reach and ghs - umweltbundesamt · reach and ghs ghs: core elements of ... definition: a substance...
TRANSCRIPT
fg-kb; 7419
Product Safety –safe products, safe business
REACH and GHS
GHS: Core Elements of the New System:
- Physical Hazards- Health Hazards- Environmental Hazards
Dr. Helmut FleigProduct SafetyRegulations, Toxicology and Ecology
Vienna, Hofburg, March 29, 2006
Slide 2 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
Human Health & Welfare
Environ-mental
Hazards
Physical
Hazards
Health
Hazards
GHS: Core elements of the new system
Slide 3 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
Contents
� Introduction� General Principles
� Physical Hazards
� Health Hazards � Environmental Hazards
� Mixtures (Preparations)� Hazard Communication (Labelling)
� Comparison GHS vs. EU� Outlook / Conclusion
Slide 4 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: General Principles
• No reduction in protection level
• Classification criteria based on intrinsic hazards,
i.e. properties
• No requirement for testing (exception some PH)
Slide 5 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
� Classification (C):Assignment of a chemical to a
– Hazard Class (nature of hazard) and to a – Hazard Category (degree of hazard)
� Labelling (L):Hazard Communication via
– Label (package)
– Safety Data Sheet
GHS: General Principles
- Definitions
Slide 6 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
LabellingClassification
Highly
flammable
liquid and
vapour
DangerCat. 2 (4)Flammable liquidsPH
HazardStatement
Signal Word
SymbolsHazard Category(Total no. of
Categories)
Hazard ClassHazard
GHS: General Principles
- Example C&L
Slide 7 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Core elements of the new system
Physical Hazards (PH)
Slide 8 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Physical [Chemical] Hazards (PH)
- Origin
Basis for a GHS: UN Transport System (TDG*; Orange Book)
� TDG start 1957; detailed; continuously amended
� Worldwide acceptance and use
� Related with standard test methods (UN Manual )
Conclusion:TDG most appropriate basis for GHS-PH(ILO - Working Group; UNO)
*TDG = Transport of Dangerous Goods
Slide 9 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: PH
- Overview / Comparison
EU: not existing1Corrosive to Metals
EU: only 2 hazard levels3Oxidizng Solids
EU: classification as Oxidisier3Organic Peroxides
EU:Same3Water Reactive → Flammable Gases
EU: only 2 hazard levels3Oxidizing Liquids
EU :Same1Pyrophoric Lquids
EU :Same1Pyrophoric Solids
EU :No correspondence: Explos., Flam., No CTypes: A - GSelf-Reactive Substances / Mixtures
EU :Similar; only 1 hazard level2Flammable Solids
EU: no classification criterion2Self-Heating Substances / Mixtures
EU: not existing; 4 groups: compressed; liquified; refrigerated liquified dissolved;;no intrinsic property
1Gases under Pressure
EU :Same1Oxidizing Gases
2Flammable Aerosols
.EU: only 1 hazard level;most gases classified
2Flammable Gases
4Flammable Liquids EU :Similar; differing cut-offs ,1 hazard level less
GHS includes articles;very complex allocation procedure
Div. 1 - 6Explosives
Comparison to EU; RemarksHazard CatsGHS - Hazard Class
Slide 10 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: PH
- Corrosive to Metals
Definition:A substance or a mixture which by chemical action will materially damage, or even destroy, metals.
