reatining wall with horzontal bach fill and trrafic load

27
RCC design B.C.Punmia RETAINING WALL 18.2 TYPE OF RETAINING WALLS 1 Gravity walls 2 Cantilever retaining walls a. T- shaped b. L- shaped 3 Counterfort retainig walls. 4 Buttresssed walls. The cantilever retaining wall resist the horizontal earth pressure as wel A retaining wall or retaining structure is used for mai the ground surfgaces at defrent elevations on either side of it. embankments are involed in construction ,retaining wall are usually ne In the construction of buildins having basements, retaining walls are ma Similsrly in bridge work, the wing walls and abutments etc. are des retaining walls , to resist earth pressure along with superimposed lo material retained or supported by a retaining wall is called backfill lyi the horizontal plane at the elevation of the top of a wall is ca In the design of retaining walls or other retaining str it is necessary to compute the lateral earth pressure exerted bythe r mass of soil. The equation of finding out the lateral earth pressure retaining wall is one of the oldest in Civil Engineering field. The pla strees, when the failure is imminent, was invetigated by Rankine in1860. theoretical experiment work has been done in this field and many th Retaining walls may be classified according to their resisting the earth pressure,and according to their shape. Following are commen types of retaining walls (Fig) A gravity retaining wall shown in fig 1 is the one in w earth pressure exrted by the back fill is resisted by dead weight which is either made of masonry or of mass concrete . The stress devlo wall is very low ,These walls are no proportioned that no tension is

Upload: gagajain

Post on 28-Nov-2014

203 views

Category:

Documents


10 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

RCC design B.C.Punmia

RETAINING WALL

18.2 TYPE OF RETAINING WALLS

1 Gravity walls2 Cantilever retaining walls a. T- shaped b. L- shaped3 Counterfort retainig walls.4 Buttresssed walls.

The cantilever retaining wall resist the horizontal earth pressure as well as other vertical pressure by way of beending of varios components acting as cantilever s.A coomon form of cantilever retaining waal

A retaining wall or retaining structure is used for maintaining the ground surfgaces at

defrent elevations on either side of it. Whenever embankments are involed in construction ,retaining

wall are usually necessary. In the construction of buildins having basements, retaining walls are

mandatory. Similsrly in bridge work, the wing walls and abutments etc. are designed as retaining

walls , to resist earth pressure along with superimposed loads. The material retained or supported by

a retaining wall is called backfill lying above the horizontal plane at the elevation of the top of a wall

is called the surcharge, and its inclination to horizontal is called the surcharge angle b

In the design of retaining walls or other retaining structures, it is necessary to compute the lateral earth pressure exerted bythe retaining mass of soil. The equation of finding out the lateral earth pressure against retaining wall is one of the oldest in Civil Engineering field. The plastic state of strees, when the failure is imminent, was invetigated by Rankine in1860. A Lot of theoretical experiment work has been done in this field and many theory and hypothesis heve benn proposed.

Retaining walls may be classified according to their mode of resisting the earth pressure,and according to their shape. Following are some of commen types of retaining walls (Fig)

A gravity retaining wall shown in fig 1 is the one in which the earth pressure exrted by the back fill is resisted by dead weight of wall, which is either made of masonry or of mass concrete . The stress devlop in the wall is very low ,These walls are no proportioned that no tension is devloped any where, and the resultant of forces remain withen the middle third of the base.

Page 2: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

The cantilever retaining wall resist the horizontal earth pressure as well as other vertical pressure by way of beending of varios components acting as cantilever s.A coomon form of cantilever retaining waal

Page 3: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

The cantilever retaining wall resist the horizontal earth pressure as well as other vertical pressure by way of beending of varios components acting as cantilever s.A coomon form of cantilever retaining waal

Page 4: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

[email protected]

