re: assessment of bernaliflo county application s-2361...
TRANSCRIPT
.
TedmicalMemoraixium
Date: 4/25/05To: Kristofer Knutson
Administrative Litigation UnitVia: Tom Morrison,
Chief, Hydrology BureauCc: FileFrom: J.P. Frost, Hydrology Bureau, Office of the State Engineer
RE: Assessment of Bernaliflo County Application S-2361, Sandia Basin
IntroductionApplication S-2361 regards a new well and diversion at x= 472874.34 and y 519097.41,NM Central zone, for 29.7 acres of land in Section 18-Ti iN R6E (projected), BernalilloCounty, NM. The application lies in the Sandia Administrative basin in the EastMountain aiea of Bernaliulo County, about a mile north and northeast of Sandia Park andSan Antonito, Map 1. The intent of the well is for domestic and irrigation use at the VistaGrande Community Center. The principal water bearing formations are interpreted aspotentially Triassic sandstone and shale formations based on the regional geologic map.The application requests 30 afy from a 6 inch diameter well to be drilled approximately400 feet deep. No offsetting water rights are being moved in this application. The welllies in the San Pedro Creek surface watershed. According to the WATERS database, 83OSE well records exist within a 10,000 foot radius. However, WATERS data locationsare sometimes questionable in the Sandia Basin. Entranosa Water and Wastewater Coopalso serves the Vista Grande Community Center and other water users in this area fromwells in the Estancia basin.
This memo addresses several technical issues of the application. They include: impacts tosurface water sources, including effects on San Pedro Creek, a semi perennial streamdraining the area towards the Rio Grande; the ability of the subject well to produce thequantity of water sought; and drawdown effects on nearby wells. The issue of whetherunappropriated groundwater exists in the Sandia basin, and the long term viability of theground water resource for public water supply uses are additional concerns. Because ofthe subsurface geologic complexity, there is considerable uncertainty in predicting futureimpacts on senior rights and wells.
The appurtenant land adjoins land of Campbell Farms, who protested the application,
-
1
if
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2I A :1 — a
amj.un Iaau
. .
Location Map andRadii to select water featuresBernalillo County Application
S-2361
2
.
Several hydrogeologic reports addressing the general area have been submitted toBernalillo County in support of the subdivision review process. Bernalillo County didnot submit a technical report or water budget in support of this application.
HydrogeologyThe Sandia basin is the subject of a number of water studies including Balleau (2000),Shomaker and Associates(1996), Geohydrology Associates (1987), and a regionalassessment by Dr. Frank Titus of the NM Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources(1980). Funded by the OSE and the State Legislature, the USGS is currently conductinga new review and update of Titus’ report, including adding wells to a water levelmeasurement program and analyzing water chemistry. Results are not yet released.
Application S-2361 lies within a County Recreation complex along La Madera Road on
f the west side of Highway 14. According to OSE records, the well has yet to be drilled.Groundwater wells in the area encounter a variety of conditions and yields. Wellsproduce from a number of locally interconnected strata, most well yields are modest.
The native groundwater flow system receives mountain front recharge from the adjoininguplands including the Sandia mountains, and ultimately discharges to San Pedro Creekand the Rio Grande. This application lies near Cienega Creek and Armijo Draw, thbutay,toSanPedroCreek.
Many arroyos and streams in the Sandia basin are ephemeral. Historical flowmeasurements of spring and stream discharge are spotty and show high variability.
— :However, there are several important springs and stream reaches in the area Springs -
above San Antonito and Sandia Park, and the perennial reach of San Pedro Creekinteract with groundwater and these water sources are important considerations for thisapplication. Approximate distance of important springs to the southwest, as well as SaiijPedro Spring on San Pedro Creek is approximately 12,000 feet. The radius to a semiperennial reach in Cienega Canyon is about 8000 feet.
Mapped shallow ground water levels smoothly parallel the rugged topography, althoughwater level data are sparse(Titus, 1980, and others). This finding reinforces theinterpretation that the productive intervals in wells are in communication with otheraquifers. Only a few wells have been measured in the vicinity, and water levels do not
show discernible historical trends. USGS hydrographs in nearby wells are copied in theAppendices.