Classification Criteria:
Corrosion rate on steel or aluminium surfaces exceeding 6.25 mm
per year at a test temperature of 55 °C
1
CriteriaCategory
Label elements:
Category 1Label element
CorrosiveSymbol
May be corrosive to metalsHazard statement
WarningSignal word
Slide 11 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Core elements of the new system
Health Hazards (HH)
Slide 12 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Health Hazards (HH)
- Overview
3• Germ cell mutagenicity
3• Carcinogenicity
Subdivision: Fertility and DevelopmentAdditional category : Lactation
3• Reproductive toxicity
2 categories: serious non-lethal effects3rd category: transient effects(Respiratory Tract Irritation; Narcotic Effects)
3• Spec. Target Organ Systemic Toxicity –Single Exposure ( STOST )
1• SensitiziationRespiratory or skin
2• Aspiration Hazard
2• Spec. Target Organ Systemic Toxicity –Repeated Exposure
2• Serious eye damage / irritation
3 subcategories for Corrosivity: 1A, 1B, 1C ;1optional Irritation Category ( 3;mild )
3• Skin corrosion / irritation
3 subgroups: oral, dermal, inhalation5• Acute Toxicity
RemarksHazard Categories
Hazard Classes
Slide 13 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: HH
- Classification Criteria for Acute Toxicity
510.50.05Dust and mists (mg/l)
201020.5Vapours (mg/l)
5,0002,500500100Gases (ppm)
2,0001,00020050Dermal (mg/kg)
5,000
Equivalent doses for dermal and inhalation
Remark: for “Vulnerable Populations”
ATE = Acute Toxicity Estimate
(e.g. LD50 / LC50 = Median
Lethal Dose/Concentration)
2,000300505Oral (mg/kg)
Cat. 5Cat. 4Cat. 3Cat. 2Cat. 1Acute toxicity(ATE )
Slide 14 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: HH
- Examples: Acute Toxicity
1) CoffeinLD50 rat, oral: 279 mg/kg bw
2) NaCl = Sodium chlorideLD50 rat, oral: 3,000 mg/kg bw
Classification
Cat. 5--2)
Cat. 3-Xn; harmfulR 22 = Harmful by ingestion
1)
GHSTransport (UNO)EU
Slide 15 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: HH
- Decision Logic for Skin Sensitization
Does the substance (mixture) have skin sensitization data or information?
No Classification not possible
Yes
� Is there evidence in humans that the substance (mixture) can inducesensitization by skin contact in a substantial number of persons or
� Are there positive results from an
appropriate animal test?
Yes
Category 1
Warning
No
Not classified
Slide 16 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
Allergic contact eczema
� Cause: single exposure to an allergen after preceding
sensitization
� Substance: Tenside in skin
cleansing agent
� Localisation: whole body
� Measures:
– stationary treatment
– wear protective cloth
GHS: HH
- Sensitization
Slide 17 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: HH
- Criteria for Reproductive Toxicity
Additional category
Effects on or via lactation
Category 2
Suspected
Category 1BPresumed(animal studies )
Category 1AKnown
Optional cut-offs for mixtures: – 0.1% – 0.3%
Optional cut-offs formixtures:s. Cat. 1
Optional cut-offs formixtures:– 0.1%– 3%
Category 1
Adverse effects on sexual functionand fertility (F), or development (D)
Slide 18 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: HH
Slide 19 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: HH
Criteria for STOST (Specific Target Organ Systemic Toxicity) - Single Exposure
Remarks: No cut-off values for Cat. 3
Remarks: - Significant toxicity: severe non-lethal effects-Cut-off (guidance) values identical with those of
Cat. 3 and 4 Acute Toxicity
Category 3
Transient Target Organ Effects
Respiratory Tract Irritation and Narcotic Effects
Category 2
Presumed
- Animal studies at moderate exposure
- Human evidence in exceptional cases
Category 1
Significant toxicity :
-Known
-Presumed: animal studies at low exposure
Slide 20 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: HH
- Examples for STOST – Single Exposure
Drowsiness/dizziness in humansDiethylether3Narcotic Effects
Distinct irritation in humansSulfur dioxide3Respiratory TractIrritation
Significant neurotoxicity in rats(E D >300,<2,000mg/kg )
Neurotoxicant2
Visual damage in humansMethanol1
EffectSubstanceCategory
Slide 21 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
Changes compared to EUHazard Class
↑� Aspiration
↑� Reproduction
~� Mutagenicity
~� Carcinogenicity
~� Narcotic Effects (STOST* Cat . 3)
↑� Chronic Toxicity (STOST* Cat. 1 & 2)
~
~
� Sensitization• Skin• Respiratory tract
~� Corrosion
↑↑~
� Irritation• Skin• Eyes• Respiratory tract (STOST* Cat. 3)
↑↑
� Acute Toxicity• Mortality / Evident Toxicity• Irreversible non lethal effects (STOST Cat. 1 & 2*)
* = Specific Target Organ Systemic Toxicity; ↑ = aggravation; ~ = comparable
GHS: HH
- Comparison vs. EU
Slide 22 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Core elements of the new system
