1

3.2 Flat slabs

3.2.1 Introduction

Slabs which are not supported by beams or walls along the edges but are supported directly

by columns are known as flat slabs (Fig. 3.2.1). The required slab depth for such a system is

generally less than for a one-way spanning slab system but greater than for a two-way

spanning slab system. However, the use of flat slabs results in a reduced depth of structure

overall as beams, when they are present, govern the structural depth. Another great advantage

of this system is that it only requires simple shuttering there are no beams for which

formwork must be prepared. One disadvantage of flat slab construction is that the

arrangement of reinforcement can be very complex, particularly adjacent to columns where

punching shear reinforcement is often required if the slab depth is kept to a minimum.

Flat slabs are often provided with drops or enlarged column heads, as illustrated in Fig.

3.2.2, to increase the shear strength of the slab around the column supports. However, this

substantially increases the complexity of the shuttering, countering one of the principal

advantages of the system.

Figure 3.2.1 Flat slab construction

2

3.2.2 Methods of Analysis

A flat slab including supporting columns or walls may be analyzed using the equivalent

frame method or, where applicable, the simplified method. The provision in the methods are

for the design of flat slabs supported by a generally rectangular arrangement of columns and

where the ratio of the longer to the shorter spans does not exceed 2. A flat slab is subdivided

into column and middle strips (Fig. 3.2.3). Column strip is a design strip with a width on each

side of a column center-line equal to 0.25Lx or if drops with dimension not less than Lx/3 are

used, a width equal to the drop dimension. Middle strip is a design strip bounded by two

column strips.

For both methods of analysis, the negative moments greater than those at a distance hc/2 from

the center-line of the column may be ignored provided the moment Mo obtained as the sum of

the maximum positive design moment and the average of the negative design moments in any

one span of the slab for the whole panel width is such that:

Figure 3.2.2 Flat slab construction details: (a) no column head; (b) flared column head;

(c) slab with drop panel; (d) flared column head and drop panel.

3

2

12

03

2

8

cdd

hL

LqgM

Where L1 = panel length parallel to span, measured from centers of columns.

L2 = panel width, measured from centers of columns

hc = effective diameter of a column or column head.

When the above condition is not satisfied, the negative design moments shall be increased.

The effective diameter of a column or column head hc is the diameter of a circle

whose area equals the cross-sectional area of the column or, if column heads are used,

the area of the column head based on the effective dimensions as defined below. In no

case shall hc be taken as greater than one-quarter of the shortest span framing into the

column.

Figure 3.2.3 Division of Panels in Flat Slabs

4

The effective dimensions of a column head for use in calculation of hc are limited

according to the depth of the head. In any direction, the effective dimension of a head

Lh shall be taken as

The lesser of the actual dimension Lh o , or Lh,max, where Lh,max is given by:

Lh,max = Lc + 2dh

For a flared head, the actual dimension Lho is that measured to the center of the

reinforcing steel (see Fig. 3.2.4).

A drop may only be considered to influence the distribution of moments within the

slab where the smaller dimension of the drop is at least one third of the smaller

dimension of the surrounding panels. Smaller drops may, however, still be taken into

account when assessing the resistance to punching shear.

Equivalent Frame Method

Structure may be divided longitudinally and transversely into frames consisting of

columns and strips of slab

The width of slab used to define the effective stiffness of the slab will depend upon

the aspect ratio of the panels and the type of loading, but the following provisions

may be applied in the absence of more accurate methods:

In the case of vertical loading, the full width of the panel, and

Figure 3.2.4 Types of Column Head

5

For lateral loading, half the width of the panel may be used to calculate the

stiffness of the slab.

The moment of inertia of any section of slab or column used in calculating the relative

stiffness of members may be assumed to be that of the cross section of the concrete

alone.

Moments and forces within a system of flat slab panels may be obtained from analysis

of the structure under the single load case of maximum design load on all spans or

panels simultaneously, provided:

The ratio of the characteristic imposed load to the characteristic dead load

does not exceed 1.25.

The characteristic imposed load does not exceed 5.0 kN/m2 excluding

partitions.

Where it is not appropriate to analyze for the single load case of maximum design

load on all spans, it will be sufficient to consider the following arrangements of

vertical loads:

All spans loaded with the maximum design ultimate load, and

Alternative spans with the maximum design ultimate load, and all other spans

loaded with the minimum design ultimate load (1.0Gk)

Each frame may be analyzed in its entirety by any elastic method. Alternatively, for

vertical loads only, each strip of floor and roof may be analyzed as a separate frame

with the columns above and below fixed in position and direction at their extremities,

In either case, the analysis shall be carried out for the appropriate design ultimate

loads on each span calculated for a strip of slab of width equal to the distance between

center lines of the panels on each side of the columns.