200 Q= 2 kN/m

Height of Parapet wall 1000

Height of Retaining wall = 6.00 m

Super imposed load due to road traffic = 18.00 10 300 @ c/c 20

Unit weight of Earth = 18.002000

520 @ c/c

Angle of repose = 30 Degree 6000

Safe Bearing capacity of soil = 160 10 300 @ c/c

Coffiecent of friction = 0.4 5540 20

Height of Parapet wall = 1.00 m3100

260 @ c/c

Concrete M- 20 25000 10 160 @ c/c

m 13.33 7 20 130 @ c/c

Steel Fy 415 230600

20 180 @ c/c

Nominal cover = 30 mm 8 120 @ c/c

260 Toe Heel

DESIGN SUMMARY200 460

900200

Stem thickness At footing 600 mm At top 200 mm

Heel width 1800 mm Toe width 1800 mm 8 1800

600Footing width 4200 mm Key 600 x 600 mm 120 @ c/c 1800 20 130

4200

Reinforcement Summary 10 600 10 160

300 @ c/c

Main

100% Reinforcement upto mm 3100 20 130 mm c/c 10 20

50% Reinforcement upto mm 2000 20 260 mm c/c 300 @ c/c3.10 2.00

520 @ c/c

25% Reinforcement upto Top 20 520 mm c/c

Distribution 8 160 mm c/c 5540

Tamprecture 8 300 mm c/c 20

260 @ c/c

Main 20 130 mm c/c

Distribution 8 120 mm c/c 20

130 @ c/c

Main 20 120 mm c/c All diamention in mm

Distribution 8 120 mm c/c Out side face Earth side face Not to scale

DESIGN OF CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL with horizontal back fill and traffic load.

KN/m2 mm F mm F

KN/m3

KN/m2 mm Fmm F

wt.c N/m3 mm Fscbc N/mm2 mm F

sst N/mm2 mm Fmm F

mm F

mm F @ c/c

mm F mm F @ c/c

STEM:-

mm F@ mm F mm F

mm F@

mm F@

mm F@

mm F@ mm F

TOE:-mm F@

mm F@ mm FHEEL:-

mm F@

mm F@

Page 5: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

[email protected]

DESIGN OF T SHAPED CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL

Height of Retaining wall = 6.00 m

Super imposed load due to road traffic = 18.00Unit weight of Earth g = 18 = 18000Angle of repose = 30 Degree

Safe Bearing capacity of soil = 160Coffiecent of friction m = 0.4 = 25Height of Parapet wall = 1.00 m

Concrete = M - 20

0 = 13.33 wt.c = 25000 N/m3

Steel fe = 415 = 230

= 7

Nominal cover = 30 mm

1 Design Constants:- For HYSD Bars Cocrete M = 20

m*c=

13.33 x 7= 0.289

13.33 x 7 + 230

= 1 - 0.289 / 3 = 0.904

= 0.5 x 7 x 0.904 x 0.289 = 0.913

2 Diamension of base:-

Assume that a horizontal force Q= 2 kN/m length of parapet wall will be act because of person standing near the parapet

Due to surcharge eqivalent height of fill given by w=

18= 1.00 m

y 18.00

Hence, H2=H+he'= 6.00 + 1.00 = 7.00 m

a = 1 - = 1 -160

= 0.4232.2 y H 2.2 x 18 x 7.00

= 0.42 …. Eq (1)

The width of base is given by Eq.

b = 0.95 H x Ka = =1 - 0.50

= 0.33(1- a)x(1+3 a) 1 + 0.5

b = 0.95 x 7.000.333

= 3.35 ( 1 - 0.42 )x( 1 + 1.26 )

The base width from the considration of sliding is given by Eq.

b =0.7HKa

=0.7 x 7.00 x 0.333

= 7.04 m( 1 - 0.42 )x 0.4

Taking maximum value of H = 0.6 b = 0.60 x 7.00 = 4.20 m

Hence Provided, b = 4.20 m

The wall will be unsafe against sliding. This will be made safe by providing a shear Key at base .

Width of toe slab = = 0.42 x 4.20 = 1.76 m Provided toe slab = 1.80 m

Let the thickness of base be = H/12 = 7.00 / 12 = 0.58 or say = 0.60 m

Hence width of heel slab = 4.20 - 0.60 - 1.80 = 1.80 m

kN/m2

kN/m3 N/m2

q0 kN/m2

N/mm2

sst N/mm2

scbc

k=m*c+sst

j=1-k/3

R=1/2xc x j x k

he=

in determining the valueof b and a etc. we will use a height

The ratio of the length of toe slab EF to the base width b may be determinined by eq.

q0

Keep a

Ka 1-sin F1+sinF

(1-a) mThis width is excessive. Normal practice is to provide b between 0.5 to 0.6 H .

a x b

for design purpose

Page 6: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

[email protected]

3 Thickness of stem:-Heigth AB = 6.00 - 0.60 = 5.40 m consider 1 m length of retaining wall

below B.Due to surcgarge w, there will be a uniform horizontal pressure

= 0.33 x 18 = 6.002

moment of rectangular pressure distribution, plus moment of triangular pressure distribution.

