator El‐Sibai

 

Rail Ship

munities conhe increase oHMSA is urgmerging hazy El‐Sibaie, AOffice of Hazees and futuencouraging crude shipm

ing 

d ie 

ments 

ntinue to of Bakken ging HMEP zard into Associate zardous re them to 

ments by rail..  

Page 12: Region 6 L EPC Update · 2014. 4. 9. · Safety Data S logists who p ating victims guages in the 50 key coun nce EC® h & Special P mento, CA to f responders st sums up C ing the

 

SURVIVING FAMILY MEMBERS  © 2014 Frederick J. Cowie, Ph.D.* 

Surviving family members, whether of disasters, tragic accidents, or diseases, are, unsurprisingly, raw with sadness, anger, and disbelief.  And although surviving‐family management is a special area of incident and emergency management, this article is not about the view from the top, but the view from the bottom, from the perspective of we survivors.   Stress is the key element in the behavior of survivors, and stress 

management principles are the key elements in coming to thrive after 

the death of a loved one.  No one as a survivor can hope to employ all 

of these strategies, but if one knows they exist, one has more hope of 

thriving, while surviving.  Remember grieving is natural, personal, and 

intense, but it can be done better or worse.  

Deep Breathing:  Deep, conscious, purposeful breathing, with the desire to regulate blood pressure, heart rate, and 

diminish irregular breathing is the key to stabilizing behavior and initiating deliberate decision making.  Deep breathing 

is indispensable.  Staying Home:  While one might want to be at the scene, that is not a good idea.  Survivors feel that proximity is 

important, but it is not.  In fact, proximity aggravates your strained, tensed behavior and brings with it its own 

destabilizing circumstances.  Surviving‐family proximity also inhibits incident management.  Proximity is not a good idea 

from any perspective. 

 

Keep with Routine:  Routine stabilizes and ritual normalizes.  Nothing you do that is 

erratic, over‐emotional, or reactive, will ever make anything any better.  Stay with 

family, friends, coworkers.  If you can, go to school, go to work, go to church.  Making 

yourself miserable and crazy will not help you, your family, the incident, or 

life.  Work is the best therapy, intensified waiting is the worst. Get a Representative:  If you want to impact the incident, use a trained, qualified 

professional.  Someone who knows the emergency management and incident 

management business, who can interact with the response complex professionally, 

not emotionally.  It’s like getting a lawyer for court.  Otherwise you have a fool for a 

representative or client. When it is time, and only if you want, go to the scene:  When they have found your loved one or the recovery phase is 

over, and you have made whatever arrangements were appropriate, you can go to the scene, if you find that personally 

necessary, many people don’t.  Nothing you do will mean you cared for or didn’t care for your loved one.  Don’t worry 

about what other people might think.  Someone will always criticize.  Just do what feels right. 

Page 13: Region 6 L EPC Update · 2014. 4. 9. · Safety Data S logists who p ating victims guages in the 50 key coun nce EC® h & Special P mento, CA to f responders st sums up C ing the

Surviving Family Members (cont.) 

 

More could be said, but if you stay within the meat of the above bell‐curve of activities, if you keep within one standard deviation from stability, you’ll do fine. 

But if you are out on the edges, either screaming or shut down totally, things will not bode well for your thriving and helping others to thrive.  

 

*I have been involved in planning, hazmat safety, and emergency 

management since 1985; have survived the long‐term disease and 

death of my son; and have worked as a mentor and stress manager 

for several decades. 

State EPCRA / LEPC Coordinators 

Arkansas  Kenny Harmon  501‐683‐6700  [email protected] 

Louisiana  Gene Dunegan  225‐925‐6113  [email protected] 

New Mexico  Susan Walker (Interim)  505‐476‐9640  [email protected]  

Oklahoma Tom Bergman 

Bonnie McKelvey 

405‐702‐1013 

405‐521‐2481 

[email protected] 

[email protected] 

Texas 

Bernardine Zimmerman 

Chase Yarbrough 

 

800‐452‐2791 512‐424‐2447 

[email protected] 

[email protected] 

 

 

 

 

Page 14: Region 6 L EPC Update · 2014. 4. 9. · Safety Data S logists who p ating victims guages in the 50 key coun nce EC® h & Special P mento, CA to f responders st sums up C ing the

 

 

 

Eme

Arkans

Louisia

New M

Oklaho

Texas E

Nation

EPA Re

CHEMT

 

 

 

ergency

sas Dept. of E

ana State Poli

Mexico State P

oma Dept. of 

Environmenta

al Response 

egion 6 

TREC 

    

y Respo

Emergency M

ice 

Police 

Environment

al Hotline 

Center 

 

The article

EPA does 

upon this 

Please con

Mention o

interprete

 

onse Nu

anagement 

tal Quality 

es herein are

not accept r

information

nsult the app

of trade nam

ed as convey

mbers

e provided f

responsibilit

n. 

plicable regu

mes, product

ying official 

for general p

ty for any er

ulations wh

ts, or service

PEA approva

80

87

50

80

80

80

86

80

purposes on

rrors or omis

en determin

es does not 

al, endorsem

00‐322‐4012 

77‐925‐6595 

05‐827‐9126 

00‐522‐0206 

00‐832‐8224 

00‐424‐8802 

66‐372‐7745 

00‐424‐9300 

nly. 

ssions or res

ning complia

convey, and

ment, or rec

sults of any 

ance. 

d should not

commendat

actions bas

t be 

ion. 

 

ed