redaurum red lake mines limited - ontario · 2017-01-17 · introduction at the request of mr. w.w....
TRANSCRIPT
REDAURUM RED LAKE
S2N84SWei23 2 .9293 FAIRLIE TWP
MINES LIMITED
010
PRELIMINARY OPERATIONAL REPORT
ON
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS,
HUMLIN WEST EXTENSION
27 July 1986
INTRODUCTION
At the request of Mr. W.W. Cummins, VLF-EM and magnetometer surveys were carried out on 18 contiguous claims in Fairlie Township, District of Red Lake, Ontario, on behalf of Redaurum Red Lake Mines Limited. The surveys were completed by Mr. Ken Bernier of Sioux Lookout, Ontario during the period February to April of 1986. The data have been processed, plotted, and drafted by Redaurum personnel and by R.T. Marcroft and Assoc iates, Cartographic Consultants of Mississauga, Ontario.
The surveys were initiated as part of an on-going gold exploration project designed to delineate suitable targets for diamond drill investi gation on an area known as the Hum!in West Extension, on ground held by Redaurum. A total of 30 miles of VLF-EM, and 30 miles of magnetometer, surveys, were completed, for a total of 3168 stations per survey
The offices of Redaurum Red Lake Mines Limited are located at 111 Richmond St.W., Suite 908, Toronto, Ontario.
LOCATION l ACCESS
The property is located about seven miles west of the town of Red Lake, Ontario, and is easily accessible by boat from that locale.
The Humlin West Extension (Company project name) is situated within 18 contiguous claims: KRL 788406 - KRL 788409 inclusive and KRL 828264 - KRL 828277 inclusive. The area is underlain by a complexly folded and sheared sequence of andesitfcmetavolcanics, lean iron formation, and often highly altered ultramafic units of uncertain genesis.
PREVIOUS WORK
Redaurum Red Lake Mines Limited had not undertaken any work on the area under consideration prior to commencement of the EM and magnetic surveys covered by this report.
- 2 -
INSTRUMENTATION l SURVEY PROCEDURES
The VLF - EM survey was undertaken using a Geonics EM - 16 unit, manufactured by Geonics Ltd. of Mississauga, Ontario. Station NAA, Cutler, Maine (24.0 KHz) was utilized as primary signal source for optimum coupling. Data a-fc presented in two forms: as profile (1" E 20 35} in-phase and quadrature values, and as contoured Fraser filtered values. Instrument sensitivity is 1 #.
The magnetic survey was carried out using an EDA OMNI 4 magnetometer system with accompanying base station unit. The EDA unit measures total intensity values of the ambient magnetic field, and processes all field data to correct for diurnal drift. Data have been presented as corrected field values, and contoured at an, interval of 100 gammas. Instrument sen sitivity is ^ 1 gamma.
Both surveys were carried out on picketed survey lines spaced 200' apart; readings were obtained at a uniform interval of 50'.
RESULTS
As illustrated in the accompanying map of profiled data, the VLF - EM survey has delineated a number of conductive hor izons which broadly trend east-west. Several specific trends are defined in the data, at about 065 0 , 0900 , and 1000 - 110 0 . Detailed interpretation of the data is pending completion of current mapping by qualified geolo gists on the property. Preliminary observations suggest that certain of the conductor axes correlate with previously known pyrrhotite- and minor pyrite - bearing siliceous lean iron formation, and with exposed and drill interpreted zones of intense shear deformation.
An extensive zone of somewhat homogeneous magnetic response (up to about 2500 gammas intensity locally) trends across the northern - and eastern - most parts of the property. This response correlates broadly with serpentinous mafic and ultramafic units as mapped by the Ontario Geological Survey (Map 2125), and by company geologists employed by pre sent and past holders of the property. In contrast, the central and north- central areas are characterized by more heterogeneously anomalous response, within which individual anomalies range up to a maximum of 8000 gammas
- 3 -
intensity, and trend discordantly to the broad ultramafic - derived region noted above. The intensity and localized nature of these anomalies may suggest, in part, sources within magnetic - and/or pyrrhotite - bearing deformed iron formation and mineralized shear zones. However, it is again emphasized that detailed geophysical interpretation awaits proper geological control to be provided by field mapping in progress at the time of this writing.
SUMMARY ft RECOMMENDATIONS
The VLF - EM survey has defined a number of east - west trending conductor axes whose response can be attributed reasonably - as a preliminary observation - to both weakly mineralized shear systems and pyrrhotite and pyrite bearing lean iron formation. Correlation of certain of these with localized intense magnetic anomalies in the central part of the property is indicated by the data. The magnetic survey results additionally have defined a zone of broad signature and modest response which coincides with previously mapped serpentlnous units. A number of discontinuities within the contoured magnetics suggest the presense of northwest - southeast and northeast - southwest late fault axes.
