rbc global mining & materials conference

RBC Global Mining & Materials

ConferenceJune 2014

Cautionary statements

2

All monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated

Total cash costs shown net of by-product sales unless otherwise stated

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSCertain information contained in this presentation, including any information relating to New Gold’s future financial or operating performance are “forward looking”. All statements in this presentation,other than statements of historical fact, which address events or developments that New Gold expects to occur are “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are statements that arenot historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”,“intends”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “potential”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “willbe taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation of such terms. Forward-looking statements in this presentation include those on the slide entitled “2014 Consolidated Guidance” andalso include, among others, statements with respect to: guidance for production, total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs and capital expenditures; mine life at various mines and projects; theexpected throughput and recovery rates at New Afton; planned modifications to the New Afton mine and mill and related timing, costs, return and payback period; expected future mining activities;exploration potential; the estimation of Mineral Reserves and Resources and the realization of such estimates; the results of the Rainy River and Blackwater Feasibility Studies, including expectedproduction and costs; the timing of permitting activities and environmental assessment processes; expected timing of project development and construction activities and; the potential annualproduction and cash costs, and the potential for a block cave, at the El Morro project.

All forward-looking statements in this presentation are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and are subject to important risk factors anduncertainties, many of which are beyond New Gold’s ability to control or predict. Certain material assumptions regarding our forward-looking statements are discussed in this presentation, NewGold’s MD&As, its Annual Information Form and its Technical Reports filed at www.sedar.com. In addition to, and subject to, such assumptions discussed in more detail elsewhere, the forward-looking statements in this presentation are also subject to the following assumptions: (1) there being no signification disruptions affecting New Gold’s operations; (2) political and legal developmentsin jurisdictions where New Gold operates, or may in the future operate, being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (3) the accuracy of New Gold’s current mineral reserve and resourceestimates; (4) the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, Mexican Peso and U.S. dollar being approximately consistent with current levels; (5) prices for diesel, natural gas,fuel oil, electricity and other key supplies being approximately consistent with current levels; (6) labour and material costs increasing on a basis consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (7)permitting and arrangements with First Nations and other Aboriginal groups in respect of Rainy River and Blackwater being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (8) all environmentalapprovals (including the environmental assessment process for the Blackwater and Rainy River projects), required permits, licenses and authorizations being obtained from the relevantgovernments and other relevant stakeholders within the expected timelines; and (9) the results of the feasibility studies for the Rainy River and Blackwater projects being realized.

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actualresults, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, without limitation:significant capital requirements; price volatility in the spot and forward markets for commodities; fluctuations in the international currency markets and in the rates of exchange of the currencies ofCanada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile; discrepancies between actual and estimated production, between actual and estimated reserves and resources and between actual andestimated metallurgical recoveries; changes in national and local government legislation in Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile or any other country in which New Gold currentlyor may in the future carry on business; taxation; controls, regulations and political or economic developments in the countries in which New Gold does or may carry on business; the speculativenature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining and maintaining the validity and enforceability of the necessary licenses and permits and complying with thepermitting requirements of each jurisdiction in which New Gold operates, including, but not limited to: in Canada, obtaining the necessary permits for the Blackwater and Rainy River projects; inMexico, where Cerro San Pedro has a history of ongoing legal challenges related to our environmental authorization (EIS); and in Chile, where the courts have temporarily suspended the approvalof the environmental permit for El Morro; the lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, which may not be immune from the influence of political pressure, corruption or other factors thatare inconsistent with the rule of law; the uncertainties inherent to current and future legal challenges New Gold is or may become a party to; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves andresources; competition; loss of key employees; additional funding requirements; rising costs of labour, supplies, fuel and equipment; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activities;uncertainties inherent to mining economic studies including the feasibility studies for Rainy River and Blackwater; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; accidents; labourdisputes; defective title to mineral claims or property or contests over claims to mineral properties; unexpected delays and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of First Nations andother Aboriginal groups; uncertainties with respect to obtaining all necessary surface and other land use rights or tenure for Rainy River; risks, uncertainties and unanticipated delays associated withobtaining and maintaining necessary licenses, permits and authorizations and complying with permitting requirements, including those associated with the environmental assessment processes forBlackwater and Rainy River. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental events and hazards,industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover theserisks) as well as “Risk Factors” included in New Gold’s disclosure documents filed on and available at www.sedar.com.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results and future events could materially differ from those anticipated in such statements. All of the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are qualified by these cautionary statements. New Gold expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-lookingstatements whether as a result of new information, events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

The footnotes and endnotes to this presentation contain important information. The endnotes are found at the end of the presentation.

Portfolio of assets

in top-ratedjurisdictions

Invested and

experienced team

Amonglowest-cost

producers with established track record

Peer-leading growth pipeline

A history of value creation

New Gold investment thesis

3

18.5 Moz gold

reserves(1)

~$85 million

investment by

Board &

Management

Q1’14 all-in

sustaining

costs(2) – $674/oz

~900 Koz annual

production

potential from

growth projects(3)

+230% increase

in share price

since March 2009

1. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to New Gold’s Annual Information Form for the financial year ended December 31, 2013 dated March 28, 2014. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to

U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.

2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

3. Based on ~325Koz annual production from Rainy River, ~485Koz annual production from Blackwater and ~90Koz annual production from El Morro, as outlined in the feasibility studies for the projects.

Portfolio of assets in top-rated jurisdictions

Blackwater

New Afton

Rainy River

Mesquite

Cerro San Pedro

El Morro

Peak Mines

Mine Life: 17 years

Mine Life: 10 years

Mine Life: 14 years

Mine Life: 8+ years

Mine Life: 2+ years

Mine Life: 17 years

Mine Life: 6+ years

#1CANADA

#3UNITED

STATES

#5MEXICO

#4CHILE

#2AUSTRALIA

OPERATING

DEVELOPMENT

4

All Assets Ranked in Top 5 Global Mining Jurisdictions(1)

1. Based on 2014 Behre Dolbear Report – “2014 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment”.

2. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to New Gold’s Annual Information Form for the financial year ended December 31, 2013 dated March 28, 2014. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to


Gold

18.5 Moz

Silver

90.1 Moz

Copper

3.0 Blbs

Mineral Reserves(2)

Collectively ~$85 million invested in New Gold

5

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

David Emerson Former Canadian Cabinet Minister

James Estey Former President, UBS Securities Canada

Robert Gallagher President & Chief Executive Officer

Vahan Kololian Founder, Terra Nova Partners

Martyn Konig Former Executive Chairman, European Goldfields

Pierre Lassonde Chairman, Franco-Nevada

Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman

Raymond Threlkeld Chairman, Newmarket Gold

EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM

Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman

Robert Gallagher President & Chief Executive Officer

Brian Penny Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

2014 first quarter highlights

6

91,317oz $674per oz

All-in sustaining costs(1)

Successfully completed

Rainy River Feasibility

Study and advanced

project

+$24million

Increase cash balance during quarter

Gold Production Costs

$254per oz

Total cash costs(2)

New Afton

Financial Rainy River Cash and Equivalents

New Afton achieved record

quarterly gold and copper

production

$81million

Net cash generated

from operations

$438million

Cash balance at March 31, 2014


2. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

27,364oz - Gold

22mlbs - Copper

+39%versus Q1’13

71. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. 2014 total cash costs assume: Gold - $1,300/oz, Silver - $22.00/oz, Copper - $3.25/lb, USD/CDN - $0.90, USD/AUD - $0.88.

2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. 2014 all-in sustaining costs assume: Gold - $1,300/oz, Silver - $22.00/oz, Copper - $3.25/lb, USD/CDN - $0.90, USD/AUD - $0.88.

2014 consolidated guidance

GOLD PRODUCTION (Koz) COPPER PRODUCTION (Mlbs)SILVER PRODUCTION (Moz)

ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz)TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz)

380 – 420

$320 – $340 $815 – $835

1.35 – 1.75 92 – 100

Low cost producer

• Record low all-in sustaining costs(2)

in first quarter 2014

• 2014E all-in sustaining costs(2) to

decrease by over $70 per ounce

versus 2013

• Costs benefiting from depreciating

Canadian and Australian dollars

• Expect to generate ~$200 per ounce

incremental margin versus average

of peer-companies

8

Lower costs driving higher margins(1)



2014 FIRST QUARTER ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS ($/oz)(2)

2014 FULL-YEAR ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS ($/oz)(2)

$674

$786 $799 $820 $833 $840$908

$1,001$1,034 $1,038

$1,390

$825$850

$950 $950$975 $980 $990 $1,000

$1,125 $1,135 $1,150

C-Zone M&I Resource(2)

New Afton – A special asset

9

87

102-112

Gold

(Koz)

72

78-84

Copper

(Mlbs)

2013 2014E

2013 2014E

NEW AFTON

Future UpsideNear-Term Upside

Jurisdiction Current Production

British Columbia,

Canada

#1Country

Ranking(1)


2. Mineral Resources are inclusive of Reserves. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to New Gold’s Annual Information Form for the financial year ended December 31, 2013 dated March 28, 2014. Refer to

Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.

