reducing patient harm and improving quality through...

20
Proprietary and Confidential. Please do not share. Reducing patient harm and improving quality through technological innovation

Upload: others

Post on 08-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

Proprietary and Confidential. Please do not share.

Reducing patient harm

and improving quality

through technological

innovation

Page 2: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

Laurie Anne Buckenberger MSN, ANP

Vice President, Information Technology

Mount Sinai Health System

Robbie Freeman, MSN, RN, NE-BC

Assistant Director, Nursing Quality Initiatives

Mount Sinai Beth Israel

Page 3: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

About Mount Sinai Health System

▶ Founded in 1852

▶ 3,535 beds across 7 hospital campuses

▶ 135 operating rooms

▶ 6,200 physicians

▶ 2,000 residents and fellow

▶ 36,000 employees

▶ 170,000 inpatient admissions

▶ 2,600,000 non-ED outpatient visits

▶ 500,000 ED visits

▶ 18,000 babies delivered per year

▶ 542 medical students and 600 graduate

students (PhD, MPH, MD/PhD,

Masters)

▶ 5,100 faculty

▶ School receives $214M in NIH funding

▶ MSH and MS Queens are HIMSS

EMRAM Stage 6 Hospitals

3

Page 4: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

MSHS IT At a Glance

4

Our Team

▶ The IT Leadership Team is comprised of the CIO

and 14 senior leaders

▶ Total authorized staff for IT is ~750FTEs

▶ IT staff are concentrated at our Corporate Services

Center in Midtown and data centers at MSH and in

Secaucus, NJ

Our Finances 1

▶ 2015 IT Operating Budget: $175M

▶ 2015 IT Capital Budget: $54.0M

1 Includes School of Medicine, but not Scientific Computing

Our Customers

The IT Team supports:

▶ 144 Remote Clinical and Administrative Sites

▶ >40,000 End-Users, including:

▶ >20,000 Epic users

▶ (Inpatient & Ambulatory EMR at MSH,

MSQ, and some BI and SLR practices)

▶ >17,400 PRISM users

▶ (Inpatient EMR at BI and SLR)

▶ >3,400 eClinicalWorks users

▶ (Ambulatory EMR at many BI and SLR

practices)

▶ >800 Meditech users

▶ (Inpatient & Ambulatory EMR at NYEE)

Our Environment

The IT Team operates and supports:

▶ 6 Data Centers

▶ Mount Sinai Icahn Building (11,000 sq ft)

▶ BI-SLR Secaucus (4,360 sq ft)

▶ Mount Sinai Hess Center (2,350 sq ft)

▶ Beth Israel-Fierman (2,200 sq ft)

▶ Roosevelt-Winston (1,150 sq ft)

▶ NYEE (400 sq ft)

▶ > 54,000 Phone Lines

▶ > 750 Applications

▶ > 27,000 Workstations

▶ > 5,800 Printers and Scanners

▶ > 6,200 MSHS-owned Smartphone Devices

Page 5: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

Struggling to meet the need

“To succeed in a tough environment,

we need micro optimized solutions to fill the obvious gaps in our

systems” Chief Nursing officer’s, Chief Medical Information Officer’s, Chief Quality Officer’s, Chief Information Officer’s and Chief Patient

Safety Officer’s

Difficult Economic Headwinds

• Declining reimbursements

• Increasing shared risks

• Fierce competition

• Razor thin margins

Resource Constraints

• Budget constraints

• Staffing

• Fierce competition

In today’s healthcare environment organizations face…

…but must continue to deliver on Quality, Safety, Risk

Management and Patient Satisfaction

EMR Gaps

• Do not quite meet the need

• Too hard to get information

• Technology fatigue after often

arduous implementation

Page 6: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

Targeted Innovation Needs

Improve quality and

safety scores

Lower hospital costs

Early identification of high cost

hospital events

Reduce LOS Improve patient

satisfaction

Micro Optimization…Filling in the gaps

Page 7: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

Micro-Optimization

Page 8: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

Innovation Partners

“Mt. Sinai was seeking ways to use mobile technologies to energize our clinical community

and provide new innovative cutting edge technology at the point of care”

Proprietary and Confidential. Please do not

share.