The specific pertinence of individual anomalies from both data sets to on-going exploration for gold has not been assessed at the time of this writing. It is expected that the results of early diamond drilling, and current detailed geological mapping and sampling, will be compiled in the near future. Detailed geophysical interpretation of the present survey results will form an integral part of that compilation.
Resp
John F. Whitton
27 July 1986
Ontario
Min,s!'y Ol Nor'horn O '
Ties'tnes
iReport of Work
(Geophysica 1 , Geological, L- Geochemical and Expenditures)
Min.52N84SW8123 2 .9293 FAIRLIE TWP 900
Type o' S urveyisJ
^ Ground Magnetic and V.L.F. E.M. SurveysClairrT'HolcJerlsl
Redaurum Red Lake Mines Limited
i Township Of Area
i Fairlie TownshipiProspector's ticcnce No.
i T 1864Address
__Suke[908 - 111 Richmond Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5H 2G4 .... . .............____Survey Company l Date ol Survey Hrom a to) Ftotal Miles of line Cut
__K.J. Bernier, Highway 72, Sioux Lookout, Ont. j Day | M O i vr. | oav j MO.j vr. j 32 MilesQce&land)Name and Address of Author (of Goo-Tochmcal report)
W.A. Barclay. W.A. Barclay Exploration Services, 23 Grenadier Road, Toronto, Ont. M6R 1L1Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 clays. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
i Days per i Claim
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic A n
- Magnetometer
- Riidiornetric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Man Days
Complete reverse side
and enter total(s) here
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
Days per Claim
- Magnetometer i
- Radiometric
- Otheri -i ... -i -Geological
Geochemical
Airborne Credits Days per Claim
Note: S pecial provisions i Electromagnetic
credits do not apply
to Airborne Surveys. Magnetometer
Radiometric
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numeiical sequence)
Type Of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total ExpendituresTotal
Days Credits
Instructions
Total Days Credits may tie apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of clays credits per claim selected in columns at right.
Mining Claim
Prefix ; Number
C.R.L. 788406 ^788407
u;
788408c
788409 *'
828264 c
828265 (
828266 t
828267 t
828268 t
828269 *-
828270 t
828271 '
828272 (
828273 r
828274 ,
828275 * -
_ 8J8276 J,
. 82827JiLL
. .-.
Expend. Days Cr.
6p
^
i
67)^w
60
-
Mining Claim
Prefix 1 Number
/IS
Ovi
\
S'- lj\^...^.l..[^
,/' *RECEIVE winRED LAKE
^MINING Dn
^^XLSS-
Expend. Days Cr.
;"'ss
XArt6 j*
*^v
^
Total number of mining claims covered by this - report of work. 1 O
Date Recorded Holder or Agont (Signature)
Certification Verifying Report of Woik
l hereby certify that l hnvi) a poison.il and mMn.ite knowledge of the Kicts set forth m the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed s;ime durmo nnd or ;ift"'i us completion onci the annexed ropori is true.
1 and Postal Arjiirpss ot Person Ct-'rt;t V'* 1 '.)
John Whitton, Box 934, Red Lake, Ontario POV 2MO (Agent)D.ite COM.
//,.
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ontario
Geophysical-Geologlcal-Geochemlcal Technical Data Statement
File—
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Township c
Claim Hold
Survey Con
Author of ]
Address of
Covering D
Total Miles
SPECIAL
, Fairlie Townshipir Area rRedaurum Red Lake Mines Limited
erw ———————————————————————————————————
,pa ny K' J - Bernier , Highway 72, Sioux Lookoutreport W' A - B arcl ay Exploration ServicesA,,thor 2 3 Grenadier Road, Toronto, Ont. M6R 1L1ates of Survey
of T.iner.iit 3 2
, PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
2/86 to 11/04/86((incoming to office)
(ice S land)
DAYS- i - i per claim Geophysical
—Electromagnetic.....^^
— M?ignptnmftpr 0&Q
—Radiometric . ,,-Other
C,fr,rhfm\rst\
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit! do not apply to airborne lurveyi)
Magnetome
DATE; d
Res. Geol.
ter RWtrnmagnetir RaHinmrtrir(enter days per claim) * * s
f ''
Previous SurveysFile No.
...,..............
Type D i
c
7 Author of Repdrt or AgenK
Qu^lifitations ______ A y ____ ""•"•'•^•fiOTite ^aimplder^tt^gR ^rJ*.,.................,..............^.,.....,,,^..
