region 18 february 2011 · 2017. 8. 25. · for february 2011 february 2011 march 2011 region 18...

25
Department of Child Services Practice Indicator Reports Published For February 2011 February 2011 March 2011 Region 18 Data in the report (both historical and current) may be subject to change as it is continually being validated and updated. This may result in statistical data in previous reports to be inconsistent with statistics found in more recent reports even when the data pertain to the same time period.

Upload: others

Post on 04-Feb-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Department of Child Services

    Practice Indicator Reports

    Published

    For February 2011

    February 2011

    March 2011

    Region 18

    Data in the report (both historical and current) may be subject to change as it is continually being validated and updated. This may result in statistical data in previous reports to be inconsistent with statistics found in more recent reports even when the data pertain to the same time period.

  • This report uses data collected over a rolling three month period ending with the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use a rolling three month period ending with the historical month listed. Reports Taken – This section has data regarding the reports taken during the three month period ending with the report month.

    Count – This is the total number of reports of abuse or neglect that are entered into ICWIS during the period ending with the report month.

    Percent Resulting in Screen Outs – This is the percentage of reports that are screened out divided by the total reports taken during the period ending with the report month.

    Assessments Substantiated – This section has data regarding the number of assessments with substantiated findings of abuse and/or neglect during the three month period ending with the report month.

    Count – This is the total number of assessments with substantiated findings of abuse and/or neglect during the period ending with the report month.

    Percent Resulting in Removal – This is the percentage of substantiated assessments during the period that resulted in removal of the child from the home by the end of the report month divided by the total number of substantiated assessments during the period ending with the report month.

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    Initial Assessment - Use of Substitute Care

    For February 2011

    Report Description

    March 02 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • 1,731 35.18% 275 22.55%

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    Initial Assessment - Use of Substitute Care

    Location Reports Taken

    Percent Resulting in Screen Outs

    For Dec 2010 to Feb 2011

    Percent Resulting in Removal

    CountCount

    Assessments Substantiated

    For Dec 2010 to Feb 2011

    Statewide 34,738 34.9% 5,149 30.8%

    Region 18

    For February 2011

    February 2011 Statewide Percent Removal Trend

    Region 18 For February 2010 to February 2011

    28.3

    29.029.5

    30.9 30.8

    31.3 31.5

    30.4

    29.629.2

    30.3

    30.8 30.8

    26.5

    2727.5

    28

    28.5

    2929.5

    30

    30.5

    3131.5

    32

    02-

    '10

    03-

    '10

    04-

    '10

    05-

    '10

    06-

    '10

    07-

    '10

    08-

    '10

    09-

    '10

    10-

    '10

    11-

    '10

    12-

    '10

    01-

    '11

    02-

    '11

    Percent Removal

    Region 18 Percent Removal

    Month Reports Taken

    Percent Resulting in Screen Outs

    For Dec 2010 to Feb 2011

    Percent Resulting in Removal

    CountCount

    Assessments Substantiated

    For Dec 2010 to Feb 2011

    21.6

    26.528.1

    35.2

    26.1

    22.319.4

    22.323.8

    20.418.0 17.7

    22.5

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    02-

    '10

    03-

    '10

    04-

    '10

    05-

    '10

    06-

    '10

    07-

    '10

    08-

    '10

    09-

    '10

    10-

    '10

    11-

    '10

    12-

    '10

    01-

    '11

    02-

    '11

    Percent Removal

    Clark 643 36.2% 141 19.1%

    Floyd 432 28.7% 44 20.5%

    Harrison 143 34.3% 14 14.3%

    Scott 334 37.1% 60 31.7%

    Washington 179 44.1% 16 31.3%

    Feb 2011 1,731 35.2% 275 22.5%

    Jan 2011 1,624 35.7% 271 17.7%

    Dec 2010 1,672 34.6% 266 18.0%

    Nov 2010 1,734 37.5% 323 20.4%

    Oct 2010 1,785 38.3% 320 23.8%

    Sep 2010 1,703 38.0% 337 22.3%

    Aug 2010 1,764 32.7% 309 19.4%

    Jul 2010 1,662 26.5% 349 22.3%

    Jun 2010 1,634 19.8% 329 26.1%

    May 2010 1,473 14.7% 344 35.2%

    Apr 2010 1,304 12.1% 327 28.1%

    Mar 2010 1,177 11.7% 339 26.5%

    Feb 2010 1,112 9.4% 347 21.6%

    March 02 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children from CHINS cases that were open on the last day of the report month. It also collects where that child is located (in their own home or in substitute care). For the purpose of this report, a child with a non-custodial parent is considered “in home”. Total CHINS Count – This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the report month. CHINS – This section has data regarding all children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.

    In Home – This section has data regarding children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home divided by the total number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.

    Foster Care – This section has data regarding children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement divided by the total number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month.

    Out of Home Placements – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in out of home placement.

    Relative Homes – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed with relatives divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

    Foster Homes – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes.

    Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in foster homes divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

    Residential – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting. Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are placed in residential setting divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

    Other – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings. Example would be a court ordered unlicensed placement.

    Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in other placement settings divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

    Report Description

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    CHINS Placements by County

    For February 2011

    March 02 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • DCS Practice Indicator Report

    For February 2011

    CHINS Placements by County

    Location Total CHINS

    Foster Homes ResidentialIn Home Relative Home Other

    Count % Count %Count % Count %

    Region 18 638 182231 182 29 14407 44.7% 44.7% 7.1% 3.4%

    Statewide 14102 52354181 3507 956 2239,921 35.3% 52.8% 9.6% 2.2%

    Statewide Foster Care Placement Breakdown

    Region 18 Foster Care Placement Breakdown

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    02-'1

    003

    -'10

    04-'1

    005

    -'10

    06-'1

    0

    07-'1

    008

    -'10

    09-'1

    0

    10-'1

    011

    -'10

    12-'1

    0

    01-'1

    102

    -'11

    Relative Foster Home Residential Other

    Foster Care

    Out of Home Placements

    %

    36.2%

    29.6%

    %

    63.8%

    70.4%

    Count Count Count

    CHINS

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    02-'1

    003

    -'10

    04-'1

    005

    -'10

    06-'1

    0

    07-'1

    008

    -'10

    09-'1

    0

    10-'1

    011

    -'10

    12-'1

    0

    01-'1

    102

    -'11

    Relative Foster Home Residential Other

    February 2011

    Region 18 For February 2010 to February 2011

    Month Total CHINS

    Foster Homes ResidentialIn Home Relative Home Other

    Count % Count %Count % Count %

    Foster Care

    Out of Home Placements

    % %Count Count Count

    CHINS

    Clark 299 74113 95 8 937.8% 51.1% 39.8% 4.3% 4.8%186 62.2%

    Floyd 70 1729 12 8 441.4% 29.3% 41.5% 19.5% 9.8%41 58.6%

    Harrison 67 2418 18 7 026.9% 36.7% 49.0% 14.3% 0.0%49 73.1%

    Scott 167 4959 53 6 035.3% 49.1% 45.4% 5.6% 0.0%108 64.7%

    Washington 35 1812 4 0 134.3% 17.4% 78.3% 0.0% 4.3%23 65.7%

    Feb 2011 638 182231 182 29 1436.2% 44.7% 44.7% 7.1% 3.4%407 63.8%

    Jan 2011 628 175239 166 32 1638.1% 42.7% 45.0% 8.2% 4.1%389 61.9%

    Dec 2010 600 161238 152 35 1439.7% 42.0% 44.5% 9.7% 3.9%362 60.3%

    Nov 2010 603 162232 161 34 1438.5% 43.4% 43.7% 9.2% 3.8%371 61.5%

    Oct 2010 593 155229 163 33 1338.6% 44.8% 42.6% 9.1% 3.6%364 61.4%

    Sep 2010 627 165245 170 38 939.1% 44.5% 43.2% 9.9% 2.4%382 60.9%

    Aug 2010 628 168276 146 31 743.9% 41.5% 47.7% 8.8% 2.0%352 56.1%

    Jul 2010 670 181278 159 41 1141.5% 40.6% 46.2% 10.5% 2.8%392 58.5%

    Jun 2010 680 175291 159 47 842.8% 40.9% 45.0% 12.1% 2.1%389 57.2%

    May 2010 707 195292 164 48 841.3% 39.5% 47.0% 11.6% 1.9%415 58.7%

    Apr 2010 699 188296 158 45 1242.3% 39.2% 46.7% 11.2% 3.0%403 57.7%

    Mar 2010 688 188311 145 40 445.2% 38.5% 49.9% 10.6% 1.1%377 54.8%

    Feb 2010 688 196317 127 42 646.1% 34.2% 52.8% 11.3% 1.6%371 53.9%

    March 02 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children from CHINS cases that were open on the last day of the report month. It also collects where that child is located (in their own home or in substitute care). For the purpose of this report, children with non-custodial parents are considered to be in their own home. Total CHINS Count – This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the report month. In Home or Relative Care – This section has data regarding children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care.

    Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care divided by the total number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month. Target (At or Above) % – The target for the percent of the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are in their own home or in relative care to the total number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month is 50% or higher.

    Non Relative Foster Care – This section has data for children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care.

    Count- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care. Percent- This is the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month. Target (At or below) % – The target for the percent of the number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month and are not in their own home or in relative care to the total number of children that have an open CHINS case on the last day of the month is 50% or higher.

    Report Description

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    Use of Foster Care by County

    February 2011

    March 08 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • Location Total CHINS

    Region 18 638 413 225

    Statewide 14102 7688 6,414

    Statewide Foster Care Placement Breakdown

    Region 18 Foster Care Placement Breakdown

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    02-'1

    003

    -'10

    04-'1

    005

    -'10

    06-'1

    0

    07-'1

    008

    -'10

    09-'1

    0

    10-'1

    011

    -'10

    12-'1

    0

    01-'1

    102

    -'11

    In Home or Relative Foster Care Target

    Non-Relative Foster Care

    %

    64.7%

    54.5%

    %

    35.3%

    45.5%

    Count Count Count

    In Home or Relative Care

    February 2011

    Region 18 For February 2010 to February 2011

    Month

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    For February 2011

    Use of Foster Care by County

    Target (At or Above)

    %

    Target (At or Below)

    %

    50.0%

    50.0%

    50.0%

    50.0%

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    02-'1

    003

    -'10

    04-'1

    005

    -'10

    06-'1

    0

    07-'1

    008

    -'10

    09-'1

    0

    10-'1

    011

    -'10

    12-'1

    0

    01-'1

    102

    -'11

    In Home or Relative Foster Care Target

    Total CHINS

    Non-Relative Foster Care

    % %Count Count Count

    In Home or Relative Care

    Target (At or Above)

    %

    Target (At or Below)