3. Return calculation assumes: Gold - $1,300/oz, Silver - $22.00/oz, Copper - $3.25/lb, USD/CDN - $0.90.

2015 to

benefit

further

from mill

expansion

Mill Expansion - $45mm

Throughput:

Recoveries:

Return(3):

Payback:

12,500 14,000

85-86% 88-89%

+50%

<2 years

GOLD 0.83 g/t 0.7Moz

COPPER 0.91% 0.5Blbs

26 Million Tonnes

C-zone overview

10

C-zone

B-zone

Isometric view looking NE YEAR-END 2013 C-ZONE RESOURCES(1)

Tonnes

(000’s)

Gold

(g/t)

Copper

(%)

Gold

(Koz)

Copper

(Mlbs)

Measured 618 0.75 0.91 15 12

Indicated 25,223 0.84 0.91 678 504

Total M&I 25,842 0.83 0.91 693 516

Inferred 11,288 0.63 0.64 227 159



Measured and Indicated Resources

Inferred Resources

92

86

95

87

107 108

2013 2014E 2015E

11

• Both gold and copper production already exceed 2009 technical report estimates

• Mill expansion and C-zone potential to further increase New Afton annual cash flow and mine life

Case study – New Afton value enhancement

COPPER PRODUCTION (MILLION POUNDS)GOLD PRODUCTION (THOUSAND OUNCES)

70

65

7272

81 82

2013 2014E 2015E

Actual/Guidance(2)2009 Technical Report(1) Actual/Guidance(2)2009 Technical Report(1)

• Only 14 holes drilled into C-zone at time of

New Afton production start

• In two years, M&I resource up to 26 million

tonnes(3)

C-ZONE RESOURCE

B-ZONE C-ZONE

Tonnes (Mt) 68 26

Gold grade (g/t) 0.65 0.83

Copper grade (%) 0.91 0.91

MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCES(3)

1. New Afton Project technical report dated December 31, 2009.

2. 2015 New Afton production estimate assumes successful completion of New Afton mill expansion of 14,000 tonnes per day by mid-2015.



Rainy River

12

Gold Resource/UpsideSituated for Mine

Development

#1

Ontario, Canada

Jurisdiction

Country

Ranking(1)

+169 km2

Land Package

Multiple regional targets

RAINY RIVER


2. Development capital assumes $0.90 USD/CDN exchange rate.

3. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Total cash costs assume: Gold - $1,300/oz, Silver - $22.00/oz, USD/CDN - $0.95.

4. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. All-in sustaining costs assume: Gold - $1,300/oz, Silver - $22.00/oz, USD/CDN - $0.95.



Flat terrain

Close to infrastructure

17km tie-in to power

+3.8 MozReserves(5)

+6.2 MozM&I Resources(5)

2014 Feasibility StudyFirst nine years:

$613/ozTotal Cash Costs(3)

325 Koz (1.44 g/t)Annual Production

~$840 millionDevelopment Capital(2)

$736/ozAll-in Sustaining

Costs(4)

$0.05 change in exchange rate

~$141 million in pre-tax NAV

13

Rainy River – Progress milestones

2014 2015

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Complete Feasibility Study

Submit Environmental Assessment Report

Order Long Lead Equipment

Award EPCM Contract

Detailed Engineering & Procurement

Provincial Environmental Assessment Approval

Federal Environmental Assessment Approval

Construction/Other Permits

Arrival of Mobile Equipment

Begin Construction - Water Management Facility

Pour First Concrete for Mill Building

Commence Pre-Strip

Arrival of Mill Equipment

Complete Enclosure of Mill Building

Targeted milestones

1. Near-term milestones based on company plans which are consistent with timelines presented in the Rainy River Technical Report, entitled “Feasibility Study of the Rainy River Project, Ontario, Canada” dated February 14, 2014 and available on SEDAR.

Targeting commissioning in late 2016 with first year of full production in 2017

14

• Purchase orders

completed for:

• Mobile equipment

• Primary crusher

• SAG mill

• Ball mill

• AMEC engaged as EPCM

partner

Rainy River – Progress update

Project Development Capital Costs

Description Cost ($ million)

Direct Costs

Process Equipment $127

Process Facilities – Construction $170

Site Development $111

Open Pit Mine Equipment $81

Overburden and Waste Stripping $80

Tailings and Water Management $48

Power Line and Roads $21

Total Direct Capital Costs $638

Owner's and Indirect Costs

Owner's Costs $76

EPCM $48

Other Indirects $53

Total Owner's & Indirect Capital Costs $177

Subtotal $815

Contingency $70

Total Project (at US$/C$ - 0.95) $885

Total Project (at US$/C$ - 0.90) $840

21% of pricing

locked in

98% of pricing

locked in

EPCM engaged

1. Project development capital costs based on Rainy River Technical Report, entitled “Feasibility Study of the Rainy River Project, Ontario, Canada” dated February 14, 2014 and available on SEDAR.

Blackwater

15

UPSIDEGOLD RESOURCE

British Columbia,

Canada

BLACKWATER

Regional UpsideSignificant Gold Resource

Jurisdiction

#1Country

Ranking(1)

8.2 MozReserves(5)

9.5 Moz M&I Resources(5)

~1,100 km2

Land Package

Initial resource at

Capoose

Multiple newly

identified targets


2. Development capital assumes $0.90 USD/CDN exchange rate.

3. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Total cash costs assume: Gold - $1,300/oz, Silver - $22.00/oz, USD/CDN - $0.95.

4. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. All-in sustaining costs assume: Gold - $1,300/oz, Silver - $22.00/oz, USD/CDN - $0.95.



17-yearMine Life

2013 Feasibility StudyFirst nine years:

485 KozAnnual Production

~$1,760 millionDevelopment Capital(2)

$555/ozTotal Cash Costs(3)

$685/ozAll-in Sustaining

Costs(4)

$0.05 change in exchange rate

~$270 million in pre-tax NAV

El Morro

16

Chile

EL MORRO

Unique Joint Venture

Structure

Gold/Copper Reserve &

Resources (30%)

Jurisdiction 2011 Feasibility Study (30%)

#4Country

Ranking(1)

85 MlbsAnnual Copper Production

($700/oz)Total Cash Costs(2)

90 KozAnnual Gold Production

Goldcorp 70% partner

Funds 100% of capital

New Gold retains portion of

cash flow from mine start-up

2.7 Moz @ 0.5 g/t Gold

2.0 Blbs @ 0.5%Copper

Life of mine:


2. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Total cash costs assume: Gold - $1,200/oz, Copper - $2.75/lb, Chilean Peso/USD - $550.

3. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to New Gold’s Annual Information Form for the f inancial year ended December 31, 2013 dated March 28, 2014. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to


Reserves(3) –

Open Pit

Inferred Resources(3) –

Potential Block Cave

1.1 Moz @ 1.0 g/t Gold

0.6 Blbs @ 0.8%Copper

17

Organic pipeline

• Mesquite return to run rate (2015+)

• New Afton expansion (mid-2015)

• Rainy River development (2015/2016)

• CSP to residual leaching (2016)

Existing low cost production base to be further enhanced by our

lower cost development projects(1)

• Sequence Blackwater development

• El Morro advanced

2014(2) 2017(3) Future Potential(4)

GO

LD

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N

1. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Rainy River and Blackwater life-of-mine all-in sustaining costs are estimated to be $736/oz and $685/oz, respectively, based on their respective Feasibility Studies.

2. Based on mid-point of 2014 guidance.

3. Based on expected annual production from current operations according to their respective mine plans, including positive production impact of New Afton’s mill expansion targeted for mid-2015, Mesquite mine plan moving into grades more in line with

reserve grade, which is partially offset by Cerro San Pedro ceasing active mining and moving into residual leaching, and includes the first year of full production from Rainy River. Assumes on-time completion of Rainy River.

4. Based on ~325Koz annual production from Rainy River, ~485Koz annual production from Blackwater and ~90Koz annual production from El Morro as outlined in the Feasibility Studies for these projects, and production contribution from New Afton,

Mesquite and the Peak Mines according to their respective mine plans. Assumes the timely development of Blackwater and El Morro.

18

Cash flow growth and value

$79

$182$230 $236 $249

$292

~$400 ~$400

~$600

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E

1. For 2013, figure shown is Adjusted net cash generated from operations. Net cash generated from operations in the 2013 period included certain non-recurring cash flows. Net cash generated from operations in 2013 was $172 million.

