reference manual for the artbrace 2018 - home page …demauroy.eu/pdf/art reference manual.pdf · 2...
TRANSCRIPT
Reference Manual
for the ARTbrace
2018SECOND EDITION
Jean C de Mauroy
P u bl i s h e d by t h e a u t h o rLYO N F R A N C E
iii
The information in this book is Open Access and could be shared with everyone if the information is freely given and the source
acknowledged No part of this book may be reproduced for profit
Copyright copy 2017 by Author Name
All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means including photocopying recording or other electronic or mechanical meth-ods without the prior written permission of the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law For permis-sion requests write to the publisher addressed ldquoAttention Permis-sions Coordinatorrdquo at the address below
Jean Claude de MauroyClinique du Parc155 Boulevard Stalingrad 69006 Lyon Francewwwdemauroyeu
Book Layout copy2015 BookDesignTemplatescom
Ordering InformationQuantity sales Special discounts are available on quantity purchases by corporations associations and others For details contact the ldquoSpecial Sales Departmentrdquo at the address above
Reference Manual for the ARTbrace Jean C De Mauroy mdash2nd ed 2017
Contents
History of ARTbrace 2
The interdisciplinary team approach 7
New concepts 11
Principles of ARTbrace 21
Brace prescription 32
Regional Shape Capture 36
Brace construction 41
Management of the patient with ARTBrace 51
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace 55
Results amp discussion 59
Conclusion 65
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my gratitude to the late Cyril Lecantedagger
whose expertise understanding and patience added considerably
to my medical experience Cyril will not see the end of the ART-
brace project but every time a brace is fitted a small part of him
lives again This book is dedicated to him
A very special thanks goes out to Steacutephane Lecante who contin-
ued the work of his brother Cyril at the head of The Lecante- Pro-
teor Group He organised the first training sessions that gave birth to
this book I would like to also thank the other members of the team
and especially Sophie Pourret Freacutedeacuteric Didier Jonathan Alith and
the numerous others who worked on this project who unfortunately
cannot all be named here I must also acknowledge Pascal Genevois
who has been able with his whole team to finalise the new sensor
ldquoOrten full bodyrdquo specifically adapted to the ARTbrace
Thanks also goes out to my secretary Marina Catherin who has
the difficult task of organising appointments for patients and sup-
port them administratively in this ldquoobstacle racerdquo that is currently
the French Medical World Appreciation also goes out to the Radiol-
ogy Department at the Clinique du Parc - Lyon Park Clinic which
for many years has been at the forefront of technology with the EOS
system
The regional shape capture was born in 2013 during the SOSORT
meeting that I had the honour to chair The brace is the fruit of 10
years of research within the SOSORT and I am very proud that the
acronym ARTbrace was created by my friend Stefano Negrini
I would also like to thank my family for the support they gave me
through my entire life and in particular I must acknowledge my wife
Alice Without her love encouragement and patience I would not
have finished this book Furthermore my daughter Agnes who from
London corrects my English
In conclusion I recognise that this research would not have been
possible whithout the patients who sometimes come from so far and
who do their utmost to follow the insructions and protocols A spe-
cial thanks to Christine Chenot President of the french ldquoScoliose et
Partagerdquo Association who agreed to assess the psychological feeling
of this brace
Dr Jean Claude de Mauroy
Prolegomenon
There has been several major chapters in the conservative
treatment of scoliosis The most recent 70 years ago is the use of
plastic materials to replace leather One of the latest is the creation of
highly asymmetric braces by Jacques Checircneau 40 years ago (in-brace
reduction 30-40) Since then progress was more likely thanks to
the use of CAD CAM systems for the realisation of braces rather
than on the conception of the braces themselves Until recently only
very high rigidity braces were able to treat scoliosis of more than 40deg
The ARTbrace (in-brace reduction 69-73 ) combines high rigidity
Lyon braces and the Checircneau asymmetry which is obtained using a
regional shape capture and software with the superposition of three
forms determined by the patient itself according to its reducibility
After a period which can be referred to as lsquohighly surgicalrsquo the in-
terest to conservative treatments whose effectiveness has been sci-
entifically proven by BrAIST study is noted again The high rigidity
PMMA Lyon brace (in-brace reduction 40-50) has demonstrated
its effectiveness for scoliosis including adolescents and scoliosis over
40deg The new Lyon ARTbrace takes much of this legacy even if it
uses the most modern techniques and new concepts In fact the new
ARTbrace concentrates a maximum of technological innovations ex-
plaining a double in-brace correction than polyethylene ones
The primary purpose of this book is to provide all users of the
Very High Rigidity a Manual allowing them to use the high rigidity
and deal with the greater part of situations It is the fruit of three
years of specific experience It is destined primarily for all those
who attended the ldquoTraining Courserdquo in Lyon
The book is published in pdf or epub format For practical rea-
sons some of the multimedia documents figures videos and bib-
liographical references require an internet connection to be used
Some regular updates will be published according to feedback re-
ceived during training sessions
Remember the learning pyramid Reading + Audiovisual = 20
of learning
2 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 3
c h a p t e r 1
History of ARTbrace
Lyon orthopedics began in 1741 with Nicolas Andry born in
Lyon and who published under the neologism ldquoOrthopae-
diardquo a book summarizing the different methods to prevent
and correct deformations in children Nicolas Andry analyzes the
malformations and understands the biomechanical principles re-
lated to the skeleton He is a keen supporter of movement therapy
that is to say physiotherapy The frontispiece of his book repre-
sents the torso tree which has become the symbol of many ortho-
pedic societies around the world
The orthopedic tradition for vertebral deformities was devel-
oped by Charles Gabriel Pravaz He was not only the inventor of the
syringe but he also created in Lyon a great Orthopaedic Institute to
treat scoliosis 200 years ago He published 2 books interesting for
us ldquoNew method of treating deviations of the spineldquoand ldquoGymnas-
tics applied to treatment of some constitutional diseasesldquo The Lyon
method also deals with physiotherapy exercises (PSSE) At that
time the present exercises characterising the Schroth were already
practiced
Another Lyon physician Claude Bernard is important to mention
He is the creator of Experimental Medicine as opposed to Empirical
and Observational medicine He wrote in 1865 ldquoScience is a perma-
nent exchange between theory and experimental facts And For a
man of science there is no separate science of Medicine or Physiol-
ogy there is only a science of liferdquo
Plaster cast and Plastic deformation
The first plaster casts were made in the early twentieth century
by Sayre and Abbott Calot at Berck resumes the principles of Sayrersquos
correction The cast is made in upright position the elongation ldquopullrdquo
effect is priority Subsequently Cotrel developed a Frame to facili-
tate Elongation Derotation and Flexion or bending (EDF) which is
used in the Lyon treatment The objective of the plaster is to obtain
a plastic deformation with elongation of the viscoelastic structures
of the concavity
4 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 5
Old Lyon Brace amp new ARTbrace
The Lyon Bracing Management with adjustable underarm brace
has evolved since 1947 as a cooperative effort between Pierre Stag-
nara MD and Bouillat amp Terrier CPO
The Lyon management protocol requires at first a plastic defor-
mation with a plaster cast for one to four months after which the
brace is shape captureed and fitted The brace is a high rigidity ad-
justable under arm design and does not have a superstructure
Very early braces were made from a combination of steel and
leather Following World War II Reacutegis Lecante CPO discovered a
Messerschmitt cockpit near his country house Made of a very du-
rable plastic it could be easily machined tapped and screwed The
use of PMM (polymetacrylate of methyl) or Plexidurtrade was born
revolutionising modern brace materials and design
The Lyon Brace created in 1947 by Pierre Stagnara is designed
to be
bull Adjustable It is easily modified accommodating up to 7 cm
of growth and 7 kg of weight while also being more cost effective
requiring fewer and less frequent changes
bull Active The rigidity of the Polymetacrylate or Ploycarbonate
structure stimulates the child to initiate an active axial auto correc-
tion which decreases superficial pressures
bull Decompressive As a consequence of the ldquoAdjustablerdquo fea-
ture the effect of extension between the two pelvic and scapular
girdles also decreases the pressure on the intervertebral discs and
promotes more effective pushes
bull Symmetrical In addition to being more aesthetically pleas-
ing the brace was much easier to build The new Lyon ARTbrace is
Asymmetrical thanks to advances in digital 3D technology
bull Stable The stability of both shoulder and pelvic girdle facili-
tates the intermediate corrections
bull Transparent Skin pressures are easily observed and direct
control of the pushes stops drives and reliefs is possible Comple-
mentary pads are rarely needed
The Lyon Brace is always constructed after the completion of the
reductive plaster casting protocol using a Cotrel EDF frame The re-
sults of the Lyon Brace Management have been validated by numer-
ous teams in Europe However the plaster cast process is quite diffi-
cult for the patient and physician Consequently many teams looked
for more convenient and expedient solutions without preliminary
plaster cast reduction Moreover when the angular correction is low
the plastic deformation remains limited
h t t p s c o l i o s i s j o u r n a l b i o m e d c e n t r a l c o m articles1011861748-7161-6-4
6 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 7
It was only in 2013 that advances in computer technology with
the latest generation software (OrtenShape) allowed the superpo-
sition of different CADCAM shape captures and a segmental 3D
reconstruction The aim was to use this new software to replace the
plaster cast with a new Lyon brace the ARTbrace The Regional
shape capture is one of the fundamental innovations of the ART
brace The overcorrection is performed in the frontal plane and the
sagittal plane precisely and individually for each child at three levels
pelvis lumbar spine and thoracic spine The detorsion is obtained by
untwisting the whole spine
Like the historical Lyon brace the ARTbrace is ADJUSTABLE
Both axillary and pelvic clamps are adjustable with a precise wrench
and a bolt system and an anterior ratcheting buckle
Like the historical Lyon brace the SAGITTAL PLANE is fixed by
the posterior bar But the sagittal plane is determined by the regional
shape capture and the superposition of the 3 shape captures In addi-
tional it is the lack of support at the sternoclavicular level and at the
abdominal level that avoids lumbar delordosis and thoracic flat back
The initial aim was to avoid the plaster cast but very quickly the
ARTbrace appeared to be a much more effective solution compared to the former casts and it was even better tolerated Following the
early successes of in-brace correction (40 better in-brace correc-
tion) the whole treatment was continued with the same brace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189456845
ISPO 2017 - Olomouc
History of Scoliosis Treatment and modern trends today
c h a p t e r 2
The interdisciplinary team approach
Since 2013 we had the opportunity to create an interdisci-
plinary team for the ARTbrace with commitment and con-
stant nurturing A careful planning from 2013 to 2018 was
established
The first goal was to use the ART as a plaster cast to maintain the
concept of plastic deformation During the regional shape captur-
ing the MD performs the correction which he previously carried out
during the plaster cast The CPO saves to the computer the 3 shape
captures and it lsquos at this moment that occurs the maximum exchange
of information
Since the first patients we realised that the ART was correcting
40 more than the formerly used plaster cast and we took the deci-
sion to continue the entire treatment with the ART also replacing
the old Lyon brace The ARTbrace project was born
As opposed to multidisciplinary interdisciplinary team work is a
complex process in which different types of staff work together to
share expertise knowledge and skills to impact on patient care It
8 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 9
was first described by Drinka (2000) Several practicians identified
methods of team practice which are used to match the ART bracing
1 Leadership and Management
Project Manager JC de Mauroy - Clinique du Parc Lyon
Product Manager Sophie Pourret - lecante Group
Team Manager Freacutedeacuteric Barral - Lecante Group
CADCAM Orten Collaboration Pascal Genevois - Orten
Liaison Engineer Alith Hoang - Orten
Patients partners Scoliose et Partage (Christine Chenot)
Commercial Management Steacutephane Lecante - Proteor
Group
All senior managers are international leaders in the field of sco-
liosis bracing
2 Communication
Scientific publications
Website
Newsletter
International training
All members of the team are choosen for their Communication
skills with the patient within the team and outside
3 Learning Training and Development
Two Training sessions were performed in 2015
Four Educational Sessions in Italy in 2015 (Piacenza Bari
Palermo)
All individual team members are motivated
4 Appropriate resources and procedures
Structures Lecante Bracing Manufacture Full Instantaneous 3D
CADCAM Orten EOS X Ray - Clinique du Parc Medical Orthopae-
dic Unit amp Radiology Unit
Weekly coordination during the Regional shape capturing (JCdM
SP)
Monthly Team Meeting (LBM)
All team members are working in Lyon
5 Appropriate skill mix
A full competent staff is constituted with mix and balance of
personalities
6 Climate
Innovation team culture of trust value contributions nurturing
consensus and inter professional atmosphere were created
7 Individual characteristics
10 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 11
Knowledge experience initiative knowing strengths and weak-
nesses listening skills reflexive practice desire to work on the same
goals are the main skills
8 Clarity of vision
Having a clear set of values that drive the direction of the service
and the care provided Portraying a uniform and consistent external
image
9 Quality and outcomes of care
Patient-centered focus outcomes and satisfaction encouraging
feedback capturing and recording evidence of the effectiveness of
care and using that as part of a feedback cycle to improve care
10 Respecting and understanding roles
Tasks and roles are well defined sharing power joint working
autonomy
The Scoliosis Team
The family and patients are also part of the chain The brace com-
pliance depends partly on them When they exist the alternatives of
different protocols must be discussed and the choice is made jointly
A chain is only as strong as its weakest link
c h a p t e r 3
New concepts
Mathematical Basis Circled Helicoid
The mathematical basis of the torso column is the cir-cled helicoid with horizontal generating circle described
by the French mathematician Robert Ferreacuteol For a circled helicoid
the Cartesian parameterisation is the parameterisation of the circle
with diameter carried by Ox with a center (a00) with a radius b
forming an angle alpha with the horizontal For torso column alpha
= 0
12 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 13
The aim is to get not only a straight spine but a reverse torso
shape capture opposite to scoliosis ie overcorrection of the scolio-
sis curvature This overcorrection is possible only if the vertebral
bodies are not distorted Otherwise we favour the correction accen-
tuating the asymmetry of pressure on the vertebral body
The main innovative features are in the acronym of ART
1 A stands for Asymmetry obtained with an overlay of three re-
gional shapes captures
2 R stands for Rigidity (in fact High rigidity) of polycarbonate
3 T stands for Torsion the brace performing a Detorsion of the
scoliotic Torso Column which is a circled helicoid with horizontal
generating circle in opposite direction of the spiral column while fix-
ing the sagittal plane in a physiological position
Asymmetry
Background
Although the effectiveness of bracing for scoliosis is now proved
(level 1) [Weinstein 2013] there are more than twenty types of
braces used worldwide All of them have not shown to be as effective
as the others A recent review found that Asymmetric braces have
led to better corrections than that described for symmetric braces
[Sy 2015] The efficacy of the brace also depends on moulding The
CAD CAM systems and especially those associated with Finite Ele-
ment Simulation [Cobetto 2016] have been proven to be more effec-
tive than the old plaster moulds [Wong 2011]
Symmetrical molding is easier to perform than asymmetric
molding If plaster casting is used the main effect is essentially axial
self-correction with possibly a lumbar shift In all cases the sagittal
curvatures are diminished Checircneau makes the corrections on the
positive plaster but without taking into account the rigidity of each
scoliosis These corrections are difficult if a constant volume is to
14 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 15
be maintained In fact the corrections are operator-dependent and
approximate which explains the use of polyethylene When using
CAD CAM systems It is necessary to differentiate the sensors type
ldquoIpadrdquo with precision of more than 1 cm probably less reliable than
the plaster or systems with raster-stereographie or the sensors with
4 columns almost instantaneous whose precision is of 1 mm Respi-
ratory blocking is then done in an intermediate position for children
and deep inspiration for adults
Aims
The aim of the asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To obtain the maximum asymmetry for each block (Katerina
Schroth block concept) lumbar and thoracic for two curves and
thoraco-lumbar for one curve by superposition of three asymmetric
shape captures codified and reproducible
2 To obtain the maximum precision (less than 1 mm) in the mini-
mum of time (less than 3 seconds) with the use of a professional
sensor This precision is also indispensable if one associates asym-
metry and high rigidity
Scope
The scope is to obtain the maximum in-brace correction by a
precise asymmetry using the new Regional Shape Capture with the
professional 4 column CADCAM
Rigid (very high) Polycarbonate
Background
Even if the old Lyon brace in polymethacrylate was very rigid
the credit for VERY HIGH RIGIDITY goes to the Italian team of
ISICO with the Sforzesco brace which has proven to be effective
by avoiding plaster casts for scoliosis over 45deg The acronym ART
brace (Asymmetrical Rigid Torsion brace) was created by Stefano
Negrini The merit of the ART brace is the addition of overcorrec-
tion to the high rigidity with a global detorsion It is this overcorrec-
tion for small curvatures which explains the average improvement of
the in-brace correction
Polycarbonate characteristics are
bull Transparency
bull Unbreakable (25 stronger than PPMA)
bull Lightweight (4 mm sheet)
bull No bisphenol A
bull Glass transition 147deg-155deg
bull Bending brake till 120deg
bull Insulation Rvalue 143
Aims
16 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 17
The aim of the high rigid asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To replace the plaster cast during the initial plastic deforma-
tion of the Lyon management
2 To improve the comfort in brace thanks to the soft contact
The Soft Contact concept is that of the squeeze attachment for cy-
lindrical hay bales Pressures are spread over the entire cylinder sur-
face this is contrary to the principle of the push and counter-push of
the historical Lyon brace or other three point braces
As usual in the correction of 3D deformities of the scoliotic
spine room should be provided for migration of lateral curvature
rotated vertebrae and breathing exercises In this design actually
various 3-point pressure systems are provided to correct the lateral
curvature and vertebral rotation from different anatomical planes
In the ART brace the shape of the brace is not a straight spine like
the Sforzesco or the old Lyon brace but an overcorrected spine with
reverse scoliosis
3 To realize the baby lift or lsquopullrsquo which is an axillary extension
that occurs in the armpits like when wearing a child
Scope
The scope is to achieve all the over-correction in the outer sur-
face of the brace which makes the inner surface smooth without
pads The brace then becomes dynamic with a lsquopullrsquo asymmetry
Torsion
Background
Global Detorsion vs 3 points system (Solid Geometry)
Given the multiplicity of planes the corrections by the 3 points
system only operate in a limited number of planes On the contrary
the ARTbrace works in an overall untwisting
The Global detorsion is performed with a fixed sagittal plane
Axial elongation brings the vertebral bodies near the central axis in
the frontal plane and by untwisting the scoliotic spine between the
pelvis and the shoulder the horizontal plane is corrected So both
geometrical detorsion and mechanical detorsion of the cylinder are
working together
19
18 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T
Mayonnaise Tube Effect
The translation along the vertical axis is a fundamental step of
untwisting The concept of elongation has progressed during the last
century
1 Simple cervical traction against gravity it is more of a stretching
2 With Milwaukee this elongation is between the head and the
pelvis which provides elongation
3 With the Lyon brace elongation occurs between shoulder and
pelvic belts
4 With Boston it is the effect ldquocherry stonerdquo that is privileged
with the idea that correcting the bottom of the column will help to
correct the upper part of the spine
5 Finally with ARTbrace there is a real extrusion by bringing
together the two pieces (hemi-shells)
20 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 21
The principle of the wrench and bolt is to ldquounscrew or untwistrdquo
scoliosis For instance the Checircneau brace uses the principle of pres-
sure and expansion in many precise areas For a double major curve
in the ARTbrace the thoracolumbar area is the fixed point with un-
screwing between this fixed point and the pelvis for lumbar curva-
ture and the shoulder girdle for thoracic curvature For a thoraco-
lumbar curve the fixed points are at the cranial and caudal parts of
the spine and the unscrewing is done at thoracolumbar level The
pelvis is the laquobolt headraquo which is stabilised by a symmetrical pelvic
base like a key Lumbar and thoracic segments above act as a wrench
for the detorsion of scoliosis
The EOS 3D system automatically calculates the rotation for each
vertebral segment The twist (Torsion) is the sum of all the segmental
rotations We can calculate the overall in-brace untwisting
c h a p t e r 4
Principles of ARTbrace
1 PLASTIC DEFORMATION
Some definitions The relationship between the stress
and strain that a material displays is known as that materialrsquos
stressndashstrain curve It is unique for each material and is found by
recording the amount of deformation (strain) at distinct intervals of
tensile or compressive loading (stress)
In physics and materials science plasticity describes the defor-
mation of a (solid) material undergoing non-reversible changes of
shape in response to applied forces for example a solid piece of
metal being bent or pounded into a new shape displays plasticity
as permanent changes occur within the material itself In engineer-
ing the transition from elastic behavior to plastic behavior is called
yield
When an elastic material containing fluid is deformed the return
of the material to its original shape is delayed in time and it is slower
to restore to its original position This is why we ask the patient to
remove the brace two hours before the X-ray
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
iii
The information in this book is Open Access and could be shared with everyone if the information is freely given and the source
acknowledged No part of this book may be reproduced for profit
Copyright copy 2017 by Author Name
All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means including photocopying recording or other electronic or mechanical meth-ods without the prior written permission of the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law For permis-sion requests write to the publisher addressed ldquoAttention Permis-sions Coordinatorrdquo at the address below
Jean Claude de MauroyClinique du Parc155 Boulevard Stalingrad 69006 Lyon Francewwwdemauroyeu
Book Layout copy2015 BookDesignTemplatescom
Ordering InformationQuantity sales Special discounts are available on quantity purchases by corporations associations and others For details contact the ldquoSpecial Sales Departmentrdquo at the address above
Reference Manual for the ARTbrace Jean C De Mauroy mdash2nd ed 2017
Contents
History of ARTbrace 2
The interdisciplinary team approach 7
New concepts 11
Principles of ARTbrace 21
Brace prescription 32
Regional Shape Capture 36
Brace construction 41
Management of the patient with ARTBrace 51
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace 55
Results amp discussion 59
Conclusion 65
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my gratitude to the late Cyril Lecantedagger
whose expertise understanding and patience added considerably
to my medical experience Cyril will not see the end of the ART-
brace project but every time a brace is fitted a small part of him
lives again This book is dedicated to him
A very special thanks goes out to Steacutephane Lecante who contin-
ued the work of his brother Cyril at the head of The Lecante- Pro-
teor Group He organised the first training sessions that gave birth to
this book I would like to also thank the other members of the team
and especially Sophie Pourret Freacutedeacuteric Didier Jonathan Alith and
the numerous others who worked on this project who unfortunately
cannot all be named here I must also acknowledge Pascal Genevois
who has been able with his whole team to finalise the new sensor
ldquoOrten full bodyrdquo specifically adapted to the ARTbrace
Thanks also goes out to my secretary Marina Catherin who has
the difficult task of organising appointments for patients and sup-
port them administratively in this ldquoobstacle racerdquo that is currently
the French Medical World Appreciation also goes out to the Radiol-
ogy Department at the Clinique du Parc - Lyon Park Clinic which
for many years has been at the forefront of technology with the EOS
system
The regional shape capture was born in 2013 during the SOSORT
meeting that I had the honour to chair The brace is the fruit of 10
years of research within the SOSORT and I am very proud that the
acronym ARTbrace was created by my friend Stefano Negrini
I would also like to thank my family for the support they gave me
through my entire life and in particular I must acknowledge my wife
Alice Without her love encouragement and patience I would not
have finished this book Furthermore my daughter Agnes who from
London corrects my English
In conclusion I recognise that this research would not have been
possible whithout the patients who sometimes come from so far and
who do their utmost to follow the insructions and protocols A spe-
cial thanks to Christine Chenot President of the french ldquoScoliose et
Partagerdquo Association who agreed to assess the psychological feeling
of this brace
Dr Jean Claude de Mauroy
Prolegomenon
There has been several major chapters in the conservative
treatment of scoliosis The most recent 70 years ago is the use of
plastic materials to replace leather One of the latest is the creation of
highly asymmetric braces by Jacques Checircneau 40 years ago (in-brace
reduction 30-40) Since then progress was more likely thanks to
the use of CAD CAM systems for the realisation of braces rather
than on the conception of the braces themselves Until recently only
very high rigidity braces were able to treat scoliosis of more than 40deg
The ARTbrace (in-brace reduction 69-73 ) combines high rigidity
Lyon braces and the Checircneau asymmetry which is obtained using a
regional shape capture and software with the superposition of three
forms determined by the patient itself according to its reducibility
After a period which can be referred to as lsquohighly surgicalrsquo the in-
terest to conservative treatments whose effectiveness has been sci-
entifically proven by BrAIST study is noted again The high rigidity
PMMA Lyon brace (in-brace reduction 40-50) has demonstrated
its effectiveness for scoliosis including adolescents and scoliosis over
40deg The new Lyon ARTbrace takes much of this legacy even if it
uses the most modern techniques and new concepts In fact the new
ARTbrace concentrates a maximum of technological innovations ex-
plaining a double in-brace correction than polyethylene ones
The primary purpose of this book is to provide all users of the
Very High Rigidity a Manual allowing them to use the high rigidity
and deal with the greater part of situations It is the fruit of three
years of specific experience It is destined primarily for all those
who attended the ldquoTraining Courserdquo in Lyon
The book is published in pdf or epub format For practical rea-
sons some of the multimedia documents figures videos and bib-
liographical references require an internet connection to be used
Some regular updates will be published according to feedback re-
