rda (resource description and access) for school libraries sonia m. gementiza, phd library director,...
TRANSCRIPT
RDA (Resource Description and Access) for School Libraries
Sonia M. Gementiza, PhD
Library Director, DLSU Dasmarinas
August 30, 2013 Rizal Library, Ateneo de Manila UniversityKatipunan Avenue, Quezon City
Objectives Understand the role of FRBR and FRAD in
Resource Description and Access (RDA)
Understand the impact of RDA on cataloging tasks
Understand the impact of RDA on user operations
Consider a strategy for implementing RDA in the school library media center
What do we need to learn about RDA?
• The main questions being asked are: How do we use it? How do we implement it in our
library? Are vendors creating new systems
that use it? • Perhaps the most challenging aspect
will be learning the complexity of the FRBR entity-relationship models in which information resources are classified as:
• Works, Expressions, Manifestations, and Items (often referred to as WEMI).
3
Where we are and how we got here
Resource Description and Access (RDA) replaces Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed. (AACR2) in January 2010, as an online database product to incorporate the features and functionalities of online access. (JSC, www.rda-jsc.org/)
Work began in 2004, initially conceived as AACR3 but need for greater flexibility drove the movement to a new approach
Based in part on conceptual models in Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD)
Motivated by :
Changes in technology
• Impact on descriptive/access data
• Book catalogs
• Card catalogs
• OPACs
• Next generation
Move from the isolated individual library to incorporation of the international audience
Move from classes of materials to elements and values (more controlled vocabularies)4
5
Bibliographic Universe
Books Serials Maps, globes, etc. Manuscripts. Musical scores A-V
sound recordings motion pictures photographs,
slides Multimedia “Remote” digital
materials Etc.
Intention of RDA
Broaden the statement of principles (Paris Principles) All types of resources (not just books)
Bibliographic relationships, descriptive cataloging, not Subject Cataloging at this time
Access (not just choice and form of entry, but all access for bibliographic and authority records)
Builds on Great cataloguing traditions of the world
FRBR and FRAD and future FR-Subjects
6
AACR2 vs. RDA: Difference in Proportions
AACR2 Descriptin of information entities—13 chapters
(Part 1) (2-12 focus on separate format) Weak on access points; talks of main and
added (MAP, AAP), have to look all over Part II for access point provisions (e.g., title access points are discussed in chapter 21 only and then only as a default provision, not much direction)
Is not really based on the idea of a “work”, rather it is very much based on the unit record system.
7
AACR2 vs. RDA, continuedRDA Description is covered in 4 chapters, everything
else is about access points Form is no longer the first decision; chapters are
not based on form (e.g., no longer have chapters 2-12 as in AACR2)
Does not focus on the unit record system—it can be, but it doesn’t need to do so—rather it operates on the idea of a “work”
Does not put the cataloger in the decision of having to decide Main and Added Access points; we don’t need those distinctions any longer although it does use the idea of a “preferred access point”
8
RDA and AACR2
How RDA Differs from AACR2
Not organized by form of item
Based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)
How RDA is similar to AACR2
Most rules will not change
Discusses description and access points
9
10
RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS (RDA)
RECORDING ATTRIBUTES Introduction Section 1. Chapters 1-4
Recording attributes of manifestation and itemSection 2. Chapters 5-7
Recording attributes of work and expressionSection 3. Chapters 8-11
Recording attributes of person, family, and corporate body
Section 4. Chapters 12-16Recording attributes of concept, object, event, and place
RECORDING RELATIONSHIPS Section 5. Chapter 17
Recording primary relationships between work, expression, manifestation, and item
Section 6. Chapters 18-22Recording relationships to persons, families, and corporate bodies
Section 7. Chapters 23Recording relationships to concepts, objects, events, and places associated with a work
Section 8. Chapters 24-28Recording relationships between works, expressions, manifestations, and items
Section 9. Chapters 29-32Recording relationships between persons, families, and corporate bodies
Section 10. Chapters 33-37Recording relationships between concepts, objects, events, and places
Appendices A-M Glossary
ANGLO-AMERICAN CATALOGUING RULES, 2ND ED., REV.