2. 2014E based on Bloomberg consensus CFPS of $0.58 multiplied by 504 million basic shares outstanding.

3. 2015 to 2017 estimates based on the following price and exchange rate assumptions (which were also used for 2014 guidance): Gold - $1,300/oz, Silver - $22.00/oz, Copper - $3.25/lb, USD/CDN - $0.90, USD/AUD - $0.88. 2015 estimated cash flow

assumes: successful mill expansion to 14,000 tonnes per day at New Afton in mid-2015, Mesquite moving into mining of higher grade areas of the open pit in 2015 in accordance with the current mine plan, Peak’s copper production increasing from 2014

levels in accordance with the current mine plan, and Cerro San Pedro mining higher grade material in its final year of active mining in accordance with the current mine plan. 2016 estimated cash flow assumes: New Afton processing for a full year at

14,000 tonnes per day, Mesquite remaining in higher grade areas in accordance with the current mine plan, Peak further increasing its copper production in accordance with the current mine plan, and Cerro San Pedro moving into its first year of residual

leaching in accordance with the current mine plan. 2017 estimated cash flow assumes: Rainy River commercial production is achieved on schedule and Rainy River has its first full year of production in 2017 with a production level consistent with the

project’s feasibility study, New Afton processing 14,000 tonnes per day, Mesquite remaining in higher grade areas in accordance with the current mine plan, Peak further increasing its copper production in accordance with the current mine plan, and

Cerro San Pedro continuing its residual leaching in accordance with the current mine plan. Assumes no non-recurring cash flows in 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017.

4. Based on the average of the estimates by research analysts for the net asset values of the Blackwater and El Morro assets.

(2)

NET CASH FROM OPERATIONS ($ MILLIONS)

Enterprise Value $3.5 billion

Consensus Blackwater and El Morro Value(4) $0.7 billion

Enterprise Value (excluding Blackwater and El Morro) $2.8 billion

Trading at ~4.7x 2017E cash flow at 2014 guidance prices

(3)(3) (3)(1)

Catalysts

19

2014 costs declining versus 2013

New Afton production and cash flow continues to increase

New Afton C-zone exploration

Rainy River regional exploration

Blackwater regional exploration

Rainy River permitting

Blackwater permitting

New Afton mill expansion

Cash flow growth

New Gold investment thesis

20

A history of value creation

Peer-leading growth pipeline

Amonglowest-cost

producers with established track

record

Invested and experienced

teamPortfolio of assets

in top-ratedjurisdictions

Establishing the leading

intermediate gold company

Appendices

21

Appendices

Page

1. Financial information 22

2. Consolidated operating performance 27

3. New Afton 34

4. Mesquite, Peak Mines, Cerro San Pedro 42

5. Rainy River 45

6. Blackwater 46

7. El Morro 47

8. Exploration 50

9. Reserves and Resources notes 54

10. Commodity price/foreign exchange assumptions 63

$438 mm

$107 mm

Liquidity

Position$545 mm

Cash and

Equivalents(1)

Undrawn Credit

Facility(2)

Strong balance sheet

22

1. Cash and equivalents as at March 31, 2014.

2. $43 million of total $150 million at March 31, 2014 used for Letters of Credit.

3. See Appendix 1 – Summary of debt for detailed breakdown of components of debt.

• Face value $881 million in

long-term debt(3)

• Face value $300 million,

7.00% notes due in 2020

• Face value $500 million,

6.25% notes due in 2022

• $81 million in carried El Morro

loan, payable out of El Morro

project cash flow

Appendix 1

Summary of debt

23

Undrawn Credit

Facility

Senior Unsecured Notes

(April 2012)

Senior Unsecured Notes

(November 2012)

El Morro Funding

Loan

Face Value $150 million(1) $300 million $500 million $81 million

Maturity 1 year with annual

extensions permitted

April 15, 2020 November 15, 2022 n/a

Interest Rate See ‘Key features’ 7.00% 6.25% 4.58%

Payable Revolving credit Semi-annually Semi-annually Upon start of

production

Conversion price n/a n/a n/a n/a

Current trading value n/a ~106 ~103 n/a

Key features • Normal financial

covenants

Interest Rate

• 3.00-4.25% over

LIBOR based on

ratios

• Standby fee of 0.75-

1.06%

• Senior unsecured

• Redeemable after April 15,

2016 at 103.5% down to

100% of face after 2018

• Unlimited dividends if

leverage ratio below 2:1

• Senior unsecured

• Redeemable after

November 15, 2017 at par

plus half coupon, declining

ratably to par

• Unlimited dividends if

leverage ratio below 2:1

New Gold to repay

Goldcorp out of

80% of its 30%

share of cash flow

once El Morro

starts production

1. $43 million of total $150 million at March 31, 2014 used for Letters of Credit.

Appendix 1

24

2014 capital expenditures by category

New

Afton

~$340

million

Sustaining Capital: ~$145 million Growth Capital: ~$195 million

Mesquite

Peak

Mines

Cerro San

Pedro

Rainy

River

New Afton

Cerro San

Pedro

Blackwater

Total Capital

Appendix 1

• Q1’14 - $28 million • Q1’14 - $29 million

25

Growth capital

• Set out below is a breakdown of expected 2014 capital expenditures at each site divided into two

categories – sustaining capital and growth capital (future production growth and mine life extension)

New Afton - $115 million

Rainy River - $105 million

Mesquite - $40 million

Sustaining capital

48%52%

100%

100%

• $60 million – ~2,500 metre development, two new trucks, dam raise and

surface ventilation upgrade

• $35 million – mill expansion

• $20 million – C-zone scoping level engineering and capitalized exploration

• $60 million – property, plant and equipment

• $35 million – detailed engineering, studies, environmental monitoring and

permitting

• $10 million – capitalized exploration

• $28 million – four new trucks and leach pad expansion

• $12 million – major components/building and tank construction


Appendix 1

26

Peak Mines - $40 million

Cerro San Pedro - $28 million

100%

71%

• $20 million – two haul trucks and site maintenance

• $20 million – capitalized development and capitalized exploration

• $20 million – capitalized stripping

• $8 million – leach pad expansion


Growth capital Sustaining capital

New Gold’s 30% share of estimated 2014 El Morro capital costs of

$6 million fully carried by Goldcorp Inc.

Blackwater - $15 million

100%• $10 million – permitting

• $5 million – engineering studies

29%

Appendix 1

2013 full year mine-by-mine operating results

27

2013 FULL YEAR

Gold production

(Koz)

Total cash costs(1)

($/oz)

All-in sustaining costs(2)

($/oz)



New Afton 87 ($1,196) ($133)

Mesquite 107 $907 $1,108

Peak Mines 101 $850 $1,331

Cerro San Pedro 103 $676 $766

398 $377 $899

New Afton co-product cash costs(1)

Gold ($/oz) $486

Copper ($/lb) $1.19

New Gold co-product cash costs(1)

Gold ($/oz) $712

Copper ($/lb) $1.86

Silver ($/oz) $10.24

2013 FULL YEAR

• New Afton throughput higher

in each consecutive quarter

during the year

• 5% increase in gold

production at Peak Mines

versus previous year

• Lowest total cash costs(1) in

company’s history

Appendix 2

2014 first quarter mine-by-mine operating results

28

New Afton 27 ($1,283) ($664)

Mesquite 28 $893 $1,069

Peak Mines 20 $757 $1,102

Cerro San Pedro 19 $947 $1,080

94 $254 $674

2014 FIRST QUARTER

Gold sales

(000s ounces)

Cash costs(1)

($/oz)

All-in Sustaining

costs(2) ($/oz)

New Afton co-product costs(1)

Gold ($/oz) $413 $630

Copper ($/lb) $0.93 $1.41



3. 2014 first quarter consolidated co-product costs: Gold - $658 per ounce; Silver - $10.03 per ounce; Copper - $1.64 per pound.

4. 2014 first quarter consolidated co-product all-in sustaining costs: Gold - $908 per ounce; Silver - $13.93 per ounce; Copper - $2.21 per pound.

Co-product

cash costs(1)

Co-product all-in

sustaining costs(2)

NEW AFTON

2014 FIRST QUARTER

Appendix 2

(3) (4)

$465

$418 $446

$421

$377

$320 - $340

$478

$557

$643

$766 $767

29

Among lowest cost producers in industry

Industry

New Gold

2014E

Incremental

Benefit to NGD

Shareholder

2009

(2)

New Gold versus Industry Average Total Cash Costs,(1) Net of By-Product Credits

1. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. New Gold total cash costs based on 2014 guidance.