    %

    Clark 299 208 9169.6% 50.0%50.0% 30.4%

    Floyd 70 41 2958.6% 50.0%50.0% 41.4%

    Harrison 67 36 3153.7% 50.0%50.0% 46.3%

    Scott 167 112 5567.1% 50.0%50.0% 32.9%

    Washington 35 16 1945.7% 50.0%50.0% 54.3%

    February 2011 638 413 22564.7% 50.0%50.0% 35.3%

    January 2011 628 405 22364.5% 50.0%50.0% 35.5%

    December 2010 600 390 21065.0% 50.0%50.0% 35.0%

    November 2010 603 393 21065.2% 50.0%50.0% 34.8%

    October 2010 593 392 20166.1% 50.0%50.0% 33.9%

    September 2010 627 415 21266.2% 50.0%50.0% 33.8%

    August 2010 628 422 20667.2% 50.0%50.0% 32.8%

    July 2010 670 437 23365.2% 50.0%50.0% 34.8%

    June 2010 680 450 23066.2% 50.0%50.0% 33.8%

    May 2010 707 456 25164.5% 50.0%50.0% 35.5%

    April 2010 699 454 24564.9% 50.0%50.0% 35.1%

    March 2010 688 456 23266.3% 50.0%50.0% 33.7%

    February 2010 688 444 24464.5% 50.0%50.0% 35.5%

    March 08 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • This report uses data collected over at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, children with their non-custodial parents are considered to be in their own home. Total Out of Home Placements – This is the total number of CHINS children that are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month. Placed in Same County – This is the total number of CHINS children that are placed in the same county as the county of their case. Percent Locally Placed – This is the percentage of CHINS children that are placed in the same county as the county of their case divided by the total number of CHINS children which are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month.

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    Locally Placed CHINS

    For February 2011

    Report Description

    March 02 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • Locally Placed CHINS

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    For February 2011

    407 279 68.6%

    Location Total Out of Home

    Placements

    Placed in Same County

    Percent Locally Placed

    Statewide 9,921 7,093 71.5%

    Region 18

    February 2011

    Region 18 For February 2010 to February 2011

    74.174.3 74.2 74.2

    73.4

    72.972.6 72.5 72.4

    71.7 71.8

    71.0

    71.5

    69

    70

    71

    72

    73

    74

    75

    Feb

    '10

    Mar

    '10

    Apr

    '10

    May

    '10

    Jun

    '10

    Jul '

    10A

    ug '1

    0Se

    p '1

    0O

    ct '1

    0N

    ov '1

    0D

    ec '1

    0Ja

    n '1

    1Fe

    b '1

    1

    Statewide Percent Placed Locally

    Region 18 Percent Placed Locally

    71.2

    71.9

    70.5

    69.6

    68.6

    69.6

    70.5 70.4 70.6

    69.5 69.6

    67.9

    68.6

    65

    66

    67

    68

    69

    70

    71

    72

    73Fe

    b '1

    0M

    ar '1

    0A

    pr '1

    0M

    ay '1

    0Ju

    n '1

    0Ju

    l '10

    Aug

    '10

    Sep

    '10

    Oct

    '10

    Nov

    '10

    Dec

    '10

    Jan

    '11

    Feb

    '11

    Month Total Out of Home

    Placements

    Placed in Same County

    Percent Locally Placed

    186 115 61.8%Clark

    41 29 70.7%Floyd

    49 36 73.5%Harrison

    108 84 77.8%Scott

    23 15 65.2%Washington

    407 279 68.6%Feb 2011

    389 264 67.9%Jan 2011

    362 252 69.6%Dec 2010

    371 258 69.5%Nov 2010

    364 257 70.6%Oct 2010

    382 269 70.4%Sep 2010

    352 248 70.5%Aug 2010

    392 273 69.6%Jul 2010

    389 267 68.6%Jun 2010

    415 289 69.6%May 2010

    403 284 70.5%Apr 2010

    377 271 71.9%Mar 2010

    371 264 71.2%Feb 2010

    March 02 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. Average Number of Placements Per Child – This is the total number of out of home placements for each CHINS child in out of home placement on the last day of the report month. This includes all placements during the current removal episode. If a child had at least one placement end in the first 8 days from removal, then that child's number of placements was reduced by one. This number is divided by the total number CHINS children who are in out of home placement on the last day of the report month.

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    Average Number of Placements

    For February 2011

    Report Description

    March 02 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • Location Average Number of

    Placements Per Child

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    For February 2010 to February 2011

    Average Number of Placements

    Statewide Average Number of Placements

    2.44

    2.46

    2.48

    2.5

    2.52

    2.54

    2.56

    02-

    '10

    03-

    '10

    04-

    '10

    05-

    '10

    06-

    '10

    07-

    '10

    08-

    '10

    09-

    '10

    10-

    '10

    11-

    '10

    12-

    '10

    01-

    '11

    02-

    '11

    Average Placements

    February 2011

    Region 18 For February 2010 to February 2011 Region 18 Average Number of Placements