PART I DESCRIPTION Introduction Chapter 1.
General RulesChapters 2-12
Special rules applicable to particular types of information resources (i.e., maps, manuscripts, music, etc.)
Chapter 13 Analytical descriptions
PART I HEADINGS, UNIFORM TITLES AND REFERENCES Chapter 20
IntroductionChapter 21
Choice of Access points [main and added]Chapter 22
Headings for personsChapter 23
Geographic namesChapter 24
Headings for Corporate BodiesChapter 25
Uniform TitlesChapter 26
References Appendices A-EIndex
How much must I re-learn?
RDA now outlines the first step in creating a catalog record as deciding on the type of description to be represented, and not deciding on format, although format is still integral
Types of description (rules 1.2) Comprehensive, analytical, or multi-level
description More emphasis on showing bibliographic
relationships (e.g., taxonomy of bibliographic relationships) in order to better allow clustering of records Read--works by B. Tillett, R. Smiraglia; M. Yee, S.
Vellucci, E. O’Neill, D. Vizine-Goetz, just to name a few…
11
Preparation
Cataloging community must study the conceptual model offered by FRBR and FRAD
Read and study drafts of RDA as released
Provide feedback to JSC and vendors
Have the trial access of RDA
Vendors must consider a re-design of their automation systems in order to incorporate new functionality of bibliographic and authority data
Vendors producing bibliographic records must consider how and when to add the new RDA fields to MARC records
12
What’s a conceptual model?
• Abstract depiction of the universe of things being described The things in that universe
(entities) Identifying characteristics of those
entities (attributes/elements) The relationships among the
entities13
Why do we need FRBR?
Improve the user experience in locating information Guide systems designs for the future Guide rule makers
Cut costs for the description and access to resources in our libraries
Position information providers to better operate in the Internet environment and beyond
14
Applications of the Conceptual Model
FRBR is conceptual model No application is
prescribed Opportunities for
the future in new systems designs Australia, Europe Variations3, etc.
Keep user foremost in mind
15
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)
User tasks Find Identify Select Obtain
Entity-relationship model Entities: Group 1, 2, 3 Relationships Attributes
National level record elements (mandatory & optional data)
16
FRBR Entities
Group 1:Products of intellectual & artistic endeavor = bibliographic resources
Work Expression Manifestation Item
17
FRBR’s Entity-Relationship Model
Entities Relationships Attributes (data
elements)
18
relationship
One Entity Another Entity
Expression
Manifestation
Item
Work
Physical -recording ofcontent
Intellectual/artistic content
is realized through
is embodied in
is exemplified by
20
Work
Expression
Manifestation
Item
is realized through
is embodied in
is exemplified by
recursive
one
many
Group 1
23
24
Elements to Describe Resources Work
ID Title Date etc.
Expression ID Form Date Language etc.
Manifestation ID Title Statement of
responsibility Edition Imprint (place,
publisher, date) Form/extent of
carrier Terms of availability Mode of access etc.
Item ID Provenance Location etc.
Examples
1. Leatherbound autographed copy in Rare Books Collection?
2. Digitized version of the Oxford University Press text published in 2008?
3. French translation?4. London Symphony Orchestra
2005 performance?5. The Three Musketeers?