2. Industry data per GFMS reports calculated net of by-product credits for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Appendix 2

2014 first quarter financial summary

30

2013 FIRST QUARTER2014 FIRST QUARTER

Revenues ($ million) $191 $202

Operating margin(1) ($ million) $92 $96

Adjusted net earnings(2) ($ million) $18 $21

Adjusted net earnings per share(2) ($/share) $0.04 $0.04

Net earnings ($ million) ($2) $36

Net earnings per share ($/share) ($0.00) $0.08

Net cash generated from operations ($ million) $81 $59

Average realized gold price ($ per ounce) $1,308 $1,494

Average realized silver price ($ per ounce) $20.40 $29.25

Average realized copper price ($ per pound) $2.98 $3.44

1. Refer to Endnote on operating margin under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

2. Refer to Endnote on adjusted net earnings under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Appendix 2

31

Detailed operating results and assumptions

Appendix 2

2013A 2013A 2013A 2013A

Tonnes processed (000 tonnes) 14,297 13,000 - 13,300 13,463 13,400 - 13,800 814 830 - 850 4,087 4,500 - 4,700

Tonnes mined (000 tonnes) 48,206 56,000 - 58,000 31,018 33,000 - 35,000 1,100 1,300 - 1,320 4,226 4,600 - 4,800

Strip ratio 2.37 3.31 - 3.36 1.30 1.46 - 1.54 -- -- - -- -- -- - --

Gold grade (g/t) 0.37 0.40 - 0.44 0.47 0.35 - 0.40 4.14 3.9 - 4.1 0.78 0.81 - 0.85

Silver grade (g/t) -- -- - -- 20.91 15.0 - 17.0 -- -- - -- -- -- - --

Copper grade (%) -- -- - -- -- -- - -- 0.85% 0.86% - 0.90% 0.93% 0.93% - 0.95%

Gold recovery (%) 63.0% 51.0% 92.9% 91.0% - 93.0% 85.1% 85.0% - 87.0%

Silver recovery (%) -- -- - -- 15.0% -- -- - -- -- -- - --

Copper recovery (%) -- -- - -- -- -- - -- 88.0% 91.0% - 93.0% 85.9% 86.0% - 88.0%

Production

Gold production (Koz) 107.0 113.0 - 123.0 102.8 70.0 - 80.0 100.7 95.0 - 105.0 87.2 102.0 - 112.0

Silver production (Koz) -- -- - -- 1,300.6 1,100.0 - 1,300.0 -- -- - -- -- -- - --

Copper production (Mlbs) -- -- - -- -- -- - -- 13.4 14.0 - 16.0 72.0 78.0 - 84.0

Reserve grade

Gold grade (g/t)

Silver grade (g/t)

Copper grade (%)

3.52

7.1

1.22%

0.56

2.2

0.84%

0.60

--

--

0.46

18.1

--

Mesquite

2014E2014E

New AftonCerro San Pedro

2014E

Peak Mines

2014E

~50%

~15%

~65%

32

2014 total cash cost sensitivities

Appendix 2

Category Copper Price Silver Price AUD/USD CDN/USD MXN/USD Diesel

Base Assumption $3.25 $20.00 $1.14 $1.11 $13.00 $3.25

Sensitivity +/- $0.25 +/- $1.00 +/- $0.05 +/- $0.05 +/- $1.00 +/- $0.25

Total Cash Costs(1)

- Impact

New Afton +/-$200 - - +/-$65 - -

Mesquite - - - - - +/-$15

Peak Mines +/-$40 - +/-$50 - - -

Cerro San Pedro - +/-$15 - - +/-$50 -

New Gold Consolidated +/-$60 +/-$5 +/-$15 +/-$15 +/-$10 +/-$5

Total Cash Costs(1)

- Sensitivities


33


2. General and administrative includes stock-based compensation and asset retirement obligation.

3. Sustaining capital based on New Gold’s total 2014 estimated capital expenditures excluding expenditures related to growth-related initiatives.


2014 estimated all-in sustaining costs

Total cash costs(1) ~$330/oz

General and administrative(2) ~$90/oz

Exploration expense ~$35/oz

Sustaining capital(3) ~$370/oz

ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(4) ~$825/oz

Appendix 2

34

New Afton – 2014 guidance

GOLD PRODUCTION (Koz) COPPER PRODUCTION (Mlbs)

ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz)TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz)

102 – 112 78 – 84

($1,260) –

($1,240)

($620) –

($600)

TOTAL CASH COSTS(1)

$440 –

$460

$1.10 –

$1.20

Co-Product Gold ($/oz) Co-Product Copper ($/lb)

• Copper price - $3.25 per pound

(2013A - $3.23 per pound)

• Canadian dollar: U.S. dollar exchange –

$1.11

• $0.25 per pound change in copper

equals ~$200 per ounce change in New

Afton total cash costs

• $0.01 change in Canadian dollar equals

~$15 per ounce change in New Afton

total cash costs

• Gold and copper production expected to

increase due to:

• Increase in average annual

throughput rate

• Increase in gold grades

• Costs benefit from targeted increase in

copper production, depreciating

Canadian dollar and decrease in

sustaining capital costs

OVERVIEW

KEY ASSUMPTIONS AND SENSITIVITIES



Appendix 3

New Afton – Mill schematic

35

New Facilities

To Tailings

Surface Stockpile

Appendix 3

New Afton – Expansion timeline

36

• EPCM contract award

• Geotechnical and detailed

engineering

• Early works

• Buried services relocation

• Reagent tank relocation

H1’15

• Excavation

• Foundations

• Building construction

• Building services

• Vertimill delivery

• Piping/electrical

• Instrumentation

• Commissioning

H2’14H1’14

Appendix 3

Mill expansion capital estimates

37

Engineering, Construction and Equipment $26 million

Building and Site Works $12 million

Owner’s Costs $2 million

Contingency $5 million

ESTIMATED EXPANSION

CAPITAL

$45

MILLION

• Below is a summary of the key capital estimates for the expansion project

Target: 14,000 tonnes per day at higher metal recoveries

• $35 million of capital to be spent in 2014 with remainder in 2015

Appendix 3

Value creation through mill expansion

38

IRR of +50% and payback period of less than two years

2014 TARGETED

AVERAGES

RUN RATE TARGETED AVERAGES

WITH MILL EXPANSION

Throughput

Gold recovery

Copper recovery

12,500 14,000

~85% ~87-88%

~86% ~88-89%

+12%

+2-3%

+2-3%

Appendix 3

New Afton – C-zone resource expansion

39

• C-zone originally identified through

limited deep holes drilled from

surface

• Drilling from underground

commenced in second half of 2012

• During 2013 completed 41 holes

totaling 26,800 metres

• Increased tonnes and grade of

Measured and Indicated resource

resulting in 10-fold increase in

contained gold and copper

• Incremental increase to Inferred

resource

Tonnes

(000’s)

Gold

(g/t)

Copper

(%)

Gold

(Koz)

Copper

(Mlbs)

Measured 618 0.75 0.91 15 12

Indicated 25,223 0.84 0.91 678 504

Total M&I 25,842 0.83 0.91 693 516

Inferred 11,288 0.63 0.64 227 159

YEAR-END 2012 C-ZONE(1)

YEAR-END 2013 C-ZONE(2)

Tonnes

(000’s)

Gold

(g/t)

Copper

(%)

Gold

(Koz)

Copper

(Mlbs)

Measured 400 0.60 0.73 8 6

Indicated 2,900 0.63 0.68 58 43

Total M&I 3,300 0.62 0.68 66 49

Inferred 13,600 0.70 0.76 307 228

1. 2012 information per Annual Information Form dated March 27, 2013.

2. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to Appendix 2. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and

“Technical Information”.

Appendix 3

New Afton – 2014 C-zone program

40

• Convert Inferred resource to Measured and Indicated

• Expand resource laterally to east and west as well as vertically

• Underground delineation and infill – 30,000 to 35,000 metres

Appendix 3

41

New Gold has a track record of successful mine development

Mine development – Creating options

Once mines are in production – multiple options to further enhance value

Cerro San Pedro (April 2007) – ~35,000 tonne per day open pit/heap leach

Mesquite (January 2008) – ~40,000 tonne per day open pit/heap leach

New Afton (June 2012) – 11,000 tonne per day block cave/process facility

Mine life extension (Mesquite(1), Peak Mines(2), New Afton C-zone)

Increased production rate (Cerro San Pedro(3), New Afton)

1. Mesquite’s mine life has been extended beyond the 9.5 years that were estimated when the mine re-started production in January 2008.

2. The Peak Mines originally began production in 1992 with an approximate eight year life and have operated continuously since then and continue to have six or more years of mine life.