    2.3

    Statewide 2.5

    Region 18

    Month Average Number of Placements Per

    Child

    2

    2.1

    2.2

    2.3

    2.4

    2.5

    2.6

    2.7

    02-

    '10

    03-

    '10

    04-

    '10

    05-

    '10

    06-

    '10

    07-

    '10

    08-

    '10

    09-

    '10

    10-

    '10

    11-

    '10

    12-

    '10

    01-

    '11

    02-

    '11

    Average Placements

    2.4Clark

    2.5Floyd

    2.2Harrison

    2.2Scott

    1.6Washington

    2.3February 2011

    2.3January 2011

    2.4December 2010

    2.4November 2010

    2.4October 2010

    2.2September 2010

    2.3August 2010

    2.2July 2010

    2.2June 2010

    2.3May 2010

    2.4April 2010

    2.4March 2010

    2.6February 2010

    March 02 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, children with a non-custodial parent are considered to be in their own home. Count of Sibling Cases – This is the number of open cases as of the end of the report month which have more than one child in out of home placement at the end of the report month. Cases With All Children Placed Together – This is the number of cases with more than one child in out of home placement where all of the children are placed in the same resource with the same resource ID. Percent Placed Together of Sibling Cases– This is the percentage of the number of cases where all of the children in out of home placement are placed together divided by the number of open cases with more than one child in out of home placement as of the end of the report month. Average Number of Children per Case – This number takes the number of children in out of home placement from cases with more than one child in out of home placement and divides it by the number of cases with more than one child in out of home placement as of the end of the report month.

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    Sibling Placement Report

    For February 2011

    Report Description

    March 02 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • February 2011

    Region 18 For February 2010 to February 2011

    Location Count of Sibling Cases

    Cases With All Children Placed

    Together

    Average Number of Children per

    Case

    Percent Placed Together of

    Sibling Cases

    105 81 2.6277.1%

    Statewide 2433 1743 2.7071.6%

    Region 18

    71.4

    71.7

    71.371.4 71.4 71.4 71.3 71.4

    71.0

    70.6 70.670.7

    71.6

    70

    70.2

    70.4

    70.6

    70.8

    71

    71.2

    71.4

    71.6

    71.8

    02-

    '10

    03-

    '10

    04-

    '10

    05-

    '10

    06-

    '10

    07-

    '10

    08-

    '10

    09-

    '10

    10-

    '10

    11-

    '10

    12-

    '10

    01-

    '11

    02-

    '11

    Percent Together

    Statewide Percent Together

    Region 18 Percent Together

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    February 2011

    Sibling Placement Report

    78.6

    79.880.2

    81.1

    79.4

    80.980.5

    81.0

    78.5

    81.1 81.1 81.0

    77.1

    75

    76

    77

    78

    79

    80

    81

    82

    02-

    '10

    03-

    '10

    04-

    '10

    05-

    '10

    06-

    '10

    07-

    '10

    08-

    '10

    09-

    '10

    10-

    '10

    11-

    '10

    12-

    '10

    01-

    '11

    02-

    '11

    Percent Together

    Month Count of Sibling Cases

    Cases With All Children Placed

    Together

    Average Number of Children per

    Case

    Percent Placed Together of

    Sibling Cases

    Clark 46 38 2.6382.6%

    Floyd 10 7 2.7070.0%

    Harrison 13 10 2.5476.9%

    Scott 29 20 2.6969.0%

    Washington 7 6 2.2985.7%

    February 2011 105 81 2.6277.1%

    January 2011 100 81 2.6081.0%

    December 2010 95 77 2.5881.1%

    November 2010 95 77 2.6481.1%

    October 2010 93 73 2.6278.5%

    September 2010 100 81 2.6081.0%

    August 2010 87 70 2.6480.5%

    July 2010 94 76 2.6680.9%

    June 2010 97 77 2.6079.4%

    May 2010 106 86 2.5581.1%

    April 2010 96 77 2.6380.2%

    March 2010 89 71 2.6279.8%

    February 2010 84 66 2.6578.6%

    March 02 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of the historical month listed. This report looks at CHINS children that were in out of home placement at the end of the month. It measures the number of days since the child was last removed from its home. One Year - 0 to 365 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’s removal.

    Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 0 and 365 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

    One Year - 366 to 730 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the chlast removal.

    Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 366 and 730 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

    One Year - 731 to 1095 Days– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal.

    Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement between 731 to 1095 days since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

    One Year - 1096 Days+– This is column shows data for CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal.

    Count- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal. Percent- This is the number of CHINS children that have been in out of home placement 1096 days or more since the child’s last removal divided by the total number of CHINS children in out of home placement at the end of the month.

    Length Per Child – This column shows data for length of time of CHINS children who were in out of home placement at the end of the report month have been in out of home placement since the child’s last removal from their home.

    Average- This column calculates the average or “mean” length of time in out of home placement since the last removal per child in out of home placement at the end of the report month. Median- This column calculates the median length of time in out of home placement since the last removal per child in out of home placement at the end of the report month.

    Report Description

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    Length of Stay in Out of Home PlacementChildren in Out of Home Placement by Length of Time Since Latest Removal

    For February 2011

    March 02 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • 216 114 32 4553.1% 28.0% 7.9% 11.1% 520.4

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    Length of Stay in Out of Home PlacementChildren in Out of Home Placement by Length of Time Since Latest Removal

