realignment: a first look at statewide trends

14
Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends Chief Michael Daly Marin County Probation Kevin O’Connell, Analyst, CPOC

Upload: mort

Post on 22-Feb-2016

25 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends. Chief Michael Daly Marin County Probation Kevin O’Connell, Analyst, CPOC. CPOC Realignment Research Priorities. Identify aggregate data elements that all 58 counties can track and submit from October 1, 2011 Focused on: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends

Realignment: A First Look at Statewide

TrendsChief Michael Daly

Marin County ProbationKevin O’Connell,

Analyst, CPOC

Page 2: Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends

Identify aggregate data elements that all 58 counties can track and submit from October 1, 2011

Focused on:◦ Movement of Post Release Community

Supervision (PRCS) population back to counties◦ Sentencing of 1170h (non3, non-non-non, local

prison) offenders Disseminate in useful formats Disseminate in a timely way

CPOC Realignment Research Priorities

Page 3: Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends

Receive Data from counties

and run statistical

quality control

Send data back to

counties for quality control

Send final data report to Chiefs of Probation

Make data publicly

available via dashboards and reports

CPOC Quarterly Realignment Data Collection Process

Page 4: Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends

Per 100,000 people, where are PRCS going?

Per 100,000 people, where are 1170h sentences occurring?

Page 5: Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends

PRCS offenders released PRCS warrant-before appearance Active PRCS offenders Active PRCS warrant-after appearance at

probation

PRCS Measures

Page 6: Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends

Bay Central North Sacramento South80%85%90%95%

100%105%110%

94%

108%

100%

92%

101%

% of PRCS Estimates

PRCS Releases as of March 2012 99% of expected PRCS cases statewide 7% of PRCS failed to appear within 72

hours

Page 7: Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends

~23,000 active offenders as of March 31 4% of active PRCS cases are wanted on

warrants

Active PRCS Population Status

South

Central

Sacramento

Bay

North

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%

3%

4%

5%

7%

9%

% of Active Cases on Warrant

Statewide average of 4%

Page 8: Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends

1170h (a) jail only sentences 1170h (b) split sentences 1170h (b) no jail sentences Active 1170 (b) offenders

1170h Measures

Page 9: Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends

Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-120%

50%

100%

150%

% of Monthly 1170h Estimates, Cumulative

Actual vs. Estimated 1170h Sentences• ~15,000 1170h sentences as of March 31• 34% above initial estimates

Page 10: Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends

October NovemberDecember January February March0500

10001500200025003000 2484

20731790 1798

1526 1676

456 511 494 525 524 551

1170h Jail Only 1170h Split Sentence

1170h Sentences Statewide • 22% of 1170h sentences were split sentences• 29% of split sentences have started mandatory

supervision and are out of custody

Page 11: Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends

PRCS Closures (6-12months)◦ How many PRCS offenders were closed

PRCS Closures (1 year)◦ How many PRCS cases were closed at 1 year by

law as they had no return to custody Recidivism

◦ Of those terminated, how many had a felony conviction during supervision

PRCS Closures after more than 18 months◦ PRCS offenders who spent more than 18 months

on local supervision

Outcome Measures

Page 12: Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends

http://cpoc.org/php/realign/dashboardinfo/CPOCbrief11.pdf

Page 13: Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends

http://www.cpoc.org/php/realign/dashboardinfo/dashboard.swf

Page 14: Realignment: A First Look at Statewide Trends

Updated data from 9 months don’t show significant changes from 6months at first glance

Too early to draw systematic or county level conclusions

Data has to drive the discussion All CCP partners should submit data to the

conversation Evidence based programming and practices

needs to be the benchmark

In Conclusion