reference frames. lorentz contraction. twin paradox...

18
Special Relativity Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jun-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

Special Relativity

Reference frames.

Lorentz contraction.

Twin paradox (maybe).

Page 2: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship leaves the Earth (Event 1) and goes at 95% of the speed of

light to arrive at Proxima Centauri (Event 2) 4.3 light years away. What is the space and time separations between the two events in the Earth frame and the ship frame?

Earth: ΔxE = 4.3 light years

ΔtE = (4.3 light years)/(0.95 speed of light) = 4.53 years

Starship: ΔxS = 0, but what about ΔtS? Use the interval!

s2 = (ΔtS)2 – (0)2 = (ΔtE)2 – (ΔxE)2

= (4.53)2 – (4.3)2 (years)2

ΔtS = 1.42 years

Time dilation without Lorentz transformations!!!

Page 3: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

Spacetime

• The invariance of the spacetime interval is really, really

deep. Space by itself and time by itself are not

fundamental (noted first by Hermann Minkowski). Space

and time are different for different observers. Spacetime

is the same for all observers.

• BUT: while space and time are thus on equal footing,

they are NOT the same entity; their nature is different, as

manifested, albeit formally, by the “minus” sign in the

expression for the interval:

s2 = (Δt)2 – (Δx)2

Page 4: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

The Inertial Frames

Page 5: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

Inertial Frames

• Inertial (freefall, or free-float) frames: every free particle

preserves its state of motion (or rest) in such frames.

• Inertial frames are local in both space and time:

(by the way, in his papers or Relativity Einstein often used people riding trains to explain things or to present “paradoxes” – do you know why?)

Page 6: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

Free-Falling and Floating Freely

elevator at rest w.r.t. Earth

elevator in a free-fall (free-float)

Page 7: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

Tidal accelerations

• In a real free-float frame (with non-zero extents in

space and time) free objects will eventually change their

motion, given sufficient time

d=20m

d<20m

Page 8: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

Sneak peak into General Relativity

• Newtonian gravity is just another force

• Einstein says: gravity is different form all other forces,

has to do with the spacetime curvature

• Get rid of local gravity, chose a free-float (inertial)

frame!

• All that’s left is tidal accelerations – relative motion of

objects due to imperfectly local character of the

reference frame

Page 9: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

Curved spacetime: gravitational waves

Page 10: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

Recall: the principle of Relativity

• “Physics laws are the same in all inertial frames”, or

• “No test of laws of physics provides any way whatsoever to

distinguish one inertial frame from another”

• Principle of Relativity is a postulate – that is, it is not something that

has been measured in an experiment, or derived. It has been postulated.

Thus, Special Relativity is a theory. But a very good one! Tested and

verified in numerous experiments.

• A side remark: When Einstein’s paper on Special Relativity came out in

1905, almost nobody could understand it! Two years later Minkowski

formulated Special Relativity in geometrical terms, making it

understandable for all (physicists).

Page 11: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

• First postulate (principle of relativity)

- The laws of electrodynamics and optics will be valid for all

frames in which the laws of mechanics hold good.

- Every physical theory should look the same mathematically

to every inertial observer.

- The laws of physics are independent of location space or time.

• Second postulate (invariance of c)

The speed of light in vacuum, commonly denoted c, is the same to

all inertial observers, is the same in all directions, and does not

depend on the velocity of the object emitting the light. When

combined with the First Postulate, this Second Postulate is

equivalent to stating that light does not require any medium (such as

"aether") in which to propagate.

Einstein

Minkowski

Formulated Special Relativity in geometric terms, invented

spacetime diagrams, geometrical representation of the

interval, and laid the groundwork for General Relativity,

that treats gravity as a geometrical curvature of spacetime

Page 12: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

What exactly is the same?

• Physics laws, e.g. Second Law of Thermodynamics, blackbody

radiation, Ohm’s Law.

• Fundamental constants: - the fine structure constant, electron charge

• Speed of light! Consider Alice and Bob:

Bob is flying on the Earth’s orbit in the ISS

Alice is flying by at 99.999% speed of light (Full Impulse)

Bob fires a Photon Torpedo parallel to Alice’s line of travel

Speed of light is the same for both!

Page 13: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

What is NOT the same in different frames?

• Space and time separations

• Velocity, acceleration and force

• Electric and magnetic fields

Page 14: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

Simultaneity in different frames

• Time separations are not the same in different inertial frames. When

are they the same though? When there is no relative motion between the

frames.

• So, if there is relative motion between frames, time separations are not

the same – generally. What about a very particular case: zero time

separation (i.e. simultaneous events)??? Can zero be different in

different frames?

• Generally speaking, yes! Only if the space separation is zero (two

events taking place in the same point in space), or in the plane

perpendicular to the direction of motion, will time separation be zero in all

inertial frames (moving along given direction).

Page 15: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

Clicker question #15

What is the same in different reference frames?

(more than 1 correct answer!!!)

A. Time intervals

B. Distances between objects

C. Speed of light

D. Spacetime intervals

E. Laws of physics

Page 16: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

Relativity of simultaneity:

Einstein’s “train paradox”

Page 17: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

Train paradox – view from the train

Page 18: Reference frames. Lorentz contraction. Twin paradox (maybe).courses.washington.edu/bbbteach/110/pdfs/Lecture 19.pdf · Twin paradox (maybe). Sample problem 1: a starship • Starship

Lorentz contraction

• Lorentz contraction follows from the relativity of simultaneity:

To measure the length of a moving rod, we mark the locations of

the ends of the rod at the same instant.

But it will not be the same instant in the moving frame!

And vise versa: what was simultaneous in the Rocket frame will

not be simultaneous in the Lab frame

• The result is different length measurements in frames moving relative to

one another.

• Length measured in the object’s rest frame: the proper length