Simplified Method

Moments and shear forces in non-sway flat slab structures may be determined using

Table 3.2.1, subject to the conditions described below.

The following limitations shall be observed when using the simplified method:

Design is based on the single load case of all spans loaded with the maximum

design ultimate load.

There are at least three rows of panels of approximately equal span in the direction

being considered.

Successive span length in each direction shall not differ by more than one-third of

the longer span.

6

Maximum offsets of columns from either axis between center lines of successive

columns shall not exceed 10% of the span (in the direction of the offset).

Table 3.2.1 Bending Moment and Shear Force Coefficients for Flat Slabs of Three or

More Equal Spans

Outer support

Near

Center of

first span

First

Interior

support

Center of

interior

span

Interior

support

Column

Wall

Moment

Shear

Total column

moments

-0.040FL

0.45F

0.040FL

-0.020FL

0.40F

-

0.083FL

-

-

-0.063FL

0.60F

0.022FL

0.071FL

-

-

-0.055FL

0.50F

0.022FL

NOTE 1. F is the total design ultimate load on the strip of slab between adjacent columns considered.

2. L is the effective span = L1 -2hc/3.

3. The limitations in section 3.2.2 need not be checked.

4. The moments shall not be redistributed.

Figure 3.2.5 Building idealization for equivalent frame analysis

7

Division of Moments between Column and Middle Strips

The design moments obtained from analysis of the continuous frames using the

Equivalent Frame method or from simplified method shall be divided between the

column and middle strips in the proportions given in Table 3.2.2.

Table 3.2.2 Distribution of Design Moments in Panels of Flat Slabs

Apportionment between column and middle strip expressed as

percentages of the total negative or positive design moment

Column strip (%) Middle strip (%)

Negative

Positive

75

55

25

45

NOTE: For the case where the width of the column strip is taken as equal to that of the drop,

and the middle strip is thereby increased in width, the design moments to be resisted by the

middle strip shall be increased in proportion to its increased width. The design moments to be

resisted by the column strip may be decreased by an amount such that the total positive and

the total negative design moments resisted by the column strip and middle strip together are

unchanged.

3.2.3 Design Considerations

General

Details of reinforcement in flat slabs shall be as follows:

The reinforcement in flat slabs shall have minimum bend point locations and

extensions for reinforcement as prescribed in Fig. 3.2.6.

Where adjacent spans are unequal, extension of negative reinforcement beyond the

face of support as prescribed in Fig. 3.2.6 shall be based on requirements of longer

span.

Bent bars may be used only when depth-to-span ratio permits use of bends 450 or

less.

For flat slabs in frames not braced against side sway and for flat slabs resisting lateral

loads, lengths of reinforcement shall be determined by analysis but shall not be less than

those prescribed in Fig. 3.2.6.

8

Figure 3.2.6 Minimum Bend Point Location and Extension for Reinforcement in Flat

Slabs

9

Internal panels

The column and middle strips shall be designed to withstand the design moments

obtained from section 3.2.2.

Two-thirds of the amount of reinforcement required to resist the negative design moment

in the column strip shall be placed in a width equal to half that of the column strip and

central with the column. This concentration of reinforcement over the column will

increase the capacity of the slab for transfer of moment to the column by flexure (see

Section 3.2.4)

Edge panels

The design moments shall be apportioned and designed exactly as for an internal panel,

using the same column and middle strips as for an internal panel.

3.2.4 Moment Transfer between Slab and Column

(a) When gravity load, wind, earthquake, or other lateral forces cause transfer of moment

between slab and column, a fraction of the unbalanced moment shall be transferred by

flexure. Fraction of unbalanced moment not transferred by flexure shall be transferred

by eccentricity of shear in accordance with Section 3.2.4.

(b) A fraction of the unbalanced moment given by

shall be considered transferred by flexure over an effective slab width between lines

that are one and one half slab or drop panel thickness (1.5h) outside opposite faces of

the column or capital.

(c) Concentration of reinforcement over the column by closer spacing as specified in

Section 3.2.2, or additional reinforcement must be used to resist the unbalanced

moment on the effective slab width defined in (b).

(d) The design for transfer of load from slab to supporting columns or walls through shear

and torsion shall be in accordance with Section 3.2.4.

(e) As an alternative to (b) above, the slab may be designed for the minimum bending

moments per unit width, msdx and msdy in the x and y direction, respectively, given by

Equation below (see Fig. 3.2.7).