Environmental Hazards
(EnvH)
Slide 23 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: EnvH
- Aquatic Toxicity- Basis
� Classification is based on:
• acute aquatic toxicity
• potential for bioaccumulation
• degradation (biotic/ abiotic ) for organic chemicals
• chronic aquatic toxicity
Remark: Detailed guidance is given in annexes 9 and 10
of the Purple Book
Slide 24 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: EnvH
- Aquatic Toxicity
� Fish, LC50, 96 h
� Crustacea, EC50, 48 h
� Algae, EC50, 72 or 96 h (or other aquatic plant test)
-Surrogates for all aquatic organisms
-LC/EC50 :Lethal / Effect Concentration
Slide 25 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: EnvH
- Aquatic Toxicity- Categories
� Three separate acute categories:
� Four chronic categories:
• acute toxicity and environmental fate data
Remark: EU only with one acute category
Slide 26 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: EnvH
- Aquatic Toxicity- Acute Categories
� Acute 1: L(E)C50 < 1 mg/l
� Acute 2: 1 mg/l > L(E)C50 < 10 mg/l
� Acute 3: 10 mg/l > L(E)C50 < 100 mg/l
Slide 27 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: EnvH
- Aquatic Toxicity- Chronic Categories
Chronic 1
• Classified as Acute Toxicity Cat. 1
AND
• not rapidly degradable and /or has the potential for
bioaccumulation
Remark: declassification possible by use of chronic data
Slide 28 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Core elements of the new system
Mixtures (Preparations)
Slide 29 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Mixtures (Preparations)
- Overview
� Physical Hazards: – testing (e.g. flammable solids)
– calculation (e.g. flammable aerosols)
– testing or calculation (e.g. flammable gases)
� Health and Environmental Hazards: – testing
– tiered approach (decision tree)
Slide 30 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
� Hierarchy: – Generally use test data for the mixtures – Use “bridging principles”, if applicable
↓– Estimate hazards using ingredient information
* Remark: Ambiguity (options ) with CMRs
GHS: Mixtures
- Main Principles
� Tiered approach; Method dependent on:
– type of effect
– amount of information for the mixture itself and/or for its ingredients
Slide 31 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Mixtures
- Bridging Principles
� Dilution with an equivalent or less toxic substance
(e.g. acute toxicity)
Classification:� equivalent to original mixture
� use additivity method (formula)
Remark: Discrepancy US-DE in evaluating an example (UN)
� Batching: Conclusion from a tested mixture to an equivalent batch:
Classification equivalent to original mixture
Slide 32 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Mixtures
- Ingredient Based Methods
� Additivity methods, applied for e.g.:
– acute toxicity HH and EnvH
– skin corrosion/irritation (certain substances )
� Non-additivity methods, applied for e.g.:
- CMRs
- skin corrosion/irritation (e.g.acids )
Slide 33 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
Test data / information available for all or some ingredients:
A combination of the toxicities of the components by a
weighted summation procedure taking ATE* values andconcentrations of ingredients into account
Prerequisite: Effects regarded as additive
*ATE = Acute Toxicity Estimate (e.g. LD50 / LC50 = Median Lethal Dose/Concentration)
GHS: Mixtures
- Additivity Methods
Slide 34 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
α) Data / Information available for all ingredients:Use additivity formula:
ATE = Acute Toxicity Estimate (LC50/LC%)
Ci = Concentration of i
n ingredients, i running from 1 to n
100ATEmix
Ci
ATEi
=Σn(cf. UNO Transport)
Remark: Problem with the formula for toxic gas mixtures
GHS: Mixtures
- Additivity Methods
Slide 35 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
Data / Information not available for all ingredients:
β) < 10% ingredients of unkown toxicity
• additivity formula and
• statement: „x% of the mixture consists of ingredients
of unkown toxicity“
GHS: Mixtures
- Additivity Methods
γ) > 10% ingredients of unkown toxicity
• modified additivity formula: malus system
• statement (s. β)
Slide 36 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
Example:Carcinogenicity: General cut-off for Cat. 1: 0.1%
NC*0.090.06
Σ 0.15
Benzene and Asbestos
Cat. 10.15Benzene
NC*0.09Benzene
Classification of the mixture
%Chemical
*NC = No Classification
GHS: Mixtures
- Non-additivity
Slide 37 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
Possibility for substance Specific Concentration Limits
( case by case)
� Lower : if identifiable hazard assumed to exist
� Higher : if conclusive data that no hazard is posed
Remark:
A convincing rationale with adequate documentation required
(expert judgement !)