The local aquifer is composed of several bedrock formations, including the moderatelywater yielding Permian San Andres-Glorieta formations and Yeso Formations, and theoverlying, but poorer aquifers, the Triassic Santa Rosa sandstone and Chinle formations.All arc consolidated rocks that have been faulted, tilted and fractured in the presence oflarge regional fault trends. In the vicinity of the application, the rocks lie on the west
3
.limb of a broadly folded, northeast trending downwarp or syncline. Triassic age shaleand sandstone formations dip 10 to 35 degrees east to the center of the fold. The PermianSan Andres formation underlies the Triassic shales and sandstones and is composed offine grained limestones which require fracturing to be effective aquifers. The Permiancan be a better aquifer than the Triassic, but may lie deeper than the application’sproposed depth.
Aquifers such as these have highly variable well yields and aquifer coefficients.Typically, groundwater storage is low and the thickness of effective saturation isunpredictable, being reliant on fractures. Some wells proximal to regional faults havefound very high Transmissivities, the ability for water to flow to the well. However,most well yields are modest and dry holes have been reported. In the WATER wellsresearched for this report, well depths average 285 feet, and depth to water range from 31to 320 feet. Most of these wells are domestic wells.
Technical ConsiderationsLong term water availability in the area, the ability of the well to produce the quantity ofwater sought, well drawdown, and spring and stream depletion are potential concerns.Because the water use is associated with a public facility in Bernalillo County, effects areevaluated for 70 years, the amount of time effects are required to be calculated for newsubdivisions in the County.
Unappropriated groundwater:This application for a new appropriation will cause increased drawdown and surfacewater depletion in an aquifer already stressed by wells and undeployed rights dedicatedLtbresidential use. Titus (1980) observed that: “Large quantities of groundwater are notavailable in the Sandia and northern Manzano Mountains” ‘
In addition to local well pumping, dozens of domestic wells, and several acequias near -‘
San Antonio all lie within the flow system draining to San Pedro Creek Of all thehydrologic studies conducted in the area, none have revealed abundant groundwaterresources. This is evidenced by the fact that Entranosa Water and WastewaterCooperative provides water to hundreds of recently developed lots in the area.
Applicant has not proposed any water rights transfer in this application.
Surface Water DepletionsS-2361 lies about 1 mile north of Arroyo Armijo, a major tributary of San Pedro Creek.The confluence with San Pedro Creek lies about 2 miles to the east, and further down thecreek, San Pedro springs lie about 12000 feet from the application. A buried alluvialvalley is believed to exist within the center of the syncine and beneath San Pedro Creek.Groundwater flow is toward San Pedro Creek and spring. In a development applicationfor San Pedro Creek Estates, BGW (2000), estimated surface water availability on SanPedro Creek and discussed depletions due to that application. Using the Glover-Balmerequation, BGW found that development by domestic wells at San Pedro Creek Estates
4
.could cause a reduction of fourteen percent in fifty years of an average baseflow of 200afy in San Pedro Creek.
Ability To Produce The Quantity SoughtThe proposed well has not been drilled to better estimate its long term capacity. 30aflyear, annualized, is a modest pumping rate of about 30 gallons per minute pumping60% of the time. However, more water is needed during the irrigation season. As muchas 50 or more gallons per minute is desirable for irrigating large expanses like soccerfield and ball diamonds. Securing a well capable of these rates is somewhat speculativein this area and proposed well depth.
Hydrology Bureau Model PredictionsAlthough the OSE has experimented with Sandia area MODFLOW models, none aredeemed suitable for this application. Very little subsurface data exist, and there are fewpump tests and long term water level trends to calibrate a reliable model. San PedroCreek streamfiow data are equally sketchy. Because of the apparent aquifer complexity,the OSE versions of the Theis and the Glover- Balmer models were employed to reportpotential effects.