28
Item
Manifestation
Expression
Expression
Work
Original Work - Same
Expression
Same Work – New Expression
New WorkCataloging Rules Cut-Off Point
DerivativeEquivalent Descriptive
Facsimile
Reprint
ExactReproduction
Copy
MicroformReproduction
Variations or Versions
Translation
Simultaneous“Publication”
Edition
Revision
SlightModification
ExpurgatedEdition
IllustratedEdition
AbridgedEdition
Arrangement
SummaryAbstractDigest
Change of Genre
Adaptation
DramatizationNovelizationScreenplay
Libretto
FreeTranslation
Same Style orThematic Content
Parody
Imitation
Review
Criticism
AnnotatedEdition
Casebook
Evaluation
Commentary
Family of Works
29
30
Relationships Inherent among
the Group 1 entities
Content relationships among works/expressions
Work
Expression
Manifestation
Item
Whole-Part
AccompanyingSequentialDerivative
FRBR Entities
Group 2: Those responsible for the intellectual & artistic content = Parties Person Corporate body Family
32
Work
Expression
Manifestation
Item
34
Group 2
many
is owned by
is produced by
is realized by
is created by
Person
Corporate Body
Family
FRBR Entities
Group 3:Subjects of works Groups 1 & 2 plus Concept Object Event Place
Subject relationship35
Work
37
Group 3
many
has as subject
Expression
Manifestation
Item
Person
Corporate Body
Work
Concept
Object
Event
Place
has as subject
has as subject
Family
FRBR Benefits Collocation
Better organization to catalog
More options to display
Identifying elements
Pathways
38
Simplify cataloging enabling links and re-use of identifying elements
Objectives of Catalogs
Cutter’s objectives for the catalogFinding - description and access
standardsCollocating - controlled
“vocabularies” for precision of searching
Objectives of Catalogs
Finding (locate) A single specific resource
Collocating (sets of resources) All resources belonging to the same work All resources belonging to the same expression All resources belonging to the same
manifestation All the works and expressions of a person,
corporate body, or family All resources on a given subject All resources sharing some specific characteristic
Language, place of publication, date, etc.
Collocation by Works
Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616.
+ All’s well that ends well
+ As you like it
+ Hamlet
+ Macbeth
+ Midsummer night’s dream
+ …
Collocation by Family of Works and Expressions
Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Hamlet.
+ Texts
+ Motion Pictures
+ Sound Recordings
Collocation by Expressions
Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Hamlet.+ Texts – Danish
+ Texts – Dutch
+ Texts – English
+ Texts – French
+ Texts – Spanish
+ Motion Pictures – English
+ Sound Recordings - English
Collocation of Manifestations
Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Hamlet.
- Motion pictures – English
+ 1964 Director, Bill Collegan
+ 1990 Director, Kevin Kline, Kirk Browning
+ 1990 Director, Franco Zeffirelli
+ 1992 Director, Maria Muat
+ 1996 Director, Kenneth Branagh
+ 2000 Director, Campbell Scott, Eric Simonson
46
Collocation
Objectives of a catalog: display
All the works associated with a person, etc.
All the expressions of the same work
All the manifestations of the same expression
All items/copies of the same manifestation
Hamlet
Stockholm2008
English
Swedish
French
German
Shakespeare
Library of CongressCopy 1Green leather binding
Romeo andJuliet
47
Pathways to Related Works
Hamlet
Stockholm2008
English
Swedish
French
German
Shakespeare
Library of CongressCopy 1Green leather binding
Romeo andJuliet
Stoppard
Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead
Tex
t
Movies…
Derivativ
e
w
orks
Subject
LC Control No. : 47023612 LCCN Permalink : http://lccn.loc.gov/47023612 Type of Material : Book (Print, Microform, Electronic, etc.) Personal Name : Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Main Title : ... Hamlet, traduit par Andre Gide.Published/Created : [Paris] Gallimard [1946] Description : 2 p. l., 7-237, [2] p. 17 cm.
CALL NUMBER : PR2779.H3 G5Copy 1 -- Request in : Jefferson or Adams Bldg General or
Area Studies Reading Rms
Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Hamlet. French.
48
LC Control No. : 47023612 LCCN Permalink : http://lccn.loc.gov/47023612 Type of Material : Book (Print, Microform, Electronic, etc.) Personal Name : Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Main Title : ... Hamlet, traduit par Andre Gide.Published/Created : [Paris] Gallimard [1946] Description : 2 p. l., 7-237, [2] p. 17 cm.
CALL NUMBER : PR2779.H3 G5Copy 1 -- Request in : Jefferson or Adams Bldg General or
Area Studies Reading Rms
Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Hamlet. French.
