reduced order model for htsc - pm interaction for flywheel...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Reduced Order Model for HTSC - PM Interaction for Flywheel ...gcep.stanford.edu/pdfs/symposium2012/ClayHearn_poster...HTSC rings. Each discrete ring of the bulk HTSC is represented](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081618/60b22e8d3329bb373a39cdea/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Reduced Order Model for HTSC - PM Interaction for Flywheel
Bearing Applications Clay Hearn1, Sid Pratap1, Robert Hebner1, Dongmei Chen2, and Raul Longoria2
Introduction
Bond graphs are highly useful for modeling systems across multiple energy domains,
such as the mechanical and magnetic coupling of the PM-HTSC system [2]. The far
left 1-junction of the bond graph below represents the mechanical dynamics of the
levitated PM mass. The G gyrator elements represent the electromechanical
coupling forces which levitate the PM mass and induce currents within the nested
HTSC rings. Each discrete ring of the bulk HTSC is represented by a 1-junction and
connected to the other rings via mutual inductance matrix, represented by the large I
element. A nonlinear resistance term is also tied to each HTSC ring element to
describe the rapid rise in resistivity once the critical current density, Jc, is exceeded
[3].
1 The Center for Electromechanics at The University of Texas at Austin 2 The Department of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin
References 1. Smythe, William R., Static and Dynamic Electricity, Hemisphere Publishing, New York, 1989, pp.
234, 290-291
2. Karnopp, Dean C., Margolis, Donald L., and Rosenberg, Ronald C. System Dynamics: Modeling
and Simulation of Mechatronic Systems. 3rd Ed. pp. 228-237. John Wiley and Sons, New York,
2000.
3. J. Rhyner. Magnetic properties and AC losses of superconductors with power law current-voltage
characteristics. Physica C, vol. 212, pp. 292-300, 1993
4. D.R. Alonso, T.A. Coombs, and A.M. Campbell. “Numerical Analysis of High-Temperature
Superconductors with the Critical State Model”. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity,
vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 2053-2063, Dec. 2004.
Initial Pass
HTSC Top Surface
HTSC BottomSurface
PM and mass
HTSC
IDEC Position Probe
Guide Rod
𝑑𝑧𝑝𝑚
𝑑𝑡= 𝑣𝑝𝑚
𝑑𝑣𝑝𝑚
𝑑𝑡= −𝑔 −
𝐹𝑟(𝑣𝑝𝑚 )
𝑀+
1
𝑀
𝑑𝜙𝑠𝑖
𝑑𝑧𝑠𝑖𝐼𝑖
𝑛
𝑖=1
𝑑𝐼1𝑑𝑡𝑑𝐼2𝑑𝑡⋮𝑑𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑡
= −𝑳−1
𝑅1 𝐼1
𝑅2 𝐼2 ⋮
𝑅𝑛 𝐼𝑛
−
𝑑𝜙𝑠1
𝑑𝑧𝑑𝜙𝑠2
𝑑𝑧⋮
𝑑𝜙𝑠𝑛
𝑑𝑧
𝑣𝑝𝑚
(1)
Model Development
The HTSC puck is modeled as discrete, nested, superconducting rings shorted
on themselves. The permanent magnet is modeled by discrete current loops to
represent the equivalent surface currents and the resultant magnetic fields in
free space. This model assumes that the permanent magnet puck is concentric
to the bulk HTSC, which allows the use of an axisymmetric model.
Based on conventional formulations [1], the magnetic potential due to a current
loop can be calculated at any axial and radial location with respect to loop in
free space. From this calculation of magnetic potential, the magnetic flux, and
change in flux with respect to axial location of the permanent magnet can be
calculated for each discrete superconducting ring of the bulk puck.
Z axis
𝑟𝑖
𝑧𝑠 𝑎𝑠
𝐼𝑠
𝑧𝑖
𝐴𝑠𝑖 =𝜇0𝐼𝑠𝜋𝑘𝑠𝑖
𝑎𝑠𝑟𝑖
12 1 −
1
2𝑘𝑠𝑖
2 𝐾 𝑘𝑠𝑖 − 𝐸 𝑘𝑠𝑖
𝑘𝑠𝑖 = 4𝑎𝑠𝑟𝑖
𝑎𝑠 + 𝑟𝑖 2 + 𝑧𝑖 − 𝑧𝑠
2
𝜙𝑠𝑖 = 𝐴𝑠𝑖 𝑑𝑙𝑖 = 2𝜋𝑟𝑖𝐴𝑠𝑖
Calculation of magnetic potential in free space
Modulus of elliptical integrals of 1st and 2nd kind
Magnetic flux which links ring i of bulk HTSC
Reduced Order Dynamic Model and Bond
Graph Representation
Our flywheel sizing studies for grid storage highlight the well-recognized benefit
that accrues when the losses are reduced in flywheels. To help provide the
engineering knowledge to design robust systems, this project presents a
reduced order model for a permanent magnet (PM) and high temperature
superconductor (HTSC) in an axisymmetric frame to determine static and
dynamic force response. This model is formulated as a bond-graph to be used
for system models, where the nonlinear force-displacement interactions are
important for stability analysis and control design. The development of the
reduced order model is based on the mechanical and electromagnetic
interaction between a permanent magnet and bulk HTSC. Performance of the
proposed reduced order model is compare to FEM analysis and experimental
tests to confirm the static and transient performance.
Publications 1. C.S. Hearn, S.B. Pratap, D. Chen, and R. Longoria. Reduced Order Dynamic Model of Permanent
Magnet and HTSC Interaction in an Axisymmetric Frame. Submitted to IEEE Transactions on
Mechatronics, Aug. 27, 2012
Comparison to FEA
To verify performance of the reduced order model, comparisons were made to the finite
element method (FEM). The FEM algorithm [4] which utilizes the critical state model, was
used for this analysis. The system in this study consisted of a cylindrical PM moving through
a bulk HTSC ring at a constant velocity. The hysteretic nature of the force-displacement
profile is captured by both analysis techniques.
Experimental Validation
An experiment was performed to
validate the model performance by a
drop test. This procedure creates a
dynamic response by means of a step
input, where the weight of the PM is
quickly transferred to the magnetic
interaction between the PM and HTSC.
Tests were performed at different load
weights and initial heights above the
bulk HTSC. Time domain and
frequency response predictions from the
model matched experimental results