3. During 2011 and 2012, Cerro San Pedro operated at a rate above its design capacity to increase its annual gold and silver production.

Appendix 3

42

• Diesel comprises ~25% of Mesquite’s

total costs

• Rack diesel price most correlated to

Brent oil price

• Diesel price - $3.25 per gallon

• Every $0.25 per gallon change in diesel

price has ~$15 per ounce impact on

total cash costs

• Production increase driven by planned

mining of higher grades versus 2013

• Increase in costs attributable to

increase in total tonnes mined

• Peak year for sustaining capital at

Mesquite

Mesquite – 2014 guidance

GOLD PRODUCTION (Koz) OVERVIEW

KEY ASSUMPTIONS AND SENSITIVITIESALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz)TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz)



113 – 123

$930 –

$950

$1,310 –

$1,330

Appendix 4

43

• Copper price - $3.25 per pound

(2013A - $3.29 per pound)

• Australian dollar: U.S. dollar

exchange – $1.14

• $0.25 per pound change in copper

equals ~$40 per ounce change in Peak

Mines total cash costs

• $0.01 change in Australian dollar equals

~$10 per ounce change in Peak Mines

total cash costs

• Gold production in line with 2013

• Increase in copper production a result of

increased copper grade and recovery

• Decrease in total cash costs a result of

increased copper by-product revenue,

depreciating Australian dollar and

increased productivity through lower

turnover

Peak Mines – 2014 guidance

GOLD PRODUCTION (Koz) COPPER PRODUCTION (Mlbs) OVERVIEW




95 – 105 14 – 16

$630 –

$650

$1,065 –

$1,085

Appendix 4

44

• Silver price - $20.00 per ounce

(2013A – $23.61 per ounce)

• Mexican peso: U.S. dollar exchange –

$13.00

• $1.00 per ounce change in silver equals

~$15 per ounce change in Cerro San

Pedro total cash costs

• $1.00 change in Mexican peso equals

~$50 per ounce change in Cerro San

Pedro total cash costs

• Decrease in production reflects the

increased strip ratio for Phase 5

pushback and mining of lower grade ore

• Increase in costs primarily driven by

lower gold production, lower silver by-

product revenue and increased volume

of processing reagents

Cerro San Pedro – 2014 guidance

GOLD PRODUCTION (Koz) SILVER PRODUCTION (Moz) OVERVIEW




70 – 80 1.1 – 1.3

$1,030 –

$1,050

$1,125 –

$1,145

Appendix 4

45

• 21,000 tonne per day process plan with

conventional crushing, grinding, leaching

and carbon-in-pulp technology

• Targeted commissioning in 2016 with first

year of full production in 2017

• 14-year mine life with direct processing of

open pit and underground ore for first nine

years and processing of a combination of

stockpile and underground ore thereafter

• Development capital of $885 million

inclusive of $70 million contingency (at

$1.05 CDN/USD)

• ~$840 million at $1.11 CDN/USD

• Life-of-mine gold and silver recoveries of

91% and 64%

• Open pit mining schedule incorporates an

elevated cut-off grade strategy during first

nine years

Rainy River – Project overview

Appendix 5

Pre-tax Economics

Gold Price ($/oz) 1,150 1,300 1,300 1,450 1,600

US$/C$ exchange 0.93 0.95 0.91 0.97 1.00

5% NPV ($mm) 138 438 551 738 1,009

IRR (%) 7.8 13.1 15.3 17.6 21.1

Payback (years) 6.8 5.4 4.8 4.3 3.6

After-tax Economics

Gold Price ($/oz) 1,150 1,300 1,300 1,450 1,600

US$/C$ exchange 0.93 0.95 0.91 0.97 1.00

5% NPV ($mm) 100 314 396 520 706

IRR (%) 7.1 11.3 13.2 14.9 17.8

Payback (years) 6.8 5.5 5.0 4.4 3.8

46

• Conventional truck and shovel open pit mine

with 60,000 tonne per day processing plant

• Simple, conventional flowsheet using whole

ore leach process

• Low grade stockpiling strategy

• Development capital of $1,865 million

inclusive of $190 million contingency (at

$1.05 CDN/USD)

• ~$1,760 million at $1.11 CDN/USD

• Life-of-mine operational strip ratio of 1.88 to 1

• Life-of-mine gold and silver recoveries of

87% and 49%

• Conventional waste rock and Tailings

Storage Facility

• Power supply from the hydroelectric power

grid, via 140-kilometre transmission line

• Minimal off-site infrastructure required

• Good existing access road; water supply

within 15 kilometres

• Low environmental risk and facility designed

for closure

Blackwater – Project overview

Appendix 6

Pre-tax Economics

Gold Price ($/oz) 1,150 1,300 1,300 1,450 1,600

US$/C$ exchange 0.93 0.95 0.91 0.97 1.00

5% NPV ($mm) 402 991 1,209 1,582 2,120

IRR (%) 7.8 11.3 12.9 14.4 16.8

Payback (years) 7.5 6.2 5.6 5.1 4.5

471. Capital estimates based on December 2011 Feasibility Study.

El Morro (30%) – Funding structure

Funded by

$1.2 billioninterest at 4.58%

~ $2.7 billion 70%

20% 80%

• New Gold’s 30% share of development capital 100% carried

• Interest fixed at 4.58%

30% 70%

30%

Total Capital100%

~ $3.9 billion(1)

100% Average annual

cash flow

Carried funding repayment

Appendix 7

48

2013 open pit Proven and

Probable reserves and Measured

and Indicated resources

Underground Inferred

resource with block

cave potential

500 metres

La Fortuna deposit

Appendix 7

Reserve Grade

Gold: 0.46 g/t

Copper: 0.49%

Inferred Grade

Gold: 0.97 g/t

Copper: 0.78%

491. All reserve information taken from Goldcorp’s December 31, 2013 year-end resource statements.

2. Gold equivalent calculated based on the following commodity prices: Gold - $1,300/oz; Silver - $22.00/oz; Copper - $3.00/lb; Lead - $0.90/lb; Zinc - $0.90/lb.

El Morro relative positioning(1)

EL MORRO WITHIN GOLDCORP PORTFOLIO

Asset Gold Reserves (Moz) Asset Gold Equivalent(2) (Moz)

Penasquito 11.6 Penasquito 30.6

Los Filos 8.0 El Morro 18.0

El Morro 6.7 Los Filos 8.9

Pueblo Viejo 6.5 Pueblo Viejo 7.5

Cerro Negro 5.7 Cerro Negro 6.6

Appendix 7

50

New Gold’s estimated exploration budget for 2014 is $50 million

• Capitalized: $30 million (included in sustaining capital total shown previously)

• Expensed: $20 million (approximately 70% related to current operations)

New Afton

30,000-35,000

metres

Peak Mines

45,000

metres

Blackwater

10,000-15,000

metres

2014 exploration program overview

Rainy River

35,000-40,000

metres

1. Circle proportions are representative of both capitalized and expensed exploration for each respective asset.

Appendix 8

Rainy River exploration

51

• Intrepid resource drilled off and incorporated into Feasibility Study

• Condemnation drilling program approximately 40% complete by year end

• Improved ability to predict prospective ore horizons beneath surface cover

2013 ACHIEVEMENTS

2014 PROGRAM

Targeting resource expansion in near-mine environment

• Complete condemnation drilling program

• Test potential to expand open pit resource to west

• Explore prospective trends south of main mine area and extending

from Intrepid Zone

Intrepid Zone

Appendix 8

Blackwater exploration

52

2013 Achievement

• Expanded exploration targeting coverage to ~50% of claim block

• 14 prospective target areas identified to date

• Seven new targets drill tested with favorable geology intercepted on six

and gold mineralization intercepted on three

• Acquired Key property immediately south of Blackwater deposit area

2014 Program

• Follow up favorable results at Van Tine, Fawn and earlier stage prospects

• Initiate exploration at Key

Appendix 8

Peak Mines exploration

53

• Near-mine exploration and resource conversion partially offset mine depletion

• Advanced earlier stage targets along regional Rookery fault trend

2013 ACHIEVEMENTS

2014 PROGRAM

Focus on reserves replacement in near-mine environment

• Convert Measured and Indicated resources to reserves to extend mine life

• Test newly emerging targets along mine corridor

• Continue to advance earlier stage regional targets

Appendix 8


Reserves and resources summary

Appendix 9

Gold

Koz

Silver

Koz

Copper

Mlbs

Gold

Koz

Silver

Koz

Copper

Mlbs

Proven and Probable Reserves 18,538 90,080 2,953 7,752 31,256 3,282

Measured and Indicated Resources (inclusive of Reserves) 27,505 124,499 4,353 21,403 131,847 4,061