ceived during training sessions
Remember the learning pyramid Reading + Audiovisual = 20
of learning
2 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 3
c h a p t e r 1
History of ARTbrace
Lyon orthopedics began in 1741 with Nicolas Andry born in
Lyon and who published under the neologism ldquoOrthopae-
diardquo a book summarizing the different methods to prevent
and correct deformations in children Nicolas Andry analyzes the
malformations and understands the biomechanical principles re-
lated to the skeleton He is a keen supporter of movement therapy
that is to say physiotherapy The frontispiece of his book repre-
sents the torso tree which has become the symbol of many ortho-
pedic societies around the world
The orthopedic tradition for vertebral deformities was devel-
oped by Charles Gabriel Pravaz He was not only the inventor of the
syringe but he also created in Lyon a great Orthopaedic Institute to
treat scoliosis 200 years ago He published 2 books interesting for
us ldquoNew method of treating deviations of the spineldquoand ldquoGymnas-
tics applied to treatment of some constitutional diseasesldquo The Lyon
method also deals with physiotherapy exercises (PSSE) At that
time the present exercises characterising the Schroth were already
practiced
Another Lyon physician Claude Bernard is important to mention
He is the creator of Experimental Medicine as opposed to Empirical
and Observational medicine He wrote in 1865 ldquoScience is a perma-
nent exchange between theory and experimental facts And For a
man of science there is no separate science of Medicine or Physiol-
ogy there is only a science of liferdquo
Plaster cast and Plastic deformation
The first plaster casts were made in the early twentieth century
by Sayre and Abbott Calot at Berck resumes the principles of Sayrersquos
correction The cast is made in upright position the elongation ldquopullrdquo
effect is priority Subsequently Cotrel developed a Frame to facili-
tate Elongation Derotation and Flexion or bending (EDF) which is
used in the Lyon treatment The objective of the plaster is to obtain
a plastic deformation with elongation of the viscoelastic structures
of the concavity
4 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 5
Old Lyon Brace amp new ARTbrace
The Lyon Bracing Management with adjustable underarm brace
has evolved since 1947 as a cooperative effort between Pierre Stag-
nara MD and Bouillat amp Terrier CPO
The Lyon management protocol requires at first a plastic defor-
mation with a plaster cast for one to four months after which the
brace is shape captureed and fitted The brace is a high rigidity ad-
justable under arm design and does not have a superstructure
Very early braces were made from a combination of steel and
leather Following World War II Reacutegis Lecante CPO discovered a
Messerschmitt cockpit near his country house Made of a very du-
rable plastic it could be easily machined tapped and screwed The
use of PMM (polymetacrylate of methyl) or Plexidurtrade was born
revolutionising modern brace materials and design
The Lyon Brace created in 1947 by Pierre Stagnara is designed
to be
bull Adjustable It is easily modified accommodating up to 7 cm
of growth and 7 kg of weight while also being more cost effective
requiring fewer and less frequent changes
bull Active The rigidity of the Polymetacrylate or Ploycarbonate
structure stimulates the child to initiate an active axial auto correc-
tion which decreases superficial pressures
bull Decompressive As a consequence of the ldquoAdjustablerdquo fea-
ture the effect of extension between the two pelvic and scapular
girdles also decreases the pressure on the intervertebral discs and
promotes more effective pushes
bull Symmetrical In addition to being more aesthetically pleas-
ing the brace was much easier to build The new Lyon ARTbrace is
Asymmetrical thanks to advances in digital 3D technology
bull Stable The stability of both shoulder and pelvic girdle facili-
tates the intermediate corrections
bull Transparent Skin pressures are easily observed and direct
control of the pushes stops drives and reliefs is possible Comple-
mentary pads are rarely needed
The Lyon Brace is always constructed after the completion of the
reductive plaster casting protocol using a Cotrel EDF frame The re-
sults of the Lyon Brace Management have been validated by numer-
ous teams in Europe However the plaster cast process is quite diffi-
cult for the patient and physician Consequently many teams looked
for more convenient and expedient solutions without preliminary
plaster cast reduction Moreover when the angular correction is low
the plastic deformation remains limited
h t t p s c o l i o s i s j o u r n a l b i o m e d c e n t r a l c o m articles1011861748-7161-6-4
6 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 7
It was only in 2013 that advances in computer technology with
the latest generation software (OrtenShape) allowed the superpo-
sition of different CADCAM shape captures and a segmental 3D
reconstruction The aim was to use this new software to replace the
plaster cast with a new Lyon brace the ARTbrace The Regional
shape capture is one of the fundamental innovations of the ART
brace The overcorrection is performed in the frontal plane and the
sagittal plane precisely and individually for each child at three levels
pelvis lumbar spine and thoracic spine The detorsion is obtained by
untwisting the whole spine
Like the historical Lyon brace the ARTbrace is ADJUSTABLE
Both axillary and pelvic clamps are adjustable with a precise wrench
and a bolt system and an anterior ratcheting buckle
Like the historical Lyon brace the SAGITTAL PLANE is fixed by
the posterior bar But the sagittal plane is determined by the regional
shape capture and the superposition of the 3 shape captures In addi-
tional it is the lack of support at the sternoclavicular level and at the
abdominal level that avoids lumbar delordosis and thoracic flat back
The initial aim was to avoid the plaster cast but very quickly the
ARTbrace appeared to be a much more effective solution compared to the former casts and it was even better tolerated Following the
early successes of in-brace correction (40 better in-brace correc-
tion) the whole treatment was continued with the same brace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189456845
ISPO 2017 - Olomouc
History of Scoliosis Treatment and modern trends today
c h a p t e r 2
The interdisciplinary team approach
Since 2013 we had the opportunity to create an interdisci-
plinary team for the ARTbrace with commitment and con-
stant nurturing A careful planning from 2013 to 2018 was
established
The first goal was to use the ART as a plaster cast to maintain the
concept of plastic deformation During the regional shape captur-
ing the MD performs the correction which he previously carried out
during the plaster cast The CPO saves to the computer the 3 shape
captures and it lsquos at this moment that occurs the maximum exchange
of information
Since the first patients we realised that the ART was correcting
40 more than the formerly used plaster cast and we took the deci-
sion to continue the entire treatment with the ART also replacing
the old Lyon brace The ARTbrace project was born
As opposed to multidisciplinary interdisciplinary team work is a
complex process in which different types of staff work together to
share expertise knowledge and skills to impact on patient care It
8 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 9
was first described by Drinka (2000) Several practicians identified
methods of team practice which are used to match the ART bracing
1 Leadership and Management
Project Manager JC de Mauroy - Clinique du Parc Lyon
Product Manager Sophie Pourret - lecante Group
Team Manager Freacutedeacuteric Barral - Lecante Group
CADCAM Orten Collaboration Pascal Genevois - Orten
Liaison Engineer Alith Hoang - Orten
Patients partners Scoliose et Partage (Christine Chenot)
Commercial Management Steacutephane Lecante - Proteor
Group
All senior managers are international leaders in the field of sco-
liosis bracing
2 Communication
Scientific publications
Website
Newsletter
International training
All members of the team are choosen for their Communication
skills with the patient within the team and outside
3 Learning Training and Development
Two Training sessions were performed in 2015
Four Educational Sessions in Italy in 2015 (Piacenza Bari
Palermo)
All individual team members are motivated
4 Appropriate resources and procedures
Structures Lecante Bracing Manufacture Full Instantaneous 3D
CADCAM Orten EOS X Ray - Clinique du Parc Medical Orthopae-
dic Unit amp Radiology Unit
Weekly coordination during the Regional shape capturing (JCdM
SP)
Monthly Team Meeting (LBM)
All team members are working in Lyon
5 Appropriate skill mix
A full competent staff is constituted with mix and balance of
personalities
6 Climate
Innovation team culture of trust value contributions nurturing
consensus and inter professional atmosphere were created
7 Individual characteristics
10 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 11
Knowledge experience initiative knowing strengths and weak-
nesses listening skills reflexive practice desire to work on the same
goals are the main skills
8 Clarity of vision
Having a clear set of values that drive the direction of the service
and the care provided Portraying a uniform and consistent external
image
9 Quality and outcomes of care
Patient-centered focus outcomes and satisfaction encouraging
feedback capturing and recording evidence of the effectiveness of
care and using that as part of a feedback cycle to improve care
10 Respecting and understanding roles
Tasks and roles are well defined sharing power joint working
autonomy
The Scoliosis Team
The family and patients are also part of the chain The brace com-
pliance depends partly on them When they exist the alternatives of
different protocols must be discussed and the choice is made jointly
A chain is only as strong as its weakest link
c h a p t e r 3
New concepts
Mathematical Basis Circled Helicoid
The mathematical basis of the torso column is the cir-cled helicoid with horizontal generating circle described
by the French mathematician Robert Ferreacuteol For a circled helicoid
the Cartesian parameterisation is the parameterisation of the circle
with diameter carried by Ox with a center (a00) with a radius b
forming an angle alpha with the horizontal For torso column alpha
= 0
12 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 13
The aim is to get not only a straight spine but a reverse torso
shape capture opposite to scoliosis ie overcorrection of the scolio-
sis curvature This overcorrection is possible only if the vertebral
bodies are not distorted Otherwise we favour the correction accen-
tuating the asymmetry of pressure on the vertebral body
The main innovative features are in the acronym of ART
1 A stands for Asymmetry obtained with an overlay of three re-
gional shapes captures
2 R stands for Rigidity (in fact High rigidity) of polycarbonate
3 T stands for Torsion the brace performing a Detorsion of the
scoliotic Torso Column which is a circled helicoid with horizontal
generating circle in opposite direction of the spiral column while fix-
ing the sagittal plane in a physiological position
Asymmetry
Background
Although the effectiveness of bracing for scoliosis is now proved
(level 1) [Weinstein 2013] there are more than twenty types of
braces used worldwide All of them have not shown to be as effective
as the others A recent review found that Asymmetric braces have
led to better corrections than that described for symmetric braces
[Sy 2015] The efficacy of the brace also depends on moulding The
CAD CAM systems and especially those associated with Finite Ele-
ment Simulation [Cobetto 2016] have been proven to be more effec-
tive than the old plaster moulds [Wong 2011]
Symmetrical molding is easier to perform than asymmetric
molding If plaster casting is used the main effect is essentially axial
self-correction with possibly a lumbar shift In all cases the sagittal
curvatures are diminished Checircneau makes the corrections on the
positive plaster but without taking into account the rigidity of each
scoliosis These corrections are difficult if a constant volume is to
14 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 15
be maintained In fact the corrections are operator-dependent and
approximate which explains the use of polyethylene When using
CAD CAM systems It is necessary to differentiate the sensors type
ldquoIpadrdquo with precision of more than 1 cm probably less reliable than
the plaster or systems with raster-stereographie or the sensors with
4 columns almost instantaneous whose precision is of 1 mm Respi-
ratory blocking is then done in an intermediate position for children
and deep inspiration for adults
Aims
The aim of the asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To obtain the maximum asymmetry for each block (Katerina
Schroth block concept) lumbar and thoracic for two curves and
thoraco-lumbar for one curve by superposition of three asymmetric
shape captures codified and reproducible
2 To obtain the maximum precision (less than 1 mm) in the mini-
mum of time (less than 3 seconds) with the use of a professional
sensor This precision is also indispensable if one associates asym-
metry and high rigidity
Scope
The scope is to obtain the maximum in-brace correction by a
precise asymmetry using the new Regional Shape Capture with the
professional 4 column CADCAM
Rigid (very high) Polycarbonate
Background
Even if the old Lyon brace in polymethacrylate was very rigid
the credit for VERY HIGH RIGIDITY goes to the Italian team of
ISICO with the Sforzesco brace which has proven to be effective
by avoiding plaster casts for scoliosis over 45deg The acronym ART
brace (Asymmetrical Rigid Torsion brace) was created by Stefano
Negrini The merit of the ART brace is the addition of overcorrec-
tion to the high rigidity with a global detorsion It is this overcorrec-
tion for small curvatures which explains the average improvement of
the in-brace correction
Polycarbonate characteristics are
bull Transparency
bull Unbreakable (25 stronger than PPMA)
bull Lightweight (4 mm sheet)
bull No bisphenol A
bull Glass transition 147deg-155deg
bull Bending brake till 120deg
bull Insulation Rvalue 143
Aims
16 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 17
The aim of the high rigid asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To replace the plaster cast during the initial plastic deforma-
tion of the Lyon management
2 To improve the comfort in brace thanks to the soft contact
The Soft Contact concept is that of the squeeze attachment for cy-
lindrical hay bales Pressures are spread over the entire cylinder sur-
face this is contrary to the principle of the push and counter-push of
the historical Lyon brace or other three point braces
As usual in the correction of 3D deformities of the scoliotic
spine room should be provided for migration of lateral curvature
rotated vertebrae and breathing exercises In this design actually
various 3-point pressure systems are provided to correct the lateral
curvature and vertebral rotation from different anatomical planes
In the ART brace the shape of the brace is not a straight spine like
the Sforzesco or the old Lyon brace but an overcorrected spine with
reverse scoliosis
3 To realize the baby lift or lsquopullrsquo which is an axillary extension
that occurs in the armpits like when wearing a child
Scope
The scope is to achieve all the over-correction in the outer sur-
face of the brace which makes the inner surface smooth without
pads The brace then becomes dynamic with a lsquopullrsquo asymmetry
Torsion
Background
Global Detorsion vs 3 points system (Solid Geometry)
Given the multiplicity of planes the corrections by the 3 points
system only operate in a limited number of planes On the contrary
the ARTbrace works in an overall untwisting
The Global detorsion is performed with a fixed sagittal plane
Axial elongation brings the vertebral bodies near the central axis in
the frontal plane and by untwisting the scoliotic spine between the
pelvis and the shoulder the horizontal plane is corrected So both
geometrical detorsion and mechanical detorsion of the cylinder are
working together
19
18 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T
Mayonnaise Tube Effect
The translation along the vertical axis is a fundamental step of
untwisting The concept of elongation has progressed during the last
century
1 Simple cervical traction against gravity it is more of a stretching
2 With Milwaukee this elongation is between the head and the
pelvis which provides elongation
3 With the Lyon brace elongation occurs between shoulder and
pelvic belts
4 With Boston it is the effect ldquocherry stonerdquo that is privileged
with the idea that correcting the bottom of the column will help to
correct the upper part of the spine
5 Finally with ARTbrace there is a real extrusion by bringing
together the two pieces (hemi-shells)
20 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 21
The principle of the wrench and bolt is to ldquounscrew or untwistrdquo
scoliosis For instance the Checircneau brace uses the principle of pres-
sure and expansion in many precise areas For a double major curve
in the ARTbrace the thoracolumbar area is the fixed point with un-
screwing between this fixed point and the pelvis for lumbar curva-
ture and the shoulder girdle for thoracic curvature For a thoraco-
lumbar curve the fixed points are at the cranial and caudal parts of
the spine and the unscrewing is done at thoracolumbar level The
pelvis is the laquobolt headraquo which is stabilised by a symmetrical pelvic
base like a key Lumbar and thoracic segments above act as a wrench
for the detorsion of scoliosis
The EOS 3D system automatically calculates the rotation for each
vertebral segment The twist (Torsion) is the sum of all the segmental
rotations We can calculate the overall in-brace untwisting
c h a p t e r 4
Principles of ARTbrace
1 PLASTIC DEFORMATION
Some definitions The relationship between the stress
and strain that a material displays is known as that materialrsquos
stressndashstrain curve It is unique for each material and is found by
recording the amount of deformation (strain) at distinct intervals of
tensile or compressive loading (stress)
In physics and materials science plasticity describes the defor-
mation of a (solid) material undergoing non-reversible changes of
shape in response to applied forces for example a solid piece of
metal being bent or pounded into a new shape displays plasticity
as permanent changes occur within the material itself In engineer-
ing the transition from elastic behavior to plastic behavior is called
yield
When an elastic material containing fluid is deformed the return
of the material to its original shape is delayed in time and it is slower
to restore to its original position This is why we ask the patient to
remove the brace two hours before the X-ray
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my gratitude to the late Cyril Lecantedagger
whose expertise understanding and patience added considerably
to my medical experience Cyril will not see the end of the ART-
brace project but every time a brace is fitted a small part of him
lives again This book is dedicated to him
A very special thanks goes out to Steacutephane Lecante who contin-
ued the work of his brother Cyril at the head of The Lecante- Pro-
teor Group He organised the first training sessions that gave birth to
this book I would like to also thank the other members of the team
and especially Sophie Pourret Freacutedeacuteric Didier Jonathan Alith and
the numerous others who worked on this project who unfortunately
cannot all be named here I must also acknowledge Pascal Genevois
who has been able with his whole team to finalise the new sensor
ldquoOrten full bodyrdquo specifically adapted to the ARTbrace
Thanks also goes out to my secretary Marina Catherin who has
the difficult task of organising appointments for patients and sup-
port them administratively in this ldquoobstacle racerdquo that is currently
the French Medical World Appreciation also goes out to the Radiol-
ogy Department at the Clinique du Parc - Lyon Park Clinic which
for many years has been at the forefront of technology with the EOS
system
The regional shape capture was born in 2013 during the SOSORT
meeting that I had the honour to chair The brace is the fruit of 10
years of research within the SOSORT and I am very proud that the
acronym ARTbrace was created by my friend Stefano Negrini
I would also like to thank my family for the support they gave me
through my entire life and in particular I must acknowledge my wife
Alice Without her love encouragement and patience I would not
have finished this book Furthermore my daughter Agnes who from
London corrects my English
In conclusion I recognise that this research would not have been
possible whithout the patients who sometimes come from so far and
who do their utmost to follow the insructions and protocols A spe-
cial thanks to Christine Chenot President of the french ldquoScoliose et
Partagerdquo Association who agreed to assess the psychological feeling
of this brace
Dr Jean Claude de Mauroy
Prolegomenon
There has been several major chapters in the conservative
treatment of scoliosis The most recent 70 years ago is the use of
plastic materials to replace leather One of the latest is the creation of
highly asymmetric braces by Jacques Checircneau 40 years ago (in-brace
reduction 30-40) Since then progress was more likely thanks to
the use of CAD CAM systems for the realisation of braces rather
than on the conception of the braces themselves Until recently only
very high rigidity braces were able to treat scoliosis of more than 40deg
The ARTbrace (in-brace reduction 69-73 ) combines high rigidity
Lyon braces and the Checircneau asymmetry which is obtained using a
regional shape capture and software with the superposition of three
forms determined by the patient itself according to its reducibility
After a period which can be referred to as lsquohighly surgicalrsquo the in-
terest to conservative treatments whose effectiveness has been sci-
entifically proven by BrAIST study is noted again The high rigidity
PMMA Lyon brace (in-brace reduction 40-50) has demonstrated
its effectiveness for scoliosis including adolescents and scoliosis over
40deg The new Lyon ARTbrace takes much of this legacy even if it
uses the most modern techniques and new concepts In fact the new
ARTbrace concentrates a maximum of technological innovations ex-
plaining a double in-brace correction than polyethylene ones
The primary purpose of this book is to provide all users of the
Very High Rigidity a Manual allowing them to use the high rigidity
and deal with the greater part of situations It is the fruit of three
years of specific experience It is destined primarily for all those
who attended the ldquoTraining Courserdquo in Lyon
The book is published in pdf or epub format For practical rea-
sons some of the multimedia documents figures videos and bib-
liographical references require an internet connection to be used
Some regular updates will be published according to feedback re-
ceived during training sessions
Remember the learning pyramid Reading + Audiovisual = 20
of learning
2 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 3
c h a p t e r 1
History of ARTbrace
Lyon orthopedics began in 1741 with Nicolas Andry born in
Lyon and who published under the neologism ldquoOrthopae-
diardquo a book summarizing the different methods to prevent
and correct deformations in children Nicolas Andry analyzes the
malformations and understands the biomechanical principles re-
lated to the skeleton He is a keen supporter of movement therapy
that is to say physiotherapy The frontispiece of his book repre-
sents the torso tree which has become the symbol of many ortho-
pedic societies around the world
The orthopedic tradition for vertebral deformities was devel-
oped by Charles Gabriel Pravaz He was not only the inventor of the
syringe but he also created in Lyon a great Orthopaedic Institute to
treat scoliosis 200 years ago He published 2 books interesting for
us ldquoNew method of treating deviations of the spineldquoand ldquoGymnas-
tics applied to treatment of some constitutional diseasesldquo The Lyon
method also deals with physiotherapy exercises (PSSE) At that
time the present exercises characterising the Schroth were already
practiced
Another Lyon physician Claude Bernard is important to mention
He is the creator of Experimental Medicine as opposed to Empirical
and Observational medicine He wrote in 1865 ldquoScience is a perma-
nent exchange between theory and experimental facts And For a
man of science there is no separate science of Medicine or Physiol-
ogy there is only a science of liferdquo
Plaster cast and Plastic deformation
The first plaster casts were made in the early twentieth century
by Sayre and Abbott Calot at Berck resumes the principles of Sayrersquos
correction The cast is made in upright position the elongation ldquopullrdquo
effect is priority Subsequently Cotrel developed a Frame to facili-
tate Elongation Derotation and Flexion or bending (EDF) which is
used in the Lyon treatment The objective of the plaster is to obtain
a plastic deformation with elongation of the viscoelastic structures
of the concavity
4 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 5
Old Lyon Brace amp new ARTbrace
The Lyon Bracing Management with adjustable underarm brace
has evolved since 1947 as a cooperative effort between Pierre Stag-
nara MD and Bouillat amp Terrier CPO
The Lyon management protocol requires at first a plastic defor-
mation with a plaster cast for one to four months after which the
brace is shape captureed and fitted The brace is a high rigidity ad-
justable under arm design and does not have a superstructure
Very early braces were made from a combination of steel and
leather Following World War II Reacutegis Lecante CPO discovered a
Messerschmitt cockpit near his country house Made of a very du-
rable plastic it could be easily machined tapped and screwed The
use of PMM (polymetacrylate of methyl) or Plexidurtrade was born
revolutionising modern brace materials and design
The Lyon Brace created in 1947 by Pierre Stagnara is designed
to be
bull Adjustable It is easily modified accommodating up to 7 cm
of growth and 7 kg of weight while also being more cost effective
requiring fewer and less frequent changes
bull Active The rigidity of the Polymetacrylate or Ploycarbonate
structure stimulates the child to initiate an active axial auto correc-
tion which decreases superficial pressures
bull Decompressive As a consequence of the ldquoAdjustablerdquo fea-
ture the effect of extension between the two pelvic and scapular
girdles also decreases the pressure on the intervertebral discs and
promotes more effective pushes
bull Symmetrical In addition to being more aesthetically pleas-
ing the brace was much easier to build The new Lyon ARTbrace is
Asymmetrical thanks to advances in digital 3D technology
bull Stable The stability of both shoulder and pelvic girdle facili-
tates the intermediate corrections
bull Transparent Skin pressures are easily observed and direct
control of the pushes stops drives and reliefs is possible Comple-
mentary pads are rarely needed
The Lyon Brace is always constructed after the completion of the
reductive plaster casting protocol using a Cotrel EDF frame The re-
sults of the Lyon Brace Management have been validated by numer-
ous teams in Europe However the plaster cast process is quite diffi-
cult for the patient and physician Consequently many teams looked
for more convenient and expedient solutions without preliminary
plaster cast reduction Moreover when the angular correction is low
the plastic deformation remains limited
h t t p s c o l i o s i s j o u r n a l b i o m e d c e n t r a l c o m articles1011861748-7161-6-4
6 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 7
It was only in 2013 that advances in computer technology with
the latest generation software (OrtenShape) allowed the superpo-
sition of different CADCAM shape captures and a segmental 3D
reconstruction The aim was to use this new software to replace the
plaster cast with a new Lyon brace the ARTbrace The Regional
shape capture is one of the fundamental innovations of the ART
brace The overcorrection is performed in the frontal plane and the
sagittal plane precisely and individually for each child at three levels
pelvis lumbar spine and thoracic spine The detorsion is obtained by
untwisting the whole spine
Like the historical Lyon brace the ARTbrace is ADJUSTABLE
Both axillary and pelvic clamps are adjustable with a precise wrench
and a bolt system and an anterior ratcheting buckle
Like the historical Lyon brace the SAGITTAL PLANE is fixed by
the posterior bar But the sagittal plane is determined by the regional
shape capture and the superposition of the 3 shape captures In addi-
tional it is the lack of support at the sternoclavicular level and at the
abdominal level that avoids lumbar delordosis and thoracic flat back
The initial aim was to avoid the plaster cast but very quickly the
ARTbrace appeared to be a much more effective solution compared to the former casts and it was even better tolerated Following the
early successes of in-brace correction (40 better in-brace correc-
tion) the whole treatment was continued with the same brace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189456845
ISPO 2017 - Olomouc
History of Scoliosis Treatment and modern trends today
c h a p t e r 2
The interdisciplinary team approach
Since 2013 we had the opportunity to create an interdisci-
plinary team for the ARTbrace with commitment and con-
stant nurturing A careful planning from 2013 to 2018 was
established
The first goal was to use the ART as a plaster cast to maintain the
concept of plastic deformation During the regional shape captur-
ing the MD performs the correction which he previously carried out
during the plaster cast The CPO saves to the computer the 3 shape
captures and it lsquos at this moment that occurs the maximum exchange
of information
Since the first patients we realised that the ART was correcting
40 more than the formerly used plaster cast and we took the deci-
sion to continue the entire treatment with the ART also replacing