Work
Person49
LC Control No. : 47023612 LCCN Permalink : http://lccn.loc.gov/47023612 Type of Material : Book (Print, Microform, Electronic, etc.) Personal Name : Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Main Title : ... Hamlet, traduit par Andre Gide.Published/Created : [Paris] Gallimard [1946] Description : 2 p. l., 7-237, [2] p. 17 cm.
CALL NUMBER : PR2779.H3 G5Copy 1 -- Request in : Jefferson or Adams Bldg General or
Area Studies Reading Rms
Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Hamlet. French.
Expression
50
LC Control No. : 47023612 LCCN Permalink : http://lccn.loc.gov/47023612 Type of Material : Book (Print, Microform, Electronic, etc.) Personal Name : Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Main Title : ... Hamlet, traduit par Andre Gide.Published/Created : [Paris] Gallimard [1946] Description : 2 p. l., 7-237, [2] p. 17 cm.
CALL NUMBER : PR2779.H3 G5Copy 1 -- Request in : Jefferson or Adams Bldg General or
Area Studies Reading Rms
Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Hamlet. French.
Manifestation
51
LC Control No. : 47023612 LCCN Permalink : http://lccn.loc.gov/47023612 Type of Material : Book (Print, Microform, Electronic, etc.) Personal Name : Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Main Title : ... Hamlet, traduit par Andre Gide.Published/Created : [Paris] Gallimard [1946] Description : 2 p. l., 7-237, [2] p. 17 cm.
CALL NUMBER : PR2779.H3 G5Copy 1 -- Request in : Jefferson or Adams Bldg General or
Area Studies Reading Rms
Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Hamlet. French.
Item
52
FRBR-based systems
53
Work
Manifestation
Person
Expression
Manifestation
Item Item
Item
Concept
Corporate body
Person
MARC 21 Changes (slide from “RDA and OCLC”, Webinar presentation, October 2009. K. Calhoun, J. Godby, T. Fons, and G.Patton)
Bibliographic records 040 ‡e code ‘rda’ to identify the rules used New fields for content type, media type and
carrier type Field 336 – Content type Field 337 – Media type Field 338 – Carrier type
Authority records 040 ‡e code ‘rda’ to identify the rules used Other fields for entity attributes OCLC implementation in time for use in the
testing
54
Content, media, and carrier types
Content type MARC Leader/06 - must continue to use
Less granular than RDA MARC LDR/06 code examples
e - cartographic material f - manuscript cartographic material
New field 336 - use to record exact RDA terms $a Content type terms$2 Source RDA term examples
cartographic dataset cartographic image cartographic moving image cartographic tactile image cartographic tactile three-dimensional form cartographic three-dimensional form
336 ## $a cartographic dataset $2 rda55
Content, media, and carrier types Media type
MARC 007/00 – close match with RDA 007 provides coding for multiple facets of resource
MARC 007/00 code examples h - microform s - sound recording
New field 337 - use to record exact RDA terms and/or do not need to code additional facets of resource
$a Media type term$2 Source RDA term examples
microform audio
337 ## $a microform $2 rda 337 ## $a audio $2 rda 56
Content, media, and carrier types Carrier type
MARC 007/01 – close match with RDA 007 provides coding for multiple facets of resource
MARC 007/01 code examples b - microfilm cartridge d - sound disc
New field 338 - use to record exact RDA terms and do not need to code additional facets of resource
$a Carrier type term$2 Source RDA term examples
microform cartridge audio disc
338 ## $a microfilm cartridge $2 rda 338 ## $a audio disc $2 rda 57
Who’s ready now?
VTLS - Virtua http://www.vtls.com/products/virtua
Automation system designed with FRBR concepts
The Primo® system from Ex Libris http://www.exlibrisgroup.com
FRBRized interface to streamline the discovery process.