    Location One Year0 to 365 Days

    Two Years366 to 730 Days

    Three Years731 to 1095 Days

    Three + Years1096 Days+

    Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

    For February 2011

    Average Median

    Length Per Child

    February 2011

    Region 18 For February 2010 to February 2011

    Statewide Median Length

    Region 18 Median Length

    4,635 2,469 1,234 1,58346.7% 24.9% 12.4% 16.0% 635.4Statewide 402.3

    Region 18 347.2 368364 363

    368363

    371

    377 375

    381

    388

    399 398402

    340

    350

    360

    370

    380

    390

    400

    410

    02-

    '10

    03-

    '10

    04-

    '10

    05-

    '10

    06-

    '10

    07-

    '10

    08-

    '10

    09-

    '10

    10-

    '10

    11-

    '10

    12-

    '10

    01-

    '11

    02-

    '11

    Median

    295 302 298 293309

    331365 341 352 355 358 340 347

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    02-

    '10

    03-

    '10

    04-

    '10

    05-

    '10

    06-

    '10

    07-

    '10

    08-

    '10

    09-

    '10

    10-

    '10

    11-

    '10

    12-

    '10

    01-

    '11

    02-

    '11

    Median

    Month One Year0 to 365 Days

    Two Years366 to 730 Days

    Three Years731 to 1095 Days

    Three + Years1096 Days+

    Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Average Median

    Length Per Child

    97 50 10 2952.2% 26.9% 5.4% 15.6% 601.0Clark 347.0

    21 13 2 551.2% 31.7% 4.9% 12.2% 553.9Floyd 347.2

    31 11 5 263.3% 22.4% 10.2% 4.1% 418.2Harrison 334.3

    57 33 13 552.8% 30.6% 12.0% 4.6% 418.7Scott 330.0

    10 7 2 443.5% 30.4% 8.7% 17.4% 503.8Washington 470.5

    216 114 32 4553.1% 28.0% 7.9% 11.1% 520.4February 2011 347.2

    212 99 35 4354.5% 25.4% 9.0% 11.1% 525.3January 2011 340.3

    182 103 36 4150.3% 28.5% 9.9% 11.3% 544.7December 2010 358.0

    190 105 34 4251.2% 28.3% 9.2% 11.3% 527.0November 2010 354.6

    184 102 38 4050.5% 28.0% 10.4% 11.0% 522.6October 2010 352.0

    206 98 41 3753.9% 25.7% 10.7% 9.7% 498.0September 2010 340.5

    176 96 38 4250.0% 27.3% 10.8% 11.9% 540.2August 2010 365.0

    226 83 41 4157.8% 21.2% 10.5% 10.5% 503.8July 2010 331.0

    221 80 44 4357.0% 20.6% 11.3% 11.1% 504.8June 2010 309.4

    241 79 44 5058.2% 19.1% 10.6% 12.1% 510.3May 2010 293.4

    233 73 44 5258.0% 18.2% 10.9% 12.9% 526.5April 2010 297.6

    214 78 32 5256.9% 20.7% 8.5% 13.8% 538.6March 2010 301.5

    213 75 31 5157.6% 20.3% 8.4% 13.8% 536.2February 2010 295.3

    March 02 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • This report uses CHINS and IA case types that have case type status end date occurring during the month. It then groups these cases using the closure reasons codes into categories of closure reasons. Case with closure reason code “Case opened in error – disregard” are filtered out for the purpose of this report. This report uses the reason codes selected by the worker at the date of case closure. Adoption closure reasons will not match the number of actual finalized adoptions reported from the hearing information fields in ICWIS/MaGik. Closure Reasons are group by:

    Description Category Description Category

    Child Reunited with Parents Reunification Case closed; AG case created Guardianship

    Child never Removed from own home, wardship terminated

    Reunification Child placed with relatives Relative

    Extended wardship terminated (on court order for age 18 to 21)

    Emancipation Child Placed with Legal guardian Guardianship

    Child Returned to Primary Home Reunification Child Reached Age of Majority (age 18) Emancipation

    Period of IA ended code used for Informal Adjustment cases only

    Reunification Emancipated Court Ordered (age 18) Emancipation

    Child Adoption Finalized Adoption Child Already Reunited with parent (s) when wardship terminated

    Reunification

    The Permanency column “Total” refers to the total case with reason codes in the Reunification, Adoption, Relative, Guardianship, and Emancipation categories. The Permanency column “Total within 24 months” refers to the total case that ended within 24 month of the case status type begin date in the Reunification, Adoption, Relative, Guardianship, and Emancipation categories.

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    CHINS and IA Permanency Report

    For February 2011

    Report Description

    March 11 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • DCS Practice Indicator Report