the old Lyon brace The ARTbrace project was born
As opposed to multidisciplinary interdisciplinary team work is a
complex process in which different types of staff work together to
share expertise knowledge and skills to impact on patient care It
8 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 9
was first described by Drinka (2000) Several practicians identified
methods of team practice which are used to match the ART bracing
1 Leadership and Management
Project Manager JC de Mauroy - Clinique du Parc Lyon
Product Manager Sophie Pourret - lecante Group
Team Manager Freacutedeacuteric Barral - Lecante Group
CADCAM Orten Collaboration Pascal Genevois - Orten
Liaison Engineer Alith Hoang - Orten
Patients partners Scoliose et Partage (Christine Chenot)
Commercial Management Steacutephane Lecante - Proteor
Group
All senior managers are international leaders in the field of sco-
liosis bracing
2 Communication
Scientific publications
Website
Newsletter
International training
All members of the team are choosen for their Communication
skills with the patient within the team and outside
3 Learning Training and Development
Two Training sessions were performed in 2015
Four Educational Sessions in Italy in 2015 (Piacenza Bari
Palermo)
All individual team members are motivated
4 Appropriate resources and procedures
Structures Lecante Bracing Manufacture Full Instantaneous 3D
CADCAM Orten EOS X Ray - Clinique du Parc Medical Orthopae-
dic Unit amp Radiology Unit
Weekly coordination during the Regional shape capturing (JCdM
SP)
Monthly Team Meeting (LBM)
All team members are working in Lyon
5 Appropriate skill mix
A full competent staff is constituted with mix and balance of
personalities
6 Climate
Innovation team culture of trust value contributions nurturing
consensus and inter professional atmosphere were created
7 Individual characteristics
10 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 11
Knowledge experience initiative knowing strengths and weak-
nesses listening skills reflexive practice desire to work on the same
goals are the main skills
8 Clarity of vision
Having a clear set of values that drive the direction of the service
and the care provided Portraying a uniform and consistent external
image
9 Quality and outcomes of care
Patient-centered focus outcomes and satisfaction encouraging
feedback capturing and recording evidence of the effectiveness of
care and using that as part of a feedback cycle to improve care
10 Respecting and understanding roles
Tasks and roles are well defined sharing power joint working
autonomy
The Scoliosis Team
The family and patients are also part of the chain The brace com-
pliance depends partly on them When they exist the alternatives of
different protocols must be discussed and the choice is made jointly
A chain is only as strong as its weakest link
c h a p t e r 3
New concepts
Mathematical Basis Circled Helicoid
The mathematical basis of the torso column is the cir-cled helicoid with horizontal generating circle described
by the French mathematician Robert Ferreacuteol For a circled helicoid
the Cartesian parameterisation is the parameterisation of the circle
with diameter carried by Ox with a center (a00) with a radius b
forming an angle alpha with the horizontal For torso column alpha
= 0
12 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 13
The aim is to get not only a straight spine but a reverse torso
shape capture opposite to scoliosis ie overcorrection of the scolio-
sis curvature This overcorrection is possible only if the vertebral
bodies are not distorted Otherwise we favour the correction accen-
tuating the asymmetry of pressure on the vertebral body
The main innovative features are in the acronym of ART
1 A stands for Asymmetry obtained with an overlay of three re-
gional shapes captures
2 R stands for Rigidity (in fact High rigidity) of polycarbonate
3 T stands for Torsion the brace performing a Detorsion of the
scoliotic Torso Column which is a circled helicoid with horizontal
generating circle in opposite direction of the spiral column while fix-
ing the sagittal plane in a physiological position
Asymmetry
Background
Although the effectiveness of bracing for scoliosis is now proved
(level 1) [Weinstein 2013] there are more than twenty types of
braces used worldwide All of them have not shown to be as effective
as the others A recent review found that Asymmetric braces have
led to better corrections than that described for symmetric braces
[Sy 2015] The efficacy of the brace also depends on moulding The
CAD CAM systems and especially those associated with Finite Ele-
ment Simulation [Cobetto 2016] have been proven to be more effec-
tive than the old plaster moulds [Wong 2011]
Symmetrical molding is easier to perform than asymmetric
molding If plaster casting is used the main effect is essentially axial
self-correction with possibly a lumbar shift In all cases the sagittal
curvatures are diminished Checircneau makes the corrections on the
positive plaster but without taking into account the rigidity of each
scoliosis These corrections are difficult if a constant volume is to
14 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 15
be maintained In fact the corrections are operator-dependent and
approximate which explains the use of polyethylene When using
CAD CAM systems It is necessary to differentiate the sensors type
ldquoIpadrdquo with precision of more than 1 cm probably less reliable than
the plaster or systems with raster-stereographie or the sensors with
4 columns almost instantaneous whose precision is of 1 mm Respi-
ratory blocking is then done in an intermediate position for children
and deep inspiration for adults
Aims
The aim of the asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To obtain the maximum asymmetry for each block (Katerina
Schroth block concept) lumbar and thoracic for two curves and
thoraco-lumbar for one curve by superposition of three asymmetric
shape captures codified and reproducible
2 To obtain the maximum precision (less than 1 mm) in the mini-
mum of time (less than 3 seconds) with the use of a professional
sensor This precision is also indispensable if one associates asym-
metry and high rigidity
Scope
The scope is to obtain the maximum in-brace correction by a
precise asymmetry using the new Regional Shape Capture with the
professional 4 column CADCAM
Rigid (very high) Polycarbonate
Background
Even if the old Lyon brace in polymethacrylate was very rigid
the credit for VERY HIGH RIGIDITY goes to the Italian team of
ISICO with the Sforzesco brace which has proven to be effective
by avoiding plaster casts for scoliosis over 45deg The acronym ART
brace (Asymmetrical Rigid Torsion brace) was created by Stefano
Negrini The merit of the ART brace is the addition of overcorrec-
tion to the high rigidity with a global detorsion It is this overcorrec-
tion for small curvatures which explains the average improvement of
the in-brace correction
Polycarbonate characteristics are
bull Transparency
bull Unbreakable (25 stronger than PPMA)
bull Lightweight (4 mm sheet)
bull No bisphenol A
bull Glass transition 147deg-155deg
bull Bending brake till 120deg
bull Insulation Rvalue 143
Aims
16 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 17
The aim of the high rigid asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To replace the plaster cast during the initial plastic deforma-
tion of the Lyon management
2 To improve the comfort in brace thanks to the soft contact
The Soft Contact concept is that of the squeeze attachment for cy-
lindrical hay bales Pressures are spread over the entire cylinder sur-
face this is contrary to the principle of the push and counter-push of
the historical Lyon brace or other three point braces
As usual in the correction of 3D deformities of the scoliotic
spine room should be provided for migration of lateral curvature
rotated vertebrae and breathing exercises In this design actually
various 3-point pressure systems are provided to correct the lateral
curvature and vertebral rotation from different anatomical planes
In the ART brace the shape of the brace is not a straight spine like
the Sforzesco or the old Lyon brace but an overcorrected spine with
reverse scoliosis
3 To realize the baby lift or lsquopullrsquo which is an axillary extension
that occurs in the armpits like when wearing a child
Scope
The scope is to achieve all the over-correction in the outer sur-
face of the brace which makes the inner surface smooth without
pads The brace then becomes dynamic with a lsquopullrsquo asymmetry
Torsion
Background
Global Detorsion vs 3 points system (Solid Geometry)
Given the multiplicity of planes the corrections by the 3 points
system only operate in a limited number of planes On the contrary
the ARTbrace works in an overall untwisting
The Global detorsion is performed with a fixed sagittal plane
Axial elongation brings the vertebral bodies near the central axis in
the frontal plane and by untwisting the scoliotic spine between the
pelvis and the shoulder the horizontal plane is corrected So both
geometrical detorsion and mechanical detorsion of the cylinder are
working together
19
18 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T
Mayonnaise Tube Effect
The translation along the vertical axis is a fundamental step of
untwisting The concept of elongation has progressed during the last
century
1 Simple cervical traction against gravity it is more of a stretching
2 With Milwaukee this elongation is between the head and the
pelvis which provides elongation
3 With the Lyon brace elongation occurs between shoulder and
pelvic belts
4 With Boston it is the effect ldquocherry stonerdquo that is privileged
with the idea that correcting the bottom of the column will help to
correct the upper part of the spine
5 Finally with ARTbrace there is a real extrusion by bringing
together the two pieces (hemi-shells)
20 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 21
The principle of the wrench and bolt is to ldquounscrew or untwistrdquo
scoliosis For instance the Checircneau brace uses the principle of pres-
sure and expansion in many precise areas For a double major curve
in the ARTbrace the thoracolumbar area is the fixed point with un-
screwing between this fixed point and the pelvis for lumbar curva-
ture and the shoulder girdle for thoracic curvature For a thoraco-
lumbar curve the fixed points are at the cranial and caudal parts of
the spine and the unscrewing is done at thoracolumbar level The
pelvis is the laquobolt headraquo which is stabilised by a symmetrical pelvic
base like a key Lumbar and thoracic segments above act as a wrench
for the detorsion of scoliosis
The EOS 3D system automatically calculates the rotation for each
vertebral segment The twist (Torsion) is the sum of all the segmental
rotations We can calculate the overall in-brace untwisting
c h a p t e r 4
Principles of ARTbrace
1 PLASTIC DEFORMATION
Some definitions The relationship between the stress
and strain that a material displays is known as that materialrsquos
stressndashstrain curve It is unique for each material and is found by
recording the amount of deformation (strain) at distinct intervals of
tensile or compressive loading (stress)
In physics and materials science plasticity describes the defor-
mation of a (solid) material undergoing non-reversible changes of
shape in response to applied forces for example a solid piece of
metal being bent or pounded into a new shape displays plasticity
as permanent changes occur within the material itself In engineer-
ing the transition from elastic behavior to plastic behavior is called
yield
When an elastic material containing fluid is deformed the return
of the material to its original shape is delayed in time and it is slower
to restore to its original position This is why we ask the patient to
remove the brace two hours before the X-ray
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
Prolegomenon
There has been several major chapters in the conservative
treatment of scoliosis The most recent 70 years ago is the use of
plastic materials to replace leather One of the latest is the creation of
highly asymmetric braces by Jacques Checircneau 40 years ago (in-brace
reduction 30-40) Since then progress was more likely thanks to
the use of CAD CAM systems for the realisation of braces rather
than on the conception of the braces themselves Until recently only
very high rigidity braces were able to treat scoliosis of more than 40deg
The ARTbrace (in-brace reduction 69-73 ) combines high rigidity
Lyon braces and the Checircneau asymmetry which is obtained using a
regional shape capture and software with the superposition of three
forms determined by the patient itself according to its reducibility
After a period which can be referred to as lsquohighly surgicalrsquo the in-
terest to conservative treatments whose effectiveness has been sci-
entifically proven by BrAIST study is noted again The high rigidity
PMMA Lyon brace (in-brace reduction 40-50) has demonstrated
its effectiveness for scoliosis including adolescents and scoliosis over
40deg The new Lyon ARTbrace takes much of this legacy even if it
uses the most modern techniques and new concepts In fact the new
ARTbrace concentrates a maximum of technological innovations ex-
plaining a double in-brace correction than polyethylene ones
The primary purpose of this book is to provide all users of the
Very High Rigidity a Manual allowing them to use the high rigidity
and deal with the greater part of situations It is the fruit of three
years of specific experience It is destined primarily for all those
who attended the ldquoTraining Courserdquo in Lyon
The book is published in pdf or epub format For practical rea-
sons some of the multimedia documents figures videos and bib-
liographical references require an internet connection to be used
Some regular updates will be published according to feedback re-
ceived during training sessions
Remember the learning pyramid Reading + Audiovisual = 20
of learning
2 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 3
c h a p t e r 1
History of ARTbrace
Lyon orthopedics began in 1741 with Nicolas Andry born in
Lyon and who published under the neologism ldquoOrthopae-
diardquo a book summarizing the different methods to prevent
and correct deformations in children Nicolas Andry analyzes the
malformations and understands the biomechanical principles re-
lated to the skeleton He is a keen supporter of movement therapy
that is to say physiotherapy The frontispiece of his book repre-
sents the torso tree which has become the symbol of many ortho-
pedic societies around the world
The orthopedic tradition for vertebral deformities was devel-
oped by Charles Gabriel Pravaz He was not only the inventor of the
syringe but he also created in Lyon a great Orthopaedic Institute to
treat scoliosis 200 years ago He published 2 books interesting for
us ldquoNew method of treating deviations of the spineldquoand ldquoGymnas-
tics applied to treatment of some constitutional diseasesldquo The Lyon
method also deals with physiotherapy exercises (PSSE) At that
time the present exercises characterising the Schroth were already
practiced
Another Lyon physician Claude Bernard is important to mention
He is the creator of Experimental Medicine as opposed to Empirical
and Observational medicine He wrote in 1865 ldquoScience is a perma-
nent exchange between theory and experimental facts And For a
man of science there is no separate science of Medicine or Physiol-
ogy there is only a science of liferdquo
Plaster cast and Plastic deformation
The first plaster casts were made in the early twentieth century
by Sayre and Abbott Calot at Berck resumes the principles of Sayrersquos
correction The cast is made in upright position the elongation ldquopullrdquo
effect is priority Subsequently Cotrel developed a Frame to facili-
tate Elongation Derotation and Flexion or bending (EDF) which is
used in the Lyon treatment The objective of the plaster is to obtain
a plastic deformation with elongation of the viscoelastic structures
of the concavity
4 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 5
Old Lyon Brace amp new ARTbrace
The Lyon Bracing Management with adjustable underarm brace
has evolved since 1947 as a cooperative effort between Pierre Stag-
nara MD and Bouillat amp Terrier CPO
The Lyon management protocol requires at first a plastic defor-
mation with a plaster cast for one to four months after which the
brace is shape captureed and fitted The brace is a high rigidity ad-
justable under arm design and does not have a superstructure
Very early braces were made from a combination of steel and
leather Following World War II Reacutegis Lecante CPO discovered a
Messerschmitt cockpit near his country house Made of a very du-
rable plastic it could be easily machined tapped and screwed The
use of PMM (polymetacrylate of methyl) or Plexidurtrade was born
revolutionising modern brace materials and design
The Lyon Brace created in 1947 by Pierre Stagnara is designed
to be
bull Adjustable It is easily modified accommodating up to 7 cm
of growth and 7 kg of weight while also being more cost effective
requiring fewer and less frequent changes
bull Active The rigidity of the Polymetacrylate or Ploycarbonate
structure stimulates the child to initiate an active axial auto correc-
tion which decreases superficial pressures
bull Decompressive As a consequence of the ldquoAdjustablerdquo fea-
ture the effect of extension between the two pelvic and scapular
girdles also decreases the pressure on the intervertebral discs and
promotes more effective pushes
bull Symmetrical In addition to being more aesthetically pleas-
ing the brace was much easier to build The new Lyon ARTbrace is
Asymmetrical thanks to advances in digital 3D technology
bull Stable The stability of both shoulder and pelvic girdle facili-
tates the intermediate corrections
bull Transparent Skin pressures are easily observed and direct
control of the pushes stops drives and reliefs is possible Comple-
mentary pads are rarely needed
The Lyon Brace is always constructed after the completion of the
reductive plaster casting protocol using a Cotrel EDF frame The re-
sults of the Lyon Brace Management have been validated by numer-
ous teams in Europe However the plaster cast process is quite diffi-
cult for the patient and physician Consequently many teams looked
for more convenient and expedient solutions without preliminary
plaster cast reduction Moreover when the angular correction is low
the plastic deformation remains limited
h t t p s c o l i o s i s j o u r n a l b i o m e d c e n t r a l c o m articles1011861748-7161-6-4
6 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 7
It was only in 2013 that advances in computer technology with
the latest generation software (OrtenShape) allowed the superpo-
sition of different CADCAM shape captures and a segmental 3D
reconstruction The aim was to use this new software to replace the
plaster cast with a new Lyon brace the ARTbrace The Regional
shape capture is one of the fundamental innovations of the ART
brace The overcorrection is performed in the frontal plane and the
sagittal plane precisely and individually for each child at three levels
pelvis lumbar spine and thoracic spine The detorsion is obtained by
untwisting the whole spine
Like the historical Lyon brace the ARTbrace is ADJUSTABLE
Both axillary and pelvic clamps are adjustable with a precise wrench
and a bolt system and an anterior ratcheting buckle
Like the historical Lyon brace the SAGITTAL PLANE is fixed by
the posterior bar But the sagittal plane is determined by the regional
shape capture and the superposition of the 3 shape captures In addi-
tional it is the lack of support at the sternoclavicular level and at the
abdominal level that avoids lumbar delordosis and thoracic flat back
The initial aim was to avoid the plaster cast but very quickly the
ARTbrace appeared to be a much more effective solution compared to the former casts and it was even better tolerated Following the
early successes of in-brace correction (40 better in-brace correc-
tion) the whole treatment was continued with the same brace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189456845
ISPO 2017 - Olomouc
History of Scoliosis Treatment and modern trends today
c h a p t e r 2
The interdisciplinary team approach
Since 2013 we had the opportunity to create an interdisci-
plinary team for the ARTbrace with commitment and con-
stant nurturing A careful planning from 2013 to 2018 was
established
The first goal was to use the ART as a plaster cast to maintain the
concept of plastic deformation During the regional shape captur-
ing the MD performs the correction which he previously carried out
during the plaster cast The CPO saves to the computer the 3 shape
captures and it lsquos at this moment that occurs the maximum exchange
of information
Since the first patients we realised that the ART was correcting
40 more than the formerly used plaster cast and we took the deci-
sion to continue the entire treatment with the ART also replacing
the old Lyon brace The ARTbrace project was born
As opposed to multidisciplinary interdisciplinary team work is a
complex process in which different types of staff work together to
share expertise knowledge and skills to impact on patient care It
8 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 9
was first described by Drinka (2000) Several practicians identified
methods of team practice which are used to match the ART bracing
1 Leadership and Management
Project Manager JC de Mauroy - Clinique du Parc Lyon
Product Manager Sophie Pourret - lecante Group
Team Manager Freacutedeacuteric Barral - Lecante Group
CADCAM Orten Collaboration Pascal Genevois - Orten
Liaison Engineer Alith Hoang - Orten
Patients partners Scoliose et Partage (Christine Chenot)
Commercial Management Steacutephane Lecante - Proteor
Group
All senior managers are international leaders in the field of sco-
liosis bracing
2 Communication
Scientific publications
Website
Newsletter
International training
All members of the team are choosen for their Communication
skills with the patient within the team and outside
3 Learning Training and Development
Two Training sessions were performed in 2015
Four Educational Sessions in Italy in 2015 (Piacenza Bari
Palermo)
All individual team members are motivated
4 Appropriate resources and procedures
Structures Lecante Bracing Manufacture Full Instantaneous 3D
CADCAM Orten EOS X Ray - Clinique du Parc Medical Orthopae-
dic Unit amp Radiology Unit
Weekly coordination during the Regional shape capturing (JCdM
SP)
Monthly Team Meeting (LBM)
All team members are working in Lyon
5 Appropriate skill mix
A full competent staff is constituted with mix and balance of
personalities
6 Climate
Innovation team culture of trust value contributions nurturing
consensus and inter professional atmosphere were created
7 Individual characteristics
10 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 11
Knowledge experience initiative knowing strengths and weak-
nesses listening skills reflexive practice desire to work on the same
goals are the main skills
8 Clarity of vision
Having a clear set of values that drive the direction of the service
and the care provided Portraying a uniform and consistent external
image
9 Quality and outcomes of care
Patient-centered focus outcomes and satisfaction encouraging
feedback capturing and recording evidence of the effectiveness of
care and using that as part of a feedback cycle to improve care
10 Respecting and understanding roles
Tasks and roles are well defined sharing power joint working
autonomy
The Scoliosis Team
The family and patients are also part of the chain The brace com-
pliance depends partly on them When they exist the alternatives of
different protocols must be discussed and the choice is made jointly
A chain is only as strong as its weakest link
c h a p t e r 3
New concepts
Mathematical Basis Circled Helicoid
The mathematical basis of the torso column is the cir-cled helicoid with horizontal generating circle described
by the French mathematician Robert Ferreacuteol For a circled helicoid
the Cartesian parameterisation is the parameterisation of the circle
with diameter carried by Ox with a center (a00) with a radius b
forming an angle alpha with the horizontal For torso column alpha
= 0
12 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 13
The aim is to get not only a straight spine but a reverse torso
shape capture opposite to scoliosis ie overcorrection of the scolio-
sis curvature This overcorrection is possible only if the vertebral
bodies are not distorted Otherwise we favour the correction accen-
tuating the asymmetry of pressure on the vertebral body
The main innovative features are in the acronym of ART
1 A stands for Asymmetry obtained with an overlay of three re-
gional shapes captures
2 R stands for Rigidity (in fact High rigidity) of polycarbonate
3 T stands for Torsion the brace performing a Detorsion of the
scoliotic Torso Column which is a circled helicoid with horizontal
generating circle in opposite direction of the spiral column while fix-
ing the sagittal plane in a physiological position
Asymmetry
Background
Although the effectiveness of bracing for scoliosis is now proved
(level 1) [Weinstein 2013] there are more than twenty types of
braces used worldwide All of them have not shown to be as effective
as the others A recent review found that Asymmetric braces have
led to better corrections than that described for symmetric braces
[Sy 2015] The efficacy of the brace also depends on moulding The
CAD CAM systems and especially those associated with Finite Ele-
ment Simulation [Cobetto 2016] have been proven to be more effec-
tive than the old plaster moulds [Wong 2011]
Symmetrical molding is easier to perform than asymmetric
molding If plaster casting is used the main effect is essentially axial
self-correction with possibly a lumbar shift In all cases the sagittal
curvatures are diminished Checircneau makes the corrections on the
positive plaster but without taking into account the rigidity of each
scoliosis These corrections are difficult if a constant volume is to
14 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 15
be maintained In fact the corrections are operator-dependent and
approximate which explains the use of polyethylene When using
CAD CAM systems It is necessary to differentiate the sensors type
ldquoIpadrdquo with precision of more than 1 cm probably less reliable than
the plaster or systems with raster-stereographie or the sensors with
4 columns almost instantaneous whose precision is of 1 mm Respi-
ratory blocking is then done in an intermediate position for children
and deep inspiration for adults
Aims
The aim of the asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To obtain the maximum asymmetry for each block (Katerina
Schroth block concept) lumbar and thoracic for two curves and
thoraco-lumbar for one curve by superposition of three asymmetric
shape captures codified and reproducible
2 To obtain the maximum precision (less than 1 mm) in the mini-
mum of time (less than 3 seconds) with the use of a professional
sensor This precision is also indispensable if one associates asym-
metry and high rigidity
Scope
The scope is to obtain the maximum in-brace correction by a
precise asymmetry using the new Regional Shape Capture with the
professional 4 column CADCAM
Rigid (very high) Polycarbonate
Background
Even if the old Lyon brace in polymethacrylate was very rigid
the credit for VERY HIGH RIGIDITY goes to the Italian team of
ISICO with the Sforzesco brace which has proven to be effective
by avoiding plaster casts for scoliosis over 45deg The acronym ART
brace (Asymmetrical Rigid Torsion brace) was created by Stefano
Negrini The merit of the ART brace is the addition of overcorrec-
tion to the high rigidity with a global detorsion It is this overcorrec-
tion for small curvatures which explains the average improvement of
the in-brace correction
Polycarbonate characteristics are
bull Transparency
bull Unbreakable (25 stronger than PPMA)
bull Lightweight (4 mm sheet)
bull No bisphenol A
bull Glass transition 147deg-155deg
bull Bending brake till 120deg
bull Insulation Rvalue 143
Aims
16 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 17
The aim of the high rigid asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To replace the plaster cast during the initial plastic deforma-
tion of the Lyon management
2 To improve the comfort in brace thanks to the soft contact
The Soft Contact concept is that of the squeeze attachment for cy-
lindrical hay bales Pressures are spread over the entire cylinder sur-
face this is contrary to the principle of the push and counter-push of
the historical Lyon brace or other three point braces
As usual in the correction of 3D deformities of the scoliotic
spine room should be provided for migration of lateral curvature
rotated vertebrae and breathing exercises In this design actually
various 3-point pressure systems are provided to correct the lateral
curvature and vertebral rotation from different anatomical planes
In the ART brace the shape of the brace is not a straight spine like
the Sforzesco or the old Lyon brace but an overcorrected spine with
reverse scoliosis
3 To realize the baby lift or lsquopullrsquo which is an axillary extension
that occurs in the armpits like when wearing a child
Scope
The scope is to achieve all the over-correction in the outer sur-
face of the brace which makes the inner surface smooth without
pads The brace then becomes dynamic with a lsquopullrsquo asymmetry
Torsion
Background
Global Detorsion vs 3 points system (Solid Geometry)
Given the multiplicity of planes the corrections by the 3 points
system only operate in a limited number of planes On the contrary
the ARTbrace works in an overall untwisting
The Global detorsion is performed with a fixed sagittal plane
Axial elongation brings the vertebral bodies near the central axis in
the frontal plane and by untwisting the scoliotic spine between the
pelvis and the shoulder the horizontal plane is corrected So both
geometrical detorsion and mechanical detorsion of the cylinder are
working together
19
18 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T
Mayonnaise Tube Effect
The translation along the vertical axis is a fundamental step of
untwisting The concept of elongation has progressed during the last
century
1 Simple cervical traction against gravity it is more of a stretching