^ ^
0^//',# ,' \
*
k
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
KRL 788406 tpr* lx 788407 n"mber)
788408 "
788409 -
828264 '
828265 '
828266 '828267 .
828268 .
828269 '828270 ,
828271 .
828272 .
828273 .
828274 '
828275 '
5JT 828276
hi 828277'ijv-
TOTAI.CI.ATMS
837 (85/12)
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations 3 168 ~.—^~ . * r,.. J : ...
Station interval Profile scale
12,672
.val 50 feet Line snarincr .
••6" ——————————————————————————————
200 feetVLF - EM:- 1" ^ 2056
,rval VLF - EM:- 10X Magnetometers - 100 Gammas
Instrument. EDA OMNI 4
+ 1 GammaAccuracy — Scale constant.Diurnal correction methnH S ynchronous Reading Base Station
c, - u i - - i /u \ N ot aPP! icable Base Station check-in interval (hours)—^———————————————-——^——.^n c* *- i *- j i B ase L 1ne a t 0 + 00., 60,000 Gammas Base Station location and value __________________'———!^—————^——
Uh"C
t ZC4
V
l
Instrument Coil configuration Coil separation —
Accuracy _____ Method: Frequency————
Parameters
Geonics EM - 16Not Applicable
Not Applicable1
C] Fixed transmitterN.A.A., Cutler, Maine
D Shoot back24.0 KHz
(specify V.L.F. nation)In - P h ^e and Quadrature Values
In line Parallel line
Instrument.
Scale constantCorrections made.
Base station value and location.
Z
S
Qli
W3
3
Elevation accuracy.
Instrument .-——..-———— Method D Time DomainParameters — On time
-Off
l l Frequency DomainFrequency ————Range ———————
— Integration time.
Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode
SELF POTENTIALInstrument——————————————————————————————————————— Range.Survey Method ———————————————————————————————————————————
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRICInstrument———Values measured.
Energy windows (levels)^^^—^^-^—^^^—^———————-——-————————Height of instrument___________________________Background Count. Size of detector^————^^^—^———^——————-———————-—-——-——————.Overburden ^^^^^^——————^-^^^^^———————.————.^.^^^-—
(type, depth — include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey_______________________Instrument ————-—————————^^^^-^^^—— Accuracy__________________________Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) ———
Instrument(s) ——————(specify for each type of turvey)
Accuracy———^———...———.———(specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used.-—————^———^—————————.—...-.—....—.—.
Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude——————————————-—.————.———^—Line SparingMiles flown over total area———————————---.—.——————Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken—
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight———————
Method of Collection————————
Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain————————
Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent
p. p. m. p. p. b.
Daa
Cu, Pb,
Others—
Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)
Field Analysis
Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——
Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. _________
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis —-——
Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——
Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory^ Extraction Method——. Analytical Method - Reagents Used ————
.tests)
.tests)
-tests)
GeneraL General.
October 3, 1986 Your File: 40-86 Our File: 2.9293
Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and MinesP;0. Box 324Red Lake, OntarioPOV 2(10
Dear Sir:
RE: Letter of Approval dated September 19, 1986
The Technical Assessment Work Credit statement which was Included with the above-noted letter was Incorrect due to typographic error. Enclosed 1s the corrected statement.
Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.
Yours sincerely,
J.C. Smith, Supervisor Mining Lands Section
Whitney Block, 6th Floor Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3
Telephone: (416) 965-4888
SH/mccc: Redaurum Red Lake Mines
Toronto, Ontario
John WMttonRed Lake, Ontario
W,A. Barclay toronto, Ontario
Mr. G.H. FergusonMining 4 Lands Commissionertoronto, Ontario
Resident Geologist Red Lake, Ontario
End.
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ontario
Technical Assessment Work Credits
CORRECTED COPYDate
October 3, 1986"
File
2.9293Mining Recorder's Report of Work No.
40-86
r
?":L
I
1
i, 'i.-
f
f
f
f
•si: .
Is
f
is1
•'i:
P
J!:.
Ae''K'
I:t
Recorded Holder
Township or AreaREDAURUM RED LAKE MINES LIMITED
FAIRLIE TOWNSHIP
Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim
Geophysical
Induced polarization
Other
40
20
Hays
Haus
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column
Geological
Gporhpmir.al
Man days | |
Special provision Cxl
D Credits have been coverage of claims
|~l Credits have been to work dates and
days
Hays
Airborne | |
Ground [x~1
reduced because of partial
reduced because of corrections figures of applicant.