Groundwater DrawdownBased on the local geology, it is presumed that S-2361 will produce from the Santa Rosasandstone. The Theis model was run employing a Transmissivity of 134 feet2/day, or1000 gpm/ft day, and Storage Coefficient S of 0.001, relying on Spinks, 1986 for theSanta Rosa about 3 miles to the south. Better estimates of effects could be made if thewell was already drilled and tested. Higher Transmissivities result in more modestdrawdown but faster stream depletion effects. To simulate possible boundary effects ofthe Tijeras and San Antonito fault zones, a no-flow boundary was inserted 13,000 feetbeyond the well, and drawdown was calculated at and up to 10,000 feet further awayfrom the pumping well. Results are portrayed in the following graph for a well pumping30 afy for 70 years.
N.)
j1 {Q?)
5
. .
40-— Forty years
so- • Seventy years
c
The OSE WATERS database, reports that 83 WATERS records, mostly domestic wells,lie within a 10,000 foot radius from S-2361, Appendices. The nearest well of otherownership in WATERS is located about 1700 feet south. Albuquerque Public Schools, S1756 possesses a total depth of 224’, and water column of 146’. This well may incur 28feet of drawdown due to the application. A permit has been pulled for the Vista GrandeChurch, but the church has not been built and no drillers record has been filed.
The nearest protestants well is S-2073 approximately 5000 feet distant to the east and650 feet deep. Another protestant well lies approximately 6900 feet to the west, S-2072,drilled in the 1930’s and depth unknown. According to the following table, maximumdrawdown in either well is projected to be 14.5 feet or less due to the application..
C)
Projected S-2361 Drawdown
-1000 1000 3000 5000 7000 9000DIstançe feet
I
11000 13000 15000
70 year drawdown effects by radius of influence:Radius: Number of WATERS Wells Drawdown range:Near well bore proposed well exceeds 50 feet500’ 2 28 to 32’500—2000’ 1 28to232000’ to5000’ 17 23 to 17’5000 to 10000’ 63 14.5’ or less
Potential Cienega Canyon and San Pedro Creek surface depletionThe proposed well lies in the groundwater flow path to San Pedro Spring. A GloverBalmer equation estimate of total pumping depletion was calculated at San Pedro Springusing the same coefficients employed as in the Theis runs. If the calculated depletion isshared with several surface water sources, the proportional depletion at San Pedro Creekor Cienega Canyon will be less. The springs occurring west of Cienega Canyon andSandia Park have not been evaluated separately, as they contribute to arroyos flowing to
6
.Armijo Draw and San Pedro Creek. Thus the reported Glover - Balmer result may beregarded as a net effect to the San Pedro Creek system. Stream depletion approaches100% after 30 years of pumping. Model attached.
Conclusions:S-2361. will be drilled to support Bernaliulo County’s Vista Grande Community Center,including sporting field irrigation. The Community Center currently receives water fromEntranosa. No water budget has been submitted by the applicant to support the quantityof water sought. The proposed well will produce from moderate yield aquifer fomiationsfor the area, and perhaps should be drilled deeper than the applied-for 400 feet. No pumptest results are available in the vicinity. Model projections of future drawdown and streamimpacts rely on theoretical assumptions sometimes not reliable in this situation; hence, ifthe application is approved, model projections should be verified by future pumping andwater level monitoring.
Net effects on surface water sources are estimated to be 30 afy in 70 years. These effectmay occur on Cienega Canyon or San Pedro Creek, or both.
(15LMaximum drawdown in the nearest well of other ownership, S-&1 the School well, isestimated to be 28 feet.
The nearest protestants well is S-2073, lying approximately 5000 feet to the east and 650feet deep. Another protestant well lies approximately 6900 feet to the west, S-2072,drilled in the 1930’s and depth unknown. Maximum drawdown in either well isprojected to be 14.5 feet or less due to the application.
c.Well metenng and reporting, coupled with penodic water level momtoring should berequired.
C., .?
BibliographyBalleau Groundwater, Inc., 2000, Geohydrology and Water Availability for the Overlookat San Pedro Creek, Sandoval County, NM, prepared in support of land development inSandoval County.