2 With Milwaukee this elongation is between the head and the
pelvis which provides elongation
3 With the Lyon brace elongation occurs between shoulder and
pelvic belts
4 With Boston it is the effect ldquocherry stonerdquo that is privileged
with the idea that correcting the bottom of the column will help to
correct the upper part of the spine
5 Finally with ARTbrace there is a real extrusion by bringing
together the two pieces (hemi-shells)
20 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 21
The principle of the wrench and bolt is to ldquounscrew or untwistrdquo
scoliosis For instance the Checircneau brace uses the principle of pres-
sure and expansion in many precise areas For a double major curve
in the ARTbrace the thoracolumbar area is the fixed point with un-
screwing between this fixed point and the pelvis for lumbar curva-
ture and the shoulder girdle for thoracic curvature For a thoraco-
lumbar curve the fixed points are at the cranial and caudal parts of
the spine and the unscrewing is done at thoracolumbar level The
pelvis is the laquobolt headraquo which is stabilised by a symmetrical pelvic
base like a key Lumbar and thoracic segments above act as a wrench
for the detorsion of scoliosis
The EOS 3D system automatically calculates the rotation for each
vertebral segment The twist (Torsion) is the sum of all the segmental
rotations We can calculate the overall in-brace untwisting
c h a p t e r 4
Principles of ARTbrace
1 PLASTIC DEFORMATION
Some definitions The relationship between the stress
and strain that a material displays is known as that materialrsquos
stressndashstrain curve It is unique for each material and is found by
recording the amount of deformation (strain) at distinct intervals of
tensile or compressive loading (stress)
In physics and materials science plasticity describes the defor-
mation of a (solid) material undergoing non-reversible changes of
shape in response to applied forces for example a solid piece of
metal being bent or pounded into a new shape displays plasticity
as permanent changes occur within the material itself In engineer-
ing the transition from elastic behavior to plastic behavior is called
yield
When an elastic material containing fluid is deformed the return
of the material to its original shape is delayed in time and it is slower
to restore to its original position This is why we ask the patient to
remove the brace two hours before the X-ray
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
2 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 3
c h a p t e r 1
History of ARTbrace
Lyon orthopedics began in 1741 with Nicolas Andry born in
Lyon and who published under the neologism ldquoOrthopae-
diardquo a book summarizing the different methods to prevent
and correct deformations in children Nicolas Andry analyzes the
malformations and understands the biomechanical principles re-
lated to the skeleton He is a keen supporter of movement therapy
that is to say physiotherapy The frontispiece of his book repre-
sents the torso tree which has become the symbol of many ortho-
pedic societies around the world
The orthopedic tradition for vertebral deformities was devel-
oped by Charles Gabriel Pravaz He was not only the inventor of the
syringe but he also created in Lyon a great Orthopaedic Institute to
treat scoliosis 200 years ago He published 2 books interesting for
us ldquoNew method of treating deviations of the spineldquoand ldquoGymnas-
tics applied to treatment of some constitutional diseasesldquo The Lyon
method also deals with physiotherapy exercises (PSSE) At that
time the present exercises characterising the Schroth were already
practiced
Another Lyon physician Claude Bernard is important to mention
He is the creator of Experimental Medicine as opposed to Empirical
and Observational medicine He wrote in 1865 ldquoScience is a perma-
nent exchange between theory and experimental facts And For a
man of science there is no separate science of Medicine or Physiol-
ogy there is only a science of liferdquo
Plaster cast and Plastic deformation
The first plaster casts were made in the early twentieth century
by Sayre and Abbott Calot at Berck resumes the principles of Sayrersquos
correction The cast is made in upright position the elongation ldquopullrdquo
effect is priority Subsequently Cotrel developed a Frame to facili-
tate Elongation Derotation and Flexion or bending (EDF) which is
used in the Lyon treatment The objective of the plaster is to obtain
a plastic deformation with elongation of the viscoelastic structures
of the concavity
4 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 5
Old Lyon Brace amp new ARTbrace
The Lyon Bracing Management with adjustable underarm brace
has evolved since 1947 as a cooperative effort between Pierre Stag-
nara MD and Bouillat amp Terrier CPO
The Lyon management protocol requires at first a plastic defor-
mation with a plaster cast for one to four months after which the
brace is shape captureed and fitted The brace is a high rigidity ad-
justable under arm design and does not have a superstructure
Very early braces were made from a combination of steel and
leather Following World War II Reacutegis Lecante CPO discovered a
Messerschmitt cockpit near his country house Made of a very du-
rable plastic it could be easily machined tapped and screwed The
use of PMM (polymetacrylate of methyl) or Plexidurtrade was born
revolutionising modern brace materials and design
The Lyon Brace created in 1947 by Pierre Stagnara is designed
to be
bull Adjustable It is easily modified accommodating up to 7 cm
of growth and 7 kg of weight while also being more cost effective
requiring fewer and less frequent changes
bull Active The rigidity of the Polymetacrylate or Ploycarbonate
structure stimulates the child to initiate an active axial auto correc-
tion which decreases superficial pressures
bull Decompressive As a consequence of the ldquoAdjustablerdquo fea-
ture the effect of extension between the two pelvic and scapular
girdles also decreases the pressure on the intervertebral discs and
promotes more effective pushes
bull Symmetrical In addition to being more aesthetically pleas-
ing the brace was much easier to build The new Lyon ARTbrace is
Asymmetrical thanks to advances in digital 3D technology
bull Stable The stability of both shoulder and pelvic girdle facili-
tates the intermediate corrections
bull Transparent Skin pressures are easily observed and direct
control of the pushes stops drives and reliefs is possible Comple-
mentary pads are rarely needed
The Lyon Brace is always constructed after the completion of the
reductive plaster casting protocol using a Cotrel EDF frame The re-
sults of the Lyon Brace Management have been validated by numer-
ous teams in Europe However the plaster cast process is quite diffi-
cult for the patient and physician Consequently many teams looked
for more convenient and expedient solutions without preliminary
plaster cast reduction Moreover when the angular correction is low
the plastic deformation remains limited
h t t p s c o l i o s i s j o u r n a l b i o m e d c e n t r a l c o m articles1011861748-7161-6-4
6 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 7
It was only in 2013 that advances in computer technology with
the latest generation software (OrtenShape) allowed the superpo-
sition of different CADCAM shape captures and a segmental 3D
reconstruction The aim was to use this new software to replace the
plaster cast with a new Lyon brace the ARTbrace The Regional
shape capture is one of the fundamental innovations of the ART
brace The overcorrection is performed in the frontal plane and the
sagittal plane precisely and individually for each child at three levels
pelvis lumbar spine and thoracic spine The detorsion is obtained by
untwisting the whole spine
Like the historical Lyon brace the ARTbrace is ADJUSTABLE
Both axillary and pelvic clamps are adjustable with a precise wrench
and a bolt system and an anterior ratcheting buckle
Like the historical Lyon brace the SAGITTAL PLANE is fixed by
the posterior bar But the sagittal plane is determined by the regional
shape capture and the superposition of the 3 shape captures In addi-
tional it is the lack of support at the sternoclavicular level and at the
abdominal level that avoids lumbar delordosis and thoracic flat back
The initial aim was to avoid the plaster cast but very quickly the
ARTbrace appeared to be a much more effective solution compared to the former casts and it was even better tolerated Following the
early successes of in-brace correction (40 better in-brace correc-
tion) the whole treatment was continued with the same brace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189456845
ISPO 2017 - Olomouc
History of Scoliosis Treatment and modern trends today
c h a p t e r 2
The interdisciplinary team approach
Since 2013 we had the opportunity to create an interdisci-
plinary team for the ARTbrace with commitment and con-
stant nurturing A careful planning from 2013 to 2018 was
established
The first goal was to use the ART as a plaster cast to maintain the
concept of plastic deformation During the regional shape captur-
ing the MD performs the correction which he previously carried out
during the plaster cast The CPO saves to the computer the 3 shape
captures and it lsquos at this moment that occurs the maximum exchange
of information
Since the first patients we realised that the ART was correcting
40 more than the formerly used plaster cast and we took the deci-
sion to continue the entire treatment with the ART also replacing
the old Lyon brace The ARTbrace project was born
As opposed to multidisciplinary interdisciplinary team work is a
complex process in which different types of staff work together to
share expertise knowledge and skills to impact on patient care It
8 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 9
was first described by Drinka (2000) Several practicians identified
methods of team practice which are used to match the ART bracing
1 Leadership and Management
Project Manager JC de Mauroy - Clinique du Parc Lyon
Product Manager Sophie Pourret - lecante Group
Team Manager Freacutedeacuteric Barral - Lecante Group
CADCAM Orten Collaboration Pascal Genevois - Orten
Liaison Engineer Alith Hoang - Orten
Patients partners Scoliose et Partage (Christine Chenot)
Commercial Management Steacutephane Lecante - Proteor
Group
All senior managers are international leaders in the field of sco-
liosis bracing
2 Communication
Scientific publications
Website
Newsletter
International training
All members of the team are choosen for their Communication
skills with the patient within the team and outside
3 Learning Training and Development
Two Training sessions were performed in 2015
Four Educational Sessions in Italy in 2015 (Piacenza Bari
Palermo)
All individual team members are motivated
4 Appropriate resources and procedures
Structures Lecante Bracing Manufacture Full Instantaneous 3D
CADCAM Orten EOS X Ray - Clinique du Parc Medical Orthopae-
dic Unit amp Radiology Unit
Weekly coordination during the Regional shape capturing (JCdM
SP)
Monthly Team Meeting (LBM)
All team members are working in Lyon
5 Appropriate skill mix
A full competent staff is constituted with mix and balance of
personalities
6 Climate
Innovation team culture of trust value contributions nurturing
consensus and inter professional atmosphere were created
7 Individual characteristics
10 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 11
Knowledge experience initiative knowing strengths and weak-
nesses listening skills reflexive practice desire to work on the same
goals are the main skills
8 Clarity of vision
Having a clear set of values that drive the direction of the service
and the care provided Portraying a uniform and consistent external
image
9 Quality and outcomes of care
Patient-centered focus outcomes and satisfaction encouraging
feedback capturing and recording evidence of the effectiveness of
care and using that as part of a feedback cycle to improve care
10 Respecting and understanding roles
Tasks and roles are well defined sharing power joint working
autonomy
The Scoliosis Team
The family and patients are also part of the chain The brace com-
pliance depends partly on them When they exist the alternatives of
different protocols must be discussed and the choice is made jointly
A chain is only as strong as its weakest link
c h a p t e r 3
New concepts
Mathematical Basis Circled Helicoid
The mathematical basis of the torso column is the cir-cled helicoid with horizontal generating circle described
by the French mathematician Robert Ferreacuteol For a circled helicoid
the Cartesian parameterisation is the parameterisation of the circle
with diameter carried by Ox with a center (a00) with a radius b
forming an angle alpha with the horizontal For torso column alpha
= 0
12 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 13
The aim is to get not only a straight spine but a reverse torso
shape capture opposite to scoliosis ie overcorrection of the scolio-
sis curvature This overcorrection is possible only if the vertebral
bodies are not distorted Otherwise we favour the correction accen-
tuating the asymmetry of pressure on the vertebral body
The main innovative features are in the acronym of ART
1 A stands for Asymmetry obtained with an overlay of three re-
gional shapes captures
2 R stands for Rigidity (in fact High rigidity) of polycarbonate
3 T stands for Torsion the brace performing a Detorsion of the
scoliotic Torso Column which is a circled helicoid with horizontal
generating circle in opposite direction of the spiral column while fix-
ing the sagittal plane in a physiological position
Asymmetry
Background
Although the effectiveness of bracing for scoliosis is now proved
(level 1) [Weinstein 2013] there are more than twenty types of
braces used worldwide All of them have not shown to be as effective
as the others A recent review found that Asymmetric braces have
led to better corrections than that described for symmetric braces
[Sy 2015] The efficacy of the brace also depends on moulding The
CAD CAM systems and especially those associated with Finite Ele-
ment Simulation [Cobetto 2016] have been proven to be more effec-
tive than the old plaster moulds [Wong 2011]
Symmetrical molding is easier to perform than asymmetric
molding If plaster casting is used the main effect is essentially axial
self-correction with possibly a lumbar shift In all cases the sagittal
curvatures are diminished Checircneau makes the corrections on the
positive plaster but without taking into account the rigidity of each
scoliosis These corrections are difficult if a constant volume is to
14 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 15
be maintained In fact the corrections are operator-dependent and
approximate which explains the use of polyethylene When using
CAD CAM systems It is necessary to differentiate the sensors type
ldquoIpadrdquo with precision of more than 1 cm probably less reliable than
the plaster or systems with raster-stereographie or the sensors with
4 columns almost instantaneous whose precision is of 1 mm Respi-
ratory blocking is then done in an intermediate position for children
and deep inspiration for adults
Aims
The aim of the asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To obtain the maximum asymmetry for each block (Katerina
Schroth block concept) lumbar and thoracic for two curves and
thoraco-lumbar for one curve by superposition of three asymmetric
shape captures codified and reproducible
2 To obtain the maximum precision (less than 1 mm) in the mini-
mum of time (less than 3 seconds) with the use of a professional
sensor This precision is also indispensable if one associates asym-
metry and high rigidity
Scope
The scope is to obtain the maximum in-brace correction by a
precise asymmetry using the new Regional Shape Capture with the
professional 4 column CADCAM
Rigid (very high) Polycarbonate
Background
Even if the old Lyon brace in polymethacrylate was very rigid
the credit for VERY HIGH RIGIDITY goes to the Italian team of
ISICO with the Sforzesco brace which has proven to be effective
by avoiding plaster casts for scoliosis over 45deg The acronym ART
brace (Asymmetrical Rigid Torsion brace) was created by Stefano
Negrini The merit of the ART brace is the addition of overcorrec-
tion to the high rigidity with a global detorsion It is this overcorrec-
tion for small curvatures which explains the average improvement of
the in-brace correction
Polycarbonate characteristics are
bull Transparency
bull Unbreakable (25 stronger than PPMA)
bull Lightweight (4 mm sheet)
bull No bisphenol A
bull Glass transition 147deg-155deg
bull Bending brake till 120deg
bull Insulation Rvalue 143
Aims
16 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 17
The aim of the high rigid asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To replace the plaster cast during the initial plastic deforma-
tion of the Lyon management
2 To improve the comfort in brace thanks to the soft contact
The Soft Contact concept is that of the squeeze attachment for cy-
lindrical hay bales Pressures are spread over the entire cylinder sur-
face this is contrary to the principle of the push and counter-push of
the historical Lyon brace or other three point braces
As usual in the correction of 3D deformities of the scoliotic
spine room should be provided for migration of lateral curvature
rotated vertebrae and breathing exercises In this design actually
various 3-point pressure systems are provided to correct the lateral
curvature and vertebral rotation from different anatomical planes
In the ART brace the shape of the brace is not a straight spine like
the Sforzesco or the old Lyon brace but an overcorrected spine with
reverse scoliosis
3 To realize the baby lift or lsquopullrsquo which is an axillary extension
that occurs in the armpits like when wearing a child
Scope
The scope is to achieve all the over-correction in the outer sur-
face of the brace which makes the inner surface smooth without
pads The brace then becomes dynamic with a lsquopullrsquo asymmetry
Torsion
Background
Global Detorsion vs 3 points system (Solid Geometry)
Given the multiplicity of planes the corrections by the 3 points
system only operate in a limited number of planes On the contrary
the ARTbrace works in an overall untwisting
The Global detorsion is performed with a fixed sagittal plane
Axial elongation brings the vertebral bodies near the central axis in
the frontal plane and by untwisting the scoliotic spine between the
pelvis and the shoulder the horizontal plane is corrected So both
geometrical detorsion and mechanical detorsion of the cylinder are
working together
19
18 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T
Mayonnaise Tube Effect
The translation along the vertical axis is a fundamental step of
untwisting The concept of elongation has progressed during the last
century
1 Simple cervical traction against gravity it is more of a stretching
2 With Milwaukee this elongation is between the head and the
pelvis which provides elongation
3 With the Lyon brace elongation occurs between shoulder and
pelvic belts
4 With Boston it is the effect ldquocherry stonerdquo that is privileged
with the idea that correcting the bottom of the column will help to
correct the upper part of the spine
5 Finally with ARTbrace there is a real extrusion by bringing
together the two pieces (hemi-shells)
20 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 21
The principle of the wrench and bolt is to ldquounscrew or untwistrdquo
scoliosis For instance the Checircneau brace uses the principle of pres-
sure and expansion in many precise areas For a double major curve
in the ARTbrace the thoracolumbar area is the fixed point with un-
screwing between this fixed point and the pelvis for lumbar curva-
ture and the shoulder girdle for thoracic curvature For a thoraco-
lumbar curve the fixed points are at the cranial and caudal parts of
the spine and the unscrewing is done at thoracolumbar level The
pelvis is the laquobolt headraquo which is stabilised by a symmetrical pelvic
base like a key Lumbar and thoracic segments above act as a wrench
for the detorsion of scoliosis
The EOS 3D system automatically calculates the rotation for each
vertebral segment The twist (Torsion) is the sum of all the segmental
rotations We can calculate the overall in-brace untwisting
c h a p t e r 4
Principles of ARTbrace
1 PLASTIC DEFORMATION
Some definitions The relationship between the stress
and strain that a material displays is known as that materialrsquos
stressndashstrain curve It is unique for each material and is found by
recording the amount of deformation (strain) at distinct intervals of
tensile or compressive loading (stress)
In physics and materials science plasticity describes the defor-
mation of a (solid) material undergoing non-reversible changes of
shape in response to applied forces for example a solid piece of
metal being bent or pounded into a new shape displays plasticity
as permanent changes occur within the material itself In engineer-
ing the transition from elastic behavior to plastic behavior is called
yield
When an elastic material containing fluid is deformed the return
of the material to its original shape is delayed in time and it is slower
to restore to its original position This is why we ask the patient to
remove the brace two hours before the X-ray
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
4 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 5
Old Lyon Brace amp new ARTbrace
The Lyon Bracing Management with adjustable underarm brace
has evolved since 1947 as a cooperative effort between Pierre Stag-
nara MD and Bouillat amp Terrier CPO
The Lyon management protocol requires at first a plastic defor-
mation with a plaster cast for one to four months after which the
brace is shape captureed and fitted The brace is a high rigidity ad-
justable under arm design and does not have a superstructure
Very early braces were made from a combination of steel and
leather Following World War II Reacutegis Lecante CPO discovered a
Messerschmitt cockpit near his country house Made of a very du-
rable plastic it could be easily machined tapped and screwed The
use of PMM (polymetacrylate of methyl) or Plexidurtrade was born
revolutionising modern brace materials and design
The Lyon Brace created in 1947 by Pierre Stagnara is designed
to be
bull Adjustable It is easily modified accommodating up to 7 cm
of growth and 7 kg of weight while also being more cost effective
requiring fewer and less frequent changes
bull Active The rigidity of the Polymetacrylate or Ploycarbonate
structure stimulates the child to initiate an active axial auto correc-
tion which decreases superficial pressures
bull Decompressive As a consequence of the ldquoAdjustablerdquo fea-
ture the effect of extension between the two pelvic and scapular
girdles also decreases the pressure on the intervertebral discs and
promotes more effective pushes
bull Symmetrical In addition to being more aesthetically pleas-
ing the brace was much easier to build The new Lyon ARTbrace is
Asymmetrical thanks to advances in digital 3D technology
bull Stable The stability of both shoulder and pelvic girdle facili-
tates the intermediate corrections
bull Transparent Skin pressures are easily observed and direct
control of the pushes stops drives and reliefs is possible Comple-
mentary pads are rarely needed
The Lyon Brace is always constructed after the completion of the
reductive plaster casting protocol using a Cotrel EDF frame The re-
sults of the Lyon Brace Management have been validated by numer-
ous teams in Europe However the plaster cast process is quite diffi-
cult for the patient and physician Consequently many teams looked
for more convenient and expedient solutions without preliminary
plaster cast reduction Moreover when the angular correction is low
the plastic deformation remains limited
h t t p s c o l i o s i s j o u r n a l b i o m e d c e n t r a l c o m articles1011861748-7161-6-4
6 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 7
It was only in 2013 that advances in computer technology with
the latest generation software (OrtenShape) allowed the superpo-
sition of different CADCAM shape captures and a segmental 3D
reconstruction The aim was to use this new software to replace the
plaster cast with a new Lyon brace the ARTbrace The Regional
shape capture is one of the fundamental innovations of the ART
brace The overcorrection is performed in the frontal plane and the
sagittal plane precisely and individually for each child at three levels
pelvis lumbar spine and thoracic spine The detorsion is obtained by
untwisting the whole spine
Like the historical Lyon brace the ARTbrace is ADJUSTABLE
Both axillary and pelvic clamps are adjustable with a precise wrench
and a bolt system and an anterior ratcheting buckle
Like the historical Lyon brace the SAGITTAL PLANE is fixed by
the posterior bar But the sagittal plane is determined by the regional
shape capture and the superposition of the 3 shape captures In addi-
tional it is the lack of support at the sternoclavicular level and at the
abdominal level that avoids lumbar delordosis and thoracic flat back
The initial aim was to avoid the plaster cast but very quickly the
ARTbrace appeared to be a much more effective solution compared to the former casts and it was even better tolerated Following the
early successes of in-brace correction (40 better in-brace correc-
tion) the whole treatment was continued with the same brace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189456845
ISPO 2017 - Olomouc
History of Scoliosis Treatment and modern trends today
c h a p t e r 2
The interdisciplinary team approach
Since 2013 we had the opportunity to create an interdisci-
plinary team for the ARTbrace with commitment and con-
stant nurturing A careful planning from 2013 to 2018 was
established
The first goal was to use the ART as a plaster cast to maintain the
concept of plastic deformation During the regional shape captur-
ing the MD performs the correction which he previously carried out
during the plaster cast The CPO saves to the computer the 3 shape
captures and it lsquos at this moment that occurs the maximum exchange
of information
Since the first patients we realised that the ART was correcting
40 more than the formerly used plaster cast and we took the deci-
sion to continue the entire treatment with the ART also replacing
the old Lyon brace The ARTbrace project was born
As opposed to multidisciplinary interdisciplinary team work is a
complex process in which different types of staff work together to
share expertise knowledge and skills to impact on patient care It
8 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 9
was first described by Drinka (2000) Several practicians identified
methods of team practice which are used to match the ART bracing
1 Leadership and Management
Project Manager JC de Mauroy - Clinique du Parc Lyon
Product Manager Sophie Pourret - lecante Group
Team Manager Freacutedeacuteric Barral - Lecante Group
CADCAM Orten Collaboration Pascal Genevois - Orten
Liaison Engineer Alith Hoang - Orten
Patients partners Scoliose et Partage (Christine Chenot)
Commercial Management Steacutephane Lecante - Proteor
Group
All senior managers are international leaders in the field of sco-
liosis bracing
2 Communication
Scientific publications
Website
Newsletter
International training
All members of the team are choosen for their Communication
skills with the patient within the team and outside
3 Learning Training and Development
Two Training sessions were performed in 2015
Four Educational Sessions in Italy in 2015 (Piacenza Bari
Palermo)
All individual team members are motivated
4 Appropriate resources and procedures
Structures Lecante Bracing Manufacture Full Instantaneous 3D
CADCAM Orten EOS X Ray - Clinique du Parc Medical Orthopae-
dic Unit amp Radiology Unit
Weekly coordination during the Regional shape capturing (JCdM
SP)
Monthly Team Meeting (LBM)
All team members are working in Lyon
5 Appropriate skill mix
A full competent staff is constituted with mix and balance of
personalities
6 Climate
Innovation team culture of trust value contributions nurturing
consensus and inter professional atmosphere were created
7 Individual characteristics
10 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 11
Knowledge experience initiative knowing strengths and weak-
nesses listening skills reflexive practice desire to work on the same
goals are the main skills
8 Clarity of vision
Having a clear set of values that drive the direction of the service
and the care provided Portraying a uniform and consistent external
image
9 Quality and outcomes of care
Patient-centered focus outcomes and satisfaction encouraging
feedback capturing and recording evidence of the effectiveness of
care and using that as part of a feedback cycle to improve care
10 Respecting and understanding roles
Tasks and roles are well defined sharing power joint working
autonomy
The Scoliosis Team
The family and patients are also part of the chain The brace com-
pliance depends partly on them When they exist the alternatives of
different protocols must be discussed and the choice is made jointly
A chain is only as strong as its weakest link
c h a p t e r 3
New concepts
Mathematical Basis Circled Helicoid
The mathematical basis of the torso column is the cir-cled helicoid with horizontal generating circle described
by the French mathematician Robert Ferreacuteol For a circled helicoid
the Cartesian parameterisation is the parameterisation of the circle
with diameter carried by Ox with a center (a00) with a radius b
forming an angle alpha with the horizontal For torso column alpha
= 0
12 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 13
The aim is to get not only a straight spine but a reverse torso
shape capture opposite to scoliosis ie overcorrection of the scolio-
sis curvature This overcorrection is possible only if the vertebral
bodies are not distorted Otherwise we favour the correction accen-
tuating the asymmetry of pressure on the vertebral body
The main innovative features are in the acronym of ART
1 A stands for Asymmetry obtained with an overlay of three re-
gional shapes captures
2 R stands for Rigidity (in fact High rigidity) of polycarbonate
3 T stands for Torsion the brace performing a Detorsion of the