    CHINS and IA Permanency Report

    For February 2011

    Statewide Permanency within 24 Months

    Region 18 Permanency within 24 Months

    Statewide

    Region 18 85.3 85.4 85.586.0

    84.1

    85.4

    84.5

    88.1

    86.5

    85.0

    82.9

    86.1

    88.4

    80

    81

    82

    83

    84

    85

    86

    87

    88

    89

    02-

    '10

    03-

    '10

    04-

    '10

    05-

    '10

    06-

    '10

    07-

    '10

    08-

    '10

    09-

    '10

    10-

    '10

    11-

    '10

    12-

    '10

    01-

    '11

    02-

    '11

    583 73 21 51 24

    13 3 0 2 0

    Location

    Reunification Adoption Relative Guardianship Emanicipation

    752

    18

    Total

    Closed Cases Types with Permanency Outcomes

    88.4

    88.9

    24 Month Rate

    665

    16

    Within 24 Months

    Permanency

    February 2011

    Region 18 For February 2010 to February 2011

    Location

    Reunification Adoption Relative Guardianship EmanicipationTotal

    Closed Cases Types with Permanency Outcomes

    24 Month Rate

    Within 24 Months

    Permanency

    93.2

    85.0

    97.7

    82.5

    88.5

    81.8

    90.9

    83.8

    89.7

    94.4

    87.7

    93.1

    88.9

    70

    75

    80

    85

    90

    95

    100

    02-

    '10

    03-

    '10

    04-

    '10

    05-

    '10

    06-

    '10

    07-

    '10

    08-

    '10

    09-

    '10

    10-

    '10

    11-

    '10

    12-

    '10

    01-

    '11

    02-

    '11

    Clark 5 0 0 0 0 5 100.05

    Floyd 2 3 0 0 0 5 60.03

    Harrison 2 0 0 0 0 2 100.02

    Scott 2 0 0 2 0 4 100.04

    Washington 2 0 0 0 0 2 100.02

    Feb 2011 13 3 0 2 0 18 88.916

    Jan 2011 17 2 0 10 0 29 93.127

    Dec 2010 43 5 0 7 2 57 87.750

    Nov 2010 25 2 0 8 1 36 94.434

    Oct 2010 21 1 1 5 1 29 89.726

    Sep 2010 25 5 1 5 1 37 83.831

    Aug 2010 51 9 1 2 3 66 90.960

    Jul 2010 35 4 2 11 3 55 81.845

    Jun 2010 45 0 3 7 6 61 88.554

    May 2010 25 10 1 2 2 40 82.533

    Apr 2010 37 1 0 4 2 44 97.743

    Mar 2010 30 2 0 8 0 40 85.034

    Feb 2010 35 1 2 3 3 44 93.241

    March 11 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • This report uses data collected over at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, a person is considered family for the child if they have the following relationships:

    • Father

    • Mother

    • Stepfather

    • Stepmother

    • Grandfather

    • Grandmother

    • Pre-adoptive father

    • Pre-adoptive mother

    • Adoptive grandparent

    • Legal Guardian Children Out of Home Entire Month – This column shows the number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month who also have a removal date prior to the first of the report month. Contact Information – This section of the reports shows information regarding FCM contacts (from the contact screens) during the report month. FCM with Family – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child’s family (as described above) during the report month.

    Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).

    FCM with Child – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child during the report month.

    Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a the child during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with the child divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).

    FCM with Family and Child – This section of the report shows FCM contacts with the child’s family (as described above) AND the child during the report month. Contact with both had to have occurred for the child to be included in this section. The family and child do not need to present at the same contact, contact with each could have been made in two separate contacts.

    Children – This is the total number of children that the FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family and at least one contact with the child during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that FCM had at least one contact with a member of the child’s family and at least one contact with the child during the report month divided by the total number of children in out of home placement for the entire month (as described above).

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    Family Case Manager Contacts Report

    For February 2011

    Report Description

    March 08 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • DCS Practice Indicator Report

    For February 2011

    Family Case Manager Contacts Report

    Location

    Children

    Statewide Child Contact Rate

    Region 18 Child Contact Rate

    February 2011

    Region 18 For February 2010 to February 2011

    395 147 37.2%

    Statewide

    Region 18

    94.6

    96.1

    97.4

    94.9

    96.8

    94.5

    97.1

    95.8

    93.3

    92.2

    94.9

    97.6

    93.4

    89.0

    90.0

    91.0

    92.0

    93.0

    94.0

    95.0

    96.0

    97.0

    98.0Fe

    b '1

    0M

    ar '1

    0A

    pr '1

    0M

    ay '1

    0Ju

    n '1

    0Ju

    l '10

    Aug

    '10

    Sep

    '10

    Oct

    '10

    Nov

    '10

    Dec

    '10

    Jan

    '11

    Feb

    '11

    Child Contact

    Contact Information

    FCM with Family

    Rate Children

    FCM with Child

    Rate Children

    FCM with Family and Child

    Rate

    Children out

    of home entire month

    144 36.5%369 93.4%

    9,638 2,728 28.3% 2,684 27.8%9,378 97.3%

    Month

    Children

    Contact Information

    FCM with Family

    Rate Children

    FCM with Child

    Rate Children

    FCM with Family and Child

    Rate

    Children out of home entire

    month

    96.3

    98.3

    97.1

    96.2

    98.097.8 97.8

    97.1

    96.6

    96.9

    97.4 97.5 97.3

    95.0

    95.5

    96.0

    96.5

    97.0

    97.5

    98.0

    98.5

    Feb

    '10

    Mar

    '10

    Apr

    '10

    May

    '10

    Jun

    '10

    Jul '

    10A

    ug '1

    0Se

    p '1

    0O

    ct '1

    0N

    ov '1

    0D

    ec '1

    0Ja

    n '1

    1Fe

    b '1

    1

    Child Contact

    182 58 31.9%Clark 58 31.9%170 93.4%

    41 15 36.6%Floyd 15 36.6%41 100.0%

    49 27 55.1%Harrison 26 53.1%43 87.8%

    101 37 36.6%Scott 35 34.7%93 92.1%

    22 10 45.5%Washington 10 45.5%22 100.0%

    395 147 37.2%Feb 2011 144 36.5%369 93.4%

    369 131 35.5%Jan 2011 126 34.1%360 97.6%

    353 114 32.3%Dec 2010 110 31.2%335 94.9%

    359 116 32.3%Nov 2010 113 31.5%331 92.2%

    357 131 36.7%Oct 2010 125 35.0%333 93.3%

    358 137 38.3%Sep 2010 137 38.3%343 95.8%

    347 128 36.9%Aug 2010 128 36.9%337 97.1%

    379 129 34.0%Jul 2010 125 33.0%358 94.5%

    373 138 37.0%Jun 2010 133 35.7%361 96.8%

    395 135 34.2%May 2010 132 33.4%375 94.9%

    384 129 33.6%Apr 2010 126 32.8%374 97.4%

    357 144 40.3%Mar 2010 142 39.8%343 96.1%

    354 132 37.3%Feb 2010 131 37.0%335 94.6%

    March 08 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the historical month listed. For the purpose of this report, a person is considered family for the child if they have the following relationships:

    • Father

    • Mother

    • Stepfather

    • Stepmother

    • Grandfather

    • Grandmother

    • Pre-adoptive father

    • Pre-adoptive mother

    • Adoptive grandparent

    • Legal Guardian Children out of home with case plan goal of reunification – This column shows the number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month who also have reunification as the most recently entered primary case plan goal. Children with visits to their family during the month – This section of the report shows data regarding children who have had a visit with the child’s family (as described above) begin during the report month.