Inferred Resources 4,161 30,360 1,821 4,383 84,620 1,114

M&I Resources (inclusive of Reserves)

New Afton 2,297 7,786 1,988 1,979 6,830 1,818

Mesquite 4,904 - - 5,684 - -

Peak Mines 810 1,380 158 880 1,350 146

Cerro San Pedro 397 15,948 - 1,703 57,980 -

Rainy River 6,236 14,635 - n/a n/a n/a

Blackwater 9,500 70,130 - 8,070 56,190 -

Capoose 320 14,620 - 196 9,497 -

El Morro 3,041 - 2,207 2,891 - 2,097

Total M&I 27,505 124,499 4,353 21,403 131,847 4,061

Mineral Reserves and Resources Summary

As at December 31, 2013 As at December 31, 2012(1)

55

Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)

Appendix 9

Tonnes

000's

Gold

g/t

Silver

g/t

Copper

%

Gold

Koz

Silver

Koz

Copper

Mlbs

Tonnes

000's

Gold

g/t

Silver

g/t

Copper

%

Gold

Koz

Silver

Koz

Copper

Mlbs

New Afton

Proven - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Probable 48,821 0.56 2.2 0.84 879 3,500 904 52,500 0.65 2.3 0.93 1,100 3,880 1,080

Total New Afton P&P 48,821 0.56 2.2 0.84 879 3,500 904 52,500 0.65 2.3 0.93 1,100 3,880 1,080

Mesquite

Proven 3,809 0.70 - - 86 - - 13,140 0.68 - - 287 - -

Probable 112,094 0.60 - - 2,152 - - 114,409 0.56 - - 2,055 - -

Total Mesquite P&P 115,903 0.60 - - 2,237 - - 127,549 0.57 - - 2,342 - -

Peak Mines

Proven 1,820 4.35 6.7 1.16 255 390 47 2,109 5.89 7.5 1.08 399 510 50

Probable 1,820 2.69 7.4 1.27 157 430 51 2,118 3.82 6.8 1.18 260 466 55

Total Peak Mines P&P 3,640 3.52 7.1 1.22 412 820 98 4,227 4.85 7.2 1.13 659 976 105

Cerro San Pedro

Proven 12,982 0.47 17.5 - 197 7,311 - 21,100 0.52 17.1 - 353 11,600 -

Probable 13,714 0.44 18.7 - 195 8,239 - 26,400 0.48 17.4 - 407 14,800 -

Total CSP P&P 26,696 0.46 18.1 - 392 15,550 - 47,500 0.50 17.3 - 760 26,400 -

Mineral Reserves statement as at December 31, 2013

Contained metalMetal grade Metal grade Contained metal



56


Appendix 9

Tonnes

000's

Gold

g/t

Silver

g/t

Copper

%

Gold

Koz

Silver

Koz

Copper

Mlbs

Tonnes

000's

Gold

g/t

Silver

g/t

Copper

%

Gold

Koz

Silver

Koz

Copper

Mlbs

Rainy River

Direct processing material

Open Pit

Proven 15,839 1.47 2.0 - 746 1,038 -

Probable 46,866 1.26 3.1 - 1,896 4,594 -

Open Pit P&P (direct processing) 62,705 1.31 2.8 - 2,642 5,632 -

Underground

Proven - - - - - - -

Probable 4,187 4.96 10.3 - 668 1,388 -

Underground P&P (direct processing) 4,187 4.96 10.3 - 668 1,388 -

Stockpile material

Open Pit

Proven 6,843 0.38 1.5 - 84 332 -

Probable 30,541 0.39 2.1 - 378 2,058 -

Open Pit P&P (stockpile) 37,384 0.38 2.0 - 462 2,390 -

Total P&P

Proven 22,681 1.14 1.9 - 830 1,370 -

Probable 81,594 1.12 3.1 - 2,943 8,040 -

Total Rainy River P&P 104,275 1.13 2.8 - 3,773 9,410 -

Blackwater


Proven 124,500 0.95 5.5 - 3,790 22,100 -

Probable 169,700 0.68 4.1 - 3,730 22,300 -

P&P (direct processing) 294,300 0.79 4.7 - 7,510 44,400 -

Stockpile material

Proven 20,100 0.50 3.6 - 330 2,300 -

Probable 30,100 0.34 14.6 - 330 14,100 -

P&P (stockpile) 50,200 0.40 10.2 - 650 16,400 -

Total Blackwater P&P 344,400 0.74 5.5 - 8,170 60,800 -

El Morro 30% Basis

Proven 321,814 0.56 - 0.55 1,746 - 1,163 307,949 0.57 - 0.56 1,705 - 1,135

Probable 277,240 0.35 - 0.43 929 - 788 335,152 0.37 - 0.44 1,186 - 962

Total El Morro P&P 599,054 0.46 - 0.49 2,675 - 1,951 643,101 0.47 - 0.49 2,891 - 2,097

Total P&P 18,538 90,080 2,953 7,752 31,256 3,282

100% Basis 30% Basis 100% Basis


Contained metalMetal grade Metal grade Contained metal



57


Appendix 9

Tonnes

000's

Gold

g/t

Silver

g/t

Copper

%

Gold

Koz

Silver

Koz

Copper

Mlbs

Tonnes

000's

Gold

g/t

Silver

g/t

Copper

%

Gold

Koz

Silver

Koz

Copper

Mlbs

New Afton

A&B Zones

Measured 41,059 0.79 2.7 1.09 1,041 3,624 984 33,500 0.86 2.9 1.18 929 3,160 873

Indicated 26,966 0.44 2.1 0.65 384 1,777 384 45,900 0.67 2.4 0.89 984 3,530 896

A&B Zone M&I 68,025 0.65 2.5 0.91 1,425 5,401 1,368 79,400 0.75 2.6 1.01 1,913 6,690 1,769

C-Zone

Measured 618 0.75 1.5 0.91 15 30 12 400 0.60 1.3 0.73 8 20 6

Indicated 25,223 0.84 2.0 0.91 678 1,589 504 2,900 0.63 1.3 0.68 58 120 43

C-Zone M&I 25,842 0.83 2.0 0.91 693 1,620 516 3,300 0.62 1.3 0.68 66 140 49

HW Lens

Measured - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Indicated 11,035 0.50 2.2 0.43 179 763 104 - - - - - - -

HW Lens M&I 11,035 0.50 2.2 0.43 179 763 104 - - - - - - -

Total New Afton M&I 104,901 0.68 2.3 0.86 2,297 7,786 1,988 82,700 0.74 2.6 1.00 1,979 6,830 1,818

Mesquite

Measured 9,070 0.66 - - 191 - - 24,000 0.61 - - 452 - -

Indicated 304,081 0.48 - - 4,713 - - 370,100 0.45 - - 5,232 - -

Total Mesquite M&I 313,151 0.49 - - 4,904 - - 394,100 0.45 - - 5,684 - -

Peak Mines

Measured 3,000 4.69 6.7 1.06 450 650 70 2,700 5.74 7.5 1.05 494 647 62

Indicated 3,400 3.29 6.7 1.18 360 730 88 3,200 3.75 6.8 1.19 386 703 84

Peak Mines M&I 6,400 3.95 6.7 1.12 810 1,380 158 5,900 4.66 7.1 1.13 880 1,350 146

Cerro San Pedro

Measured 13,387 0.46 17.3 - 199 7,459 - 42,300 0.40 14.4 - 532 18,900 -

Indicated 14,311 0.43 18.4 - 198 8,489 - 109,400 0.34 11.5 - 1,171 39,080 -

Total CSP M&I 27,698 0.45 17.9 - 397 15,948 - 151,700 0.35 11.9 - 1,703 57,980 -

M easured and Indicated mineral R eso urce statement ( inclusive o f R eserves) as at D ecember 31, 2012