GHS: Mixtures
- Specific Concentration Limits:
Slide 38 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Core elements of the new system
Hazard Communication
(Labelling)
Slide 39 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
� Symbol:Easily understandable graphical element (pictogram)
� Signal word:Indication of the relative level of severity of hazard
� Hazard statement:
Describing the nature and the degree of hazard
Remark: In addition further labelling elements
(e.g. product-/supplier identification, precautionary statements,supplemental information)
GHS: Hazard Communication
- Standardized Labelling Elements
Slide 40 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
!
Explosive Flammable Oxidizing Compressed gases
ToxicCMRs
Sensitizing ( respir.)STOST Cats 1&2
Corrosion Hazardousto the aquaticenvironment
Acute Tox Cat 4Irritation
Sensitizing (skin )STOST Cat 3
GHS: Hazard Communication; Labelling
- Symbols
Slide 41 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Hazard Communication; Labelling
- Example
Slide 42 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Hazard Communication; Labelling
- Proposals for the New Health HazardSymbol (2002)
Slide 43 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Core elements of the new system
Comparison GHS vs. EU
Slide 44 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS:
- Comparison GHS vs. EU (Overview)
I) General Issues
no consequencesSubstances: no consequencesMixtures, acute toxicity:additional statement and more rigorous C&L
Data Gaps
generally not appliedfor consumersRisk based Labelling
Symbol; R- & S-Phrasesadditonal information
Symbol; Signal Word; Hazard Statement; additional information
Labelling (L)
EU:Conflicting interpretation
a general criterion„likelihood of adverse effects may be considered“
Normal Handling & Use
for substances not in Annex I„as far as possible“Self Classification
for PH, HHnot possibleAdditional HazardStatements
allocation of an indication of danger & R-phrase
Hazard Class &Hazard Category
Definition of Classification(C)
RemarksEUGHSIssues
Slide 45 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS:
- Comparison GHS vs. EU (Overview)
I) General Issues
not applicable (n.a.)Options:
n.a.e.g. -acute toxicity: different methods:dilution or additivity formula
-reprotox :cat. 2 cut-offs: 0.1 or 3%-CMRs ::use of test or ingredient data
- Mixture C & L
n.a.optional classes; e.g. mild irritant (Cat. 3)
- Substance C & L
separate presentation
n.a.General principle - Building Block Approach (BBA)
RemarksEUGHSIssues
Slide 46 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
II) Criteria
1) PH:GHS covers a great spectrum of hazards: more hazard classes and categories than in EU
2) HH:Increase in number and serverity of classified substances and
mixtures: acute toxicity, chronic toxicity (STOST), skin and eye irritation, reproductive toxicity, aspiration
3) EnvH:– GHS based on EU system, thus in principle comparable– GHS has more separate acute Hazard Classes
– More classified substances and mixtures
GHS:
- Comparison GHS vs. EU (Overview)
Slide 47 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Core elements of the new system
Outlook / Conclusion
Slide 48 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Outlook
Outlook:
Program of work (UNO / OECD, 2005 – 2006)
Health Hazards:
� Water reactive substances releasing toxic/corrosive gases
� Toxic gas mixtures
� Sensitization (induction / elicitation; strong vs. weak)
� Carcinogenicity / Reproductive toxicity: potency
Slide 49 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Outlook
Environmental Hazards:
� Criteria development for terrestrial hazard
� Examination of possibilities to develop criteria for Ozone
Depleting Substances
� Chronic aquatic toxicity
Hazard Communication:
� Guidance for Building Block Approach
� Hierarchy of labelling elements
Slide 50 fg-kb7419; March 2006
Product Safety –
safe products,
safe business
GHS: Conclusion
The GHS
� is a worldwide applicable comprehensive system for
Classification and Hazard Communication
� is intended for all target audiences
� is generally broader and more stringent than existing systems, e.g. EU
� will not lead in near future to a totally globally harmonized
C&L system due to optional regulations
� is a big step foreward giving the chance for a worldwide
better protection against hazardous chemicals