    Children – This is the total number of children that the child had at least one visit with a member of the child’s family during the report month. Rate – This is the total number of children that the child had at least one visit with a member of the child’s family divided by the total number of children in out of home placement at the end of the report month with case plan goal of reunification(as described above).

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    Child Visitation Report

    For February 2011

    Report Description

    March 15 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • DCS Practice Indicator Report

    For February 2011

    Child Visitation Report

    Location

    Children

    Statewide Visitation Rate

    Region 18 Visitation Rate

    February 2011

    Region 18 For February 2010 to February 2011

    257 64 24.9%

    Statewide

    Region 18

    18.5

    23.6

    39.9

    35.1

    29.6 30.632.3

    40.4

    29.9

    23.421.5 21.1

    24.9

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    35.0

    40.0

    45.0Fe

    b '1

    0M

    ar '1

    0A

    pr '1

    0M

    ay '1

    0Ju

    n '1

    0Ju

    l '10

    Aug

    '10

    Sep

    '10

    Oct

    '10

    Nov

    '10

    Dec

    '10

    Jan

    '11

    Feb

    '11

    Visit Rate

    Children with visits to

    their family during the month

    Rate

    Children out of home

    with case plan goal of reunification

    5,238 1,313 25.1%

    Month

    18.9

    21.720.0

    17.4 17.2 18.218.8

    21.219.1

    17.3

    21.523.6

    25.1

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    Feb

    '10

    Mar

    '10

    Apr

    '10

    May

    '10

    Jun

    '10

    Jul '

    10A

    ug '1

    0Se

    p '1

    0O

    ct '1

    0N

    ov '1

    0D

    ec '1

    0Ja

    n '1

    1Fe

    b '1

    1

    Visit Rate

    Children

    Chidlren with visits to their family during the

    month

    Rate

    Children out of home with case plan goal of

    reunification

    Clark 112 15 13.4%

    Floyd 22 7 31.8%

    Harrison 32 12 37.5%

    Scott 76 16 21.1%

    Washington 15 14 93.3%

    Feb 2011 257 64 24.9%

    Jan 2011 232 49 21.1%

    Dec 2010 233 50 21.5%

    Nov 2010 235 55 23.4%

    Oct 2010 221 66 29.9%

    Sep 2010 230 93 40.4%

    Aug 2010 220 71 32.3%

    Jul 2010 255 78 30.6%

    Jun 2010 257 76 29.6%

    May 2010 248 87 35.1%

    Apr 2010 238 95 39.9%

    Mar 2010 208 49 23.6%

    Feb 2010 211 39 18.5%

    March 15 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • This is a description of the key elements used in this report. Time Period – The time period used in this report is the 12 months prior to the month of the report. Assessments during time period – The assessment used in this report are assessment with BOTH report date AND approval date during the time period (12 months prior to the month of the report). Victim Selection – The children used in this report were identified as having at least one substantiated allegation of abuse or neglect on an assessment during the time period. First Occurrence – This looks at the victims of substantiated abuse or neglect during the first 6 months of the time period (6 to 12 months prior to the month of the report). If a child was a victim in multiple assessments with substantiated abuse or neglect, the assessment with the earliest report date is considered the first occurrence. Recurrence Time Period – The time period used to see if a child is a substantiated victim in a recurring assessment of abuse or neglect is based off the report date of the first occurrence. The recurrence period begins one day after the first occurrence report date and ends 183 after the first occurrence report date (>= 1

    st

    Occurrence +1 and

  • 582 510 87.63%

    12,002 10,748 89.55%Statewide

    Region 18

    Statewide Absence of Repeat Maltreatment

    Region 18 Absence of Repeat Maltreatment

    92.2

    8

    92.4

    2

    92.7

    5

    92.5

    5

    92.2

    4

    91.9

    1

    91.8

    7

    91.8

    7 91.0

    9

    90.9

    0

    90.1

    4

    89.7

    5

    89.5

    5

    87.00

    88.00

    89.00

    90.00

    91.00

    92.00

    93.00

    94.00

    95.00

    02-

    '10

    03-

    '10

    04-

    '10

    05-

    '10

    06-

    '10

    07-

    '10

    08-

    '10

    09-

    '10

    10-

    '10

    11-

    '10

    12-

    '10

    01-

    '11

    02-

    '11

    Absence of Repeat Maltreatment Standard

    County Absence of Repeat

    Maltreatment Percent

    Victims from Mar 2010 to

    Sep 2010

    Victims without a recurrence within 6

    months

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    Absence of Repeat Maltreatment