scoliotic Torso Column which is a circled helicoid with horizontal
generating circle in opposite direction of the spiral column while fix-
ing the sagittal plane in a physiological position
Asymmetry
Background
Although the effectiveness of bracing for scoliosis is now proved
(level 1) [Weinstein 2013] there are more than twenty types of
braces used worldwide All of them have not shown to be as effective
as the others A recent review found that Asymmetric braces have
led to better corrections than that described for symmetric braces
[Sy 2015] The efficacy of the brace also depends on moulding The
CAD CAM systems and especially those associated with Finite Ele-
ment Simulation [Cobetto 2016] have been proven to be more effec-
tive than the old plaster moulds [Wong 2011]
Symmetrical molding is easier to perform than asymmetric
molding If plaster casting is used the main effect is essentially axial
self-correction with possibly a lumbar shift In all cases the sagittal
curvatures are diminished Checircneau makes the corrections on the
positive plaster but without taking into account the rigidity of each
scoliosis These corrections are difficult if a constant volume is to
14 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 15
be maintained In fact the corrections are operator-dependent and
approximate which explains the use of polyethylene When using
CAD CAM systems It is necessary to differentiate the sensors type
ldquoIpadrdquo with precision of more than 1 cm probably less reliable than
the plaster or systems with raster-stereographie or the sensors with
4 columns almost instantaneous whose precision is of 1 mm Respi-
ratory blocking is then done in an intermediate position for children
and deep inspiration for adults
Aims
The aim of the asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To obtain the maximum asymmetry for each block (Katerina
Schroth block concept) lumbar and thoracic for two curves and
thoraco-lumbar for one curve by superposition of three asymmetric
shape captures codified and reproducible
2 To obtain the maximum precision (less than 1 mm) in the mini-
mum of time (less than 3 seconds) with the use of a professional
sensor This precision is also indispensable if one associates asym-
metry and high rigidity
Scope
The scope is to obtain the maximum in-brace correction by a
precise asymmetry using the new Regional Shape Capture with the
professional 4 column CADCAM
Rigid (very high) Polycarbonate
Background
Even if the old Lyon brace in polymethacrylate was very rigid
the credit for VERY HIGH RIGIDITY goes to the Italian team of
ISICO with the Sforzesco brace which has proven to be effective
by avoiding plaster casts for scoliosis over 45deg The acronym ART
brace (Asymmetrical Rigid Torsion brace) was created by Stefano
Negrini The merit of the ART brace is the addition of overcorrec-
tion to the high rigidity with a global detorsion It is this overcorrec-
tion for small curvatures which explains the average improvement of
the in-brace correction
Polycarbonate characteristics are
bull Transparency
bull Unbreakable (25 stronger than PPMA)
bull Lightweight (4 mm sheet)
bull No bisphenol A
bull Glass transition 147deg-155deg
bull Bending brake till 120deg
bull Insulation Rvalue 143
Aims
16 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 17
The aim of the high rigid asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To replace the plaster cast during the initial plastic deforma-
tion of the Lyon management
2 To improve the comfort in brace thanks to the soft contact
The Soft Contact concept is that of the squeeze attachment for cy-
lindrical hay bales Pressures are spread over the entire cylinder sur-
face this is contrary to the principle of the push and counter-push of
the historical Lyon brace or other three point braces
As usual in the correction of 3D deformities of the scoliotic
spine room should be provided for migration of lateral curvature
rotated vertebrae and breathing exercises In this design actually
various 3-point pressure systems are provided to correct the lateral
curvature and vertebral rotation from different anatomical planes
In the ART brace the shape of the brace is not a straight spine like
the Sforzesco or the old Lyon brace but an overcorrected spine with
reverse scoliosis
3 To realize the baby lift or lsquopullrsquo which is an axillary extension
that occurs in the armpits like when wearing a child
Scope
The scope is to achieve all the over-correction in the outer sur-
face of the brace which makes the inner surface smooth without
pads The brace then becomes dynamic with a lsquopullrsquo asymmetry
Torsion
Background
Global Detorsion vs 3 points system (Solid Geometry)
Given the multiplicity of planes the corrections by the 3 points
system only operate in a limited number of planes On the contrary
the ARTbrace works in an overall untwisting
The Global detorsion is performed with a fixed sagittal plane
Axial elongation brings the vertebral bodies near the central axis in
the frontal plane and by untwisting the scoliotic spine between the
pelvis and the shoulder the horizontal plane is corrected So both
geometrical detorsion and mechanical detorsion of the cylinder are
working together
19
18 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T
Mayonnaise Tube Effect
The translation along the vertical axis is a fundamental step of
untwisting The concept of elongation has progressed during the last
century
1 Simple cervical traction against gravity it is more of a stretching
2 With Milwaukee this elongation is between the head and the
pelvis which provides elongation
3 With the Lyon brace elongation occurs between shoulder and
pelvic belts
4 With Boston it is the effect ldquocherry stonerdquo that is privileged
with the idea that correcting the bottom of the column will help to
correct the upper part of the spine
5 Finally with ARTbrace there is a real extrusion by bringing
together the two pieces (hemi-shells)
20 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 21
The principle of the wrench and bolt is to ldquounscrew or untwistrdquo
scoliosis For instance the Checircneau brace uses the principle of pres-
sure and expansion in many precise areas For a double major curve
in the ARTbrace the thoracolumbar area is the fixed point with un-
screwing between this fixed point and the pelvis for lumbar curva-
ture and the shoulder girdle for thoracic curvature For a thoraco-
lumbar curve the fixed points are at the cranial and caudal parts of
the spine and the unscrewing is done at thoracolumbar level The
pelvis is the laquobolt headraquo which is stabilised by a symmetrical pelvic
base like a key Lumbar and thoracic segments above act as a wrench
for the detorsion of scoliosis
The EOS 3D system automatically calculates the rotation for each
vertebral segment The twist (Torsion) is the sum of all the segmental
rotations We can calculate the overall in-brace untwisting
c h a p t e r 4
Principles of ARTbrace
1 PLASTIC DEFORMATION
Some definitions The relationship between the stress
and strain that a material displays is known as that materialrsquos
stressndashstrain curve It is unique for each material and is found by
recording the amount of deformation (strain) at distinct intervals of
tensile or compressive loading (stress)
In physics and materials science plasticity describes the defor-
mation of a (solid) material undergoing non-reversible changes of
shape in response to applied forces for example a solid piece of
metal being bent or pounded into a new shape displays plasticity
as permanent changes occur within the material itself In engineer-
ing the transition from elastic behavior to plastic behavior is called
yield
When an elastic material containing fluid is deformed the return
of the material to its original shape is delayed in time and it is slower
to restore to its original position This is why we ask the patient to
remove the brace two hours before the X-ray
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
6 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 7
It was only in 2013 that advances in computer technology with
the latest generation software (OrtenShape) allowed the superpo-
sition of different CADCAM shape captures and a segmental 3D
reconstruction The aim was to use this new software to replace the
plaster cast with a new Lyon brace the ARTbrace The Regional
shape capture is one of the fundamental innovations of the ART
brace The overcorrection is performed in the frontal plane and the
sagittal plane precisely and individually for each child at three levels
pelvis lumbar spine and thoracic spine The detorsion is obtained by
untwisting the whole spine
Like the historical Lyon brace the ARTbrace is ADJUSTABLE
Both axillary and pelvic clamps are adjustable with a precise wrench
and a bolt system and an anterior ratcheting buckle
Like the historical Lyon brace the SAGITTAL PLANE is fixed by
the posterior bar But the sagittal plane is determined by the regional
shape capture and the superposition of the 3 shape captures In addi-
tional it is the lack of support at the sternoclavicular level and at the
abdominal level that avoids lumbar delordosis and thoracic flat back
The initial aim was to avoid the plaster cast but very quickly the
ARTbrace appeared to be a much more effective solution compared to the former casts and it was even better tolerated Following the
early successes of in-brace correction (40 better in-brace correc-
tion) the whole treatment was continued with the same brace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189456845
ISPO 2017 - Olomouc
History of Scoliosis Treatment and modern trends today
c h a p t e r 2
The interdisciplinary team approach
Since 2013 we had the opportunity to create an interdisci-
plinary team for the ARTbrace with commitment and con-
stant nurturing A careful planning from 2013 to 2018 was
established
The first goal was to use the ART as a plaster cast to maintain the
concept of plastic deformation During the regional shape captur-
ing the MD performs the correction which he previously carried out
during the plaster cast The CPO saves to the computer the 3 shape
captures and it lsquos at this moment that occurs the maximum exchange
of information
Since the first patients we realised that the ART was correcting
40 more than the formerly used plaster cast and we took the deci-
sion to continue the entire treatment with the ART also replacing
the old Lyon brace The ARTbrace project was born
As opposed to multidisciplinary interdisciplinary team work is a
complex process in which different types of staff work together to
share expertise knowledge and skills to impact on patient care It
8 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 9
was first described by Drinka (2000) Several practicians identified
methods of team practice which are used to match the ART bracing
1 Leadership and Management
Project Manager JC de Mauroy - Clinique du Parc Lyon
Product Manager Sophie Pourret - lecante Group
Team Manager Freacutedeacuteric Barral - Lecante Group
CADCAM Orten Collaboration Pascal Genevois - Orten
Liaison Engineer Alith Hoang - Orten
Patients partners Scoliose et Partage (Christine Chenot)
Commercial Management Steacutephane Lecante - Proteor
Group
All senior managers are international leaders in the field of sco-
liosis bracing
2 Communication
Scientific publications
Website
Newsletter
International training
All members of the team are choosen for their Communication
skills with the patient within the team and outside
3 Learning Training and Development
Two Training sessions were performed in 2015
Four Educational Sessions in Italy in 2015 (Piacenza Bari
Palermo)
All individual team members are motivated
4 Appropriate resources and procedures
Structures Lecante Bracing Manufacture Full Instantaneous 3D
CADCAM Orten EOS X Ray - Clinique du Parc Medical Orthopae-
dic Unit amp Radiology Unit
Weekly coordination during the Regional shape capturing (JCdM
SP)
Monthly Team Meeting (LBM)
All team members are working in Lyon
5 Appropriate skill mix
A full competent staff is constituted with mix and balance of
personalities
6 Climate
Innovation team culture of trust value contributions nurturing
consensus and inter professional atmosphere were created
7 Individual characteristics
10 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 11
Knowledge experience initiative knowing strengths and weak-
nesses listening skills reflexive practice desire to work on the same
goals are the main skills
8 Clarity of vision
Having a clear set of values that drive the direction of the service
and the care provided Portraying a uniform and consistent external
image
9 Quality and outcomes of care
Patient-centered focus outcomes and satisfaction encouraging
feedback capturing and recording evidence of the effectiveness of
care and using that as part of a feedback cycle to improve care
10 Respecting and understanding roles
Tasks and roles are well defined sharing power joint working
autonomy
The Scoliosis Team
The family and patients are also part of the chain The brace com-
pliance depends partly on them When they exist the alternatives of
different protocols must be discussed and the choice is made jointly
A chain is only as strong as its weakest link
c h a p t e r 3
New concepts
Mathematical Basis Circled Helicoid
The mathematical basis of the torso column is the cir-cled helicoid with horizontal generating circle described
by the French mathematician Robert Ferreacuteol For a circled helicoid
the Cartesian parameterisation is the parameterisation of the circle
with diameter carried by Ox with a center (a00) with a radius b
forming an angle alpha with the horizontal For torso column alpha
= 0
12 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 13
The aim is to get not only a straight spine but a reverse torso
shape capture opposite to scoliosis ie overcorrection of the scolio-
sis curvature This overcorrection is possible only if the vertebral
bodies are not distorted Otherwise we favour the correction accen-
tuating the asymmetry of pressure on the vertebral body
The main innovative features are in the acronym of ART
1 A stands for Asymmetry obtained with an overlay of three re-
gional shapes captures
2 R stands for Rigidity (in fact High rigidity) of polycarbonate
3 T stands for Torsion the brace performing a Detorsion of the
scoliotic Torso Column which is a circled helicoid with horizontal
generating circle in opposite direction of the spiral column while fix-
ing the sagittal plane in a physiological position
Asymmetry
Background
Although the effectiveness of bracing for scoliosis is now proved
(level 1) [Weinstein 2013] there are more than twenty types of
braces used worldwide All of them have not shown to be as effective
as the others A recent review found that Asymmetric braces have
led to better corrections than that described for symmetric braces
[Sy 2015] The efficacy of the brace also depends on moulding The
CAD CAM systems and especially those associated with Finite Ele-
ment Simulation [Cobetto 2016] have been proven to be more effec-
tive than the old plaster moulds [Wong 2011]
Symmetrical molding is easier to perform than asymmetric
molding If plaster casting is used the main effect is essentially axial
self-correction with possibly a lumbar shift In all cases the sagittal
curvatures are diminished Checircneau makes the corrections on the
positive plaster but without taking into account the rigidity of each
scoliosis These corrections are difficult if a constant volume is to
14 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 15
be maintained In fact the corrections are operator-dependent and
approximate which explains the use of polyethylene When using
CAD CAM systems It is necessary to differentiate the sensors type
ldquoIpadrdquo with precision of more than 1 cm probably less reliable than
the plaster or systems with raster-stereographie or the sensors with
4 columns almost instantaneous whose precision is of 1 mm Respi-
ratory blocking is then done in an intermediate position for children
and deep inspiration for adults
Aims
The aim of the asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To obtain the maximum asymmetry for each block (Katerina
Schroth block concept) lumbar and thoracic for two curves and
thoraco-lumbar for one curve by superposition of three asymmetric
shape captures codified and reproducible
2 To obtain the maximum precision (less than 1 mm) in the mini-
mum of time (less than 3 seconds) with the use of a professional
sensor This precision is also indispensable if one associates asym-
metry and high rigidity
Scope
The scope is to obtain the maximum in-brace correction by a
precise asymmetry using the new Regional Shape Capture with the
professional 4 column CADCAM
Rigid (very high) Polycarbonate
Background
Even if the old Lyon brace in polymethacrylate was very rigid
the credit for VERY HIGH RIGIDITY goes to the Italian team of
ISICO with the Sforzesco brace which has proven to be effective
by avoiding plaster casts for scoliosis over 45deg The acronym ART
brace (Asymmetrical Rigid Torsion brace) was created by Stefano
Negrini The merit of the ART brace is the addition of overcorrec-
tion to the high rigidity with a global detorsion It is this overcorrec-
tion for small curvatures which explains the average improvement of
the in-brace correction
Polycarbonate characteristics are
bull Transparency
bull Unbreakable (25 stronger than PPMA)
bull Lightweight (4 mm sheet)
bull No bisphenol A
bull Glass transition 147deg-155deg
bull Bending brake till 120deg
bull Insulation Rvalue 143
Aims
16 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 17
The aim of the high rigid asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To replace the plaster cast during the initial plastic deforma-
tion of the Lyon management
2 To improve the comfort in brace thanks to the soft contact
The Soft Contact concept is that of the squeeze attachment for cy-
lindrical hay bales Pressures are spread over the entire cylinder sur-
face this is contrary to the principle of the push and counter-push of
the historical Lyon brace or other three point braces
As usual in the correction of 3D deformities of the scoliotic
spine room should be provided for migration of lateral curvature
rotated vertebrae and breathing exercises In this design actually
various 3-point pressure systems are provided to correct the lateral
curvature and vertebral rotation from different anatomical planes
In the ART brace the shape of the brace is not a straight spine like
the Sforzesco or the old Lyon brace but an overcorrected spine with
reverse scoliosis
3 To realize the baby lift or lsquopullrsquo which is an axillary extension
that occurs in the armpits like when wearing a child
Scope
The scope is to achieve all the over-correction in the outer sur-
face of the brace which makes the inner surface smooth without
pads The brace then becomes dynamic with a lsquopullrsquo asymmetry
Torsion
Background
Global Detorsion vs 3 points system (Solid Geometry)
Given the multiplicity of planes the corrections by the 3 points
system only operate in a limited number of planes On the contrary
the ARTbrace works in an overall untwisting
The Global detorsion is performed with a fixed sagittal plane
Axial elongation brings the vertebral bodies near the central axis in
the frontal plane and by untwisting the scoliotic spine between the
pelvis and the shoulder the horizontal plane is corrected So both
geometrical detorsion and mechanical detorsion of the cylinder are
working together
19
18 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T
Mayonnaise Tube Effect
The translation along the vertical axis is a fundamental step of
untwisting The concept of elongation has progressed during the last
century
1 Simple cervical traction against gravity it is more of a stretching
2 With Milwaukee this elongation is between the head and the
pelvis which provides elongation
3 With the Lyon brace elongation occurs between shoulder and
pelvic belts
4 With Boston it is the effect ldquocherry stonerdquo that is privileged
with the idea that correcting the bottom of the column will help to
correct the upper part of the spine
5 Finally with ARTbrace there is a real extrusion by bringing
together the two pieces (hemi-shells)
20 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 21
The principle of the wrench and bolt is to ldquounscrew or untwistrdquo
scoliosis For instance the Checircneau brace uses the principle of pres-
sure and expansion in many precise areas For a double major curve
in the ARTbrace the thoracolumbar area is the fixed point with un-
screwing between this fixed point and the pelvis for lumbar curva-
ture and the shoulder girdle for thoracic curvature For a thoraco-
lumbar curve the fixed points are at the cranial and caudal parts of
the spine and the unscrewing is done at thoracolumbar level The
pelvis is the laquobolt headraquo which is stabilised by a symmetrical pelvic
base like a key Lumbar and thoracic segments above act as a wrench
for the detorsion of scoliosis
The EOS 3D system automatically calculates the rotation for each
vertebral segment The twist (Torsion) is the sum of all the segmental
rotations We can calculate the overall in-brace untwisting
c h a p t e r 4
Principles of ARTbrace
1 PLASTIC DEFORMATION
Some definitions The relationship between the stress
and strain that a material displays is known as that materialrsquos
stressndashstrain curve It is unique for each material and is found by
recording the amount of deformation (strain) at distinct intervals of
tensile or compressive loading (stress)
In physics and materials science plasticity describes the defor-
mation of a (solid) material undergoing non-reversible changes of
shape in response to applied forces for example a solid piece of
metal being bent or pounded into a new shape displays plasticity
as permanent changes occur within the material itself In engineer-
ing the transition from elastic behavior to plastic behavior is called
yield
When an elastic material containing fluid is deformed the return
of the material to its original shape is delayed in time and it is slower
to restore to its original position This is why we ask the patient to
remove the brace two hours before the X-ray
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
8 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 9
was first described by Drinka (2000) Several practicians identified
methods of team practice which are used to match the ART bracing
1 Leadership and Management
Project Manager JC de Mauroy - Clinique du Parc Lyon
Product Manager Sophie Pourret - lecante Group
Team Manager Freacutedeacuteric Barral - Lecante Group
CADCAM Orten Collaboration Pascal Genevois - Orten
Liaison Engineer Alith Hoang - Orten
Patients partners Scoliose et Partage (Christine Chenot)
Commercial Management Steacutephane Lecante - Proteor
Group
All senior managers are international leaders in the field of sco-
liosis bracing
2 Communication
Scientific publications
Website
Newsletter
International training
All members of the team are choosen for their Communication
skills with the patient within the team and outside
3 Learning Training and Development
Two Training sessions were performed in 2015
Four Educational Sessions in Italy in 2015 (Piacenza Bari
Palermo)
All individual team members are motivated
4 Appropriate resources and procedures
Structures Lecante Bracing Manufacture Full Instantaneous 3D
CADCAM Orten EOS X Ray - Clinique du Parc Medical Orthopae-
dic Unit amp Radiology Unit
Weekly coordination during the Regional shape capturing (JCdM
SP)
Monthly Team Meeting (LBM)
All team members are working in Lyon
5 Appropriate skill mix
A full competent staff is constituted with mix and balance of
personalities
6 Climate
Innovation team culture of trust value contributions nurturing
consensus and inter professional atmosphere were created
7 Individual characteristics
10 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 11
Knowledge experience initiative knowing strengths and weak-
nesses listening skills reflexive practice desire to work on the same
goals are the main skills
8 Clarity of vision
Having a clear set of values that drive the direction of the service
and the care provided Portraying a uniform and consistent external
image
9 Quality and outcomes of care
Patient-centered focus outcomes and satisfaction encouraging
feedback capturing and recording evidence of the effectiveness of
care and using that as part of a feedback cycle to improve care
10 Respecting and understanding roles
Tasks and roles are well defined sharing power joint working
autonomy
The Scoliosis Team
The family and patients are also part of the chain The brace com-
pliance depends partly on them When they exist the alternatives of
different protocols must be discussed and the choice is made jointly
A chain is only as strong as its weakest link
c h a p t e r 3
New concepts
Mathematical Basis Circled Helicoid
The mathematical basis of the torso column is the cir-cled helicoid with horizontal generating circle described
by the French mathematician Robert Ferreacuteol For a circled helicoid
the Cartesian parameterisation is the parameterisation of the circle
with diameter carried by Ox with a center (a00) with a radius b
forming an angle alpha with the horizontal For torso column alpha
= 0
12 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 13
The aim is to get not only a straight spine but a reverse torso
shape capture opposite to scoliosis ie overcorrection of the scolio-
sis curvature This overcorrection is possible only if the vertebral
bodies are not distorted Otherwise we favour the correction accen-
tuating the asymmetry of pressure on the vertebral body
The main innovative features are in the acronym of ART
1 A stands for Asymmetry obtained with an overlay of three re-
gional shapes captures
2 R stands for Rigidity (in fact High rigidity) of polycarbonate
3 T stands for Torsion the brace performing a Detorsion of the
scoliotic Torso Column which is a circled helicoid with horizontal
generating circle in opposite direction of the spiral column while fix-
ing the sagittal plane in a physiological position
Asymmetry
Background
Although the effectiveness of bracing for scoliosis is now proved
(level 1) [Weinstein 2013] there are more than twenty types of
braces used worldwide All of them have not shown to be as effective
as the others A recent review found that Asymmetric braces have
led to better corrections than that described for symmetric braces
[Sy 2015] The efficacy of the brace also depends on moulding The
CAD CAM systems and especially those associated with Finite Ele-
ment Simulation [Cobetto 2016] have been proven to be more effec-
tive than the old plaster moulds [Wong 2011]
Symmetrical molding is easier to perform than asymmetric
molding If plaster casting is used the main effect is essentially axial
self-correction with possibly a lumbar shift In all cases the sagittal
curvatures are diminished Checircneau makes the corrections on the
positive plaster but without taking into account the rigidity of each
scoliosis These corrections are difficult if a constant volume is to
14 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 15
be maintained In fact the corrections are operator-dependent and
approximate which explains the use of polyethylene When using
CAD CAM systems It is necessary to differentiate the sensors type
ldquoIpadrdquo with precision of more than 1 cm probably less reliable than
the plaster or systems with raster-stereographie or the sensors with
4 columns almost instantaneous whose precision is of 1 mm Respi-
ratory blocking is then done in an intermediate position for children
and deep inspiration for adults
Aims
The aim of the asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To obtain the maximum asymmetry for each block (Katerina
Schroth block concept) lumbar and thoracic for two curves and
thoraco-lumbar for one curve by superposition of three asymmetric
shape captures codified and reproducible
2 To obtain the maximum precision (less than 1 mm) in the mini-
mum of time (less than 3 seconds) with the use of a professional
sensor This precision is also indispensable if one associates asym-
metry and high rigidity
Scope
The scope is to obtain the maximum in-brace correction by a
precise asymmetry using the new Regional Shape Capture with the
professional 4 column CADCAM
Rigid (very high) Polycarbonate
Background
Even if the old Lyon brace in polymethacrylate was very rigid
the credit for VERY HIGH RIGIDITY goes to the Italian team of
ISICO with the Sforzesco brace which has proven to be effective
by avoiding plaster casts for scoliosis over 45deg The acronym ART
brace (Asymmetrical Rigid Torsion brace) was created by Stefano
Negrini The merit of the ART brace is the addition of overcorrec-
tion to the high rigidity with a global detorsion It is this overcorrec-
tion for small curvatures which explains the average improvement of
the in-brace correction
Polycarbonate characteristics are
bull Transparency
bull Unbreakable (25 stronger than PPMA)
bull Lightweight (4 mm sheet)
bull No bisphenol A
bull Glass transition 147deg-155deg
bull Bending brake till 120deg
bull Insulation Rvalue 143
Aims
16 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 17
The aim of the high rigid asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To replace the plaster cast during the initial plastic deforma-
tion of the Lyon management
2 To improve the comfort in brace thanks to the soft contact
The Soft Contact concept is that of the squeeze attachment for cy-
lindrical hay bales Pressures are spread over the entire cylinder sur-
face this is contrary to the principle of the push and counter-push of
the historical Lyon brace or other three point braces
As usual in the correction of 3D deformities of the scoliotic
spine room should be provided for migration of lateral curvature
rotated vertebrae and breathing exercises In this design actually
various 3-point pressure systems are provided to correct the lateral
curvature and vertebral rotation from different anatomical planes
In the ART brace the shape of the brace is not a straight spine like
the Sforzesco or the old Lyon brace but an overcorrected spine with
reverse scoliosis
3 To realize the baby lift or lsquopullrsquo which is an axillary extension
that occurs in the armpits like when wearing a child
Scope
The scope is to achieve all the over-correction in the outer sur-
