ratings of ukrainian Сities: february 2016

www.ratingpro.orgThe International Republican Institutewww.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls

Governmentof CanadaIRI

By results of municipal surveys conducted by Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents)

Ratings of Ukrainian Сities - IRI second municipal survey

Summary rating of oblast centers of UkraineIndex of satisfaction with the quality of

public goods and services

The International Republican Institutewww.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls

Governmentof Canada

Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI

where 1 is «terrible», 2 – «bad», 3 – «average», 4 – «good», and 5 – «excellent»

2,52,62,62,62,72,72,72,72,72,82,92,92,92,92,93,03,03,03,03,13,13,23,23,4

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Odesa

Zaporizhia

Chernihiv

Kirovograd

Dnipropetrovsk

SumyUzhgorod

Chernivtsiі

Kyiv

Zhytomyr

Sievierodonetsk

Ivano-Frankivsk

Poltava

Cherkasy

Mariupol

Rivne

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Lutsk

Lviv

Kharkiv

Vinnytsa

Dynamics of changes in the Index (2015-2016) of satisfaction with the quality of

public goods and services

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

were not surveyed in 2015

Situation has worsened

Situation has not changed

Situation has improved

www.ratingpro.org

Sense of pride for the city

Vinnitsa

2,7

Lviv

ChernivtsiOdesa

Ivano-FrankivskKharkiv

2,6

Ternopil

MykolaivSievierodonetsk

Uzhgorod

2,5Chernihiv

KyivDnipropetrovsk

2,4

RivneZaporizhia

LutskPoltava

2,3

SumyCherkasy

2,2

KhersonKhmelnytskyi

2,1

ZhytomyrKirovograd

2,0

Mariupol

Index of the sense of pride for the citywhere «definitely proud of their city» – 3, «somewhat proud» – 2,

«not very proud» – 1, «definitely not proud» – 0


Governmentof Canada


www.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada

Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada.

Rating of oblast centers of Ukraine by areas

IRI

Vin

nytsa

Kh

arkiv

Lviv

Lu

tsk

Kh

meln

ytskyi

Terno

pil

Po

ltava

Rivn

e

Ch

erkasy

Ivano

-Fran

kivsk

Zh

ytom

yr

Mariu

po

l

Sieviero

do

netsk

Ch

ernivtsi

Kyiv

Uzh

go

rod

Su

my

Ch

ernih

iv

Dn

ipro

petro

vsk

Kiro

vog

rad

Kh

erson

Od

esa

Zap

orizh

ia

Myko

laiv

Index of satisfaction with the quality of public goods and services


2,0

2,2

2,4

2,6

2,8

3,0

3,2

3,4

3,6

3,8

www.ratingpro.org

Ecology

Humanitarian area

Medical institutions

Communal area

Infrastructure

Level of satisfaction with the quality of

3,2

3,0

2,8

2,6

2,4

2,2

Street markets and trade premises Water supply

SchoolsUniversities, technical institutes, colleges

Heating

Garbagecollection

Culture premises

Public parksand gardens

Kindergartens

Sport facilities

SewageStreet lighting

Transport infrustructurePolice (militia)

Sidewalks

Ecology

Yards and areas near buildings

Medical institutions

Parking

Accessibility for people with disabilities Roads Industrial zones /

Industrial development


Governmentof Canada


www.ratingpro.org



Aggregate result for all the cities

public goods and services in the cities


Survey was not conducted


50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 20-29%60-69% 10-19%

consider that things in the city are going in the right direction

50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 20-29%60-69% 10-19%

are satisfied with the Mayor, elected during the last elections


Governmentof Canada


www.ratingpro.org

3.2-3.3 3.0-3.1 2.8-2.9 2.6-2.73.4 2.5

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Comparison of the level of satisfaction with the quality of public goods and services with the local elections results

