reading and interpreting the ayp status report. annual measurable objectiv es percentage of...

13
Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report

Upload: syed-pettett

Post on 01-Apr-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014

Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report

Page 2: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students(ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards)

  2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

  Grade 3   73 73 77 77 81 85 88 92 96 100

  Grade 4 68 68 73 73 77 77 82 86 91 95 100

  Grade 5   73 73 77 77 81 85 88 92 96 100

  Grade 6 74 74 78 78 81 81 85 89 93 96 100

  Grade 7   63 63 68 68 74 79 84 89 95 100

  Grade 8 43 43 51 51 59 59 67 76 84 92 100

  Grade 11 81 81 84 84 86 86 89 92 95 97 100MATHEMATICS

  2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

  Grade 3   63 63 68 68 74 79 84 89 95 100

  Grade 4 61 61 67 67 72 72 78 83 89 94 100

  Grade 5   59 59 65 65 71 77 82 88 94 100

  Grade 6 39 39 48 48 56 56 65 74 83 91 100

  Grade 7   40 40 49 49 57 66 74 83 91 100

  Grade 8   48 48 55 55 63 70 78 85 93 100

  Grade 11 68 68 73 73 77 77 82 86 91 95 100

No Child Left Behind and AYP

Page 3: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
Page 4: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014

95 % 0.0 or

above

HS or schools with Grade 12: 90 % GR or improvement

Grades 3 - 8: 95% attendance rate

Page 5: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students(ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards)

  2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

  Grade 3   73 73 77 77 81 85 88 92 96 100

  Grade 4 68 68 73 73 77 77 82 86 91 95 100

  Grade 5   73 73 77 77 81 85 88 92 96 100

  Grade 6 74 74 78 78 81 81 85 89 93 96 100

  Grade 7   63 63 68 68 74 79 84 89 95 100

  Grade 8 43 43 51 51 59 59 67 76 84 92 100

  Grade 11 81 81 84 84 86 86 89 92 95 97 100MATHEMATICS

  2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

  Grade 3   63 63 68 68 74 79 84 89 95 100

  Grade 4 61 61 67 67 72 72 78 83 89 94 100

  Grade 5   59 59 65 65 71 77 82 88 94 100

  Grade 6 39 39 48 48 56 56 65 74 83 91 100

  Grade 7   40 40 49 49 57 66 74 83 91 100

  Grade 8   48 48 55 55 63 70 78 85 93 100

  Grade 11 68 68 73 73 77 77 82 86 91 95 100

Page 6: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014

By the number of subgroups

Page 7: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014

5

5 4

4

1

Page 8: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014

School Improvement

• Goals over time• School performance this year and prior years• Two consecutive years in the same component

Page 9: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014

“Two and Two”

No AYP

SI 1

Made AYP Not in SI

SI 1 D

SI 2

Page 10: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014

Reading

No AYPReading

SI Year 1

Mathematics

SI Year1D

Reading

SI Year 2

Mathematics

No AYPMathematics

SI Year 1

AAI

No AYPAAI

SI Year 1 AAI

SI Year 3AAI

SI Year 2

Page 11: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014

There are 4 Ways to Make AYP

• Meet proficiency• Confidence Interval (CI)• Uniform Averaging (UA)• Safe Harbor (SH)

Page 12: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014

Partial CreditPartial Credit

• Students scoring in Levels III or IV are considered to be proficient and count as 1.0 toward proficiency.

• Students scoring in Level II are considered to be partially proficient and count as 0.5 toward proficiency.

• Students scoring in Levels III or IV are considered to be proficient and count as 1.0 toward proficiency.

• Students scoring in Level II are considered to be partially proficient and count as 0.5 toward proficiency.

Page 13: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014

Need More Information?

• Follow this path to get to the Interpretive Guide document:

– www.alsde.edu – Sections– Student Assessment– Publications– Choose document and download

• Follow this path to get to the Sanctions and Rewards document:– www.alsde.edu – Sections– Federal Programs– Publications– Choose document and download