face of the brace which makes the inner surface smooth without
pads The brace then becomes dynamic with a lsquopullrsquo asymmetry
Torsion
Background
Global Detorsion vs 3 points system (Solid Geometry)
Given the multiplicity of planes the corrections by the 3 points
system only operate in a limited number of planes On the contrary
the ARTbrace works in an overall untwisting
The Global detorsion is performed with a fixed sagittal plane
Axial elongation brings the vertebral bodies near the central axis in
the frontal plane and by untwisting the scoliotic spine between the
pelvis and the shoulder the horizontal plane is corrected So both
geometrical detorsion and mechanical detorsion of the cylinder are
working together
19
18 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T
Mayonnaise Tube Effect
The translation along the vertical axis is a fundamental step of
untwisting The concept of elongation has progressed during the last
century
1 Simple cervical traction against gravity it is more of a stretching
2 With Milwaukee this elongation is between the head and the
pelvis which provides elongation
3 With the Lyon brace elongation occurs between shoulder and
pelvic belts
4 With Boston it is the effect ldquocherry stonerdquo that is privileged
with the idea that correcting the bottom of the column will help to
correct the upper part of the spine
5 Finally with ARTbrace there is a real extrusion by bringing
together the two pieces (hemi-shells)
20 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 21
The principle of the wrench and bolt is to ldquounscrew or untwistrdquo
scoliosis For instance the Checircneau brace uses the principle of pres-
sure and expansion in many precise areas For a double major curve
in the ARTbrace the thoracolumbar area is the fixed point with un-
screwing between this fixed point and the pelvis for lumbar curva-
ture and the shoulder girdle for thoracic curvature For a thoraco-
lumbar curve the fixed points are at the cranial and caudal parts of
the spine and the unscrewing is done at thoracolumbar level The
pelvis is the laquobolt headraquo which is stabilised by a symmetrical pelvic
base like a key Lumbar and thoracic segments above act as a wrench
for the detorsion of scoliosis
The EOS 3D system automatically calculates the rotation for each
vertebral segment The twist (Torsion) is the sum of all the segmental
rotations We can calculate the overall in-brace untwisting
c h a p t e r 4
Principles of ARTbrace
1 PLASTIC DEFORMATION
Some definitions The relationship between the stress
and strain that a material displays is known as that materialrsquos
stressndashstrain curve It is unique for each material and is found by
recording the amount of deformation (strain) at distinct intervals of
tensile or compressive loading (stress)
In physics and materials science plasticity describes the defor-
mation of a (solid) material undergoing non-reversible changes of
shape in response to applied forces for example a solid piece of
metal being bent or pounded into a new shape displays plasticity
as permanent changes occur within the material itself In engineer-
ing the transition from elastic behavior to plastic behavior is called
yield
When an elastic material containing fluid is deformed the return
of the material to its original shape is delayed in time and it is slower
to restore to its original position This is why we ask the patient to
remove the brace two hours before the X-ray
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
10 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 11
Knowledge experience initiative knowing strengths and weak-
nesses listening skills reflexive practice desire to work on the same
goals are the main skills
8 Clarity of vision
Having a clear set of values that drive the direction of the service
and the care provided Portraying a uniform and consistent external
image
9 Quality and outcomes of care
Patient-centered focus outcomes and satisfaction encouraging
feedback capturing and recording evidence of the effectiveness of
care and using that as part of a feedback cycle to improve care
10 Respecting and understanding roles
Tasks and roles are well defined sharing power joint working
autonomy
The Scoliosis Team
The family and patients are also part of the chain The brace com-
pliance depends partly on them When they exist the alternatives of
different protocols must be discussed and the choice is made jointly
A chain is only as strong as its weakest link
c h a p t e r 3
New concepts
Mathematical Basis Circled Helicoid
The mathematical basis of the torso column is the cir-cled helicoid with horizontal generating circle described
by the French mathematician Robert Ferreacuteol For a circled helicoid
the Cartesian parameterisation is the parameterisation of the circle
with diameter carried by Ox with a center (a00) with a radius b
forming an angle alpha with the horizontal For torso column alpha
= 0
12 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 13
The aim is to get not only a straight spine but a reverse torso
shape capture opposite to scoliosis ie overcorrection of the scolio-
sis curvature This overcorrection is possible only if the vertebral
bodies are not distorted Otherwise we favour the correction accen-
tuating the asymmetry of pressure on the vertebral body
The main innovative features are in the acronym of ART
1 A stands for Asymmetry obtained with an overlay of three re-
gional shapes captures
2 R stands for Rigidity (in fact High rigidity) of polycarbonate
3 T stands for Torsion the brace performing a Detorsion of the
scoliotic Torso Column which is a circled helicoid with horizontal
generating circle in opposite direction of the spiral column while fix-
ing the sagittal plane in a physiological position
Asymmetry
Background
Although the effectiveness of bracing for scoliosis is now proved
(level 1) [Weinstein 2013] there are more than twenty types of
braces used worldwide All of them have not shown to be as effective
as the others A recent review found that Asymmetric braces have
led to better corrections than that described for symmetric braces
[Sy 2015] The efficacy of the brace also depends on moulding The
CAD CAM systems and especially those associated with Finite Ele-
ment Simulation [Cobetto 2016] have been proven to be more effec-
tive than the old plaster moulds [Wong 2011]
Symmetrical molding is easier to perform than asymmetric
molding If plaster casting is used the main effect is essentially axial
self-correction with possibly a lumbar shift In all cases the sagittal
curvatures are diminished Checircneau makes the corrections on the
positive plaster but without taking into account the rigidity of each
scoliosis These corrections are difficult if a constant volume is to
14 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 15
be maintained In fact the corrections are operator-dependent and
approximate which explains the use of polyethylene When using
CAD CAM systems It is necessary to differentiate the sensors type
ldquoIpadrdquo with precision of more than 1 cm probably less reliable than
the plaster or systems with raster-stereographie or the sensors with
4 columns almost instantaneous whose precision is of 1 mm Respi-
ratory blocking is then done in an intermediate position for children
and deep inspiration for adults
Aims
The aim of the asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To obtain the maximum asymmetry for each block (Katerina
Schroth block concept) lumbar and thoracic for two curves and
thoraco-lumbar for one curve by superposition of three asymmetric
shape captures codified and reproducible
2 To obtain the maximum precision (less than 1 mm) in the mini-
mum of time (less than 3 seconds) with the use of a professional
sensor This precision is also indispensable if one associates asym-
metry and high rigidity
Scope
The scope is to obtain the maximum in-brace correction by a
precise asymmetry using the new Regional Shape Capture with the
professional 4 column CADCAM
Rigid (very high) Polycarbonate
Background
Even if the old Lyon brace in polymethacrylate was very rigid
the credit for VERY HIGH RIGIDITY goes to the Italian team of
ISICO with the Sforzesco brace which has proven to be effective
by avoiding plaster casts for scoliosis over 45deg The acronym ART
brace (Asymmetrical Rigid Torsion brace) was created by Stefano
Negrini The merit of the ART brace is the addition of overcorrec-
tion to the high rigidity with a global detorsion It is this overcorrec-
tion for small curvatures which explains the average improvement of
the in-brace correction
Polycarbonate characteristics are
bull Transparency
bull Unbreakable (25 stronger than PPMA)
bull Lightweight (4 mm sheet)
bull No bisphenol A
bull Glass transition 147deg-155deg
bull Bending brake till 120deg
bull Insulation Rvalue 143
Aims
16 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 17
The aim of the high rigid asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To replace the plaster cast during the initial plastic deforma-
tion of the Lyon management
2 To improve the comfort in brace thanks to the soft contact
The Soft Contact concept is that of the squeeze attachment for cy-
lindrical hay bales Pressures are spread over the entire cylinder sur-
face this is contrary to the principle of the push and counter-push of
the historical Lyon brace or other three point braces
As usual in the correction of 3D deformities of the scoliotic
spine room should be provided for migration of lateral curvature
rotated vertebrae and breathing exercises In this design actually
various 3-point pressure systems are provided to correct the lateral
curvature and vertebral rotation from different anatomical planes
In the ART brace the shape of the brace is not a straight spine like
the Sforzesco or the old Lyon brace but an overcorrected spine with
reverse scoliosis
3 To realize the baby lift or lsquopullrsquo which is an axillary extension
that occurs in the armpits like when wearing a child
Scope
The scope is to achieve all the over-correction in the outer sur-
face of the brace which makes the inner surface smooth without
pads The brace then becomes dynamic with a lsquopullrsquo asymmetry
Torsion
Background
Global Detorsion vs 3 points system (Solid Geometry)
Given the multiplicity of planes the corrections by the 3 points
system only operate in a limited number of planes On the contrary
the ARTbrace works in an overall untwisting
The Global detorsion is performed with a fixed sagittal plane
Axial elongation brings the vertebral bodies near the central axis in
the frontal plane and by untwisting the scoliotic spine between the
pelvis and the shoulder the horizontal plane is corrected So both
geometrical detorsion and mechanical detorsion of the cylinder are
working together
19
18 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T
Mayonnaise Tube Effect
The translation along the vertical axis is a fundamental step of
untwisting The concept of elongation has progressed during the last
century
1 Simple cervical traction against gravity it is more of a stretching
2 With Milwaukee this elongation is between the head and the
pelvis which provides elongation
3 With the Lyon brace elongation occurs between shoulder and
pelvic belts
4 With Boston it is the effect ldquocherry stonerdquo that is privileged
with the idea that correcting the bottom of the column will help to
correct the upper part of the spine
5 Finally with ARTbrace there is a real extrusion by bringing
together the two pieces (hemi-shells)
20 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 21
The principle of the wrench and bolt is to ldquounscrew or untwistrdquo
scoliosis For instance the Checircneau brace uses the principle of pres-
sure and expansion in many precise areas For a double major curve
in the ARTbrace the thoracolumbar area is the fixed point with un-
screwing between this fixed point and the pelvis for lumbar curva-
ture and the shoulder girdle for thoracic curvature For a thoraco-
lumbar curve the fixed points are at the cranial and caudal parts of
the spine and the unscrewing is done at thoracolumbar level The
pelvis is the laquobolt headraquo which is stabilised by a symmetrical pelvic
base like a key Lumbar and thoracic segments above act as a wrench
for the detorsion of scoliosis
The EOS 3D system automatically calculates the rotation for each
vertebral segment The twist (Torsion) is the sum of all the segmental
rotations We can calculate the overall in-brace untwisting
c h a p t e r 4
Principles of ARTbrace
1 PLASTIC DEFORMATION
Some definitions The relationship between the stress
and strain that a material displays is known as that materialrsquos
stressndashstrain curve It is unique for each material and is found by
recording the amount of deformation (strain) at distinct intervals of
tensile or compressive loading (stress)
In physics and materials science plasticity describes the defor-
mation of a (solid) material undergoing non-reversible changes of
shape in response to applied forces for example a solid piece of
metal being bent or pounded into a new shape displays plasticity
as permanent changes occur within the material itself In engineer-
ing the transition from elastic behavior to plastic behavior is called
yield
When an elastic material containing fluid is deformed the return
of the material to its original shape is delayed in time and it is slower
to restore to its original position This is why we ask the patient to
remove the brace two hours before the X-ray
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
12 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 13
The aim is to get not only a straight spine but a reverse torso
shape capture opposite to scoliosis ie overcorrection of the scolio-
sis curvature This overcorrection is possible only if the vertebral
bodies are not distorted Otherwise we favour the correction accen-
tuating the asymmetry of pressure on the vertebral body
The main innovative features are in the acronym of ART
1 A stands for Asymmetry obtained with an overlay of three re-
gional shapes captures
2 R stands for Rigidity (in fact High rigidity) of polycarbonate
3 T stands for Torsion the brace performing a Detorsion of the
scoliotic Torso Column which is a circled helicoid with horizontal
generating circle in opposite direction of the spiral column while fix-
ing the sagittal plane in a physiological position
Asymmetry
Background
Although the effectiveness of bracing for scoliosis is now proved
(level 1) [Weinstein 2013] there are more than twenty types of
braces used worldwide All of them have not shown to be as effective
as the others A recent review found that Asymmetric braces have
led to better corrections than that described for symmetric braces
[Sy 2015] The efficacy of the brace also depends on moulding The
CAD CAM systems and especially those associated with Finite Ele-
ment Simulation [Cobetto 2016] have been proven to be more effec-
tive than the old plaster moulds [Wong 2011]
Symmetrical molding is easier to perform than asymmetric
molding If plaster casting is used the main effect is essentially axial
self-correction with possibly a lumbar shift In all cases the sagittal
curvatures are diminished Checircneau makes the corrections on the
positive plaster but without taking into account the rigidity of each
scoliosis These corrections are difficult if a constant volume is to
14 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 15
be maintained In fact the corrections are operator-dependent and
approximate which explains the use of polyethylene When using
CAD CAM systems It is necessary to differentiate the sensors type
ldquoIpadrdquo with precision of more than 1 cm probably less reliable than
the plaster or systems with raster-stereographie or the sensors with
4 columns almost instantaneous whose precision is of 1 mm Respi-
ratory blocking is then done in an intermediate position for children
and deep inspiration for adults
Aims
The aim of the asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To obtain the maximum asymmetry for each block (Katerina
Schroth block concept) lumbar and thoracic for two curves and
thoraco-lumbar for one curve by superposition of three asymmetric
shape captures codified and reproducible
2 To obtain the maximum precision (less than 1 mm) in the mini-
mum of time (less than 3 seconds) with the use of a professional
sensor This precision is also indispensable if one associates asym-
metry and high rigidity
Scope
The scope is to obtain the maximum in-brace correction by a
precise asymmetry using the new Regional Shape Capture with the
professional 4 column CADCAM
Rigid (very high) Polycarbonate
Background
Even if the old Lyon brace in polymethacrylate was very rigid
the credit for VERY HIGH RIGIDITY goes to the Italian team of
ISICO with the Sforzesco brace which has proven to be effective
by avoiding plaster casts for scoliosis over 45deg The acronym ART
brace (Asymmetrical Rigid Torsion brace) was created by Stefano
Negrini The merit of the ART brace is the addition of overcorrec-
tion to the high rigidity with a global detorsion It is this overcorrec-
tion for small curvatures which explains the average improvement of
the in-brace correction
Polycarbonate characteristics are
bull Transparency
bull Unbreakable (25 stronger than PPMA)
bull Lightweight (4 mm sheet)
bull No bisphenol A
bull Glass transition 147deg-155deg
bull Bending brake till 120deg
bull Insulation Rvalue 143
Aims
16 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 17
The aim of the high rigid asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To replace the plaster cast during the initial plastic deforma-
tion of the Lyon management
2 To improve the comfort in brace thanks to the soft contact
The Soft Contact concept is that of the squeeze attachment for cy-
lindrical hay bales Pressures are spread over the entire cylinder sur-
face this is contrary to the principle of the push and counter-push of
the historical Lyon brace or other three point braces
As usual in the correction of 3D deformities of the scoliotic
spine room should be provided for migration of lateral curvature
rotated vertebrae and breathing exercises In this design actually
various 3-point pressure systems are provided to correct the lateral
curvature and vertebral rotation from different anatomical planes
In the ART brace the shape of the brace is not a straight spine like
the Sforzesco or the old Lyon brace but an overcorrected spine with
reverse scoliosis
3 To realize the baby lift or lsquopullrsquo which is an axillary extension
that occurs in the armpits like when wearing a child
Scope
The scope is to achieve all the over-correction in the outer sur-
face of the brace which makes the inner surface smooth without
pads The brace then becomes dynamic with a lsquopullrsquo asymmetry
Torsion
Background
Global Detorsion vs 3 points system (Solid Geometry)
Given the multiplicity of planes the corrections by the 3 points
system only operate in a limited number of planes On the contrary
the ARTbrace works in an overall untwisting
The Global detorsion is performed with a fixed sagittal plane
Axial elongation brings the vertebral bodies near the central axis in
the frontal plane and by untwisting the scoliotic spine between the
pelvis and the shoulder the horizontal plane is corrected So both
geometrical detorsion and mechanical detorsion of the cylinder are
working together
19
18 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T
Mayonnaise Tube Effect
The translation along the vertical axis is a fundamental step of
untwisting The concept of elongation has progressed during the last
century
1 Simple cervical traction against gravity it is more of a stretching
2 With Milwaukee this elongation is between the head and the
pelvis which provides elongation
3 With the Lyon brace elongation occurs between shoulder and
pelvic belts
4 With Boston it is the effect ldquocherry stonerdquo that is privileged
with the idea that correcting the bottom of the column will help to
correct the upper part of the spine
5 Finally with ARTbrace there is a real extrusion by bringing
together the two pieces (hemi-shells)
20 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 21
The principle of the wrench and bolt is to ldquounscrew or untwistrdquo
scoliosis For instance the Checircneau brace uses the principle of pres-
sure and expansion in many precise areas For a double major curve
in the ARTbrace the thoracolumbar area is the fixed point with un-
screwing between this fixed point and the pelvis for lumbar curva-
ture and the shoulder girdle for thoracic curvature For a thoraco-
lumbar curve the fixed points are at the cranial and caudal parts of
the spine and the unscrewing is done at thoracolumbar level The
pelvis is the laquobolt headraquo which is stabilised by a symmetrical pelvic
base like a key Lumbar and thoracic segments above act as a wrench
for the detorsion of scoliosis
The EOS 3D system automatically calculates the rotation for each
vertebral segment The twist (Torsion) is the sum of all the segmental
rotations We can calculate the overall in-brace untwisting
c h a p t e r 4
Principles of ARTbrace
1 PLASTIC DEFORMATION
Some definitions The relationship between the stress
and strain that a material displays is known as that materialrsquos
stressndashstrain curve It is unique for each material and is found by
recording the amount of deformation (strain) at distinct intervals of
tensile or compressive loading (stress)
In physics and materials science plasticity describes the defor-
mation of a (solid) material undergoing non-reversible changes of
shape in response to applied forces for example a solid piece of
metal being bent or pounded into a new shape displays plasticity
as permanent changes occur within the material itself In engineer-
ing the transition from elastic behavior to plastic behavior is called
yield
When an elastic material containing fluid is deformed the return
of the material to its original shape is delayed in time and it is slower
to restore to its original position This is why we ask the patient to
remove the brace two hours before the X-ray
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
14 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 15
be maintained In fact the corrections are operator-dependent and
approximate which explains the use of polyethylene When using
CAD CAM systems It is necessary to differentiate the sensors type
ldquoIpadrdquo with precision of more than 1 cm probably less reliable than
the plaster or systems with raster-stereographie or the sensors with
4 columns almost instantaneous whose precision is of 1 mm Respi-
ratory blocking is then done in an intermediate position for children
and deep inspiration for adults
Aims
The aim of the asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To obtain the maximum asymmetry for each block (Katerina
Schroth block concept) lumbar and thoracic for two curves and
thoraco-lumbar for one curve by superposition of three asymmetric
shape captures codified and reproducible
2 To obtain the maximum precision (less than 1 mm) in the mini-
mum of time (less than 3 seconds) with the use of a professional
sensor This precision is also indispensable if one associates asym-
metry and high rigidity
Scope
The scope is to obtain the maximum in-brace correction by a
precise asymmetry using the new Regional Shape Capture with the
professional 4 column CADCAM
Rigid (very high) Polycarbonate
Background
Even if the old Lyon brace in polymethacrylate was very rigid
the credit for VERY HIGH RIGIDITY goes to the Italian team of
ISICO with the Sforzesco brace which has proven to be effective
by avoiding plaster casts for scoliosis over 45deg The acronym ART
brace (Asymmetrical Rigid Torsion brace) was created by Stefano
Negrini The merit of the ART brace is the addition of overcorrec-
tion to the high rigidity with a global detorsion It is this overcorrec-
tion for small curvatures which explains the average improvement of
the in-brace correction
Polycarbonate characteristics are
bull Transparency
bull Unbreakable (25 stronger than PPMA)
bull Lightweight (4 mm sheet)
bull No bisphenol A
bull Glass transition 147deg-155deg
bull Bending brake till 120deg
bull Insulation Rvalue 143
Aims
16 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 17
The aim of the high rigid asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To replace the plaster cast during the initial plastic deforma-
tion of the Lyon management
2 To improve the comfort in brace thanks to the soft contact
The Soft Contact concept is that of the squeeze attachment for cy-
lindrical hay bales Pressures are spread over the entire cylinder sur-
face this is contrary to the principle of the push and counter-push of
the historical Lyon brace or other three point braces
As usual in the correction of 3D deformities of the scoliotic
spine room should be provided for migration of lateral curvature
rotated vertebrae and breathing exercises In this design actually
various 3-point pressure systems are provided to correct the lateral
curvature and vertebral rotation from different anatomical planes
In the ART brace the shape of the brace is not a straight spine like
the Sforzesco or the old Lyon brace but an overcorrected spine with
reverse scoliosis
3 To realize the baby lift or lsquopullrsquo which is an axillary extension
that occurs in the armpits like when wearing a child
Scope
The scope is to achieve all the over-correction in the outer sur-
face of the brace which makes the inner surface smooth without
pads The brace then becomes dynamic with a lsquopullrsquo asymmetry
Torsion
Background
Global Detorsion vs 3 points system (Solid Geometry)
Given the multiplicity of planes the corrections by the 3 points
system only operate in a limited number of planes On the contrary
the ARTbrace works in an overall untwisting
The Global detorsion is performed with a fixed sagittal plane
Axial elongation brings the vertebral bodies near the central axis in
the frontal plane and by untwisting the scoliotic spine between the
pelvis and the shoulder the horizontal plane is corrected So both
geometrical detorsion and mechanical detorsion of the cylinder are
working together
19
18 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T
Mayonnaise Tube Effect
The translation along the vertical axis is a fundamental step of
untwisting The concept of elongation has progressed during the last
century
1 Simple cervical traction against gravity it is more of a stretching
2 With Milwaukee this elongation is between the head and the
pelvis which provides elongation
3 With the Lyon brace elongation occurs between shoulder and
pelvic belts
4 With Boston it is the effect ldquocherry stonerdquo that is privileged
with the idea that correcting the bottom of the column will help to
correct the upper part of the spine
5 Finally with ARTbrace there is a real extrusion by bringing
together the two pieces (hemi-shells)
20 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 21
The principle of the wrench and bolt is to ldquounscrew or untwistrdquo
scoliosis For instance the Checircneau brace uses the principle of pres-
sure and expansion in many precise areas For a double major curve
in the ARTbrace the thoracolumbar area is the fixed point with un-
screwing between this fixed point and the pelvis for lumbar curva-
ture and the shoulder girdle for thoracic curvature For a thoraco-
lumbar curve the fixed points are at the cranial and caudal parts of
the spine and the unscrewing is done at thoracolumbar level The
pelvis is the laquobolt headraquo which is stabilised by a symmetrical pelvic
base like a key Lumbar and thoracic segments above act as a wrench
for the detorsion of scoliosis
The EOS 3D system automatically calculates the rotation for each
vertebral segment The twist (Torsion) is the sum of all the segmental
rotations We can calculate the overall in-brace untwisting
c h a p t e r 4
Principles of ARTbrace
1 PLASTIC DEFORMATION
Some definitions The relationship between the stress
and strain that a material displays is known as that materialrsquos
stressndashstrain curve It is unique for each material and is found by
recording the amount of deformation (strain) at distinct intervals of
tensile or compressive loading (stress)
In physics and materials science plasticity describes the defor-
mation of a (solid) material undergoing non-reversible changes of
shape in response to applied forces for example a solid piece of
metal being bent or pounded into a new shape displays plasticity
as permanent changes occur within the material itself In engineer-
ing the transition from elastic behavior to plastic behavior is called
yield
When an elastic material containing fluid is deformed the return
of the material to its original shape is delayed in time and it is slower
to restore to its original position This is why we ask the patient to
remove the brace two hours before the X-ray
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
16 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 17
The aim of the high rigid asymmetrical ARTbrace is
1 To replace the plaster cast during the initial plastic deforma-
tion of the Lyon management
2 To improve the comfort in brace thanks to the soft contact
The Soft Contact concept is that of the squeeze attachment for cy-
lindrical hay bales Pressures are spread over the entire cylinder sur-
face this is contrary to the principle of the push and counter-push of
the historical Lyon brace or other three point braces
As usual in the correction of 3D deformities of the scoliotic
spine room should be provided for migration of lateral curvature
rotated vertebrae and breathing exercises In this design actually
various 3-point pressure systems are provided to correct the lateral
curvature and vertebral rotation from different anatomical planes
In the ART brace the shape of the brace is not a straight spine like
the Sforzesco or the old Lyon brace but an overcorrected spine with
reverse scoliosis
3 To realize the baby lift or lsquopullrsquo which is an axillary extension
that occurs in the armpits like when wearing a child
Scope
The scope is to achieve all the over-correction in the outer sur-
face of the brace which makes the inner surface smooth without
pads The brace then becomes dynamic with a lsquopullrsquo asymmetry
Torsion
Background
Global Detorsion vs 3 points system (Solid Geometry)
Given the multiplicity of planes the corrections by the 3 points