Ferguson, C.A., Timmons, J.M., Pazzaglia, F.J., Karlstrom, K. E., Osburn, G.R. andBauer, P.W., 1966, Geology of Sandia Park Quadrangle, Bemalillo and SandovalCounties, NM. New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Open File DigitalGeologic Map OF-DM-1, Plate 1.
Geohydrology Associates, Inc., 1987, Geohydrologic Conditions and Water Supply forLomas Lindas Subdivision, Bernalillo County, NM, prepared in support of landdevelopment in Bemalillo County.
7
0
Shomaker and Associates, 1996, Update on Hydrogeologic Conditions at the CampbellFarming Corporation San Pedro Creek Estates, Sandoval County, NM, unpublishedreport.
Spinics, Michael P., 1986, Geology, Hydrology, Hydrologic model and estimateddrawdown effects relative to the proposed use of replacement well by Dick Holben inSandia Underground Water Basin OSE File S-670, NMSEO unpublished report.
Titus, F. B., 1980, Ground Water in the Sandia and Northern Manzano Mountains, NewMexico, New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral resources, Hydrologic Report 5.
C
— t5—
rfl
8
0 I..
Please call or email me to let me know that you received this.Thank you,
ellaS”7(505)-827-6 140lane11e.hauht(state.nm.us
L—
.S-2361 Theis Model
TIME and DATEmonth: 4 day: 29 year: 2005hour: 13 minu:e: 48 second: 18
DRAWDOWN AT RANDOM COORDINATES IN AN INFINITESTRIP, NON - LEAKY AQUIFER USER SPECIFIED BOUNDARIESAT Y = 0 AND A Y SPECIFIED BY USER
PUMPING MULTIPLE WELLS LOCATED AT POINTS SPECIFIEDBY USER. EACH WELL MAY HAVE A DIFFERENT
PUMPING SCHEDULE. ALL COORDINATES IN THE X - Y PLANE.
(Theis equation)
At y = 0, there is a no-flow boundaryThere is no other boundary to system
T = 1000. gpd/ft S = .001000
Number of pumping wells = 1
Coordinates of pumping wells and the no. of pumping rates
Well # x Coordinate Y Coordinate No. of PumpingRates
.0 13000.0 1
PUMPING SCHEDULES FOR THE WELLS
Well Schedule for Pumping Well Number 1
Pumping Rate Pumping Time
c__Q( 1) = 18.6 gpm for 25550.000 days
—
Coordinates of Computation Points
r—-(Number of computation points 7)
Point 4 X Coordinates Y Coordinatesfeet feet
1 .0 13001.02 .0 13010.03 .0 13100.04 .0 13500.05 .0 14000.06 .0 18000.07 .0 28000.0
Image Control .1000000E—02time variable (t)
t miii = 3650.000 days; t max 25550.000 days;delta t = 3650.000 days
10
RESUIIrSTJrawdowns and Coordinates of
Measured in feetcomputation points
x= .0Y = 13001.0
X= .0Y = 13010.0
x= .0Y = 13100.0
Time in days
3650.0007300. 000
10950.00014600.00018250.00021900.00025550.000
46.07348.70350.31651 .48452.40053.15353.793
and Coordinates ofMeasured in feet
36.25738.88640.50041.66742.58343.33643 .976computation points
26.43129.05830.67131 .83832.75433.50734.147
x=Y = 13500.0
.0 x=Y = 14000.0
.0 x= .0Y = 18000.0
Time in days
3650.0007300.000
10950.00014600.00018250.00021900.00025550.000
19.52522.14323.75324.91825.83326.58527.225
16.51619.12220.72821.89122.80423.55624.194
9.29811.80013.36614.50815.40816.15116.784
Drawdowris and Coordinates ofMeasured in feet
computation points
x= .0
.‘--
fT
crn-. )4
‘-
—
—
Drawdowns
Time in days
3650.0007300.000
10950.00014600.00018250.00021900.00025550.000
Y = 28000.0
4.2076.3667-7978.8689.724
10.43611.047
11
Depletion
in
Period
feet)
10.000163 .360708
20.000262.226170
30.000288.660104
40.000296.595625
50. 000298.978127
60.000299.692983
70.000299.907895
Pumping time70.000 years
.S-2361 Glover-Balmer Calculation
TIME and DATEmonth: 4 day: 29 year: 2005
hour: 14 minute: 33 second: 47
STREAM DEPLETION CAUSED BY PUMPING MULTIPLE WELLS AT
VARIOUS RATES IN AN INFINITE - STRIP, NON - LEAKY AQUIFER.