Mining Claims Assessed
KRL 788406 to 409 inclusive 828264 to 276 inclusive
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
20 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC10 DAYS MAGNETOMETER
KRL 828277
Vlo credits have been allowed for the following mining claims[ | not sufficiently covered by the survey | | insufficient technical data filed
:' : The Mining Recorder may reduce the nbovo credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geoloyor.il - '10; Geochemical - 10; Section 77(19) - GO.
GRAVES ,TWP (M.-2I66)W. R
W.R ,42MI9.90CE
NE
CHJ
6^V:21?*: Jr.^lAW^IMVi
1o3fl31 Wf4jj
iKttC IRMISQ
L-_- i_-U --t--_ i- -
vw i l"~ "~"~~ — ~~ —"-—— "~ ~- - —"
KRL , KRL 'KRL i
775755 775828 | 775627
J 0 P/037J 1 790068 |790052!|
YJS77I -fs^ t .idijdi J 775761 j 79006B 1775779'•'KRL i/KBI ilTo ™ ~~ij^i ~.™ —i ~t
' 7-75762 ' 7 V sTBS ' j 77578 6l J J -j j? l f;C ' x^; Jf l0 7 ** f4***? lg8***!--1. — L- — - 7-zJ7la..L- _u TL 'KRL . KRI "."r;;L "" . K RL""i K"n * ,'fl?^ | " Rl \ vri - "1|tnt- V!^ L ! K!
' 7757Z.•* . ^O 775716
(L l l, til "T h (M. TOW|NSHI!P KRL KRL
1775726 l
Ci
il/D 8 * C Of Mf . W' K B.ZftCs
WPSW.corntr
I7*ew
BAIRD TWR (M,2138)
4BCN.
3.98^9,
52N*4SW0123 2.9293 FAIRLIE TffP 200
THE TOWNSHIP-' -, PF . '^'
FAIRLIEDISTRICT OF ~ -
KENORA ^(PATRICIA PORTION)"i ^ - - ' 'v*
' RED LAKE ~ V/:'MINING DIVISION '' ' ^ w
SCALE:1-INChN4O CHAINS
LEGEND
PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALE tLEASESLOCATED , LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLY ' SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY ,' ROADS r IMPROVED ROADS- , ^ KING'S ! HIGHWAYS - ^ ' RAILWAYS ' * * POWER LINES MARSH OR MUSKEG " xMINES -^ yCANCELLED '
X ^: lm.R,6:.S.R.O.
t——,—L*-*?Uv(lrf^^-*'l
'•r.-i' .P-
NOtES' —^T.- i' 1 ' -400' surface rights reservation- *~ along the shores of all lo"kes and r ivers
SEPj-1 0 1986
f-
-.DLAKE MINING DIVISIONr-
s-' li 1986
lit LiAl, ONfARIO
PLAN NO-M'2158
ONTARIO t f
MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH
RED
AU
RU
M R
ED L
AK
E M
INES
LIM
ITED
HU
MLI
N W
EST
EXTE
NSI
ON
Fa
irlie
Tw
p.,
Red
Lak
e, O
ntar
io
V/.F
- Eh
500
tOO
O F
EE
T
SC
ALE
l"
s 20
0Fee
l M
ay
1986
52N64SWei23 2.9293 FAIRLIE TWP
RE
DL
AK
E
20 N
BA
SE
L
lNt
Inst
rum
ent..
...
......
...
...E
DA
O
MN
I 4
Base
sta
tion
loca
tion.
.....
A
Rea
ding
bas
e le
vel..
....5
9,00
0gam
mas
Con
tour
in
terv
al...
......
....1
00 g
amm
as
2500
gam
ma
cont
our
SO
Oga
mm
a co
ntou
r
100
gam
ma
cont
our
Dep
ress
ion
......
......
......
....
(
RE
DA
UR
UM
R
ED
LA
KE
M
INE
S
LIM
ITE
D
HU
MLI
N W
ES
T E
XTE
NS
ION
Fa
irlie
Tw
p.,
Red
Lak
e, O
ntar
io
Mag
neto
met
er S
urve
y TO
TAL
FIEL
D C
ON
TOU
RS
10
00
F
EE
T
5aN
04S
wei
123
2.9
39
3
FA
IRL
IE
TWP
22
0S
CA
LE
l"
'- 20
0 F
eel
May
19
86
•* f*
•20
N
W l
ION
/r -a
BA
SE
LI
NE
'*
-a
** i -y
LA
KE
•/B-j
*(
-i, -t.