Comparison of the assessments of situation

32%

23%

16% 15%11%

8%5%

0%

-10%-16%

-19% -21%

-28%-32% -33%

-36%-39%

-42% -42% -43%-46% -46%

-59% -61%

-39% -39%

-56% -57%-52%

-42%

-61%-64%

-55%-50%

-32%-30%

-54%

-41%

-48% -48% -47%

-61% -60%

-48%

-63% -61%-65% -62%

Balance of the assessments of «right» and «wrong» movement

city country

The International Republican Institute GovernmentSurvey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI

www.ratingpro.org

Zh

ytom

yr

Terno

pil

Myko

laiv

Kh

arkiv

Mariu

po

l

Dn

ipro

petro

vsk

Sieviero

do

netsk

Rivn

e

Lu

tsk

Ch

ernih

iv

Vin

nytsa

Ivano

-Fran

kivsk

Ch

erkasy

Kyiv

Po

ltava

Lviv

Od

esa

Uzh

go

rod

Kh

erson

Ch

ernivtsi

Zap

orizh

ia

Kiro

vog

rad

Kh

meln

ytskyi

Su

my

in the cities and Ukraine

Approval level of the institutions activities


Governmentof Canada


www.ratingpro.org

68%

-64%

-63%

-61%

-46%

-42%

-31%

-28%

-24%

-17%

3%

4%

8%

10%

11%

24%

27%

37%

42%

Government of Ukraine

Parliament of Ukraine

Courts

Prosecutors office

Communal enterprises

President of Ukraine

Oblast state administration

Oblast city council

Executive committee

City council

National media

City Head

Police (Militia)

Neighborhood associations (OSBB, OSN)

Local media

National Guard

NGOs

Army

Church

Balance of the assessments «approve» and «disapprove» the activities


Comparison of approval rates of the institutions activities


Governmentof Canada


www.ratingpro.org

45% 42%

33%27% 25% 23%

19%15% 15%

9% 7%4%

-6% -7%-11%

-17% -17%-22%

-33% -33%-40%

-49% -50% -50%-55%

-31%-26%

-65%

-27%

-42%

-31%

-52%

-36% -36% -34%

-42%

-33%-38% -40%

-64%

-32%

-65%

-44%

-28%

-37%

-54%

-46%

-56%


Mayor President

Myko

laiv

Terno

pil

Po

ltava

Kh

meln

ytskyi

Od

esa

Kyiv

Rivn

e

Vin

nytsa

Mariu

po

l

Ch

ernih

iv

Lu

tsk

Lviv

Zh

ytom

yr

Su

my

Sieviero

do

netsk

Kh

arkiv

Ch

erkasy

Zap

orizh

ia

Ch

ernivtsi

Dn

ipro

petro

vsk

Uzh

go

rod

Kiro

vog

rad

Ivano

-Fran

kivsk

Kh

erson

Comparison of approval rates of the institutions activities


Governmentof Canada


www.ratingpro.org

19%

10% 8%4% 4% 3% 1%

-4% -6% -9% -10% -11%-16% -18%

-21% -22% -24%-28%

-33%-38%

-43%

-50% -52%

-63%

-69%

-51%

-81%

-63%-69% -69%

-62%-56%

-60%

-47%

-60%-54%

-67%

-57%-52%

-64%

-53%

-74%

-53% -54%

-68%-75% -74%

-75%


City council Parliament

Rivn

e

Mariu

po

l

Sieviero

do

netsk

Vin

nytsa

Kh

meln

ytskyi

Ch

ernih

iv

Zh

ytom

yr

Ch

erkasy

Ivano

-Fran

kivsk

Myko

laiv

Lviv

Lu

tsk

Kiro

vog

rad

Su

my

Zap

orizh

ia

Kh

arkiv

Dn

ipro

petro

vsk

Po

ltava

Ch

ernivtsi

Od

esa

Uzh

go

rod

Kh

erson

Terno

pil

Kyiv

Satisfaction with the Police institution activities

March 2015

February 2016

21%23%25%26%29%32%32%33%34%34%36%36%37%

44%44%45%45%

48%52%

61%61%

67%

Chernihiv

Chernivtsi

Zhytomyr

Sumy

Cherkasy

Kherson

Kirovograd

Rivne

Ivano-Frankivsk

Zaporizhia

Poltava

Ternopil

Mykolaiv

Dnipropetrovsk

Odesa

Vinnytsa

Kharkiv

Uzhgorod

Khmelnytskyi

Lutsk

Kyiv

Lviv

at the time of the survey Patrol police has already operated in the city

% of respondents, who approve the activities of Police institution


Governmentof Canada


www.ratingpro.org

Personal security sense in the city

% of respondents who feel absolutely or mostly safe walking home alone at night

Surveywas not conducted

March 2015

February 2016

50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 20-29%60-69%


Governmentof Canada


www.ratingpro.org(dynamics 2015-2016)