= + Kaw x +2 6

x ( 5.40 + 1.00 + 0.33 x 18 x5.40 0.33 x 18 x( 5.40

2 6\ M = 257.74 Kn-m

BM=

257.74 x= 531 mm

Rxb 0.913 x 1000

Keep d = 540 mm and total thickness = 540 + 60 = 600= 200 mm at top so that effective depth of = 140 mm

continue uniform thickness of 200

4 Stability of wall:-Full dimension wall is shown in fig 1a

= 4.20 - 1.80 - 0.60 = 1.80 m

= weight of rectangular portion of stem

= weight of triangular portion of stem

= weight of base slab

= weight of soil on heel slab.

= Total super imposed traffic load, over heel slab.

The calculation are arrenged in Table

Detail force(kN) lever arm Moment about toe (KN-m)

1 x 0.20 x 6.40 x 25 = 32.00 2.30 73.60

1/2 x 0.40 x 6.40 x 25 = 32.00 2.00 64.00

1 x 4.20 x 0.60 x 25 = 63.00 2.10 132.30

1 x 1.80 x 5.40 x 18 = 175.00 3.30 577.37

1 x 1.80 x 1.00 x 18.00 = 32.00 3.30 106.92

= 302.00 847.27

Total resisting moment = 847.27 kN-m

Earth pressure p = =0.33 x 18 x( 6.00

= 108 kN2 2

Over turning

Over turning moment at Toe, due to horizontal force = 2 x 7 = 14

Over turning moment at Toe, due to earth pressure = 108 x6

= 2163

=0.33 x 18 x( 6.00

= 1082

Total over turning moment = 338 kN/m

\ F.S. against over turning =847.27

= 2.51 > 2 'Hence safe'338

2 + 108 +( 0.333 x 18 x 6.00 )= 146

\ F.S. against Sliding = =0.40 x 302

0.83 < 1.5146

Special shear key will have to be designed to make the wall safe against sliding

Due to retained soil, the earth pressure diagram will be a triangle,having an ordinate equal to Ka.y.h at h

Ka.w kN/m2 throughout the height.

The total bending moment at C will be due to moment of horizontal force Q= kN acting at A, plus

\ M Q(H1+he)H1

2

Kay xH1

3

\ M 22x

Effective depth required =

10 6

Reduce the total thickness to

mm from B to A

Length of heel slab CD

Let w1

w2

w3

w4

w5

w1

w2

w3

w4

w5

Sw total MR

Ka x y x H2 )2

Over turning moment due to Horizontal pressure caused by live load

)2

Total horizontal pressure, Sp =

mSW

Sp

Page 7: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

[email protected]

Pressure distribution 847.27 - 338 = 509.27 kN-m\ Distance x of the point of application of resultant, from toe is