Metal grade Contained metal


Contained metalMetal grade


58


Appendix 9

Tonnes

000's

Gold

g/t

Silver

g/t

Copper

%

Gold

Koz

Silver

Koz

Copper

Mlbs

Tonnes

000's

Gold

g/t

Silver

g/t

Copper

%

Gold

Koz

Silver

Koz

Copper

Mlbs

Rainy River


Open Pit

Measured 20,282 1.45 1.9 - 947 1,261 -

Indicated 80,411 1.35 2.6 - 3,486 6,584 -

Open Pit M&I (direct processing) 100,693 1.37 2.4 - 4,433 7,846 -

Underground

Measured 89 4.95 2.8 - 14 8 -

Indicated 5,469 4.53 11.3 - 796 1,994 -

Underground M&I (direct processing) 5,558 4.53 11.2 - 810 2,002 -

Stockpile material

Open Pit

Measured 6,294 0.37 1.3 - 74 262 -

Indicated 64,816 0.44 2.2 - 919 4,526 -

Open Pit M&I (stockpile) 71,110 0.43 2.1 - 993 4,788 -

Total M&I

Measured 26,665 1.21 1.8 - 1,035 1,531 -

Indicated 150,696 1.07 2.7 - 5,202 13,104 -

Total Rainy River M&I 177,361 1.09 2.6 - 6,236 14,635 -

Blackwater


Measured 116,955 1.04 5.6 - 3,900 21,060 -

Indicated 189,044 0.78 6.0 - 4,730 36,470 -

M&I (direct processing) 305,999 0.88 5.8 - 8,620 57,520 -

Stockpile material

Measured 26,521 0.30 4.1 - 260 3,500 -

Indicated 64,382 0.30 4.4 - 620 9,110 -

M&I (stockpile) 90,904 0.30 4.3 - 870 12,600 -

Total Blackwater M&I 396,903 0.74 5.5 - 9,500 70,130 - 296,146 0.85 5.9 - 8,070 56,190 -

Capoose

Indicated 20,280 0.50 22.4 - 320 14,620 - 14,200 0.43 20.8 - 196 9,497 -

El Morro

Measured 341,604 0.56 - 0.54 1,848 - 1,230 307,949 0.57 - 0.56 1,705 - 1,135

Indicated 349,803 0.35 - 0.42 1,193 - 977 335,152 0.37 - 0.44 1,186 - 962

Total El Morro M&I 691,407 0.46 - 0.48 3,041 - 2,207 643,101 0.47 - 0.49 2,891 - 2,097

Total M&I 27,505 124,499 4,353 21,403 131,847 4,061



100% Basis 30% Basis


Contained metal

100% Basis 30% Basis

Metal grade


59


Appendix 9

Tonnes

000's

Gold

g/t

Silver

g/t

Copper

%

Gold

Koz

Silver

Koz

Copper

Mlbs

Tonnes

000's

Gold

g/t

Silver

g/t

Copper

%

Gold

Koz

Silver

Koz

Copper

Mlbs

New Afton

A&B-Zone 5,607 0.32 1.5 0.38 59 272 46 14,900 0.45 2.0 0.65 216 940 212

C-Zone 11,288 0.63 1.7 0.64 227 602 159 13,600 0.70 1.5 0.76 307 670 228

HW Lens 818 0.56 1.3 0.42 15 33 7 - - - - - - -

New Afton Inferred 17,713 0.53 1.6 0.54 301 907 212 28,400 0.57 1.8 0.70 523 1,610 440

Mesquite 17,550 0.42 - - 238 - - 50,900 0.40 - - 651 - -

Peak Mines 2,000 2.34 4.7 1.17 150 300 51 1,700 2.64 4.8 1.13 144 261 42

CSP 1,174 0.34 11.6 - 13 436 - 103,900 0.25 8.8 - 850 29,200 -

Rainy River

Direct processing

Open Pit 9,388 0.97 2.3 - 292 687 -

Underground 2,641 4.46 8.3 - 379 707 -

Total Direct Processing 12,029 1.74 3.6 - 671 1,394 -

Stockpile

Open Pit 8,626 0.37 1.2 - 102 323 -

Rainy River Inferred 20,655 1.16 2.6 - 773 1,717 -

Blackwater

Direct processing 13,815 0.76 4.1 - 340 1,820 -

Stockpile 3,785 0.31 3.6 - 40 440 -

Blackwater Inferred 17,600 0.66 4.0 - 380 2,260 - 16,585 0.58 10.8 - 310 5,760 -

Capoose 29,263 0.39 26.3 - 370 24,740 - 64,070 0.29 23.2 - 595 47,789 -

El Morro - Open Pit 564,217 0.16 - 0.26 871 - 970 137,555 0.99 - 0.70 1,310 - 632

El Morro - Underground 113,840 0.97 - 0.78 1,065 - 587

Total Inferred 4,161 30,360 1,821 4,383 84,620 1,114

100% Basis 30% Basis30% Basis100% Basis

Inferred Resource statement as at December 31, 2013

Contained metalMetal grade

Inferred Resource statement as at December 31, 2012



60

New Gold reports its Measured and Indicated mineral resources inclusive of its mineral reserves. Measured and Indicated mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have

demonstrated economic viability. Inferred mineral resources have a greater amount of uncertainty as to their existence and economic and legal feasibility, do not have demonstrated economic

viability, and are exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral reserves have been estimated in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) definition

standards and National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”).

1) Mineral Reserves for the company’s mineral properties have been estimated based on the following metal prices and lower cut-off criteria:

Mineral Property Gold

(US$/oz)

Silver

(US$/oz)

Copper

(US$/lb)

Lower Cut-off

New Afton $1,300 $22.00 $3.00 US$21.00/t NSR

Mesquite $1,300 - - 0.21 g/t Au – Oxide and transition reserves

0.41 g/t Au – Non-oxide reserves

Peak Mines $1,300 $22.00 $3.00 A$88 – 134/t NSR

Cerro San Pedro $1,300 $22.00 - US$3.00/t

Rainy River $800

$1,300

$25.00

$22.00

- Open Pit: 0.3 – 0.7 g/t Au

Underground: 3.5 g/t Au

Blackwater $1,300 $22.00 - Direct processing: 0.26 – 0.38 g/t AuEq

Stockpile: 0.32 g/t AuEq

El Morro $1,300 - $3.00 0.20% Cu

Reserves and resources notes

Appendix 9

61

2) Mineral Resources for the company’s mineral properties have been estimated based on the following metal prices and lower cut-off criteria:

3) Mineral resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred resources and are reported based on technical and economic parameters consistent with the methods most suitable

for their potential commercial exploitation. Where different mining and/or processing methods might be applied to different portions of a mineral resource, the designators ‘open pit’ and

‘underground’ have been applied to indicate envisioned mining method. Likewise the designators ‘oxide’, ‘non-oxide’ and ‘sulphide’ have been applied to indicate the type of mineralization

as it relates to appropriate mineral processing method and expected payable metal recoveries. Additional details regarding mineral resource estimation, classification, reporting parameters,

key assumptions and associated risks for each of New Gold’s mineral properties, other than Rainy River, are provided in the respective NI 43-101 Technical Reports which are available at

www.sedar.com. Refer to the supplementary information below regarding the mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates for Rainy River.

Mineral Property Gold

(US$/oz)

Silver

(US$/oz)

Copper

(US$/lb)

Lower Cut-off

New Afton $1,400 $24.00 $3.25 0.40% CuEq

Mesquite $1,400 - - 0.11 g/t Au – Oxide and transition resources

0.22 g/t Au – Non-oxide resources

Peak Mines $1,400 $24.00 $3.25 A$92 - 125/t NSR

Cerro San Pedro $1,400 $24.00 - 0.10 g/t AuEq – Open pit oxide resources

0.30 g/t AuEq – Open pit sulphide resources

Rainy River $1,400 $24.00 - Open Pit: 0.3 – 0.45 g/t Au

Underground: 2.5 g/t Au

Blackwater $1,400 $24.00 - Direct processing: 0.40 g/t AuEq

Stockpile: 0.30 – 0.40 g/t AuEq

Capoose $1,400 $24.00 - 0.40 g/t AuEq

El Morro $1,300 - $3.00 0.20% Cu

Reserves and resources notes (cont’d)

Appendix 9

62

Rainy River Mineral Reserves:

1. Open pit mineral reserves have been estimated using an optimized pit shell based on metal prices of $800 per ounce gold and $25 per ounce silver, a foreign exchange rate of C$1.05 to

US$1.00, gold recovery of 89.9% (non-CAP Zone) and 74.3% (CAP Zone) and a silver recovery of 67.1% (non-CAP Zone) and 69.5% (CAP Zone). The cut-off grade is based on a gold

price of $1,200. Underground reserves have been estimated from mining shapes generated using a cut-off grade of 3.5 g/t gold-equivalent. Development material from stope access drives

above a cut-off grade of 1.5 g/t gold-equivalent is also assumed to be sent to the mill for processing. Underground breakeven cut-off grade is calculated at 2.75 g/t gold-equivalent based on

metal prices of $1,300 per ounce gold and $22 per ounce silver, a foreign exchange rate of CAD $1.05 to USD $1.00, gold recovery of 95% and a silver recovery of 75%.

2. Open pit reserves have been estimated using a dilution of 4% at 0.21 g/t Au and 1.19 g/t Ag, and underground reserves have been estimated using an overall dilution of 8.3%, inclusive of

both rock and backfill dilution. Open pit and underground reserves have been estimated using a mining recovery of 95% and 96.5%, respectively.

3. Open pit direct processing material is defined as mineralization likely to be mined and processed directly and above a variable cut-off grade ranging from 0.3-0.7 Au g/t.

