recipes for plasma atomic layer etching* ankur agarwal a) and mark j. kushner b) a) department of...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
221 views
TRANSCRIPT
RECIPES FOR PLASMA ATOMIC LAYER ETCHING*
Ankur Agarwala) and Mark J. Kushnerb)
a)Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, [email protected]
b)Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
http://uigelz.ece.iastate.edu
34th IEEE ICOPS, June 2007
*Work supported by the SRC and NSF
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
AGENDA
Atomic Layer Processing
Plasma Atomic Layer Etching (PALE)
Non-sinusoidal Bias Waveforms
Tailored Bias PALE Recipes
SiO2 using Ar/c-C4F8
Self-aligned contacts
Concluding Remarks
ANKUR_ICOPS07_Agenda
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
ATOMIC LAYER PROCESSING
Advanced microelectronics structures require extreme selectivity in etching materials with nm resolution.
Atomic layer plasma processing may allow for this level of control.
Current techniques employ specialized ion beam equipment.
The high cost of atomic layer processing challenges its use.
Plasma Atomic Layer Etching (PALE) is potentially an economic alternative.
ANKUR_ICOPS07_01
Double Gate MOSFET
Tri-gate MOSFET
Refs: AIST, Japan; Intel Corporation
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
PLASMA ATOMIC LAYER ETCHING (PALE)
In PALE etching proceeds monolayer by monolayer in a cyclic, self limiting process.
First step: Top monolayer is passivated in non-etching plasma.
Passivation makes top layer more easily etched compared to sub-layers.
Second step: Remove top layer (self limiting).
Exceeding threshold energy results in etching beyond top layer.
ANKUR_ICOPS07_02
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
PLASMA ATOMIC LAYER ETCHING (PALE)
PALE has been computationally and experimentally investigated using conventional plasma equipment.
Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) Capacitively coupled plasma (CCP)
Since the equipment is already in fabrication facilities, no additional integration costs are incurred.
The low speed of PALE processes hinder its integration into production line.
Speed can be increased but only at the cost of losing control of CD (critical dimensions) or damaging material interfaces.
ANKUR_ICOPS07_03
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
INCREASING SPEEDOF PALE … HOW?
ANKUR_ICOPS07_04
Conventional PALE
Tailored Bias PALE
Conventional PALE Different gas mixtures for each step. Although self-limiting, purge steps
increase process time.
Tailored bias PALE
Create nearly mono-energetic ion distribution.
Control ion energies via changes in voltage amplitude.
Single gas mixture for both steps eliminates purge and reduces time.
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
NON-SINUSOIDAL BIAS WAVEFORMS: IEADs
ANKUR_ICOPS07_05
Custom waveform produces nearly constant sheath potential resulting in narrow IEAD.
Peak energy of IEAD is controlled by amplitude.
IED broadens at higher biases due to thickening of sheath and longer transit times.
Vp-p
= 10%; Vp-p = 200 V
Ref: A. Agarwal and M.J. Kushner, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 23, 1440 (2005)
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
HYBRID PLASMA EQUIPMENT MODEL (HPEM)
ANKUR_ICOPS07_06
Electromagnetics Module: Antenna generated electric and magnetic fields
Electron Energy Transport Module: Beam and bulk generated sources and transport coefficients.
Fluid Kinetics Module: Electron and Heavy Particle Transport, Poisson’s equation
Plasma Chemistry Monte Carlo Module:
Ion and Neutral Energy and Angular Distributions
Fluxes for feature profile model
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
MONTE CARLO FEATURE PROFILE MODEL
Monte Carlo techniques address plasma surface interactions and evolution of surface morphology and profiles.
Inputs: Initial material mesh Surface reaction mechanism Ion and neutral energy and
angular distributions
Fluxes at selected wafer locations.
Fluxes and distributions from equipment scale model (HPEM)
ANKUR_ICOPS07_07
FLUOROCARBON PLASMA ETCHING OF SiO2/Si
CFx radicals produce polymeric passivation layers which regulate delivery of precursors and activation energy.
Chemisorption of CFx produces a complex at the oxide-polymer interface
Low energy ion activation of the complex produces polymer.
Polymer complex sputtered by energetic ions etching.
As SiO2 consumes the polymer, thicker layers on Si slow etch rates enabling selectivity.