x = =509.27

= 1.69 mb

=4.20

= 0.70 m302.00 6 6

Eccenticity e =b

- x =4.20

- 1.69 = 0.41 < 0.70 'Hence safe'2 2

= 1 +6 e

=302.00

x 1 +6x 0.41

= 114.4 < 160b b 4.20 4.20 Hence safe

= 1 -6 e

=302.00

x 1 -6x 0.41

= 29.40 < 160b b 4.20 4.20 Hence safe

Pressure p at the junction of stem with toe slab is

p = 114.40 -114.40 - 29.40

x 1.80 = 77.974.20

Pressure p at the junction of stem with Heel slab is

p = 114.40 -114.40 - 29.40

x 2.40 = 65.834.20

5 Design of toe slab:-

(1) Up ward soil pressure (2) Down ward weight of slab

Down ward weight of slab per unit area = 0.60 x 1 x 1.00 x 25 = 15.00

Hence net pressure intensities will be = 114.40 - 15.00 = 99.40

= 77.97 - 15.00 = 62.97

= 0.50 x( 99.40 + 62.97 ) x 1.80 = 146.00 kN

=62.97 2.00 x 99.40

x1.80

= 0.97 m62.97 + 99.40 3

\ = 146.00 x 0.97 = 141.23 kN-m

Effective depth required =BM

=141.23 x

= 393 mmRxb 0.913 x 1000

Keep effective depth d = 400 mm and total thickness = 400 + 60 = 460Reduce the total thickness to = 200 mm or 0.20 m at edge say = 0.46

Bars available from stem reinforcemnet are 20 130 = 2416

=146 x 1000

= 0.32 > 0.30 Hence un safe1000 x 460

% of reinforcement provided =100As

=100 x 2416

= 0.53 % = 0.30 Rafer table 3.1bd 1000 x 460

Hence unsafe, To make safe, either increase the reinforcment or increase the Depth.

= 0.32 0.6 reinforcement

Ast =0.60 x b x d

=0.6 x 1000 x 400

= 2400 Rafer table 3.1

100 100

Using 20 = =3.14 x ( 20

= 3144 4

Hence Spacing =1000 x 314

= 131 mm say= 130 mm c/c

2400 Hence the slab just safe in shear

Distribution steel =0.12

x 1000 x460 + 200

= 396100 2

Using 8 = =3.14 x ( 8

= 504 4

\ Spacing =1000 x 50

= 127 mm say = 120 mm c/c396

net moment SM =

SM

Sw

Pressure p1 at toe

SW kN -m2

Pressure p1 at Heel

SW kN -m2

kN-m2

kN-m2

The upward pressure distribution on the toe slab is shown in fig 1b .The weight of soil above the toe slab is neglicted . Thus two forces are acting on it

kN-m2

kN-m2 under D

kN-m2 under E

Total force = S.F. at F

C.G. of force from F+

B.M. at F

10 6

mm F @ mm c/c giving Ast

Tv N/mm2

\ tc

The reinforcement % required to get Tc >= N/mm2 is equal to %

mm2

mm F bars, Area P D2 )'2

mm2

mm2

mm F bars, Area P D2 )'2

mm2

Page 8: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

[email protected]

6 Design of heel slab :-Four force act on it 1. down ward weight of soil = 5.40 m high

2 Live traffic load 3 down ward weight of heel slab 4 upward soil pressure

Total weight of soil = 1.80 x 5.40 x 1 x 18 = 175.0 KN acting at 0.90Live Load = 18.00 x 1 x 1.80 = 32.4 KN acting at 0.90

Total weight of heel slab = 1.80 x 0.46 x 25 = 20.70 KN acting at 0.90Total upward soil pressure = 1/2 x( 65.83 + 29.40 )x 1.80 = 85.71 kN

Acting at =65.83 + 2 x 29.40

x1.80

= 0.7965.83 + 29.40 3

\ Total force = 175 + 32.40 + 20.70 - 85.71 = 142.35 kN\ = ( 175 + 32.40 + 20.70 ) x 0.90 - 85.71 x 0.79 =

= 138.0 x

Effective depth required =BM

=137.95 x

= 389 mmRxb 0.913 x 1000

Keep effective depth d = 400 mm and total thickness = 400 + 60 = 460Reduce the total thickness to = 200 mm or 0.20 m at edge (as that of toe slab)

Ast = =137.95 x

= 1660230 x 0.904 x 400

Using 20 = =3.14 x ( 20

= 3144 4

\ Spacing =1000 x 314

= 189 mm say = 180 mm c/c1660

=142.35 x 1000

= 0.361000 x 400

= 0.36 0.82 % of reinforcemenrt

Ast =0.82 .b.d

=0.82 x 1000 x 314

= 2575Rafer table 3.1

100 100

Using 20 = =3.14 x ( 20

= 3144 4

Hence Spacing =1000 x 314

= 122 mm say = 120 mm c/c

2575 Hence the slab just safe in shear

Hence provided 20 mm bars @ 120 mm c/c, Actual Ast =1000 x 314

= 2617120

Distribution steel =0.12

x 1000 x460 + 200

= 396100 2

Using 8 = =3.14 x ( 8

= 504 4

\ Spacing =1000 x 50

= 127 mm say = 120 mm c/c396

7 Reinforcement in the stem:-

Ast =BM x1000

=257.74 x

= 2297230 x 0.904 x 540

Using 20 = =3.14 x ( 20

= 3144 4

\ Spacing =1000 x 314

= 137 mm say = 130 mm c/c2297

= 1000 x314

x 2416130

m from C.