211

1

bb

10

Msdx (or msdy) nVsd

Where Vsd is the shear force developed along the critical section

n is the moment coefficient given in Table 3.2.3.

(f) In checking the corresponding resisting moments, only those reinforcing bars shall be

taken into account, which are appropriately anchored beyond the critical area (Fig.

3.2.8)

(g) Where analysis of the structure indicates a design column moment larger than the

moment Mt,max which can be transferred by flexure and shear combined (in accordance

with (b) and (d) above), the design edge moment in the slab shall be reduced to a value

not greater than Mt,max and the positive design moments in the span adjusted

accordingly. The normal limitations on redistributions and neutral axis depth may be

disregarded in this case.

(h) Moments in excess of Mt,max may only be trsnsferred to a column if an edge beam or

strip of slab along the free edge is reinforced to carry the extra moment into the column

by torsion.

(i) In the absence of an edge beam, an appropriate breadth of slab may be assessed by using

the principles illustrated in Fig. 3.2.9, for transfer of moment between the slab and an

edge or corner column.

Table 3.2.3 Moment Coefficient nfor Equation (A.10)

Position of

column

n for msdy

Effective

width

n for msdy

Effective

width

top

bottom

top bottom

Internal column

Edge columns

Edge of slab

Parallel, to x-

axis

Edge columns

Edge of slab

Parallel to y-axis

Corner column

-0.125

-0.25

-0.125

-0.5

0

0

0.125

0.5

0.3Ly

0.15Ly

(per m)

(per m)

-0.125

-0.125

-0.25

-0.5

0

0.125

0

0.5

0.3Lx

(per m)

0.15.Lx

(per m)

11

Figure 3.2.7 Bending Moments mSdx and mSdy in Slab-Column Joints subjected to

Eccentric Loading, and Effective Width for resisting these Moments.

Figure 3.2.8 Detailing Reinforcement over Edge and Corner Columns

12

3.2.5 Design of slabs for punching shear

The punching shear failure mechanism illustrated in Fig. 3.2.10 can occur in any two-way

spanning members which are supported directly by columns or which are acted on by heavy

concentrated loads. The cross-sectional shape of the supporting column or the concentrated

load, known as the loaded area, determines the shape of the failure surface in the concrete

slab. In particular, circular loaded areas cause conical wedges to form and rectangular loaded

areas cause pyramidal wedges to form. For design purposes, the inclined surfaces are

represented by vertical ones. It is assumed that these vertical surfaces occur at a constant

distance from the edges of the loaded area as illustrated in Fig. 3.2.11. The corresponding

perimeter, illustrated in both figures, is known as the critical perimeter.

Figure 3.2.9 Definition of Breadth of Effective Moment Transfer Strip be for

Typical Cases

13

Figure 3.2.10 Punching shear failure at column

support

Figure 3.2.11 Critical perimeters for punching shear

14

Checking for punching shear in slabs with constant depth

As for regular shear, the average applied shear stress in a member with punching shear is

given by equation:

= V/bwd

However , in the case of members with punching shear, the breadth of the section in shear

is equal to the length of the critical perimeter. Further , with punching shear, there are two

effective depths, one for reinforcement running parallel to the X-axis and one for

reinforcement running parallel to the Y-axis (the layers of reinforcement will, of

necessity, be at different depths as one must rest on the other). Thus, for punching shear,

the average shear stress becomes:

= V/udav

where u = length of the critical perimeter

dav = average of the two effective depths.

The shear strength, c, for members subjected to punching, is calculated differently

c = 0.25fctdk1k2udav

Where: 0.25011 ek

0.16.12 dk - scale effect parameter (d in meters)

2yxav ddd

015.021 eyexe - effective longitudinal reinforcement ratio.

ex and ex = geometric ratios longitudinal reinforcement parallel to x and y,

respectively

When the punching shear force due to applied loads is eccentric to the loaded area or the

force is combined with a moment as would happen in an edge or corner column (see Fig.

3.2.12), the adverse effect of the applied load is significantly increased. This effect is

allowed for by the multiplication of the applied force, Vsd , by a factor . When no

eccentricity of loading is possible, =1. In other cases, can be taken from equation

below or Fig. 3.2.12.

Veq = Vsd

15

Where: Zeud 1

e = eccentricity of the load or reaction with respect to the centroid of the

critical section, always positive.

Z = section modulus of the critical section, corresponding to the direction of

the eccentricity.

1211 bb - fraction of moment which is considered transferred by eccentricity of the shear about the centroid of the critical section.

b1 and b2 = sides of the rectangle of outline u, b1 being parallel to the direction

of the eccentricity e.

Figure 3.2.12 Factor to allow for eccentricity of loading