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Personal security senseP

ort

ugal

Spain

France

Italy

Slovenia

Austria

Czech Republic

GermanyBelgium

Netherlands

Great Britain

Ireland

Denmark

Sweden

Finland

Estonia

Latvia

Lithuania

Poland

Romania

Bulgaria

Greece

Macedonia

Montenegro

Serbia

Croatia

Hungary

Slovakia

Cyprus

Iceland

Malta

Luxembourg

Turkey

Comparison with European countries

EUROBAROMETER, 2014

% of respondents who feel absolutely or mostly safewalking home alone at night


50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 20-29%60-69%80-89% 70-79%90-99%


Governmentof Canada


all oblast centers of UKRAINE

www.ratingpro.org

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

The spread of corruption at the local level


Governmentof Canada


www.ratingpro.org

Іndex of frequency of corruption actsHave had to do a favor, give a gift or pay a bribe to a local official

in order to get service or document

where 3 is «more than 5 times», 2 – «3-5 times», 1 – «1-2 times», 0 – «never»

0,10,20,20,20,20,20,20,30,30,40,40,40,40,40,40,40,50,50,50,50,50,60,6

0,8

Mykolaiv

Mariupol

Sievierodonetsk

Zhytomyr

Lviv

Sumy

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Kirovograd

Chernihiv

Lutsk

Kherson

Khmelnytskyi

Zaporizhia

Poltava

Kharkiv

Rivne

Dnipropetrovsk

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Odesa

Cherkasy

Vinnytsa

Uzhgorod

Dynamics of changes in Index (2015-2016) of frequency of corruption acts


Situation has worsened

Situation has not changed

Situation has improved

Changes in corruption perception (2015-2016)


Decrease

Increase of respondents considering such actions as corruption acts

Consider such actions (a favor, a gift or a bribe to a local official in order to get service or document) as corruption acts

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Priority areas of economy for the cities

Легка промисловість Харчова промисловість ТоргівляLight industry Food industry Trade

Легка промисловість Харчова промисловістьConstruction Wood processing

Харчова промисловість ТоргівляChemical industry Machine building

ТоргівляEnergy


Governmentof Canada


* Respondents used to mention this area as priority for the local economy relatively more often

www.ratingpro.org

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Легка промисловістьMining and metallurgical sector

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Priority areas of economy for the cities

Легка промисловість Харчова промисловість ТоргівляCulture Educational services Scientific research

Харчова промисловістьІТ sector

Легка промисловість Харчова промисловість ТоргівляFinance and banking Services Tourism


Governmentof Canada


* Respondents used to mention this area as priority for the local economy relatively more often

www.ratingpro.org

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi


Governmentof Canada


Rates of the interaction with local authorities

IRI

2,0

2,2

2,4

2,6

2,8

3,0

3,2

3,4

Vin

nytsa

Ch

erkasy

Lu

tsk

Kh

meln

ytskyi

Lviv Tern

op

il

Uzh

go

rod

Kh

arkiv

Ch

ernivtsi

Su

my

Ivano

-Fran

kivsk

Mariu

po

l

Po

ltava

Zap

orizh

ia

Od

esa

Kyiv

Ch

ernih

iv

Dn

ipro

petro

vsk

Zh

ytom

yr

Rivn

e

Myko

laiv

Kiro

vog

rad

Sieviero

do

netsk

Kh

erson

Manner in which local authorities treated those who have addressed

Waiting time (if addressed personally)