system only operate in a limited number of planes On the contrary
the ARTbrace works in an overall untwisting
The Global detorsion is performed with a fixed sagittal plane
Axial elongation brings the vertebral bodies near the central axis in
the frontal plane and by untwisting the scoliotic spine between the
pelvis and the shoulder the horizontal plane is corrected So both
geometrical detorsion and mechanical detorsion of the cylinder are
working together
19
18 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T
Mayonnaise Tube Effect
The translation along the vertical axis is a fundamental step of
untwisting The concept of elongation has progressed during the last
century
1 Simple cervical traction against gravity it is more of a stretching
2 With Milwaukee this elongation is between the head and the
pelvis which provides elongation
3 With the Lyon brace elongation occurs between shoulder and
pelvic belts
4 With Boston it is the effect ldquocherry stonerdquo that is privileged
with the idea that correcting the bottom of the column will help to
correct the upper part of the spine
5 Finally with ARTbrace there is a real extrusion by bringing
together the two pieces (hemi-shells)
20 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 21
The principle of the wrench and bolt is to ldquounscrew or untwistrdquo
scoliosis For instance the Checircneau brace uses the principle of pres-
sure and expansion in many precise areas For a double major curve
in the ARTbrace the thoracolumbar area is the fixed point with un-
screwing between this fixed point and the pelvis for lumbar curva-
ture and the shoulder girdle for thoracic curvature For a thoraco-
lumbar curve the fixed points are at the cranial and caudal parts of
the spine and the unscrewing is done at thoracolumbar level The
pelvis is the laquobolt headraquo which is stabilised by a symmetrical pelvic
base like a key Lumbar and thoracic segments above act as a wrench
for the detorsion of scoliosis
The EOS 3D system automatically calculates the rotation for each
vertebral segment The twist (Torsion) is the sum of all the segmental
rotations We can calculate the overall in-brace untwisting
c h a p t e r 4
Principles of ARTbrace
1 PLASTIC DEFORMATION
Some definitions The relationship between the stress
and strain that a material displays is known as that materialrsquos
stressndashstrain curve It is unique for each material and is found by
recording the amount of deformation (strain) at distinct intervals of
tensile or compressive loading (stress)
In physics and materials science plasticity describes the defor-
mation of a (solid) material undergoing non-reversible changes of
shape in response to applied forces for example a solid piece of
metal being bent or pounded into a new shape displays plasticity
as permanent changes occur within the material itself In engineer-
ing the transition from elastic behavior to plastic behavior is called
yield
When an elastic material containing fluid is deformed the return
of the material to its original shape is delayed in time and it is slower
to restore to its original position This is why we ask the patient to
remove the brace two hours before the X-ray
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
19
18 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T
Mayonnaise Tube Effect
The translation along the vertical axis is a fundamental step of
untwisting The concept of elongation has progressed during the last
century
1 Simple cervical traction against gravity it is more of a stretching
2 With Milwaukee this elongation is between the head and the
pelvis which provides elongation
3 With the Lyon brace elongation occurs between shoulder and
pelvic belts
4 With Boston it is the effect ldquocherry stonerdquo that is privileged
with the idea that correcting the bottom of the column will help to
correct the upper part of the spine
5 Finally with ARTbrace there is a real extrusion by bringing
together the two pieces (hemi-shells)
20 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 21
The principle of the wrench and bolt is to ldquounscrew or untwistrdquo
scoliosis For instance the Checircneau brace uses the principle of pres-
sure and expansion in many precise areas For a double major curve
in the ARTbrace the thoracolumbar area is the fixed point with un-
screwing between this fixed point and the pelvis for lumbar curva-
ture and the shoulder girdle for thoracic curvature For a thoraco-
lumbar curve the fixed points are at the cranial and caudal parts of
the spine and the unscrewing is done at thoracolumbar level The
pelvis is the laquobolt headraquo which is stabilised by a symmetrical pelvic
base like a key Lumbar and thoracic segments above act as a wrench
for the detorsion of scoliosis
The EOS 3D system automatically calculates the rotation for each
vertebral segment The twist (Torsion) is the sum of all the segmental
rotations We can calculate the overall in-brace untwisting
c h a p t e r 4
Principles of ARTbrace
1 PLASTIC DEFORMATION
Some definitions The relationship between the stress
and strain that a material displays is known as that materialrsquos
stressndashstrain curve It is unique for each material and is found by
recording the amount of deformation (strain) at distinct intervals of
tensile or compressive loading (stress)
In physics and materials science plasticity describes the defor-
mation of a (solid) material undergoing non-reversible changes of
shape in response to applied forces for example a solid piece of
metal being bent or pounded into a new shape displays plasticity
as permanent changes occur within the material itself In engineer-
ing the transition from elastic behavior to plastic behavior is called
yield
When an elastic material containing fluid is deformed the return
of the material to its original shape is delayed in time and it is slower
to restore to its original position This is why we ask the patient to
remove the brace two hours before the X-ray
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
20 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 21
The principle of the wrench and bolt is to ldquounscrew or untwistrdquo
scoliosis For instance the Checircneau brace uses the principle of pres-
sure and expansion in many precise areas For a double major curve
in the ARTbrace the thoracolumbar area is the fixed point with un-
screwing between this fixed point and the pelvis for lumbar curva-
ture and the shoulder girdle for thoracic curvature For a thoraco-
lumbar curve the fixed points are at the cranial and caudal parts of
the spine and the unscrewing is done at thoracolumbar level The
pelvis is the laquobolt headraquo which is stabilised by a symmetrical pelvic
base like a key Lumbar and thoracic segments above act as a wrench
for the detorsion of scoliosis
The EOS 3D system automatically calculates the rotation for each
vertebral segment The twist (Torsion) is the sum of all the segmental
rotations We can calculate the overall in-brace untwisting
c h a p t e r 4
Principles of ARTbrace
1 PLASTIC DEFORMATION
Some definitions The relationship between the stress
and strain that a material displays is known as that materialrsquos
stressndashstrain curve It is unique for each material and is found by
recording the amount of deformation (strain) at distinct intervals of
tensile or compressive loading (stress)
In physics and materials science plasticity describes the defor-
mation of a (solid) material undergoing non-reversible changes of
shape in response to applied forces for example a solid piece of
metal being bent or pounded into a new shape displays plasticity
as permanent changes occur within the material itself In engineer-
ing the transition from elastic behavior to plastic behavior is called
yield
When an elastic material containing fluid is deformed the return
of the material to its original shape is delayed in time and it is slower
to restore to its original position This is why we ask the patient to
remove the brace two hours before the X-ray
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
22 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 23
In materials science creep (sometimes called cold flow) is the
tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently
under the influence of mechanical stresses It can occur after a long-
time exposure to high levels of stress that are still below the yield
strength of the material
So Creep is the time dependent elongation of a tissue when
subjected to a constant stress For scoliosis 4 weeks are needed to
achieve sustainable elongation for a scoliosis under 30deg
The tissue response to load is dependent on 1 Magnitude of
load (quantity of hypercorrection) 2 Duration of load (from 1 to
4 months) 3 Prior loading (physiotherapy) The type of response
should be creep
The viscoelasticity is also a nonlinear system which is observed
in all soft connective tissues One of the characteristic of a visco-
elastic system is the creep which is a definitive modification of the
length of the ligament (plastic deformation vs elastic deformation)
Creep is obtained maintaining a continuous load of the structure
The tissue elongated rapidly at first and then continues to elongate
more slowly (This property may be used in the treatment of defor-
mities of the skeleton such as clubfoot or scoliosis where a constant
load with a plaster cast may be arranged to cause creep of the tissue
in the appropriate direction
From the 3rd week remodeling can be obtained The collagen
fibers gradually realign themselves to conform with the original
structure Clinically a minimum of 3 weeks of immobilisation are
necessary
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
24 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 25
Another example of creep can be provided by animal testing
This experience dates from the time of lateral electrical stimulation
of scoliosis If the spine of a rat is maintained for 5 weeks in lateral
bending a definitive structural scoliosis will be obtained
The initial full time and the in-brace over-correction allow the
plastic deformation which will restore the tensegrity of the spine
2TENSEGRITY RESTORATION
Tensegrity is a nonlinear concept of spine biomechanics
This concept of tensegrity completes the traditional physi-
ological concept against gravity developed by Newton
The name of ldquotensegrityrdquo was created by an architect Buckmin-
ster Fuumlller The Definition is ldquoIn biomechanics the tensegrity is the
property of the objects which components use tension and compres-
sion in order that strength and resistance are higher than the addi-
tion of its components Therefore muscles and bones act together
to be strongerrdquo
The tensegrity is a characteristic of terrestrial vertebrates Due to
gravity the initially functional frontal plane in aquatic environment
became sagittal Aquatic mammals as whales and dolphins which are
probably back in the water after a land phase have maintained this
sagittal function plane
Tensegrity is probably at the origin of bipedalism as we see since
the Rhesus monkey the transformation of ilio-lumbar muscles in
strong ligaments The vertebral column is not only made of piled
cubes but is a system with ligaments under tension like a ship The
muscle fascia is organized into chains that will cross at the thoraco-
lumbar junction for the frontal chains and at the pelvis for the sagit-
tal chains
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
26 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 27
Homo sapiens is the only one with a pubertal growth of about
25 cm of growth on the spine Quadruped vertebrates grow linearly
The growth plate is located at the vertebral body This growth is lim-
ited by paravertebral ligaments except in Marfanrsquos syndrome These
patients have a decrease in curvatures in the sagittal plane and a
thoracolumbar kyphosis We can say that the pubertal growth is the
primum movens of tensegrity and curvatures in the sagittal plane
Thanks to the tensegrity spine acquires an omnidirectional func-
tion allowing the practice of sports at a high level The maximum
tensegrity phase is between 15 and 35 years which is the great peri-
od of sports activity We will see the main characteristics of tenseg-
rity 1 The basic triangle structure which offers a best stability 2
The nonlinearity with rigid bone structure in discontinuous com-
pression and ligaments always in continuous tension 3 A Nonlinear
system means that a little modification of length (some mm) can
increase a lot strength and resistance of the whole system
The basic structure is the triangle which offers a best stability In
fact the paravertebral muscle structure as deep as superficial has a
triangular structure The posterior arch has also a triangular struc-
ture with transverse apophysis and median spinous apophysis The
muscular chains are working diagonally and in spiral
The intervertebral disc is also a structure of tensegrity with the
nucleus in compression and the annulus fibrosus in tension The ori-
entation of the concentric lamels of the annulus in reversed layer and
30deg inclined from the horizontal is a characteristic of the tensegrity
The maximum stability is obtained with a minimum of material
The pressure is distributed over the entire volume as the canvas of a
tent or a bicycle wheel If one of the rays doesnrsquot have a good tension
the wheel will be bent
Many muscles act as tensors and increase the resistance of the
whole spine The yellow ligament called this way because of its main
component elastin is the elastic of the spine A bad healing can ex-
plain an instability after surgery The objective of the Lyon brace
is to tighten and rebalance tension by straightening the main mast
which is the spine
The tensegrity principle is universal When the nucleus of the
carbon is organized in an icosahedral structure The graphite turns
into a diamond
The matrix has also an interconnected structure Stress is ab-
sorbed by the core and produces a reaction of molecular rigidity due
to the increase of the tension
The concept of tensegrity explains the role of the plastic defor-
mation which realizes a real ligament lengthening at the concavity
level Four weeksrsquo minimum of continuous tension are necessary
to obtain a lengthening of the ligament otherwise the ligament re-
mains at the elasticity level Another important consequence of high
rigidity is the discontinuous pressure during breathing and move-
ment on the thoracic cage This discontinuous pressure on the bone
structure is the same as tensegrity
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
28 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 29
So we have a new pattern of the spine It is the soft tissues around
the spine under an appropriate tension which maintain and can lift
all the spine The spine is no longer a column a pile of vertebrae but
a tensegrity structure The paravertebral ligaments are always in ten-
sion when the spine is at rest The length of the paravertebral mus-
cles at rest is such that they are always under tension The vertebrae
and the discs are in discontinuous compression The 206 bones are
working in discontinuous compression they are lifted in the gravity
field by the continuous tension of muscles fasciae and ligaments
A tensegrity structure works if all vertebral segments are inde-
pendent Physical therapy and manual medicine will compensate the
stiffness associated with scoliosis but also with the plaster cast and
the brace
On the contrary surgery removes segmental motion The col-
umn will be rectified but tensegrity and omni directionality of the
fused spine is lost
33D COUPLED MOTION OF THE SPINE
The correction during the regional shape capture is done
only in 2 planes frontal and sagittal It is the restoration of
the lumbar lordosis and the sagittal kyphosis which allows a good
alignment of the posterior joints and a mechanical derotation in the
horizontal plane (Laws of Penjabi and Fryette)
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221116720
Bangalore 2017
3D nature of scoliosis
Usually conventional braces with 3 points systems decrease lor-dosis and thoracic kyphosis Untwisting the spine with ARTbrace is
done maintaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane1 Indeed the
screw is not straight but curved However curving the screwdriver
is useless The new solution is the shape capture in frontal bending
which respects lordosis and kyphosis and allows untwisting whilst
retaining the curvatures in the sagittal plane The spine in the sagit-
tal plane is fixed as physiologically as possible Only the frontal and
horizontal planes are mobile
4 4D Global correction of the ARTbrace
The mechanical action of the ART brace is carried out
bull Along the vertical axis of the spine In the three sag-
ittal frontal and horizontal planes of the spine In the ART brace
the reference plane is the horizontal plane at the thoraco-lumbar
1 SOSORT guileline ldquoIt is recommended that the brace proposed for treating a scoliotic de-formity on the frontal and horizontal planes should take into account the sagittal plane as much as possible
ldquo
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 31
junction The anterior and posterior muscle chains in the frontal
plane intersect at this level The middle brace closure with ratchet-
ing buckle must be strict The elongation along the axis of the spine
is carried out during the first shape capture The spring effect moves
the apical vertebrae near the spinal axis This is the correction of the
internal geometric vertebral torsion
bull This classical elongation in braces such as the Milwaukee
brace has the disadvantage of reducing the curvatures also in the
sagittal plane Segmental shape captureings in the lumbar and tho-
racic areas overcome this disadvantage and reproduce physiological
curvatures in the fixed sagittal plane
The correction in the horizontal plane is on the whole external
surface of the trunk (mechanical detorsion)
In the case of a double curvature there is a first untwisting be-
tween the pelvis and the reference thoraco-lumbar plane and a sec-
ond untwisting between the reference plane and the shoulder girdle
The correction in the frontal plane is also exerted on the en-
tire external surface of the trunk It is the shift that is achieved with
shape captureings 2 and 3 which allows this correction The transla-
tion is at the apical vertebra level and not below as in the old Lyon
brace For a single thoraco-lumbar curve it is the reference thoraco-
lumbar plane which ensures derotation of the entire trunk between
both pelvic and scapular planes The lever arm is more important
and the curve is therefore better corrected In the frontal plane it is
also the reference thoraco-lumbar plane that will translate between
both scapular and pelvic girdles Lumbar and thoracic shifts take
place in the same direction
The 4D global correction of ARTbrace occurs during the day
and the movement is obtained by balancing among both frontal and
horizontal anatomical planes The inversion of the curvatures auto-
matically creates an expansion in the concavity that allows the 4th
dynamical dimension ie Contact during movement and breathing
5 THE BEST OR NOTHING
The guidelines Ndeg 16 of SOSORT can be confusing ldquoIt is
recommended to use the least invasive brace in relation to the
clinical situation provided the same effectiveness to reduce the psy-
chological impact and to ensure better patient compliancerdquo More rigid
does not mean more invasive The strategy of ldquostep by steprdquo ie a
less corrective brace for a small angulation and a very rigid brace for
a larger angulation is not used in current practice of Lyon manage-
ment The risk of failure culture with progression to braces more and
more rigid is often misperceived by children and parents The use of
the brace immediately the most effective with partial time wearing
was preferred For the same effectiveness the psychological impact
is reduced by partial time wearing and compliance is improved
httpsplayervimeocomvideo165402830
Global presentation of the ARTbrace
httpsplayervimeocomvideo189261747
APOSM 2016 3D Correction of the ARTbrace
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
32 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 33
c h a p t e r 5
Brace prescription
The goal of the Lyon bracing management is to allow non-
operative treatment of scoliosis by preventing progres-
sion of the scoliosis in the growing child A better under-
standing of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis has refined
the indications for brace treatment Brace treatment begins when
the probability of the progression of scoliosis is high The patient
with a mild curve near the completion of growth is unlikely to have
further progression of the scoliosis and probably does not benefit
from wearing a brace
Chaotic amp Linear Scoliosis
Below 20deg scoliosis is more often a deviation which can be re-
versible For now it is impossible to predict the evolution This stage
is called chaotic scoliosis Beyond 20deg-25deg there is a structural de-
formation during growth which will cause the vicious circle of sco-liosis described by Ian Stokes
The linear evolution of the scoliosis has been described by Ms
Duval Beaupegravere To avoid over treatment we do not brace in chaotic
phase
The preadolescent with a moderate scoliosis (curvature gt30deg) is
at significant risk concerning the progression of the scoliosis and
may derive a great benefit from wearing a brace (Virtuous Bone circle)
The adolescent with a 45-degree curvature and growth remaining
may achieve curve control with bracing or can be served by surgical
treatment In general for the adolescent with a curvature of 25-45deg
degrees and growth remaining Lyon bracing management is indi-
cated and will stop progression of the curvature in 55 of patients
it will improve curvature in 35 and curve progression will continue
in spite of bracing in 10 Bracing large curves in the younger child
may delay surgery and allow further spinal growth before fusion In
juvenile idiopathic scoliosis brace wear is initiated when the curva-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
34 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 35
ture exceeds 20deg In the adolescent or late onset idiopathic scoliosis
the following guidelines are suggested by SRS
Approximate guidelines for brace treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Juvenile curves should
be braced much earlier- probably if over 20deg)
0deg - 20deg Observe for progression20deg - 25deg Brace if substantial progression documented25deg - 30deg Brace if progressive and growth remains30deg - 40deg Brace if less than 1 year after end of growth 40deg - 45deg Brace If less than 2 years after end of growthgt 45deg If family refutes surgery
Curve Location
The Lyon brace makes it possible to treat all curves except pri-
mary high thoracic curves for which we advise the use of the or-
thotic device of Milwaukee Fortunately this pattern of scoliosis is
less evolutive than others
Hypokyphosis and Thoracic Lordosis
The restoration of thoracic kyphosis requires
- The stability of the lumbar spine in lordosis
- The anterior xiphoidian stop
- Bending of the posterior and anterior bars
Contra indications to bracing
1 Severe thoracic lordosis (thoracic kyphosis lt 0deg) is a contrain-
dication to brace All braces that apply transverse forces with pos-
terolateral push on the spine via a rib articulation may worsen the
lordotic spine Surgical Treatment is recommended for progressive
curves with true thoracic lordosis
2 No participation from patient and family The Lyon brace re-
mains an elitist treatment When the child and his family accept the
plaster cast or ART full time (in approximately two thirds of the
cases) the part time bracing which follows will be well accepted It
appears useless to us to spend money for a brace not to be worn and
when the scoliosis evolves it is better to consider surgical treatment
3 Morbid obesity may make effective bracing for scoliosis im-
possible The brace is designed to grip the pelvis bony prominences
and large amount of growth remains otherwise observe (night time
bracing)
4 Psychological Reaction
5 In-brace reducibility lt20
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221173809
Bangalore 2017
Kyphosis - Clinical amp Radiological Assessement
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
36 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 37
c h a p t e r 6
Regional Shape Capture
Biomechanical Basis Coupled Movement
The biomechanical basis according to Panjabi is the cou-pled motion behaviour of the spine The shape captureing is
2D but the correction is 3D
The direction of rotation may differ depending on the incurva-
tion of the spine in the sagittal plane When there is a flat back the
initial scoliotic rotation may be increased by the correction in the
frontal plane Restitution of physiological curves in the sagittal plane
seems to decrease the scoliosis rotation (Harrison Fryettersquos laws)
Principle I When the spine is in a neutral position sidebending
to one side will be accompanied by horizontal rotation to the op-
posite side
Principle II When the spine is in a flexed or extended position
(non-neutral) sidebending to one side will be accompanied by rota-
tion to the same side
Although these laws have not been described in the context of
scoliosis we often see an accentuation of the rotation during pre-surgical bendings in supine position
Specific Device with Visual Control of Alignment
Today the majority of the CAD CAM moldings are carried out
using the ldquoStructure Sensorrdquo adapted especially on the ipad The
precision of this sensor is of the order of 1 cm insofar as the circle
described around the child is perfect and especially that the child
does not move during the 15 seconds necessary to complete this
circle Such inaccuracy is not suitable for the very high rigidity of
the polycarbonate
To obtain a torso column on the opposite side of the scoliosis the
superposition of three electronic instantaneous full 3D shape captu-
reings is necessary These shape captureings were made with the full
3D instantaneous raster stereography digitiser Orten Markers are
placed on the optical jersey
bull On the front at the upper and lower part of the sternum and
at the antero-superior iliac spine
bull On the back on a point on each vertebral spinous process
A visually monitored control with a posterior and profile view is
mandatory to obtain the ideal posture and bench marks on the opti-
cal jersey facilitate the reconstruction
Sagittalometer Assessment
The basic use of sagittalometer is the calculation of the pelvic in-cidence Pelvic incidence is a constitutional factor and does not vary
according to the movements in the sagittal plane
Depending on the angle of pelvic incidence sagittalometer in-
dicates the theoretical value of the sacral slope (shape capture 1)
lordosis (shape capture 2) and kyphosis (shape capture 3)
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
38 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 39
1st shape capture (self-elongation amp pelvic tilt modificator )
The First shape capture is performed in self active axial elonga-
tion from the pelvis to the shoulders Pelvic version and harmony of
curvatures in the sagittal plane are monitored carefully but without
trying to correct them
2nd shape capture (lumbar shift and lordosis modificator)
The second shape capture is performed in lumbar shift and
physiological lordosis for the lumbar spine On the concave side the
axillary-trochanter line is vertical
3rd shape capture (thoracic bending and kyphosis modificator)
The third shape capture is performed in thoracic shift and physi-
ological kyphosis for the thoracic spine On the concave side the ax-
illary-trochanter line is vertical To improve the high thoracic shift
the hand is placed on the head which bows towards the concavity
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
40 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 41
httpsplayervimeocomvideo164001004
Reacutegional shape capture -
case 682
c h a p t e r 7
Brace construction
Modelling of the trunk shape with shapes overlay
These modifications are made using the software
OrtenShape In the frontal plane shape capture 2 is su-perimposed on shape capture 1 then shape captureing 3
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
42 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 43
Similarly in the sagittal plane the second shape captureing is
superposed on the first one then on the third shape captureing
Changes are made at constant volume and detorsion which is a result
of both corrections in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane
The ARTbrace is constructed with 2 rigid asymmetrical lateral
pieces of polycarbonate They are connected posteriorly at the mid-
line by a duraluminium bar like the historical Lyon brace
All metal parts are similar to those of the old Lyon brace Both
anterior and lower ratcheting buckles are rigid the upper third is
Velcro The brace is not in complete contact with the body there is
an expansion in the concavity which is there to allow room for the
bodyrsquos expansion during inhalation
Specific design and curve pattern
A specific classification is not used indeed most classifications
were developed for surgery For bracing a specific classification was
developed by Rigo for the specific needs of the RSC brace
bull For the ARTbrace the sagittal plane pelvic tilt and axial
balance are strictly controlled The only modifications concern the
frontal plane
bull For a single thoracic curve the second shape captureing is
used only if the lordosis of the first shape captureing is incorrect and
if this is the case we do not need the frontal shift
bull For a single thoraco-lumbar curve both thoracic and lumbar
shifts will be made in the same direction
bull For a double curve the horizontal plane of overlay is at the
level of the transitional vertebra usually at the lumbosacral junction
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
44 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 45
bull For a double thoracic curve we give priority to the main rib
hump mainly the lower curve and in this case the plastazote pad
will be used to control the upper curve
If the shoulders are unbalanced it is also possible to make the
upper end of the brace asymmetric at the axillary level like the his-
torical Lyon brace
No specific segmental derotation is required as the ARTbrace