    For February 2011

    February 2011

    Region 18 For February 2010 to February 2011

    County Victims from Mar 2010 to

    Sep 2010

    Absence of Repeat

    Maltreatment Percent

    Victims without a recurrence within 6

    months

    93.7

    0

    93.4

    5

    93.1

    0

    92.4

    9

    92.2

    7

    92.6

    4

    91.6

    5

    93.0

    4

    92.0

    7

    91.7

    0

    89.3

    5 87.7

    5

    87.6

    3

    84.00

    86.00

    88.00

    90.00

    92.00

    94.00

    96.00

    02-

    '10

    03-

    '10

    04-

    '10

    05-

    '10

    06-

    '10

    07-

    '10

    08-

    '10

    09-

    '10

    10-

    '10

    11-

    '10

    12-

    '10

    01-

    '11

    02-

    '11

    Absence of Repeat Maltreatment Standard

    94.60%

    94.60%

    National Standard

    National Standard

    245 212 86.53%Clark 94.60%

    61 60 98.36%Floyd 94.60%

    73 64 87.67%Harrison 94.60%

    146 122 83.56%Scott 94.60%

    57 52 91.23%Washington 94.60%

    582 510 87.63%February 2011 94.60%

    547 480 87.75%January 2011 94.60%

    573 512 89.35%December 2010 94.60%

    578 530 91.70%November 2010 94.60%

    580 534 92.07%October 2010 94.60%

    560 521 93.04%September 2010 94.60%

    599 549 91.65%August 2010 94.60%

    639 592 92.64%July 2010 94.60%

    621 573 92.27%June 2010 94.60%

    626 579 92.49%May 2010 94.60%

    638 594 93.10%April 2010 94.60%

    656 613 93.45%March 2010 94.60%

    651 610 93.70%February 2010 94.60%

    March 01 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • This is a description of the key elements used in this report. Time Period – The time period used in this report is the 12 months prior to the month of the report. Assessments during the time period – The assessment used in this report are assessment with BOTH report date AND approval date during the time period (12 months prior to the month of the report). Victim of maltreatment in Foster Care – The children used in this report were identified as having at least one substantiated allegation of abuse or neglect on an assessment during the time period where the perpetrator is a foster parent or institutional staff. Children in Foster Care during the time period – All CHINS children with an open removal episode at any time during the 12 months prior to the month of the report. Also included are Probation children (who are IV-E eligible) with an open removal episode at any time during the 12 months prior to the month of the report. Percent of absence of maltreatment – This calculations uses the terms defined above. The numerator is the number of children in foster care minus the number of victims of maltreatment in foster care. The denominator is the number of children in foster care.

    (Children in Foster Care – Victims of maltreatment in Foster Care) Children in Foster Care

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care

    For February 2011

    Report Description

    March 01 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739

  • 21,280 65 99.69%Statewide

    Region 18 823 3 99.64%

    Statewide Trend of Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care

    99.5

    2

    99.5

    5

    99.5

    7

    99.5

    9

    99.5

    7

    99.5

    2

    99.5

    2

    99.5

    8

    99.6

    1

    99.6

    3

    99.6

    4

    99.6

    7

    99.6

    9

    99.2

    99.3

    99.4

    99.5

    99.6

    99.7

    99.8

    99.9

    100

    02- '

    1003

    - '10

    04- '

    1005

    - '10

    06- '

    1007

    - '10

    08- '

    1009

    - '10

    10- '

    1011

    - '10

    12- '

    1001

    - '11

    02- '

    11

    Maltreatment Standard

    Region 18 Trend of Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care

    Location Absence of Maltreatment

    Percent

    For February 2011

    Children in Foster Care

    from Mar 2010 to Feb 2011

    Substantiated Victims in Foster

    Care

    Region 18 for February 2010 to February 2011

    Month Children in Foster Care

    from Mar 2010 to Feb 2011

    Substantiated Victims in Foster

    Care

    National Standard

    99.68%

    Absence of Maltreatment

    Percent

    National Standard

    99.68%

    DCS Practice Indicator Report

    Absence of Maltreatment in Foster Care

    For February 2011

    99.6

    5

    99.6

    5 99.5

    4

    99.5

    5

    99.5

    4

    99.5

    4

    99.5

    3

    99.5

    4

    99.5

    2

    99.5

    2

    99.7

    5

    99.7

    6 99.6

    4

    99.2

    99.3

    99.4

    99.5

    99.6

    99.7

    99.8

    99.9

    100

    02- '

    1003

    - '10

    04- '

    1005

    - '10

    06- '

    1007

    - '10

    08- '

    1009

    - '10

    10- '

    1011

    - '10

    12- '

    1001

    - '11

    02- '

    11

    Maltreatment Standard

    Clark 332 0 100.00% 99.68%

    Floyd 113 1 99.12% 99.68%

    Harrison 92 0 100.00% 99.68%

    Scott 213 0 100.00% 99.68%

    Washington 73 2 97.26% 99.68%

    February 2011 823 3 99.64% 99.68%

    January 2011 825 2 99.76% 99.68%

    December 2010 811 2 99.75% 99.68%

    November 2010 826 4 99.52% 99.68%

    October 2010 829 4 99.52% 99.68%

    September 2010 866 4 99.54% 99.68%

    August 2010 855 4 99.53% 99.68%

    July 2010 862 4 99.54% 99.68%

    June 2010 869 4 99.54% 99.68%

    May 2010 882 4 99.55% 99.68%

    April 2010 877 4 99.54% 99.68%

    March 2010 866 3 99.65% 99.68%

    February 2010 846 3 99.65% 99.68%

    March 01 2011

    Prepared by

    Office of Data Management, Reports, and Analysis

    Source:

    ICWIS Monthly Data

    State of Indiana

    Mitchell E. Daniels Jr, Governor - James W. Payne, Director

    302 West Washington Street Room E306 / Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739