reducing red-tape to improve outcomes the council on financial assistance reform initiatives march...
TRANSCRIPT
Reducing Red-Tape to Improve OutcomesThe Council on Financial Assistance
Reform Initiatives
March 12, 2014
2
Increase in Federal Grants Activity
$7B$24B
$91B
$200B
$600B
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance lists over 2,000 Federal grant programs
3
Guidance Reform History
Nov. 2009: Executive
Order: Reduce
Improper Payments
Feb 2011: Presidential
Memo: Reduce
Administrative Burden
Feb 2012: Advance Notice of Proposed Guidance
(public comments)
Feb 2013: Notice of Proposed Guidance
(public comments)
Dec 2013: Final
Uniform Guidance
4
Diverse Range of Stakeholders Engaged
Type of Institution Represented ExamplesState Governments NASACT
NASCIONonprofits National Council of NonprofitsAuditors AICPA
CIGIE Indian Tribes NAFOA
GAOGrants Professionals AGA
NGMAUniversities COGR
AAUAPLU
5
“OMB Simplifies Government-wide Grant
Guidance”
“A Whole New World: OMB Publishes New
Grants Reform Guidance”
December 2013: Final Uniform Guidance
6
Challenge & ImpactChallenge Under Previous Guidance Impact of New Uniform Guidance
1. Eight Overlapping Sets of Compliance Requirements
Eliminates Duplicative and Conflicting Guidance
2. High Levels of Administrative Burden Performance and Internal Controls Over Compliance for Accountability
3. Hundreds of Forms with Non-Standard Data Definitions
Provides Framework for Standard Business Processes & Data Definitions
4. Outdated Guidance Does Not Account for Modern Electronic Work Environment
Promotes Efficient Use of IT and Shared Services
5. Inconsistent and Non-Transparent Treatment of Costs
Requires Consistent and Transparent Treatment of Costs
6. Lack of Support for Policies with Work-Life Balance
Encourages Non-Federal Entities to Have Family-Friendly Policies
7. Audit Findings Repeated Each Year = Waste
Stronger Oversight & Target Audits on Risk of Waste, Fraud, and Abuse
8. Lack of Accountability for Effectively Correcting Financial Integrity Weaknesses
Increased Accountability for Effective Resolution of Weaknesses
7
Eliminating Duplicative and Conflicting Guidance
AwardsReceived
• A-102 & A-89• A-87• A-133 &A-50
Subawards to
universities
• A-110• A-21
Subawards to
nonprofits
• A-110• A-122
INSERT YOUR STATE OR AGENCY
HERE
Now: All OMB guidance streamlined in 2 CFR 200.
Then:
8
Performance Over Compliance for Accountability
• Emphasis on strong internal controls and reduction in specific compliance requirements– Example: Specific examples of justification for salaries
and wages eliminated for more flexibility in implementing a strong system of internal controls
• Alignment with M-13-17 encouraging innovative program design based on evidence
• Performance measurement aimed at developing lessons learned
• Fixed amount awards aimed at performance milestones
9
Consistent and Transparent Treatment of Costs
• Voluntary Committed Cost Sharing is not expected under research awards
• Pass-through entities must provide an indirect cost rate for subawards
• Standards for treating admin costs as direct• High bar for circumstances where agencies may
deviate from Federally negotiated rates• Option to extend rate for up to 4 years• De minimis rate of 10% of MTDC for entities
without a Federally negotiated rate
10
Standard Business Processes & Data Definitions
• Sets framework for standardizing data definitions in all grants-related forms governmentwide
• Standardizes format for notices of funding opportunities w/60 days to apply
• Standardizes Information to be provided in all Federal Awards and Subawards
• Highlights areas where specific agency approval is needed
11
Family-Friendly Policies
• Where consistent with non-Federal entity policy:– Allows costs of conference hosts to identify locally
available child care – Allows temporary dependent care costs that meet
specified standards for travel– Allows family leave as a fringe benefit
12
Stronger Oversight
• Requires mandatory disclosures for conflict of interest and criminal violations
• Requires pre-award review of merit of proposal and risk of applicant
• Federal agencies may assign specific conditions for awards based on risk
• Strong focus on internal controls
13
Targeting Waste, Fraud, and Abuse
• Single Audit Threshold raised from $500,000 to $750,000 – reducing burden for 5,000 entities while maintaining coverage for 99% of current dollars covered.