Quality of service received

Level of the local authorities' knowledge on the subject matter

Index of satisfaction with the interaction with local authorities where 1 is «terrible», 2 – «bad», 3 – «average», 4 – «good», and 5 – «excellent»

among those who have addressed local authorities during the last 2 years

www.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada


Assessment of municipal authorities

IRI

Vin

nytsa

Lviv

Kh

arkiv

Terno

pil

Kh

meln

ytskyi

Lu

tsk

Ch

erkasy

Ivano

-Fran

kivsk

Dn

ipro

petro

vsk

Mariu

po

l

Ch

ernivtsi

Od

esa

Rivn

e

Uzh

go

rod

Kyiv

Zh

ytom

yr

Su

my

Po

ltava

Ch

ernih

iv

Myko

laiv

Zap

orizh

ia

Kh

erson

Kiro

vog

rad

Sieviero

do

netsk

Improvement of the city imageImprovement of the public safety

Securing investmentsTransparent activity

Facilitation of citizens' participation in decision making Responsive attitude to citizens priorities

0,5

0,8

1,1

1,4

1,7

2,0

2,3

Index of assessment of municipal authorities in terms of areas where 3 is «definitely yes», 2 – «somewhat yes», 1 – «somewhat no», 0 – «definitely no»

www.ratingpro.org

in terms of management areas

Manner and level of making city related decisions


Governmentof Canada


www.ratingpro.org

13%

14%

14%

15%

15%

15%

20%

22%

24%

29%

30%

43%

47%

41%

30%

50%

52%

54%

56%

24%

39%

27%

35%

28%

36%

33%

21%

16%

16%

17%

10%

10%

18%

9%

9%

10%

12%

7%

6%

7%

14%

5%

4%

8%

6%

12%

8%

12%

9%

8%

4%

4%

4%

6%

3%

2%

2%

3%

6%

3%

5%

4%

4%

2%

2%

13%

17%

9%

9%

10%

9%

17%

16%

20%

12%

16%

7%

7%

Dismissal of heads of municipal communal enterprises, education and healthcare entities

Appointing head of local police

Approving general plan of the city

Adopting landscaping rules

Local taxes and fees

Construction of new micro-districts, buildings, establishments

Cancelling decisions of the city council

Privatization or closure of communal enterprises

Appointing local judges

Merger with other cities and villages into a combined community

Dismissal of head of local police

Establishment / dismantlement of monuments

Changing topographic names of streets, towns, etc.

By decision of Mayor

By city council

By citizens on local referendum

Other / Difficult to answer

By decision of President / Governor

By decision of Government / Minister


Self-organization of population and its efficiency


Governmentof Canada


www.ratingpro.org

8%


live in the apartment building where a housing association has been established

OSBB( )

77%12%

among them consider that it ...

did help to solve problem issues in the building

did not help

10%

live in the building, quarter, or micro-district where a body of self-organization of population

has been established (OSN, housing committee, etc.)

70%17%among them consider that it ...

did help to solve problem issues

in the building, quarter, or micro-district

did not help

13%

volunteer with groups to clean street or park, plant trees, collect garbage, etc.

36%regularly rarely

Level of public initiative and


Governmentof Canada


% of respondents who are ready to join the process on providing proposals

for the city council


25-30% <25%>30%% of respondents who consider

that democratic system of government is more important than prosperous economy


25-40% <25%>40%

democracy perceptionwww.ratingpro.org

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Comparison of the level of public initiative and


Governmentof Canada


% of respondents who are ready to join the process on providing proposals

for the city council

Чернівці


25-30% <25%>30%Index of optimism toward economic situation

of Ukraine in the next 12 months


2.0-2.2 <2.0>2.4

optimism toward economic situation in the countrywww.ratingpro.org

where 5 is «will improve a lot», 4 – «will improve somewhat», 3 – «will stay the same», 2 – «will worsen somewhat», and 1 – «will worsen a lot»

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

European integration attitudes in the cities

Support for the economic integration of Ukraine with European Union

Support for Ukraine joining NATO


80-95%

70-79%

60-69%

50-59%

40-49%

30-39%

25-29%


80-90%

70-79%

60-69%

50-59%

40-49%

30-39%

20-29%


Governmentof Canada


www.ratingpro.org

Kyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

ChernivtsiKyiv

Sievierodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipropetrovsk

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyi

Vinnytsa

Cherkasy

Kirovograd

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi


Governmentof Canada


Compliance of political rights of women and young people

IRI

www.ratingpro.org

37%33% 31%

25% 24% 22% 22% 21% 20% 20% 19% 19% 19% 19% 18% 17% 17% 16% 14% 12% 12% 10% 10% 8%