THE WELLS ARE BETWEEN THE STREAM AND A PLANE BOUNDARY.
(Glover and Balmer equation)
T = 134. square ft/day S = .001000
Number of wells = 1
Distance from stream to plane boundary 6.00 miles
Distances of the wells from the stream and thenthnber of pumping rates
Well Distance (miles) No. of rates
1 2.30 1
PUMPING SCHEDULES FOR THE WELLS
Pumping schedule for well number 1
Pumping rate
Q( 1) = 30.0 ac-ft/yr for
Image Control .10000000E-02Time variable (t) Only 500 timesteps allowed
t mm = 10.000 years; t max = 70.000 years;
delta t = 10.000 yearsAccumulated
Rate of Depletion Volume
Time Depletion Volume Time
(years) (ac-f t/yr) (acre-feet) (acre-
23.504679
28.050114
29.414625
29.824265
29.947242
29 - 984161
29.995246
163 .360708
425.586878
714.246983
1010.842608
1309.820735
1609.513717
1909.421613
( I
—- m
12
Ber
nalil
loC
ount
yap
plic
atio
nS-
2361
appn
toap
prop
riat
eup
to3o
afy
for
29.7
acre
sof
land
inse
c.18
TI
iNR
6E10
,000
foot
sear
chra
dius
from
X=
472,
874,
Y=1
519
097
Cen
tral
zone
WE
LL
ISU
RFA
CE
DA
TA
RE
POR
T
6O:h
id
H
1—
.n..
’r.
I..,V
-.
reft
(ac
per
ann
urn)
Div
ersi
DB
Fil
eN
brU
seon
S00
009
S00
040
S00
163
S00
336
S00
447
S00
526
S00
531
S00
532
S00
556
S00
659
S00
950
S01
065
Sta
rt
Dat
eD
OM
DO
M
DO
M
DO
M
DO
M
DO
M
DO
M
DO
M
DO
M
DO
M
SAN
SUB
uN
05E
uN
05E
uN
06E
uN
06E
Fin
ish
Dep
thD
epth
Dat
eO
wne
r
3JA
ME
SA
.PR
ICE
3JE
FFR
EY
B.
&S
US
AN
J.W
EE
KS
3R
ON
AL
DE.
&JE
AN
NE
A.
OV
ER
AL
L
3HIL
BE
RT
F.
GU
TIE
RR
EZ
3W
ILL
IAM
H.
GR
UE
NB
ER
GE
R
3JO
EG
OB
ER
3VA
LE
RIE
CA
LD
WE
LL
3SH
EIL
HSW
EE
NH
AR
T
3D
EN
NIS
B. C
LA
R.K
3FR
ED
LE
CK
MA
N
3G
RA
NT
MO
NT
GO
ME
RY
OA
ME
RIW
EST
CO
RPO
RA
TIO
N
Wel
lW
ater
bigg
estt
osm
all
est
XY
are
inFe
et
Tw
sR
ugSe
cq
Zon
eX
Y
24C
4688
34
24C
4683
67
19
31
C47
2902
19C
4718
57
C48
2821
uN
06E
193
14C
4730
36
uN
06E
30C
4733
73
C47
7850
241
22C
4670
88
243
11C
4653
17
25222C
4626
28
C47
9150
C47
9150
C48
0550
C48
0550
C47
9150
uN
05E
24C
4654
42
uN
USE
uN
USE
uN
USE
. .