4. Stockpile material includes all material within designed open pit between variable cut-offs described above in Note 3, as well as material within the CAP Zone (code 500) that is suitable for

stockpiling and future processing.

5. Mineral Reserves for the open pit are derived from the resource model effective November 2, 2013. Models for the underground reserves were derived from the August 2013 and

September 2013 models for the main ODM zone and Intrepid Zone, respectively. Models were prepared by Dorota El-Rassi, P.Eng. (APEO #100012348) and Glen Cole, P.Geo. (APGO

#1416), of SRK, both independent “Qualified Persons" as that term is defined in National Instrument 43-101. Rainy River’s exploration program in Richardson Township is being supervised

by Mark A. Petersen, (AIPG Certified Professional Geologist #10563), Vice President, Exploration for New Gold and a “Qualified Person” as defined in National Instrument 43-101. New Gold

continues to implement a rigorous QA/QC program to ensure best practices in drill core sampling, analysis and data management.

6. Qualified persons - The open pit portion of the mineral reserve statement was prepared under the supervision of Patrice Live (OIQ #38991) of BBA, and the underground portion of the

mineral reserve statement was prepared by Colm Keogh, P.Eng. (APEGBC #37433) of AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., both independent “Qualified Persons" as that term is defined

in National Instrument 43-101.

7. The mineral reserve estimate may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, and other relevant issues.

Rainy River Mineral Resources:

1. Mineral resources are reported in relation to conceptual pit shells and are inclusive of the Intrepid zone. Vertical limit of -150m msl.

2. Open pit mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.30 gpt gold, underground mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 2.5 gpt gold based on a gold price of $1,400

per ounce, a silver price of $24.00 per ounce, a foreign exchange rate of C$1.10 to US$1.00, gold recovery of 88% for open pit resources and 90% for underground resources with silver

recovery at 75%.

3. Direct processing material is defined as mineralization above a cut-off of 0.45 g/t gold and likely to be mined and processed directly.

4. Stockpile material includes all material within conceptual pit shells in the gold grade range 0.30 – 0.45 gpt as well as all material within the CAP zone that is suitable for stockpiling and

future processing based on average metallurgical recoveries of 88% gold and 75% silver.

5. Qualified Persons – The mineral resource statement was prepared by Dorota El-Rassi, P. Eng. (APEO #100012348) and Glen Cole (APGO #1416) from SRK, both independent "Qualified

Persons" as that term is defined in National Instrument 43-101.

6. Mineral resources are inclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

7. The mineral resource estimate may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing and other relevant issues.

4) Qualified Person: The preparation of New Gold's mineral reserve and mineral resource statements has been done by Qualified Persons as defined under National Instrument 43-101 under

the supervision of Mark A. Petersen, a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 and an officer of New Gold.

Reserves and resources notes (cont’d)

Appendix 9

63

Guidance assumptions

Spot:

2014

Gold price ($/oz) 1,300

Silver price ($/oz) 20.00

Copper price ($/oz) 3.25

AUD/USD 1.14

CDN/USD 1.11

MXN/USD 13.00

Spot

Gold price ($/oz) 1,270

Silver price ($/oz) 19.65

Copper price ($/oz) 3.03

AUD/USD 1.07

CDN/USD 1.09

MXN/USD 13.02

Commodity price/foreign exchange assumptions

Appendix 10

Endnotes

64

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. READERS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCES

Information concerning the properties and operations of New Gold has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to

similar information for United States companies. The terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” used in this Report are

Canadian mining terms as defined in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by CIM Council on

November 27, 2010 and incorporated by reference in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). While the terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and

“Inferred Mineral Resource” are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations, they are not defined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. As such,

certain information contained in this Report concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar information made public by United States

companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

An “Inferred Mineral Resource” has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal feasibility. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form

the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher confidence category. Readers are cautioned not

to assume that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable.

Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “Reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted

at the time the Reserve estimation is made. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the Measured or Indicated Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves will ever be converted

into Mineral Reserves. In addition, the definitions of “Proven Mineral Reserves” and “Probable Mineral Reserves” under CIM standards differ in certain respects from the standards of the United States

Securities and Exchange Commission.

TECHNICAL INFORMATION

The scientific and technical information in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Mark A. Petersen, Vice President, Exploration of New Gold. Mr. Petersen is an AIPG Certified Professional

Geologist and a “qualified person” under National Instrument 43-101. For additional information with respect to our Mineral Resource and Reserve estimates and the Feasibility Studies discussed herein,

refer to our news release dated February 6, 2014, the Rainy River Technical Report, the Blackwater Technical Report and our other technical reports available at www.sedar.com.

Endnotes

65

NON-GAAP MEASURES

(1) ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS

Consistent with guidance announced in 2013 by the World Gold Council, an association of various gold mining companies from around the world of which New Gold is a member, New Gold defines “all-in

sustaining costs” per ounce as the sum of total cash costs, capital expenditures that are sustaining in nature, corporate general and administrative costs, capitalized and expensed exploration that is

sustaining in nature and environmental reclamation costs, all divided by the ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. New Gold believes this non-GAAP financial measure provides further

transparency into costs associated with producing gold and will assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders of the company in assessing the company’s operating performance, its ability to generate

free cash flow from current operations and its overall value. This data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP financial measure. All-in sustaining costs presented do not have a

standardized meaning under GAAP and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of

performance prepared in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of cash flow from operations under GAAP or operating costs presented under GAAP. Further details regarding all-in

sustaining costs and a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measures are provided in our MD&A accompanying our financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com.

(2) TOTAL CASH COSTS

“Total cash costs” per ounce figures are non-GAAP measures which are calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The Gold Institute, a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold

products that ceased operations in 2002. Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. New Gold

reports total cash costs on a sales basis. The company believes that certain investors use this information to evaluate the company’s ability to generate liquidity through operating cash flow and that this

measure, along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of the company’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash flow from its mining operations. Total cash costs include mine site operating

costs such as mining, processing and administration costs, royalties, production taxes, and realized gains and losses on fuel contracts, but are exclusive of amortization, reclamation, capital and exploration

costs and net of by-product sales. Total cash costs are then divided by ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. Co-product cash costs remove the impact of other metal sales that are produced as

a by-product of gold production and apportion the cash costs to each metal produced on a percentage of revenue basis, and subsequently divides the amount by the total ounces of gold or silver or pounds

of copper sold, as the case may be, to arrive at per ounce or per pound figures. Unless otherwise indicated, all total cash cost information in this presentation is net of by-product sales. These measures,

along with sales, are considered to be a key indicator of a company’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash flow from its mining operations. This data is furnished to provide additional information

and is a non-GAAP financial measure. Total cash costs and co-product cash costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under GAAP and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by

other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of cash flow from

operations under GAAP or operating costs presented under GAAP. Further details regarding total cash costs and a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measures are provided in our MD&A accompanying

our financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com.

(3) ADJUSTED NET EARNINGS

“Adjusted net earnings” and “adjusted net earnings per share” are non-GAAP financial measures. Net earnings have been adjusted and tax affected for the group of costs in “Other gains and losses” on the

condensed consolidated income statement. The adjusted entries are also impacted for tax to the extent that the underlying entries are impacted for tax in the unadjusted net earnings from continuing

operations. The company uses this measure for its own internal purposes. Management’s internal budgets and forecasts and public guidance do not reflect fair value changes on senior notes and non-

hedged derivatives, foreign currency translation and fair value through profit or loss and financial asset gains/losses. Consequently, the presentation of adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per

share enables investors and analysts to better understand the underlying operating performance of our core mining business through the eyes of management. Management periodically evaluates the

components of adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share based on an internal assessment of performance measures that are useful for evaluating the operating performance of our

business and a review of the non-GAAP measures used by mining industry analysts and other mining companies. Adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share are intended to provide

additional information only and do not have any standardized definition under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. They should not be considered in isolation

or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flows from operations as determined under IFRS.

Further details regarding adjusted net earnings and a reconciliation for first quarter figures are provided in our MD&A accompanying our financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com.

(4) OPERATING MARGIN

“Operating margin” is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standard meaning under GAAP, which management uses to further evaluate the company’s results of operations in each reporting period.

Operating margin is calculated as revenue less operating expenses and therefore does not include depreciation and depletion. Operating margin is intended to provide additional information only and does

not have any standardized definition under IFRS; it should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate

this measure differently and this measure is unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Further details regarding operating margin and a reconciliation for first quarter

figures are provided in our MD&A accompanying our financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com.

Contact information

66

Investor Relations

Hannes Portmann

Vice President, Corporate Development

416-324-6014

[email protected]