real analysis - berkeley - class style
TRANSCRIPT
8/13/2019 Real Analysis - Berkeley - Class style
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/real-analysis-berkeley-class-style 1/2
MATH H104 LECTURE 23, NOVEMBER 15, 2005
LECTURER: YUVAL PERES.
SCRIBE: BRIAN SHOTWELL
We move on to your 2nd (or 3rd) exposure to Calculus.
Definition 0.1. The derivative of a function f (x) is denoted by f (x), which is defined by
f (x) = limh→0
f (x + h)− f (x)
h = L.
(provided the limit exists). Recall that the limit L exists if for all > 0, then there exists a δ > 0 such that if 0 <| h |< δ then | f (x+h)−f (x)
h − L |< .
We state the following two properties of derivatives of functions, whose proofs can befound in Pugh:
(f + g)(x) = f (x) + g(x).
(f g)(x) = f (x)g(x) + f (x)g(x).
Theorem 0.2. The Chain Rule states that if we have a function f : (a, b) → R which is differentiable at x ∈ (a, b), and another function g : (c, d) → R which is differentiable at
y = f (x) ∈ c, d, then ψ = g ◦ f is differentiable at x and ψ
(x) = g
(y)f
(x).Proof. ψ(z ) = g(f (z )) for all z ∈ (a, b). We are given > 0. Before we start finding δs, let’sfirst look at ψ(x + h) − ψ(x) = g(f (x + h)) − g(f (x)):
ψ(x + h)− ψ(x)
h =
g(f (x + h)) − g(f (x))
h =
g(y + hR) − g(y)
h =
f (x + h)− f (x)
h .
(aside): For 1 > 0 chosen later, there is a δ > 0 such that | h | δ =⇒| R − f (x) |< 1.
Assuming that the limit of products is the product of limits, if f (x) = 0, then [ g(y+hR)−g(y)hR
]R →g(y)f (x) (as h → 0).
If f (x) = 0, then given 1 choose α > 0 so that
0 <| β |< α =⇒| g(y + β ) − g(y)β − g(y) |< 1.
| hR |< α =⇒| g(y + hR)− g(y) − hRg(y) |≤ e1hR
=⇒| ψ(x + h) − ψ(x)
h −Rg(y) |≤ 1R ≤ /2.
Choose 1 = /2 and ensure δ < α small enough so that | h |< δ . Thus | h |< δ =⇒| R |< 1,and therefore | Rg(y) |< /2.
Date : December 14, 2005.
1
8/13/2019 Real Analysis - Berkeley - Class style
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/real-analysis-berkeley-class-style 2/2
2 Yuval Peres
Theorem 0.3. The Mean Value Theorem says that if f : [a, b] → R is continuous, and
if f is differentiable on (a, b), then there exists a θ ∈ (a, b) with f (θ) = f (b)−f (a)b−a
.
Proof. Let g(x) = f (x) − cx, where c = f (b)−f (a)
b−
a
. g(b) − g(a) = f (b) − f (a) − c(b − a) = 0.We have the folloing three cases:
Case 1:max g ∈ [a, b] > g(a)
Then find θ ∈ (a, b) with g(θ) = max g ∈ [a, b]. g(x + h) ≤ g(θ) for all small h.
limh→0
g(θ + h) − g(θ)
h =
g(θ) ≤ 0, using h > 0g(θ) ≥ 0, using h < 0
Case 2: Case 1 fails but min g ∈ [a, b] < g(a).Case 3: Both 1 and 2 fail. g(x) ≡ g(a) such that for all x ∈ [a, b), g = 0 ∈ (a, b). f
differentiable at x =⇒ f is continuous at x.
We will now note a few properties concerning the relationship between continuity anddifferentiability. First, although differentiability implie continuity, continuity does not implydifferentiability (look at the function f (x) =| x | at x = 0.
Now, suppose f : R → R is differentiable in R. Must f be continuous? NO. For example,look at the function f defined as follows:
f (x) =
0, if x = 0x2sin(1/x), if x = 0
For x = 0, f (x) = 2xsin(1/x)− cos(1/x). limf (x) as x → 0 does not exist.
University of California, Berkeley
E-mail address : [email protected]