reduced scope environmental, land use and social impacts, as in original dow – 12 chapters focus...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Reduced scope
• Environmental, land use and social impacts, as in original DoW – 12 chapters
• Focus on the primary user, EC officer, maybe sectoral issues
• Russian version can be reduced variant
• SIA retained
Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008
Chapter 1. Sustainable Development in a European policy contextSustainable development: environment, economy, society • policies and
practices in EU and Russia • intra-generational equity • EU regions, proportionality, subsidiarity, stakeholders • Sustainability Science •. e-LUP approach •
writers: NERI, HEL, ERI, EAC, others
Chapter 2. Impact Assessment; concepts, guidelines, practices SIA/IA/SA/RIA • EU impact assessment, procedures •. EU impact
assessment, experiences •. RF impact assessment •. Member states impact assessment •.
writers: HEL, NERI, EAC others
Chapter 3. Tools for Impact Assessment; Qualitative tools • Dynamic models •. Land use integrated models •.
Indicator sets •. Statistics and databases • GIS and remote sensing •.writers: HEL, Zalf and others
Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008
Part I CONCEPTS
Urgent needs
– Quality of texts – Policy relevance of texts– SIA usefulness of texts
– Feedback on quality– Feedback on usability– Feedback of potential end users
– Awareness of relevant projects, sources– Communicating with relevant …
– e-learning technologies and pedagogics– Integration of cases and models
– Keep the timetable
Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008
Urgent needs & actions – Quality of texts / focus on end user – new chapter template –reviews
(below)– Policy relevance of texts / monitoring – chapter guideline – policy
cases– SIA usefulness of texts / monitoring – chapter guideline – policy cases
– Feedback on quality / internal review – advisory board – external review
– Feedback on usability / the above – testing phase– Feedback of potential end users / adv board – EC meeting
– Awareness of relevant projects, sources /survey report – chapter team webpages
– Communicating with relevant … / identifying synergies, contacting …
– e-learning technologies and pedagogics / embedded tools (Cmap…, multimedia, interactivity enhancement
– Integration of cases and models / WP2, 3 and 4 action plans
– Keep the timetable / new schedule and responsibilities, coordinator
Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008
(vii) Survey of related projects
• A 2nd version is needed – a closer analysis of the related projects will be of great help in (a) tailoring the new e-LUP methodology, (b) selecting projects to be contacted, (c) conclusions on state of the art in SIA tools and models for our Chapter 3 ’Tools’.
• Survey contains chapter level tables, to be transfered to e-LUP project website for further elaboration by chapter teams in communication with the outer world.
Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008
(viii) time chart / workplan
Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008
WP 6 Testing
Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008
• testing in 5 jurisdictions, originally 3
• Starting in January 2009; planning of questionnaires (SPbSU and HEL)
• external review and compilation of results
WP 6 Testing (2)
• WP6 partners will arrange mini-workshops at their facilities, gathering small groups of civil servants and policy makers exposed to SIA or strategic planning issues for test runs of the e-tool.
• Preceded by lecture on SIA at EC, the IA practice in particular jurisdictions might be quite different from EC model. In that case the question posed: is the EC model desirable?
Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008
Project management report 2+
Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008
0
500 000
1 000 000
1 500 000
2 000 000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Budget > spent period 1 > spent p2 > spent + 4 months > spent total
WP 6 Testing (2)
• WP6 partners will arrange mini-workshops at their facilities, gathering small groups of civil servants and policy makers exposed to SIA or strategic planning issues for test runs of the e-tool.
• Preceded by lecture on SIA at EC, the IA practice in particular jurisdictions might be quite different from EC model. In that case the question posed: is the EC model desirable?
Project e-LUP, second review, Brussels 17.11.2008