ANKUR_ICOPS07_08
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
CFx Ion+
I*, CF2
SiO2CxFy SiOCFy
CxFy
Ion+
CO2Ion+
CO2
Polymer
SiF3
Ion+,FSiF3
CFx
Polymer
F
SiF SiF2 SiF3
Ion+,F
SiF3
SiO2
Plasma
Si
CxFy
Plasma
PassivationLayer
CxFyPassivation
Layer
CFx Ion+
I*, CF2
SiO2CxFy SiOCFy
CxFy
Ion+
CO2Ion+
CO2
Polymer
SiF3
Ion+,FSiF3
CFx
Polymer
F
SiF SiF2 SiF3
Ion+,F
SiF3
SiO2
Plasma
Si
CxFy
Plasma
PassivationLayer
CxFyPassivation
Layer
MAIN ETCH-PALE FOR VERY HIGH ASPECT RATIO FEATURES
ANKUR_ICOPS07_09
Iowa State UniversityOptical and Discharge Physics
10:1 Trench
PALE will always be slow compared to conventional etching.
Selectivity of PALE is only needed at end of etch at material interface.
Combine:
Rapid “main etch” to reach material interface
PALE to clear feature with high selectivity.
Feature to be investigated is SiO2-over-Si trench with an aspect ratio of 1:10.
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
Ar/c-C4F8 ICP FOR SiO2 ETCHING
Test system is inductively coupled plasma with 5 MHz biased substrate.
Ar/C4F8 = 75/25, 100 sccm, 15 mTorr, 500 W ICP
Main etch is conventional sinusoidal waveform.
PALE uses tailored bias waveform: Passivate: 50 V (peak-to-peak) Etch: 100 V (peak-to-peak)
ANKUR_ICOPS07_10
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
MAIN ETCH OF SiO2-over-Si
ANKUR_ICOPS07_11
Main etch performed using a sinusoidal bias waveform.
Micro-trenching at sides of feature due to specular reflection off walls.
Central SiO2 remains when underlying Si is exposed.
Significant etching into Si during over-etch to clear feature.
Ar/C4F8 = 75/25, 100 sccm, 15 mTorr, 500 W, 100 V at 5 MHz
Aspect Ratio = 1:10
Si
Mask
SiO2
ANIMATION SLIDE-GIF
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
Ar/c-C4F8 TAILORED BIAS PALE: IEADs
ANKUR_ICOPS07_12
PALE of SiO2 using ICP Ar/C4F8 with variable bias.
Step 1 Vp-p = 50 V Passivate single layer with SiO2CxFy
Low ion energies to reduce etching.
Step 2 Vp-p = 100 V Etch/Sputter SiO2CxFy layer. Above threshold ion energies.
Narrow IEADs enable discrimination between threshold energies of undelying SiO2 and polymer complex.
Ar/C4F8 = 75/25, 100 sccm, 15 mTorr, 500 W
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
SiO2-over-Si: PALE vs CONVENTIONAL ETCH
ANKUR_ICOPS07_13
Narrow IEAD enables etching of rough initial profile at bottom.
Redeposition of etched products and polymer cover exposed Si and sidewall; avoids notching and damage.
High speeds (~ 4 ML/cycle) with high etch selectivity.
5 cycles of PALE
Si
SiO2
ANIMATION SLIDE-GIF 1 cell = 3 Å
Conventional Etching
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
PALE: ROUGHNESS vs STEP 2 ION ENERGY
ANKUR_ICOPS07_14
Speed of PALE can be increased via change in ion energies.
At high ion energies, distinction between threshold energies is lost.
Final etch profile is rough.
Already exposed underlying Si vulnerable at high ion energy.
Surface roughness scales linearly with ion energies.
140 eV
120 eV
110 eV
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
PALE: ETCH RATE vs STEP 2 ION ENERGY
ANKUR_ICOPS07_15
Number of PALE cycles required to clear feature decrease with increasing ion energy.
Etch rate saturates at high ion energies due to the rough initial feature profile.
Trade-off between high etching rates and selectivity.
Etching of already exposed underlying Si leads to roughness.
Initial Final
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
PALE: CONVENTIONAL vs TAILORED BIAS
ANKUR_ICOPS07_16 ANIMATION SLIDE-GIF
Conventional PALE scheme utilizes 20 cycles.
High speeds (~ 3-4 ML/cycle) and extreme selectivity of PALE enable fast etching of self-aligned contacts.
Final etch profile is smooth even at high etching rates.
Tailored: 5 cycles
Si
SiO2
SiO2CxFy
Plasma
1 cell = 3 Å
Conventional: 20 cycles
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Atomic layer control of etch processes will be critical for 32 nm node devices.
PALE using conventional plasma equipment makes for an more economic processes.
Slow etching rates of conventional PALE need to be optimized: trade-off between high selectivity and etch rate
PALE of SiO2 in Ar/c-C4F8 plasma investigated using custom bias waveforms,
Non-sinusoidal bias waveforms enable:
Precision control of IEADs
Elimination of purge step to increase process speeds
High selectivity at high etching rates (~ 4 ML/cycle)
ANKUR_ICOPS07_17