100 $a Preferred name for the person $d Date of birth 240 $a Preferred title for the work $l Language of expression 245 $a Title proper $c Statement of responsibility relating to title proper250 $a Designation of edition260 $a Place of publication $b Publisher’s name $c Date of publication300 $a Extent338 $a Carrier type500 $a Nature of the content…700 $a Preferred name for the person $c Title of the person$e Relationship designator700 $a Preferred name for the person $c Profession or occupation$e Relationship designator730 $a Preferred title for the work $d Date of work740 $a Variant title
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
100 $a Preferred name for the person $d Date of birth$t Preferred title for the work $l Language of expression530 $a Preferred title for the work $d Date of work$0 Identifier for the work…
NAME-TITLE AUTHORITY RECORD
Linked bibliographic and authority records
100 $a Preferred name for the person $c Title of the person400 $a Variant name for the person500 $a Preferred name for the person $d Date of birth $0 Identifier for the person…
NAME AUTHORITY RECORD
100 $a Preferred name for the person $c Profession or occupation400 $a Variant name for the person…
NAME AUTHORITY RECORD
130 $a Preferred title for the work $d Date of work500 $a Preferred name for the person $d Date of birth$t Preferred title for the work $l Language of expression $0 Identifier for the work…
TITLE AUTHORITY RECORD
100 $a Preferred name for the person $d Date of birth 400 $a Variant name for the person500 $a Preferred name for the person $c Title of the person$0 Identifier for the person…
NAME AUTHORITY RECORD
506 $a Restrictions on access561 $a Custodial history of item562 $a Item-specific carrier characteristic…
HOLDINGS RECORD
1 2
3
77
New: identifying families (authority records) RDA 8.1.2=“two or more persons related by birth,
marriage, adoption, etc. Scope:
Now considered creators, contributors, etc. Important for archives, museums, and special collections
Examples: 100 3# Ingebretson (Family) 376 ## Family Date associated with the family (RDA 10.4) 046 ## 1925 $t 1976 100 3# Pahlavi (Dynasty : $d 1925-1979) 376 ## Dynasty Place associated with the family 046 ## 1529 $t 1739 100 3# Nayak (Dynasty : $d 1529-1739 : Madurai, India) 370 ## Madurai, India 376 ## Dynasty
79
MARC21 new & updated tags
Bibliographic records Leader/18: “i” 033—Date/Time, and place of event [LC: TBD] 040 $e rda 260 $c—give “copyright date” after publication date 336--content type; 337--media type; 338--carrier type 380-384: Form of work, medium of performance &
numeric designation, etc. [LC policy to be decided] 518—Date/Time and place of event note [LC: TBD] 533/776: LC decision on reproduction policy
80
MARC21 new & updated tags Authority records
008/10—Descriptive cataloging rules: use “z” (other) [A value is not defined for RDA]
040 $e rda 046 $k Beginning or single date created [TBD] 046 $l Ending date created [TBD] 370--Associated place; 371—Address; 372—
Field of activity; 373—Affiliation; 374—Occupation; 375—Gender; 376: Family information; 377—Associated languages [used to be 670; implementing the FRAD]
380-384: Form of work; Other characteristics; Medium of performance; Numeric designation of a musical work; key [TBD]
500-530: $4—relationship code; $w/0 “r”—control subfield
81
Summary: initial observations (B. Jones)
Benefits: Authority record is much more strengthened with
more information even though they are optional elements.
If 336-338 information will be processed well in discovery tool, it would be a great source for facet searching or collocating.
Try to be more user-friendly, e.g. spell-out form Go beyond MARC community Outreach international community
Concerns: RDA Toolkit: no index
Hard to search and navigate Top priority for the enhancement in the next release
82
Summary: initial observations Concerns:
RDA is not format-based, so harder to catalog specific type of resources.
RDA does not have sufficient examples; therefore, other resources are extremely helpful for creating RDA records, e.g.
Workflows in Toolkit, LC examples, JSC examples, Adam Schiff’s slides, University of Chicago’s examples on website, esp. with OPAC view
Repetitive information, esp. for AV materials
It takes longer to catalog if more information added to bibliographic and authority records.