m from C.

m from C.

m from B

S.F. at B=

B.M.at C

B.M.at C 10'6 N-mm2

10 6

BM 10 6

mm2

sst x j x D

mm F bars, Area P D2 )'2

mm2

Tv N/mm2

The reinforcement % required to get Tc > N/mm2 is equal to

mm2

mm F bars, Area P D2 )'2

mm2

mm2

mm F bars, Area P D2 )'2

mm2

10 6

mm2

sst x j x D

mm F bars, Area P D2 )'2

mm2

Actual AS provided mm2

Page 9: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

[email protected]

Bent all bars bars in the toe slab to serve as tensile reinforcement there. However in order to make the

= 2400 = 130 mm c/c

Hence provide 20 130

= 2 + 0.33 x 18 x 5.40 + 0.33 x 185.40

1222

=121.88 x 1000

= 0.23 < 0.28<

1000 x 540.00 Hence safe

% of reinforcement provided =100As

=100 x 2400

= 0.44 = 0.28 Rafer table 3.1bd 1000 x 540

and if the depth of stem were constant, half the bars could have been curtailed at a depth

and if the depth of stem were constant, half the bars could have been curtailed at a depth

D = = = 0.79

force, let us try at depth = 0.65 H1 = 0.65 x 5.40 = 3.51

= 3.51 m

= + Kaw x +2 6

x ( 3.51 + 1.00 + 0.33 x 18 x3.51 0.33 x 18 x( 3.51

2 6\ = 89.22 Kn-m

= 140 +540 - 140

x h

d' = 140 +540 - 140

x 4 = 400 mm5.40

Ast = =89.22 x

= 1074 < 1149230 x 0.904 x 400

This is less than half of that provided at C. Hence half bars can be curtailed at this depth.

= 12 x 20 = 240 mm

or D = 400 mm beyond this point, whichever is more.

Hence h = 3.51 - 0.4 = 3.10 m. Hence curtailed half bars at a height of 3.10

If we wish to curtailed half of the remaning part, let us try it at a section at depth

h = 0.65 x 3.51 = 2.30 m

= + Kaw x +2 6

x ( 2.30 + 1.00 + 0.33 x 18.00 x2.30 0.33 x 18 x( 2.30

2 6\ = 34.64 Kn-m

= 140 +2400 - 140

x h

d' = 140 +540 - 140

x 2.30 = 310 mm5.40

Ast = =34.64 x

= 537 < 574230 x 0.904 x 310

This is less than half of that provided at C. Hence half bars can be curtailed at this depth.

= 12 x 20 = 240 mm

or D = 310 mm beyond this point, whichever is more.

Hence h = 2.30 - 0.3104 = 2.00 m. Hence curtailed half bars at a height of 2.00

toe slab safe in shear, steel required Ast mm2 Give spacing

mm F bars @ mm c/c . Due to this, sufficient bond length will be

available to the side of point C (point of maximum bending moment)

Total Shear force at C =Q+Ka.w.H1+KayH12/2

S.F. at C2=

Shear stress at C Tv N/mm2Tv Tc

\ tc

Let us curtail reinforcement between C and B. If there were no external force, except the earth pressure,

H1 H1H1 Below the point B because of presence of other

2(1/3) 2(1/3)

m below B to see whether

half bars could be curtailed there or not. Thus, depth of section below B = h

\ B. M. Q(H1+he)H1

2

Kay xH1

3

\ B. M. = 22x

The effective depth d' at section is (where h In meter)H1

BM 10 6

mm2

sst x j x D

However, the bars should be extented by a distance of =12 F

\ B. M. Q(H1+he)H1

2

Kay xH1

3

\ B. M. = 22x

The effective depth d' at section is (where h In meter)H1

BM 10 6

mm2

sst x j x D

However, the bars should be extented by a distance of =12 F

Page 10: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

[email protected]

Distribution and temprechure reinforcement:-

Average thickness of stem = 600 + 200= 400 mm

2

\ Distribution reinforcement =0.12

x 1000 x 400 = 480100

Using 10 = =3.14 x ( 10

= 78.504 4

= 1000 x 79= 164 mm say = 160 mm c/c

480

Hence provided 10 mm F bars @ 160 mm c/c at the inner face of wall,along its length.