240
300
300
200
220
385
380
100
325
400
200
515
515
102
1512
152
11/3
0/19
6612
112/
1966
1512
454
2/9/
1968
2/10
/196
8
1511
887
5/16
/199
051
17/1
990
1514
642
711f
2003
8/81
2003
1509
418
9/7/
2004
9/8/
2004
1514
012
9/10
/200
491
13/2
004
1510
655
5/11
/200
45/
11/2
004
1523
000
8/16
/197
98/
16/1
979
1516
871
6/27
/200
36/
30/2
003
1514
672
1/22
/198
11/
22/1
981
1511
732
5/29
1192
451
30/1
984
1523
700
9/91
1985
9/18
/198
515
2370
09/
9/19
859/
18/1
985
1526
250
1212
/198
512
12/1
985
1526
250
1523
700
1515
182
S01
065
TPU
BM
OU
NT
AIN
RA
NC
H
S01
220
DO
M3D
AL
EL
OD
ER
MA
N
S01
362
DO
M3
WE
RN
ER
BR
AC
HT
140
190
160 80 110 70 320 31 165 35 44 212
122 52 170 95
uN
06E
281
4C
4806
8715
1210
711
/27/
2004
5/13
/200
35/
17/2
003
300
12/2
/200
426
0
14
S01
568
PUB
OM
OU
NT
AIN
RA
NC
HL
IMIT
ED
PTN
SHP
C47
9150
1523
700
S01
602
DO
M3
INC
.SU
NC
HA
SEEN
T.u
N05
E24
41
4C46
8633
1513
856
6/30
/200
47/
2120
0436
020
0
S01
640
DO
M3B
EN
M.
BA
LD
WIN
uN
06E
2811
C48
1162
1511
178
10/2
8)20
0310
/29/
2003
[45
75
S01
731
MU
L3E
DD
Y&
TA
MM
YT
HO
MA
SO
NU
N06
1319
11
4C47
1602
1516
287
1/20
/200
41/
23/2
004
220
95
S01
756
SAN
5A
LB
UQ
UE
RQ
UE
PUB
LIC
SCH
OO
LS
uN
06E
18C
4729
0015
1750
012
/31/
1958
224
78
S01
819
MU
L3R
OB
ER
TI.
GO
NZ
AL
ES
uN
06E
204
34C
4792
6815
1221
76/
13/2
003
6/18
/200
340
014
8
S02
072
DO
M##
CA
MPB
EL
LFA
RM
ING
CO
RPO
RA
TIO
Nu
N06
E13
3C
4661
0015
1795
07/
2011
998
7/29
/199
85
l011
0
S02
073
IRR
##C
AM
PB
EI.
LF
AR
MIN
GC
OR
PO
RA
TIO
Nu
N06
1317
C47
8050
1518
000
12/3
1119
5512
131/
1955
650
S02
076
STK
6CA
MPB
EL
LFA
RM
ING
CO
RPO
RA
TIO
Nu
N06
E9
C48
1500
1527
320
6/30
/196
06/
30/1
960
S02
107
PUB
MO
UN
TA
INR
AN
CH
C48
0550
1526
250
102
S02
108
PUB
MO
UN
TA
INR
AN
CH
C48
0550
1526
250
150
S02
109
PUB
MO
UN
TA
INR
AN
CH
C47
9150
1523
700
460
S02
114
SAN
3TH
EP
LA
ZA
AT
SAN
DIA
PAR
K,
LL
Cu
N06
E193
1IC
4703
8715
1418
510
/3/1
999
10/3
/199
918
062
S02
185
DO
M3D
IAN
AS
CH
RO
EN
-CA
RE
Yu
N05
E24
C46
7000
1514
450
11/1
/200
111
/9/2
001
285
220
S02
216
STK
OM
OU
NT
AIN
RA
NC
HL
IMIT
ED
PAR
TN
ER
1iN
06E
7C
4727
5015
2730
0
S02
274
MU
L3J0
EA
ND
BA
RB
AR
AT
RU
JIL
LO
IiN
06E
19C
4709
4215
1471
741
2312
003
4/24
/200
320
011
0
S02
276
DO
M3E
RN
EST
OS.
&D
AN
A-H
INE
SR
OM
ER
OuN
06E
18C
4742
4315
1386
424
0
S02
282
DO
M3E
RN
EST
OJ.