From Use Case to Go Live

Used Lean and Agile methodologies to deliver highly

successful applications

Immediate measureable benefits

• Reduction in Key Clinical Goals

• Migration from paper to automated systems -

Near Real Time data

2 products - 6 months

Rapid Innovation

Tied to System Quality Goals

4 Hospitals – 100 users

“I use the Konnarock system on a daily basis. In my job, it helps me to avoid incidences of

CLABSI’s by unit as well as provides the ability to assign patients for follow up to specific nurse

managers. The system is intuitive and easy to learn.”

Laurie Anne Buckenberger ANP, MSN

VP IT , Mount Sinai Health System

Robbie Freeman, MSN, RN-BC

Assistant Director, Nursing Quality Initiatives

Page 9: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

I. Using a Framework for Partner Engagement

II. Pre-Discovery Process

III. Capability Curve Mapping – Where do we want to be

IV. Deep dive user engagement workflow mapping

V. Build and Deploy

Page 10: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

Framework for Partner Engagement

Page 11: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

Pre-Discovery Example

Page 12: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

Capability Curve Mapping

Post-Discovery Example

Page 13: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

Deep Dive Session with Proven Tools

Page 14: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

High Value Workflow Driven Apps

▶ QCRM – Key Users – Infection Prevention, Quality/Safety, Nurse Managers

– Identify at risk patient population for potential intervention with high risk devices and MDRO’s

– Standard of care observation/audits

▶ NQM – Key Users – WOCN’s, Quality/Safety, Nurse Mangers, Staff Nurses

– Identify at risk patient population for potential skin integrity intervention

– Survey at risk patient population

– Submit data to Press Ganey

▶ KRM – Key Users – CNO/CMO/CSO, Physician/Nurse Dyads, Quality/Safety, Nurse Managers, Staff Nurses

– Identify at risk patient population for potential intervention

– Early sepsis recognition

– Provide visibility into care process measures and gaps in care

Page 15: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

NQM Nursing Quality Manager

QCRM Quality Care Risk Manager

RM Risk Manager

KRM Risk Manager

Shine a spotlight on skin

integrity to improve patient safety

Mobile bedside risk and care assessments

Automated Press Ganey submission

Map risk and safety data into existing workflows and display interventional data real time

Identifies At Risk and high risk patient populations and provides easy to use application to identify, monitor, intervene

Give providers a quick, consolidated , easy view of key real-time risk and safety data to improve patient care

Give CXO's, Quality and Safety a risk associated profile of unit and facility census based upon predefined clinical criteria

Why did we go after it?

Cloud Mobile Easy

Highly Intuitive

Pluggable Rapid Time to

Value

Page 16: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

Demo

Page 17: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

IT - Rapid Time to Value

Low Effort

• Up and running within a

matter of days

• Quick cloud based

implementation

• Configurable data element list

to choose from

• Simple intuitive User

Interface minimizes training

• Integrates with EMR -Accepts

all types of data

Key Decisions

• Data sources

• Data elements

• Apps in suite

• On-premise vs. Cloud

• Number of users

Integration

• Mapping based on data

elements selected

• Connections based on data

sources

Vendor Resources

• Dedicated concierge

implementation

• Bundled program

management and integration

resources

Health System Resource

Requirements

• Part time project manager – 5

hours per week for 4 weeks

• Clinical champion (CNO,

CMO, CQO) – 5 hours per

week for 4 weeks

• Nursing resource – 5 hours per

week for 4 weeks

• IT Resource – 5 hours per

week for 4 weeks

Page 18: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

Key Takeaways

▶ Move Seamlessly from the office to the bedside

▶ Workflow design and process improvement supported by technology

▶ The carrot's just as important as the stick - using incentives for positive

reinforcement

▶ Success Metrics

Page 19: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

Q&A

Page 20: Reducing patient harm and improving quality through ...s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/... · Management and Patient Satisfaction EMR Gaps • Do not quite meet the

APPENDIX