Area = 480 provide 10 mm bars = 300Design of shear key:-

The wall is in unsafe in sliding, Let us provide a shear keys of depth a below the stem

==

1=

1= 3

= 3.00 x 77.97 = 233.90 Ka 0.33

This intencity may be considered to be constant along the depth of key, through there will be little increase

in Pp , because of increase in pwith depth.Wewill, however,consider the constant value of Pp = 233.90

Pp x a = 233.90 a.kN Keeping a = 600Pp x a = 233.90 x 0.60 = 140 kN

Total sliding force at the bottom of key is = 2 x ( 6.00 x 6.6 )+ 0.33 x 18 x6.60

2

= 172.28 kN

Weight of the soil between bottom of the base and JJ = 4.20 x 0.6 x 18 = 45.36\ = 302.00 + 45.36 = 347.36 kN (Approx)

Hence F.S. against sliding is = =0.4 x 347 + 140

= 1.62 1.5 Hence safe172.28

= = a tan x 45 +F

=2 shearing angle of passive resistance

\ = 0.6 x ( 3.00

= 1.04 m .Actual length of the slab available GF = 1.80 m Hence satisfactory

Let us keepthe width of key = 600Actual force to be resisted by the key =

= 1.5 x 172 - 0.4 x 347.36

= 119 kN

=119 x 1000

= 0.20 < 1.8600 x 1000

=119 x 300 x 1000 Hence safe

1/6 x 1000 x( 600

= 0.59 < 7 Permissible Bending stress in M20 concrete

Hence safe

Since concrete can take this much of tensile stress no special reinforcement is necessary for key.

The key is to be cast monolithically with the base.

9 Construction Joint:-

A construction joint, in the form of key, is to be provided at the junction of stem with the

base slab. The width of key is kept equal to d/4 = 540 / 4 = 140 mm

mm2

mm F bars, Area P D2 )'2

mm2

\ spacing

for tempreture reinforcement

mm2 mm c/c both way in outer face

Let Pp be the intensity of passive pressure Pp devloped just in front of shear key.this intencity Pp depend upon the soil pressure P just in front of the key

Pp Kp x P Where Kp

\ Pp kN/m3

\ total passive pressure Pp = mm (equal to stem width)

S P

SW

m Sw+Pp

SP

it should be noted that passive pressure taken into account above will be devloped only when length a1 given below is avilable in front of key ;

a1 a tan F a Ökp

where (45 + F/2) =

a1 )1/2

a1

mm (Equal to stem width)

1.5.S.P - mSW

\ shear stress N/mm2 Permissible shear stress in M20 concrete

\ Bending stress )2

N/mm2

Page 11: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

[email protected]

DESIGN OF T SHAPED CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL

Eq (1)

0.33

m

The base width from the considration of sliding is given by Eq.

The wall will be unsafe against sliding. This will be made safe by providing a shear Key at base .

may be determinined by eq.

H .

for design purpose

Page 12: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

[email protected]

moment of rectangular pressure distribution, plus moment of triangular pressure distribution.

mm

Moment about toe (KN-m)

..(1)

..(2)

kN-m

kN-m

kN-m

'Hence safe'

kN

Special shear key will have to be designed to make the wall safe against sliding

kN acting at A, plus

)3

Page 13: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

[email protected]

'Hence safe'

Hence safe

Hence safe

mm

m

Hence un safe

Rafer table 3.1

Hence unsafe, To make safe, either increase the reinforcment or increase the Depth.