AN
DD
AN
A-H
INE
SR
OM
E1i
N06
E19
C47
4066
1512
817
5/5/
2003
5/5/
2003
140
57
S02
283
DO
M3W
AR
RE
NF.
FRA
INu
N05
1324
C46
5237
1515
000
6/61
2003
6/20
/200
328
526
0
S02
286
DO
M3C
RIS
TIN
AO
LD
SC
4662
2815
1013
76/
1120
036/
14/2
003
280
100
S02
287
DO
M3G
EO
RG
EM
IHA
LJK
C46
4835
1516
407
6/15
/200
36/
30/2
003
220
60
S02
293
DO
M3P
ET
ER
WE
LL
SC
4691
2115
1253
46/
12/2
003
6/12
/200
316
094
S02
299
DO
M3S
AN
DR
AJA
NE
AL
LE
Nu
N05
E24
C46
8130
1516
752
6/30
/200
37/
4/20
0330
516
5
S02
301
DO
M3R
ON
WE
STuN
0613
20C
4806
2615
1216
47/
26/2
003
7/28
/200
326
012
0
S02
305
DO
M3J
AM
ES
.1.Y
OO
C46
6803
1512
318
8/8/
2003
8/14
/200
330
010
0
S02
306
DO
M3R
OY
RE
NT
ZS
CH
uN
0513
242
1C
4666
1315
1243
810
/21/
2003
1012
7/20
0344
028
5
S02
308
DO
M3G
ER
AL
DJ.
RO
ME
RO
uN
06E
19C
4727
1015
1295
58/
1/20
038/
4/20
0338
060
S02
311
DO
M3G
RE
G&
CA
TH
YY
EA
RO
UT
.C
4691
8115
1712
69/
9/20
039/
1512
003
300
185
60L
JC
JL
I_
1Jf’
.iv
--•
——
i.•”
J15
(VY
:•-—
\.1
1’r.cr,J
J:JL
tjIL
;IcJ
IV••
t—
c-+
jii
3LYJ
.
S02
312
DO
M3D
OM
INIC
&A
NG
EL
APE
RE
Au
N05
E24
C46
6535
1512
471
8/81
2003
8118
/200
331
020
0S
0232
1D
OM
3RO
NA
LD
E.K
IDN
ER
uN
0513
25C
4655
2315
1033
210
/15/
2003
10/2
0/20
0332
019
5S
0232
2D
OM
3NIL
SK
AM
MFU
LL
ER
TO
NC
4656
9515
1508
28/
5/20
048/
6/20
0412
060
S02
330
DO
M3M
ICH
AE
LP
.B
AR
RB
’fl’
Eu
N06
1320
C47
6749
1513
640
11/1
4120
0311
/17/
2003
120
79S
0233
2D
OM
3JO
HN
B.
CA
RSO
NC
4666
9015
1201
911
/4/2
003
11/4
1200
330
019
0S
0233
3D
OM
3WA
LT
ER
HE
ITZ
ING
ER
uN
06E
20C
4792
3015
1376
711
/26/
2003
1112
9/20
0330
080
S02
334
DO
MO
DA
NE
&JU
LIA
B.H
OG
AN
C46
5817
1515
427
250
S02
335
DO
MO
JAM
FS
&G
AB
RIE
LL
AP
OP
PU
N05
1324
C46
7687
1512
111
300
S02
341
DO
M3W
.D.
(WIL
LIA
MD
ON
)M
ILL
ER
tiN
06E
204
C47
8305
1513
080
5/22
/200
45/
25/2
004
360
140
S02
342
MU
LO
CA
RL
D.
&A
MA
ND
AC
.1-J
OU
SMA
NuN
05E
24C
4652
1815
1623
735
0S
0234
3D
OM
3GA
ILL
AR
DS.
PRY
OR
I IN
0613
30C
4747
7715
1113
45/
5/20
045/
8/20
0432
513
5S
0234
4D
OM
3JA
ME
SA
.FU
NST
ON
C46
8697
1517
543
2/21
2004
2/3/
2004
200
80S
0234
5D
OM
3RIC
HA
RD
A.