• Publication of single audit reports online with safeguards for PII and optional exception for Indian tribes
• Senior Accountable Official to implement metrics and encourage cooperative resolution
• Strong requirement to rely on existing audits first
14
Stakeholder Reactions
• Significant interest in training webcast held January 27, 2014 & future outreach – Over 5,000 registrations for mailing list– Recorded version will be available at
CFO.gov/COFAR• General recognition of significance of reform• Interest in resources to assist in smooth
implementation
15
Guidance Metrics
Metrics to gauge impact of guidance on reducing the risks of non-compliance and unnecessary administrative burdenPossible General Metrics:• Number of OMB Approved Exceptions • Number of fixed amount awards issued• Number of IDC rate extensions approved by
Cognizant Officials
16
Guidance Metrics
Possible Audit Metrics:• # of major programs before and after
guidance effective• % of timely submissions of single audits • # of repeat findings• # of ‘unclean’ opinions for major programs• # of material audit findings in single audits
17
Council On Financial Assistance Reform Priorities
Guidance Targets Risk & Minimizes
Burden
Standardized Business
Processes & Data
Well Trained Workforce
Strong Program Oversight:
Audit Resolution
Better Outcomes for Grants
EvidenceSpending
Transparency
Shared Services
Financial Management
18
Framework for 2014 COFAR Activities
All deliverables will be strategically aligned to support effective
implementation of guidance reform with minimum resource burden to Federal agencies and non-Federal
entities.
19
Strong Program Oversight: Audit Resolution
19
• Over 4,000 audited programs failed to receive clean opinions in 2011 (3% of total audited programs)
• No existing guidance holds agencies and recipients accountable for effectively correcting financial integrity weaknesses
Challenge
• September 2013: High risk programs and recipients identified
• November 2013: CAROI pilot results presented to COFAR principals
Accomplishments
20
Strong Program Oversight: Audit Resolution
20
• December 2013: Document best practices on CAROI to contribute to resource repository
• February 2014: Complete framework for 2014 Compliance Supplement (w/preview of guidance implementation)
• March 2014: Compile and publish Federal agencies’ audit resolution policies• March 2014: Finalize Single Audit Metrics• April 2014: Publish 2014 Compliance Supplement • June 2014: FAC to deliver available standard and ad hoc reports and
analytical tools
Short Term Deliverables
• July 2014: Reconvene to plan management decision letter pilot• December 2014: Publish proposal to revise Data Collection Form and SEFA
Long Term Deliverables
21
Workforce Development
• Lack of consistent standards for qualifying people to perform the grants management function
• No government-wide core training requirement for people performing the grants management function
Challenge
• December 2013: Competencies established• December 2013: Resource repository built, available
for use, and in testing phase
Accomplishments
22
Workforce Development
• March 2014: Knowledge-Sharing Resource Center available for sharing ideas and best practices
• August 2014: Publish Grants Management 101 Course
Short Term Deliverables
• October 2014: Reconvene to discuss long-term vision and possible industry-wide credentialing framework
Long Term Deliverables
23
Federal Grants Workforce Training
GrantsWorkforce
Grants 101 Course
Uniform Guidance
Knowledge-Sharing
24
Grants Data Standardization
• Over 700 distinct grant related forms approved in OMB database
• No current process to vet and validate existing data elements nor to create and validate new data elements
• Multiple stakeholders must be engaged to fully explore grants data standards and chart a successful path forward
• Non-standard data definitions compromise quality of publicly reported financial data
Challenges
• September 2013: Preliminary analysis of 1100 data elements• September 2013: Contract awarded to support further analysis
of data elements and development of governance framework• December 2013: 99 standard definitions in final guidance
Accomplishments
25
Grants Data Standardization
• Over 700 distinct grant related forms approved in OMB database
• No current process to vet and validate existing data elements nor to create and validate new data elements
• Multiple stakeholders must be engaged to fully explore grants data standards and chart a successful path forward
• Non-standard data definitions compromise quality of publicly reported financial data
Challenges
• September 2013: Preliminary analysis of 1100 data elements• September 2013: Contract awarded to support further analysis
of data elements and development of governance framework• December 2013: 99 standard definitions in final guidance
Accomplishments
26
Grants Data Standardization
• December 2013: Grants data standardization proposed vision, project outline, and governance framework
• March 2014: HHS to brief COFAR on grants data standards records repository functional requirements
Short Term Deliverables
• June 2014: Brief COFAR on proof of concept for grants data standards
• July 2014: Reconvene to plan additional long term deliverables based on HHS and Treasury short term deliverables.
Long Term Deliverables
27
Federal Spending Transparency
• Quality: Improving data integrity
• Completeness: Expanding the focus
to include obligations and expenditures
• Functionality: Providing a one-stop
location for all Federal spending
• Utility: Linking spending information
to program activity
28
December 2013: Final Guidance
Published
January-April 2014: Training Webcasts,
Single Audit & Other Metrics, Publish 2014
Single Audit Compliance Supplement
June 2014: Agencies Submit
Draft Rules to OMB, Continued
Outreach on Implementation
December 2014: Final Guidance
Effective, Baseline Metrics Collected,
Case Studies of Best Practices Published
The Road Ahead: Implementing Grants Reform
29
Engage With COFAR
For More Information Visit: CFO.gov/COFAR
Send Questions To:
Thank you!