Rafer table 3.1

Hence the slab just safe in shear

kN -m2

kN -m2

The upward pressure distribution on the toe slab is shown in fig 1b .The weight of soil above

mm2

Page 14: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

[email protected]

upward soil pressure

mm

(as that of toe slab)

Rafer table 3.1

Hence the slab just safe in shear

m from C.

m from C.

m from C.

mm2

Page 15: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

[email protected]

kN

Rafer table 3.1

and if the depth of stem were constant, half the bars could have been curtailed at a depth

This is less than half of that provided at C. Hence half bars can be curtailed at this depth.

m

If we wish to curtailed half of the remaning part, let us try it at a section at depth

This is less than half of that provided at C. Hence half bars can be curtailed at this depth.

m

If there were no external force, except the earth pressure,

because of presence of other

)3

)3

Page 16: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

[email protected]

mm c/c at the inner face of wall,along its length.

The wall is in unsafe in sliding, Let us provide a shear keys of depth a below the stem

This intencity may be considered to be constant along the depth of key, through there will be little increase

kN

(Approx)

Hence safe

shearing angle of passive resistance

Hence satisfactory

Permissible Bending stress in M20 concrete

A construction joint, in the form of key, is to be provided at the junction of stem with the

both way in outer face

devloped just in front of shear key.this intencity

kN/m2

(equal to stem width)

2

it should be noted that passive pressure taken into account above will be devloped only when length

Permissible shear stress in M20 concrete

Page 17: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

0.20 0.20 0.2018.00 KN/m2

1.002 kN/m

A A A

H= 4.00

6.00 m 5.40 m 6.00 m 5.40 m 5.40 m

W1 W1 W1

2.40 4.201.80 W2 1.80 W2 1.80 1.80 W2 1.80

toe heelD E B C D E B C D E B C

0.60 0.60 0.60

Toe Toeb = 4.20 m b = 2.40 m

##

#

##

#

##

# ##

# a

e

P=

P=

H1= H1=

a b

a1

Kay(H+a)

D1 C1

Pp = Kpp

Page 18: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

P=

P=

##

#

##

#

0.20

2 kN/mHeight of parapet wall 1.00

18.00 KN/m2A

Outer side face10 Earth side Face

@ 300 c/c `

10@ 300 c/c

H= 6.00 m 20 520 C/C

##

#

10 160 C/C

##

#

5.54

1010 @ 300 c/c

@ 160 c/c

20 260 C/C

10@ 300 c/c

20 130 C/C

N.S.L.

8 20 180 C/C

@ 120 c/c600

260 Toe Heel Earth side Face Outer side faceReinforcement Detail Reinforcement Detail

200 460 200Foundation level

20 600 8

mm F

mm F

mm F@

mm F@

mm Fmm F

mm F@

mm F

mm F@

mm F mm F@

mm F mm F

Page 19: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

@ 130 c/c @ 120 c/c `

600

Page 20: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load
Page 21: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

c/c

c/c

mm F

mm F

Page 22: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

Grade of concrete M-10 M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40

1.2 2.0 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4

(N/mm2) (N/mm2) (N/mm2)

10 3.0 300 2.5 250 -- --

15 5.0 500 4.0 400 0.6 60

20 7.0 700 5.0 500 0.8 80

25 8.5 850 6.0 600 0.9 90

30 10.0 1000 8.0 800 1.0 100

35 11.5 1150 9.0 900 1.1 110

40 13.0 1300 10.0 1000 1.2 120

45 14.5 1450 11.0 1100 1.3 130

50 16.0 1600 12.0 1200 1.4 140

Table 1.18. MODULAR RATIO

Grade of concrete M-10 M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40

Modular ratio m

Table 2.1. VALUES OF DESIGN CONSTANTSGrade of concrete M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40

Modular Ratio 18.67 13.33 10.98 9.33 8.11 7.18 Grade of concrete

5 7 8.5 10 11.5 13

93.33 93.33 93.33 93.33 93.33 93.33

0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4

0.867 0.867 0.867 0.867 0.867 0.867

0.867 1.214 1.474 1.734 1.994 2.254

0.714 1 1.214 1.429 1.643 1.857

0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329

0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89

0.732 1.025 1.244 1.464 1.684 1.903

0.433 0.606 0.736 0.866 0.997 1.127

0.289 0.289 0.289 0.289 0.289 0.289

0.904 0.904 0.904 0.904 0.904 0.904

0.653 0.914 1.11 1.306 1.502 1.698

0.314 0.44 0.534 0.628 0.722 0.816

0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253

0.916 0.916 0.916 0.914 0.916 0.916

0.579 0.811 0.985 1.159 1.332 1.506

Table 1.15. PERMISSIBLE DIRECT TENSILE STRESS

Tensile stress N/mm2

Table 1.16.. Permissible stress in concrete (IS : 456-2000)