-j -'
•f/O
'
O
'f-y
/ j
-s \
-f -f"f
-/O
ft
LEG
EN
D
fO
V
-/i-
-f
/g
''f
-l
-s -i
t-l
-o
/o
J
-/O -'1
-
, 1
-; -f -8 'IO
''O "f
-,t.
5 3- t J SS5^
5J
*-t
"t
*?
fi.
0 f}
*L
o -r
!
' --
i **
-
0-1
0
0 -f
0
ff -f
0
——
——
— 0 —
— -4
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
0 —
—
d 0 -3 -)
-
3S 00
-"
^ -i
'' -s - s -3 0 o -
^
a
^^ ^V
"
X- \
IOS
< \
iLJ-
*(t
0
*4 */
*i
*i•i
*f -
0 fit n
•i *j
^M
——
——
——
——
——
——
0~
-3
e
.1
0
-f
0
-f
o .
-4
o
•1
0
-/O
|
'/*
0
.
-/)
d
-rf
p"1
7 t
"fr
o
'
''1*
0
-fl~
*l-"
*^
0
'it,
A,6
.
y-/!
\ "'
\ \
--^^C
^i
5 D tf- -l* c r
20S
//A
-^
+S
-t • \+1
04
i *-A
*
o /r
o *f
KR
L^-
i ——
——
——
——
— S
—
. Q
2Q
2
73 +
J
-i
*f
-J
^
-? */
-J */
^ */
-8
,/
-
-tf
V
-H
l)
"f
"
-/t
O
'
,/f,
*f
-*L
rf
-fi
t'f
-A0
. v*
. -
i*
**f
''8
tja
"^
r/v
-/t
-fflf'
^"^
tt lift,
/*
* *
o A
"j
//KR
U
7/ 82
8 1
277-
l -f
I i * - 't! "f
\\ '~
li
.^*
l .
\ "'
\\
-J"-4
..
\\ "
\ " \\
*,o
-^
*.i-
-,*
v-G
-(
0 -*.
X.
0
*^
o
*f
0
*J —
——
——
——
——
——
0—
fi
0
o d
o f
1-L
s .
-t
f
^
f
0
f
-2
f
-/O
C
-1
0
-tt.
0
-H-
Q
.
-,t
f
-ft
f
-U -JLO
'0
,ii
If
-f*
^
"ff
^
.'8
/O
-
-^*
*o
-A*
*
J.*
0
-^
^i
"7
-#-/l
.
-t
-tt
'f-*9
^
-iA
'f 6
-Z2
''*
-/| •VY
'.e
.
-^a
-.a
-(A
-'0
,|
-rt
-V
'fO
.
-•i
'J
-t
o
-i
o
-z
^r.'l
-#
o1
'J -/J
- 1
/Y
" -^
ili
-/3
-1
^ /6
,,O
i
/*
-,*
i | i ./a _
__
__
__
__
__
-,^
'f
-/o
!
^ ^
;i
-^
/."
' -L
* -5
J o
#
0
i o
-
j 0
' 0
"*
0
-* ..*
6
-tj
0
i/ -i)
0 J
-A?
o
-ill
0
'it
0
-AY
0
-
-A?
*
-A4
o
-A/
-^
-/t
-*.
"^
0
-/J
" ^
-7f
'*
-/o
/o
-'li
/O
'J
^
-*1
o
-A
*
6
,.
f
-^
Y
-'*
y
-i*
f
-,a
J -*
3 ^
3 X
,6 'O IO '0 /o g 8 -*e~
- -
M '0 1* 'b • z 'S 'i 'fa '3 10 8 4 •A—
— l
^ -2 -8 -fc -'i
-/l -ir -'Z -/fc
-it
-'1 -i -5
-S -t O l S fe '3 't /to ./* y* JO * -i
-4
M-to
; /
J
-lo
/5
J-2
20 M
KR
L Jfi
A,0
-i
g
78
8
40
6"
-
7 -
-f
7 -f
KR
L s -f
f -
-i
'/o -
7 -Jt
-.U 'f
y -
ye v/-
-i o
uJ
s -y
(Z.O
o
.Zi
- '
'f
i
i o
-(,
-f /f
*/
-/t
o
-/t
3
-n f
-/fa
. 7
-/y
t/
/f
if
rf
/f -i? -i? -i
RE
DA
UR
UM
R
ED
LA
KE
M
INE
S
LIM
ITE
D
HU
MLI
N W
ES
T E
XTE
NS
ION
Fa
irlie
Tw
p.,
Red
Lak
e, O
ntar
io
UJ
'
OU
JL
JC
M
50
0'
SC
ALt
May
i9
86
23
0S
2N04
SW
ei23
2
.92
93
F
AIR
LIE
T
*P