44%

30%

44%

55%

40%34% 34%

54%47%

38%31%

62%

42% 40%45% 46%

50% 51%44%

48%

40% 42%48%

39%

50% 48% 47% 45% 45%40% 38% 38% 36% 35% 33% 33% 32% 31% 31% 30% 29% 27% 26% 26%

22% 21%

11% 9%

43%49% 52% 53% 53%

66% 68%65%

43%49%

41% 43%

53%

41%

62%

37% 36%

52%

42%

53% 54%

46% 45%49%

cons

ider

that

«po

litic

ians

do

not l

iste

nto

the

need

s an

d id

eas

of w

om

en"

prop

ortio

n of

wo

men

in th

e ci

ty c

ounc

il (b

y re

sults

of l

ocal

ele

ctio

ns 2

015)

cons

ider

that

«po

litic

ians

do

not l

iste

nto

the

need

s an

d id

eas

of y

ou

ng

peo

ple

»

prop

ortio

n of

dep

uti

es a

ged

18-

35 in

the

city

cou

ncil

(by

resu

lts o

f loc

al e

lect

ions

201

5)

Vin

nytsa

Sieviero

do

netsk

Ivano

-Fran

kivsk

Od

esa

Rivn

e

Su

my

Kyiv

Myko

laiv

Lviv

Zap

orizh

ia

Kh

arkiv

Ch

ernih

iv

Terno

pil

Lu

tsk

Kiro

vog

rad

Mariu

po

l

Dn

ipro

petro

vsk

Ch

ernivtsi

Kh

meln

ytskyi

Zh

ytom

yr

Uzh

go

rod

Po

ltava

Kh

erson

Ch

erkasy

Kh

erson

Uzh

go

rod

Kh

arkiv

Lu

tsk

Lviv

Kyiv

Rivn

e

Kh

meln

ytskyi

Ivano

-Fran

kivsk

Zap

orizh

ia

Po

ltava

Ch

ernivtsi

Ch

ernih

iv

Dn

ipro

petro

vsk

Sieviero

do

netsk

Ch

erkasy

Vin

nytsa

Zh

ytom

yr

Od

esa

Su

my

Mariu

po

l

Kiro

vog

rad

Terno

pil

Myko

laiv


Governmentof Canada


Attitude toward people with disabilities

IRI

Vin

nytsa

Sieviero

do

netsk

Ivano

-Fran

kivsk

Od

esa

Rivn

e

Su

my

Kyiv

Myko

laiv

Lviv

Zap

orizh

ia

Kh

arkiv

Ch

ernih

iv

Terno

pil

Lu

tsk

Kiro

vog

rad

Mariu

po

l

Dn

ipro

petro

vsk

Ch

ernivtsi

Kh

meln

ytskyi

Zh

ytom

yr

Uzh

go

rod

Po

ltava

Kh

erson

Ch

erkasy

www.ratingpro.org

1,0

1,3

1,6

1,9

2,2

2,5

2,8

Me, personallyPeople in my surrounding Local governmentNational government

of the assessment of attitude toward people with disabilitiesIndexwhere 3 is «very positive», 2 – «somewhat positive», 1 – «somewhat negative», 0 – «very negative»


Governmentof Canada


Attitude toward people with disabilities

IRI

www.ratingpro.orgAggregate result for all the cities

88%4%

positive negative

Me, personally People in my surrounding

35% 39%

positive negative

Local government

29% 43%

positive negative

National government

Despite the fact that the vast majority of respondents declares positive attitude toward people with disabilities, other surveys show that not always such a tolerance is confirmed by the actions ...

... thus, only 40% of Ukrainians would feel comfortable if their direct supervisor at work was a person with disability

... only 37% would feel comfortable if their city mayor was a person with disability

Meanwhile, tolerance toward people with disabilities is

higher in villages than in cities

By results of RatingPro Survey «Spread of Discrimination in Ukraine», May 2015, www.ratingpro.org

76%10%

positive negative

ratings of ukrainian Сities: february 2016

News & Politics