Grade of concrete

M

Permission stress in compression (N/mm2) Permissible stress in bond (Average) for plain bars in tention (N/mm2)Bending acbc Direct (acc)

Kg/m2 Kg/m2 in kg/m2

31 (31.11)

19 (18.67)

13 (13.33)

11 (10.98)

9 (9.33)

8 (8.11)

7 (7.18)

scbc N/mm2

m scbc

(a) sst = 140

N/mm2 (Fe 250)

kc

jc

Rc

Pc (%)

(b) sst = 190

N/mm2

kc

jc

Rc

Pc (%)

(c ) sst = 230 N/mm2 (Fe 415)

kc

jc

Rc

Pc (%)

(d) sst = 275 N/mm2 (Fe 500)

kc

jc

Rc

Page 23: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

0.23 0.322 0.391 0.46 0.53 0.599

(d) sst = 275 N/mm2 (Fe 500)

Pc (%)

Page 24: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

bd M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40

% 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20

0.25 % 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23

0.50 % 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32

0.75 % 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.37 0.38

1.00 % 0.37 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.42

1.25 % 0.40 0.42 0.44 0.45 0.45 0.46

1.50 % 0.42 0.45 0.46 0.48 0.49 0.49

1.75 % 0.44 0.47 0.49 0.50 0.52 0.52

2.00 % 0.44 0.49 0.51 0.53 0.54 0.55

2.25 % 0.44 0.51 0.53 0.55 0.56 0.57

2.50 % 0.44 0.51 0.55 0.57 0.58 0.60

2.75 % 0.44 0.51 0.56 0.58 0.60 0.62

3.00 and above 0.44 0.51 0.57 0.6 0.62 0.63

Over all depth of slab 300 or more 275 250 225 200 175 150 or less

k 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30

Grade of concrete M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40

1.6 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.3 2.5

Grade of concrete M-10 M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40 M-45 M-50

-- 0.6 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

Plain M.S. Bars H.Y.S.D. Bars

M 15 0.6 58 0.96 60

M 20 0.8 44 1.28 45

M 25 0.9 39 1.44 40

M 30 1 35 1.6 36

M 35 1.1 32 1.76 33

M 40 1.2 29 1.92 30

M 45 1.3 27 2.08 28

M 50 1.4 25 2.24 26

Table 3.1. Permissible shear stress Table tc in concrete (IS : 456-2000)100A s Permissible shear stress in concrete tc N/mm2

< 0.15

Table 3.2. Facor k

Table 3.3. Maximum shear stress tc.max in concrete (IS : 456-2000)

tc.max

Table 3.4. Permissible Bond stress Table tbd in concrete (IS : 456-2000)

tbd (N / mm2)

Table 3.5. Development Length in tension

Grade of concrete tbd (N / mm2) kd = Ld F tbd (N / mm2) kd = Ld F

Page 25: Reatining WAll With HORZONTAL Bach Fill and Trrafic Load

Value of angle

Degree sin cos tan

10 0.174 0.985 0.176

15 0.259 0.966 0.268

16 0.276 0.961 0.287

17 0.292 0.956 0.306

18 0.309 0.951 0.325

19 0.326 0.946 0.344

20 0.342 0.940 0.364

21 0.358 0.934 0.384

22 0.375 0.927 0.404

23 0.391 0.921 0.424

24 0.407 0.924 0.445

25 0.422 0.906 0.466

30 0.500 0.866 0.577

35 0.573 0.819 0.700

40 0.643 0.766 0.839

45 0.707 0.707 1.000

50 0.766 0.643 1.192

55 0.819 0.574 1.428

60 0.866 0.500 1.732

65 0.906 0.423 2.145