causes a global helical untwisting
THE SPECIAL CASE OF INFANTILE SCOLIOSIS
The ARTbrace was created to replace the plaster cast in the Lyon
management for AIS It was therefore tempting to use it to replace
the serial casting for infantile scoliosis Infantile scoliosis are rare
and a study of two cases is the most useful to illustrate the prob-
lems infantile scoliosis might cause The first problem has been the
miniaturisation of the brace with a use of a 3mm polycarbonate
The posterior metal bar was reduced in proportion so as the ante-
rior closures The second problem is the impossibility of achieving
the regional shape captureing for children under 3 years which can-
not maintain asymmetric postures The problem is solved by using
the mirror technique The first shape captureing is realised in pas-
sive axial elongation meaning reducing the curvature by pulling the
child by the upper limbs During the superimposing step we invert
the image creating a reverse torsion of the initial scoliosis Thus a
major expansion in the concavity is performed for asymmetrical
correction of scoliosis and breathing
The story of Olympe
Early Onset Scoliosis was discovered at the age of 2 years with
a right thoracolumbar curve At the age of 3 years the curve is 30deg
Olympe was not compliant with the first Milwaukee that was quickly
replaced by an asymmetrical polyethylene TLSO well-worn during 3
years Despite bracing the scoliosis is still progressing to 42deg with-
out brace and in-brace correction is 25deg At 8 years old it was pos-
sible to achieve the classic regional shape captureing in 3 steps The
in-brace correction is complete at 5deg At the six months follow-up
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
46 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 47
the angulation without a brace is 17deg a little better than under the
TLSO Olympe prefers the polycarbonate
The story of Adele
Adele two and a half years old lives in a North West town of
France At the age of three months her left infantile scoliosis is dis-
covered Her Scoliosis is highly progressive because the curve T6-
T12 reaches 95deg on May 31 2015 A serial casting from May to July
was realised and then a TLSO brace adapted MD and CPO are doing
their best but the correction is limited to 60deg The CADCAM Mir-
ror technique was used The in-brace angulation is reduced at 36deg
(62) the child is well balanced in the frontal plane and the kypho-
sis is corrected in the sagittal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221149859
Untill now there were not many alterna-
tives to sequential and repetitive surgery
for infantile scoliosis The 3mm polycar-
bonate seems to be able to replace the
Min Mehtarsquos serial casting and the poly-
ethylene TLSO
By comparing the results obtained in the same infantile scoliosis
by a conventional TLSO and the ART it is possible to better appreci-
ate the technology differences In both cases the results seem to be
better for the 3mm polycarbonate
ADULT SCOLIOSIS
Scoliosis is a major demographic health issue in the adult popula-
tion with pain imbalance and angular curve progression In a series
of 158 adult scoliosis treated by classical polyethylene brace and re-
viewed on average 8 years after the start of treatment the natural
angular evolution of scoliosis is halted in 80 of cases However
it appears that current braces fail to stop the kyphotic evolution of
adult scoliosis and justifies the improvement of existing braces As
the high rigidity of the ART 4 mm polycarbonate is better tolerated
by children than the conventional polyethylene it was logical to use
the new concepts of ldquobaby liftrdquo and overall untwisting for adults The
first encouraging results justify this presentation especially as there
is to date no other solution As with adolescent scoliosis we use
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
48 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 49
the regional shape captureing The third shape capture is made in
maximal inspiration because the expansion in the concavity is lower
than for children The visual control of the instantaneous 3D scan
allows a perfect alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane The su-
perposition of the three shape captureings is carried out by the spe-
cific OrtenShape software The usual wearing protocol of the brace
is of 4 hours a day As adult patients are evolving in kyphosis the
posterior axillary support is lower than for children Similarly the
anterior abdominal expansion due to the restoration of lordosis im-
proves tolerance An ARTbrace was performed in 32 adult patients
from February to November 2015 Although there are difficulties
for the camptocormia all patients appreciate the anterior closing by
the ratcheting buckle of the ART One of our patients passing from
polyethylene to polycarbonate sums up the situation ldquoBefore I car-
ried the brace now the brace carries merdquo
Our first case is a lady born in April 1931 She has a thoraco-lum-
bar scoliosis (T11-L3 52deg) and especially a high thoracic kyphosis of
88deg with significant walking difficulties The result is kyphosis in-
brace correction at 48deg and scoliosis at 38deg Unfortunately the brace
is worn less than 4 hours per day as she has leukaemia
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221922316
Our second case is an aging patient treated by the former poly-
ethylene bivalve brace with sterno clavicular support She presents
a scoliosis T5-T12 80deg T12-L4 60deg Since an accident in 2013 the
former brace is no longer suitable A hip flexion and a pelvic retro-
version are compensating partially the high thoracic kyphosis The
ART adult is completed in March 2015 From the beginning twist-
ing sensation disappears less lumbar pain she is able to climb three
floors without breathlessness At the 6-month follow up the brace
is worn every morning is very well tolerated and the high thoracic kyphosis is improving at 45deg
In conclusion the adult ARTbrace has the advantage of correct-
ing scoliosis as well as kyphosis The lateral thoracic support is better
tolerated than the sternoclavicular support of a sagittal 3 points sys-
tem The anterior closure is a benefit to patients The absence of ab-
dominal compression limits the bladder and digestive complications
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
50 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 51
MANUFACTURING
httpsplayervimeocomvideo154408259
FITTING AND FABRICATION OF THE ARTBRACE
Trim Lines
The anterior space between the two pieces is about 2 cm
The cutting at the breast level is wide to avoid compression
The anterior inferior cutting is higher than for the old Lyon brace
It is at the level of the Antero-Superior Iliac apophysis
The posterior cutting allows the opening of the brace like a book
However the opening is always partial because the two hinges are
not in the same frontal plane The cutting is wider in the concavity ie in the opposite direction of scoliosis which facilitated the opening
and allows some manual control for the physiotherapist
The posterior-inferior cutting is at the level of the acetabular roof
The posterior-superior cutting is very high especially in case of
flat back
From a lateral view the axillary line is inclined from 10deg to 20deg
on the horizontal the posterior part being higher than the anterior
c h a p t e r 8
Management of the patient with ARTBrace
How to check the braceClinically the height of the child in brace is measured
because the gain in height is an average of 158 cm due
to the untwisting of the spine This is an excellent clinical indicator
of the effectiveness of the brace In the sagittal plane alignment of
Tragus ndash Acromion - Trochanter - Ankles is checked
Frontal and sagittal X rays are performed 3 to 4 days after fitting
the brace with the ultra-low dose EOS system which also allows a 3D
reconstruction if necessary
The metal bar must be vertical in the frontal plane and the C7
axis well balanced
Adjusting the brace is made in the supine position The middle
ratcheting buckle is checked at the chondro-costal level The tighten-
ing of the lower ratchet closure does not compress the abdomen but
stabilizes trochanters Upper Velcro closure must be tight enough to
prevent the tingling in the upper limbs
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
52 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 53
It is always possible to add on a plastazote pad inside the polycar-
bonate but in practice this is an exception Indications of the sitting
posture are given with feet behind the chair buttocks in front of the
seat polycarbonate touching the edge of the table and forearms on
the table
In the ARTbrace the fixed point is the lower part of the thorax
at the thoracolumbar junction The dynamic movement of the poste-
rior part of the spine is better in this posture It is the fourth dimen-
sion of the brace The child will relax in the listening posture on the
back of the chair Alternating these two extreme postures seems to
be more dynamic
Follow-up and Management
1 - First initial Control 6 months after the end of full time
Curve STABLE --gt Decrease during the day by
blocks of 4 hours
Curve UNSTABLE (elasticity of
more than 10deg)
--gt No Change
Curve Worsening of more than
5deg
--gt No change + 1 month full
time every year
2 - Next Control every 6 months
Same protocol till reaching 8 h24 = Night time
How to determine the weaning time
The Risser test is not a very good test when the brace regularly
presses on the iliac crest We use more simply the measurement
of standing height barefoot When the size no longer changes the
weaning time depends on the maximum reached by the scoliosis
angle
1 Below 30deg Removal at the end of linear growth
2 Between 30deg and 40deg Removal 1 year after the end of growth
in stature
3 For more than 40deg Removal 18 months after the end of
growth in stature A 6 months test ab-
lation during the summer is then pro-
grammed In general at the end of the
school year in June for Europe (heat)
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
54 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 55
The child is followed in January of the following year If the elas-
ticity is below 10deg we confirm the final ablation If the elasticity
is greater than 10deg a recovery of the brace during night time for a
further 6 months may be considered
Physical therapy management (PSSE)
Physiotherapy has remained the same but the brace asymmetry
and preparation for segmental shape captureing are closer to asym-
metric methods and probably the current protocol will be adapted
in the future
httpsplayervimeocomvideo221152755
Bangalore 2017
Lyon Method PSSE
c h a p t e r 9
Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
Protocol and every day usage Initial Full Time
Similarly to the plaster cast the total time is advised with
weaning of a maximum of 10 minutes allowed for a shower
Unlike clubfoot treated by serial casting according to the Ponseti
method there is little data in the literature regarding the time re-
quired to achieve a creep of the concavity in scoliosis
The Lyon experience is as follows below 30deg scoliosis the total
time is 1 month The time required is two months for scoliosis be-
tween 30deg and 39deg and 4 months for scoliosis of more than 40deg
Indeed continuous stretching for more than 3 weeks is neces-
sary to permanently change the length of a ligament (creep) as for
an ankle sprain If the brace is removed for more than one hour
the viscoelastic structures return to their original length with only
elasticity
Physiotherapy is essential throughout the total time period it is
identical to that which was recommended with the plaster cast
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
56 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 57
Sport is permitted with the brace and even recommended to bet-
ter adjust the tension of the muscle chains When the paraspinal
musculature is active it creates a pre-stressed beam along the spine
which protects the vertebral body from collapsing
Protocol and every day usage Partial Time
The protocol of brace wearing is precised during the first consul-
tation according to the angulation of the curves and is confirmed if
the in-brace reducibility is more than 50
The brace wearing time can be increased if the reducibility is less
than 50
When the patient is seen six months after the full time wearing
it is possible to appreciate scoliotic elasticity (difference between
in-brace angulation and Cobb angle without a brace at 6 months)
When the elasticity is less than 10deg the protocol provides a decreas-
ing of the wearing time of further 4 hours during the day When
the elasticity is greater than 10deg the same protocol is maintained
or exceptionally the wearing time is increased We proceed in the
same way to the next check until the last step which is the night time
wearing
Practice of sport The weaning is authorised without any time limitation for the
practice of sport
Generally we advise the sports favouring the tonification of the
muscular ligamentar paravertebral structure during puberty growth
such as swimming climbing From the first period and when the
body is fully developed
When the body is fully developed we advise high impact sports
such as running dance to favour the fixation of the calcium on the
bone and the constitution of an important bony mass
In a specific way when the ribs are asymmetric we recommend to
avoid deep and quick inhalation which favours the vertebral rotation
and therefore the breathlessness during the practice of sports
For lumbar curves we advise as well against the quick flexions of the trunk forward or the position extending with an anterior flex-
ion of the trunk
Body cares
Perfumes and chemical colourings have to be avoided and use a
neutral soap or alcohol is better The undershirt under the brace is in
cotton long enough to cover the pelvis and if possible seamless like a
T shirt In France 8 under shirts like the one described are delivered
with the brace
Alimentation
The straightening up of a scoliosis can modify the oesophagus
gastric passing through the diaphragm
The inflation of the stomach has to be reduced by spreading
meals throughout and avoiding all fizzy drinks
Sitting position
We have to dissociate the laquo listening raquo sitting position feet for-
ward ischion behind the bottom and back against the dorsal sup-
port from the ldquowritingrdquo sitting position feet backwards ischion in
front of the bottom brace against the anterior edge of the counter
the two forearms lying on the desk
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
58 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 59
At night
The mattress has to be thick a little pillow stabilizing the cervical
spine If the patient complains of a superior member dysaesthesia
we have to use a second pillow to move aside the arm in abduction
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222068368
ART Spirometry
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222069112
ART Quality of Life
c h a p t e r 1 0
Results amp discussion
Methods
Study design
This is a prospective controlled cohort observational study based
on ongoing database (from 1998) including 544 patients with AIS
treated thanks to the ARTbrace from May 2013 to November 2015
A historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis
treated with the old Lyon brace management was used for compara-
tive purposes These are the last 100 patients treated before May
2013 only primary curves were selected lumbar curves Lenke 5 are
excluded as they are treated with the short GTB brace
Protocol
Brace checking is performed 3-4 days after brace delivery with
ultra-low dose EOS system
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis has been conducted with SPSS v20 For
all variables normality of data was ascertained by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnovrsquos test All analyses were performed according to the inten-
tion-to-treat principle All tests were two-sided with significance set
at p lt 005 Results are presented as mean plusmn standard deviation (SD)
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
60 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 61
To measure the effectiveness of a brace two main factors can be
involved
1 The immediate in-brace reduction depending how to get the
three-dimensional correction and its reproducibility
2 The patientrsquos adherence (compliance) which depends on aes-
thetics and tolerance
In-brace Correction for the 141 first patients with SRS criteria
All 141 patients was reviewed at the control no drop out
The mean age was 1292 years (SD=139 range 10ndash15) 125 pa-
tients are female (887 )
n = 141 Cobb init In-brace correction
Thoracic (98) 3033deg plusmn 46 1004deg plusmn 72 677 plusmn 212
Lumbar (75) 2861deg plusmn 41 636deg plusmn 65 788 plusmn 213
Total (141) 2962deg plusmn 46 845deg plusmn 71 725 plusmn 219
A Spearmanrsquos rank-order correlation was run to determine the
relationship between initial thoracic angulation and in-brace cor-
rection (Percent) There was a strong positive correlation between
initial and in-brace correction which was statistically significant (r
= -339 p = 001)
There was also a strong positive correlation between initial and
in-brace correction for lumbar curves which was statistically signifi-
cant (r = -296 p = 001)
For the BrAIST study average in-brace correction was 33
(n=152 range -48 to 100 )
Sagittal Correction
The radiological follow-up of old Lyon braces was performed
without lateral X-ray and therefore it is not possible to make a sta-
tistical comparison But thanks to the use of the micro dose EOS
system a systematic sagittal analysis was possible for the main group
of patients (ARTbrace)
In a previous study we showed that the average thoracic kypho-
sis angle with the upper limit T4 was 37deg For this study we set the
cut off at 30deg for hypokyphosis or flat back
The results are the subject of a separate presentation we can sum-
marise in the following table
T4-T12lt30deg Cobb init In-brace 1 year
73148 (494) 196deg plusmn 68 2845deg plusmn 58
50 1858 plusmn 66 2806 plusmn 545 2715 plusmn 54
The in-brace improvement is 9deg (rate 50 ) and very significant
(p = 0000) and without brace at the last 1 year follow up the im-
provement rate is 46 (p = 0000) There was no statistical differ-
ence between the in-brace group and 1 year after when not wearing
a brace (p = 0289) The in-brace improvement is therefore main-
tained at the 1 year follow up when the brace is off
38 of patients showed an improvement of 10deg or more 36 of
patients showed an improvement between 5deg and 9deg 26 of cases
with stability no back flat worsened
Progressive Improvement in 1 year
Cosmetic Results at 1 year
The aesthetic results were evaluated at 1 year comparing them
with those obtained by the former Lyon protocol The improvement
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
62 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 63
in ARTbrace is statistically significant They were evaluated at T0
(initial) and T2 (1 year monitoring) for the rib hump and ATR (an-
gle of trunk rotation)
End Treatment Results at Weaning for the first 73 patients
The dropout rate calculated for the first 125 patients is 14
The mean age is 1444 years (SD=132 range 10ndash17) 62 patients
are female (85 )
Cobb Init In-brace Weaning
2684deg plusmn 71 619deg plusmn 83 (794 plusmn 266)
1889deg plusmn 94 (530 plusmn 256)
Out of 100 curvatures (45 thoracic and 55 lumbar) no curvature
is worsened by more than 5deg 17 are stable and 83 have an improve-
ment of more than 5deg
Correlations
There is a negative correlation between initial angulation and end
treatment percent correction r=-0414 n=43 p=0001 for thoracic
curves and less r=-0292 n=53 p=0034 for lumbar curves
There is a strong positive correlation between in-brace correc-
tion rate and end treatment correction rate r=0684 n=43 p=0000
for thoracic curves and r=0596 n=53 p=0000 for lumbar curves
In our experience the weaning results are very close to those 2
years after weaning and can be considered as significant Patients
are a little older (144 vs 134) and with lower initial angulation than
in the general statistics (2684 vs 2961) The in-brace reduction is
greater (794 vs 694) which explains the outstanding weaning
correction rate (50 vs 25 for the old Lyon brace)
CONCLUSION
For the same indications and with the same management prin-
ciples we can confirm that
1 The early treatment with low angle
2 The quality of immediate in-brace correction
is fundamental to a successful outcome
Discussion
Castro studying a prospective cohort of 41 AIS concludes that
the brace treatment is not recommended with patients whose cor-
rection is less than 020 in TLSO
Appelgreen in an article detailing measurement of the Cobb
angle from the end vertebra in 121 AIS concludes that an average
in-brace correction of 030 gives hope a correction at the end of
treatment
Landauer studying the predictive criteria of conservative treat-
ment results in the first 6 months of treatment wrote that compli-
ant patients who have a high initial correction greater than 040 can
expect a final reduction of about 7deg and bad compliance is always
associated with curve progression
Wong comparing the results of the electronic shape capture of
20 patients versus the traditional plaster shape captureing of 20 oth-
er patients noted an improvement in the in-brace reduction from
032 to 042 in support of CADCAM shape captureing
Bullmann presenting the prospective results of 52 patients treat-
ed with the Checircneau-Toulouse-Muumlnster brace with curves between
25deg and 40deg estimated the in-brace correction at 043 There was a
positive correlation between flexibility and Cobb angle correction
during brace treatment and a negative correlation between Cobb
angle correction during brace treatment and curve progression
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
64 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 65
In the sagittal plane the correction obtained in the flat back is
unique today Indeed most authors consider that the correction in
the frontal plane is related to axial stretching accentuating the flat
back With the ARTbrace there is certainly an extension but the
main part of the correction is made by unscrewing or untwisting the
spine with translation of the vertebral bodies near the midline
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222022211
Bangalore 2017
ART Results in the Frontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222070293
ART Results in the horizontal plane
httpsplayervimeocomvideo222030310
ART Results in the Sagittal
plane
c h a p t e r 1 1
Conclusion
After more than four years using the ARTbrace we can sum-
marise some improvements (in alphabetical order)
4D action hypercorrection action in the frontal and horizontal
planes during breathing and motion
Aesthetics the brace is transparent almost invisible under cloth-
ing However the asymmetrical ARTbrace is less aesthetic than the
symmetrical Sforzesco brace
Economy no more plaster casts no more hospitalisation and the
life-span of the brace is greater than that of the plaster cast
Efficiency the brace is adjustable in the frontal plane an addi-
tional correction by internal pad is easy
Hygiene a daily 15 minute shower is possible
Insulation the polycarbonate is more insulating than the glass
and there is no need for perforation
Lightness it is the end of 5-7 kg plaster casts and the ARTbrace
is 25 lighter than the historical Lyon brace
Originality this is the first untwisting brace of the whole spine
in three planes of space
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
66 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 67
Simplicity anyone can make a frontal bending with lordosis or
kyphosis no major correction of the positive shape capture is neces-
sary like the Checircneau brace
Tolerance polycarbonate is biologically well tolerated
Universality it is possible to correct hyperkyphosis like
hypokyphosis
These results can not still predict the final outcome but during
the last 50 years the immediate in-brace reducibility of scoliosis re-
mained around 050 and progress focused on aesthetics and toler-
ance Thanks to advances in computer graphic technology this cor-
rection exceeds for the first time 070 with the ARTbrace
This correction requires no more significant alteration of the
positive shape capture but the superposition of three segmental
CADCAM in a simple and strictly defined posture
Improving the flat back in the sagittal plane has never been de-
scribed with scoliosis braces used to date
Lyon brace management and protocol are not modified by the
use of the ARTbrace and a priori the final results of the treatment
cannot be worse than the historic Lyon brace
While the ARTbrace could be defined as a modified or ldquonewrdquo
Lyon brace the new concepts and first results prove that it can com-
pletely replace the casting and old Lyon brace process it really de-
serves to be recognised as its unique design has surpassed its prede-
cessor and former protocol
Further results will be inserted progressively in this book
The best BRACE does not exist but the best in-brace correction doesAnnex 1 Comparative tables of different materials
Soft Polyeth-
ylene
Polycar-
bonate
Comment
Frontal 38 43 70 In-brace
Sagittal No publi-
cation
-3deg +8deg Flat back
Rotation
(apical)
+++ +++
Torsion
(Global)
++ +++ Need high rigid
upper point
A x i a l
Elongation
0 ++ +++ 18 cm
Contact Strap Pads Soft
Efficiency 0 ++ ++++ (cost)
Effect ive-
ness
+ +++ ++++
Efficacy + +++ ++++
Tolerance ++++ +++ ++++ Initial full time
Invasive + + ++++ +++ Soft contact
Versatility ++++ + ++++ Plan B night
overcorrecting
Easiness ++++ ++ +++ Full 3D
instantaneous
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
68 bull J E A N C D E M A U R O Y C O N T E N T R E F E R E N C E M A N U A L F O R T H E A R T B R A C E bull 69
Repeatabil-
ity
+ ++ ++++ 3 regional
moulading
Precision ++ ++ ++++ High Rigid
Adaptation
time
1 hour +
physio
3 weeks 3 days Initial full time
Bibliography
ldquoBrace Technologyrdquo Thematic Series - The Lyon approach to the
conservative treatment of scoliosis de Mauroy JC Lecante
C Barral F Scoliosis 2011 Mar 2064
Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion
of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the
new Lyon brace ARTbrace Jean Claude de Mauroy Cyril
Lecante Freacutedeacuteric Barral and Sophie Pourret Scoliosis 2014
919
Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idio-
pathic scoliosis Negrini S De Mauroy JC Grivas TB Knott
P Kotwicki T Maruyama T OrsquoBrien JP Rigo M Zaina F Eur
J Phys Rehabil Med 2014 Feb50(1)87-92 Review
Bracing for scoliosis in 2014 state of the art Zaina F De Mauroy
JC Grivas T Hresko MT Kotwizki T Maruyama T Price N
Rigo M Stikeleather L Wynne J Negrini S Eur J Phys Reha-
bil Med 2014 Feb50(1)93-110 Review
The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace a prospec-
tive case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time
results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospec-
tive case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis SOSORT award
2015 winner de Mauroy JC Journe A Gagaliano F Lecante
C Barral F Pourret S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 191026
SOSORT Award Winner 2015 a multicentre study comparing the
SPoRT and ART braces effectiveness according to the SO-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
71
SORT-SRS recommendations Zaina F de Mauroy JC Don-
zelli S Negrini S Scoliosis 2015 Aug 111023 doi 101186
s13013-015-0049-4 eCollection 2015
Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment state of the art
Zaina F Romano M Knott P de Mauroy JC Grivas TB Kotwicki T
Maruyama T OrsquoBrien J Rigo M Negrini S Scoliosis 2015
Jul 111021 doi 101186s13013-015-0046-7 eCollection
2015
Brace Classification Study Group (BCSG) part one - definitions and
atlas Grivas TB de Mauroy JC Wood G Rigo M Hresko
MT Kotwicki T Negrini S Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016 Oct
311143 eCollection 2016
Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review
of seven major schools Berdishevsky H Lebel VA Bettany-
Saltikov J Rigo M Lebel A Hennes A Romano M Białek
M Mrsquohango A Betts T de Mauroy JC Durmala J Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016 Aug 41120 doi 101186s13013-016-
0076-9 eCollection 2016 Review
Index
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
de Mauroy de Curiegravere de Castelnau Jean Claude
Medical Doctor Specialist in
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system
- Electromyography
- Osteopathy and manual medicine
- Sports Medicine
Head of Orthopaedic Medicine Department ndash Clinique du Parc
- Lyon
In 1973 Dr de Mauroy was still a medicine student at the Centre
des Massues world famous centre for scoliosis treatment He met
Dr Stagnara who entrusted him his thesis on infantile scoliosis MD
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-
72
in 1975 he became head of a department of 36 beds for paediatric
orthopaedics
He will create with Dr Stagnara the Outpatient and Documenta-
tion department of the Centre des Massues With Dr Stagnara retir-
ing he created with his successor Dr Picault the Lyon Spine Center
at the Clinique du Parc
Dr de Mauroy a is retired lecturer at the University Claude Ber-
nard Lyon 1
- Faculty of Medicine
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Institute of Rehabilitation
- Polytechnic Institute
Dr de Mauroy is President of the SIRER (International Society of
Spine Research) and was President of the SOSORT in 2013
He is the co-inventor of the new Lyon brace ARTbrace (2013)
(EP 2 878 284 A1)
AWARDS
SOSORT 2010 ndash award for ldquoHistorical Lyonnaise brace treatment
for adolescent hyperkyphosis Results of 272 cases reviewed 2 years
minimum after removal of the bracerdquo
SOSORT 2015 ndash award for ldquoThe short time results after 1- year of
the first 1 00 scoliosis treated with the new Lyon ARTbrace
A matched pair control with the old Lyon Bracerdquo
- History of ARTbrace
- The interdisciplinary team approach
- New concepts
- Principles of ARTbrace
- Brace prescription
- Regional Shape Capture
- Brace construction
- Management of the patient with ARTBrace
- Instructions for wearing the ARTbrace
- Results amp discussion
- Conclusion
-