STIB
OL
TII
N05
1324
C46
6430
1516
600
1/30
/200
41/
31/2
004
260
140
S02
346
DO
M3G
EO
RG
EM
IHA
LIK
lIN
0613
19C
4690
3015
1589
73/
1212
004
3/16
/200
428
011
2S
0235
0ST
K3I
GN
AC
IO&
RU
TH
GU
TIE
RR
EZ
uN
0613
19C
4744
3715
1399
2S
0235
5D
OM
3FR
AN
KPE
HR
IIN
0513
24C
4690
7315
1656
73/
25/2
004
3/29
/200
428
022
0S
0235
6D
OM
3KIM
SMiT
HtI
N05
1324
C46
8979
1517
087
6/1/
2004
6/15
/200
432
019
5S
0235
7D
OM
3GU
YG
AR
DN
ER
uN
0513
244
31C
4.67
946
1513
143
3/25
/200
44/
5120
0417
090
S02
359
DO
M3S
USA
NL
ITT
LE
uN
OSE
24C
4652
2615
1651
45/
22/2
004
5/25
)200
438
570
S02
365
DO
M3F
RA
NK
A. L
OG
AN
tiN
05E
25C
4652
9115
1227
26/
18/2
004
7115
/200
444
011
0S
0236
6D
OM
3MA
RK
D.
DIS
MU
KE
uN
0513
24C
4696
8015
1595
420
S02
367
DO
M3M
AR
KD
.D
ISM
UK
E1I
N05
1324
C46
9859
1516
035
200
S02
373
DO
M3O
RL
AN
DO
O.
FER
NA
ND
EZ
uN
0613
19C
4705
3015
1365
68/
8/20
048/
9/20
0414
570
S02
374
DO
M3R
US
SE
LL
SM
ITH
uN
06E
20C
4783
3415
1332
68/
4/20
048/
5/20
0436
016
0S
0237
6D
OM
3SO
HA
ILT
AF
RE
SH
IC
4747
6515
1375
3S
0237
8D
OM
3KE
NN
ET
H1.
PAD
1LL
Au
N05
1324
C46
7965
1512
523
8/31
/200
491
1)20
0436
015
1S
0237
9D
OM
3B
RU
CE
M.
&L
AV
ON
NE
JOM
ILL
ER
C46
7061
1510
733
8/23
/200
48/
24/2
004
230
110
S02
380
DO
M3S
TE
VE
R.
WIL
KS
uN
06E
28C
4825
4115
0986
68/
31/2
004
9/1/
2004
325
135
. .
16
S02
386
DO
M3D
AN
IEL
P.
DIS
MIJ
KE
uN
OSE
24C
4689
3715
1537
110
114t
2004
11f2
1200
418
014
5
S02
387
nul
OD
AN
IEL
P.D
ISM
UK
EuN
05E
24C
4696
9315
1520
310
t25t
2004
11t2
/200
420
050
S02
388
DO
M3
STE
PHE
NW
ILU
AM
DIS
MU
KE
C46
8405
1515
379
S02
392
DO
M3
JAM
ES
RA
Th
C46
7942
1512
270
1011
9t20
0410
/20/
2004
360
176
S02
405
DO
M3
VIR
GIN
IAD
EV
AN
EY
1iN
05E
25C
4673
6915
1060
411
7f20
0511
8t20
0530
016
0
S02
408
nul
OT
HO
MA
SDU
VA
LuN
05E
2423
3C46
5710
1513
195
350
S02
410
SAN
3VIS
TA
GR
AN
DE
CH
IJR
CH
C47
1747
1518
739
S02
416
nul
OL
ES
SC
HU
MA
NN
CO
NS
TR
UC
T[O
NC
Ou
NO
SE25
C46
7501
1512
379
350
S02
417
DO
M3F
RA
NK
ME
LL
Ou
N06
E20
C47
7213
1514
519
360
Rec
ord
Cou
nt:
83A
ve28
512
8
31-3
20
a
Qj:
l11d
;
17