re: needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence

1
[4] Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Faeh D, Santos-Eggimann B. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in rural and urban settings of 10 European countries. Prev Med 2007;44:442–6. [5] Buschemeyer III WC, Freedland JS. Obesity and prostate cancer: epidemiology and clinical implications. Eur Urol 2007;52:331–43. Judd W. Moul Division of Urologic Surgery and the Duke Prostate Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.062 Re: Needle Biopsies on Autopsy Prostates: Sensi- tivity of Cancer Detection Based on True Preva- lence Haas GP, Delongchamps NB, Jones RF, et al J. Natl. Cancer Inst 2007;99:1484–9. Expert’s summary: This study was designed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of current prostate biopsy protocols. Eigh- teen-core needle biopsies were performed on autopsy prostates from 164 US men (median age 64 yr) who had no history of prostate cancer. Six cores were taken from each of the following regions: the midperipheral zone, the lateral peripheral zone, and the central zone. Using 4-mm whole-mount sections, cancer was found in 47 (29%) cases, of which 27 met the Stamey criteria for insignificant disease (< 0.5 ml tumour volume and Gleason score 6). Pathological stage mix was 62% T2a/b, 12% T2c, and 13% T3. Median tumour volume was 0.29 ml (IQR 0.07–0.88 ml). Central zone biopsies did not detect cancer in any case that was not also detected from the peripheral zone biopsies. Expert’s comments: The ideal biopsy strategy would detect all significant prostate cancers, and no insignificant cancers. Although this is not possible, this is the ideal for which we should aim. This unique study confirms the importance of laterally directed peripheral zone biopsies, but cautions against the trend towards taking ever-increasing numbers of cores. The more cores taken, the greater the chance of detecting a clinically insignificant cancer. A 6-core protocol detected 11% of all ‘‘insignificant’’ cancers, whereas a 12-core protocol detected 33%. The study also calls into question the Stamey criteria for ‘‘clinically insignificant’’ disease, origin- ally based on a study of 55 prostate cancers in 139 cystoprostatectomy specimens [1]. Given a lifetime prostate cancer risk, in the absence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing of 8%, the authors argued that only 11 (8% of 139) of the cancers detected were destined to be significant. The largest 11 tumours ranged in volume from 0.5–6.1 ml, leading to the conclusion that tumours smaller than 0.5 ml were insignificant. In the current study, 20 of the 47 cases did not meet the criteria for insignificant disease, whereas in reality, they were all clinically insignificant because they were not diagnosed within the patients’ lifetime. This illus- trates that, strictly speaking, it is not possible to define clinically insignificant disease in terms of histopathological features alone. There remains a need for long-term, prospective studies of untreated prostate cancer to better understand the natural history of the disease, rather than relying on relatively arbitrary histopathological definitions of clinical significance. As this study shows, many cancers that do not meet histopathological criteria for insignificant disease will in fact turn out not to be significant. Conflicts of interest: The author has nothing to disclose. Reference [1] Stamey TA, Freiha FS, McNeal JE, et al. Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumour volume to clinical signifi- cance for treatment of prostate cancer. Cancer 1993;71(Suppl 3):933–8. Chris Parker Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom Tel. +44 020 8661 3425. E-mail address: [email protected] DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.063 european urology 54 (2008) 231–236 233

Upload: chris-parker

Post on 04-Sep-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

e u r o p e a n u r o l o g y 5 4 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 2 3 1 – 2 3 6 233

[4] Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Faeh D, Santos-Eggimann B.

Prevalence of overweight and obesity in rural and

urban settings of 10 European countries. Prev Med

2007;44:442–6.

[5] Buschemeyer III WC, Freedland JS. Obesity and prostate

cancer: epidemiology and clinical implications. Eur Urol

2007;52:331–43.

Judd W. Moul

Division of Urologic Surgery and the Duke Prostate Center,

Duke University Medical Center,

Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.062

Re: Needle Biopsies on Autopsy Prostates: Sensi-tivity of Cancer Detection Based on True Preva-lenceHaas GP, Delongchamps NB, Jones RF, et al

J. Natl. Cancer Inst 2007;99:1484–9.

Expert’s summary:This study was designed to assess the diagnosticaccuracy of current prostate biopsy protocols. Eigh-teen-core needle biopsies were performed onautopsy prostates from 164 US men (median age64 yr) who had no history of prostate cancer. Sixcores were taken from each of the following regions:the midperipheral zone, the lateral peripheral zone,and the central zone. Using 4-mm whole-mountsections, cancer was found in 47 (29%) cases, ofwhich 27 met the Stamey criteria for insignificantdisease (< 0.5 ml tumour volume and Gleason score� 6). Pathological stage mix was 62% T2a/b, 12% T2c,and 13% T3. Median tumour volume was 0.29 ml(IQR 0.07–0.88 ml). Central zone biopsies did notdetect cancer in any case that was not also detectedfrom the peripheral zone biopsies.

Expert’s comments:The ideal biopsy strategy would detect all significantprostate cancers, and no insignificant cancers.Although this is not possible, this is the ideal forwhich we should aim. This unique study confirmsthe importance of laterally directed peripheral zonebiopsies, but cautions against the trend towardstaking ever-increasing numbers of cores. The morecores taken, the greater the chance of detecting aclinically insignificant cancer. A 6-core protocoldetected 11% of all ‘‘insignificant’’ cancers, whereasa 12-core protocol detected 33%.

The study also calls into question the Stameycriteria for ‘‘clinically insignificant’’ disease, origin-ally based on a study of 55 prostate cancers in

139 cystoprostatectomy specimens [1]. Given alifetime prostate cancer risk, in the absence ofprostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing of 8%, theauthors argued that only 11 (8% of 139) of the cancersdetected were destined to be significant. The largest11 tumours ranged in volume from 0.5–6.1 ml,leading to the conclusion that tumours smallerthan 0.5 ml were insignificant. In the current study,20 of the 47 cases did not meet the criteria forinsignificant disease, whereas in reality, they wereall clinically insignificant because they were notdiagnosed within the patients’ lifetime. This illus-trates that, strictly speaking, it is not possible todefine clinically insignificant disease in terms ofhistopathological features alone. There remains aneed for long-term, prospective studies of untreatedprostate cancer to better understand the naturalhistory of the disease, rather than relying onrelatively arbitrary histopathological definitions ofclinical significance. As this study shows, manycancers that do not meet histopathological criteriafor insignificant disease will in fact turn out not to besignificant.

Conflicts of interest: The author has nothing to disclose.

Reference

[1] Stamey TA, Freiha FS, McNeal JE, et al. Localized prostate

cancer. Relationship of tumour volume to clinical signifi-

cance for treatment of prostate cancer. Cancer

1993;71(Suppl 3):933–8.

Chris Parker

Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital,

Sutton, United Kingdom

Tel. +44 020 8661 3425.

E-mail address: [email protected]

DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.063